Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2024/06/05
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_-_KHPN_-_13-11-23.jpg){kind=link}
_-_KHPN_-_13-11-23.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
![148 File:"Ferid El Atrache" Street.JPG](#File:"Ferid_El_Atrache"_Street.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(1).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
This is a picture of a unkown girl during a private party. There are people in the photo who do not want to be on Wikipedia. 213.119.201.18 06:53, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 09:05, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Please provide a reason and sign it with Bau12467887654324567876543234567876543 (talk) 22:19, 4 June 2024 (UTC) Bau12467887654324567876543234567876543 (talk) 22:19, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: alread deleted by Fitindia. --Rosenzweig τ 12:31, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Copyright infringement Thomas R. Schwarz (talk) 01:48, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: obvious copyvio (TV screenshot). --Rosenzweig τ 12:41, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Copyright infringement Thomas R. Schwarz (talk) 01:48, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: obvious copyvio (TV screenshot). --Rosenzweig τ 12:40, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Copyright infringement Thomas R. Schwarz (talk) 01:49, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: obvious copyvio (TV screenshot). --Rosenzweig τ 12:40, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Copyright infringement Thomas R. Schwarz (talk) 01:49, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: obvious copyvio (TV screenshot). --Rosenzweig τ 12:40, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
I did not write that it is a protected area, and i delete that photo and upload same with the title protect area Jeca22 (talk) 09:39, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 12:42, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Carrefour
[edit]Since this is a simple typeset word, I'm not sure we need any of these, but I know we don't need 24 of them.
- File:Carrefour svg (1).svg
- File:Carrefour svg (2).svg
- File:Carrefour svg (3).svg
- File:Carrefour svg (4).svg
- File:Carrefour SVG Logo (1).svg
- File:Carrefour SVG Logo (10).svg
- File:Carrefour SVG Logo (11).svg
- File:Carrefour SVG Logo (12).svg
- File:Carrefour SVG Logo (13).svg
- File:Carrefour SVG Logo (14).svg
- File:Carrefour SVG Logo (15).svg
- File:Carrefour SVG Logo (16).svg
- File:Carrefour SVG Logo (17).svg
- File:Carrefour SVG Logo (18).svg
- File:Carrefour SVG Logo (19).svg
- File:Carrefour SVG Logo (2).svg
- File:Carrefour SVG Logo (3).svg
- File:Carrefour SVG Logo (4).svg
- File:Carrefour SVG Logo (5).svg
- File:Carrefour SVG Logo (6).svg
- File:Carrefour SVG Logo (7).svg
- File:Carrefour SVG Logo (8).svg
- File:Carrefour SVG Logo (9).svg
- File:Carrefour Negro.svg
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
. Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:15, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Way more, see Category:Hipermercado Carrefour and Category:Produits Carrefour. They have at least 6 accounts. See also Special:DeletedContributions/Jesus Rojas995. --Achim55 (talk) 16:36, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --FitIndia Semi-retired 15:02, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Carrefour
[edit]Is the logo of Carrefour above or below the Threshold of Originality? There are several files with the logo on Commons, and a single DR seems to be the right solution in order to fix the matter.
- File:Carrefour 1980.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 1.png
- File:Carrefour 1992 10.png
- File:Carrefour 1992 11.png
- File:Carrefour 1992 12.png
- File:Carrefour 1992 13.png
- File:Carrefour 1992 2.png
- File:Carrefour 1992 3.png
- File:Carrefour 1992 4.png
- File:Carrefour 1992 5.png
- File:Carrefour 1992 6.png
- File:Carrefour 1992 7.png
- File:Carrefour 1992 8.png
- File:Carrefour 1992 PNG Imagen.png
- File:Carrefour 1992 svg logos 1.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 svg logos.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992-1995-1997.svg
- File:Carrefour 2008.svg
- File:Carrefour 2009.svg
- File:Carrefour Argentina con la Letra C.svg
- File:Carrefour Colombia logo.svg
- File:Carrefour Páginas.png
- File:Carrefour svg (10).svg
- File:Carrefour svg (16).svg
- File:Carrefour1975.svg
- File:Carrefour1983.svg
- File:Carrefour67.svg
- File:Hipermercado Carrefour 1995 3.svg
- File:MaxiGB-Carrefour Arlon.jpg
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Ruthven (msg) 09:55, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 12:12, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Carrefour
[edit]I'm not sure why we need more than one of these in black. There are also 15 more in various colors.
- File:Carrefour 1995 (10).svg
- File:Carrefour 1995 (11).svg
- File:Carrefour 1995 (13).svg
- File:Carrefour 1995 (14).svg
- File:Carrefour 1995 (15).svg
- File:Carrefour 1995 (16).svg
- File:Carrefour 1995 (17).svg
- File:Carrefour 1995 (18).svg
- File:Carrefour 1995 (19).svg
- File:Carrefour 1995 (20).svg
- File:Carrefour 1995 (21).svg
- File:Carrefour 1995 (22).svg
- File:Carrefour 1995 (27).svg
- File:Carrefour 1995 (28).svg
- File:Carrefour 1995 (29).svg
- File:Carrefour 1995 (31).svg
- File:Carrefour 1995 (32).svg
- File:Carrefour 1995 (33).svg
- File:Carrefour 1995 (35).svg
- File:Carrefour 1995 (36).svg
- File:Carrefour 1995 (7).svg
- File:Carrefour 1995 (9).svg
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
. Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:19, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 12:12, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Carrefour
[edit]This monument is recent. There is no FoP in Cameroon.
- File:Maroua Carrefour L’an 2000 01.jpg
- File:Maroua Carrefour L’an 2000 02.jpg
- File:Maroua Carrefour L’an 2000 03.jpg
- File:Maroua Carrefour L’an 2000 04.jpg
- File:Maroua Carrefour L’an 2000 05.jpg
- File:Maroua Carrefour L’an 2000 06.jpg
- File:Maroua Carrefour L’an 2000 07.jpg
- File:Maroua Carrefour L’an 2000 08.jpg
. Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:25, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --FitIndia Semi-retired 07:23, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Carrefour
[edit]Out of the project scope or copyright violations (or both) (per above DRs)
- File:Carrefour Color.png
- File:Carrefour Numeros.svg
- File:Carrefour Paginas 1.svg
- File:Carrefour Paginas 2.svg
- File:Carrefour Paginas 3.svg
- File:Carrefour Paginas.svg
Nutshinou Talk! 17:05, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Delete we should delete everything uploaded by this user. everything they uploaded was either a copyvio or a mess for us to clear up.- All the best -- Chuck Talk 17:08, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --FitIndia Semi-retired 06:04, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Carrefour
[edit]Per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Logos of Carrefour Group, France has a very low threshold of originality.
- File:Carrefour 1992 35.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 36.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 37.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 38.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 39.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 40.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 41.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 42.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 43.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 44.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 45.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 46.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 47.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 48.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 49.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 50.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 51.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 52.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 53.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 54.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 55.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 56.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 57.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 58.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 59.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 60.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 61.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 62.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 63.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 64.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 65.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 66.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 67.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 68.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 69.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 70.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 71.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 72.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 73.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 74.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 75.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 76.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 77.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 78.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 79.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 80.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 81.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 82.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 83.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 84.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 85.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 86.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 87.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 88.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 89.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 19.svg
Günther Frager (talk) 14:17, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:39, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mennessanome (talk · contribs)
[edit]Poor quality penis photo from a new user, unlikely to be useful
A1Cafel (talk) 04:19, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: previously deleted under another name. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:28, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Not even claimed to be a free image, only use was on a spam page on en.wp. Just Step Sideways (talk) 18:04, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:36, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
On nl:Abdelilah Amraoui, the subscript is '© Artistic Ninja', the uploader added a © sign, too. Erik Wannee (talk) 07:06, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy as copyvio. Jcb (talk) 14:54, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 12:31, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Scan of a newspaper Günther Frager (talk) 13:54, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by EugeneZelenko. --Rosenzweig τ 12:14, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
File:An old-fashioned illustration of the tale 'The Lord of the Sea' featuring the water djinn Bu Darya.webp
[edit]
Out of scope: failed attempt at AI illustration. The story and character referenced in the title are from Qatari folklore, but the generated image doesn't reflect that cultural background - it looks like an illustration from an American pulp horror magazine more than anything else. Omphalographer (talk) 21:34, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: As the uploader, this is a fair and accurate criticism. Elspamo4 (talk) 22:38, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 12:07, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Authorship Mistake. Sculpture not mine. I am the photographer. Jhhardcastle (talk) 23:17, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 12:06, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
It was just test/trolling. My bad. Pickmegirl (talk) 22:08, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 12:05, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
I notice that the original uploder on YouTube, newsjamm, doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. Sulley721 (talk) 01:27, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Túrelio. --Rosenzweig τ 08:20, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Die Datei wurde durch eine neue Fotografie ersetzt. Joachim Mohr (talk) 13:25, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- "These dates were the result of new photography" --RAN (talk) 03:24, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Actually "The file was replaced by a new photograph". --Rosenzweig τ 08:15, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 08:16, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Created by sock of Meena Kurian Air on White (talk) 21:41, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: already deleted by Túrelio. --Rosenzweig τ 08:08, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unable to resolve copyright issues AndyARP (talk) 09:53, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: already deleted. (non-admin closure) — doclys (❀) 15:16, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
The image similar to https://twitter.com/Lammtarra_akiba/status/406695084973764608/photo/1 Nnh (talk) 16:36, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. (non-admin closure) — doclys (❀) 15:19, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Low quality AI image (multiple anatomy issues) - unused and unusable, so out of COM:SCOPE The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:24, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:05, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons:What Commons is not#Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 01:46, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:05, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
Maybe scan from photo, see complete original photo shizhao (talk) 02:15, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- The Good Old Days(再見艷陽天) was broadcast in 1996. It is impossible to hold a press conference in 2024 to promote this TV series shizhao (talk) 02:20, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:05, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 05:22, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:06, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in Cambodia A1Cafel (talk) 07:54, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:06, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Indonesia A1Cafel (talk) 07:54, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:06, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
Unlikely own work, it looks like a book cover. Günther Frager (talk) 13:53, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:07, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 15:08, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:07, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
File:Chaîne humaine à Paris avant l’ouverture de la COP21 - Human Chain in Paris before the opening of the COP21 (23374030046).jpg
[edit].jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 15:08, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:07, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
File:Chaîne humaine à Paris avant l’ouverture de la COP21 - Human Chain in Paris before the opening of the COP21 (23104411870).jpg
[edit].jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 15:08, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:07, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 15:18, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:07, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 15:44, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:07, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in New Zealand A1Cafel (talk) 15:49, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:07, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 15:49, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:07, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in New Zealand A1Cafel (talk) 15:51, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:07, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in New Zealand A1Cafel (talk) 15:54, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:07, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in New Zealand A1Cafel (talk) 15:56, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:07, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in New Zealand A1Cafel (talk) 15:57, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:08, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
COM:DW: not own work, missing info for original work (may be PD-old); different web sources eg https://repository.urosario.edu.co/server/api/core/bitstreams/f55e13c7-256a-4786-aa37-026c1c4252e5/content Wdwd (talk) 18:30, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:08, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
Not used. In scope? Really own work? E4024 (talk) 13:13, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:15, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Generic AI image (and not a great one at that) - even if it did show any meaningful features they wouldn't be accurate, so this should never be used and is therefore out of COM:SCOPE.
This image is not related to the previous deleted image of the same name. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:19, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:29, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
Because it has no educational value, just being a trollish mash up of a swastika, the LGBTQ+ rainbow flag, and some random person's face. OmegaMantis (talk) 01:30, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom OwenBlacker (talk) 22:05, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:29, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
On the Alamy stock photo site (https://www.alamy.com/stock-photo-ss-cotopaxi-bermuda-triangledisappearance-124650103.html), this image is incorrectly identified as the SS Cotopax (built 1918). This image is actually of another SS Cotopaxi, built in 1954 (https://www.shipsnostalgia.com/media/s-s-cotopaxi.109719/). This error has been picked up and the photo displayed in several otherwise reliable news articles. As the photo cannot predate 1954, this image is not necessarily in the public domain. Rift (talk) 01:50, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Keep It is a published postcard as we can see from the other version, and would have to have registered for a copyright and a renewal for a US copyright, I can find neither in the USCO databases. --RAN (talk) 03:18, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per RAN. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:30, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
On the Alamy stock photo site (https://www.alamy.com/stock-photo-ss-cotopaxi-bermuda-triangledisappearance-124650103.html), this image is incorrectly identified as the SS Cotopax (built 1918). This image is actually of another SS Cotopaxi, built in 1954 (https://www.shipsnostalgia.com/media/s-s-cotopaxi.109719/). This error has been picked up and the photo displayed in several otherwise reliable news articles. As the photo cannot predate 1954, this image is not necessarily in the public domain. Rift (talk) 01:51, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep It is a published postcard and would have to have registered for a copyright and a renewal for a US copyright, I can find neither in the USCO databases. The file name and description have been fixed. --RAN (talk) 03:17, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per RAN. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:30, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
COM:TOYS &/or copyrighted sculptures/characters Elisfkc (talk) 18:43, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 14:24, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
This file appears to have been deleted before per COM:TOYS Di (they-them) (talk) 02:29, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:30, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
COM:TOYS &/or copyrighted sculptures/characters Elisfkc (talk) 18:45, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 14:26, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
This file appears to have been deleted before for being derivative work of a copyrighted sculpture/character art. Di (they-them) (talk) 02:31, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:31, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
Derivative work, COM:TOYS. Di (they-them) (talk) 02:32, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
-20240605023200-File:2013_Operation_Toy_Drop_lottery_day_131206-A-XN107-595.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete per nom Queen of Hearts (not related) 06:30, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:31, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
Selfie without education use Drakosh (talk) 04:56, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:36, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
Personal photo without education use Drakosh (talk) 04:57, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:37, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
Personal photo without education use Drakosh (talk) 04:57, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:37, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
Personal photo without education use Drakosh (talk) 04:57, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:37, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
Personal photo without education use Drakosh (talk) 04:57, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:37, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
Personal photo without education use Drakosh (talk) 04:58, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:37, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
Personal photo without education use Drakosh (talk) 04:59, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:37, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
Personal photo without education use Drakosh (talk) 05:00, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:37, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: unusable low-quality photo of a drawing on a whiteboard (with an inexplicable caption "Summer View: Plants And Me"). Omphalographer (talk) 06:25, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- A lot of creativity! :) 186.175.207.136 12:20, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. It's a low quality photograph (poor focus, reflections, etc.) of a low quality hand drawn diagram (illegible text, etc.). As such, it is really unusable. There are plenty of high quality anatomy diagrams of that can be used instead. Marbletan (talk) 14:23, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:38, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 06:47, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:38, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: fictitious (and, frankly, rather absurd) flag. Omphalographer (talk) 07:08, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:39, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: fictitious flag (as identified by uploader) Omphalographer (talk) 07:14, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:39, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: personal flag. Omphalographer (talk) 07:15, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: personal flag. King I Likes Minecraft — Preceding unsigned comment added by King I Likes Minecraft (talk • contribs) 22:20, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:40, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
Poster of a movie cannot be a personal work. Shkuru Afshar (talk) 09:32, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:40, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status Fenikals (talk) 09:57, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:40, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status Fenikals (talk) 09:59, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:40, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Corrupt image 88.97.195.160 10:11, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination, non-corrupt version already uploaded at File:Paysage, M.C. 9221(3).jpg. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:47, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
School assignment/essay. Outside of COM:SCOPE. Marbletan (talk) 15:28, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:49, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
Not used. Out of scope. Taggers (talk) 12:01, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 21:19, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
Speedy G4. 200.39.139.25 16:07, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:51, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
Questionable copyright; looks too professional to be a one-time-upload; image also found on Google Malik Nursultan B (talk) 00:13, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 20:04, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Chillwave Maverick (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: personal Minecraft images.
Omphalographer (talk) 06:51, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 20:06, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by 17Boulders (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: personal or fictitious flags.
Omphalographer (talk) 07:07, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 20:06, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: this doesn't appear to ever have been a recognized flag of South Sudan. Omphalographer (talk) 07:10, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 20:06, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
This logo file is deprecated and misleading; the correct version already exists at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Virtuozzo_logo.svg in svg format. Alienbraincookies (talk) 08:04, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 20:06, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
The file is not relevant to wikipedia, it was made for self promotion years ago (do not remember why) Gmrtt (talk) 08:18, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 20:07, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Pliannatarium (talk · contribs)
[edit]AI-generated illustrations of a 14th century historical site, out of COM:SCOPE as having little or no basis in reality.
Belbury (talk) 10:37, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 20:07, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Pliannatarium (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: unused AI-generated fantasy images with no clear educational use case.
- File:Gorg sunset in the field.jpg
- File:Wtaerhole.jpg
- File:Angry bear.jpg
- File:Fighting in the fields.jpg
- File:Dark dreamy sky.jpg
- File:Wiyokota tribe.jpg
- File:Maygrass fields.jpg
- File:Forest w gibson and clive.jpg
- File:Cahokia forest.jpg
- File:Fake forest.jpg
Omphalographer (talk) 18:47, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Not useful, low quality. Prototyperspective (talk) 09:28, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:48, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
too vague and small photos Lemonaka (talk) 11:18, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
).jpg){kind=link}
Comment This image was cropped from this image (free Crown license). --Msb (talk) 19:07, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 20:07, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
).jpg){kind=link}
Obviously not the uploader's own work; the image is likely a screen shot of a Google satellite view. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 11:33, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 20:08, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
Copied from Instagram (https://www.instagram.com/micaela_reistenbach/p/C6_hgImL2-K/). Needs evidence of permission from the photographer. Marbletan (talk) 11:48, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 20:08, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
I realized it is bad for my privacy. 186.175.207.136 12:15, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: F10. --Kadı Message 20:08, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
I wish this were an own work, to open a special beard category for it, but it's not. 186.175.207.136 12:17, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: https://lens.google.com/search?p=AbrfA8o8x2xsLv7Xn7b4WlmmAvBi32qSA2_83vzrGMHs9fjEiQ4d3WRoISNctSXTRNQsrCUOTmnchCVgngPmX_4ti2bF3jH5zA8ryKFOArbvhcsJywjH_a3yd0bDbTp-i1rjCvqYdcwAmr8x7ODi3yaFyXygwEgGwvzBGaqk1XiR4xDHIrbQ1NUVHNsYYy__i1cmWyK-i_p1wd_fbKBTP1P5gl30vpPP9qUlwmhpysBq1Fx1FLABg6HvHynMxJIHb5xG-VTe0WZq3w%3D%3D#lns=W251bGwsbnVsbCxudWxsLG51bGwsbnVsbCxudWxsLDEsIkVrY0tKR0V6TUdNNVptRXdMVGRsWVRVdE5EY3dPUzA0TVRNeExUQXlPR1l3TnpCbU9EbGtaaElmYjNoUlJXbFhWV05sYlVsak5FWXpjRVF5ZGpoaFkzUlBNa0pZYUVGQ2F3PT0iLG51bGwsbnVsbCxudWxsLG51bGwsbnVsbCxudWxsLFtudWxsLG51bGwsW11dXQ==. --Kadı Message 20:09, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
Unused poor images of nondescript, unidentified, and unidentifiable airplane, no educational value, out of scope.
- File:Aircraft above the University of North Carolina Wilmington Main Campus 07.jpg
- File:Aircraft above the University of North Carolina Wilmington Main Campus 05.jpg
- File:Aircraft above the University of North Carolina Wilmington Main Campus 01.jpg
- File:Aircraft above the University of North Carolina Wilmington Main Campus 02.jpg
- File:Aircraft above the University of North Carolina Wilmington Main Campus 03.jpg
- File:Aircraft above the University of North Carolina Wilmington Main Campus 04.jpg
- File:Aircraft above the University of North Carolina Wilmington Main Campus 06.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:40, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --FitIndia Semi-retired 19:55, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
Album cover for the recent Conway the Machine album. Highly doubt this editor is the copyright holder, nor that the actual copyright holder would release the image for free. QuietHere (talk) 13:43, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 20:09, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Félix Rougier (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams.
- File:Capture d’écran 2022-05-14 à 17.42.14.png
- File:Capture d’écran 2022-04-24 à 17.48.33.png
- File:Capture d’écran 2022-04-24 à 17.41.15.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:46, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Félix Rougier (talk · contribs) 2
[edit]Not own works, clearly identified as screen captures.
- File:Capture d’écran 2022-05-23 à 19.27.12.png
- File:Capture d’écran 2022-05-23 à 18.54.40.png
- File:Capture d’écran 2022-05-14 à 17.31.37.png
P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:47, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 20:09, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
copyright issue Mickey Đại Phát (talk) 15:05, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 20:10, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
Unused, out of scope, insufficient license info. Sinigh (talk) 15:35, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 20:10, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
See source 200.39.139.25 16:07, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: copyrighted source. --Kadı Message 20:12, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
See source 200.39.139.25 16:08, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: copyrighted source. --Kadı Message 20:13, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
See source 200.39.139.25 16:09, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: copyrighted source. --Kadı Message 20:13, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
See source 200.39.139.25 16:09, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: copyrighted source. --Kadı Message 20:13, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
See source 200.39.139.25 16:10, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: copyrighted source. --Kadı Message 20:13, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Likely copyrighted art. Ooligan (talk) 16:41, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete. NASA has pretty thorough release forms with these sort of art contests, but this is not really relevant as this is clearly out of scope and not useful for an educational purpose. IronGargoyle (talk) 19:56, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 20:13, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Impaulogarcia (talk · contribs)
[edit]Images clearly come from various sources, doubtful own work claims. Also out of scope (not notable): pt:Lil Jaga
- File:Lil jaga6463.jpg
- File:Lil jaga474747.jpg
- File:Lil jaga6363.jpg
- File:Lil jaga566.jpg
- File:Lil jaga4344.jpg
- File:Iil jaga6363.jpg
- File:Lil jaga454i.jpg
- File:Liljagaree.jpg
- File:Lil jaga.jpg
Nutshinou Talk! 17:16, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 20:14, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: plain text, apparent nonsense. Omphalographer (talk) 18:04, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 20:10, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
Being replaced by File:Assai Atacadista logo 2024.svg 2016Começa (talk) 18:27, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 20:12, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
https://www.salondulivredemontreal.com/auteurs/daniel-guenette Xocolatl (talk) 18:39, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- La photo a été fournie par Daniel Guénette lui-même... N'est-il pas maître de sa propre image ?? Étienne Charron (talk) 22:26, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 20:12, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
Facebook 191.125.63.123 20:20, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 20:11, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused, low-quality AI illustration. I think this is supposed to represent a star, but the background looks like textured plastic, not space. Omphalographer (talk) 21:37, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 20:11, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sergey Puttov (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: Personal fiction
Enyavar (talk) 22:05, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Чем тебе не нравятся эти файлы? Я их ещë летом сделал, только ч думаю как их вставить на свои будущие страницы Sergey Puttov (talk) 09:55, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- Please find out with Com:Scope, #"realistic educational purpose". - Enyavar (talk) 11:26, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Bedivere (talk) 03:17, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sergey Puttov (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: miscellaneous unused personal images, fictitious flags, and an irredentist map of Russia (incorporating significant portions of Ukraine).
- File:Ledryn-Gorpaev.jpg
- File:Metal-Allaram.png
- File:Flag-of-Sivland.png
- File:Celestron Andromeda.png
- File:Principality-of-Sivland-Flag-Map.png
- File:Union State Flag Map.png
Omphalographer (talk) 21:43, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 20:11, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
Cover of a book cannot be a personal work. Shkuru Afshar (talk) 09:33, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:57, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
Reasons for deletion request: This file is copyrighted by BabaPhoto. Please remove it. - Kalocsaizsuzsa (talk) 04:58, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
- @Kalocsaizsuzsa: you uploaded it 8 years ago saying this was your own work. How does BabaPhoto come to own the copyright? - Jmabel ! talk 07:44, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
Kalocsaizsuzsa (talk · contribs) previously stated that she is the subject (Q1103629) but the account is very likely operated by Nóra Kamarás (AKA Hella Krencsey), not confirmed former partner of the subject, who accuses the subject with domestic violence. She also published a book about this, is currently suing the subject and pushed this information to the huwiki article and is permanently blocked on the project.
According to her blog, all pictures with BabaPhoto watermark were taken by her. In ticket:2023122710001034 we also received a take-down request. Please note that the following file uploaded by the user has the same issue:
Bencemac (talk) 08:54, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
- @Bencemac: thank you. Under the circumtances, I'd oppose deletion. Sounds to me like if this is a copyright violation, someone should serve a DMCA notice; otherwise, we should assume for now that the (irrevocable) CC license is probably valid. - Jmabel ! talk 19:43, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you for the suggestion, I responded to the ticket and suggested foundation:Legal:DMCA_takedowns. Bencemac (talk) 20:22, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, as Kalocsaizsuzsa = BabaPhoto and therefore CC license declaration at time of upload is valid. —holly {chat} 18:32, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
The company "BabaPhoto" owns this picture, it is not my own work anymore. It is copyrighted. Kalocsaizsuzsa (talk) 05:33, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- You cannot undo the irrevocable license you issued when you uploaded this. We have been through this before (see above). - Jmabel ! talk 05:39, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- I can't ask to remove my own work from here 9 years later? Is it true? The new right owner sell this picture, but everyone take it down from here. Is it OK? Kalocsaizsuzsa (talk) 16:58, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
- Keep per above unless a takedown notice is in the offing. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 14:04, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Keep If you sold the rights, that does not revoke the earlier CC license. If you get sued for it, that's not our problem. --PaterMcFly (talk) 05:52, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- The new owner doesn't agree with that anyone can use this picture. It is a very popular photo and the company, who has the rights for it, sell the picture, so they asked me to ask a remove from Wiki. I really don't understand why you can't delete it, if it is not mine anymore, and I, the uploader would like to remove it after 9 years. What is the problem, what can I do? Kalocsaizsuzsa (talk) 16:45, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
- There are 3 photos on Wiki Media for this title, why you can't use the third one which is free and it is not under copyright? Kalocsaizsuzsa (talk) 16:56, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 21:12, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
I uploaded this file 9 years ago, it is my work, but the Babaphoto is the right owner, and I don't own this picture anymore, so it is copyrighted by a company, not me. Please, remove the photo! Kalocsaizsuzsa (talk) 16:41, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 21:12, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
The owner of this picture is company "BabaPhoto", so it is not running under my copyrights since 2019.. Kalocsaizsuzsa (talk) 05:35, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 21:14, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
I uploaded this file 9 years ago, it is my work, but the Babaphoto is the right owner, and I don't own this picture anymore, so it is copyrighted by a company, not me. Please, remove the photo! Kalocsaizsuzsa (talk) 16:46, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 21:14, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
This is a screenshot that has been uploaded to YouTube without permission Steinninn ♨ 16:56, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Where did you get the idea that this was uploaded to YouTube without permission? What do you mean by a screenshot uploaded to YouTube? If you click on the link provided (https://youtube.com/watch?v=JZR7Zzwe6hs?feature=shared&t=1023), you'll see that it's a video clip, and I have no reason to believe that the YouTube uploader who uploaded it with the CC-BY licence doesn't own the rights to the material. Derkoenig (talk) 19:09, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- I meant that it's a screenshot from a video that has been uploaded to youtube (I see that I wasn't clear). You can see the RUV logo at the top right corner of the video. RUV is the Icelandic national television station. The television station has never released their content under CC license. Steinninn ♨ 19:30, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- The uploader on Youtube is not affiliated with RÚV in any way and does not have permission to license this media under CC. Bjarki S (talk) 09:17, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per Steinninn and Bjarki S - apparently that's a case of license laundering. Despite the official sounding name of the Youtube channel "Myndskjalasafn Lýðveldisins" ("The Republic's Image Archive"), it doesn't seem to be a channel affiliated with the Icelandic broadcaster RÚV, but a private initiative uploading news videos from the RÚV website. --Gestumblindi (talk) 22:29, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Mohammdaon (talk) 20:33, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 15:38, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
File:2024 CKS 22681 0022 000(gerald leslie brockhurst ra portrait of yvonne macdonald nee norton-be120745).jpg
[edit].jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Artwork by British painter Gerald Brockhurst (1890-1978). Still copyrighted in the UK, its country of origin (70 years pma). We need the date of publication to determine when does it enter in the US public domain. Günther Frager (talk) 15:22, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: Work created in 1939. Not PD yet. Undelete in 2049 per the 70 years p.m.a. UK term. 81.41.177.91 00:33, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 08:29, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
Blurry - image too blurry to be used Coldstreamer20 (talk) 02:52, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Keep in my opinion the picture is very clear. Contributor2020Talk to me here! 07:46, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:00, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Blurry - image too blurry to be used Coldstreamer20 (talk) 02:52, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Keep in my opinion the picture is very clear. Contributor2020Talk to me here! 07:46, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:00, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Blurry - image too blurry to be used Coldstreamer20 (talk) 02:52, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Keep in my opinion the picture is very clear. Contributor2020Talk to me here! 07:46, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:00, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Blurry - image too blurry to be used Coldstreamer20 (talk) 02:53, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Keep in my opinion the picture is very clear. Contributor2020Talk to me here! 07:47, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:00, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Blurry - image too blurry to be used Coldstreamer20 (talk) 02:53, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Keep in my opinion the picture is very clear. Contributor2020Talk to me here! 07:47, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:00, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Blurry - image too blurry to be used Coldstreamer20 (talk) 02:54, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Keep in my opinion the picture is very clear. Contributor2020Talk to me here! 07:47, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:01, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Blurry - image too blurry to be used Coldstreamer20 (talk) 02:54, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Keep in my opinion the picture is very clear. Contributor2020Talk to me here! 07:47, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:01, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Blurry - image too blurry to be used Coldstreamer20 (talk) 02:56, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Keep in my opinion the picture is very clear. Contributor2020Talk to me here! 07:47, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:01, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Blurry - image too blurry to be used Coldstreamer20 (talk) 02:56, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Keep in my opinion the picture is very clear. Contributor2020Talk to me here! 07:47, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:01, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Blurry - image too blurry to be used Coldstreamer20 (talk) 02:57, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep in my opinion the picture is very clear. Contributor2020Talk to me here! 07:48, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:01, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Blurry - image too blurry to be used Coldstreamer20 (talk) 02:57, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep in my opinion the picture is very clear. Contributor2020Talk to me here! 18:39, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:01, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Blurry - image too blurry to be used Coldstreamer20 (talk) 02:58, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Keep in my opinion the picture is very clear. Contributor2020Talk to me here! 18:39, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:01, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Blurry - image too blurry to be used Coldstreamer20 (talk) 02:58, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Keep in my opinion the picture is very clear. Contributor2020Talk to me here! 18:40, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:01, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
_-_KHPN_-_13-11-23.jpg){kind=link}
_-_KHPN_-_13-11-23.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Blurry - image too blurry to be used Coldstreamer20 (talk) 02:59, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
_-_KHPN_-_13-11-23.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep in my opinion the picture is very clear. Contributor2020Talk to me here! 18:40, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:01, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
_-_KHPN_-_13-11-23.jpg){kind=link}
_-_KHPN_-_13-11-23.jpg){kind=link}
_-_KHPN_-_13-11-23.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Blurry - image too blurry to be used Coldstreamer20 (talk) 02:59, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
_-_KHPN_-_13-11-23.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep in my opinion the picture is very clear. Contributor2020Talk to me here! 18:40, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:01, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
_-_KHPN_-_13-11-23.jpg){kind=link}
Blurry - image too blurry to be used Coldstreamer20 (talk) 02:59, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Keep in my opinion the picture is very clear. Contributor2020Talk to me here! 18:40, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:01, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Blurry - image too blurry to be used Coldstreamer20 (talk) 03:00, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Keep in my opinion the picture is very clear. Contributor2020Talk to me here! 18:40, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:01, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Per cancellazione Rossella Sorvillo (talk) 22:55, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — billinghurst sDrewth 12:24, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
I can't see any evidence on the linked YouTube page that the video was released under a CC licence Amakuru (talk) 08:15, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Maybe it was CCBY earlier and they changed it. Seems like this should be deleted asap and doesn't seem to be a matter of debate. Prototyperspective (talk) 15:36, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:20, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Clearly marked (C) not own work as claimed Gbawden (talk) 08:48, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:23, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Drawing by Bolivian artists Víctor Valdivia (1897-1967) [1] and published in Argentine magazine Caras y Caretas. The copyright protection in Argentina is 70 years pma. We can undelete it in 2038. Günther Frager (talk) 17:39, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:07, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
possible copyvio - Copyright Helmut Moling M2k~dewiki (talk) 09:23, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- we as institution own the rights to this picture Südtirol Filarmonica (talk) 09:30, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 06:20, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
possible copyvio (c) santifaller-photography M2k~dewiki (talk) 10:00, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- we did not use this picture on the wikipedia page at the end Südtirol Filarmonica (talk) 10:02, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 06:20, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by KOQUIBAND ORQUESTA (talk · contribs)
[edit]Possible copyvio: The band is marked as the author, VRT requested https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Wikimedia_VRT_release_generator
- File:KOQUIBAND EN FIESTA 106.JPG
- File:KOQUIBAND EN TV.jpg
- File:Wilmer lozano y argenis koquito ORQUESTA KOQUIBAND.JPG
- File:ORQUESTA KOQUIBAND.JPG
CoffeeEngineer (talk) 21:50, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 06:20, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Banner from a radio, VRT requested https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Wikimedia_VRT_release_generator CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:03, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 06:20, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Banner from a radio, VRT requested https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Wikimedia_VRT_release_generator CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:08, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 06:20, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
File:231222 Gabi Fechtner Gelsenkirchen Jahresabschlussfeier VVV - Fotocredit - Heiko Grupp.jpg
[edit]
Release to commns by Heiko Grupp is missing. Tohma (talk) 13:33, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- The image was originally used here. Der.Traeumer (talk) 13:38, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Yes and I was allowed by them to use that photo too Melonenfan (talk) 10:26, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- Heiko Grupp isnt on Commons! Melonenfan (talk) 10:26, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Wieso soll das Foto gelöscht werden??? Ich habe das Foto von Gabi Fechtners Büro selbst per E-Mail erhalten, mit allen Informationen zu den Linzenzen, Autoren, Standort etc. Es ist das einzige Foto, was von ihr hier auf Wikipedia existiert und ich habe die explizite Erlaubnis von ihrem Büro bekommen das Foto zu verwenden und es wurde benötigt, um die Website der MLPD und von ihr selbst zu erweitern. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Melonenfan (talk • contribs) 07:21, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Why should the photo be deleted??? I received the photo from Gabi Fechtner's office itself via email, with all the information about the licenses, authors, location, etc. It is the only photo of her that exists here on Wikipedia and I received explicit permission from her office to use the photo and it was needed to expand the MLPD website and her own. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Melonenfan (talk • contribs) 09:10, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Melonenfan: In dem Fall sollte der Fotograf oder evtl. besagtes Büro eine Genehmigung per E-Mail an Wikimedia Commons schicken. Details, Adresse, zu verwendender Text usw. siehe COM:VRT/de. --Rosenzweig τ 08:19, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- Ich habe eine E-Mail an das Büro von Frau Fechtner geschickt, dass diese eine E-Mail an Commons schicken. Melonenfan (talk) 10:45, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, can be undeleted with VRT. --Gbawden (talk) 08:37, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
The photo contains the book cover of a copyrighted book published in Denmark in 2023. Günther Frager (talk) 15:15, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Kritzolina (talk) 18:30, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
Files found with Special:Search/Agbor gilbert
[edit]Credited to someone else in the exif of the original - we need OTRS to confirm ownership
- File:Agbor gilbert and asaba at CIMFEST.jpg
- File:Agbor gilbert and asaba at CIMFEST (cropped).jpg
- File:Asaba (cropped).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Gbawden (talk) 12:24, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 00:40, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
Opis pliku w historii pliku nie da się usunąć a jest błędny. Zamierzam wysłać ten sam plik jeszcze raz z poprawionym opisem. JerzyJamroz (talk) 20:02, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
Author requested deletion via email but it doesn't comply with G7 speedy deletion criterium because the file is used on Polish Wikipedia and Wikidata. However, it still qualifies for deletion due to inproper use of PD-Polish template. This PD criterion requires publication without a copyright notice before 1994 and such source has not been stated in the file description. ~Cybularny Speak? 12:04, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Keep per PD-Poland. Michalg95 (talk) 12:15, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Michalg95: Where is "publication without a copyright notice before 1994" documented? — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 14:34, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Keep I also agree per PD-Poland. We follow US copyright case law, an image is made public when it leaves the custody of the photographer. I could see arguing it never left the custody of the creator if we found a copy in a commercial archive like Getty, where Getty is making a copyright claim. --RAN (talk) 21:55, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Photo must be PD under both Polish and US law. To prove PD under Polish copyright a source from before 1994 including that material without a copyright notice must be provided. Otherwise the photo cannot be hosted on Commons even if it's somehow PD in the US. ~Cybularny Speak? 00:00, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:08, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
Naruszenie praw autorskich - plik został skopiowany z tej strony: https://muzeumkresow.eu/lubaczowskie-struktury-zwiazku-walki-zbrojnej-armii-krajowej-i-ich-udzial-w-walkach-o-narol-w-maju-1944-r/ Glaube (talk) 10:34, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Ten sam plik pochodzi z książki M. Argasiński, Konspiracja w powiecie lubaczowskim 1939–1947, Zwierzyniec–Rzeszów 2010., więc w żaden sposób nie doszło do tu do NPA, na co nie zwróciłeś uwagi że strona używa też źródeł z tej książki. Querty1231 (talk) 18:33, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
- Skoro plik jest skanem z książki, to tym bardziej doszło do NPA. Glaube (talk) 10:45, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ankry (talk) 23:16, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
duplicate of File:Street Sign in La Goulette.JPG Quick-ease2020 (talk) 06:28, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
![06:28, 5 June 2024 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2024/06/05#c-Quick-ease2020-20240605062800-File:"Ferid_El_Atrache"_Street.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:31, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
![07:31, 12 July 2024 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2024/06/05#c-Gbawden-20240712073100-File:"Ferid_El_Atrache"_Street.JPG){kind=link}
Urheberrechtsverletzung, Bild stammt von https://www.adac-motorsport.de/adac-gt4-germany/fahrer/2024/denny-berndt/ und ist laut Impresum der Website urheberrechtlich geschützt 2A01:5241:70A:7600:0:0:0:3CA6 08:06, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:30, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Beirut Archives (talk · contribs)
[edit]Given the uploader's questionable uploads (see their talk page), I doubt these are self-photographed images. Needs to determine if the images come from freely-licensed external sources or not.
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:16, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:30, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
Own what? 200.39.139.25 16:13, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Own work not. 200.39.139.25 16:19, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, needs info on painter etc. --Gbawden (talk) 07:25, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
copyvio, artist died in 1961; no fop. Martin Sg. (talk) 17:45, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:21, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files in Category:Katholische Kirche Lyss
[edit]copyvio, artist died in 2015; no fop.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Martin Sg. (talk) 17:45, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:30, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
Es posible subir diplomas a Commons? 191.125.63.123 20:17, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, OoS. --Gbawden (talk) 07:29, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
Salud! Quienes son? 191.125.63.123 20:18, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 07:27, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
Periodico? 191.125.63.123 20:25, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:25, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
Is this about topi prices? 191.125.63.123 20:28, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, OoS. --Gbawden (talk) 07:26, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
Trabajo propio? Quien es? 191.125.63.123 20:38, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:27, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
If this photo was taken in 1985, it is not likely to be in the public domain. discospinster (talk) 20:45, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:28, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
possible copyvio (c) Otto Jezek M2k~dewiki (talk) 20:45, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Uploader bezeichnet sich als Oliver Gindlhumer und Sohn von Rudolf Gindlhumer.
--AxelHH (talk) 22:19, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unlikely to be own work. --Gbawden (talk) 07:27, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
This file was drawn based on personal data to which I did not give consent to share, therefore I ask it to be removed! Balintgyongyosi (talk) 12:15, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - CoA are public. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:10, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
Aucune raison d'être Peter Dalmas nk (talk) 12:38, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: personal photo. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:11, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
Admin from SATAF? 186.175.207.136 12:28, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: OoS. --Gbawden (talk) 17:13, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:Lakyanaik
[edit]- File:Molotov Cocktail.png
- File:Stun Grenade.png
- File:P90 Gun.png
- File:VSS Gun.png
- File:Kar98K Gun.png
- File:Sticky Bomb.png
- File:AKM Gun.png
- File:PES PU College Mandya Front View.jpg
- File:Rajat Patidar during RCB Net Practice.jpg
- File:Veerasaiwa Vidywardhak's Sangha Logo.jpg
- File:The President, Shri Ram Nath Kovind presenting the Padma Shri Award to Shri Neeraj Chopra, at the Civil Investiture Ceremony-II, at Rashtrapati Bhavan, in New Delhi on March 28, 2022.jpg
- File:The President, Shri Ram Nath Kovind presenting the Padma Shri Award to Shri Neeraj Chopra, at the Civil Investiture Ceremony-II, at Rashtrapati Bhavan, in New Delhi on March 28, 2022(Cropped).jpg
- File:The President, Shri Ram Nath Kovind presenting the Padma Shri Award, 2022 to Shri Neeraj Chopra for Athletics, Rashtrapati Bhavan, in in New Delhi on March 08, 2022.jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
Uploaded under an obviously incorrect 'own work' license. --Loafiewa (talk) 12:59, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- File:The President, Shri Ram Nath Kovind presenting the Padma Shri Award, 2022 to Shri Neeraj Chopra for Athletics, Rashtrapati Bhavan, in in New Delhi on March 08, 2022.jpg and File:The President, Shri Ram Nath Kovind presenting the Padma Shri Award to Shri Neeraj Chopra, at the Civil Investiture Ceremony-II, at Rashtrapati Bhavan, in New Delhi on March 28, 2022(Cropped).jpg and File:The President, Shri Ram Nath Kovind presenting the Padma Shri Award to Shri Neeraj Chopra, at the Civil Investiture Ceremony-II, at Rashtrapati Bhavan, in New Delhi on March 28, 2022.jpg are under Government of India license
- Delete. 𝕃𝐖 (talk) 16:36, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: All except three mentioned under which are under GODL-India. ShaanSenguptaTalk 02:55, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- File:The President, Shri Ram Nath Kovind presenting the Padma Shri Award to Shri Neeraj Chopra, at the Civil Investiture Ceremony-II, at Rashtrapati Bhavan, in New Delhi on March 28, 2022.jpg
- File:The President, Shri Ram Nath Kovind presenting the Padma Shri Award to Shri Neeraj Chopra, at the Civil Investiture Ceremony-II, at Rashtrapati Bhavan, in New Delhi on March 28, 2022(Cropped).jpg
- File:The President, Shri Ram Nath Kovind presenting the Padma Shri Award, 2022 to Shri Neeraj Chopra for Athletics, Rashtrapati Bhavan, in in New Delhi on March 08, 2022.jpg
Deleted: Most deleted, 3 kept per discussion. --Gbawden (talk) 17:13, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
No publication date, origin, or author given. No longer of FlickR. Without any real information about the age or location of photo, I don't think we can assume that this is a freely licensed image. 4meter4 (talk) 03:33, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Keep I substituted other websites and scholarly articles and removed the dead link. --RAN (talk) 22:05, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) under what rationale? We have an un-dated un-published before 1929 photo which means it is still protected by copyright unless it was known to be made in 1903 or earlier. None of the sources date the work specifically and honestly, this could be as late as the 1920s. 1910 is just a guess. Without any known publication before 1929, we are required to follow "PD-old-assumed" which does not cover c. 1910 photos (no source says this... just "early 20th century) Anything 1904 or later is still under copyright under United States law where the author is not known. You must provide detailed publication information of a pre-1929 publication (publisher, name of source, year, page, etc.) if we are going to release this under a creative commons license. Alternatively you may identify the photographer with a reliable source and provide evidence that the photographer has been dead for at least 70 years. Absent either of those pieces of evidence, we probably will have to wait until the year 2040 to upload this image because US copyright law says you have to wait 120 years to use unpublished photos by an unknown author, and I don't think we can confidently date this lower then 1920 for copyright purposes. 4meter4 (talk) 04:19, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- US copyright case law says that an image is "made public" when it leaves the custody of the photographer. If we had a provenance that showed that the image was never found in the wild, I would agree. We have images from the Getty archive that were deposited as negatives with Getty by the photographer, and Getty claims a copyright because the images have been placed in their custody by the creator. See the discussion and relevant cases at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Minerva Kohlhepp Teichert 1908.jpg. --RAN (talk) 04:43, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) Well that was an incorrect decision. The Getty archive is a post-1929 source, and as such it can not release photos into the public domain under US law in the manner you are suggesting. The copyright still holds, and the Getty archive has no impact whatsoever on the copyright status of the photo. The Getty archive would have had to have published the photo pre-1929 to relinquish the rights of the artist. Giving a negative to the Getty Archive doesn't automatically relinquish re-publication rights. We would have to have specific evidence the artist released their work into the public domain through a signed agreement with the Getty Archive. We don't have that evidence. 4meter4 (talk) 04:53, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- This has nothing to do with Getty, Getty was given as an example of an archive where we have a provenance for each image from creation to the present. This image of partiers was found in the wild with no provenance, it was "made public", presumably at creation. We are not going to convince each other, so no need to ping me. Let others express their opinions. --RAN (talk) 04:58, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- What license are we using? And under what evidence? You can't just claim a photo was made public and is free to be used. Where was it made public? A photo not published is presumed to be private and copyrighted under US law. All photos "in the wild" by an unknown author are presumed to be copyrighted unless they were published prior to 1929 or can be proven to be more then 120 years old. We need proof its a public photo in print prior to 1929, or that it is older then 120 years. Without details on a pre-1929 publication or evidence of a pre-1904 creation there is no creative commons license we can legally use.4meter4 (talk) 05:04, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- Let me just cut and paste what I already wrote, please do not make me cut and paste it a third time: "US copyright case law says that an image is "made public" when it leaves the custody of the photographer. If we had a provenance that showed that the image was never found in the wild, I would agree. See the discussion and relevant legal decisions at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Minerva Kohlhepp Teichert 1908.jpg. To be eligible for a copyright in the United States you had to register with the USCO up to 1989. --RAN (talk) 16:11, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- I don’t know why you keep linking to the Minerva Kohlhepp photo which had a valid license because its photographer was known and the photographer had been dead for 70 years which means it’s copyright had definitely expired. It doesn’t set the precedent you are claiming because it had a valid licensing rationale that fit one of Commons recognized licensing templates.
- This photo in contrast is by an unknown author and was never published so the “PD-old” template is the only license we can use and which Commons accepts in such cases. That license works for images that are more than 120 years old (which this image isn’t). We don’t recognize the esoteric and obscure case law argument you are making in our copyright templates on commons. You are arguing a legal line we just don’t recognize at WikiCommons as being valid, and it doesn’t fit with any of Commons copyright license templates. Nor is this novel argument in line with widely used ethics protocols at research universities in the United States. I’ve never heard or seen this rationale anywhere in academic protocols on the use of found images. The standard is to assume copyright protection in cases like this. If you can not identify a license we actually recognize and use on Commons (which you haven’t) then we can’t keep this image.4meter4 (talk) 02:22, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- Why don't we just accept that we are not going to change each other's opinions and let other people express their opinions. It will save me cutting and pasting my same argument over and over, and please no need to to respond to this message. Your knowledge of US copyright law seems to be limited to 1929 publication, but up until 1989 you still had to register for a copyright, it was not automatic prior to that date. Prior to 1964 your copyright lapsed unless you had registered and complied with all copyright formalities, and then renewed to take advantage of the extension. --RAN (talk) 20:49, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. I completly agree with Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ). Contributor2020Talk to me here! 18:43, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Not enough information given on the provenance of the photograph, Flickr license was bogus, no copyright restrictions license also bogus. The photograph looks Edwardian to me, and we don't know where it was first published so we cannot reasonably apply US law unless we have evidence this is an American photograph rather than a British one. I'm setting 1914 as the last possible date of creation, Undelete in 2035. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:30, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
Se sospecha de violación a derechos de autor (copyvio). La imagen había sido publicada anteriormente en el Facebook personal de la persona retratada [2]. No queda claro si la persona que subió el archivo es también el autor de la fotografía. Es posible que simplemente haya sacado la imagen de otro sitio y la haya subido utilizando una licencia inadecuada, en cuyo caso sería una violación al derecho de autor. SamuelInzunza (talk) 04:47, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:32, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
The same image as a recently deleted one, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Cai Lun.jpg. To quote from there: "According to Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/China#Stamps post of 1928 stamps of the country are copyrighted by China Post or its affiliates unless we can find the death date of the artist" (which is unavailable) Aza24 (talk) 05:31, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, similar but not exactly the same image, would still need death date of artist. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:37, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
I believe that photocopy of copyrighted work is still copyrighted work and the author of the photocopy does not become "copyright holder of this work" Prikryl (talk) 06:17, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- It's a photo of part of a club shirt. Milíkov1234 (talk) 10:08, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- That's obvious. And that's the very point of my opinion that this is a copyright violation. Prikryl (talk) 09:31, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delete, shirt prints are not covered by COM:FOP afaik, hence copyvio. Jonteemil (talk) 02:14, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and discussion, DW of copyrighted work. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:42, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
Per COM:CSM, as a model, this looks like a piece of 3D art that doesn't have a licence for reuse here. The photograph being licensed isn't sufficient as I understand it Amakuru (talk) 08:31, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- The reason for deletion makes no sense. It is not an artwork. It's a mockup being publicly displayed for scientific educational purposes only, just like every other exhibit being shown in museums. Shujianyang (talk) 16:01, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- It's clearly a model, which is defined in COM:CSM as being under the same prohibition as sculptures etc. It would need to be shown that the model itself has been released under a CC or public domain licence. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tango B-396 Model.JPG for a similar example. Also, "exhibits shown in museums" would fall under the same banner. Amakuru (talk) 20:50, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- If that rule applies here, should all the following images be deleted based on the same rule as well?
- All the above are "models". Shujianyang (talk) 03:49, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- It's clearly a model, which is defined in COM:CSM as being under the same prohibition as sculptures etc. It would need to be shown that the model itself has been released under a CC or public domain licence. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tango B-396 Model.JPG for a similar example. Also, "exhibits shown in museums" would fall under the same banner. Amakuru (talk) 20:50, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- I would like to support Shujianyang's opposition to this instance of overzealous nomination-for-deletion. Amakuru cited the fact that this photo is that of a model and, as such, COM:CSM prohibits its upload/use; however, this prohibition only applies to models falling under US law and jurisdiction while the present image is that of a model displayed in China. Further, the use/upload of the image under consideration almost certainly would survive under the doctrine of Fair Use (just as the recent image of the Chang'e 6 lander sitting on the lunar surface that was released by China News Service). For these reasons, I'd suggest Amakuru should reconsider his/her action in this case. Spotty's Friend (talk) 20:09, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- This isn't a popularity contest, and Commons licensing restrictions are not subject to opinions such as that above, or my "reconsidering". Images must comply with he the law both in the country of origin and in The US, where the servers are hosted. Furthermore, the principle of fair use doesn't apply to Commons. Perhaps on Wikipedia or elsewhere this could be used, but here the file must go. Cheers Amakuru (talk) 20:36, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- So are you going to delete the other photos of rocket models I mentioned? Shujianyang (talk) 03:27, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- This isn't a popularity contest, and Commons licensing restrictions are not subject to opinions such as that above, or my "reconsidering". Images must comply with he the law both in the country of origin and in The US, where the servers are hosted. Furthermore, the principle of fair use doesn't apply to Commons. Perhaps on Wikipedia or elsewhere this could be used, but here the file must go. Cheers Amakuru (talk) 20:36, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- I would like to support Shujianyang's opposition to this instance of overzealous nomination-for-deletion. Amakuru cited the fact that this photo is that of a model and, as such, COM:CSM prohibits its upload/use; however, this prohibition only applies to models falling under US law and jurisdiction while the present image is that of a model displayed in China. Further, the use/upload of the image under consideration almost certainly would survive under the doctrine of Fair Use (just as the recent image of the Chang'e 6 lander sitting on the lunar surface that was released by China News Service). For these reasons, I'd suggest Amakuru should reconsider his/her action in this case. Spotty's Friend (talk) 20:09, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. To argue that this photo needs to be deleted because it is protected as a model, we need to find if it is protected as a model in the first place. According to “Guidelines for the Trial of Copyright Infringement Cases” by the Beijing High Court (北京高院侵害著作权案件审理指南), “A work which is enlarged or scaled down using the same dimensions based on an existing object is not considered a model” (根据已有作品制作的等比例缩小或者放大的立体模型不属于模型作品). Furthermore, in a case in 2017 which involved a scaled-down replica of a J-10 plane, the Supreme Court ruled that (Google translated) “AVIC Zhicheng (company which made the scaled-down plane) did not create new points, lines, surfaces and geometric structures through its own selection, choice, arrangement, design, synthesis and description. Its proportional reduction process only accurately reproduced the original appearance of the J-10 aircraft on another carrier, without bringing new expressions. It is a technical process of strictly proportional reduction. In the case that AVIC Zhicheng cannot prove that the J-10 aircraft model it manufactured based on the proportional reduction of the J-10 aircraft is original, the process is still a copy, and the resulting J-10 aircraft model is a copy of the J-10 aircraft and does not constitute a model work protected by my country's copyright law. Therefore, the second-instance court's determination that "the higher the degree of similarity between the model and the original, the higher its originality" violates the basic principles of my country's copyright law, and this court corrects it. In view of the fact that my country's copyright law only protects the expression of works and does not extend to ideas, processes, operating methods or mathematical concepts, and that the expressions protected by my country's copyright law are intellectual achievements with literary, artistic and scientific aesthetic significance, and do not protect practical and functional expressions that meet people's actual life needs, the second-instance court's determination that "the more the model meets practical needs, the higher its originality" also violates the legislative intent of my country's copyright law, and this court corrects it.” Original in Chinese: 中航智成公司均未经过自己的选择、取舍、安排、设计、综合、描述，创作出新的点、线、面和几何结构，其等比例缩小的过程仅仅只是在另一载体上精确地再现了歼十飞机原有的外观造型，没有带来新的表达，属于严格按比例缩小的技术过程。在中航智成公司不能证明其根据歼十飞机等比例缩小而制造的歼十飞机模型具有独创性的情况下，该过程仍然是复制，产生的歼十飞机模型属于歼十飞机的复制件，不构成受我国著作权法所保护的模型作品。因此，二审法院关于“模型与原物的近似程度越高，其独创性越高”的认定，违背我国著作权法的基本原理，本院予以纠正。又鉴于我国著作权法只保护作品的表达，不延及思想、工艺、操作方法或数学概念，且我国著作权法保护的表达是具有文学、艺术和科学审美意义的智力成果，不保护为满足人们实际生活需要的实用性和功能性的表达，因此，二审法院关于“模型越满足实际需要，其独创性越高”的认定，也违背我国著作权法的立法本意，本院予以纠正。[3] I’m not sure whether this is a 1:1 or a 1:10 (or whichever dimension this is), but based on the above cases it does not appear that there is newer eligibility for copyright on the model, meaning the copyright is based on the original satelite, which is a COM:UA, thus no copyright is introduced. S5A-0043Talk 02:03, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
Speedy keep: Did you see the description on COM:CSM#Models? The "not OK" is specifically for the U.S., where there is no freedom of panorama for artistic works (whether 2D or 3D). On the other hand if you check with COM:FOP China (after all it's photographed in Zhuhai, China) there is no FOP problems with 3D artwork (assuming the model itself is treated as an artwork).廣九直通車 (talk) 10:08, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. This would either be a COM:UA or if considered sculpture, covered by FOP in China. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:45, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
photo trop ancienne Loveattic (talk) 08:51, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept: we can keep old photos. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:47, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
_(1).jpg){kind=link}
_(1).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
There is an earlier version of this picture in better quality svg format, so to avoid confusion, please remove it. FotosLaLiga (talk) 10:27, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
_(1).jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:48, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
_(1).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
There is an earlier version of this picture in better quality svg format, so to avoid confusion, please remove it. FotosLaLiga (talk) 10:28, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:48, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
There is an earlier version of this picture in better quality svg format, so to avoid confusion, please remove it. FotosLaLiga (talk) 10:29, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:48, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
The quality of this photo is terrible, and there are other photos available, so to avoid mistakes, I suggest its removal. FotosLaLiga (talk) 10:31, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Keep The image is not COM:Redundant. There's no harm in having different images from the same person. --NoonIcarus (talk) 12:35, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment See also Commons:Help desk#Bad quality Photo, how to erase?. --NoonIcarus (talk) 12:37, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per NoonIcarus. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:49, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
Fake logo reproduction. Delete it and possibly upload the correct version. 37.161.35.83 14:49, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- The logo consists of text that do not meet the requirements of originality. Anyone can recreate this logo on their own. If you think that Wikimedia Commons should include a logo from a box other than the U.S. one, you can upload it. Pottero (talk) 22:59, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- The problem with your logos is that they are fake, and quite different from the original ones. If the latter "do not meet the requirements of originality", then they can be uploaded on Wikimedia Commons in their correct version. 78.210.62.41 16:00, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept: COM:INUSE. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:01, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
Fake logo reproduction. Delete it and possibly upload the correct version. 37.161.35.83 14:50, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- The logo consists of text that do not meet the requirements of originality. Anyone can recreate this logo on their own. If you think that Wikimedia Commons should include a logo from a box other than the U.S. one, you can upload it. Pottero (talk) 22:59, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- The problem with your logos is that they are fake, and quite different from the original ones. If the latter "do not meet the requirements of originality", then they can be uploaded on Wikimedia Commons in their correct version. 78.210.62.41 16:00, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept: COM:INUSE. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:01, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
Fake logo reproduction. Delete it and possibly upload the correct version. 37.161.35.83 14:50, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- The logo consists of text that do not meet the requirements of originality. Anyone can recreate this logo on their own. If you think that Wikimedia Commons should include a logo from a box other than the U.S. one, you can upload it. Pottero (talk) 22:59, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- The problem with your logos is that they are fake, and quite different from the original ones. If the latter "do not meet the requirements of originality", then they can be uploaded on Wikimedia Commons in their correct version. 78.210.62.41 16:00, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept: COM:INUSE. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:02, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
Fake logo reproduction. Delete it and possibly upload the correct version. 37.161.35.83 14:51, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- The logo consists of text that do not meet the requirements of originality. Anyone can recreate this logo on their own. If you think that the logo from the Polish game box should be included on Wikimedia Commons, you can upload it. Pottero (talk) 23:01, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- The problem with your logos is that they are fake, and quite different from the original ones. If the latter "do not meet the requirements of originality", then they can be uploaded on Wikimedia Commons in their correct version. 78.210.62.41 16:01, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept: COM:INUSE. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:03, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
Fake logo reproduction. Delete it and possibly upload the correct version. 37.161.35.83 14:52, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- The logo consists of text that do not meet the requirements of originality. Anyone can recreate this logo on their own. If you think that Wikimedia Commons should include a logo from a box other than the U.S. one, you can upload it. Pottero (talk) 23:00, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- The problem with your logos is that they are fake, and quite different from the original ones. If the latter "do not meet the requirements of originality", then they can be uploaded on Wikimedia Commons in their correct version. 78.210.62.41 16:01, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept: COM:INUSE. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:05, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
Fake logo reproduction. Delete it and possibly upload the correct version. 37.161.35.83 14:53, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept: COM:INUSE. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:06, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
Uploader is different from Artist's name - possible copyright violation. Till (talk) 14:59, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: needs VRT comfirmation. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:57, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Dronebogus as no permission (No permission since) Krd 15:25, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:58, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
This would probably a very useful file. @Gusti Made Pura Riana: did you take this photo yourself? If so please see COM:VRT. Prototyperspective (talk) 15:55, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: needs VRT confirmation. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:59, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in New Zealand A1Cafel (talk) 03:35, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:53, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in New Zealand A1Cafel (talk) 16:00, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:40, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
Painting by Eugenia Belín Sarmiento (1860-1952) published in Argentine magazine Caras y Caretas in 1938. The artwork is currently in the public domain in its country of origin (70 years pma), but it was not in 1996 at URAA time. Thus, it is still copyrighted in the US. Following COM:PCP we cannot keep it. We can undelete it in 2034. Günther Frager (talk) 16:31, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I did not know that URAA applied also for paintings and other artwork, my fault. Beyond of that, the obsession of the nominator for deleting images is becoming far from reasonable (with due respect from my humble point of view). Fma12 (talk) 17:40, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, Undelete in 2034. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:41, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Eliyiah as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: outdated photo: not a valid criterion, converting to DR. —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - uselesscontributions} 17:38, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope personal photo. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:43, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
The Centre d'archives de Laval (CAL) is the rightful owner of this image. The CAL owns the negative. The photographer, Roland Beauchamp (and not Germain Beauchamp as indicated in the file), died in 2007. According to legislation passed on 30 december 2022, the image will not be part of the public domain until 2070. That is why we want this image removed from Wikimedia Commons. 142.112.120.167 17:46, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept: circa 1940 photograph per sources, PD in Canada and the U.S. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:47, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
Please delete this file I just uploaded myself for privacy reasons. JIP (talk) 21:18, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:48, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
listed by (presumed, assuming these are official portraits taken during the period of office) date of creation.
okay ( Keep) because PD-old:
- file:Antonio Lucero.jpg (1912-1918)
- file:Manuel Martinez 1922.jpg (1919-1922)
- file:Soledad C. Chacon.jpg (1923-1926)
- file:Jennie Fortune.jpg (1927-1928)
depends on exact date of illustration:
- file:E. A. Perrault.jpg (1929-1930)
Delete not federal works as claimed by the license template, and unlike California works by officers of New Mexico and work-for-hire contractors are not automatically PD:
- file:Marguerite P. Baca.jpg (1931-1934)
- file:Elizabeth F. Gonzales.jpg (1935-1938)
- file:Jessie M. Gonzales.jpg (1939-1942)
- file:Cecilia T. Cleveland.jpg (1943-1946)
- file:Alicia Valdez Romero.jpg (1947-1950)
- file:Beatrice Roach Gottlieb.jpg (1951-1954)
- file:Natalie Smith Buck.jpg (1955-1958)
- file:Betty Fiorina.jpg (1959-1962)
- file:Alberta Miller.jpg (1963-1966)
- file:Ernestine Durán Evans.jpg (1967-1970)
- file:Shirley Hooper.jpg (1979-1982)
- file:Clara Padilla Jones.jpg (1983-1986)
- file:Rebecca Vigil-Giron.jpg (1987-1990)
- file:Stephanie Gonzales.jpg (1991-1998)
- file:Mary Herrera.jpg (2007-2010)
- file:Dianna Duran.jpg (2011-2015)
okay because freely licensed:
- file:Rebecca Vigil-Giron and Martin Heinrich (2574282051).jpg (CC-BY 2.0, 2008)
- file:Maggie Toulouse Oliver.jpg and file:Maggie Toulouse Oliver (cropped).jpg (CC-BY 3.0, 2014)
- file:politics (44409868565).jpg (CC-BY 2.0, 2018)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
— Arlo James Barnes 21:33, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- The portraits from PD year through 1989 need to be checked if they meet {{PD-US-no-notice}} or {{PD-US-1978-1989}}. Curbon7 (talk) 22:36, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- I haven't found any sources for the images other than the SOS page using w:Tineye, so I am not sure how to understand whether they were originally published with or without notice. Arlo James Barnes 12:10, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Those prior to 1989. As well as a copyright symbol, you still had to register with the USCO to be eligible for copyright protection. I have checked the database for those prior to 1989 under variations of the people's name and have not found any registration. file:Stephanie Gonzales.jpg (1991-1998) and file:Mary Herrera.jpg (2007-2010) and file:Dianna Duran.jpg (2011-2015) would be under an active copyright, unless released under a CC license. --RAN (talk) 13:22, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: I deleted the post-1978 ones since it's unclear if those were published under current definitions of publication before 1989. Kept the pre-1978 photos per RAN, PD by formalities and pre-1978 definition of publication. --Abzeronow (talk) 21:44, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
listed by (presumed, assuming these are official portraits taken during the period of office) date of creation.
okay ( Keep) because PD-old:
- file:Antonio Lucero.jpg (1912-1918)
- file:Manuel Martinez 1922.jpg (1919-1922)
- file:Soledad C. Chacon.jpg (1923-1926)
- file:Jennie Fortune.jpg (1927-1928)
depends on exact date of illustration:
- file:E. A. Perrault.jpg (1929-1930)
Delete not federal works as claimed by the license template, and unlike California works by officers of New Mexico and work-for-hire contractors are not automatically PD:
- file:Marguerite P. Baca.jpg (1931-1934)
- file:Elizabeth F. Gonzales.jpg (1935-1938)
- file:Jessie M. Gonzales.jpg (1939-1942)
- file:Cecilia T. Cleveland.jpg (1943-1946)
- file:Alicia Valdez Romero.jpg (1947-1950)
- file:Beatrice Roach Gottlieb.jpg (1951-1954)
- file:Natalie Smith Buck.jpg (1955-1958)
- file:Betty Fiorina.jpg (1959-1962)
- file:Alberta Miller.jpg (1963-1966)
- file:Ernestine Durán Evans.jpg (1967-1970)
- file:Shirley Hooper.jpg (1979-1982)
- file:Clara Padilla Jones.jpg (1983-1986)
- file:Rebecca Vigil-Giron.jpg (1987-1990)
- file:Stephanie Gonzales.jpg (1991-1998)
- file:Mary Herrera.jpg (2007-2010)
- file:Dianna Duran.jpg (2011-2015)
okay because freely licensed:
- file:Rebecca Vigil-Giron and Martin Heinrich (2574282051).jpg (CC-BY 2.0, 2008)
- file:Maggie Toulouse Oliver.jpg and file:Maggie Toulouse Oliver (cropped).jpg (CC-BY 3.0, 2014)
- file:politics (44409868565).jpg (CC-BY 2.0, 2018)
— Arlo James Barnes 21:33, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- The portraits from PD year through 1989 need to be checked if they meet {{PD-US-no-notice}} or {{PD-US-1978-1989}}. Curbon7 (talk) 22:36, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- I haven't found any sources for the images other than the SOS page using w:Tineye, so I am not sure how to understand whether they were originally published with or without notice. Arlo James Barnes 12:10, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Those prior to 1989. As well as a copyright symbol, you still had to register with the USCO to be eligible for copyright protection. I have checked the database for those prior to 1989 under variations of the people's name and have not found any registration. file:Stephanie Gonzales.jpg (1991-1998) and file:Mary Herrera.jpg (2007-2010) and file:Dianna Duran.jpg (2011-2015) would be under an active copyright, unless released under a CC license. --RAN (talk) 13:22, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: I deleted the post-1978 ones since it's unclear if those were published under current definitions of publication before 1989. Kept the pre-1978 photos per RAN, PD by formalities and pre-1978 definition of publication. --Abzeronow (talk) 21:44, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
Fake logo reproduction. Delete it and possibly upload the correct version. 37.161.35.83 14:48, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- I'll give this another week. Please link "the correct version" so this claim can be evaluated. Abzeronow (talk) 19:00, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --VIGNERON (talk) 16:21, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
Fake logo reproduction. Delete it and possibly upload the correct version. 37.161.35.83 14:52, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- It is simply a vectorization of the new logo. It can be revision reuploaded. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 12:00, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- Enwiki lists this as "non-free" so this may need deletion if above ToO. This is in use by Portuguese and Chinese Wikipedia. Abzeronow (talk) 19:05, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion (two short words and a trapezoid seems largely under ToO). --VIGNERON (talk) 16:20, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
I see no PD indication from the website of the President of Maldives. {{Presidency of Maldives (CC-BY-4.0)}} should be enough A1Cafel (talk) 15:42, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:38, 6 September 2024 (UTC)