Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2023/07/28
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
File:Ambox warning orange.svg 2001:4451:8638:4000:7D7A:8672:3A3:73C5 03:01, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: No reason given, in use. --Achim55 (talk) 07:08, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Okay! please 2001:4451:866E:4700:4459:5E71:FE12:C12C 03:06, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per above. (Non-admin closure.) Omphalographer (talk) 05:02, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Delete please 112.204.115.115 04:25, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept again. (Non-admin closure.) Omphalographer (talk) 05:12, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Delete Page Cjhpaz (talk) 02:03, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
Likely a copyvio in light of this user's other uploads. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:04, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Speedy delete as this is a reupload of File:Yoon Eun Hye Actress 01.jpg (which currently redirect to this file). Original source is https://www.favor.im/actors, the artist agency. — Paper9oll 03:48, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Thanks, Paper9oll, I didn't see anything in reverse image search. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:34, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Mondo (talk) 15:28, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: replaced by ´No permission' tag. --Wutsje 16:21, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Fiz errado WhoamiARX (talk) 17:49, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's requset & F10. --Achim55 (talk) 19:41, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Copyvio and apparently hoax. Хоббит (talk) 20:40, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per uploader's claim of copyvio at Special:Diff/787784747. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:39, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Escudo de San Roque.svg. Fry1989 eh? 20:09, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:27, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
Big stack of unsourced 1990s political photos uploaded as "own work" with garbled filenames and Uploaded while editing "1997 United Kingdom general election" on en.wikipedia.org; presumably this is one of the alternate history crowd who dump images onto Commons just to make a Wikipedia preview that they can screenshot for Reddit.
- File:Aa1majjhess.png
- File:Major and heseltine.jpg
- File:Imagejsnklablab.png
- File:Heseltine and thatcher.jpg11111.jpg
- File:Heseltine and thatcher111.jpg
- File:Major and thatcher111.jpg
- File:Iangillmopr.png
- File:Denzilmppp.png
- File:Denzil2.jpg
Belbury (talk) 18:29, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:26, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
A bunch of low resolution political portraits taken from other websites (eg. https://npgshop.org.uk/products/enoch-powell-npg-x85605-card), claimed as own work.
- File:Heseltine90.jpg
- File:Bobmellish.png
- File:Westmp.png
- File:Tavernedick.jpg
- File:Enochpopo.jpg
- File:Hogg.jpg
- File:Fowler 97.png
- File:Ridders.png
- File:William wolfe.png
- File:AS green.jpg
- File:JOJ CUK.png
- File:Anthony taylor sdp.jpg
- File:William Clouston.png
- File:Rod lid.png
- File:POF o flynn.png
- File:GS Stringer.png
Belbury (talk) 16:54, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 18:48, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
Fictional and out of scope N Panama 84534 21:06, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 02:07, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
I don't believe that the uploader is the author/photographer of this picture. Waterborough (talk) 21:22, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Delete. Given the name, this is unambiguously copied from https://faroutmagazine.co.uk/pattie-boyd-first-meeting-george-harrison-the-beatles/, which credits the image to a stock photo site. Tagged as copyvio. Omphalographer (talk) 23:49, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 11:00, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
possible copyvio ( (Photo by Samir Hussein/WireImage) M2k~dewiki (talk) 20:43, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by AFBorchert. --Rosenzweig τ 23:04, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Chromjunuor (talk · contribs)
[edit]None of these are own works. So either plain copyvios, or AI-generated fake images.
- File:King George II Frederik Clarence Miskito coast.jpg
- File:Stephen Clarence (miskito coast).jpg
File:Retrato Rey Carlos VII, duque de Madrid.jpg— Proper license can be applied- File:Empress Marie-Claire Bonheur-Dessalines of Haiti.png
- File:Portrait Prince Jacques Bien Aimé d’Haiti (Dessalines).jpg
File:El infante Carlos Maria Isidro de Borbón (Francisco Lacoma y Fontane).jpg— Proper license can be appliedFile:Prince royal Victor Henri II of Haiti.jpg— Proper license can be applied- File:Emperor James I of Haiti (Dessalines).jpg
- File:Portrait emperor Jacques Dessalines of Haiti.jpg
- File:Prince Charles Michel de Bourbon.jpg
- File:Prezidan Jacques Sylvain Hyppolite Ayiti.jpg
- File:Prezidan Fabre Geffrard ayiti.jpg
- File:Prezidan, Anpere ayiti Sylvain Salnave.jpg
- File:Prezidan Lysius Salomon ayiti.jpg
- File:Prezidan Joseph Lamothe ayiti.jpg
- File:Daniel Gérard Rouzier.webp
- File:Prime minister haitian, Robert Malval.webp
- File:Prime minister haitian, Jean-Jacques Honorat.webp
- File:Prime minister haitian, Smarck Michel.webp
- File:Prime minister haitian, Martial Celestin.webp
- File:Prime minister haitian, Jean-Marie Cherestal.webp
- File:Prime minister haitian, Rosny Smarth.webp
- File:President Joseph Nerette.webp
- File:President Emile Jonassaint.webp
- File:H. NAMPHY president.webp
- File:L. MANIGAT president.webp
- File:P. AVRIL president.webp
- File:Ertha Pascal Trouillot president of Haiti.webp
- File:Joseph Lamothe president de la R% 3Fpublique.webp
- File:H. ABRAHAM president.webp
- File:President Boisrond Canal.webp
- File:President Fritz Jean.webp
- File:Joseph Lambert president of the Senate.webp
- File:Louis Eugene Roy president of Haiti.png
- File:Rosalvo Bobo president of Haiti.png
- File:Philippe Sudre Dartiguenave president of Haiti republic.png
- File:Oreste Zamor general of Haiti.jpg
- File:François Antoine Simon general of Haiti.png
- File:Cincinnatus Leconte general of Haiti.png
- File:Tancrede Auguste general of Haiti.png
- File:Michel Oreste-Lafontant general of Haiti.jpg
- File:Jean Vilbrun Guillaume Sam general of Haiti.jpg
- File:Joseph Davilmar Theodore general of Haiti.jpg
- File:Pierre Nord Alexis general of Haiti.jpg
- File:General Florvil Hyppolite of Haiti.jpg
- File:General Tiresias Simon Sam of Haiti.jpg
- File:General Lysius Salomon of Haiti.jpg
- File:President Joseph Lamothe of Haiti.jpg
- File:General Fabre Geffrard of Haiti.png
- File:General Jean Louis Pierrot of Haiti.jpg
- File:General Philippe Guerrier of Haiti.jpg
- File:General Jean Baptiste Riché of Haiti.jpg
- File:Emperor Faustin Soulouque of Haiti.png
- File:General Charles Herard of Haiti.png
- File:General Jean-Pierre Boyer of Haiti.png
- File:Prince Victor Henry Christophe haiti.jpg
- File:Emperor Jean-Jacques Dessalines Haiti.png
- File:Presidente Vicente Guerrero.png
- File:Presidente Pedro Velez.png
Yann (talk) 12:56, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Some are really bad looking, like early days MidJourney nonsense with uncanny faces and other such details. Totally inappropriate as a historical document, and iffy even if clearly tagged as an artwork — which, being non-comtemporary nor otherwise historical, is still inappropriate. However some of these are in use in at ht:Lis prezidan Ayiti. What now? -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 13:36, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete We have to get rid of them before Alamy and others begin to copy them. We risk reuploading them years from now, not realizing their origin. All have no source and an incorrect license. Some are real images, but they appear to be under active copyright. The Haitian Wikipedia can host the few real president images under "fair use", but even there the original source needs to be acknowledged. --RAN (talk) 14:20, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Comment File:Emperor James I of Haiti (Dessalines).jpg appears to trace back to an Etsy shop where the seller identifies themself as the creator of the image using an AI tool. ("The artwork was created by myself (Mikelson Toussaint-Fils) using artificial intelligence (Midjourney). I am a 3D artist but most of the artwork in this shop are AI-generated and modified/polished in Photoshop. The creation date is February 16, 2023.") With the proper credit, this one may be allowable under COM:AI. —Tcr25 (talk) 15:08, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- You can see how they can be copied and circulate and gain legitimacy. Some of these are comical, but the next generation will harder to detect. --RAN (talk) 05:29, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
- Comment File:Retrato Rey Carlos VII, duque de Madrid.jpg was painted in the late 19th century by José Soriano Fort (1873–1937) and is held at the private Museo Carlista de Madrid. The information should be able to be corrected. —Tcr25 (talk) 15:38, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Comment File:El infante Carlos Maria Isidro de Borbón (Francisco Lacoma y Fontane).jpg is by Francesc Lacoma i Fontanet (c. 1748–1849) MutalArt. Similarly File:Prince royal Victor Henri II of Haiti.jpg is cropped from a painting by an anonymous artist c. 1810 that is held by the Musée du Panthéon National Haïtien. The information for both files should be able to be corrected. —Tcr25 (talk) 15:46, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete all that cannot be traced to a verified free licensed source and the information on file pages corrected accordingly. BTW, I note that File:Presidente Vicente Guerrero.png and File:Presidente Pedro Velez.png appear to be using a non-free-licensed Adobe stock frame [1]. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:23, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Good catch on the frame. The image itself is fine (lithography by Santiago Hernandez who died in 1909), but the frame could well be an issue. I updated the file based upon finding the artist information, but will go back and add in the dispute tag based on the frame. —Tcr25 (talk) 16:34, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Note that all the images at fr:Liste des chefs d'État du Mexique use that frame or similar. —Tcr25 (talk) 16:36, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- File:King George II Frederik Clarence Miskito coast.jpg is quite simply fraudulent. Image seems based on 18th century European royalty, which "King George II of the Mosquito Coast" certainly was not, he was of the en:w:Miskito people. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk)
- File:Prime minister haitian, Robert Malval.webp has a random ear floating off his lower cheek. It's not just an AI image, it's a very bad one. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:36, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- File:Prime minister haitian, Jean-Marie Cherestal.webp quite simply blatant copyright violation of non-free image [2] -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:38, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- I've gone ahead and deleted a few of the most blatant and obvious problem images, I encourage other admins to not delay in any clear cases. I have no objection to giving more time to check on those that *might* be legitimate PD/free licensed, but otherwise I agree that the sooner we get rid of the problem images the better. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk)
- I have given the user a 3 day block, because they twice reuploaded two deleted fraudulent images. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:53, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete all images which can't be traced back to an artist, as they're likely to be fabricated. In particular, most of the paintings of "Haitian generals", towards the end of the list, look suspect to me. A bunch of them have misshapen buttons and medals on their chest; some of them look suspiciously similar to other known art of the subject (e.g. File:General Charles Herard of Haiti.png and File:Charles Rivière-Hérard.jpg). Perhaps most ridiculously, File:Pierre Nord Alexis general of Haiti.jpg is wearing a crown? Omphalographer (talk) 21:56, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Most ridiculously, for me, even more then the anachronic crown, is his half moustache… -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 03:18, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
- I suspect this may be related to User:ActiveWindows at Wikidata. --RAN (talk) 04:36, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
- Most Deleted (I see no reason for further delay); a few kept per discussion. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:28, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
Accidentally uploaded with wrong information/ownership MargaretZ26 (talk) 03:02, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Neutral The information can be corrected afterwards. The deletion request need to be more clear. Miniwark (talk) 13:53, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Accidentally uploaded with wrong information/ownership MargaretZ26 (talk) 03:03, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- duplicate request. Miniwark (talk) 13:54, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Yann. --Rosenzweig τ 07:42, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
problemi di riproduzione F.conti90 (talk) 06:23, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Neutral can you explain more clearly the problem here ? Miniwark (talk) 14:12, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- The video is jerky, it is not smooth. I would try to upload it again F.conti90 (talk) 14:00, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
file danneggiato F.conti90 (talk) 13:58, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 06:37, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
Satellite images from National Institute of Informatics (NII) were All Rights Reserved A1Cafel (talk) 17:10, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by The Squirrel Conspiracy. --Rosenzweig τ 07:41, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Hrishikeskashyap (talk) 07:38, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Empty file? Coud be a candidate for speedydelete anyway. Miniwark (talk) Miniwark (talk) 13:01, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already a month ago. --Achim55 (talk) 07:57, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
" foto Vanessa Nagel Vega", credit to Mexico professor of architecture; no indication this is the same person as the uploader. (User has uploaded multiple blatant copyrigtht violations with false licenses.) Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:40, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:10, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
Looks to be from old magazine or postcard, not 2023 photo by uploader Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:44, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:10, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
breach of copyright, not released under the stated license Rain Forest (talk) 00:49, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete copyvio Miniwark (talk) 13:49, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:31, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
Facebook 186.174.153.29 01:20, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete copyvio Miniwark (talk) 13:50, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:31, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
It's not to found at the alleged source and is almost certainly not CC-licensed. Sumanuil (talk) 01:31, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete copyvio Miniwark (talk) 13:51, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:31, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
I am not the original photographer and do not own the rights to this photo. Moajjem Hossain 02:43, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete If the uploader say so. Miniwark (talk) 12:42, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:32, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
I am not the original photographer and do not own the rights to this photo. Moajjem Hossain 02:44, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete If the uploader say so. Miniwark (talk) 12:42, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:32, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
I am not the original photographer and do not own the rights to this photo. Moajjem Hossain 02:44, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete If the uploader say so. Miniwark (talk) 12:43, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:32, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
replased other photograph of identifiable file such as revshin001.jpg 175.213.64.125 03:00, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Out of scope & low quality. Miniwark (talk) 13:52, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:33, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Mozambique A1Cafel (talk) 03:21, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:10, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Mozambique A1Cafel (talk) 03:21, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:10, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
The statue was completed in 1935 by Ruy Roque Gameiro (1906–1935) and António Reis Camelo (1899–1985), There is no freedom of panorama in Mozambique. The copyright term of the country is 70 years, and the image can be undeleted in 2056.
- File:2009 Praça dos Trabalhadores Maputo Mozambique 3857861679.jpg
- File:Estátua Grande Guerra.jpg
- File:Monumento aos Mortos da Primeira Guerra Mundial, Maputo.jpg
- File:Praça dos Trabalhadores (4107218900).jpg
- File:Praça dos Trabalhadores Statue in Maputo.jpg
- File:Ruy Roque Gameiro Monumento aos Mortos da Primeira Guerra Mundial.jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 03:26, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:34, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
No FoP in Namibia. The museum was completed in 2014, and I don't think the artist has been dead for 50 years A1Cafel (talk) 03:41, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:10, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
No FoP in Namibia. The museum was completed in 2014, and I don't think the artist has been dead for 50 years A1Cafel (talk) 03:41, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:10, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
No FoP in Namibia. The museum was completed in 2014, and I don't think the artist has been dead for 50 years A1Cafel (talk) 03:41, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:10, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Namibia A1Cafel (talk) 03:43, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:10, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Ukraine.
- File:Chernobyl disaster memorials in Molodizhnyi Park, Kharkiv (1).jpg
- File:Chernobyl disaster memorials in Molodizhnyi Park, Kharkiv (2).jpg
- File:Chernobyl victimis monument Kharkov.jpg
- File:Molodegniy park 15.jpg
- File:Molodegniy park 16.jpg
- File:Monument to Chernobyl victims, Molodizhnyi Park, Kharkiv (2019-07-27).jpg
- File:Пам'ятник жертвам Чорнобиля у Молодіжному парку 01.jpg
- File:Пам'ятник жертвам Чорнобиля у Молодіжному парку 02.jpg
- File:Пам'ятник жертвам Чорнобиля у Молодіжному парку 03.jpg
- File:Пам'ятник жертвам Чорнобиля у Молодіжному парку 04.jpg
- File:Пам'ятник жертвам Чорнобиля у Молодіжному парку 05.jpg
- File:Пам'ятник жертвам Чорнобиля у Молодіжному парку м. Харків.JPG
- File:Пам'ятник жертвам Чорнобиля.JPG
- File:Памятник чернобыльцам на Пушкинской.jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 03:49, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Question: the PD-RU-exempt licence did not apply here ? If the monument date before 1991 then it may be the case. Miniwark (talk) 12:53, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- This is located in Ukraine, not Russia. --A1Cafel (talk) 17:30, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:34, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Azerbaijan A1Cafel (talk) 03:58, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:11, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Estonia A1Cafel (talk) 04:03, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:11, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Atlas Tower (Casablanca)
[edit]In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Morocco.
- File:La tour Atlas - ville de Casablanca.jpg
- File:La tour Atlas à Casablanca.jpg
- File:Tour Atlas, Casablanca.jpg
- File:Tour Atlas.jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 04:05, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:35, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vanito Wik (talk · contribs)
[edit]Not notable person. COM:PERSONAL
Larryasou (talk) 04:19, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete The problem here is more the fact than this images are copyvio of https://walterwhitemz.blogspot.com/ (This singer may be notable in Mozambique). Miniwark (talk) 14:03, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:35, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
No FoP in Italy, artist Renzo Piano is still alive A1Cafel (talk) 04:27, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:11, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
No FoP in France, artist Henri Laurens died in 1954 A1Cafel (talk) 06:10, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete not a public domain artwork and not de minimis. Miniwark (talk) Miniwark (talk) 12:57, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:35, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
No FoP in France, artist Henri Laurens died in 1954 A1Cafel (talk) 06:10, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete not a public domain artwork and not de minimis. Miniwark (talk) Miniwark (talk) 12:57, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:35, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
Flag of some fictitious country, out of project scope. Rosenzweig τ 06:10, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Out of scope Miniwark (talk) 14:07, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:36, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Grattacielo Lancia
[edit]Sorry, but this building of Nino Rosani, M. Partesi, G. M. Pugno. is too recent (1957) and Italy has no FOP exemption.
Delete per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Auditorium Parco della Musica (Rome).
- File:Grattacielo Lancia.JPG
- File:GrattacieloLancia001.jpg
- File:GrattacieloLancia002.jpg
- File:GrattacieloLancia003.jpg
- File:GrattacieloLancia004.jpg
- File:GrattacieloLancia005.jpg
Raoli ✉ (talk) 22:43, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
- Delete--Dega180 (talk) 18:30, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:14, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Grattacielo Lancia
[edit]The building was completed in 1956 by Nino Rosani (1909–2000). There is no freedom of panorama in Italy. The copyright term of the country is 70 years, and the image can be undeleted in 2071.
- File:Grattacielo ex - Lancia.JPG
- File:Grattacielo Lancia.JPG
- File:Grattacielo uffici Lancia.JPG
- File:Palazzo Lancia - anni '50.jpg
- File:Palazzo Lancia - mostra Van Gogh.jpg
- File:Palazzo lancia01 (3143598357).jpg
- File:Palazzo lancia02 (3143597341).jpg
- File:Palazzo lancia03 (3144423746).jpg
- File:Palazzo lancia04 (3143597915).jpg
- File:Palazzo lancia05 (3143598155).jpg
- File:PalazzoLancia lato.jpg
- File:Veduta del Grattacielo Lancia, Torino anni Cinquanta - san dl SAN IMG-00001298.jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 06:18, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Not public domain, see also the previous decision by INeverCry Miniwark (talk) 14:08, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:36, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Grattacielo RAI (Turin)
[edit]Sorry, but this building of Aldo Morbelli (died in 1963) is too recent and Italy has no FOP exemption.
Delete per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Auditorium Parco della Musica (Rome).
- File:Grattacielo rai da porta susa.png
- File:Grattacielo rai torino 01 via cernaia angolo via giucciardini.png
- File:Grattacielo rai torino 02 facciata corso bolzano.png
- File:Grattacielo rai torino 03 via guicciardini angolo via ruffini.png
- File:Grattacielo rai torino 05 portico via cernaia.png
- File:Grattacielo rai torino 06 dettaglio via guicciardini angolo via cernaia.png
- File:Grattacielo rai torino 07 facciata via guicciardini.png
- File:Grattacielo rai torino 08 via ruffini ang via guicciardini.png
File:Grattacielo rai torino 09 scala antincendio.png- File:Palazzo RAI Torino.jpg
Raoli ✉ (talk) 22:46, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
Keep File:Grattacielo rai torino 09 scala antincendio.png the main subject is the fire escape stair, of the building we see only some windows. --Yoggysot (talk) 03:23, 8 February 2013 (UTC)- Delete but Keep File:Grattacielo rai torino 09 scala antincendio.png.--Dega180 (talk) 18:32, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: 1 kept, the rest deleted. INeverCry 02:15, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Grattacielo RAI (Turin)
[edit]In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Italy.
- File:Grattacielo rai torino 09 scala antincendio.png
- File:Grattacielo RAI.JPG
- File:Sede rai torino.jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 06:21, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep keep File:Grattacielo rai torino 09 scala antincendio.png because the main subject is the the fire escape stair. Miniwark (talk) 14:10, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:36, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D works in Norway A1Cafel (talk) 06:25, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:11, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D works in Norway, artist Renzo Piano is still alive A1Cafel (talk) 06:27, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:11, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
No FoP in Luxembourg, artist Claus Cito died in 1965 A1Cafel (talk) 06:38, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:11, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
No FoP in Luxembourg, artist Claus Cito died in 1965 A1Cafel (talk) 06:38, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:11, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
No FoP in Luxembourg, artist Claus Cito died in 1965 A1Cafel (talk) 06:39, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:11, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
No FoP in Luxembourg, artist Claus Cito died in 1965 A1Cafel (talk) 06:39, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:11, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
Not notable logo. COM:PS Larryasou (talk) 08:01, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Spam Miniwark (talk) 13:04, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:37, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Abdoalaa226 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photo for non-Wikipedian: out of scope
--Alaa :)..! 12:18, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:12, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
Das Bild zeigt ohne meine Zustimmung mein Balkonkraftwerk, in der Beschreibung wird die volle Adresse genannt. Die Veröffentlichung und die Nennung der Adresse erfolgten ohne mein Wissen und ohne meine Zustimmung. Sollte die Löschung nicht unverzüglich erfolgen, werde ich rechtliche Schritte einleiten. 93.204.191.195 12:46, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Es gibt kein de:Recht am Bild der eigenen Sache, bitte mal lesen und einen Anwalt fragen. --Achim55 (talk) 13:42, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rosenzweig τ 06:49, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
nonsense, nondescript Nutshinou Talk! 13:17, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 06:48, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
There are no Freedom of Panorama in Ukraine and no Freedom of Panorama in Russia for monuments. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 13:20, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:12, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
The statue of The Little Mermaid in Copenhagen is subject to copyright because the creator Edvard Eriksen (* 1876; † 1959) died less than 70 years ago. Dannebrog Spy (talk) 14:43, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The file can be restored in 2030. --Rosenzweig τ 06:47, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
Getty Images photo, Flickr user does not own the rights to the image. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 14:47, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 06:47, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
Image of a random PowerPoint slide/template. Not COM:INUSE. Don't see any COM:EDUSE out of this slide/template. Out of project scope. Matr1x-101 {user - talk? - useless contributions} 15:06, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:12, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
Delete older version of this file which fairly prominently features copyrighted text; keep latest upload in which text is blurred past point of readability. Bobamnertiopsis (talk) 15:24, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- (Sorry if there's a better process I should be going through for this type of request!) Bobamnertiopsis (talk) 15:25, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:12, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
- Undeleted: as per [3]. Yann (talk) 16:20, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Gottfried Helnwein
[edit]Photo of a copyrighted photo, requested for #04 at ticket:2023072810004825. But possibly COM:FOP Mexico? Discuss.
- File:Gottfried Helnwein Expo San Carlos 01.JPG
- File:Gottfried Helnwein Expo San Carlos 02.JPG
- File:Gottfried Helnwein Expo San Carlos 03.JPG
- File:Gottfried Helnwein Expo San Carlos 04.JPG
—Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:28, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Delete Even if it is free in Mexico, it is most likely non-free in US. Ankry (talk) 18:09, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, discussion, COM:PCP; artist Gottfried Helnwein is alive. --Rosenzweig τ 06:45, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
pointless, as in childish vandalism Hmvh (talk) 16:48, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 06:43, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
Childish scribbles with no context Hmvh (talk) 16:53, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Also deleted quasi-duplicate File:World terraria.png. --Rosenzweig τ 06:41, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
Source of DVIDsHub video is Natochannel, and original video source is now a deadlink. Delete per COM:PCP Abzeronow (talk) 17:06, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:12, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
Unused real estate map. Uploader's only contribution to Commons. Abzeronow (talk) 17:43, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:13, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
FBMD in metadata... yet no VRT permission Nutshinou Talk! 17:48, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Rosenzweig τ 06:40, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
"alternate History" fictional flag. Unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 17:50, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 06:37, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
"alternate History" fictional flag. Unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 17:51, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 06:37, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
"alternate History" fictional flag. Unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 17:51, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 06:37, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
"alternate History" fictional flag. Unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 17:52, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 06:38, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kalgonn 17 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Fantasy flag/emblem
Nutshinou Talk! 17:57, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 06:36, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
Unidentified artwork. Source is a deadlink, TinEye turns up a few links but they only work in Wayback Machine and the pages are in Chinese. Artwork is probably public domain but I need more information on it. Abzeronow (talk) 18:02, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:13, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: plain text content. Omphalographer (talk) 18:46, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. Outside of COM:SCOPE. Also, the file contains photographs without evidence of permission from the photographer/copyright holder. Marbletan (talk) 14:08, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 06:36, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
AI porn images
[edit]- File:Stable Diffusion (unfiltered) - At the bakery.jpg
- File:Stable Diffusion (unfiltered) - At the coffeehouse.jpg
- File:Stable Diffusion (unfiltered) - At the guesthouse - 1.jpg
- File:Stable Diffusion (unfiltered) - At the guesthouse - 2.jpg
- File:Stable Diffusion (unfiltered) - At the guesthouse - 3.jpg
- File:Stable Diffusion (unfiltered) - At the guesthouse - 4.jpg
- File:Stable Diffusion (unfiltered) - At the guesthouse - 5.jpg
- File:Stable Diffusion (unfiltered) - At the library.jpg]
- File:Stable Diffusion (unfiltered) - At the temple.jpg
- File:Stable Diffusion (unfiltered) - Camping in the desert 01.jpg
- File:Stable Diffusion (unfiltered) - Camping in the desert 08.jpg
- File:Stable Diffusion (unfiltered) - Camping in the desert 2.jpg
- File:Stable Diffusion (unfiltered) - Cult of Sancta Atra - 1.jpg
- File:Stable Diffusion (unfiltered) - Cult of Sancta Atra - 2.jpg
- File:Stable Diffusion (unfiltered) - Cult of Sancta Atra - 3.jpg
- File:Stable Diffusion (unfiltered) - Hiking In the desert - 3.jpg
- File:Stable Diffusion (unfiltered) - Hiking in the desert.jpg
- File:Stable Diffusion (unfiltered) - In the desert - 1.jpg
- File:Stable Diffusion (unfiltered) - In the desert - 3.jpg
- File:Stable Diffusion (unfiltered) - In the garden.jpg
- File:Stable Diffusion (unfiltered) - In the village - 1.jpg
- File:Stable Diffusion (unfiltered) - In the village - 2.jpg
- File:Stable Diffusion (unfiltered) - In the village - 3.jpg
- File:Stable Diffusion (unfiltered) - In the village - 4.jpg
- File:Stable Diffusion (unfiltered) - In the village - 5.jpg
- File:Stable Diffusion - At the desert garden - 1.jpg
- File:Stable Diffusion - At the desert garden - 2.jpg
- File:Stable Diffusion - At the desert garden - 3.jpg
- File:Stable Diffusion - At the desert garden - 4.jpg
- File:Stable Diffusion - At the old cabin - 1.jpg
- File:Stable Diffusion - At the old cabin - 2.jpg
- File:Stable Diffusion - At the old cabin - 3.jpg
- File:Stable Diffusion - At the old cabin - 4.jpg
- File:Stable Diffusion - At the old cabin - 5.jpg
- File:Stable Diffusion - At the old cabin - 6.jpg
- File:Stable Diffusion - At the old cabin - 8.jpg
- File:Stable Diffusion - At the old cabin - 9.jpg
- File:Stable Diffusion - At the old library - 2.jpg
- File:Stable Diffusion - At the old library - 3.jpg
- File:Stable Diffusion - At the old library.jpg
- File:Stable Diffusion - At the old temple - 2.jpg
- File:Stable Diffusion - At the old temple - 3.jpg
- File:Stable Diffusion - At the old temple.jpg
- File:Stable Diffusion - At the temple - 2.jpg
- File:Stable Diffusion - At the village - 6.jpg
- File:Stable Diffusion - At war - 2.jpg
- File:Stable Diffusion - At war - 3.jpg
- File:Stable Diffusion - At war - 4.jpg
- File:Stable Diffusion - At war.jpg
- File:Stable Diffusion - Cult of Sancta Atra - 4.jpg
- File:Stable Diffusion - Cult of Sancta Atra - 5.jpg
- File:Stable Diffusion - Cycling in the desert.jpg
- File:Stable Diffusion - In Ancient Rome - 1.jpg
- File:Stable Diffusion - In Ancient Rome - 2.jpg
- File:Stable Diffusion - In Ancient Rome - 3.jpg
- File:Stable Diffusion - In Ancient Rome - 4.jpg
- File:Stable Diffusion - In Ancient Rome - 5.jpg
- File:Stable Diffusion - In Ancient Rome - 6.jpg
- File:Stable Diffusion - In Ancient Rome - 8.jpg
- File:Stable Diffusion - In bed - 1.jpg
- File:Stable Diffusion - In bed - 2.jpg
- File:Stable Diffusion - In bed - 3.jpg
- File:Stable Diffusion - In bed - 4.jpg
- File:Stable Diffusion - In space - 1.jpg
- File:Stable Diffusion - In space - 2.jpg
- File:Stable Diffusion - In space - 3.jpg
- File:Stable Diffusion - In the desert - 10.jpg
- File:Stable Diffusion - In the desert - 4.jpg
- File:Stable Diffusion - In the desert - 5.jpg
- File:Stable Diffusion - In the desert - 6.jpg
- File:Stable Diffusion - In the desert - 7.jpg
- File:Stable Diffusion - In the desert - 8.jpg
- File:Stable Diffusion - In the lake.jpg
- File:Stable Diffusion - In the street - 1.jpg
- File:Stable Diffusion - In the street - 2.jpg
- File:Stable Diffusion - In the street - 3.jpg
- File:Stable Diffusion - In the street - 4.jpg
- File:Stable Diffusion - In the street - 5.jpg
- File:Stable Diffusion - In the street - 6.jpg
- File:Stable Diffusion - In the street - 7.jpg
- File:Stable Diffusion - In the village - 7.jpg
- File:Stable Diffusion - On Talos III - 2.jpg
- File:Stable Diffusion - On Talus III - 1.jpg
- File:Stable Diffusion - Pulp magazine - 2.jpg
- File:Stable Diffusion - Pulp magazine - 3.jpg
- File:Stable Diffusion - Pulp magazine - 4.jpg
- File:Stable Diffusion - Pulp magazine - 5.jpg
- File:Stable Diffusion - Pulp magazine - 6.jpg
- File:Stable Diffusion -In the desert - 9.jpg
Out of scope. I cannot think of any reason why we would need AI-generated pornography, especially so much of it. --Di (they-them) (talk) 19:21, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. These images are not realistically useful for an educational purpose. A limited number of AI-generated images could be useful as illustrations of AI image generation itself, but the borderline pornographic nature of most of these images is an unnecessary distraction from that goal. In any event, illustrating AI image generation would require more details about how exactly the images were generated (e.g. what specific model, prompt, and parameters were used), and these images lack any of that information. Omphalographer (talk) 21:34, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete, for reasons stated by others above. - Jmabel ! talk 23:13, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per COM:PORN. Their quality is neither good for educational purpose, and I think non-pornographic AI-generated images can do the illustration work as well.廣九直通車 (talk) 08:16, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete
WTF? Nothing of value here. Gamowebbed (talk) 13:20, 2 August 2023 (UTC) - Delete Delete all this filth without exceptions! How could one even hesitate, this should be a speedy deletion, no need to bother the community with that, the difference is so obvious:
-
HQ educational material
-
Pornographic junk
-
HQ educational material -
Pornographic junk
-
HQ educational material
-
Pornographic junk
-
HQ educational material -
Pornographic junk
-
HQ educational material -
Pornographic junk
-
HQ educational material -
Pornographic junk
.jpg)
.jpg){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
_Muzej_Sam_Nujoma.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(48526694481).jpg){kind=link}
_(50459461477).jpg){kind=link}
,_Astrup_Fearnley_Museet_(Renzo_Piano),_Oslo_-_Norway.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_01.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_sculpture,_Reykjavík,_Iceland.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_choi_kwang-mo(ceremonial_dress).jpg){kind=link}
DSC03948.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Muzej_Sam_Nujoma.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Muzej_Sam_Nujoma.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_Muzej_Sam_Nujoma.jpg){kind=link}
_Muzej_Sam_Nujoma.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(48526694481).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(48526694481).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_(48526694481).jpg){kind=link}
_(48526694481).jpg){kind=link}
_(50459461477).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(50459461477).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_(50459461477).jpg){kind=link}
_(50459461477).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Astrup_Fearnley_Museet_(Renzo_Piano),_Oslo_-_Norway.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Astrup_Fearnley_Museet_(Renzo_Piano),_Oslo_-_Norway.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_01.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_01.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_01.jpg){kind=link}
_01.jpg){kind=link}
![[3]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests&oldid=790513941#File:Beach-gb1d422857_1920.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_-_At_the_bakery.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_At_the_coffeehouse.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_At_the_guesthouse_-_1.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_At_the_guesthouse_-_2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_At_the_guesthouse_-_3.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_At_the_guesthouse_-_4.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_At_the_guesthouse_-_5.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_At_the_library.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_At_the_temple.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_Camping_in_the_desert_01.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_Camping_in_the_desert_08.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_Camping_in_the_desert_2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_Cult_of_Sancta_Atra_-_1.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_Cult_of_Sancta_Atra_-_2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_Cult_of_Sancta_Atra_-_3.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_Hiking_In_the_desert_-_3.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_Hiking_in_the_desert.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_In_the_desert_-_1.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_In_the_desert_-_3.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_In_the_garden.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_In_the_village_-_1.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_In_the_village_-_2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_In_the_village_-_3.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_In_the_village_-_4.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_In_the_village_-_5.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-- Tullius Detritus (talk) 10:27, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Tullius Detritus: Just because other stuff exists on Commons doesn't mean that your porn is necessary. In fact, if you think that the other images are out of scope, you are free to nominate them for deletion as well. Di (they-them) (talk) 22:06, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
- WTF? as stated above, you can nominate those for deletion too Gamowebbed (talk) 17:35, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
- Regular looking real nude women = bad, imaginary nude women who look like pornstars = good? Dronebogus (talk) 22:52, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
- Delete not because AI porn is out of scope, but because we have enough to represent the bare (geddit) concept and any new uploads should represent notable topics. These are spam uploads of personal art, so they’re out of scope. Dronebogus (talk) 22:58, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:39, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by KraftwerkGlatzing (talk · contribs)
[edit]This user needs to contact COM:VRT to verify that they are an authorized representative of Kraftwerk Glatzing-Rüstorf.
- File:Photovoltaikanlage am Kraftwerk Hart.jpg
- File:Photovoltaikanlage Kraftwerk Hart.jpg
- File:Restwasserschnecke am Wehr Hart.png
- File:Fischaufstiegshilfe am Buchleitenwehr.jpg
- File:Fischaufstiegshilfe am Wehr Deutenham.jpg
- File:Fischaufstiegshilfe am Wehr Hart.jpg
- File:KWGTimelkam.jpg
- File:KWGKaufing.jpg
- File:KraftwerkGlatzingRüstorf.jpg
King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:55, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files by KraftwerkGlatzing --Hangman'sDeath (talk) 14:11, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:40, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Baliwag Clock Tower
[edit]Appears to be recent, erected in 2000. Unfortunately, there is no freedom of panorama in the Philippines. Either a commercial license permission from the designer, or introduction of FOP, can help restore or keep these image files.
- File:0014Poblacion, Baliuag, Bulacan 35.jpg
- File:2302Poblacion, Baliuag, Bulacan 48.jpg
- File:2384Poblacion, Baliuag, Bulacan 01.jpg
- File:2384Poblacion, Baliuag, Bulacan 10.jpg
- File:5262Effects of Tropical Depression Quinta in Baliuag, Bulacan 34.jpg
- File:6019Poblacion, Baliuag, Bulacan 38.jpg
- File:6019Poblacion, Baliuag, Bulacan 39.jpg
- File:6019Poblacion, Baliuag, Bulacan 40.jpg
- File:6019Poblacion, Baliuag, Bulacan 41.jpg
- File:6181Effects of tropical depression Baliuag, Bulacan 01.jpg
- File:6181Effects of tropical depression Baliuag, Bulacan 02.jpg
- File:6181Effects of tropical depression Baliuag, Bulacan 05.jpg
- File:6181Effects of tropical depression Baliuag, Bulacan 11.jpg
- File:6181Effects of tropical depression Baliuag, Bulacan 14.jpg
- File:6181Effects of tropical depression Baliuag, Bulacan 15.jpg
- File:6181Effects of tropical depression Baliuag, Bulacan 16.jpg
- File:6181Effects of tropical depression Baliuag, Bulacan 28.jpg
- File:6181Effects of tropical depression Baliuag, Bulacan 32.jpg
- File:6181Effects of tropical depression Baliuag, Bulacan 34.jpg
- File:6181Effects of tropical depression Baliuag, Bulacan 47.jpg
- File:9825Baliuag, Bulacan Proper Poblacion 69.jpg
- File:Baliuagchurchjf5974 10.JPG
- File:Baliuagjf1656 01.JPG
- File:Baliuagjf1664 06.JPG
- File:Baliwag cityhood plebiscite 23.jpg
- File:Baliwag cityhood plebiscite 24.jpg
- File:Baliwag cityhood plebiscite 25.jpg
- File:Bulacanjf0929 16.JPG
- File:Bulacanjf0929 17.JPG
- File:Bulacanjf0929 18.JPG
- File:Baliuag- Baliuag Clock Tower.jpg
- File:FvfPobBaliuag8478 19.JPG
- File:FvfPobBaliuag8478 24.JPG
- File:FvfPobBaliuag8478 26.JPG
- File:FvfPobBaliuag8478 27.JPG
- File:FvfPobBaliuag8478 28.JPG
- File:FvfPobBaliuag8478 31.JPG
- File:FvfPobBaliuag8478 32.JPG
- File:FvfPobBaliuag8478 33.JPG
- File:FvfPobBaliuag8478 37.JPG
- File:FvfPobBaliuag8478 38.JPG
- File:FvfPobBaliuag8478 41.JPG
- File:Glorietta Plaza Baliuag.jpg
- File:JfBaliuagLandscapes9422Towerjfv 04.JPG
- File:JfBaliuagLandscapes9422Towerjfv 06.JPG
- File:JfBaliuagLandscapes9422Towerjfv 08.JPG
- File:JfBaliuagLandscapes9422Towerjfv 09.JPG
- File:JfBaliuagLandscapes9422Towerjfv 11.JPG
- File:Poblacion Centro Baliuag 05.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 23:37, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:40, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
Appears to be recent statue. The year inscribed on the plaque is 2011. Proper documentation is needed to determine if this was just transferred from its previous location (so that there may be still chance that it is an old statue), or this was just unveiled in 2011 (which makes it unfree). The source country of the 3D work does not grant freedom of panorama. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 23:59, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:13, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
Not notable person.
- File:Zagubnyy-Mayk-protiv-Nabi-Nabat-140-bmp-batl.png
- File:YOyNabi.jpg
- File:YOykJBQzP1Y.jpg
- File:Наби Набат.jpg
- File:Wzd6Nhuqrb4.jpg
- File:PhotoNabiNabat.jpg
- File:HesoyamCOVER.jpg
- File:RushInArt4.jpg
Larryasou (talk) 08:47, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Out of Scope (and probable copyvios, the authors for at last two image is "Adamovich Elena Vyacheslavovna"). Miniwark (talk) 14:36, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Fitindia (talk) 09:50, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
Duplicate : File:Gare de Tlemcen 2016.jpg Riad Salih (talk) 21:59, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, duplicate-processed. --Túrelio (talk) 07:57, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors and architects copyright. Created after 1991. Derivatives of work. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 20:08, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:28, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
Copyvio https://www.pinterest.es/pin/651896114787436477/ Aurelio de Sandoval (Mensajes aquí please) 20:15, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:30, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
copyright violation, not an own work PizzaKing13 (talk) 20:43, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:30, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
Non free poster, and thus not fair use. 2600:1017:B818:4F0F:DCC5:E9E6:E1DF:2A18 20:45, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy delete - Obvious copyright violation. (Oinkers42) (talk) 15:11, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:30, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
Because it's a personal photo. PhilippeAthos (talk) 11:23, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Image of a person with a Wikipedia article. "This is a personal photo" is not a sufficient rationale. Miniwark (talk) 14:57, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Speedy keep COM:INUSE. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:28, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
{{Delete}} reason=This file is verified source. PhilippeAthos (talk) 06:17, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
- Comment I don't understand the deletion reason. PhilippeAthos, if you're saying it's stolen from somewhere, please provide a link. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:45, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Nonsense request by sock. --Эlcobbola talk 11:54, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
Not appropriate and suitable to use into Infobox or anywhere. Pretty Baxon (talk) 13:56, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Keep File is in use, so this reasoning is obviously wrong. PaterMcFly (talk) 14:02, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no new arguments. --GPSLeo (talk) 14:21, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
Not appropriate for infobox Pretty Baxon (talk) 09:45, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept as before. Probably sock nomination. (Non-admin closure) 186.174.134.132 12:08, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis gif, not special enough to be educationally useful Adsci8 (talk) 15:11, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete very blurry. PaterMcFly (talk) 19:34, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wutsje 03:17, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Low-quality chemical structure with opaque (white) background & colored atoms. Replaced by File:D-Erythronolactone-2D-skeletal.svg as high-quality version. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 06:57, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep There is enough quality for me, a PNG image may still be useful. it also here colours, compared to the SVG version. Miniwark (talk) 14:14, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Miniwark: There are Manual of Style guidelines for drawing chemical structures within Commons:WikiProject Chemistry and this structure clearly does not match the criteria. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 14:40, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Chem Sim 2001: You are pointing an essay in English-language Wikipedia that can relate to what editors in English-language Wikipedia agree to do there, not to what should be done in Commons by other users.--Pere prlpz (talk) 19:05, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
- The Commons wikiproject for chemistry has also adopted it (pointing exactly to the English and/or German wikipedia style-guides). DMacks (talk) 21:17, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Chem Sim 2001: You are pointing an essay in English-language Wikipedia that can relate to what editors in English-language Wikipedia agree to do there, not to what should be done in Commons by other users.--Pere prlpz (talk) 19:05, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Miniwark: There are Manual of Style guidelines for drawing chemical structures within Commons:WikiProject Chemistry and this structure clearly does not match the criteria. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 14:40, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete While I could envision finding a use for it, the specific choice of color and specific atoms that are visible and colored certain ways would have to match my use-case. Because it would be trivial to draw it to any niche spec and this one's specs seem non-standard, I don't see a need to keep it by default even if the overall quality is not poor. DMacks (talk) 16:54, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Per Miniwark. Not low quality, and in scope of Commons because of potential educational uses. It's up to users and reusers to decide which one to use.--Pere prlpz (talk) 19:05, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
- Besides the graphically low quality of this image, it contains also a factual mistake because the stereochemistry at both position holding the hydroxy groups is ambiguous. It's clear that both OH groups are pointing backwards, but the additionally drawn hydrogen atoms are not specified according to stereochemistry! Hence, still Delete. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 17:12, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
- Besides the graphically low quality of this image, it contains also a factual mistake because the stereochemistry at both position holding the hydroxy groups is ambiguous. It's clear that both OH groups are pointing backwards, but the additionally drawn hydrogen atoms are not specified according to stereochemistry! Hence, still
- Delete low quality diagram that does not meet IUPAC recommendations for structure drawing and therefore should not be used in any respectable publication. Wostr (talk) 20:13, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
- Except for making two hydrogens explicit, that diagram like the one found at http://www.chemspider.com/Chemical-Structure.4483398.html. It seems that not all respectable publications use the same guidelines.
- Furthermore, I'm affraid in these deletion proposals some users mix "which image should be preferred in a given Wikipedia article" with whether a given image is in Commons scope.--Pere prlpz (talk) 09:54, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. The stereochemistry in this image is represented in an ambiguous way - either the hydrogen atoms should not be explicitly shown or they should have wedge stereobonds. Marbletan (talk) 18:58, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:51, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Derivative work from somewhere. Certainly not "own work" from 2020: The gentleman in the image died in 2017 according to the German WP (the article is very likely going to be deleted, BTW). 2003:C0:8F09:F400:389B:AE2F:3AFA:648B 22:28, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:12, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
Derivative work from somewhere. Certainly not "own work" from 2020: The gentleman in the image died in 1989 according to the German WP (the article is very likely going to be deleted, BTW). 2003:C0:8F09:F400:389B:AE2F:3AFA:648B 22:30, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:13, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
COM:NETCOPYVIO: Unknown source and author is still copyrighted A1Cafel (talk) 17:12, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:51, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Superseded by File:Portaal Suriname DN.GIF DimiTalen 08:37, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- All right for me. Ymnes (talk) 11:06, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete No need to keep a low quality gif not used any more by a local wikiproject. Miniwark (talk) 14:27, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:09, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
No longer in use, no reason to expect it ever being used again. DimiTalen 08:39, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete No need to keep an image not used any more by a local wikiproject. Miniwark (talk) 14:30, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:09, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
Superseded by File:Portaal Canada.png DimiTalen 08:42, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete No need to keep an image not used any more by a local wikiproject. Miniwark (talk) 14:29, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:09, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
self-promotion. COM:SPAM.
Larryasou (talk) 08:48, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Spam Miniwark (talk) 14:33, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:09, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
out of scope 최광모 (talk) 08:57, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep - Why out of scope? There are millions of files here. There are better examples of 'out of scope'. - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 09:16, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep I see no problems with this one. Miniwark (talk) 13:12, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep In scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:21, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:08, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
Non-free screenshot, most likely not falling below COM:TOO. Ntx61 (talk) 13:02, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep I disagree. The image shows just text and very simple graphics. --PaterMcFly (talk) 14:11, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep The Man Without Fear scare 01:35, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy keep per COM:TOO US, COM:INUSE. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:33, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:10, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio. Promotional photo, all other uploads by this user of this model were either copyvios or claimed as third-party permission from different sources without evidence. As their first upload, they may have defaulted to CC-own-work rather than attempting to credit the source. Belbury (talk) 07:52, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 04:37, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
Author request Manavpreet Kaur (talk) 15:51, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. No. The image was uploaded long ago and is used on various pages. PaterMcFly (talk) 19:47, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: not a recent upload, in use. --Wdwd (talk) 12:24, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
Author Deletion Manavpreet Kaur (talk) 15:52, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. No. The image was uploaded long ago and is used on various pages. PaterMcFly (talk) 19:48, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: not a recent upload, in use. --Wdwd (talk) 12:24, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
Author's request ਕੁਲਜੀਤ ਕੌਰ (talk) 15:56, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Image was uploaded long ago and is in use. PaterMcFly (talk) 19:49, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: not a recent upload, in use. --Wdwd (talk) 12:23, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
Not Creative Commons. Strugglehouse (talk) 16:16, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 12:22, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No evidence of Commons license at source and source not archived so no evidence that license was ever CC-BY. Bobamnertiopsis (talk) 16:46, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 11:38, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
COM:SS of non-free content A1Cafel (talk) 17:07, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 11:28, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
COM:SS of non-free content A1Cafel (talk) 17:07, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 11:29, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
one of few user's uploads. The user is not a declared author, and there is no evidence of a licence. Pibwl (talk) 18:30, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 10:57, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
_sculpture,_Reykjav%C3%ADk,_Iceland.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_sculpture,_Reykjav%C3%ADk,_Iceland.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No Freedom of Panorama for recent artwork in Iceland. Till (talk) 20:16, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
_sculpture,_Reykjavík,_Iceland.jpg){kind=link}
- Ok! Let's delete this. Oxir (talk) 15:24, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
No Freedom of Panorama for recent artwork in Iceland. Oxir (talk) 07:27, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
_sculpture,_Reykjavík,_Iceland.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 10:03, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
_sculpture,_Reykjavík,_Iceland.jpg){kind=link}
Uploader is not the copyright holder Murgatroyd49 (talk) 20:53, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 09:57, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: Entirely fictional content
Enyavar (talk) 22:04, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 09:54, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
I doubt this posed photo is the contributor's own work. Liz (talk) 22:19, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- No, I've link of this photo where I get it from nainika instagram account. I saved it after that I uploaded here. Pradeepkoli (talk) 09:39, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio, missing permission. --Wdwd (talk) 09:53, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by AntiCompositeBot as no license (User:AntiCompositeBot/NoLicense/tag). Late 1920s photograph created in Egypt, but we're missing essential information like source and author which we'd need in order to determine copyright status. Abzeronow (talk) 15:35, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- This photograph is part of family archives. I was the one taking the picture. I modified the file with source and author = Phizik6 and changed the copyright status with GFDL plus Creative Commons license. Phizik6 (talk) 19:34, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Are you an heir to the original photographer? We need information on the original photograph to determine copyright status. Abzeronow (talk) 15:45, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP: Missing information about the original photograph. --Wdwd (talk) 13:09, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
Low resolution image missing full EXIF data, dubious claim of own work CoffeeEngineer (talk) 15:19, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 13:50, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
unfree image (copyright violation) Mateus2019 (talk) 15:32, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: COM:POSTER. --Wdwd (talk) 13:48, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyvio of the Louvre Museum texts Miniwark (talk) 12:09, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 20:56, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Own work?! 186.174.153.29 00:02, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: can be restored if the uploader sends an appropriate email to COM:VTR. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:21, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
Own work?! 186.174.153.29 00:02, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: can be restored if the uploader sends an appropriate email to COM:VTR. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:21, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Own work?! 186.174.153.29 00:03, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: can be restored if the uploader sends an appropriate email to COM:VTR. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:21, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Own work?! 186.174.153.29 00:03, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: can be restored if the uploader sends an appropriate email to COM:VTR. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:21, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Own work?! 186.174.153.29 00:04, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: can be restored if the uploader sends an appropriate email to COM:VTR. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:20, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
Own work?! 186.174.153.29 00:04, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: can be restored if the uploader sends an appropriate email to COM:VTR. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:20, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
Own work?! 186.174.153.29 00:05, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: can be restored if the uploader sends an appropriate email to COM:VTR. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:20, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Tanzania A1Cafel (talk) 03:15, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- According in COM:FOP Tanzania:
Not OK for photographs ("still images"), 
OK only for audio-viusual works ("moving images or videos")
It seen the paragraphs "still images". However, we need to wait the 50 years of the sculptures. TentingZones1 (talk) 11:09, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:22, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
Np FoP for 3D works in Crimea
- File:2021. Евпатория DSC 3536.jpg
- File:Евпатория в июле 2022, 51.jpg
- File:Евпатория в июле 2022, 53.jpg
- File:Евпатория в июле 2022, 54.jpg
- File:Евпатория, 2021, 118.jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 03:52, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Question: the PD-RU-exempt licence did not apply here ? If the monument date before 1991 then it may be the case. Miniwark (talk) 12:53, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:22, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Ukraine.
- File:Вышгород памятник чернобыльцам.jpg
- File:Пам'ятник ліквідаторам аварії на ЧАЕС IMG 3659.jpg
- File:Пам'ятник ліквідаторам аварії на ЧАЕС IMG 3660.jpg
- File:Пам'ятник ліквідаторам аварії на ЧАЕС Вишгород 01.jpg
- File:Пам'ятник ліквідаторам аварії на ЧАЕС Вишгород 02.jpg
- File:Памятник ликвидаторам аварии на ЧАЭС в г. Вышгород.jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 03:54, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Question: the PD-RU-exempt licence did not apply here ? If the monument date before 1991 then it may be the case. Miniwark (talk) 12:54, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- This is located in Ukraine, not Russia. --A1Cafel (talk) 17:30, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. See also COM:FOP Ukraine. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:24, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Ukraine.
- File:Makariv-Chornobyl-memorial.jpg
- File:Меморіал пам'яті «Тим, хто врятував світ» Макарів 1.jpg
- File:Меморіал пам'яті «Тим, хто врятував світ» Макарів 2.jpg
- File:Меморіал пам'яті «Тим, хто врятував світ» Макарів.jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 03:56, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Question: the PD-RU-exempt licence did not apply here ? If the monument date before 1991 then it may be the case. Miniwark (talk) 12:54, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- This is located in Ukraine, not Russia. --A1Cafel (talk) 17:30, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. See also COM:FOP Ukraine. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:24, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Mausoleum of Mohammed V
[edit]The building was completed in 1971 by Cong Vo Toan (or Eric Vo Toan, 1924–2004). There is no freedom of panorama in Morocco. The copyright term of the country is 70 years, and the image can be undeleted in 2075.
- File:2017 11 (Cemeteries) - Rabat.jpg
- File:2nd Part of Mausoleum Mohammed V - Rabat.jpg
- File:Antique entrance covered in marble.jpg
- File:Columns-at-Mausoleum-of-Mohammed.jpg
- File:Door-at-Mausoleum-of-Mohammed-V.jpg
- File:Door-at-the-Mausoleum-of-Mohammed.jpg
- File:Entrance-to-the-Mausoleum-of-Mohammed-V.jpg
- File:Fer forgé du Mausolée Med V.jpg
- File:Fontaine dans le mausolée MED V.jpg
- File:Fountain-at-Mausoleum-of-Mohammed.jpg
- File:Guard outside Mausoleum of Mohammed V - Rabat - Morocco.jpg
- File:Guard-at-the-Mausoleum-of-Mohammed V.jpg
- File:Guard-at-the-Mausoleum-of-Mohammed.jpg
- File:Hassan darih.jpg
- File:Imges 03.jpg
- File:Imges 04.jpg
- File:Imges 06.jpg
- File:La coupole du mausolée Mohammed-V.jpg
- File:Le mausolée Mohammed V.jpg
- File:Le mausolée Mohammed-V - Photo de Abdellatif AMAJGAG.jpg
- File:Les fontaines du mausolée.jpg
- File:Marokko 011.jpg
- File:Mausoleum of King Mohammed V.jpg
- File:Mausoleum of Mohammed V (2).jpg
- File:Mausoleum of Mohammed V (20180913).jpg
- File:Mausoleum of Mohammed V (5508502407).jpg
- File:Mausoleum of Mohammed V (Old name-Rabat 54IMG 20180321 164938 (41114729000).jpg).jpg
- File:Mausoleum of Mohammed V (Old name-Rabat 54IMG 20180321 165139 (41114725560).jpg).jpg
- File:Mausoleum of Mohammed V - 2018 1.jpg
- File:Mausoleum of Mohammed V - 2018 3.jpg
- File:Mausoleum of Mohammed V - 2018 4.jpg
- File:Mausoleum of Mohammed V - 2018 5.jpg
- File:Mausoleum of Mohammed V - 2018 6.jpg
- File:Mausoleum of Mohammed V - DSC 0241 (28230049659).jpg
- File:Mausoleum of Mohammed V - guard.jpg
- File:Mausoleum of Mohammed V - No idols (50036155813).jpg
- File:Mausoleum of Mohammed V - rabat.jpg
- File:Mausoleum of Mohammed V - Rabat.jpg
- File:Mausoleum of Mohammed V - western pavillion.jpg
- File:Mausoleum of Mohammed V Kamiox.jpg
- File:Mausoleum of Mohammed V Rabat 2007.jpg
- File:Mausoleum of Mohammed V Rabat Morocco 120147 (49678812968).jpg
- File:Mausoleum of Mohammed V Rabat Morocco 120205 (49678812088).jpg
- File:Mausoleum of Mohammed V Rabat Morocco.jpg
- File:Mausoleum of Mohammed V Rabat.jpg
- File:Mausoleum of Mohammed V-Rabat-2.jpg
- File:Mausoleum of Mohammed V-Rabat.jpg
- File:Mausoleum of Mohammed V.jpg
- File:Mausoleum Rabat (6144945737).jpg
- File:Mausoleum Rabat (6144956527).jpg
- File:Mausoleum von König Mohammed V. (27963668267).jpg
- File:MausoleumMohammedV2.jpg
- File:Mausolée de Mohammed V.JPG
- File:Mausolée hassan - rabat.jpg
- File:Mausolée Hassane.jpg
- File:Mausolée Mohamed 5.jpg
- File:Mausolée Mohamed V 2387751623.jpg
- File:Mausolée Mohamed V Rabat P1060450.JPG
- File:Mausolée Mohammed V 2.jpg
- File:Mausolée Mohammed V, Rabat.jpg
- File:Mausolée Mohammed V.jpg
- File:Mausolée Nohammed V.jpg
- File:Mohammed V mausoleum(js).jpg
- File:Morocco-12 (2218236229).jpg
- File:Morocco-16 (2218236579).jpg
- File:Morocco-29 (2218205119).jpg
- File:Mosolé Mohamed 5 à Rabat.jpg
- File:New mosque, old courtyard Rabat. Capital of Morocco (37086116373).jpg
- File:New mosque. Rabat. Moroccan capital. April 1972 (37708209156).jpg
- File:Ngrachid8.jpg
- File:Plafond Mausoleum (6144927417).jpg
- File:Quartier Hassan, Rabat, Morocco - panoramio (2).jpg
- File:Quartier Hassan, Rabat, Morocco - panoramio (3).jpg
- File:Quartier Hassan, Rabat, Morocco - panoramio.jpg
- File:Rabat - Mausoleum of Mohammed V - 20140324153943.jpg
- File:Rabat - Mausoleum of Mohammed V - 20190804132000.jpg
- File:Rabat 54DSC 0697 (27948336607).jpg
- File:Rabat 54DSC 0699 (27948336077).jpg
- File:Rabat 54DSC 0710 (28959412328).jpg
- File:Rabat 54DSC 0715 (28959409878).jpg
- File:Rabat 54DSC 0716 (41931666495).jpg
- File:Rabat 54DSC 0717 (28959409218).jpg
- File:Rabat 54DSC 0720 (41931665465).jpg
- File:Rabat 54DSC 0721 (28959407848).jpg
- File:Rabat 54DSC 0722 (42784040232).jpg
- File:Rabat 54DSC 0723 (28959407178).jpg
- File:Rabat 54DSC 0730 (42784036852).jpg
- File:Rabat 54DSC 0736 (41931651435).jpg
- File:Rabat 54DSC 0740 (41022108660).jpg
- File:Rabat 54IMG 20180321 163940 (28055837777).jpg
- File:Rabat 54IMG 20180321 164902 (42924936481).jpg
- File:Rabat 54IMG 20180321 164905 (41114729690).jpg
- File:Rabat 54IMG 20180321 164946 (42206686074).jpg
- File:Rabat 54IMG 20180321 165036 (42924935331).jpg
- File:Rabat 54IMG 20180321 165046 (41114727650).jpg
- File:Rabat 54IMG 20180321 165053 (28055827327).jpg
- File:Rabat 54IMG 20180321 165100 (41114726990).jpg
- File:Rabat 54IMG 20180321 165131 (41114726780).jpg
- File:Rabat 54IMG 20180321 165134 (28055824757).jpg
- File:Rabat 54IMG 20180321 165142 (42206559404).jpg
- File:Rabat 54IMG 20180321 165219 (42924932061).jpg
- File:Rabat Mausole Mohamed V.jpg
- File:Rabat Mausole MohammedV.jpg
- File:Rabat Mausoleum Door.JPG
- File:Rabat mausoleum mohammed v.jpg
- File:Rabat morocco.jpg
- File:Rabat Prefecture - Hassan Mosque and Mausoleum of Mohammed V - 20131207152703.jpg
- File:Rabat Prefecture - Hassan Mosque and Mausoleum of Mohammed V - 20170321132635.jpg
- File:Rabat, Mausoleum of Mohammed V.jpg
- File:Rabat, Modern Capital and Historic City a Shared Heritage-117204.jpg
- File:Rabat, Modern Capital and Historic City a Shared Heritage-117206.jpg
- File:Roof of Mausoleum of Mohammed V(Old name "Morocco-25 (2218204677).jpg").jpg
- File:Roof-Detail-Mausoleum-of-Mohammed.jpg
- File:Sanctuaire HASSAN RABAT.jpg
- File:Structure dans la porte du mosolé Mohamed 5.jpg
- File:The Mausoleum of Mohammed V in Rabat city Morocco.jpg
- File:Tile-detail-at-Mausoleum-of-Mohammed.jpg
- File:Vue du Mausolée Mohammed V.JPG
- File:الرباط - ضريح محمد الخامس.jpg
- File:باب مسجد حسان.jpg
- File:باب مسجد ضريح حسان بمدينة الرباط.jpg
- File:باب مسجد ضريح حسان.jpg
- File:باب مسجد.jpg
- File:جامور نحاسي.jpg
- File:زخرفة بروضة في الرباط.jpg
- File:زليج في ضريح محمد الخامس.jpg
- File:ضريح محمد الخامس الرباط.jpg
- File:ضريح محمد الخامس بالعاصمة.jpg
- File:ضريح محمد الخامس بمدينة الرباط.jpg
- File:ضريح محمد الخامس من وجهة مغايرة.jpg
- File:ضريح محمد الخامس.jpg
- File:قبة ضريح محمد الخامس.jpg
- File:مآثر تاريخية بصومعة حسان بالرباط.jpg
- File:مسجد حسان من زاوية أخرى.jpg
_-_Rabat.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg%22).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
A1Cafel (talk) 04:16, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:25, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
This is non-free work. It was not AI generated. Artists/humans still created this. Favre1fan93 (talk) 15:01, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Multiple sources have confirmed that it was AI-generated. "Secret Invasion's opening credits are made by AI. Here's why"; "Marvel's Secret Invasion AI credits should shock no one"; "Marvel Used AI to Create ‘Secret Invasion’ Opening Credits, EP Says It Fits the ‘Shape-Shifting’ Plot"; "Marvel’s AI-Generated ‘Secret Invasion’ Sequence Sparks Backlash", etc etc. Di (they-them) (talk) 15:11, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- It was not generative AI, rather AI "tools" were used to assist the artists. See the statement here from Method, the team behind it. Particular quotes from said statement: AI is just one tool among the array of toolsets our artists used. No artists’ jobs were replaced by incorporating these new tools; instead, they complemented and assisted our creative teams. along with The entire process, guided by expert art direction, encompassed the initial storyboard phase, illustration, AI generation, 2D/3D animation and culminated in the final compositing stage. I'm fairly certain non-free AI images have to be wholly original in their generation. This was not and is still copyrighted material. If commons has a policy about this, I would like to see it as I'm having a hard time finding one regarding copyright status and AI. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 15:44, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- The human element would have come in in the animation/composition of the intro. This particular screenshot shows no human creative work; the quote references storyboarding, illustration, and 2D/3D animation which were made by humans, of which this screenshot shows none. It is a screenshot of a single image generated by artificial intelligence. Di (they-them) (talk) 15:56, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- This particular screenshot shows no human creative work You don't know that. We know that human artists worked on this, so we don't know of this singular image, what was their creation and then what was augmented through AI. Regardless of how much AI was used to craft this, this image is still the copyright of Method Studios, Marvel Studios, and Disney, and is not a non-free work. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 15:03, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
- Regardless of how much AI was used to craft this, this image is still the copyright of Method Studios, Marvel Studios, and Disney This is literally a contradiction. AI-generated images cannot be copyrighted in the United States. To say that it's copyrighted "regardless" of being made with AI shows a complete lack of understanding of copyright. It's very simple: the image was generated with AI, ergo, it is not copyrighted. Di (they-them) (talk) 16:53, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
- We know that human artists worked on this, so we don't know of this singular image, what was their creation and then what was augmented through AI. This is also false. Method Studios specifically said that they used storyboarding, illustration, and 2D/3D animation. This image doesn't have a storyboard, it doesn't have any illustration, and it doesn't have any animation. Therefore, it does not have any of the human contributions that Method claims they used on certain parts of the intro. Di (they-them) (talk) 16:56, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
- You and I, and anyone else here, unfortunately do not know the full extent to which AI was actually used in this opening. Taking more from Method's statement, they say the AI was used specifically for creating unique character attributes and movements. If that is the case, then a human still crafted, at some stage, the design of this opening, and looking at this particular frame, likely created the layout of a close up on Fury's face with part Skrull attributes (I do not know this for any certain, that is my own personal assumption). We, again, don't know then what the studio's AI tools did or added to make the final opening and have it differ from what was created by humans. That is why I don't believe this is a simple, cut and dry indication of this screenshot being allowed by the still work in progress guidelines set here for Commons. - 21:16, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
- This particular screenshot shows no human creative work You don't know that. We know that human artists worked on this, so we don't know of this singular image, what was their creation and then what was augmented through AI. Regardless of how much AI was used to craft this, this image is still the copyright of Method Studios, Marvel Studios, and Disney, and is not a non-free work. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 15:03, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
- The human element would have come in in the animation/composition of the intro. This particular screenshot shows no human creative work; the quote references storyboarding, illustration, and 2D/3D animation which were made by humans, of which this screenshot shows none. It is a screenshot of a single image generated by artificial intelligence. Di (they-them) (talk) 15:56, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- taking this from a reddit comment.
- See
- https://federalregister.gov/d/2023-05321
In other cases, however, a work containing AI-generated material will also contain sufficient human authorship to support a copyright claim. For example, a human may select or arrange AI-generated material in a sufficiently creative way that “the resulting work as a whole constitutes an original work of authorship.” Or an artist may modify material originally generated by AI technology to such a degree that the modifications meet the standard for copyright protection. In these cases, copyright will only protect the human-authored aspects of the work, which are “independent of” and do “not affect” the copyright status of the AI-generated material itself.
- And as for why the images aren't copyrightable, they say in part:
If a work's traditional elements of authorship were produced by a machine, the work lacks human authorship and the Office will not register it. For example, when an AI technology receives solely a prompt from a human and produces complex written, visual, or musical works in response, the “traditional elements of authorship” are determined and executed by the technology—not the human user. Based on the Office's understanding of the generative AI technologies currently available, users do not exercise ultimate creative control over how such systems interpret prompts and generate material. Instead, these prompts function more like instructions to a commissioned artist—they identify what the prompter wishes to have depicted, but the machine determines how those instructions are implemented in its output.
- MonkeyBBGB (talk) 20:25, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
- It was not generative AI, rather AI "tools" were used to assist the artists. See the statement here from Method, the team behind it. Particular quotes from said statement: AI is just one tool among the array of toolsets our artists used. No artists’ jobs were replaced by incorporating these new tools; instead, they complemented and assisted our creative teams. along with The entire process, guided by expert art direction, encompassed the initial storyboard phase, illustration, AI generation, 2D/3D animation and culminated in the final compositing stage. I'm fairly certain non-free AI images have to be wholly original in their generation. This was not and is still copyrighted material. If commons has a policy about this, I would like to see it as I'm having a hard time finding one regarding copyright status and AI. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 15:44, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy keep Comment AI works are impossible to copyright under US law. Gamowebbed (talk) 06:02, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Gamowebbed: Oh this is interesting : when it deals with nudity or sex, it has to be deleted according to people like you, but not when it's other AI stuff (even if there's no obvious usefulness...). Pathetic... --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 12:42, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
- @TwoWings: Whataboutism aside, there's a very clear difference between a bunch of porn (which has no realistic usefulness) and a screenshot from a television intro (which is used on several Wikipedia articles and is used for educational purposes). It's a matter of COM:SCOPE. The two aren't even remotely comparable. Di (they-them) (talk) 23:07, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Di (they-them) ignore him, @TwoWings has a personal issue against me and is having an emotional overreaction Gamowebbed (talk) 04:17, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Gamowebbed: "a personal issue against me and is having an emotional overreaction" > You're ridiculous. You really think you're that important? I don't care about you, I just care about Commons, its purposes and its rules. From my first message, you have behaved like a child who doesn't accept criticism. Grow up and question yourself, you're the one who was blocked for vandalism and abusive speedy DR, not me. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 05:49, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Di (they-them) ignore him, @TwoWings has a personal issue against me and is having an emotional overreaction Gamowebbed (talk) 04:17, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
- @TwoWings: Whataboutism aside, there's a very clear difference between a bunch of porn (which has no realistic usefulness) and a screenshot from a television intro (which is used on several Wikipedia articles and is used for educational purposes). It's a matter of COM:SCOPE. The two aren't even remotely comparable. Di (they-them) (talk) 23:07, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Gamowebbed: Oh this is interesting : when it deals with nudity or sex, it has to be deleted according to people like you, but not when it's other AI stuff (even if there's no obvious usefulness...). Pathetic... --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 12:42, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Please see the discussion at w:Talk:Secret Invasion (miniseries)/Archive 1#Opening Credits are public domain?. Consensus is that because it is unclear to what extent AI was used to create the sequence, and evidence suggests that AI was only used to assist in its creation rather than being the sole author, we should err on the side of caution. InfiniteNexus (talk) 04:42, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
- For the record, that discussion is on English Wikipedia, so it doesn't establish consensus on Commons. Di (they-them) (talk) 04:50, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
- Comment The outcome of this discussion should also apply to File:Secret Invasion intro screenshot AI 2.jpg. InfiniteNexus (talk) 04:43, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
Note: Di (they-them) has added the second file to the nomination. InfiniteNexus (talk) 21:37, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Just because AI was used to some extent in creating the image does not mean it is solely created by AI. The company that made the image has said that AI was one tool of many that their artists used to create the image. Uploading this image as copyright-free is making big assumptions that are not supported by any of the sources provided above. - Adamstom.97 (talk) 05:03, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
- Another court ruling affirmed that AI works don’t qualify for copyright. They make a distinction in the decision too about how cameras are just reproducing real life and so they are ok for copyright. But since AI doesn’t have actual human input in the creation process beyond a request that it doesn’t qualify. MonkeyBBGB (talk) 19:49, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: If we knew that this content was fully AI-generated, it wouldn't be copyrighted, but, as InfiniteNexus says: "it is unclear to what extent AI was used to create the sequence, and evidence suggests that AI was only used to assist in its creation rather than being the sole author" - so COM:PCP applies. --Gestumblindi (talk) 21:58, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
Posibble copyright violation + low quality Kelly The Angel (talk) 04:52, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:05, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Ca as 'Copyviow' (copyvio) Headlock0225 (talk) 07:07, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Text only therefore not copyrightable. Wrong licence. Should be Public Domain. Headlock0225 (talk) 07:10, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Simple text are not copyrightable. However, the text is hand-drawn, giving it a creative quality. Not to mention the pencil drawing. Ca (talk) 07:24, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with Ca. It's not text only ans there is also the pencil drawing. Miniwark (talk) 14:17, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:06, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope and apparently copyrighted poem HeminKurdistan (talk) 07:20, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:06, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
Because it's a personal photo. PhilippeAthos (talk) 11:24, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Image of a person with a Wikipedia article. "This is a personal photo" is not a sufficient rationale. Miniwark (talk) 14:57, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep per COM:INUSE unless the uploader is not the same as the author. Small photo, but 2011. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:30, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:07, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
Personal photo for non-Wikipedian: out of scope --Alaa :)..! 12:18, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete out of scope Miniwark (talk) 14:58, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:07, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
Personal photo for non-Wikipedian: out of scope --Alaa :)..! 12:18, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete out of scope Miniwark (talk) 14:58, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:07, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
Personal photo for non-Wikipedian: out of scope
--Alaa :)..! 12:18, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:08, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The uploader is not the author as per the metadata CoffeeEngineer (talk) 12:34, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:08, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Andrei Romanovich1936 (talk · contribs)
[edit]All files are falsely claimed to be own work.
- File:Marie Fikáčková (09.09.1936).jpg
- File:Maniac Golovkin.jpg
- File:Mugshot serial killer Sergey Golovkin (25.11.1959).jpg
- File:Ladislav Hojer (15.04.1958).jpg
- File:Sergei Lozovoi (01.05.1965).jpg
- File:Clifford Olson (01.01.1940).jpg
- File:Jack Unterweger (16.08.1950).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Gumruch (talk) 15:32, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:56, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Andrei Romanovich1936 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Not own work. Some of uploads can be PD-mugshots, but a real source and author should be provided. The user should not upload more images with fake authorship claim.
- File:Ондрей (1955).png
- File:Ондрей Риго (17.12.1955).jpg
- File:Rodney James Alcala (23.08.1943.jpg
- File:John Rodney McRae (20.11.1934).jpg
- File:Гэри Майкл Хейдник (22.11.1943).jpg
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Gumruch (talk) 12:50, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:08, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
profile picture of random redditor (https://www.reddit.com/user/Xolaya/), no educational value Nutshinou Talk! 13:01, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:09, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
J'ai besoin d'afficher cette photo dans wikidata et wikipédia mais je ne retrouve pas le lien donc je vais la supprimer et retenter un téléchargement. Merci Archives départementales de l'Hérault (France) DAASI (talk) 13:02, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
_DAASI-20230728130200-File:Mons_(14).jpg){kind=link}
- Speedy keep COM:INUSE all over the place. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:33, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:09, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Low resolution image missing full EXIF data, dubious claim of own work CoffeeEngineer (talk) 13:03, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:14, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
edited/misleading version of File:State Ensign of Italy.svg Nutshinou Talk! 13:08, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:14, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
J'ai besoin d'afficher cette photo dans wikidata et wikipédia mais le lien ne fonctionne pas. Je vais retenter un téléchargement de l'image. Merci Archives départementales de l'Hérault (France) DAASI (talk) 13:08, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
_DAASI-20230728130800-File:Loupian_(2).jpg){kind=link}
- Speedy keep COM:INUSE all over the place. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:34, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:09, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Ghadfrgg123 (talk · contribs)
[edit]nonsense, nondescript
Nutshinou Talk! 13:13, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:14, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Discord (software), the Discord logo is not freely licensed Nutshinou Talk! 13:46, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:14, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
COM:DM the statue was establishement in 2009 [4]. eien20 (talk) 07:50, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Yasu (talk) 15:28, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
possible copyvio (c) Teresa Novotny M2k~dewiki (talk) 00:34, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:59, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Own work?! 186.174.153.29 00:50, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 07:00, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
copyrighted Veracious (talk) 04:33, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, too complex IMO. --Gbawden (talk) 07:01, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Teatro Strehler (Milan)
[edit]Built 1998, {{NoFoP-Italy}} The architect(s) is either alive, or has not been dead for over 70 years.
- File:28 Festival Mix - Lato Piccolo Teatro Strehler, Milano, Italia.JPG
- File:28 Festival Mix - Panoramica Piccolo Teatro Strehler, Milano, Italia.JPG
- File:28 Festival Mix al Piccolo Teatro Strehler, Milano, Italia.jpg
- File:Piccolo Teatro di Milano - Teatro Strehler.JPG
- File:Teatro Strehler (Milan) 2013-09-18.jpg
_2013-09-18.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Josve05a (talk) 19:35, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:37, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
Files in Category:Teatro Strehler (Milan)
[edit]The building was compeleted in 1998 by Marco Zanuso (1916–2001). There is no freedom of panorama in Italy. The copyright term of the country is 70 years, and the image can be undeleted in 2072.
- File:28 Festival Mix - Ingresso Piccolo Teatro Strehler, Milano, Italia.JPG
- File:Milano - teatro Strehler.jpg
- File:Piccolo Teatro, Castello, Milano, Lombardia, Italy - panoramio.jpg
- File:Teatro Strehler - panoramio (1).jpg
- File:Teatro Strehler - panoramio.jpg
- File:Tram notturno - night tram (3755663277).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
A1Cafel (talk) 04:40, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- The building is not the main subject in File:Tram notturno - night tram (3755663277).jpg, the tram and tramway are. You can't even properly see the shape of the building as only the contours of the lower half are visible in the darkness. Nemo 06:25, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- I have blurred the theatre from the image (it can't be just cropped because the tram line's infrastructure is at the top of the picture). I suggest to remove the image from this DR. Nemo 06:31, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, kept the blurred image. --Gbawden (talk) 07:03, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
low quality, lack of EXIF make the own work claim dubious The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:23, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete look like a scan from a book cover to me. Miniwark (talk) Miniwark (talk) 12:59, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, PCP, low quality, unlikely to be own work. --Gbawden (talk) 07:05, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
COM:DW of image from freeimages whose license is incompatible with Commons. Larryasou (talk) 05:47, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:06, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
Non-free software and non-licensed screenshot either. Larryasou (talk) 06:09, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, (C) at source. --Gbawden (talk) 07:05, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Akt79
[edit]- File:President Nygren.jpg
- Derivative: File:President Nygren (cropped).jpg
- File:Vice-President Montoya.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Most likely not own work, has website elements overlaid on top of with that, along with the "Date and time of data generation" in the metadata, suggests that it is a screenshot of a website. --reppoptalk 07:37, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:08, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
Has now been replaced by the family to a more suitable main profile picture. PatriciaMoranFamily (talk) 10:43, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep i could not find the replacement (File:Patricia Moran Artist.png is not the same image.) Miniwark (talk) 14:53, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:10, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
Duplicate - now replaced by a higher quality version. PatriciaMoranFamily (talk) 10:47, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete replaced by File:Patricia Moran Artist.png. Miniwark (talk) 14:51, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:11, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
unfree img, no fop, no pd-old Mateus2019 (talk) 11:49, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:12, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
Per the 2019 Copyright Act, there is no more freedom of panorama in Myanmar. Also the photo was found on reversed image search. Ninja✮Strikers «☎» 14:47, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 07:15, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
Copyright information is incorrect, this is one of a series of photographs taken by RN photographers in May 1982. Example: https://www.iwm.org.uk/collections/item/object/205022148/. No Argentine photographers were present so clearly copyright does not vest in the Argentine Government. Alternatives exist on the IWM.org.uk collection that can be used instead. WCMemail 14:52, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, source is unavailable for futher verification. --Gbawden (talk) 07:19, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
Low resolution image missing full EXIF data, dubious claim of own work CoffeeEngineer (talk) 15:16, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:14, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
unused, low quality image of apparently nonnotable model Adsci8 (talk) 15:22, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Keep for now. 1M YT subscribers means she may be notable. --Gbawden (talk) 07:16, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
Any proof this is your own work? Seems like it'd be a bit better quality if you took the photo. Strugglehouse (talk) 16:39, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 07:18, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
A rubbish bin with no context. Hmvh (talk) 16:51, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:19, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
Super Smash Bros. Slamfest images
[edit]- File:Super Smash Bros. Slamfest '99 - Introductions.jpg
- File:Super Smash Bros. Slamfest '99 - Battling it out.jpg
- File:Super Smash Bros. Slamfest '99 - Yoshi trips Pikachu.jpg
- File:Super Smash Bros. Slamfest '99 - DK Cornered.jpg
- File:Super Smash Bros. Slamfest '99 - Knocked out.jpg
- File:Super Smash Bros. Slamfest '99 - Yoshi beatdown.jpg
- File:Super Smash Bros. Slamfest '99 - Yoshi cornered.jpg
- File:Super Smash Bros. Slamfest '99 - After the fight.jpg
- File:Super Smash Bros. Slamfest '99 - Pikachu vs. Yoshi.jpg
- File:Super Smash Bros. Slamfest '99 - Mario vs. DK.jpg
These files are all copyright violations. The photographs were taken by Ed Espinoza, who is not the uploader. The uploader claimed that the photos are their own work when they are not. --Di (they-them) (talk) 17:07, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Hello, sorry for the error - I think I misunderstood the "own work" tag definition when uploading. These photos were freely provided to members of the Lost Media Wiki by Slamfest '99's producer Ed Espinoza to be shared publicly. There is no copyright on any of these photographs to my knowledge. I do not claim ownership over any of these.
- I will update the Source data on each image to properly credit Ed there. Bozo ssb (talk) 21:33, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Just because the files were shared publicly doesn't mean that they are freely licensed. They are still copyrighted unless Ed specifically released them under a usable license. Di (they-them) (talk) 22:23, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, can be undeleted with permission. --Gbawden (talk) 07:21, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors and architects copyright. Created after 1961. Derivatives of work. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 20:07, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination sadly. --Gbawden (talk) 07:23, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Flag of the President of Egypt.svg. Fry1989 eh? 20:27, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:22, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
Very lo-rez/lo-quality, replaced on all WMF wikis per objections at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sinead O'Connor.jpg. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 20:32, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:24, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
Unused logo, no educational value Zafer (talk) 20:36, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:24, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Hangman'sDeath as no source (No source since). COM:TOO? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:53, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Maybe but {{own}} and {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} are not correct --Hangman'sDeath (talk) 06:21, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Too simple IMO. --Gbawden (talk) 07:25, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ModernTacitus (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely all created by the same photographer, possible Flickrwashing.
- File:Eleftherios Papadimitriou.jpg
- File:Eleftherios Papadimitriou & George - Lena Rally.jpg
- File:Eleftherios Papadimitriou & Archbishop Iacovos.jpg
- File:Παπαδημητρίου Παπουλιας καραμανλης.jpg
- File:Eleftherios Papadimitriou Greek MP.jpg
- File:Dukakis & Papadimitriou & Spirou (middle).jpg
- File:Eleftherios Papadimitriou (age30).jpg
- File:Papadimitriou & Mitsotakis.jpg
- File:Mikis Theodorakis & Eleftherios Papadimitriou.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Greece/el
- All the above pictures files are freely licensed. This is not a case of flickr washing -
- Fair Use (and Related Exemptions)
- However, this concept is uniquely American.
- Other nations, including those in the EU, do not have as broad of a view on fair use. Some, like the UK, have fair dealing, an approach that is similar to fair use but is generally narrower and more targeted at very specific exemptions.
- Public domain images are not subject to copyright restrictions, allowing anyone to use, modify, and distribute them freely. They can be used for commercial and non-commercial purposes without permission. However, be aware that even if an image is in the public domain, trademarks, patents, and privacy/publicity rights may still apply.
- To specifically find public domain images, you can use websites like Pixabay, Unsplash, and Pexels, which offer a wide range of high-quality images that are free to use. Additionally, you can search for images in the public domain on digital archives and libraries such as the Library of Congress or Wikimedia Commons.
- When it comes to freely licensed images, Creative Commons licenses are commonly used. These licenses allow the copyright holder to grant specific permissions to others while retaining certain rights. Websites like Flickr or Wikimedia Commons offer images with Creative Commons licenses, enabling users to freely use, share, and modify them within the terms of the specific license. ModernTacitus (talk) 13:22, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- is clearly an attempt to mislead the commons. The user had appeared at the beginning saying he owned the photos. When he was asked for a ticket he didn't give it, all the photos were deleted and suddenly appeared on flickr.
- https://el.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ελευθέριος_Κ._Παπαδημητρίου&action=history ΔώραΣτρουμπούκη (talk) 17:19, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Krd this user @ΔώραΣτρουμπούκη is banned (indefinitely) from Greek Wikipedia.
- + He/she violates Wikipedia rules: #Wikipedia:Harassment ModernTacitus (talk) 07:44, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
- ̊ModernTacitus, same argument you make against ΔώραΣτρουμπούκη applies to you: you have been blocked indefinitely from EN/WP for suckpuppetry, and for "Disruptive editing, WP:BATTLEGROUND and possible COI at Eleftherios Papadimitriou (article)". ǁ ǁǁǁ Chalk19 (talk) 11:21, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
- ModernTacitus, COM:FAIRUSE is irrelevant to Commons. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:31, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
- All pictures created before 1978. 62.74.19.64 15:11, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
Ticket:2023081810006359 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 16:00, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: all files were already deleted by Krd because of "No ticket permission since 18 August 2023". --Rosenzweig τ 11:14, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
_choi_kwang-mo(ceremonial_dress).jpg){kind=link}
_choi_kwang-mo(ceremonial_dress).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Archivo personal sin uso 191.125.10.227 22:16, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
_choi_kwang-mo(ceremonial_dress).jpg){kind=link}
- Keep Selfie of a user with thousands of uploads. Besides, a photo of a South Korean military policeman (which I think is what he is) in uniform is useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:46, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per Ikan Kekek. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:16, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
_choi_kwang-mo(ceremonial_dress).jpg){kind=link}
_choi_kwang-mo(ceremonial_dress).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
As the person in the photo, I request deletion for reasons of portrait rights. Also, that picture is assumed to be out of scope. 최광모 (talk) 18:38, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
- Duplicate request. Miniwark (talk) 13:24, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep In no way is a photo of a military policeman in uniform "assumed to be out of scope." In addition, you waived all rights under copyright law. We may have to delete your photos of other people under South Korean law if you truly did not get anyone's permission; I don't know whether a personality rights tag would suffice. But I don't see how you can suddenly assert privacy rights of a selfie you uploaded as a public-domain file. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:26, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:34, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
_choi_kwang-mo(ceremonial_dress).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-3){kind=link}
I request deletion to protect my personal portrait rights and personal information. It is true that I agreed to the CC copyright when I uploaded this photo. However, as the photo is continuously exposed in Google search and used on various commercial sites, my portrait right and personal information are being infringed. It is assumed that it is impossible to prevent Wikimedia's photos from being exposed to search engines at the request of the user. Everyone has the right not to be arbitrarily photographed, portrayed, or publicized about their face, and not to be used for profit. This portrait right is constitutionally guaranteed under Article 10 of the Constitution of the Republic of Korea. Therefore, I would like to withdraw my intention to agree to the copyright at the time of upload. Best Regards, Choi kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 09:06, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Duplicate request. Miniwark (talk) 13:24, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:33, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
_choi_kwang-mo(ceremonial_dress).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-4){kind=link}
I request deletion to protect my personal portrait rights and personal information. It is true that I agreed to the CC copyright when I uploaded this photo. However, as the photo is continuously exposed in Google search and used on various commercial sites, my portrait right and personal information are being infringed. It is assumed that it is impossible to prevent Wikimedia's photos from being exposed to search engines at the request of the user. Everyone has the right not to be arbitrarily photographed, portrayed, or publicized about their face, and not to be used for profit. This portrait right is constitutionally guaranteed under Article 10 of the Constitution of the Republic of Korea. Also, The right to be forgotten refers to the right to self-determination and the right for information subjects to request deletion and prevention of spread of all information related to them online. On April 29, 2016, the Korea Communications Commission announced the 'Guidelines for Requesting Exclusion of Access to Internet Posts' to guarantee the right to be forgotten. This guideline allows one to request access exclusion from website administrators (wikimedia commons) and search service providers for posts that one cannot delete onerself. Therefore, I would like to withdraw my intention to agree to the copyright at the time of upload and request deletion of this photo. Best Regards, Choi kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 20:34, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:56, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
File:Choi Kwang-mo 최광모 이승훈 Yonsei-KOICA Scholarship Program Hoengseong Fire Station disaster psychology education IMG 5628.jpg
[edit]
To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 19:59, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Image made during what look like to be a public sport event. (Also good looking Korean firefighters are the bests.) Miniwark (talk) 13:41, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per comment. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:35, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
File:Choi Kwang-mo 최광모 이승훈 Yonsei-KOICA Scholarship Program Hoengseong Fire Station disaster psychology education IMG 5628.jpg
[edit]
I request deletion to protect my personal portrait rights and personal information. It is true that I agreed to the CC copyright when I uploaded this photo. However, as the photo is continuously exposed in Google search and used on various commercial sites, my portrait right and personal information are being infringed. It is assumed that it is impossible to prevent Wikimedia's photos from being exposed to search engines at the request of the user. Everyone has the right not to be arbitrarily photographed, portrayed, or publicized about their face, and not to be used for profit. This portrait right is constitutionally guaranteed under Article 10 of the Constitution of the Republic of Korea. Therefore, I would like to withdraw my intention to agree to the copyright at the time of upload. Best Regards, Choi kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 09:08, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Duplicate request. Miniwark (talk) 13:23, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete My understanding that this a picture of you. Therefore you could not have possibly taken the photograph. The copyright belongs to the photographer. You claim also to be the Uploader although the User name are different. Assuming the Uploader and you are same person, then the Uploader cannot make a claim of "Own Work" and cannot licence it under a cc-by-sa licence. It is therefore a copyright infringement and should be deleted. Headlock0225 (talk) 20:51, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Non notable person, unused, out of scope. --Yann (talk) 13:30, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
Single upload from the uploader, small size without EXIFs. Very unlikely to be own work but grabbed from one of many online gun catalogs and forums. Christian Ferrer (talk) 03:46, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Neutral This image is already used on various wiki, we need a better proof of copyvio (withc online catalog ?). Miniwark (talk) 13:56, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Almost identical to this photo clearly not own work. [5] 172.58.222.156 01:52, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and universally replaced with File:HS2000 at Tula State Museum of Weapons.jpg. —holly {chat} 20:08, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
The shape of the form is very complex, exists a possibility to reach the TOO. Taichi (talk) 04:16, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete copyvio as per the source description. Miniwark (talk) 13:57, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Neutral --Ulisesval (talk) 00:57, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete, not simple enough. Cambalachero (talk) 16:41, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. Günther Frager (talk) 17:19, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 20:08, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
This seems like a screenshot (look at the black line on the right) and own work claim is questionable. Also out of scope for being redundunt and unused due to existance of many organizational charts for the Iranian political system on Commons. HeminKurdistan (talk) 07:45, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep to many "maybe" and "questionable" in he deletion proposal. if it's a copyvio please provide a link. This is not Out Of Scope for me, even is there are other similar charts for the Iranian state (unless the content is incorect). Miniwark (talk) 14:22, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: PD-chart. —holly {chat} 20:11, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
Derivative work, COM:FOP Iran HeminKurdistan (talk) 07:46, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- I uploaded to photos one was deleted by another former disgraced commons admin and government guy user:4nn1 this is below Iranian freedom of pano threshold Baratiiman (talk) 14:09, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. @Baratiiman, a work of architecture is eligible for copyright protection. If this is your reupload of a previously-deleted file of yours, then this is eligible for speedy deletion as a reupload of a file deleted through consensus like a valid deletion request. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:12, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 20:12, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
COM:TOO Iran, screenshot from a copyrighted software. HeminKurdistan (talk) 07:50, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- This is way too too simple even for commons Baratiiman (talk)
Kept: PD-text. —holly {chat} 20:18, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
COM:TOO Iran, screenshot from a copyrighted software. HeminKurdistan (talk) 07:50, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: PD-text. —holly {chat} 20:18, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
COM:TOO Iran, screenshot from a copyrighted software. HeminKurdistan (talk) 07:50, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- this is just a plain simple text table farsi text tahoma font Baratiiman (talk) 14:04, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: PD-text. —holly {chat} 20:19, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
According to [6], this statue was created by Lee Heung-su only 24 years ago and installed on 20 March 1999 per its inscription (the year shown is 4332 of the Dangi era, which counts years starting from 2333 BC, so 4332-2333=1999), so its still under copyright since its author hasn't been dead for at least 70 years. Also, there's no freedom of panorama in South Korea. Chiyako92 (talk) 08:06, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete copyvio Miniwark (talk) 14:25, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 21:08, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
Superseded by File:Portaal Frans.jpg DimiTalen 08:38, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 21:07, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
Old logo - not used anymore, new logo has been uploaded already 176.199.209.24 09:28, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Not a reason to delete it, in contrary this may still be useful for historical reasons. Miniwark (talk) 13:39, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: COM:INUSE. —holly {chat} 21:08, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
|
File:Stammbaum zum Roman Perkin Warbeck.svg is a vector version of this file.
File:Deletion requests/Archive/2023/07/28 → File:Stammbaum zum Roman Perkin Warbeck.svg
For more information, see Help:SVG. |
 |
I originally uploaded this file but the replaced it by an svg version. It is no longer needed. Schmila (talk) 09:39, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Neutral The SVG file is here: File:Stammbaum zum Roman Perkin Warbeck.svg. Miniwark (talk) 14:45, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
I, myself the uploader of the file request its deletion, all references have been updated to the new svg version Schmila (talk) 15:41, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete This grafik supports the corresponding article The Fortunes of Perkin Warbeck. The now orphaned png version makes no sense by itself and will not follow potential updates of the current svg version. Further more it was only put online a few days before and then schortly after replaced by the svg version. Schmila (talk) 22:21, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 21:10, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
copyright violation? see metadata Xocolatl (talk) 14:11, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 21:12, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
per COM:PCP; many of this uploader's images appear to be low-resolution, indicating possible copyright violations. Was this image really taken by the uploader? ViperSnake151 (talk) 15:42, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Even if it is by the uploader, I'm not sure whether this counts as architecture and is therefore covered by FOP/US. PaterMcFly (talk) 19:45, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 21:19, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
Violates COM:TOYS. Toys more likely made in 2000s. Per another DR discussion. George Ho (talk) 18:05, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 21:19, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
Violates COM:TOYS. Toys more likely made in 2000s. Per another DR discussion. George Ho (talk) 18:07, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 21:19, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
Violates COM:TOYS. Toys more likely made in 2000s. Per another DR discussion. George Ho (talk) 18:07, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 21:19, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
possible copyvio "Este portal contiene información que es protegida por derechos de propiedad intelectual y derechos morales de autor" https://www.barranquilla.gov.co/condiciones-de-uso Mateus2019 (talk) 19:46, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 21:20, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors and architects copyright. Created after 1991. Derivatives of work. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 20:06, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 21:34, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Belbury as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative work of copyrighted material. COM:SCREENSHOT with nonfree artwork elements. Contested at COM:UNDEL, converting to DR to discuss COM:DM. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:54, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- @King of Hearts Hi, the message in my talk page asked me to comment on why I don't think this should be deleted.
- The screenshot is of the Lemmy discussion forum software, which is free software (see here). I'm new to Commons but after reading the page on derivative works and screenshots, it seems the only issue can be the thumbnails and logo being copyrighted.
- However because these are small and the image (which is meant to show the structure and features of the Lemmy software) will be fine without these, I think it satisfies COM:DM.
- Hope I haven't missed any other possible issues. SevenTriangles (talk) 09:19, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion; COM:DM applies for the copyrightable pieces. —holly {chat} 21:41, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Curt von François monument
[edit]The statue was completed in 1965 by Hennie Potgieter (1916–1992). There is no freedom of panorama in Namibia. The copyright term of the country is 50 years, and the image can be undeleted in 2043.
- File:Curt von François-Denkmal in Windhoek 04.jpg
- File:Curt von François-Denkmal in Windhoek 05.jpg
- File:Curt von François-Denkmal in Windhoek 06.jpg
- File:Statue Curt von Francois - Windhoek.jpg
- File:Windhoek Central, Windhoek, Namibia - panoramio (6).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
A1Cafel (talk) 03:37, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Comment possible U.S. copyright involvement here? Because Namibia has no FOP and the work depicted is not architectural, U.S. copyright should not be ignored. So 1965+95+1=January 1, 2061 if this is true. U.S. copyright can be dismissed if the country has FOP in the first place, in which case {{Not-free-US-FoP}} can be used. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:31, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, Undelete in 2061. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:44, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
Scanned coin 3d object. Derivative, not Own work. Copyright status? Drakosh (talk) 05:46, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per COM:PCP, COM:Jamaica says nothing about currency so we should assume it's copyrighted. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:47, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
Scanned coin 3d object. Derivative, not Own work. Copyright status? Drakosh (talk) 05:46, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per COM:PCP, COM:Jamaica says nothing about currency so we should assume it's copyrighted. 2001 coin. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:48, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
Scanned coin 3d object. Derivative, not Own work. Copyright status? Drakosh (talk) 05:46, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per COM:PCP, COM:Jamaica says nothing about currency so we should assume it's copyrighted. 1996 coin. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:49, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
Scanned banknote. Derivative, not Own work. Copyright status? Drakosh (talk) 05:47, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per COM:PCP, the page for COM:Myanmar says nothing about currency, and notes that works of applied art are protected. Currency is not listed under things not protected. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:52, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
Scanned banknote. Derivative, not Own work. Copyright status? Drakosh (talk) 05:47, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per COM:PCP, the page for COM:Myanmar says nothing about currency, and notes that works of applied art are protected. Currency is not listed under things not protected. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:52, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
Ensayo sin permiso 186.174.59.157 13:13, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: No evidence of permission. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 04:51, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Adam Freeman-Pask
[edit]A low-res screenshot of what appears to be a profile photo. Doubtful that it is the uploader's work.
_2004.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Adeletron 3030 (talk) 13:56, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Precautionary principle; no evidence of permission from the copyright holder. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 04:52, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
I request deletion to protect my personal portrait rights and personal information. It is true that I agreed to the CC copyright when I uploaded this photo. However, as the photo is continuously exposed in Google search and used on various commercial sites, my portrait right and personal information are being infringed. It is assumed that it is impossible to prevent Wikimedia's photos from being exposed to search engines at the request of the user. Everyone has the right not to be arbitrarily photographed, portrayed, or publicized about their face, and not to be used for profit. This portrait right is constitutionally guaranteed under Article 10 of the Constitution of the Republic of Korea. Therefore, I would like to withdraw my intention to agree to the copyright at the time of upload. Best Regards, Choi kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 09:07, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Neutral This one may be very useful, but only after a blur filter is done to hide the privacy informations this real person. If not cleaned i recommand to delete it. Miniwark (talk) 13:21, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Raymond (talk) 06:26, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
I request deletion to protect my personal portrait rights and personal information. It is true that I agreed to the CC copyright when I uploaded this photo. However, as the photo is continuously exposed in Google search and used on various commercial sites, my portrait right and personal information are being infringed. It is assumed that it is impossible to prevent Wikimedia's photos from being exposed to search engines at the request of the user. Everyone has the right not to be arbitrarily photographed, portrayed, or publicized about their face, and not to be used for profit. This portrait right is constitutionally guaranteed under Article 10 of the Constitution of the Republic of Korea. Therefore, I would like to withdraw my intention to agree to the copyright at the time of upload. Best Regards, Choi kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 09:07, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Out of Scope. No need to keep this one, particularly if it became a privacy problem for this person (who is not a public person). Miniwark (talk) 13:18, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Essentially the same as a vacation photo, out of scope for Commons. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:32, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
I apply for deletion to protect the portrait rights and privacy of the person in the photo. When I uploaded this photo, I did not obtain the consent of the person in the photo. As the photos are continuously exposed in Google search and used on various commercial sites, the portrait rights and personal information of the people in the photos are being infringed. It is assumed that it is impossible to prevent Wikimedia's photos from being exposed to search engines at the request of the user. Everyone has the right not to be arbitrarily photographed, portrayed, or publicized about their face, and not to be used for profit. This portrait right is constitutionally guaranteed under Article 10 of the Constitution of the Republic of Korea. Therefore, I assert that the intention with which I consented to the copyright at the time of upload is invalid. Best Regards, Choi kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 09:08, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Out of Scope. No need to keep this one, particularly if it became a privacy problem for this persons (who are not a public person). Miniwark (talk) 13:22, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: 2 non notable people on a bench in an unidentified park. It's not a photo that we need. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:33, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
No source. Found online here (header). If the uploader is really the creator of this work, why upload a cropped low resolution .png version, and not the full ress .jpg with metadata ? Gyrostat (talk) 09:11, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Hello,
- I am the creator of this photo and I have modified it. In addition, I am also responsible for the website mentioned.
- I remind you, as indicated on my personal page, I am Jérôme Legavre's parliamentary assistant and responsible for his communication. MatthewMarion93 (talk) 09:16, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Neutral To MatthewMarion93 We have no way to believe you. Please see COM:VRT to solve this as the image was uploaded first on an external site. Miniwark (talk) 14:43, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Needs VRT comfirmation. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:16, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
I apply for deletion to protect the portrait rights and privacy of the person in the photo. When I uploaded this photo, I did not obtain the consent of the person in the photo. As the photos are continuously exposed in Google search and used on various commercial sites, the portrait rights and personal information of the people in the photos are being infringed. It is assumed that it is impossible to prevent Wikimedia's photos from being exposed to search engines at the request of the user. Everyone has the right not to be arbitrarily photographed, portrayed, or publicized about their face, and not to be used for profit. This portrait right is constitutionally guaranteed under Article 10 of the Constitution of the Republic of Korea. Therefore, I assert that the intention with which I consented to the copyright at the time of upload is invalid. Best Regards, Choi kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 09:11, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep The person is not recognisable, and this image could be very useful for the project. Miniwark (talk) 13:26, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Person is not easily identifible and photograph is useful. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:17, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
I apply for deletion to protect the portrait rights and privacy of the person in the photo. When I uploaded this photo, I did not obtain the consent of the person in the photo. As the photos are continuously exposed in Google search and used on various commercial sites, the portrait rights and personal information of the people in the photos are being infringed. It is assumed that it is impossible to prevent Wikimedia's photos from being exposed to search engines at the request of the user. Everyone has the right not to be arbitrarily photographed, portrayed, or publicized about their face, and not to be used for profit. This portrait right is constitutionally guaranteed under Article 10 of the Constitution of the Republic of Korea. Therefore, I assert that the intention with which I consented to the copyright at the time of upload is invalid. Best Regards, Choi kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 09:33, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete No need to keep this one, look like a private conservation between random people to me. Also, as there is no public in the seats we can't say than this image was done during the public event (the event was probably ended already). Miniwark (talk) 13:33, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:18, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
I apply for deletion to protect the portrait rights and privacy of the person in the photo. When I uploaded this photo, I did not obtain the consent of the person in the photo. As the photos are continuously exposed in Google search and used on various commercial sites, the portrait rights and personal information of the people in the photos are being infringed. It is assumed that it is impossible to prevent Wikimedia's photos from being exposed to search engines at the request of the user. Everyone has the right not to be arbitrarily photographed, portrayed, or publicized about their face, and not to be used for profit. This portrait right is constitutionally guaranteed under Article 10 of the Constitution of the Republic of Korea. Therefore, I assert that the intention with which I consented to the copyright at the time of upload is invalid. Best Regards, Choi kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 09:04, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Out of Scope. No need to keep this one, particularly if it became a privacy problem for this person (who is not a public person). Miniwark (talk) 13:15, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --Krd 11:31, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
I apply for deletion to protect the portrait rights and privacy of the person in the photo. When I uploaded this photo, I did not obtain the consent of the person in the photo. As the photos are continuously exposed in Google search and used on various commercial sites, the portrait rights and personal information of the people in the photos are being infringed. It is assumed that it is impossible to prevent Wikimedia's photos from being exposed to search engines at the request of the user. Everyone has the right not to be arbitrarily photographed, portrayed, or publicized about their face, and not to be used for profit. This portrait right is constitutionally guaranteed under Article 10 of the Constitution of the Republic of Korea. Therefore, I assert that the intention with which I consented to the copyright at the time of upload is invalid. Best Regards, Choi kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 09:05, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Out of Scope. No need to keep this one, particularly if it became a privacy problem for this persons (who is are public persons). Miniwark (talk) 13:16, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --Krd 11:31, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
I apply for deletion to protect the portrait rights and privacy of the person in the photo. When I uploaded this photo, I did not obtain the consent of the person in the photo. As the photos are continuously exposed in Google search and used on various commercial sites, the portrait rights and personal information of the people in the photos are being infringed. It is assumed that it is impossible to prevent Wikimedia's photos from being exposed to search engines at the request of the user. Everyone has the right not to be arbitrarily photographed, portrayed, or publicized about their face, and not to be used for profit. This portrait right is constitutionally guaranteed under Article 10 of the Constitution of the Republic of Korea. Therefore, I assert that the intention with which I consented to the copyright at the time of upload is invalid. Best Regards, Choi kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 09:05, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Out of Scope. No need to keep this one, particularly if it became a privacy problem for this person (who is not a public person). Miniwark (talk) 13:16, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --Krd 11:31, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
I apply for deletion to protect the portrait rights and privacy of the person in the photo. When I uploaded this photo, I did not obtain the consent of the person in the photo. As the photos are continuously exposed in Google search and used on various commercial sites, the portrait rights and personal information of the people in the photos are being infringed. It is assumed that it is impossible to prevent Wikimedia's photos from being exposed to search engines at the request of the user. Everyone has the right not to be arbitrarily photographed, portrayed, or publicized about their face, and not to be used for profit. This portrait right is constitutionally guaranteed under Article 10 of the Constitution of the Republic of Korea. Therefore, I assert that the intention with which I consented to the copyright at the time of upload is invalid. Best Regards, Choi kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 09:08, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Out of Scope. No need to keep this one, particularly if it became a privacy problem for this person (who is not a public person). Miniwark (talk) 13:23, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:32, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
I apply for deletion to protect the portrait rights and privacy of the person in the photo. When I uploaded this photo, I did not obtain the consent of the person in the photo. As the photos are continuously exposed in Google search and used on various commercial sites, the portrait rights and personal information of the people in the photos are being infringed. It is assumed that it is impossible to prevent Wikimedia's photos from being exposed to search engines at the request of the user. Everyone has the right not to be arbitrarily photographed, portrayed, or publicized about their face, and not to be used for profit. This portrait right is constitutionally guaranteed under Article 10 of the Constitution of the Republic of Korea. Therefore, I assert that the intention with which I consented to the copyright at the time of upload is invalid. Best Regards, Choi kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 09:32, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Image made during what look like to be a public event. Miniwark (talk) 13:28, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 11:32, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
DSC03948.jpg){kind=link}
DSC03948.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I apply for deletion to protect the portrait rights and privacy of the person in the photo. When I uploaded this photo, I did not obtain the consent of the person in the photo. As the photos are continuously exposed in Google search and used on various commercial sites, the portrait rights and personal information of the people in the photos are being infringed. It is assumed that it is impossible to prevent Wikimedia's photos from being exposed to search engines at the request of the user. Everyone has the right not to be arbitrarily photographed, portrayed, or publicized about their face, and not to be used for profit. This portrait right is constitutionally guaranteed under Article 10 of the Constitution of the Republic of Korea. Therefore, I assert that the intention with which I consented to the copyright at the time of upload is invalid. Best Regards, Choi kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 09:32, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Look like it was done during a public sport event. Miniwark (talk) 13:30, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 11:32, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
I request deletion to protect my personal portrait rights and personal information. also it is out of cope. It is true that I agreed to the CC copyright when I uploaded this photo. However, as the photo is continuously exposed in Google search and used on various commercial sites, my portrait right and personal information are being infringed. It is assumed that it is impossible to prevent Wikimedia's photos from being exposed to search engines at the request of the user. Everyone has the right not to be arbitrarily photographed, portrayed, or publicized about their face, and not to be used for profit. This portrait right is constitutionally guaranteed under Article 10 of the Constitution of the Republic of Korea. Therefore, I would like to withdraw my intention to agree to the copyright at the time of upload. Best Regards, Choi kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 09:34, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Neutral No need to keep this one, particularly if it became a privacy problem for this person (who is not a public person). That said, i find this image artistic. Miniwark (talk) 13:37, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 11:32, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
I request deletion to protect my personal portrait rights and personal information. It is true that I agreed to the CC copyright when I uploaded this photo. However, as the photo is continuously exposed in Google search and used on various commercial sites, my portrait right and personal information are being infringed. It is assumed that it is impossible to prevent Wikimedia's photos from being exposed to search engines at the request of the user. Everyone has the right not to be arbitrarily photographed, portrayed, or publicized about their face, and not to be used for profit. This portrait right is constitutionally guaranteed under Article 10 of the Constitution of the Republic of Korea. Also, The right to be forgotten refers to the right to self-determination and the right for information subjects to request deletion and prevention of spread of all information related to them online. On April 29, 2016, the Korea Communications Commission announced the 'Guidelines for Requesting Exclusion of Access to Internet Posts' to guarantee the right to be forgotten. This guideline allows one to request access exclusion from website administrators (wikimedia commons) and search service providers for posts that one cannot delete onerself. Therefore, I would like to withdraw my intention to agree to the copyright at the time of upload and request deletion of this photo. Best Regards, Choi kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 20:41, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:57, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
no trivial logo
- File:המהדורה הצעירה לוגו.png
- File:חדשות הבוקר 2022.png
- File:פאולה וליאון 2022.png
- File:הכל כלול 2022.png
- File:הדוח היומי סמל 2022.jpg
- File:העולם הבוקר לוגו 2022 בלי מנחים.jpg
- File:Microsoft edge.png
· מקף Hyphen ෴ · 14:46, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep File:הדוח היומי סמל 2022.jpg and File:הכל כלול 2022.png as they appear to be below COM:TOO Israel. Delete the rest. —holly {chat} 21:16, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per Holly, kept two and deleted the rest as being above the ToO in Israel. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:19, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors and architects copyright. Created after 1991. Derivatives of work. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 20:06, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep This photo does not depict anything that would have individual economic significance. The text is not copyrightable (short fact without creativity), and the picture is a reproduction of a public domain photo File:Yevgen Konovalec.jpg. The economic significance is coming from creating a 3D-plaque, but when photographed as 2D it is a mere reproduction of a public domain photo with trivial text, and so none of economically significant contributions of the engraver can be seen — NickK (talk) 00:06, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
- Delete First of all, it's a 3D work and a photo of a 3D work means there are two copyrights in play: one of the work itself and one of the photo of the work. Secondly, the engraving does not appear to use the same image as the photo. For one, the subject's hair is different. Now if it *is* the same photo and the sculptor made the conscious decision to make the hair different, then that was a creative choice and by definition, that would mean a new copyright. —holly {chat} 21:32, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
- I understand the double copyright, but the new Ukrainian copyright law added a limited freedom of panorama for cases when reproductions have no independent economic significance (note that this is not the same wording as commercial value, unfortunately so far no legal expert explained this norm nor it was yet applied in the court in either way). So the only thing we can do is our own interpretation and comparison with EU countries (which inspired this law), and in this case the 2D reproduction is supposed to exactly result in the original work (which is a public domain photo), essentially being the exact case of no independent economic significance. Now there is indeed something strange going on with the hair, Konovalets never had such a haircut, so probably a problem reproducing the photo in the pre-Internet era. I don't think it creates anything of independent economic significance though, it looks more like a mistake than a conscious choice — NickK (talk) 22:23, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
- @NickK I think the condition on Ukrainian FoP is not a de minimis condition but a clear condition that images should not be licensed under Wikimedia-required licenses that mandate commercial or for-profit reuses (CC-BY, CC-BY-SA, CC-zero, and/or PD). Also, the claims of Ukrainian legislature that their 2022 amendments are inspired from the EU laws are not entirely accurate: the EU directive does not mandate non-commercial condition (but also does not require commercial condition) (see Clindberg's input at Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2023/05#NEW copyright law of Ukraine). The WIPO now has an English copy of the updated law, and that copy uses "value" instead of "significance", so much closer to prohibition of distribution and sharing of images under lucrative Creative Commons licenses than a test on de minimis. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:33, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
- I understand the double copyright, but the new Ukrainian copyright law added a limited freedom of panorama for cases when reproductions have no independent economic significance (note that this is not the same wording as commercial value, unfortunately so far no legal expert explained this norm nor it was yet applied in the court in either way). So the only thing we can do is our own interpretation and comparison with EU countries (which inspired this law), and in this case the 2D reproduction is supposed to exactly result in the original work (which is a public domain photo), essentially being the exact case of no independent economic significance. Now there is indeed something strange going on with the hair, Konovalets never had such a haircut, so probably a problem reproducing the photo in the pre-Internet era. I don't think it creates anything of independent economic significance though, it looks more like a mistake than a conscious choice — NickK (talk) 22:23, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: The engraving is a creative work of its own as Holly says. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:20, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
The actual author of this painting is Jiang Yizi (江逸子), not in Public Domain. (see https://www.sohu.com/a/396075618_466973) Not a Japanese 17th century work. 120.229.229.123 09:09, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 18:36, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
Given s:zh:Wikisource:版權討論/2023年中華人民共和國政府公報特別提刪討論頁, there are some evidences to indicate that government gazettes aren't PD-PRC-exempt available, see also statement from Supreme People's Court of China Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:02, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Liuxinyu970226: Wouldn't this affect everything in Category:State Council Gazette? —holly {chat} 21:10, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Holly Cheng This will need serious re-check, some (i.e. before 1973) are already PD due to aging. At the moment I'm only in favor of nominating two of them. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:18, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: I am trusting that you know what you're talking about. —holly {chat} 01:14, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Given s:zh:Wikisource:版權討論/2023年中華人民共和國政府公報特別提刪討論頁, there are some evidences to indicate that government gazettes aren't PD-PRC-exempt available, see also statement from Supreme People's Court of China Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:04, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: I am trusting that you know what you're talking about. —holly {chat} 01:14, 28 November 2023 (UTC)