User talk:RockyMasum

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to my talk page... To contact with me put message here... Very soon I hope to be able to answer ...


Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Graffiti at University of Rajshahi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:56, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! নির্মাণাধীন বঙ্গবন্ধু রেলওয়ে সেতু.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 09:11, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mad Max logo.png

[edit]

Hi, thanks for renaming the page, could you also remove the redirect? Thanks in advance. Aaaaaa123s (talk) 16:13, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Choto Sona Mosque - East South exposure.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:08, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Darasbari Mosque - front.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ratekreel 20:38, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wonton.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 08:13, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stones inside the Darasbari Mosque.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Georgfotoart 17:50, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:46, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:গ্রাফিতি - ভাতের হোটেল.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Syrus257 (talk) 11:11, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!

[edit]
2022 Picture of the Year: Great Cormorant (Phalacrocorax carbo), Little Egret (Egretta garzetta) and Gadwall (Mareca strepera) in Nepal.

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2023 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighteenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and top 5% of most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2022 Picture of the Year contest.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:03, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! গ্রাফিতি - সংস্কার (১).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:07, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Graffiti in Rajshahi after July revolution.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:15, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:গ্রাফিতি - ভাতের হোটেল.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! গ্রাফিতি - ভাতের হোটেল.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 07:13, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! গ্রাফিতি - দ্যা গ্রেট ওয়েভ ২৪.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --A. Öztas 18:17, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! গ্রাফিতি - ভাতের হোটেল - vater hotel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good picture, maybe you can add to the description what the graffiti says. --Plozessor 03:43, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Saint Martin (6).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Saint Martin (6).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wikimedia Photowalk Rajshahi Sep 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Georgfotoart 16:59, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cedric van der Gun file move

[edit]

I wish I should have noticed this earlier, I can confirm that the page move title you did a week ago was incorrect[1] since that person's name is not Cedric van der Sentry-Gun. Plus the user who requested that move seems to have their account locked due to long-term abuse. A bit of knowledge on Cedric van der Gun in case you didn't know who he is when you first noticed a request renaming a week ago. Iggy the Swan (talk) 15:48, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Iggy the Swan: Apparently, it seems okay to me that time. Anyway, thank you for pointing it out and informing me. Rocky Masum (talk) 05:20, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lamp post in Rajshahi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 10:44, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!

[edit]

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you previously voted in the Picture of the Year contest. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2023.

Round 2 will end at UTC.

Click here to vote now!

If you have already voted for Round 2, please ignore this message.


Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:14, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sumaiya Shimu.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Syrus257 (talk) 11:46, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]