User talk:Plutowiki
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- 09:00, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
File:Ablaufdiagramm Wachsamkeitskontrolle.PNG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:SBB BDe 4-4.JPG
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:SBB BDe 4-4.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
JuTa 18:37, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
File:Goldachbrücke SBB.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Pechristener (talk) 05:18, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
BSicon
[edit]Hi, great work with all the BSicons! May I suggest that you use a text editor to generate them? Programs such as Inkscape introduce a lot of junk code that drastically increases its size and makes it unreadable. Such simple files as BSicons are better created and edited using a simple text editor, like Notepad or Notepad++; you may preview them in any modern Internet Browser. Try opening for example (tSTRa
), (tLSTR
) or (LSTR
) in such a text editor. Also, we have started collecting various samples of coding at BSicon/Icon geometry and SVG code neatness. YLSS (talk) 15:07, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Bruggwaldtunnel Schachtabstützung.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Bruggwaldtunnel Schachtabstützung.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:59, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
File:Zug bei Dubrovnik.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Herby (Vienna) (talk) 09:24, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
File:JZ 740 Travnikjpg.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Herby (Vienna) (talk) 09:30, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
File:Eisenbahnunfall von Hordorf - Lokomotive.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Quedel (talk) 09:49, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
File tagging File:Eisenbahnunfall Genthin.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Eisenbahnunfall Genthin.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Eisenbahnunfall Genthin.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Quedel (talk) 09:51, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
File:Eisenbahnunfall von Hordorf - Lokomotive.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Sanandros (talk) 18:06, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, Ronhjones (Talk) 21:30, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
File:RSG CFZm 1-3 Typenskizze.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
JuTa 01:49, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
File:RSG Ed 3-4 Typenskizze.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
JuTa 08:54, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
File:SC G2x2-2Typenskizze.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
JuTa 08:56, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
File:K.k. Südl. Staatsbahn - Engerth-Lokomotive (Briefmarke).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Ww2censor (talk) 20:41, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
File:Wilhelm Engerth - 200. Geburtstag (Briefmarke).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Ww2censor (talk) 21:02, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
File:Banja Luka-Doboj 1951.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.
|
Túrelio (talk) 08:40, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
Hi Plutowiki, einzig folgendes Kriterium käme hier in frage: "Fotographie oder Werk der angewandten Kunst, das vor dem 1. Januar 1966 veröffentlicht wurde". Aber wo ist die Evidenz dafür? In das von dir nun angefügte Forum komme ich nicht rein. --Túrelio (talk) 08:47, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
- Hier ist der Link. Als Lizenz käme auch Template:PD-Bosnia and Herzegovina in Frage. Viele Grüsse -- Plutowiki (talk) 08:59, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
- Ok. Danke. Streng genommen belegt das zwar keine Publikation der Fotos vor 1966; aber aufgrund der damaligen politischen Verhältnisse kann man wohl zurecht annehmen, dass diese Fotos aus "Propagandagründen" sofort publiziert wurden. --Túrelio (talk) 09:04, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:NStCM ABe 4-8 Le Muids.jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:NStCM ABe 4-8 Le Muids.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:NStCM ABe 4-8 Le Muids.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
And also:
Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:03, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
Flags in Liechtenstein
[edit]On official Liechtenstein commune websites I can see:
- Eschen: https://www.eschen.li/unsere-gemeinde/wappen
- Mauren: "Die Flagge der Gemeinde ist quergeteilt; die obere Hälfte in Schwarz, die untere Hälfte in Gold." http://mauren.li/wappen
- Ruggel: Horizontal flag image here: https://www.ruggell.li/files/attachments/thumbnails/resize/300x0/Flagge_Ruggell_633329662101718750.jpg
- Schaan: "Die Flagge ist gespalten von Blau-Weiss-Rot (2/5, 1/5, 2/5)." https://www.schaan.li/GemeindePolitik/Geschichte/Wappen.aspx
- Schellenberg: Wappenfahne (not Flagge) image: http://www.schellenberg.li/files/attachments/wappenfahne_633921700632510000.gif
- Triesen: Wappenbrief with horizontal flag:http://www.triesen.li/files/attachments/thumbnails/CenterMiddle/820x0/wappen-urkunde-s1s2-2000-gelb_634243194085551250_635652431262573749.jpg
- Vaduz: "Die Flagge der Gemeinde Vaduz ist quergeteilt, das obere Feld rot-weiss, das untere Feld rot. Mit der Verleihung des neuen Wappens am 25. Juli 1978 bestätigte Fürst Franz Josef II. die unveränderte Übernahme der Flagge." https://www.vaduz.li/vaduz-aktuelles/portrait/wappen-und-logo/
So there are two big issues with your proposals:
- they contradict commune sites
- they contradict some pictures here on commons see bes
Liechtenstein schaan flags 2009-08-15.jpg|Schaan "flag" (in fact vertical banner of arms with commune colours) on picture Flag of Schaan Liechtenstein-1.svg|Your Schaan flag (in fact vertical banner of commune colours) Flag_of_Schaan.svg|Flag of Schaan according to the commune website </gallery>
Best regards, --Jfblanc (talk) 20:55, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
- @Jfblanc: Hello Jfblanc
- I wrote a letter to the local government of Schaan:
- Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren
- In meiner Freizeit bin ich als Wikipedia-Autor tätig und beschäftige mich u.a. mit liechtensteinischen Themen. In diesem Zusammenhang ist die Frage nach dem Längen-Breiten-Verhältnis der Schaaner Gemeindeflagge aufgetaucht. Auf ihrer Homepage und im Schaaner Wappenreglement lassen sich dazu keine Angaben finden.
- Auf Wikimedia – der Bilderdatenbank für Wikipedia – lassen sich zwei verschiedene Schaaner Wappen finden:
- Flag of Schaan Liechtenstein-1.svg hat ein Breiten-Höhen-Verhältnis von 4 : 1 und ist hängend dargestellt
- Flag of Schaan.svg hat ein Breiten-Höhen-Verhältnis von 3 : 5 und ist liegend dargestellt.
- Benutzt die Gemeinde Schaan beide Formen dieser Flaggen oder ist nur eine Variante im Gebrauch. Vielen herzlich Dank für Ihre Auskunft.
- Ich darf an dieser Stelle noch anfügen, dass wir über das Pfingstwochenende in der Jugi Schaan eine internationale Wikipedia-Tagung durchführen. Die Ausschreibung und das Programm ist (ab morgen wieder) auf Wikipedia unter Wikipedia:300 Jahre FL zu finden.
- Freundliche Grüsse
- X.Y. (Plutowiki)
- I received this answer:
- Sehr geehrter Herr X.
- Herzlichen Dank für Ihre Anfrage - es freut mich, wenn unser Wappen bzw. unsere Flagge auf Resonanz stösst.
- In der Verleihungsurkunde des Wappens (she. Anhang) ist lediglich das Grössenverhältnis der Balken definiert. So wird es auch (hoffentlich) gehandhabt.
- Die liegende Form ist praktisch nicht in Gebrauch - weder mir noch unserem Werkmeister ist etwas bekannt, diese Form sieht für uns auch seltsam aus, da ungewohnt.
- Wir verwenden nur die hängende Form; allerdings, wie erwähnt, ohne Definition des Verhältnisses Länge:Breite. Wir verwenden in der Regel Fahnen 5*1m, ältere noch in den Massen 3*0.8 und 5*0.8 (aber immer im richtigen Verhältnis der Balken zu einander).
- Gerne schaue ich morgen in die Wikipedia. Bereits jetzt viel Erfolg und Spass an Ihrer Tagung in Schaan!
- Freundliche Grüsse
- N.M.
- Gemeinde Schaan ¦ Landstrasse 19 ¦ FL-9494 Schaan
- T +423 237 72 00 ¦ M +423 794 72 02
- n.m@schaan.li ¦ www.schaan.li
-
Flag of Schaan Liechtenstein-1.svg:
Only this form is used by the municipality Schaan. -
Flag_of_Schaan.svg:
This form is not in use. «She also looks weird to us, being unfamiliar.» -
Urkunde Wappenverleihung Schaan (Anhang)
Best regards -- Plutowiki (talk) 16:54, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
File:Wikiolo in Liechtenstein (124a).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
TheTokl (talk) 15:46, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Ruggeler Riet 482.jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:Ruggeler Riet 482.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Ruggeler Riet 482.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:07, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
@Magog the Ogre: Was soll das? Ich habe die Fotografie selbst erstellt. Das lässt sich belegen anhand der Metadaten. Ich habe weitere, an diesem Tag mit der gleichen Kamera in Liechtenstein geschossene Fotos hochgeladen. -- Plutowiki (talk) 22:10, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks!
[edit]Hello,
Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at Wikimedia Commons.
I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!
From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.
If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.
Thank you!
--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 22:05, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
An unfree Flickr license was found on File:Lokomotif BB204.jpg
[edit]
Túrelio (talk) 21:11, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Eisenbahnunfall Breitenstein.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Eisenbahnunfall Breitenstein.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
--廣九直通車 (talk) 04:27, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
Hallo Plutowiki, diese rote Kategorie wird in von dir bearbeiteten Dateien angezeigt. Was ist damit? Legst du die Kategorieseite noch an? --Leyo 22:20, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
- Danke für den Hinweis. Hab ich gemacht. Plutowiki (talk) 20:36, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
Map "Schienennetz Schweiz" (Streckennummern BAV)
[edit]Die Seite https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liste_der_bestehenden_Schweizer_Eisenbahnstrecken referenziert bisher das System der Schweizer Fahrplanfelder und deine Map https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/18/Fahrplanfelder_Schweiz.png. Nachdem es in der Schweiz seit 2018 nun endlich Streckennummern (nicht nur Fahrplanfelder) gibt (siehe https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diskussion:Liste_der_bestehenden_Schweizer_Eisenbahnstrecken), möchte ich gerne auf eine Map Schienennetz Schweiz (Streckennummern BAV) referenzieren - als Pendant zu den Fahrplanfelder Schweiz. Kannst du mir weiterhelfen oder evtl. Lust, diese Map zu erstellen? CharlieMRT (talk) 17:31, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
Error?
[edit]Hello. Are File:EBSicon STR+Z.svg, File:EBSicon STR+Za.svg & File:EBSicon STR+Ze.svg correctly named? Seems weird to be EBSicon STR
and not BSicon eSTR
--Minorax«¦talk¦» 12:18, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks. The files are renamed. -- Plutowiki (talk) 08:29, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
File:KukMB 62.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
5.173.113.30 17:20, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
File:KukMB 72.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
94.254.176.66 22:06, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
File:KukMB 52.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
94.254.176.66 22:06, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
File:Station Potoci der Steinbeisbahn.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
--Matr1x-101Pinging me doesn't hurt! {user - talk? - useless contributions} 11:35, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Franz Ferdinand at Sarajevo Station.jpg
- File:KkBB Erst-Zweitklasswagen.jpg
- File:KkBB gedeckter Güterwagen.jpg
- File:Narentabahn Unfall 1913.jpg
- File:Ostreljj.jpg
- File:Sarajevo Tram.jpg
- File:Station Ivan mit Tunnel.jpg
- File:Station Potoci der Steinbeisbahn.jpg
- File:Steinbeisbahn bei Oštrelj.jpg
- File:Steinbeisbahn Et Drvar.jpg
- File:Steinbeisbahn Oštrelj.jpg
- File:Zelenika Landungsplatz.jpg
- File:Zepca 1890.jpg
Yours sincerely, Notrealname1234 (talk) 01:00, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
Verwunderlicher Löschantrag
[edit]Hallo Plutowiki; dein Löschantrag Commons:Deletion requests/File:Dübendorf Luftaufnahme von Westen 2011.tif - ich habe das Bild gerade behalten - hat mich erstaunt, daher auch hier noch kurz der Hinweis: Du schreibst "Das Foto wurde von Anidaat hochgeladen, der für dieses Foto über keine Urheberrechte verfügt", was natürlich völlig korrekt ist, jedoch ist das Bild - wie auch Rosenzweig festgehalten hat - von der ETH unter CC BY-SA freigegeben, was im ETH-Bildarchiv so nachzulesen ist, d.h. jedermann darf es hier unter dieser Lizenz hochladen. Gestumblindi (talk) 11:41, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
File:BSicon exhWHSTaeq.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Hattori 15 (talk) 05:26, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
File:BSicon exWBRÜCKE2q+extSTReaq.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Hattori 15 (talk) 05:26, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Servus!
Obige Grafik gibt es auch in deutlich besserer Qualität: ANNO ZIA 1892, wenn auch auf etwas vergilbtem Papier...
Magst du das evt. austauschen - ein Freigabeantrag ist immer so eine langwierige Prozedur? Hattori 15 (talk) 13:39, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
File:Wallfahrtskirche St Iddaburg - Chorbild.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |