User talk:Lmbuga

Babel

gl Este usuario é galegofalante.

es Este usuario es un hablante nativo del español.

pt-2 Este utilizador tem um nível médio de português.

en-1 This user is able to contribute with a basic level of English.

This user has uploaded 16 featured pictures to Wikimedia Commons.

This user has uploaded 2727 quality images to Wikimedia Commons.

103,619+This user has made over 103,619 contributions to Wikimedia projects.

60,091+This user has made over 60,091 contributions to Commons.

This user has been on Wikimedia Commons for 19 years, 3 months and 13 days

Conversas arquivadas en User talk:Lmbuga/Discusións anteriores.

Conversations archived at User talk:Lmbuga/Discusións anteriores.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 08-2011. Panthera tigris tigris - Texas Park - Lanzarote -TP02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 13:14, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 6 August 2021 (UTC)

En una foto de la Catedral de León.

Buenas tardes, Luis Miguel: Estoy viendo esta versión de una foto de la catedral de León: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Catedral_de_Le%C3%B3n._Espa%C3%B1a-44.jpg Compruebo que la imagen está distorsionada, aplastada. Las proporciones no son correctas. Al corregir la perspectiva original (con líneas caídas), se produjo esta distorsión de la altura. Así parece como si la catedral tuviese menos elevación. ¿Podrías corregir este efecto? Muchas gracias. --Carlos Teixidor Cadenas (talk) 14:48, 12 August 2021 (UTC)

@CARLOS TEIXIDOR CADENAS: : Ahora mismo no puedo. Sí en septiembre o en los útimos días de agosto. En caso de que el resultado no me convenza demasiado, la subo con otro nombre como imagen retocada. Saludos--Lmbuga (talk) 08:43, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

Perfecto. Cuando puedas. Una referencia que puede ser muy útil es el reloj de la torre derecha de la catedral. Su esfera es un círculo contenido en un cuadrado perfecto. Ese cuadrado debe tener los cuatro lados iguales. En cambio, en la foto "aplastada" podrás comprobar que los lados verticales son más cortos que los horizontales. Esa es la clave. Muchas gracias.--Carlos Teixidor Cadenas (talk) 09:27, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Detalle dunha parede cuberta con cunchas de vieira. Cambados. Galiza 2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Carsten Steger 18:25, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruínas da Torre de San Sadurniño. Cambados. Galiza 2021-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:40, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruínas da Torre de San Sadurniño. Cambados. Galiza 2021-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:40, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Happy holidays 2021/2022!

		* Happy Holidays 2021/2022, Lmbuga! *
		Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Joyeux Noël! Bonne année! Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!    -- George Chernilevsky talk 14:04, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

File:Mineral Bauxita ollos verdes GDFL116.jpg

Luis Miguel,

I refer to your Wikimedia Commons image File:Mineral Bauxita ollos verdes GDFL116.jpg, which is a bit confusing since it's not an image of bauxite, more probably a variety of gabbro. Perhaps you've mislabelled the image?

regards John beta (talk) 06:29, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

I don't know. mislabelled image.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Banco - Parque Eugenio Granell - Santiago de Compostela 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality imo. I like the shallow depth of field. --Ximonic 19:14, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

Reminder

Hi Lmbuga. I noticed that you've made a malformed deletion request. Here, {{Delete}} is not for speedy deletion, please see COM:DP. When you want to delete a page by manually using the {{Delete}} template (rather than the automatic Nominate for deletion tool in the Tools menu on the sidebar per COM:DR#Starting requests), you must follow the instructions in the template, including the "Click here to show further instructions" portion (or Commons:Deletion requests/Listing a request manually policy), otherwise you will create a lot of work for other people.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 15:51, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

@Jeff G.: Thanks, but I'm confused, I can't. In addition I have found out that the photos should not be deleted--Lmbuga (talk) 15:56, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

Please feel free to comment at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Postal Card of Russia - 2015 - 160 - Mosfilm - IP Dmitriev.png.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 21:34, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baiona lmb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 19:10, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baiona lmb-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 19:11, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baiona lmb-8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 19:11, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baiona lmb-14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 19:09, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Río Sar- Parque Eugenio Granell - Santiago de Compostela 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:56, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baiona lmb-17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --MB-one 13:45, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baiona lmb-18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 14:51, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baiona lmb-19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 14:51, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baiona lmb-21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 14:51, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canón no Monte de San Pedro. A Coruña-c2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 14:53, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baiona lmb-9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:22, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baiona lmb-22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 13:52, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canón no Monte de San Pedro. A Coruña-c1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 14:52, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canón no Monte de San Pedro. A Coruña-c3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 13:51, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baiona lmb-29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 13:37, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baiona lmb-28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 13:37, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baiona lmb-26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 10:45, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baiona lmb-15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tomer T 11:45, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baiona lmb-35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 13:44, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baiona lmb-33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 13:51, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baiona lmb-36.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 13:51, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 18 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerto de la Cruz. Tenerife. Illas Canarias. eue455.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 15:28, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arco das ruínas de Santa Mariña Dozo - Cambados-CA15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 15:28, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Igrexa de Santa Mariña Dozo - Cambados-CA32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 15:28, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arcos das ruínas de Santa Mariña Dozo - Cambados-CA14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 12:48, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2022.Garita á par do castelo de San Filipo. F-44.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 23:30, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Estatua en contraluz. Ferrol. F-25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:04, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cartelo da Palma. 1597. Mugardos. F-37.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 23:30, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Caselo da Palma. 1597. Mugardos. F-36.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:07, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Camilo Díaz Baliño 1889-1936. Ferrol. F-22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tomer T 16:56, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Escultura en Ferrol. F-21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 21:26, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ferrol. F-6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 18:40, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2022. Castelo de San Filipo. F-40.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:33, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ferrol. Porto- F-4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ximonic 13:01, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Camilo Díaz Baliño 1889-1936. Ferrol. F-23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:19, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ferrol. Edificio da autoridade portuaria- F-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:19, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Murallas do Castelo de San Filipo. F-47.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tsungam 10:50, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parque. Ferrol. F-28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 11:13, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Posición dun canón no castelo de San Filipo. F-46.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tsungam 10:50, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ferrol. F-11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --aismallard 13:39, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Estatua en contraluz. Ferrol. F-30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --aismallard 18:48, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 6 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ferrol. Porto- F-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 15:11, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ramón Pla y Monge, Marqués de Amboage. Ferrol. F-10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 17:22, 4 March 2022 (UTC) Larus michahellis--Lmbuga 23:19, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ramón Pla y Monge, Marqués de Amboage. Ferrol. F-9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 17:22, 4 March 2022 (UTC)  Comment Funny photo. I'd suggest adding a category for the gull, but it's up to you. -- Ikan Kekek 21:31, 4 March 2022 (UTC)  Done Larus michahellis Thank you for the review. More likeable is the previous photo--Lmbuga 22:48, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Costa de Puerto de la Cruz. Tenerife. España eue15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 15:16, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 7 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Relevo nunha porta en ruínas. Ferrol. F-34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --aismallard 12:05, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruínas. Porta. Ferrol. F-33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --aismallard 12:05, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruínas da Torre de San Sadurniño. Cambados. Galiza 2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --aismallard 12:05, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Foz. Galiza. eue - 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 14:55, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

Please check again this edit because now this photo has only a promotion with no signature. --C messier (talk) 18:12, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torre de Hércules - DivesGallaecia2012-20-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:28, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Victoriano Sánchez Barcaiztegui. Ferrol. F-20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 09:32, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baiona lmb-16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:28, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2022. Castelo de San Filipo. Cheminea. F-41.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 12 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Noces Walnuts Nueces.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 13:20, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lápida. Igrexa de San Pedro Fiz. Catedral. O Incio (1 de 1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 15:24, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Catedral de Santiago de Compostela. Galiza 2022-eue--13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:51, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Catedral de Santiago de Compostela. Galiza 2022-eue--11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:51, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Catedral de Santiago de Compostela. Galiza 2022-eue--10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 10:53, 10 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

Happy holidays 2022/2023!

		* Happy Holidays 2022/2023, Lmbuga! *
		Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Joyeux Noël! Bonne année! Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!    -- George Chernilevsky talk 06:39, 22 December 2022 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Moeda México 50 pesos a.jpg

And also:

• File:Moeda México 50 pesos b.jpg

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 08:00, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 - Le palais du Luxembourg, dans le jardin du Luxembourg, Paris - 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:23, 20 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:7º centenary de la signatura dels Pareatges. Andorra 146.jpg

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 03:19, 12 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puma (Puma concolor) - 20191228.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 08:03, 20 August 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 23 August 2023 (UTC)

File:Torre de Hércules - DivesGallaecia2012-47.jpg & File:Torre de Hércules - DivesGallaecia2012-62.jpg

Hello Luis Miguel Bugallo Sáchez! Your photos are amazing!! I’ve used some of your photos of Torre de Hércules for the 442th ArchiGuesser! Thank you for your work!! Flibust1er (talk) 22:39, 15 September 2023 (UTC)

File:Sculpture of Mn. Jacint Verdaguer. Escaldes-Engordany. Andorra 102.jpg

File:Sculpture of Mn. Jacint Verdaguer. Escaldes-Engordany. Andorra 102.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 05:50, 20 September 2023 (UTC)

File:Sculpture of Mn. Jacint Verdaguer. Escaldes-Engordany. Andorra 101.jpg

File:Sculpture of Mn. Jacint Verdaguer. Escaldes-Engordany. Andorra 101.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 05:50, 20 September 2023 (UTC)

File:Sculpture of Mn. Jacint Verdaguer. Escaldes-Engordany. Andorra 103.jpg

File:Sculpture of Mn. Jacint Verdaguer. Escaldes-Engordany. Andorra 103.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 05:52, 20 September 2023 (UTC)

Happy holidays!

		* Happy Holidays! *
		Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Joyeux Noël! Bonne année! Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!    -- George Chernilevsky talk 22:08, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

File:Escultura en Escaldes-Engordany. Andorra 135.jpg

File:Escultura en Escaldes-Engordany. Andorra 135.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 09:37, 27 March 2024 (UTC)

File:Homenatge a l'immigrant. Antonio Tenreiro. Andorra 134.jpg

File:Homenatge a l'immigrant. Antonio Tenreiro. Andorra 134.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 04:47, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

File:Escultura de J. Viladomat perante a igrexa parroquial de Sant Pere Màrtir. Escaldes-Engordany. Andorra 72.jpg

File:Escultura de J. Viladomat perante a igrexa parroquial de Sant Pere Màrtir. Escaldes-Engordany. Andorra 72.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 04:49, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

File:Escultura de J. Viladomat perante a igrexa parroquial de Sant Pere Mártir. Escaldes-Engordany. Andorra 62.jpg

File:Escultura de J. Viladomat perante a igrexa parroquial de Sant Pere Mártir. Escaldes-Engordany. Andorra 62.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 04:50, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

File:Escultura de J. Viladomat perante a igrexa parroquial de Sant Pere Màrtir. Escaldes-Engordany. Andorra 71.jpg

File:Escultura de J. Viladomat perante a igrexa parroquial de Sant Pere Màrtir. Escaldes-Engordany. Andorra 71.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 04:50, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

File:Escultura de J. Viladomat perante a igrexa parroquial de Sant Pere Mártir. Escaldes-Engordany. Andorra 61.jpg

File:Escultura de J. Viladomat perante a igrexa parroquial de Sant Pere Mártir. Escaldes-Engordany. Andorra 61.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 04:51, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

File:Escultura de J. Viladomat perante a igrexa parroquial de Sant Pere Mártir. Escaldes-Engordany. Andorra 63.jpg

File:Escultura de J. Viladomat perante a igrexa parroquial de Sant Pere Mártir. Escaldes-Engordany. Andorra 63.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 04:51, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

File:Escultura de J. Viladomat perante a igrexa parroquial de Sant Pere Mártir. Escaldes-Engordany. Andorra 73.jpg

File:Escultura de J. Viladomat perante a igrexa parroquial de Sant Pere Mártir. Escaldes-Engordany. Andorra 73.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 04:51, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

File:Escultura ante a igrexa parroquial de Sant Pere Màrtir. Escaldes-Engordany. Andorra 56.jpg

File:Escultura ante a igrexa parroquial de Sant Pere Màrtir. Escaldes-Engordany. Andorra 56.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 04:39, 18 September 2024 (UTC)