Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2020/06/02

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive June 2nd, 2020
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Rocky Masum (talk) 03:05, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedy per contest rules. ~ Nahid Talk 19:52, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Rocky Masum (talk) 03:06, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedy per contest rules. ~ Nahid Talk 19:51, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Rocky Masum (talk) 03:06, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedy per contest rules. ~ Nahid Talk 19:42, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Rocky Masum (talk) 03:07, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedy per contest rules. ~ Nahid Talk 19:51, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Rocky Masum (talk) 03:07, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedy per contest rules. ~ Nahid Talk 19:44, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Rocky Masum (talk) 03:10, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedy per contest rules. ~ Nahid Talk 19:44, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Rocky Masum (talk) 03:10, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedy per contest rules. ~ Nahid Talk 19:45, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Rocky Masum (talk) 03:15, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedy per contest rules. ~ Nahid Talk 19:45, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

i uploaded this by mistake AnnaZinonos (talk) 18:06, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pease delete this photo which i uploaded by mistake in a batch work at some day long time ago.

I am not able to undurstand how this photo of wikipedian is of so much value to you unless you want to harass me , because im a female wikipedian and make a mistake.

I humply ask the wikipedia project to see the remarks by ppl here who instead of collaborating with me they delay the deletion and make personal remarks that show lack of respect and racism. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Annaathens (talk • contribs) 12:34, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Now in an edit war with Annaathens, who keeps breaking the {{Delete}} template. --> who accuse me of what? im not yet aware of the tools in here. If you think a noob is someoen you can can laugh about you are only showing lack of humanity. Im really sorry for this wikipedias making scathing comments against new user. Possibly sexist too. I will try to contact someone who is in higher rank who can see my problem here and not mock me anymore.

It is me in the photo and uploaded in batch by mistake. WHy you refuse to delete? You must give a reason why you want a wikipedian photo on wikipedia! THis is absurd.I m keeping screenshots of all the changes and accusations yu make. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Annaathens (talk • contribs) 12:38, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: not useful, out of scope. --Strakhov (talk) 18:30, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duck Flickr washing - clearly manufacturer product image, low res, no EXIF, Flickr stream has other images that are clearly not Flickr user's own - e.g., this. Эlcobbola talk 19:26, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not really flickrwashing but abusing flickr images for advertising purposes. --Achim (talk) 13:01, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: speedily: Used for linkspam & uploader is abusing multiple accounts. --Achim (talk) 13:03, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I WASN'T aware of the Sandbox Utility. This is trash. I like it! Thankyou. Ron 68.3.170.103 23:17, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Nothing to do. --Achim (talk) 10:22, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unsplash image after June 5, 2017 has licensing conditions which are restrictive of the CC0 license. acagastya 17:19, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Photo was published on Unsplash "on July 7, 2017". --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 19:59, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Speedy. On 5 June 2017, Unsplash switched the old sitewide license for all uploads from Creative Commons CC0 to a custom license arrangement which does not meet the free content licensing requirements for Commons. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 19:59, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

̇ I withdraw my nomination Low-re poster. Besides director is probably not the illustrator. Patrick Rogel (talk) 08:18, 2 June 2020 (UTC) CC license added at source. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 19:37, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The poster art copyright is believed belong to the distributor of the film, the publisher of the film or the graphic artist, but is Commons Attribution-ShareAlike. The entire poster: because the image is poster art, a form of product packaging or service marketing, the entire image is needed to identify the product or service, properly convey the meaning and branding intended, and avoid tarnishing or misrepresenting the image. The copy is of sufficient resolution for commentary and identification but lower resolution than the original poster. Copies made from it will be of inferior quality, unsuitable as counterfeit artwork, pirate versions or for uses that would compete with the commercial purpose of the original artwork. As film poster art, the image is not replaceable by free content; any other image that shows the same artwork or poster would also be copyrighted, and any version that is not true to the original would be inadequate for identification or commentary. Neepes (talk) 16:42, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Incomprehensible explainations. @Neepes: may you have the poster designer sending a permission via COM:OTRS? In the meantime may you reupload the file at the highest resolution? --Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:40, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 2.0 Generic license. @Patrick Rogel: Us are free to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work and to remix – to adapt the work. Please check the Source link. (talk) 13:42, 4 June 2020 (UTC).[reply]
As I've already said I doubt Vladimir Seixas is the poster designer. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:43, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Vladimir Seixas is the director of the film and the poster designer is for his production company (Couro de Rato Filmes in http://couroderato.com.br/). All poster rights are Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 2.0 Generic license. Neepes (talk) 11:18, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Neepes: Then if not the poster designer Vladimir Seixas has not the right to license it (you say it yourself "The poster art copyright is believed belong to the distributor of the film, the publisher of the film or the graphic artist"). Please do as requested above or have this poster being posted at http://couroderato.com.br under a valid license. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:07, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Patrick Rogel: According to the published response from the production company, Vladimir Seixas is the designer and the "Posters available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License" http://couroderato.com.br/cartazes/ Neepes (talk) 14:47, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Stereochemical mistake (File:Α-Cubebene.svg correctly has the 3,5 rings cis-fused DMacks (talk) 03:25, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per discussion. --Leyo 20:48, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vauxford2 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

I uploaded these via Flickr-to-Commons using my alt, but it no longer have a bot to automatically review the license. It doesn't even add the description of the author, time and the source it got it from. I have no clue why it doing this because it hasn't happened to me before when using the tool.

Vauxford2 (talk) 01:10, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment Vauxford2 is my alt and I usually use it to transfer CC images from Flickr but due to the reason above, I nominated the 315 files as accidental uploads. If I figure out why the tool no longer does the bot process then I would reupload them again. --Vauxford (talk) 01:28, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 05:23, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OTRS-permission from copyright holder Evrard Champagne is needed. Taivo (talk) 10:42, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 05:29, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jedmartialarts (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious claim of own work. Some look like screenshots, others like photos of photos. PCP

Gbawden (talk) 12:42, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 05:30, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Servas Wiki (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own works: inconsistent sizes and quality, 4 different cameras or no EXIF data. And mostly out of scope, personal or promotional images. All unused.

P 1 9 9   14:04, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 05:33, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Misscity88 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused screenshots and icons, no educational use, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   14:10, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 05:34, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AntonioRP2019 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:12, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 05:36, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, no educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9   14:14, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 05:36, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by حسن سلمانی (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photos and logo, no educational use, out of scope. And likely not own works but screengrabs.

P 1 9 9   14:16, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 05:37, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tesjor (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photos, logos, and graph, COM:WEBHOST, no educational use, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   14:33, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:15, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Drblood06 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photos, no educational use, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   14:41, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:18, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dak15 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photos, no educational use, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   14:43, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:20, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tomi tuominen84 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused photos of non-notable band, no educational use, out of scope. And likely not own work: transmission code in EXIF data.

P 1 9 9   14:46, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:20, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by William A. Kelley (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused table, equation, should be in wiki markup if needed; and graphs, no context, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   15:07, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:27, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Daudt (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused text diagram, should be in wiki markup if needed, and personal images, no educational use, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   15:12, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:28, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Zibu057 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused promotional photos, COM:WEBHOST, no educational use, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   15:18, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:29, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MatiasDR (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Duck COM:NETCOPYIOs - low res, no EXIF, no source or author, uploader serial copyvio uploader related to Club Atlético Tigre. COM:EVID + COM:PRP issue.

Эlcobbola talk 19:18, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:30, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not found at URL. Patrick Rogel (talk) 05:09, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 13:18, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Saya mengunggahnya secara tidak sengaja M.faroy (talk) 12:58, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 10:29, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source/license fail (uncited composite, which also explains the self-contradictory lighting). Have File:N-Propylamine 3D ball.png as replacement (CommonsDelinker is scheduled to handle the replacement) DMacks (talk) 03:11, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:31, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by OceanBluePlasticProjects (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unlikely to be own works, unclear copyright status

Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:45, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:03, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by OceanBluePlasticProjects (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These images have been uploaded by an account associated with an organization, and were obviously taken by multiple people. Several have no EXIF, while File:Photo of the Ocean and Sunset.jpg has EXIF indicating it was taken from Instagram. Verification of permission via OTRS is needed.

Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:08, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 10:23, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope SirEdimon Dimmi!!! 00:29, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 10:22, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sorry But this file was uploaded accidentally without the permission of the school OOOOOOOw (talk) 01:32, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploaders request for deletion. - FitIndia Talk 10:29, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sorry But this file was uploaded accidentally without the permission of the school OOOOOOOw (talk) 01:33, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploaders request for deletion. - FitIndia Talk 10:29, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The Photo is uploaded without permission OOOOOOOw (talk) 01:38, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploaders request for deletion. - FitIndia Talk 10:30, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The Photo is uploaded without permission OOOOOOOw (talk) 01:39, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 10:31, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by REFEREEIPC (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Facebook images, missing permission.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 04:18, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 10:33, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by CHARLES MKT (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not selfies, photographer(s) permission(s) needed via COM:OTRS.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 05:08, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 10:33, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User:European.polls

[edit]

Test files, out of project scope. --Slashme (talk) 11:33, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 10:36, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo, no educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9   14:55, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 10:38, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 10:38, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Juoett (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 10:38, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused very low-res image, unusable, out of scope. P 1 9 9   14:55, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 15:49, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal logo, no educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9   15:09, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 15:50, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused promotional QR code, no educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9   15:10, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 15:50, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of non-notable person (article deleted on en.wp), no educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9   15:13, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 15:50, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Elinformático12k (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 15:51, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hiphopist (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:47, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 15:52, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:15, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 14:51, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 14:51, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PENIS. 4nn1l2 (talk) 15:11, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 14:52, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused presentation of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:36, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 14:53, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not a selfie. Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:44, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 14:51, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:45, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 14:51, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Hanooz 15:46, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 14:53, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:47, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 14:53, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

While FOP exists in Germany and it might cover murals, however this appears to be a derivative of a copyrighted photograph of the subject, which the painter is not able to "release".

--Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 17:17, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I think there should be enough abstraction between the original image and the painting. --GPSLeo (talk) 18:42, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with GPSLeo. लोकाः समस्ताः सुखिनो भवन्तु (talk) 20:06, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Just out of curiosity: What would be the issue if there weren't? FOP in Germany appears to cover murals, but I could not find legal evidence that one has to verify the originality of the photographed works. The original painter did not "release" their derivative work; the main issue IMO is whether this even matters at all and whom the rights holder would be able to raise claims against at all. --stk (talk) 16:40, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep a photo of graffiti on a wall, that may in itself be derivative, is not derivative. Nfitz (talk) 22:43, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Its fair, some of my drawings depicting people, which I uploaded here, were actually deleted from the site because they were «derivated works». It will not be fair to keep this photographs, for me that would not be right. We should be fair people. TheBellaTwins1445 (talk) 16:22, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If we talk about fairness it would be better to keep these as they have an important political message. As there is many art around based on these image it would may be the best to find the creator of the original image or is it a selfie, I am not sure. --GPSLeo (talk) 19:56, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Well then I think its also fair that we keep the drawing I made myself for the page of wrestling fugure Kemonito - https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_TheBellaTwins1445#Files_uploaded_by_TheBellaTwins1445_%28talk_%C2%B7_contribs%29 TheBellaTwins1445 (talk) 21:30, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep I can't see any violation of a copy right. The artist placed the graffiti in public space and wanted to send a clear message. To delete this on Commons would mean sending a completely wrong signal. --Stolp (talk) 20:57, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep The mural and the photo depict the same person so there are bound to be similarities, but to call the mural a derivative work based on the selfie is like calling this sculpture a derivative of this one. -- Malatinszky (talk) 20:40, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep FOP covers this photo no matter how the copyright status of the graffiti itself might be. // Martin K. (talk) 16:18, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • No! FOP, or freedom of panorama as it is called, is the right to photograph copyrighted works without the 2D-photograph infringing on the underlying artwork you've photographed. If the artwork however is a copyright infringement, so does the 2D-photograph become. You can't make a Micke Mouse sculpture and place it in the public and therby be allowed to upload photos of it, since only Disney is allowed to place their work in public. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 17:02, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
      • Is this really the case? Is this an issue the person invoking FOP has to check and verify, or is this a problem the graffito artist has with the original rights holder? I have been digging for leading cases regarding this and haven't found anything so far. --stk (talk) 17:17, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
        • In order to permanently place an artwork in to "the public" they need to have the legal authority and ability to do so. If you do not own the copyright of the artwork, you can't legally place it in the public without that being a copyright infringement. FOP states that a photo of a copyrighted object in public does not infringe n the artist copyright, however, if the artist doesn't hold the copyright, then...FOP can't be invoked. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 17:51, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
        • If a copyright holder places a work permanently in public, then it "limit the right of the copyright owner to take action for breach of copyright against the creators and distributors of such images. It is an exception to the normal rule that the copyright owner has the exclusive right to authorize the creation and distribution of derivative works." If the copyright owner of the picture was not the one who placed the artwork in the public, then it hasn't "given away" their rights. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 17:56, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
          • I would totally see this argument if the artwork in case were the original artwork that is supposedly being infringed upon. This is, however, definitely not the case. The argument seems to hinge around the question whether the depicted graffito is a derivative works of its own according to § 24 Abs. 1 UrhG. If it is, it is in and of itself a protected work that does not need permission by the rights holder of the work from which it was derived. The way it is contextualized with a political slogan, as well as the production style with (possibly) a distinctive style of spraypainting by the artist can each be arguments for the graffito to be covered by at least the same umbrella of copyright legislation as the selfie that the work was based upon. Just out of curiosity: Are there precedents where the Wiki Commons community starts trying to preemptively delete images of works of art because they suspected them to be copyright infringement themselves? --stk (talk)
            • We delete on a precautionary principle (COM:PCP) since we only want free work we are sure are ok. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 20:00, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
              • As in my contribution above, I would totally see this argument if the artwork in case were the original photograph. This is still not the case. There is ample evidence that the graffito constitutes a work of its own, that, in turn, falls unter FOP. --stk (talk) 20:24, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
              • Addendum: If you still believe that this graffito cannot constitute a Freie Benutzung according to § 24 UrhG and therefore a original work, would you mind going ahead and also mark the photographs of the Brezhnev/Honecker mural for deletion? It is also based on a protected photograph (Corbis currently holds the rights to it) and is painted on a wall in Berlin. --stk (talk) 17:27, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: consensus is that these images are FOP-Germany. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 22:19, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, uncategorized, probably out of scope. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 04:29, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 01:04, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution image that might not be free 2605:6000:1526:450B:BDB3:AF47:F425:E909 20:03, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Low resolution is because it's a screenshot; but the screenshot was taken from a YouTube video which is available under a CC-BY license, already confirmed by a reviewer. --Gestumblindi (talk) 01:08, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, uncategorized, probably out of scope. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 20:14, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 01:06, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

thumbnail, scarce description, unused, uncategorized, probably out of scope. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 20:22, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. Very low-quality, small-sized image of some kind of unidentified living room(?). --Gestumblindi (talk) 01:12, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Virhidalgo2003 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

https://www.closermag.fr/people/kylie-jenner-fait-un-achat-en-confinement-de-13-millions-d-euros-1109617#img3

Patrick Rogel (talk) 04:32, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 06:30, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused low-res promotional photo, COM:WEBHOST, out of scope. P 1 9 9   14:18, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Fitindia (talk) 09:32, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely own work but taken from FB as per EXIF data. P 1 9 9   14:19, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Fitindia (talk) 09:32, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hartystrikes82 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Duck COM:NETCOPYVIOs - all lacking camera EXIF, most low res, appeared elsewhere before commons upload (e.g., File:Jahangirkhan.jpg is here, etc.)

Эlcobbola talk 20:22, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Fitindia (talk) 09:33, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hartystrikes82 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious own-work claims. Various camera models (from Nikon, Sony, Canon, iPhone X) and authors in EXIF data ("BennyTsui@www.PassionPhoto.hk", "Theo Huen", "GNPHOTO-CHUN"). These files lack evidence of permission, COM:PCP applies.

plicit 14:32, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --FitIndia Semi-retired 03:02, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rajput Bus Service (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:PS: Personal promo, no educational value at all

~ Nahid Talk 09:38, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:25, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rajput Bus Service (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused and uncategorised files. Two of them are thumbnails

Estopedist1 (talk) 20:35, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Fitindia (talk) 09:34, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pr9nik2 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Images by new user of Modern Sculptures. No FoP for Sulptures in Russia

Stolbovsky (talk) 21:40, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Fitindia (talk) 09:37, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Modern sculpture, no FoP for sculptures in Russia Stolbovsky (talk) 21:32, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fitindia at 09:37, 14 Juni 2020 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Pr9nik2 --Krdbot 19:55, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ecce Ego (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE random documents.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:24, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 11:13, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duck COM:NETCOPYVIO - low res, no camera EXIF, desciption says "Foto: Tuca". See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Gabriela Correa.jpg same issue from this uploader with different author credit (!!!) Эlcobbola talk 18:34, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Found elsewhere online. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 03:41, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely not under Creative Commons TaurusEmerald (talk) 18:21, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No creative commons license at source, "Copyright 2020 © Stewart-Haas Racing. All Rights Reserved". Without additional evidence that this photo is freely licensed, as a work previously published elsewhere with a non-free license, we need permission via COM:OTRS. —RP88 (talk) 01:03, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lianemora (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Both images are very small, with no EXIF. They are the only contributions of this editor. Neither shows up in a Google search, but if these are actually {{Own}} work as claimed, they should be uploaded at full camera size.

.     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:38, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:31, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lianemora (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:04, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

. DavidGriffiths94 (talk) 06:28, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 06:53, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion request is a clear conflict of interest by a political staffer who is in the process of uploading multiple images of politicians in his party. (N.B. Peter Malinauskas was quite happy to pose for me to take the photo at the time.) Bahudhara (talk) 07:29, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep - no valid rationale for deletion by the nominator, no copyright issues whatsoever. Deus et lex (talk) 02:50, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 11:47, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image found on Instagram and website in 2011, possible copyvio A1Cafel (talk) 07:32, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:17, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very low quality, no any educational value. Красный wanna talk? 08:52, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:18, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free image taken from Flickr without attribution: https://www.flickr.com/photos/s11aun/44404680165/ IceWelder [] 09:27, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:20, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free image taken from Flickr without attribution: https://www.flickr.com/photos/humbersidepolicepics/35990171993 IceWelder [] 09:34, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:20, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free image taken from Flickr without attribution: https://www.flickr.com/photos/humbersidepolicepics/14549497428 IceWelder [] 09:43, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:20, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free image taken from Flickr without attribution: https://www.flickr.com/photos/s11aun/44381510365 IceWelder [] 09:44, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:19, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free image taken from Flickr without attribution: https://www.flickr.com/photos/s11aun/43457726130/ IceWelder [] 09:46, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:18, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

party logo; might be copyrighted Mannivu · 10:03, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: false claim of own work / invalid free license. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:21, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Double posted. It is also accidentally posted by my newer account (Long lasting memories). After delete this file, this account is going to be deleted also and keep active only new account. When in G (talk) 05:05, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Question: What is the other file name of this image? --Achim (talk) 10:19, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Achim55: The other filename is File:Γαλαξείδι 01.jpg. I want to keep Γαλαξείδι 01.jpg and delete Γαλαξείδι. Σεπτέμβριος 2019.jpg. — Preceding unsigned comment added by When in G (talk • contribs) 09:42, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Is User:Long lasting memories another account of yours? --Achim (talk) 09:52, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Achim55: Long lasting memories is my new account. I forgot that i had When in G account also. When in G account created only for upload this file in wikimedia, but now, i plan to delete When in G account. — Preceding unsigned comment added by When in G (talk • contribs) 09:55, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Well, File:Γαλαξείδι. Σεπτέμβριος 2019.jpg is a slightly different crop from the original (same for File:Γαλαξείδι 01.jpg) but in this case I think we can  Delete leaving a redirect because the former was uploaded 8 months ago. --Achim (talk) 10:52, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Achim55: Thank you very much! The difference between these two files is in RAW editing software used for. In the case of Γαλαξείδι 01.jpg the RAW editor was RawTherapee software instead of Silkypix used for Γαλαξείδι. Σεπτέμβριος 2019.jpg file. This software can read more pixels from the outer area of the camera sensor than used by the build-in JPEG engine of the camera. This is why this file has more than 6000 horizontal pixels (which is Nikon's D3300 horizontal JPEG pixels) — Preceding unsigned comment added by When in G (talk • contribs) 14:14, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:23, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self portrait, no description XRay talk 10:09, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of COM:SCOPE. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:24, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Manasbose (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Logo is complex enough to be above India's threshold of originality. Permission is needed from the political party.

pandakekok9 10:17, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:26, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unidentified subject, uncategorized since 2008, no foreseeable use - out of scope Santosga (talk) 19:01, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. Mbdortmund (talk) 00:13, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per {{NoFoP-Morocco}}, there's no freedom of panorama in Morocco. Maybe the photo violates architect's copyright. Who is the architect and when (s)he died? How old the gate is? Taivo (talk) 10:29, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:26, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader requested. Wrong file uploaded. Jeffrey Beall (talk) 10:44, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:26, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded without school permission OOOOOOOw (talk) 12:11, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyright violation. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:27, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This appears to be recent public art; the US has no freedom of panorama for art. Either permission from the artist, or proof that the artwork is in the public domain due to publication date, is needed. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:10, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:50, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These Photos are uploaded without permission OOOOOOOw (talk) 01:39, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:54, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The Photo is uploaded without permission OOOOOOOw (talk) 01:39, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:54, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The Photo is uploaded without permission OOOOOOOw (talk) 01:40, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:54, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The Photo is uploaded without permission OOOOOOOw (talk) 01:40, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Not sure which “permission” this refers to (privacy or copyright) but there appears to be a copyright issue at least. Another of the user’s uploads has a copyright notice in the EXIF data and most have little-to-no EXIF data. Brianjd (talk) 12:41, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; likely copyvio. --Gbawden (talk) 10:54, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The Photo is uploaded without permission OOOOOOOw (talk) 01:40, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:54, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The Photo is uploaded without permission OOOOOOOw (talk) 01:41, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:54, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The Photo is uploaded without permission OOOOOOOw (talk) 01:41, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:54, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

empty page ShaulaH (talk) 04:39, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:55, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

empty page ShaulaH (talk) 04:40, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:55, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photo missing Pikiwiki - Israel free image collection project (talk) 16:50, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:51, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

empty page ShaulaH (talk) 04:41, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:55, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photo missing Pikiwiki - Israel free image collection project (talk) 16:56, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:10, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Freddie Azumah (talk · contribs)

[edit]

http://infohents.blogspot.com/2016/09/full-list-winners-of-ghana-teen-choice.html

Patrick Rogel (talk) 04:54, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:55, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal, unused picture. Out of scope. SirEdimon Dimmi!!! 06:29, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:56, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 06:57, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:55, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per FBMD... in beginning of special instructions field of metadata, the image comes from Facebook. All previously published images must have OTRS-permission or other evidence of free license. Taivo (talk) 09:22, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:54, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Zdjęcie (fotografia) z 1830 roku? Bzdura kompletna Kriis bis (talk) 19:10, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Zmieniłam na "zdjęcie portretu namalowanego w 1830 r.". Rzeczywiście fotografia została zrobiona trochę później, w II połowie XIX wieku, przez syna Józefa. Przepraszam, ale trudno mi się zorientować co, gdzie i jak tu się pisze i edytuje, interfejs i zasady są zbyt skomplikowane. Pozdrawiam AweAb

  • Proszę nie kłamać. Puchalski nie służył w armii Królestwa Polskiego, więc w 1830 roku nie mógł nosić munduru. Wysłałem zdjęcie do znajomych specjalistów epoki. Wg nich postać na portrecie nie nosi munduru z czasów Księstwa Warszawskiego, ani z czasów Królestwa Polskiego; mundur pochodzi raczej z drugiej połowy dziewiętnastego wieku. A znajdujący się portret Puchalskiego w kaliskim Muzeum jest zupełnie niepodobny do niniejszego. Jest zwyczajny fejk. --Kriis bis (talk) 21:14, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • Kriis ale można nieco mniej agresywnie, prawda? Mamy tu do czynienia z dwoma różnymi sprawami. 1. Czy zdjęcie przedstawia tę osobę, którą sądimy. 2. Czy nei narusza praw autorskich. Na commons nie zajmujemy się de facto 1. To leży w gestii lokalnych wikipedii, gdzie w hasłach nie powinno się umieszczać nieweryfikowalnych elementów. Na Commons, możemy dodatkowo oznaczyć to zdjęcie, jako wątpliwe. Co do 2. to zdjęcie jest już zapewne w PD, ale należy to udowodnić. Fraza, że pochodzi z albumu, wobec wątpliwości z punktem 1. niestety nie daje takiej gwarancji. Masur (talk) 14:32, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Masur (talk) 14:32, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not required anymore, thanks!


Deleted: 12:53, 30. Jun. 2020 Gbawden (A) Diskussion Beiträge Sperren löschte die Seite User talk:Archive1 (Author or uploader requested deletion of recently created, unused content (G7): content before blanking was: "#REDIRECT User talk:Diegodiez03/Archive1"). --Emha (talk) 12:53, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Das Logo ist veraltet und wurde nicht vom ZKM | Zentrum für Kunst und Medien zur Verfügung gestellt. Daher die Bitte zur Löschung. Zkmkarlsruhe (talk) 12:33, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion: even former logos and their history are relevant information. PD-Textlogo, therefore no problem with copyright. --Emha (talk) 13:46, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lucas Werkmeister (talk · contribs)

[edit]

(a) Derivative of a drawing which is above COM:TOO; (b) the drawing itself might be a derivative of a photograph

--Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 17:19, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Derivative / photograph of a drawing publicly displayed should be protected by freedom of panorama. That the drawing itself could be a copyright violation is pure speculation. Do you know the original or not? --Don-kun (talk) 16:20, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep, though I’m afraid I don’t know enough about copyright to justify this very well. But I hope that some of the reasoning at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:George Floyd mural Mauerpark Berlin applies here as well. I also note that the same memorial banner is also depicted in File:George Floyd memorial banner Berlin-Kreuzberg 1.jpg (also by me) as well as File:BlackLivesMatter protest Berlin 2020-05-30 50.jpg, File:BlackLivesMatter protest Berlin 2020-05-30 78.jpg and File:BlackLivesMatter protest Berlin 2020-05-30 79.jpg (by GPSLeo), which were not nominated for deletion. --Lucas Werkmeister (talk) 20:24, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Eine Voraussetzung für die Panoramafreiheit in Deutschland ist die dauerhafte Anbringung eines Kunstwerks oberhalb der Schöpfungshöhe. Die bemalte Mauer ist ein klassisches Beispiel, weil hier davon auszugehen ist, dass dieses Motiv dort dauerhaft, zumindest aber länger bleibt. Das bemalte Transparent ist - ebenso wie zum Beispiel Litfaßsäulen - darauf ausgelegt, temporär gezeigt zu werden. Deswegen muss es leider gelöscht werden.
A prerequisite for panoramic freedom in Germany is the permanent installation of a work of art above the height of creation. The painted wall is a classic example, because here it can be assumed that this motif will remain there permanently, or at least longer. The painted banner - just like advertising pillars, for example - is designed to be shown temporarily. Therefore it must unfortunately be deleted. --Emha (talk) 13:59, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Datei offensichtlich beschädigt Georg Karl Ell (talk) 17:59, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: File was repaired, thank you very much!. --Emha (talk) 14:03, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOYS.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 20:43, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Photos of COM:TOYS are not allowed. --Emha (talk) 14:07, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOYS.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 20:48, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: COM:TOYS. --Emha (talk) 14:08, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOYS.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 20:52, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: COM:TOYS. --Emha (talk) 14:08, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOYS.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 20:46, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Emha (talk) 14:09, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Google search result with an unclear copyright status on Commons (no license tag). Moreover the same photograph is used on the facebook site of the depicted person (see: https://scontent.fmuc4-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/20106796_10155625728558648_3098593648233098305_n.jpg?_nc_cat=100&_nc_sid=6e5ad9&_nc_ohc=jiVdbTG_F4IAX-uC8aW&_nc_ht=scontent.fmuc4-1.fna&oh=8ca0c35fdf100be5b0ac5dfb2fefbf6e&oe=5EFB5D06) Mosbatho (talk) 08:58, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 08:39, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal file. Same as File:Who am I.jpg, but not used Estopedist1 (talk) 07:19, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Excessive censorship... — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 131.0.43.246 (talk) 09:57, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete: Lack of COM:EDUSE & very poor quality because blown up version of File:Who am I.jpg. --Achim (talk) 10:55, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
But this one has a PD tag. We should check if the other file can be changed to PD too. Brianjd (talk) 12:55, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; PD tag is a red herring. Out of Scope is out of scope. --Gbawden (talk) 12:24, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by LifetimeWiki as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Missing permission. Let's discuss it for a week. Taivo (talk) 07:23, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:24, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of non-notable performers, no educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9   14:35, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:15, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and uncategorised file. Commons is not private media repository.Only (remaining) uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 20:31, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:25, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused and uncategorised file. Commons is not private media repository. Only (remaining) uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 20:32, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:25, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused and uncategorised file. Commons is not private media repository. Only (remaining) uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 20:39, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:25, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no useful description, no location, unused, uncategorized, probably out of scope. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 20:49, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:25, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no EXIF-data, no description, no location, unused, uncategorized, probably out of scope. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 21:00, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:25, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Espero100 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photos, COM:WEBHOST, no educational use, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   14:13, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't checked all of those files, but most of them seem to belong to Category:International Youth Congress of Esperanto, some of them specifically to Category:International Youth Congress of Esperanto 1988 (Zagreb, 1988). We just need to rwad the description, even though it is „only“ in Esperanto, partially als in Polish. Thus IMO those pictures are definitely not out of scope, they are documents of historical events. A different question, though, could be whether the licensing is correct. Some of the images have a watermark saying that A. Sochacki is photographer – which is a different name than the uploader's user name. A. Sochacki sounds like a polish name to me, some of the images have descriptions also in polish language (chosen by the uploader). So possibly things are okay, but I'm not sure yet about this point. Regards, --Kleeblatt187 (talk) 17:13, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Copyvio, not own work. --Gbawden (talk) 09:58, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Yuchen.li94 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photos, COM:WEBHOST, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   14:38, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Just because some may be related to other uploads that are used, doesn't give these images any usefulness. Still out of scope. --P 1 9 9   13:03, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • I raised the original deletion request and was rather baffled at the outcome as it seemed to be creating a whole new rule set, or at least one I wasn't aware of, whereby any file that could be shown to have a relationship with a "valid" file was to be kept irrespective of how useless it was. Malcolma (talk) 09:27, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:47, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Junglaxxl (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:TOYS.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 21:13, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 11:52, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOYS. Yuraily Lic (talk) 21:16, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 11:54, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal, unused picture. Out of scope. SirEdimon Dimmi!!! 21:19, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 11:54, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal, unused picture. Out of scope. SirEdimon Dimmi!!! 21:20, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 11:54, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOYS. Yuraily Lic (talk) 21:20, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 11:56, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOYS. Yuraily Lic (talk) 21:21, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 11:56, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOYS. Yuraily Lic (talk) 21:25, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 11:56, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOYS. Yuraily Lic (talk) 21:25, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 11:56, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Irene-meissner (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:36, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


The text documents are the official explanations of the organizer of these exhibitions. The important documents are not any longer available otherwise. The copyright is noted in the documents. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Riemerschmid (talk • contribs) 17:41, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 15:23, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio of [3] Liance (talk) 02:34, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: complex logo. --ƏXPLICIT 01:32, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All those files are not published under CC license.

talk 03:19, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept,  I withdraw my nomination since Creative Commons Attribution license available in archive link. talk 13:19, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This logo is still protected by French copyright TheMuscovian (talk) 05:04, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:34, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This logo is copyright, and public interiors are not covered by COM:FOP China. Larryasou (talk) 13:39, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:35, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely own work: transmission code in EXIF data, and watermark credit doesn't match uploader. P 1 9 9   14:17, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:35, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not found at URL. Who is the illustrator? Permission? Patrick Rogel (talk) 04:46, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The description says "Rights status of individual images not evaluated. For general information see: "Copyright and Other Restrictions" but this page says nothing about Rehse Archiv für Zeitgeschichte und Publizistik, DLC. Besides even if seized I'm not sure work changes of nationality. Besides this source [6] doesn't say no copyright in US but "Use of this item may be governed by US and international copyright laws. You may be able to use this item, but copyright and other considerations may apply. For possible additional information or guidance on your use, please contact the contributing organization." --Patrick Rogel (talk) 05:19, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry wrong link: here it says "Copyright Status: No Copyright - US". If we're considering German law, pseudonymous works expire 70 years after publication. So this should be fine unless someone is able to determine who "Paske" is. Buidhe (talk) 05:24, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
It doesn't mean German copyright doesn't yet apply hence the former question: if seized does the works change of nationality? --Patrick Rogel (talk) 05:33, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
It doesn't matter whether we're considering German or US copyright law because as I stated above it is free in both countries. Buidhe (talk) 05:35, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
No, if image is under German law and since Paske is not anonym he might well have died less than 70 years ago and the file is still copyrighted. The two questions are: is the work German or became it American due to his seizure and when Paske died? --Patrick Rogel (talk) 07:42, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
It's not clear who he is, so it's effectively anonymous/pseudonomous; just surname alone is not enough to identify the author. For comparison, the same source identifies known authors with dates of life [7] "Artist: von Axster-Heudtlass, Werner, 1898-1949" Buidhe (talk) 07:56, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
That's the reason why further researchs seems necessary. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:10, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I did look. I cannot find any further life information on a German artist named Paske. There's no indication it's actually his real name. Buidhe (talk) 12:15, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps you did your best but not everything is on the Internet but often in the archives. IMO I think it's not a good idea to force the issue with this ad-hoc {{PD-because|seized enemy property}} (I'm really not sure it becomes magically a public domain U.S. work) or {{Anonymous-EU}} (work is signed so not anonymous and it seems to me -but I might be wrong- that they are case laws on Commons on this subject). The wise thing is surely to wait for an Administrator's decision. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:25, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: So that illustration is apparently in the PD in the US. Since this is clearly a German work, German law is what really matters however. The illustration is signed, so it's not anonymous. That "Paske" is a pseudonym is a convenient assumption, it could just be that person's actual family name as well. "It's not clear who he is" or "We don't know who that is" does NOT mean that this a pseudonymous work. Which means we have to assume it's still protected by copyright per the usual 70 years pma formula. So I've deleted the file, along with some other "Paske" files from the same series. They're all from 1940, so they can all be restored in 2061 with {{PD-old-assumed}}. Unless, of course, someone can tell us more about "Paske", specifically, that this person died at least 70 years ago. --Rosenzweig τ 20:18, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Additional "Paske" files from the 1940 "Wochenspruch der NSDAP" series deleted:

And: Creator:Paske. --Rosenzweig τ 20:22, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Der Sturmer had known contributors so I doubt this work is genuinely anonymous. According to the text, Streicher didn't write it. Likely copyrighted both in Germany and US. German FoP does not apply to the interior of museums. Buidhe (talk) 08:50, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete, unfortunately. Copyright in the US was almost certainly restored by URAA, even if it was anonymously or pseudonymously published, since it wasn't public domain in Germany on the restoration date (January 1, 1996). clpo13(talk) 18:38, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. It's not a content of "Der Stürmer" by any known contributor but a poster of the "Stürmer Verlag" who ceased to exist in 1945 with no hint to any identifiable contributor. There is no proof that this poster - just an idea of Buidhe - that this poster is not "genuinely anonymous" or "likely copyrighted". After all institutions like the "Deutsches Historisches Museum" and the "United States Holocaust Memorial Museum" are using that same poster on their websites. Xenophon(talk) 20:12, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • @Xenophon: Well, first of all the image appears to have a signature in the upper right corner. I cannot read it but we would have to investigate if it is a known individual before assuming that no one could claim the copyright. Could you link where "Deutsches Historisches Museum" and the "United States Holocaust Memorial Museum" are using the image; I could not find with reverse image search. These websites may also be using it under fair use, but of course we cannot allow fair use at Commons. Buidhe (talk) 20:27, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
It seems highly unlikely that a Museum founded in 1987 would own the copyright to a poster made in 1935, which is one of its exhibits, though admittedly I'm no expert. nagualdesign 01:05, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: The illustration is signed "Fips", this is de:Philipp Rupprecht, who died in 1975. So it's still protected by copyright until the end of 2045. The file can be restored in 2046. --Rosenzweig τ 20:32, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, artist died in 1974. Martin Sg. (talk) 21:39, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Der angefragte Urheberrechte-Inhaber, Christof Bucherer, ist leider nicht bereit, ein OTRS-Ticket für das abgebildete Werk auszustellen, weil er nicht möchte, dass sein Großvater, Max Bucherer, mit Ludwig Finckh in Beziehung gesetzt wird; ansonsten gewährte er die Lizenz für jedes andere, ihm genehme Werk seines Großvaters. Bedauerlich, aber nicht zu ändern. Ich bitte also um Löschung. --Markus Wolter (talk) 14:45, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nein,nicht löschen. Ich stelle vorab in Frage, dass der Enkel Christof Bucherer hier überhaupt auf sein Nutzungsrecht reklamieren kann, zumal die weit verbreitete, zeitgenössische Kunstpostkarte als Bildmotiv einen Holzschnitt Max Bucherers - vermutlich bearbeitet - reproduziert und das Bildrecht beim unbekannten Kartenverlag liegt. Außerdem ist die Bilddatei in erster Linie als Autograph von Finckh zu betrachten, die Kunstpostkarte als dessen Textträger ; die Illustration also vielleicht sogar nur als ungeschütztes "Beiwerk" des Autographen zu betrachten?--Markus Wolter (talk) 09:19, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. The artwork is definitely not "Beiwerk" (de minimis). If you just want the text by Finckh, upload a cropped version of the card, without the artwork. --Rosenzweig τ 20:45, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, artist died in 1971. Martin Sg. (talk) 22:38, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Der angefragte Urheberrechte-Inhaber, Christof Bucherer, ist leider nicht bereit, ein OTRS-Ticket für das abgebildete Werk auszustellen, weil er nicht möchte, dass sein Großvater, Max Bucherer, mit Ludwig Finckh in Beziehung gesetzt wird; ansonsten gewährte er die Lizenz für jedes andere, ihm genehme Werk seines Großvaters. Bedauerlich, aber nicht zu ändern. Ich bitte also um Löschung. --Markus Wolter (talk) 14:44, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nein, keine Löschung. Eine Frage stellt sich mir bei diesem Fall: Liegt das Urheberrecht bei Bucheinbandgestaltungen denn notwendig beim Künstler oder doch nicht vielmehr beim Verlag des Buches? Kann. mit anderen Worten, Christof Bucherer, denn überhaupt das Nutzungsrecht über die Bucheinbandgestaltungen seines Großvaters für sich reklamieren? --Markus Wolter (talk) 09:01, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. The artist actually died in 1974. --Rosenzweig τ 20:49, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Who is the painter? Patrick Rogel (talk) 04:16, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Painter's name is Kamal. The Painter is an Army Painter and this Painting was placed in Army Museum by Pakistan Army for Public use and consumption. -- Muhammadahmad79 (talk) 04:37, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Paintings are protected by copyright 50 years after the author's death in Pakistan then since artwork is dated 1986 it's far from being public domain, sorry. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 08:10, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:56, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author : 'From google drive' Delwar10:03, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:57, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that this is indeed USAF work. Also copyright claim in ticket:2020060210005077 Ankry (talk) 11:12, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:58, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Who is the painter? Permission? Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:17, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It is my own work (oil on canvas) copy of a large-size photo of Dear Mother. Pls DO NOT DELETE, thx, rgds--PeterDix (talk) 19:37, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:59, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work (Stefan Dikidzhiev died 1970), permission of his heirs needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:19, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:59, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 12:17, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:59, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a photo provided for a missing person search, seen at: https://fletchermarple.com/post/138020600984/as-a-child-and-later-a-teenager-tammy-lynn Ytoyoda (talk) 12:34, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Эlcobbola talk 13:00, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:55, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:58, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Milwomen (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:56, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:01, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Melv peru (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:58, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:58, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Map of a fictional micronation used only in uploader's sandbox at cs.wiki. Harold (talk) 16:46, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:02, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{Vva|Emblem of the Police of Finland.svg}} 85.76.115.64 20:22, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted by Turelio. --Gbawden (talk) 10:02, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, no educational use, out of scope. And previously published, needs COM:OTRS. P 1 9 9   14:47, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:29, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not a selfie, https://www.amazon.fr/Patricia-Leavy/e/B001ITXNCO?ref_=dbs_p_pbk_r00_abau_000000, COM:LL. Patrick Rogel (talk) 07:51, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; flickrwashing. --Gbawden (talk) 09:23, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

http://www.hikhasi.com/ work, not Argia. Patrick Rogel (talk) 08:53, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:35, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality, no any educational value. Красный wanna talk? 08:53, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:34, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by AJZ as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Advertisement. I do not see promotionality. Big photo, EXIF exists. Photo is beautiful, but educational value is somehow weak. Discussion is needed. Taivo (talk) 09:03, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio, found all over the web. --Gbawden (talk) 09:34, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Tagged as own work, but also cites two external sources: a Flickr account with no direct image source and a Blogspot blog. Based on the URL of the latter, it seems like this is a screenshot taken from a live tour DVD. Additionally, the author's other transferred file of another singer at the same concert (File:AI Otsuka Live Earth Concert.jpg) was deleted as a copyright violation. COM:PCP applies.

ƏXPLICIT 10:38, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete It looks like a screencap - no evidence of this being the author's work. --Prosperosity (talk) 12:50, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:35, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Watermarked photograph claimed own work, no OTRS. Buidhe (talk) 14:30, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:36, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:35, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Oklahombre (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical documents. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:38, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by REYMONDNico (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical drawings. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:41, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:36, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:47, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Scope? BlinxTheKitty (talk) 02:16, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment This is a clear photograph of a man wearing a neckbeard. He is the only person of colour currently represented in Category:Neckbeards, which is dominated by old, dead and/or white men. The photograph was cropped from the original (see File:Jameseastmontmalloakland3.jpg) in order to suggest it as an option to represent neckbeards on the English Wikipedia page for Beards (we were trying at the time to locate more diverse images of men with facial hair, as someone had objected that the page was dominated by white faces.). In my opinion, the image is completely within scope, and - particularly given current affairs - it would be bad optics to delete the only PoC from the neckbeards category simply for being considered "out of scope" when there is nothing comparable in the rest of the category. Mabalu (talk) 02:56, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • This is what happens when you go around nominating images of people for deletion because they are “out of scope”, whatever that means. I think there is a bigger issue here. Brianjd (talk) 13:02, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

When the hell did i say i was deleting this because of his skin color? the file name and the no use of this file made it seem it was uploaded out of the blue for no reason --BlinxTheKitty (talk) 00:09, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unnecessary crop - almost identical to File:Jameseastmontmalloakland3.jpg. --Gbawden (talk) 13:04, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duck COM:NETCOPYVIO - low res, no camera EXIF, description says "Fotos: João P. Teles" Эlcobbola talk 18:29, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:03, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOYS.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 22:00, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 11:57, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOYS.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 12:57, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

To give an example, there is a light brown bear toy in File:Wikimania 2018 - Group photo plushies & General Assembly Wikimedia Cuteness Association (1).jpg. It is a toy of Rilakkuma, obviously copyrighted. So, these files should be deleted as COM:TOYS. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 12:59, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
COM:TOYS ist Quatsch. --Ralf Roletschek 14:12, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:09, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

and also:

This file was initially tagged by Mannivu as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: same image can be found here. That link credits the image to en.wikipedia. Maybe a copyvio from other source, maybe not. Opening discussion. Strakhov (talk) 23:00, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; likely taken from her FB feed. --Gbawden (talk) 13:02, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

2005 photo of 1997/1998 works by Takashi Murakami, who is still alive. The sculptures themselves are under copyright. The photos were taken in Turin, Italy at the Perrotin Gallery - look at other photos in the Flickr uploader's photostream and compare to the images at the gallery website. Italy does not have freedom of panorama - see {{NoFoP-Italy}}. I believe this is a copyright violation. Alex Cohn (talk) 23:29, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your review. My assumption is File:My Lonesome Cowboy.jpg would constitute a copyright violation as well? Morgan695 (talk) 23:36, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I think it would, for the same reasons. I'll add that image to this deletion request. Thanks for responding and bringing it up, Morgan695! --Alex Cohn (talk) 00:12, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure COM:TOYS applies here. TOYS is a rebuttal to the argument that toys aren't works of art but rather utilitarian objects. These photos depict two life-size sculptures displayed in an art gallery; the sculptures have no utilitarian purpose and are well over the TOO for copyright protection in just about any jurisdiction. Alex Cohn (talk) 02:31, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 02:33, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Portada de un disco con copyright. No hay permisos y posiblemente el usuario no es el autor. Geom (talk) 16:57, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete It seems to be a music album cover. Artist: Julia Medina ‎– No Dejo De Bailar. As long as there is no permission by the copyright holder (Label: Universal Music Spain (?)) there is little chance to keep it here. --Mosbatho (talk) 19:22, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Nagy (talk) 08:07, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

the world wide map is useful; the Australia only map is not MargaretRDonald (talk) 04:28, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per author request. --King of ♥ 14:27, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

i put article wrong date ខ្ញុំចង់ដឹង (talk) 18:19, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per author request. --King of ♥ 14:28, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duck COM:NETCOPYVIO: low res, no camera EXIF, description says "Fotos: João P. Teles" Эlcobbola talk 18:36, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 14:28, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duck COM:NETCOPYVIO: low res, no camera EXIF, description credits "Fotógrafo: Alexandre Magno", see also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Gabriela Correa.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Gabriela-correa.jpg Эlcobbola talk 18:51, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 14:28, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope MiguelAlanCS (talk) 19:00, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 14:28, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOYS. Yuraily Lic (talk) 20:54, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 14:29, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOYS. Yuraily Lic (talk) 20:55, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 14:29, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOYS. Yuraily Lic (talk) 20:58, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 14:29, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOYS. Yuraily Lic (talk) 20:59, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 14:29, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOYS. Yuraily Lic (talk) 21:01, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 14:29, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOYS. Yuraily Lic (talk) 21:02, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 14:29, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOYS. Yuraily Lic (talk) 21:05, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 14:29, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely copyright violation - the user's other two uploads were lifted from the subject's Twitter account, but TinEye can't find this one.

Also likely out of COM:SCOPE, as the article on CallMeKevin has been deleted on EnWiki multiple times for lack of notability. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:02, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:40, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook image per Metadata, permission is required A1Cafel (talk) 14:24, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A1Cafel – this is not a Facebook image, nor did it originate as one. I am the author and original uploader of this photo. Carbrera (talk) 23:59, 2 June 2020 (UTC).[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Mhhossein talk 13:26, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOYS.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 13:17, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 16:26, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOYS.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 13:42, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 11:50, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOYS.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 21:10, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 11:50, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Underlying work is a Tom and Jerry fan comic (source); may not be safe for use. -BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 01:47, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 10:38, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook image per Metadata, permission is required A1Cafel (talk) 14:24, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 10:39, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

file in copyviol - not under PD-Italy or CC licence. 79.36.186.75 15:06, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 10:38, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Given the other images copied from https://www.istma.org/en/board-of-directors/ and this low resolution image, the claim of own work is not credible. Whpq (talk) 17:24, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 10:42, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image has the "FBMD" metadata string from Facebook, and the photo was also published on Twitter as the subject's profile photo: https://twitter.com/sepulvedalf. OTRS ticket needed. Ytoyoda (talk) 17:37, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 10:37, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cannot find image from the White House, but find it on Mikheil Saakashvili's Facebook. Thus, this image is unlikely to be US Government's work and it is copyrighted A1Cafel (talk) 06:23, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 18:20, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cannot find image from the White House, but find it on Mikheil Saakashvili's Facebook. Thus, this image is unlikely to be US Government's work and it is copyrighted A1Cafel (talk) 06:26, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 18:21, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete this is a 1970 stamp and Turkish stamps are copyright for 70 years per Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Turkey#Stamps. Ww2censor (talk) 12:40, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 18:21, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per request. no longer used. Gcd822 (talk) 02:07, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 05:18, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is from the 1967 Rīgas kinostudija-released film "Četri balti krekli" (Four White Shirts). Photograph credit is Juris Dzenis. Highly doubtful the image is under CC BY 4.0 – uploader does not specify that he is Juris Dzenis and has a multitude of questionable uploads to Commons. ExRat (talk) 07:06, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 05:33, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Who is the painter? Permission? Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:10, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: We need more information the file to determine the licence. --Podzemnik (talk) 05:36, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Who is the painter? Permission? Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:16, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unclear copyright status. --Podzemnik (talk) 05:37, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

author is Martina Trchová - need their permission Gbawden (talk) 12:46, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 05:38, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete this is a 1982 stamp and Turkish stamps are copyright for 70 years per Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Turkey#Stamps. Ww2censor (talk) 12:49, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 05:39, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete this is a 1966 stamp and Turkish stamps are copyright for 70 years per Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Turkey#Stamps. Ww2censor (talk) 12:50, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 05:39, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete these are 1969 stamps and Turkish stamps are copyright for 70 years per Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Turkey#Stamps. Ww2censor (talk) 12:52, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 05:39, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete this is a 2003 stamp and Turkish stamps are copyright for 70 years per Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Turkey#Stamps. Ww2censor (talk) 13:02, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 05:39, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Amousey (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused files. Looks like some sort of personal artwork. Probably out of scope

Estopedist1 (talk) 17:48, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I uploaded these and want to keep them. They are similar to the Adobe Animate logo. They are small because they are icons that could be sized down to 16x16 px. I plan to use them for images indicating not to use graphics animation in content. There's nothing similar here, or elsewhere online. User:Estopedist1. Amousey (talk) 17:55, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Files barely uploaded 24 hours ago by a user with significant contributions on Commons and other projects. Perhaps we could cut them some slack, especially if they plan on using the images here. Brianjd (talk) 13:04, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I uploaded this since there are no similar icons, and I hope itcwill stay Amousey (talk) 22:41, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Amousey: all three logos still unused. Should be deleted as personal artwork--Estopedist1 (talk) 05:17, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Still not used but I can see potentional usage. I trust the claim of User:Amousey that (s)he will use them for the good of the project. --Podzemnik (talk) 05:43, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Errore di adesione Kikkaelia17 (talk) 19:17, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Author's request shortly after the upload. --Podzemnik (talk) 05:45, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Errore di Kikkaelia17 (talk) 19:18, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Author's request shortly after the upload. --Podzemnik (talk) 05:45, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lower-resolution duplicate of File:L' Italia ha bisogno di carne-frumento-grasso & zucchero LCCN2002711995.jpg Vahurzpu (talk) 20:27, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 05:46, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical newspaper. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 14:12, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's my own photo. I want to delete this one and upload a different version of it which is cleaner and brighter. Thanks. Raf1986 (talk) 16:05, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's going to be a totally different photo. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Raf1986 (talk • contribs) 15:53, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • @Raf1986: In that case, you should upload the new photo under a new name (it looks like you haven’t done this yet). Then see if enwiki editors will agree to use the new photo in the article instead of the current one. Then, if the current photo is not used anywhere else, you can ask again to have it deleted. Brianjd (talk) 03:13, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Its in use. GeorgHHtalk   16:07, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 14:13, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photographs are not ineligible for copyright in Germany... unlikely to be PD-US because of URAA even if published in 1938. Buidhe (talk) 13:47, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:55, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright infringement, no real source is mentioned by the uploader, in addition to that River Plate logo exist already on wikimedia commons DZwarrior1 (talk) 00:56, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep As a simple textlogo. - Fma12 (talk) 21:34, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 19:40, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright infringement, no real source is mentioned by the uploader, in addition to that River Plate logo exist already on wikimedia commons DZwarrior1 (talk) 00:57, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 19:42, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright infringement, no real source is mentioned by the uploader, in addition to that River Plate logo exist already on wikimedia commons DZwarrior1 (talk) 00:58, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 19:42, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not the official version of the logo, in addition to that River Plate logo exist already on wikimedia commons DZwarrior1 (talk) 01:03, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 19:42, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of rule COM:FOP Estonia. Maxinvestigator (talk) 04:45, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Maxinvestigator: no FOP in Estonia, but just move it to etwiki where is special template for that (et:mall:KunstiteoseFoto)--Estopedist1 (talk) 10:55, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 19:43, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation of [8] Liance (talk) 02:33, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hey! I have recieved the acceptance of Tal Ben-Shahar to use this picture. Just tell me how can I proove it, and I'd love to. --OmahaBeach44 (talk) 22:54, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: below TOO and in use. Once the draft on en.wp is deleted, renominate this image as out-of-scope. --P 1 9 9   18:57, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.0 Generic (CC BY-NC-ND 2.0)
No indication why PD-India would not apply: Photographs created before 1960 are in the public domain 50 years after creation. Storkk (talk) 08:24, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Storkk: Surely because it hasn't been first published in India or no evidence of that has been provided. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 08:30, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Patrick Rogel: Sure - but if you need to examine the details regarding where the first publication of a photo was, I would argue it's ipso facto not obvious enough to speedy. Storkk (talk) 12:41, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: appears to be PD as per license tag (before 1961 publishing date doesn't seem to matter). --P 1 9 9   19:14, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by DaveEscher (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Photos of vintage family pictures ranging from 1896 (!) to 1969, not the same person's work. Please explain why public domain in Mexico ̟ out of scope (ːesːMaría Cámara Vales).

Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:15, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that these are not "vintage family photos" as described. They are photographs which although they form part of my private collection, are of public figures. The person photographed served as Second Lady of Mexico between 1911 and 1913. In 1969, her contribution to Mexico Society was considered sufficient for her to be awarded the Belisario Domínguez Medal of Honour by the Mexican Senate. This is the highest award the Mexican Government awards its citizens. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Belisario_Dom%C3%ADnguez_Medal_of_Honor) If you speak Spanish, a very interesting article on this person's contributions during the Mexican Revolution can be found at UNAM: (https://archivos.juridicas.unam.mx/www/bjv/libros/7/3364/19.pdf.) Please note that both images selected for deletion are relevant. - One of the photographs is of María Cámara Vales posing with José María Pino Suárez, who served as Vice-President of Mexico between 1911 and his assassination in 1913. (His wikipedia page can be consulted here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jos%C3%A9_Mar%C3%ADa_Pino_Su%C3%A1rez.) His assassination in 1913 was one of the most violent periods of the Mexican Revolution and María Cámara was an important historical figure during these events. - On the other hand, the other photograph is a portrait of María Cámara Vales and is shows her wearing the Belisario Domínguez Medal of Honour. This person is at least as relevant (although I would argue more so) than Carrie Babcock Shermann, Second Lady of the United States between 1909 and 1912 who has her own wikipedia page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carrie_Babcock_Sherman). — Preceding unsigned comment added by DaveEscher (talk • contribs) 01:15, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@DaveEscher: It's not a notability problem but a lack of permission. "Private collection" doesn't mean nothing here since we are only interested in who the photographer is. Therefore claiming {{Own}} for these images is a false claim because "own" denotes that "you personally created the entire original image by yourself". The date is unvalid too (please read Template:Information). So you have to name the original photographer and ask him/her (or his/her heirs) to send a permission via Commons:OTRS or explain why images are public domain in Mexico. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:31, 5 June 2020 (UTC) P.S. Finally it's a notability issue too since ːesːMaría Cámara Vales has been deleted. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:25, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:23, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Book inside: copyrighted. Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:12, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:24, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

If 1984 not public domain yet in Bulgaria. Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:14, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:24, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete according to the copyright rules of Bermuda 70 years pma or 70 years after creation are the terms but we don't know the photographer and if it was taken in 2009 as the stamp claims, the photographer cannot be dead 70 years nor can it be old enough. Ww2censor (talk) 12:12, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:25, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:59, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour la photo est de mon propre travail, elle a été prise lors des j Awards 2019 dans le cadre du projet Tapis Rouge wikimedia Guinée.Aboubacarkhoraa (talk) 16:36, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Je vient même d'ajouter l'image original, Merci EugeneZelenko.--Aboubacarkhoraa (talk) 17:07, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: new full-sized version has EXIF data, not found elsewhere online published prior to upload here. --P 1 9 9   19:28, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lower-resolution duplicate of File:Col. Fred'k S. Foltz, 18th Cavalry LCCN2016821809.jpg Vahurzpu (talk) 20:42, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:29, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Most likely not uploader's own work. See https://www.ebay.com/itm/Press-Photo-Fred-Rogers-on-Mister-Rogers-Neighborhood-with-Francois-Clemmons/373065348060?hash=item56dc6d73dc:g:qjcAAOSwGSZefjkk where photo credit is given to Terry Clark. No OTRS ticket is available to verify that the uploader owns the copyright to this image or any other images uploaded by them. FunnyMath (talk) 21:14, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The following cropped versions should be deleted as well:

FunnyMath (talk) 20:11, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Archived version of the eBay link in case it becomes dead: [9] FunnyMath (talk) 20:14, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The following files uploaded by the same user should be deleted:

All of the above are labelled as the uploader's own work. This is doubtful as I have been able to prove that some of the user's photos are not their own works and can be found elsewhere on the Internet. I have marked the photos with definitive proof for speedy deletions. FunnyMath (talk) 20:31, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Found the sources for all images immediately above. No need to worry about them now. They are all marked for speedy deletion. FunnyMath (talk) 19:48, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This cropped version should be deleted too: File:Fred Rogers 1986.png FunnyMath (talk) 22:35, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:33, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

probably incomplete occurrence data. This name is a synonym MargaretRDonald (talk) 23:23, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. --P 1 9 9   19:36, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality. BriefEdits (talk) 23:29, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:36, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photographs fail to meet the official guidelines of COM:TOYS, specifically:

When uploading a picture of a toy, you must show that the toy is in the public domain in both the United States and in the source country of the toy. In the United States, copyright is granted for toys even if the toy is ineligible for copyright in the source country.

There has been no evidence presented that the toys at the focus of this photograph, and named in the category or title, are public domain. Photographs where there is a potential de minimis rationale, and other items or people may be the main focus, have not been selected in this request.

For an in-depth background and explanation of Commons copyright policies, refer to the Stuffed Animals essay and the precedent of prior closely related deletion requests: Petit tigre, Erminig, Wendy the Weasel & Percy Plush, Wikimania 2014 Day 1, Jimmy Wales meeting Mr Penguin.

-- (talk) 17:54, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Addendum The list of other examples used in the nomination has been reformatted in this change for better clarity, but there has been no material change to content. -- (talk) 09:15, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep all in subdirectories as none of these have not been tagged for deletion and uploaders (and other interested parties) have not been notified and it is unclear whether the nominator actually wants to delete them or not (many are trivially obviously de minimus or otherwise not problematic so the do need to be individually nominated). Thryduulf (talk) 11:46, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Info Two files are listed in the nomination, no others. -- (talk) 07:54, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Please see User:Elcobbola/Stuffed Animals & COM:TOYS. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:48, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOYS.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 22:10, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 11:59, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOYS.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 12:52, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • It should be safe to merge these two open DRs. Where mascots have been handmade by the uploader (or friends), this needs to be explained clearly with the copyright release, confirming they are original toys, for example the crocheted bees for wikidata and not based on a commercial pattern. -- (talk) 13:16, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep File:Wikizade Bambi Cuteness.jpg is hand mande by a friend. Hard to understand any meaning for deletion. --Nevit Dilmen (talk) 17:33, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    @Nevit: Is your friend a Wikimedian? If so, they should simply make a statement here agreeing to the CC-BY-SA 4.0 and GFDL 1.2+ licenses you have chosen. (Your act of uploading the photo only releases your portion of the copyright.) If not, then they need to send a copyright release to COM:OTRS. -- King of ♥ 02:51, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 12:19, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Improper use of Anonymous-EU, because: 1. it isn't anonymous, we know it was made by British schoolmaster Samuel Butler 2. the anon-eu license explicitly says that it isn't for works published in Britain and this work likely was.  — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs)  03:08, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep license changed to the correct one: {{PD-old-100}}, additional description about the author added. PawełMM (talk) 04:46, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No reason to doubt license now. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 23:34, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(1) the subject [Miroslav Lajcak] has NOT published his own signature; (2) secondary sources have NOT reproduced the signature, nor did the subject give consent for its reproduction; (4) the signature is NOT directly relevant to the article in which it is displayed 147.67.241.226 11:15, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unsourced. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 23:37, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted music from 1970 King Crimson Lizard album. Harold (talk) 16:22, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 23:44, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Buidhe as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: See [10], copyright held by John W. Mosenthal
Converted by me to regular DR, as this case requires a discussion. The role of the cited "John W. Mosenthal" wrt copyright is quite unclear; in most sources he is called "research analyst", but not "photographer". -- Túrelio (talk) 20:45, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Same problem with:

--Túrelio (talk) 20:57, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

USHMM is usually good about tagging public domain images as such, so the fact that they are listed as copyrighted according to them is an indication against keeping the images. It's possible that these images were indeed taken by a US Army member in the line of duty but we need actual evidence of that (right now there is none). Buidhe (talk) 20:49, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 00:13, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am pretty sure that the author cannot assert a copyright over a bunch of emoji images he copied from other sites. Guy Macon (talk) 21:05, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am no expert on copyright law, but this got me wondering about copyrights and emojis. after all, if I found that all of the emojis he used are under CC-BY-SA 3.0, then the collection would be under CC-BY-SA 3.0, right? Here is what I found:
[ https://www.wipo.int/wipo_magazine/en/2018/03/article_0006.html ] has some interesting material, but I am not sure what parts to apply here. --Guy Macon (talk) 21:37, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Copyright laws don't distinguish between logos, icons, emoji (which are a subcategory of icons), and other graphics. What is important in this context is that their design is above the threshold of originality, and that the copyrights and trademarks associated with the emoji designs are the property of Apple Inc. The Guidelines for Using Apple Trademarks and Copyrights stipulate the following:
"2. Apple Logo and Apple-owned Graphic Symbols: You may not use the Apple Logo or any other Apple-owned graphic symbol, logo, or icon on or in connection with web sites, products, packaging, manuals, promotional/advertising materials, or for any other purpose except pursuant to an express written trademark license from Apple, such as a reseller agreement."
So it seems this is a case of expressly prohibited copyright violation. And this also applies to File:The Emoji Set of Sitelen Emoji as of April 2020.jpg that was uploaded by the same user. Love —LiliCharlie (talk) 22:30, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
P.S.: The above is of course not about emoji as abstract characters that are transmitted via the Internet and which are hardly copyrightable, but about graphically designed representations of such characters, i.e. glyph images as depicted in the uploaded JPG's. Love —LiliCharlie (talk) 03:07, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I just read up some more on copyrighted graphics in general and Apple-copyrighted icons/emoji in particular. Very educational. I agree that both of the files we are talking about are unambiguous copyright violations.
On a personal note; while researching this I found that to my eye Apple has better looking emojis that the Linux and Windows machines I use. Whoever Apple hired did a great job. This would influence me towards buying an Apple machine if I was a heavy emoji user, so I can see that Apple has a strong financial interest in defending the copyright on their valuable images. --Guy Macon (talk) 04:02, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
There are zillions of nicely designed free emoji on the Web. And when I say free I mean they are for free and under a free licence. For example, you can get 2,986 emoji (in various formats: SVG, PNG, and TrueType colour font) all in one download if you click the green button at the Noto Emoji font repository. Or you could search them here starting from Category:Emoji by subject. It is strange this user resorted to commercial graphics. — I hardly ever use emoji, but I use a Firefox add-on that displays a different set of emoji than the ones that ship with my OS. Love —LiliCharlie (talk) 11:46, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Copyvio and beyond COM:TOO US. Although some of emojis are below TOO (e,g, the "no" emoji), IMO that should be uploaded separately. SCP-2000 10:06, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 00:13, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Internet forum is not a reliable source, and even so I couldn't find this image or mention of Schumacher at the link. I even looked for evidence that he testified at Nuremberg trials but could not find reliable source that said so. So, it is unclear what the status of this image is. Previous DR involved many other images with clearer providence. Buidhe (talk) 23:20, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No information has been provided to contradict the PD claim. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 00:50, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:General Baron T. Kuroki, three-quarter length portrait, in uniform, facing front) - R. Maruki, Atarashibashi Kado, ShibaTokio, Japan LCCN2005680343.jpg Vahurzpu (talk) 23:56, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You marked the wrong one as duplicate. As you can see the image you say is the original was uploaded 20 March 2018, the one I uploaded was on 3 July 2016. So if you want to delete a duplicate it shouldn't be this one, but the one that was uploaded some two years after this one. Cheers, Nesnad (talk) 07:18, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I don’t think there is any “right” or “wrong” one. There are simply two images that are identical. And the one that was nominated for deletion is not in use. Brianjd (talk) 13:24, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The original has better tags. Did you upload the duplicate? Nesnad (talk) 17:50, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Nesnad: As clearly shown on the file description pages, I did not upload any version of either file. In fact, as far as I can remember, I have not been involved with these files at all. Brianjd (talk) 03:16, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Then why mark this one for deletion? It seems to have better tags and was uploaded first, not sure what your motives are? Nesnad (talk) 09:08, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Older version kept, newer version deleted. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 00:59, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

La fotografía que aparece como de la periodista Petrona Rosende es la misma que aparece como perteneciente a la educadora argentina Rosario Vera Peñaloza, se debe corroborar la información LischinskyPatri (talk) 21:37, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:37, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Are graphics in the StopCovid app in a free license? If not, the illustration should be cropped. Thibaut (talk) 23:03, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

How on Earth should I know?!? I knew that making a file available is a license nightmare. I really hope it's not like the photos of Eiffel Tower by night.
If I need to crop it ok, no problem, just let me know and I'll upload a cropped version: basically you want ONLY the text to be seen?
Thanks! --Vlad (talk) 05:21, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Is the text only error message ok now? Can this file be kept or you still want to have it deleted?!? --Vlad (talk) 05:27, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Vlad: Looks fine now, we must now wait for an admin to close this DR, it can takes some time, the backlog is huge right now. --Thibaut (talk) 10:59, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much, I didn't realize you wanted it like that (i.e. with the full screen, but with graphics wiped out). I thought you were an admin, but maybe you can't decide on a deletion request you made. --Vlad (talk) 18:24, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: illustration was removed (deleted original version). --P 1 9 9   16:39, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Questionable licensing. I tried to verify from the book it is allegedly from, but could not find evidence that this book even exists. Likely copyrighted under URAA and/or 70 year rule of author death, since there is no evidence that Rosenberg is actually the creator of the image. Oh, and the uploader was blocked on enwiki for disruptive editing [11]. Buidhe (talk) 03:23, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Buidhe, as I told you on en.wiki, you can verify the book exists here on Google Books, in note 433 from Heidegger and the Jews: The Black Notebooks by Donatella Di Cesare, published by John Wiley & Sons in 2018. The note indicates that the book was published in German in 1921 and in English in 1923. Given that, it is out of copyright, and it makes no difference who made the images, Rosenberg or an illustrator: everythong published in 1923 is now out of copyright and in the public domain. Beyond My Ken (talk) 05:01, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Given the issues with Ludvicus' contributions, I don't think we can AGF that this work is really from the book, especially as it's very obscure and cannot be found online. Your statement that "it makes no difference who made the images" is untrue, in Germany and the UK copyright runs life + 70 years which may well not have expired yet. Buidhe (talk) 05:27, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • In the absence of any indication of an illustrator other then Rosenberg, the presumption must be that either Rosenberg did the drawings, or that they were a work for hire which would be covered under Rosenberg's copyright. We know that Rosenberg died in 1946 (by hanging), so the 70 years has elapsed. In other for the 70 uears not to have elapsed, we have to presume an illustrator the existence of whom is lacking any evidence whatsoever. Beyond My Ken (talk) 17:53, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • That assumes that the image was actually printed in the book. Worldcat says it isn't held by any libraries [12] so how did Ludvicus access it? Given his history of disruptive editing we're supposed to take his word for it? Furthermore, the book was co-written with en:Ernst Boepple who has not been dead for 70 years. Buidhe (talk) 18:18, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • OK, the book the illustration seems to have come from may be Bolsheviks and British Jews: The Anglo-Jewish Community, Britain and the Russian Revolution by Sharman Kadish, published in 2013 by Routledge. The book has a list of illustrations which includes the entry: "facing page 140 Caricatures of Lenin, Radek, Martov and Emma Goldman from Alfred Rosenberg's The Jewish Bolshevism, published in England by The Britons in 1922 {London, Wiener Library, Britons Collection)". [13] With the exception of the credit to the library, this is exactly the text on the prevision revision linked by clpo13 above. However, as the image was first uploaded in 2007, it may have come directly from the Wiener Library. Beyond My Ken (talk) 08:52, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep This image has been uploaded in 2007. If there was someone having the copyright he would have requested his rights since then. If we cannot prove 100 percent that the author is dead since 70 years minimum, the absence of request since now 13 years is a very strong presumption. --FLLL (talk) 08:26, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
... that seems to go against what COM:PRP says. Buidhe (talk) 08:33, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete on Commons, but transfer to enwiki and other projects that may allow it under local policies. From what I can tell from the above link to Heidegger and the Jews and page 87 of Haters, Baiters and Would-Be Dictators by Nick Toczek, the referenced text "The Jewish Bolshevism" is only a portion (essay? chapter?) of the book Totengräber Russlands (in English, The Gravediggers of Russia), published in Germany by en:Ernst Boepple in 1921, then re-published in England by The Britons/Britons Publishing Society in 1923. According to Toczek's book, It consisted of thirty-two caricature cartoons by Otto von Kursell, each of a leading Russian Jew and purported to illustrate the different kinds of Jewish physiognomy. That description matches the picture here, so I'm okay with assuming this image is present in the book. Otto von Kursell died in 1967, so his illustrations won't be public domain in Germany and other life+70 countries until 2038. However, since the book containing the illustrations was first published in 1921, they're public domain in the United States. Works must be free in both the United States and the country of origin in order to be hosted on Commons (Commons:Licensing#Interaction of US and non-US copyright law), but enwiki only requires works to be free in the United States (en:Wikipedia:Non-U.S. copyrights). I don't know enough about the other projects using the file to comment on their policies. clpo13(talk) 19:41, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • What I can ascertain from looking at available copies of Totengräber Russlands and The Gravediggers of Russia or Russia's Gravediggers is that Boepple does not appear to be an author, he appears to be a publisher. The publisher credit on the listing for the German edition from 1921 says "München, Deutscher Volks-Verlag Dr. Ernst Boepple". The author is given as "Otto von Kursell / Dietrich Eckart", confirming what clpo13 wrote above - von Kursell was the artist, Eckart wrote the words. [14] However, the English edition (new, published in 2019) gives Rosenberg as the only author. [15]. The GErman edition is very pricey -- all copies were going for over $1,000. The new English edition is not dirt cheap at under $30, but I think I may order a copy so we can short-circuit this discussion and come to a conclusion. Amazon also has three different English edition, two of which are unavailable, but the covers are interesting. [16],[17],[18] In the last, the credits are drawings by von Kurfell, "verses" by Eckart, and introduction by Rosenberg. The second one mixed up von Kursell and Eckart. I can;t read the text on the cover of the first, the image is too small. Beyond My Ken (talk) 08:36, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • According to German Wikipedia (mechanically translated): "In 1921, Kursell finally received German citizenship. In the same year he was involved in the brochure “Gravedigger of Russia” published by Deutsches Volksverlag, for which Rosenberg wrote the foreword. In this popular booklet, which conveys the conspiracy theory of Jewish Bolshevism, there are 32 caricatures by Kursell, which show high-ranking Bolshevik officials with "Jewish" facial features in a racist sense and are each underlaid with four-lines by Dietrich Eckart." [20] Beyond My Ken (talk) 09:01, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - The copy of the brochure I ordered just came. Here is a description:
  • The cover says "Russia's Gravediggers / Alfred Rosenbergm Otto Kurfell (Ill.)"
  • Next two pages are advertising for the publisher, "Facsimile Publisher" of New Delhi, with an address.
  • The next page says "Russia's Gravediggers" and has the ISBN 4-444000-406954
  • The next page has the same text as the cover, with Facsimile Publisher's logo at the bottom (which is not on the cover)
  • The following page has the same information as the cover, plus the ISBN number, plus "Reprint in 2020 in India by Facsimile Publisher" and their address
  • the title page (finally), which is numbered as page 1, has the title "Russia's Gravediggers", then "Drawings by Otto Kurfell" and then "Foreward by Alfred Rosenberg" Plus the drawing of Trotsky from inside the pamphlet, which has been filled-in, dimensioned, and shadowed and placed against a background featuring a menorah, dead bodies, skulls, the Eye of Providence in a triangle (such as on the back of the US $1 bill), and other images that I cannot make out
  • The next page (2) has a quote from Goethe
  • Pages 3 through 9 is the forward by Rosenberg, which is titled "The Jewish Bolshevism" and dated "Munich, November 1921". It is signed "Aflred Rosenberg (reval)"
  • Page 10, titled "The grave diggers of Russia" begins the caricatures, which continue through page 38. Most pages have a caricature, a name I.e. "Sinowjeff-Abfelbaum (Appletree)", a description "Societ Governor of Petrograd, President of the Soviet Commonwealth of the North, President of the Executive of the third International" followed by four lines of verse. Some pages (32, 33 36, 38) have two caricatures with descriptions and verse. Page 14 has two photographs, the first labelled "An interesting meeting of the Soviet Leaders" about which it claims possession in Russia is "punished by death"; the second photo is "A Squad of Murderers" and depicts what appear to be Cossacks on horseback.
  • Page 39 is in some ways the most interesting for what it says about the "facsimile" edition. Although it is numbered, and therefore one would think it is part of the facsimile of the original, it contains a URL, which, of course, could not have been in the original. The contents are:
  • "Today's America is as Judaized as the Soviet Union was! /Same names, same faces, same age-old agenda"
  • "Who Controis America" and the URL, which I won't give, but will say that it includes "ZOG"
  • A drawing of a man lieing on the ground being help down by a man's foot and leg (see Orwell's "1984") with the Statue of Liberty in the background
  • A quote labelled as being from Goebbels: "As long as the Jews remain anonymous, they are secure. The moment they lose their anonymity, the racial problem became acute and required a suitable solution. ... Jewry's strength is in its anonymity."
  • The following page is also numbered (40), but also seems likely not to have been in the original. It has two images. The first is a drawing showing a stereo-typical hook-nosed Jew is in the center of a Star of David, with a dollar sign above the star to the left, and a hammer and sickle above to the right. The second image is a photo of Mussolini at a microphone with his left arm stretched out in front of him, pointing slightly upward.
  • The next page (41) says: "The Secret World Government / or / 'The Hidden Hand' / by Maj. Gen. Count Cherep-Spiridovitch // The Unrevealed in History / 100 Historical Mysteries Explained // Read this book and the World will never a gain [sic] seem / the same to you." This is the final page, excepting some blank leafs.
  • The rear cover has the Facsimile Publisher's logo, its name and address, the name and address of the distributor "Gyan Books Pvt. Ltd." of New Delhi, the ISBN and barcode, and the prices. "US$ 10.00 / R. 500.00"

As I think the final three pages make clear, this is not a "facsimile" edition as we would usually understand it, it's purpose is to distribute modern anti-semitic propaganda attached to hkistoric anti-semitic propaganda Whether this version was created by Facsimile Publisher, or whther they merely re-printed someone else's propagada is unknown. Given that, I'm not sure how much we can trust the material on pages 3-9 (Rosenberg's foreward), and 10-38 (caricatures and verse) to be accurate representations of the original pamphlet, with nothing left out. Those modern propaganda pages case doubt on the rest of the content.

Assuming, though, that the bulk of the pamphlet is accurate, some things to note:

  • There is no mention of Dietrich Eckart as the writer of the verse, although we know this from other sources
  • There is no place in this pamphlet in which four caricatures are together on one page with no text, so this specific image under discussion must have been assembled by someone else for some other purpose. The pamphlet sheds no light on the question of who did that, or for what text.
Beyond My Ken (talk) 00:21, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Fascinating. If this image is spliced together, are you able to recognize the individiual images on pages in your version and if so, are they correctly labeled? (eg. are the caricatures really of "Vladimir Lenin, Karl Radek, Julius Martov, and Emma Goldman"?) Buidhe (talk) 02:39, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yes, the caricatures are correctly identified in the image's information. Beyond My Ken (talk) 03:36, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • A bit more information: a web search indicates that Gyan Books (the distributor) is either the parent of Facsimile Publisher, or vice versa. Their catalog doesn't jump out to me as being politically biased, but I know little about the culture and politics of India. The advertisement for Facsimile in the pamphlet says things like: "demand Any Rare Book", "Print & Publish: If you wish to get your book printed or published, we have the service for you", and "We offer customization of books as per the demand of the customer." This sounds very much ike a "publish on demand: operation, and lends credence to the supposition that the pamphlet's inclusion of modern antisemtic propaganda was done by someone else who then contracted with Facsimile/Gyan for printing and distribution. Beyond My Ken (talk) 03:46, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Another bit of strangeness, Gyan books has two versions of the pamphlet in their catalog, one called "Russia's Gravediggers -- which is the one I have -- and the other called "Gravediggers of Russia". [21] the later credits Eckart on the cover. Both are listed as "Print on demand", which I didn't notice before. Beyond My Ken (talk) 03:51, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and per Clpo13. Undelete in 2038. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 06:55, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Muhammadahmad79 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Please explain why images are public domain in Pakistan.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 04:25, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

All of these images are either pre Independence (before 1947) or of Independence 1947, These images were given to public domain status by the Pakistani Government when it passed the Law that any Photograph or any artwork older then 50 years will become part of public domain.
--Muhammadahmad79 (talk) 04:44, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Muhammadahmad79: Pakistan copyright law talks about 50 years after publication, not creation, so evidence of first publication more than 50 years ago must be provided. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 05:28, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 06:57, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Again, Egunkaria is not within the material covered by Berria.eus CC license: "Baldintza horiek ondoko salbuespenak dituzte: ez diete eragingo EFE eta Argazki Press agentzietatik datozen edukiei eta Euskal Editorea ez den beste enpresa batzuetatik datozenei." Patrick Rogel (talk) 08:46, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 09:56, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
  • And extracted image File:Velika Hrvatska (Hrvatski Domobran) (cropped).jpg
  • According to Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Argentina, the tags applied to this work are only for photographs, not newspapers. As collective works, newspapers are copyrighted for 70 years after the death of the last collaborator, which probably hasn't happened yet as the relevant paper was published in 1939. Buidhe (talk) 18:07, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • How does that gel with Intellectual Property in Argentina by Guillermo Cabanellas, which says, under the heading "Limitations or Exemptions to the Scope of Copyright Protection", (d) "News of general interest: Articles including such news, as part of a newspaper or periodical publication, may be used, transmitted or retransmitted. They may be published in their original version provided the source is mentioned."? See [22]. Peacemaker67 (talk) 02:33, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
      • I don't know how to interpret that because if newspapers did not have copyright on articles and anyone could reproduce them, I don't know how they would stay in business. But that refers specifically to articles and it wouldn't exempt a map from copyright, I think. Buidhe (talk) 03:23, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Weak delete I can't find anything in Argentine copyright law to suggest that all news articles are public domain. The relevant article, Article 28, sounds more like fair use than public domain. I also can't quite tell if the authors are anonymous (and the copyright would be held by the newspaper) or if they are not (and the authors would hold copyright). If it was anonymously published, copyright would have expired after 50 years in 1990, before the 1996 URAA date. Otherwise, we'd need to know the names and death dates of the various authors. Unfortunately, even if all the authors died as soon as it was published, the newspaper wouldn't be PD in time for the URAA date, so the file would be non-free in the US. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 00:08, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per discussion. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:47, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No publication date given. Unclear if this was published before 1949 as necessary to be PD, per {{PD-Czechoslovakia-anon}}. (Source is a 2002 book). Uploader has a history of copyvio. Buidhe (talk) 08:38, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep, this is clearly taken and published before World War II as can be inferred from the title translated into "Merger of SDP (Sudetenland Deutsche Partei) and NSDAP (Nazi Party)" meaning that it is PD since the annexation of the Sudetenland during the Appeasement era occurred in 1939 just before the War. As you can see by the Blutfahne and it's holder Jakob Grimminger, it is definitely before the war so it is I assume Public domain. PyroFloe (talk) 05:27, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted, no information about author or publication before 2002. Thuresson (talk) 02:54, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Deleted per nomination. Thuresson (talk) 03:01, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dead link. No publication that satisfies license conditions is indicated. Unclear copyright status. Buidhe (talk) 20:33, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by nomination. Thuresson (talk) 03:04, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dead link. No publication that satisfies license conditions is indicated. Unclear copyright status. Buidhe (talk) 20:33, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted per nomination. Thuresson (talk) 03:03, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]