Commons:Deletion requests/mobile tracking

File:1945-08-29 CanadianFilmWeekly p2 CiC-ad-72dpi.jpg

The date of death of the author is unknown, it cannot be confirmed that the file is in the public domain. Astrinko (talk) 12:04, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

According to US federal copyright law, fair use includes the use of a photo for educational purposes, research, criticism, comment and news reporting. One factor in determining fair use is whether it is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit purposes. In this instance I have uploaded it for inclusion on a forthcoming Wikipedia page detailing the life of the author of the original novel behind "Christmas in Connecticut", so its use is both educational and not for profit. Fearless6 (talk) 13:50, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also safe to assume from published photos the author is now either dead or over 120 years old. Fearless6 (talk) 13:51, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

COM:FAIRUSE does not exist on Commons, whose COM:Licensing terms require commercial use to be acceptable under copyright laws. en.wikipedia and some of the other Wikipedias do allow fair use under specified conditions. However, was publicity for American films ever copyrighted, when that required registration? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:25, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use files should not be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, as fair use files are still under copyright protection. Wikimedia Commons cannot accept copyrighted content unless the copyright owner allows the file to be freely re-shared. Astrinko (talk) 01:33, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:2020 Karabakh conflict collage.jpg

File:Ibrahim Aqil (Hezbollah).webp

I find it highly unlikely that Rewards for Justice is creator of this photograph. Discostu (talk) 20:06, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@MeirKovner, Are you the creator of the picture? It's a shame that the image used on many wiki sites will be deleted. Neriah (talk) 19:33, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The photo is property of the United States government, which is free for dispersal. Rewards for Justice is a government organization, and if they didn't own the rights to the photo, they wouldn't have been able to print wanted posters, and send the photo to the masses with hope of identification. This should not be deleted, in accordance with copyright law. MeirKovner (talk) 19:14, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The user @MeirKovner you are right. Aurelio Sandoval (Mensajes aquí please) 17:12, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Nothing suggests this photo was generated by the US government; they usually make available photos given by third parties. Although the website belongs to the DOJ, it clearly states a "© 2024 Rewards for Justice" notice. This makes me think the photo is not in the public domain. --Bedivere (talk) 16:59, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cutouts TheSmile.jpg

У изображения должно быть право на добросовестное использование. А у обычных пользователей право выкладывать изображение альбома или другого вида искусства нельзя Simplyhuman05 (talk) 22:09, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logo provincia di Grosseto.png

Copyrighted, from Araldicacivica.it (with license CC-BY-NC-ND, source: https://www.araldicacivica.it/provincia/grosseto/) Ashoppio (talk) 22:43, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete, per nomination. For araldicacivica's licensing policy see https://www.araldicacivica.it/info/disclaimer/ Arrow303 (talk) 22:21, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Taranto - Ponte di Porta Napoli - 2024-09-18 14-20-05 001.jpg

Perché la foto ritrae il Ponte San Francesco di Paola, comunemente chiamato Ponte Girevole Giacomo Resta (talk) 15:17, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not a deletion reason, as you are free to edit the file description and request COM:File renaming, but is this really your own work, User:Marycristin? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:40, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alto Trujillo Logo.jpg

Creí que esta imagen era PNG, pero tiene un fondo negro. Rocky god (talk) 12:33, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You had claimed it was your own work when you uploaded it. Can you clarify? Platonides (talk) 23:46, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sudarshan Chakra Corps.png

Old version Adiiitya (talk) 09:34, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So what? My question would be what is this a logo of and why is it in COM:SCOPE? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:56, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Trishakti Corps India.png

Old version Adiiitya (talk) 09:35, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So what? My question would be what is this a logo of and why is it in COM:SCOPE? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:57, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Villa D'Adige - Piazza Felice Chieregatto.jpg

Licenza errata, opera derivata senza specificare la fonte che è evidentemente un libro o una pubblicazione, originariamente probabilmente cartoline delle quali non si conosce l'autore né il periodo dello scatto. Threecharlie (talk) 10:33, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Translate: "Incorrect license, derivative work without specifying the source which is evidently a book or a publication, originally probably postcards of which the author and the period of the shot are unknown."
Keep Here we have a pic of pic. The original looks like a postcard circa 1940 or earlier. Italy only awards 20 years of exclusivity. --RAN (talk) 01:34, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Blanche-monnier.png

Yanlış resim (Alınan kaynak hatalı yönlendirdi) Klingbeil16 (talk) 11:44, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

PD old. Keep. 186.172.224.161 13:44, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Banner of West Bengal.png

Wrong mime type Coolmaster69 (talk) 12:17, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep COM:INUSE. I don't understand the problem, but why don't you fix it and upload your edit? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:07, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This image was deleted several times by consensus, e.g., Commons:Deletion_requests/Emblem_of_West_Bengal, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Emblem of the Government of West Bengal.svg, and Commons:Undeletion_requests/Archive/2023-10#File:Emblem_of_West_Bengal.svg. Günther Frager (talk) 22:03, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Belomorkanal

Derivatives, COM:PACKAGING.

Quick1984 (talk) 18:52, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This one is a bit more complex. The original packaging design was made by the Leningrad artist Andrey Tarakanov (Андрей Тараканов). It showed three different canals on it (Belomor-Baltic, Kiel, and Suez canals). Neither of the nominated files has this design. The design was updated in the 1950s to only show Soviet canal with red lines for borders (of the USSR). This is the design we see in File:Belomorkanal gaspers pack. Avers and revers.jpg and File:Belomorkanalsav.jpg. The design was once again updated after the Soviet Union fell apart. This time the red lines that were symbolizing the borders were removed. That's the design we see in File:Belomorkanal cigarette box.jpg and File:Belomorkanal.JPG. Source for the info on the designs: [1][2]. So, we have two derivate works of a design which was created some time between 1932 and the 1950s, and the author's birth date and death date are not mentioned anywhere it seems (it's also a quite common name; there are several artists with that name, the oldest one I'm finding was born in 1898). Nakonana (talk) 19:11, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Citu flag.jpg

This file was initially tagged by GoldRoger487 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Offensive
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion. Rationale needs elaboration. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:52, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like someone is offended by the hammer and sickle. That's totally OK, but serious reference sites don't delete important symbols and images just because they may be offensive. Can you imagine if Wikipedia were restricted to inoffensive subjects? It would become utter pablum, rather than an encyclopedia. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:55, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It should no longer be deleted as it is the flag of the Centre of Indian Trade Unions and not a joke about the romanian polician Florin Citu.

I will add Category:Centre of Indian Trade Unions and Category:Flags of trade unions in India categories beside the current ones.GoldRoger487 (talk) 12:23, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Primer escudo de Oriente Petrolero.png

Es extremadamente falso,no es la bandera original ,la bandera no viene con esos colores 🌈 Rexenticford (talk) 18:23, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

El escudo es extremadamente falso,ha Sido modificado y además no tiene esos colores 🌈 Rexenticford (talk) 18:28, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

{{ subst : delete3 |pg=File:Primer escudo de Oriente Petrolero.png}} — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 177.222.37.49 (talk) 18:43, 20 October 2024 (UTC) https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Primer_escudo_de_Oriente_Petrolero.png[reply]

El escudo es falso no pertenece al club y no tiene nada que ver con lo relacionado de la busqueda Lucianoxddd12345 (talk) 23:47, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag-map of Jamaica.svg

No muestra la imagen. Maximum 1995 (talk) 17:47, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I cannot explain what happened to the image, but this seems to be a Commons-wide problem as I've seen it happen to other files over the last few months as well. The file will need to be repaired. Fry1989 ^eh? 19:57, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rajabagan police station.jpg

Not clear pic Soumava2002 (talk) 13:55, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Perfectly usable, but if you'd like to resubmit, consider submitting a larger photo, and include EXIF Metadata to show clearly that you took the photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:29, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ikan Kekek: The user usually don't submit good-quality photos compared to average photos uploaded by many other Indian users, which often lead me to doubt whether the photos are taken by him (yes, Soumava, a variant of Soumyabha, is a male name). Some of the photos are aerial shots. Let me ping him to confirm it. Sbb1413 (he) (talk • contribs • uploads) 12:10, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Any comment, User:Soumava2002? Are the photos you submit photos you shot? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:19, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nu, User:Soumava2002? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:59, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Structure idf.png

This page violates the information security of the Israel Defense Forces. External parties can use this information against the IDF, and harm the current security of the state by using this information. It should be remove from the IDF page, and delete this file. Nivst (talk) 18:28, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are quite late. The file has been here since 2009; the current version since 2013. Nakonana (talk) 19:53, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Widely COM:INUSE. Is there any copyright problem with it? It's not Commons' job to protect Israeli security. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:38, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Belinus panels.jpg

This is Isaksen Solar's photo. We did not authorize the uploading of this photo. We reserve all rights to this image. Rcross12 (talk) 12:18, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Yuri Togkces working at Amnesty international as coordinator.jpg

Copyright Yisel alitane (talk) 21:16, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright Robert Dobson (talk) 16:46, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Does not meet the criteria Robert Dobson (talk) 06:30, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Does not meet the criteria Robert Dobson (talk) 06:34, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright Robert Dobson (talk) 06:36, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Espace réservé au statut du musée patrimoniale de Baham.jpg

presence de marque de telephone Bile rene (talk) 02:17, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Watermarks are discouraged but not on their own a reason to delete; source image for a cropped version without the watermark. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:14, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sylheti world.jpg

Inaccurate map with no sources or references, such figures can never found as no data is recorded of such a group and wrong countries are highlighted giving false information Abu Ayyub (talk) 21:52, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep COM:INUSE. Discuss this on the file's talk page. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:12, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Seseorang ISTJ dapat cermat dalam menyelesaikan tugas.jpg

Kesalahan pada berkas Trivalprim (talk) 08:13, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No reason for deletion given ("Kesalahan pada berkas" means "Error in file", useless in the context), unsure whether in scope. Taylor 49 (talk) 00:23, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logo-PSB40.png

Not own work Heylenny (talk) 19:23, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Charleston County Sunset.jpg

The uploader wishes to repost this file with no changes except for removing the image title section. Sl4d56 (talk) 22:13, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sylheti map.png

The author had uploaded a new version: File:Sylheti Map.png while it should have been uploaded in this file as there were multiple uploads, the new file is more detailed and accurate Abu Ayyub (talk) 22:41, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Musée de la civilisation Québec 53.jpg

It needs to be evaluated whether the depicted piece of text is (or not) above threshold of originality. Canada has no freedom-of-panorama exception for 2D-works. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:29, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Same problem with File:Musée de la civilisation Québec 54.jpg

File:Jimmy Spencer Crew Chief DF-SD-01-07451 (cropped).jpg

Not Donnie Wingo Bradleyrmcelroy (talk) 20:44, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Vaild PD license. The category can be changed and the file removed from wikidata, if the photo is not Donny Wingo. I do not know if that person is correctly identified. Thanks, -- Ooligan (talk) 22:09, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hay que proceder a su eliminación — Preceding unsigned comment added by Laurasanchez27 (talk • contribs) 13:23, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Juanjo Bona Arregui.png

No sé adecúa a los criterios de derechos de autor Laurasanchez27 (talk) 13:13, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:বানু শাহ আগার দুর্গের ধ্বংসাবশেষ.jpg

This is not the ruins of Banu Shah Agar Fort. This is an image of the Castle of Montearagón. ফারদিন (talk) 13:48, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The important issue is copyrights, though. 200.39.139.20 15:06, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Прапор хотина Монтажная область 1.svg

Зробив нову версію прапора Potemkovskiy_Vladislav (talk) 15:46, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ante starcevic square.jpg

I uploaded it a year ago, after buying the photo on Shutterstock or Adobe, not sure anymore. It is not my own work and now I know that photos uploaded on Wikimedia commons must be my own work, or at least not being affected by copyright. I don't want to steal the photo or break any law or rule, which I did by uploading the photo. Please remove it ASAP. Thank you and sorry for not reading the rules correctly! Maddock13 (talk) 13:40, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Adil Shahi Dynasty (Bijapur sultanate).png

Exaggerated, the Sultanate did not go that far south, it never even came close to Mangalore. The map was made by a malicious Sockpuppet and should be deleted in order to prevent any confusion from happening (it has already happened once). AlvaKedak (talk) 18:48, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Teymur Mammadov34

..................... Teymur Mammadov34 (talk) 19:44, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Teymur Mammadov34, why did you create your userpage if you didn't want it? Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 19:54, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dhenkanal, Odisha, India - panoramio (4).jpg

Wedding not for any public use JAMKUM (talk) 07:58, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep privacy is not important, because it's just a COM:Non-copyright restrictions. "Weak keep", however, since I am uncertain if the possibly-copyrighted décor shown passes COM:FOP India (as a "work of artistic craftsmanship"). If it's not meant to be a permanent décor, then the Panoramio import needs to be deleted, unfortunately. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contributions) 10:50, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kuba Szyperski.jpg

False copyright claim – picture downloaded from Instagram Ambiroz (talk) 12:57, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Torquemada. La ruda 44.jpg

Torquemada no era inquisidor? 200.39.139.29 15:18, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, and Torquemada is also a family name. Either way, not a reason for deletion. However I am unsure of it this is in project COM:SCOPE - photo of person lying on a floor, may be part of a series of a theater production? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:01, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/User talk:Praju Ramasamy

File:Map of Mehrauli Archaeological Park.jpg

Not OK. For copyrighted 2D (paintings, drawings, maps, pictures, engravings, etc.) per COM:FOP India Ooligan (talk) 22:10, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Manual breast pump being used.png

Personal photo by non-contributors, see COM:NUDITY. Astrinko (talk) 17:02, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Procedural keep In use on en.wiki, and it appears to be a valid use. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:06, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Agree.

Keep. This one is definitely one of the "in scope" type of nudity images. Nakonana (talk) 02:35, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Yep. COM:INUSE, and even if not, I'd argue that it should probably be kept as useful if it were really the uploader's photo. However, the Metadata says only "Software used: gnome-screenshot." So why do we think this is really User:Rogerthat9001's own work as claimed? The combination of the metadata and the size suggests to me that this is likely to have been stolen from some website, so I support deletion unless the uploader can convince COM:VRT that they shot the photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:52, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, yes I took the photo (and the others I have uploaded), with the consent of the two individuals in the photos. The reason the metadata says screenshot is simply because rather than edit the image I took a screenshot in order to crop it. Please feel free to reverse image search the image. I cannot provide a non cropped image as this will show the individuals face, however perhaps I can upload a version with the original metadata intact. Thank-you for agreeing with regard to the usefulness of the photo, there are many images of breasts on the commons however the vast majority of these are not particurly useful as they are taken from a distance - this may also be the only image showing the use of a breast pump on the commons. Rogerthat9001 (talk) 08:14, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Contact VRT, please. Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:32, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I assume good faith here and this is obviously not porn because it shows breasts being used for their intended purpose. Dronebogus (talk) 04:12, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I concur with Ikan's comment. --A1Cafel (talk) 16:29, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Do you keep screenshots without VRT? 186.175.55.8 20:23, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but those are properly licensed. --A1Cafel (talk) 09:45, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Canuto García.jpg

The name of author and the date death of author this image are not mentioned. Worried that the image is still under copyright protection. Astrinko (talk) 03:27, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have added the name of the author, which is a goverment corporation, non profit, payed by taxpayers. The sourse explicit says: "complete or partial reproduction authorized, as long as the source is mentioned." Page 2 at the bottom. P4blogarcia (talk) 15:19, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:1974graduation.jpg

This photo comes from Malaysia. Under the Malaysian Copyright Act of 1987, copyright expires after 50 years of the death of the author, or an image published anonymously more than 50 years ago. This photo was taken in 1974, it will not enter the public domain until 2025. Astrinko (talk) 15:43, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's only one month left. How likely is it that this deletion request will be processed until then? Nakonana (talk) 17:57, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:A pair of walnut (Juglans hopeiensis).jpg

Image is a copyrighted computer screen image Fumikas Sagisavas (talk) 09:05, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am the uploader of the image. The photo shows my own computer, and the image on the screen follows the CC 4.0 standard and has been sufficiently blurred. I believe there are no copyright issues. You can also keep the cropped image showing only the walnut; please make the final decision. 蝠翔似黑潮 (talk) 09:17, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The content on the screen is a photo of the type specimen of this walnut (Juglans hopeiensis), sourced from the Chinese Virtual Herbarium. The link is as follows: https://www.cvh.ac.cn/spms/detail.php?id=075d503e You can see the CC 4.0 logo at the bottom of the webpage. 蝠翔似黑潮 (talk) 09:22, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, de minimis. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:29, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support: I agree to keep this image, but I need to indicate the authorization license of the screen web page (Screenshot CC-BY-4.0). Fumikas Sagisavas (talk) 22:53, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Harringay Stadium 1950s.png

The name of photographer and country origin of this photo were not mentioned. The copyright status is still questionable. Astrinko (talk) 17:18, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Country where this was taken is England, London. Nakonana (talk) 19:52, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Luka Dax.jpg

Die personen auf dem bild sind mit der veroffentlichung nicht einverstanden. Es werden rechtliche schritte gegen die veröffentlichende person vorbereitet LukaHorn69 (talk) 18:55, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Google translation: "The people in the picture do not agree with the publication. Legal action is being taken against the person who published the picture". Ban this user for real-world legal threats? And do people performing publicly have any right to demand the takedown of photos of them? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:48, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Might get tricky if even newspapers are reporting on the event with photos: https://www.bietigheimerzeitung.de/inhalt.tanzsportgemeinschaft-bietigheim-neuling-ist-heiss-auf-deutschland-tour.02923f97-c951-4688-825d-a7a97e300ba0.html . There may be the "right to be forgotten" in the European Union, but I don't know if it would be applicable here. We could maybe argue that the person in the image is not notable enough (yet) and their image therefore out of scope (because there aren't really any other newspaper reports on them aside from the local news report above). But the options to take legal actions against the uploader might be limited due to the public nature of the event. Nakonana (talk) 20:15, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Estonia Concert Hall.jpg

no Commons:Freedom of panorama in Estonia Wkentaur (talk) 08:16, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dayo1.ogg

Out of scope, no educational value cross-wiki. Astrinko (talk) 14:27, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean by "cross-wiki"? The only thing that saps value from this file is that the language, place name or whatever is not further identified. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:03, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Inioluwa1.ogg

Out of scope, no educational value cross-wiki. Astrinko (talk) 14:28, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean by "cross-wiki"? The only thing that saps value from this file is that the language, place name or whatever is not further identified. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:03, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Oluseye1.ogg

Out of scope, no educational value cross-wiki. Astrinko (talk) 14:29, 25 November 2024 (UTC) Hello @Astrinko, i trust that you're doing fine, the file above is an audio pronunciation of the Nigerian name "Oluseye"[reply]

It's part of my contribution to the @Celebrating Nigeria names event. The project was approved and funded by the Wikimedia Foundation few months back and its aim is to create Wikipedia articles and Wikidata pages about indigenous Nigeria names, followed by uploading the correct pronunciation of these names to Wikicommons and subsequently linking them to the Wikipedia articles. This is an example of such article.

In case you're also concerned that some of these pronunciations(audio) are duplicated - it's because some (a rather small percentage) of the pronunciations are not correct and I had to upload a correct version.

In essence, the audio file will be linked to https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oluseye which currently contains an incorrect pronunciation of the name. Dr Marve (talk) 16:51, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Dr Marve, thanks for explaining! Could you please add an instructive category to all of these files? Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:05, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Olaniyan1.ogg

Out of scope, no educational value cross-wiki. Astrinko (talk) 14:29, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Astrinko, the file above is an audio pronunciation of the Nigerian name "Olaniyan"

It's part of my contribution to the @Celebrating Nigeria names event. The project was approved and funded by the Wikimedia Foundation few months back and its aim is to create Wikipedia articles and Wikidata pages about indigenous Nigeria names, followed by uploading the correct pronunciation of these names to Wikicommons and subsequently linking them to the Wikipedia articles. This is an example of such article.

In case you're also concerned that some of these pronunciations(audio) are duplicated - it's because some (a rather small percentage) of the pronunciations are not correct and I had to upload a correct version.

In essence, the audio file will be linked to https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Olaniyan which currently contains an incorrect pronunciation of the name. Dr Marve (talk) 16:45, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Olaonipekun1.ogg

Out of scope, no educational value cross-wiki. Astrinko (talk) 14:29, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Meghna Bank PLC Head Office Gulshan 1.jpg

No freedom of panorama in Bangladesh since 2023 Syrus257 (talk) 15:59, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per FOP-Bangladesh. Dmartin969 (talk) 18:43, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tatra T6B5 (423).jpg

Автор выложивший это фото на Википедию взял фото без разрешения из моего Instagram. Yesyaaa (talk) 21:26, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.instagram.com/p/CUZeDMcIl7V/?igsh=bWw4cDkzbzlpZ2tp

я выложил фотографию 29 сентября 2021 года, сверху ссылку на мой аккаунт с этой фотографией, прошу удалить данную фотографию, потому что автор который её сюда выложил, автором фото не является. Yesyaaa (talk) 22:00, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete COPYVIO. Nakonana (talk) 00:05, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nature Park, Kolkata.jpg

Not clear pic Soumava2002 (talk) 08:52, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Under some circumstances a file can be summarily deleted at the request of the uploader (COM:CSD#G7), but this doesn't appear to be such a case. This file is currently in use, it falls within COM:SCOPE, and (as far as I can tell) we don't have a better photo of this subject. Marbletan (talk) 18:29, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep Author requested deletion 13 days later. The accusation "Not clear pic" is false. Taylor 49 (talk) 22:03, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Soumava2002, did you shoot the photo? Please answer and tell us what you used to shoot it, if you did. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:49, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I feel like everyone is ignoring the bigger issue, which is that this user's uploads are of small photos that lack good metadata, and they never say whether they actually shot them, when asked. It's true that small file + problematic exif is an insufficient reason to delete per Com:dr, but how about that plus an uploader who's active refusing to ever state whether their "own work" claims are accurate? Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:53, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Acceptable quality, within scope. Dmartin969 (talk) 02:21, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ethnicity of Qazvin province.jpg

Esfarvarin ans shal and Takestan, Segzabad is TAT people. (Wrong and false map) Qazvingram (talk) 11:25, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep per COM:INUSE. Argue about the map at fa.wikipedia.org and/or its talk page, and you can put a content disputed template on it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:53, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This map has Deleting the people of Tat these areas. It has no source and is purely a personal work. Esfarvarin, Takestan, Danesfehan, Segzabad, Shal is Tat people Qazvingram (talk) 20:31, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:RSS Flag (Bhagwa Dhwaja).jpg

This file was initially tagged by Ratnahastin as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Taken from here and tagged as in public domain when clearly it is a computer generated imagery and not an image from 1925 as the documentation claims.. ShaanSengupta^Talk 06:57, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I have made some fixes according to my understanding. This is simply a work that anyone can create on computer therefore is ineligible for copyright. Therefore, I have fixed the licensing accordingly. If someone believes that it is a copyvio, then I would myself request to delete it ASAP. Thank you. ShaanSengupta^Talk 07:00, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's not how it works, unless the original creator releases it here we can't keep it.Ratnahastin (talk) 09:51, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Actually that's not how it works. There is no rule that requires the original creator to themselves release it here. Just like US Federal works are released by US govt and we take it from there website and upload it here. Anyways this is just a simple work which anyone can make on a computer. So PD-ineligible applies. ShaanSengupta^Talk 13:46, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Have you created it? You clearly took it from somewhere like the link I mentioned above. You do not have the rights to upload it. Ratnahastin (talk) 13:58, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Even works by different departments of Govt of India are not created by me. But I absolutely have all the rights to upload it if they are under free licence. I have not marked that as my own work that will require it to be my creation. Thank you. ShaanSengupta^Talk 14:09, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have provided no evidence that this is a work by the government or the organisation itself released under a free license. Until proof is provided that it is not a copyright violation it should be deleted.Ratnahastin (talk) 14:15, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio is for works that are protected by copyright. I find myself repeating. This is a simple drawing which even you can create on your computer. Therefore this comes under PD-ineligible. So there is no need for this to be released as such. This is what I make of this. As I said if it is a vio it will be deleted when some admin closes this discussion. So let's leave it here. Thank you and bye from my side. ShaanSengupta^Talk 14:19, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is a "simple drawing" created by a person that has not released it under a free licence. Assuming that the link of the site I provided is the oldest instance of it, it falls under copyright. Ratnahastin (talk) 14:30, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please read COM:TOO. Thank you. ShaanSengupta^Talk 15:07, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:West Thottathodu Bridge.jpg

Need to remove due to wrong file name Varghesepunnamada (talk) 16:57, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I've renamed the file. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 20:38, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Besides, that's never a necessary reason for deletion. Varghesepunnamada, please have a look at COM:File renaming. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:22, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks @Iwaqarhashmi. Varghesepunnamada (talk) 01:51, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Akhil Bharat Times News.png

Delete this image Citizen arindam (talk) 04:08, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Story Television.webp

Non-free version is on the Wikipedia and this is no longer needed: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Story_television_logo.png OWaunTon (talk) 03:56, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:White Spotted Supple Skink.jpg

Uploaded by mistake. Want to remove file. Gannu03 (talk) 15:43, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why? Uploaded almost a year ago. Needs better categories, though. If there are a lot of better photos of this type of skink, a courtesy deletion would be acceptable. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:47, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Депутат Котрикадзе Георгий Николаевич.jpg

здравствуйте. я загружал когда-то этот файл. хочу удалить, потому что считаю это фото неудачным. хотел заменить файл на другой, но не получилось этого сделать Kotrikadze (talk) 20:13, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Palatul Telefoanelor

The building was completed in 1934 by Walter Froy (unknown year of birth and death), Louis S. Weeks (1881–1971) and Edmond van Saanen Algi (1882–1938). There is no freedom of panorama in Romania. The copyright term of the country is 70 years, and the image can be undeleted in 2042

A1Cafel (talk) 03:26, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I doubt that my picture File:Palatul Telefoanelor - antennae etc.jpg shows enough of the architecture to be an issue. It's basically a picture of satellite dishes and antennae, which presumably are considered mainly to be practical objects rather than works of architecture (or any other visual art). - Jmabel ! talk 03:45, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Question about my picture File:Palatul Telefoanelor from Hotel Capitol 2002.jpg: while I took it mainly as a photo of Palatul Telefoanelor, there are quite a few other buildings in it. Are any others of these still in copyright? If not, I'd like to salvage a crop of what it shows of the east side of Calea Victoriei from that vantage point. - Jmabel ! talk 03:47, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- I've derived a separate File:Palatul Telefoanelor from Hotel Capitol 2002-major Gaussian blur for copyright reasons.jpg that I believe can be kept; please indicate if you think something further needs to be done there. The original can be deleted now and undeleted in 2042, at which point the derivative work will become redundant. - Jmabel ! talk 04:46, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
File:Casa Capșa, București.jpg barely shows Palatul Telefoanelor. I think it might be de minimis as it stands. If not, we could certainly put a Gaussian blur over it without diminishing the value of the photo. - Jmabel ! talk 03:49, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Similarly for File:Hotel Continental - Calea Victoriei.jpg. At worst, we could keep a crop showing just the Hotel Continental, but I think a Gaussian blur might be better. While the reproduction of the old National Theater in front of the Novotel is quite recent (2006), it is a rather faithful copy of a building that is long out of copyright, and I doubt it is copyrightable, so there is little other than Palatul Telefoanelor copyrightable in that photo. - Jmabel ! talk 03:53, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  - I've derived a separate File:Hotel Continental - Calea Victoriei-major Gaussian blur for copyright reasons.jpg that I believe can be kept; please indicate if you think something further needs to be done there. The original can be deleted now and undeleted in 2042, at which point the derivative work will become redundant. - Jmabel ! talk 05:26, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Sector 3, Bucharest, Romania - panoramio.jpg is a somewhat similar view, but enough of Palatul Telefoanelor is visible that it would definitely need a Gaussian blur or other concealment. - Jmabel ! talk 03:59, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  - I've derived a separate File:Sector 3, Bucharest, Romania - panoramio-major Gaussian blur for copyright reasons.jpg that I believe can be kept; please indicate if you think something further needs to be done there. The original can be deleted now and undeleted in 2042, at which point the derivative work will become redundant. (I belatedly realized: that's probably a bad file name, since this is nowhere near Sector 3. Probably both the original and the derivative should be renamed in parallel before deletion, with the new names noted here for 2042. I don't want to rename the original now because it is confusing to rename a file in the middle of a DR discussion.) - Jmabel ! talk 05:18, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'd also like to separately assess File:Palatul Telefoanelor rear.jpg (which I see is mine, though I don't recall taking it). Although Palatul Telefoanelor is its ostensible subject, it actually makes up very little of the picture. Are there other buildings here that raise issues? If not, a Gaussian blur over Palatul Telefoanelor would let us keep it - Jmabel ! talk 03:56, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- I've derived a separate File:Strada Matei Millo, 2006.jpg that I believe can be kept; please indicate if you think something further needs to be done there. The original can be deleted now and undeleted in 2042, at which point the derivative work will become redundant. - Jmabel ! talk 05:02, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It would probably be worth assessing if there are also others that have non-infringing content worth cropping into separate files. - Jmabel ! talk 04:03, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@A1Cafel: on each of the ones I've singled out, I'd appreciate your opinion. - Jmabel ! talk 04:03, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- @Jmabel: I remove File:Palatul Telefoanelor - antennae etc.jpg. Satellite dishes and antennae is not copyrighted, but I haven't nominated File:Casa Capșa, București.jpg because I believe it falls under de minimis. The remaining images seems difficult to fall under de minimis. I'd appreciate a crop/blur to save those images which are still potentially useful. --A1Cafel (talk) 04:09, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  - @A1Cafel: I believe I've addressed the issues for the images I discussed above, in each case by uploading a separate derivative work; please have a look and tell me if you think any of those are still problematic so I can address your further issues. - Jmabel ! talk 05:29, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logo Kementerian Imigrasi dan Pemasyarakatan.jpg

This is not official logo yet, there are several logos that being selected to the final MesinKetik (talk) 04:42, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can the logos under consideration be hosted here? It's interesting to have a record of which logos were submitted, but not if there's a copyright problem with hosting them here. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:01, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Interior of Stadtbibliothek am Mailänder Platz

All of those are unfree, as there is no FOP for interiors in Germany.

h-stt !? 16:35, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Moin h-stt,

danke für die Info, ich muss jetzt mal die Mail von 2012 suchen, hatte extra um die Freigabe der Innenansichten gebeten, aber nicht weiter an das OTRS Team gesendet. Ich schaue mal, ob ich sie noch finde, ansonsten schreibe in die BIB noch mal an. Tschüß -- Ra Boe watt?? 07:45, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Moinh-stt,

thanks for the info, I have to look for the mail from 2012, had specifically asked for the release of the interior views, but did not send it to the OTRS team. I'll have a look if I can still find them, otherwise write to the BIB again. Bye -- Ra Boe watt??

You know, that you need a permission by the architect en:Eun Young Yi, not the library staff, right? --h-stt !? 16:18, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ich sehe hier nichts Schützenswertes. Da hat ein Architekt einfach nur seine Arbeit gemacht, nichts Besonderes. --Ralf Roleček 16:57, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nun sah ich aus so, aber ich werde zusammen dem dem Team des OE in Stuttgart nächste Woche Freitag ein Text an den Architekten verfassen, ich war auch davon ausgegangen, warum auch immer, das bei öffentlichen Gebäude eine erweiterte Panoramafreiheit gilt, wie ich auf den Trichter gekommen bin, weiß ich nicht mehr, daher hatte ich auch nur die Bib angeschrieben. Ich hoffe jetzt nur das die Bilder nicht so schnell gelöscht werden, damit wir Zeit habe auf die Antwort des Eun Young Yi zu warten bzw. ich suche verzweifelt nach einer Vorlage (nicht die Standartvorlage) wie man einem Architekten es schmackhaft machen kann, die Bilder frei zu geben. Der gleiche Architekt hat ja auch den neuen Landtag in Hannover entworfen und da wäre es schick zwei Fliegen mit einer Klappe zu schlagen. ;) Tschüß -- Ra Boe watt?? 09:10, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Viel Glück! Bigbossfarin (talk) 10:57, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nachtrag: Wir bitte um etwas mehr Geduld, da wir auf die Antworten warten. Es wäre viel Arbeit alle Bilder wieder herstellen zu müssen.

Addendum: We ask for a little more patience, as we are waiting for the answers. It would take a lot of work to recover all the images. Tschüß -- Ra Boe watt?? 19:35, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo allerseits; bin im Kontakt mit Herrn Yi. Bitte noch etwas Geduld. --Mussklprozz (talk) 17:08, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Mussklprozz and Raboe001: Any progress? --Leyo 09:21, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ja der Architekt informiert sich im Punkt freie Lizenz und was sie bedeutet und meldet sich wieder bei uns. -- Ra Boe watt?? 09:40, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

yes the architect informs himself in the point of free license and what it means and will contact us again. -- Ra Boe watt?? 09:40, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tried to reach him on the phone this week. He is in Corea at the moment. Will call him again mid of next week. --Mussklprozz (talk) 11:34, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - files can be undeleted when a valid permission arrives. It's a pity that we have to delete the files for now, these are high quality pictures. --Jcb (talk) 14:14, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Interior of Stadtbibliothek am Mailänder Platz

Beautiful architecture, but its architect Eun Young Yi is still alive and the library is located in Germany where there is no FoP for interior views and a standard of life + 70 years.

Paradise Chronicle (talk) 23:22, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:28, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Interior of Stadtbibliothek am Mailänder Platz

No freedom of panorama for interiors. Permission from architect Eun Young Yi necessary. In the past, there have been attempts to get such from him for a large number of photos, but it was not given, and all those photos had to be deleted. Same arguments applies for newly uploaded images thereafter.

Mussklprozz (talk) 09:49, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep most of these. There are very few if any substantive architectural elements shown here. There are simple windows, hallways and bookshelves, most of which are not sufficiently creative to copyright. These are only de minimis elements of the larger architectural work. IronGargoyle (talk) 02:15, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The elements shown in the images listed above are by no means de minimis, but integral parts of the architectural design which took months to develop and which won the price in the public competition for that building. The design of book shelves is carefully chosen. It follows an integrated overall design that took months to develop. The design of the metre-high hall in the lower part of the building also follows a creative idea. The minimalist, cubist design can be misleading if you don't know the building. Instead of uninformed judgement about parts being de minimis, read this critique or this one or other competent reviews that you can find on the internet. – And one more thing: not only US-copyright applies here, but German copyright as well. – Cheers, Mussklprozz (talk) 17:01, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A handful of these images (File:Stadtbibliothek am Mailänder Platz (10941267463).jpg, for example) might show sufficient creative details, but to say that all these do is utter nonsense. If you are going to bring up national differences, you should also note that German copyright has a particularly high threshold of originality for applied arts (see COM:UA). IronGargoyle (talk) 17:18, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your assignment of this work of architecture to applied arts is utter nonsense. The source which is given in COM:UA refers so industrial products, thus being off topic. German copyright explicitly lists Baukunst (architecture) in the same category as Fine Arts, music, literature etc. (Urheberrechtsgesetz (UrhG) §2) Furthermore, the same section of the UrhG does not require that an artwork must show much detail. Instead, it requires that the work be a persönliche geistige Schöpfung (personal intellectual creation). The big hallway on the ground floor, which is shown on a considerable part of the images, is certainly such a personal intellectual creation: The room's size and form, the arrangement of the windows, the fountain in the middle and most of all: the huge impressive void of the white room follow an obvious architectural idea. And so do the simple, but harmonic and carefully chosen design of the bookshelves, the room design in the basement etc. Mussklprozz (talk) 22:44, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as already said, no architectural presence in most of the files.

, this could be any library. -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton^m 21:45, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Obvious case of de minimis, IMO. Darwin ^Ahoy! 17:58, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@DarwIn German de minimis as defined by existing court case files is apparently less liberal than French or Estonian ones (French: accessory/incidental, Estonian: "not the main subject"). De minimis cannot be invoked to an image if censoring out the copyrighted piece of architecture or artwork negatively affects the entire image to the point the viewers/readers will immediately notice that censorship. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contributions) 21:45, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@JWilz12345 I'm not so highly familiar with German law indeed to the point of detect such nuances, but your explanation makes sense, and I defer to your expertise in the subject. But I'm puzzled how empty walls, common book shelves and what seems to be a very common staircase can attract any copyright, even in Germany. Darwin ^Ahoy! 22:01, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@DarwIn German de minimis is not of my expertise tbh, but I learned it from Rosenzweig, in some discussions here concerning interiors of train stations as well as a discussion on English Wikivoyage regarding de minimis comparison (Philippine vs. French vs. German de minimis) as applied in an image of Rizal Park in Manila, the Philippines. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contributions) 22:07, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@JWilz12345 @Paradise Chronicle says below the space is recognizable, could be the disposition of the furniture and other architectural elements that makes the whole thing protected by copyright. In any case, I defer to that evaluation. Darwin ^Ahoy! 22:16, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep simple utilitarian layout, no architectural input to protect. Andy Dingley (talk) 21:26, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No FoP in Germany for interior spaces. Images are from an identifiable piece of architecture of well-known architect. COM:UA, as explained well by Mussklprozz, should not apply. The keep arguments are personal preferences which should not have a say in a DR. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 05:41, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:61National Museum of Natural History Manila 05.jpg

Copyright violation. No FOP in the Philippines. Sculptor died in 1976 (48 years ago). Also, it appears to have been taken with a flash which is a violation of the museum's visitor guidelines. PhiliptheNumber1 (talk) 01:25, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@PhiliptheNumber1 Commons does not need to comply with museum rules, see COM:NCR. Any violation of museum rule is the burden of the uploader, not of Commons. The relevant issue is on sculptural copyright, though. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contributions) 02:25, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@JWilz12345 Yes, Commons can't really do much about that... I'm not sure why I added that. Oops. The issue is certainly on the sculpture's copyright status.

Sincerely yours, PhiliptheNumber1 (talk) 15:02, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:유네스코 아시아·태평양국제이해교육원.jpg

No freedom of panorama in South Korea. Syrus257 (talk) 08:13, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:31, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:유네스코 아시아·태평양국제이해교육원.jpg

The building is still the intended subject of the photograph. There is no commercial Freedom of Panorama in South Korea, making this image an infringement of architect's copyright. The architectural work is likely recent, as the UNESCO Asia-Pacific center was first established in 2000. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contributions) 01:48, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:FA Logo Kementrian Imigrasi dan Pemasyarakatan.png

The logo of ministry has yet to be decided. This not official logo MesinKetik (talk) 05:29, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What does that mean in terms of copyright? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:42, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

sudah dipakai di kop surat di kemenimipas.. Supardisahabu (talk) 06:48, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Love sculpture (University of Pennsylvania)

According to [3], this sculpture was "recently constructed" as of 1996. There's no FOP in US for 3D art and en:Robert Indiana died in 2018. The original sculpture of en:Love (image) was 1970, so it might be PD if there was no copyiright statement associated with its original publication, but post-1989 that was no longer required. Need opinions on whether a 3D reproduction of a free 3D item gets its own protection or whether the original is protected.

DMacks (talk) 05:38, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:মুকাদ্দাস মালাইকা চৌধুরী.jpg

The file is not the uploader's own work; it is non-free copyrighted content. Vengeance • Talk 11:32, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:آرامگاه فردوسی♡♡♡.jpg

failed deleted 56964 (talk) 11:40, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Synthestrome, could you please elaborate what you're asking for and why? Ratekreel (talk) 14:47, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Forest at CrestlineCalifornia.jpg

This image was uploaded incorrectly, not a lot of information can appear here now. Informationappeared (talk) 23:52, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Not particularly out of scope. Dmartin969 (talk) 03:10, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Users have the right to a courtesy deletion of files they uploaded within the last week, so this will be deleted. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:41, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete G7 per uploader's request, was uploaded recently and unused. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:12, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lu y Ngò.jpg

Because it is not useful in providing information. It used to be linked to the Lu y phan van ngo page on viwiki, but the page was quickly deleted because it was a test page. Cát trắng (talk) 10:34, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Viva Engage Logo.png

An almost identical file exists. GeorgeM2011 (talk) 09:16, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Human hand.jpg

No longer want to share the image LazySloth1.0 (talk) 13:16, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hudson Riverfront 9-11 Memorial HDR 2022 jeh.jpg

No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 05:06, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. These are steel beams recovered from the ruins of the World Trade Center. They are not creative works. IronGargoyle (talk) 01:16, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bosnia and Herzegovina Ethnic map.png

It is incorrect map. Žepče and Mostar were majority Croatian municipalities not Bosniak. Visaches 37 (talk) 12:59, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Is that a deletion reason? Can you cite a Commons guideline that says we should delete a detailed map because of issues with 2 municipalities? Did you try working on agreement for an edit? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:37, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:2023 MNE PARLIAMENTARY ELECTION.png

Doesn't exist anymore! Mirditor22 (talk) 14:31, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Roma Party Kosovo.png

It's not used anymore Mirditor22 (talk) 14:33, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not a deletion reason. But is there a copyright issue with the logo? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:40, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Comprovante de submissão de artigo para Revista Texto Livre.png

Olá, desculpem o equívoco, mas esse arquivo não deveria constar como público. Peço a eliminação rápida dele. Grato AHilsenbeck (WMB) (talk) 16:04, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:A North Bengal Gray Cattle in Aftabnagar, Dhaka during Eid-ul-Azha.jpg

Miss information AshiqJB007 (talk) 07:20, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file is COM:INUSE and was uploaded in 2020. You're the uploader, so what's preventing you from fixing anything false you put on the file page? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:01, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep nonsense request. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 14:26, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wales-England border 1086.png

Dont need it Editor account 2222 (talk) 10:41, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:B-5958.jpg

Mistake the airplane number Seungiyu32 (talk) 07:55, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Not a valid reason for deletion. File is in use and it is a within scope airline photograph even if not. Rename file if necessary. IronGargoyle (talk) 18:29, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Karl Marx Sarani, Garden Reach.jpg

It's hazy Soumava2002 (talk) 14:40, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Seshat edit2.svg, File:Seshat edit.svg

duplicate, these pages as far as I can tell are no different from this page

PharaohCrab (talk) 16:44, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep File:Seshat edit2.svg as COM:INUSE. Commons does not dictate editorial choices for other projects regarding illustrations. Deletion requests for such files should first address their removal from all relevant pages. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 05:55, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Heo Young of the Democratic Party of Korea 20241118.jpg

This work corresponds to KOGL 2. (Wikimedia only allows KOGL 1.) LandAndTree (talk) 14:10, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Moncif ait ahmed 2021.jpg

Template:Copyright delete 7amosatv (talk) 16:12, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i no longer hold the copyright of this image 7amosatv (talk) 16:12, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why? You sold the copyright? It looks like a personal image, anyway, though, so deletion is appropriate. And it's almost definitely not by you, if you are the subject of the photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:02, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Museum of Santhal Culture, Bishnubati, Bolpur decking up for food festival. December 8, 2024. 24.jpg

The photo was taken by someone else other than the author, using the author's phone. Oindrilla Maity Surai (talk) 18:58, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:۲محسن شورگشتی خراسانی.jpg

اطلاعات مفیدی ندارد Ali2174 (talk) 15:28, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Shia LaBeouf "Just Do It" Motivational Speech (Original Video by LaBeouf, Rönkkö & Turner).webm

We don't know if the MotivaShian channel is connected to LaBeouf, Rönkkö & Turner; they could just be a fan account who uploaded this segment after seeing the non commercial Creative Commons license on Vimeo. prospectprospekt (talk) 22:08, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:ANSONBEAN 20211125.jpg

not a presentable photo to represent the artist AIKWETARZAN (talk) 22:15, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep：This photo is clear to explain who is ANSONBEAN (In Chinese: 陳毅燊).--Tombus20032000 (talk) 22:40, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep Not a reason to delete the photo, for God's sake! And COM:INUSE. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:05, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wings for the IRT- The Irresistible Romance of Travel.jpg

The sculpture was completed in 1995 by Jane Greengold (1945–). There is no freedom of panorama in the United States for non-architectural works, permission from the sculptor is required A1Cafel (talk) 05:25, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Being built into the station tile work, I would say that this an architectural detail allowable per COM:FOP US. IronGargoyle (talk) 01:35, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mariamman17CE.jpg

Copyright violation. This is an image from an auction site Asianarto (talk) 16:23, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of Kurdistan with measure.png

علامة وهمية Ali suhel (talk) 22:50, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

COM:INUSE. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:03, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Deutsche Demokratische Partei logo.svg

This is not a logo of any party. It's just a small design element that happened to be used on one poster to fill a bit of empty space. There are no reliable sources supporting the claim that this is a "logo" of the DDP. One can easily find lots of posters by the DDP. None of them use this supposed "logo". If the file is not deleted, it should be renamed to something like "Graphical detail adapted from a DDP poster". Chrisahn (talk) 12:42, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sony Xperia Z2 D6503 home screen 20170913.png

App icons in screenshot copyrighted by Sony so shouldn't be hosted here Xeverything11 (talk) 15:53, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:KakAni.jpg

Wrong picture created Bella Hakim (talk) 17:54, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Deletion requested by the uploader shortly after upload but file is COM:INUSE at en:Noraniza Idris. --Rosenzweig τ 20:49, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:久間田琳加宣材 (1).jpg

The image is credited to Japanese photographer Takahiro Sakai, whose website also features a similar image ( https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/6180dd5c17d9a0496c90e4d2/2192b893-95c3-4843-ae19-af915d545835/rinkakumada_01-11.jpg?format=1000w ). Additionally, the image has been used by multiple Japanese news sites ( https://www.daily.co.jp/gossip/2022/06/10/0015375028.shtml https://realsound.jp/movie/2023/06/post-1346189.html ), making it unlikely that the uploader is responsible. Daraku K. (talk) 11:51, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:FN3011.jpg

Page has new and better picture, there is no link from the FN 30-11 page to this picture Edwin76 (talk) 19:44, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Adamu ab (talk · contribs)

out of scope / copyvios

Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:04, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete these and all other uploads of this so-called contributor. 186.172.193.92 02:07, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:54, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Adamu ab (talk · contribs)

Some low-res uploads (deleted), multiple sizes. Doubtful own work.

--Min☠︎rax^«¦talk¦» 08:45, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:47 transition seal.png

I disagree that this file is a copyright violation (and thus believe it should not be speedily deleted), as it is clearly a derivative work of the Great Seal of the United States in a similar vein to the Biden Transitional logo which is also on Commons (under the title 'File:Office of the President-Elect.svg') Loytra (talk) 11:48, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are now claiming that it is public domain for reasons other than what you listed on the image page itself. You may be correct, but this isn't what you claimed on the image page. --Yamla (talk) 12:39, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I apologise, but I simply copied the license used on the page for the aforementioned Biden transition logo. Since that's such a high-profile logo and has been up for 4 years now without any issues, I assumed it had the correct license. I'm not very well-versed with Commons, so if you know of a more appropriate license feel free to update both pages. Loytra (talk) 13:58, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dum Dum Cant Metro station.jpg

Not clear pic Soumava2002 (talk) 13:00, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:CM Punk AEW Debut at United Center.jpg

New file created Wiknown77 (talk) 13:10, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Continuing the Conversation (Georgia Institute of Technology)

The sculpture was completed in 2018 by Martin Dawe. There is no freedom of panorama in the United States for non-architectural works, permission from the sculptor is required

A1Cafel (talk) 06:37, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:James Carville (5817022049).jpg

Under a non commercial license Bramnickatriot (talk) 00:24, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Per Flickr, it was under CC BY 2.0 from 2017 to 2021. CC licenses are irrevocable. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:10, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:LL-Q9610 (ben)-Kryesmin-অনধিকার চর্চা.wav

পরীক্ষামূলক কার্যক্রম Kryesmin (talk) 09:01, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:LL-Q9610 (ben)-Kryesmin-গৃহস্থ.wav

পরীক্ষামূলক কার্যক্রম Kryesmin (talk) 09:02, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:LL-Q9610 (ben)-Kryesmin-সূরা.wav

experimental Kryesmin (talk) 09:06, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Volodymyr Zelenskyy 2023 portret (cropped 2).png

Unneeded, slightly cropped version of already uploaded image that is of lower quality. Self-delete Loytra (talk) 10:54, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:থানাহাট এ.ইউ পাইলট সরকারি উচ্চ বিদ্যালয়.jpg

Non-free image, not the uploader’s own work. (Source) Vengeance • Talk 11:19, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hay my name is Eleonora. gaggero.png

probable copyright infringement Threecharlie (talk) 11:20, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Likely copyrighted, but even if it wasn't, it would still be out of scope. ReneeWrites (talk) 13:45, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Suuka.jpg

Out of scope --Min☠︎rax^«¦talk¦» 13:17, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:پزشکیان در پاویون مهرآباد.png

This image does not have the appropriate copyright license and has been taken without permission from the following link:isna Harold Krabs (talk) 14:49, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Basre.png

This image does not have the appropriate copyright license and has been taken without permission from the following link:president Harold Krabs (talk) 14:53, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:NECHIRVAN.jpg

This image does not have the appropriate copyright license and has been taken without permission from the following link:isna Harold Krabs (talk) 14:57, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:HEKMAT MELLI.jpg

This image does not have the appropriate copyright license and has been taken without permission from the following link:isna Harold Krabs (talk) 15:00, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:لوح پیام رهبر جمهوری اسلامی به نخست وزیر عراق.jpg

This image does not have the appropriate copyright license and has been taken without permission from the following link:isna Harold Krabs (talk) 15:02, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Videoframe 6418.png

This image does not have the appropriate copyright license and has been taken without permission from the following link: isna Harold Krabs (talk) 15:04, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:BAZERGANAN.jpg

This image does not have the appropriate copyright license and has been taken without permission from the following link: isna Harold Krabs (talk) 15:07, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Masuud.jpg

This image does not have the appropriate copyright license and has been taken without permission from the following link: isna Harold Krabs (talk) 15:08, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ahzaab.jpg

This image does not have the appropriate copyright license and has been taken without permission from the following link: khabaronline Harold Krabs (talk) 15:10, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:عراقچی و وزیر امور خارجه عراق.jpg

This image does not have the appropriate copyright license and has been taken without permission from the following link:gov Harold Krabs (talk) 15:17, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:(I)İNTERCONTNENTAL.jpg

Bad quality photo. Unlikely to be useful. Kadı Message 23:34, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Llama en la plaza de Toconao.jpg

Out of focus, parts of the Lama (nose, ear) are missing. Not used. User has uploaded some other (better) photos. Lodewicus de Honsvels (talk) 01:02, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Monumento al donatore di AVIS del 10-6-1973 a San Donato Milanese (ottobre 2022).jpg

No freedom of panorama in Italy A1Cafel (talk) 04:44, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ceremonial gift.jpg

Derivative work of a copyrighted card A1Cafel (talk) 05:04, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Interior of Dreieinigkeitskirche (Berlin-Gropiusstadt)

The church was built from 1969 to 1971 by Reinhold Barwich. The work is therefore protected by copyright. Freedom of panorama does not apply to interior shots in Germany.

Lukas Beck (talk) 09:44, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:NARAM COSMETIC MAROC.png

Old Logo And Not a valid representation of the brand MIKAH0912 (talk) 13:05, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this company is notable, old as well as current logos are worth keeping. Otherwise, no logo for it should be hosted here. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:59, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of hashemite kingdom of jordan.png

Duplicate of File:Flag of Jordan.svg. Fry1989 ^eh? 14:09, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Penis on the earth.jpg

one of hundreds of images of human penis... out of scope Threecharlie (talk) 20:02, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Threecharlie But does the context make it interesting? It does indeed show a penis resting on vegetation. Someone obviously finds that interesting. Brianjd (talk) 13:25, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Someone...who?--Threecharlie (talk) 00:33, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Threecharlie Whoever uploaded this. Also, if penises in artwork are notable, then surely real penises in different contexts are useful too. Brianjd (talk) 00:43, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Where you see an artistic message I see the usual narcissist who wants to display his reproductive apparatus for anything but such purposes. These are opinions, but as long as there are only two of us it's a nice 50/50, let's wait for other opinions. Good luck.--Threecharlie (talk) 09:03, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope, as per Threecharlie. --Marcok (talk) 09:57, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep I have also struggled to whether nominated this file to DR or not. As Brianjd mentioned there is no image of penis on the vegetation (Maybe yes, but I think there is not much). I also think that this may be distinctive enough to be kept on Commons, but I won't be upset if this image ended up deleted. --A1Cafel (talk) 10:29, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Krd 11:36, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Penis on the earth.jpg

Unnecessary ugly dick. Replace any use and delete. 186.172.152.104 03:56, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Not a valid reason for deletion. Was previously kept. PaterMcFly (talk) 07:19, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are free to keep all the penis images you want in your personal collection, let's see what the people who care more about Commons will say about this request. 186.172.152.104 11:11, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Penis on grass? Is that a Chinese dish? Tiger penis I suppose... 186.172.152.104 13:05, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please read COMMONS:Commons is not censored PaterMcFly (talk) 14:39, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per all above. modern_primat^ඞඞඞ^----TALK 20:05, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Commons:Deletion requests/File talk:Penis on the earth.jpg Taylor 49 (talk) 21:05, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I don’t see how this isn’t a violation of COM:PENIS— it’s a nondescript, recently uploaded image of a nondescript penis only made distinct by the oddball setting which has nothing to do with educational value. Does anyone seriously think a penis surrounded by grass is somehow an important niche we need to illustrate? And if so, does that mean we should keep any and all new images of penises as long they’re in an unusual setting? user:Threecharlie made good points in their original nomination and user:Marcok seconded them. The two keep voters just seemed convinced of the intrinsic value of penises in random, but unique, contexts, which was apparently good enough for the closing admin. But it’s not good enough for me and probably wouldn’t be good enough for a majority of people who saw this image Dronebogus (talk) 12:39, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per previous DR. --Abzeronow (talk) 21:09, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Penis on the earth.jpg

I’m not impressed with the rationales for keeping this image twice. Precedent isn’t good enough when there was barely a consensus the first time. Per my original deletion vote: “I don’t see how this isn’t a violation of COM:PENIS— it’s a nondescript, recently uploaded image of a nondescript penis only made distinct by the oddball setting which has nothing to do with educational value. Does anyone seriously think a penis surrounded by grass is somehow an important niche we need to illustrate? And if so, does that mean we should keep any and all new images of penises as long they’re in an unusual setting? user:Threecharlie made good points in their original nomination and user:Marcok seconded them. The two keep voters just seemed convinced of the intrinsic value of penises in random, but unique, contexts, which was apparently good enough for the closing admin. But it’s not good enough for me and probably wouldn’t be good enough for a majority of people who saw this image.” Dronebogus (talk) 16:03, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The mere fact that an image is unique in some way, e.g. by depicting a combination of topics which doesn't appear in any other image, doesn't necessarily make it educationally useful. Unless there's some special significance to a penis resting on grass which I'm not aware of, I don't see what this image is meant to depict, beyond the simple combination of "penis + grass" (which, again, isn't inherently useful). Omphalographer (talk) 20:18, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logotipo monocromático LBX.png

Photo used for promotional article on the Portuguese-speaking Wikipedia, not used elsewhere O Geógrafo Amarelo (talk) 18:11, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The image was produced by myself. It is about a well-known and important NGO in the field of Education and Sports. The image can be used freely for references today and in the future. Davidbrasil78 (talk) 06:49, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by الشيخ ياسر الدوسري (talk · contribs)

unlikely to be own work

Didym (talk) 23:31, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:"Colloquio spoletino" di Pietro Consagra. Spoleto 1962.jpg

The sculpture was completed in 1962 by Pietro Consagra (1920–2005). There is no freedom of panorama in Italy. The copyright term of the country is 70 years, and the image can be undeleted in 2076 A1Cafel (talk) 06:13, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flammiform ale glasses.jpg

Uploaded many examples of this. Shows personal living space. Please delete and see other pictures on ‘dwarf ale glass’ page. A1989C2 (talk) 12:25, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Uploaded in 2023 and quite nice and usable. Did you upload photos of the same glasses that are not in your personal living space? Though there's really not much seen of that, anyway. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:04, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep illustrates flammiform, i.e. the pincered edge of gadrooning (see Gadrooning), in a 18th-century glass. Nakonana (talk) 17:31, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Dwarf ale glasses.jpg

Poor quality image A1989C2 (talk) 10:45, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. File is fine quality and in use. IronGargoyle (talk) 18:46, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: acceptable quality. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:35, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dwarf ale glasses.jpg

Poor quality image. A1989C2 (talk) 12:26, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep NOT poor. Taylor 49 (talk) 00:50, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep A little dark, but certainly usable and uploaded in 2023. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:05, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Tabonmohamed (talk · contribs)

Not own work, likely from internet

茅野ふたば (talk) 13:54, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Japanese American Memorial to Patriotism During World War II

The memorial was completed in 2000 by Paul Matisse (1933–) and Nina Akamu (1955–). There is no freedom of panorama in the United States for non-architectural works, permission from the sculptors are required

A1Cafel (talk) 03:34, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logo Kementerian Koordinator Bidang Kesejahteraan Rakyat RI (2012).png

The logo is available in SVG. This file is too big. Requested by original uploader MesinKetik (talk) 04:04, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logo Kementerian Koordinator Bidang Pemberdayaan Masyarakat (Indonesia) (2024).png

The logo is available in SVG. This logo is too big in MB. Requested by original uploader MesinKetik (talk) 04:29, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:CHE 2014-04-25 17-32.jpg

Highly likely to be a copyright infringement and false "own work" claim Beedlejoos (talk) 11:16, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unless actual source, date, authorship can be identified and photo is shown to be out of copyright. Quick reverse image search shows multiple versions online at least 6 years before Wikimedia upload. Uploader's claims not credible; certainly not a 2014 photo of someone who died in 1967. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:37, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by الشيخ ياسر بن راشد الدوسري (talk · contribs)

صور لها حقوق، وبعضها مكرر

Mohammed Qays 🗣 12:37, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by OsascanianoPouPou (talk · contribs)

Files are fictional and out of scope, evident with the incoherent descriptions of most files --N Panama 84534 20:37, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per nom. Adsci8 (talk) 15:32, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:37, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by OsascanianoPouPou (talk · contribs)

Out of scope: Personal fiction (symbols and maps); descriptions mostly nonsense like "fdsfffffddddsss"

Enyavar (talk) 19:12, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Clearly fictitious given maps like File:CalériaWiki.png (an extra land mass in the middle of the Atlantic). Omphalographer (talk) 20:06, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Le Maroc anchantè.jpg

Not the uploader’s work. Likely NASA photo but can’t find exact match. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 20:44, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Male_Ejaculation.gif

What's the educational value of this gif-sequence? Lupo1064 (talk) 09:18, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Strange. I thought this had been discussed before?!? Can't find anything, though --PaterMcFly (talk) 11:12, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete cos novadays everyone is allowed to upload crap on commons...--Yikrazuul (talk) 12:13, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I actually think this is a speedy one. We do have a far better quality one somewhere I think - this is very poor. --Herby ^{talk thyme} 16:03, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Think about it the user name bothers me too - might be promotionally inclined. --Herby ^{talk thyme} 16:05, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Crap.--Giorgiomonteforti (talk) 16:32, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete nonsense. --JN466 13:06, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. This is is a really bad example - done Herby ^{talk thyme} 13:10, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Male Ejaculation.gif

Poor quality – as per COM:PENIS. jdx ^Re: 05:06, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted per nom. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:40, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Male Ejaculation.gif

not educational Sisu0000 (talk) 00:06, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Poor quality. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:13, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment uploaded 3 times only. Taylor 49 (talk) 21:56, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Falconara Marittima-Stemma.svg

Perché il gonfalone del Comune di Falconara Marittima è un altro. Questo è un falso Marcocatalani (talk) 06:14, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@MarcocatalaniPiuttosto che cancellare il file, lo si dovrebbe completare con l'aggiunta del monte all'italiana di rosso. Betelgeuse2003 (talk) 10:39, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep Widely COM:INUSE. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:16, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of the Provisional People's Committee for North Korea.svg

이 파일은 역사적으로 어디에 사용되었는지 나오지 않으며 북조선인민위원회에서도 대한민국과 같은 태극기를 사용했으므로 삭제 부탁드립니다. SkyC1oud (talk) 09:44, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose This was I reproduced after I saw some photographs from North Korea, such photos could be seen from Category:Photographs of flags of Korea. -- Great Brightstar (talk) 09:56, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep COM:INUSE. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:22, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]