Commons:Deletion requests/mobile tracking/archive/2014-23

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not "own work". From [1]. No information about the year it was taken, nor by whom. No information about publication history. Without such information, it's impossible to determine whether {{PD-Mongolia}} might apply. Since the photo shows an elderly, highly decorated man we really would need evidence that this is old enough to fulfill the criteria outlined at Commons:Copyright rules by territory#Mongolia. Lupo 05:47, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 09:41, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 06:30, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 12:18, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 06:31, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 12:18, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Also:

Out of COM:PS: Yes, of course you are cute but really sorry we don't store personal images. ~ Nahid Talk 07:09, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 09:40, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope as not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Storkk (talk) 08:42, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 02:02, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Minecraft

These images seem to be out of scope. The tables are better done as a wikitable and the logo seems to be a personal logo of no use for people other than the artist.

Stefan4 (talk) 16:16, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:34, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Minecraft

Screenshots, figures, etc. from the game Minecraft, mostly all uploaded in 2013. Inumerous related deletion requests and discussions available and - as I could follow - the related files were all deleted, see also above. Reference-DR might be eventually Commons:Deletion requests/File:Minecraft 1.1 Title.png.

Gunnex (talk) 18:06, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Obs.: I found several uncategorized Minecraft related screenshots etc. which I categorized in this category after iniciating this DR. Please evaluate these files too. Gunnex (talk) 18:15, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted -FASTILY 08:57, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Minecraft

Screenshots, figures, etc. from the game Minecraft, mostly all uploaded in 2014. Inumerous related deletion requests and discussions available and - as I could follow - the related files were all deleted, see also above. Reference-DR might be eventually Commons:Deletion requests/File:Minecraft 1.1 Title.png.

Gunnex (talk) 08:45, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. JurgenNL (talk) 07:37, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Minecraft

Various screenshots, logos and textures from Minecraft (which isn't freely licensed)

Logos
Screenshots
Derivative works of Minecraft textures

Lewis Hulbert (talk) 16:04, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted by INeverCry. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 11:08, 1 September 2014 (UTC) (non-admin closure)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Minecraft

Screenshots of a non-free video game, thus making these images non-free deriative works.

Lewis Hulbert (talk) 00:05, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This doesn't make sense to me. I understand that Minecraft is closed source so a general screenshot of landscape that was generated by the program or programmers would not be my work. But there are a huge number of photos of real buildings in the Wikimedia Commons. The person who took that photo of a building probably didn't build the building, they only took the photo. Isn't that "derivative" work? I made that Bitcoin icon myself with several hours of labor, and then I took the photos/screenshots. Two parts of the creative process were my own and that creative work would not exist without my significant efforts. Can the brick maker sue the architect for his "derivative" work? And then the architect sue the photographer for using their building in the photographic "derivative" work? If what I posted is illegal to post, then it shouldn't be, and we should fight stupid laws like that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Beatljuice (talk • contribs) 00:40, 1 October 2014‎ (UTC)[reply]

All real buildings have copyrights, until they expire. In many countries, Commons photographs are permitted by laws which specifically exempt the photographs from being derivative works, see COM:FOP. However, that is a bad analogy. Think, instead, of drawings of real buildings, including both the architectural drawings used to construct them, renderings used to show them before construction, and post construction drawings. All of them have copyrights and you will not see them on Commons without a specific license from the creator.
The brick maker cannot sue because bricks aren't copyrighted, but the architect can sue a photographer in many countries (those with no FOP law) and can sue someone who copies his drawings in every country.
Copyright law is not stupid. If it were not for copyright laws, few people would go to the effort of writing books or creating sculptures, because they could not earn money for doing it. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:37, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that my analogy isn't perfect, but I think it's closer to accurate than yours James. Copies, or photos of architectural drawings would be more like copies or photos of computer code. A more accurate analogy would be if I went to Disneyland and built a tower out of foam blocks that are supplied by Disney and then took a picture of my creation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.164.208.15 (talk • contribs) 18:13, 1 October 2014‎ (UTC)[reply]

No, sorry, you are wrong. As I noted above, there are explicit exemptions in some countries for photographs of actual buildings. Minecraft is not buildings. Your Disney block creation would be a sculpture. In any event, with limited exceptions which don't apply here, every created work has a copyright. While there are exceptions for actual buildings (and other things) in some countries, any other copy of such a work is a copyvio. Since no exception applies to computer generated works anywhere, this is a copyvio. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:24, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure what you're saying I'm wrong about. I'm trying to come up with an analogy that we can agree on so that arguments can be made from some sort of common ground. I understand that legally there may be a problem. I don't claim to know international IP law (I live in the US). I do believe that if there are laws that restrict what I posted, then those laws should be changed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.164.208.15 (talk • contribs) 17:00, 2 October 2014‎ (UTC)[reply]



Let's start from scratch. There is nothing international about this -- it is all US law and Commons rules. One of two things is true. Either:
  • You drew these completely from your own mind with no reference to anything on Minecraft, or
  • These are derived from or use images or parts of images from Minecraft.
In the first case, they are your personal creations and we do not keep personal art from non-notable artists, see COM:SCOPE.
In the second case, your images are derivative works of the copyrighted work of other people and therefore must be deleted as copyvios.
.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:06, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per Jim, derivative works from a copyrighted game artworks. --PierreSelim (talk) 06:11, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Minecraft

Screenshots, figures, etc. from the game Minecraft, mostly all uploaded 2015. Inumerous related deletion requests and discussions available and - as I could follow - the related files were all deleted, see also above.

Gunnex (talk) 16:02, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Rather than "Other stuff doesn't exist", do you have a policy-based reason for deletion? Andy Dingley (talk) 16:57, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
COM:L. Screenshots of a non-free video game (COM:SS). Gunnex (talk) 19:53, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. INeverCry 00:20, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Minecraft

Self-promotional logo uploads and artwork by non-notable individuals. Out of scope, and on top of that many are likely copyvios.

Lewis Hulbert (talk) 22:16, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as per nom. --P 1 9 9   14:32, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Minecraft

Screenshots and assets from a copyrighted video game. I wonder how many of these I'll actually have to make.

Lewis Hulbert (talk) 02:43, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What part of File:Discobeat Skin.png is Mojang's IP? Andy Dingley (talk) 12:16, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Good catch on that one, I would've said the background but it doesn't appear to be Mojang's textures. However, we still can't be sure whether the background is freely licensed. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 16:47, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This seems to be the personal player model skin used by the uploader. From the publicly available logs at de.wp it appears that this may have been used for a self-promotional article that was deleted speedily – which raises the additional question of COM:SCOPE. --El Grafo (talk) 08:44, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment maybe a warning message equivalent to {{NoUploads}} might help to keep new uploads to the category down a little bit? --El Grafo (talk) 08:44, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:11, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Minecraft

Copyrighted video game screenshots, derivitave content or otherwise out of scope uploads.

Lewis Hulbert (talk) 11:39, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment File:Skin de Diamantum576.jpg has a watermark from novaskin.me/wallpapers, a page that seems to provide a functionality where you can place your own player skin into a pre-made wallpaper. They use CC-BY-SA-NC as a license for their stuff, so even if the background image was their own (which I'm tempted to doubt based on the other clearly non-free stuff they use) we can't keep it. --El Grafo (talk) 14:48, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment File:The Feed The Beast Launcher.png seems to show a separate software called Feed The Beast Launcher, which is licensed {{Apache}}. The screenshot shows logos for different Minecraft modpacks which might not be part of that license, however. Don't know if these might qualify for COM:De minimis/{{De minimis}}? --El Grafo (talk) 15:03, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I've updated the page to show the Apache license, rather than the CC-own work claim. Checking the Feed the Beast modpack list the modpacks included in the screenshot are All Rights Reserved, which I would assume includes the logo too. I'm not too sure about de minimis either, especially since one of the logos cover a decent amount of the image, but in the worst case the logos could be edited out in order to keep the image. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 15:46, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment I'd like to point out that the three which are struck out and stated to be "in use" are likely all COM:COPYVIOs as they are COM:DW of copyrighted game "Minecraft". A copyvio "in use" does not become ineligible to delete. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:40, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment The last one (File:Tinkers Construct smeltery.png) is fine, I think: It doesn't contain anything from the original game, everything displayed comes from the Tinkers Construct mod which has a free license. --El Grafo (talk) 16:22, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment (Edit conflict) Not all of these files were nominated as copyright violations, some were also nominated as out of scope.
-Lewis Hulbert (talk) 16:33, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Daphne Lantier 21:18, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Minecraft

Screenshots of Minecraft, or derivative content using textures owned by Mojang.

Lewis Hulbert (talk) 15:29, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The head of the skin appears to me to be a derivative of the Pig that appears in Minecraft, and I'd also imagine there was some issue with the Spider-Man uniform too. Either way, out of scope. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 13:01, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Daphne Lantier 21:19, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Minecraft

Copyright violations or out of scope uploads.

Copyright violations
Out of scope

--Lewis Hulbert (talk) 02:05, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voglio farti notare che la dichiarazione sulla immagine File:Herobrine skin ver. mod.png, non è esatta, non risulta nessuna copyright della Mojang su questo personaggi perché il personaggio è stato creato dalla comunità di Minecraft, inoltre l’immagine non deriva dal videogioco e stata realizzata dall’autore che la pubblicata, soprattutto il personaggio è una creepy-pasta ispirato a Minecraft. Inoltre Notch ha più volte dichiarato che il personaggio non esiste nel videogioco. Per tanto Mojang non ha mai avuto copyright sul questo personaggio immaginario. Qualsiasi riferimento della Mojang su Herobrine e solamente uno scherzò che fa alla comunità. Inoltre dire che l’immagine e derivato della skin del giocatore predefinito di Minecraft, ti poso dire che è deriva solo dalle abilità del autore della immagine che la realizzato in SVG e poi la salvato su http://minecraft.gamepedia.com in formato PNG.--0 Noctis 0 (talk) 08:17, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
It does not matter whether Mojang claim ownership or acknowledge the character, as this representation of it was made by modifying Minecraft textres. The Herobrine skin is clearly a derivative work of the Steve skin. Making minor modifications by colouring the eyes white and adding a smile does not mean that the editor now owns rights to the skin, thus they are not able to release the image under a free license. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 18:00, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Additonally, even if it were the sole authorship of the uploader on Gamepedia, the image is only licensed CC-BY-NC, which is not allowed on Wikimedia Commons. The source has no mention of the GDFL license that you claimed when uploading the file. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 18:04, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Su questo ti posso dare una spiegazione, essendo che non esiste il Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported (CC BY-NC 3.0) o perché non sono riuscito a trovarlo (probabilmente e stato nominato sotto un altro nome). Ho caricato immagine sotto la licenza che l’autore mia detto che era adeguata. Se mi stai dicendo che l’immagine come il colore della pelle e legata al copyright, l’immagine e composta da geometria semplice e colori che formano l’immagine non possono essere considerati come materiale protetto da copyright perché comuni a tutti, Non supera quindi la soglia di originalità. Inoltre cito il trademark.--0 Noctis 0 (talk) 20:10, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


As the creator of File:Flag of Satigris.svg I do not object to its deletion. I don't even remember why I uploaded it to Wikimedia Commons, to be honest. Bowwow828 (talk) 10:07, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Daphne Lantier 21:20, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Minecraft

Copyright violations (including screenshots and derivative works) and out of scope uploads related to Minecraft. Copyright violations

Out of scope

Lewis Hulbert (talk) 15:37, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 18:30, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
File:Herobrine.png

Previously {{copyvio|1=© Mojang Studios. The fact that they state that they are "quite relaxed about non-commercial things" is not enough per COM:Licensing – commercial reuse MUST be allowed for all files at Commons.}}, see User_talk:Herobrine303. The uploader removed the copyvio tag without starting a regular deletion request, so here we go.

This is a derivative work of the original default Minecraft Steve player skin (the old one, before he got a shave, low-res version of the original image here). Similar or identical files have been deleted repeatedly in the past (CTRL+F Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Minecraft for "herobrine.png"), so I don't think {{PD-ineligible}} applies. --El Grafo (talk) 13:28, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Procedural close: already deleted as noted above. Эlcobbola talk 20:55, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These photos are of a Minecraft Papercraft Chess board. The artwork on all the pieces is from the game Minecraft (by Mojang AB) and Pixel Papercraft may also arguably hold some copyright in the chess designs. These photos seem to exceed COM:DM, as the only purpose/value in the photos is to showcase the copyrighted artwork (i.e. blacking out the copyrighted parts would mean blocking out basically the entire photo). COM:DM Sweden would apply since Mojang AB is a Swedish company, and from the few examples listed on that page, it seems Sweden may have even stricter laws than the U.S., making it more likely these are not de minimis.

IagoQnsi (talk) 00:01, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:14, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, out of scope.

Leonel Sohns 15:13, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. I've tagged a few of these for speedy deletion as clear copyvios, and the rest I agree are out of scope. –IagoQnsi (talk) 02:11, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Four of these were speedy deleted as copyright violations. The remainder aren't screenshots, so weren't speedy deleted, though I do agree with the deletion nomination. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:31, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
File:EXPLICATIONZONE.png is lacking a bit of an explanation, but it could hypothetically be used in some sort of expert guide on how to select a volume using commands. Not sure on that none.  Delete all of the remaining ones as out of scope. Especially File:MoistMeter.pdf, which as far as I can tell is just made-up nonsense. --El Grafo (talk) 09:26, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:50, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 09:18, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 02:02, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal/promotional photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 09:22, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 07:39, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata, looks professionally shot. Doubtful uploader is copyright holder or can otherwise license this image. Storkk (talk) 09:30, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per COM:PCP JurgenNL (talk) 07:40, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 09:39, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 02:01, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 09:40, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 02:01, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 09:58, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 02:00, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope as not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Storkk (talk) 10:09, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 02:00, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 10:09, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 01:59, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No metadata, looks professionally shot. If uploader is copyright holder, they should confirm this by following the steps at COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 10:11, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 10:37, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 10:18, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 01:59, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 10:19, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 01:59, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 10:29, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Out of context Luishecht (talk) 12:28, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 07:45, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Watermarked "(C) Bruce Omori" - no indication that this is the uploader. Uploader - if you are Bruce Omori, please follow the instructions on COM:OTRS to confirm this. Storkk (talk) 10:30, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 07:46, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE, unusable private image. -- Túrelio (talk) 10:32, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 01:59, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AbHiSHARMA143 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:DW: Widely used stamp/photo. Uploader has no right to release under CC license. Note: I just tagged uploader's remaining one upload as copyvio

~ Nahid Talk 05:41, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:15, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AbHiSHARMA143 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:DW: Definitely not uplodars own works as claimed. Probably the book covers fall under copyvio too but i'm not sure. If they fall under public domain then license should be changed.

~ Nahid Talk 10:38, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:RudraCover.jpg THIS IS MY OWN WORK OK!! I AM BRAHMAN AND I HAVE THIS BOOK CALLED RUDRASTADHYAYI IN MY HOME AND THE PHOTO WHO NOMINATED IS MY OWN CAMERA CLICK WITH MY PHONE GALAXY GRAND 2 WITH 8 MEGAPIXEL CAMERA... THIS IS NOT COPYRIGHT, REMOVE THE DELETION TAG FAAASSSTTT!!!!

AbHiSHARMA143 (talk) 06:26, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No use SHOUTING. Our hearing is fine, thank you, and so are our eyes.
Lupo 16:25, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Some kept, rest deleted -FASTILY 20:56, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AbHiSHARMA143 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Derivative works of book covers. File:DurgaDasCover.jpg says it was published in 1915 and in 2011. The text may have been published in 1915, but this cover appears to be from the modern (2011) version. See here and numerous other sites. Floral pattern on left of File:Sudamacharit.jpg is well above ToO.

Эlcobbola talk 15:24, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete unless a release from the publisher is sent via COM:OTRS. Lupo 16:40, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

See Thiss [5]

Remove The Tag From My Photos!!

AbHiSHARMA143 (talk) 05:19, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 20:56, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 10:40, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 01:58, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 10:40, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 01:58, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of a photo. The subject (born 1924, died 1961) looks older than 25, so {{PD-Canada}} with its 1949 cutoff does not apply. Who was the photographer? From when is the photo? Lupo 11:02, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 09:46, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 12:27, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 01:57, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 10:29, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Out of context Luishecht (talk) 12:28, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 07:45, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The lack of description makes this image impossible to use. It also makes impossible to check whether there is any copyright infringement. BrightRaven (talk) 13:07, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 10:22, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This Storm Sewer cover was created in 2007 by Demuth Flake http://be.net/demuth for the City of Toronto's Grounds For Art competition, Part of the Regent Park Reviitalization project. There were 3 other winners for other utility holes in Regent Park. See http://www.drainspotting.com/mirror/http/www.toronto.ca_80/culture/groundsforart/ http://www.canada.com/story.html?id=56175d7e-7a34-4000-82ef-b9bf9347407f https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DAoVKSbspUY

Not own work, please see here: https://www.google.com/search?q=sena+runa&tbm=isch&tbs=simg:CAQSkwEJOG5D863GtI8ahwELEKjU2AQaAAwLELCMpwgaYgpgCAMSKOcGuxTkBuMGrgq4FK0KuRTGEqsK2ySvI7QsnimaLIUulCnkI7gjkykaMB5xsreVk-WOWErJltGdLMCvUFS715HXDk0pFBujYY8o36wHONnywzARSSXNCrrYWiAEDAsQjq7-CBoKCggIARIE7nxMiAw&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi92NuapJTPAhXG1SwKHY4ZCRgQ2A4IGigB&biw=1920&bih=979#imgrc=kPkXc_EfhA7zmM%3A Cap1000 (talk) 16:18, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 22:24, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 13:52, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 01:56, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 13:56, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom. Although small numbers of personal photos are permitted for use on other wikis, this image is unused and does not possess any realistic educational uses. Green Giant (talk) 17:00, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 01:54, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 14:07, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 09:48, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Minecraft screenshot. Minecraft's terms are not commons compatible, per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Minecraft_1.1_Title.png. Storkk (talk) 14:09, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 07:52, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata, and previously published in B&W online. If uploader is copyright holder, please follow the steps at COM:OTRS to confirm. Storkk (talk) 14:27, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 07:52, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

missing information and permission; point of this file? will not be used in any article Lady Lotus (talk) 15:05, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 07:53, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 15:15, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 07:54, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 16:16, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, ~ Nahid Talk 11:06, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 16:16, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, ~ Nahid Talk 11:02, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:PS: Promotional logo ~ Nahid Talk 17:29, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Out of scope Captain-tucker (talk) 20:02, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:PS: unused personal photo ~ Nahid Talk 18:31, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, ~ Nahid Talk 10:51, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

langage/utility? Triton (talk) 20:53, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Copyvio/Out of Scope Captain-tucker (talk) 19:33, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright of the cushion? Triton (talk) 20:54, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The relevant road sign is PD as a work of the Swedish Transport Agency. Fry1989 eh? 18:18, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion Krd 09:55, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused selfie of non-notable person (in Wikipedia-speak, no offence intended!); only contribution of the uploader. The only other contribution of this account across all WMF projects was to add that image to en:Google Maps Navigation, which got promptly reverted. Since then, the image and the account are unused. Lupo 22:36, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 14:52, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taken from USA TODAY: "1960 AP photo". Indeed, AP photo by Brian Calvert. Lupo 22:57, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 14:51, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work. First, looks like a crop from a larger photo (shoulder of someone standing to the right). Second lack of EXIF. Third, according to its URL, the image at http://www.nuestros-recuerdos.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/actores-et-antes-despues.jpg was uploaded in May 2013, at least two months before the upload at the Commons. The blog post using it is also from 2013-05-14.[6] Lupo 22:59, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 14:51, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work. Low res, no EXIF. Same photo also used at [7], from where it is sent with a last-modified header of "Sat, 23 Mar 2013 03:47:33 GMT"[8], more than four months before the upload here. Lupo 23:13, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 14:51, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

dark photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 01:56, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete It is not too dark. But how to use it? I cannot give an idea. If somebody can think up, how to use it, I am ready to keep the photo, but now this seems to me out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 11:48, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 02:25, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SCOPE: Used only in an article on the made-up game ONE NIL, which was speedily deleted. King of 03:05, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 18:26, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - private photo of non-notable individual Jackmcbarn (talk) 04:10, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 02:27, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 06:56, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 02:32, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 06:58, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 02:33, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 06:58, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 02:34, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 07:00, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 02:37, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 07:03, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 02:38, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 07:03, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 02:39, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo. Out of project scope. KDS444 (talk) 08:16, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 02:45, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope. personal photo. KDS444 (talk) 08:20, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 02:48, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 09:21, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:58, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 10:08, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:03, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 10:11, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:26, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 10:13, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Delete per nomination -Pete F (talk) 02:22, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:43, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 10:19, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment The photo can be categorized into identical twins, but it is small and has no metadata, so I consider copyright violation possible. Taivo (talk) 15:53, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Out of curiosity, what makes you think they are identical twins? Storkk (talk) 16:07, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
They seemed to me so similar ... Taivo (talk) 09:13, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:46, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 10:26, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:47, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 10:26, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:47, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Looks like a photo of a photo. Currently unused, was previously used here. jonkerz ♠talk 12:29, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: out of scope Ezarateesteban 18:14, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 12:55, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete I add for deletion File:Theo Kamushkin photographed in February 2014 2014-04-06 15-41.jpg due to same reason: unused personal photo, quality is quite bad. These are the user's last remaining uploads. Taivo (talk) 09:46, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Out of scope Captain-tucker (talk) 18:30, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution photos.

# File Type Local uses Global uses Cats Year Size OTRS BIL
001 3D Human Penis Erected.png png 2 0 1 2008 800×600
002 3keazw5q4i1o.jpg jpg 1 0 3 2011 640×480
003 4 color.jpg jpg 1 0 1 2011 421×676
004 64 year old man with erection and cock cage jpg 1 0 4 2013 720×953
005 A 64 year old 4.JPG jpg 0 0 3 2011 640×480
006 A 64 year old 7.JPG jpg 0 0 4 2011 640×480
007 A 64 year old 8.JPG jpg 0 0 4 2012 640×480
008 A 64 year old 9.JPG jpg 0 0 4 2012 640×480
009 A circumcised penis 2.JPG jpg 0 0 4 2011 640×480
010 A circumcised penis.JPG jpg 0 0 3 2011 640×480
011 A male cock.jpg jpg 0 0 4 2013 500×667
012 Taric Alani Cum shot.jpg jpg 1 2 3 2007 800×531 Yes Yes
013 An Uncircumsized Male Penis.JPG jpg 0 0 7 2012 882×464
014 Anus to glands.JPG jpg 0 0 4 2011 444×164
015 Aufzeichnen 3.JPG jpg 0 0 3 2013 981×746
016 Bangla boy penis 2.jpg jpg 0 0 2 2013 405×494
017 Big Scrotum 2.jpg jpg 1 0 3 2014 591×788
018 Blood vessels on penis.jpg jpg 0 14 3 2011 666×446
019 Cap uncap.JPG jpg 0 0 3 2011 690×517
020 Cock pump 1.jpg jpg 1 0 3 2014 958×718
021 Cock pump 2.jpg jpg 1 0 3 2014 591×788
022 Cock pump 3.jpg jpg 1 0 3 2014 958×718
023 Cock pump 4.jpg jpg 1 0 3 2014 591×788
024 Cock pump 5.jpg jpg 1 0 3 2014 958×718
025 Cock pump.jpg jpg 1 0 3 2014 591×788
026 Condom placement demonstration.ogv ogv 0 23 6 2009 880×532
027 Cowpers Fluid 11-04.JPG jpg 1 0 3 2009 640×480 Yes
028 Curved penis 2 (satyr).jpg jpg 0 0 2 2012 496×461
029 Dorsal Cut.jpg jpg 0 0 2 2010 267×196
030 Dydoes.jpg jpg 0 2 2 2008 200×280 Yes
031 Eichel3.jpg jpg 0 2 2 2009 670×559
032 Ejaculation-blondie.jpg jpg 0 0 4 2011 330×251
033 Erect circumcised.jpg jpg 1 0 6 2013 424×278
034 Erect full view0002.JPG jpg 0 0 2 2013 700×689
035 Erect human penis and scrotum.jpg jpg 0 0 1 2012 1024×768
036 Erect human penis and sperm.jpg jpg 0 0 1 2011 450×338
037 Erect Micropenis Measuring 3 Inches.jpg jpg 0 0 2 2012 827×661
038 Erect penis (human male jpg 0 0 3 2011 640×480
039 Erect penis (human jpg 1 0 1 2012 600×800
040 Erect penis (untrimmed pubic hair).jpg jpg 2 0 4 2014 934×667
041 Erect Penis and Testicles.jpg jpg 0 0 1 2012 644×524
042 Erect penis of human.jpg jpg 0 0 2 2012 1024×768
043 Erect penis uncut.jpg jpg 1 17 4 2009 883×800 Yes
044 Erect Penis with 8 gauge circular barbell through a Prince Albert.jpg jpg 0 1 2 2013 500×833
045 Erect penis with high angle.jpg jpg 0 0 1 2012 394×716
046 Erect phimosis.jpg jpg 0 0 2 2008 800×600 Yes
047 Erect shaved human penis.jpg jpg 0 0 1 2010 640×480
048 Erected penis -.jpg jpg 0 0 1 2012 575×810
049 Erected penis penile raphe.png png 0 1 2 2007 800×600
050 Erected penis.jpg jpg 0 2 3 2006 800×600 Yes
051 Erectf60141.jpg jpg 0 0 4 2009 480×480
052 Erection Pénis.jpg jpg 0 0 3 2011 632×435
053 Erektion.jpeg jpeg 0 0 1 2011 599×359
054 Flaccid and erect human penises in comparison.JPG jpg 1 0 3 2013 581×701
055 Frenulum 01.jpg jpg 0 0 2 2012 1024×768
056 Frenulumretained-circumcised.jpg jpg 0 4 5 2013 883×966
057 Full genitals of male..jpg jpg 0 0 2 2013 600×800
058 Glans 01.jpg jpg 0 0 1 2012 810×640
059 Hairy body trimmed pubic hair0001.jpg jpg 0 0 3 2013 479×452
060 Human anatomy Penis erected.jpg jpg 0 0 1 2010 658×636
061 Human penis in erect state.jpg jpg 0 0 1 2012 1024×768
062 Hypospadias erection.JPG jpg 2 0 2 2008 714×951
063 Japanese man.jpg jpg 0 0 1 2012 1024×768
064 Kopie von IMAG0237 03.JPG jpg 0 0 4 2012 1024×768
065 KÉP 004.jpg jpg 0 0 3 2010 640×480
066 Maestrullli.jpg jpg 0 0 1 2012 640×480
067 Male erection.jpg jpg 1 0 2 2013 640×480
068 Masturbation von Ultra00.MTS.OGG ogg 0 0 5 2011 483×272
069 Micropenis Jack Morley 3 Inch Erection.jpg jpg 0 0 2 2012 1024×768
070 Morning Wood - Flickr - stnu.jpg jpg 0 0 1 2012 683×1024
071 My dick in 2007 - Flickr - stnu.jpg jpg 0 0 1 2012 600×800
072 My erect penis 02.JPG jpg 0 0 2 2012 640×480
073 My penis 3.jpg jpg 2 0 3 2014 1041×926
074 Oily penis.jpeg jpeg 0 0 3 2013 615×820
075 Penile Subincision.jpg jpg 1 0 5 2013 480×640
076 Penis 013 edited.jpg jpg 0 0 1 2011 513×759
077 Penis 2014-03-17 16-10.jpg jpg 1 0 4 2014 319×454
078 Penis circoncis en erection.JPG jpg 1 0 2 2009 398×724
079 Penis closeup00.JPG jpg 0 0 2 2013 768×1024
080 Penis closeup01.JPG jpg 0 0 2 2013 608×947
081 Penis closeup02.JPG jpg 0 0 2 2013 759×770
082 Penis closeup06.JPG jpg 0 0 2 2013 523×985
083 Penis enlarger.jpg jpg 0 1 4 2012 420×363
084 Penis erection glans 1.jpg jpg 1 0 3 2009 845×1024 Yes
085 Penis Size jpeg 0 0 2 2013 960×552
086 Penis with vitiligo.jpg jpg 0 0 4 2008 640×480
087 Penisdaysurgery.jpg jpg 0 1 1 2012 2048×1536
088 Penise.jpg jpg 0 0 1 2011 384×512
089 Penisincockring.jpg jpg 0 0 4 2010 900×675 Yes
090 Phimose.jpg jpg 0 1 2 2007 1024×297
091 Pre-ejaculate.jpg jpg 0 0 1 2011 261×232
092 Pre-ejaculation.jpg jpg 2 0 2 2010 384×512
093 Prince albert pierced penis.jpg jpg 0 0 2 2008 1024×768
094 Prince Albert Piercing e Hafada piercing (6).tiff tiff 0 0 6 2012 640×480
095 Prince Closeup.jpg jpg 0 0 2 2010 800×532
096 Process of penile erection.png png 0 0 2 2012 728×583
097 Putting on a Condom.ogv ogv 0 0 6 2011 320×240
098 Pénis en érection 4.jpg jpg 0 0 3 2011 600×450
099 Samenerguss.gif gif 1 0 2 2011 720×576
100 Semi Erected asian penis.JPG jpg 0 0 2 2012 480×548
101 Snapshot 20131022 1.PNG png 0 0 2 2013 640×480
102 Snapshot 20131022.PNG png 0 0 2 2013 640×480
103 Steifer Penis.JPG jpg 0 0 2 2010 1024×768
104 Storstake.jpg jpg 0 0 1 2010 700×508
105 Strøm 001.jpg jpg 0 0 1 2011 640×480
106 Superficial dorsal vein of penis.jpg jpg 0 7 3 2011 685×915
107 Superficial dorsal vein of the penis (erect).png png 0 3 2 2008 705×914
108 This is me - Flickr - stnu.jpg jpg 0 0 1 2012 683×1024
109 Uncut erected penis foreskin retracted-2.jpg jpg 0 0 3 2008 455×383
110 Very large penis.jpg jpg 0 0 2 2012 598×800
111 Waynecuba.jpg jpg 0 0 2 2012 600×412
112 Wear a condom and ejaculation after Orgasm.JPG jpg 0 0 3 2010 800×390
113 Yo2.JPG jpg 0 0 2 2013 614×461
114 勃起.jpg jpg 0 0 2 2013 271×408
115 Full view ready for reproduction.JPG jpg 0 0 2 2013 686×700

Btmpnr01 (talk) 14:52, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Rather than duplicating information, I have updated the original list of files above with a wikitable including information about usage. Feel free to break this out as a separate table if there is a need to do so. Files on the MediaWiki "bad image list" have been marked out, this means they have previously been subject to extensive review and discussion, and are in use as educational images even if their content may be highly sexual in nature. -- (talk) 14:04, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep - That an image is low resolution is not in of itself a reason for deletion. While I expect some of these files could and should be deleted, such a mass DR is not the correct method. -mattbuck (Talk) 17:21, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I thought that I read Please note that low-quality images with no realistic educational use nor a purpose within the Wikimedia projects may be deleted. For further information, see Commons:Nudity. in some categories with {{Commons nudity (category header)}} and Commons:Nudity#Images better than existing images at Commons:Nudity, and I thought these files match that criteria, but also I lost my glasses, I may not reading the screen well. So sorry, it won't happen again. --Btmpnr01 (talk) 21:33, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
You're correct on that front, but a mass DR is not an appropriate way to do this IMO. Because people will no doubt think "image X is ok, but image Y should be deleted", the closing admin will be left with having to work out a confusion of comments and is likely to get things wrong because of that. Some of those photos (I'm at work, so can't look now, but I did check previously) are to me decent quality. Image resolution is one aspect of quality, but it's not the be-all and end-all. A 100 megapixel image can be bad quality - blurred, overexposed, etc - while a 0.1 megapixel image can be excellently lit and sharp. -mattbuck (Talk) 14:53, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep per Mattbuck. This haphazard collection of images, apparently selected by resolution using VFC and due to their content including nudity (though some do not), is not based on policy. Many of these images are in use (e.g. this file is in use on over 20 different Wikimedia projects), and so by default must not be deleted by a Commons administrator unless a further issue of copyright or similar policy based rationale is forthcoming. Some of the images even have verified OTRS tickets relating to them, giving a high confidence as to copyright status for re-users and increasing their value to this project for that reason. If an interested contributor were to systematically identify selfies (by adding them to that category), that were not in use on any projects, with no apparent educational value and raise a new DR on that basis, this would be helpful and far more likely to result in out of scope files being removed. -- (talk) 19:29, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept per discussion. Some of the files are in use, some of them have been uploaded years ago and may have been in use or may be in external use. Some of them may be unnecessary, though, but this would need individual review and should be addressed in smaller deletion requests. --Krd 14:18, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 15:15, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 16:19, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 18:11, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Delete: Heavily-compressed JPEG version of existing SVG. Misleading name. Illegitimate Barrister 23:52, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 10:20, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems to a derivative work of a copyrighted iamge [9] Redtigerxyz (talk) 18:32, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 10:19, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image of a non-notable person. Serves no educational purpose. —Bill william comptonTalk 18:40, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 10:19, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The artist, Alex Grey, is living. There is no evidence of permission for this use. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:20, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, by Fastily due to copyright violation. OTRS-permission from artist is needed. Taivo (talk) 11:40, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Commons is no private photo album; the educational value of this file is highly doubtful as long as it is not used on any Wikimedia project or on the uploader's userpage High Contrast (talk) 20:04, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Out of scope Captain-tucker (talk) 11:09, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Commons is no private photo album; the educational value of this file is highly doubtful as long as it is not used on any Wikimedia project or on the uploader's userpage High Contrast (talk) 20:04, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Out of scope Captain-tucker (talk) 11:09, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

What's this? Useless. Lupo 21:14, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Out of scope Captain-tucker (talk) 11:05, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

sexually explicit Thepoliticalmaster (talk) 13:23, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

They are low res, blurred, and the exif is somewhat weird... What is this, cell phone images? I thought they could be stills from a video, but they may be legit after all.-- Darwin Ahoy! 17:17, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Pornographic content is not a reason for deletion. Human sexuality is a valid topic of educational enquiry. I accept this is a truly, truly awful photo, but we really don't have anything similar which is better. If we had a range of images showing anal toy use in high resolution that are in focus I would happily delete this - I'm all for getting rid of bad images when we have suitable replacements - but we don't. -mattbuck (Talk) 02:16, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
File:Anal_2.jpg

 Delete Bad quality. Same User has uploaded File:Anal3.jpg That photo shows the same action in better quality. Gegensystem (talk) 16:13, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted - not educational usefull, so out of scope, as has been pointed out by sufficient users in the first DR - nudism is by itself not a reason to delete a file, but also isn't by itself a reason to keep like some seem to think - Jcb (talk) 13:58, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

And here it is: Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests#File:Anal_2.jpg --Saibo (Δ) 16:26, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Undeleted -mattbuck (Talk) 06:06, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
File:Anal_2.jpg 3

I believe COM:NOT#Commons is not your personal free web host and COM:PORN are what are required here. This is not used on any Wikimedia project, and it most certainly does not have any educational value. The uploader Xuri (talk · contribs) has only ever contributed photographs of himself inserting a sexual toy into himself, which is most definitely a case of COM:PORN. Just because it's freely licensed and there are no other photographs does not mean this image (and its brethren) need to be retained. —Ryūlóng (竜龙) 06:48, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted as per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Anal 3.jpg russavia (talk) 16:16, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Gbawden (talk) 06:48, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:43, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Reduntant. Image of the same object is here (better focused to penis). Kulmalukko (talk) 21:35, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 05:16, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

typical selfshot exhibitionist bad quality out of project scope penis image. Marcus Cyron (talk) 20:23, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:26, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality penis photo. -mattbuck (Talk) 17:13, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, give us this day our daily penises ... Taivo (talk) 13:20, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Gbawden (talk) 06:50, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



kept: Natuur12 (talk) 18:44, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 08:16, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Mediocre quality penis selfie, not useful photo of very common object which Commons already has many better quality illustrations. (Note: Different photo than earlier deletion of same name). --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:21, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PENIS BrightRaven (talk) 10:03, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted, very poor quality orphan own penis snapshot -- Infrogmation (talk) 12:28, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Taivo (talk) 09:19, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, by Denniss. Taivo (talk) 12:14, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Gbawden (talk) 06:50, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 14:20, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:46, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is of much too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose. It's out of project scope. Ies (talk) 16:33, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



deleted: --Krd 06:42, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 08:16, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:21, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I fail to see how this photo is relevant. Please remove it. JimHolland (talk) 04:43, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I also agree with this one. Please remove. Ellen Rovesana


Deleted: INeverCry 00:08, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PENIS BrightRaven (talk) 10:04, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted. Uselessly bad quality own penis snapshot. -- Infrogmation (talk) 12:29, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Gbawden (talk) 06:50, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



deteted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:49, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Gbawden (talk) 06:50, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:24, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I fail to see how this photo is relevant. Please remove it. JimHolland (talk) 04:41, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I agree as well. This should be removed as soon as possible. Ellen Rovesana

Ewww! RoloBeard5


Deleted: INeverCry 00:08, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Gbawden (talk) 06:50, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 10:11, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I fail to see how this photo is relevant. Please remove it. JimHolland (talk) 04:47, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please remove this one too. No one needs to see this. Ellen Rovesana

Why?? RoloBeard5


Deleted: INeverCry 00:08, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Gbawden (talk) 06:50, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:50, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Gbawden (talk) 06:51, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:25, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Gbawden (talk) 06:51, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:25, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rajput Bus Service (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:PS: Personal promo, no educational value at all

~ Nahid Talk 09:38, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:25, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rajput Bus Service (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused and uncategorised files. Two of them are thumbnails

Estopedist1 (talk) 20:35, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Fitindia (talk) 09:34, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Krd 12:15, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 09:28, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Krd 12:15, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 09:28, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Krd 12:15, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 09:29, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 12:38, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 09:29, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Also lacking source information. Storkk (talk) 13:30, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:44, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused test file. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:52, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 21:09, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 14:20, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Out of scope Captain-tucker (talk) 19:43, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not realistically useful for an educational purpose - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 14:25, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Out of scope Captain-tucker (talk) 19:43, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 14:29, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 09:37, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope Ies (talk) 14:30, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 09:38, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope Ies (talk) 14:30, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 09:38, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope Ies (talk) 14:31, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 09:39, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope Ies (talk) 14:31, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 09:39, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope Ies (talk) 14:32, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 09:39, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope Ies (talk) 14:32, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 09:39, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope Ies (talk) 14:33, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 09:39, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope Ies (talk) 14:33, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 09:39, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope Ies (talk) 14:34, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 09:42, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope Ies (talk) 14:35, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 09:42, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope Ies (talk) 14:35, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 09:42, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope Ies (talk) 14:36, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 09:43, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope Ies (talk) 14:36, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 09:43, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope Ies (talk) 14:37, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 09:43, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:29, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope Ies (talk) 14:38, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:29, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope Ies (talk) 14:38, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:45, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope Ies (talk) 14:39, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:45, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope Ies (talk) 14:39, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:45, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope Ies (talk) 14:40, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:45, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope Ies (talk) 14:42, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Out of scope Captain-tucker (talk) 19:53, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 14:47, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Keeping this image makes sense. It is a very likely 1970s photograph of a black woman with Afro-style-hair. We do not have so much of those kind. --High Contrast (talk) 14:54, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio, looks like a professional yearbook photo Captain-tucker (talk) 19:55, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 14:48, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Out of scope Captain-tucker (talk) 19:55, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 14:48, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Out of scope Captain-tucker (talk) 20:02, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Lewis Hulbert (talk) 15:04, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Out of scope Captain-tucker (talk) 20:06, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality private child image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 16:31, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 21:08, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, personal picture(s), out of Project Scope. Amitie 10g (talk) 18:53, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:49, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, personal picture(s), out of Project Scope. Amitie 10g (talk) 18:55, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:50, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Merihtarim (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused, personal picture(s), out of Project Scope.

Amitie 10g (talk) 02:41, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:33, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio http://crosbylover.tumblr.com/post/85971806445/ray-shero-youre-a-penguin-for-life-in-my-heart or http://lazy18geno71.tumblr.com/ Supertoff (talk) 05:59, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Already deleted by Fastily --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 10:03, 2 June 2014 (UTC) (non-admin closure)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio http://www.lapresse.ca/sports/hockey/201405/16/01-4767298-les-penguins-congedient-leur-dg-ray-shero.php Supertoff (talk) 06:01, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Already deleted by Fastily --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 09:57, 2 June 2014 (UTC) (non-admin closure)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio http://www.lapagesportive.com/mario-lemieux-se-vide-le-coeur/ Supertoff (talk) 06:14, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Already deleted by Fastily --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 09:56, 2 June 2014 (UTC) (non-admin closure)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 07:20, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:56, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 07:21, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:56, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata and text overlay make the assertion of {{Own}} dubious. If uploader is copyright holder, the steps on COM:OTRS should be followed to confirm this. Storkk (talk) 09:00, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 08:47, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photograph of a (dirty) screen - unlikely to be {{Own}} except as a derivative work of the original. Additionally, there are scope issues. Storkk (talk) 09:18, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete Why would anybody take a photo of Google Image results? Not too sure about the copyright status of it (simple text, but a lot of it) but since it's out of scope it's nothing worth thinking about. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 11:21, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: FASTILY 08:53, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 12:16, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:47, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 12:18, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:47, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not realistically useful for an educational purpose - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 12:23, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 08:47, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 12:37, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 08:46, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio, photo has embedded text: walkingistanbul.com. http://www.walkingistanbul.com/EserDetay.aspx?mk=249. Sayginer (talk) 12:41, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 08:46, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 12:43, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 08:48, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, not realistically useful for an educational purpose - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 12:47, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 08:47, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not realistically useful for an educational purpose - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 12:57, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 08:46, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 12:57, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 08:46, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 13:48, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:45, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:41, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:35, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is of much too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose. It's out of project scope. Ies (talk) 16:40, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:40, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is of much too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose. It's out of project scope. Ies (talk) 16:40, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:40, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio http://bleacherreport.com/articles/920848-san-jose-sharks-five-worst-decisions-of-doug-wilsons-career Supertoff (talk) 21:18, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:45, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio http://www.sportsmemorabilia.com/player/Ruslan_Fedotenko Supertoff (talk) 21:19, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:45, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio http://www.zimbio.com/photos/Evgeni+Malkin/Stanley+Cup+Finals+Pittsburgh+Penguins+v+Detroit/iC4Bzz5lUNk Supertoff (talk) 21:22, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:46, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio http://www.zimbio.com/photos/Brooks+Orpik/Stanley+Cup+Finals+Pittsburgh+Penguins+v+Detroit/PrDfNUfQg7n Supertoff (talk) 21:23, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:46, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work, copied from here https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=859229197424609&id=743099239037606&set=a.743125645701632.1073741828.743099239037606&source=46&refid=17 Vigyani (talk) 22:51, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Copyvio Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:47, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, personal picture(s), out of Project Scope. Used in article tagged for Speede Delete at es:Wikipedia. Amitie 10g (talk) 03:46, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 20:20, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, personal picture(s), out of Project Scope. Amitie 10g (talk) 03:48, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 20:21, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rogermark (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Probably not own work, seeing the user's history.

Yann (talk) 04:52, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Yann. Probably not own work for this two pics. Not only because of the user's history but these pics are from the same series  : player with Stanley Cup in hands. (Check the previous deleted files). Supertoff (talk) 05:08, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Low resolution files, uploader with a copyvio history. Dereckson (talk) 00:12, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 08:30, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, Out of COM:PS. ~ Nahid Talk 06:41, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 08:30, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, ~ Nahid Talk 06:44, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 08:31, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, Out of COM:PS. ~ Nahid Talk 06:46, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image collection, not educationally useful — Racconish ✉ 09:56, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: out of project scope Julo (talk) 12:52, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image collection, not educationally useful — Racconish ✉ 09:57, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: out of project scope Julo (talk) 12:53, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image collection, not educationally useful — Racconish ✉ 10:00, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, Out of COM:PS ~ Nahid Talk 06:52, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image collection, not educationally useful — Racconish ✉ 10:01, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 20:23, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 10:42, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:31, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 10:43, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:26, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 10:43, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:26, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 10:44, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:26, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image, not in project scope. — Racconish ✉ 13:52, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, Because of copyvio. And this is not a personal photo. South Korean actor Lee Dong-wook ~ Nahid Talk 08:43, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal file, out of project scope — Racconish ✉ 13:59, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, Out of COM:PS ~ Nahid Talk 08:44, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal file, out of project scope. — Racconish ✉ 14:01, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, ~ Nahid Talk 08:49, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal file, out of project scope. — Racconish ✉ 14:02, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, ~ Nahid Talk 08:50, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal unused file, out of project scope — Racconish ✉ 14:06, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 08:44, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal unused file, out of project scope — Racconish ✉ 14:08, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 08:44, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal unused file, out of project scope — Racconish ✉ 14:09, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 08:44, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work Fetx2002 (talk) 14:25, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 08:46, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rajat jaswaniya (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Collection of promo photos. No evidenc of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:44, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Adrien barbosa (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:44, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:44, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE. -- Túrelio (talk) 15:43, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:45, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution version of File:Anonymous emblem.svg Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:09, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:40, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image; see COM:SCOPE. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:12, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 08:48, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by No1gazza (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The two images appear to be photographs of a television broadcast (see COM:DW). The logo suffers from the same problem.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:33, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:48, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, personal picture(s), out of Project Scope. Amitie 10g (talk) 20:53, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:49, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Used only to vandalize https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ricky_Polston. Does not depict the person named in the file name. Dwpaul (talk) 00:28, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: out of scope, copyright status unclear Ymblanter (talk) 19:21, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, personal picture(s), out of Project Scope. Amitie 10g (talk) 00:50, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 19:22, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lipton.jacob (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Self prommotional or spam picture(s), out of Project Scope.

Amitie 10g (talk) 00:58, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Already deleted by Hedwig in Washington. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 12:30, 1 June 2014 (UTC) (non admin closure)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image; see COM:SCOPE. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:39, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:09, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image; see COM:SCOPE. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:47, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:09, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See COM:SCOPE. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:25, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:10, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurry to the point of useless. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:26, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:10, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found elsewhere on the internet: cf. http://www.fearnet.com/news/news-article/industrial-metal-j-pop-and-total-insanity-come-together-babymetal Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:27, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:14, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rafiqun (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal images; see COM:SCOPE.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:42, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:15, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rafiqun (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal image

INeverCry 01:20, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:43, 14 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, personal picture(s), out of Project Scope. Amitie 10g (talk) 03:58, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Could have been speedy as well. No scope whatsoever. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:19, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Includes copyrighted and trademarked images, such as http://www.zimbio.com/photos/Nate+Wolters/Milwaukee+Bucks+v+Dallas+Mavericks/1nDqJFurB1g. discospinster (talk) 04:12, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 08:46, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright issue -- see http://espn.go.com/nba/player/_/id/2491079/nate-wolters discospinster (talk) 04:22, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: likely copyright violation Ymblanter (talk) 19:25, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 04:44, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Is uploading a picture of a penis even allowed on wikimedia commons? Besides that, is quality or irrelevance a criteria for deletion? PointsofNoReturn (talk) 20:26, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:53, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 06:33, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:16, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 06:34, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:16, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 08:18, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 19:27, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unknown person. Quality makes it essentially unusable. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:43, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:16, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lowest quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 10:53, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 08:48, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vishwaradhyaswamy (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image, out of scope

Indeedous (talk) 18:48, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: very heavy self-promotion. Taivo (talk) 15:52, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Vishwaradhyaswamy (talk · contribs)

[edit]

private images, missing essential information, nonsense-categorization

Indeedous (talk) 19:48, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • If I recall correctly I nominated some files with some similar names in the past for deletion. I suggest blocking the uploader, and, of course, all of these pictures should be deleted because of their self-promotional nature. --küñall (nütramyen) 05:18, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Agree. Looks ads like. --Achim (talk) 19:12, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. --Krd 17:13, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vishwaradhyaswamy (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Can't be own work if uploader is visible on images. No use for Commons due to lack of information about what the photos depict / location / etc..

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 20:59, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:00, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Vishwaradhyaswamy (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope

Natuur12 (talk) 12:02, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deleted as before. --Krd 12:08, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 13:33, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:32, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 13:34, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:32, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 13:34, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 08:47, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PENIS BrightRaven (talk) 10:03, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted, very poor quality orphan own penis snapshot -- Infrogmation (talk) 12:28, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Taivo (talk) 09:19, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, by Denniss. Taivo (talk) 12:14, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Gbawden (talk) 06:50, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 14:20, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:46, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is of much too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose. It's out of project scope. Ies (talk) 16:33, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



deleted: --Krd 06:42, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 08:16, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:21, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

If this is "own work" as claimed, then it is personal art and should be dleted. If it is not own work, then there is no license. There are no Google hits for this, so I also think it is out of scope as not notable. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:42, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:34, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation, no metadata, the rest of images uploaded by the same user have been speedily deleted (or will soon be) as copyright violations. Mike Rosoft (talk) 15:33, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Actually I don't think there's much evidence about this copy-vio. I've searched Tamim Iqbal's photo in 39 well-knowed newspapers or online portals. But couldn't find. So maybe no metadata, the rest of images uploaded by the same user have been speedily deleted (or will soon be) as copyright violations. won't help. --Pratyya (Hello!) 13:28, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: com:PCP Natuur12 (talk) 22:02, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

there are people in the picture without permission Gerri80 (talk) 16:28, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 08:46, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Subject not eligible for an article on any wiki: see COM:SCOPE. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:54, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:19, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Subject not eligible for an article on any wiki: see COM:SCOPE. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:06, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:19, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Yildenyilden (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Subject not eligible for an article on any wiki: see COM:SCOPE.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:08, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:19, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Subject's article was deleted on en.wp; not eligible for an article on any wiki: see COM:SCOPE. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:13, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:19, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 17:29, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:20, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurry, we do have an SVG file of this flag. Fry1989 eh? 18:00, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 08:45, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

404 error for the upload McZusatz (talk) 19:07, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:20, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

404 error. (please reupload) McZusatz (talk) 19:17, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:21, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - private photo of non-notable individual Jackmcbarn (talk) 21:00, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 08:47, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Certainly not "own work". Promo photo/movie still. Posted 2013 here. Original source and provenance unclear; U.S. copyright unclear. Lupo 22:31, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:22, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - private photo of non-notable individual Jackmcbarn (talk) 23:34, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 08:47, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE Jackmcbarn (talk) 23:44, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: (c)vio Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:40, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE Jackmcbarn (talk) 23:46, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted by Hedwig in Washington as a copyright violation. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 07:11, 2 June 2014 (UTC) (non-admin closure)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

http://tineye.com/search/54c46c2e208f75c7e95677531b2e98d0ee53ce3e/?sort=size&order=desc 太刻薄 (talk) 02:21, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete

{{db|obviously not the author's own work, see the link}}

— Preceding unsigned comment added by PointsofNoReturn (talk • contribs) 

Deleted -FASTILY 08:47, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Túrelio as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Out of COM:SCOPE, personal image, hardly usable. -- Krd 06:47, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 08:45, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 06:54, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 08:45, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 06:54, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 08:44, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

What does it hurt? It's made a couple very happy and odds are no-one will happen across this and be mislead by any information pertained within. I cannot see why anyone would even object to it. It's totally harmless and makes us happy and we actually hope to expand on the page. If it would make it more appropriate I can actually include bios and other information to make it more appropriate. However I see nothing wrong with a simple page bringing joy to a couple and their friends.

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 07:00, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 08:46, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 07:00, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 08:46, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 07:07, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 08:46, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 07:09, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 08:47, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 07:09, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 08:47, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 07:09, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:52, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 07:09, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 08:47, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope; powerpoint slide, text only Lupo 08:23, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 08:47, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not "own work". Promo photo, watermarked bottom right. Available from Allposters and similar sites, for instance [10]. Original source unknown; publication history and U.S. copyright unknown. Lupo 10:27, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted by Krd. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 13:49, 2 June 2014 (UTC) (non-admin closure)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bouzid1987 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Screenshot or promo photos from U.S. films from the 1960s.

Lupo 10:32, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 10:58, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

selfie of non-notable person OTAVIO1981 (talk) 11:18, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 08:45, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 12:21, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 08:47, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo of dubious educational value - out of scope... additionally, size and lack of metadata point to possible copyright issues, and uploader would need to confirm they are the copyright holder by following the steps at COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 12:26, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 08:47, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 12:28, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 08:45, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 12:31, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 08:45, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 13:14, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 08:45, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not realistically useful for an educational purpose - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 13:16, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 08:46, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright for logo not likely to be held by uploader. Logo is crosses the threshold of originality, and is probably not PD. If uploader is copyright holder, they should carefully follow the instructions on COM:OTRS to confirm this. Storkk (talk) 13:22, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 08:46, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 13:23, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 08:47, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not "own work". Corbis has this photo, too: [11] and claim it was rights managed by them. They give the date the photo was taken as January 2, 1929, and the location as San Francisco, California, USA. Indeed she was in the U.S. in early 1929; c.f. [12]. Which means it's a U.S. work and we need to figure out the publication history of this photo to ascertain its copyright status in the U.S. Lupo 13:26, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 08:44, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 13:31, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 08:48, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 13:32, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 08:46, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 13:33, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 08:46, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 13:39, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 08:47, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Gbawden (talk) 13:40, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 08:48, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Luis7698 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Photos of Brazilian soccer players. Not "own work". Publication history unknown, creation date unknown. Pinto was born 1921, Quarentinha 1933, Alvim 1920, and Zizinho 1921. {{PD-Brazil-media}} might apply if these photos had been published before 1944... At least for the Quarentinha photo that is flat out impossible. For the other photos, we'd need to know at least when the photos were taken or originally published.

Lupo 14:14, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: All clear copyvios. For the sake of the smooth running of the operations I would ignore Zizinho, who anyway is free per 1 January 2015 ({{PD-Brazil-media}} / 70 years after publication). On the other hand, for all practical intents and purposes, the commercial value of the rights to these images is at very best nominal as we know. The complete photo library of Manchete dos Sports, a major 1950s sports magazine from Rio de Janeiro, published by Mario Filho and Nelson Rodrigues (they are biggos!) was on the market a few years ago: not the slightest interest for a cheap asking price of some cents per picture, not even an offer. And this included the successful World Cup of 1958. The reason for this is, there is a gazillion of this type of material around as Rio in that era had about half a dozen newspapers (A Noite, A Manhã, O Imparcial, Ultima Hora, Globo, J. do Brasil, Diário de Notícias, Diário Carioca, ...) and a number of sports dailies (Esporte Illustrado, Jornal dos Sports, Manchete, ...) out there, and essentially all of them went bust. As a result, the existing media enterprises have pics like that by the ton and buyers, there simply aren't any. Any argument about those pictures is pretty much esoteric. Cheers, OAlexander (talk) 01:26, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the explanations. I don't quite get it, though. First you say they were copyvios, then that the Zizinho image would be PD next year. So you do have evidence for a publication in 1944 for that image, but not for the others? The commercial value of these is not important when it comes to copyright.
As an aside, I have in the meantime indef-blocked the uploader as he kept uploading lots of modern soccer player images that all were copyvios and kept ignoring any warnings. These four were the only ones of his uploads that just might be OK if we can show pre-1944 publication. Lupo 05:53, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Lupo: The last four digits of the images seem to indicate the year of publication in which the the uploader has found those images, which seems to be in line with the contents of those images. It would be unreasonable to attempt to track the images to their original sources, but with my expertise in historic Brazilian football (I read publications from that era regularly, (as can be eg. gleaned from EN:Nicolas Ladany, EN:Martim Francisco ...) I would suggest, that the uploader made a typo in the file name of the Zizinho image, which by my judgement (the jersey, etc.) looks rather from Esporte Illustrado (RJ), 1943 or earlier, I thus have marked this image {{PD-Brazil-media}} accordingly. The rest, regretfully can not be remedied, and according to regulations can be dealt with swiftly. I will see, if I can find some replacements for them. Cheers, OAlexander (talk) 07:33, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
No, the last four digits are the time of the upload (in local time, not UTC). It's auto-generated by the Mobile/Web upload of MediaWiki. Lupo 08:28, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
BTW, if you can date the images by the jerseys, that's fine, but how did you arrive at the conclusion that it must have been published in Esporte Illustrado? Lupo 08:45, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Also, according to [13], the Zizinho image was used in 1950 as an autograph photo. I would think that for the World Cup 1950, they'd have used a more recent picture, not a seven year old one, so I'm not sure about your 1943 dating. He's wearing a CBD jersey; I guess that's the one of the national team? According to en:Thomaz Soares da Silva, he was on the national team from 1942 to 1957, so that would give some date bracket. Lupo 08:53, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Esporte Ilustrado have a very typical style of photography suited to the format of the publication, which indeed consists largely of little text and expressive photographs that in portraits are relatively expressive, almost artful. A bit like Argentina's El Gráfico in its earlier decades (some years ago they had their 80th Jubilee and their first two decades were completely online - what a feast) - but Esporte Ilustrado did not quite live up to that. It was actually revived some years ago, but did not even sell for a ridiculous price of 50 Cents or thereabouts. Anyway, after delving deeper into the issue I can no longer support the idea that the Zizinho portrait is an early 40s one and must support the deletion of all images in question. When I get to it, I will upload another Zizinho from "EI", but surely properly sourced. Cheers, OAlexander (talk) 02:15, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:22, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - private photo of a non-notable individual Jackmcbarn (talk) 14:25, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 08:46, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 08:44, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 08:45, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 14:53, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 08:45, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright issues - looks like a photo of a newspaper/magazine. Additionally, the size and quality of the photograph mean it's not realistically useful for an educational purpose, thus out of scope. Storkk (talk) 14:56, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 08:47, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 15:13, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 08:47, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 16:25, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 08:46, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 16:26, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 08:46, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, personal picture(s), out of Project Scope. Amitie 10g (talk) 19:00, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 08:46, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of non-notable minor used for purposes of vandalism. discospinster (talk) 22:59, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per above Lupo 10:01, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of minor used for purposes of vandalism. discospinster (talk) 23:00, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:22, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]