User talk:Dannebrog Spy

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Velkommen til Commons, Dannebrog Spy!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | asturianu | azərbaycanca | Bahasa Banjar | català | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | Esperanto | euskara | estremeñu | français | Frysk | galego | hrvatski | Bahasa Indonesia | interlingua | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | Kiswahili | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | magyar | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandés | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | occitan | Plattdüütsch | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | rumantsch | Scots | shqip | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | Basa Sunda | suomi | svenska | Tagalog | Türkçe | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | Ирон | македонски | нохчийн | русский | српски / srpski | тоҷикӣ | українська | ქართული | Հայերեն | नेपाली | भोजपुरी | मराठी | हिन्दी | অসমীয়া | বাংলা | தமிழ் | മലയാളം | සිංහල | ไทย | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | မြန်မာဘာသာ | 한국어 | 日本語 | 中文 | 中文(台灣)‎ | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 粵語 | עברית | اردو | العربية | تۆرکجه | سنڌي | فارسی | +/−
De første skridt

Vores hjælpeoversigt første skridt og vores ofte stillede spørgsmål kan hjælpe dig efter din brugeroprettelse. Siderne forklarer, hvordan du tilpasser din brugergrænseflade (for eksempel sprog), hvordan man lægger en fil op og gør rede for vores licenspolitik. Du behøver ikke tekniske færdigheder for at bidrage på Commons. Hav modet til at bidrage og tro på, at andre også arbejder efter den bedste vilje. Dette er en wiki - det er nemt.

Få hjælp

Du kan finde mere information på Brugerportalen. Du kan stille spørgsmål på Landsbybrønden eller på IRC-kanalen #wikimedia-commons. Du kan også kontakte en administrator på hans eller hendes diskussionsside. Hvis du har et specifikt spørgsmål på ophavsret, så spørg på Commons:License questions.

Tips og tricks
  • Indsæt Babel-bokse på din brugerside, så andre ved, hvilke du sprog du taler og forstår.
  • Alle de filer, du har lagt op, gemmes i dit personlige galleri.
  • Underskriv dine indlæg på diskussionssider ved at skrive ~~~~
  • Anvend CommonSense-redskabet for at finde velegnede kategorier til dine filer (så vil andre også kunne finde dem!)
  • For at linke til en billedside, så skriv dette: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], det giver: Image:Foo.jpg
  • Hvis du kopierer filer fra et andet projekt, så anvend CommonsHelper
Lavet en fejl?
  • Ville du give en fil et nyt navn eller flytte den? Så skal du bare lægge filen op igen og markere den gamle således: {{bad name|Rigtigt navn}}
  • Læs hele Deletion guidelines for mere information.
(P.S. Ønsker du at give feedback på denne besked?)

Brug af billeder fra Hedeland

[edit]

Hej Leif! Jeg kan se du har en masse rigtige gode billeder fra Hedeland liggende, og dem vil jeg gerne bruge til et par plakater for Hedelands Veteranbane. Men den nuværende licens på billederne siger krav på afkreditering, hvilket plakaternes opsætning ikke tillader sammen med Creative Commons-mærke... Hvordan ville du have det, hvis vi lavede en aftale om frit brug af billederne til plakaterne? De går til et godt formål!

--Benj5378 (talk) 11:59, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Jo, det kan vel godt gå an. Normalt vil jeg foretrække, at folk angiver mit navn, når de genbruger mine billeder, men når du nu spørger pænt først. Og Creative Commons-mærket betyder alligevel ikke så meget for mig. Men af ren nysgerrighed kunne jeg da godt tænke mig at høre, hvilke billeder du har i tankerne? --Dannebrog Spy (talk) 14:23, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Det er et ganske fint billede du har fået tegnet op. Men der er en lille detalje du har overset. For Lille Nord mellem Helsingør og Hillerød køres også af DSB. Den tekniske forklaring er, at strækningen ejes af HUR, der har indgået en kontrakt med DSB S-tog om kørslen på denne strækning. --|EPO| 19:08, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tak for velkomsten og rosen. Jo jeg ved godt, at Lille Nord ejes af Hovedstadens Lokalbaner og drives af DSB S-tog. For at undgå at skulle rette kortet hele tiden har jeg imidlertid medtaget et par ændringer, der først træder i kraft i 2007, nemlig at Lokalbanen A/S overtager driften af Lille Nord og metroens forlængelse til Lufthavnen. Men det kan jeg lige tilføje i bemærkningerne til kortet. Dannebrog Spy 20:17, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Trianglen 22. feb 07

[edit]

Verden er lille... Havde jeg været lidt hurtigere eller langsommere, havde jeg været med på billedet. Jeg kan huske ladvognen th i billedet med en palle salt på ladet, da jeg var på vej hjem fra Netto på Blegdamsvej :-) G®iffen 15:41, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wax museum of Tussauds

[edit]

==> http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Madame_Tussauds

I think you should read a bit more about copyright before correcting my edits! --217.231.244.115 15:26, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry but your mass-tagging of pictures in short time from an anonymous IP-adress seemed much like vandalism. You even tagged categories! --Dannebrog Spy 16:17, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello Dannebrog Spy!

Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images uploaded to Commons should be useful to all users of Wikimedia projects. This is possible only if the images can be found by other people.

To allow others to find the images you uploaded here, the images should be in some place that can be found by navigating the category structure. This means that you should put the images into appropriate topic pages, categories, optionally galleries, or both of them (see Commons:Categories). To find good categories for your images, the CommonSense tool may help.

You can find a convenient overview of your uploaded files in this gallery.

The important point is that the images should be placed in the general structure somewhere. There are a large number of completely unsorted images on Commons right now. If you would like to help to place some of those images where they can be found, please do!

Thank you. BotMultichillT (talk) 09:42, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 21:18, 28 January 2012 (UTC)


dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 21:01, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

Autopatrol given

[edit]

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. INeverCry 20:42, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Den Lille Havfrue m.fl.

[edit]

Hej. Du skrev til mig for nogen tid siden om statuer i København. Jeg har lige nomineret en stak billeder til sletning. Der er nok flere rundt om men nu er der i alt fald taget hul på diskussionen. --MGA73 (talk) 17:23, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Category:Lego City Advent Calendar 2010 has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rybec (talk) 22:13, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

S-train map

[edit]

Hello. Sorry, it was a map of the city with a diagram of the network which was supposed to be good. But it was apparently not. I am going to ask that this file was deleted. --Karldupart (talk) 12:25, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Articulated buses on line 5A 3.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 14:05, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kategorisering af tog-relaterede filer

[edit]
The Category Barnstar
For dit vedholdende og grundige arbejde med at kategorisere tog-relaterede emner :) heb [T C E] 17:42, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tusind tak for det. Ja Darkweasel94 uploadede over 3.800 af Kurt Rasmussens billeder fra http://www.bahnbilder.de for et par uger, så der var rigeligt at gå i gang med, selvom jeg holdt mig til de danske af dem. Først flere hundred københavnske sporvogne der skulle kategoriseres en for en efter linie og gade. Og derefter adskillige S-tog, Y-tog, skinnebusser og andre tog der skulle kategoriseres efter togtype og station. Og indimellem skulle der så oprettes en stribe nye kategorier. Tilbage er nogle kategoriseringer af sporvogne efter type, men det kan heldigvis klares med cat-a-log. --Dannebrog Spy (talk) 22:09, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dobbelt redigering

[edit]

Vi sidder vist og redigerer de samme billeder samtidigt... :-) Jeg sletter Sindssygehospitalet og tilføjer The psychiatric hospital - du gør det modsatte... :-) Tænkte at det engelske navn er det mest korrekte, eller? Thuecl (talk) 15:17, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ja vi har krydset hinanden der. Jeg har faktisk lige skrevet et indlæg om det på Nybegynderforummet på dansk Wikipedia. Kan du ikke svare der, så vi kan holde diskussionen på et sted. --Dannebrog Spy (talk) 15:26, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Translating the interface in your language, we need your help

[edit]
Hello Dannebrog Spy, thanks for working on this wiki in your language. We updated the list of priority translations and I write you to let you know. The language used by this wiki (or by you in your preferences) needs about 100 translations or less in the priority list. You're almost done!
To add or change translations for all wikis, please use translatewiki.net, the MediaWiki localisation project.

Please register on translatewiki.net if you didn't yet and then help complete priority translations (make sure to select your language in the language selector). With a couple hours' work or less, you can make sure that nearly all visitors see the wiki interface fully translated. Nemo 14:06, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and thanks!

[edit]

Just a quick note as I realised I never thanked you for editing my Copenhagen pictures long ago! I have more you might need to check out :-D Montanaro 1 (talk) 12:13, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

railway-cat reverts

[edit]

Is there any discussion somewhere about the railway-cat reverts? - actually to me categorizing equipment to its number would make sense-even in a double-cat (db-class-xxx AND xx-xxx-xx) --Ordercrazy (talk) 13:42, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, there were discussions at de:Portal_Diskussion:Bahn#Splitterkategorisierung_Bahnbilder_auf_Commons, User talk:46.76.30.119, User talk:Rodhullandemu#Train categories and Commons:Village pump/Archive/2015/08#5.60.27.239 (diskussion · bidrag). The problem is that an IP user created hundreds of categories for individual German locomotives and multiple units with just one or two images each. So instead of one category you may got 10 categories for just 13 pictures. Which is rather pointless, as most people just need pictures of an a given class, not a particular locomotive.
Furthermore most of the category names are meaningless, unless you are familiar with the German classification of trains. And in some cases the IP user even claimed that a picture was of a particular train, despite it being impossible to tell from the picture, and the text telling nothing about it. --Dannebrog Spy (talk) 14:02, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for doing all the reverts of useless subcategorizing by those IPs! Regards, --Kleeblatt187 (talk) 17:09, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, thanks also from my side!-- Gürbetaler (talk) 21:15, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Themightyquill (talk) 12:18, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Inside the apartments

[edit]

Greetings Leif I have been in many European cities but never in apartment rooms.My own commons photos are only exteriors. Are you able to take interior shots of lived in flats? From the look of agents shots of flats for rent the interiors are different to those here in Ireland (more like Ikea) but agents do that. It is not real.I will take some shots of my own house soon- also not typical.Notafly (talk) 21:10, 5 January 2016 (UTC) PS Here is a Rome block I have to guess what is inside The same for Uppsala No guessing in Portugal but too late[reply]

Well, I can see your problem. Most pictures of interiors are either those you mention, from parties or from museums. One of the better examples of museums is however Tidens Samling, which features Danish living rooms from the 1900's to the 1980's. As for present day pictures I am afraid I can't help you. Most people prefer some privacy regarding their own homes afterall. --Dannebrog Spy (talk) 22:11, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Holbæk or not?

[edit]

we were on the way to Nykøbing Sjælland station and had a change over somewhere.Smiley.toerist (talk) 15:42, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It is indeed Holbæk Station, where you change from the regional train in the picture to the local train for Nykøbing Sjælland. --Dannebrog Spy (talk) 19:15, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Ras67 (talk) 17:22, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jakob Stegelmann

[edit]
Jakob Stegelmann

Jeg har lavet tilklipning af billedet af Jakob Stegelmann, til brug i da:Jakob Stegelmann. Håber du er blevet krediteret korrekt. --Kjeldjoh (talk) 08:45, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Elektrificering

[edit]

Har du kilden til File:DK_2012_Electrification.jpg? Den skal opdateres... Paa forhaand tak. --Ysangkok (talk) 15:11, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tak for henvendelsen. Jeg har lavet File:DK 2018 Electrification.png som erstatning. --Dannebrog Spy (talk) 22:34, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, - Alexis Jazz 14:28, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Østre Færge

[edit]

Kære Dannebrog Spy, jeg ved ikke om det har nogen betydning, men i kategorien Østre Færge (ship, 1962), som du lige har oprettet, er de to afbildede færger ikke den samme. Den som er affotograferet fra siden lå til kaj, og var ikke i brug. Mvh. Orphée (talk) 04:54, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Det er en fejl fra min side. Jeg syntes de lignede hinanden, og da begge billeder var fra Orø, gik jeg ud fra, at det var den samme færge. Men ved nærmere eftersyn kan jeg godt se, at det er to forskellige. File:Østre Færge Orø.jpg viser Østre Færge og hører derfor til i kategorien. Færgen på File:Færgen fra Hammer Bakke.jpg må så være Karen Orø. --Dannebrog Spy (talk) 10:50, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Du har sikkert ret. Den som ligger stille, er i hvert fald mindre end den anden. Mvh. Orphée (talk) 05:58, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Lapidariumsbroen

[edit]

Eksisterer File:Lapidariumsbroen.jpg stadig og må man cykle på den? Jeg mindes at have set at den var opført som en midlertidig løsning. Hedder den rent faktisk "Lapidariumsbroen"? --Hjart (talk) 17:54, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Jeg gik da over den og tog billeder både af og fra den 4. oktober i år. Der var også andre fodgængere og cyklister på den. Broen er rigtig nok midlertidigt, men Trafik-, Bygge- Boligstyrelsen har forlænget tilladelsen til den indtil 1. maj 2019. Der nævnes dog ikke noget om et navn på broen, hverken i tilladelsen eller andre steder. Og Google kender kun navnet Lapidariumsbroen her fra Commons. Men måske Orf3us, der har uploaded billedet, har en forklaring på det? --Dannebrog Spy (talk) 19:03, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Jeg har hørt broen omtales sådan, men jeg tror ikke at man må cykle på den. Og ja, broen ligger der stadig. Orphée (talk) 15:33, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Monument for Danmarks Internationale Indsats efter 1948

[edit]

Har du mulighed for at tage billeder af Monument for Danmarks Internationale Indsats efter 1948 oppe fra volden således at man får hele monumentet med? --Hjart (talk) 12:53, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Jo, jeg kan da godt lægge vejen forbi på et tidspunkt. For jeg kan godt se, at det kniber med oversigtsbilleder i kategorien. --Dannebrog Spy (talk) 14:44, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Hjart: Nu har jeg uploaded 12 billeder med hele eller dele af monumentet fra forskellige vinkler i kategorien. Det var ikke helt nemt at få det i sin helhed, for en del af det ligger inde i Prinsessens Bastion. Desuden må græsset på volden ikke betrædes, hvilket lægger en yderligere dæmper på de mulige fotovinkler. Men jeg håber da, at der er noget af det, der kan bruges. Du kan eventuelt eksperimentere med belysning og tilklipning, hvis du synes. --Dannebrog Spy (talk) 22:36, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dine billeder fra Skjern

[edit]

Jeg har brugt nogle af dine billeder fra Skjern i mit arbejde på OpenStreetMap: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/JAC . Hvis du undrer dig over at jeg gør så meget i wikidata og geokodning, så er det på grund af OSM :-) --Hjart (talk) 14:01, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Det er helt i orden. Jeg var i Vestjylland i anden anledning men benyttede det til en udflugt til Skjern. Her fik jeg blandt andet set nærmere på nogle af parkerne i Den Grønne Korridor. Stationen blev også gennemfotograferet, så den kommer der også billeder af. Jeg har dog lige opdaget, at Upload Wizard ikke har fået angivet kamerapositioner på en række af mine vestjyske billeder, selvom der er GPS-angivelser i billedfilerne. Så der bliver noget at rette op på der. --Dannebrog Spy (talk) 15:38, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Tak. Kamerapositioner gør det væsentlig lettere at finde ud af præcist hvilke objekter man ser på billederne. Er der ikke gps-positioner i billederne kan det kræve en hel del research at stedbestemme dem. --Hjart (talk) 21:12, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Placering af de forskellige ting i Tivoli

[edit]

Jeg har adskillige gange i årenes løb kortlagt lidt i Tivoli. Problemet er dog at det kan være ret svært, hvis man ikke lige er godt kendt der, at gennemskue på luftfotos etc hvad der er hvad og hvordan de forskellige ting er placeret i forhold til hinanden. Derfor vil jeg spørge om ikke du kunne lave noget til Mapillary i stil med f.eks. https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/_fzwv6FDtFiWXwyu4h_BcA , men i dagslys og på et tidspunkt hvor der ikke for mange mennesker. Vi kan se Mapillary sekvenser direkte i vores editorer til OSM og hurtigt gå frem og tilbage i dem, så derfor kan de være vældig praktiske. --Hjart (talk) 11:37, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Jeg må ærligt indrømme, at jeg aldrig havde hørt om Mapillary før. Nu har jeg fået den installeret, og så må jeg prøve den ved lejlighed. Tivoli står dog ikke for lige foreløbigt og da slet ikke her i højsæsonen, selvom jeg godt kan se, at dækningen af den lader noget tilbage at ønske. Google Streetview har ganske vist været rundt i den gamle have for et par år siden, men der er huller, ligesom der er sket nogle ændringer i mellemtiden. Nå, men til gengæld er der da parker og andre områder, der også godt kunne dækkes bedre, og som ikke ændres så hurtigt. Så mon ikke der bliver mulighed for at få brugt appen. --Dannebrog Spy (talk) 20:32, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Super :-) Det kan godt kræve lidt øvelse at lave nogle sekvenser der reelt er anvendelige i OSM. Der er masser af eksempler på folk der har suset rundt og taget en frygteligt masse billeder, men slet ikke har haft tanke for hvor kameraet har peget hen, så det er fint lige at eksperimentere lidt.

På f.eks. https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/0o5PzABtMkl9eS9DfKf9Aw har jeg haft et kamera monteret på cykelstyret og ladet det automatisk tage et billede hvert 2 sekunder. Det er fint til hurtigt at fange vejskilte mm langs veje og stier. På https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/Wxm7_XGS2pmlLRZDkW-vhA derimod har jeg manuelt taget enkeltbilleder for at være sikker på at få de væsentlige ting med. --Hjart (talk) 11:19, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Jeg gik en tur i Fælledparken her i København i formiddags. Nu har jeg så fået uploaded et par serier med billeder af stier, der ikke var dækket i forvejen. Jeg håber at det er noget af det der efterspørges. Se https://www.mapillary.com/app/?focus=photo&pKey=llc5TX60O0ZX0ws1JqGKCQ og https://www.mapillary.com/app/?focus=photo&pKey=NBnHyFTeCBc1mM4p8sPhzQ . --Dannebrog Spy (talk) 15:37, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Det er simpelthen super. Tak for det :-) --Hjart (talk) 08:26, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sporvejsmuseet

[edit]

Jeg linkede billeder/kategorier til de forskellige bygninger og holdepladser på Sporvejsmuseet forleden og brugte dem til at sætte navne på. I dag gik en kollega amok i dem: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/71600786 (se 4. kommentar). Vi har god gavn af dem ovre i OSM :-) --Hjart (talk) 21:36, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Godt at I kan bruge dem. Museet er blevet udvidet ret kraftigt med fem nye bygninger i 2014-2018, så det kan være sin sag at få det hele med. Jeg kunne dog ikke lade være med at trække på smilebåndet af angivelsen af telefonboksen, for det er altså en ren udstillingsgenstand. Ja der har faktisk ikke været danske telefonbokse i drift, siden de sidste blev taget ud af drift I Aarhus i december 2017. Et par tips I øvrigt: gaden mellem Valby Gamle Remise og Remise 4 hedder Århusgade. Smallegade er gaden mellem Bushallen og Magasinet. Den lange hovedgade med sporene mellem Remise 1 og Remise 3 på den ene side og Valby Gamle Remise, Bushallen og Garagen på den anden hedder Valby Langgade. --Dannebrog Spy (talk) 15:37, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Yuraily Lic (talk) 17:07, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Arosio Stefano (talk) 07:49, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:H.C. Ørsted Instituttet, Nørre Allé.jpg og File:Nørre Allé 2020.jpg

[edit]

Hej Dannebrog Spy
Tak for de mange billeder, du bidrager til Commons med. Jeg har tilladt mig at redigere ovennævnte to af dine billeder fra Nørre Allé i København. Der har blot været tale om at rette perspektivet, mindske lyseksponeringen samt et par småting, så de nu fremstår endnu pænere.
Mvh. Bob Collowan (talk) 06:48, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Det er helt i orden. Normalt bruger jeg et kamera til at fotografere med, men lige de her blev taget med en smartphone. --Dannebrog Spy (talk) 11:45, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Søkvæsthuset - Orlogsmuseet

[edit]

Jeg stødte lige på ovenstående. Kan du kigge på Category:Søkvæsthuset og Category:Royal Danish Naval Museum? Kategorierne ser noget rodede ud, men jeg har desværre ikke helt styr på lokalforholdene. Hjart (talk) 02:54, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Det er heller ikke så underligt, for der er sket nogle ændringer de seneste år, som ikke fremgik af artiklerne på dansk Wikipedia. Orlogmuseet (Royal Danish Naval Museum) blev oprettet i 1957, men fra 1989 lå det i Søkvæsthuset. Museet lukkede 1. januar 2016, hvorefter dets samlinger blev overført til Tøjhusmuseet, fra juli 2018 Krigsmuseet. Jeg har samlet billederne af bygningen i Category:Søkvæsthuset, for den står der stadig, selvom den nok bruges til andet formål nu. Desuden har jeg opdateret de danske artikler. --Dannebrog Spy (talk) 13:11, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Yuraily Lic (talk) 06:08, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Yuraily Lic (talk) 23:04, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Use of images posted on your profile

[edit]

Dear DS, I want to inquire about re-using images posted on your profile as part of an academic article that I'm writing on sustainable architecture and design in Copenhagen, specifically these ones: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:T%C3%A5singe_Plads_03.jpg and https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:T%C3%A5singe_Plads_06.jpg. I understand these have been posted under a CC licence but the editor and the publisher requires direct confirmation from the photographer that I can use the images. The terms of the licence would be as follows: - non-exclusive rights to reproduce the item within your article in the journal 'Landscape Research' targeted at a specialist academic readership with a defined circulation; print and electronic rights for the full term of copyright and any extensions of copyright to facilitate reproduction of the material in the journal’s print and online editions Would you be happy for me to use the images under these conditions? It would be very helpful and much appreciated. If you would like to contact me or if you would like any further information please get in touch here or through the email user function. Kind regards, Daniel // https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Tubrideee

User:Tubrideee: You are welcome to use the pictures in the journal under the mentioned terms and conditions. --Dannebrog Spy (talk) 13:56, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
File:Den gamle By - Aarhus fortæller 06.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 02:33, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Models of trains from Bombardier - Twindexx Vario 03.jpg

[edit]

Hej Leif! I found your picture "Models of trains from Bombardier - Twindexx Vario 03.jpg" and we would like to use it modified in a business brochure. Can we have your ok for that? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gunnar Ziwes (talk • contribs) 13:04, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Who are "we"? Who do you represent? --Dannebrog Spy (talk) 13:48, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, you are right. We are Euro-Composites. If it is ok for you, you can contact me at ziwes@euro-composites.com. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gunnar Ziwes (talk • contribs) 14:29, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may use my picture if you credits me. Generally speaking all pictures at Wikimedia Commons may be used for free provided you credits the creators. You are not allowed to present other peoples pictures as your own. --Dannebrog Spy (talk) 15:08, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Brug af billede 150S

[edit]

Hej Leif,

Jeg er en studerende på en videregående uddannelse som skal fremlægge om infrastruktur og kollektiv transport. (På bachelor) Jeg stødte på dit billede med bus 150S på Helsingiørmotorvejen og vil gerne spørge om jeg, med kildehenvisning, må bruge dit billede i min PowerPoint fremlæggelse? Vh Kristian Mr Dating (talk) 14:44, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jo du må gerne bruge mine billeder til den slags, så længe du husker at angive, at det er mig, der har taget dem. Held og lykke med din fremlæggelse. --Dannebrog Spy (talk) 14:59, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
File:Mascot in Original Sokos Hotel Viru Tallinn.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 02:55, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 02:57, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Yuraily Lic (talk) 07:14, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Climate Planet at Rådhuspladsen 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:54, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Climate Planet at Rådhuspladsen 02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:54, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

geogroup

[edit]

Jeg har en stump kode i min common.js, som indsætter en nyttig knap i min toolbar.--Hjart (talk) 12:34, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Legoland Garden i Dubai 2016.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Per the category template, "Copyright Law of the UAE forbids the publication or commercial use of photographs taken of copyrighted buildings".
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Lord Belbury (talk) 14:00, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Page purge

[edit]

Jeg kan anbefale gadgetten "Page purge", som tilføjer en "Purge" under tabben "Mere" . Jeg bruger den ofte til at få nye infobokse til at vise sig, eller opdatere infobokse, når jeg har lavet ændringer på WD.--Hjart (talk) 01:19, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sletning af billeder

[edit]

Hej leif.

Jeg bemærker at du har sat en del af mine billeder til sletning heraf "Rute 601A i Næstved". Jeg har igennem Facebook fået tilladelse af Netop Kaj W til at uploade dem på Wikipedia....

Jeg bemærker ligedan har du har sendt anmodning om billedderne af "Sydtrafik Bybus/Rutebil design", Disse billeder lå i forvejen på Wikipedia commons og jeg var nødsaget til at slette billederne i artiklen at jeg finskrev og udvidede selve artiklen. Hvad med at du spørger til råds før du bare træffer konstateringer? Er du Wikipedia Moderator? For ærligt føler flere brugere inklusive jeg selv at du opføre dig som en alt dominærende politimand der bestemmer over hvad folk lægger op på wikipedia.....

Dertil kan spørges. Er det "Movia" logo du har lagt op til artiklen om "Movia" et du selv har siddet og tegnet i hånden?? i såfald skal det også slettes. hov nej der står "Public domain", Ligedan er Sydtrafik, Fynbus og Nordjyllands trafikselskab OGSÅ "Public domain". ligedan er trafikkortene "Public domain"....

Category:Cosplay of Rem (Re:Zero -Starting Life in Another World-)

[edit]

Er der en grund til at vi ikke bare kan kalde kategorien Category:Cosplay of Rem? --Trade (talk) 15:54, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Der er flere andre fiktive figurer, der også hedder Rem, jvf. en:Rem. Jeg ved dog ikke, om der er cosplay af nogle af de andre. --Dannebrog Spy (talk) 14:29, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cruise ship year 97 and 98

[edit]

Do you know a Leif Jorgensen that was on a cruise ship in 1997 ,98? Danced with a girl named Andrea Geren? Email: andreageren@yahoo.com 107.77.211.58 23:29, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Politie

[edit]

Hello! Concerning this edit, isn’t that a Police station on the middle left of the image, on the closerst background plane? -- Tuválkin 23:35, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No, the round building is Bien. It combines shelters for tram (now bus) passengers, public toilets and a kiosk. The white letters on it were advertisement for the Danish newspaper Politiken. It was later replaced by advertisement for another newspaper, B.T. --Dannebrog Spy (talk) 10:48, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Lukas Beck (talk) 13:08, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Lukas Beck (talk) 13:12, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Lukas Beck (talk) 13:16, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Lukas Beck (talk) 13:20, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Lukas Beck (talk) 13:21, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Lukas Beck (talk) 13:25, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Lukas Beck (talk) 14:53, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Lukas Beck (talk) 14:58, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Lukas Beck (talk) 14:59, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Lukas Beck (talk) 15:00, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Lukas Beck (talk) 15:07, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Lukas Beck (talk) 15:10, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Lukas Beck (talk) 15:13, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Lukas Beck (talk) 15:15, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Lukas Beck (talk) 15:17, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Lukas Beck (talk) 15:18, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Lukas Beck (talk) 15:21, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Lukas Beck (talk) 15:23, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Lukas Beck (talk) 15:25, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Lukas Beck (talk) 15:26, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Lukas Beck (talk) 15:27, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Lukas Beck (talk) 15:32, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Heste med bind for øjnene

[edit]

Det er insektnet de 2 heste har på. På den måde undgår de at blive unødigt generet af fluer mm. Hjart (talk) 14:09, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, det har jeg rettet. Jeg tænkte bare, at de måske ikke skulle distraheres af folk, der kom forbi Hvissingestenen på den anden side af stien. Men i juli kan jeg dog godt forstå, at fluer og andre insekter kan være et problem. --Dannebrog Spy (talk) 14:51, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
De har dem på af samme grund, som vi mennesker bruger myggenet. Det er blevet ret almindeligt at se heste rende rundt med insektnet af forskellig udformning Hjart (talk) 16:44, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jonckheere Arrow

[edit]

Hi Dannebrog Spy, I hope you're well, Many years ago you created Category:Jonckheere Arrow on Volvo B12MA - Could I ask how did you know those images were Arrows ?, The Jonckheere Mistral is an identical vehicle and from what I can tell there's no exterior differece with both these models so I was curious as to how you may know ?, Many thanks, Warm Regards, –Davey2010Talk 14:17, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I used the database Danskebusser.dk which have informations on nearly all buses in Denmark. Information on File:Gråhundbus on Hammerichsgade.jpg for instance I found by searching on the registration number (number plate). According to that the bus was a Jonckheere Arrow on Volvo B12MA-55. The database have both Jonckheere Arrow and Jonckheere Mistral but I don't know the difference either. --Dannebrog Spy (talk) 14:55, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, Ah okay, That website is similar to what us Brits use for buses over here (https://www.buslistsontheweb.co.uk/) so that does all seem correct,
My plan at the time was to redirect the Arrow category back to the Mistral but that would be rather silly now, It's very confusing though,
Anyway thanks so much for helpful reply and for the Database link too that'll come in handy :), Take care Dannebrog Spy, Warm Regards, –Davey2010Talk 15:13, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Lukas Beck (talk) 06:18, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Vestindien

[edit]

Hej Leif I denne pamflet er der et kort over Assistens Kirkegård med afmærkning af diverse grave med tilknytning til Vestindien. Flere af dem kunne jeg gudt bruge billeder af til forskellige artikler. Jeg har dog ind til videre ikke rigtig haft den helt store succes med rent faktisk at lokalisere dem. Så hvis du på et tidspunkt har lyst til en skattejagt vil det være stærkt påskønnet, hvis du kan komme op med billeder af nogle af dem. Nogen er godt nok på grund af alderen stærkt medtagne (ikke rigtig læselige), men da der er tale om personer hvor det ellers er vanskeligt at finde ret mange relevante illustrationer, vil billederne ikke desto mindre være nyttige. Intet problem hvis det er uden for din interessesfære, så prøver jeg bare selv igen ved anden lejlighed. God weekend.Ramblersen2 (talk) 08:42, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Lige for tiden koncentrerer jeg mig om Holmens Kirkegård, dels af private årsager og dels fordi mange grave der kan lokaliseres ved hjælp af Find gravsted og oernen.dk. Men mærkeligt nok virker det ikke til, at nogen har lavet lignende databaser for Assistens Kirkegård. Så det vil nok blive lidt sværere at finde de ønskede grave, selvom billederne i pamfletten da giver et fingerpeg. Umiddelbart regner jeg dog ikke med at gå på jagt der, men jeg skal nok have det i mente, hvis der bliver tid til det. Men til gengæld kan jeg da oplyse, at der kommer en ny portion billeder fra Holmens Kirkegård om nogle dage. --Dannebrog Spy (talk) 12:01, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ja det har også undret mig, at man ikke har gjort noget i den stil på Assistens Kirkegård. Ikke mindst fordi der jo ligefrem er et formidlingscenter, som endda har lavet små videoer om nogle af de mere interessante personer som ligger der. Men jeg vil forsøge at finde nogen af dem når jeg får mulighed for det.Og så holde øje med hvad der dukker op fra Holmens fra din side.188.183.102.182 21:14, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
File:KS 701 on Sporvejsmuseet - night line.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

85.80.225.15 11:50, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hej Leif, Er det muligt at bruge et af dine billeder til et togprojekt

[edit]

Hej Leif, Jeg har forsøgt at komme i kontakt med dig.

Er det muligt at bruge et af dine billeder til et modeltogprojekt ?

Mvh Morten Greenland - Thrane (talk) 17:16, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hvilket billede handler det om? Og hvad er det for et projekt? --Dannebrog Spy (talk) 20:19, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hej Jørgen,
Jeg søger et billede af toget Sølvpilen.
Jeg og min familie har et lille firma, der laver modeltogsvogn. Firmaet hedder IMHobby.
Vi er igang med at lave en togvogn, hvor vi gerne skal bruge et billeder af Søvpilen som baggrund.
Jeg fandt:DSB MA 460 in Tommerup.jpg.
Jeg vil derfor høre om der var nogle muligheder.
Mvh Morten 37.18.45.163 23:11, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Jeg ville lige høre om der var en mulighed. Greenland - Thrane (talk) 12:54, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Undskyld det forsinkede svar. Jo det er muligt, bare I husker at kreditere mig. Dannebrog Spy (talk) 15:44, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Det lyder godt. Der er desværre ikke plads på togvognen til at kreditere dig (togvognen er ca. 10 cm lang), så jeg håber det er i orden at vi gør det på vores hjemmeside, hvor man kan se togvognen. Greenland - Thrane (talk) 23:39, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dansk tekst

[edit]

Jeg indså på et tidspunkt at det ikke er en given ting at alle bidragsydere blandt vores landsmænd er alt for fortrolige med det engelske sprog. Derfor påsætter jeg danske tekster, hvor det giver mening på kategorier mm. Hjart (talk) 14:34, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]