Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2024/06/14

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive June 14th, 2024
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The only 2600:1015:B093:F24:40A:D2F4:C940:9B29 00:21, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Speedily kept. (Non-admin closure.) No coherent reason for deletion. Omphalographer (talk) 01:09, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Sathyaganthi.s (talk) 05:43, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 08:43, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Professorsanthoshstat (talk) 07:48, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 08:42, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fautes d'orthographe dans le nom du fichier. Ch202424 (talk) 09:12, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 11:07, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Suppression pour fautes d'orthographe dans le nom du fichier. Ch202424 (talk) 09:18, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 11:07, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Re-creation of File:Eiffel Tower in pink, Paris - Oct 1, 2021.jpg, see relevant DRs A1Cafel (talk) 10:49, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, Recreation of content deleted per community consensus. Artistic works created from pink and blue light are copyrightable, especially in France. Taivo (talk) 12:35, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Toghrul R as Speedy (db) and the most recent rationale was: On the uploader's (author's) request Yann (talk) 14:48, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No valid reason. Uploaded in 2020, in use. However I wonder who is the photographer. Yann (talk) 14:49, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The photo was taken by me, as mentioned in the license. Therefore, I requested deletion of the photo Toghrul R (talk) 15:14, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Then it won't be deleted. Yann (talk) 16:07, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 16:08, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Delete this nonsense please. 186.172.151.61 01:33, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: COM:CSD#F10. --Achim55 (talk) 17:41, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
COM:NOTUSED: the image is a falsification - the head of Admiral V. S. Zavoyko was "glued" to the figure of General of Infantry A. P. Khrushchev in a photo editor. See: 80.234.76.43 14:01, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Everything is quite clear, it needs to be deleted. The value of the image of a certain officer with arbitrary orders is zero--Трифонов Андрей (talk) 14:10, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, uploader agrees. --Achim55 (talk) 17:57, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lo subí desde una cuenta equivocada, refiriéndome créditos que no me corresponden. Deseo eliminarlo para resubirlo desde la cuenta de los dueños del contenido. Juliana Espínola (talk) 17:29, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 18:06, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted movie scene, definitely not uploader's work A1Cafel (talk) 06:43, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:02, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted movie scene, definitely not uploader's work A1Cafel (talk) 03:21, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete: Again. It's Toy Story 3. - THV | | U | T - 02:21, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: G4. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:43, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Compare to https://www.nationalgeographic.com/adventure/article/130709-asiana-flight-214-crash-korean-airlines-culture-outliers , an AP photo Marcio Jose Sanchez. This also isn't a photo that a random bystander could get, given the elevated angle. It's a web-sized photo with no EXIF. Despite the long history and frequent use, I can't see any reason this isn't just a long standing copyvio. Prosfilaes (talk) 23:14, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unambiguous copyright violation. --Bedivere (talk) 01:29, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ich habe die Seite ohne Namensraum Category erstellt. Art-in-public (talk) 12:03, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Jameslwoodward. --Rosenzweig τ 13:55, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo by non-contributer. -- Karim (talk) 13:30, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete per COM:SPEEDY#F10 185.172.241.184 14:26, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: already deleted by Yann. --Rosenzweig τ 13:54, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Direitos autorais, desculpe-me,não prestei atenção Baderneiro (talk) 14:20, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: already deleted by Yann. --Rosenzweig τ 13:54, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Its creation was a mistake via the CropTool. Emiya1980 (talk) 14:58, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 13:53, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I accidentally created this duplicate of File:H.J.A. Verberk.jpg Robotje (talk) 18:36, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 13:51, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

test image while instructing a friend Zblace (talk) 16:22, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:53, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded New File Prakash lVl (talk) 16:26, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete both this and File:Eternal Space.jpg (presumably the "new file"). Images of plain text are generally not appropriate for Commons, and these are no exception. Omphalographer (talk) 16:49, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:54, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Por Favor Eliminen está imagén por favor Ernesto Casas Rz (talk) 13:37, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Bedivere (talk) 15:27, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fizzza (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely own work. The user uploaded and reupladed plenty of copyvios of voluptuous women taken from Facebook, Instagram, and adult websites.

Günther Frager (talk) 17:45, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: CSD F1 - Invalid VRT tickets, banned user, the works. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 16:32, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Brandymodel (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:NOTHOST - poor quality fan art uploaded for vanity gallery on es.wiki (INUSE requires legitimate use) and COM:DW copyvios of photographs (e.g., File:Melanie Martinez Painting.jpg is this; File:Nicki Minajs Painting.jpg is this; File:Bad Bunny Painting.jpg is this; etc.)

Эlcobbola talk 16:53, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: all files already deleted by Billinghurst. --Rosenzweig τ 07:37, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Brandymodel (talk · contribs)

[edit]

More of the same uploaded after above DR. File:Amy WInhouse Painting.jpg is this; File:Kali Uchis Painting.jpg is this; File:Ariana Grande Butera Dos.jpg is this; etc.

Эlcobbola talk 14:03, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: all files already deleted by Billinghurst. --Rosenzweig τ 07:36, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Brandymodel (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: selfies.

Omphalographer (talk) 04:45, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Commons is not a COM:WEBHOST. Günther Frager (talk) 13:49, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:01, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Brandymodel (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: as previously, vanity content, including some derivative works.

Omphalographer (talk) 04:44, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 23:57, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

On a now-deleted gallery page, the uploader says "This is a selfie image of Priyanka Ares". On the upload, they say that they are the photographer. It doesn't look like a selfie, but the photographer must be clarified. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:02, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by The Squirrel Conspiracy. --Rosenzweig τ 11:22, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo by non-contributer. -- Karim (talk) 13:28, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Billinghurst. --Rosenzweig τ 11:22, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

seems unlikely that the contributor is the copyright holder for the model; claim of freedom of panorama would need to indicate where it is being held for display  — billinghurst sDrewth 00:01, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:39, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source of the photo is Facebook per metadata. Abzeronow (talk) 00:29, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:39, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Morocco A1Cafel (talk) 03:11, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:39, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Mozambique A1Cafel (talk) 03:16, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:39, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Mozambique A1Cafel (talk) 03:17, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:39, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Mozambique A1Cafel (talk) 03:17, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:40, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 03:25, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:40, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 3D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 03:28, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:40, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 03:30, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:40, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:POSTERs are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 03:32, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:40, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:POSTERs are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 03:32, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:40, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in Australia A1Cafel (talk) 03:37, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:40, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 3D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 03:38, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:40, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 03:39, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:40, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 03:39, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:40, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 03:39, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:40, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in France. Architect I. M. Pei died in 2019, still within the 70 p.m.a. of the country A1Cafel (talk) 03:40, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:40, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 03:43, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:41, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 03:43, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:41, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 03:43, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:41, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 03:47, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:41, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in France, artist Raymond Moretti died in 2005 A1Cafel (talk) 03:49, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:41, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 03:49, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:41, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 03:50, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:41, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in France, architect Johan Otto von Spreckelsen died in 1987 A1Cafel (talk) 03:56, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:41, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in France, architect Johan Otto von Spreckelsen died in 1987 A1Cafel (talk) 03:56, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:41, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 03:57, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:41, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal artwork of the user, no permissions  — billinghurst sDrewth 05:28, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:41, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

on an article at wiki (in use), though that has now been nominated for deletion  — billinghurst sDrewth 05:36, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:41, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image published in Argentine magazine Somos in 1984. It is currently in the public domain in its country of origin, but it was not in 1996 at URAA time. Thus, it is still copyrighted in the US. Following COM:PCP we cannot keep this image. Günther Frager (talk) 08:33, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:42, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 08:43, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:42, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 08:45, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:42, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source is the, now defunct, website of the photographer person. Günther Frager (talk) 10:34, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:42, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

EXIF indicates a screenshot - uploader has only copyright violations as contributions Whpq (talk) 13:21, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:42, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of trophy (see, for example, User:Elcobbola/Awards); also potential COM:NOTHOST - unused, poor quality image Эlcobbola talk 14:44, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:42, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False CC license, not old enough for PD-old. 0x0a (talk) 14:56, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:43, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 15:24, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:43, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 15:24, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:43, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 15:24, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:43, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This logo likely exceeds COM:TOO Hong Kong which is similarly low to that of the UK. Wcam (talk) 15:58, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:43, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   20:03, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:43, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused promotional corporate image, no context, COM:WEBHOST, out of scope. P 1 9 9   20:06, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:44, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   20:09, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:44, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely not own work: visual characteristics suggest screenshot. P 1 9 9   20:11, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:44, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal montage, COM:WEBHOST, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   20:13, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:44, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio, seems a screenshot Ezarateesteban 22:45, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:44, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no FoP in the Philippines. An uploader admitted that the chandeliers at w:en:Barasoain Church are recent; hence, still under the copyrights of the works' designers or craftsmen. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 23:55, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:44, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dvcpmt2017 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused screenshots, no educational value, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   20:05, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - uselesscontributions} 17:40, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Lotje (talk) 01:25, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 09:44, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work, Source from a facebook per exif. メイド理世 (talk) 01:51, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 09:44, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work, Source from a facebook per exif. メイド理世 (talk) 01:53, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 09:44, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Delete him, he is not even a user. 186.172.151.61 01:58, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 09:44, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

According to the license history on Flickr, this was licensed under BY-NC-SA at the time it was uploaded to Commons. RadioKAOS (talk) 03:49, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. The flickr histories of other images from that flickr account show the same problem. Commons has some 62 files from that flickr account (74122471@N00). They were uploaded to Commons, from 2005 to early 2008, by several different users, their licenses were reviewed by the flickr review bot and even sometimes double reviewed by administrators. Also, the flickr pages show that users sometimes left comments thanking the flickr account for having used a license that allowed upload to Commons. At least one file was a featured picture and picture of the day, which normally means additional scrutiny, including of the license, by more users. It is very unlikely that all the users and reviewers, and the bot, were all mistaken. It seems more likely that there is something incomplete on the side of the flickr histories of that flickr account. -- Asclepias (talk) 13:56, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @Ukglo: Can you comment on "Flickr displaying false license history for at least one account on Flickr?" C.Suthorn (@Life_is@no-pony.farm - p7.ee/p) (talk) 14:54, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Some more details. This is a list of the users who uploaded or reviewed files of this flickr account:
User:Adam~commonswiki 7 uploads
User:Nilfanion (former administrator, VRT member) 1 review
User:Rodrigo.Argenton 1 retouched upload
User:Calliopejen 8 uploads
User:FlickreviewR (review bot) 51 reviews
User:Riana 1 upload
User:Aconcagua 6 uploads (through User:File Upload Bot (Magnus Manske))
User:File Upload Bot (Magnus Manske) 6 reviews
User:Imzadi1979 1 retouched upload
User:Boricuaeddie 6 uploads
User:Talgraf777 1 upload
User:Djlayton4 1 upload
User:Electron (license reviewer) 2 uploads
User:Sandstein 2 uploads
User:Kanchelskis 3 uploads
User:Arria Belli (former administrator) 3 uploads
User:One last pharaoh 1 upload
User:Mattbuck (former administrator) 1 review
User:Sylfred1977 2 uploads
User:Überraschungsbilder 12 uploads
User:Asta~commonswiki 2 uploads
User:O (former administrator) 1 review
User:FloNight 1 upload
User:Lokal_Profil (former administrator) 1 review
User:Urban~commonswiki 2 uploads
User:TheLarch 1 upload
User:Dodo (former administrator) 1 review
User:Ww2censor (license reviewer) 1 upload
It seems that all the files were uploaded from 2005 to early 2008. I think the latest upload was made on 5 May 2008. Unsurprisingly, most users listed are now inactive on Commons. Still, many of them were serious users. In total, 28 users participated in handling the files of this flickr account, including 21 uploaders, 2 reviewer bots and 5 human reviewers. They can't all have been wrong about the license. It's practically impossible. Also, it seems significant that all the uploads are from before mid-2008 and none since then. That's unlikely to be because all those Commons users, reviewers and bots were all making the same mistake before mid-2008 and then everybody stopped making that mistake after mid-2008. The more logical hypothesis is that the license changed at the flickr account. And there may be one technical fault in the flickr system that makes it unable to find and correctly display license changes made before some date, say mid-2008 (at least at that flickr account, possibly at other or at all accounts). -- Asclepias (talk) 18:53, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Flicker had a big issue; you could change the license to a more restricted one.
If our bot attested, by no margin of error, the image at that time was at cc-by 2.0.
This was a very simply check that bot those, and Flicker reviewers became obsolete.
Basically,  Keep and ignore all other comparison at Flicker website, it is unreliable by now. -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m 21:33, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Flickr did not show a license history in the past, it does show a license history for some time now. As far as I know, it is not a bug, but a feature that Flickr users can (still) change a "license to a more restricted one". @Rodrigo.Argenton: @Asclepias suggests that the display of the license history is wrong at least for one flickr account for license changes before 2008, but to me it seems, that you do not think that, but consider something different? I remember that one of my imports was deleted because OTRS member Olaf Kosinsky said, that License Review Bots are not to be trusted. C.Suthorn (@Life_is@no-pony.farm - p7.ee/p) (talk) 21:55, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It was a typo, big issue.
If the user can change to a more restricted one, that is it. You cannot under after 10 years and say that the license is incorrect. Simply as that.
Olaf Kosinsky is wrong, the bot is quite simply, and reliable. I do not understand the point of further discussion. If the user can change the license, and we reviewed the license back there, the most reasonable is imagine that the user change the license after the bot attest it. Not the other way. -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m 22:16, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
At this point, it looks like it's close to 100% certain that there is a problem in the flickr license history system, that it cannot deal correctly with old license statuses of some old flickr uploads, and as a result it displays unreliable or wrong information. The cut date for unreliability might be 17 July 2008. On images uploaded to flickr later than 2008, it is often indicated that there is no license history before 17 July 2008. About the comment by Olaf Kosinsky, context would be necessary to know what it was about, but maybe he simply commented that bots check what license exists at the flickr source, but they do not check if the flickr user is the legitimate copyright owner. -- Asclepias (talk) 00:05, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Looking at a 2007 photo from a different flickr account, the license history displays the usual note stating that "there is no license history before 17 July 2008" and it displays a subsequent change of license made on 13 August 2008. So, I'm guessing that the problem with the license histories on flickr may affect flickr images whose license was changed before 17 July 2008, by displaying in their license history a text that seems to imply that the license had not changed since the upload to flickr. -- Asclepias (talk) 15:35, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Given the number of different people who uploaded from this Flickr account with parallel claims about licensing, it beggars belief that all of these users were involved in some sort of fraud, rather than that Flickr has an error in terms of tracking the licensing history of these files. - Jmabel ! talk 18:54, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep FlickreviewR confirmed the license. It would not have done that if the license at the time was not what it said what it was. Authors are always free to stop distributing files under a free license (which is effectively what they do when they change the license on Flickr, nothing wrong with that). But files already copied under that license are not revocable. Given that its was uploaded by a user looking for free images on Flickr, and confirmed by bot, I would more suspect an error in Flickr's early data. Carl Lindberg (talk) 01:08, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as per above discussion. --Yann (talk) 08:32, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Miami B (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Bulk COM:NETCOPYVIOs stolen from social media, Flickr, etc. - File:Cattle..M.jpg is here; File:Rabbit...9.jpg is here; File:View of rwanda.jpg is here; File:Volcano ...6.jpg is here; File:Urusyo1.jpg is here; File:Weaving of traditional.jpg is here; File:Creativit.jpg is here; File:On ground.jpg is here, and on and on and on....

Эlcobbola talk 15:03, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 09:46, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mhm951 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:PERSONAL, out of scope

Quick-ease2020 (talk) 15:21, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 09:45, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Memberuser (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Own work claims seem impossible: files of varying size with no (or Facebook) metadata, that clearly come from various sources. Uploader has a large history of copyvios: User talk:Memberuser

Nutshinou Talk! 16:24, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 09:46, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: The subject of the image is marked as the author, F10 CoffeeEngineer (talk) 17:14, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 09:46, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Virgil T. Castaneda (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No permission

CoffeeEngineer (talk) 17:23, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 09:46, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo without educational use Drakosh (talk) 19:06, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 09:47, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo without educational use Drakosh (talk) 19:07, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 09:47, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Disassembled PC photo without educational use Drakosh (talk) 19:07, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 09:47, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo without educational use Drakosh (talk) 19:07, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 09:47, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fictional content (such as flags) is out of scope Nutshinou Talk! 19:32, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 09:46, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unattributed Facebook photograph. Unclear license. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 19:36, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 09:46, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by YBN YELT$U (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope.

Geohakkeri (talk) 19:39, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 09:46, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:POSTERs are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 03:30, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Why should this file be deleted? I am contesting this. BrendonJH (talk) 19:59, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why should this file be deleted? I am contesting this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BrendonJH (talk • contribs) 19:59, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - uselesscontributions} 10:33, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Online copyright statement www.dipali.hu Copyright holder: © dipali Yann (talk) 18:28, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I see some similarities between "dipali" and uploader user name "Fodipali". Maybe it's the same person? Красный wanna talk? 04:43, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I defnitely think so, as also the exif data shows dipali. I believe this is a person that gave us a trial image under a free license, to see how it is used. Kritzolina (talk) 06:21, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 15:36, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work as claimed. Credited to her campaign. Needs VRT. One has author info in exif

Gbawden (talk) 10:20, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 15:44, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found online in 2022 - https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=1333033943850742 - needs VRT Gbawden (talk) 10:20, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's my Facebook Page Jakesilbermannrocks (talk) 10:53, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You claimed this as your own work which this is clearly not. This is a professional photo - we need confirmation from the person who took the photo that they have released it to Commons. Gbawden (talk) 11:25, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 15:44, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution, missing EXIF data, uploaded by single edit account, probably not own work. 188.123.231.76 10:28, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 15:43, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio (c) Klaus Bösch M2k~dewiki (talk) 11:06, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

dem upload assistent fehlt leider die Option: es ist eine Gemeinschaftsproduktion, wir bezahlen Lizenzgebühren zur Verwendung der Hintergrund-Bilder als Coproduktion. sie sind urheberrechtlich geschützt. sobald ich das Urheberrecht bestätige, wird vorgeschlagen, das Bild nicht hochzuladen. was sollen wir also tun? Bilder trotzdem stehen lassen? Rich KB (talk) 07:21, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 15:44, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio (c) Klaus Bösch M2k~dewiki (talk) 11:07, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 15:43, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio (c) Klaus Bösch M2k~dewiki (talk) 11:07, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 15:43, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio (c) Klaus Bösch M2k~dewiki (talk) 11:07, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 15:43, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-quality file w/o metadata available on the internet, no proof of own work claim. HeminKurdistan (talk) 11:19, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also affected: File:Physiatrist assessing a patient.jpg. HeminKurdistan (talk) 11:20, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 15:43, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It seems this is the source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gFAJ_1gk4GQ And as can be seen, the uploader has not put a Commons-acceptable license on it. Uploaders CAN do that, but he hasn't. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 11:27, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can I upload it onto my local wiki as fair use? 48JCL (talk) 11:28, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nope, he's gloriously alive. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 11:36, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete. For a screenshot of a YouTube video to have a {{YouTube CC-BY}} license, the video has to actually be licensed, which it is not. reppoptalk 23:33, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 15:44, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Highvoltage113 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

This users claims of own work cannot be trusted. Most have no exif and one that does credits Belinda Patten. All need VRT to keep IMO

Gbawden (talk) 11:51, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 15:45, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A scanned photostudio image, not own work. 188.123.231.76 18:02, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 15:46, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not used anywhere, probably "misattribution", inconsistent notation with PiIn15Mytes.png (cs: Cimrmanova_čísla.png) Mykhal (talk) 18:40, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Andy Dingley (talk) 23:26, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 15:46, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

insignificant, nonsense, without meaningful use Robins7 (talk) 14:42, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
— Preceding unsigned comment added by JCimroman (talk • contribs) 15:14, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Very significant scientific discovery, useful in many ways, especially for programmers and binary mathematics lectors JCimroman (talk) 16:12, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep It's not Commons' role to rule on the correctness of a topic or theory, merely to judge whether graphic representations of aspects of them are valid for the study of those theories. To censor the works of Jára Cimrman like this would be like deleting the works of de Selby. Andy Dingley (talk) 15:31, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 15:03, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not used anywhere, probably "misattribution", inconsistent notation with PiIn15Mytes.png (en: Cimrman's_series.png) Mykhal (talk) 18:41, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's mine discovery and it's very useful 🤷🏻‍♂️ — Preceding unsigned comment added by JCimroman (talk • contribs) 19:16, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Re. @JCimroman: Has this discovery been documented and published in some form outside Commons (e.g. in a mathematical journal)? Omphalographer (talk) 21:34, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Andy Dingley (talk) 23:26, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 15:46, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not used anywhere, probably "misattribution", inconsistent notation with Cimrman's_series.png/Cimrmanova_čísla.png Mykhal (talk) 18:42, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Andy Dingley (talk) 23:26, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 15:45, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bg1948Bg (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal text documents, out of scope.

Yann (talk) 18:47, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, as well as File:Relato de General Juan Francisco Morales Llerena.pdf which appears to have nearly the same contents as File:Relatos Para la Familia.pdf. Along with scope, I'm concerned that the scanned book contents in these PDFs may not be freely licensed. It clearly isn't PD-US, given that the text opens by describing events in 1999. Omphalographer (talk) 20:44, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
El libro escaneado es un manuscrito porque el autor nunca publicó el libro o derechos de autor del manuscrito. El libro fue escrito como sus memorias de su vida para ser leídos por su familia o cualquier persona interesada. Abg. Manuel Rodriquez Morales murió un día después de completar el libro. Abg. Manuel Rodríguez Morales fue el nieto del general Morales y fue abogado principal desde 1964 hasta 1996 para el principal emprendedor de Ecuador, el Sr. Luis A. Namoa Naranjo. Me gustaría saber cómo puedo poner el archivo PDF que consiste en una portada y 4 páginas del Relato de General Morales que estaba en el anexo del manuscrito de Abg. Manuel Rodríguez Morales. Bg1948Bg (talk) 16:21, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 15:45, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image of non-notable event, no context/location, no educational value, out of scope. LIkely uploaded for promotional purposes. P 1 9 9   20:04, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:44, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jding917 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused screenshot snippets, no educational value, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   20:12, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:40, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused promotional corporate image, non-notable event, no context/location, COM:WEBHOST, out of scope. P 1 9 9   20:10, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 20:57, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, not for any purpose. Taichi (talk) 06:48, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 02:37, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by CelinaBari (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promotional photos from various different photographers; this GQ article includes some of these credited to Allen Henson and Soroosh Hammati. No credit or permission is given here.

Belbury (talk) 07:18, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In fact all of these photos are visibly watermarked to GQ magazine. --Belbury (talk) 07:19, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 02:37, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused file, promotional. Not notable Estopedist1 (talk) 07:58, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 02:37, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Previously deleted file. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:St. Laurent and Diefenbaker (1957).png PascalHD (talk) 02:25, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:58, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted citation by Paulo Coelho. RodRabelo7 (talk) 06:37, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, Facebook, per exif. メイド理世 (talk) 07:16, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment: メイド理世, a file being from Facebook isn't per se a reason to delete it. For instance, uploader could have uploaded it to Facebook, deleted the original, and just later decided to upload it to Commons. RodRabelo7 (talk) 07:19, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:00, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be "own work". See for instance https://cnbbn2.com.br/dom-paulo-andreolli-cnbb-regional-norte-2/ Py4nf (talk) 14:51, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:02, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW; YouTube user is not the copyright holder of character [3] en:w:Street Fighter, en:w:Characters_of_the_Street_Fighter_series#Sagat. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:10, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination,896 subs, unlikely to own the rights. --Gbawden (talk) 11:15, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 03:22, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:16, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 03:38, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Weak keep for the glass. --Gbawden (talk) 11:15, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please check metadata, it is very likely from a Facebook or another Meta service, maybe copyvio. S8321414 (talk) 05:37, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:15, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo is copyrighted to the National Maritime Museum, Greenwich, in the source book which was published in 2016. Seems to be the photo at https://www.rmg.co.uk/collections/objects/rmgc-object-42898 which is not freely licenced. Belbury (talk) 15:26, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:16, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Can't claim author's life plus 70 years or fewer if the author is unknown. Photo was taken only 81 years ago. Belbury (talk) 19:26, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:17, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded as own work, but it certainly looks like a promotional image. Only use was on a now-deleted spam page on en.wp. Just Step Sideways (talk) 19:42, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:17, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image as portrayed is not exhibiting educational value; no authorship, no location of image; not high quality; to be retained needs further information, a useful name and better categorisation  — billinghurst sDrewth 00:08, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This painting located in Singapore. Probably no FoP TentingZones1 (talk) 07:11, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, and unknown copyright status. --P 1 9 9   00:51, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spoof (?) image with an unknown source (described as a “self-portrait” but obviously not in fact). It also seems that the image has covered a normal image of Mendel on other wikis. Keiri (talk) 02:55, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   00:54, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:TOYS. Copyrighted character design (Oinkers42) (talk) 03:46, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   01:10, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Beaver Building is distorted here. There are better images like File:WTM3 PAT M IN NYC 0060.jpg and File:WTM3 PAT M IN NYC 0058.jpg, in which the building does not look distorted. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:45, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   01:10, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fake image Bahnmoeller (talk) 12:55, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9   00:58, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Deadstar as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: photo of a photo, user is not creator of the file. No source

May be old enough? Yann (talk) 15:03, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe, it's not clear enough to read. On closer inspection, is there a watermark on the left hand side? -- Deadstar (msg) 12:29, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   01:00, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: plain text. Omphalographer (talk) 15:25, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   01:01, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not at all Public Domain, published in 1972 Tournesol (talk) 15:52, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   01:05, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fake license HeminKurdistan (talk) 15:57, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   01:04, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused book with unclear authorship and uncredited images. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 17:54, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   01:05, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative of copyrighted artworks. 188.123.231.76 17:57, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   01:06, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence provided that the author died 70 or more years ago. 188.123.231.76 17:59, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   01:07, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence provided that the author died 70 or more years ago. 188.123.231.76 17:59, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   01:07, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence provided that the author died 70 or more years ago. 188.123.231.76 18:00, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   01:07, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence provided that the author died 70 or more years ago. 188.123.231.76 18:00, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   01:07, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence provided that the author died 70 or more years ago. 188.123.231.76 18:00, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   01:07, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence provided that the author died 70 or more years ago. 188.123.231.76 18:00, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   01:07, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not in public domain, published 1983, seemingly reproduced without permission. Also a direct screencap from the 2021 book "Genocide in Libya: Shar, a Hidden Colonial History" by Ali Abdullatif Ahmida", p. 66, as evidenced by the figure caption. Meluiel (talk) 18:05, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   01:09, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio (c) Michaela Dzurna M2k~dewiki (talk) 20:03, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   01:03, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

License of the website (non-commercial) does not allow for upload to Wikimedia Commons. Howardcorn33 (talk) 21:30, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   01:02, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taken from Instragram https://www.instagram/llsantozs Otávio Astor Vaz Costa (talk) 22:31, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   01:02, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ricky Martin? 186.172.151.61 02:01, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to publicly confirm that I am the sole owner of this image and it should remain here.
Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Keypad320 (talk • contribs) 13:35, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: not notable, out of scope. --P 1 9 9   18:30, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm unable to find any reference to this flag outside of Wikipedia. Tempted to say that this is imaginary work and therefore out of scope. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 14:06, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I was able to find https://www.belgiumwwii.be/belgique-en-guerre/articles/wallonie-libre-la.html which shows a logo (not a flag) related to a Resistance movement called "La Wallonie Libre". Cryptic-waveform (talk) 15:53, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm still in favor of removing this made-up flag, and replacing its usage with the actual original logo. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 16:00, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I do not understand why you want to remove the flag. There are sources relating the existence of this flag. The file is usefull. Sthubertliege (talk) 19:30, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There are 2 reasons why I think this file should be removed:
  • Unless a source is provided that this logo was used as a flag, it is an interpretation of the logo and therefore not historically accurate.
  • An actual picture of the flag would be preferable to this file which has gone through several versions, hinting at the fact that it is not accurate.
The file can be replaced with File:Logo La Wallonie Libre.png. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 14:21, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: in use. You can add {{Factual accuracy}} for now. --P 1 9 9   18:32, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unsourced/fantasy flag. Although it is true that the central emblem was indeed used by the underground newspaper Wallonie Libre during the occupation period, there is no evidence that it was ever made into a flag or has any existence outside of the creator's mind. The movement has indeed used another flag since the 1970s (e.g. 1, 2) which we already have on commons in a separate file. Any uses of this file on Wikipedia are easily substitutable with one of the two other images and appear to have been added by the creator or a closely affiliated account. ((Brigade Piron (talk) 09:48, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I do not undertsand why you want to delete this file. The flag has been built directly from archives of the website : Wallonie libre (La) (belgiumwwii.be), which contains lot of references of the red and yellow logo. The are lots of examples on this website : La Wallonie Libre | The Belgian War Press (cegesoma.be). On the other hand, this file : File:Flag of Wallonie Libre.jpg — Wikimedia Commons has been built on pure imagination ! You should focus your deletation efforts on this document, not mine. Really, I do not see why you want to delete this file. We have perfectly the right to build a modern version of the flag based on original documents. The flag is correctly referencing the original logo with walloon rooster and Lorraine cross. There is no reason why it would makes problem for you. Please respect users right to import better quality version of historical logo, wich is a way to improve Wikipedia files. Sthubertliege (talk) 11:03, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please provide evidence that this flag has ever existed. I'm talking about a flag, not a logo. Transforming a logo into a flag that never existed is what is discussed here. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 14:51, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I agree. The logo clearly existed - and we already have it here although frankly I'm not sure of the copyright position. The use of the devise as part of a flag is pure fantasy, however. Brigade Piron (talk) 09:10, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete There is no evidence that this logo was used as a flag, and it was added to Wikipedia articles such as List of Belgian flags. Where needed, the historically accurate File:Logo La Wallonie Libre.png should be used instead. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 14:50, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Bastique ☎ let's talk! 21:43, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 211.243.137.72 as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F3 Uploader not informed. Unlikely to be own work, but I can't find a source on the Net. Yann (talk) 15:03, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio, many uncropped versions readily found online. --P 1 9 9   18:35, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Фотография 1976 года никак не может быть собственной работой 2023 года. Jim Hokins (talk) 15:43, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Подскажите, пожалуйста, а как лучше поступить?
Фото очень старое, из семейного архива.
Нигде больше его нет, это мой скан.
Просто хотелось поделиться таким "реликтом" с пользователями.
Или это никак не возможно? Анастасия525 (talk) 16:23, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:40, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Фотография 1941 года никак не может быть собственной работой 2023 года. Jim Hokins (talk) 15:43, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Подскажите, пожалуйста, а как лучше поступить?
Фото очень старое, из семейного архива.
Нигде больше его нет, это мой скан.
Просто хотелось поделиться таким "реликтом" с пользователями.
Или это никак не возможно? Анастасия525 (talk) 16:17, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:40, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Фотография человека, умершего в 2001 году, никак не может быть собственной работой 2023 года. Jim Hokins (talk) 15:45, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Подскажите, пожалуйста, а как лучше поступить?
Фото очень старое, из семейного архива.
Нигде больше его нет, это мой скан.
Просто хотелось поделиться таким "реликтом" с пользователями.
Или это никак не возможно? Анастасия525 (talk) 16:22, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:39, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Фотография 1973 года никак не может быть собственной работой 2023 года. Jim Hokins (talk) 15:46, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Подскажите, пожалуйста, а как лучше поступить?
Фото очень старое, из семейного архива.
Нигде больше его нет, это мой скан.
Просто хотелось поделиться таким "реликтом" с пользователями.
Или это никак не возможно? Анастасия525 (talk) 16:21, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:39, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Фотография 1963 года никак не может быть собственной работой 2023 года. Jim Hokins (talk) 15:46, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Подскажите, пожалуйста, а как лучше поступить?
Фото очень старое, из семейного архива.
Нигде больше его нет, это мой скан.
Просто хотелось поделиться таким "реликтом" с пользователями.
Или это никак не возможно? Анастасия525 (talk) 16:21, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:39, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Фотография 1976 года никак не может быть собственной работой 2023 года. Jim Hokins (talk) 15:46, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Подскажите, пожалуйста, а как лучше поступить?
Фото очень старое, из семейного архива.
Нигде больше его нет, это мой скан.
Просто хотелось поделиться таким "реликтом" с пользователями.
Или это никак не возможно? Анастасия525 (talk) 16:20, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:39, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is a new file. Frendy Aldo Tobing (talk) 09:34, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 13:34, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The maker's request. Frendy Aldo Tobing (talk) 19:51, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination, superseded by File:Monumen Guru Patimpus Sembiring Pelawi (II).jpg. --P 1 9 9   18:44, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

there is a new file. Frendy Aldo Tobing (talk) 09:32, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep No reason for deletion. Keeping old photographs is an important part of the project! -- Herbert Ortner (talk) 16:42, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The problem is that there is already a new file, Sir (File:Monumen Guru Patimpus Sembiring Pelawi (I).jpg) which is equipped with better metadata and naming; So it's impossible for duplicate files, right sir 😅. Frendy Aldo Tobing (talk) 16:20, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 13:35, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The maker's request. Frendy Aldo Tobing (talk) 19:53, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In that case  Delete as duplicate. Herbert Ortner (talk) 17:52, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination, superseded by File:Monumen Guru Patimpus Sembiring Pelawi (I).jpg. --P 1 9 9   18:43, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Film Festival 2014, camera says 2012, upload date 2016. Real own work? 186.173.182.219 21:10, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Already published here in 2013, needs COM:VRT. --P 1 9 9   18:47, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Luxembourg A1Cafel (talk) 08:42, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


The work represented on this photo is published in application of Article 10, point 7 ° of the Law of April 18, 2001 on copyrights, neighboring rights and databases (« Loi du 18 avril 2001 sur les droits d’auteur, les droits voisins et les bases de données ») :
"When the work has been lawfully made accessible to the public, the author cannot prohibit the reproduction and communication of works located in a place accessible to the public, when these works do not constitute the main subject of reproduction or communication." GilPe (talk) 11:54, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - clearly the work is the main subject. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:22, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 08:46, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:23, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source is the book "Quiera el pueblo votar" published in Argentina in 2017. Copyright protection in Argentina is 20 years after first publication and 25 years after creation. We only have evidence of the second condition. To keep this image we need the info of its first publication to ensure it is in the public domain in both Argentina and the US. Günther Frager (talk) 08:57, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Still not outside of 20 years, but per Worldcat, Quiera el pueblo votar : imágenes de un siglo de campañas políticas was first published in 2007, not 2017. That said, while the specific page for this image isn't reproduced on Google Books per the book's back cover and what is visible, it consists of images of previously published items ("Reproduce afiches, pintadas, volantes, votos, actos, movilizaciones, libros y objetos que se suceden cronológicamente"). While having the exact details of first publication is important, it seems unlikely that this book would be the first place the image was published. —Tcr25 (talk) 13:48, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the source, I took the 2017 from the publisher [5], but it is probably a reprint. The problem is that any photo taken in Argentina after 1971 needs proper sources as most of them are still copyrighted in the US. Günther Frager (talk) 14:23, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:23, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1927 poem on a poster. It is unclear who produced this poster, the uploader put a "self" licence on it. -- Deadstar (msg) 14:03, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:26, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wycofuję zgodę Wojtas2610 (talk) 21:10, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my consent
translator: Google Translate Consigned (talk) 23:22, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: per Consigned. —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - uselesscontributions} 18:41, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wycofuję zgodę Wojtas2610 (talk) 21:12, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my consent
translator: Google Translate Consigned (talk) 23:22, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: per Consigned. —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - uselesscontributions} 18:42, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wycofuję zgodę Wojtas2610 (talk) 21:14, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my consent

 Keep per COM:INUSE. CC licenses are non-revokable (COM:L). Consigned (talk) 23:27, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: per Consigned. —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - uselesscontributions} 18:42, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wycofuję zgodę Wojtas2610 (talk) 21:15, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my consent

 Keep per COM:INUSE. CC licenses are non-revokable (COM:L). Consigned (talk) 23:27, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: per Consigned. —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - uselesscontributions} 18:42, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mispronunciation: Audio like Paccaikkuḻantai வாலைப்பழத்திற்காக (vālaippaḻattiṟkāka) viḻuntu viḻuntu aḻutatu, This should be like வாழைப்பழத்திற்காக (vāḻaippaḻattiṟkāka). Some examples of pronunciation: File:Ta-வாழை.oga, File:LL-Q5885 (tam)-Sriveenkat-வாழைப்பழம்.wav. Sriveenkat (talk) 02:37, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: COM:INUSE. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:16, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Maybe not PD-old-70. 左侧题字为“写庄子故事 戊子年九月??写于北京”(see [6], [7]). 最近两次的戊子年为1948和2008年,而北京是在1949年改名为“北京”,所以这幅画应当是在2008年绘制。 shizhao (talk) 06:26, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The inscription on the left side is "写庄子故事 戊子年九月??写于北京" (see [1], [2]). The two most recent WuZi years(戊子年) were 1948 and 2008, and Beijing(北京) was renamed "Beijing" in 1949, so this painting must have been painted in 2008. shizhao (talk) 06:31, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support for deletion if not PD-old-70. Charlestpt (talk) 07:53, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Is there any reason to think the painting wasn't made before 1928 when it was also called Beijing? That said, the earliest published version I could find of this came from a http://daily.cnnb.com.cn/gx/page/661/2011-07-06/A2/46411309907000905.pdf 2011 issue of 国学报] (Journal of Chinese Studies). —Tcr25 (talk) 14:56, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per COM:PCP, not enough evidence that this was painted before the 1940s. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:19, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The logo image may be at the minimum copyright protection threshold. If it is above the copyright protection threshold, please re-upload its logo and keep only its letter portion. Fumikas Sagisavas (talk) 08:08, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment: Files with the same image as the one from commons are uploaded under fair use on the English Wikipedia and the Chinese Wikipedia, rather than using the file from commons. See also: w:File:Monsanto_logo.svg Fumikas Sagisavas (talk) 08:11, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:20, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Professional wrestling magazines

[edit]

Screengrabs of photos from professional wrestling magazines, mostly from Internet Archive, have been a problem since they started appearing on the site five years ago. The half-assed, piecemeal approach of single-file DRs has not helped. If anything, it's perhaps made the problem worse. Users see content remaining on the site and then proceed to upload further content in the same vein, with their own peculiar interpretations of copyright law as it concerns the lack of a copyright notice.

The bulk of this request focuses on the so-called "Apter mags", the family of magazines published under the corporate names G.C. London and T.V. Sports. Most if not all of their magazines published between summer 1973 and late 1977 are in the public domain due to the lack of a copyright notice. However, this content comes from later issues. The criteria justifying {{PD-US-no notice}} ≠ the criteria justifying {{PD-US-1978-89}}, yet most of these files appear to claim PD based solely on the lack of a copyright notice without acknowledgement of extenuating circumstances. I initiated a similar DR last year. The closing admin provided the following:

I found the following copyright registrations in the copyright.gov database:

  1. V2833P041 for GC London Publishing, which covers the following titles:
    1. Inside wrestling
    2. Victory sports series
    3. World boxing
    4. Wrestling superstars
    5. The Wrestler
  2. V2833P043 for TV Sports Inc / GC London Publishing
    1. KO magazine
    2. Pro wrestling
Searching the database myself, it showed that the above-listed registrations were filed and recorded in 1992, so these copyrights would be valid.

Published in the "Apter mags" with a claim of no copyright notice. Based on what I found at Internet Archive and other places online, these magazines contained copyright notices through the May 1973 cover date. The earliest issue I found without a copyright notice bore an August 1973 cover date.

Published in Wrestling Revue. This magazine was published in Canada, so {{PD-US-no notice}} simply does not apply. While I didn't spend a whole lot of time on the matter, I couldn't find anything in Canadian copyright law pertaining to material falling into the public domain due to lack of a copyright notice.

UPDATE: I had a little time so I investigated further. Wrestling Revue was published in Canada for a number of years, bookended by periods where it was published in the U.S. Most issues do contain a valid copyright notice but some do not. There appears to be no consistent pattern to it, unlike the Apter mags. The Canadian publisher listed a Montreal address and many of the above photos center on the pro wrestling scene at the time in Quebec. Regardless, COM:PCP also applies here, as the uploader(s) and source(s) are pretty much the same as those referred to below, and just as unverifiable unless the specific issue is hosted on Internet Archive.

I didn't have time to dig deeper and had sketchy Internet access last evening, so I had to come back to this. The coverage of this magazine on Internet Archive is scattershot at best. The 1971 issues found there, not including the one referenced in the above list, were published in the U.S. and bear valid copyright notices. The January 1973 issue was published in the U.S. with a defective copyright notice ("All rights reserved by Champion Sports Publishing Corp. 1972"). The earliest issue published in Canada bore a May 1973 cover date. This continued to be the case until 1982, when it was again published in the U.S. by many of the same individuals previously involved with Champion Sports Publishing.

Published in Wrestling All Stars, which very clearly shows a copyright notice at the given source.

Published in GLOW, which very clearly shows a copyright notice at the given source.

Published in Championship Wrestling, which very clearly shows a copyright notice at the given source.

Published in The Ring's Wrestling Magazine, which very clearly shows a copyright notice at the given source.

Published in Wrestling Guide. COM:PCP applies, as the numerous eBay sources this uploader scrounged from are pretty much unverifiable at this point (I tried the Wayback Machine). I couldn't find this particular issue online apart from the cover. Other issues I've found online do include a copyright notice.

Published in Wrestling Sports Stars. COM:PCP also applies for the same reason, the numerous eBay sources this uploader scrounged from are pretty much unverifiable at this point (I tried the Wayback Machine). I couldn't find this particular issue online. The 1973 issue I found on Internet Archive and the 1974 issue I personally own both contain a copyright notice.

Addition to the original nomination, which I discovered while adding the Ellis photo to his Wikipedia article. Published in Wrestling Confidential. This issue is on Internet Archive and does contain a copyright notice. The only other file from this magazine I found on Commons was from 1987. That issue did not contain a copyright notice.
--RadioKAOS (talk) 08:18, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there,
Some of these files were uploaded by myself. I did so on the basis that I believed they were in the public domain (under Template:PD-US-1978-89) because, after careful examination, the magazine the images appeared in did not have any correct copyright notice and I was not aware that their copyright was renewed at any point. I was careful not to upload from magazines which did contain valid copyright notices, such as GLOW magazine or from publishers such as JEMS, Inc.
RadioKaos has pointed out that it may be the case that G.C. London/T.V. Sports did renew their copyright on 23 October 1992, which I was previously unaware of.
Can I ask for a clarification? Does that October 1992 renewal retroactively cover their entire catalogue? Or does it only cover images from 5 years previously, ie 23 October 1987?
Template:PD-US-1978-89 states "its copyright was not subsequently registered with the U.S. Copyright Office within 5 years."
Surely this would mean that images published between 1978 and 23 October 1987 were not registered within 5 years, and thus those images are still valid for Template:PD-US-1978-89. If this is the case, I would ask that images published between 1978 and 23 October 1987 be retained. CeltBrowne (talk) 11:40, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@CeltBrowne: A copyright expert will have to comment. From what I can tell, the registration requirement was within five years following the effective date of the Berne Convention Implementation Act of 1988, which was March 1, 1989. Also, it wouldn't cover their entire catalog. The Copyright Act of 1976 took effect on January 1, 1978 and specified that any published works lacking a copyright notice to that point were PD.RadioKAOS (talk) 12:00, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@RadioKAOS As per Copyright Office's Circular 3 regarding Copyright Notice:

"An omission or mistake in using a copyright notice may not have invalidated the copyright to works published between January 1, 1978 and March 1, 1989, if... The work was registered before or within five years after the publication without notice and a reasonable effort was made to add notice to all copies or phonorecords distributed in the United States after the omission was discovered"

This verbiage seems pretty clear that the registration should have been made whithin 5 years of the publication and not the effective date of the Berne Convention Implementation Act of 1988. Pfcab (talk) 14:05, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Office's Circular 3 regarding Copyright Notice Pfcab (talk) 14:06, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for that clarification. It seemed highly unlikely to me that an image published in 1980 and in the public domain could be taken back out of the public domain an entire 12 years later.
So to reinitiate, based on that information, I believe that all images published by GC London/TV Sports without a copyright notice before 23 October 1987 should be retained. CeltBrowne (talk) 20:59, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Also, if what you're saying does prove to be the case, how can a publication date be determined in edge cases? I know at least in the case of the Apter mags, they mailed to subscribers via a certain class of mail in order to avoid any requirement for a circulation audit, which would have provided that date. The cover date is no indication: they often appeared on newsstands prior to that month, plus were actually produced as long as four or five months prior in order to satisfy the printer's lead time requirements.RadioKAOS (talk) 12:28, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I will not protest the deletion. I did not know about how mass deletions work at the time, and, as I got a message telling me one by one deletion is not acceptable, I felt frustrated, I stopped and forgot about it with time, as no other action has been taken. I am really sorry the situation got worse. CoffeeEngineer (talk) 16:42, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@RadioKAOS: I agree that determining the exact date when this magazines were published is difficult, but as you pointed out the magazines were in cirulation before the cover date. Therefore, there would be no edge cases where an edition was published after the date indicated on it's cover date.
Furthermore, as per Copyright Office's Circular 1 regarding Copyright Basics: [8]

Under copyright law, publication is the distribution of copies or phonorecords of a work to the public by sale or other transfer of ownership or by rental, lease, or lending. Offering to distribute copies or phonorecords to a group of people for purposes of further distribution, public performance, or public display also constitutes publication.

Which means even if the magazines only began to be sold exactly on the day indicated by the cover date it would already be considered to be published before that date as they would have already been distributed to resellers. Pfcab (talk) 14:45, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@RadioKAOS: OK, I'm sure you know better than I about copyright issues. Krok6kola (talk) 19:23, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Going section by section...
    •  Keep those in the first batch dated up to 23 October 1987, as copyright was not registered within 5 years of publication, per CeltBrowne above
    •  Delete those in the first batch dated 23 October 1987 and later, as copyright was registered within 5 years of publication, per CeltBrowne above
    •  Delete the remainder, nominator's rationale in each of the other sections justifies that they are likely copyrighted.
      -Consigned (talk) 20:48, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      Leaning delete those in the first batch dated 1987, unless we can prove the date of publication is before 23 October 1987
      If a magazine is sent out or on store shelves by October 1987, then obviously the photograph had to be taken before that date. Therefore isn't anything up to September 1987 automatically safe? CeltBrowne (talk) 11:25, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      Yes, things up to Sep 1987 should be safe. I thought we only had the year for 1987 files, but looking into a few we do have month or season, and many files have specific dates, so will clarify my comment with the specific dates. Consigned (talk) 12:55, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      The benchmark would be the publication date, which is not the same as the cover date. As I previously mentioned, these magazines typically avoided circulation audits so they could inflate their circulation numbers to their audience. The tricky part is going to be determining that date. One of the magazines I own is the March 1976 issue of Inside Wrestling. The issue describes events which occurred in October and November 1975. A story on Terry Funk contains an appended note next to the headline referring to Funk winning the NWA World's Heavyweight Championship, which occurred on December 10, 1975. That doesn't necessarily mean that the note was added in while it was at the printer. In his autobiography, Bill Apter said wrestling promoters trusted Stanley Weston enough to provide him such information in advance. Anyway, based on prior discussions I've read, the publication date could be construed as the date it left the publisher's office(s), not the date it appeared on newsstands. RadioKAOS / Talk to me, Billy / Transmissions 14:41, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment I started a thread at VPT Commons:Village pump/Technical#Query to find dates of DR items to see if someone technically minded can bring the dates from the files into the first list, so that those before/after 23 Oct 1987 can be more easily identified. Consigned (talk) 13:07, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done --Geohakkeri (talk) 15:03, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Awesome, thank you! Consigned (talk) 16:52, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: deleted the files from the first batch published after Oct. 1987, kept files from first batch published before Oct. 1987 per discussion. Deleted the other batches per discussion. --Abzeronow (talk) 21:09, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is licensed as CC-0, which does not reflect the copyright statement at the source. If this image were first published in Eritrea and nowhere else within 30 days and if it was not published as part of a book or collection or bore the address of an agent, it would be in the public domain in Eritrea. However, it is taken from a Swedish website with a copyright statement, and I just think that without further evidence we cannot assert all those conditions. Felix QW (talk) 14:37, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 21:10, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

png render of en:File:Shell logo.svg, which is under fair use on en.wiki. Allegedly a complex logo per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Shell logos, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Shell-logo.svg, File:Shell logo from petrol station.jpg Nutshinou Talk! 15:51, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and consensus. --Abzeronow (talk) 21:10, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image footage was from China Central Television (CCTV), not from China News Service (CNS), thus the CC license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 16:05, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:51, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence provided that this is anonymous work or the author died 70 or more years ago as PD rationale claims. Quick1984 (talk) 17:38, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:55, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The architects died in the 1990s, the last one in 1997 and Germany has a standard of life + 70 years and no FoP for interior views Paradise Chronicle (talk) 19:11, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination, Undelete in 2068. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:55, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Really questionnable if we're talking about a copyrights free file here. In terms of date, certainly it's hardly believable, especially by taking into consideration Greek standards, that this file is copyrights free by now. As for the presented here template, I'm sorry but this file doesn't seem to match what's written on it. Election ballots, to some extent at least, are created by the respective parties themselves and, then, approved or not by the state. At the same time, the photo on top of the ballot is certainly not a state creation and most probably not, as well, out of copyrights. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 19:50, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, photograph is not free, and not de minimis. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:56, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative of non-free murals, no evidence of PD or author's permission. Quick1984 (talk) 17:36, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Murals is not primary object of this photo (near 1/9 of size). There is depicted general view of some location in the city. --Kaganer (talk) 18:06, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
     Delete. Wrong. This image is made for, focused on and named after those murals. --Quick1984 (talk) 15:50, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    made for, focused on and named after those murals.
    We not very interested of the for what the author of the photo was focusing on, and what he named it (by way, incorrectly - this was not a murals). We should be analyse, that is depicts really. --Kaganer (talk) 14:45, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    This was not a murals or another kind of a sustainable work of art. On the firewalls there we see a temporary campaign banners, which were created by mechanically redrawing from a sketch by "square by square" manner, and changed as they faded. At the 2011 street view we can still see the outline of that banner on the left firewall. --Kaganer (talk) 14:59, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
     Comment File was renamed. --Kaganer (talk) 15:05, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    FYI: Files with copyright issues should NOT be renamed until copyright issues are resolved. Quick1984 (talk) 06:25, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Weak delete The murals are the primary focus of the photo, which is in my opinion self-evident, but also shown by the photographer's original filename and description. That said, they are not in particularly high resolution, so the risk of copyright infringement is small (but still IMO above COM:PRP). Consigned (talk) 23:11, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep I think the issue was with the original naming of the file, which used the word "mural" in it. So you cannot have a photo of a building if there is a mural on it? Corporations and evil-doers take note. It is a great way to get pesky protesters and reporters from taking photos of your headquarters or building project you don't want to be photographed. The murals are not the primary object of this photo. The buildings are. In this case, the deletion request is excessive.Myotus (talk) 01:22, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete From the image, it is a borderline case, but the title suggest that including the mural is the purpose of taking this photo, so IMO not de minimis. --A1Cafel (talk) 03:29, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    How a photo is labeled by the original photographer does not mean it is a copyright violation. The two should not be mistaken for the same thing. All it means it was the interest of the photographer. Such as the photo labeled File:Lincolnatgettysburg.jpg only represents a the interest of the person who uploaded it to Wikpedia, the photo was never about Abraham Lincoln the photo captured the event. The images of the murals themselves in the photograph are of very poor quality if blownup and do not represent a threat to an artists copyright.

    Additionally:
    The other issue is the copyright term in the Soviet Union is 25 years from the first publication of a work and the death of the creator. In this case, the photo was taken on March 23, 1984. The work from its style is likely from the 1960s, so the work is at least 60 years old. The copyright has likely expired, and any challenges are unlikely, especially when you take in the poor pixelated condition of the image showing the building with the murals. The image can be pulled if a copyright holder emerges and submits a challenge. Because Copyright is not always clear and there are many orphaned images this is also about risk assessment. It would be detrimental to the mission of Wikimedia Commons fail in its responsibilities support educational content and to facilitate the sharing of multimedia resources that can be used for teaching, academic research, and other knowledge dissemination purposes,
    in an overzellus attempt to avoid all risks. Myotus (talk) 20:29, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Try reading COM:Russia#Durations first. COM:EVID may help too. Quick1984 (talk) 20:37, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • I think the photographers intent was to focus on the murals so they're not de minimis in my opinion, but blurring them would still have this as a useful file. @Jmabel: — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abzeronow (talk • contribs) 17:53, 2 September 2024‎ (UTC).[reply]
    I agree with@Jmabel that blur should be placed on the three artworks, because the file would still useful. Thanks, -- Ooligan (talk) 20:59, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
User:Kaganer has moved the file to File:Obvodny kahal Embankment at west from Novo-Kamenny bridge.jpg, so the title no longer emphasizes the murals. I believe I've added sufficient Gaussian blur to the murals to address the copyright issue. @Kaganer, Quick1984, A1Cafel, Consigned, Myotus, and Ooligan: does the current name and version address your concerns? (Please answer below,) - Jmabel ! talk 21:18, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No objection. Quick1984 (talk) 21:29, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
My feeling is the Gaussian blur is not needed. Myotus (talk) 01:23, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: copyright issue resolved. --Abzeronow (talk) 22:39, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Arlofc (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Likely not own works: low-res/web-size images with disparate quality and styles, missing EXIF data or credit to someone else.

P 1 9 9   20:02, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete per nom - mix of resolution and exif suggests not the uploader's own photos. One of the two credits photographer Miguel SCHINCARIOL in exif, unsure if this is the uploader. The uploader uploaded a few other photos with consistent exif which are more likely to be own work. If the uploader is the photographer of the nominated files, please provide permission to COM:VRT. Consigned (talk) 23:17, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 23:57, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wycofuję zgodę Wojtas2610 (talk) 21:13, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my consent




Deleted: per discussion. --Abzeronow (talk) 23:58, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wycofuję zgodę Wojtas2610 (talk) 21:18, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my consent
translator: Google Translate Consigned (talk) 23:31, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per discussion. --Abzeronow (talk) 23:59, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Sebbog13 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: I do not believe this url ([9]) is the original source, but it was discovered by tineye in 2010 and allegedly won an award in 2009, there are other results for this image on tineye but that's just one example, so the uploader is most likely not the author, having uploaded the image in 2020.

The uploader removed the notice and on the talk page, said Cette photo a été extraite par mes soins d'un film amateur réalisé par un membre de ma famille en 1955. Non il ne s'agit pas d'un scan d'une couverture de livre ou d'une photo trouvée sur le net. La demande de suppression immédiate est un non sens. reppoptalk 23:22, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@FlyAkwa: if you could upload the entire film, that would help clear this up (and it would probably be highly useful as well). Also, the media that Sebbog13 pointed to does exist. I take it you don't know anything about how it got there—maybe you could ask your family about that? Snowmanonahoe (talk) 23:28, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If you do own the copyright it would be great if you could upload the whole thing, per Snowmanonahoe. Sebbog13 (talk) 23:34, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • As a point of information, a series of stills from the film are featured in en:Deadliest Crash: The Le Mans 1955 Disaster, a documentary made for the BBC in 2009 and broadcast in 2010, which is what Reppop links to. I am able to watch it on YouTube but since that may be a copyvio, I won't link it. The film zooms in on what looks like the same frame, first seen at 37:30, but the image is wider, extending to the left. I don't think the author is named at that point, but the owners of the film may be named in the end credits. FlyAkwa, can you confirm that that's the same film? Presumably your family gave permission for it to be used? Yngvadottir (talk) 20:17, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is going nowhere. - Sebbog13 (talk) 21:29, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per COM:PCP. --Abzeronow (talk) 00:01, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

all images without explicitly watermarked attribution to agency photographers are presumed to be outside this license

{{User|POS78}}talk 00:02, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Of course, I assume that Yaser Salari took these pictures! @HeminKurdistan: What do you think? {{User|POS78}}talk 00:26, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@POS78 The news website whose owner is Yaser Salari indicates that he is indeed the photographer. About the time these photos were taken, his name regularly appears on Tasnim's reports from Razavi Khorasan Province, meaning that he was employed by Tasnim. I think we should keep the files. HeminKurdistan (talk) 12:40, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@HeminKurdistan With the help of the site you mentioned, I talked to Yaser Salari and they told me they received the pictures. Unfortunately, I do not know how to deal with the received images! And I always have a problem that they should stay or be deleted? {{User|POS78}}talk 18:56, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Circumstancial but correct evidence. Vysotsky (talk) 12:54, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per consensus that they fit the license. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:25, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

all images without explicitly watermarked attribution to agency photographers are presumed to be outside this license

{{User|POS78}}talk 23:52, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:41, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Krd: please restore these photos. Their license is valid and they had watermark (gallery), likely someone cropped it and then POS78 assumed they're "not free". --Orijentolog (talk) 22:54, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

all images without explicitly watermarked attribution to agency photographers are presumed to be outside this license

{{User|POS78}}talk 00:09, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Of course, I assume that Yaser Salari took these pictures! @HeminKurdistan: What do you think? {{User|POS78}}talk 00:26, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
special:diff/884283183 {{User|POS78}}talk 19:10, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:42, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wycofuję zgodę Wojtas2610 (talk) 21:14, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my consent



Kept: license cannot be revoked. --Krd 12:50, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Functionally indentical to en:File:Shell logo.svg, which is under fair use on en.wiki. Allegedly a complex logo per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Shell logos, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Shell-logo.svg, File:Shell logo from petrol station.jpg Nutshinou Talk! 15:51, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep this is a photograph, not a SVG/PNG graphic design logo. There are a lot of similar pictures where the Shell logo is displayed at front such as File:Shell gas sign.JPG, File:Логотип Shell.jpg, or file:Fisogni Museum Monteshell sign 1990s.jpg. Fma12 (talk) 23:31, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Then it's a derivative work, that I am not sure is covered by FoP considering this is cropped from an image (File:Shell logo from petrol station.jpg) that was deleted for the same reason I opened this deletion request. Also "other files exist" isn't a valid rationale in this case as File:Логотип Shell.jpg is covered by COM:FOP Netherlands (I think anyway) and File:Fisogni Museum Monteshell sign 1990s.jpg by Commons:Deletion requests/File:Fisogni Museum Monteshell sign 1990s.jpg Nutshinou Talk! 17:11, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment if the image is reached by any FoP protection, it should be deleted. I don't know where the removed photograph was taken in. So this could be deleted per precautionary principle. Fma12 (talk) 21:22, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think this can be kept per FoP-UK, can't it? --Krd 15:30, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Krd 07:16, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]