Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2023/05/30
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
MedicalDriedOut.jpg GMoney2026 (talk) 01:54, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 06:19, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
File:MV5BOTRiM2YzYTgtZDdmNi00ZWUzLWE4ZWQtMmMyMTcxZGFkMDkwXkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyMTAyMzYwNzgw. V1 FMjpg UX1000.jpg
[edit]IMDB source. 186.173.99.173 02:11, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wutsje 03:10, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
copyright vio BlinxTheKitty (talk) 04:05, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wutsje 04:24, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
The author isn't unknown whatsoever. The photographer is Robert Giard, and his name is literally within the link the uploader has provided (https://www.advocate.com/photography/2019/6/07/22-photos-lgbtq-writers-artists-activists-80s-and-90s#media-gallery-media-20); an article in The Advocate about the photographer ExRat (talk) 02:29, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Túrelio. --Rosenzweig τ 10:59, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Man sieht nicht die Wüllnerstraße sondern die Lochnerstraße. Die Datei wurde bereits neu angelegt als Lochnerstraße. Die Version hier kann damit ersatzlos gelöscht werden. Besten Dank (Nachricht vom ursprünglichen Hochlader) Rhetos (talk) 07:50, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 08:07, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
I have accidentally uploaded this file to Wikimedia Commons instead of Wikipedia Wanja01 (talk) 08:11, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 10:58, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
I have accidentally uploaded this file to Wikimedia Commons instead of Wikipedia Wanja01 (talk) 08:11, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 10:58, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
I have accidentally uploaded this file to Wikimedia Commons instead of Wikipedia Wanja01 (talk) 08:11, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 10:57, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
I have accidentally uploaded this file to Wikimedia Commons instead of Wikipedia Wanja01 (talk) 08:12, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 10:57, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
I have accidentally uploaded this file to Wikimedia Commons instead of Wikipedia Wanja01 (talk) 08:12, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 10:57, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
I have accidentally uploaded this file to Wikimedia Commons instead of Wikipedia Wanja01 (talk) 08:12, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 10:57, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
كان مجرد تجربة عواطف نطر (talk) 10:13, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 10:56, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Is this a legitimate Flickr file? 186.173.99.173 00:07, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Delete the file is a copyvio. See for example [1] it is credited Edwin Reichert/AP so unlikely the German photographer released it under a free license. Günther Frager (talk) 00:44, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per above. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:13, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Because it is Press photo, Random photo from internet, Logo 203.78.120.70 (talk) 19:29, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: nonsense nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 13:51, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Own work! 186.173.99.173 02:32, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: CV, facebook profile image. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:20, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
source is cc-by-nc-nd 4.0, not free license shizhao (talk) 02:26, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
- What's the problem? Change the license to the right one, I don't mind. cc-by-nc-nd 4.0 Can you do it yourself or do you need me to give permission? I allow it if it depends on me!!! Dmitry Dzhagarov (talk) 17:29, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
- {{subst:delete2|image=File:Frailty.jpg|reason=source is cc-by-nc-nd 4.0, not free license}} ~~~~ Dmitry Dzhagarov (talk) 03:59, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (Nc and nd licenses not allowed on Commons; see Commons:Licensing). --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:45, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Uploaded for advertising purpose. U.T. 06:37, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Whatever the uploader's purpose, might have been ok as a mundane photo of a school in Nepal - however it was taken from the schools website clearly marked "©2023 Global Academy". CV. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:52, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
It's pretty likely this isn't the uploaders own work and it's clearly above the threshold of originality in the meantime. So it should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can present evidence to the contrary. More then likely it's a screenshot from an old movie. If that's the case then there's a chance the image is PD if the movie is, but there's no way of knowing that without knowing what movie it's a screenshot from. Adamant1 (talk) 06:39, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; CV from Spongebob Squarepants. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:01, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
This should be deleted as COPYVIO since it's almost certainly a screenshot from a commercial for the television show Abot-Kamay na Pangarap. That is unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary. Adamant1 (talk) 06:48, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Comment about the threshold of originality: a wordmark is simple as below, but the background is complex as above. I concur with a nominator; therefore, delete. - The Harvett Vault | he/him | user | talk - 09:40, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- I could be wrong, but I think if it's a screenshot of a non-free video it would be copyrighted either way. That said, I'm with it being deleted for being over the threshold of originality regardless. --Adamant1 (talk) 13:31, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per above. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:22, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
This looks like a screenshot from a television program or something. So it's clearly COPYVIO. Adamant1 (talk) 08:05, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unused, only upload by user from 2021. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:03, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
This is image isn't the uploaders own work since it looks like there's a World of Warcraft logo in the middle of the block that obviously comes from Minecraft. So it should be deleted as COPYVIO. Since I'm pretty sure both the WoW logo and assets from Minecraft like blocks are copyrighted. That's not even accounting for wherever the background image is properly ripped from either. Adamant1 (talk) 08:21, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Speedy delete per nominator. - The Harvett Vault | he/him | user | talk - 10:17, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:03, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
The flag is no longer in use by anyone Q28 (talk) 09:02, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom, non-notable fictional flag. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:05, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Fan-flag that are not used and are not educational Q28 (talk) 09:03, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: non-notable fictional flag. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:07, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Fan-made flag that are not educational Q28 (talk) 09:06, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, non notable fictional flag, COM:DW. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:08, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Fan-made flag that are not educational Q28 (talk) 09:06, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unused non notable fictional flag. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:09, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Fan-made flag that is not educational Q28 (talk) 09:51, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:10, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Fan-made flag that is not educational Q28 (talk) 09:52, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:10, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Fan-made flag that is not educational Q28 (talk) 09:52, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:10, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Fan-made flag that is not educational Q28 (talk) 09:53, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:11, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Fan-made flag that is not educational Q28 (talk) 09:53, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:11, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by IP 104.246.130.239 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: derivative of original licensed with CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion. -- Túrelio (talk) 10:06, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- Comment by the nominating IP at User talk:Túrelio#File:Charles I execution, and execution of regicides.jpg
Keep Engraving from the 1600s. When there is no clear rationale, just remove the speedy tag, there is no reason to move it to a deletion_nomination. --RAN (talk) 12:42, 30 May 2023 (UTC)- Delete Clear rationale: the original in question is a digital file belonging to the British Museum and posted on its web site, not the public domain printed image captured in the file. Anyone is free to photograph or scan the paper item in the British Museum's collection to make a differently licensed file if the Musuem will allow it. 104.246.130.239 13:57, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- Any claim made on the website does not affect the underlying public domain status of the original work. This is a mechanical reproduction of an original long out of copyright. See en:w:Copyfraud -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:14, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Well and truly out of copyright. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:15, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Fan-made flag that is not educational. Q28 (talk) 10:08, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:17, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
So blurry as to be useless. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 10:25, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: CV with false license claim as well. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:19, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Fan-made flag that is not educational. Q28 (talk) 10:36, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:18, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Fan-made flag that is not educational. Q28 (talk) 10:37, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:20, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
i made a mistake [error] i want to upload again with better resolution QalasQalas (talk) 12:38, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 13:53, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
My mistake, Aaron Ansuini did not license this under creative commons like he does with many of his other videos. Brainy J (talk) 13:08, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 13:52, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
G7 - Uploader request (confirmed by the blanking of the page and the message on the user's talk page) - the file is less than a week old ShifaYT 
✉Talk 17:07, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: speedily per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:18, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Unused logo, no educational value Lymantria (talk) 20:21, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wutsje 00:45, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused logo, no educational value. Lymantria (talk) 20:22, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wutsje 00:43, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
Mistakenly created. Rocky Masum (talk) 15:46, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the creator shortly after creation. --Rosenzweig τ 06:59, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Al*from*Lig (talk) 17:17, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 06:55, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
duplicate DawidWdowczyk (talk) 19:19, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 06:54, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
duplicate DawidWdowczyk (talk) 19:19, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 06:53, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake William1230 (talk) 20:17, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 06:53, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake William1230 (talk) 20:18, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 06:52, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
no longer needed PurpleViss (talk) 01:13, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request, renamed to File:Kit shorts persija19a.png. --Achim55 (talk) 18:17, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
Improper citation of copyright permissions (though it's already implied the user never did have the original permission). The image is also inappropriately extracted from another website. Tunestoons (talk) 06:13, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 20:47, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
the photographer of this image is given as the person portrayed in the data which is impossible since this is not a selfie. The real photographer is Merlijn Doomernik but he has not given permission so copyvio Hoyanova (talk) 09:08, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, needs OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 09:54, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
I am the photographer and owner of the image. I recently discovered it was labeled incorrectly as an astrolabe sphere. It is actually a replica armillary sphere (as someone noted in the caption). The original image has been corrected on Flickr, and I do not want the incorrect image on Wikimedia Commons. Sheiladoc (talk) 22:40, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Hi, Sheiladoc. I corrected the descriptions and categorization. What would you like the file to be renamed as, and is there anything else you'd like to be changed? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:53, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
- Ivan - Thanks for your help with this. I am new to Wikimedia Commons, and don't understand it very well yet, which explains why my deletion rationale was "clueless". (My pictures have been previously been added through my Creative Commons licensing, not by me directly.) The file should be renamed "Armillary Sphere" to match the original on Flickr. Can the caption be changed to "Novelty armillary sphere with several dozen zodiac signs, latitude fixed at 0 degrees. Earth is way off center."? I'd rather not comment on the quality of construction.
- Sheiladoc Sheiladoc (talk) 20:17, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
- Keep, obviously: Licensing is irrevocable and the license selected by the photographer has no provisions about curation (nor it could be used in Commons if it had); also the deletion rationale is either frivolous or clueless. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 09:39, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Agreed, no reason to delete, but we should rename the file. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:49, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: and renamed to File:Armillary Sphere (9541169465).jpg. --Achim55 (talk) 20:29, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
The building was completed in 2016 by Tsuyoshi Tane (born in 1979). There is no freedom of panorama in Estonia, thus permission from the architect is required.
- File:Dan Dorell Lina Ghotmeh ja Tsuyoshi Tane Viron kansallismuseo 2016 A.jpg
- File:Eesti rahva muuseum DSC05187.jpg
- File:Estonian National Museum in Tartu.jpg
- File:Musée national estonien DGT architects.jpg
- File:Tartu (34266494734).jpg
- File:Tartu (34266571844).jpg
- File:Tartu (34302210633).jpg
- File:Tartu (34302311683).jpg
- File:Tartu (34302311813).jpg
- File:Tartu (34723399230).jpg
- File:Tartu (34723412670).jpg
- File:Tartu (34725659410).jpg
- File:Tartu (34725659680).jpg
- File:Tartu (34725723450).jpg
- File:Tartu (34725724540).jpg
- File:Tartu (34725808860).jpg
- File:Tartu (34725809050).jpg
- File:Tartu (34945435942).jpg
- File:Tartu (34945436552).jpg
- File:Tartu (34945436672).jpg
- File:Tartu (34945436762).jpg
- File:Tartu (34947624782).jpg
- File:Tartu (34947627892).jpg
- File:Tartu (34947628212).jpg
- File:Tartu (34947670502).jpg
- File:Tartu (34947748272).jpg
- File:Tartu (34979436821).jpg
- File:Tartu (34979437611).jpg
- File:Tartu (34979939971).jpg
- File:Tartu (35072708986).jpg
- File:Tartu (35072709086).jpg
- File:Tartu (35072709126).jpg
- File:Tartu (35072713706).jpg
- File:Tartu (35072784546).jpg
- File:Tartu (35110144775).jpg
- File:Tartu (35110426285).jpg
- File:Tartu (35110460735).jpg
- File:Tartu (35110461015).jpg
- File:Tartu (35110745145).jpg
- File:Tartu (35112376565).jpg
- File:Tartu (35112427625).jpg
- File:Tartu (35213773346).jpg
- File:Tartu (35213774176).jpg
- File:Tartu (35213774646).jpg
- File:Tartu (35213775066).jpg
- File:Tartu (35213775116).jpg
- File:Tartu (35213775596).jpg
- File:Tartu (35213777706).jpg
- File:Tartu (35213777996).jpg
- File:Tartu (35253865685).jpg
- File:Tartu (35253865895).jpg
- File:Tartu (35253867285).jpg
- File:Tartu (35253868665).jpg
- File:Tartu (35253868885).jpg
- File:Tartu (35253869125).jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 03:38, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Per the nominator since images of the buildings are clearly copyrighted by the original architect. --Adamant1 (talk) 08:30, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:02, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Baohiemgiavnn (talk · contribs)
[edit]A bunch of stock photos with Vietnamese phrases about financial topics overlaid on them. All copyvios, out of scope, and likely promotional, given the links in the descriptions.
- File:Cac chien luoc giao dich dua tren bien do dao dong gia.jpg
- File:Bien do dao dong gia va thi truong tien dien tu.jpg
- File:Bien do dao dong gia va cac mo hinh du bao gia.jpg
- File:Cac mo hinh va bieu do lien quan den bien do dao dong gia.jpg
- File:Bien do dao dong gia va quan ly rui ro trong giao dich.jpg
- File:Bien do dao dong gia va cac chi so ky thuat.jpg
- File:Su tuong quan giua bien do dao dong gia va khoi luong giao dich.jpg
- File:Bien do dao dong gia va bieu do nen.jpg
- File:Bien do dao dong gia va do tin cay cua xu huong gia.jpg
- File:Cach tinh toan va do luong bien do dao dong gia.jpg
- File:Bien do dao dong gia va cac yeu to ky thuat trong phan tich ky thuat.jpg
- File:Phan tich bien do dao dong gia trong thi truong chung khoan.jpg
- File:Bien do dao dong gia va bien dong thi truong.jpg
- File:Cac yeu to anh huong den bien do dao dong gia.jpg
- File:Dinh nghia va khai niem co ban ve bien do dao dong gia.jpg
- File:Tiem nang va dong gop cua MXV doi voi nen kinh te Viet Nam.jpg
- File:Huong phat trien va mo rong cua MXV trong tuong lai.jpg
- File:Tinh thanh khoan va kha nang giai ngan tren MXV.jpg
- File:Cac bien phap va chinh sach cua MXV nham tang cuong su tham gia cua cac doanh nghiep.jpg
- File:Vai tro cua MXV trong viec tao dieu kien cong bang va minh bach cho thi truong hang hoa.jpg
- File:Cac san pham giao dich chu luc tren san MXV.jpg
- File:Thach thuc va co hoi cho MXV trong thoi gian toi.jpg
- File:Tam quan trong cua MXV trong phat trien thi truong hang hoa Viet Nam.jpg
- File:Quy trinh giao dich va co che hoat dong tai so giao dich hang hoa Viet Nam.jpg
- File:Su phat trien va vai tro cua so giao dich hang hoa Viet Nam MXV.jpg
- File:So giao dich hang hoa viet nam - Gia Cat Loi.jpg
- File:Chien luoc dau tu ngan han.jpg
- File:Dau tu hang hoa.jpg
- File:Mo hinh nen 2 dinh day.jpg
- File:Cac loai hop dong phai sinh hang hoa.jpg
- File:Phan tich ki thuật dau tu.jpg
- File:San pham phai sinh.jpg
- File:Giao dich hang hoa phai sinh - Gia Cat Loi.jpg
- File:Giao dich minh bach.jpg
- File:Giao dich 2 chieu.jpg
Omphalographer (talk) 04:47, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete There's essentially zero chance that these images aren't COPYVIO. Plus they are clearly out of scope on top if it. So there's really no reason for Commons to host the files. --Adamant1 (talk) 08:33, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy delete all rubbish spam per nominator. - The Harvett Vault | he/him | user | talk - 10:04, 30 May 2023 (UTC); edited: 10:08, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wutsje 03:30, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
This picture is from GoogleStreetview. Copyvio. 運動会プロテインパワー (talk) 14:34, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Rosenzweig τ 07:06, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: plain text. Omphalographer (talk) 15:28, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- I do not see the reason you do not agree with the subject I have published Addeco office (talk) 19:40, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- The issue isn't that I don't agree with what you've written, but rather that Wikimedia Commons isn't an appropriate place to publish it:
Wikimedia Commons hosts only media files such as photographs, scanned images, diagrams, animations, audio (e.g. music and spoken dialogue) and video clips, along with any associated metadata.
- This might be a better fit for Wikinews, but I'm not familiar with their policies so I can't say for sure. Omphalographer (talk) 20:09, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 07:04, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
out of scope * Pppery * it has begun... 16:38, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 07:03, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
out of scope * Pppery * it has begun... 16:39, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 07:03, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
There's zero evidence that the uploader of this image is the artist since it looks like a screenshot from a television program and it's clearly above the threshold of originality in the meantime. So it should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary. Adamant1 (talk) 17:29, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:10, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vorhaut-weg (talk · contribs)
[edit]per COM:NUDE
- File:Mein Schwanz voll erigiert mit Cockring.jpg
- File:Low-and-loose and adult-cut cock, mein Schwanz.jpg
- File:Mein Penis mit Dorsal-vein.jpg
- File:Meine Dorsal-vein.jpg
----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 17:32, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- warum meine Bilder löschen?/why take out my pics? Vorhaut-weg (talk) 01:23, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
- read: COM:NUDE @Vorhaut-weg ----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 09:33, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete The names imply that these images aren't intended for any educational purpose. --PaterMcFly (talk) 13:46, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
- read: COM:NUDE @Vorhaut-weg ----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 09:33, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:09, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vorhaut-weg (talk · contribs)
[edit]- File:Beschnittener Penis.jpg
- File:Downward curved penis.jpg
- File:Stiff cock.jpg
- File:Corona glans penis.jpg
- File:Nicht erigierter Penis.jpg
Deleted: per nomination. Fitindia (talk) 17:06, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vorhaut-weg (talk · contribs)
[edit]Another batch of COM:PENIS.
- File:Masturbation01.jpg
- File:Total schlaffer Penis.jpg
- File:Shaved genitals.jpg
- File:Beschnittener, erigierter Penis.jpg
- File:Eichel eines beschnittenen Penis.jpg
- File:Circumcised cock.jpg
- File:Cock with cockring.jpg
- File:Circumcised penis with dorsal-vein.jpg
—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 03:21, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
- Weak keep File:Shaved genitals.jpg, there’s one vein that makes it… uh… different, though of course, thankfully, I’m not a specialist on Commons penises. I wouldn’t oppose it to be deleted if someone comes up with a random, obscure category with hundreds of veiny penises, lol… Delete the rest. RodRabelo7 (talk) 04:18, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep The ones with cock rings. At least in the Category:Cock rings there are no other pictures actually showing them in use. --PaterMcFly (talk) 08:14, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete all. We had hundreds of men with cock rings, that one is not special. --A1Cafel (talk) 08:30, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete I now agree, I was looking at the wrong category. --PaterMcFly (talk) 10:59, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:52, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vorhaut-weg (talk · contribs)
[edit]—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 04:19, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:52, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vorhaut-weg (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:PENIS again
- File:Extrem low-and-loose beschnittener Penis im schlaffen Zustand.jpg
- File:Extrem schlaffer, beschnittener Penis.jpg
- File:Circed Penis.jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 03:52, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete rest of it. and this user needs a block. ----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 11:58, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- already 1 week blocked by yann. ----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 11:59, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:52, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lolipeople NFT (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of project scope.
- File:Lolipeople 9.png
- File:Lolipeople 3.png
- File:Lolipeople 10.png
- File:Lolipeople 8.png
- File:Lolipeople 7.png
- File:Lolipeople 6.png
- File:Lolipeople 5.png
- File:Lolipeople 4.png
- File:Lolipeople 1.png
- File:Lolipeople 2.png
----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 17:34, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy delete all useless NFT junk per nominator. - The Harvett Vault | he/him | user | talk - 20:33, 30 May 2023 (UTC); edited: 20:42, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:08, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Beaudine Wilson (talk · contribs)
[edit]Uploader requesting deletion of recent material (speedy deletion reason G7). Incorrect format (wiktionary requires ogg).
- Ping User:Beaudine Wilson: Wiktionary doesn't require ogg. Wave is often used, and hundreds of thousands of LinguaLibre recordings are currently in use on Wiktionary pages, including yours, listed here. Olaf (talk) 18:14, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
- Oh, I see, thanks for clarifying. The guide used
.oggso consistently, I assumed it was a requirement and I just didn't set up LiLi correctly. But since they're acceptable, should I add them to the English Wiktionary (since that doesn't have a bot)? Also, should I un-nominate these files for deletion, or is that handled differently? Beaudine Wilson (talk) 21:43, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
- File:LL-Q9067 (hun)-Beaudine Wilson-tej.wav
- File:LL-Q9067 (hun)-Beaudine Wilson-rizs.wav
- File:LL-Q9067 (hun)-Beaudine Wilson-hamu.wav
- File:LL-Q9067 (hun)-Beaudine Wilson-gyógyszertár.wav
- File:LL-Q9067 (hun)-Beaudine Wilson-gólya.wav
- File:LL-Q9067 (hun)-Beaudine Wilson-gitár.wav
- File:LL-Q9067 (hun)-Beaudine Wilson-farok.wav
- File:LL-Q9067 (hun)-Beaudine Wilson-étterem.wav
- File:LL-Q9067 (hun)-Beaudine Wilson-ecet.wav
- File:LL-Q9067 (hun)-Beaudine Wilson-csónak.wav
- File:LL-Q9067 (hun)-Beaudine Wilson-búza.wav
- File:LL-Q9067 (hun)-Beaudine Wilson-bálna.wav
- File:LL-Q9067 (hun)-Beaudine Wilson-angyal.wav
- File:LL-Q9067 (hun)-Beaudine Wilson-szén.wav
- File:LL-Q9067 (hun)-Beaudine Wilson-matematika.wav
- File:LL-Q9067 (hun)-Beaudine Wilson-levegő.wav
- File:LL-Q9067 (hun)-Beaudine Wilson-köröm.wav
- File:LL-Q9067 (hun)-Beaudine Wilson-könyök.wav
- File:LL-Q9067 (hun)-Beaudine Wilson-királynő.wav
- File:LL-Q9067 (hun)-Beaudine Wilson-étel.wav
- File:LL-Q9067 (hun)-Beaudine Wilson-tető.wav
- File:LL-Q9067 (hun)-Beaudine Wilson-születésnap.wav
- File:LL-Q9067 (hun)-Beaudine Wilson-nitrogén.wav
- File:LL-Q9067 (hun)-Beaudine Wilson-szín.wav
- File:LL-Q9067 (hun)-Beaudine Wilson-oxigén.wav
- File:LL-Q9067 (hun)-Beaudine Wilson-málna.wav
- File:LL-Q9067 (hun)-Beaudine Wilson-labda.wav
- File:LL-Q9067 (hun)-Beaudine Wilson-iszik.wav
- File:LL-Q9067 (hun)-Beaudine Wilson-hagyma.wav
- File:LL-Q9067 (hun)-Beaudine Wilson-feleség.wav
- File:LL-Q9067 (hun)-Beaudine Wilson-vas.wav
- File:LL-Q9067 (hun)-Beaudine Wilson-térd.wav
- File:LL-Q9067 (hun)-Beaudine Wilson-szappan.wav
- File:LL-Q9067 (hun)-Beaudine Wilson-szabadság.wav
- File:LL-Q9067 (hun)-Beaudine Wilson-sárgabarack.wav
- File:LL-Q9067 (hun)-Beaudine Wilson-pillangó.wav
- File:LL-Q9067 (hun)-Beaudine Wilson-patkány.wav
- File:LL-Q9067 (hun)-Beaudine Wilson-melléknév.wav
- File:LL-Q9067 (hun)-Beaudine Wilson-hattyú.wav
- File:LL-Q9067 (hun)-Beaudine Wilson-béke.wav
- File:LL-Q9067 (hun)-Beaudine Wilson-hangya.wav
- File:LL-Q9067 (hun)-Beaudine Wilson-alumínium.wav
- File:LL-Q9067 (hun)-Beaudine Wilson-uborka.wav
- File:LL-Q9067 (hun)-Beaudine Wilson-konyha.wav
- File:LL-Q9067 (hun)-Beaudine Wilson-őszibarack.wav
- File:LL-Q9067 (hun)-Beaudine Wilson-lepke.wav
- File:LL-Q9067 (hun)-Beaudine Wilson-vörös.wav
- File:LL-Q9067 (hun)-Beaudine Wilson-újság.wav
- File:LL-Q9067 (hun)-Beaudine Wilson-szamár.wav
- File:LL-Q9067 (hun)-Beaudine Wilson-sárgarépa.wav
- File:LL-Q9067 (hun)-Beaudine Wilson-kerékpár.wav
- File:LL-Q9067 (hun)-Beaudine Wilson-hegedű.wav
- File:LL-Q9067 (hun)-Beaudine Wilson-citrom.wav
- File:LL-Q9067 (hun)-Beaudine Wilson-villa.wav
- File:LL-Q9067 (hun)-Beaudine Wilson-cipő.wav
- File:LL-Q9067 (hun)-Beaudine Wilson-tigris.wav
- File:LL-Q9067 (hun)-Beaudine Wilson-szivárvány.wav
- File:LL-Q9067 (hun)-Beaudine Wilson-száj.wav
- File:LL-Q9067 (hun)-Beaudine Wilson-réz.wav
- File:LL-Q9067 (hun)-Beaudine Wilson-repülőtér.wav
- File:LL-Q9067 (hun)-Beaudine Wilson-nyúl.wav
- File:LL-Q9067 (hun)-Beaudine Wilson-narancs.wav
- File:LL-Q9067 (hun)-Beaudine Wilson-mókus.wav
- File:LL-Q9067 (hun)-Beaudine Wilson-kígyó.wav
- File:LL-Q9067 (hun)-Beaudine Wilson-körte.wav
- File:LL-Q9067 (hun)-Beaudine Wilson-jég.wav
- File:LL-Q9067 (hun)-Beaudine Wilson-hold.wav
- File:LL-Q9067 (hun)-Beaudine Wilson-hajó.wav
- File:LL-Q9067 (hun)-Beaudine Wilson-görögdinnye.wav
- File:LL-Q9067 (hun)-Beaudine Wilson-fokhagyma.wav
- File:LL-Q9067 (hun)-Beaudine Wilson-ezüst.wav
- File:LL-Q9067 (hun)-Beaudine Wilson-cseresznye.wav
- File:LL-Q9067 (hun)-Beaudine Wilson-ceruza.wav
- File:LL-Q9067 (hun)-Beaudine Wilson-burgonya.wav
- File:LL-Q9067 (hun)-Beaudine Wilson-tehén.wav
- File:LL-Q9067 (hun)-Beaudine Wilson-róka.wav
- File:LL-Q9067 (hun)-Beaudine Wilson-pók.wav
- File:LL-Q9067 (hun)-Beaudine Wilson-láb.wav
- File:LL-Q9067 (hun)-Beaudine Wilson-kacsa.wav
- File:LL-Q9067 (hun)-Beaudine Wilson-farkas.wav
- File:LL-Q9067 (hun)-Beaudine Wilson-tojás.wav
- File:LL-Q9067 (hun)-Beaudine Wilson-szék.wav
- File:LL-Q9067 (hun)-Beaudine Wilson-repülőgép.wav
- File:LL-Q9067 (hun)-Beaudine Wilson-kávé.wav
- File:LL-Q9067 (hun)-Beaudine Wilson-hús.wav
- File:LL-Q9067 (hun)-Beaudine Wilson-csont.wav
- File:LL-Q9067 (hun)-Beaudine Wilson-eper.wav
- File:LL-Q9067 (hun)-Beaudine Wilson-szív.wav
- File:LL-Q9067 (hun)-Beaudine Wilson-főnév.wav
- File:LL-Q9067 (hun)-Beaudine Wilson-kés.wav
- File:LL-Q9067 (hun)-Beaudine Wilson-fül.wav
- File:LL-Q9067 (hun)-Beaudine Wilson-oroszlán.wav
- File:LL-Q9067 (hun)-Beaudine Wilson-cukor.wav
- File:LL-Q9067 (hun)-Beaudine Wilson-anya.wav
- File:LL-Q9067 (hun)-Beaudine Wilson-sárga.wav
- File:LL-Q9067 (hun)-Beaudine Wilson-medve.wav
- File:LL-Q9067 (hun)-Beaudine Wilson-kenyér.wav
- File:LL-Q9067 (hun)-Beaudine Wilson-apa.wav
Beaudine Wilson (talk) 18:10, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no reason. --Krd 07:07, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: primarily plain text. Omphalographer (talk) 18:42, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 07:02, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: primarily plain text. Omphalographer (talk) 18:42, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 07:01, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: primarily plain text. Omphalographer (talk) 18:43, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. In addition to being outside of COM:SCOPE, the file contains photos of unknown copyright status/permission. Marbletan (talk) 12:58, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 07:01, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by HutchDoesStuff (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal photos, COM:WEBHOST, Commons is not a family photo album, out of scope.
- File:Family picture of fraternal twins.jpg
- File:Newborns.jpg
- File:Fraternal twin drip.jpg
- File:Twin boys in snow.jpg
- File:Newborn fraternal twins.jpg
- File:A young boy skiing.jpg
- File:Fraternal twins dressed up as the Mario Bros.jpg
- File:Fraternal twin boys.jpg
- File:A boy with a dog.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:37, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- Comment I find it hard to search for how many photos we have of fraternal twins, because there appears to be no Category:Fraternal twins. Do you know how many we'd have if these were deleted? There may be good reasons to keep at least some of these photos as such. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:01, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:06, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: plain text, unpublished article with false claims of authorship (w:Stuart J. Russell and w:Peter Norvig are certainly not coauthors) Omphalographer (talk) 21:14, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 07:00, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: plain text content. Omphalographer (talk) 21:15, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 06:59, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
File:Merlin, el asistente de chat de inteligencia artificial que revoluciona el mundo a través del internet.pdf
[edit]Out of scope: primarily plain text, unpublished article, contains nonfree images. Omphalographer (talk) 22:19, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- Late add, but also nominating File:-ieee-es_MERLIN_I.A.pdf, which is largely the same content. (The only visible difference is that the word "nuevo" has been added to the title.) Omphalographer (talk) 22:26, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy delete: Spam. --Achim55 (talk) 21:10, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 06:59, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: primarily plain text, unpublished article, contains nonfree images. (There has been an odd influx of these recently.) Omphalographer (talk) 23:02, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 06:57, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
© 2023 . 186.173.11.27 23:27, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete - There's no evidence that a source doesn't have a free (libre) CC license; it has a derivative issue. - The Harvett Vault | he/him | user | talk - 03:07, 31 May 2023 (UTC); edited: 03:10, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and evidence. --Slgrandson (talk) 02:16, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:05, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
Duplicate of deleted files. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mao Tse-tung - panoramio.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mao Zedong portrait.jpg. Teetrition (talk) 03:30, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- @Rosenzweig: Sorry to ping again. Teetrition (talk) 03:35, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 07:12, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
KHÔNG CẦN THIẾT Khoakis (talk) 07:12, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Không sử dụng nữa Khoakis (talk) 07:13, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Rosenzweig τ 07:10, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
Copy vio from https://fr1.topnews.media/2023/05/18/traditions-histoire-de-la-date-ukraine-tsn-ua/ (bottom of page) Acabashi (talk) 12:42, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:04, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Túrelio. --Rosenzweig τ 07:07, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by The Harvett Vault as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G7|Transferred to Miraheze Commons (currently in progress) and/or Internet Archive.. Delete out of COM:SCOPE, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Avis Draws - S'cuse Me (2017).png. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:08, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per nominator. I don't have time to wait here. - The Harvett Vault | he/him | user | talk - 20:21, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:12, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by The Harvett Vault as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G7|Transferred to Miraheze Commons (currently in progress) and/or Internet Archive. Delete out of COM:SCOPE, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Avis Draws - S'cuse Me (2017).png. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:08, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per nominator. I don't have time to wait here. - The Harvett Vault | he/him | user | talk - 20:22, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:12, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by The Harvett Vault as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G7|Transferred to Miraheze Commons (currently in progress) and/or Internet Archive. Delete out of COM:SCOPE, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Avis Draws - S'cuse Me (2017).png. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:09, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per nominator. I don't have time to wait here. - The Harvett Vault | he/him | user | talk - 20:23, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Info - The file was transferred to Miraheze Commons, which can now be available here. - The Harvett Vault | he/him | user | talk - 23:36, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:12, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Mdaniels5757 as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G7|Transferred to Miraheze Commons (currently in progress) and/or Internet Archive. Delete out of COM:SCOPE, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Avis Draws - S'cuse Me (2017).png. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:09, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per nominator. I don't have time to wait here. - The Harvett Vault | he/him | user | talk - 20:23, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- Info - The file was transferred to Miraheze Commons, which can now be available here. - The Harvett Vault | he/him | user | talk - 23:03, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:12, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by The Harvett Vault as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G7|Transferred to Miraheze Commons (currently in progress) and/or Internet Archive. Delete out of COM:SCOPE, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Avis Draws - S'cuse Me (2017).png. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:10, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per nominator. I don't have time to wait here. - The Harvett Vault | he/him | user | talk - 20:24, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- Info - The file was transferred to Miraheze Commons, which can now be available here. - The Harvett Vault | he/him | user | talk - 22:46, 30 May 2023 (UTC); edited: 22:54, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:13, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by The Harvett Vault as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G7|Transferred to Miraheze Commons (currently in progress) and/or Internet Archive. Delete out of COM:SCOPE, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Avis Draws - S'cuse Me (2017).png. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:10, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per nominator. I don't have time to wait here. - The Harvett Vault | he/him | user | talk - 20:24, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- Info - The file was transferred to Miraheze Commons, which can now be available here. - The Harvett Vault | he/him | user | talk - 22:53, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:13, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by The Harvett Vault as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G7|Transferred to Miraheze Commons (currently in progress) and/or Internet Archive. Delete out of COM:SCOPE, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Avis Draws - S'cuse Me (2017).png. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:10, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per nominator. I don't have time to wait here. - The Harvett Vault | he/him | user | talk - 20:25, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- Info - The file was transferred to Miraheze Commons, which can now be available here. - The Harvett Vault | he/him | user | talk - 23:11, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:13, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by The Harvett Vault as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G7|Transferred to Miraheze Commons (currently in progress) and/or Internet Archive. Delete out of COM:SCOPE, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Avis Draws - S'cuse Me (2017).png. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:11, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per nominator. I don't have time to wait here. - The Harvett Vault | he/him | user | talk - 20:26, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:13, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
As Louis Armstrong died in 1971, this is clearly not a 2017 photo of him. I see no reason why claims of authorship and license should be assumed to be any more accurate. Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:07, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:14, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
Clearly not a 2019 photo of someone dead since 1971. Needs factual source information. Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:12, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:14, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
false date, dubious claims Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:13, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Obviously. Armstrong died in 1971. --PaterMcFly (talk) 13:22, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:30, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
false date, dubious claims Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:13, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Obviously. Armstrong died in 1971. --PaterMcFly (talk) 13:23, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:30, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Greece A1Cafel (talk) 03:05, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:14, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
Potentially out of scope, I see little value of putting a glans penis on the head A1Cafel (talk) 03:08, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete for vandalism of course— “dick head” geddit? Dronebogus (talk) 09:56, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
- @Dronebogus: Possibly COM:CSD#G3? --A1Cafel (talk) 12:43, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:16, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope per overall presentation A1Cafel (talk) 03:08, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete vandalistic nonsense Dronebogus (talk) 09:57, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:16, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
Low quality penis photo, we had better alternatives to illustrate the category A1Cafel (talk) 03:14, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete very bad quality Dronebogus (talk) 09:56, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:16, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Bulgaria A1Cafel (talk) 03:29, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:14, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Estonia A1Cafel (talk) 03:31, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:14, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Estonia A1Cafel (talk) 03:32, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:14, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Estonia A1Cafel (talk) 03:32, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:14, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Estonia A1Cafel (talk) 03:32, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:14, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Estonia A1Cafel (talk) 03:33, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:14, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Estonia A1Cafel (talk) 03:33, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:15, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Estonia A1Cafel (talk) 03:33, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:15, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Estonia A1Cafel (talk) 03:34, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:15, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Estonia A1Cafel (talk) 03:35, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:15, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Estonia A1Cafel (talk) 03:35, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:15, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Estonia A1Cafel (talk) 03:40, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:15, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Estonia A1Cafel (talk) 03:40, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:15, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Bosnia and Herzegovina A1Cafel (talk) 03:43, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:15, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
The picture is not subjected for commercial use, it is by Fair Use License publishing only and cannot be used otherwise, therefore it should not be a subject of deletion. The general image request for deletion should not be a topic of misleading photography flaws or policies that infringe upon freedom of panorama in any way, shape or argument, regardless of intent. Felky (talk) 16:20, June 2023 (GMT+1)
- @Felky: non-commercial content is not allowed on Wikimedia Commons, kindly read COM:Licensing. Reusers must be able to reuse photos in post cards or commercial souvenir or merchandise items, but B&H law does not allow these activities. Therefore, B&H freedom of panorama, for non-commercial only, is perpetually unacceptable, unless they finally allow use for gaining economic advantage. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:34, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Bosnia and Herzegovina A1Cafel (talk) 03:44, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:15, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Bosnia and Herzegovina A1Cafel (talk) 03:45, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:16, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Bosnia and Herzegovina A1Cafel (talk) 03:45, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:16, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Integralov neboder
[edit]In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Bosnia and Herzegovina.
- File:Integralov 2132.jpg
- File:Integralov 2144.jpg
- File:Integralov 2145.jpg
- File:Integralov 2221.jpg
- File:Интегралов.jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 03:47, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:16, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Bosnia and Herzegovina A1Cafel (talk) 03:48, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:16, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Bulgaria A1Cafel (talk) 03:50, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:16, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Cambodia A1Cafel (talk) 03:53, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:16, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Cambodia A1Cafel (talk) 03:54, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:16, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Cambodia A1Cafel (talk) 03:56, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:16, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Cambodia A1Cafel (talk) 03:57, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:16, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Cambodia A1Cafel (talk) 03:58, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:16, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Cambodia A1Cafel (talk) 03:59, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:16, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Estonia A1Cafel (talk) 04:01, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:16, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 04:03, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:16, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
No FoP in Cambodia. Architect Vann Molyvann died in 2017 A1Cafel (talk) 04:06, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:17, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
No FoP in Cambodia. Architect Vann Molyvann died in 2017 A1Cafel (talk) 04:07, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:17, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Estonia A1Cafel (talk) 04:09, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:17, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Estonia A1Cafel (talk) 04:11, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:17, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Azerbaijan A1Cafel (talk) 04:32, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:17, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope text PDF. Rosenzweig τ 06:29, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:17, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
Same as their twitter profile pic https://twitter.com/Dikdikperazalia , no exif. We need OTRS Gbawden (talk) 06:44, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:17, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
out of scope Codc (talk) 09:29, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:21, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
Found here in 2017 according to Google - https://www.xxlmag.com/lil-yachtys-album-release-party-epic-food-fight/ - needs OTRS Gbawden (talk) 12:34, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:18, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Belarus. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:18, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Belarus. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:18, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons:What Commons is not#Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:00, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:18, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons:What Commons is not#Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:02, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:18, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons:What Commons is not#Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:04, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:18, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
1930 British photograph by Keystone View Company, the photograph also depicts a 1930 statue that is public domain in the UK (and would be covered by FoP anyway). The photograph would be subject to URAA since this was not public domain in 1996 in the UK. Undelete in 2026. Abzeronow (talk) 16:26, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:19, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
The building was completed in 1954 by Luigi Mattioni (1914–1961). There is no freedom of panorama in Italy. The copyright term of the country is 70 years, and the image can be undeleted in 2032 A1Cafel (talk) 17:15, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:19, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
The building was completed in 1957 by Luigi Mattioni (1914–1961). There is no freedom of panorama in Italy. The copyright term of the country is 70 years, and the image can be undeleted in 2032 A1Cafel (talk) 17:17, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:19, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Italy A1Cafel (talk) 17:26, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:20, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Italy A1Cafel (talk) 17:32, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- Keep for a lot of reasons:
- it is not a "panorama" but a detail of an old stairway including the remains of a mural
- today the mural no longer exists, as usually happens in town, so this is an extreme case of Commons:De minimis : the Copyrighted does not longer exist and two steps with two legs of old stairway cannot be considered for FOP
- cancellation proposal requested for incomprehensible pique by a user to whom many uploaded images have been removed or are predicted to be.--Bramfab (talk) 07:32, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - it is very obviously a photo of the mural, and de minimis doesn't apply. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:34, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Italy A1Cafel (talk) 17:34, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:20, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
No FoP in Italy. It seems a legally painted mural, and I don't see any reason to deny the painter's copyright A1Cafel (talk) 17:36, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:20, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
Photograph that contains a four sentence quote by American executive William Raduchel. What is the source of this quote? The earliest I can find is from 1997, which would definitely make it still in copyright. https://www.fastcompany.com/33076/how-make-your-career-move Abzeronow (talk) 17:44, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:20, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
most likely copyvios, no metadata + low resolution, see: User talk:ShopLeft. user have so many other copyvios.
- File:Saboi addressing media outside Woodlands Police.jpg
- File:Saboi addresses the media.jpg
- File:Saboi Emboela.jpg
- File:Lawrence Mwelwa.jpg
- File:Munshaya in 2023.jpg
- File:Kateka in 2021.jpg
- File:Kateka during a press conference.jpg
- File:Xaven.jpg
- File:Kabuswe Paul.jpg
- File:Kabuswe in 2022.jpg
- File:Golden Mwila 2.jpg
- File:Twaambo Mutinta in Kenya.jpg
- File:Mumba in 2022.jpg
- File:Kalimbwe on Phoenix.jpg
- File:Kalimbwe on DW TV.jpg
- File:Kalimbwe and Chamisa.jpg
- File:Kalimbwe and Zitto Kabwe.jpg
- File:Kalimbwe on Diamond TV.jpg
- File:Patience Masua.jpg
- File:Young woman points to a Nampol officer.jpg
- File:Windhoek GBV Protests.jpg
- File:Woman lifts hand at Windhoek protest.jpg
- File:ShutItAllDownNamibia.jpg
- File:Utaara Mootu in 2020.jpg
- File:Twaloloka fire.jpg
- File:Inna Hengari fist list.jpg
- File:Hengari in 2020.jpg
- File:Joseph Kalimbwe and Inna Hengari.jpg
- File:Angelina Immanuel.jpg
- File:Shipululo Amupanda.jpg
----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 17:57, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:37, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
Metadata says this is a photograph by Marcel Krijgsman who is a professor photographer. Doesn't match the name of the uploader. Abzeronow (talk) 18:14, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:20, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
Image is facebook or smaller size, no useful metadata other than "google", low quality image unlikely own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:28, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:20, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
This file has no relevance, it's totally made up and is not educational. California is not a communist government. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:35, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:20, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
Out of project sccope: unused logo, no educational value. Lymantria (talk) 19:01, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:20, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused logo, no educational value. Lymantria (talk) 19:01, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:20, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 19:10, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:20, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope (no idea what it might mean). Andrei Romanenko (talk) 19:11, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:21, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope. And likely not own work: subject is same as uploader. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:47, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:21, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
mostly grey - looks like an upload error WereSpielChequers (talk) 20:23, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- Keep: I've overwritten the file with the low-resolution version from Geograph, since that seems to be intact. I've reported the problem to Geograph so hopefully they'll be able to repair the high-resolution version. --bjh21 (talk) 14:24, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: issue resolved. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:40, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
out of project scope Krd 04:16, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 13:52, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
This logo is an old logo. Please delete. The new on is here https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:1822direkt-logo.png 195.140.123.182 07:52, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Old logo are kept for historical reasons. --Leyo 09:23, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- Keep per Leyo, and as there's a de.wp article about 1822direkt, it's clearly notable. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:25, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Captain-tucker (talk) 13:53, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
Logo ist alt. Neues Logo der 1822direkt wurde bereits hochgeladen 195.140.123.182 10:39, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Not a reason for deletion, we keep historic logos. --Rosenzweig τ 13:10, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
Speedy Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Kept previously earlier this month. Commons is for historic as well as current media. If it was in scope previously, it still is even if it not a current version. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:44, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
Fan-made pictures that are not educational Q28 (talk) 09:04, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:13, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
Fan-made flag that are not educational Q28 (talk) 09:05, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:13, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
Photograph of copyrighted museography from the Louvre Musem Miniwark (talk) 09:22, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 13:55, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
probablemente foto de un menor subida sin su consentimiento Ontzak 
(Bilbo ta Bizkai guztia) 09:43, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. Also, as a personal file outside of COM:SCOPE speedy deletion per COM:CSD#F10 applies. Marbletan (talk) 13:11, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 13:55, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
probablemente foto de un menor subida sin su consentimiento Ontzak (Bilbo ta Bizkai guztia) 09:46, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. Also, as a personal file outside of COM:SCOPE speedy deletion per COM:CSD#F10 applies. Marbletan (talk) 13:10, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 13:56, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
Fan-made flag that are not educational Q28 (talk) 09:49, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:14, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
Fan-made flag that are not educational Q28 (talk) 09:50, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:14, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
Fan-made flag that is not educational Q28 (talk) 09:50, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:14, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
Unused and unexplained pie chart. Without meaningful description is of no educational value. Malcolma (talk) 10:18, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 13:59, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
Unused and unexplained pie chart. Without meaningful description is of no educational value. Malcolma (talk) 10:19, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 14:00, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
Out of commons:SCOPE. Tomer T (talk) 10:20, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 13:57, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
Fan-made flag that is not educational. Q28 (talk) 10:22, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:13, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
Illegible text. Out of scope Malcolma (talk) 10:24, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, no evident usefulness, unused and uncat since 2015. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:21, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 14:00, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
blatant advertising Veracious (talk) 10:38, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 14:00, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
I believe the molecule is incorrect, it's the oxygen that's connected to the benzene ring and not the carbon. Jan Myšák (talk) 11:19, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. It's tough to see with a spinning molecule, but I believe you are correct. There is a hydroxymethyl group where there should be a methoxy group. Marbletan (talk) 19:04, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- Comment. This file is used on many pages; perhaps it could be replaced by File:Codeine3Dan.gif. Marbletan (talk) 19:07, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- @Marbletan Yeah, it sadly doesn't have the nitrogen done as clearly, but that's my suggestion as well. Jan Myšák (talk) 19:14, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- All uses of Codeine 3d transparent.gif have now been replaced with Codeine3Dan.gif (except user pages). Marbletan (talk) 14:59, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete after replacement as proposed. "Lower quality but factually correct" always beats "factually incorrect of any quality". DMacks (talk) 18:16, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. We have a better replacement. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 10:00, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:13, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
I believe the molecule is incorrect, it's the oxygen that's connected to the benzene ring and not the carbon. Jan Myšák (talk) 11:19, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. It's tough to see with a spinning molecule, but I believe you are correct. There is a hydroxymethyl group where there should be a methoxy group. Marbletan (talk) 19:02, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. In addition, the file is not used anymore. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 17:23, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:13, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Avis Draws - S'cuse Me (2017).png
- File:Avis Draws - Zoe Againnn (2017).png
- File:Avis Draws - Insane Yura (2017).png
- File:Avis Draws - Awkward (2017).png
- File:Avis Draws - In Reality of It (2017).png
- File:Avis Draws - yutyegfsdgh (2017) (brightened variant).webp
- File:Avis Draws - Confetti (2017).png
- File:Avis Draws - Why Do I Keep Changing My Character (2017).png
- File:Avis Draws - Trash (2018).png
- File:Avis Draws - Unamused (2018).png
- File:Avis Draws - Casually Snazzy (2018).png
- File:Avis Draws - Pow Pow (2018).png
- File:Avis Draws - Stolen (2018).png
- File:Avis Draws - Star Smoothie (2018).png
- File:Avis Draws - Shiba Cutie (2018).png
- File:Avis Draws - Somethin' Special (2018).png
- File:Avis Draws - Cute Babies (2018).png
- File:Avis Draws - Pink Hood (2018).png
- File:Avis Draws - Sassssss (2018).png
- File:Avis Draws - Casually Snazzy (2018).png
- File:Avis Draws - Pow Pow (2018).png
- File:Avis Draws - Stolen (2018).png
- File:Avis Draws - Star Smoothie (2018).png
- File:Avis Draws - Shiba Cutie (2018).png
- File:Avis Draws - Oof! Indeed, Sir (2018).png
- File:Avis Draws - Somebody Once (2018).png
- File:Avis Draws - OwO (2018).png
- File:Avis Draws - Begone (2018).png
- File:Avis Draws - Grocery Boi (2019).png
- File:Avis Draws - Eh (2019).png
- File:Avis Draws - Sad (2019).png
- File:Avis Draws - Lost (2019).png
- File:Avis Draws - Fox Thing (2019).png
- File:Avis Draws - Cute (2019).png
- File:Avis Draws - Nighttime Drawing (2019).png
- File:Avis Draws - Sassy Boi (2019).png
- File:Avis Draws - Purple Night (2019).png
- File:Avis Draws - She Fab Girl (2019).png
- File:Avis Draws - Best Buds (2019).png
- File:Avis Draws - Buff Boi (2019).png
- File:Avis Draws - Take One to the Head (2019).png
- File:Avis Draws - Hand Challenge (2019).png
- File:Avis Draws - Flower Boi (2019).png
- File:Avis Draws - Girlz (2019).png
- File:Avis Draws - Cute Thang (2020).png
- File:Avis Draws - Unnamed OC (2021).png
- File:Avis Draws - Magic Cat Jester (2021).png
- File:Avis Draws - Yura (2017).png
- File:Avis Draws - Avis' Outfits (2019).png
- File:Avis Draws - Avis (2020) (SFW variant).png
- File:Avis Draws - Nebula (2020).png
- File:Avis Draws - Something (2017).gif
- File:Avis Draws - Bloop (2020).png
Kelly The Angel (talk) 11:48, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy delete all for good per nominator by handling it. 41 out of 61 files, in total 67%, have been transferred to Miraheze Commons.— Preceding unsigned comment added by The Harvett Vault (talk • contribs) 12:01, 30 May 2023 (UTC); edited: 14:07, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
- Added deletion templates to each. Delete per cited DR. @The Harvett Vault: Note that this does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, so a normal DR is best to resolve this issue. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:07, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- Are you kidding me? It's just a waste of time getting me bored during this nomination. I want those all deleted this instant so freaking badly. - The Harvett Vault | he/him | user | talk - 19:50, 30 May 2023 (UTC); edited: 03:34, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
- After that, all Wikidata entries will go away as well. - The Harvett Vault | he/him | user | talk - 14:15, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
- Are you kidding me? It's just a waste of time getting me bored during this nomination. I want those all deleted this instant so freaking badly. - The Harvett Vault | he/him | user | talk - 19:50, 30 May 2023 (UTC); edited: 03:34, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: Once again, Miraheze Commons is our lifeguard. As we get this latest batch transferred, we might give the Wikimedia copies some more time before they get phased out here. --Slgrandson (talk) 02:08, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:15, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
Non-educational out of scope vanity image and no real indication that the uploader holds any rights Acabashi (talk) 12:16, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 14:45, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
Non-educational out of scope vanity image and no real indication that the uploader holds any rights Acabashi (talk) 12:17, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 14:46, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
Screenshot from YouTube channel Adi Hidayat Official 36.69.122.200 16:35, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:37, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope PROMO upload of a non-notable app as can be seen by the description. Adamant1 (talk) 17:45, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:36, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Toledorockets1fan (talk · contribs)
[edit]possible copyvio images, actually i wanna mark them with "no permission". but, there is so much file.
- File:Currentebebounckleniocnece.jpg
- File:Mega fcs football champs frisco.jpg
- File:5620e8f1141b5.image.jpg
- File:8428069 orig.jpg
- File:TFrwer3r3r3r3wr3rwt4t.jpg
- File:S-l500 (1).jpg
- File:Ncaa-football-bowl-program 2015-cotton-bowl jan.jpg
- File:Ncaa-football-bowl-program 2007-champs-sports-bowl.jpg
- File:Ncaa-football-bowl-program 2019-pinstripe-bowl.jpg
- File:Ncaa-football-bowl-program 2018-redbox-bowl.jpg
- File:TOLEDO2001.jpg
- File:2001MCBOWLTOLEDO.jpg
- File:Rdwwedwdwdefedef.jpg
- File:SPT-UT-WARD.jpg
- File:Alam05progl.jpg
- File:Timbeckmantoledo original.jpg
- File:Rwdwadwdwdwdwdw.jpg
- File:Ncaa-football-bowl-program 2012-famous-idaho-potato-bowl.jpg
- File:Ncaa-football-bowl-program 2011-military-bowl.jpg
- File:Tom Amstutz2008.jpg
- File:Arkansas-State-seniors-wrap-career-in-GoDaddy-Bowl.jpg
- File:5119996 orig.jpg
- File:Rwdwdwdwdw.jpg
- File:OIPwdwd.jpg
- File:Moooooooo.jpg
- File:DKChPbqUMAAxpaC.jpg
- File:2005 Insight Bowl.jpg
- File:Mud Hens.jpg
----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 18:01, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:36, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
Advertising because of the filename and description. MarinaMann (talk) 18:42, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:35, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
out of project scope images+possible copyvio
- File:MADOWN EN LA FERIA DE ROCKOPOLIS 2023.jpg
- File:Madown feria del rock 2023.jpg
- File:Madown rockopolis 2023.jpg
- File:Madown rockopolis Mansion del rio.jpg
- File:Madown en la feria del rock.jpg
- File:Alan Madown y Bloke-o.jpg
- File:Alan Madown en concierto.jpg
----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 18:43, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:35, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Michelangelo Valderrama (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of project scope image.
----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 19:03, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:34, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
This cannot be released under Creative Commons, it is a logo. In Australia I don’t think it can be licensed in such a way, it is definitely the copyright of Shippit. Chris.sherlock2 (talk) 19:28, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Based on COM:TOO Australia, it appears that you could well be right. I'd like to know whether any logo has been determined by Australian courts not to be original enough to be considered copyrightable, and if so, what the reasoning of the decision was. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:04, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:34, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
Unused photo of non-notable event/person, no context/location, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:56, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:34, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
Uses inaccurate and imprecise borders compared with a newer version of the map available with more accurate borders(File:1872NEPresidentialElectionCounties.svg) Incognito melon (talk) 20:30, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- speedy keep there’s no reason to delete this image. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2600:1009:B06C:78AA:C8A6:9D6D:9FAB:FD2A (talk) 20:36, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Speedy keep COM:INUSE. If you think other files are more accurate, just replace the files in the relevant Wikipedia article. No need to try to get these hidden. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:56, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:34, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
Uses imprecise county borders and a newer, updated map is available Incognito melon (talk) 20:32, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- speedy keep there’s no reason to delete this image. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2600:1009:B06C:78AA:C8A6:9D6D:9FAB:FD2A (talk) 20:36, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy keep COM:INUSE. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:54, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:34, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
Unused out of scope personal image that (at least from what I can tell) is of a non-notable person. Adamant1 (talk) 16:19, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:37, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Minorax. --Captain-tucker (talk) 14:49, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
Personal holiday snap. 62.216.206.157 16:37, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:37, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Minorax. --Captain-tucker (talk) 14:50, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
Vanity image supporting a Wiki spam user pageː https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Noël_DEPARIS_-_NDP Acabashi (talk) 12:25, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete In addition to this, this user is using a large amount of sock puppets for spam: meta. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 01:49, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:14, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
Vanity image supporting a Wiki spam user pageː https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Noël_DEPARIS_-_NDP Acabashi (talk) 12:25, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete In addition to this, this user is using a large amount of sock puppets for spam: meta. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 01:49, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:14, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
Vanity image supporting a Wiki spam user pageː https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Noël_DEPARIS_-_NDP Acabashi (talk) 12:25, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete In addition to this, this user is using a large amount of sock puppets for spam: meta. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 01:49, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:14, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
copyright vio BlinxTheKitty (talk) 04:06, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 11:05, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
Copyright vio 158.248.127.13 16:54, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 11:05, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by The Harvett Vault as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G7. Too old for G7. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:18, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:46, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Derivative work. RodRabelo7 (talk) 19:47, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 17:00, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Derivative work of copyrighted photograph. RodRabelo7 (talk) 19:49, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 17:00, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Derivative work of copyrighted photographs. RodRabelo7 (talk) 19:50, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 17:00, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Derivative work of copyrighted book covers. RodRabelo7 (talk) 19:52, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete, Agree with above. -- Ooligan (talk) 07:02, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 17:00, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Derivative work of copyrighted book covers. RodRabelo7 (talk) 19:54, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. I agree with @RodRabelo7. Ooligan (talk) 12:17, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 17:00, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lhoussine AIT TAYFST (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:57, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 16:52, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lhoussine AIT TAYFST (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
- File:Akbay asggan.jpg
- File:Aduzewiɣ.jpg
- File:Anẓiḍ amaziɣ.jpg
- File:Afltas.jpg
- File:Ayyis amaziɣ.jpg
- File:Agjjim.jpg
- File:Axurzal.jpg
- File:Aridal.jpg
- File:Aɣucaf n tagut n Tafṛiqt.jpg
- File:Addad.jpg
- File:Adanay armiti.jpg
- File:Abubbaẓ n waṭlaṣ.jpg
- File:Azggaɣ udmer.jpg
- File:Lbaraj.jpg
- File:Agadir tassaout.jpg
- File:Agadir Fetwaka.jpg
- File:Agadir Anzou.jpg
- File:Agadir Boachiba.jpg
- File:Agadir Bouaachiba.jpg
- File:Agadir Bouachiba winter.jpg
- File:Ḥmad Ɛaṣid.png
- File:Tagmamt.png
- File:Ɛli Azayku.jpg
- File:Tasnamḍelt 2.png
- File:Tasrtit 3.png
- File:Tadamsa 3.png
- File:Tusnakt 4.png
- File:Tusnakt 3.png
- File:Tasnaggurt 12.png
- File:Tasnamunt 11.png
- File:Tasekda.png
- File:Tasnamunt 9.png
- File:Tasnagurt 2.png
- File:Tamẓri.png
- File:Tamikanikt 3.png
- File:Tamikanikt 2.png
- File:Tamikanikt.jpg
- File:Tafruxt tamaziɣt.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:59, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:38, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lhoussine AIT TAYFST (talk · contribs)
[edit]Various small files without metadata, user with a history of copyvios, unlikely to be under a free license.
- File:Juba n Tuja.png
- File:Tanḍḍamt.png
- File:Lɛammt n iḥuddjin infḍwak.png
- File:Lɛammt n infḍwak.png
- File:Aẓawan amaziɣ.png
- File:Taḥidust 2.png
- File:Taḥidust.png
- File:Tamawayt.png
- File:Tagruppit Ayt Laman.png
- File:Tagruppit iẓnkaḍ.png
- File:Tamriɣt.jpg
- File:Alɣm g iqqṛbaṣ.jpg
- File:Qṣaṛ Tabuṣṣamt.jpg
- File:Ɛica Maya.png
- File:Sidi Ḥraẓm.jpg
- File:Ɛbdelmalk Faraj.jpg
- File:Tamɣnast Laṭifa Lbuḥsini.png
- File:Maha Laziri.png
- File:Baba Ɛli azwl.png
- File:Tiskrt.jpg
- File:Ɛllal Butajangut.png
- File:Takarḍa n Anzu.jpg
- File:Udem n ufgan.png
- File:Tafgga n ufgan.jpg
- File:Asak°n n umɣuz 9.jpg
- File:Asak°n n umɣuz 6.jpg
- File:Asak°n n umɣuz 8.jpg
- File:Asak°n n umɣuz 7.jpg
- File:Asak°n n umɣuz 4.jpg
- File:Asak°n n umɣuz 5.jpg
- File:Asak°n n umɣuz 2.jpg
- File:Asak°n n umɣuz 1.jpg
- File:Asak°n n umɣuz.jpg
- File:Amzdaɣ n udayn 4.jpg
- File:Amzdaɣ n udayn 1.jpg
- File:Amzdaɣ n udayn 3.jpg
- File:Amzdaɣ n udayn 2.jpg
- File:Tizɣa 5.jpg
- File:Tizɣa 4.jpg
- File:Tizɣa.jpg
- File:Tizɣa 3.jpg
- File:Tizɣa 2.jpg
- File:Tasawt g undbu.jpg
- File:Irumin g tasawt.jpg
- File:Lmakina n tiznirt.jpg
- File:Tasawt.jpg
- File:Tuga n umzdaɣ.jpg
- File:Ammas n ugadir.jpg
- File:Aɛmṛun.jpg
- File:Targa n tlubt.jpg
- File:َAgadir Bouachiba 4.jpg
- File:َAgadir Bouachiba 6.jpg
- File:َAgadir Bouachiba 10.jpg
- File:َAgadir Bouachiba 8.jpg
- File:َAgadir Bouachiba 12.jpg
- File:َAgadir Bouachiba 15.jpg
- File:َAgadir Bouachiba 13.jpg
- File:Agadir Bouachiba.jpg
Yann (talk) 19:19, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:22, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lhoussine AIT TAYFST (talk · contribs)
[edit]Derivative works. No evidence of a permission or a free license for the object photographied.
- File:Amḥizwr n Wikipidya Lmɣrib.png
- File:Amḥizwr n wikimidya Lmɣrib.png
- File:لافتة ارشادية بالموقع.jpg
- File:نطاق منتزه جيوبارك مكون.jpg
- File:لافتة بموقع ايواريضن.jpg
Yann (talk) 20:26, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 17:01, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Personal reasons Randomuser314159 (talk) 02:27, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- I wish to remove the files to prevent potential doxxing due to personally identifiable info present. Randomuser314159 (talk) 05:42, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:41, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
Personal reasons Randomuser314159 (talk) 02:36, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Uploader wish expressed wrongly, affecting other deletion requests. See history.186.173.99.173 02:52, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- Apologies to anyone who's affected by my wrong actions; I'm still on the learning phase.
- I wish to remove the files to prevent potential doxxing due to personally identifiable info present. Randomuser314159 (talk) 03:07, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- I don't see any personally identifyable information here. The image has no exif data. --PaterMcFly (talk) 13:25, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:42, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
Per COM:PACKAGE A1Cafel (talk) 04:00, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:42, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
Uploaded for advertising purpose. U.T. 06:36, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Might otherwise be ok as mundane photo of school in Nepal, but user's only other upload was a copyright violation from the school website. While I did not find this in a quick reverse image search, the small size and webp format suggest this was taken from a website as well rather than being an original photo by the user. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:59, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per Infrog. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:43, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
I doubt this is the uploaders own work and it's clearly above the threshold of originality since it's not a "simple" text logo. So it should be deleted as COPYVIO. If not also for being promotional since being used on a personal "test" Wikipedia page for the BALTIC Centre for Contemporary Art. Adamant1 (talk) 06:37, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Above COM:TOO UK. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:22, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:43, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
This image should be deleted as COPYVIO since it's pretty likely the logo wasn't created by the uploader. Plus it's clearly not below the threshold of originality. Especially consider the apparently low standards of originality in South Korea where this logo originates from. Adamant1 (talk) 06:57, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:43, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
This image should be deleted as COPYVIO since the logos clearly aren't the uploaders own work and at least one of them (if not more) has to be above the threshold of originality in the meantime. Thanks. Adamant1 (talk) 06:59, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:44, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
This image should be deleted as COPYVIO since the logos clearly aren't the uploaders own work and at least one of them (if not more) has to be above the threshold of originality in the meantime. Thanks. Adamant1 (talk) 06:59, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:44, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
It's pretty likely this image isn't the uploaders own work since it comes from Facebook and it's clearly not below the threshold of originality. So it should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary. Adamant1 (talk) 07:01, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:44, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
It's pretty doubtful this image is the uploaders own work and it clearly isn't below the threshold of originality either. So it should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary. Thanks. Adamant1 (talk) 07:10, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:44, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
The image is apparently for a non-notable YouTube channel. So it should be deleted as COPYVIO, being out of scope, or both. Adamant1 (talk) 07:13, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: OOS. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:44, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
it's doubtful this is the uploaders own work since it can be found on a commercial website, which is linked to in the file summary, and it's not below the threshold of originality either. So it should be deleted as COPYVIO, if not also because it is out of scope anyway. Adamant1 (talk) 07:48, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:46, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
This image should be deleted since it's pretty likely not to be the uploaders own work and it isn't below the threshold of originality either. So it's clearly COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary. Although, I'd argue it's also out of scope even if it isn't copyrighted. Adamant1 (talk) 07:53, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:46, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
Fan-made flag that are not educational Q28 (talk) 09:11, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:47, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
Fan-made flag that are not educational Q28 (talk) 09:13, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:47, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
Fan-made flag that are not educational Q28 (talk) 09:14, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:47, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
Fan-made flag that are not educational Q28 (talk) 09:15, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:47, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
REDIRECT page with wrong title. 源義信 (talk) 09:31, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:45, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
Fake logo, bad image created by user and nothing official.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by StomboyCarGeek (talk • contribs) 05:44, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- Comment In use. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:17, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy keep Yep. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:27, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- Comment In it.wikipedia there is a screenshot. --StomboyCarGeek (talk) 21:31, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
Kept: COM:INUSE. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:45, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
The source file is marked '© All rights reserved', and the alleged CC-Zero license is not true 31.2.45.106 10:57, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:45, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
Vanity image of no educational value... no real indication in EXIF or description that the uploader has rights to this image... default position is always that such could be copyvio therefore for the legal safety of Wikimedia should be removed. Acabashi (talk) 12:33, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 03:15, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
Could be copyvio based on possible copyrightable craft toy. Acabashi (talk) 12:49, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ✗plicit 03:16, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:08, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 07:21, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
Ubused and unexplained photo. Looks like some kind of guess the object competition. Malcolma (talk) 18:26, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Rosenzweig τ 11:17, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
Unused and unexplained photo. No educational value. Malcolma (talk) 18:32, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Rosenzweig τ 11:17, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Sree4707 (talk) 15:14, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: uploaded in December 2022, might actually be useful for cat fur colors. --Rosenzweig τ 13:03, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
This image was published in the internet before being published under a free licence in the Flickr. Seems like a case of COM:FLICKRWASHING Kacamata! Dimmi!!! 03:30, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:14, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
copyright vio, uploader is 100% an account to promote this BlinxTheKitty (talk) 04:08, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:15, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
es el logotipo antiguo, ya en desuso DCMSistemes (talk) 06:01, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Not a deletion reason! However, are you notable? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:09, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:18, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
Either this isn't the uploaders own work and it's above the threshold of originality, or they did create and it's OOS since the company isn't notable. The image should be deleted either way though. Adamant1 (talk) 06:30, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:19, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
File:19jalover, is one of the most entertaining and informative website, visited by majority of internet users daily… On 9jalover.png
[edit]This should be deleted as an advert SPAM upload as is clear by the file name and description. Although the company doesn't appear to be notable anyway even if the file wasn't uploaded purely for advertising purposes. . Adamant1 (talk) 06:32, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:19, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
Low quality image for a non-notable company. Adamant1 (talk) 06:33, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:19, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
This image should be deleted as OSS since it seems to be the logo a non-notable "film collection." At least I think it is. Unfortunately there's no way to know with the lack of clear information in the description though. Which as far as I'm concerned is all the more reason to delete it. Adamant1 (talk) 06:52, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:20, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
PNG copy from screen, unlikely to be self portrait. User has uploaded other photos suspect to be not own work. Mussklprozz (talk) 07:22, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- While it is clear that two of his other uploads are not by him, thus copyvio, this one could be a webcam selfie. Metadata would help. --2003:C0:8F4A:BD00:84CB:E9F4:BA7F:F62D 10:25, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:21, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
https://www.giornalelavoce.it/news/cronaca/533012/i-famigliari-chiedono-rispetto-siamo-sconvolti.html?=false&id=0 Maybe75 (talk) 08:23, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:23, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
no author given no source given, uploaded as "own work"which is not possible seeing the date Hoyanova (talk) 09:06, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:23, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
copyvio no permission - see metadata that clearly stat "Author Merlijn Doomernik Copyright holder Merlijn Doomernik" Hoyanova (talk) 09:09, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:23, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
Onduidelijkheid of de licentie waaronder de foto hier is vrijgegeven klopt. トトト (talk) 09:32, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no free license at source. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:24, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
Unused poor-quality selfie of non-notable individual. DAJF (talk) 08:28, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
- He is well-known on the internet in Spain.--Sebasweee (talk) 19:50, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata. Taivo (talk) 07:37, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
Image taken from a forum without copyright information - Goldorak (talk) 11:15, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:25, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
There's zero evidence that this is the uploaders own work or that they are connected to the band that the logo is for. Plus, the logo clearly isn't below the threshold of originality. So it should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary. Adamant1 (talk) 14:00, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:27, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
Offensichtliche Fehllizenzierung als "Eigenes Werk" - laut Metadaten aber Fotograf / Urheber Maria Schiffer Lutheraner (talk) 14:01, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:28, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation. Uploader has added images credited to Oren Milstein and Ronrico Smith without adequate explanation of permission to do so. Bri (talk) 16:12, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:29, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
Copyvio https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=StNT2stmgrI Aurelio de Sandoval (Mensajes aquí please) 14:37, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:30, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
Essentially a duplicate of File:As11 40 5903 (26531177776).jpg Adeletron 3030 (talk) 14:49, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:31, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Spotify banner CoffeeEngineer (talk) 15:08, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:35, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
There's zero information about what this logo is for. Plus it's extremely low quality and impossible to see anyway. So in absence of those issues being fixed I think it should be deleted as out of scope. Adamant1 (talk) 15:36, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:35, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
This is not an own work: [2] HeminKurdistan (talk) 15:51, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:36, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:51, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:36, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation. Uploader has added images credited to Oren Milstein and Ronrico Smith without adequate explanation of permission to do so. Bri (talk) 16:14, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- I have not created this file. Rajarshipc88 (talk) 17:11, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- I do not own this file. I nominate it for deletion Rajarshipc88 (talk) 18:46, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:37, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mh21production (talk · contribs)
[edit]fictional flag
----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 17:35, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- WHats the problem?
- check here for more information Mh21production (talk) 16:35, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
- Yeah, Althistory flags are not educational within our scope, we deal with reality in Wikipedia. If this was not used historically, Delete. --Enyavar (talk) 10:09, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:38, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
While photos of schools are generally in scope, this one has been photoshopped so that it isn't a factual representation anymore. This is therefore outside of COM:SCOPE. In addition, the "Visit us at..." watermark indicates a promotional intention. Marbletan (talk) 18:01, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:39, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
Not own work. (https://artigercek.com/yasam/kadikoye-yeni-tramvay-hatti-maltepeye-kadar-gidecek-242308h) MarinaMann (talk) 18:38, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:44, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
Is this a screenshot? 181.43.5.222 19:37, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- Isn't it? 181.43.5.222 14:06, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, screenshot per EXIF data. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:43, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
Seems too small to be an own work and no EXIF.181.43.5.222 19:38, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- https://twitter.com/juanduquega/status/1658104440237244416/photo/1 --Achim55 (talk) 20:02, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:42, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
Near duplicate of File:Wild Mouse Cedar Point (4).png Cards84664 (talk) 20:10, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:42, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
Description confirms it's not an own work. 181.43.5.222 20:36, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:40, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
Own work. Really? 186.173.99.173 02:27, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- Not my own work, own work is the default option and I forgot to change that. Now I don't know how to change it, and I don't want it to be deleted since it's a historical document depicting an important person in Paraguayan history. Guyermou (talk) 02:39, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- Cuál sería la opción correcta? 186.173.99.173 02:48, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- Guyermou, you can edit a page by clicking "Edit" at the top of the page, but why do you think this photo is not subject to a restrictive copyright? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:05, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- I can see it as maybe being a copyvio, but old pictures are often free of copyright. If it is a copyvio, then I'm sorry. I'll edit the page now. Guyermou (talk) 17:58, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete, now that I've read Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Paraguay. Please read it, too, noting that "economic rights shall subsist throughout the life of the author and for 70 years thereafter" - in other words, unless the photographer has already been dead for at least 70 years, their copyright is in force, and the photo cannot be hosted on Commons. Whether it can be hosted on a particular Wikipedia depends on that Wikipedia's fair use policies, which you need to search out and read carefully. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:08, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- I can see it as maybe being a copyvio, but old pictures are often free of copyright. If it is a copyvio, then I'm sorry. I'll edit the page now. Guyermou (talk) 17:58, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- Guyermou, you can edit a page by clicking "Edit" at the top of the page, but why do you think this photo is not subject to a restrictive copyright? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:05, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- Cuál sería la opción correcta? 186.173.99.173 02:48, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- also look: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Guyermou ----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 17:43, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:32, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Bosnia and Herzegovina.
- File:Blokada (9181845205).jpg
- File:Blokada (9181851465).jpg
- File:Blokada (9184098328).jpg
- File:Blokada (9184104686).jpg
- File:Bosnien 3885 (5552947022).jpg
- File:Damaged government building in Sarajevo, 1996.JPEG
- File:Evstafiev-sarajevo-building-burns.jpg
- File:Flags of Bosnia and Herzegovina in Sarajevo.jpg
- File:Greece–Bosnia and Herzegovina Friendship Building (by Pudelek).jpg
- File:Greece–Bosnia and Herzegovina Friendship Building (north side).jpg
- File:Greece–Bosnia and Herzegovina Friendship Building 2.jpg
- File:Greece–Bosnia and Herzegovina Friendship Building.jpg
- File:Parlament Sarajevo.JPG
- File:Parliament (6042784223).jpg
- File:Parliament building in sarajevo.jpg
- File:Reconstruction of Parliament of BiH.jpg
- File:Sarajevo - Parlamentarna skupština Bosne i Hercegovine (49104980446).jpg
- File:Sarajevo - Parlamentarna skupština Bosne i Hercegovine (49104980776).jpg
- File:Sarajevo - Parlamentarna skupština Bosne i Hercegovine (49122293136).jpg
- File:Sarajevo Parlament.JPG
- File:Sarajevo parlamentti.jpg
- File:Sarajevo poslije rata.jpg
- File:Sarajevo Tram-212 Line-1 2011-10-28 (2).jpg
- File:Sarajevo Tram-271 Line-3 2011-10-28.jpg
- File:Sarajevo Tram-715 Line-1 2013-10-21.jpg
- File:Sarajevo Winter 2012-02-05 (12).JPG
- File:Sarajevo-ancien-batiment-gouvernement-bosnie.jpg
- File:Zgrada Parlamenta i Saveta ministara BiH.jpg
- File:Zgrada prijateljstva (2985237154).jpg
- File:Zgrada prijateljstva između Grčke i Bosne i Hercegovine.JPG
- File:Zgrada Vijeća ministara BiH Sarajevo.JPG
A1Cafel (talk) 03:20, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: I'm looking into exceptions at https://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/text/227216:
- Article 44 (Informing the Public) might be adequate for photographs of the building during the en:Bosnian War i.e. in its damaged state?
- Article 52 (Works Permanently Located in Public Places) might be adequate for all of these photographs since the building is located in a place accessible by the public, is not being reproduced in three-dimensional form or for gaining economic advantage.
- I'll try look more into exceptions if these are not adequate. –Vipz (talk) 06:32, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- @Vipz Commons does not accept content that reusers cannot exploit for economic advantage. Delete, Bosnian FOP, for non-commercial use of public space works only, does not conform to COM:Licensing which requires commercial use without architects and artists' permissions for photos of copyrighted public space works. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:18, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
- Whoever commercializes Commons content, or whoever this right is reserved for, really did the entire rest of the Wikimedia community a huge disfavor. –Vipz (talk) 09:57, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
- @Vipz: I don't think so. Wikimedia Foundation, which operates Wikimedia Commons, is supposed to uphold free culture values — where anyone in the world can freely share, distribute, and use media files. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:12, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
- @JWilz12345: I won't argue over this here, but I want to note that you didn't object to my invocation of article 44, which does not have an NC restriction. –Vipz (talk) 09:56, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
- @Vipz: "informing the public" is analogous to "for informatory purposes only", disallowing commercial or for-profit use. So still B&H legal rights are
Not OK for Commons. Any content in which reuses in postcards, commercial travel portal sites, stamps, souvenir items, calendar designs, and commercial vlogs without artists' permissions are prohibited is not permitted on Commons. A reform in B&H law to finally accept free culture uses for their architecture and public art would finally permit Commons to host photos here, and to undelete/restore to public view dozens of previously deleted files from B&H. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:02, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
- On whom is the responsibility to transfer such files to local Wikipedias (as if fair use)? Editors who happen to randomly notice such deletions on-going and happen to care about the images? –Vipz (talk) 10:21, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
- @Vipz: "informing the public" is analogous to "for informatory purposes only", disallowing commercial or for-profit use. So still B&H legal rights are
- @JWilz12345: I won't argue over this here, but I want to note that you didn't object to my invocation of article 44, which does not have an NC restriction. –Vipz (talk) 09:56, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
- @Vipz: I don't think so. Wikimedia Foundation, which operates Wikimedia Commons, is supposed to uphold free culture values — where anyone in the world can freely share, distribute, and use media files. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:12, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
- Whoever commercializes Commons content, or whoever this right is reserved for, really did the entire rest of the Wikimedia community a huge disfavor. –Vipz (talk) 09:57, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
- @Vipz Commons does not accept content that reusers cannot exploit for economic advantage.
- Keep. It's a public building for god's sake. And the building of the country government at that. No such user (talk) 11:01, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- As I mentioned numerous times before, Wikimedia Commons has interpreted the Copyright Law of Bosnia and Herzegovina incorrectly when it comes to Freedom of Panorama. In Bosnia and Herzegovina there is Freedom of Panorama. Google has interpreted the same law correctly, and that's why Google Street View is available in Bosnia and Herzegovina. You can check that for yourselves at the following link. Please stop this nonsense with deleting photos, and restore those ones already deleted. https://www.google.com/maps/@43.8556234,18.4037062,3a,75y,132.91h,94.03t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sAF1QipPzhMYlwZhnbqvUEKQCWhxfynWYOkllQtqRMLlp!2e10!7i5760!8i2880?entry=ttu My-wiki-photos (talk) 00:30, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
- per above --Pudelek (talk) 11:08, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
- @My-wiki-photos Commons interpretation is correct, the law must be changed to remove restrictions on gaining economic advantage for Wikimedia to finally host photos of copyrighted works of your country. Google Street View imagery is allowed because Street View images are not freely-licensed or commercially-licensed in the first place; therefore, there is unintentional protection for architects and artists of public space works of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Unintentional but complying with restrictive law of B&H. Twofold protection brought by unfree GSV imagery: protection of Alphabet Inc.'s copyright over GSV imagery as well as protection of artists/architects' copyrights over any copyrighted works appearing on GSV imagery. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:26, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
- @JWilz12345 Your comment has missed my point. Here is why. Let me explain, so please bear with me and read this carefully. Alphabet (Google) is the largest commercial/for profit company on the internet. The more internet traffic it gets, the more commercially successful it is. It's the nature of its business. Google's lawyers have studied the Copyright Law of Bosnia and Herzegovina. They have concluded that THERE IS FREEDOM OF PANORAMA in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Therefore Google has created its own Google Street View imagery, and posted it online in order to attract more internet traffic and by doing so to gain an economic advantage. In other words, Google Street View has been created and posted for Google's commercial purposes. The license under which Google has published their imagery is for the sole protection of the ownership of its own imagery, nothing else. If there was No Freedom of Panorama in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Google itself would be in violation of the Copyright Law of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Since there is Freedom of Panorama in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Google is not in any violation and it's free to publish its own street imagery for its commercial purposes under any license it prefers. I trust this clarifies the matter. Keep My-wiki-photos (talk) 10:00, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
- Wrong, @My-wiki-photos: . Freedom of panorama is more on reusers. You are not allowed to commercially reuse GSV imagery because the imagery is copyrighted and not under commercial Creative Commons licensing. Because of this, there is some form of protection for architects and artists from exploitation by the public. The context of freedom of panorama as it applies for Commons is that you (or other reusers) are free to exploit public space artworks like using your or other Wikimedians' photos in post cards, souvenir items, stamps, and other commercial merchandise, without payment of royalties to architects and artists.
- Can you cite a source, research paper, or online article claiming that Alphabet Inc. concluded there is commercial freedom of panorama in Bosnia and Herzegovina? If there is, can you present it to COM:Village pump/Copyright? JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:09, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
- Google is using that imagery commercially, which is not allowed per se, I assume. But any copyrighted work is de minimis in Google Streetview. I assume that's the base for them being able to have such a project in countries with restricted FoP. LPfi (talk) 06:26, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
- @JWilz12345 Your comment has missed my point. Here is why. Let me explain, so please bear with me and read this carefully. Alphabet (Google) is the largest commercial/for profit company on the internet. The more internet traffic it gets, the more commercially successful it is. It's the nature of its business. Google's lawyers have studied the Copyright Law of Bosnia and Herzegovina. They have concluded that THERE IS FREEDOM OF PANORAMA in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Therefore Google has created its own Google Street View imagery, and posted it online in order to attract more internet traffic and by doing so to gain an economic advantage. In other words, Google Street View has been created and posted for Google's commercial purposes. The license under which Google has published their imagery is for the sole protection of the ownership of its own imagery, nothing else. If there was No Freedom of Panorama in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Google itself would be in violation of the Copyright Law of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Since there is Freedom of Panorama in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Google is not in any violation and it's free to publish its own street imagery for its commercial purposes under any license it prefers. I trust this clarifies the matter.
- As I mentioned numerous times before, Wikimedia Commons has interpreted the Copyright Law of Bosnia and Herzegovina incorrectly when it comes to Freedom of Panorama. In Bosnia and Herzegovina there is Freedom of Panorama. Google has interpreted the same law correctly, and that's why Google Street View is available in Bosnia and Herzegovina. You can check that for yourselves at the following link. Please stop this nonsense with deleting photos, and restore those ones already deleted. https://www.google.com/maps/@43.8556234,18.4037062,3a,75y,132.91h,94.03t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sAF1QipPzhMYlwZhnbqvUEKQCWhxfynWYOkllQtqRMLlp!2e10!7i5760!8i2880?entry=ttu My-wiki-photos (talk) 00:30, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
- Keep This is not a photo of architecture, it is a photo of a fire. What architecture that is included, I'd assume to be de minimis. –LPfi (talk) 06:28, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:35, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
- some belated comment regarding GSV: @LPfi: , perhaps Google makes profit over their content, but their content are not de minimis. This also applies to YouTube which is also owned by them. But, they are not sharply criticized by ADAGP (from France) and other societies of visual artists and architects, because they pay royalties to the said societies. YT has a 2010 agreement with ADAGP and SACD, in which the platform gives royalties in exchange for artworks and buildings the YouTubers present in their YT content. That is per ADAGP's claim in their presentation to the EU Parliament in 2015 that sharply rebukes Wikipedia community (they do not treat Wikipedia and Wikimedia as distinct communities). I assume that GSV, being under Google too, has similar artwork and architectural licensing arrangements with ADAGP and others for the display of non-de minimis GSV imageries of public buildings and monuments. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:02, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- I am not an expert on the GSV issue, but I assume the imagery includes a lot of de minimis works. However, my main argument was about those images that depicted the fire, or otherwise something else than the building itself (as main subject). –LPfi (talk) 07:36, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
I'm adding Category:Undelete in 2045, assuming the building was a "collective work" and "the lawful disclosure" of the building was when it was completed in 1974 (according to Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Bosnia and Herzegovina#General rules and en:Greece–Bosnia and Herzegovina Friendship Building). Images of the fire and of trams should probably be deleted at once, as no argument was made above about whether de minimis applies. Some of the images were quite recent, and I don't know whether some of them included features introduced in 2006. –LPfi (talk) 07:36, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Bosnia and Herzegovina A1Cafel (talk) 03:27, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- As I mentioned numerous times before, Wikimedia Commons has interpreted the Copyright Law of Bosnia and Herzegovina incorrectly when it comes to Freedom of Panorama. In Bosnia and Herzegovina there is Freedom of Panorama. Google has interpreted the same law correctly, and that's why Google Street View is available in Bosnia and Herzegovina. You can check that for yourselves at the following link. Please stop this nonsense with deleting photos, and restore those ones already deleted. https://www.google.com/maps/@43.8556234,18.4037062,3a,75y,132.91h,94.03t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sAF1QipPzhMYlwZhnbqvUEKQCWhxfynWYOkllQtqRMLlp!2e10!7i5760!8i2880?entry=ttu My-wiki-photos (talk) 00:30, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete the B&H FOP is clearly NC. Compare with {{FoP-Croatia}}, which has identical wording on prohibition of 3D reproductions but without NC condition. Commons' interpretation won't change. It is the B&H legislature that should change B&H FOP, not Wikimedia Commons or even Wikimedia Foundation. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:29, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:36, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Estonia A1Cafel (talk) 03:31, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- Обсуждай-не обсуждай, всё равно получишь хай. Liilia Moroz (talk) 16:34, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:36, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
The arch was completed in 1936 by Petre Antonescu (1873–1965), there is no freedom of panorama in Romania. The copyright terms of the country lasted for 70 years, thus they can be undeleted in 2036. A1Cafel (talk) 04:29, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- Keep per previous discussions. I must once again raise the lack of respect that re-nominating without new arguments shows wrt to other contributors. Strainu (talk) 07:29, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- Comment One of the arguing point is de minimis, but I think this photo fails because the arch occupied the majority part of it, and the title also indicated that the arch is the purpose of taking this photo. --A1Cafel (talk) 02:51, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:37, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
According the description this is the "official image of Frases Banderas", whoever that is. Either way, it's pretty likely they aren't the uploader. Nor would the uploader if they aren't Frases Banderas have the ability to share the image on their behalf, at least I assume not. So it should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone (maybe the uploader or perhaps this Frases Banderas person?) can provide evidence to the contrary. Thanks. Adamant1 (talk) 08:37, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:37, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
Photo was taken by Mikhail Tereshenko, TASS. Hence, it is copyrighted by TASS and can't come under the licensing of kremlin.ru Bookish Worm (talk) 09:27, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- @Bookish Worm Hmm, give me a source. Tryvix1509 (talk) 02:24, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
- The source is in the page description. Direct link. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 03:37, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:37, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work; Software used: Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows). --Karim talk to me :)..! 12:50, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:38, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
This appears to be a scaled-down copy of de:Datei:Logensiegel_tofix.jpg. The original may or may not suitable for a transfer to Commons, but this is not the way to do it. It would need an appropriate proper Public Domain tag, not CC-BY-SA. El Grafo (talk) 13:20, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:38, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
Image of underage person (11-12 y.o.) loaded without any apparent parental authorization Superspritz (talk) 13:28, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- Comment a web search for "Alfio Russo saxophone" seems to show that this person has been playing saxophone professionally at a young age. Multiple videos online of them performing. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:41, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:39, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
Self promotion William Graham (talk) 14:24, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:39, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
Self promotion William Graham (talk) 14:24, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Unused personal image Mazbel (Talk) 01:47, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:39, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Belarus. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- Хочу Вам напомнить, что {{NoFoP-Belarus}} не используется на страницах файлов Викисклада, несмотря на то, что данная категория файлов должна быть довольна заполненной на фоне большого числа зданий, подпадающие под эти критерии. MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 18:19, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- Значит, этим кому-то надо заниматься и не только по фотографиям, сделанным в Белоруссии. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:40, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Belarus. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:40, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
Contenu ne respectant pas les normes encyclopédiques Albertorrororo (talk) 14:54, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- Comment previously listed and kept as part of mass deletion request in January 2017. Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_M.Aurelius -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:07, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- Keep I am unsure what not respecting encyclopedic norms mean, but nudity is not by it self a reason for deletion. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:09, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Nonsense and not a deletion reason! However, I could take or leave this photo in terms of quality. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:31, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:46, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by AntiCompositeBot as no license (User:AntiCompositeBot/NoLicense/tag) It has a license but it's the wrong license. 1913 British photograph. I cannot read the lower right so I don't know if that's a credit to the photographer or not. Abzeronow (talk) 15:21, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- The photograph is from a digital archive at https://earthwise.bgs.ac.uk/index.php/File:P585028.jpg#file
- The website explicitly makes it clear that the image can be downloaded and freely used and shared for non-commercial use:
- 'Download of 1000 x 1000 pixel images is free for all non-commercial use - all we ask in return is for you to acknowledge BGS when using our images.'
- The acknowledgement requested says 'When using the images please credit 'British Geological Survey' and include the catalogue reference ('P Number') of the item to allow others to access the original image or document.'
- Bernard Smith. BGS Image P585028. Chaiten1 (talk) 15:31, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- Commons doesn't accept non-commercial licenses. COM:L We could keep this if it can be shown that this photograph is public domain in the UK. It definitely is public domain in the United States as the photograph was made available to the public in 1913. We'd have to either know that the photographer died before 1953 or if the photographer could not be found by a reasonable inquiry. Abzeronow (talk) 15:38, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- Keep PD-UK-unknown, if we can eventually read the text and see that it is the name of a photographer I can look up a death date. --RAN (talk) 01:53, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - We use 120 years as the latest image where we assume that the photographer has been dead for 70 years. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:48, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
This file is obtained from social media HeminKurdistan (talk) 15:50, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:49, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
Holaaaa. Se permite este tipo de propaganda política aquí? 186.174.169.114 16:06, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete There's no issue with the message, as far as Commons is concerned, because it's great to have a photo of this. However, my reading of COM:FOP Chile is that is it's "OK for most works permanently located in 'squares, avenues and public places,'" it's probably not OK for posters that are put up in connection with a particular politician or campaign and likely to eventually be taken down. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:53, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:49, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
Die Datei ist veraltet. Die Wortmarke hat sich geändert. Bei den Rechten wäre ich mir nicht so sicher, dass das Logo gemeinfrei ist. Die Markenrechte sind gesichert. 141.84.225.210 16:47, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- Keep No reason for deletion, we keep historical logos. The logo consists of simple forms and is PD-ineligible by German standards. --Rosenzweig τ 06:57, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:49, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Other speedy deletions
[edit]Nominated G7 by uploader, but ineligible due to age. These are high quality, hand drawn works and could be within scope, so kicking them to DR.
- File:Theophilus the Wolf (separated) (without shading variant).png
- File:Harvett Fox (2021 version) (separated) (without shading and shadow variant).png
- File:Fox (Silvio B.) - Happy Fox Pop Day (separated) (without shading variant).png
The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 10:08, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy delete all because those variants are unnecessary. - THV | ♂ | U | T - 10:13, 15 January 2024 (UTC); edited: 10:25, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: These are high quality works, I commend the uploader for their artistry, courtesy deletion is granted. --Abzeronow (talk) 22:04, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Corporate Logo claimed as own work. It may be simple enough to be considered PD-textlogo Jmcgnh (talk) 17:17, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:51, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
See this page. Ox1997cow (talk) 02:32, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
- Keep There has been a long discussion in the Village Pump to define this template, which comes from a large consensus. E.g. see Template talk:FoP-Italy. Since then (few months ago), no novel law has been approved in Italy which disregards the FoP template formulation. (besides, this delete request brings no valid reason for deletion) --Ruthven (msg) 19:19, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
- The problem is that @Racconish: don't agree with that consensus. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:01, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
- I did not suggest the deletion of this template. — Racconish 💬 06:43, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
- The problem is that @Racconish: don't agree with that consensus. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:01, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
- @JWilz12345: What do you think about this? Ox1997cow (talk) 15:58, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
- No comment, sorry. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 16:47, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Closed as Kept, no consensus to delete. (Note: This is not a judgement on whether the current version of the template is accurate.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:14, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
This VP discussion reaffirmed that there is actually no Commons-acceptable FoP for Italy. The template is misleading. For those building who falls below COM:TOO, {{Italy-MiBAC-disclaimer}} is already functioning A1Cafel (talk) 17:23, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- I can't help agreeing with you.--3knolls (talk) 17:41, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:52, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
There's zero evidence that the uploader of this image is the artist and it's clearly above the threshold of originality in the meantime. So it should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary. Adamant1 (talk) 17:27, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:53, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
There's zero evidence that the uploader of this image is the artist and it's clearly above the threshold of originality in the meantime. So it should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary. Adamant1 (talk) 17:29, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:53, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
No COM:FOP in Italy. Subject is a building opened only in 2008 and designed by en:Manfredi Nicoletti (1930—2017). Can be undeleted in 2088 (2017+71). Howhontanozaz (talk) 14:08, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:22, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
It is reaffirmed that there is no FoP in Italy, even the architect is already died A1Cafel (talk) 17:31, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:54, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
There's zero evidence that the uploader of this image is the artist since it comes from Facebook and it's clearly above the threshold of originality in the meantime. So it should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary. Adamant1 (talk) 17:31, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:54, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
some of them are copyvio images and all of them mostly like are copyvios. also look: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Enrique Riera Figueredo.jpg
- File:Johanna Ortega.png
- File:Celeste Amarilla.jpg
- File:Enrique Riera Figueredo.jpg
- File:Carlos Filizzola.jpg
- File:Enrique Riera.jpg
- File:Juan Carlos Wasmosy.jpg
- File:Arnoldo Wiens 2015.jpg
- File:Blas Riquelme.jpg
- File:Eduardo Nakayama.jpg
- File:Domingo Laíno.jpg
- File:Tito Saguier.jpg
- File:Oscar González Daher.jpg
- File:Juan Carlos Galaverna's official portrait (2003).jpg
----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 17:43, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- None of them are copyvios.
- Official portraits provided by the government:
- - File:Celeste Amarilla.jpg
- - File:Carlos Filizzola.jpg
- - File:Enrique Riera.jpg
- - File:Juan Carlos Wasmosy.jpg
- - File:Blas Riquelme.jpg
- - File:Domingo Laíno.jpg
- - File:Tito Saguier.jpg
- - File:Oscar González Daher.jpg
- - File:Juan Carlos Galaverna's official portrait (2003).jpg
- Screencap from a video (just like the picture used in the Shakira article):
- - File:Johanna Ortega.png
- Photos uploaded by the person in question to social media (these are the only two I can see as maybe copyvio):
- - File:Arnoldo Wiens 2015.jpg
- - File:Eduardo Nakayama.jpg
- Wikipedia severely lacks content about Paraguay, especially its history and politics. I'm trying to make knowledge available and accesible, for educational purposes, but everytime I do some mod deletes something that is allowed for other (first world) countries. Guyermou (talk) 17:53, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- Ping Guyermou: Official files from most U.S. states are constantly deleted here as copyright violation, so this is not about how rich or powerful a place is. Who holds the copyrights to these photos, and how were they licensed? Photos uploaded to social media sites usually are copyright, all rights reserved, as are videos. Does the government of Paraguay have a policy that all official portraits are released under Creative Commons licenses that allow them to be used commercially, as required by COM:LICENSING?
- The other thing for you to consider is that Wikipedias have their own policies, separate from Commons' policies, and that some of them permit fair use, which does not exist on this site. So you might be able to upload some fair use images locally to some Wikipedias, following their fair use policies, which you should look up and follow carefully. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:02, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek
Thank you. ----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 18:39, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- Glad to do my part to help. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:00, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek
- The other thing for you to consider is that Wikipedias have their own policies, separate from Commons' policies, and that some of them permit fair use, which does not exist on this site. So you might be able to upload some fair use images locally to some Wikipedias, following their fair use policies, which you should look up and follow carefully. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:02, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.webp){kind=link}
.webp){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.webp){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.webp&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.webp&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.webp){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.webp){kind=link}
.webp&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.webp&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.webp){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.webp){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(brightened_variant).webp&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(SFW_variant).png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.webp&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.webp&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.webp){kind=link}
.webp){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
,_Chatham_Bus_Station,_19_December_2017.jpg){kind=link}
,_31_October_2018_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
,_Waterfront_Way_(Chatham_Bus_Station),_19_December_2017.jpg){kind=link}
,_31_October_2018.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
,_Chatham_Bus_Station,_17_January_2018.jpg){kind=link}
,_Chatham_Bus_Station,_17_January_2018_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
_rear_view.jpg){kind=link}
_front_view.jpg){kind=link}
_front_view.jpg){kind=link}
_rear_view.jpg){kind=link}
_CRDi_(India)_rear_view.jpg){kind=link}
_CRDi_(India)_front_view.jpg){kind=link}
_(without_shading_variant).png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(separated)_(without_shading_and_shadow_variant).png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_Happy_Fox_Pop_Day_(separated)_(without_shading_variant).png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:55, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
Since this photo is made by a professionnal photography studio, I doubt it is under a compatible license. Antimuonium (talk) 18:20, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:56, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
Since this photo is made by a professionnal photography studio, I doubt it is under a compatible license. Antimuonium (talk) 18:20, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:56, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
Dubious claim of own work on this signed photograph. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:28, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Apparently not own work. The uploader asked for help but has not come back: Commons:Bybrunnen#Egen bild. However, Nils J. Lundgren lived 1881–1954, so the photo is taken at latest 1954, which means {{PD-Sweden-photo}} applies, and applied at the URAA date. The photo is probably from {{Private collection}}. I don't know how to discern the photographer from the signature (or whether it is one or some other marking). –LPfi (talk) 20:01, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
- If the signature ends in -41, the photo would probably have been taken in 1941, when Lundgren was 60 years old, which seems possible. –LPfi (talk) 20:24, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Another easily solved one by looking at the PD-licenses from the county of origin. When people claim "own work" they are correct in that the scan, legally a derivative copy, is their own work. While in the US an exact copy doesn't get a new copyright, in other legal jurisdictions you have to credit the person that scanned the image, to create the derivative work, because of the "sweat of the brow" principle. --RAN (talk) 05:13, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- Yes. And at least in Swedish, the upload wizard asks "Who created the file?", rather than who created the underlying work. –LPfi (talk) 07:43, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —howcheng {chat} 23:01, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
This photo is signed "Sörner" and "EvH 41". It is the same type of signature as in this photo. This page refers to "Atelier Sörner, Heideken E. von", who was an active photographer in Helsingborg, and whose initials corresponds to the signature. On the web site of the Swedish Museum of Modern Art is mentioned the photographer Elsa von Heideken, b 1912, d 1956. This means that the image is protected by copyright until 2026/7. The photo does not meet the terms of PD-Sweden, because it is a high end professional studio portrait with originality, intended for framing and not for publication in a newspaper or similar. Riggwelter (talk) 18:30, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:57, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
Reuploaded after prior deletion. Still not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:26, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:57, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Sahaib as no permission (No permission) Krd 06:08, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: (different photo than previous of same name) Internet archive confirms photo online before uploader's claimed creation date [3]. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:57, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Redundant with File:Nevada Presidential Election Results 1892.svg 2600:1009:B06C:78AA:C8A6:9D6D:9FAB:FD2A 20:19, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- It is not redudant, rather it improves on the borders to make them more geographically precise and accurate Incognito melon (talk) 20:24, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- Keep The two maps are not the same. Why would it make sense to delete this one? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:58, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:46, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
Copyright vio 158.248.127.13 20:57, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - EXIF says " AleksanderØdegaard" is copyright holder. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:46, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
Jan-Hendrik Pelz and/or Balint Goldenstein claim to be the authors ("selbst fotografiert") and copyright holders of this image. According to the metadata, this is not true: The photographer is a person by the name of Satoko Toyoda. The copyright note in the metadata therefore is invalid, since by German law, the Urheberrecht is non-transferable and remains with the photographer under all circumstances except death. 87.150.8.228 22:58, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:47, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
Les droits d'auteur de cette photographie ne sont pas respectés 87.90.71.203 18:00, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
Les droits d’auteur de cette photographie ne sont pas respectés 87.90.71.203 12:52, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:48, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
This is clearly not a 2017 photo of someone who died in 1972. Lacking factual actual source info. Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:06, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- Keep "PD-US-not renewed" circa 1940 publicity photo. --RAN (talk) 05:05, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. There is no evidence at all for the theory that this is a circa 1940 US publicity photo for which the copyright was not renewed. --Rosenzweig τ 11:05, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
Low res, likely not own work. 194.9.27.69 20:13, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:21, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
This image should be deleted because there's zero indication from anything what this logo relates to and it's out of scope anyway. That is unless someone can figure out where it came from, if it's public domain, and find a usage for it somewhere. I couldn't though. Adamant1 (talk) 15:20, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Denim Therapy appears to be a shop with two locations. They've been covered briefly in Elle, Vogue and IMO more interestingly by American Express's online magazine in an article called "Denim Therapy: Re-Visiting a Culture of Repair Instead of Replace." (Did you know American Express had a magazine, and one with some non-promotional content at that? I didn't.) So maybe they're notable, but has this logo ever had anything to do with them? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:48, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- Comment If this is in fact a logo they used, it would definitely be below COM:TOO US. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:49, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for information. It's still out of scope IMO, but it doesn't really matter that much either way as long as we at least know where it came from. And no, I didn't know American Express had an online magazine. I can't see that at all being an interesting read lol. --Adamant1 (talk) 17:52, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- That's OK. I find it only mildly interesting, anyway. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:04, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for information. It's still out of scope IMO, but it doesn't really matter that much either way as long as we at least know where it came from. And no, I didn't know American Express had an online magazine. I can't see that at all being an interesting read lol. --Adamant1 (talk) 17:52, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused logo for entity with no WP article = out of scope. —holly {chat} 18:32, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
The original upload here is a copy from Peoples Republic of China, not own work. The current flag appears to be uploaded on top of the first one and the current one doesn't contain copyright elements. The first one does. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:36, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Question Sorry, but what is "the original upload" you are talking about? There's only one upload in the file history. And yes, it's own work because I myself combined rainbow stripes from the USSR rainbow flag with official PRC flag. Also, I added PD-PRC-exempt now, so it has correct copyright information. Arado Ar 196 (talk) 18:55, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- Update: I checked the logs for file. There was upload of new version [4], but it was supressed from history by deletion-undeletion, because it was attack by now-blocked user (who also attacked USSR rainbow flag here). Is that supressed disruptive upload a valid reason for deletion of original file? Arado Ar 196 (talk) 19:23, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- @Ellin Beltz What do you mean by this? —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:37, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination It's ok now. The disruptive upload was the issue. Cheers! Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:43, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Withdrawn. —holly {chat} 18:30, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Probably not an own work 181.43.5.222 20:12, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: No instances found on TinEye, so without proof of copyright violation, we should assume good faith on the part of the uploader. —holly {chat} 18:28, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
