User talk:JLVwiki
|
File:Ramón Montserrat.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:49, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
File:Juan Cruz Allí.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:51, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
File tagging File:Jefatura de Policia Sevilla 2007 A.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Jefatura de Policia Sevilla 2007 A.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Jefatura de Policia Sevilla 2007 A.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
And also:
Yours sincerely, Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:52, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
La imagen esta tomada de https://guiadigital.iaph.es/inicio se trata de una plataforma de datos abiertos, término que utiliza la legislación española para referirse a los datos (de cualquier tipo: texto, imagen, aplicaciones, etc.) que la Administración Pública (en este caso la Junta de Anadlucía) deja a libre disposición de los usuarios. --JLVwiki (talk) 21:35, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
Adjunto, el texto con el que se presenta esta guiadigital:
La Guía Digital del Patrimonio Cultural de Andalucía es una producto de información que pone disposición de la ciudadanía el resultado del trabajo de documentación del patrimonio cultural andaluz realizado por IAPH en sus casi 30 años de existencia, en colaboración con otros organismos e instituciones tanto públicas como privadas.
En la actualidad, la Guía registra 1.000.000 de visitas anuales desde 70 países, ofreciendo, además, un conjunto de datos estructurados accesibles a través de una plataforma de datos abiertos que se configura como una de las mayores proveedoras de contenidos digitales abiertos del patrimonio cultural a nivel nacional e internacional: https://guiadigital.iaph.es/inicio
Copyright status: File:Larrainzar 1870.01.01 - 1890.12.31.pdf
[edit]Copyright status: File:Larrainzar 1870.01.01 - 1890.12.31.pdf
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Larrainzar 1870.01.01 - 1890.12.31.pdf. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:01, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
File tagging File:Larrainzar 1870.01.01 - 1890.12.31.pdf
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Larrainzar 1870.01.01 - 1890.12.31.pdf. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Larrainzar 1870.01.01 - 1890.12.31.pdf]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
JuTa 09:13, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
ː̺@JuTa: En el enlace que facilité con el orgigen de la imagen (http://www.navarra.es/home_es/Temas/Turismo+ocio+y+cultura/Archivos/Programas/Archivo+Abierto/Documentos/Planos-de-masas-de-cultivos-Borradores-Valle-de-Ulzama-Larrainzar_IcI3mnna5GHPAFzUNHVSdw) se puede leer con toda claridadː " Esta obra está bajo una licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 3.0 España."
ːPor mi parte no se me ocurre qué más hacer; me temo que esta plantilla se ha puesto leer la página a la que lleva el enlace.
ːSi no es así, y hay algo que no he hecho de acuerdo con lo previsto, agradeceré que se me expliqué, pero -por favor- no mediante una plantilla.JLVwiki (talk) 09:41, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, but NonCommercial-NoDerivs is not accepted on commons - see Commons:Licensing. --JuTa 09:47, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
- Muchas gracias @JuTa: , está muy claro, me quedé con que era Creative Commons, y no me fije en el resto. Perdón. JLVwiki (talk) 10:57, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, but NonCommercial-NoDerivs is not accepted on commons - see Commons:Licensing. --JuTa 09:47, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted content
[edit]
File:Larrainzar 1870.01.01 - 1890.12.31.pdf
- use in any work, regardless of content
- creation of derivative works
- commercial use
- free distribution
See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons, and Commons:Image casebook for some specific examples. Some other Wikimedia projects have different licensing policies. For example, the English Wikipedia allows fair use of sounds and photographs. This is not the case on Wikimedia Commons; "fair use" materials are not acceptable here.
Please make sure that you only upload educational content you have created yourself, those which are out of copyright, or those for which you have the required permission for the work to be used in all the ways described above. Please note that derivative works of copyrighted material are also considered copyrighted. Again, please read through Commons:Licensing, which is quite crucial, to understanding how Wikimedia Commons works. Thanks for your contribution, and please do leave me a message if you have further questions.To undelete the file(s), the copyright holder must send a permission to the OTRS team.
Yours sincerely, Arthur Crbz (talk) 14:02, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
vías pecuarias en El Bosque
[edit]Hola @JLVwiki.
No hace falta que me trates de usted. Perdona la tardanza en responder sobre tu petición de fotos. Me suena que uno de esos cordeles lo corta la carretara de Arcos a El Bosque (A-372), por lo que la próxima vez que me acerque podría hacerle una foto. Pero la otra no tengo idea. ¿Cómo podría comprobar el itinerario de los cordeles?
Saludos.
- @El Pantera: , muchas gracias. Te paso un enlace con el que puedes descargar un planito centrado en El Bosque. El cordel, llamado de Zahara, aparece en verde claro, está ya deslindado (probablemente amojonado); la línea verde oscura, que rodea por el norte El Bosque, se llama Cordel de Grazalema a Arcos, y todavía no está deslindado. JLVwiki (talk) 14:56, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Miss Marple First Image.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 08:52, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
RE. File:Opus Gay (236011903).jpg
[edit]Buenas tardes. La argumentación es la correcta, además que ya tiene la categoría de "ate anticlerical" que creo engloba mejor y la categoriza de mejor forma. Gracias por el apunte. Saludos! MiguelAlanCS (talk) 17:59, 30 November 2020 (UTC).
- @MiguelAlanCS: Me parece muy bien, gracias JLVwiki (talk) 18:05, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
Reminder
[edit]Hi JLVwiki. I noticed that you've made a malformed deletion request. Here, {{Delete}} is not for speedy deletion, please see COM:DP. When you want to delete a page by manually using the {{Delete}} template (rather than the automatic Nominate for deletion tool in the Tools menu on the sidebar per COM:DR#Starting requests), you must follow the instructions in the template, including the "Click here to show further instructions" portion (or Commons:Deletion requests/Listing a request manually policy), otherwise you will create a lot of work for other people. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 23:54, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, but... JLVwiki (talk) 18:36, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Facerías
[edit]Hola JLV:
Veo que has corregido Category:Las Limitaciones añadiendo "de las Améscoas". Supongo que así es más preciso, aunque no sé si hay otras Limitaciones en otra parte. En cualquier caso, ahora mismo hay una duplicación entre Category:Facerías y Category:Territorios faceros. Si estás puesto en el tema, creo podrías solucionarlo de una forma u otra. Un saludo
LBM1948 LBM1948 (talk) 16:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- Gracias; siguiendo tu sugerencia he tratado de poner algo de orden en estas categorías:
- Territorios faceros son un tipo específico de las facerías: son las facerías que no quedan incluidas en ningún término municipal: esto es lo que sucede con Limitaciones de las Améscoas.
- He aprovechado también para incluir Category:Montes de utilidad pública de Navarra en Category:Forests in Navarre, pues no todos los Forest son Montes de utilidad pública.
- Me parece que con esto queda ordenado; si todavía hay algo huérfano, dímelo. JLVwiki (talk) 18:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
File:Sello del papa Francisco.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Veverve (talk) 17:08, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
File:Sello del papa Francisco.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Veverve (talk) 17:08, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
Please consider updating the file description to explain why this own work, rather than a scan of an existing one?
You can also make use of {{Book}} to give catalog details for the book. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:51, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
- @ShakespeareFan00 He añadido una explicación del origen de esa imagen, se trata de una foto obtenido del facsimil, y guardada como PDF.
- JLVwiki (talk) 16:55, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
Proper categories
[edit]Please put what you upload into proper categories. Create new categories if need be, and especially if a WP article already exists on the topic. Veverve (talk) 12:08, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
- Pienso que lo he hecho así; si he subido alguno sin categorizarlo, agradecería saber cuál o cuáles.JLVwiki (talk) 08:27, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
- It is not that there is not categorisation, it is that a more precise categorisation is needed. For example, you have uploaded encyclicals byt you have not create a WCommons category for them when WP articles on them already existed. Veverve (talk) 19:56, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
- Lo siento, no entiendo qué categoría debería haber creado.
Supongo que su mensaje tiene su origen en el modo en que he categorizado File:Quarto abeunte saeculo.pdf
Efectivamente, sobre esa encíclica hay artículos en WP ¿Podría indicarme qué categoría debería haber creado? Se lo agradecería para poder tenerlo en cuenta en otras ocasiones. JLVwiki (talk) 09:26, 21 August 2023 (UTC)- Category:Quarto abeunte saeculo should have been created. Veverve (talk) 14:14, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
- Entendido, cuando se sube un documento escrito que tiene algún artículo en WP, además de asignarle las categorías ya existentes, se crea una categoría específica para ese documento, aunque en esa categoría solo exista un documento. Así queda relacionado con ese texto en WP y WD. He comprobado como ha quedado resuelto en Category:Quarto abeunte saeculo
Aprovecharé para comprobar algunos documentos similares que he subido anteriormente. Muchas gracias... JLVwiki (talk) 16:26, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
- Entendido, cuando se sube un documento escrito que tiene algún artículo en WP, además de asignarle las categorías ya existentes, se crea una categoría específica para ese documento, aunque en esa categoría solo exista un documento. Así queda relacionado con ese texto en WP y WD. He comprobado como ha quedado resuelto en Category:Quarto abeunte saeculo
- Category:Quarto abeunte saeculo should have been created. Veverve (talk) 14:14, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
- Lo siento, no entiendo qué categoría debería haber creado.
- It is not that there is not categorisation, it is that a more precise categorisation is needed. For example, you have uploaded encyclicals byt you have not create a WCommons category for them when WP articles on them already existed. Veverve (talk) 19:56, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
File:Catecismo Mayor de San Pío X.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |