Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2024/02/03
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
|
|
Clear copyvio - image from newspaper Psubhashish (talk) 02:46, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:28, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Random penis photo, also appears to be used as advertising A1Cafel (talk) 03:09, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:29, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation https://www.theroar.com.au/2024/02/02/extraordinary-talent-and-steadfast-dedication-windies-lock-up-shamar-joseph-as-t20-leagues-circle/ WWGB (talk) 03:20, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:32, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
One more pyramid of the Louvre, No FOP in France Miniwark (talk) 10:46, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 09:43, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 03:50, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:10, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
See previous DRs A1Cafel (talk) 16:06, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:11, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
See previous DRs A1Cafel (talk) 03:26, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Re-Deleted: --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:30, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
See previous DRs A1Cafel (talk) 15:39, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Infrogmation and Túrelio. --Rosenzweig τ 16:06, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
One more pyramid of the Louvre, No FOP in France Miniwark (talk) 10:47, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 09:43, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 03:50, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:10, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
See previous DRs A1Cafel (talk) 16:06, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:10, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
See previous DRs A1Cafel (talk) 03:26, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:30, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
See previous DRs A1Cafel (talk) 15:39, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:28, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
One more pyramid of the Louvre, No FOP in France Miniwark (talk) 10:46, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 09:43, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 03:50, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
Re-deleted per nomination; same image recently deleted. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:09, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
See previous DRs A1Cafel (talk) 16:06, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:10, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
See previous DRs A1Cafel (talk) 03:26, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:30, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
See previous DRs A1Cafel (talk) 15:39, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:30, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
One more pyramid of the Louvre, No FOP in France Miniwark (talk) 10:46, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 09:43, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 03:50, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
Re-Deleted: per nomination; same image deleted earlier this month. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:08, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
See previous DRs A1Cafel (talk) 16:06, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:10, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
See previous DRs A1Cafel (talk) 03:27, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:31, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
See previous DRs A1Cafel (talk) 15:39, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:30, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused low resolution image. Kacamata! Dimmi!!! 03:05, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F3 - Minecraft. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:36, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: Unused personal photo A1Cafel (talk) 16:08, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per G10 TheImaCow (talk) 16:04, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:47, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: Unused personal photo A1Cafel (talk) 10:21, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:23, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
See previous DRs A1Cafel (talk) 03:34, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G4. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:36, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
See previous DRs A1Cafel (talk) 15:40, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Redeleted. @RenateCotass: why did you (re) upload this? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:24, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Per COM:PACKAGE A1Cafel (talk) 03:34, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F3. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:37, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
See previous DRs A1Cafel (talk) 15:51, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Redeleted, inappropriate re-upload -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:20, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 10:19, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:30, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 03:35, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G4. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:37, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
See previous DRs A1Cafel (talk) 15:51, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Redeleted, inappropriate re-upload -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:22, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 10:19, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:30, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 03:35, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G4. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:37, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
See previous DRs A1Cafel (talk) 15:51, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:21, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 10:19, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:30, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 03:35, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G4. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:37, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
See previous DRs A1Cafel (talk) 15:50, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:22, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 08:20, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:09, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 03:36, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G4. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:37, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
See previous DRs A1Cafel (talk) 15:50, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:23, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
See previous DRs A1Cafel (talk) 03:18, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per COM:CSD#G4. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 10:49, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: G4. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:06, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
No FoP in Italy, architect César Pelli died in 2019 A1Cafel (talk) 06:18, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:54, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Italy A1Cafel (talk) 03:36, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G4. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:38, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
See previous DRs A1Cafel (talk) 15:40, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:30, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Italy A1Cafel (talk) 16:11, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:21, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Italy A1Cafel (talk) 03:36, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G4. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:38, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
See previous DRs A1Cafel (talk) 15:40, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:30, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D works in Denmark A1Cafel (talk) 02:37, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:57, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D works in Denmark A1Cafel (talk) 03:37, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G4. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:38, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
See previous DRs A1Cafel (talk) 15:40, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:31, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 02:40, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:41, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 03:37, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G4. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:38, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
See previous DRs A1Cafel (talk) 15:40, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:31, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional files uploaded by company; no usage and out of scope
- File:1504181761381 Rebranding-of-ayming.jpg
- File:Ayming Logo CMYK AW SingleColour Stacked.png
- File:BPA winners.jpg
- File:3B3C8971.jpg
Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:20, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:39, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
I uploaded it to test the Commons app, in order to fix a bug with the camera Misaochan (talk) 14:18, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:26, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
i was testing wikimedia Hassanoureddine (talk) 12:26, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
- Small file (by an occasional visitor) without camera EXIF; dubious "own work". Not in scope either. As it is an F10 case + uploader request please delete this file immediately. Danke. --E4024 (talk) 18:01, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 23:37, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Test photo nominate Shalomie ☮️ (she/her/hers) •~Talk~• •Contribs• 05:30, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F3 - Minecraft. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:39, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
This appears to be made-up personal nonsense. Jmabel ! talk 06:40, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:40, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Clear copyvio; and it predates the ship taking to sea. Dicklyon (talk) 07:06, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F1. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:41, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Porn clip, "own work" doubtful, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 07:49, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F1. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:41, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Porn clip, "own work" doubtful, there is a watermark in the corner. no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 07:51, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F1. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:41, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
unused private artwork, "own work" doubtful, there is a watermark in the corner. no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 07:54, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F1. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:41, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
unused private artwork, "own work" doubtful, there is a watermark in the corner. no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 07:55, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F1. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:41, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: Unused personal photo A1Cafel (talk) 10:32, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 21:19, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: Unused personal photo A1Cafel (talk) 03:34, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:28, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Previously published at https://www.football-espana.net/2023/04/04/osasuna-manager-jagoba-arrasate-its-a-day-to-avoid-doing-strange-things, no evidence of license provided Adeletron 3030 (talk) 12:35, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (also other commercial websites 2 years earlier). --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:37, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Derivative work of a copyrighted poster B dash (talk) 03:27, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (poster is too big). --Arthur Crbz (talk) 21:21, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 15:12, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: again. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:47, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Flag of Arizona.svg. Fry1989 eh? 15:30, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unused dupe with silly title. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:48, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
no longer needed Alchemicalizing (talk) 16:10, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per prompt uploader request; no evidence of free license. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:17, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Google Street View image, uploaded in 2013 in error. Ajsmith141 (talk) 16:20, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:34, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Google Street View image, uploaded in 2013 in error. Ajsmith141 (talk) 16:21, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:34, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
peace leave me without your tree 187.190.224.79 23:01, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy keep widely used, no deletion rationale. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 00:07, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: Test or nonsense request. --Achim55 (talk) 07:44, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
TikTok screenshot is unfree A1Cafel (talk) 03:46, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Didym. --Rosenzweig τ 17:34, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
this is not own work Jim0714 (talk) 10:00, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Túrelio. --Rosenzweig τ 17:33, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Bild irrtümlicherweise doppelt hochgeladen. Korrekt ist das Bild Schweizerische Südostbahn ABe 4 4 71 im Ablieferungszustand 1959.jpg ! Transfer 2015 (talk) 17:05, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: The duplicate File:Schweizerische Südostbahn ABe 4 4 71 im Ablieferungszustand 1959.jpg was deleted and is now a redirect to this file. --Rosenzweig τ 15:55, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
possible copyvio M2k~dewiki (talk) 20:05, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy delete (so tagged); unambiguous copyvio. Source photo is at https://ga.de/region/sieg-und-rhein/sankt-augustin/birgit-fels-stellt-noch-viele-fragen_aid-42379775 and has the exact same filename, but without the logo in the upper left. Omphalographer (talk) 23:48, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Sreejithk2000. --Rosenzweig τ 15:46, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
It does not fulfill wikimedia commons project scope and is not educationally useful. OmegaMantis (talk) 01:17, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:50, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Random nude photo, nothing special, unlikely to be useful A1Cafel (talk) 03:10, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete poorly lit amateur photo Dronebogus (talk) 03:23, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:51, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:41, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:33, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:51, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:32, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy as recreation. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:44, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 03:46, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:51, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Logo seems to be above COM:TOO A1Cafel (talk) 03:48, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:51, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Unused, not clear what is it all about so unless cleared up this can't be used. Bedivere (talk) 04:02, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:56, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Unused, not clear what is it all about so unless cleared up this can't be used. Bedivere (talk) 04:03, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:56, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 04:05, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:57, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 04:06, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Comment maybe an obvious copyvio? The look of the building here suggests it is a computerized render and not a true photograph taken by the uploader. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:26, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:57, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 50 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Rwanda.
- File:Anti corruption monument 001.jpg
- File:Anti corruption monument 002.jpg
- File:Anti corruption monument 003.jpg
- File:Anti-corruption Monument of Rwanda at night.jpg
- File:Anti-corruption Monument of Rwanda during day time.jpg
- File:Anti-corruption Monument of Rwanda next to Kigali Convention Center in Kigali city in Rwanda.jpg
- File:Anti-corruption Monument.jpg
- File:IKIGANZA.jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 03:50, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:14, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
No proper source - no evidence of CC license at source The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:57, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:20, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Rwanda A1Cafel (talk) 03:52, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:20, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Rwanda A1Cafel (talk) 03:56, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:20, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Rwanda A1Cafel (talk) 04:02, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:20, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
derivative work issue Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:34, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:20, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
derivative work with unclear copyright status Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:38, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:20, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
While the photo was produced by NASA and is PD, the Frascati Manual is not PD or freely-licensed. Jaqen (talk) 12:38, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:20, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 15:00, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:21, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 15:00, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:21, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 15:01, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:21, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
strange montage, sources unknown, I hardly see any possible use for this image Denniss (talk) 15:11, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:21, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Not own work, IMDB credits "Redd Sparxx - © Spoken Images Productions". Günther Frager (talk) 15:53, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:21, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons:What Commons is not#Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:36, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:21, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons:What Commons is not#Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:38, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:21, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Screenshot from a television program. Abzeronow (talk) 17:51, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:21, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Likely COM:Flickrwashing. Günther Frager (talk) 18:01, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:21, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:47, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:22, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: From Facebook
CoffeeEngineer (talk) 09:45, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: unlikely to be own work. --Strakhov (talk) 09:03, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The painter died after 1986, and his paintings are not PD yet. Nanahuatl (talk) 22:29, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:24, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The painter died in 2013, and his paintings are not PD yet. Nanahuatl (talk) 22:42, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:24, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The painter is still alive, and his paintings are not PD yet. Nanahuatl (talk) 22:43, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:24, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The painter died in 2012, and his paintings are not PD yet. Nanahuatl (talk) 22:43, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:24, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope. Just a list of some arbitrary formulas created in Word. Jan Kameníček (talk) 22:46, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete; additionally, there are glaring spelling errors throughout the document ("eletricity", "amphere", "secound"), notational issues (word "square" used to represent 2), and a conceptual problem ("heating energy" is not distinct from "electric energy"). Omphalographer (talk) 23:42, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination & discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:24, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The painter died in 2016, and his paintings are not PD yet. Nanahuatl (talk) 22:52, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:23, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The painter died in 2022, and his paintings are not PD yet. Nanahuatl (talk) 22:53, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:23, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The painter died in 2004, and his paintings are not PD yet. Nanahuatl (talk) 22:53, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:23, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The painter died in 2023, and his paintings are not PD yet. Nanahuatl (talk) 22:54, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:23, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The painter died in 1994, and his paintings are not PD yet. Nanahuatl (talk) 23:03, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:23, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The painter died in 1997, and his paintings are not PD yet. Nanahuatl (talk) 23:06, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:23, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The painter died in 2012, and his paintings are not PD yet. Nanahuatl (talk) 23:06, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:23, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The painter died in 1976, and his paintings are not PD yet. Nanahuatl (talk) 23:06, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:23, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Irrelevant Canton Viaduct (talk) 23:48, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per uploader request, unused. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:22, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Irrelevant Canton Viaduct (talk) 23:48, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per uploader request; unused. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:18, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Irrelevant Canton Viaduct (talk) 23:48, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per uploader request; unused. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:18, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Irrelevant Canton Viaduct (talk) 23:49, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per uploader request; unused. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:19, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Irrelevant Canton Viaduct (talk) 23:49, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per uploader request; unused. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:19, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Unused image Canton Viaduct (talk) 23:53, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: In scope; properly identified and categorized; no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:20, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Unused image Canton Viaduct (talk) 23:53, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:20, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Unused image Canton Viaduct (talk) 23:55, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:21, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Unused image Canton Viaduct (talk) 23:56, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:21, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Unused image Canton Viaduct (talk) 23:56, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:22, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Unused image Canton Viaduct (talk) 23:57, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: In scope; properly identified & categorized; no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:17, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Unused image Canton Viaduct (talk) 23:58, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: in use in multiple projects (and unused by itself would not necessitate deletion). --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:15, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Source site says "All Rights Reserved." Even though the coin itself is PD this seems to be a non-free derivative work. funplussmart (talk) 22:12, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:14, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused, low-quality AI "enhancement" of File:Joaquim Nabuco 1902.jpg. This is, frankly, worse than the original; the heavy smoothing makes the photo look like a cartoon. Omphalographer (talk) 21:16, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:25, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Also:
Jahobr (talk) 21:23, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:25, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Only used on 2 portal pages and 1 talk page on the Chinese Wikipedia. Also, the image is {{BadGIF}} with vector replacement. Alfa-ketosav (talk) 18:47, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. File:Retrosynthetic analysis of phenylacetic acid.svg is the replacement. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 06:52, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:41, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Unused {{BadJPG}} with vector-based alternative. Alfa-ketosav (talk) 18:53, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. I suppose that File:Acyl Halide plus Alcohol.svg is the named vector-based alternative. However, this file has the disadvantage of subscript numbering of the R groups. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 15:07, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:40, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Unused bad JPG. Alfa-ketosav (talk) 18:59, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 15:07, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:39, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Unused low quality image due to colored atom symbols and JPG format. Alfa-ketosav (talk) 19:03, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 15:14, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:39, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Logo with opaque (white) background and too large margins. Replaced by File:Logo of Sabic.svg as high-quality SVG version. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 21:22, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:39, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
The painter died in 1982, and his paintings are not PD yet. Nanahuatl (talk) 22:30, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:55, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
The painter died after 1982, and his paintings are not PD yet. Nanahuatl (talk) 22:31, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:55, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
The painter died after 1980, and his paintings are not PD yet. Nanahuatl (talk) 22:42, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:55, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
The painter died after 1987, and his paintings are not PD yet. Nanahuatl (talk) 22:52, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:55, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
NoFoP Italy and COM:POSTER. There is a copyright protection period of 20 years, maybe even 70 years. Syunsyunminmin (talk) 13:57, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. Günther Frager (talk) 18:44, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Per the nominator. Clearly copyrighted. --Adamant1 (talk) 06:37, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:42, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Angegeber Autor ist offensichtlich nicht der tatsächliche Autor. Dieser Fehler bestand auch schon auf Flickr. Das ist definitiv kein Selfie. Grüße vom Sänger ♫ (talk) 15:00, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:45, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
File:Martin Sellner holding a loudspeaker in front of a crowd at the "Remigrationsdemo" (Vienna, 2023).jpg
[edit]Angegeber Autor ist offensichtlich nicht der tatsächliche Autor. Dieser Fehler bestand auch schon auf Flickr. Das ist definitiv kein Selfie. Grüße vom Sänger ♫ (talk) 15:00, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:44, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Angegeber Autor ist offensichtlich nicht der tatsächliche Autor. Dieser Fehler bestand auch schon auf Flickr. Das ist definitiv kein Selfie. Grüße vom Sänger ♫ (talk) 15:00, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:44, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
File:Martin Sellner photographed from behind speaking at a conference of the "Institut für Staatspolitik" (2023).jpg
[edit]Angegeber Autor ist offensichtlich nicht der tatsächliche Autor. Dieser Fehler bestand auch schon auf Flickr. Das ist definitiv kein Selfie. Grüße vom Sänger ♫ (talk) 15:00, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:44, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Angegeber Autor ist offensichtlich nicht der tatsächliche Autor. Dieser Fehler bestand auch schon auf Flickr. Das ist definitiv kein Selfie. Grüße vom Sänger ♫ (talk) 15:01, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:43, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Angegeber Autor ist offensichtlich nicht der tatsächliche Autor. Dieser Fehler bestand auch schon auf Flickr. Das ist definitiv kein Selfie. Grüße vom Sänger ♫ (talk) 15:01, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:43, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Angegeber Autor ist offensichtlich nicht der tatsächliche Autor. Dieser Fehler bestand auch schon auf Flickr. Das ist definitiv kein Selfie. Grüße vom Sänger ♫ (talk) 15:01, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:43, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Angegeber Autor ist offensichtlich nicht der tatsächliche Autor. Dieser Fehler bestand auch schon auf Flickr. Das ist definitiv kein Selfie. Grüße vom Sänger ♫ (talk) 15:01, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:43, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: AI-generated image of a "large metropolis". Unused and redundant to countless real photos of cities on Commons. Omphalographer (talk) 21:06, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Per the nominator. Totally redundant and not worth keeping simply because it was created by AI. --Adamant1 (talk) 06:22, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:24, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Newspapers published in 1977 is still copyrighted A1Cafel (talk) 05:32, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:22, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Copyright issues [1] Elfabso (talk) 09:42, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:25, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Later depiction of Mickey Mouse, still not under public domain. QuickQuokka [talk • contribs] 10:32, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:26, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
advertisement MarinaMann (talk) 10:43, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:26, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Advertisement MarinaMann (talk) 10:46, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:26, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Advertisement MarinaMann (talk) 10:47, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:26, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
non-enyploedic person, personal advertisement MarinaMann (talk) 10:51, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:27, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Screenshot of a club portrait, no evidence of permission. You can find this image previously published in the video at https://x.com/footballempower/status/1449276043269853189 and a Google Lens search shows the image is the standard team portrait from Hume City. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 12:29, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:28, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
I accidentally uploaded a photo of my wife. Chris.sherlock2 (talk) 13:35, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G7. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:28, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Official Arjun Panchariya 45 (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope. spam
- File:सत्य सनातन संस्कृति.jpg
- File:सनातन धर्म में स्वस्ति चिह्न स्कूल के बच्चो द्वारा.jpg
- File:Official prerna Panchariya.jpg
--Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:53, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:49, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 15:00, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:49, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Painting by Romanian artist Ioan Popei, still alive. Note metadata points to Facebook as the source of this file.
- File:Marine 03.jpg
- File:Monk in Greece Ioan Popei.jpg
- File:Saint John the Baptist - Ioan Popei.jpg
- File:Monk in Greece.jpg
- File:Morning Water.jpg
- File:Memories of Venice.jpg
- File:Glasss Flowers.jpg
- File:Self Portrait Ioan Popei.jpg
- File:Boat on Aegean.jpg
Günther Frager (talk) 16:07, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:51, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary advertisement. Belgium has freedom of panorama but it only applies to works installed permanently. Günther Frager (talk) 16:40, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:52, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: plain text. Omphalographer (talk) 17:10, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:52, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
File:CreativeTools.se - PackshotCreator - CreativeTools.se - PackshotCreator - Super Mario Brothers - Wario in Toy Car figure (4353112203).jpg
[edit]Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 17:29, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:53, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Photo is from fox4news and there is no source for public domain 2pattywhack27 (talk) 17:48, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:53, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Source is twitter, no permission from author. Neanderen (talk) 18:39, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:54, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
advertisement Ciaurlec (talk) 19:51, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:54, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Unused personal image, out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 22:09, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:55, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Copyrighted book cover. Nanahuatl (talk) 22:10, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:55, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
File:Karıncaların Şekeri ve Şahitler Meyhanesi. 21 nci yüz yıl Türkiyesin'de parça parça hayatların birlikteliğini anlatan roman. Aynı zamanda ezilenlerin kurtuluş mücadelesini anlatır.jpg
[edit]Copyrighted book cover. Nanahuatl (talk) 22:10, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:56, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
unused personal file, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 22:12, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:56, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Is it PD? 200.111.17.97 22:51, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by User:Didym. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:56, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
File:Wahab Hassan, Anchor Person, Senior journalist, On Air Image, Hum News, Hum Television Network Pakistan.jpg
[edit]Is it accepted? 200.111.17.97 22:52, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by User:Didym. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:57, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Is it TV? 200.111.17.97 22:53, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by User:Didym. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:57, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
TV news anchor 200.111.17.97 22:53, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by User:Didym. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:57, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Reading the description 200.111.17.97 22:54, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by User:Didym. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:57, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Not own photo 200.111.17.97 22:55, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by User:Didym. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:57, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Propaganda in definition 200.111.17.97 22:55, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by User:Didym. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:57, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Incorrect signature Canton Viaduct (talk) 23:45, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. Looking at the source, the signature seems to be correct as far as I can tell. While the file is not in use, the subject is notable. IronGargoyle (talk) 04:00, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 10:01, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Incorrect signature Canton Viaduct (talk) 23:46, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Duplicate of File:Frederick S. Holmes Patent Signature from 1897.png. IronGargoyle (talk) 04:02, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Duplicate of File:Frederick S. Holmes Patent Signature from 1897.png. --Wdwd (talk) 10:02, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Is this inside scope? 186.173.189.23 15:23, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Personal photo by non-contributors (F10). --Эlcobbola talk 22:14, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
This picture seems to be copied as it appears in several places on the web (such as this one). It cannot stay in the Commons without a proper VRT (formerly, OTRS) release note. Ldorfman (talk) 01:21, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:58, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
A formal PR picture of an Israeli executive, clearly taken by a photographer, but with no EXIF. It cannot stay in the Commons without a proper VRT (formerly, OTRS) release note. Ldorfman (talk) 01:34, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:58, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
The map lacks any credible sources to substantiate its claims, and I incorporated it into various Wikipedia articles without conducting proper fact-checking. This negligent approach may result in the dissemination of inaccurate information. Riad Salih (talk) 01:48, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: It is COM:INUSE. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:59, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
No permission from the source and author A1Cafel (talk) 05:34, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:02, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
No source 94.203.60.200 05:50, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:02, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
the logo is quite creative IMO, it is likely above the ToO, see also https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:OfflineTV_2021_logo.svg Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:36, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:02, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
The file is corrupted CoffeeEngineer (talk) 12:57, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:03, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Copyrights violated 186.173.189.23 14:32, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Samara Miranda/Ascom Remo. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:03, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The uploader is not the author CoffeeEngineer (talk) 09:21, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 13:44, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The uploader is not the author CoffeeEngineer (talk) 09:21, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 13:41, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
Excelente com:Pack 186.173.189.23 14:57, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- This photo was taken by me. You can research. Samizambak (talk) 15:06, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- People who are not authorized on Wikipadia, please do not add to the pages. Samizambak (talk) 15:08, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Anonymous users do not have the authority to delete or have pages deleted. Please stop this behavior. Samizambak (talk) 15:26, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:PACKAGING. ✗plicit 13:43, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:毛澤東選集
[edit]Works by Mao Zedong are still copyrighted
- File:CADAL07003539 毛澤東選集.djvu
- File:CADAL07003540 毛澤東選集 第五卷.djvu
- File:CADAL07006696 毛澤東選集.djvu
- File:CADAL07006707 毛澤東選集 第一卷.djvu
- File:CADAL3000542 毛澤東選集.djvu
- File:NLC416-01jh002280-78915 毛澤東選集.pdf
- File:NLC416-01jh002346-78867 毛澤東選集.pdf
- File:NLC511-023031404036580-37056 毛澤東選集.pdf
- File:NLC511-07003539-63936 毛澤東選集.pdf
- File:SSID-10938303 毛澤東選集 湖南農民運動考察報告.pdf
- File:SSID-10938304 毛澤東選集 新民主主義論.pdf
- File:SSID-10938305 毛澤東選集 中國抗日民族統一戰線在目前階段的任務.pdf
- File:SSID-10938306 毛澤東選集 論持久戰.pdf
- File:SSID-10938307 毛澤東選集 經濟問題與財政問題.pdf
- File:SSID-10938308 毛澤東選集 中國共產黨在民族戰爭中的地位.pdf
- File:SSID-11335510 毛澤東選集.pdf
- File:SSID-11337827 毛澤東選集 第1卷.pdf
- File:SSID-11337843 毛澤東選集 第5卷.pdf
- File:SSID-11337924 毛澤東選集 第1卷.pdf
- File:SSID-11568441 毛澤東選集 第5卷 第1分冊.pdf
- File:SSID-11568442 毛澤東選集 第5卷 第2分冊.pdf
- File:SSID-11568443 毛澤東選集 第5卷 第3分冊.pdf
- File:SSID-11568444 毛澤東選集 第5卷 第4分冊.pdf
- File:SSID-12548859 毛澤東選集.pdf
- File:SSID-13115172 毛澤東選集 5卷.pdf
- File:SSID-13115173 毛澤東選集 4卷.pdf
- File:SSID-13115178 毛澤東選集 1卷.pdf
- File:SSID-13120329 毛澤東選集.pdf
- File:SSID-13646472 毛澤東選集 新民主主義論 第4版.pdf
Midleading (talk) 07:22, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support. --Upload for Freedom (talk) 06:28, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Bedivere (talk) 23:26, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
No source, no author, so there's no way to know if it's in the public domain because of age, or if it's a modern illustration The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:32, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:20, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
This seems to be a promo picture from discogs, and there is no proof that the image is properly licensed. Very unlikely this image is actually in a CC license unless there is other proof im missing 49p (talk) 02:51, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Oh you're definitely right, when I uploaded the image I didn't really understand how Wikimedia worked. SailingTheSeasOfCheese (talk) 05:32, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:22, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
Though screenshots from GCS Game World's games are free images, this is not a screenshot, it's a cover. Оранге (talk) 03:01, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:22, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
The metadata claims that user:Rodtico21 took this photo in 1920 and released it under cc license, and also that he died more than 100 years ago. That seems unlikely. If it is PD work than we need to know why Jarekt (talk) 04:10, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Attribution and license now fixed. Every noob chooses the default settings, you can just fix yourself. --RAN (talk) 05:20, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The "fixes" are merely assumptions. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:24, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
Possible Copyvio: Uploader Herbert2018 ≠ author Joel Heyd, a professional photographer (see joelheyd.com). KlausHeide (talk) 04:50, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, screenshot. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:25, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
Artist Henry Moore died in 1986, not old enough to be in PD A1Cafel (talk) 05:30, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:46, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by FordPrefecUser_talk:Polarlys/Archiv5#Takashi Ochi https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Polarlys/Archiv5#Takashi_Ochit42 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: copyvio from https://www.szo-online.de/szo/wp-content/downloads/Ochi-Takashi.pdf p. 6
Update: according to User_talk:Polarlys/Archiv5#Takashi Ochi there was some discussion about permission, but the file has never been licensed properly since then. @User:Polarlys: FYI. FordPrefect42 (talk) 06:19, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:47, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 09:18, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:48, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 09:18, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:48, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The uploader is not te author, From Facebook CoffeeEngineer (talk) 09:46, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Hello! I have uploaded this file, the photographer is Tim Schnetgoeke and it's copyrighted. What can I do this file not to be deleted? Tata.tata3 (talk) 13:41, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
- Hello, You can follow the instruction on this link to be sure the author authorized the file to be on Commons [2], but if it is copyrighted, it might not be able to be on Commons. CoffeeEngineer (talk) 16:46, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:49, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
claims of own work are dubious, the image has to have been taken in the late 1900's and with it being digitized 4 months ago, there is a chance, but it is unlikely. Geardona (talk) 02:25, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Attribution now fixed. --RAN (talk) 05:18, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- This photo was taken during extensive international missionary travels. It will not be found on the internet. I am the copyright holder. Davendres (talk) 21:07, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- On that note, it was found on a find a grave website somewhere. Geardona (talk) 15:49, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
- Ok, thanks and apologies, I withdraw my nomination Geardona (talk) 15:43, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: Nom withdrawn. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:47, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
This is a more recent arrangement and performance of this work, so copyright has not yet expired Nikkimaria (talk) 04:25, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: both the underlying composition and the recording/performance need to be free licensed, no evidence of the latter. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:49, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Derivative work of a copyrighted artwork Bedivere (talk) 05:05, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Good day! This coat of arms constitute fair use since this is a transformative work, even if the original coat of arms in question does not have an official copyright status tagged by the Diocese of Malaybalay. In fact, a clear digital file of the original does not exist elsewhere, and this version that I made was reconstructed from screenshots of the coat of arms in the links attached in the file's summary for the purpose of providing a clear version of the coat of arms. The ones currently used in social media are taken from this uploaded file. GiovanniYosh12 (talk) 10:50, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Fair use is not allowed in Commons. Bedivere (talk) 16:18, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- If my rendition is not considered so, then all other coats of arms I've done or made by other artists such as User:SajoR should have also been tagged for deletion. However, these renditions are only artistic representations of the "BLAZON" of the coat of arms itself. Where is the official announcement that the artwork is copyrighted? My artistic rendition of the coat of arms is based on the following links: [3][4], which are low resolution images. No copyrighted images have been used in this artistic rendition. Please see the arguments posted on the following deletion requests: [5][6][7][8] GiovanniYosh12 (talk) 05:22, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Fair use is not allowed in Commons. Bedivere (talk) 16:18, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination & discussion. This is a fairly recently created archdiosise, so not PD old. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:51, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Photograph taken by Frederick John Alexander Terrell, who died in 1985 A1Cafel (talk) 05:24, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- The photograph has now been tagged as Public Domain, as it was taken in India in 1933 and copyright has therefore expired. (India Copyright Act 1957). Zzjlamb (talk) 12:11, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:52, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
A 1975 photograph is still copyrighted A1Cafel (talk) 05:59, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Photo Zatknutie Malara.jpg is screenshot from movie. The name of this movie is "Live during escape", in slovak language "Život na úteku". Lukasabram (talk) 07:05, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- See thisone https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xx7CBCvedGM Lukasabram (talk) 07:07, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Last minutes of video Lukasabram (talk) 07:55, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Work created in 1975 cannot have been made by someone who died more than 70 years ago. No evidence presented for free status for any other reason. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:54, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
COM:TOO Australia - logo and trademarked, copyright violation. Chris.sherlock2 (talk) 08:46, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:55, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
COM:TOO Australia - logo and trademarked, copyright violation. Chris.sherlock2 (talk) 08:46, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:55, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
COM:TOO Australia - logo and trademarked, copyright violation. Chris.sherlock2 (talk) 08:47, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:55, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
COM:TOO Australia - logo and trademarked, copyright violation. Chris.sherlock2 (talk) 08:48, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:55, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
COM:TOO Australia - logo and trademarked, copyright violation. Chris.sherlock2 (talk) 08:48, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:55, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
this is not own work Europe2009 (talk) 10:00, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination & reverse image search. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:57, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Qazaq Steppe eagle (talk · contribs)
[edit]Flags (and a CoA) proposed by a user with no educational value, not used and are also fake SVGs.
- File:Internal Troops Ensign of Kazakhstan (proposal).svg
- File:Internal Troops Ensign of Kazakh SSR, dress (proposal).svg
- File:Internal Troops Ensign of Kazakh SSR (proposal).svg
- File:Coast Guard Ensign of Kazakhstan (proposal).svg
- File:Coast Guard Ensign of Kazakh SSR, dress (proposal).svg
- File:Coast Guard Ensign of Kazakh SSR (proposal).svg
- File:Auxiliary Fleet Ensign of Kazakhstan (proposal).svg
- File:Auxiliary Fleet Ensign of Kazakh SSR, dress (proposal).svg
- File:Auxiliary Fleet Ensign of Kazakh SSR (proposal).svg
- File:Naval Ensign of Kazakhstan (proposal).svg
- File:Emblem of the Kazakh SSR (variant).svg
- File:Naval Ensign of Kazakh SSR, dress (proposal).svg
- File:Naval Ensign of Kazakh SSR (proposal).svg
- File:Flag of Kazakh SSR, variant (with steppe eagle).svg
- File:Flag of Kazakh SSR (variant).svg
Goldsztern ✶ 10:59, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:58, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Copyright copyvio 186.173.189.23 14:04, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- How it is copyrighted? Unable to see any similar photo on internet. আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 15:50, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- How is this a copyright violation? - Chris.sherlock2 (talk) 15:14, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no evidence for anon allegation found. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:59, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope.
- File:La roca skate ministry 2.jpg
- File:Samu y su hand blunt.jpg
- File:Boar slide de samuu.jpg
- File:Samuu.jpg
- File:Vuela kelvin !.jpg
- File:Kelvin papa.jpg
- File:David aprendió crooked de bajada.jpg
- File:David armando su tabla nueva.jpg
- File:Willigang.jpg
- File:Halcaf crooked de Willy.jpg
- File:“Willy se mentaliza para el truco “.jpg
- File:Juan Daniel.jpg
- File:Varial shoviet de Juan Daniel.jpg
- File:La roca skate ministry.jpg
- File:Truco Nhellflip.jpg
- File:Crooked de gabex.jpg
- File:Gabriel castillo “skater”.jpg
--Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:52, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep The few showing only people may be debatable but otherwise these are high quality images and perfectly in scope. -- Herbert Ortner (talk) 18:41, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep I prefer color images, but to describe skater culture, you need representative images. --RAN (talk) 23:39, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: skateboarding is in scope, no consensus for mass deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:05, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Yes, it is. Own work 186.173.189.23 15:01, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CV per reverse image search. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:07, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Look in description. Propaganda comercial 186.173.189.23 15:38, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: multiple other places online earlier. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:09, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
there is a better version of the logo in the svg format: File:Flughafen Zurich Logo.svg Jnmths (talk) 15:41, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:09, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Unknown author could not die 70 years ago. Quick1984 (talk) 15:42, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Пишите на русском, чтобы я вас понял. Также не надо все подряд номирировать на удаление, это вандализм. Diniyar Khasanov (talk) 15:50, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep License now fixed. --RAN (talk) 19:07, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- I don't think so. 'Created' doesn't mean 'published' and 'unknown' doesn't mean 'anonymous'. --Quick1984 (talk) 08:55, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: lacking sufficient source info to determine license. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:11, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
No FOP in Russia for sculpture. UPD: The sculptor Zilfat Basyrov died in 2000. Quick1984 (talk) 15:43, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Зачем номинировали на удаление? Этой мой личный файл, который я сам сделал и загрузил. Пишите на русском, и не используйте абревиатуры и сокращения, так как я не знаю английского, а переводчик не можешь перевести абревиатуры. Diniyar Khasanov (talk) 15:48, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Так в чем проблема? По правилам там в пункте 1 указано, что свободное использование разрешено, за имключением случаев, если изображение произведения является основным объектом использования или изображение произведения используется в целях извлечения прибыли. А этот бюст открыт для всех, никому и ничего платить не надо, и, как и другие памятники и бюсты, может быть сфотографирован и выложен в пространство Викимедии. Diniyar Khasanov (talk) 19:30, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Diniyar Khasanov: (1) The bust is the main subject of the photo ("основным объектом использования"). (2) Commons accepts only images which may be reproduced commercially ("используется в целях извлечения прибыли"). (3) No, we are not required to discuss in Russian (which most of us don't speak) any more than you are required to write in English (which apparently you don't speak). - Jmabel ! talk 18:47, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete, undelete in 2071. - Jmabel ! talk 18:47, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination & discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:11, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
I question the use of {{PD-logo}} on this logo. 4ing (talk) 16:08, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - no info on TOO Ethiopia; no reason to think it lenient. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:14, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
File:Kara kuvvetleri komutanı orgeneral Faruk gürler genelkurmay başkanı Memduh tagmaç deniz kuvvetleri komutanı oramiral celal eyiceoglu ve hava kuvvetleri komutanı Muhsin batur.jpg
[edit]Turkish Armed Forces does not have CC license. MRTFR55 (talk) 17:11, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, nor did CC-sa-4.0 exist in 1971. No factual license info. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:15, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Logos of Carrefour Group
[edit]Not too simple for copyright. See Commons:Deletion requests/Carrefour logo.
- File:Crf180x35 1.jpg
- File:Carrefour Express.png
- File:Carrefour City Café logo.png
- File:Carrefour GB logo 2009.png
- File:Carrefour Planet logo.png
- File:Carrefour Poland logo.svg
- File:Carrefour-planet 1.jpg
- File:Groupe Carrefour 2009.gif
- File:Groupe Carrefour logo.svg
- File:Logo Carrefour Express.svg
- File:Logo Carrefour Market.svg
- File:Logo carrefour planet 2.jpg
- File:Logo Carrefour sans texte.png
- File:LogoCarrefourMóvil.png
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:14, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
- File:Logo Carrefour sans texte.png is the right group logo. --Swaf75 (talk) 21:58, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
- Speedy keep. Carrefour logo is above the Threshold of originality in the US. Similar images are below the threshold of originality required for copyright protection. Especially the Subway and Nikken logos are good examples. The Carrefour logo is just a square of red and blue colors with a transparent "C" letter. It's not complicated enough to be above the US standards.
Comparison This logo Logos below the Threshold of Originality in the United States -
The Carrefour logo is just a square of red and blue colors with a transparent "C" letter.I added description. --Rezonansowy
-
- Rezonansowy (talk) 16:29, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
- I updated my comment to include a comparison. --Rezonansowy (talk) 16:41, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
- I don't see a section under TOO for the country of Spain. So your keep rationale does not apply. Also, "speedy" means you are attempting to censor the discussion by having it closed prematurely; we only do that for bad faith nominations. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:04, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
- I updated my comment to include a comparison. --Rezonansowy (talk) 16:41, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
- The design of all works listed above bases on File:Logo Carrefour sans texte.png, which is the original logo and trademark of Carrefour. Carrefour S.A. is a company which bases in France. Country of origin of the Carrefour logo is France then.
- According to Commons:Copyright rules policy: Files uploaded to Commons should be free both in the country of origin (as defined by the Berne Convention) and in the United States of America. Other juridical territories are not involved in the creation of the work.
- According to Commons:Threshold of originality policy, the examples of the Threshold of originality in the United States given above are: OK to upload to Commons, because they are below the threshold of originality required for copyright protection and are judged ineligible for copyright protection by a court or similar authority.
- According to Commons:Threshold of originality policy, the Threshold of originality in the France: asserts that a work is copyrightable when it bears the "imprint of the personality of the author" and In practice, it depends on the work in question, but this has left the bar quite low for many works where an artistic intent can be shown.
- The logo of Carrefour Group presents the design of the same nature which was already judged by the United States Copyright Office as ineligible to be copyrighted. In addition, the logo of Carrefour Group does not show the personality of the author or the artistic intent as required by the French law. Therefore, the copyright for the logo of Carrefour Group does not exist.
- Your deletion rationale was a statement Not too simple for copyright. and a link reference to another Deletion Request – Commons:Deletion requests/Carrefour logo.
- The contents of the above reference also consist only of votes and personal opinions without expressing any arguments of legal nature. The above Deletion Request authored by Taivo with a rationale: I think, that the logo surpasses threshold of originality. and that statement on the previous similar case on Commons that in my opinion the result was incorrect. The request was closed by Natuur12 with a rationale I agree with Taivo, non basic shapes.
- As a response to the above, I posted my vote of speedy keep for this work as I did not see a right rationale to contest the copyright status of this logo just by relying on personal votes. Unlike yours unfortunately, my vote has a rationale with a legal basis.
- Regarding the legal jurisdiction of the Carrefour Group headquarters it is difficult for me to understand why you provided Spain as a country which is binding in Threshold of originality to the logo of Carrefour Group. Spain was not the source country of this work and/or the country originally involved in its initial creation or first publication.
- If believe that you should include Spain in the copyright scope of the work and did not find information you were interested then you should rather apply the rule of assuming the copyright good status of the file. You just provide as your rationale a statement that I don't see a section under TOO for the country of Spain.
- You responded that So your keep rationale does not apply. Regarding the above this is not right.
- Your deletion rationale does not conform to a Community standards of Wikimedia Commons which are described under Commons:Deletion policy#Reasons for deletion.
- You answered me that "speedy" means you are attempting to censor the discussion by having it closed prematurely; we only do that for bad faith nominations. First, as I stated above I voted speedy keep because your deletion request seems to be likely invalid as it does not contain any specific rationale. By simply stating Not too simple for copyright you do not start the discussion. Also, who is we? General statements that we do that or we do not that which lack any specific disclosure are very misleading, especially when it is written by an admin. You should not do that. Please be more specific and direct. This is also described in Commons:Deletion requests.Added a reference.--Rezonansowy (talk) 17:40, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
- In addition, by saying to me that by expressing my vote you are attempting to censor the discussion is likely against my freedom of speech and expression and also against the Community standards and policies like Commons:Assume good faith which says about the assuming good faith standard. Even if you did not intend to you actually did me feel like this. I and everyone else have a right to express any vote or opinion which does not hurt anyone or is not against the law.
- @Magog the Ogre, Natuur12, and Taivo: I really appreciate your service as admins on Commons but guys, what are you doing? You seem to completely ignore any standards of merit discussion which always shall include legal and material arguments. You replaced these standards with a showcase of personal opinions and agreements. Such practice lead to performing a wrong decisions and they harm everyone at Wikimedia Commons. I am very tired of dealing with such crap. When even admins do it, it is enough. Pleas stop it and start respecting the Community standards and official policies by relying on merit arguments (like providing the legal basis).
- Again, I appreciate your work and service (all of you guys!) and know that you have your own lives but please pay attention to the above...
Yours in Community,
--Rezonansowy (talk) 15:09, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
- When creating previous request, I did not realize, that this is big white C on blue and red background. Writing big white C into square in such way, that I do not understand, that this is C in square, clearly shows personality of the author and artistic intent. I agree now, that the logo is too simple for copyright in USA, but probably not in source country France. Taivo (talk) 16:21, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
- @Taivo: Thank you for your response and legal analysis. Towards France, the thing is the the work is assigned to a company and companies cannot have a personality. They can express their services through logo but not personality. This work was created for marketing purposes not artistic so there is no direct artistic intent, even you or some other individual finds it interesting in an aesthetic sense. --Rezonansowy (talk) 17:46, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
- I do not agree with your conclusion, that logos of companies of France cannot be copyrighted. Taivo (talk) 17:52, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
- @Taivo: Again, please reread the Commons:Deletion requests#Overview on how to express an opinion on Wikimedia Commons. I can understand the need to research the case more closely, but you cannot just say that you agree or not with something. --Rezonansowy (talk) 00:25, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
- I do not agree with your conclusion, that logos of companies of France cannot be copyrighted. Taivo (talk) 17:52, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
- @Taivo: Thank you for your response and legal analysis. Towards France, the thing is the the work is assigned to a company and companies cannot have a personality. They can express their services through logo but not personality. This work was created for marketing purposes not artistic so there is no direct artistic intent, even you or some other individual finds it interesting in an aesthetic sense. --Rezonansowy (talk) 17:46, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
- Delete all. According to com:TOO the threshold for France seems to be "imprint of the personality of the author" and one cannot deny that such a threshold is met with those logo's. Also it’s required that a work is free in the source country and the US. Therefor the US examples are irrelevant. I would also note that fonts can be copyrighted in Europe. Therefor the “it’s just a C-argument” has little merit. I would find it funny to read that company’s cannot hold a copyright over their logo’s but it’s just plain sad honestly. I would recommend that Rezonansowy takes an introduction course about copyright before they accuse others off “completely ignore any standards of merit discussion”. Natuur12 (talk) 13:46, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, the logo has artistic intent and therefore is copyrighted in source country France. Taivo (talk) 18:48, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Files in Category:Logos of Carrefour Group
[edit]The logo's of Carrefour are copyrighted. The design is above threshold of originality per COM:TOO France. Therefore these files cannot be hosted on Commons with one of the free licences.
- File:Bandera Carrefour San Pablo, Sevilla, España, 2015.gif
- File:Carrefour 1966.svg
- File:Carrefour C.svg
- File:Carrefour Douliou Store 20140726.jpg
- File:Logo Carrefour 1966.svg
Ellywa (talk) 09:54, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 18:39, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Logos of Carrefour Group
[edit]Per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Logos of Carrefour Group. The country of origin of the logo is France where the threshold of originality is too low.
- File:1992 10 años.svg
- File:1992 Carrefour.svg
- File:1992 EPMB 2.svg
- File:1992 EPMB 4.svg
- File:1992 EPMB 5.svg
- File:1992 EPMB 6.svg
- File:1992 EPMB.svg
- File:Carrefour (Unternehmen) 2021 logo.svg
- File:Carrefour 1984-1986.svg
- File:Carrefour 1988.svg
- File:Carrefour 1991 1.svg
- File:Carrefour 1991 2.svg
- File:Carrefour 1991 3.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 1.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 10.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 11.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 12.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 13.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 2.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 3.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 4.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 5.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 6.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 7.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 8.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 9.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992.svg
- File:Carrefour 1995 1.svg
- File:Carrefour 1995 2.svg
- File:Carrefour 1995 3.svg
- File:Carrefour 1995 4.svg
- File:Carrefour 1995 5.svg
- File:Carrefour 1995 6.svg
- File:Carrefour 1995 7.svg
- File:Carrefour 1995.svg
- File:Carrefour 1997 (1).svg
- File:Carrefour 1997 (2).svg
- File:Carrefour 1997 (3).svg
- File:Carrefour 1997 (4).svg
- File:Carrefour 1997 (5).svg
- File:Carrefour 1997 (6).svg
- File:Carrefour ar -g4938.svg
- File:Carrefour ar -g5900.svg
- File:Carrefour ar -g5927.svg
- File:Carrefour ar -g5954.svg
- File:Carrefour ar -g5980.svg
- File:Carrefour Arte (1).svg
- File:Carrefour Arte (2).svg
- File:Carrefour Arte (3).svg
- File:Carrefour Arte (4).svg
- File:Carrefour Arte (5).svg
- File:Carrefour Arte (6).svg
- File:Carrefour Arte (7).svg
- File:Carrefour Arte (8).svg
- File:Carrefour Arte (9).svg
- File:Carrefour Arte 1992.svg
- File:Carrefour bio logo.svg
- File:Carrefour city logo.svg
- File:Carrefour contact logo.svg
- File:Carrefour El Precio Mas Bajo.svg
- File:Carrefour express logo.svg
- File:Carrefour Lingostiere Logo.png
- File:Carrefour logo.svg
- File:Carrefour Market logo.svg
- File:Carrefour market logo.svg
- File:Carrefour Maxi Cacheuta 16-11-2023.svg
- File:Carrefour Sempre O Menor Preço 1.svg
- File:Carrefour Sempre O Menor Preço.svg
- File:Carrefour-Banque 2016.jpg
- File:Carrefour-express.jpg
- File:Carrefour-Logo.svg
- File:Carrefour.svg
- File:Grupo Carrefour Brasil logo.png
- File:La Letra C De Carrefour.svg
- File:Logo Fblanc Express.jpg
- File:Productos Carrefour 2023.svg
- File:Servicios Financieros Carrefour.png
- File:Su -g11107.svg
- File:Su -g11262.svg
Günther Frager (talk) 17:12, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ✗plicit 00:04, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Logos of Carrefour Group
[edit]The country of origin of the logo is France where the threshold of originality is too low. See previous DR on these category.
- File:Carrefour 1990-1992 (1).svg
- File:Carrefour 1990-1992 (2).svg
- File:Carrefour 1990-1992 (3).svg
- File:Carrefour 1990-1992 (4).svg
- File:Carrefour 1990-1992 (5).svg
- File:Carrefour 1990-1992 (6).svg
Günther Frager (talk) 22:52, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:16, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Logos of Carrefour Group
[edit]Per above DRs, this logo of the letter C in a rhombus with slightly rounded corners is above COM:TOO France, somehow
- File:Carrefour 09-12-1995.svg
- File:Carrefour 11-06-1995.svg
- File:Carrefour 15-12-1995.svg
- File:Carrefour 1985-1987.svg
- File:Carrefour 1987.svg
- File:Carrefour 1988.svg
- File:Carrefour 1989-1992 1.svg
- File:Carrefour 1989-1992.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 Logos Imagenes (1).svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 Logos Imagenes (2).svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 Logos Imagenes (3).svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 Logos Imagenes (4).svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 Logos Imagenes (5).svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 Logos Imagenes (6).svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 Logos Imagenes (7).svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 Logos Imagenes (8).svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 Logos Imagenes (9).svg
- File:Carrefour 1992-1994.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992-1995 2.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992-1995.svg-g30196-499.png
- File:Carrefour 1992-1995.svg-g30196-810.png
- File:Carrefour El Precio Mas Bajo 1.svg
- File:Carrefour El Precio Mas Bajo 10.svg
- File:Carrefour El Precio Mas Bajo 11.svg
- File:Carrefour El Precio Mas Bajo 1992 1.png
- File:Carrefour El Precio Mas Bajo 1992.png
- File:Carrefour El Precio Mas Bajo 2.svg
- File:Carrefour El Precio Mas Bajo 3.svg
- File:Carrefour El Precio Mas Bajo 4.svg
- File:Carrefour El Precio Mas Bajo 5.svg
- File:Carrefour El Precio Mas Bajo 6.svg
- File:Carrefour El Precio Mas Bajo 7.svg
- File:Carrefour El Precio Mas Bajo 8.svg
- File:Carrefour El Precio Mas Bajo 9.svg
- File:Carrefour Express logo green.svg
- File:Carrefour montagne logo.svg
- File:Carrefour Paginas 4.svg
- File:Carrefour Planet.jpg
- File:Carrefour Telecom.png
- File:CarrefourSA.jpg
- File:Logo Carrefour Express (naranja).svg
- File:Logo Carrefour-Bon-App.svg
- File:Logo-rueducommerce-carrefour.png
Nutshinou Talk! 17:05, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination (and previous ones). Threshold of originality in France is too low. Günther Frager (talk) 17:13, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- This logo is also original here in Spain, although its origin is French, I understand. In all the integrated food chains of petrol stations, there are many of these logos. This is the problem. Autopistero20502020 (talk) 17:17, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy keep the file File:Logo Carrefour Express (naranja).svg should not be deleted because it is placed in several articles on motorways and highways as part of a CEPSA service area or petrol station integrated with Carrefour Express. The problem is not the rights of the author, but, the problem is that the icon has to appear for the transparency to the drivers. There are several logos of other food chains that are integrated in the petrol station and for this reason, please do not delete the file.
- I hope you understand me well in English.
- Thank you very much and best regards. Autopistero20502020 (talk) 17:14, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Carrefour 1988.svg was previously deleted (note the blue link among the long list of red links above). I don’t know whether the file’s contents are the same as before, but the file’s log suggests that the original uploader may have returned under a different name. Brianjd (talk) 02:36, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Brianjd, this file File:Logo Carrefour Express (naranja).svg does not come from this file File:Carrefour 1988.svg, it comes from another site, just so you know. I think the original may come from the Carrefour logo (red and blue color, the original, not the old). Autopistero20502020 (talk) 08:51, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and previous decisions. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:56, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
COM:FOP Spain makes it clear photographing works in public spaces for commercial use (necessary for uploading on Commons) is not permitted. Bedivere (talk) 17:51, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Bedivere: there is still no strong consensus to accept two lower Spanisg courts' rulings that restrict Spanish FoP to non-commercial by virtue of the Berne Three-Step Test doctrine that they applied to all of their limitations/exceptions to copyright; see also both Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2023/08#NO-FOP in Spain? and User:MarcoAurelio/FoP-ES for insights on this. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:31, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep for now unless there is new amendment. --A1Cafel (talk) 09:43, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:23, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
COM:FOP Spain makes it clear photographing works in public spaces for commercial use (necessary for uploading on Commons) is not permitted. Bedivere (talk) 17:51, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Until now, we accepted them. The last DR was closed as Kept, IIRC. Yann (talk) 17:26, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep for now unless there is new amendment. --A1Cafel (talk) 09:43, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:25, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Paintings by French artist Irène Reymond (1902-1998). The work is still copyrighted in France.
Günther Frager (talk) 18:06, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- The rights of these two images belong to the Fondation Irène Reymond in Lausanne.
- The Foundation allowed the right of these works for the publication of the book "53 lauréats 1996-2005" published in 2006, for the website "fondationirènereymond.ch" and also for any non commercial publication who serves the work of Irène Reymond. Same for the movies "irène Reymond,artiste peintre" by Jacqueline Veuve included in the catalogue and partly visible on the website of the Fondation. Cofalit (talk) 12:42, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Cofalit: the licensing policy doesn't allow licenses that doesn't allow the commercial usage of the images. Also if you are not the copyright holder you should not use
{{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}}
as you did. Günther Frager (talk) 12:56, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Cofalit: the licensing policy doesn't allow licenses that doesn't allow the commercial usage of the images. Also if you are not the copyright holder you should not use
Deleted: per nomination & discussion; no proof of free license permission from heirs of artist. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:26, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Unused, lower-quality duplicate of File:2-butanol Line-Structure.svg. Alhadis (talk) 18:34, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted and redirected. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:27, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Copyright issues [9] Elfabso (talk) 20:01, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:34, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Very low quality, no location information; exif missing MPF (talk) 20:58, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. I think the subject of the photo is meant to be the green bird perched above the cluster of dates, but it's so blurry as to be practically unidentifiable. Omphalographer (talk) 23:45, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:35, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Not own photo 200.111.17.97 22:26, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:37, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
The painter died in 1982, and his paintings are not PD yet. Nanahuatl (talk) 22:26, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:36, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
The painter died after 1961, and his paintings are not PD yet. Nanahuatl (talk) 22:27, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:37, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
The painter died in 1980, and his paintings are not PD yet. Nanahuatl (talk) 22:28, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:38, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
The painter died in 1982, and his paintings are not PD yet. Nanahuatl (talk) 22:28, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:38, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
The painter died in 1969, and his paintings are not PD yet. Nanahuatl (talk) 22:30, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:38, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
This is obviously a modern representation of the original map, photographed from a new book. It is unlikely that the uploader is the copyright holder. MarioGom (talk) 10:25, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Bedivere (talk) 22:48, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
Not own work. (https://www.akishaber.com.tr/chp-denizli-buyuksehir-adayi-cavusogluna-gorkemli-karsilama-117807h.htm) MarinaMann (talk) 10:37, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Bedivere (talk) 22:48, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Diphenyl oxalate.svg. Alhadis (talk) 13:41, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 12:31, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by J.gigengack (talk · contribs)
[edit]Professional images with incomplete information about the origin and copyright status of these pictures, two other uploads from the uploader have been deleted in the past. One of the images shows up partly in the header of https://gemeentegiro.amsterdam, where the header says "with images from the Amsterdam city archives" but they are not available on their website.
Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 10:52, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 02:19, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
Pd? From which year is original foto? 2022 or 1922? 186.173.189.23 15:07, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- When is the first publication... 186.173.189.23 15:08, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Photo dates back to 1969. 2A02:2788:1004:257:AC4E:3395:AF01:199 15:35, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Then it's not 70 years. 186.173.189.23 15:39, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete This looks like memorabilia published by the Opera House and sold to attendees of the performances. This copy appears to have been autographed by the performer (assuming the signature is genuine). Her English Wikipedia article suggests her first performance in Belgium was in the 1968 to 1969 season. Assuming that the photographer is anonymous, that would mean the source country copyright will expire on 1 January in either 2039 or 2040. The US copyright should have been restored on the URAA date, so US copyright will expire 95 years after publication. Undelete on 1 January 2065. From Hill To Shore (talk) 10:15, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 02:20, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
Probably not own work but taken from [10] and [11].
Antti T. Leppänen (talk) 15:07, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 02:20, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
Source seems to be the person photographed, yet the photgrapher is "unknown". The claim of CC-BY is not valid unless the copyright holder is identified, and they grant such license. Günther Frager (talk) 18:39, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- There is an VRTS email received for “File:HAGIT KAZINITZ.jpg” but not processed yet, ticket:2024020310002587. -- Geagea (talk) 10:42, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: procedural close - already deleted. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 02:21, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
- Restored per VRT. This is a selfie taken by the author. -- Geagea (talk) 11:31, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
I think that this was uploaded already LostplanetKD73 (talk) 20:57, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep There is another version at File:South Shore Line Little Joe 803 at Illinois Railway Museum.jpg but it has been edited. There is no harm in keeping the original and the edited version as two separate files. From Hill To Shore (talk) 17:59, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 02:22, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Nazarbayev University
[edit]No FOP in Kazakhstan
- File:Nazarbayev University Building Fall.jpg
- File:Nazarbayev University.JPG
- File:Nazarbayev University.jpg
- File:NU Building.jpg
- File:Visita a la Universidad de Nazarbayev (14574450385).jpg
- File:Назарбаев университет 2017.jpg
- File:Университет Nazarbayev University (47984853106).jpg
- File:Kazakh scientific research institute.jpg
Prodraxis (talk) 21:14, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Added a couple of more files in the category that I think are FOP violations to this deletion request. Prodraxis (talk) 19:47, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 02:22, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
Unused promotional/personal logo. Out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 22:32, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 10:30, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
aynı içeriklerin .svg dosya uzantılı sürümleri yüklenecek. Ege619 (talk) 23:07, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 10:30, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Vector version available Ege619 (talk) 23:24, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 10:30, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Vector version available Ege619 (talk) 23:23, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 10:30, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Vector version available Ege619 (talk) 23:31, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 10:30, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Vector version available Ege619 (talk) 23:33, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 10:30, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Vector version available Ege619 (talk) 23:34, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 10:30, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Vector version available Ege619 (talk) 23:35, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 10:30, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Vector version available Ege619 (talk) 23:37, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 10:30, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Unused out of scope logo. Kacamata! Dimmi!!! 23:37, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 10:30, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Vector version available Ege619 (talk) 23:38, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 10:30, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Vector version available Ege619 (talk) 23:55, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 10:30, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Vector version available Ege619 (talk) 23:57, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 10:30, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Vector version available Ege619 (talk) 23:58, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 10:30, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Vector version available Ege619 (talk) 23:59, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 10:30, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Source marking "own work" is obviously wrong, see the copyright marking in the bottom right corner. File source is likely to be a Deutsche Bahn press release: https://www.deutschebahn.com/de/presse/pressestart_zentrales_uebersicht/30-Jahre-ICE-Bundespraesident-Steinmeier-tauft-laengsten-Hochgeschwindigkeitszug-Deutschlands-6867058. N9713 (talk) 20:06, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:46, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
License laundering. The source website is not the proper copyright holder and has credit to [12], which is not free. Quick1984 (talk) 15:49, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
The user is misleading and gives a link to the students' website, although there is a link to a free website in the file description.--Il Nur (talk) 07:45, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
- Il Nur, can you see well? So finally open the link you provide and find there: Источник: https://kopilkaurokov.ru/literatura/uroki/tvorchieskii_put_poeta_il_dara_iuzieieva Can you read Russian? If not, please become aware that Источник is the Russian for Source. And moreover, both these websites are not proper copyright holders for this photo. --Quick1984 (talk) 08:30, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
- ok Il Nur (talk) 08:34, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
- Why don't you submit your card details for deletion? Are they also made on the basis of other maps and it is not written about them? Category:Russians in Russia. Here is the file File:Russians in Ulyanovsk Oblast.png, here is the original, or perhaps also unoriginal - File:Raions of Ulyanovsk Oblast 2.png? Il Nur (talk) 08:37, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: real source and authorship are unknown. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 23:01, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:The Hobbit
[edit]No FOP in Australia for temporary installations.
russavia (talk) 14:34, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:03, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:The Hobbit
[edit]The two first editions are copyrighted as the copyright was restored following the URAA. While the pages might not be complex, the user's images of the title pages does not supersede the copyright of the books. Undelete in either 2033 or 2034 depending on how we classify by UK or US publication.
And I don't think the 1982 video game is public domain. Don't know much about it, but doubt the game is the work of that uploader. Of which they have had materials deleted in the past.
- File:HMCoFirstEdSecondPrintTitle.jpg
- File:The Hobbit (1982).png
- File:The Hobbit - title page of first American print.jpg
SDudley (talk) 05:14, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- If there is nothing copyrightable copied, then there is no problem even if the text of the books is still under copyright. The parts I would be a bit concerned with would be the illustrations partly visible on the left -- would be better to crop those out or blur them a bit. The second part would be the small drawings on the title page itself. The one from the second edition looks familiar -- if other books from before 1929 had the same drawing, or one close enough such that changes weren't copyrightable (such as this one), it may be fine. The one from the first edition I don't recognize offhand, but again if it was used in pre-1929 books it would also be OK, but we may need to find it. Carl Lindberg (talk) 06:27, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Here are similar logos for the 2nd edition from Commons. 1909 and 1921
- I also found this 1928 mark for the publisher. This isn't the best version of it, but it is a wholly different design. So it seems the one present in the 1938 printings was at least based on older versions as shared above.
- Thanks for the notes on the title page. I always appreciate getting to learn more from you. And I agree that the illustrations likely need to be removed until 2044 since that is 70 years after the death of Tolkein. SDudley (talk) 03:05, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 19:39, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep The title page has nothing copyrightable. The Houghton Mifflin logo is out of copyright. You can trim out the de minimus image on the left. --RAN (talk) 23:37, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: I've revdelled the versions of the title page with illustrations and have marked the deleted versions for undeletion in 2044. The 1982 video game file was already deleted, and that probably won't be restored until at least 2078. --Abzeronow (talk) 21:44, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
No permission from Dominique Losay, that the heirs of the subject, who agrees to publish the image under a free license A1Cafel (talk) 05:26, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep PD-EU, owning a copy of an image does not transfer the copyright in the EU. The copyright belongs to the commercial photographer and has expired. --RAN (talk) 19:10, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Weak delete Insufficient evidence to demonstrate that PD-EU applies due to unknown authorship. All we know is that it's tagged as author unknown. We also don't know the publication date, just the apparent image date. 69.174.144.79 04:09, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: URAA applies. Undelete in 2038. --Abzeronow (talk) 21:46, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
Image made by Richard Dudman/Sygma/Corbis. Librero2109 (talk) 15:31, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. https://www.flickr.com/photos/13476480@N07/3797143107 says this is a Richard Dudman photograph. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:32, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
duplicate of older file File:2020 abstandshalter natenom fahrrad 5-600x400.jpg from 2020 --SI 18:51, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- update: file is now tagged as
{{duplicate}}
for speedy deletion, sorry for mixing up the buttons first. --SI 19:14, 3 February 2024 (UTC)- It is the same picture in better resolution. As the name says: the old picture is 600x400. This one is 2000x1333. I tried to replace the previous image, but since it was not uploaded by me, this wasn't possible.
- My guess was that we are interested in good resolutions, if available. I'm not interested in duplicates neither in increasing my upload counter, so any solution will be fine with me, hopefully one where we have hires pictures. Korrupt (talk) 19:43, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- I had uploaded the bigger version to the old name, before placing the deletion request.[1] (While doing so, you have to click again after getting a warning message). Also I have requested the old file to be renamed[2], although that is not mandatory, we keep a lot of updated files with obsolete size suffixes in their file name, afaik. :-) --SI 20:04, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Ah :) Thanks! Warning looked to me like a "not possible". Fine by me then. let me know when i ncan do anything to speed up the deletion. Korrupt (talk) 20:11, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Nice, so we have reached consensus here. (The best way to speed this up would go here I quess?) ;-) -- SI 20:30, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Ah :) Thanks! Warning looked to me like a "not possible". Fine by me then. let me know when i ncan do anything to speed up the deletion. Korrupt (talk) 20:11, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- I had uploaded the bigger version to the old name, before placing the deletion request.[1] (While doing so, you have to click again after getting a warning message). Also I have requested the old file to be renamed[2], although that is not mandatory, we keep a lot of updated files with obsolete size suffixes in their file name, afaik. :-) --SI 20:04, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: It appears duplicate issue was dealt with. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:46, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
problematic user. Unlike that own work. Book covers, permission is needed from illustrator
- File:Füüsika õhtuõpik.png
- File:Keemia õhtuõpik.png
- File:Rohepesu.png
- File:Jyriliivport.jpg
- File:Õhtuõpikud.png
- File:Turps.jpg
Estopedist1 (talk) 21:24, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- It is quite possible that File:Jyriliivport.jpg which is used at et:Jüri Liiv was uploaded by Jüri Liiv himself, though it would be good to have it confirmed.
- The cover images of the books are copyvios even if the uploader were identical with the author of the books Jüri Liiv, because the illustrations were drawn by somebody else. E. g. the author of the image at File:Keemia õhtuõpik.png is Merike Tamm according to https://www.kirjavara.ee/keemia-ohtuopik-juri-liiv/.
- The image File:Turps.jpg contains a logo of the company, and without a permission it must also be considered a copyvio. --Jan Kameníček (talk) 23:19, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: all but 1 which had camera EXIF and no hits on TinEye. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:50, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
The second edition, is it PD? 200.111.17.97 22:28, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: None of the versions are PD in the US. --Abzeronow (talk) 21:28, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
A formal PR picture of an Israeli journalist and politician, clearly taken by a photographer. It cannot stay in the Commons without a proper VRT (formerly, OTRS) release note. Ldorfman (talk) 23:48, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, needs VRT. --Abzeronow (talk) 21:31, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Incorrect signature Canton Viaduct (talk) 23:49, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: Misidentified signatures can be corrected, no reason for deletion. --Abzeronow (talk) 21:32, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Afbeelding lijkt van elders overgenomen te zijn Saschaporsche (talk) 15:52, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Ik heb deze foto zelf genomen. Als hij elders te vinden is is dat omdat ik de gebruiker zoals een uitgever daar toestemming toe heb gegeven met vermelding van mijn naam. Roepot (talk) 19:37, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
- De beschrijving zegt dat de afbeelding gemaakt is door Roelof Pothuis. De afbeelding is geplaatst door gebruiker:Roepot dat zou dezelfde persoon kunnen zijn, maar er bestaat twijfel over. Bovendien staat de afbeelding online. Zie hier De vraag blijft of die afbeelding rechtenvrij is. Saschaporsche(talk) 08:43, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
- I cannot tell when the link the nominator mentioned was published. The uploader's name being the name mentioned is plausible but given that it may have been published on the site linked before it was uploaded to Commons, makes me think that User:Roepot should do contact COM:VRT with the original Camera EXIF to confirm that they are the photographer. Abzeronow (talk) 18:42, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
- Started the proces, thank you for the comment. Roepot (talk) 22:14, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- I cannot tell when the link the nominator mentioned was published. The uploader's name being the name mentioned is plausible but given that it may have been published on the site linked before it was uploaded to Commons, makes me think that User:Roepot should do contact COM:VRT with the original Camera EXIF to confirm that they are the photographer. Abzeronow (talk) 18:42, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: now has VRT confirmation. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:29, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
Verdades ocultas... 186.173.189.23 14:09, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Supposedly taken at a film premiere. No EXIF but no hits on TinEye either. Abzeronow (talk) 18:17, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no hits on Google images either. Let's assume GF (and metadata deletion at upload time). Ruthven (msg) 13:46, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Copyright Violation Q1q2q3qwertz (talk) 06:45, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
- I replaced the Speedy-deletion request with for reason of copyright violation by the template for regular deletion because I don’t see the violation. The video was uploaded by the author „Crooked House Films“ (the company who created the film) with a cc 3.0 license, a valid license for this page.—Q1q2q3qwertz (talk) 06:57, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep per Q1q2q3qwertz. I'm not able to see the video itself but the Vimeo upload appears to be from an official account and is licensed CC BY 3.0. -M.nelson (talk) 22:36, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --rubin16 (talk) 11:43, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
The image is an screenshot from a video hosted in Viemo under a CC-BY license. The problem is that the video is an ad from the costmetics company Decoté, and the uploader is not this company, but Crooked House Films, the company hired to make the commercial. It is normal that on WHF works, the copyright holder is the company paying for it, and not the commissioned company. The Vimeo channel has also other commecialf of BMW, Renault, Revlon, Tesco, etc and some music video clips, all with bogus CC-BY. Günther Frager (talk) 14:39, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Not necessarily. Copyright is normaly owned by the individuals creating the movie or their employer, not whoever payed for the work. If I hire a painter to create a painting for me, I own the painting and I can use it for whatever I want, but I don't get the copyright.
- If the creators release it under a CC license, they're likely breaking the contract with the company that hired them (as it would be normal for them to get exclusive usage rights), but that's not our problem, but theirs. PaterMcFly (talk) 12:00, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- It is not our problem if they get sued for hosting a video on Vimeo with the wrong license, but it is our problem if we host it in Commons since our users can get sued for reusing it. The COM:PCP is quite clear, about it: we cannot keep images if there is a significant doubt about their copyright status. The question here is not about what is hypothetically possible, but what is the most likely scenario. A marketing company doesn't make a commercial for BMW hiring actors, paying for music rights, etc and then goes to BMW headquarters to see if they would like to buy a license to use it. We can keep these images if we have a COM:VRT ticket where Crooked House Films shows evidence that they keep the copyright of the ads they were hired to produce. Günther Frager (talk) 14:28, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- No, we don't have to, as the copyright cannot be sold. As I said, they could have exclusively licensed the work to BMW, but then if they license it to someone else, that license is also valid, even if BMW would want to sue them for breach of their contract. Since it seems to be undisputed that Crooked House indeed uploaded this to Vimeo, whatever contract they have with somebody else is irrelevant. Licensing the same work under various licenses is perfectly valid. PaterMcFly (talk) 14:58, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- I never said they are selling copyright, you can read the US law about who gets assigned the copyright by default [13]: «If a work is made for hire, the employer or the party that specially ordered or commissioned that work is the initial owner of the copyright in the work unless the employer or the commissioning party has signed a written agreement to the contrary with the work’s creator.». Günther Frager (talk) 15:43, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- It however looks like this work was made in the UK, not the US. And the UK doesn't have this rule, but more an European-style copyright, as far as I know. Crooked House Films is based in London. PaterMcFly (talk) 18:00, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- I never said they are selling copyright, you can read the US law about who gets assigned the copyright by default [13]: «If a work is made for hire, the employer or the party that specially ordered or commissioned that work is the initial owner of the copyright in the work unless the employer or the commissioning party has signed a written agreement to the contrary with the work’s creator.». Günther Frager (talk) 15:43, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- No, we don't have to, as the copyright cannot be sold. As I said, they could have exclusively licensed the work to BMW, but then if they license it to someone else, that license is also valid, even if BMW would want to sue them for breach of their contract. Since it seems to be undisputed that Crooked House indeed uploaded this to Vimeo, whatever contract they have with somebody else is irrelevant. Licensing the same work under various licenses is perfectly valid. PaterMcFly (talk) 14:58, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- It is not our problem if they get sued for hosting a video on Vimeo with the wrong license, but it is our problem if we host it in Commons since our users can get sued for reusing it. The COM:PCP is quite clear, about it: we cannot keep images if there is a significant doubt about their copyright status. The question here is not about what is hypothetically possible, but what is the most likely scenario. A marketing company doesn't make a commercial for BMW hiring actors, paying for music rights, etc and then goes to BMW headquarters to see if they would like to buy a license to use it. We can keep these images if we have a COM:VRT ticket where Crooked House Films shows evidence that they keep the copyright of the ads they were hired to produce. Günther Frager (talk) 14:28, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep per PaterMcFly. A professional film production company can be presumed to be familiar with the legal rights that it is able to release its own films under. IronGargoyle (talk) 03:47, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep per PaterMcFly and IronGargoyle.—Indopug (talk) 11:17, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. Ruthven (msg) 13:46, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Poorly made self-published PDF, COM:SELFIE, out of COM:SCOPE. Veverve (talk) 13:53, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- La imagen fue publicada en España en 1906, por tanto han transcurrido más de 80 años.
La legislación española establece el plazo de 80 años para el mantenimiento del copyright para las obras publicadas antes de 1987.
Por tanto pienso que esta imagen está dn dominio público.
Si la razón por la que se propone borrar, no se refiere al copyright, agradeceré que se expongan con claridad las razones. JLVwiki (talk) 16:57, 7 February 2024 (UTC)- Keep: Previously I thought it might be a later edition, but after the PDF's page 4 I saw that appears the original 1906 version, which is in fact in the public domain as the author died in 1914 and it was published 118 years ago. 83.61.247.43 21:56, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
- Info: However, the first 3 pages are clearly recent and may be copyright violations unless the original creators (both the author of the text and the photographer who took the cover's image, if are different persons) authorize their use under a free license. I suggest remove these first pages from the document. 83.61.247.43 21:57, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep: Previously I thought it might be a later edition, but after the PDF's page 4 I saw that appears the original 1906 version, which is in fact in the public domain as the author died in 1914 and it was published 118 years ago. 83.61.247.43 21:56, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep after deleting pages 1, 2, and 3. 69.174.144.79 04:11, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
- Hopefully someone can overwrite with the pages omitted or covered up so I can close this. Abzeronow (talk) 18:14, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
- @83.61.247.43, Vd. escribe que "the first 3 pages are clearly recent and may be copyright violations unless the original creators"
- Sin embargo precisamente en la página 2, se indica que está en dominio público. El que ha escrito (después del año 1906) que está en dominio público, es obvio que deja también en dominio publico lo que escribe.
- La página 3, incluye la fecha de la edición: 1906. No se entiende por qué se escribe que las 3 primeras páginas son claramente recientes. JLVwiki (talk) 16:14, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- The issue is that the first three pages contain a modern photo not found in the 1906 edition. I don't know enough Spanish to state whether the text is a problem or not on those pages. Abzeronow (talk) 17:16, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- La imagen no estaba en la edición de 1907, pero en la segunda página del PDF se recoge el siguiente texto:
- La imagen no estaba en la edición de 1907, pero en la segunda página del PDF se recoge el siguiente texto:
- Hopefully someone can overwrite with the pages omitted or covered up so I can close this. Abzeronow (talk) 18:14, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
- Esta imagen de la portada está en dominio público, por deseo expreso del autor, Molostock, que permite su uso para fines personales y comerciales, además de la creación de obras adaptadas a partir de la imagen original.
Origen: http:llwww.freepik.eslfoto-gratis/ig/esia-en-mitad• del-campo_874787.htm - Propongo cerrar ya esta discusión y eliminar solicitud de borrado. JLVwiki (talk) 10:38, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- That URL doesn't work so I cannot verify if the photograph is actually released to the public domain. I will give two more weeks to for this to be resolved. If things are the same then, as they are now, I will delete this. Abzeronow (talk) 17:30, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- I have managed to understandthe URL, it is in fact: https://web.archive.org/web/20160725030942/http://www.freepik.es/foto-gratis/iglesia-en-mitad-del-campo_874787.htm
- It is the Church of the Good Shepherd at the Lake Tekapo (New Zealand).
- The image does not seem to be on Freepik anymore. Maybe the image was copyrighted and illegally uploaded on Freepik. Also, I have no idea how reliable Freepik is. Veverve (talk) 18:19, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks. I'd rather just have someone overwrite this to remove the extraneous stuff since this New Zealand church isn't relevant to the rest (the 1906 document). Abzeronow (talk) 21:12, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- That URL doesn't work so I cannot verify if the photograph is actually released to the public domain. I will give two more weeks to for this to be resolved. If things are the same then, as they are now, I will delete this. Abzeronow (talk) 17:30, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- Esta imagen de la portada está en dominio público, por deseo expreso del autor, Molostock, que permite su uso para fines personales y comerciales, además de la creación de obras adaptadas a partir de la imagen original.
Deleted: First three pages are out of scope and nobody bothered to overwrite as suggested. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:06, 22 April 2024 (UTC)