Commons:Deletion requests/mobile tracking/archive/2014-23
Not "own work". From [1]. No information about the year it was taken, nor by whom. No information about publication history. Without such information, it's impossible to determine whether {{PD-Mongolia}} might apply. Since the photo shows an elderly, highly decorated man we really would need evidence that this is old enough to fulfill the criteria outlined at Commons:Copyright rules by territory#Mongolia. Lupo 05:47, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 09:41, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 06:30, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 12:18, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 06:31, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 12:18, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
Also:
- File:Me in cute yes or no 2014-05-27 15-04.jpg
- File:Init eh trip lang po haha? 2014-05-27 15-07.jpg
- File:Cno to me o ndi 2014-05-27 15-11.jpg
Out of COM:PS: Yes, of course you are cute but really sorry we don't store personal images. ~ Nahid Talk 07:09, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
- Delete all. Out of scope. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 02:36, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 09:40, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope as not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Storkk (talk) 08:42, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 02:02, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
Closed discussions from Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Minecraft
|
---|
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Minecraft 1.1 Title.png. File:Pioche okyn.png looks more complex than a Sundborn plate, and in a court ruling, the Supreme Court of Sweden ruled that it is likely that the plate is protected by copyright.
Stefan4 (talk) 16:14, 26 December 2012 (UTC) Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:34, 2 January 2013 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
These images seem to be out of scope. The tables are better done as a wikitable and the logo seems to be a personal logo of no use for people other than the artist.
Stefan4 (talk) 16:16, 26 December 2012 (UTC) Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:34, 2 January 2013 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Screenshots, figures, etc. from the game Minecraft, mostly all uploaded in 2013. Inumerous related deletion requests and discussions available and - as I could follow - the related files were all deleted, see also above. Reference-DR might be eventually Commons:Deletion requests/File:Minecraft 1.1 Title.png.
Gunnex (talk) 18:06, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 08:57, 5 August 2013 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Screenshots, figures, etc. from the game Minecraft, mostly all uploaded in 2014. Inumerous related deletion requests and discussions available and - as I could follow - the related files were all deleted, see also above. Reference-DR might be eventually Commons:Deletion requests/File:Minecraft 1.1 Title.png.
Gunnex (talk) 08:45, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. JurgenNL (talk) 07:37, 4 June 2014 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Various screenshots, logos and textures from Minecraft (which isn't freely licensed)
Lewis Hulbert (talk) 16:04, 25 August 2014 (UTC) Deleted: Deleted by INeverCry. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 11:08, 1 September 2014 (UTC) (non-admin closure) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Screenshots of a non-free video game, thus making these images non-free deriative works.
Lewis Hulbert (talk) 00:05, 1 October 2014 (UTC) This doesn't make sense to me. I understand that Minecraft is closed source so a general screenshot of landscape that was generated by the program or programmers would not be my work. But there are a huge number of photos of real buildings in the Wikimedia Commons. The person who took that photo of a building probably didn't build the building, they only took the photo. Isn't that "derivative" work? I made that Bitcoin icon myself with several hours of labor, and then I took the photos/screenshots. Two parts of the creative process were my own and that creative work would not exist without my significant efforts. Can the brick maker sue the architect for his "derivative" work? And then the architect sue the photographer for using their building in the photographic "derivative" work? If what I posted is illegal to post, then it shouldn't be, and we should fight stupid laws like that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Beatljuice (talk • contribs) 00:40, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
I agree that my analogy isn't perfect, but I think it's closer to accurate than yours James. Copies, or photos of architectural drawings would be more like copies or photos of computer code. A more accurate analogy would be if I went to Disneyland and built a tower out of foam blocks that are supplied by Disney and then took a picture of my creation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.164.208.15 (talk • contribs) 18:13, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
I'm not sure what you're saying I'm wrong about. I'm trying to come up with an analogy that we can agree on so that arguments can be made from some sort of common ground. I understand that legally there may be a problem. I don't claim to know international IP law (I live in the US). I do believe that if there are laws that restrict what I posted, then those laws should be changed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.164.208.15 (talk • contribs) 17:00, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Per Jim, derivative works from a copyrighted game artworks. --PierreSelim (talk) 06:11, 8 October 2014 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Various screenshots or textures from a non-free video game
Lewis Hulbert (talk) 05:30, 25 March 2015 (UTC) Deleted. INeverCry 02:40, 1 April 2015 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Screenshots, figures, etc. from the game Minecraft, mostly all uploaded 2015. Inumerous related deletion requests and discussions available and - as I could follow - the related files were all deleted, see also above.
Gunnex (talk) 16:02, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted. INeverCry 00:20, 7 June 2015 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Self-promotional logo uploads and artwork by non-notable individuals. Out of scope, and on top of that many are likely copyvios.
Lewis Hulbert (talk) 22:16, 3 July 2015 (UTC) Deleted: as per nom. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:32, 21 July 2015 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Yet another Minecraft batch deletion request. Screenshots and assets from a non-free video game.
Lewis Hulbert (talk) 13:58, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:31, 15 October 2015 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Screenshots and assets from a copyrighted video game. I wonder how many of these I'll actually have to make.
Lewis Hulbert (talk) 02:43, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:11, 1 December 2015 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Copyrighted video game screenshots, derivitave content or otherwise out of scope uploads.
Lewis Hulbert (talk) 11:39, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Daphne Lantier 21:18, 24 July 2017 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Screenshots of Minecraft, or derivative content using textures owned by Mojang.
Lewis Hulbert (talk) 15:29, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Daphne Lantier 21:19, 24 July 2017 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Copyright violations or out of scope uploads.
--Lewis Hulbert (talk) 02:05, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Daphne Lantier 21:20, 24 July 2017 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Copyright violations (including screenshots and derivative works) and out of scope uploads related to Minecraft. Copyright violations Out of scope Lewis Hulbert (talk) 15:37, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 18:30, 18 September 2017 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Previously {{copyvio|1=© Mojang Studios. The fact that they state that they are "quite relaxed about non-commercial things" is not enough per COM:Licensing – commercial reuse MUST be allowed for all files at Commons.}}, see User_talk:Herobrine303. The uploader removed the copyvio tag without starting a regular deletion request, so here we go. This is a derivative work of the original default Minecraft Steve player skin (the old one, before he got a shave, low-res version of the original image here). Similar or identical files have been deleted repeatedly in the past (CTRL+F Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Minecraft for "herobrine.png"), so I don't think {{PD-ineligible}} applies. --El Grafo (talk) 13:28, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
Procedural close: already deleted as noted above. Эlcobbola talk 20:55, 13 April 2021 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Minecraft[edit]These photos are of a Minecraft Papercraft Chess board. The artwork on all the pieces is from the game Minecraft (by Mojang AB) and Pixel Papercraft may also arguably hold some copyright in the chess designs. These photos seem to exceed COM:DM, as the only purpose/value in the photos is to showcase the copyrighted artwork (i.e. blacking out the copyrighted parts would mean blocking out basically the entire photo). COM:DM Sweden would apply since Mojang AB is a Swedish company, and from the few examples listed on that page, it seems Sweden may have even stricter laws than the U.S., making it more likely these are not de minimis.
IagoQnsi (talk) 00:01, 23 March 2023 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:14, 30 March 2023 (UTC) |
Files in Category:Minecraft
[edit]Unused, out of scope.
- File:1-18-ore-distribution.jpg
- File:11e législature de l'Assemblée Nationale de Minecraft.jpg
- File:13e législature de l'Assemblée Nationale de Minecraft.jpg
- File:14e législature de l'Assemblée Nationale de Minecraft.jpg
- File:Arettic flag.png
- File:Barako the Sunchief.jpg
- File:Dhow Ship.png
- File:EarthMC Logo.jpg
- File:EXPLICATIONZONE.png
- File:Legotorch.png
- File:MoistMeter.pdf
- File:Гарнизон "Бабочка".jpg
Leonel Sohns 15:13, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. I've tagged a few of these for speedy deletion as clear copyvios, and the rest I agree are out of scope. –IagoQnsi (talk) 02:11, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
- Four of these were speedy deleted as copyright violations. The remainder aren't screenshots, so weren't speedy deleted, though I do agree with the deletion nomination. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:31, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
- File:EXPLICATIONZONE.png is lacking a bit of an explanation, but it could hypothetically be used in some sort of expert guide on how to select a volume using commands. Not sure on that none. Delete all of the remaining ones as out of scope. Especially File:MoistMeter.pdf, which as far as I can tell is just made-up nonsense. --El Grafo (talk) 09:26, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:50, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 09:18, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 02:02, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
File:KAIF ANSARI-Director of Magic Touch Media & Entertainment Pvt Ltd- Mumbai 2014-05-07 08-49.jpg
[edit]Unused personal/promotional photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 09:22, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 07:39, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
Small size, no metadata, looks professionally shot. Doubtful uploader is copyright holder or can otherwise license this image. Storkk (talk) 09:30, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Per COM:PCP JurgenNL (talk) 07:40, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 09:39, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 02:01, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 09:40, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 02:01, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 09:58, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 02:00, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope as not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Storkk (talk) 10:09, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 02:00, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 10:09, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 01:59, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
No metadata, looks professionally shot. If uploader is copyright holder, they should confirm this by following the steps at COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 10:11, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 10:37, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 10:18, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 01:59, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
File:اسلم ولد سيد محمد هو تلميذ مجتهد وعبقري يدرس في مدرسة موريتانية تدعى التقوى وهو من أذكى التلاميذ في القسم 2014-05-07 16-03.jpg
[edit]Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 10:19, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 01:59, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 10:29, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
Out of context Luishecht (talk) 12:28, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 07:45, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
Watermarked "(C) Bruce Omori" - no indication that this is the uploader. Uploader - if you are Bruce Omori, please follow the instructions on COM:OTRS to confirm this. Storkk (talk) 10:30, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 07:46, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
File:Luiz Rangel foi pai aos 33 anos e tem como primogênito Luiz Rangel II 2014-05-27 07-16.jpg
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE, unusable private image. -- Túrelio (talk) 10:32, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 01:59, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by AbHiSHARMA143 (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:DW: Widely used stamp/photo. Uploader has no right to release under CC license. Note: I just tagged uploader's remaining one upload as copyvio
- File:नृसिंह भगवान हिरण्यकश्यप का उद्धार करते हुए 2014-05-17 23-24.jpg
- File:भक्त प्रह्लाद का राज्याभिषेक 2014-05-17 23-18.jpg
- File:ब्रह्मा 2014-05-17 13-51.jpg
~ Nahid Talk 05:41, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:15, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by AbHiSHARMA143 (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:DW: Definitely not uplodars own works as claimed. Probably the book covers fall under copyvio too but i'm not sure. If they fall under public domain then license should be changed.
- File:DurgaDasRanbanka.jpg
- File:DurgadasAndAjitSingh.jpg
- File:RudraCover.jpg
- File:LordBrahma143.jpg
- File:Siva with Parvati and Nandi Kangra style at Lahore.jpg
- File:Gitapress 2014-05-21 14-46.jpg
- File:SudamaCover 2014-05-20 16-06.jpg
~ Nahid Talk 10:38, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
File:RudraCover.jpg THIS IS MY OWN WORK OK!! I AM BRAHMAN AND I HAVE THIS BOOK CALLED RUDRASTADHYAYI IN MY HOME AND THE PHOTO WHO NOMINATED IS MY OWN CAMERA CLICK WITH MY PHONE GALAXY GRAND 2 WITH 8 MEGAPIXEL CAMERA... THIS IS NOT COPYRIGHT, REMOVE THE DELETION TAG FAAASSSTTT!!!!
AbHiSHARMA143 (talk) 06:26, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
- No use SHOUTING. Our hearing is fine, thank you, and so are our eyes.
- File:DurgaDasRanbanka.jpg: got speedied after the uploader had put a speedy tag on it. Looked modern, so I agree with the deletion.
- File:DurgadasAndAjitSingh.jpg: according to [2], this would be {{PD-Art}}. Keep.
- File:RudraCover.jpg: the image on the cover looks modern and is even signed in the bottom right, so this would be copyrighted. Needs at the very least a release to be sent via OTRS from the publisher from an "@gitapress.org" e-mail address. Absent such a release: Delete.
- File:LordBrahma143.jpg: copyvio per [3], no evidence of free license. Delete.
- File:Siva with Parvati and Nandi Kangra style at Lahore.jpg: according to [4] created AD 1855, therefore {{PD-Art}}. Keep.
- File:Gitapress 2014-05-21 14-46.jpg also needs a release via OTRS, otherwise Delete.
- File:SudamaCover 2014-05-20 16-06.jpg looks PD-ineligible to me, but I question its usefulness. I would also delete this.
- Lupo 16:25, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
- No use SHOUTING. Our hearing is fine, thank you, and so are our eyes.
Some kept, rest deleted -FASTILY 20:56, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by AbHiSHARMA143 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Derivative works of book covers. File:DurgaDasCover.jpg says it was published in 1915 and in 2011. The text may have been published in 1915, but this cover appears to be from the modern (2011) version. See here and numerous other sites. Floral pattern on left of File:Sudamacharit.jpg is well above ToO.
Эlcobbola talk 15:24, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
- Delete unless a release from the publisher is sent via COM:OTRS. Lupo 16:40, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
See Thiss [5]
Remove The Tag From My Photos!!
AbHiSHARMA143 (talk) 05:19, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 20:56, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 10:40, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 01:58, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 10:40, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 01:58, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
Photo of a photo. The subject (born 1924, died 1961) looks older than 25, so {{PD-Canada}} with its 1949 cutoff does not apply. Who was the photographer? From when is the photo? Lupo 11:02, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 09:46, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 12:27, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 01:57, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 10:29, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
Out of context Luishecht (talk) 12:28, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 07:45, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
The lack of description makes this image impossible to use. It also makes impossible to check whether there is any copyright infringement. BrightRaven (talk) 13:07, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 10:22, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
This Storm Sewer cover was created in 2007 by Demuth Flake http://be.net/demuth for the City of Toronto's Grounds For Art competition, Part of the Regent Park Reviitalization project. There were 3 other winners for other utility holes in Regent Park. See http://www.drainspotting.com/mirror/http/www.toronto.ca_80/culture/groundsforart/ http://www.canada.com/story.html?id=56175d7e-7a34-4000-82ef-b9bf9347407f https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DAoVKSbspUY
Not own work, please see here: https://www.google.com/search?q=sena+runa&tbm=isch&tbs=simg:CAQSkwEJOG5D863GtI8ahwELEKjU2AQaAAwLELCMpwgaYgpgCAMSKOcGuxTkBuMGrgq4FK0KuRTGEqsK2ySvI7QsnimaLIUulCnkI7gjkykaMB5xsreVk-WOWErJltGdLMCvUFS715HXDk0pFBujYY8o36wHONnywzARSSXNCrrYWiAEDAsQjq7-CBoKCggIARIE7nxMiAw&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi92NuapJTPAhXG1SwKHY4ZCRgQ2A4IGigB&biw=1920&bih=979#imgrc=kPkXc_EfhA7zmM%3A Cap1000 (talk) 16:18, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 22:24, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 13:52, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 01:56, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 13:56, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
Delete per nom. Although small numbers of personal photos are permitted for use on other wikis, this image is unused and does not possess any realistic educational uses. Green Giant (talk) 17:00, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 01:54, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
File:Имя при рождение- Иван Волощенко- Дата рождения- 9 декабря 2002г--Место рождения- Москва, Россия-Родители- Волощенко М 2014-05-08 00-41.jpg
[edit]Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 14:07, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 09:48, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
Minecraft screenshot. Minecraft's terms are not commons compatible, per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Minecraft_1.1_Title.png. Storkk (talk) 14:09, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
- Delete --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 02:32, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 07:52, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
Small size, no metadata, and previously published in B&W online. If uploader is copyright holder, please follow the steps at COM:OTRS to confirm. Storkk (talk) 14:27, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 07:52, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
missing information and permission; point of this file? will not be used in any article Lady Lotus (talk) 15:05, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 07:53, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 15:15, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 07:54, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 16:16, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, ~ Nahid Talk 11:06, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 16:16, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, ~ Nahid Talk 11:02, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
File:This is the logo of thunder hawk group owned by patni siddharth- Contact me for more on www-thunderhawkgroup-webs-com 2014-05-27 22-38.jpg
[edit]Out of COM:PS: Promotional logo ~ Nahid Talk 17:29, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope Captain-tucker (talk) 20:02, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
Out of COM:PS: unused personal photo ~ Nahid Talk 18:31, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, ~ Nahid Talk 10:51, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
langage/utility? Triton (talk) 20:53, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio/Out of Scope Captain-tucker (talk) 19:33, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
copyright of the cushion? Triton (talk) 20:54, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
- The relevant road sign is PD as a work of the Swedish Transport Agency. Fry1989 eh? 18:18, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion Krd 09:55, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused selfie of non-notable person (in Wikipedia-speak, no offence intended!); only contribution of the uploader. The only other contribution of this account across all WMF projects was to add that image to en:Google Maps Navigation, which got promptly reverted. Since then, the image and the account are unused. Lupo 22:36, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 14:52, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
Taken from USA TODAY: "1960 AP photo". Indeed, AP photo by Brian Calvert. Lupo 22:57, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 14:51, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work. First, looks like a crop from a larger photo (shoulder of someone standing to the right). Second lack of EXIF. Third, according to its URL, the image at http://www.nuestros-recuerdos.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/actores-et-antes-despues.jpg was uploaded in May 2013, at least two months before the upload at the Commons. The blog post using it is also from 2013-05-14.[6] Lupo 22:59, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 14:51, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work. Low res, no EXIF. Same photo also used at [7], from where it is sent with a last-modified header of "Sat, 23 Mar 2013 03:47:33 GMT"[8], more than four months before the upload here. Lupo 23:13, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 14:51, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
dark photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 01:56, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
- Delete It is not too dark. But how to use it? I cannot give an idea. If somebody can think up, how to use it, I am ready to keep the photo, but now this seems to me out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 11:48, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 02:25, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
COM:SCOPE: Used only in an article on the made-up game ONE NIL, which was speedily deleted. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:05, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 18:26, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope - private photo of non-notable individual Jackmcbarn (talk) 04:10, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 02:27, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 06:56, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 02:32, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
File:Imam Maulana adalah salah satu orang terkaya,tertampan,dan terkecil-imam sewaktu SD bersekolah di SD harapan 3 dan SMP harapan 1-Ayah Imam bernama suharman dan Ibunya Hamidah-Dia mempunyai negara bernama Indoh 2014-05-28 00-49.jpg
[edit]Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 06:58, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 02:33, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 06:58, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 02:34, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 07:00, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 02:37, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
File:Ye mera photo hai (Aashik Ali)-Aaj se mai es network me naya juda hu aur mai aaplogo ko thori bahoot jo bhi mere paass hai mai jaroor share karunga- Thank you wikipedia & -Thank you Ncell-- 2014-05-28 08-00.jpg
[edit]personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 07:03, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 02:38, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
File:介紹:-原名文培匡(Pilipe Man),號士多啤梨飯碗頭。性格:賤格、為了錢而跟別人交友、喜歡做狗、欺善怕惡、喜歡說自己的陰莖很長、為人十分暴力。外形特 2014-05-28 13-47.jpg
[edit]personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 07:03, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 02:39, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
Personal photo. Out of project scope. KDS444 (talk) 08:16, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 02:45, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
out of scope. personal photo. KDS444 (talk) 08:20, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 02:48, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 09:21, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:58, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
File:Jordan Kerzazi né le 14 décembre 1999 à Bordeaux est d'origine Algérien et Portugais- C'est un jeune délinquen complice avec Matthieu-B 2014-05-09 11-25.jpg
[edit]Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 10:08, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:03, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 10:11, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:26, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
File:Justin Rodriguez right now is thinking about the next burger he's going to eat- 2014-05-09 06-58.png
[edit]Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 10:13, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
Delete per nomination -Pete F (talk) 02:22, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:43, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 10:19, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
- Comment The photo can be categorized into identical twins, but it is small and has no metadata, so I consider copyright violation possible. Taivo (talk) 15:53, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
- Out of curiosity, what makes you think they are identical twins? Storkk (talk) 16:07, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
- They seemed to me so similar ... Taivo (talk) 09:13, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:46, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 10:26, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:47, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 10:26, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:47, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope. Looks like a photo of a photo. Currently unused, was previously used here. jonkerz ♠talk 12:29, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Ezarateesteban 18:14, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 12:55, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
- Delete I add for deletion File:Theo Kamushkin photographed in February 2014 2014-04-06 15-41.jpg due to same reason: unused personal photo, quality is quite bad. These are the user's last remaining uploads. Taivo (talk) 09:46, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope Captain-tucker (talk) 18:30, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
Files in Category:Erect human penis
[edit]Low resolution photos.
# | File | Type | Local uses | Global uses | Cats | Year | Size | OTRS | BIL |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
001 | 3D Human Penis Erected.png | png | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 800×600 | ||
002 | 3keazw5q4i1o.jpg | jpg | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 640×480 | ||
003 | 4 color.jpg | jpg | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 421×676 | ||
004 | 64 year old man with erection and cock cage | jpg | 1 | 0 | 4 | 2013 | 720×953 | ||
005 | A 64 year old 4.JPG | jpg | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 640×480 | ||
006 | A 64 year old 7.JPG | jpg | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2011 | 640×480 | ||
007 | A 64 year old 8.JPG | jpg | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2012 | 640×480 | ||
008 | A 64 year old 9.JPG | jpg | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2012 | 640×480 | ||
009 | A circumcised penis 2.JPG | jpg | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2011 | 640×480 | ||
010 | A circumcised penis.JPG | jpg | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 640×480 | ||
011 | A male cock.jpg | jpg | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2013 | 500×667 | ||
012 | Taric Alani Cum shot.jpg | jpg | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2007 | 800×531 | Yes | Yes |
013 | An Uncircumsized Male Penis.JPG | jpg | 0 | 0 | 7 | 2012 | 882×464 | ||
014 | Anus to glands.JPG | jpg | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2011 | 444×164 | ||
015 | Aufzeichnen 3.JPG | jpg | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 981×746 | ||
016 | Bangla boy penis 2.jpg | jpg | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 405×494 | ||
017 | Big Scrotum 2.jpg | jpg | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 591×788 | ||
018 | Blood vessels on penis.jpg | jpg | 0 | 14 | 3 | 2011 | 666×446 | ||
019 | Cap uncap.JPG | jpg | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 690×517 | ||
020 | Cock pump 1.jpg | jpg | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 958×718 | ||
021 | Cock pump 2.jpg | jpg | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 591×788 | ||
022 | Cock pump 3.jpg | jpg | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 958×718 | ||
023 | Cock pump 4.jpg | jpg | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 591×788 | ||
024 | Cock pump 5.jpg | jpg | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 958×718 | ||
025 | Cock pump.jpg | jpg | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 591×788 | ||
026 | Condom placement demonstration.ogv | ogv | 0 | 23 | 6 | 2009 | 880×532 | ||
027 | Cowpers Fluid 11-04.JPG | jpg | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 640×480 | Yes | |
028 | Curved penis 2 (satyr).jpg | jpg | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 496×461 | ||
029 | Dorsal Cut.jpg | jpg | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 267×196 | ||
030 | Dydoes.jpg | jpg | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2008 | 200×280 | Yes | |
031 | Eichel3.jpg | jpg | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2009 | 670×559 | ||
032 | Ejaculation-blondie.jpg | jpg | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2011 | 330×251 | ||
033 | Erect circumcised.jpg | jpg | 1 | 0 | 6 | 2013 | 424×278 | ||
034 | Erect full view0002.JPG | jpg | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 700×689 | ||
035 | Erect human penis and scrotum.jpg | jpg | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 1024×768 | ||
036 | Erect human penis and sperm.jpg | jpg | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 450×338 | ||
037 | Erect Micropenis Measuring 3 Inches.jpg | jpg | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 827×661 | ||
038 | Erect penis (human male | jpg | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 640×480 | ||
039 | Erect penis (human | jpg | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 600×800 | ||
040 | Erect penis (untrimmed pubic hair).jpg | jpg | 2 | 0 | 4 | 2014 | 934×667 | ||
041 | Erect Penis and Testicles.jpg | jpg | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 644×524 | ||
042 | Erect penis of human.jpg | jpg | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 1024×768 | ||
043 | Erect penis uncut.jpg | jpg | 1 | 17 | 4 | 2009 | 883×800 | Yes | |
044 | Erect Penis with 8 gauge circular barbell through a Prince Albert.jpg | jpg | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2013 | 500×833 | ||
045 | Erect penis with high angle.jpg | jpg | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 394×716 | ||
046 | Erect phimosis.jpg | jpg | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 800×600 | Yes | |
047 | Erect shaved human penis.jpg | jpg | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 640×480 | ||
048 | Erected penis -.jpg | jpg | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 575×810 | ||
049 | Erected penis penile raphe.png | png | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2007 | 800×600 | ||
050 | Erected penis.jpg | jpg | 0 | 2 | 3 | 2006 | 800×600 | Yes | |
051 | Erectf60141.jpg | jpg | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2009 | 480×480 | ||
052 | Erection Pénis.jpg | jpg | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 632×435 | ||
053 | Erektion.jpeg | jpeg | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 599×359 | ||
054 | Flaccid and erect human penises in comparison.JPG | jpg | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 581×701 | ||
055 | Frenulum 01.jpg | jpg | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 1024×768 | ||
056 | Frenulumretained-circumcised.jpg | jpg | 0 | 4 | 5 | 2013 | 883×966 | ||
057 | Full genitals of male..jpg | jpg | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 600×800 | ||
058 | Glans 01.jpg | jpg | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 810×640 | ||
059 | Hairy body trimmed pubic hair0001.jpg | jpg | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 479×452 | ||
060 | Human anatomy Penis erected.jpg | jpg | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 658×636 | ||
061 | Human penis in erect state.jpg | jpg | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 1024×768 | ||
062 | Hypospadias erection.JPG | jpg | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 714×951 | ||
063 | Japanese man.jpg | jpg | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 1024×768 | ||
064 | Kopie von IMAG0237 03.JPG | jpg | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2012 | 1024×768 | ||
065 | KÉP 004.jpg | jpg | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 640×480 | ||
066 | Maestrullli.jpg | jpg | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 640×480 | ||
067 | Male erection.jpg | jpg | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 640×480 | ||
068 | Masturbation von Ultra00.MTS.OGG | ogg | 0 | 0 | 5 | 2011 | 483×272 | ||
069 | Micropenis Jack Morley 3 Inch Erection.jpg | jpg | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 1024×768 | ||
070 | Morning Wood - Flickr - stnu.jpg | jpg | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 683×1024 | ||
071 | My dick in 2007 - Flickr - stnu.jpg | jpg | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 600×800 | ||
072 | My erect penis 02.JPG | jpg | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 640×480 | ||
073 | My penis 3.jpg | jpg | 2 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 1041×926 | ||
074 | Oily penis.jpeg | jpeg | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 615×820 | ||
075 | Penile Subincision.jpg | jpg | 1 | 0 | 5 | 2013 | 480×640 | ||
076 | Penis 013 edited.jpg | jpg | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 513×759 | ||
077 | Penis 2014-03-17 16-10.jpg | jpg | 1 | 0 | 4 | 2014 | 319×454 | ||
078 | Penis circoncis en erection.JPG | jpg | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 398×724 | ||
079 | Penis closeup00.JPG | jpg | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 768×1024 | ||
080 | Penis closeup01.JPG | jpg | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 608×947 | ||
081 | Penis closeup02.JPG | jpg | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 759×770 | ||
082 | Penis closeup06.JPG | jpg | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 523×985 | ||
083 | Penis enlarger.jpg | jpg | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2012 | 420×363 | ||
084 | Penis erection glans 1.jpg | jpg | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 845×1024 | Yes | |
085 | Penis Size | jpeg | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 960×552 | ||
086 | Penis with vitiligo.jpg | jpg | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2008 | 640×480 | ||
087 | Penisdaysurgery.jpg | jpg | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2012 | 2048×1536 | ||
088 | Penise.jpg | jpg | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 384×512 | ||
089 | Penisincockring.jpg | jpg | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2010 | 900×675 | Yes | |
090 | Phimose.jpg | jpg | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2007 | 1024×297 | ||
091 | Pre-ejaculate.jpg | jpg | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 261×232 | ||
092 | Pre-ejaculation.jpg | jpg | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 384×512 | ||
093 | Prince albert pierced penis.jpg | jpg | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 1024×768 | ||
094 | Prince Albert Piercing e Hafada piercing (6).tiff | tiff | 0 | 0 | 6 | 2012 | 640×480 | ||
095 | Prince Closeup.jpg | jpg | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 800×532 | ||
096 | Process of penile erection.png | png | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 728×583 | ||
097 | Putting on a Condom.ogv | ogv | 0 | 0 | 6 | 2011 | 320×240 | ||
098 | Pénis en érection 4.jpg | jpg | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 600×450 | ||
099 | Samenerguss.gif | gif | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 720×576 | ||
100 | Semi Erected asian penis.JPG | jpg | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 480×548 | ||
101 | Snapshot 20131022 1.PNG | png | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 640×480 | ||
102 | Snapshot 20131022.PNG | png | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 640×480 | ||
103 | Steifer Penis.JPG | jpg | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 1024×768 | ||
104 | Storstake.jpg | jpg | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 700×508 | ||
105 | Strøm 001.jpg | jpg | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 640×480 | ||
106 | Superficial dorsal vein of penis.jpg | jpg | 0 | 7 | 3 | 2011 | 685×915 | ||
107 | Superficial dorsal vein of the penis (erect).png | png | 0 | 3 | 2 | 2008 | 705×914 | ||
108 | This is me - Flickr - stnu.jpg | jpg | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 683×1024 | ||
109 | Uncut erected penis foreskin retracted-2.jpg | jpg | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 455×383 | ||
110 | Very large penis.jpg | jpg | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 598×800 | ||
111 | Waynecuba.jpg | jpg | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 600×412 | ||
112 | Wear a condom and ejaculation after Orgasm.JPG | jpg | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 800×390 | ||
113 | Yo2.JPG | jpg | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 614×461 | ||
114 | 勃起.jpg | jpg | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 271×408 | ||
115 | Full view ready for reproduction.JPG | jpg | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 686×700 |
Btmpnr01 (talk) 14:52, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
- Rather than duplicating information, I have updated the original list of files above with a wikitable including information about usage. Feel free to break this out as a separate table if there is a need to do so. Files on the MediaWiki "bad image list" have been marked out, this means they have previously been subject to extensive review and discussion, and are in use as educational images even if their content may be highly sexual in nature. --Fæ (talk) 14:04, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
- Keep - That an image is low resolution is not in of itself a reason for deletion. While I expect some of these files could and should be deleted, such a mass DR is not the correct method. -mattbuck (Talk) 17:21, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
- I thought that I read Please note that low-quality images with no realistic educational use nor a purpose within the Wikimedia projects may be deleted. For further information, see Commons:Nudity. in some categories with {{Commons nudity (category header)}} and Commons:Nudity#Images better than existing images at Commons:Nudity, and I thought these files match that criteria, but also I lost my glasses, I may not reading the screen well. So sorry, it won't happen again. --Btmpnr01 (talk) 21:33, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
- You're correct on that front, but a mass DR is not an appropriate way to do this IMO. Because people will no doubt think "image X is ok, but image Y should be deleted", the closing admin will be left with having to work out a confusion of comments and is likely to get things wrong because of that. Some of those photos (I'm at work, so can't look now, but I did check previously) are to me decent quality. Image resolution is one aspect of quality, but it's not the be-all and end-all. A 100 megapixel image can be bad quality - blurred, overexposed, etc - while a 0.1 megapixel image can be excellently lit and sharp. -mattbuck (Talk) 14:53, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
- I thought that I read Please note that low-quality images with no realistic educational use nor a purpose within the Wikimedia projects may be deleted. For further information, see Commons:Nudity. in some categories with {{Commons nudity (category header)}} and Commons:Nudity#Images better than existing images at Commons:Nudity, and I thought these files match that criteria, but also I lost my glasses, I may not reading the screen well. So sorry, it won't happen again. --Btmpnr01 (talk) 21:33, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
- Delete No realistic educational purpose (just sole look-at-my-dick-images, just look at this or that. --Yikrazuul (talk) 13:43, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
- Keep per Mattbuck. This haphazard collection of images, apparently selected by resolution using VFC and due to their content including nudity (though some do not), is not based on policy. Many of these images are in use (e.g. this file is in use on over 20 different Wikimedia projects), and so by default must not be deleted by a Commons administrator unless a further issue of copyright or similar policy based rationale is forthcoming. Some of the images even have verified OTRS tickets relating to them, giving a high confidence as to copyright status for re-users and increasing their value to this project for that reason. If an interested contributor were to systematically identify selfies (by adding them to that category), that were not in use on any projects, with no apparent educational value and raise a new DR on that basis, this would be helpful and far more likely to result in out of scope files being removed. --Fæ (talk) 19:29, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
Kept per discussion. Some of the files are in use, some of them have been uploaded years ago and may have been in use or may be in external use. Some of them may be unnecessary, though, but this would need individual review and should be addressed in smaller deletion requests. --Krd 14:18, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 15:15, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 16:19, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 18:11, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
- Delete: Heavily-compressed JPEG version of existing SVG. Misleading name. Illegitimate Barrister 23:52, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 10:20, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
Seems to a derivative work of a copyrighted iamge [9] Redtigerxyz (talk) 18:32, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
- Delete as Copyvio. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 16:25, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 10:19, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
Image of a non-notable person. Serves no educational purpose. —Bill william comptonTalk 18:40, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 10:19, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
The artist, Alex Grey, is living. There is no evidence of permission for this use. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:20, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, by Fastily due to copyright violation. OTRS-permission from artist is needed. Taivo (talk) 11:40, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope: Commons is no private photo album; the educational value of this file is highly doubtful as long as it is not used on any Wikimedia project or on the uploader's userpage High Contrast (talk) 20:04, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope Captain-tucker (talk) 11:09, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope: Commons is no private photo album; the educational value of this file is highly doubtful as long as it is not used on any Wikimedia project or on the uploader's userpage High Contrast (talk) 20:04, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope Captain-tucker (talk) 11:09, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
What's this? Useless. Lupo 21:14, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope Captain-tucker (talk) 11:05, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
sexually explicit Thepoliticalmaster (talk) 13:23, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
- Comment: Commons is not censored. This is no valid reason to delete. -- RE rillke questions? 13:33, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
- Delete I agree with Rillke, the fact that it is explicit is no reason to delete. However, I see no educational use for the file and it is not used on any wiki. Seems more like the uploader got a kick out of putting a naked picture of themselves online. MacMed (talk) 17:06, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
- They are low res, blurred, and the exif is somewhat weird... What is this, cell phone images? I thought they could be stills from a video, but they may be legit after all.-- Darwin Ahoy! 17:17, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
- Delete - Out of scope. I agree with MacMed. - Taketa (talk) 19:21, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
- Keep because of the deletion rationale Thepoliticalmaster gave. And: please show me a broad set of pictures of the same setting/objects for replacement. --Saibo (Δ) 22:04, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
- Delete - Out of scope. No educational use for the file. --Hold and wave (talk) 19:59, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Again a useless self-made photo with no educational scope. --Yikrazuul (talk) 16:18, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
Kept: Pornographic content is not a reason for deletion. Human sexuality is a valid topic of educational enquiry. I accept this is a truly, truly awful photo, but we really don't have anything similar which is better. If we had a range of images showing anal toy use in high resolution that are in focus I would happily delete this - I'm all for getting rid of bad images when we have suitable replacements - but we don't. -mattbuck (Talk) 02:16, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
Delete Bad quality. Same User has uploaded File:Anal3.jpg That photo shows the same action in better quality. Gegensystem (talk) 16:13, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
- Keep - per my previous closure, and I really would not call File:Anal3.jpg "better" quality. -mattbuck (Talk) 16:21, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
- Delete As per nominator. --Hold and wave (talk) 20:39, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
- Please explain in what manner File:Anal3.jpg is a better image. -mattbuck (Talk) 22:18, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
- Keep As not per nominator. -- /人◕ ‿‿ ◕人\ 苦情処理係 20:46, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
- Keep unique photo. Not similar to the replacement proposed by the OP. --Saibo (Δ) 01:34, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted - not educational usefull, so out of scope, as has been pointed out by sufficient users in the first DR - nudism is by itself not a reason to delete a file, but also isn't by itself a reason to keep like some seem to think - Jcb (talk) 13:58, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
And here it is: Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests#File:Anal_2.jpg --Saibo (Δ) 16:26, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
I believe COM:NOT#Commons is not your personal free web host and COM:PORN are what are required here. This is not used on any Wikimedia project, and it most certainly does not have any educational value. The uploader Xuri (talk · contribs) has only ever contributed photographs of himself inserting a sexual toy into himself, which is most definitely a case of COM:PORN. Just because it's freely licensed and there are no other photographs does not mean this image (and its brethren) need to be retained. —Ryūlóng (竜龙) 06:48, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
- Comment: I am personally requesting that User:mattbuck recuse himself from this debate, and the other debates I started on similar files, as he has closed every single one of them and none of those closures are in any way appropriate, in my opinion.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 06:54, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
- I won't close it, but you will not stop me participating in the debate. Keep per my previous closure. -mattbuck (Talk) 07:19, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
- Delete As stated before and the deciding admin: not educational usefull. --Yikrazuul (talk) 18:11, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
- Comment - this was undeleted 2 days ago. -mattbuck (Talk) 18:36, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
- I doubt it should have.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 20:42, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
- No comment - censorship raid. "You may wish to restate your arguments as to why the Commons should no longer host these exhibitionist photographs." Ryulong. If somebody wants to delete it: have good arguments. --Saibo (Δ) 19:21, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
- This is not a censorship raid. This is a low quality photo that has no possible educational use. And I am merely notifying a user who has had opinions on these photos that I have relisted them for deletion, when he originally proposed them. There is nothing wrong about that.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 20:42, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
- Low quality doesn't make it useless. The quality is still good enough to use it in educational context. Therefore i can't see any valid reason why this file should be deleted. Keep -- /人◕ ‿‿ ◕人\ 苦情処理係 22:28, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
- What is the educational context exactly?—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 23:45, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
- As explained to you ad nauseam elsewhere, human sexuality is a valid educational pursuit, including the use of anal toys. I hope I will be able to upload high quality photos of it in the new year... I'm guessing you'll tell me those should be deleted too. -mattbuck (Talk) 06:39, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
- What is the educational context exactly?—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 23:45, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
- Low quality doesn't make it useless. The quality is still good enough to use it in educational context. Therefore i can't see any valid reason why this file should be deleted. Keep -- /人◕ ‿‿ ◕人\ 苦情処理係 22:28, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
- This is not a censorship raid. This is a low quality photo that has no possible educational use. And I am merely notifying a user who has had opinions on these photos that I have relisted them for deletion, when he originally proposed them. There is nothing wrong about that.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 20:42, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
- REQUEST - how about we merge the DRs for this, File:Anal 3.jpg, File:Anal2.jpg and File:Anal3.jpg. They're pretty much the same and the same arguments will emerge for all. -mattbuck (Talk) 06:39, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Image is out of the Commons project scope. There is no realistic educational value in keeping this image. Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 04:11, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- Do you actually read others' statements. I refer you to my previous closure...
- Pornographic content is not a reason for deletion. Human sexuality is a valid topic of educational enquiry. I accept this is a truly, truly awful photo, but we really don't have anything similar which is better. If we had a range of images showing anal toy use in high resolution that are in focus I would happily delete this - I'm all for getting rid of bad images when we have suitable replacements - but we don't.
- -mattbuck (Talk) 07:34, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- The lack of a suitable replacement is not a good enough reason when the photos don't fall within the scope in the first place.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 20:50, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- If something may be usable in educational context it is very well in scope. This picture can _definetly_ be used in educational context. You should just stop to play stupid and innocent. It doesn't help the project. -- /人◕ ‿‿ ◕人\ 苦情処理係 02:38, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
- I believe Ottava Rima makes a good point on one of the other debates. There is no proof that this is educational. There is only a hypothesis that it could be educational.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 04:22, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
- Please stop the trolling. Proof it that this picture (clicked on random) has educational value. Then we might talk. -- /人◕ ‿‿ ◕人\ 苦情処理係 14:10, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
- It's a photograph of the interior of the European Parliament which is in use on several language projects to depict the European Parliament. Again, it's being used which means it meets the scope of the project.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 02:40, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
- I did not ask if this image is in scope! I asked you to proof that it is educational. That an image is inside an article is not a proof, at least not such a proof that you requested inside your previous comment. So I am waiting for you to proof it. Alternatively you could withdraw your blatant statement, if you think that the Picture of the Parliament has educational value, while not beeing able to proof it. ;-) -- /人◕ ‿‿ ◕人\ 苦情処理係 04:33, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
- Feasibly someone wants to know what the inside of the European Parliament looks like because the Wikipedia projects cover the subject of the European Parliament. And all of the photos on the articles on dildos are of the objects not in use. There is no educational value in showing that someone has inserted the object into himself or herself because most of the projects don't teach usage as these photos intend to depict.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 08:15, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
- This is really funny. Now you claim that only images used inside articles would have any value and you speak about "most projects". No proof here and a single project would be enough. I see only rage against "offending content", vague argumentation attempts and but nothing that would speak for a deletion in itself. Have a nice christmas, I'm out of this unnecessary conversation which is below any threshold. -- /人◕ ‿‿ ◕人\ 苦情処理係 17:43, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
- I'd just like to comment here that we don't even require that one project be able to use it: Wikimedia projects are not the entirety of education, and we have certain practices which may discourage the use of images like these, whereas in the wider world they would be more useful. I've had people use my flickr photos for things where they would simply never be used on Wikimedia projects. -mattbuck (Talk) 19:04, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- This is really funny. Now you claim that only images used inside articles would have any value and you speak about "most projects". No proof here and a single project would be enough. I see only rage against "offending content", vague argumentation attempts and but nothing that would speak for a deletion in itself. Have a nice christmas, I'm out of this unnecessary conversation which is below any threshold. -- /人◕ ‿‿ ◕人\ 苦情処理係 17:43, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
- Feasibly someone wants to know what the inside of the European Parliament looks like because the Wikipedia projects cover the subject of the European Parliament. And all of the photos on the articles on dildos are of the objects not in use. There is no educational value in showing that someone has inserted the object into himself or herself because most of the projects don't teach usage as these photos intend to depict.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 08:15, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
- I did not ask if this image is in scope! I asked you to proof that it is educational. That an image is inside an article is not a proof, at least not such a proof that you requested inside your previous comment. So I am waiting for you to proof it. Alternatively you could withdraw your blatant statement, if you think that the Picture of the Parliament has educational value, while not beeing able to proof it. ;-) -- /人◕ ‿‿ ◕人\ 苦情処理係 04:33, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
- It's a photograph of the interior of the European Parliament which is in use on several language projects to depict the European Parliament. Again, it's being used which means it meets the scope of the project.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 02:40, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
- Please stop the trolling. Proof it that this picture (clicked on random) has educational value. Then we might talk. -- /人◕ ‿‿ ◕人\ 苦情処理係 14:10, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
- I believe Ottava Rima makes a good point on one of the other debates. There is no proof that this is educational. There is only a hypothesis that it could be educational.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 04:22, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
- If something may be usable in educational context it is very well in scope. This picture can _definetly_ be used in educational context. You should just stop to play stupid and innocent. It doesn't help the project. -- /人◕ ‿‿ ◕人\ 苦情処理係 02:38, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
- The lack of a suitable replacement is not a good enough reason when the photos don't fall within the scope in the first place.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 20:50, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- Do you actually read others' statements. I refer you to my previous closure...
- Keep, agree with analysis by Niabot, and Mattbuck, above. -- Cirt (talk) 00:26, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
Deleted as per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Anal 3.jpg russavia (talk) 16:16, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope Gbawden (talk) 06:48, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - low quality. -mattbuck (Talk) 16:37, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:43, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Reduntant. Image of the same object is here (better focused to penis). Kulmalukko (talk) 21:35, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 05:16, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
typical selfshot exhibitionist bad quality out of project scope penis image. Marcus Cyron (talk) 20:23, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:26, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
Low quality penis photo. -mattbuck (Talk) 17:13, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, give us this day our daily penises ... Taivo (talk) 13:20, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
out of scope Gbawden (talk) 06:50, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
- Keep - unlike the user's other photos, this one seems to be a decent photo. -mattbuck (Talk) 16:37, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
kept: Natuur12 (talk) 18:44, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 08:16, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Mediocre quality penis selfie, not useful photo of very common object which Commons already has many better quality illustrations. (Note: Different photo than earlier deletion of same name). --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:21, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
COM:PENIS BrightRaven (talk) 10:03, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, very poor quality orphan own penis snapshot -- Infrogmation (talk) 12:28, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
out of project scope Taivo (talk) 09:19, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, by Denniss. Taivo (talk) 12:14, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
out of scope Gbawden (talk) 06:50, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 14:20, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:46, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
This image is of much too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose. It's out of project scope. Ies (talk) 16:33, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
deleted: --Krd 06:42, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 08:16, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:21, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
I fail to see how this photo is relevant. Please remove it. JimHolland (talk) 04:43, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
I also agree with this one. Please remove. Ellen Rovesana
- Delete Pornography. Jahoe (talk) 10:11, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete, not the best quality. -- Cirt (talk) 04:04, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:08, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
COM:PENIS BrightRaven (talk) 10:04, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted. Uselessly bad quality own penis snapshot. -- Infrogmation (talk) 12:29, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
out of scope Gbawden (talk) 06:50, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - low quality. -mattbuck (Talk) 16:36, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
deteted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:49, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
out of scope Gbawden (talk) 06:50, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:24, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
I fail to see how this photo is relevant. Please remove it. JimHolland (talk) 04:41, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
I agree as well. This should be removed as soon as possible. Ellen Rovesana
Ewww! RoloBeard5
- Delete Pornography. Jahoe (talk) 10:10, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete, not the best quality here. -- Cirt (talk) 04:05, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete I don't know what's going on with puppets here, but we do have high quality pictures for this and don't need this one.--Prosfilaes (talk) 01:44, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:08, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
out of scope Gbawden (talk) 06:50, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - low quality. -mattbuck (Talk) 16:36, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 10:11, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
I fail to see how this photo is relevant. Please remove it. JimHolland (talk) 04:47, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
Please remove this one too. No one needs to see this. Ellen Rovesana
Why?? RoloBeard5
- Delete Pornography. Jahoe (talk) 10:12, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete, not the highest quality here. -- Cirt (talk) 04:05, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:08, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
out of scope Gbawden (talk) 06:50, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - low quality. -mattbuck (Talk) 16:37, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:50, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
out of scope Gbawden (talk) 06:51, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:25, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
out of scope Gbawden (talk) 06:51, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:25, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rajput Bus Service (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:PS: Personal promo, no educational value at all
- File:Hi Fi deep 2014-05-29 14-03.JPG
- File:Rajput Bus Service 2014-05-29 14-01.jpg
- File:Deepak Rajput (Rajput Bus Service) 2014-05-29 13-59.JPG
- File:Deep & Pari beta 2014-05-29 16-38.jpg
- File:Pari beta 2014-05-29 16-24.jpg
~ Nahid Talk 09:38, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:25, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rajput Bus Service (talk · contribs)
[edit]unused and uncategorised files. Two of them are thumbnails
Estopedist1 (talk) 20:35, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Fitindia (talk) 09:34, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
out of project scope Krd 12:15, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 09:28, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
out of project scope Krd 12:15, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 09:28, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
out of project scope Krd 12:15, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 09:29, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 12:38, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 09:29, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of scope. Also lacking source information. Storkk (talk) 13:30, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:44, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused test file. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:52, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 21:09, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 14:20, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope Captain-tucker (talk) 19:43, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 14:25, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope Captain-tucker (talk) 19:43, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 14:29, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 09:37, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope Ies (talk) 14:30, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 09:38, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope Ies (talk) 14:30, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 09:38, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope Ies (talk) 14:31, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 09:39, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope Ies (talk) 14:31, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 09:39, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope Ies (talk) 14:32, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 09:39, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope Ies (talk) 14:32, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 09:39, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope Ies (talk) 14:33, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 09:39, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope Ies (talk) 14:33, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 09:39, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope Ies (talk) 14:34, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 09:42, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope Ies (talk) 14:35, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 09:42, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope Ies (talk) 14:35, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 09:42, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope Ies (talk) 14:36, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 09:43, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope Ies (talk) 14:36, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 09:43, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope Ies (talk) 14:37, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 09:43, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:29, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope Ies (talk) 14:38, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:29, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope Ies (talk) 14:38, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:45, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope Ies (talk) 14:39, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:45, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope Ies (talk) 14:39, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:45, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope Ies (talk) 14:40, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:45, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope Ies (talk) 14:42, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope Captain-tucker (talk) 19:53, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 14:47, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
Keep Keeping this image makes sense. It is a very likely 1970s photograph of a black woman with Afro-style-hair. We do not have so much of those kind. --High Contrast (talk) 14:54, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
- Comment What's the copyright status on this though? I doubt the claim of own work. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 15:28, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio, looks like a professional yearbook photo Captain-tucker (talk) 19:55, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 14:48, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope Captain-tucker (talk) 19:55, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 14:48, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope Captain-tucker (talk) 20:02, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
File:Murder for hirer in Detroit- Shawn Bagley is a suspectin over 4 murder across Detroit- 2014-05-29 10-51.jpeg
[edit]Out of scope Lewis Hulbert (talk) 15:04, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope Captain-tucker (talk) 20:06, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
Low quality private child image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 16:31, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 21:08, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused, personal picture(s), out of Project Scope. Amitie 10g (talk) 18:53, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:49, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
File:Ambre Stone de son vrai nom Ambre Chambrier est née le 15 Janvier 2000, une humoriste qui débuta avec son premier sketch "Le chien" nous la retrouvons dans un rôle principal dans la série WATA qui interpr 2014-05-29 19-41.jpg
[edit]Unused, personal picture(s), out of Project Scope. Amitie 10g (talk) 18:55, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:50, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Merihtarim (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused, personal picture(s), out of Project Scope.
- File:Merih Tarımm 2014-05-30 00-55.jpg
- File:Merih Tarım 2014-05-30 00-54.jpg
- File:Merih Tarım- 2014-05-30 00-53.jpg
Amitie 10g (talk) 02:41, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:33, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
Copyvio http://crosbylover.tumblr.com/post/85971806445/ray-shero-youre-a-penguin-for-life-in-my-heart or http://lazy18geno71.tumblr.com/ Supertoff (talk) 05:59, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Already deleted by Fastily --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 10:03, 2 June 2014 (UTC) (non-admin closure)
Copyvio http://www.lapresse.ca/sports/hockey/201405/16/01-4767298-les-penguins-congedient-leur-dg-ray-shero.php Supertoff (talk) 06:01, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Already deleted by Fastily --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 09:57, 2 June 2014 (UTC) (non-admin closure)
copyvio http://www.lapagesportive.com/mario-lemieux-se-vide-le-coeur/ Supertoff (talk) 06:14, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Already deleted by Fastily --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 09:56, 2 June 2014 (UTC) (non-admin closure)
Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 07:20, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:56, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 07:21, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:56, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
Small size, no metadata and text overlay make the assertion of {{Own}} dubious. If uploader is copyright holder, the steps on COM:OTRS should be followed to confirm this. Storkk (talk) 09:00, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 08:47, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Photograph of a (dirty) screen - unlikely to be {{Own}} except as a derivative work of the original. Additionally, there are scope issues. Storkk (talk) 09:18, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Why would anybody take a photo of Google Image results? Not too sure about the copyright status of it (simple text, but a lot of it) but since it's out of scope it's nothing worth thinking about. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 11:21, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 08:53, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 12:16, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:47, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 12:18, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:47, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 12:23, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 08:47, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 12:37, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 08:46, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Copyvio, photo has embedded text: walkingistanbul.com. http://www.walkingistanbul.com/EserDetay.aspx?mk=249. Sayginer (talk) 12:41, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 08:46, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 12:43, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 08:48, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
File:Sawirka Aad Ujeedaan waa Ninka Lagu magacaabo Mohamed Ali Nuur (Mohamed Sadiiq) Facebook Name ^ Šúpéŕ Bôý Šôm Šťăř ^ KuDhashay Muqdisho, Somalia 2014-05-12 08-58.jpeg
[edit]Unused personal photo, not realistically useful for an educational purpose - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 12:47, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 08:47, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 12:57, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 08:46, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
File:Michael Hill is the definition of awesome and fun- And he loves people and doesn't care if u don't like him- 2014-05-11 15-11.jpg
[edit]Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 12:57, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 08:46, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 13:48, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:45, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:41, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:35, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
This image is of much too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose. It's out of project scope. Ies (talk) 16:40, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:40, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
This image is of much too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose. It's out of project scope. Ies (talk) 16:40, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:40, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
copyvio http://bleacherreport.com/articles/920848-san-jose-sharks-five-worst-decisions-of-doug-wilsons-career Supertoff (talk) 21:18, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:45, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
copyvio http://www.sportsmemorabilia.com/player/Ruslan_Fedotenko Supertoff (talk) 21:19, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:45, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
copyvio http://www.zimbio.com/photos/Evgeni+Malkin/Stanley+Cup+Finals+Pittsburgh+Penguins+v+Detroit/iC4Bzz5lUNk Supertoff (talk) 21:22, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:46, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
copyvio http://www.zimbio.com/photos/Brooks+Orpik/Stanley+Cup+Finals+Pittsburgh+Penguins+v+Detroit/PrDfNUfQg7n Supertoff (talk) 21:23, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:46, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
not own work, copied from here https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=859229197424609&id=743099239037606&set=a.743125645701632.1073741828.743099239037606&source=46&refid=17 Vigyani (talk) 22:51, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:47, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused, personal picture(s), out of Project Scope. Used in article tagged for Speede Delete at es:Wikipedia. Amitie 10g (talk) 03:46, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 20:20, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused, personal picture(s), out of Project Scope. Amitie 10g (talk) 03:48, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 20:21, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
Probably not own work, seeing the user's history.
Yann (talk) 04:52, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
- I agree with Yann. Probably not own work for this two pics. Not only because of the user's history but these pics are from the same series : player with Stanley Cup in hands. (Check the previous deleted files). Supertoff (talk) 05:08, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Low resolution files, uploader with a copyvio history. Dereckson (talk) 00:12, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
Low quality private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 08:30, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, Out of COM:PS. ~ Nahid Talk 06:41, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
Low quality private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 08:30, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, ~ Nahid Talk 06:44, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
Low quality private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 08:31, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, Out of COM:PS. ~ Nahid Talk 06:46, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
Private image collection, not educationally useful — Racconish ✉ 09:56, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope Julo (talk) 12:52, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
Private image collection, not educationally useful — Racconish ✉ 09:57, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope Julo (talk) 12:53, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
File:-Simon Fischer--Klubb- Vallentuna BK-Tröjnummer- 49-Ålder-12-Kontaktad av- Real Madrid 2014-05-23 21-05.jpg
[edit]Private image collection, not educationally useful — Racconish ✉ 10:00, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, Out of COM:PS ~ Nahid Talk 06:52, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
Private image collection, not educationally useful — Racconish ✉ 10:01, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 20:23, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 10:42, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:31, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 10:43, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:26, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 10:43, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:26, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 10:44, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:26, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jin Yin Wang (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal images. All claim to be own work, but subject is in image and they do not appear to be selfies. I have speedy deleted a larger number of similar images which had an explicit watermark. Probably violate COM:ADVERT.
- File:My chinese class 2014-05-31 12-51.jpg
- File:My dear students 2014-05-31 12-50.jpg
- File:My chinese class! 2014-05-31 12-47.jpg
- File:Jin Yin Wang 2014-05-31 12-45.jpg
- File:Malaisia 2014-05-31 12-44.jpg
- File:My dear students! 2014-05-31 12-44.jpg
- File:Jin Yin Wang in Singapore 2014-05-31 12-39.jpg
- File:Jin Yin Wang 2014-05-31 12-36.jpg
- File:Jin Yin Wang 2014-05-31 12-35.jpg
- File:Jin Yin Wang 2014-05-31 12-34.jpg
- File:Jin Yin Wang 2014-05-31 12-26.jpg
- File:Khai giảng lớp tiếng Trung tổng hợp cho các bạn bắt đầu học- Đảm bảo cho học viên giao tiếp tốt chỉ với 1 khoá học duy nhất kéo dài 1,5 - 2 -Học phí 800-000vnd- S 2014-05-31 12-19.jpg
. Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:45, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:16, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Personal image, not in project scope. — Racconish ✉ 13:52, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, Because of copyvio. And this is not a personal photo. South Korean actor Lee Dong-wook ~ Nahid Talk 08:43, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
Personal file, out of project scope — Racconish ✉ 13:59, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, Out of COM:PS ~ Nahid Talk 08:44, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
personal file, out of project scope. — Racconish ✉ 14:01, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, ~ Nahid Talk 08:49, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
Personal file, out of project scope. — Racconish ✉ 14:02, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, ~ Nahid Talk 08:50, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
File:"El tiburon" Emilio Alejandro pulido, sicario a las ordenes de Armando Valencia Cornelio"El maradona" jefe del cartel del milenio- 2013-10-06 12-10.jpg
[edit]Personal unused file, out of project scope — Racconish ✉ 14:06, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 08:44, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Personal unused file, out of project scope — Racconish ✉ 14:08, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 08:44, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
File:A Picture of Farish taken by his friend at Indian Islahi Islamic School 2014-04-21 06-28.jpg
[edit]Personal unused file, out of project scope — Racconish ✉ 14:09, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 08:44, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
not own work Fetx2002 (talk) 14:25, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 08:46, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rajat jaswaniya (talk · contribs)
[edit]Collection of promo photos. No evidenc of permission(s).
- File:Namaste 2014-05-30 01-09.jpg
- File:Of my serial 2014-05-30 01-01.jpg
- File:Actor 2014-05-30 01-00.jpeg
- File:Random picture 2014-05-30 00-59.jpeg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:44, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Adrien barbosa (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
- File:Adrien avant les billoboard muqic award 2014-05-29 15-21.jpg
- File:Photo d adrien barbosa de facebook 2014-05-29 15-10.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:44, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:44, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE. -- Túrelio (talk) 15:43, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, out of scope Beyond My Ken (talk) 20:55, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:45, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
File:Arthur Goldstein Bolocan Schmitz - Arthur Goldstein Bolocan Schmitz è nato a Milano nel 2 luglio 2002- -Ed è un famoso record man , nel 2013 gli è stato conferito il record mondiale in apnea 11 anni e attua 2014-05-30 17-54.jpg
[edit]Low resolution version of File:Anonymous emblem.svg Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:09, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
- Delete: per nom. Amitie 10g (talk) 17:56, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:40, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal image; see COM:SCOPE. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:12, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 08:48, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
The two images appear to be photographs of a television broadcast (see COM:DW). The logo suffers from the same problem.
- File:A flag created by smickers- 2014-05-30 17-18.jpg
- File:Smickers- And young Buckie - Fooled by fools 2014-05-30 17-16.jpg
- File:Smickers at LVF bonefire-- Young Buckie standing behind- Killed by fools 2014-05-30 17-12.jpg
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:33, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:48, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
File:Andreas Rey, vero nome Andrea Tavolozza, nasce ad Avellino il 10 agosto 1992- Inizia la carriera da dj producer all'età di 16 anni, i primi pezzi andarono in onda sulla radio nazionale m2o, mostrava subito un 2014-05-31 21-40.jpg
[edit]Unused, personal picture(s), out of Project Scope. Amitie 10g (talk) 20:53, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:49, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
Used only to vandalize https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ricky_Polston. Does not depict the person named in the file name. Dwpaul (talk) 00:28, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete, per nominator. Diego Grez return fire 19:45, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope, copyright status unclear Ymblanter (talk) 19:21, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused, personal picture(s), out of Project Scope. Amitie 10g (talk) 00:50, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 19:22, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lipton.jacob (talk · contribs)
[edit]Self prommotional or spam picture(s), out of Project Scope.
Amitie 10g (talk) 00:58, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Already deleted by Hedwig in Washington. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 12:30, 1 June 2014 (UTC) (non admin closure)
File:Hamid Zaki born in Afghanistan Kaboul -Occupation physicien -Years active 1980-present 2014-05-31 20-56.jpg
[edit]Unused personal image; see COM:SCOPE. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:39, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:09, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal image; see COM:SCOPE. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:47, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:09, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
File:To je folk-heavy metal band Generacija 2000 iz Reteč pri Škofji Loki- 2014-05-31 16-16.jpg
[edit]See COM:SCOPE. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:25, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:10, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Blurry to the point of useless. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:26, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:10, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Found elsewhere on the internet: cf. http://www.fearnet.com/news/news-article/industrial-metal-j-pop-and-total-insanity-come-together-babymetal Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:27, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
- Speedy delete Blatant copyvio. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 13:15, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:14, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal images; see COM:SCOPE.
- File:Sabuj 3 2014-05-31 21-05.JPG
- File:Sabuj 3 2014-05-30 08-39.jpg
- File:Rafiqun nobi sabuj 2014-05-30 08-36.jpg
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:42, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:15, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image
INeverCry 01:20, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:43, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
Unused, personal picture(s), out of Project Scope. Amitie 10g (talk) 03:58, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Could have been speedy as well. No scope whatsoever. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:19, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
Includes copyrighted and trademarked images, such as http://www.zimbio.com/photos/Nate+Wolters/Milwaukee+Bucks+v+Dallas+Mavericks/1nDqJFurB1g. discospinster (talk) 04:12, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 08:46, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Possible copyright issue -- see http://espn.go.com/nba/player/_/id/2491079/nate-wolters discospinster (talk) 04:22, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: likely copyright violation Ymblanter (talk) 19:25, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 04:44, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
- Is uploading a picture of a penis even allowed on wikimedia commons? Besides that, is quality or irrelevance a criteria for deletion? PointsofNoReturn (talk) 20:26, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:53, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 06:33, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:16, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 06:34, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:16, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 08:18, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 19:27, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Unknown person. Quality makes it essentially unusable. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:43, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Out of scope, unusable quality. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 13:17, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:16, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Lowest quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 10:53, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 08:48, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vishwaradhyaswamy (talk · contribs)
[edit]Private image, out of scope
- File:Vishwaradhyaswamy - 3.jpeg
- File:Vishwaradhyaswamy - 2.jpeg
- File:Vishwaradhyaswamy - 5.jpeg
- File:Vishwaradhyaswamy gm - 8.jpeg
- File:Vishwaradhyaswamy gm - 7.jpeg
- File:Vishwaradhyaswamy gm - 6.jpeg
- File:Vishwaradhyaswamy gm - 4.jpeg
- File:Vishwaradhyaswamy gm - 3.jpeg
- File:Vishwaradhyaswamy gm - 2.jpeg
- File:Vishwaradhyaswamy gm - 1.jpeg
- File:Vishwaradhyaswamy.jpg
- File:Vishwaradhya swamy ವಿಶ್ವರಾಧ್ಯಸ್ವಾಮಿ.jpg
Indeedous (talk) 18:48, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: very heavy self-promotion. Taivo (talk) 15:52, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vishwaradhyaswamy (talk · contribs)
[edit]private images, missing essential information, nonsense-categorization
- File:Vishawaradhya halaswamy - 1.jpeg
- File:Vishawaradhya halaswamy - 2.jpeg
- File:Vishawaradhya halaswamy - 3.jpeg
- File:Vishawaradhya halaswamy - 4.jpeg
- File:Vishawaradhya halaswamy - 5.jpeg
- File:Halaswamy Math.jpg
- File:Sri HalaSomeshwaraSwamyji Doni Hirehadagali Hirekombalagonte Sandigavada Hirewaddati Halaswamy Math - 5.jpeg
- File:Sri HalaSomeshwaraSwamyji Doni Hirehadagali Hirekombalagonte Sandigavada Hirewaddati Halaswamy Math - 1.jpeg
- File:Sri HalaSomeshwaraSwamyji Doni Hirehadagali Hirekombalagonte Sandigavada Hirewaddati Halaswamy Math - 2.jpeg
- File:Sri HalaSomeshwaraSwamyji Doni Hirehadagali Hirekombalagonte Sandigavada Hirewaddati Halaswamy Math - 4.jpeg
- File:Sri HalaSomeshwaraSwamyji Doni Hirehadagali Hirekombalagonte Sandigavada Hirewaddati Halaswamy Math - 3.jpeg
- File:Halaswamy - 10.jpeg
- File:Halaswamy - 9.jpeg
- File:Sri sannahalaswamyji hirehadagali - 2.jpeg
- File:Raj - 4.jpeg
- File:Sankadala Sri Halaswamy Mutt ( ಶ್ರೀಹಾಲಸ್ವಾಮಿ ಸಂಸ್ಥಾನ ಮಠ ಹಿರೇಹಡಗಲಿ).jpg
- File:Hirehadagali Sri Halaswamy Mutt ಶ್ರೀಹಾಲಸ್ವಾಮಿ ಸಂಸ್ಥಾನ ಮಠ ಹಿರೇಹಡಗಲಿ.jpg
Indeedous (talk) 19:48, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
- If I recall correctly I nominated some files with some similar names in the past for deletion. I suggest blocking the uploader, and, of course, all of these pictures should be deleted because of their self-promotional nature. --küñall (nütramyen) 05:18, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
- Agree. Looks ads like. --Achim (talk) 19:12, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Krd 17:13, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vishwaradhyaswamy (talk · contribs)
[edit]Can't be own work if uploader is visible on images. No use for Commons due to lack of information about what the photos depict / location / etc..
- File:Vishwaradhya Swamy - 10.jpeg
- File:Vishwaradhya Swamy - 9.jpeg
- File:Vishwaradhya Swamy- kappath gudda - 6.jpeg
- File:Vishwaradhya Swamy- kappath gudda - 8.jpeg
- File:Vishwaradhya Swamy- kappath gudda - 7.jpeg
- File:Vishwaradhya Swamy- kappath gudda - 1.jpeg
- File:Vishwaradhya Swamy- kappath gudda - 2.jpeg
- File:Vishwaradhya Swamy- kappath gudda - 4.jpeg
- File:Vishwaradhya Swamy- kappath gudda - 3.jpeg
- File:Vishwaradhya Swamy- kappath gudda - 5.jpeg
- File:Vishwaradhya Swamy - 7.jpeg
- File:Vishwaradhya Swamy - 6.jpeg
- File:Vishwaradhya Swamy - 8.jpeg
- File:Vishwaradhya Swamy - 3.jpeg
- File:Vishwaradhya Swamy - 4.jpeg
- File:Vishwaradhya Swamy - 5.jpeg
Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 20:59, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. I'm not commenting on the "own work" part. The pictures may not serve any educational use, as the user uploaded these to self-promote his family, seems to me. küñall (nütramyen) 21:18, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:00, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vishwaradhyaswamy (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope
- File:Vishwaradhya swamy.jpg
- File:Hirehadagali-583216.jpg
- File:Vishwaradhya swamy - 1.jpeg
- File:Vishwaradhya swamy - 2.jpeg
- File:Vishwaradhya Swamy - 1.jpeg
Natuur12 (talk) 12:02, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
Speedy deleted as before. --Krd 12:08, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 13:33, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:32, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 13:34, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:32, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 13:34, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 08:47, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
COM:PENIS BrightRaven (talk) 10:03, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, very poor quality orphan own penis snapshot -- Infrogmation (talk) 12:28, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
out of project scope Taivo (talk) 09:19, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, by Denniss. Taivo (talk) 12:14, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
out of scope Gbawden (talk) 06:50, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 14:20, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:46, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
This image is of much too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose. It's out of project scope. Ies (talk) 16:33, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
deleted: --Krd 06:42, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 08:16, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:21, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
If this is "own work" as claimed, then it is personal art and should be dleted. If it is not own work, then there is no license. There are no Google hits for this, so I also think it is out of scope as not notable. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:42, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:34, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation, no metadata, the rest of images uploaded by the same user have been speedily deleted (or will soon be) as copyright violations. Mike Rosoft (talk) 15:33, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
- Actually I don't think there's much evidence about this copy-vio. I've searched Tamim Iqbal's photo in 39 well-knowed newspapers or online portals. But couldn't find. So maybe
no metadata, the rest of images uploaded by the same user have been speedily deleted (or will soon be) as copyright violations.
won't help. --Pratyya (Hello!) 13:28, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: com:PCP Natuur12 (talk) 22:02, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
there are people in the picture without permission Gerri80 (talk) 16:28, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 08:46, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
File:This is A$AP Slicey- A rapping legend and is one of the best in the rap game 2014-06-01 01-22.jpg
[edit]Subject not eligible for an article on any wiki: see COM:SCOPE. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:54, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:19, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Subject not eligible for an article on any wiki: see COM:SCOPE. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:06, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:19, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Yildenyilden (talk · contribs)
[edit]Subject not eligible for an article on any wiki: see COM:SCOPE.
- File:Tugay yilden-1995-Denizli-Russia-SAratov 2014-06-01 13-19.jpg
- File:Tugay yilden serbest calisim 2014-06-01 13-15.jpg
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:08, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:19, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Subject's article was deleted on en.wp; not eligible for an article on any wiki: see COM:SCOPE. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:13, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:19, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 17:29, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:20, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Blurry, we do have an SVG file of this flag. Fry1989 eh? 18:00, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 08:45, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
404 error for the upload McZusatz (talk) 19:07, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:20, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
404 error. (please reupload) McZusatz (talk) 19:17, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:21, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope - private photo of non-notable individual Jackmcbarn (talk) 21:00, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 08:47, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Certainly not "own work". Promo photo/movie still. Posted 2013 here. Original source and provenance unclear; U.S. copyright unclear. Lupo 22:31, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:22, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope - private photo of non-notable individual Jackmcbarn (talk) 23:34, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 08:47, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE Jackmcbarn (talk) 23:44, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: (c)vio Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:40, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE Jackmcbarn (talk) 23:46, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by Hedwig in Washington as a copyright violation. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 07:11, 2 June 2014 (UTC) (non-admin closure)
http://tineye.com/search/54c46c2e208f75c7e95677531b2e98d0ee53ce3e/?sort=size&order=desc 太刻薄 (talk) 02:21, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete
{{db|obviously not the author's own work, see the link}}
— Preceding unsigned comment added by PointsofNoReturn (talk • contribs)
Deleted -FASTILY 08:47, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Túrelio as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Out of COM:SCOPE, personal image, hardly usable. -- Krd 06:47, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 08:45, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 06:54, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 08:45, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 06:54, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 08:44, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
What does it hurt? It's made a couple very happy and odds are no-one will happen across this and be mislead by any information pertained within. I cannot see why anyone would even object to it. It's totally harmless and makes us happy and we actually hope to expand on the page. If it would make it more appropriate I can actually include bios and other information to make it more appropriate. However I see nothing wrong with a simple page bringing joy to a couple and their friends.
Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 07:00, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 08:46, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 07:00, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 08:46, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 07:07, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 08:46, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 07:09, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 08:47, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 07:09, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 08:47, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 07:09, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Out of scope. That sounds painful. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 09:48, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Out of scope. Vätte (talk) 21:27, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:52, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 07:09, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 08:47, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope; powerpoint slide, text only Lupo 08:23, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 08:47, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Not "own work". Promo photo, watermarked bottom right. Available from Allposters and similar sites, for instance [10]. Original source unknown; publication history and U.S. copyright unknown. Lupo 10:27, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by Krd. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 13:49, 2 June 2014 (UTC) (non-admin closure)
Files uploaded by Bouzid1987 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Screenshot or promo photos from U.S. films from the 1960s.
- File:Robert Ryan(02) 2014-06-01 20-23.jpg
- File:Les Chasseurs de scalps01(1968) 2014-06-01 20-22.jpg
- File:Le Vent de la plaine01(1960) 2014-06-01 20-20.jpg
- File:Sept secondes en enfer01(1967) 2014-06-01 20-18.jpg
Deleted: per nomination Krd 10:58, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
selfie of non-notable person OTAVIO1981 (talk) 11:18, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 08:45, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 12:21, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 08:47, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo of dubious educational value - out of scope... additionally, size and lack of metadata point to possible copyright issues, and uploader would need to confirm they are the copyright holder by following the steps at COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 12:26, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 08:47, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 12:28, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 08:45, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 12:31, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 08:45, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 13:14, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 08:45, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 13:16, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 08:46, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Copyright for logo not likely to be held by uploader. Logo is crosses the threshold of originality, and is probably not PD. If uploader is copyright holder, they should carefully follow the instructions on COM:OTRS to confirm this. Storkk (talk) 13:22, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 08:46, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 13:23, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 08:47, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Not "own work". Corbis has this photo, too: [11] and claim it was rights managed by them. They give the date the photo was taken as January 2, 1929, and the location as San Francisco, California, USA. Indeed she was in the U.S. in early 1929; c.f. [12]. Which means it's a U.S. work and we need to figure out the publication history of this photo to ascertain its copyright status in the U.S. Lupo 13:26, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 08:44, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 13:31, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 08:48, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 13:32, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 08:46, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 13:33, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 08:46, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
File:Oscar Azriel Nava- Also known as "The Dii Creator", "The Dii King", "Lil O Nava", "Og Dii"- Has created the well known phrase "Dii"- Est- 2011- Co-founders- Evan Medellien, Leland Denson, Donaven James, Jj Gar 2014-06-02 00-17.jpg
[edit]Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 13:39, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 08:47, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope Gbawden (talk) 13:40, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 08:48, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Photos of Brazilian soccer players. Not "own work". Publication history unknown, creation date unknown. Pinto was born 1921, Quarentinha 1933, Alvim 1920, and Zizinho 1921. {{PD-Brazil-media}} might apply if these photos had been published before 1944... At least for the Quarentinha photo that is flat out impossible. For the other photos, we'd need to know at least when the photos were taken or originally published.
- File:Pinto with Brazil 2014-06-02 06-52.jpg
- File:Quarentinha 2014-06-02 06-50.jpg
- File:Danilo Alvim 2014-06-02 06-47.jpg
- File:Zizinho 2014-06-02 06-44.jpg
Comment: All clear copyvios. For the sake of the smooth running of the operations I would ignore Zizinho, who anyway is free per 1 January 2015 ({{PD-Brazil-media}} / 70 years after publication). On the other hand, for all practical intents and purposes, the commercial value of the rights to these images is at very best nominal as we know. The complete photo library of Manchete dos Sports, a major 1950s sports magazine from Rio de Janeiro, published by Mario Filho and Nelson Rodrigues (they are biggos!) was on the market a few years ago: not the slightest interest for a cheap asking price of some cents per picture, not even an offer. And this included the successful World Cup of 1958. The reason for this is, there is a gazillion of this type of material around as Rio in that era had about half a dozen newspapers (A Noite, A Manhã, O Imparcial, Ultima Hora, Globo, J. do Brasil, Diário de Notícias, Diário Carioca, ...) and a number of sports dailies (Esporte Illustrado, Jornal dos Sports, Manchete, ...) out there, and essentially all of them went bust. As a result, the existing media enterprises have pics like that by the ton and buyers, there simply aren't any. Any argument about those pictures is pretty much esoteric. Cheers, OAlexander (talk) 01:26, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks for the explanations. I don't quite get it, though. First you say they were copyvios, then that the Zizinho image would be PD next year. So you do have evidence for a publication in 1944 for that image, but not for the others? The commercial value of these is not important when it comes to copyright.
- As an aside, I have in the meantime indef-blocked the uploader as he kept uploading lots of modern soccer player images that all were copyvios and kept ignoring any warnings. These four were the only ones of his uploads that just might be OK if we can show pre-1944 publication. Lupo 05:53, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
- Lupo: The last four digits of the images seem to indicate the year of publication in which the the uploader has found those images, which seems to be in line with the contents of those images. It would be unreasonable to attempt to track the images to their original sources, but with my expertise in historic Brazilian football (I read publications from that era regularly, (as can be eg. gleaned from EN:Nicolas Ladany, EN:Martim Francisco ...) I would suggest, that the uploader made a typo in the file name of the Zizinho image, which by my judgement (the jersey, etc.) looks rather from Esporte Illustrado (RJ), 1943 or earlier, I thus have marked this image {{PD-Brazil-media}} accordingly. The rest, regretfully can not be remedied, and according to regulations can be dealt with swiftly. I will see, if I can find some replacements for them. Cheers, OAlexander (talk) 07:33, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
- No, the last four digits are the time of the upload (in local time, not UTC). It's auto-generated by the Mobile/Web upload of MediaWiki. Lupo 08:28, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
- BTW, if you can date the images by the jerseys, that's fine, but how did you arrive at the conclusion that it must have been published in Esporte Illustrado? Lupo 08:45, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
- Also, according to [13], the Zizinho image was used in 1950 as an autograph photo. I would think that for the World Cup 1950, they'd have used a more recent picture, not a seven year old one, so I'm not sure about your 1943 dating. He's wearing a CBD jersey; I guess that's the one of the national team? According to en:Thomaz Soares da Silva, he was on the national team from 1942 to 1957, so that would give some date bracket. Lupo 08:53, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
- Lupo: The last four digits of the images seem to indicate the year of publication in which the the uploader has found those images, which seems to be in line with the contents of those images. It would be unreasonable to attempt to track the images to their original sources, but with my expertise in historic Brazilian football (I read publications from that era regularly, (as can be eg. gleaned from EN:Nicolas Ladany, EN:Martim Francisco ...) I would suggest, that the uploader made a typo in the file name of the Zizinho image, which by my judgement (the jersey, etc.) looks rather from Esporte Illustrado (RJ), 1943 or earlier, I thus have marked this image {{PD-Brazil-media}} accordingly. The rest, regretfully can not be remedied, and according to regulations can be dealt with swiftly. I will see, if I can find some replacements for them. Cheers, OAlexander (talk) 07:33, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
- Esporte Ilustrado have a very typical style of photography suited to the format of the publication, which indeed consists largely of little text and expressive photographs that in portraits are relatively expressive, almost artful. A bit like Argentina's El Gráfico in its earlier decades (some years ago they had their 80th Jubilee and their first two decades were completely online - what a feast) - but Esporte Ilustrado did not quite live up to that. It was actually revived some years ago, but did not even sell for a ridiculous price of 50 Cents or thereabouts. Anyway, after delving deeper into the issue I can no longer support the idea that the Zizinho portrait is an early 40s one and must support the deletion of all images in question. When I get to it, I will upload another Zizinho from "EI", but surely properly sourced. Cheers, OAlexander (talk) 02:15, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:22, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope - private photo of a non-notable individual Jackmcbarn (talk) 14:25, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 08:46, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 08:44, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 08:45, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 14:53, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 08:45, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
File:Shelley Gill author of thunderfeet Alaska's dinosaur, The Alaska Mother Goose, Danger the dog yard cat with Libby Riddles, Kiana's Idititarod and Mammoth magic- 2014-05-14 16-21.jpg
[edit]Copyright issues - looks like a photo of a newspaper/magazine. Additionally, the size and quality of the photograph mean it's not realistically useful for an educational purpose, thus out of scope. Storkk (talk) 14:56, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 08:47, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 15:13, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 08:47, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 16:25, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 08:46, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 16:26, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 08:46, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
File:Mohammad syafi'i -Lahir lamongan 12 juli 1991-Alamat jl- Kh amin no 12 dagan solokuro lamongan 2014-06-03 01-06.jpg
[edit]Unused, personal picture(s), out of Project Scope. Amitie 10g (talk) 19:00, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 08:46, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Photo of non-notable minor used for purposes of vandalism. discospinster (talk) 22:59, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete as copyvio from https://www.flickr.com/photos/joanyona/3201405015 Lupo 08:18, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete per Lupo. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 23:10, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per above Lupo 10:01, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
Photo of minor used for purposes of vandalism. discospinster (talk) 23:00, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete as copyvio from https://www.flickr.com/photos/joanyona/3201405015 Lupo 08:19, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:22, 9 June 2014 (UTC)