Commons:Administrators
Shortcuts: COM:A • COM:ADMIN • COM:SYSOP
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/78/Commons_Administrator.svg/150px-Commons_Administrator.svg.png)
This page explains the role of administrators (sometimes called admins or sysops) on Wikimedia Commons. Note that details of the role, and the way in which administrators are appointed, may differ from other sites.
If you want to request administrator help, please post at Administrators' noticeboard.
There are currently 181 administrators on Commons.
What is an administrator?
Administrators as of February 2025 Listing by: Language • Date • Activity [+/−] |
Number of Admins: 181
If 181 is not the last number on this list, there may be an error or there are some users assigned temporarily. |
Technical
Administrators are users with the technical ability on Wikimedia Commons to:
- delete and undelete images and other uploaded files, and to view and restore deleted versions
- delete and undelete pages, and to view and restore deleted revisions
- protect and unprotect pages, and to edit admin-protected pages
- block and unblock users, individual IP addresses and IP address ranges
- edit less-restricted interface messages (see also Commons:Interface administrators)
- rename files
- add and remove user groups
- configure Upload Wizard campaigns
- delete and undelete specific log entries and revisions of pages
- import pages from other wikis
- merge the history of pages
- modify abuse filters
- not create redirects from source pages when moving pages
- override the spoofing checks and title or username blacklist
- send a message to multiple users at once (massmessage)
- use higher limits in API queries
These are collectively known as the admin tools.
Community role
Administrators are experienced and trusted members of the Commons community who have taken on additional maintenance work and have been entrusted with the admin tools by public consensus/vote. Different admins have different areas of interest and expertise, but typical admin tasks include determining and closing deletion requests, deleting copyright violations, undeleting files where necessary, protecting Commons against vandalism, and working on templates and other protected pages. Of course, some of these tasks can be done by non-admins as well.
Administrators are expected to understand the goals of this project, and be prepared to work constructively with others towards those ends. Administrators should also understand and follow Commons' policies, and where appropriate, respect community consensus.
Apart from roles which require use of the admin tools, administrators have no special editorial authority by virtue of their position, and in discussions and public votes their contributions are treated in the same way as any ordinary editor. Some admins may become more influential, not due to their position as such, but from the personal trust they may have gained from the community.
Suggestions for administrators
Please read Commons:Guide to adminship.
Removal of administrator rights
Under the de-admin policy, administrator rights may be revoked due to inactivity or misuse of sysop tools. In a de-admin request, normal standards for determining consensus in an RfA do not apply. Instead, "majority consensus" should be used, whereby any consensus to demote of higher than 50% is sufficient to remove the admin.
Apply to become an administrator
All intending administrators must go through this process and submit themselves to RFA, including all ex-administrators who are seeking to return to their previous role.
First, go to Commons:Administrators/Howto and read the information there. Then come back here and make your request in the section below.
- After clicking the appropriate button and creating the subpage, copy the link to the subpage, e.g. "Commons:Administrators/Requests/Username", edit Commons:Administrators/Requests and paste it in at the top of the section, then put it in double curly brackets (e.g. {{Commons:Administrators/Requests/Username}}) to transclude it. Request a watchlist notice at MediaWiki talk:WatchlistNotice, or edit MediaWiki:WatchlistNotice to put up one if you are an administrator.
- If someone else nominated you, please accept the nomination by stating "I accept" or something similar, and signing below the nomination itself. The subpage will still need to be transcluded by you or your nominator.
Use the box below, replacing Username with your username: |
Voting
Any registered user may vote here although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted. It is preferable you give reasons for both Support and Oppose votes as this will help the closing bureaucrat in their decision. Greater weight is given to an argument, with supporting evidence if needed, than to a simple vote.
Promotion normally requires at least 75% in favour, with a minimum of 8 support votes. Votes from unregistered users are not counted. However, the closing bureaucrat has discretion in judging community consensus, and the decision will not necessarily be based on the raw numbers. Bureaucrats may, at their discretion, extend the period of an RfA if they feel that it will be helpful in better determining community consensus.
Neutral comments are not counted in the vote totals for the purposes of calculating pass/fail percentages. However, such comments are part of the discussion, may persuade others, and contribute to the closing bureaucrat's understanding of community consensus.
Purge the cache Use the edit link below to edit the transcluded page.
Requests for adminship
When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Administrators/Archive.
- Please read Commons:Administrators before voting here. Any logged in user may vote although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.
Gnom (talk · contributions (views) · deleted user contributions · recent activity (talk · project · deletion requests) · logs · block log · global contribs · CentralAuth)
Scheduled to end: 19:28, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
Hello again – after narrowly missing the threshold in my last request for adminship in November 2023 (with 74% approval), I thought I could ask again, now that more than a year has passed and the community has had the opportunity to see some more activity from me in the areas where I would most like to be active as an admin, which is copyright-related deletion requests.
In January, some of you maybe read my blog post for Public Domain Day 2025, which discussed the tricky copyright situation around artworks by the two famous painters Frida Kahlo and Henri Matisse. Another recent project of mine that I am very excited about, albeit still in an early stage (and not admin-related), is the upload of over 2,000 recordings of organ music.
Seeing the many unsuccessful requests for Commons adminship over the last months, I must confess that I am publishing this request somewhat anxiously – but I sincerely think that I could be of help to the community with my experience as a copyright lawyer and long-time community member, and a few of the people who did not support my last request have already indicated that they would do so this time.
You can find more information about me on my user page as well as in my last request for adminship. Happy to also answer any questions you may have.
Votes
Support per nom and the answers in the previous nom. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 19:44, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
Support Queen of Hearts (talk) 20:11, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
Support per Jeff G. We can use the help. --MB-one (talk) 20:45, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
Support It's hard to find a more trusted user for the things we do and need here. --Mirer (talk) 20:46, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
- I can not laugh about it anymore. -- Marcus Cyron (talk) 21:06, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
- can you please explain? @Marcus Cyron modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 21:45, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
- @Marcus Cyron, it is inappropriate to express derision without offering an argument, and is a violation of the Universal Code of Conduct. Whatever your personal feelings or experience with Gnom, please stick to arguments relevant for his potential contribution as a Commons admin. Ijon (talk) 01:09, 14 February 2025 (UTC)
- I don't find Marcus's comment here, nor his oppose in the previous request ("I learned the hard way that Gnom doesn't care about right and wrong when it fits the agenda.") particularly useful - it's not possible for other people to decide for themselves whether a concern is valid if Marcus doesn't actually share the specifics with the rest of us - but I also don't find you throwing the Universal Code of Conduct around particularly constructive either. It feels like a needless escalation. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:55, 14 February 2025 (UTC)
- @Marcus Cyron: That sort of response is not of the high standard we would expect from a fellow admin. The position of the response does not help either. Are you laughing at the candidate or at Mirer? Brianjd (talk) 08:36, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
- I laugh at the imagination od the serious, decent fellow Wikimedian. I had to leard the hard way, that Gnom always takes the path of least resistance, shies away from any conflict (which is not possible as an admin). I experienced him as chairman of the Wikimedia board when we were both on the board, and had to experience his fickleness first hand. I have experienced few fellow Wikimedians who can deceive the masses as much as he can. But since I cannot say in detail what I would like to say, I can only laugh at the impression that is being made of him here. I can say from personal experience that when you really need it, not only do you not get any support, but you get a real stab in the back. Marcus Cyron (talk) 13:31, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
- I can not laugh about it anymore. -- Marcus Cyron (talk) 21:06, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 21:45, 13 February 2025 (UTC)very weak support - man... you have low activity here. i just look over previous discussions about adminship. and since you are lawyer on copyright and you are old editor im ok. but please, do more work here. thank you for apply.
Neutral per marcus, i wanna be neutral. sorry.modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 16:19, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
Support I supported last time and they would be a good admin due to experience. I also appreciate this user's work with WikiOrchestra. Abzeronow (talk) 23:02, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
Support per nom. I have no concerns about level of activity; every bit of work Gnom can do would be helpful and 100% good-faith. Ijon (talk) 01:04, 14 February 2025 (UTC)
Support per QOH and Jeff G. I would appreciate an uptick in activity, but we shouldn't expect every admin to be doing 100+ actions a day. All the Best -- Chuck Talk 03:22, 14 February 2025 (UTC)
Oppose with regret. As in the last RfA, valuable work is shown in the application, but none of it is admin related, and it's not pointed out what the tools should be used for. The user with no doubt is an expert on copyright, but an expert is by far more useful giving advice and commenting on deletion requests than having the mop themselves and then not using it. --Krd 08:04, 14 February 2025 (UTC)
Support I was one who opposed you last time out of the concern of a low edit count. But today I see it differently. Even if your edit count is low, those are good edits (at least in my experience). Don't really find a reason to oppose anymore.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 08:18, 14 February 2025 (UTC)
Support such a great and fitting candidate! --Rogi (talk) 08:23, 14 February 2025 (UTC)
Support I think I can keep my promise. --A1Cafel (talk) 09:49, 14 February 2025 (UTC)
Support Last time I did not vote, because you were sysop in test wiki, but you had only 1 edit there. I see, that you still have only 1 edit in test wiki, but you are not a sysop there, actually you are not sysop anywhere, and for this improvement I support you. Taivo (talk) 14:50, 14 February 2025 (UTC)
Support --Mateus2019 (talk) 16:24, 14 February 2025 (UTC)
Support No issue as far as I can tell. --Yann (talk) 17:39, 14 February 2025 (UTC)
Support seems fine to me. signed, Aafi (talk) 14:26, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
Support like last time --Ameisenigel (talk) 17:23, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
Support Looks good, we need more qualified Admins. Captain-tucker (talk) 02:56, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
Support Jianhui67 T★C 07:43, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
Support sure. --TenWhile6 07:47, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
Support --Tf 10:45, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
Oppose, for avoiding question #c-The_Squirrel_Conspiracy-20250216030600-Comments, meanwhile making plenty of non-minor edits https://xtools.wmcloud.org/globalcontribs/Gnom .--RoyZuo (talk) 16:57, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
- RoyZuo: For the record, Gnom did respond to me by email. As far as I'm concerned, nothing they said in the email couldn't be shared publicly, and nothing swayed me from my current thought on the matter, which is that if Marcus Cyron wants their complaint to be taken seriously, they need to provide actual details, and if they can't provide details because of a WMDE NDA, they need to make that explicit. All this is to say that they didn't avoid the question, though I don't see why they can't share what they emailed me here. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:57, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
Support. —— Eric Liu(Talk) 06:40, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
Support --Adamant1 (talk) 08:55, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
Support --— D Y O L F 77[Talk] 12:27, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
Support looks good -- a volunteer who knows and respect copyright wants to help out more, and be useful for the project --アンタナナ 12:53, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
Comments
- On your Mastodon account linked from your userpage, looking at it I get the impression that not all photos are properly attributed? --A.Savin 04:40, 14 February 2025 (UTC)
- Oh, you're probably right, I should be more consistent with the attributions on social media. I'll go fix that right now. As you can see here, I am able to do it in principle :-) Gnom (talk) 07:05, 14 February 2025 (UTC)
- I’m a bit late here, but I’ll try to contribute anyway. I just had a quick look at your Mastodon account. It is hard for me to judge, since most of the posts are in a language that I cannot read. But I notice there seem to be no links to any licenses, even though CC licenses require a link to the license. Can you explain? Brianjd (talk) 13:12, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- @Brianjd: You are of course correct. However, providing a license link on social media posts is rarely done by anyone in practice – just because it makes the post look a bit messy. Gnom (talk) 14:11, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- I’m not sure what to say to that. I guess I should say it’s a refreshingly honest answer (especially when contrasted with the ‘no Facebook’-style tags that have given Commons so much trouble). Brianjd (talk) 14:18, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- @Brianjd: You are of course correct. However, providing a license link on social media posts is rarely done by anyone in practice – just because it makes the post look a bit messy. Gnom (talk) 14:11, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- I’m a bit late here, but I’ll try to contribute anyway. I just had a quick look at your Mastodon account. It is hard for me to judge, since most of the posts are in a language that I cannot read. But I notice there seem to be no links to any licenses, even though CC licenses require a link to the license. Can you explain? Brianjd (talk) 13:12, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- Oh, you're probably right, I should be more consistent with the attributions on social media. I'll go fix that right now. As you can see here, I am able to do it in principle :-) Gnom (talk) 07:05, 14 February 2025 (UTC)
- Since your nomination does not talk much about the admin areas your intent to work in, could you please specify the areas you plan to focus on? --Ratekreel (talk) 16:46, 14 February 2025 (UTC)
- Hello @Ratekreel, my plan is to focus my admin activity on copyright-related deletion requests. Or was your question about something else? Gnom (talk) 21:16, 14 February 2025 (UTC)
Question @Gnom: Can you please shed light on the conflict between yourself and Marcus Cyron that they alluded to above, from your own perspective. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:06, 16 February 2025 (UTC)
Requests for bureaucratship
When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Bureaucrats/Archive.
- Please read Commons:Bureaucrats before posting or voting here. Any logged in user may vote although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.
No current requests.
Requests for CheckUser rights
When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Checkusers/Archive.
- Please read Commons:Checkusers before posting or voting here. Any logged in user may vote although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.
Yann (talk · contributions (views) · deleted user contributions · recent activity (talk · project · deletion requests) · logs · block log · global contribs · CentralAuth)
Scheduled to end: 06:02, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
Dear community,
today I would like to nominate Yann to be the next checkuser for Commons.
It appears that the most active CU for the last years, Elcobbola, is currently inactive, and I have the impression that there is some need for more hands. Per my personal perception Yann is currently the most active admin in CU releated areas. They have been CU already from 2007 to 2009, and appear to be consistently active in the last two years.
Yann has agreed in private to accept the nomination.
Thank you, yours, --Krd 06:02, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks a lot Krd for this nomination. I accept it again, and I would be glad if I could help. Yann (talk) 11:02, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
Votes
Support --— D Y O L F 77[Talk] 07:16, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
Support --— Túrelio (talk) 08:10, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
Oppose per my and other comments at Commons:Administrators/Requests/Yann (de-adminship). DrKay (talk) 14:12, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
Neutral Though he could get things done, I’m concerned the inactive CU called him
the singular worst admin on the Commons and routinely demonstrates ignorance of and disregard for policy [sic]
in the link above. I’m interested to hear how they feel now, though from the looks of it, that is not possible right now. 1989 (talk) 14:38, 18 February 2025 (UTC)- Full disclosure: this commentator is also involved, per their comments at the de-adminship discussion. Brianjd (talk) 14:46, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
Support he is
OK modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 15:23, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
- i checked discussions about this and my suggestion to yann is please do your work with consedaretion of community's concerns(bad english sory). you are hard working user. we are here voluntary, dont burnout. modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 15:43, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
Support — Jeffrey Beall (talk) 17:01, 18 February 2025 (UTC).
Oppose per Brianjd's first bullet point. Queen of Hearts (talk) 19:05, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
Support I trust Yann. And he has the checkuser experience already. Abzeronow (talk) 20:03, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
Neutral per 1989, and the inactive CU has previously had to confron Yann on when CU checks can be performed. This does not bode well, but Krd's nomination statement lays the problem out pretty clearly: we need another CU. Whether Yann is the person to fill that role? I don't know. All the Best -- Chuck Talk 03:10, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
Oppose per my discussion in the comments section. Brianjd (talk) 03:27, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
Neutral - not sure where I exactly belong. While I agree that Yann is experienced and I have had good time with them, but the issues raised are equally concerning. I am staying neutral. signed, Aafi (talk) 06:11, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
Neutral per Aafi. --TenWhile6 11:45, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
Comments
- The votes section above has already raised concerns from the de-adminship discussion. Since those concerns are being discussed anyway, I also mention the following:
- Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive 98#Unacceptable threats by Yann: A discussion from this year where another admin and I listed such threats.
- Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive 98#Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests#File:Mirror_Selfie_of_erect_penis_with_removed_pubic_hair.jpg: An even more recent discussion about an incident involving me, where the candidate both formed a wrong conclusion based on non-public information and expressed that conclusion in a poor way, making me look bad.
- In both cases, the candidate addressed some of the underlying deletion/undeletion issues but failed to acknowledge any communication issues.
Even worse, in the first discussion, the candidate said:Big LOL. This is supposed to be a joke, but your sense of humor is quite obviously lacking... Do you have anything serious to say? Otherwise, please stop wasting my time and others'.
- It is the second case that I find particularly concerning, since the community depends on checkusers to carefully analyze very non-public information and carefully communicate their conclusions. I was tempted to vote oppose on that basis, but I want to see more discussion first. Brianjd (talk) 15:07, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
- The candidate did say that, and I still find it concerning, but it might be taken out of context. Or not. I’m too tired to decide. Brianjd (talk) 15:11, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
- Honestly, in my more than 20 years on Commons, that's the weirdest complain I have ever seen against anybody. OK, I got that someone didn't like my little joke on my talk page, but reproaching me that in relation to my work as admin or check user, sorry, but I don't understand. For those you might want to know the context, File:God is busy.jpg was on a T-shirt in India, and I find it funny, even more today than when I took the picture. In our world falling apart in every ways, God is probably busy fixing all problems, so They can't bother with the little problems of our community. Yann (talk) 17:33, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
- You deserve credit for participating in this discussion, and for clarifying the meaning of my struck out quote.
- But your response also clarifies something else: you insist on continuing your petty dispute with Andy Dingley, while ignoring the real issues here. Brianjd (talk) 03:25, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- FWIW, Andy Dingley made the negative comment you linked above, but I don't have any issue with Andy, so I don't understand why they were so aggressive. Yann (talk) 08:58, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
Andy Dingley made the negative comment you linked above
I linked directly to the diff by you, with your signature. Brianjd (talk) 09:40, 19 February 2025 (UTC)- @Brianjd: Just to understand, what are you complaining about exactly? The erroneous closure of File:Mirror Selfie of erect penis with removed pubic hair.jpg, which I reverted? Or the disagreement about File:Indy Fuel new logo.png, which I undeleted and created a regular DR? FYI, the DR is still open, and for good reason: the outcome is far from obvious. Or File:God is busy.jpg on my talk page? Yann (talk) 11:58, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- I thought my unresolved complaints were clear. Here is a summary of those complaints, which you have not addressed (or even acknowledged) at all:
- Per my contribution to the ‘unacceptable threats’ section, you gave an unnecessary ‘last warning’ to a new user who had already improved their behavior after previous warnings. (That section also raises other serious issues that you have not acknowledged either. One of those issues is an unjustified accusation of incivility together with an unjustified threat of a block, both made towards a fellow admin! I have not looked at the other issues closely.)
- Per the subsequent section about the erroneously closed undeletion request, you falsely implied that I had knowingly requested undeletion of a recent naked picture of a minor.
Per the comments above, you seem to have falsely attributed your own negative comment to Andy.
- Also, the fact that you have not even acknowledged the complaints described above is itself one of my complaints. Brianjd (talk) 13:00, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- Just to be clear, I don’t give a damn about this ‘God is busy’ thing. I didn’t realize that my struck out quote was actually about that. (I would be more worried about the template {{Busy}} at the top of your talk page, but actually, you do respond swiftly to most queries, to the extent that you respond at all. So that is one good thing I can say about you.) Brianjd (talk) 13:06, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- I think there is a lot of misunderstanding here. I mistaken read "Minor" for "Mirror". I am sorry that you thought that I had accused you of anything.
- When I talked about negative comments by Andy Dingley , I mean the ones they made there. I didn't attribute my comment to Andy.
- Leyo said that I threatened them linking this. I don't see any threat there. OK, I deleted this file shortly after tagging it. A regular DR would have been better, but I still think it is too complex to be on Commons without a VRT permission.
- I tagged File:Finnischer Eishockeyverband logo.svg with missing permission, and the DR created by Andy Dingley is still open. The Squirrel Conspiracy also thinks that is should be deleted. Yann (talk) 13:34, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- In view of all this, it seems to me that the complain raised by Leyo here lacks substance. In addition, the complain by Andy of the same page (which includes the ‘God is busy’ thing) looks like a bad faith attempt to criticize me.
- I am always ready to apologize and/or revert my actions when necessary. I am more aware than anybody that, on a multilingual and multicultural project like Commons, some misunderstandings and disagreements can ready become big conflicts. Regards, Yann (talk) 13:34, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- Regarding the undeletion request, I appreciate the belated apology.
- Regarding Andy, I linked to the discussion as a whole, then later linked to your comment specifically. When you referred to my link, you were not clear about which one. So yes, there was some misunderstanding. I don’t think that was anyone’s fault.
- Regarding the threat to Leyo, I accidentally linked to the revision prior to the correct one. The correct revision was Special:Diff/987704578, where you threatened Leyo, a fellow admin, with a block. Anyway, the correct link was already provided at the ‘unacceptable threats’ discussion.
- Regarding the two files whose copyright status is in dispute, I have not looked at them closely, so I currently have no specific comment. I note that files that are considered copyright violations are often deleted immediately, regardless of tags or even discussions. I also note that these two files form context for the next issue.
- Regarding the ‘last warning’ to Xgeorg, do you have any comment?
- You have not acknowledged my complaint about the ‘last warning’ to Omar.idma. Brianjd (talk) 14:14, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- I thought my unresolved complaints were clear. Here is a summary of those complaints, which you have not addressed (or even acknowledged) at all:
- @Brianjd: Just to understand, what are you complaining about exactly? The erroneous closure of File:Mirror Selfie of erect penis with removed pubic hair.jpg, which I reverted? Or the disagreement about File:Indy Fuel new logo.png, which I undeleted and created a regular DR? FYI, the DR is still open, and for good reason: the outcome is far from obvious. Or File:God is busy.jpg on my talk page? Yann (talk) 11:58, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- FWIW, Andy Dingley made the negative comment you linked above, but I don't have any issue with Andy, so I don't understand why they were so aggressive. Yann (talk) 08:58, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- Honestly, in my more than 20 years on Commons, that's the weirdest complain I have ever seen against anybody. OK, I got that someone didn't like my little joke on my talk page, but reproaching me that in relation to my work as admin or check user, sorry, but I don't understand. For those you might want to know the context, File:God is busy.jpg was on a T-shirt in India, and I find it funny, even more today than when I took the picture. In our world falling apart in every ways, God is probably busy fixing all problems, so They can't bother with the little problems of our community. Yann (talk) 17:33, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
- The candidate did say that, and I still find it concerning, but it might be taken out of context. Or not. I’m too tired to decide. Brianjd (talk) 15:11, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
- This is not a major issue in itself, but since we are digging up a lot of old discussions here, it would help if you maintained your talk page archives correctly. Your archive links only go up to archive 61, but you now have 63 archives. Brianjd (talk) 13:30, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
Requests for Oversight rights
When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Oversighters/Archive.
- Please read Commons:Oversighters before voting here. Any logged in user may vote, although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.
No current requests.