Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2023/04/11
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![84 File:"Kanjeng Ratu Kidul" alongside flower and fruits.jpg](#File:"Kanjeng_Ratu_Kidul"_alongside_flower_and_fruits.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
No one has t shirts and I have 118.101.100.118 01:02, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
- Entonces salga del campo nudista... Cual es su problema? 191.125.18.104 02:10, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Kept, absurdo. 191.125.18.104 02:13, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Editing information that you have no clue or evidence of, even though the evidence is presented, the user acts stupid, and chooses fiction over fact. Making the user unfit to be a wiki editor. Andre Mario Smith (talk) 06:59, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep. Bad faith nomination 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 07:55, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Vandalism. --Yann (talk) 08:00, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Reproduced from this video protected by copyright. This video is. Nuraa.sinora (talk) 09:48, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:00, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
{{SD|F8}} I tried to update this file, but due to the ongoing issue with PDF updates the PDF did not properly load. Per advice of an admin on the forum, I uploaded a new copy of the file here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:New_Testament_Psalms.pdf. KetefHinnomFan (talk) 13:13, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:25, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Violating the copyright Ardy RfPas (talk) 04:41, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 21:55, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
https://twitter.com/aya_nishin0/photo Sai10ukazuki (talk) 12:37, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Comment I requested immediate removal for copyright infringement. --Sai10ukazuki (talk) 12:54, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Mdaniels5757. --Rosenzweig τ 21:51, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
The image is not released under Creative Commons license and the whole site from which the image has been taken is also not under the license. FlorianH76 (talk) 14:48, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 20:18, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
This is a part of image from https://vk.com/photo-196988844_457262597 and it belongs to https://www.mma-series.com/ru and it seems that the user is not the author of the image FlorianH76 (talk) 15:05, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 20:18, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope Michel Bakni (talk) 15:49, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Yann. --Rosenzweig τ 21:51, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
personal photo for non Wikipedian, Faisal talk 16:45, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 20:20, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Image is lifted from a YouTube video without copyright information RickyCourtney (talk) 17:34, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Mdaniels5757. --Rosenzweig τ 21:51, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Probably this uploader violates the rules too often FlorianH76 (talk) 17:47, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. We don't delete talk page. --Yann (talk) 20:17, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Incorrect chemical structure. Compare with CAS#847375-16-0 and other files in Category:WAY-267,464. Marbletan (talk) 18:26, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
- I redrawn the structural formula, and now it displays the correct one. Vaccinationist (talk) 18:45, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you for quickly correcting it. Marbletan (talk) 19:08, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Withdrawn because the file has been corrected. Marbletan (talk) 19:08, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
no author no permission Hoyanova (talk) 06:55, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Personal photo by non-contributor (F10). --Wutsje 00:43, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
no source no permission no relevance, duplicate image also Hoyanova (talk) 07:02, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Personal photo by non-contributor (F10). --Wutsje 00:41, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope Michel Bakni (talk) 15:48, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 07:00, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by GhostOfTshushima (talk · contribs)
[edit]"Teen" indicated that the subject is likely to be underage, potentially child pornography
- File:Teen dick ejaculating after masturbation.webm
- File:Flacid teen penis on close up.jpg
- File:Semi erect teen penis.jpg
- File:Shaved flacid teen dick.jpg
- File:Teen penis in close up.jpg
- File:Flacid dick in mirror.jpg
- File:Cum ejaculation.jpg
- File:Penis masturbating.jpg
- File:Male penis ejaculation.jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 03:02, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Speedily deleted on base of the justified concerns. --AFBorchert (talk) 06:47, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
I've also added File:Frontal view of unerrected human penis.jpg to the list of deleted files. --AFBorchert (talk) 07:10, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
The choice of words in the title ("puta") and the description ("whore") indicates improper use of a living person's likeness. Favonian (talk) 18:36, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy, agresión personal. 181.43.7.29 20:10, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Captain-tucker. --Rosenzweig τ 08:37, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
Because it is A selfie Utolotu (talk) 20:31, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Gbawden. --Rosenzweig τ 08:36, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
off scope -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 13:11, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:47, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
Allowance in non-commercial uses is not sufficient for Commons. Commercial use must be allowed. Abzeronow (talk) 16:15, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:47, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 83.61.231.21 as no permission (no permission) Krd 04:54, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Keep "PD-US-not renewed" to be eligible for a copyright it would have had to register, then renew that registration, and an image of this sitter does not appear in the renewal database. --RAN (talk) 12:54, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Kadı Message 07:59, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
copied from https://businessday.ng/news/article/simon-harry-nigerias-statistician-general-dies/ Ske (talk) 06:12, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 07:59, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
copied from https://www.facebook.com/105787264973510/photos/a.119449250273978/119454150273488/?type=3 Ske (talk) 06:13, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 08:00, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
Educational value is not shown. tr:Deniz Közig was deleted. Taivo (talk) 09:42, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 08:00, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
Images of personalities without EXIF data, promo shots, unlikely to be own works.
Yann (talk) 20:46, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 08:02, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
COM:SCOPE Ameisenigel (talk) 21:23, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: F10. --Kadı Message 08:02, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
COM:SCOPE Ameisenigel (talk) 21:24, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: F10. --Kadı Message 08:02, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
ouf of scope, nothing to see Joschi71 (talk) 21:26, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Kadı Message 08:03, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope. Clearly not a real flag. Xeror (talk) 22:48, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 08:04, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Logo of a company CoffeeEngineer (talk) 23:42, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 08:03, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Screenshot of Telegram CoffeeEngineer (talk) 23:43, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 08:03, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
No proven notability CoffeeEngineer (talk) 23:47, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 08:03, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The name of the author is different from the watermark on the picture CoffeeEngineer (talk) 23:48, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 08:04, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Logo of a website CoffeeEngineer (talk) 23:53, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 08:04, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
Possible advertising CoffeeEngineer (talk) 23:55, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 08:04, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
Copyright infringement Fauxey (talk) 01:18, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 08:08, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
Author requests deletion KetefHinnomFan (talk) 04:02, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
- In scope and in public domain — even if the actual author (either King David or King James, weirdly 26 centuries apart) wants it deleted, it should be kept. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 13:16, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Kadı Message 08:07, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Complex logos can be in Commons only with VRT-permission. Laws of France apply in Reunion, so you can look COM:TOO France. Taivo (talk) 09:04, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 08:08, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Is it really flag of Nepal? I doubt. Unused, probably out of project scope, maybe even as hoax. Taivo (talk) 10:38, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 08:06, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
Delete Logo is property of Woodrow Wilson High School in West Virginia. There is no evidence at the website of the high school (https://wwhs.rale.k12.wv.us/o/wwh) that the image is available under a cc-zero license nor any other license compatible with Commons. Copyright violation. Hammersoft (talk) 15:13, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 08:06, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
Taken from web site with a copyright notice: © 2022. Српски покрет Двери Ђидо (talk) 22:11, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 08:05, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused random photo without context/location, poor unusable composition, no educational value, out of scope. Also added:
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
--P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:40, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Tulsi 24x7 09:13, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
As with all of User:Drex C137's images, the bonding is incorrect. In acetate, both carbon–oxygen bonds are equivalent (not one single/one double). Have File:Acetate-anion-3D-balls.png as correct DMacks (talk) 21:41, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
- Dear DMacks, I have noticed that you consider my illustrations of molecules as wrong and qualify them with a "nonsense", I would like you to explain to me how exactly should I illustrate the molecule? I'll gladly upload an improved version Drex C137 (talk) 22:21, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
- In this case, you drew one of the carbon–oxygen bonds as single and the other double. That is false. They are both equal in length electron-count, an average of single and double. Call it "1.5" (because that's what chemists do call it), due to resonance. You don't need to bother redrawing to correct it because we already have a high-quality image that correctly illustrates it, which I placed in the eswiki article. Commons has a pre-existing massive collection of images in many styles and types of details of tens of thousands of simple and complex molecules ready for you to use. DMacks (talk) 02:02, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 14:39, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --Leyo 16:34, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
Incorrect / unfavorable depiction of radicals & low-quality image. We have File:Tert-Butyl-radical-2D-structure.svg as high-quality vector replacement. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 18:48, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Leyo 16:35, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused random photos of nondescript water and rock, no context/location, no educational value, out of scope. Also added:
- File:Ontario October 19 032 (2957095596).jpg
- File:Ontario October 19 033 (2956243785).jpg
- File:Ontario October 19 035 (2956257035).jpg
- File:Ontario October 19 037 (2957108258).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
--P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:08, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Tulsi 24x7 06:50, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Que bueno que no haya sido borrado. El auto viejo, el pose del joven, las gafas, y sobre todo los colores hacen de esta una foto admirable. KEEP. 181.43.7.29 13:53, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Mdaniels5757. --Rosenzweig τ 07:36, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
Out of Project scope: Commons is not private photo album —MdsShakil (talk) 16:35, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:15, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
copyvio no permssion - see metadata that clearly state "Copyright holder Jeroen Keep Fotografie Author Jeroen Keep" Hoyanova (talk) 17:03, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 07:36, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
[1] Disclaimer: All Logos and Pictures of various Channels, Shows, Artistes, Media Houses, Companies, Brands etc. belong to their respective owners, and are used to merely visually identify the Channels, Shows, Companies, Brands, etc. to the viewer. Does not appear to be a non-copyrighted image. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 17:38, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Polarlys. --Rosenzweig τ 07:35, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
Incorrect structure as there is no covalent bond to Ca. Correct alternatives in Category:Calcium phosphates. Leyo 12:09, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom as chemical nonsense. I removed them from their use-case (uploader had placed them in es:Fosfato hidrogenado de calcio). DMacks (talk) 21:33, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
- Delete both files per nom. Factually incorrect content should be removed instantly. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 11:34, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:16, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
Incorrect structure as there is no covalent bond to Ca. Correct alternatives in Category:Calcium acetate. Leyo 12:12, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom as chemical nonsense. I removed them from their use-case (uploader had placed them in es:Acetato de calcio). DMacks (talk) 21:37, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
- Dear DMacks, I would appreciate if you could tell me how to correctly illustrate the molecule? I don't quite understand what kind of error you find in my illustration. And I would appreciate it if you did not classify my work as nonsense, since my intention was to contribute to the Spanish Wikipedia and it was hard for me to create these illustrations. Drex C137 (talk) 22:37, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
- You may want to read es:Enlace (química)#Tipos de enlaces químicos. --Leyo 10:24, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
- I do not at all doubt your intention. But the outcome is the problem. And the outcome is what is published and visible to our readers. They deserve correct info. Science is not something that can be guessed. Making something "pretty" is only worthwhile if there is a valid factual basis for what is being illustrated. It's very easy to tell a program "make a model like this", and it will mindlessly do what you tell it. That is why it is important to learn about the topic, and look for what others have already done, before spending time doing it yourself. DMacks (talk) 15:40, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
- Dear DMacks, I would appreciate if you could tell me how to correctly illustrate the molecule? I don't quite understand what kind of error you find in my illustration. And I would appreciate it if you did not classify my work as nonsense, since my intention was to contribute to the Spanish Wikipedia and it was hard for me to create these illustrations. Drex C137 (talk) 22:37, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. We have File:Calcium acetate.svg as correct & high-quality vector graphic. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 11:36, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:15, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Logo of a band CoffeeEngineer (talk) 08:40, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 06:33, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Happy2605
[edit]- File:Bengaltigers.png
- File:Bhojpuridabanggs.png
- File:Chennairhinos.png
- File:Karnatakabulldozers.png
- File:Keralastrikers.png
- File:Mumbaiheroes.png
- File:Punjabdesher.jpg
- File:Teluguwarriors.png
- File:Veermarathis.png
All copyrighted team logos for teams in the en:Celebrity Cricket League, the copyrights belong to the relevant teams, not the person uploading them. One person cannot possibly hold the copyrights to all these logos, as each team will have a different copyright holder. --Joseph2302 (talk) 11:21, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 06:35, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
This is a picture of me and I want it deleted. It's not currently used anyways. Reave2468 (talk) 13:52, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 06:34, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
This file does not belong to the uploader and is from the images available on the Internet CaesarIran (talk) 14:58, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Ticket:2023042710014107 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 19:01, 27 April 2023 (UTC)- Comment Ticket has been accepted. --Ganímedes (talk) 20:41, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per ticket permission. --Krd 06:30, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
Es mi foto y la subí aquí para un ejemplo, no necesito que este aquí. TecnoCall LLC (talk) 18:06, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --✗plicit 06:33, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
Draft submission already denied, no longer needed. Northern Moonlight (talk) 20:46, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 06:34, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
Derivative work of a copyrighted sculpture! Heinrich Apel died in 2020 so that our descendants can undelete it in 2091, if our society then still exists.
Ras67 (talk) 20:41, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 22:00, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
Photo from 1921 year, may be italian. Can not be own work of 2023. Original author? Date? Copyright status? Drakosh (talk) 05:58, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, DW. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:46, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Says that the council has 178 members, it's actually 170, will add a newer, correcter image :P Monsoon Bowline (talk) 04:28, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 00:58, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
No evidence of permission. 91.193.179.3 04:32, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 00:59, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Utilizacao incorreta Caio Cesar Pelati (talk) 11:29, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: copyrighted to WAYART STUDIO in EXIF, no permission. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 01:04, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: Alternate history map (Poland, Germany, Ireland, Sweden deviate) Enyavar (talk) 13:39, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 01:06, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE portrait of a non-notable person ro:Rares Munteanu. Gikü (talk) 13:58, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 01:10, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Maximus Mah (talk · contribs)
[edit]not within Commons:Project scope
- File:Walmart vs Amazon.png
- File:Financial Plan for a Coffee Shop.jpg
- File:CapEx vs OpEx Model.jpg
- File:Fear of Failure.jpg
- File:Biz Stra Exec.jpg
- File:FP Model.jpg
- File:Scale Growth.jpg
- File:Value Stream Mapping.jpg
- File:Metrics Dashboard.jpg
- File:Entrepreneurship.jpg
- File:MD-Konsult Startup and Small Business Conusulting.jpg
- File:2023 Trends.jpg
- File:Futuristic Robot Wars.jpg
Polarlys (talk) 15:23, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom (unless others turn out to be copyvios) Herby talk thyme 15:51, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 01:14, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Cover of some foreword of a non notable publication. No educational value. Lymantria (talk) 15:37, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 01:17, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Same image as https://pinterest.com/pin/ram-coburger-fuchs--411446115931845359/ Radmir Far (talk) 17:13, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 01:24, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
NoFoP
The life-sized figure was created for display at Osaka Prefectural Museum of Yayoi Culture. Osaka Prefectural Museum of Yayoi Culture opened in 1991. Therefore, the figure is presumed to be under copyright protection.
The United States Copyright Law does not allow free reproductions of non-architectural artistic works located in public spaces (this includes monuments and statues), so photographs of non-architectural modern artistic works are not considered as "free works" on Wikimedia Commons. Nnkrkrhhdi (talk) 10:43, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
- Delete It is a figure made after the 20 century, not during Himiko's lifetime. --Nnkrkrhhdi (talk) 10:43, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Artanisen (uploader), please stop infringing other people's copyrights. --Nnkrkrhhdi (talk) 11:22, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Hello, the photo was taken in good faith. The life-sized figure could be made quite recent. I don't have details about that sorry. I support the deletion if it violates copyright. One argument is why aren't other photo's of miniature towns and figures in museums deleted? For example this photo. There are more photos of Museum Figures here. - Artanisen (talk) 11:30, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
- @Artanisen: Under Japanese copyright law, a photograph in which a work is the subject is treated as a copy or a derivative work of the work in which the subject is the subject, and the copyright of the work in which the subject is the subject extends to the use of the photograph. And under Japanese copyright law, copyright is protected for 70 years after the creator's death. The United States copyright law has provisions similar to those of Japan. Have you read the Commons:Derivative works? --Nnkrkrhhdi (talk) 00:25, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
- @Nnkrkrhhdi: Why are all these life-sized photos of Museum Figures in Japanese Museums allowed on Commons? The Hyōgo Prefectural Museum of Archaeology opened in 2007. The wax figures of the Takamatsu Heike Monogatari Wax Museum are probably not antique either. The Edo-Tokyo Museum opened 1993. There are various photos of life-sized figures of that museum on Commons. So why is for example this photo of life-sized figures still on Commons? Yes I read the derivatives works. If you look in this category Museum Figures by country there are many photos of life-sized figures on Commons. This photo could fall under freedom of panorama (probably not) or not copyrightable since it is based on ancient clothing. -Artanisen (talk) 02:28, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
- @Artanisen: Just because others ignore the rules doesn't mean you can ignore them.
- @Nnkrkrhhdi: Why are all these life-sized photos of Museum Figures in Japanese Museums allowed on Commons? The Hyōgo Prefectural Museum of Archaeology opened in 2007. The wax figures of the Takamatsu Heike Monogatari Wax Museum are probably not antique either. The Edo-Tokyo Museum opened 1993. There are various photos of life-sized figures of that museum on Commons. So why is for example this photo of life-sized figures still on Commons? Yes I read the derivatives works. If you look in this category Museum Figures by country there are many photos of life-sized figures on Commons. This photo could fall under freedom of panorama (probably not) or not copyrightable since it is based on ancient clothing. -Artanisen (talk) 02:28, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
- @Artanisen: Under Japanese copyright law, a photograph in which a work is the subject is treated as a copy or a derivative work of the work in which the subject is the subject, and the copyright of the work in which the subject is the subject extends to the use of the photograph. And under Japanese copyright law, copyright is protected for 70 years after the creator's death. The United States copyright law has provisions similar to those of Japan. Have you read the Commons:Derivative works? --Nnkrkrhhdi (talk) 00:25, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Hello, the photo was taken in good faith. The life-sized figure could be made quite recent. I don't have details about that sorry. I support the deletion if it violates copyright. One argument is why aren't other photo's of miniature towns and figures in museums deleted? For example this photo. There are more photos of Museum Figures here. - Artanisen (talk) 11:30, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
- This photo could not fall under the freedom of panorama (FoP). Have you read the Commons:Derivative works? This guideline says "Check Commons:Freedom of panorama." Have you checked this page?
- The United States Copyright Law does not allow FoP of non-architectural artistic works located in public spaces. Also, Japanese Law does not allow FoP of artistic works located in room. The figure is not a building. Also, the figure is located in room. I explained this issue and the Wikipedia:屋外美術を被写体とする写真の利用方針 to you on November 28, 2021, didn't I? Please, remember. --Nnkrkrhhdi (talk) 08:16, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
- @Nnkrkrhhdi: You're correct that it probably does not fall under freedom of panorama. The clothing is derivate work of ancient clothing during the time of Queen Himiko which could mean it's not copyrightable. So why do you single out this image and ignore all the other images of life-sized figures? That is unfair as if you're picking on a specific user. I asked you the question why are there many photos of Museum Figures still on Commons? Why did you not request the removal of those images? Please speak to me in English only since I understand that language well. - Artanisen (talk) 08:31, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
- The other files aren't relevant for this discussion. There are too many files on Commons for anybody to check them all, so these files might simply have been missed. There might be some specific reason for (some of) those other files to be allowed, such as explicit permission from the museum or the artist, perhaps even some more general defence, which could be relevant here. Many of them might be copyright violations and, if so, should also be nominated for deletion. –LPfi (talk) 09:17, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
- Well those images have been on Commons for many more years than this one. Hence that causes a misunderstanding that such images of life-sized figures are allowed. If there are exceptions for those image then it should be mentioned on the file pages. I think nobody bothered to verify such things. So singling out this image is a double standard. Anyway, the last argument is that this figure is not copyrightable since it's derivative work based on ancient clothing and the figure is generic. -Artanisen (talk) 09:33, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, it can be misleading, and yes, I guess nobody checked those files. But this is not about double standards; all files here should be in the public domain or properly licensed. We simply don't have the manpower to check all files. Most copyvios are seen by those patrolling recent uploads, but otherwise it is just about stumbling into a suspect file, e.g. as it is used in an article one is reading. Perhaps somebody is going to check the categories you pointed out, but that requires dedicating some time. Personally I am not going to do it, as I know neither US nor Japanese copyright law. –LPfi (talk) 09:59, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
- Right, in that case we can delete this file, but if the other life-size figure photos remain on Wiki Commons then it's easy for others to assume that it's permitted. We can agree with the deletion of this photo. It's always good to have a discussion about an image to check multiple angles. However, Nnkrkrhhdi has a history of hounding me for any mistake while conveniently ignoring other photos such as in this category of photos of Museum Figures. That is a double standard and makes other users uncomfortable. - Artanisen (talk) 15:35, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, it can be misleading, and yes, I guess nobody checked those files. But this is not about double standards; all files here should be in the public domain or properly licensed. We simply don't have the manpower to check all files. Most copyvios are seen by those patrolling recent uploads, but otherwise it is just about stumbling into a suspect file, e.g. as it is used in an article one is reading. Perhaps somebody is going to check the categories you pointed out, but that requires dedicating some time. Personally I am not going to do it, as I know neither US nor Japanese copyright law. –LPfi (talk) 09:59, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
- Well those images have been on Commons for many more years than this one. Hence that causes a misunderstanding that such images of life-sized figures are allowed. If there are exceptions for those image then it should be mentioned on the file pages. I think nobody bothered to verify such things. So singling out this image is a double standard. Anyway, the last argument is that this figure is not copyrightable since it's derivative work based on ancient clothing and the figure is generic. -Artanisen (talk) 09:33, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
- The other files aren't relevant for this discussion. There are too many files on Commons for anybody to check them all, so these files might simply have been missed. There might be some specific reason for (some of) those other files to be allowed, such as explicit permission from the museum or the artist, perhaps even some more general defence, which could be relevant here. Many of them might be copyright violations and, if so, should also be nominated for deletion. –LPfi (talk) 09:17, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
- Artanisen says "this figure is not copyrightable since it's derivative work based on ancient clothing and the figure is generic". But Himiko lived in the 3rd century, so there are no detailed records of her clothing. The clothes of this figure was based on an imagination by Osaka Prefectural Museum of Yayoi Culture. And this figure was made after the 1990s. Under Japanese copyright law, copyright is protected for 70 years after the creator's death. --Nnkrkrhhdi (talk) 16:09, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
- @Nnkrkrhhdi: You're correct that it probably does not fall under freedom of panorama. The clothing is derivate work of ancient clothing during the time of Queen Himiko which could mean it's not copyrightable. So why do you single out this image and ignore all the other images of life-sized figures? That is unfair as if you're picking on a specific user. I asked you the question why are there many photos of Museum Figures still on Commons? Why did you not request the removal of those images? Please speak to me in English only since I understand that language well. - Artanisen (talk) 08:31, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Artanisen (uploader), please stop infringing other people's copyrights. --Nnkrkrhhdi (talk) 11:22, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per COM:FOP Japan. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 11:48, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- Delete per COM:FOP Japan. -Artanisen (talk) 15:39, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Artanisen has participated in the Wikimedia projects since March 2006. But Artanisen still doesn't understand the rules. Please understand the rules first before joining the project. --Nnkrkrhhdi (talk) 16:09, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Nnkrkrhhdi yes I have participated in the Wikimedia projects since March 2006. And the far majority of all my contributions (hundreds of images as well as referenced article information) are approved and appreciated! You show zero appreciation for that fact. Mistakes are part of being human which is something you forget. Your behavior of hounding other users is extremely rude. You also ignore most other FOP cases of photos of life size museum figures which is a double standard. -Artanisen (talk) 16:13, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
- @Artanisen: Can't you understand LPfi's advice? I hope you understand about copyright and rules of the Wikimedia projects. By the way, did you take this picture? --Nnkrkrhhdi (talk) 16:29, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Nnkrkrhhdi Can't you understand healthy debates before making a final decision? Your response is again rude which proves my point about the bad way you interact with others. -Artanisen (talk) 16:30, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
- @Artanisen: Artanisen said the photo was taken by Artanisen. If you're uploading someone else's photos without their permission, you're also violating the photographer's copyright. Did you take this picture? --Nnkrkrhhdi (talk) 16:46, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Nnkrkrhhdi yes I took the photo and it has been shared many times since it's been on wiki commons. Also I rarely upload photos of 3D life-sized figures. Did you know you're still interacting with me in a condescending manner? -Artanisen (talk) 17:06, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you, I understand. I was worried because Artanisen said the photo's source is Osaka Prefectural Museum of Yayoi Culture... --Nnkrkrhhdi (talk) 17:32, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
- Information Artanisen says the photo's author is Artanisen. But Artanisen says the photo's source is Osaka Prefectural Museum of Yayoi Culture. His explanation is contradictory. --Nnkrkrhhdi (talk) 15:23, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
- The photo was taken inside Osaka Prefectural Museum of Yayoi Culture. People were allowed to take photos. The photograph author was me. It's easy to understand.-Artanisen (talk) 07:06, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
- @Artanisen: Why did you say the photo's source is Osaka Prefectural Museum of Yayoi Culture? The actual source was your own photo. Why did you lie that Osaka Prefectural Museum of Yayoi Culture was the source? --Nnkrkrhhdi (talk) 00:40, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
- Keep 2021年に受け入れられて今まで誰からも苦情は来ていない。--今まで指摘ない問題ない (talk) 15:33, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Can't you understand LPfi's advice? --Nnkrkrhhdi (talk) 15:23, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
- Delete It is protected by the copyright laws of both Japan and the United States.--Strangesnow (talk) 07:21, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
- Information Artanisen said the photo's source is Osaka Prefectural Museum of Yayoi Culture. But, in fact, the photo's source is Artanisen's work. Artanisen lies about the source of the photo, so Artanisen can't be trusted. --Nnkrkrhhdi (talk) 00:40, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
- Information Nnkrkrhhdi violates Wikipedia's pillar of Civility = No personal attacks or harassment. Artanisen explained on 17:06, 12 April 2023 that he took the photo (author) and it was taken at the museum (source). Maybe Artanisen should've put "Own work" there, but most people understand it. -Artanisen (talk) 07:09, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
- Please be careful!! The source of the photo and the location of the photo have different meanings. On January 5, 2021 (UTC), Artanisen said that the photo's source is Osaka Prefectural Museum of Yayoi Culture, not Artanisen's work. And Artanisen removed the Template:Own...
- But on April 18, 2023 (UTC), Artanisen said that the photo's source is Artanisen's work. The source of the photo and the location of the photo have different meanings. --Nnkrkrhhdi (talk) 08:49, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
- The source is extremely important to the Wikimedia Project. --Nnkrkrhhdi (talk) 09:00, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for explaining, Artanisen will strive to be more careful with the source info. There are more Commons users who put location in the source such as this photo. -Artanisen (talk) 09:07, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
- The source is extremely important to the Wikimedia Project. --Nnkrkrhhdi (talk) 09:00, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep 今まで誰からも苦情は来ていない。--善意にとる軽視しない (talk) 17:54, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted, no freedom of panorama in Japan for sculptures. Taivo (talk) 08:17, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Maybe not own work (see metadata) and published on Instagram (https://www.instagram.com/dariodondoli/?hl=it) Bradipo Lento (talk) 09:02, 11 April 2023 (UTC) Salve, tutte le fonti condivise sono anche descritte in questo articolo di giornale https://www.firenzetoday.it/social/dario-dondoli-lost-in-low-cost.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dondolidario (talk • contribs) 09:08, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:20, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Trade as no permission (No permission since) Krd 04:54, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: no compatible license at source. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:18, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Requested by the report owner. An updated version will be uploaded soon. DSaroyan (WMF) (talk) 05:43, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:21, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
I'm not so satisfied with the photo I uploaded S. Perquin (talk) 08:07, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of (fairly) recent upload. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:23, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
appears to be license laundering SecretName101 (talk) 08:16, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. "Sygma via Getty Images". --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:24, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
appears to be license laundering SecretName101 (talk) 08:16, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. "Sygma via Getty Images". --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:24, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Uploader gave PD-Iraq license. Probably he wants to say, that the photo is in public domain, because it was published before 1999. As depicted person died in 1992, it is totally possible.. But as file source is personal archive, I must ask: where exactly and when the photo was published before 1999? Taivo (talk) 09:36, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, missing essential info. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:25, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Foto de Facebook? 191.126.166.144 10:16, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:26, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Otra foto de Facebook? 191.126.166.144 10:18, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:26, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
También de Facebook? 191.126.166.144 10:18, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:26, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Que bonito sombrero! Trabajo suyo? Me gustaría tener uno también... 191.126.166.144 10:20, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Screenshot. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:26, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Trabajo propio, pero ojalá fuera más grande... 191.126.166.144 10:21, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:28, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Bonita chaqueta azul, puede subir una imagen propia de ella por favor? 191.126.166.144 10:22, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Scan of existing image. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:28, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Simply lifted from website, claims to be CC4.0, but there is no information on website to validate that claim. Onel5969 (talk) 10:40, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:55, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Derivative work of multiple paintings. There's no freedom of panorama in Indonesia. The photo violates artists' copyright. Taivo (talk) 10:42, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
![10:42, 11 April 2023 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2023/04/11#c-Taivo-20230411104200-File:"Kanjeng_Ratu_Kidul"_alongside_flower_and_fruits.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:55, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
![19:55, 8 May 2023 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2023/04/11#c-P199-20230508195500-File:"Kanjeng_Ratu_Kidul"_alongside_flower_and_fruits.jpg){kind=link}
No CC license on the source A1Cafel (talk) 10:53, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:55, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Unknown source - uploader has a history of copyvios - so this is unlikely to be own work. I think we need OTRS to keep Gbawden (talk) 11:17, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you for the invite, sometimes I feel I should leave the "unknown" source with their opinions that I have an history of "copyvios" but since @Gbawden seems to be interested and in giving me a benefit of doubt I feel I shouldn't.Those highlighted issues, I could provide the permissions with the emails sent by those who own the work but they were still deleted.
- As with Otonye Iworima who provided this picture,I have the screenshot of the mail template I sent her to send "permissions" unfortunately there is no where to attach it here except through a long process which unfortunately I do not have the bandwidth for, except there is another place I can do that.
- Regards Zend2020 (talk) 23:39, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, screenshot. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:57, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Reprinted without permission from https://eiga.com/movie/88088/photo/ 240B:253:40E0:800:2872:C622:3143:73E0 11:18, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
- Since the images were originally provided by us, we mistakenly registered them for use with those stored in our PC. We will register it again. Hit rien (talk) 07:48, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:58, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Dubious autorship claim: watermark cropped out, a few match on google Gyrostat (talk) 11:25, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; transmission code in EXIF data. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:57, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kokosgamwsas (talk · contribs)
[edit]No reason to assume own work here: small file sizes, missing EXIF data, some obvious copyright violations (File:YusteOmonoia.png, File:Tzionis.jpg). Uploaded images with false statements before.
- File:JordiOmo2.png
- File:ShhuOmonoia3.png
- File:Shehu-Abdullahi.jpg
- File:ShehuOmonoia.png
- File:Asante.png
- File:Scepovic.png
- File:FabianoOmonoia.png
- File:Lecjaks.png
- File:Papoulis.jpg
- File:Bautheac.jpg
- File:Iyayi.png
- File:YusteOmonoia.png
- File:KikoOmonoia.png
- File:Shehuomonoia.png
- File:Psaltis.jpg
- File:Panayi.jpg
- File:Kakoulis.jpg
- File:Panagiotis Zachariou.jpg
- File:Zachariou.jpg
- File:Jordi-Gomez.png
- File:Tzionis.jpg
- File:Loizos.jpg
- File:NikolasPanayiotou.jpg
- File:Lang Ádám, footballer.png
Polarlys (talk) 11:30, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:59, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Reprinted without permission from https://eiga.com/news/20211027/15/ 240B:253:40E0:800:2872:C622:3143:73E0 11:33, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
- Since the images were originally provided by us, we mistakenly registered them for use with those stored in our PC. We will register it again. Hit rien (talk) 07:59, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:59, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Citra Puspita (talk · contribs)
[edit]Credited to chika dan agus and found all over the web. PCP not own work
- File:@ChikaDanAgus Sijjin (aLbum Musik Religi) Chika Dan Agus.jpg
- File:Chika Dan Agus Gambar Rahasia Cinta Kita aLbum Perdana.jpg
- File:Album Musik Rahasia Cinta Kita 2014 - Chika Dan Agus.jpg
- File:Album Rahasia Cinta Kita 2014 - Chika Dan Agus.jpg
- File:Rahasia Cinta Kita by Chika Dan Agus.jpg
- File:Chika Dan Agus.jpg
_Chika_Dan_Agus.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Gbawden (talk) 11:34, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:00, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
A better quality version has been uploaded and the caption improved. Jjp43 (talk) 12:59, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. Appears to meet deletion criteria COM:CSD#G7. Marbletan (talk) 17:06, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:00, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
googlemaps copyvio Enyavar (talk) 13:22, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
- Hi, this is Busu Neneng, please dont delete this picture. I may ask, is it a problem if a newbie wikipedist like me to uploading a screenshot of Google Maps in the future? Im sorry but i really just know this case today, i dont know it before. But if its break rules, then delete the picture. Thank you. sorry for my bad english Busu Neneng (talk) 14:33, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Yes, it's a problem. Google Maps is copyrighted, all rights reserved. Please do not upload anything else that is copyrighted by Google. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:44, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you for the information. Its really help me to become a better wikipedist in the future. Busu Neneng (talk) 10:01, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
- You're welcome, but please note that although Wikimedia Commons and the various Wikipedias are all sister sites, each site has different policies, and some Wikipedias allow certain types of images to be uploaded locally as fair use, whereas fair use is not allowed on Commons. However, I don't think you could use a screenshot from Google Maps on any Wikimedia site. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:47, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:01, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Brief promotional biography of a non-notable individual. Outside of COM:SCOPE. Even if this text were to be needed anywhere on a Wikimedia project, it should be text on that project not a PDF on Commons. Marbletan (talk) 13:46, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:02, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
April 1 is passed, no relation to category it was placed in Enhancing999 (talk) 14:12, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:02, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
This was not one of the photos taken by Rives McDow, but was mistakenly included with his photos by myself. It is a non-free image with copyright held by an unknown person. Jacqke (talk) 14:24, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:03, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by sockpuppets of Weareme234
[edit]- File:Dhatkidih Masjod 2.png
- File:Capital Mall Dhanbad.png
- File:Parklane Resort.png
- File:P&M Mall in night.png
- File:Chennai skyline panorama.png
- File:PandM Jamshedpur.jpg
- File:Jamshedpur modern skyline.png
- File:Electronics manufacturing cluster Jamshedpur, India.png
- File:IT-Scient Jamshedpur.png
- File:TCE Tower.jpg
- File:TCE Tower 2.jpg
- File:Jamshedpur skyline 2.png
- File:Tata Steel Jamshedpur plant.jpg
- File:Skyline along with the lake of Ranchi.jpg
- File:Tata Steel Jamshedpur.jpg
- File:Tata Motors Jamshedpur.jpg
- File:Tisco Plant.jpg
- File:Tisco Gateway.jpg
- File:Tisco Plant 3.jpg
All low-quality images scraped from the internet and uploaded as own work by various sockpuppets of LTA user User:Weareme234. --Maduant (talk) 15:13, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:04, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lesliesaul (talk · contribs)
[edit]Files promoting a company, Leslie Saul, that matches username. Highly promotional file descriptions.
- File:Synagogue renovation architect.jpg
- File:Architect near Cambridge MA.jpg
- File:Renovation architect boston.jpg
Marbletan (talk) 15:17, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
- Keep these useful files, edit file descriptions suitably. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:47, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: no compatible license at source website (and no confirmation that uploader is indeed associated with the website). --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:06, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by HorrorManiaQ (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons:Project scope, Authorship questionable
- File:Aktor grający w filmie.jpg
- File:Fhrhh.png
- File:Dwdsds.png
- File:Marek racis.trojan.niepobierać..png
- File:Dyzius Marzycielus (2022).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Polarlys (talk) 15:25, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom Herby talk thyme 15:50, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:06, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Possible ad, Craqdi uses Wikipedia and Commons and the other branches as troll and advertising CoffeeEngineer (talk) 15:27, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:07, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 15:43, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:07, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Qué es © ? 181.43.7.29 16:22, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination; credit in EXIF data not matching the uploader. Needs COM:VRT. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:08, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Remaining images after deleting copyvios, no EXIF data.
- File:Mercedes-Benz GLC 300 4MATIC.jpg
- File:2023 Land Rover Defender 90 rear.jpg
- File:2023 Land Rover Defender 90.jpg
Yann (talk) 17:15, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Kept: the Mercedes image has a free YT license, and I can't find evidence of copyvio for the other two (high-res, part of series, not found elsewhere online). --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:47, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
Just two contributions to Commons. One has a website link at the bottom. Both feel like things gotten from a website although TinEye turns up no hits.
Abzeronow (talk) 17:56, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
- Looks like it's just a template with some words. The first image is a DW copyvio because it has this image by the way. --Matr1x-101Pinging me doesn't hurt! {user - talk? - useless contributions} 09:47, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:48, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
Likely Flickrwashing - credited to FGCU/photographer who is not the Flickr uploader: https://southphillyreview.com/2022/12/20/patience-and-motivation-brought-vespe-to-florida-gulf-coast/ Adeletron 3030 (talk) 18:34, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:49, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
Likely Flickrwash, uploaded to https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=423339772931476&set=pb.100057663690501.-2207520000. before Flickr upload Adeletron 3030 (talk) 18:36, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:49, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
Likely Flickrwashing, from https://www.imdb.com/name/nm2761502/mediaviewer/rm1577641729/?ref_=nm_ov_ph Adeletron 3030 (talk) 18:37, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:50, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
Screenshot from a television series Another Believer (talk) 19:47, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:52, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
I assume this is a copyrighted image or screenshot from the TV series Another Believer (talk) 19:48, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:53, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
Parece que es de Facebook esta foto. 181.43.7.29 20:02, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:54, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
No parece que la foto sea sacada por quién sube el archivo... 181.43.7.29 20:04, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:54, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
Facebook? 181.43.7.29 20:05, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:54, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
No parece que está foto fue sacada por quien la subió. 181.43.7.29 20:07, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; transmission code in EXIF data. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:54, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
This is obviously an intentional copyvio. On this website one can clearly see that the image had a photographer's watermark. This has been deliberately cut off for upload to Commons. 2003:C0:8F15:4E00:2139:8BC1:726A:45DE 20:19, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
- The uploader has now uploaded another version of the image, this time crediting photographer Alida Krampe, but forgetting to ask her consent into CC licensing. --2003:C0:8F15:4E00:2139:8BC1:726A:45DE 21:05, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:55, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
Certainly not "own work" (selfie). Looks like other behind-the-scenes photos by public TV stations. 2003:C0:8F15:4E00:2139:8BC1:726A:45DE 20:38, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:55, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
Copyvio. The website listed as the source of the image does not say that the image is licensed under a CC license. 129.89.182.254 21:25, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:56, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
better version Samuel Fritz Strom Maragon 1707.jpg Goesseln (talk) 21:48, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
- The extended version of the file was now moved to File:Samuel Fritz Strom Maragnon 1728.jpg, thx.--Jordi (talk) 06:16, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, redundant. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:59, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Graph already on the internet in 2014 according to TinEye CoffeeEngineer (talk) 23:58, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:02, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
This picture is the property of Saab AB (publ) and it includes sensitive IP protected content. Please remove it from your website asap in order to avoid further actions on this topic. 136.163.203.4 06:37, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Question What exactly is copyrighted by Saab? The photo itself, or anything presented on the photo? In the latter case the copyrighted content should rather be blurred than the photo deleted. Ankry (talk) 10:21, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, the photo itself. 136.163.203.4 06:26, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
- If the photo is your copyright, please provide information where it was copied from. We need an evidence that its source site was not under the free license. Ankry (talk) 10:18, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
- Saab AB (publ) is a Swedish company that develops, manufactures and sells sophisticated defence systems to various Governments throughout the world. Our products and systems are sensitive to our Customers and form part of our Customers national defence capability. We own all the IP and sensitive Know How and data included in our systems. We give our Customers limited rights to our IP in order for them to be able to operate the systems for defence purposes. Needless to say, we never give any general publishing rights, and certainly not for publishing on Wikipedia or the like. 136.163.203.4 11:27, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
- If the photo is your copyright, please provide information where it was copied from. We need an evidence that its source site was not under the free license. Ankry (talk) 10:18, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, the photo itself. 136.163.203.4 06:26, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - We do not take down images based on anonymous assertions. An authorized officiaL of Saab should contact VRT. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:23, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Cropped version of a deleted image. Le Petit Chat (talk) 11:03, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:46, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Are we certain that the graphic on the right does not meet Commons:Threshold_of_originality#Netherlands? Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 13:08, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
- As uploader of the image, I'd like to note that the logo is a combination of simple geometric shapes (3 lines and a triangle inside a cube). I've read the Wikimedia Commons guidelines on protected logos and trademarks before I uploaded just to be sure. Tomaatje12 (talk) 13:45, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
- Keep - Looks simple to me --Sreejith K (talk) 23:32, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: I'll wager a guess that this is a simple logo accd. to Dutch law. Ultimately though only a court could really decide that. --Rosenzweig τ 10:04, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
This logo is no longer in use by the company and should be deleted as it is no longer valid. 2A02:A46F:2DD3:1:AC28:2A70:AB69:B2E8 15:08, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Not a reason for deletion; we don't delete historical logos just because they are historical. If necessary rename the file. --Rosenzweig τ 20:37, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:52, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Author died in 1982 and painting is not in public display Paradise Chronicle (talk) 15:21, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:53, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
original author died in 1982, digital image taken by someone else, uploader was pinged Paradise Chronicle (talk) 15:23, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
- The digital image was taken by the grandson of Niklaus Stoecklin, his mother (Niklaus Stoecklin's wife) is the owner of the original picture. They both asked me to make the picture available in Wikimedia Commons. Meersicht (talk) 14:52, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
- I suggest to upload it on wikipedia directly with a non free image rationale, which I am not able to do. I know its a tedious way, but I had a similar issue twice and eventually left the articles without the images I wanted to include. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 03:14, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:53, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No COM:FOP UK for temporary advertising images. Belbury (talk) 17:50, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:54, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
COM:FOP Slovenia: author Drago Tršar died recently so no PD; artwork is main motive and no de minimis can be applied. A09 (talk) 18:57, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:54, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I created this crop some time ago and now realize that this cannot be hosted on Commons as France does not have Freedom of Panorama for architectural works. The original photo is a beach view with the building in the background. This crop shows only the building and so the building is no longer a minimal part of the image. Whpq (talk) 19:03, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:55, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Files in Category:Photography
[edit]No statement of permission on the source. Permission needs to be sent though COM:VRTS.
- File:Omar Harfouch at European Parliament, Bruxelles.jpg
- File:Omar Harfouch at the conference at Italian Parliament “The situation in Lebanon – The future”.jpg
- File:Omar Harfouch Foto.jpg
- File:Omar Harfouch, leader and founder of “The Third Lebanese Republic”.jpg
- File:Omar Harfoush won the "Peace Olive Tree" award in France.jpg
Pi.1415926535 (talk) 21:21, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
- Good evening, when uploading a photo, it was not possible to add a link to the permission to use the photo.
- I add a link to the permission below: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1dJ1Wtv1W-O1jIcDvww25wdfDOvTHLVYV/view?usp=share_link Віктор Головатюк (talk) 20:31, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: THe prohibition of use for humiliation is unacceptable. Images must be free for ANY use. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:57, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
File:Logo del Programa Universitario de Estudios sobre la Diversidad Cultural e Interculturalidad.jpg
[edit]
Wrong File Name Romano1920 (talk) 23:20, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
- If that's the only problem, just request a filename change. What is the correct filename? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:56, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:57, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Photo uploaded in 2018 in one large batch donated from the National Archive with all images released as CC0. Now five years later it turns out, that in the mean time the National Archive both updated the description of the file and the description of the photographer and reassessed the permission.
Hereby in the source documentation at the National Archive the photographer was identified and updated from "Photographer Unknown / Anefo" to "Zeylemaker, Co / ANP". Permission has been upgraded from CC0 to "under copyright".
I think we should follow this documentation update: With Co Zeijlemaker (1907-1964) as photographer the image is under copyright until 2034 in the EU. Mdd (talk) 23:55, 11 April 2023 (UTC) / 08:55, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. In addition to the reason above, the puppets on the photo are copyrighted. Per RKD Zeijlemaker died in 1964, photo can be undeleted in 2035 but puppets must be cropped from the image, maker unknown. Ellywa (talk) 05:19, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:57, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Website credit "AP Photo", not a work from the US Federal Government, thus the PD license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 04:25, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:30, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Slovenia and the photo violates architects' copyright. Taivo (talk) 09:51, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:45, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
Image is too detailed to meet PD-logo. As such, it's a copyrighted logo, which cannot be hosted on Commons. Joseph2302 (talk) 11:11, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, false license claim. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:31, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
Not own work, and image has too much detail to be classed as pd-logo. Joseph2302 (talk) 13:14, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:32, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
- Keep see Commons:Deletion requests/File:ArmsOfDenysOfSiston.jpg. Multichill (talk) 19:59, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:38, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
- Keep see Commons:Deletion requests/File:ArmsOfDenysOfSiston.jpg. Multichill (talk) 19:59, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
- Keep The new image is good, provided that the copyright can be clarified. But there is no need to delete alternative images, that can stay in Category:Denys (of Gloucestershire) arms as interesting comparative material. In fact "bad" images serve to show-up the good images, so are useful to retain to form a balanced judgement. This is artwork, no one version is "correct". Hand-drawn naive artwork like this (drawn by me many years ago!) is OK too. If an svg image is required, I have uploaded one by me at File:Denys (of Siston, Gloucestershire) arms.svg, which is the underlying image of the png version (File:Denys OfGloucestershire Arms.png) contained in Category:Denys (of Gloucestershire) arms.Lobsterthermidor (talk) 13:19, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
_arms.svg){kind=link}
- Note to self: If the new version (File:Arms of Denys of Gloucestershire.svg) is deleted due to no copyright, I will have to replace it in the following articles:
Usage on en.wikipedia.org: Thomas Tenison Alveston Pucklechurch Rule of tincture Archbishop Tenison's School Purleigh Waterton, Bridgend Hugh Denys Gilbert Denys Maurice Denys Maurice Denys (sheriff) William Denys Henry Dennis (sheriff) Denys brass, Olveston Denys family Manor of Dyrham Manor of Siston Denys family of Siston
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:39, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
- Keep see Commons:Deletion requests/File:ArmsOfDenysOfSiston.jpg. Multichill (talk) 19:58, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Strong keep. See File:Denys arms on the Denys funerary brass, Saint Mary the Virgin, Olveston, Gloucestershire, England - 20090920.jpg You can make subjective claims about which version is "better", but we have a long-established policy of not deleting "superseded" images and there is also the factor that many of the historical versions of these arms look much more like the version you denigrate here and not the "improved" version. Andy Dingley (talk) 20:07, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:39, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
This file does not belong to the uploader and is from the images available on the Internet CaesarIran (talk) 16:11, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, reverse image search confirms. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:40, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 91.193.179.3 as Logo. COM:TOO? —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:25, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, TOO Russia is uncertain. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:42, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
Clearly wrong licence + missing trademark template, but it's unclear to me if we can keep it by COM:TO — Metamorforme42 (talk) 19:31, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; false license claim; actual status uncertain. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:45, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
Poor quality, better vector version available: File:Arms of Denys of Gloucestershire.svg Giltsbeach (talk) 13:11, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
- Keep hi User:Giltsbeach, welcome to Common. Please have a look at Commons:Superseded images policy. It's an in scope 10+ year old file that is freely licensed. You very recently replaced it with File:Arms of Denys of Gloucestershire.svg. That file seems to be missing permission because it seems to be source to a different file and the Wappenwiki appears to be http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ . Multichill (talk) 19:57, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
- Keep The new image is good, provided that the copyright can be clarified. But there is no need to delete alternative images, that can stay in Category:Denys (of Gloucestershire) arms as interesting comparative material. In fact "bad" images serve to show-up the good images, so are useful to retain to form a balanced judgement. This is artwork, no one version is "correct". Hand-drawn naive artwork like this (drawn by me many years ago!) is OK too. If an svg image is required, I have uploaded one by me at File:Denys (of Siston, Gloucestershire) arms.svg, which is the underlying image of the png version (File:Denys OfGloucestershire Arms.png) contained in Category:Denys (of Gloucestershire) arms.Lobsterthermidor (talk) 13:10, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per comments. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:31, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:49, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
- Keep see Commons:Deletion requests/File:ArmsOfDenysOfSiston.jpg. Multichill (talk) 19:59, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
- Keep The new image is good, provided that the copyright can be clarified. But there is no need to delete alternative images, that can stay in Category:Denys (of Gloucestershire) arms as interesting comparative material. In fact "bad" images serve to show-up the good images, so are useful to retain to form a balanced judgement. This is artwork, no one version is "correct". Hand-drawn naive artwork like this (drawn by me many years ago!) is OK too. If an svg image is required, I have uploaded one by me at File:Denys (of Siston, Gloucestershire) arms.svg, which is the underlying image of the png version (File:Denys OfGloucestershire Arms.png) contained in Category:Denys (of Gloucestershire) arms.Lobsterthermidor (talk) 13:18, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per above. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:38, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Y-route as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Screenshot from YouTube video (0:06)|source=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FrtIo9pNFr8. Obviously not a Youtube screenshot since it has EXIF. But starting a DR since the Youtube video does predate this upload. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:44, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
- I'm not sure about this one — it seems perfectly plausible that the uploader and the YouTube user are the same person, especially as their ja-wiki POV seems to match up with the on in the YouTube video. But the user says they have permission from the uploader in a ja-wiki noticeboard, which indicates someone else took this picture (and the others on the same model iPhone). Adeletron 3030 (talk) 18:58, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
Keep My concerns about the image origin aside, I'm not seeing a compelling reason to delete this image. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 13:35, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
The uploader's remark at ja.wiki "あの画像は投稿者本人から許可が下りている為、著作権侵害ではありません"[2] means that this image is not his own work. He has to explain who took this photo, and also send the original photographer's permission to VRT. --トトト (talk) 14:22, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader implies this is not their own work. --Yasu (talk) 15:32, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Y-route as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Screenshot from YouTube video (0:08)|source=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nEVsB-NHxv4. Obviously not a Youtube screenshot since it has EXIF. But starting a DR since the Youtube video does predate this upload and due to COM:FOP Japan. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:44, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
- Commented on the other DR for the same user: it seems perfectly plausible that the uploader and the YouTube user are the same person, especially as their ja-wiki POV seems to match up with the on in the YouTube video. But the user says they have permission from the uploader in a ja-wiki noticeboard, which indicates someone else took this picture (and the others on the same model iPhone). I don't think there any FOP issues, since the Japanese restrictions on freedom of panorama only covers "artistic works", and this is a purely informational sign, with text and simple graphics of subway route and train cars. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 18:59, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
- @Adeletron 3030: FoP is not a restriction, but an exemption to copyright policy. If a country does not mention FoP in its laws (e.g. COM:FOP Saudi Arabia), then we don't say that there are "no FoP restrictions"; by default, everything is FoP-restricted if not explicitly stated. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:08, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
- Delete as no-permission copying of copyrighted documents. --Netora (talk) 03:39, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
- Keep I've already stated my thoughts of FOP and the image's provenance, but assuming the uploader is the image creator, I don't think there's anything here that's eligible for copyright. COM:TOO Japan is pretty high, I believe comparable to the U.S. TOO where a graphical element has to be pretty complex to be eligible for copyright — here, we're just looking at simple diagrams. And while I might have been clumsy in my wording, FOP in Japan applies to anything that's non-artistic, i.e. purely utilitarian like an informational sign with simple diagram of a subway route and train cars. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 13:34, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
- Delete no commercial COM:FOP Japan for any copyrightable work that is not an architecture. The author of the sign with illustration is likely not yet dead for more than 70 years. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 19:03, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
- But is it above the threshold of originality? It's just text and simple line drawings, and TOO appears to be higher in Japan. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 19:02, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
- The subway route map is deformed (ref. another version) so the individuality can be admitted. As per Japanese court's opinion, the originality of a work can be admitted if the work embodies some individuality of the author. Even the text in this picture can be copyrightable as the text is long enough and there's no FOP (even non-commercial) for text. I vote Delete here.
- COM:TOO Japan only gives some examples of text logo. Japanese court have a strict criterion on typeface and finely designed short text as per their Supreme court's case law. But for other works like slogan, photo or graphic, the TOO seems to be not that high. Even slogan like "ママの膝より チャイルドシート ボク安心" (Booster seat is safer for me than mom's knee) was ruled to be copyrightable. (ref. 東京地判平成13年5月30判時1752-141) Teetrition (talk) 10:51, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- The subway route map is deformed (ref. another version) so the individuality can be admitted. As per Japanese court's opinion, the originality of a work can be admitted if the work embodies some individuality of the author. Even the text in this picture can be copyrightable as the text is long enough and there's no FOP (even non-commercial) for text. I vote
- But is it above the threshold of originality? It's just text and simple line drawings, and TOO appears to be higher in Japan. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 19:02, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader implies this is not their own work. --Yasu (talk) 15:32, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Doublon avec file:Féval - Le Fils du diable - Tomes 1-2 (page 108 crop).jpg de meilleure qualité Acélan (talk) 11:17, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:52, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
File:Féval - Le Fils du diable - Tomes 1-2 (page 260 crop).jpg and other files in the same category
[edit].jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
Many of the files in Category:Illustrations_for_Le_fils_du_diable,_1880 are unused, because they have been replaced in the corresponding Wikisource pages by dedicated templates or better quality images. See above and :
- File:Féval - Le Fils du diable - Tomes 1-2 (page 260 crop).jpg
- File:Féval - Le Fils du diable - Tomes 1-2 (page 157 crop).jpg
- File:Féval - Le Fils du diable - Tomes 1-2 (page 172 crop).jpg
- File:Féval - Le Fils du diable - Tomes 1-2 (page 337 crop).jpg
- File:Féval - Le Fils du diable - Tomes 1-2 (page 316 crop).jpg
- File:Féval - Le Fils du diable - Tomes 1-2 (page 520 crop).jpg
- File:Féval - Le Fils du diable - Tomes 1-2 (page 567 crop).jpg
- File:Féval - Le Fils du diable - Tomes 1-2 (page 603 crop).jpg
- File:Féval - Le Fils du diable - Tomes 3-4 (page 149 crop).jpg
- File:Féval - Le Fils du diable - Tomes 3-4 (page 251 crop).jpg
- File:Féval - Le Fils du diable - Tomes 1-2 (page 205 crop).jpg
- File:Féval - Le Fils du diable - Tomes 1-2 (page 108 crop).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Acélan (talk • contribs) 14:19, 10. Apr. 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:17, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Full of every possible piece of fascist/hate imagery imaginable (Nazis, Apartheid, Confederate States, KKK, Imperial Japan, Fascist Italy, Francoist Spain, Rhodesia); evidence at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Catfish_Jim_and_the_soapdish#Not_going_to_ask_you is extremely damning and removes all possibility of good faith Dronebogus (talk) 13:34, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
- Delete as per nom. Yann (talk) 16:48, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Oppose for now, Commons don't have any rule against galleries with historically disputable images (such as nazi etc. images here). Also COM:CENSORSHIP states However, Commons is not censored, and legitimately includes content which some users may consider objectionable or offensive. The policy of "Commons is not censored" means that a lawfully-hosted file, which falls within Commons' definitions of scope, will not be deleted solely on the grounds that it may not be "child-friendly" or that it may cause offence to you or others, for moral, personal, religious, social, or other reasons. Forementioned applies to every userspace as no restrictions were placed in the policy. Also no harmful or other hate alike content is in the gallery. As every community is idependent itself, I wouldn't delete this page because of wrongdoings of this user on enwiki. Was gallery used in crosswiki spam etc.? A09 (talk) 14:11, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
- “No harmful or hate alike [sic] content”? The page is peppered with white supremacist imagery and the link above discusses the user’s apparent connections to Stormfront and the KKK! Dronebogus (talk) 18:36, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
- Maybe I would need to clarify: if it weren’t a hate speech or similara acts of violence against WMF editors, otherwise no. If this gallery is deleted we should also delete every other nazi/KKK whatever picture. A09 (talk) 06:27, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
- That is the question: How is favorite meant here? Does it mean the user likes the files for the quality or because the user likes the content? GPSLeo (talk) 10:31, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
- Your question is pretty much pointless as your statement is not a valid reason for deletion. A09 (talk) 10:35, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
- We do not have a specific rule for this because supporting racism, genocides and war crimes is against the general m:Terms of use. GPSLeo (talk) 11:15, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
- Per your logic, all categories of controversial organizations should be deleted, which I would also oppose. I don't see how this gallery supports racism and war crimes. IMO including a Third Reich flag in your gallery only to be marked as racism is a bit of a stretch. Gallery does not contain any image depicting war crimes (ie. Nanking massacre), but just persons themselves.
- Also per m:Terms of Use, please see article 3 paragraph a): "Because we provide a wide array of content that is produced or gathered by fellow users, you may encounter material that you find offensive, erroneous, misleading, mislabeled, or otherwise objectionable", which does not prohibit any such gallery and is similar to COM:CENSORSHIP. A09 (talk) 13:25, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
- I am not against having such files on Commons or in galleries. The problem is the "favorite" in the name. The relevant question is: What does "favorite" mean in this case? Does it mean, "I like the organization" oder does it mean "I like the file to illustrate the topic". GPSLeo (talk) 14:49, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
- Why did we then even open this DR? Wouldn't be a move discussion much better? IMO filename is okay (whatever the reason may be). A09 (talk) 17:31, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
- This is missing the point. Based on what I mentioned above the user probably is actually supportive of these ideologies. Dronebogus (talk) 18:53, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
- His political orientation plays no role in this DR to be honest. I don't see it as a valid reason to delete the gallery unless a strong pattern of him using this page as an attack page appears (but still probably very unlikely as gallery doesn't contain any images of actual war crimes). A09 (talk) 19:21, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
- I am not against having such files on Commons or in galleries. The problem is the "favorite" in the name. The relevant question is: What does "favorite" mean in this case? Does it mean, "I like the organization" oder does it mean "I like the file to illustrate the topic". GPSLeo (talk) 14:49, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
- We do not have a specific rule for this because supporting racism, genocides and war crimes is against the general m:Terms of use. GPSLeo (talk) 11:15, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
- Your question is pretty much pointless as your statement is not a valid reason for deletion. A09 (talk) 10:35, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
- That is the question: How is favorite meant here? Does it mean the user likes the files for the quality or because the user likes the content? GPSLeo (talk) 10:31, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
- Maybe I would need to clarify: if it weren’t a hate speech or similara acts of violence against WMF editors, otherwise no. If this gallery is deleted we should also delete every other nazi/KKK whatever picture. A09 (talk) 06:27, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
- “No harmful or hate alike [sic] content”? The page is peppered with white supremacist imagery and the link above discusses the user’s apparent connections to Stormfront and the KKK! Dronebogus (talk) 18:36, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
Page Deleted. Personal page from 2017, user not active on Commons for 2 years, indef blocked on en:w. Personal page OOS. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:37, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
Esta imagen es de mi aplicación, que ya no esta disponible en la tienda de apps. TecnoCall LLC (talk) 18:08, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: screesnhot from a software, copyright violation. --Kadı Message 17:48, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/Data:Ncei.noaa.gov/weather
[edit]Tables, out of scope for Commons.
- Data:Ncei.noaa.gov/weather/Mauna Kea.tab
- Data:Ncei.noaa.gov/weather/Bay Ridge.tab
- Data:Ncei.noaa.gov/weather/Fdr High School.tab
- Data:Ncei.noaa.gov/weather/Jurong West.tab
- Data:Ncei.noaa.gov/weather/Paya Lebar.tab
- Data:Ncei.noaa.gov/weather/Tirana.tab
- Data:Ncei.noaa.gov/weather/Borough Park.tab
- Data:Ncei.noaa.gov/weather/Montpelier.tab
- Data:Ncei.noaa.gov/weather/Fujisan.tab
- Data:Ncei.noaa.gov/weather/Green-Wood Cemetery.tab
- Data:Ncei.noaa.gov/weather/Nuuk.tab
- Data:Ncei.noaa.gov/weather/Sendai.tab
- Data:Ncei.noaa.gov/weather/Kushiro.tab
- Data:Ncei.noaa.gov/weather/Rzeszów.tab
- Data:Ncei.noaa.gov/weather/Kagoshima.tab
- Data:Ncei.noaa.gov/weather/Temperature Experiment.tab
- Data:Ncei.noaa.gov/weather/London.tab
- Data:Ncei.noaa.gov/weather/Hong Kong.tab
- Data:Ncei.noaa.gov/weather/Sapporo.tab
- Data:Ncei.noaa.gov/weather/Śnieżka.tab
- Data:Ncei.noaa.gov/weather/Miyakejima.tab
- Data:Ncei.noaa.gov/weather/Szczecin.tab
- Data:Ncei.noaa.gov/weather/Annapolis.tab
- Data:Ncei.noaa.gov/weather/Kangding.tab
- Data:Ncei.noaa.gov/weather/Hakodate.tab
- Data:Ncei.noaa.gov/weather/Xiamen.tab
- Data:Ncei.noaa.gov/weather/Kunming.tab
- Data:Ncei.noaa.gov/weather/Huili.tab
- Data:Ncei.noaa.gov/weather/Fuzhou.tab
- Data:Ncei.noaa.gov/weather/Harbin.tab
- Data:Ncei.noaa.gov/weather/Ürümqi.tab
- Data:Ncei.noaa.gov/weather/Dalian.tab
- Data:Ncei.noaa.gov/weather/Shapingba.tab
- Data:Ncei.noaa.gov/weather/Xichang.tab
- Data:Ncei.noaa.gov/weather/Pierre.tab
- Data:Ncei.noaa.gov/weather/Mount Emei.tab
- Data:Ncei.noaa.gov/weather/Qingdao.tab
- Data:Ncei.noaa.gov/weather/Augusta.tab
- Data:Ncei.noaa.gov/weather/Juneau.tab
- Data:Ncei.noaa.gov/weather/Nemuro.tab
- Data:Ncei.noaa.gov/weather/Dover.tab
- Data:Ncei.noaa.gov/weather/Wakkanai.tab
- Data:Ncei.noaa.gov/weather/Saitama City.tab
- Data:Ncei.noaa.gov/weather/Zamość.tab
- Data:Ncei.noaa.gov/weather/Minamitorishima.tab
- Data:Ncei.noaa.gov/weather/Warsaw.tab
- Data:Ncei.noaa.gov/weather/Białystok.tab
- Data:Ncei.noaa.gov/weather/Shanghai.tab
- Data:Ncei.noaa.gov/weather/Zakopane.tab
- Data:Ncei.noaa.gov/weather/Beijing.tab
- Data:Ncei.noaa.gov/weather/Yakushima.tab
- Data:Ncei.noaa.gov/weather/Akureyri.tab
- Data:Ncei.noaa.gov/weather/Reykjavík.tab
- Data:Ncei.noaa.gov/weather/Anchorage, Alaska.tab
- Data:Ncei.noaa.gov/weather/Dallas.tab
- Data:Ncei.noaa.gov/weather/Miami.tab
- Data:Ncei.noaa.gov/weather/Reno.tab
- Data:Ncei.noaa.gov/weather/Honolulu.tab
- Data:Ncei.noaa.gov/weather/Fukushima.tab
- Data:Ncei.noaa.gov/weather/Seattle.tab
- Data:Ncei.noaa.gov/weather/Hachijō-jima.tab
- Data:Ncei.noaa.gov/weather/Phoenix, Arizona.tab
- Data:Ncei.noaa.gov/weather/Tampa, Florida.tab
- Data:Ncei.noaa.gov/weather/Tokyo.tab
- Data:Ncei.noaa.gov/weather/Philadelphia.tab
- Data:Ncei.noaa.gov/weather/Asahikawa.tab
- Data:Ncei.noaa.gov/weather/Houston.tab
- Data:Ncei.noaa.gov/weather/Chicago.tab
- Data:Ncei.noaa.gov/weather/Denver.tab
- Data:Ncei.noaa.gov/weather/Minneapolis.tab
- Data:Ncei.noaa.gov/weather/Atlanta.tab
- Data:Ncei.noaa.gov/weather/Oklahoma City.tab
- Data:Ncei.noaa.gov/weather/Detroit.tab
- Data:Ncei.noaa.gov/weather/Boston.tab
- Data:Ncei.noaa.gov/weather/San Diego.tab
- Data:Ncei.noaa.gov/weather/New York City.tab
- Data:Ncei.noaa.gov/weather/Los Angeles.tab
- Data:Ncei.noaa.gov/weather/St. Louis.tab
- Data:Ncei.noaa.gov/weather/San Francisco.tab
- Data:Ncei.noaa.gov/weather/Ancient NewYork City.tab
- Data:Ncei.noaa.gov/weather/Washington, D.C..tab
- Data:Ncei.noaa.gov/weather/Salt Lake City.tab
- Data:Ncei.noaa.gov/weather/Bismarck, North Dakota.tab
- Data:Ncei.noaa.gov/weather/New York City 1821-1868.tab
Yann (talk) 10:31, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Per the nominator and my comments in the related ANU complaint. --Adamant1 (talk) 04:09, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
- Keep All weather stations from the United States and stations using NOAA data should be maintained and NOAA data are in the public domain.. Fumikas Sagisavas (talk) 06:44, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete However, the data of all non-U.S. weather stations may only be "fair use" in NOAA, because NOAA only reproduces the data of these regional weather bureaus. Fumikas Sagisavas (talk) 07:02, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
- @Yann mw:Help:Tabular Data are useful. the data can be called by templates and modules across all projects.
- mw:Extension:JsonConfig/Tabular "After a long discussion, it seemed Commons would be the best fit for such data and over 70% of the Commons community supported hosting tables on Commons."
- you also voted support https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Village_pump/Proposals&diff=prev&oldid=193976454 . :) RZuo (talk) 08:08, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
- Comment there is now also related discussion in Commons:Village pump#Wrong_deletion. MKFI (talk) 08:15, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Tabular data and map data is perfectly in scope. One of the main scopes is to host content to be used on other Wikimedia projects and this data is meant to be used there. Otherwise we would need a total new Wikimedia project just for tables and map data. --GPSLeo (talk) 12:12, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
- @GPSLeo: The problem isn't so much that it's "tabular data", it's that the data isn't sourced, lacks a description, no way to verify if it's correct, and can be edited by anyone at there whim to say whatever they want it to. Fumikas Sagisavas' says the data comes from individual weather stations and the "files" seem to be sourced to a website that contains information from weather stations, but realistically that's not a source for .tab file and it's ridiculous to expect people to parse out that (extremely obtuse if I'm being honest) website to figure out if the information in the tabular data is correct or not. Compare that to an image of a map where there's a description, source, and other relevant information that helps people to determine what exactly they are looking, the background of the file, where it came from, how accurate it is Etc. Etc. To the point that it's completely ridiculous, bad faithed analogy.
- Also, the last time I checked Wikipedia articles can and do contain tables. I don't think they can load .tab files directly anyway. At least for articles about geographical locations the weather data is usually or always manually entered. So there's no reason this information can't just be added to whatever article in Wikipedia it's going to be used in and they can deal with the sourcing issues, verify that it's correct, fix the information if it isn't, Etc. Etc. That shouldn't be our job though. Just an FYI, I'd probably have a different opinion if .tab files weren't editable and contained the same summary information every other type of media does, but they are and don't have that information, which IMO is a problem and one that warrants the deletion requests. --Adamant1 (talk) 14:36, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
- "Ncei.noaa.gov New York City" is an acceptable source. The long citation (XMACIS2; Northeast RCC CLIMOD 2, part of the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI).Downloaded using GHCN ID "USW00094728" (NY CITY CENTRAL PARK, NY).), that is of course missing on some of the pages, is even sufficient for a scientific article. As an example: The suggested citation for the German DWD is a text like "DWD Climate Data Center (CDC): Historical hourly station observations of 2m air temperature and humidity for Germany, version v006, 2018.". That is not such a huge difference. If you argue against the data because is could be vandalized or manipulated by the author we would have to close the hole project. GPSLeo (talk) 14:56, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
- Sure, but if someone goes to the "source" in Data:Ncei.noaa.gov/weather/New York City.tab it takes them to the main National Centers for Environmental Information website. Not the tab file or even an a page that contains it. That's like having an image that came from the NASA website, and instead of the source being the actual image it's just https://www.nasa.gov/. It might be fine for an un-editable image (even though I don't think it is), but we shouldn't expect people to have to search through a super obtuse website to verify that the information in the table is correct in real time (and correct it if it isn't) just because we can't provide a source to the actual file or at least the page it came from. That's not a "source." Nor is it within Commons' scope. Otherwise, how exactly is that any different then a Wikipedia article and/or someone doing research to write one? --Adamant1 (talk) 15:10, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
- "Ncei.noaa.gov New York City" is an acceptable source. The long citation (XMACIS2; Northeast RCC CLIMOD 2, part of the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI).Downloaded using GHCN ID "USW00094728" (NY CITY CENTRAL PARK, NY).), that is of course missing on some of the pages, is even sufficient for a scientific article. As an example: The suggested citation for the German DWD is a text like "DWD Climate Data Center (CDC): Historical hourly station observations of 2m air temperature and humidity for Germany, version v006, 2018.". That is not such a huge difference. If you argue against the data because is could be vandalized or manipulated by the author we would have to close the hole project. GPSLeo (talk) 14:56, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
- Also, the last time I checked Wikipedia articles can and do contain tables. I don't think they can load .tab files directly anyway. At least for articles about geographical locations the weather data is usually or always manually entered. So there's no reason this information can't just be added to whatever article in Wikipedia it's going to be used in and they can deal with the sourcing issues, verify that it's correct, fix the information if it isn't, Etc. Etc. That shouldn't be our job though. Just an FYI, I'd probably have a different opinion if .tab files weren't editable and contained the same summary information every other type of media does, but they are and don't have that information, which IMO is a problem and one that warrants the deletion requests. --Adamant1 (talk) 14:36, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
- Keep This is exactly what Data namespace is for. Strakhov (talk) 17:56, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
- Keep per https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests&oldid=770086003#Data:Ncei.noaa.gov/weather/Montpelier.tab_and_Data:Ncei.noaa.gov/weather/Juneau.tab. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:51, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
- Comment @Fumikas Sagisavas: For several of the redlinks above, I see that you moved some pages (without redirect) to a completely unrelated city, e.g. Data:Ncei.noaa.gov/weather/Kangding.tab to Data:Ncei.noaa.gov/weather/Sitka.tab. What was your reason for doing so? -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:53, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 14:54, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:State Bank of India.svg. Fry1989 eh? 16:58, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 11:32, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
Nahral/a som to omylom Blanka Luppová (talk) 12:20, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
- Comment "I uploaded by mistake". Image has been on Commons since 2019. What is the problem? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:48, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 12:14, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Knoerz as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: "Copyright für veröffentlichte, vom Betreiber dieses Onlineangebotes selbst erstellte Objekte bleibt allein beim Autor der Seiten. Eine Vervielfältigung oder Verwendung solcher Grafiken, Sounds oder Texte in anderen elektronischen oder gedruckten Publikationen ist ohne ausdrückliche Zustimmung des Betreibers dieses Onlineangebotes nicht gestattet" --> [3]. Desweiteren falsch lizensiert und falschen bzw. keinen Autor angegeben. Der Ersteller der Datei ist nicht der Urheber PD-textlogo. In use. Yann (talk) 17:25, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 12:15, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
Clearly wrong license. COM:DW of some sort of artwork. Not sure what it is but it's apparently from 1960s so not in public domain and not designed by the uploader so would need COM:OTRS permission Wknight94 talk 13:13, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:55, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
Um einen Rechtsstreit mit der Erste Bank Sparkasse zu vermeiden, ersuchen wir um Löschung des Bildes. Der Sparefroh ist ein Maskottchen der Bank. Auch wenn wir als Erben des Grafikers Heinz Traimer gerne mehr bei Wikipedia hätten, so bitten wir dem wunsch nach Löschung nachzukommen. Mit freundlichem Gruß. Matthias Bechtle und Matthias Traimer. Matthaeuswien (talk) 17:03, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 23:26, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
Um einen Rechtsstreit mit der Erste Bank Sparkasse zu vermeiden, ersuchen wir um Löschung des Bildes. Der Sparefroh ist ein Maskottchen der Bank. Auch wenn wir als Erben des Grafikers Heinz Traimer gerne mehr bei Wikipedia hätten, so bitten wir dem wunsch nach Löschung nachzukommen. Mit freundlichem Gruß. Matthias Bechtle und Matthias Traimer. Matthaeuswien (talk) 17:04, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 23:26, 13 September 2023 (UTC)