Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2024/03/13
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
|
|
I uploaded it by mistake Lucyyyph (talk) 02:43, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 08:24, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: What new could be added to Category:Human penis? EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:23, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 15:46, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
- Restored: as per [1]. Yann (talk) 15:42, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
Low quality COM:PENIS photo, unlikely to be useful A1Cafel (talk) 08:17, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 17:02, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 04:10, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete, particularly given the name of the uploader (which I'll report for an abusive user name). PaterMcFly (talk) 10:39, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 11:12, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Anai171 (talk) 12:37, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 13:23, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:08, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:12, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Chatalqumarab (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by company rep, no usage and out of scope
Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:29, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:14, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:29, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:14, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Old and Bad photo Serial Designation V (talk) 00:48, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- What's so bad about it that it needs deletion? --PaterMcFly (talk) 10:28, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G7. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:15, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Autofabricantes (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by company; no usage and out of scope
Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:53, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:16, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
"Taiwanese teenage girl" and "Upskirt" is not a category combination that should go together on Commons Trade (talk) 20:09, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- COM:DIGNITY exists.--Trade (talk) 20:14, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
I'm going to take the liberty of speedy-deleting this. It looks like a probably non-consensual upskirt photo of a probably underaged girl. - Jmabel ! talk 06:21, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Copyright 211.197.54.36 15:37, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Túrelio. --Rosenzweig τ 08:24, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Copyright 2001:2D8:E69D:775E:75F6:F567:15E5:86D 15:40, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Túrelio. --Rosenzweig τ 08:24, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Copyright 2001:2D8:E69D:775E:75F6:F567:15E5:86D 15:44, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Túrelio. --Rosenzweig τ 08:24, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Copyright 2001:2D8:E69D:775E:75F6:F567:15E5:86D 16:06, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Túrelio. --Rosenzweig τ 08:24, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by %USER% as Unfree Flickr file A09 (talk) 18:42, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Yann. --Rosenzweig τ 08:23, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Photo uploaded by a banned sockpuppet Leoboudv (talk) 21:23, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by The Squirrel Conspiracy. --Rosenzweig τ 08:21, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Photo uploaded by a banned sockpuppet Leoboudv (talk) 21:23, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by The Squirrel Conspiracy. --Rosenzweig τ 08:21, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Image uploaded by a banned sockpuppet is too blurry to use. Leoboudv (talk) 21:30, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by The Squirrel Conspiracy. --Rosenzweig τ 08:21, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Image uploaded by a banned sockpuppet is too blurry to use. Leoboudv (talk) 21:30, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by The Squirrel Conspiracy. --Rosenzweig τ 08:21, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Image uploaded by a banned sockpuppet is of little use for wikicommons. Leoboudv (talk) 21:31, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by The Squirrel Conspiracy. --Rosenzweig τ 08:21, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Image uploaded by a banned sockpuppet is of little use for wikicommons. Leoboudv (talk) 21:32, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by The Squirrel Conspiracy. --Rosenzweig τ 08:21, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Image uploaded by a banned sockpuppet is out of Common's scope Leoboudv (talk) 21:33, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by The Squirrel Conspiracy. --Rosenzweig τ 08:21, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Image uploaded by a banned sockpuppet is out of Common's scope Leoboudv (talk) 21:35, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by The Squirrel Conspiracy. --Rosenzweig τ 08:21, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Image uploaded by a banned sockpuppet is out of Common's educational scope. Leoboudv (talk) 21:37, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by The Squirrel Conspiracy. --Rosenzweig τ 08:21, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Image uploaded by a banned sockpuppet is out of Common's educational scope. Leoboudv (talk) 21:39, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by The Squirrel Conspiracy. --Rosenzweig τ 08:21, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Image uploaded by a banned sockpuppet is out of Common's educational scope. Leoboudv (talk) 21:39, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by The Squirrel Conspiracy. --Rosenzweig τ 08:21, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Image uploaded by a banned sockpuppet is out of Common's educational scope. Leoboudv (talk) 21:40, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by The Squirrel Conspiracy. --Rosenzweig τ 08:21, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Image uploaded by a banned sockpuppet is out of Common's educational scope. Leoboudv (talk) 21:41, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by The Squirrel Conspiracy. --Rosenzweig τ 08:21, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Image uploaded by a banned sockpuppet is out of Common's educational scope. Leoboudv (talk) 21:42, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by The Squirrel Conspiracy. --Rosenzweig τ 08:21, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Image uploaded by a banned sockpuppet is out of Common's educational scope. Leoboudv (talk) 21:45, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by The Squirrel Conspiracy. --Rosenzweig τ 08:21, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Image uploaded by a banned sockpuppet is out of Common's educational scope. Leoboudv (talk) 21:45, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by The Squirrel Conspiracy. --Rosenzweig τ 08:21, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
This partly blurry image uploaded by a banned sockpuppet is out of Common's educational scope. Leoboudv (talk) 21:46, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by The Squirrel Conspiracy. --Rosenzweig τ 08:21, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Image uploaded by a banned sockpuppet is out of Common's educational scope. Leoboudv (talk) 21:47, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by The Squirrel Conspiracy. --Rosenzweig τ 08:21, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Eurotram 1005 (talk) 22:42, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 08:19, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Blatant advert. Improper use of User page. Talk page should remain. 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 13:50, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy delete Apologies. It took me for ever to track down the SD reason, now applied. U3 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 22:36, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:44, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Not own work. Please provide proper source, author, and license. Yann (talk) 14:23, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Source, author, and license fixed. --RAN (talk) 05:25, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 11:13, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Hekerui as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: derivative work of medium deleted at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Nyolcak1.jpg Yann (talk) 19:55, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- I agree. In case, the original file should be deleted, this file should be as well. Unfortunately. -- ato (talk) 20:06, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep I disagree, circa 1920 image would be PD in both US and Hungary. I have no clue as to why the other image wasn't corrected, instead of deleted. The other should be restored. --RAN (talk) 05:31, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 11:05, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Hekerui as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: not own work, as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Nyolcak1.jpg Yann (talk) 19:56, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Attribution fixed. We host multiple copies of this image in various crops and tones. --RAN (talk) 05:20, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 11:14, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP SK, there is no freedom of panorama in South Korea for buildings. ✗plicit 00:35, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:17, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Personal photo used only on a spam page on the English Wikipedia. See en:User:PlatinumBucket Whpq (talk) 03:53, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:18, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP SK, there is no freedom of panorama in South Korea for buildings. This is a photo of the Olympic Weightlifting Gymnasium (which has since been remodeled and renamed to Woori Arts Hall), which was created by Kimm Jong-soung. He is still alive. ✗plicit 04:07, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:18, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
An unacceptable derivative work of an admittance ticket with a complex design. ✗plicit 04:44, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:18, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Per COM:PACKAGE A1Cafel (talk) 04:54, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:18, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the Philippines A1Cafel (talk) 04:55, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:18, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons:What Commons is not#Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:19, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons:What Commons is not#Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:19, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons:What Commons is not#Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:19, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope --Alaa :)..! 15:10, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:20, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 15:25, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:20, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in Ireland A1Cafel (talk) 16:59, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:20, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in Ireland A1Cafel (talk) 17:00, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:20, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Delete Watermarked image. A copy of the original was credited to B&B Theatres [2]. No reason to believe the uploader is an authorized representative of the theatre company and has authority to release this image under the here stipulated cc-by-sa-4.0 license. Copyright violation. Hammersoft (talk) 17:21, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:20, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Too little data to confirm the file's public domain. Per applicative {{PD-Yugoslavia}} we cannot assure any of the three articles, especially as per provided source it seems like the first publication of this image was in 1983. A09 (talk) 19:16, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:20, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Unused book cover that the uploader (whose name matches the author of the book) blanked the page. Abzeronow (talk) 22:17, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:20, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by LenaEfeutute (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:SPAM, multiple promotional images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use outside wikidata once and out of scope
Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:09, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep You have no idea what you're talking about. The file was in use in the article about the app just right before you made this totally unwarranted DR. Also COM:INUSE and I thank the uploader for licensing the logo under free license where otherwise it's not clear if it's just fair use. Prototyperspective (talk) 00:34, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: Wikidata is in use and there is a German language Wikipedia article on this as well. --IronGargoyle (talk) 06:25, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope Trade (talk) 00:56, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete crude drawing, no educational purpose. Out of scope. 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 17:34, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 06:26, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Risk of copyright violation as a derivative work. The British Museum website shows that the artist died in 2015,[3] so we need evidence from the artist's heirs. Verbcatcher (talk) 00:56, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 06:27, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
This logo isn't a {{PD-textlogo}}, the "Lima" font reaches COM:TOO, Taichi (talk) 03:05, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep per COM:TOO Andean Community. Look at "Examples". -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:58, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: Per Ikan Kekek. --IronGargoyle (talk) 06:30, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 03:25, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 06:30, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
COM:NOTHOST personal files with no educational value that are not used in projects are out of COM:SCOPE.
Grandmaster Huon (talk) 04:00, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 06:31, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
change of person 183.82.121.27 08:11, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Not a reason for deletion. We can keep it as a historical photograph if they no longer hold the position they held when the photograph was uploaded. Descriptions can be changed. Abzeronow (talk) 19:39, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 06:35, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Taken from Reddit, not uploader's work A1Cafel (talk) 10:39, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy delete Dronebogus (talk) 16:22, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 06:36, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Low quality AI generated image with fake pseudo-text, out of COM:SCOPE. Belbury (talk) 10:58, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 06:36, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
copyright Enry1477 (talk) 13:52, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Primero estas imágenes son subidas por Flickr de la Asamblea Nacional decir q es copyright sin motivo alguno es absurdo además se puso y se verificó la licencia de compartir, llama la atención q un wikipedista recién creado de la nada vengan a hacer relajo, ojalá no armen una persecución por dar mi opinión Alejandro Palacios Naspud (talk) 18:44, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Bedivere (talk) 05:56, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Appears to be a stock image (used on other news story https://tineye.com/search/886427edae12e7225b2428d9b1b6a3d2f8984708?sort=crawl_date&order=asc&page=1), and sourced to a random website Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:17, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. According to the file URL, the image was used on CNBC in June 2020, well after the photo was uploaded to Commons. The file was uploaded as part of a collaboration with Wikimedia RU (RIP); I see no reason to second-guess them here. Omphalographer (talk) 05:09, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:28, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by likely company rep, no use outside spam user sandbox; out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:37, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:28, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Diego.alvarez.represas (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:SPAM, several promotional images uploaded by presumed company rep, no usage and out of scope
Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:41, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:28, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by TheIntrepidExplorer (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by presumed company rep; no usage and out of scope (previous deletion request was about copyright and not about the fact that this is spam)
Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:44, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:29, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Low resolution, with watermark @tedskygallery, I believed that this photos is taken from fanbase social media account Urang Kamang (talk) 00:46, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:29, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Risk of copyright violation as a derivative work, we need evidence of permission from the artist of the artwork, or their heirs. The uploader added Category:Jizi, and the British Museum website indicates that he died in 2015. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jizi work in British Museum collection.png for a similar work by the same uploader. Verbcatcher (talk) 01:02, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:32, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by probable company rep, no use and out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:01, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:32, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Korovay2405 (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:SPAM, several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no usage and out of scope
Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:07, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:32, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company CEO, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:37, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: Currently COM:INUSE - relist if the ja.wiki article is deleted. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:33, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Aleksejs.resko (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:SPAM, multiple promotional images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use and out of scope
Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:38, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:33, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, multiple promotional images uploaded by presumed company rep, no usage and out of scope
Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:38, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:34, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:42, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:34, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Possible Copyvio, see [4], found elsewhere on web, seems to be a movie cover Seawolf35 (talk) 02:47, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Movie poster. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:24, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Random penis photo, not being used outside user namespace (also his userpage on kowiki appears to be a bundle of penis) A1Cafel (talk) 04:05, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:34, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Random penis photo, not being used outside user namespace (also his userpage on kowiki appears to be a bundle of penis) A1Cafel (talk) 04:05, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:34, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Random penis photo, not being used outside user namespace (also his userpage on kowiki appears to be a bundle of penis) A1Cafel (talk) 04:05, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:34, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 04:06, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:34, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 04:06, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:34, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 04:06, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:34, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 04:08, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:35, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 04:09, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:35, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 04:09, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:35, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Screenshot of a social media website A1Cafel (talk) 04:11, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:35, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 04:12, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:36, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 04:12, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:36, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 04:12, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:36, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 04:14, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:36, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 04:14, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:36, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 04:15, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:35, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 04:15, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:35, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 04:16, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:35, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 04:17, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:35, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 04:17, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:35, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 04:17, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:35, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP SK, there is no freedom of panorama in South Korea for artwork. These carved sculptures were completed in 1989. ✗plicit 04:18, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:35, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
the letter a is unique enough to merit some artistic value per COM:TOO Japan, make it regular. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 04:56, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Replaced with simplified version. Revdel if the previous logo is above TOO.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:16, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete original, but what's the value in doing this kind of simplification? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:02, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
- As to make it below TOO, the distressed letter a can have artistic appreciation to it. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 14:48, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
- But it's not the real logo. Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:55, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
- It's close enough without violating TOO. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 21:46, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
- In some cases, it's not worth manipulating a logo, and it should instead be uploaded locally on Wikipedias that allow fair use. I think this is one such case. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:40, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
- But it's not the real logo. Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:55, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Per Ikan, it's no longer the logo. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:44, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
The X may have some artistic appreciation putting it above COM:TOO Japan. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 04:59, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:44, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
- Undeleted: as per [5]. Yann (talk) 08:16, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by likely company rep, no use outside old user sandbox Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:40, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:47, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Alex.mabrouk (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:SPAM, multiple promotional images uploaded by presumed company rep, no usage and out of scope
Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:43, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:47, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Random nude photography, nothing special, unlikely to be useful A1Cafel (talk) 09:04, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- Weak keep at least better than all the images just showing dicks. This one could be useful. PaterMcFly (talk) 11:28, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:48, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
File:Lucia Jaramillo SESIÓN NO. 875 DEL PLENO DE LA ASAMBLEA NACIONAL. ECUADOR, 05 DE DICIEMBRE DEL 2023 02.jpg
[edit]Copyright Enry1477 (talk) 13:35, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: Flickr source has a free license and appears to be a valid account. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:51, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
File:Lucia Jaramillo SESIÓN NO. 875 DEL PLENO DE LA ASAMBLEA NACIONAL. ECUADOR, 05 DE DICIEMBRE DEL 2023 02.jpg
[edit]Copyright Enry1477 (talk) 13:37, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- clearly ... not. See the source. Victuallers (talk) 15:37, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep per Victuallers. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:09, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: Flickr source has a free license and appears to be a valid account. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:51, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
copyright Enry1477 (talk) 13:40, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:51, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
File:Lucia Jaramillo SESIÓN NO. 875 DEL PLENO DE LA ASAMBLEA NACIONAL. ECUADOR, 05 DE DICIEMBRE DEL 2023 01.jpg
[edit]copyright Enry1477 (talk) 13:41, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Please make sure you read declarations like this, so that you don't waste your time or anyone else's: "This image was originally posted to Flickr by Asamblea Nacional del Ecuador at https://flickr.com/photos/31582298@N08/53376656142. It was reviewed on 5 December 2023 by FlickreviewR 2 and was confirmed to be licensed under the terms of the cc-by-sa-2.0." -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:10, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: Flickr source has a free license and appears to be a valid account. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:51, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
File:Lucia Jaramillo SESIÓN PARLAMENTARIA DE POSESIÓN DE LAS Y LOS ASAMBLEÍSTAS PARA EL PERÍODO LEGISLATIVO 2023 - 2024, ECUADOR, 17 DE NOVIEMBRE DEL 2023 02.jpg
[edit]copyright Enry1477 (talk) 13:44, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- No - see the source. Nominator needs further study of copyright Victuallers (talk) 09:16, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: Flickr source has a free license and appears to be a valid account. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:51, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
File:Lucia Jaramillo SESIÓN NO. 875 DEL PLENO DE LA ASAMBLEA NACIONAL. ECUADOR, 05 DE DICIEMBRE DEL 2023 04.jpg
[edit]copyright Enry1477 (talk) 13:45, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: Flickr source has a free license and appears to be a valid account. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:51, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
File:Lucia Jaramillo SESIÓN PARLAMENTARIA DE POSESIÓN DE LAS Y LOS ASAMBLEÍSTAS PARA EL PERÍODO LEGISLATIVO 2023 - 2024, ECUADOR, 17 DE NOVIEMBRE DEL 2023 01.jpg
[edit]copyright Enry1477 (talk) 13:47, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: Flickr source has a free license and appears to be a valid account. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:52, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
File:Lucia Jaramillo SESIÓN NO. 875 DEL PLENO DE LA ASAMBLEA NACIONAL. ECUADOR, 05 DE DICIEMBRE DEL 2023 03.jpg
[edit]copyright Enry1477 (talk) 13:48, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: Flickr source has a free license and appears to be a valid account. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:52, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
File:Lucia Jaramillo (Q123499208) SESIÓN PARLAMENTARIA DE POSESIÓN DE LAS Y LOS ASAMBLEÍSTAS PARA EL PERÍODO LEGISLATIVO 2023 - 2024, ECUADOR, 17 DE NOVIEMBRE DEL 2023.jpg
[edit]copyright Enry1477 (talk) 13:49, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: Flickr source has a free license and appears to be a valid account. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:52, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
copyright Enry1477 (talk) 13:51, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
a lot of the files for this person are proposed for deletion. Bit weird?
--Charc2018 (talk) 15:40, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: Flickr source has a free license and appears to be a valid account. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:52, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
copyright Enry1477 (talk) 13:53, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: Flickr source has a free license and appears to be a valid account. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:52, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
copyright Enry1477 (talk) 13:53, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: Flickr source has a free license and appears to be a valid account. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:52, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
no source no metadata no author no permission used for promo on nl-wiki Hoyanova (talk) 14:08, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:53, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
random out of scope screenshot of the uploader's desktop, gibberish description/captions/filename, no use Nutshinou Talk! 14:42, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy delete: Also, it is Windows 8.1 entirely, which is copyrighted (non-libre). - THV | ♂ | U | T - 20:29, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:53, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Random unused out of scope screenshot, what is there to see here? Commons already has a bunch of the sort at Category:Windows Command Prompt Nutshinou Talk! 14:53, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:54, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Third party usage of copyrighted artwork, not by the creator, the description in Turkish is simply (self?) advertising Reme77 (talk) 16:29, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per nominator. - THV | ♂ | U | T - 20:20, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:54, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Movses.xorenatsi (talk · contribs)
[edit]Fictional map and flags. Out of project's scope.
A09 (talk) 19:20, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:55, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Image uploaded by a banned sockpuppet is out of Common's educational scope. No context is given. Just a random upload. Leoboudv (talk) 22:03, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by Bedivere (LTA). --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:55, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
May be above COM:TOO France, which is particularly low. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 05:11, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep, FIM is based in Mies, Switzerland since 1994 (it was previously in Geneva since 1952 and before that in England, but this logo isn't created pre-1952). I believe Switzerland has a high threshold of originality (like in Germany, and unlike Austria) per Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2012/03#Threshold of originality for logos in Switzerland (regarding Eurovision logos but this FIM logo is much simpler with three stripes (symbolising wing in the original logo but much simpler, there is a more complex modern logo created in 2007-2008 but already superseded by this one).--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 05:27, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination, per VulcanSphere. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 13:54, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: Nomination withdrawn. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:33, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
The file is identical to the Space One's official image available at https://www.space-one.co.jp/gallery/index_e.html, which is copyrighted and no indication of free license. Fukumoto (talk) 10:06, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- I deeply apologize if I made any mistakes. Please, if possible, solve the issue for me. Thank you very much for informing me. Syed Shaveer (talk) 11:50, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy delete Work of Space One (whose website says "all rights reserved") and sourced to nasaspaceflight.com, which is NOT affiliated with NASA. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 15:34, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:29, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
The photograph is from news agency, and there's no indication of free license. Fukumoto (talk) 10:35, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- I have added a reference. Please resolve the issue if you have the authority to do so. Syed Shaveer (talk) 11:44, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Syed Shaveer Kyodo News Agency does not release photographs under a free license. Unless I’m missing something here, resolving the issue means deleting the file. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 22:31, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy delete Work of Kyodo Agency, clear copyvio. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 15:33, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:29, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Shaggy Rogers goods
[edit]Violation of COM:TOYS.
- File:XVI Open de Plastimodelismo de Catanduva. Carro The Mistery Machine do desenho Scooby Doo com o famoso cachorro e Salsicha no volante. - panoramio.jpg
- File:XVI Open de Plastimodelismo de Catanduva. Famoso carro do desenho animado Scooby Doo, The Mistery Machine - panoramio.jpg
(Oinkers42) (talk) 16:21, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:26, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Abysmal quality- virtually nothing meaningful visible. Unusable and hence out of scope. Ubcule (talk) 18:27, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom Prototyperspective (talk) 22:09, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:23, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
- also File:FFWSBR.png
This file was initially tagged by Pbrks as Logo: COM:TOO argument possible here —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - contributions} 21:19, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy delete - This logo is owned by Garena, a Singaporean company. Singapore has a very low threshold of originality; see COM:TOO Singapore. – Pbrks (t • c) 22:08, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. I added a copy for deletion. Taivo (talk) 11:58, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:20, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
This file is not likely owned by the copyright holder or licensed under creative commons terms. AuroraANovaUma (talk) 21:51, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:19, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Freely licensed photograph of a demonstration includes an enlarged photograph that is the focus of the picture. FOP in Slovakia only applies to permanently displayed works which the photograph is not. So unless the photograph is freely licensed, we cannot keep this file. Abzeronow (talk) 22:01, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you. I was not aware of FOP, interesting. I uploaded the picture to practice. PLFree (talk) 07:52, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:19, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Khamadi the Amethyst (talk · contribs)
[edit]All taken from magazines or similar. Copyvios.
- File:Derek Fabulous (Warburton) for FACE Stockholm.jpg
- File:DIC5999.jpg
- File:VOUS-MAGAZINE-OCTOBER-DEREK-WARBURTON-16-768x1001.jpg
- File:VOUS-MAGAZINE-APRIL-MAN8-768x1001.jpg
- File:VOUS-MAGAZINE-APRIL-MAN7-768x1001.jpg
- File:VOUS-MAGAZINE-APRIL-MAN6-768x1001.jpg
- File:VOUS-MAGAZINE-APRIL-MAN-1572x2048.jpg
- File:VOUS-MAGAZINE-APRIL-MAN9-768x1001.jpg
- File:Derek Warburton for As If Mag.png
Nutshinou Talk! 23:56, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:17, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bulut Akacan (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused advertisement of company of questionable notability
- File:Bulut Akacan Farkında Olmak.jpg
- File:Akacan Holding.png
- File:Bulut Akacan Akacan Holding Yönetim Kurulu Başkanı.webp
- File:Bulut Akacan.jpg
- File:Bulut Akacan Akacan Holding.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --FitIndia Semi-retired 18:48, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bunde Charles (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons:What Commons is not#Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --FitIndia Semi-retired 18:48, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by E-StatesInc (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons is neither your free web host nor the right place to promote your business. No contributions to wm projects.
- File:E-states-banquet-milwaukee-1813.jpg
- File:E-states-matthew-schneider-1843.jpg
- File:Nate-helbach-matthew-schneider-1462.jpg
- File:E-states-matthew-schneider-1748.jpg
- File:E-states-banquet-milwaukee-1453.jpg
- File:E-states-banquet-milwaukee-1491.jpg
- File:E-states-banquet-milwaukee-1510.jpg
- File:E-states-sean-schneider-1519.jpg
- File:E-states-matthew-schneider-1545.jpg
- File:E-states-matthew-schneider-1538.jpg
- File:E-states-banquet-milwaukee-1562.jpg
- File:E-states-nate-helbach-1592.jpg
- File:E-states-brock-mogensen-1701.jpg
- File:E-states-nate-helbach-1598.jpg
- File:E-states-dujuan-cherry-1619.jpg
- File:E-states-brock-mogensen-1688.jpg
- File:E-states-geoff-stuhr-1658.jpg
- File:E-states-kathleen-ellis-1720.jpg
- File:E-states-banquet-milwaukee-1412.jpg
- File:E-states-matthew-schneider-1443.jpg
- User:E-StatesInc
Achim55 (talk) 16:04, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:00, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
"File not found: /v1/AUTH_mw/wikipedia-commons-local-public." when I click to enlarge the photo A1Cafel (talk) 13:21, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:28, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
"File not found: /v1/AUTH_mw/wikipedia-commons-local-public." when I click to enlarge the photo A1Cafel (talk) 13:21, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:28, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
"File not found: /v1/AUTH_mw/wikipedia-commons-local-public." when I click to enlarge the photo A1Cafel (talk) 13:21, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:28, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
"File not found: /v1/AUTH_mw/wikipedia-commons-local-public." when I click to enlarge the photo A1Cafel (talk) 13:21, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:28, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
"File not found: /v1/AUTH_mw/wikipedia-commons-local-public." when I click to enlarge the photo A1Cafel (talk) 13:21, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:28, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
"File not found: /v1/AUTH_mw/wikipedia-commons-local-public." when I click to enlarge the photo A1Cafel (talk) 13:21, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:28, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
"File not found: /v1/AUTH_mw/wikipedia-commons-local-public." when I click to enlarge the photo A1Cafel (talk) 13:22, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:29, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
"File not found: /v1/AUTH_mw/wikipedia-commons-local-public." when I click to enlarge the photo A1Cafel (talk) 13:22, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:29, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
"File not found: /v1/AUTH_mw/wikipedia-commons-local-public." when I click to enlarge the photo A1Cafel (talk) 13:22, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:29, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
"File not found: /v1/AUTH_mw/wikipedia-commons-local-public." when I click to enlarge the photo A1Cafel (talk) 13:22, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:29, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
"File not found: /v1/AUTH_mw/wikipedia-commons-local-public." when I click to enlarge the photo A1Cafel (talk) 13:22, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:29, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
"File not found: /v1/AUTH_mw/wikipedia-commons-local-public." when I click to enlarge the photo A1Cafel (talk) 13:23, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:29, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
"File not found: /v1/AUTH_mw/wikipedia-commons-local-public." when I click to enlarge the photo A1Cafel (talk) 13:23, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:29, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
"File not found: /v1/AUTH_mw/wikipedia-commons-local-public." when I click to enlarge the photo A1Cafel (talk) 13:23, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:29, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
"File not found: /v1/AUTH_mw/wikipedia-commons-local-public." when I click to enlarge the photo A1Cafel (talk) 13:23, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:29, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
"File not found: /v1/AUTH_mw/wikipedia-commons-local-public." when I click to enlarge the photo A1Cafel (talk) 13:24, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:29, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
"File not found: /v1/AUTH_mw/wikipedia-commons-local-public." when I click to enlarge the photo A1Cafel (talk) 13:24, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:29, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
"File not found: /v1/AUTH_mw/wikipedia-commons-local-public." when I click to enlarge the photo A1Cafel (talk) 13:24, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:29, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
"File not found: /v1/AUTH_mw/wikipedia-commons-local-public." when I click to enlarge the photo A1Cafel (talk) 13:24, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:29, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
"File not found: /v1/AUTH_mw/wikipedia-commons-local-public." when I click to enlarge the photo A1Cafel (talk) 13:24, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:29, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
"File not found: /v1/AUTH_mw/wikipedia-commons-local-public." when I click to enlarge the photo A1Cafel (talk) 13:24, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:29, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
"File not found: /v1/AUTH_mw/wikipedia-commons-local-public." when I click to enlarge the photo A1Cafel (talk) 13:24, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:29, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
"File not found: /v1/AUTH_mw/wikipedia-commons-local-public." when I click to enlarge the photo A1Cafel (talk) 13:24, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:29, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
"File not found: /v1/AUTH_mw/wikipedia-commons-local-public." when I click to enlarge the photo A1Cafel (talk) 13:25, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Seems a glitch upload - source photo on Flickr is still there, reupload. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:35, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- @A1Cafel It might be a temporary issue with the Wikimedia server. The Flickrreview bot recognized the photo as a Flickr upload and I can't re-upload the Flickr hi-res JPEG because it's a duplicate. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 14:51, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:29, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Humoyun Qodirov (talk · contribs)
[edit]No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Uzbekistan.
- File:Fozil Yoʻldosh oʻgʻli haykali.jpg
- File:Fozil Yoʻldosh oʻgʻli haykali (yaqindan koʻrinishi).jpg
- File:Fozil Yoʻldosh oʻgʻli haykali (umumiy koʻrinish).jpg
- File:Fozil Yoʻldosh oʻgʻli muzeyi yonidagi haykal.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:30, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
The US does not have freedom of panorama for artworks. Unfortunately, that means that Commons cannot host these photos (unless specific permission from the painter is obtained).
Pi.1415926535 (talk) 17:38, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:30, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation; artworks who's author Siegfried Assmann died in 2021; no freedom of panorama.
- File:Hamburg-Lurup, Kirche Zu den Zwölf Aposteln, Altar.jpg
- File:Hamburg-Lurup, Kirche Zu den Zwölf Aposteln, Altarbereich.jpg
- File:Hamburg-Lurup, Kirche Zu den Zwölf Aposteln, Fenster-Details.jpg
- File:Hamburg-Lurup, Kirche Zu den Zwölf Aposteln, Innenraum, Nordwand.jpg
- File:Hamburg-Lurup, Kirche Zu den Zwölf Aposteln, Innenraum, Verbindungsgang.jpg
- File:Hamburg-Lurup, Kirche Zu den Zwölf Aposteln, Innenraum, Westwand, Empore.jpg
- File:Hamburg-Lurup, Kirche Zu den Zwölf Aposteln, Kanzel.jpg
- File:Hamburg-Lurup, Kirche Zu den Zwölf Aposteln, Taufbecken (2).jpg
- File:Marcussen Orgel der Kirche "Zu den 12 Aposteln", Hamburg-Lurup.jpg
Martin Sg. (talk) 18:10, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:30, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
FAN fiction, not real emblem of Slovak National Party. ThecentreCZ (talk) 18:54, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 07:31, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
FAN fiction, not real flag of Slovak National Party. ThecentreCZ (talk) 18:54, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 07:31, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
BASURA FEA OrlandoR503 (talk) 13:20, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy keep COM:INUSE. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:15, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
Ya Nio Me Sirve Para Nada OrlandoR503 (talk) 17:28, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 11:44, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
No Lo necesito OrlandoR503 (talk) 17:26, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: Still in use. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:29, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
Es Basura X2 OrlandoR503 (talk) 17:09, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy keep Kept before, still in use, no specific reason for deletion ("it's garbage") -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:38, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 23:14, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
No Me Sirve BORRENLO OrlandoR503 (talk) 15:36, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
- Algunos usuarios tampoco sirven mucho pero soportamos nomás. 186.174.242.149 16:08, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per previous; nominator reblocked for 1 month. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:35, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Es Pura Basura OrlandoR503 (talk) 20:33, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy keep and time to block this user again. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:18, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 07:32, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
FDFGHJKL OrlandoR503 (talk) 01:18, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy keep COM:INUSE. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:38, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
Ya No Me Sirve OrlandoR503 (talk) 17:27, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
Comment: A 216 px high flag GIF is always dead giveaway that an image was nabbed from FotW-ws: In this case, it’s from its page sv-un-03.html
, a 2014 image by Fred Drews. Of course, Fred cannot claim copyright over this image, but neither can Orlando, and it’s Fred’s pixels we’re looking at. (Not fully correct, either, as this 3:5 flag should be 360×216 px for an exact match.) I’ll edit the file page for proper source. As for this absurd D.R., keep, of course. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 20:49, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
- Also, stripes should be 72+72+72 px high, not 73+72+71, and a 4-pen palette is enough; will correct. (Sorry, Fred!) -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 20:53, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
- Keep per @Tuvalkin. --Ooligan (talk) 21:38, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 21:20, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
No Lo Necesito OrlandoR503 (talk) 17:25, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
- Do q necessitas é dum ganda banhammer-azo, pá. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 09:33, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: Still in use. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:30, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
Es Basura OrlandoR503 (talk) 17:08, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. Also, looks like the «last warning» went unheeded. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 20:27, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:17, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
No Me Gusta, No Me Sirve OrlandoR503 (talk) 15:35, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per previous; nominator reblocked for a month. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:34, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Es Pura Basura X2 OrlandoR503 (talk) 20:34, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 07:32, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
Wrong license: most likely an AI image Siradan (talk) 20:48, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 20:58, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
Likely copyrighted content as the source site does not state any evidence implying that the image is under Creative Commons license. YuhakGuardian (talk) 15:57, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:17, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 04:18, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ✗plicit 05:55, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Music album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 17:15, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 05:54, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Low quality image that looks like a photograph of a television screen, which would likely be copyrighted if so. Belbury (talk) 19:02, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nominator. Contributers2020Talk to me here! 04:50, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 05:54, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Awesome Aasim as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: While Bitcoin is open source, any messages that are hidden inside of individual blocks may still be protected by copyright.
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion. -- Túrelio (talk) 10:19, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
- Comment @Túrelio: What exactly is the copyright violation here? (I also asked you this question on your talk page and you didn't respond, other than saying it was "borderline." Is it the hex numbers? Or the text? It is well known that Satoshi Nakamoto released bitcoin under open source. This DR is not in relation to any other blocks it is limited to the genesis block, and the data in this block was put there by Satoshi Nakamoto, and is of significant historical importance. Jtbobwaysf (talk) 19:46, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
- You are addressing the wrong person (I will not decide this DR, as I have opened it) and wrong issues ("historical importance" is irrelevant for copyright). You should provide arguments to refute the above presented rationale by the original nominator. --Túrelio (talk) 20:26, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
- Apologize for my confusion about who nominated, etc. Yes, indeed historical significance is not the argument. This DR is flawed as the nominator refers to messages hidden in "blocks," using the plural. This plurality is significant in that the genesis block is different than all other blocks, as it was the only block that was not mined, rather it was created (aka genesis) by Satoshi. While this is of course nuanced, it is factual and integral to understanding. While other mined blocks could indeed theoretically have something copyrighted in it that didn't have the appropriate release to be included here, it is however well known that Satoshi did release all his work product to open source. Again as this genesis block was not mined, rather it was created by Satoshi, it is thus open source like the whitepaper, the software, the logo, etc. It is inappropriate to discuss or theorize what might happen in other mined blocks that we dont know for certain who mined (created) them or what the release might have been. But in this case of this block, and only this block, we know it was not mined, and was in fact created by Satoshi with his message in it, and all content that he placed in it is certainly covered under his releases. Jtbobwaysf (talk) 20:51, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
- IMO, the most important question to be answered here is: does the message (and eventually the way it was produced) reach Threshold of originality in the country of origin and in the U.S.? If no, case can be closed (as there is nothing copyrightable). If yes, 2nd question to be answered: would this string of meaningful characters (text) surely be included in the open/free/whatever license under which bitcoin was released? --Túrelio (talk) 21:15, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
- Assuming yes, then of the first block would by definition be included in satoshi's releases, as it was solely his work. Subsequent blocks would not solely be Satoshi's work. Satoshi made numerous disclaimers releasing all of his work to public domain and naturally the first block would be included in that, it would be contrary to common sense that Satoshi's releases excluded the first block. Jtbobwaysf (talk) 20:31, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
- The genesis block is in the source code in a test suite licensed under MIT 66.31.211.75 05:15, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- IMO, the most important question to be answered here is: does the message (and eventually the way it was produced) reach Threshold of originality in the country of origin and in the U.S.? If no, case can be closed (as there is nothing copyrightable). If yes, 2nd question to be answered: would this string of meaningful characters (text) surely be included in the open/free/whatever license under which bitcoin was released? --Túrelio (talk) 21:15, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
- Apologize for my confusion about who nominated, etc. Yes, indeed historical significance is not the argument. This DR is flawed as the nominator refers to messages hidden in "blocks," using the plural. This plurality is significant in that the genesis block is different than all other blocks, as it was the only block that was not mined, rather it was created (aka genesis) by Satoshi. While this is of course nuanced, it is factual and integral to understanding. While other mined blocks could indeed theoretically have something copyrighted in it that didn't have the appropriate release to be included here, it is however well known that Satoshi did release all his work product to open source. Again as this genesis block was not mined, rather it was created by Satoshi, it is thus open source like the whitepaper, the software, the logo, etc. It is inappropriate to discuss or theorize what might happen in other mined blocks that we dont know for certain who mined (created) them or what the release might have been. But in this case of this block, and only this block, we know it was not mined, and was in fact created by Satoshi with his message in it, and all content that he placed in it is certainly covered under his releases. Jtbobwaysf (talk) 20:51, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
- You are addressing the wrong person (I will not decide this DR, as I have opened it) and wrong issues ("historical importance" is irrelevant for copyright). You should provide arguments to refute the above presented rationale by the original nominator. --Túrelio (talk) 20:26, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
- Comment: Perhaps this should be tagged public domain/MIT license instead, depending on what license the original author released the work under? Also, as some other people mentioned here, the amount of the copyrighted work used from The Times is trivial and would likely not be considered a violation under US copyright law (which I assume to be the country of origin for this work). As further justification, we have brand logos hosted here on Commons because trivial text and simple geometric shapes are common property and not protected under copyright. --ShyAlpaca482 (talk) 23:30, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep: As per my rationale in my comment above. --ShyAlpaca482 (talk) 23:31, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
- Comment: The only legible text in the block's message is the title and date of the news article by The Times. I don't think article titles fall under Copyvio. Enivid (talk) 17:07, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
- Article title only, extremely unlikely to be a copyvio. The first block was released with Bitcoin, which is under the MIT licence; the blockchain data itself could have copyrighted works inserted into it, but the chain itself is unlikely to be copyrightable, as a machine-generated assemblage of data. This very first block would be MIT-licenced at most restrictive - David Gerard (talk) 18:34, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, change from "own work released under CC license" to "released under MIT license". ShyAlpaca482 nailed it in their comment above. --Guy Macon (talk) 15:44, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. The Times headline is fair use, the genesis block data is fair use. Cagliost (talk) 08:34, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- @Cagliost: Note that fair use is generally not accepted on Commons. However, the main argument in favor of keeping the image here is that all the data in the image is either freely licensed (under the MIT license) or not copyrightable (perhaps because it falls below COM:TOO). --ShyAlpaca482 (talk) 13:27, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Can this deletion request now be closed? Cagliost (talk) 15:36, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
- @Cagliost: Good to know: deletion requests are closed by admins. When an admin reviews this deletion request and decides that there is a clear community consensus, then this deletion request may be closed. --ShyAlpaca482 (talk) 14:37, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: PD-ineligible. --Yann (talk) 12:29, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Lower-quality version superseded by identical SVG version. Alhadis (talk) 00:47, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep That is not a reason for deletion, see COM:Dupe PaterMcFly (talk) 10:27, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- @PaterMcFly Your link says otherwise:
A bitmap (PNG, JPEG or GIF) file superseded by a vector graphic is not considered to be an exact enough duplicate. Such files ought to be listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that they may be decided upon, case by case. […] Note: if it is a work that is very similar (or identical) to another, but not an exact duplicate, it’s a redundant file, which mandates a different procedure.
The JPEG version is arguably inferior: the body text is blurry from both JPEG artefacts and what appears to be manual upscaling. The SVG version, OTOH, is crisp. Alhadis (talk) 11:48, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- @PaterMcFly Your link says otherwise:
Kept: SVG differes from JPEG version, eg. different spaces. There is no reason for a deletion;. --Wdwd (talk) 08:54, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Looks like a low-quality screenshot from a video. No proof of ownership or even evidence indicating that the file shows what has been described. Yue🌙 01:38, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:DW, missing infos about original work. --Wdwd (talk) 08:56, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP SK, there is no freedom of panorama in South Korea for buildings. This arena was completed in 1986. ✗plicit 01:39, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 08:56, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Imagem usado para página de testes. Já não serve o propósito. PVieiraCoding (talk) 02:39, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused personal photo, out of scope. --Wdwd (talk) 09:01, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Imagem usado para página de testes. Já não serve o propósito. PVieiraCoding (talk) 02:40, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused personal photo, out of scope. --Wdwd (talk) 09:01, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, multiple promotional images uploaded by presumed company rep w/ ChatGPT spam descriptions, no usage and out of scope
Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:40, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 09:02, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Imagem usado para página de testes. Já não serve o propósito. PVieiraCoding (talk) 02:40, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused personal photo, out of scope. --Wdwd (talk) 09:00, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
File:TheSaigonTimes (USX).png AnVuong1222004 (1) (talk) 04:29, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused redir/G2. --Wdwd (talk) 09:05, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
File:TheSaigonTimes (US).png AnVuong1222004 (1) (talk) 04:29, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused redir/G2. --Wdwd (talk) 09:06, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Duplicate of 3.kyū kyokushin belt.png without usages NainDeathlegs (talk) 08:54, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 09:46, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Screenshot per Metadata A1Cafel (talk) 09:04, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, I agree this file should be deleted. I made a mistake and it is a screenshot. Staggerwye (talk) 16:24, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 09:46, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Munisa Rafiqjonova (talk · contribs)
[edit]Uploads of varying sizes and quality, some have watermarks on them. Doubtful own work.
- File:Mirziyoyev Ibrat maktabida.jpg
- File:Ibrat majmuasi.jpg
- File:Ibrat maktabi.jpg
- File:Ibrat bog'i.jpg
- File:Abdumurod Tilavov.jpg
- File:Ibrat maktabi sinfxonasi.jpg
- File:IBRAT maktabi bitiruvchilari 2021.jpg
- File:Ibrat maktabi 2021-yil bitiruvchilari.jpg
- File:Ibrat muzeyi.jpg
- File:TSUULL Winter.jpg
- File:Nafis gullar.jpg
--Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 12:07, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 10:55, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Unused/test image, out of COM:SCOPE. Belbury (talk) 12:49, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 10:53, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
AI illustration of a non-existent historical event, out of COM:SCOPE. Belbury (talk) 15:18, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (also very bad quality). --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:06, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
rediredt not necessary Hattori 15 (talk) 15:05, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, req'd on day of upload. --Achim55 (talk) 19:28, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
Imagem de minha autoria, que já não serve para propósito de testes. PVieiraCoding (talk) 02:37, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ✗plicit 06:56, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
This is a duplicate document and is an outdated version. This is music for which detailed data could not be updated. Vichycombo (talk) 02:31, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
- Comment I'm not sure I follow. What is this a duplicate of, and/or how is it outdated? Omphalographer (talk) 04:02, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
- Keep This file is not a duplicate. 95.52.110.80 08:04, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
Kept: INUSE, and file this is a duplicate of was never provided. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:29, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
Copyright violation; it was taken from a Slovakia-based orchestra. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sv3yYyYczNo User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 07:50, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Note, it was nominated in March 2024 but it seemed to went under the radar. "Copyright 2001:2D8:E69D:775E:75F6:F567:15E5:86D 16:10, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
https://youtube.com/watch?v=sv3yYyYczNo&pp=ygUWU2xvdmFrIHJhZGlvIEdpYnJhbHRhcg%3D%3D — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:2d8:e69d:775e:75f6:f567:15e5:86d (talk • contribs) 19:48, 13 March 2024 (UTC) (UTC)"
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:44, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Image originates from here and is mislabeled; the user definitely took it off the internet, but the source copyright is unclear https://www.computerhistory.org/collections/catalog/102631244 Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:52, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep It is marked as a publicity photo, so I would assume it was made public at creation. I fixed the attribution and date. --RAN (talk) 04:11, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, historical photo without essential info. The so-called fix is pure speculation. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:50, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope images of plain text book covers. Possible G10 territory, considering the uploader's upload history.
The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:18, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --FitIndia Semi-retired 18:46, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Adverts / out of scope. Uploader is a single-purpose account to promote A-Style, which has repeatedly been found to be non-notable
The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:21, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep at least the logo. It is below the threshold of originality in Italy, which is quite high. The article on this company was deleted from English Wikipedia, but it still exists in 3 other languages. The company also has Lionel Messi as a spokesman. I have a hard time thinking this company is truly not notable. The photos are a bit trickier. A picture of Lionel Messi is absolutely in scope. The username of the uploader seems to suggest he is Marco Burns. This is potentially problematic because he appears in both photos (and so is not the photographer). On the other hand, the founder of the company has a decent chance to control the copyright of materials produced by said company. IronGargoyle (talk) 16:30, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
- We have several hundred photos in Category:Lionel Messi and its subcats, and many of them are much higher quality than File:Marco Bruns Lionel Messi.jpg, which is terribly lit and stilted. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 18:00, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: 2 per nomination, kept 1 per above. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:38, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Grandmaster Huon as no permission (No permission since) Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 04:54, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- No proof the logo was released via CC0 by its creators. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 04:55, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- Info The raster version of the logo (File:EleutherAI logo.png) was uploaded by en:User:Stellaathena, according to her English Wikipedia profile, she is the Executive Director of EleutherAI and uploaded the logo herself to illustrate the Wikipedia article of EleutherAI. Seems to be a legit upload. I've send an email to EleutherAI for licence clarification.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 04:59, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- Ok, cool. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 05:05, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- See Stellaathena's message: Both the symbol and the font are AI-generated and therefore not copyrightable in the US. If that's insufficient, as previously noted I am the executive director of EleutherAI. Any IP rights that we may have to it are licensed under a CC-BY license. I'll confirm via the COM:VRT guidelines later this week when I have some spare time. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 22:09, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. Likely below TOO anyway. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:43, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Grandmaster Huon as no permission (No permission since) Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 05:04, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- Info This logo was uploaded by en:User:Stellaathena, according to her English Wikipedia profile and EleutherAI staff page, she is the Executive Director of EleutherAI and uploaded the logo herself to illustrate the Wikipedia article of EleutherAI. Seems to be a legit upload. I've send an email to EleutherAI for licence clarification.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 04:59, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- @VulcanSphere: Ask her to confirm it via COM:VRT. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 05:06, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- Both the symbol and the font are AI-generated and therefore not copyrightable in the US.
- If that's insufficient, as previously noted I am the executive director of EleutherAI. Any IP rights that we may have to it are licensed under a CC-BY license.
- I'll confirm via the COM:VRT guidelines later this week when I have some spare time. Stellaathena (talk) 01:06, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
- You might want to create a main user page, either via meta-wiki or locally, because a red link in your signature might stand out and not give the best impression to others. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 22:03, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- @VulcanSphere: Ask her to confirm it via COM:VRT. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 05:06, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. Likely below TOO anyway. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:44, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
was only used once in Bosnische Ostbahn, now replaced Hattori 15 (talk) 05:26, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- Ich weiss nicht, was es da zu löschen gibt. Der Speicherplatz in Wikimedia ist gross. Und zudem wollen die Datei auch Autoren ausserhalb des europäischen Sprachraums zur Verfügung stellen. -- Plutowiki (talk) 05:39, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [I don't know what there is to delete. The storage space in Wikimedia is large. And in addition, they also want to make the file available to authors outside the European language area.]
- I would concur with Plutowiki; this doesn't seem to be a valid reason for deletion and there was no need to make this nomination. While images can be deleted for being out of scope or redundant, there are plenty of images on Commons that are not used at the moment but could be potentially useful in the future. Jc86035 (talk) 06:00, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- I have no problem with this, but as there are always big discussions over the number of icons (for whatever "reason") - i just thought, it would be redundant. And it was only used once worldwide, now nowhere.
- BTW, stopping points on bridges are very, very seldom ;)... Hattori 15 (talk) 07:04, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Hattori 15: Where are you seeing these "big discussions over the number of icons"? I've never seen anything like that. Is this something specific to German Wikipedia's processes? Jc86035 (talk) 06:07, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, that seem's to be a german problem - there are long und wide "discussions" over this issue and which symbols are allowed in the offical catalogue. But when i navigate through all the icons here, i can see another world ;)...
- So let it be where it is - maybe somebody finds it once again, allthough it was made for a very specific usage (and was not quite fitting in it's place compared with the real world, so i replaced it). Hattori 15 (talk) 06:22, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Hattori 15: Where are you seeing these "big discussions over the number of icons"? I've never seen anything like that. Is this something specific to German Wikipedia's processes? Jc86035 (talk) 06:07, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. There are many, many "unused" icons. However, one never knows when another editor is going to need a particular variation, so when I create a new icon I often upload other versions "just in case". Useddenim (talk) 20:05, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:46, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
was only used once in Bosnische Ostbahn, now replaced Hattori 15 (talk) 05:26, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- Ich weiss nicht, was es da zu löschen gibt. Der Speicherplatz in Wikimedia ist gross. Und zudem wollen die Datei auch Autoren ausserhalb des europäischen Sprachraums zur Verfügung stellen. -- Plutowiki (talk) 05:40, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- Nachdem die Datei WELTWEIT nur einmal verwendet wurde, sehe ich denn Bedarf da nicht so groß ;) - aber mir ist es im Prinzip egal, das sollte kein Angriff sein... Hattori 15 (talk) 06:57, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:47, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
This image meets originality standards for copyrighted logos Fumikas Sagisavas (talk) 05:38, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:48, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
From CNN Indonesia, copyrighted voice Urang Kamang (talk) 06:32, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:49, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
This screenshot does not appear on the given source. Leoboudv (talk) 07:05, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Leoboudv, mistake of mine, fixed the video code (the title of the video and other data were already correct), the source is this one. The wrong link belonged to another video from which I had captured this screenshot, evidently I left the tab open and got confused. Cavarrone (talk) 07:19, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep the image. Source found and image reviewed. --Leoboudv (talk) 07:22, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: resolved. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:50, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Le fichier aurait été déposé par le "propriétaire", mais rien ne prouve que c'est bien lui. LeCharybde (talk) 08:36, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:51, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
unused files. seems to be about a specific kind of japanese fortune telling called "運命波学". unclear educational value. unclear copyright.
- File:Rizumu5.jpg
- File:Aishou2.jpg
- File:Aishou1.jpg
- File:Namigakulogo5.jpg
- File:Kishitunonami.jpg
- File:Rizumu12.jpg
- File:Rokugyou.jpg
- File:Umare.jpg
- File:Rizumu.jpg
- File:6points.jpg
RZuo (talk) 11:01, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- uploader appeared to have contributed to a japanese article 運命波学 which was deleted https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E7%89%B9%E5%88%A5:%E6%8A%95%E7%A8%BF%E8%A8%98%E9%8C%B2/%E7%8C%AB%E5%AF%BA . RZuo (talk) 11:02, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:53, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Images of text, information already included in en:Xiaomi_Mi_A1#Release Pieceofmetalwork (talk) 11:21, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:54, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Geen vrijgave, zie hier. Thieu1972 (talk) 13:07, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:56, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
random out of scope screenshot, no description, no use Nutshinou Talk! 14:42, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:57, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Promotional and spam content. See block reason at enwiki: en:Special:Contributions/Cskaza
Nutshinou Talk! 15:09, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:57, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Controversial rationale, no evidence of public domain. 188.123.231.46 15:37, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Historical photo, missing essential info: original author, source, date, and permission. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:58, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
It looks like an advertisement. It has 0 usages, the user has only one file uploaded - this one. It googles as a Ha Giang tourist agency Атаман Павлюк (talk) 16:01, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:58, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Unusable Tourist shot Berthold Werner (talk) 16:12, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:59, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Unusable Tourist shot from Flickr Berthold Werner (talk) 16:12, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:59, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Unusable Tourist shot from Flickr Berthold Werner (talk) 16:13, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:59, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
East Ayrshire Council images
[edit]I'm not sure that these images are licenced under OGL. The council's website suggests they aren't and the metadata on three of the four states that the council isn't even the copyright holder of the images. Stevie fae Scotland (talk) 16:11, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:59, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Because it is totally blurry MRSexton (talk) 16:43, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Not only is this a fairly low-quality photo, but it's unidentifiable. The location in the file information is clearly incorrect (it points to the middle of San Francisco), and the image title is no help either. Omphalographer (talk) 20:18, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:00, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Previously published here: https://utsports.com/news/2022/5/2/soccer-what-they-re-saying-about-head-coach-joe-kirt.aspx WikiDan61 (talk) 17:02, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:00, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
A 2016 photo is extremely unlikely of someone who died in 1980. Image description offers no further clues (is an out of context line), and this all makes claims of own work highly dubious. Eddie891 (talk) 17:23, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:01, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
not useful, such as many mass-uploads from social media (uploaded towarda WM Commons just because of their free license). Mateus2019 (talk) 17:28, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- Agree No clue about who this is, looks like a personal photo. It is OK to upload from Flickr, but please be selective. JopkeB (talk) 17:31, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:01, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Given the photo was shot in 2001 amidst the Hungarian floodings, it is ulikely that this file was either released under CC or alike license or that it is already in public domain per {{PD-Hungary}} A09 (talk) 18:50, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- Look here, this is a flood in Ukraine that is happening in a Hungarian village on the banks of the Tisza. I couldn't simply choose whether the photo is in the public domain. If you like to, you can set it to a different license or public domain that corrupt. TarMilán (talk) 19:00, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- Seems like you misunderstood how licensing works. It's not a question of how we would set the license, but wether if the license is allowed on this project (so free licenses or public domain, no fair use). So far it looks like the image is fully copyrighted. A09 (talk) 21:20, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:02, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: plain text. Printout of uz:Gaz emboliyasi. Omphalographer (talk) 18:56, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. A PDF copy of an old version of a Wikipedia article is unneeded on Commons (outside of COM:SCOPE). Marbletan (talk) 17:02, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:02, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo. Certainly above TOO. RodRabelo7 (talk) 19:17, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:03, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
The subject of the photograph claims it is his own work, while also saying that it was part of a photo shoot for the Creative Playthings catalog. Copyright belongs to the photographer or to Creative Playthings. gobonobo + c 19:18, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:03, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
out of scope, and unused Enyavar (talk) 19:18, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:04, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Low quality (JPG) image. Alfa-ketosav (talk) 19:20, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:04, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Unlikely to be uploader’s own work. RodRabelo7 (talk) 20:18, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, screengrab. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:06, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
not "own work / tictoc screenshot / CopyVio Enyavar (talk) 20:30, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:05, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Blatant copyright violation given the watermark and footer on the image. Sunnya343 (talk) 20:49, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:06, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Blatant copyright violation given the footer on the image. Sunnya343 (talk) 20:50, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:06, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Private / self-promoting images, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Uploader account is globally locked.
- File:Logo ea semmuso ea Glo.jpg
- File:Goli Denis Cela rakhoebo.jpg
- File:Guido Barbieri -ralitebele.jpg
- File:Andrea Giberti (sebapadi).jpg
- File:Eterno - sebini sa Mataliana.jpg
Habertix (talk) 21:16, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:07, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dr.Rajesh K Chauhan (talk · contribs)
[edit]Possible copyvio: The model is marked as the author
CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:15, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Delete Falls under CSD F1 & F10. --iMahesh (talk) 13:46, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:07, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
This is not A. polyphemus. This is A. luna, the luna moth. They look alike but are easily distinguished by close examination. 2806:2A0:1442:3E3A:3A:CD65:12DA:8FF 22:24, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy keep Not a valid reason to delete the photo! COM:INUSE in many articles. If you're sure it's A. luna, just change the file description, request a filename change and then work on changing which articles use the photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:20, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
- Change the description and keep. --Zenwort (talk) 14:28, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, in use. Use {{Rename}} instead and change description. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:09, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
No VRT, No Permission, Uploader looks like a fan's club Sriveenkat (talk) 23:50, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:11, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Because it is Press photo, Random photo from internet grendel|khan 04:16, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
- evidence? --Zenwort (talk) 14:05, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- It's used on the subject's LinkedIn profile, it looks like a press photo, and there's no camera information in the EXIF for being "own work". Why would you think it's not a random photo from the Internet? grendel|khan 14:34, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:12, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
No proper sourcing/copyright information is provided for this historical photograph and the uploader says it is his own work. Without more supportive information, the file should be deleted. Adavidb (talk) 15:10, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. Obviously public domain image from the mid 1800s. IronGargoyle (talk) 16:08, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: PD-old-assumed. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:13, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Missed title of gallery name RuinDig (talk) 09:55, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by Krd. --Kadı Message 13:16, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Unfortunately there's no FOP in Italy and the architect of this building, Pier Luigi Nervi, died in 1979. So these images are copyrighted until at least 2050 See Deletion requests/Files in Category:Aula Paolo VI Bahnmoeller (talk) 12:57, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep But the copyrighted building is not the main subject of the image. PaterMcFly (talk) 12:02, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Already requested for deletion here only 5 months ago and kept for de minimis (and the fact that that roof alone seen from above doesn't really seem above ToO), I don't see the point of requesting it for deletion again after such a short time.--Friniate (talk) 13:08, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep as de minimus. Queen of Hearts ❤️ (she/they/ella/elle) 03:24, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Gestumblindi (talk) 15:55, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Unfortunately there's no FOP in Italy and the architect of this building, Pier Luigi Nervi, died in 1979. So these images are copyrighted until at least 2050 See Deletion requests/Files in Category:Aula Paolo VI Bahnmoeller (talk) 12:56, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Already requested for deletion here only 5 months ago and kept for de minimis (and the fact that that roof alone seen from above doesn't really seem above ToO), I don't see the point of requesting it for deletion again after such a short time.--Friniate (talk) 13:07, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep per Friniate; de minimus. Queen of Hearts ❤️ (she/they/ella/elle) 03:24, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
But my almost identical image (the platform on top St. Peter is rather small) was deleted for the same reason. --Bahnmoeller (talk) 17:23, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- You can ask for undeletion here. Friniate (talk) 09:59, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Captain-tucker (talk) 23:53, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Unfortunately there's no FOP in Italy and the architect of this building, Pier Luigi Nervi, died in 1979. So these images are copyrighted until at least 2050 See Deletion requests/Files in Category:Aula Paolo VI Bahnmoeller (talk) 12:58, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Already requested for deletion here only 5 months ago and kept for de minimis (and the fact that that roof alone seen from above doesn't really seem above ToO), I don't see the point of requesting it for deletion again after such a short time.--Friniate (talk) 13:07, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep de minimus. Queen of Hearts ❤️ (she/they/ella/elle) 03:26, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Captain-tucker (talk) 23:54, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
The artwork is likely copyrighted Nutshinou Talk! 16:27, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 23:56, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Файл из VK, лицензия не подтверждена -- Tomasina (talk) 01:37, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 08:04, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
The arrangements of colors in the letters can give it artistic value that renders it above COM:TOO Japan, even with the clover removed. Maybe make each letter have one color only. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 04:21, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 08:05, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
The character model, the backdrop, the comment text and the profile pictures may be copyrighted. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 04:37, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. The profile pictures are de minimis, and the license presumably covers the model, background, and text. Absent any counterindications, we should assume that the license is legitimate in rights and scope and covers the entirety of the video (as stated). TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 11:14, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Keep baseless Dronebogus (talk) 14:16, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Per TE(æ)A,ea. SCP-2000 03:55, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — billinghurst sDrewth 08:06, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Same per here. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 04:38, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. The profile pictures are de minimis, and the license presumably covers the model, background, and text. Absent any counterindications, we should assume that the license is legitimate in rights and scope and covers the entirety of the video (as stated). TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 11:14, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — billinghurst sDrewth 08:10, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Remove the heart/bow string, as it may have some artistic value that can be above COM:TOO Japan. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 04:39, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Replaced with wordmark. Revdel if the previous logo is above TOO.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:19, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep original per COM:TOO Japan. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:00, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Altering the logo makes it not the logo. As far as I'm concerned, it's no longer in scope once it's altered like this, because it loses its educational value. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:44, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
- The file is in use now. SCP-2000 16:20, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — billinghurst sDrewth 08:17, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Splatters and brushstrokes may be above COM:TOO Japan. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 05:00, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Replaced with simplified version. Revdel if the previous logo is above TOO.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:15, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep, all potential TOO issues have been rectified. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 05:04, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Altering the logo makes it not the logo. As far as I'm concerned, it's no longer in scope once it's altered like this, because it loses its educational value. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:43, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
- This is the simplified version of the Pokémon Go logo, yet it is kept, because it is a free alternative to the complex version of the logo which is not allowed on Commons. I think the modified version of this logo is a good alternative that can be used on projects which don't have an exemption policy like the English Wikipedia for example. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 20:26, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — billinghurst sDrewth 08:18, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Bullet holes may be above COM:TOO Japan, clean them up. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 05:01, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Replaced with simplified version. Revdel if the previous logo is above TOO.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:16, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Altering the logo makes it not the logo. As far as I'm concerned, it's no longer in scope once it's altered like this, because it loses its educational value. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:42, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — billinghurst sDrewth 08:18, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Shooting star probably above TOO. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 05:01, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Replaced with wordmark. Revdel if the previous logo is above TOO.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:16, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Altering the logo makes it not the logo. As far as I'm concerned, it's no longer in scope once it's altered like this, because it loses its educational value. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:42, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — billinghurst sDrewth 08:19, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
The arrangements of colors in each letter may have artistic value that puts it above COM:TOO Japan. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 05:13, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Replaced with monochrome version. Revdel if the previous logo is above TOO.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:17, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep original per COM:TOO Japan. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:03, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Altering the logo makes it not the logo. As far as I'm concerned, it's no longer in scope once it's altered like this, because it loses its educational value. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:46, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. The original with colour could have been kept too, as artistic lettering is not considered under copyright protection in Japan as per COM:TOO Japan's examples. See similar, relevant discussion. Nacaru (talk) 12:09, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — billinghurst sDrewth 08:19, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Grandmaster Huon as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: delete only previous revision, as stylized chainsaw is above COM:TOO. - The simplified wordmark isn't accurate. Better to axe it and let local projects use the actual logo if they care to. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:29, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep, at least it it retains the essential parts of the logo, which is the text. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 04:42, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep the current version, Delete the previous version. 207.241.245.200 14:20, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. It's only the logo if it includes the chainsaw. So one's a copyvio, one fails scope. Andy Dingley (talk) 14:37, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
- The wordmark is also acceptable. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 15:14, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Altering the logo makes it not the logo. As far as I'm concerned, it's no longer in scope once it's altered like this, because it loses its educational value. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:47, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: in use; no valid reason for deletion. — billinghurst sDrewth 08:32, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Grandmaster Huon as Logo - Borderline - Discuss? The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:46, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep, new logo only, TOO issues have now been rectified. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 04:41, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
- If the original is OK, keep it. I don't know if it is. In this case, if it isn't, the edited version might be of some value. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:06, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Altering the logo makes it not the logo. As far as I'm concerned, it's no longer in scope once it's altered like this, because it loses its educational value. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:48, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: in use; no valid reason for deletion. — billinghurst sDrewth 08:32, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by DaxServer as no permission (No permission since)
The logo is relatively simple... maybe below ToO?
Also affected:
- File:Indian National Lok Dal Flag Official.png
- File:Indian National Lok Dal Flag.png
- File:Logo - Indian National Lok Dal.png
- File:Logo-Indian National Lok Dal.png
- File:Logo-Indian National Lok Dal.png.
Thanks Ruthven (msg) 08:37, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: below TOO; no valid reason for deletion. — billinghurst sDrewth 08:34, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:2023-yildan esdalik suratlar
[edit]Seems a pretty clear copvio of the image on the wall. No relevant Freedom of Panorama in Uzbekistan.
- File:Alpasli. Botir Zokirov portreti 01.jpg
- File:Alpasli. Botir Zokirov portreti 02.jpg
- File:Alpasli. Botir Zokirov portreti 03.jpg
- File:Alpasli. Botir Zokirov portreti 04.jpg
- File:Alpasli. Botir Zokirov portreti 05.jpg
- File:Alpasli. Botir Zokirov portreti 06.jpg
Jmabel ! talk 01:20, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: by Infrogmation per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Alpasli suratlari. Ruthven (msg) 08:23, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:2023-yildan esdalik suratlar
[edit]I can't see how these derivative works could fail to be copyright violations..
- File:2023-yilgi esdalik suratlar 11.jpg
- File:Esdalik Suratlar 28 (Taşkent Türk ilkokulu).jpg
- File:Esdalik Suratlar 29 (Taşkent Türk ilkokulu).jpg
- File:Esdalik Suratlar 30 (Taşkent Türk ilkokulu).jpg
- File:Ganira Pashayeva kitobi.jpg
Jmabel ! talk 10:36, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- Though there is the possibility on the one that is basically a book cover that the photo on the cover might itself be in the public domain. That would have to be demonstrated, of course. - Jmabel ! talk 10:38, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: deriviative works; copyvio; per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 08:35, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Probable copyvios given COM:ANV#Asbch.
- File:Heckansicht Deutsches Modell.jpg
- File:Mazda 6 GH 2.5.jpg
- File:S51-1C mit Unterzugstreben.jpg
- File:Simson S50 B & S51 1-C.jpg
- File:Ernennungsurkunde zum Regierungsinspektoranwärter auf Widerruf.png
- File:Ragetrack logo neu.jpg
- File:Ragetrack logo.jpg
- File:Notarielle Urkunde.png
- File:Gründungsurkunde Aggertal-Gymnasium (1964).jpg
- File:Prüfbescheinigung BF17.png
- File:Tresor One Dashboard.png
- File:T1 logo white.svg
- File:Maincubes logo.png
- File:Asbach GmbH Logo.png
- File:Luma logo.png
- File:Beispiel Grafana Dashboard .png
- File:Bundesverdienstkreuz am Bande.jpg
- File:Aufenthaltsberechtigung und Ausreisevisum der DDR.jpg
- File:Plesk.png
— 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 10:45, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- The certificates need to be relicensed as German government decrees, thus free. Their blank specimens will all have been part of a published decree defining their form. Adding names an dates are TOO. --Zenwort (talk) 13:35, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/Vandalism/Archive_21#Asbch per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 08:38, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Ponieważ nikogo nie interesuje kabanos wikipedzistt Novic84 (talk) 10:55, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- Niedokładnie rozumiem nieudolne zdanie powyżej, ale zapytam: na podstawie jakich badań doszedłeś do wniosku, że nikogo nie interesuje "kabanos"? Krótki wgląd w sytuację wskazuje, że "kabanos" ma 21 wersji językowych w Wikipedii, co kłóci się ze słowem "nikt"... MOs810 (talk) 17:23, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: no cler educational value; personal photo; per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 08:40, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
no source no author no permission used for promo on nl-wiki Hoyanova (talk) 14:09, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 08:41, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
no source no metadata no author no permission used for promo on nl-wiki Hoyanova (talk) 14:09, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 08:41, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Adam Bowbelski died in 1968, so not public domain yet. Yann (talk) 14:21, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 08:41, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
I took this photo myself & uploaded it, but the investigative reporter portrayed on it asked me today to delete it since she is in a war zone right now and often working undercover in a smiliar attire (unlike other photos of her online), so this is really a very urgent request out of concern for her security! RomanDeckert (talk) 14:41, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- RomanDeckert, these deletion requests usually take quite a while, and moreover, photos COM:INUSE are not supposed to be deleted, per policy, if they are properly licensed, etc. You might have luck if you contacted COM:VRT or posted something to the Commons:Administrators' noticeboard (I guess this would fall under "Other"). -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:21, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:INUSE needs to sit side by side with Commons:Deletion_policy#Photographs of identifiable people and the courtesy section. Retaining a photo at the risk of their personal harm comes to a human rights issue. — billinghurst sDrewth 08:49, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Jimmy Neutron
[edit]Violation of COM:FOP US. Copyrighted character artwork. Could be reasonably blurred for the first file, not sure about the second.
- File:Jimmy Neutron Nicktoon Blast show building.jpg
- File:Universal Studios, Orlando - panoramio (31).jpg
(Oinkers42) (talk) 16:07, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 08:49, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
possible copyvio (c) Jesco Denzel M2k~dewiki (talk) 16:35, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- Jesco Denzel hat dieses Foto (und andere) für mich in meinem Auftrag und auf meine Rechnung angefertigt und mir die Lizenz zur Verwendung erteilt Orchelderfeine (talk) 18:19, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
- please provide OTRS ticket. --Zenwort (talk) 14:12, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: @Orchelderfeine: there is no evidence that a Com:VRT has been received; if you are able to get a VRT, then please follow the undeletion request procedure. per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 08:51, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
This promotional photo is copyighted as it was published in 1994, so too recent for copyright to have expired. Secondly, since it was published after March 1, 1989, the {{PD-US-1978-1989}} terms do not apply. Such as a visual copyright notice, and registration after 5 years. These were no longer required for published works such as promo photos. Lastly the license tag is for works published before 1929. PascalHD (talk) 17:17, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 08:56, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation; artist Siegfried Assmann died in 2021; no freedom of panorama. Martin Sg. (talk) 18:06, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 08:56, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Copyright violation. The file description states that the image is copyrighted, but the source given is "own work". Till (talk) 18:34, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 08:57, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Copyright violation. The file description states that the image is copyrighted, but the source given is "own work". Till (talk) 18:35, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 08:58, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Possible Flickrwashing, the Flickr source account only contains four images, all uploaded today. Belbury (talk) 19:04, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Parece que no lo coloqué con la licencia correcta desde Flick a Commons. Bilonio (talk) 19:19, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Comment This more looks like a case of someone making images of themselves available through FLICKR then pushing them here. So more likely to be promotional rather than flickrwashing. More likely a means to avoid going through VRT. I don't see a clear copyright violation here. — billinghurst sDrewth 03:02, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
- The uploader's talk page lists around 50 deletions of photos of other people, possibly all Dominican Republic politicians, and there's a final warning for copyvios. It seems unlikely that this user has been Lizamavel Collado all along. Belbury (talk) 09:00, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry for my inexperience in Commos. It is true that I had many photographs to be deleted and I preferred to stop uploading them because I don't quite understand the licenses that Wikipedia accepts.
- As for the origin of the photograph, as soon as articles created by me, I have sent some emails requesting the photographs with the share-alike attribution. If you want, you can search for Lizamavel Collado on social networks and if you manage to contact her, ask her if she uploaded the photographs of her to Flick. She did it herself, it's her account. If I were doing what you say, then all my articles would already have photographs. I cannot upload images to Flick that I do not have the license for. On this side I consider myself an honest Wikipedian. If the image does not comply or if my explanation does not convince you, I agree with it being deleted and I would not put photos on the articles again, it seems that I am not given that, but I would like to learn.
- From the bottom of my heart, have a happy day! Bilonio (talk) 02:24, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — billinghurst sDrewth 09:00, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by A09 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: taken from https://www.tiktok.com/@cumarxuseen221 Yann (talk) 19:44, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 09:01, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
This image has strange coloring. Would it be possible to upload the original without the odd yellow color wash? Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:51, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: In use. No valid reason for deletion. --Amitie 10g (talk) 04:16, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
- If it's an original photo from life, those colors weren't there. It's possibly reflection from a cover at an exhibit, or an artefact of a bad upload, shine from a magazine page, anything is possible. It's a brand new image and we have the opportunity to get it fixed soon after upload. Also please read COM:L, we have no valid metadata on a photo claimed as recent. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:21, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
Kept: as per Amitie 10g. --Yann (talk) 11:37, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Johnj1995 as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.noovo.ca/emissions/expedition-extreme Yann (talk) 19:46, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: source of image identified and would appear to be copyvio. — billinghurst sDrewth 09:06, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Logos, so COM:DW. User with a bad history.
- File:Logo of the Freedom and Dignity People's Party.png
- File:Logo of the United People's Party.png
- File:Bulgaria of labor and reason.jpg
- File:Radio Bosilegrad logo.png
- File:Logo of political party Bulgarian National Union – New Democracy.png
Yann (talk) 19:52, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 09:07, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Hekerui as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: not own work, as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Nyolcak1.jpg Yann (talk) 19:56, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: derived work with images of unidentified origin and copyright; per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 09:09, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Found here at https://www.alamy.com/stock-photo-j-robert-oppenheimer-1904-1967-american-theoretical-physicist-and-57345122.html. Unlikely to be 'Own Work' of uploader. PascalHD (talk) 16:39, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- Info Accroding to this website, the photo was taken by Eddie Adams in 1963. Not sure if it's in public domain due to lack of a copyright notice or subsequent renewal. 0x0a (talk) 16:59, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
- I'll have to see if I can find an initial instance of publication without a notice / renewal. PascalHD (talk) 17:21, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
Comment numbers of other places have that or a similar version from a series of photographs. Definitely not user's image, so we are going to need someone to guess that it is okay, or delete based on PCP. — billinghurst sDrewth 08:55, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and discussion, no evidence this is in PD, deleted per COM:PRP. --Ellywa (talk) 18:23, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Derivative works of non free content.
- File:IMG Söst.jpg
- File:IMGHotChip.jpg
- File:Graffiti an Bahnunterführung.jpg
- File:IMG Parodie auf ACAB.jpg
- File:IMG Toilettensticker.jpg
- File:IMG Entchen Coolness.jpg
- File:Deep Dream Art 10.jpg
Yann (talk) 19:36, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- "Bahnunterführung" und "IMG Soest" are clearly permanently in open space, thus FOP Germany. --Zenwort (talk) 14:24, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Zenwort: Could you please add this information with {{FOP-Germany}} in the file descriptions? Thanks, Yann (talk) 19:18, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Keep File:IMG Söst.jpg and File:Graffiti an Bahnunterführung.jpg per freedom of panorama. Also keep File:IMG Entchen Coolness.jpg because it's likely that the uploader is the one that painted the stone. Delete the rest. Di (they-them) (talk) 17:49, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, deleted most, kept two in railway station. no evidece that stone was painted by photographer, therefore deleted as well. --Ellywa (talk) 18:29, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
possible copyvio - what makes it public domain in the United States? Photographer died 1955, 50 years after is 2005 so wasn't PD in New Zealand on URAA date (1996) TheLoyalOrder (talk) 02:28, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- Normally we don't consider URAA if the copyright has clearly expired in the source country, IIRC. --PaterMcFly (talk) 10:34, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- Well that disagrees with what I've read elsewhere (Commons:Hirtle chart), that would be good though. TheLoyalOrder (talk) 20:20, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- I know that it disagrees with that, but we are normally keeping images when the copyright owner has died more than 70 years ago (for European pictures/art). I don't know where the current policy is officially documented, though. PaterMcFly (talk) 15:30, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
- Well that disagrees with what I've read elsewhere (Commons:Hirtle chart), that would be good though. TheLoyalOrder (talk) 20:20, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, URAA applies. Undelete in 2032. --Abzeronow (talk) 20:03, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
The V and 3 have a bit of unique artistic value per COM:TOO Japan? (Even with the extraneous stylistic elements removed.) Make them less sharp, jagged and edged. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 04:18, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Replaced with simplified version. Revdel if the previous logo is above TOO.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:20, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete I do not think one can assemble a derivative work from a copyrighted file and then say it is not copyrighted. In addition, if this is not the original logo it is faulty imho and of no educational use and therefore out of scope. So delete on basis of these 2 reasons. Ellywa (talk) 18:22, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per Ellywa. --Abzeronow (talk) 20:04, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Victoria Niro
[edit]No proper permissions. Both images have ticket numbers, but these permissions are from depicted person, so I think they accepted mistakenly. // Відсутній коректний дозвіл. Файли мають номери дозволів, проте ці дозволи надані особою, яка зображена на фото, отже, скоріш за все, прийняті помилково.
Anatoliy 🇺🇦 (talk) 22:23, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Krd: You undeleted. — billinghurst sDrewth 09:52, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
- Requested that VRT reviews the ticket on the first file mentioned. — billinghurst sDrewth 09:14, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- Regarding File:Victoria Niro.jpg I have decided to accept the ticket after is was explicitly kept 14 days open for additional feedback from other VRT members, where one members supproted the keep. If Ahonc has a different opinion now, I'd appreciate if they'd tell me directly and/or document it in the ticket. As this hasn't happend, I see no reason to override my decision.
- File:Victoria Niro555.jpg never got it's ticket completed and shold stay deleted. --Krd 15:27, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- Requested that VRT reviews the ticket on the first file mentioned. — billinghurst sDrewth 09:14, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per Krd. --Ellywa (talk) 18:31, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
نسوننستتنينريرريريتايت 07Taha hammad (talk) 23:40, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- Comment COM:INUSE at ar:ويكيبيديا:تقارير_قاعدة_البيانات/أحدث_الملفات_العربية_على_كومنز. Apparently an 1895 work of en:Robert Talbot Kelly (1861–1934). --Rosenzweig τ 08:14, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Then we just need to fix the description tag and keep the image, as obviously PD. PaterMcFly (talk) 12:53, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
- This file appears to be a crop of File:SLATIN(1896) p561 THE KHALIFA INCITING HIS TROOPS TO ATTACK KASSALA.jpg. We also have the slightly different versions File:Fire and Sword in the sudan - a personal narrative of fighting and serving the dervishes, 1879-1895 (1898) (14590904300).jpg and File:Fire and sword in the Sudan; a personal narrative of fighting and serving the dervishes, 1879-1895. Translated by F.R. Wingate. Popular ed (1897) (14782891982).jpg. So this file could be deleted as a scaled-down duplicate. Or kept as a crop. --Rosenzweig τ 13:02, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no need to delete this version. --Ellywa (talk) 18:34, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Per the still-open discussion at Village Pump/Proposals on political restriction templates. While I oppose "nuclear-bombing" templates like Falun Gong and Nazi templates, I fully support "nuclear-bombing" templates that seem to help impress the territorial claims of all countries.
It is not the job of Wikimedia Commons to impress the governments of countries with disputed territorial claims, more so to warn Wikimedians and reusers that any reuses may violate the territorial laws of the said countries. We have a COM:General disclaimer page that already waives Commons the responsibility in such cases. It is mainly the job of individual Wikipedias to provide extensive information on territorial disputes. The users are responsible for their actions (as stated in our general disclaimer page); more so, the editors of all Wikipedias are responsible to ensure that their articles do not cross the line of fire of Indian (or even Philippine, Chinese, Taiwanese, Japanese, Vietnamese, Malay, Indonesian, or Pakistani) authorities with regards to insertion of such contentious maps in articles that may discuss territorial disputes.
Moreover, such restrictions on use of files are part of non-copyright restrictions, and we typically do not deal with such matters except in more frequent cases (which we typically respond by slapping {{Personality}} or other related templates to description pages of files).
The fate of {{Chinese boundaries}} will depend on the outcome of this template deletion request. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 22:50, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep — despite having a COM:General disclaimer, experience says that most people ignore the disclaimers at the bottom of the webpage. So specific warning templates at image descriptions are needed, especially if the warning is too serious, like border disputes and personality rights. We already have the {{Personality}} template for the personality rights warning and the generic {{De facto boundaries}} template for the border dispute warning. Maybe {{Chinese boundaries}} and {{Indian boundaries}} should be merged into {{De facto boundaries}}. Sbb1413 (he) (talk • contribs) 03:21, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Sbb1413 are we too concerned on the users' potential infringements on territorial laws of their respective countries? I don't see that such types of infringements are serious enough to warrant the need of templates. We here have ongoing territorial disputes with China regarding the islands of the South China Sea / West Philippine Sea, and there are regulations on what types of maps showing the Philippines are allowed to be distributed here. But such regulations are not the concerns of Commons, IMO (as based in the ongoing discussion on the Village Pump/Proposals to prohibit such templates). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:08, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Upon review, the assertion made by this template appears to be false. The w:Geospatial Information Regulation Bill of 2006 would have established legal penalties for "inaccurate" depictions of India's boundaries. However, this bill was withdrawn after extensive public outcry; it is not law, and, as far as I am aware, no law has the effect which is implied by this template.
- If that bill had been passed, however, this template would have been appropriate - innocent reuse of some Wikimedia images containing maps of India could have resulted in legal penalties to users in the country. The objective of these templates is not to provide information about territorial disputes; it's to warn users of specific and unusual legal risks involving the reuse of certain images. Omphalographer (talk) 22:33, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete, though appropiate instances can be replaced with {{De facto boundaries}} as a general service to our sister projects. Along with the dubious penalties described above, it is not the job of Commons to point out every single national law which may affect usage of a file. Non-copyright restriction warnings such as {{Trademark}}, {{Currency}}, and {{Personality rights}} exist because they mention restrictions that significantly affect commercial use, modification, redistribution, and other actions that copyright may also regulate, and non-experienced users frequently don't understand that these restrictions are separate from copyright, that affected files can be hosted here despite such restrictions, and that their presence doesn't release them from such restrictions. On the other hand, this template and {{Chinese boundaries}} deal with governments attempting to push a particular POV on a contentious topic with legal force. The issue is not the content of the file itself but rather the idea being expressed or implied not being in line with a state narrative, which is completely different from intellectual property or counterfeiting laws that affect the content itself or the publicity rights of an individual. We are able to host such files because Wikimedia Commons is based in the United States, a nation with a strong tradition of freedom of expression. It is true that many of Commons's reusers may live in nations that lack such freedom, but it is not the job of Commons to tell them what their government wants them to say or believe, especially when such ideas are often fundamental to the legitimacy or ideology of a ruling regime. If our sites, which are among the most visited and highly-publicized on the internet, can get blocked by governments for expressing verifiable facts which they may find inconvenient, we can assume that re-users in such jurisdictions are fully aware of the legal risk of using our content to challenge a state narrative without us having to tell them. funplussmart (talk) 19:12, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep per @Sbb1413: . Also, by retaining the template, Wikimedia Commons maintains transparency regarding the inclusion of contentious content. Users are informed about the presence of disputed boundaries and can make informed decisions regarding their usage. And to respond to @Omphalographer: I believe that (just read this somewhere; not sure) that even though making a map showing territorial discrepancies is okay, however endorsing it in any way would attack the sovereignty of the territories belonging to India and therefore would let incur legal damages upon the reuser. Also, I do not think that it doesn't hurt to provide a disclaimer to the reuser too. Thanks, Contributers2020Talk to me here! 15:19, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- A source for the assertion made would be helpful. If there is an actual tort law risk for reusers, having that sourced would be helpful in deciding whether to keep or not. Abzeronow (talk) 20:09, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Delete no need to get on the slippery slope of involving commons with internal squabbles of countries, as stated by policy mentioned above. (China templates ditto). --Zenwort (talk) 14:35, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Delete per above. Zanahary (talk) 07:43, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:52, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Yazxr (talk) 04:01, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:08, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Yazxr (talk) 04:02, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:08, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Yazxr (talk) 04:03, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:08, 14 March 2024 (UTC)