Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2023/03/04

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive March 4th, 2023
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Nonsense Spirius.universal (talk) 00:18, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Túrelio. --Achim55 (talk) 12:58, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Blurry, Nonsense Spirius.universal (talk) 00:19, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What is blurred in the picture? It's a view of the beams on the ceiling. --Jan Polák (talk) 00:22, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Test or nonsense request by another Android app user who could not resist. --Achim55 (talk) 13:00, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Nonsense Spirius.universal (talk) 00:20, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Test or nonsense by another Android app user who could not resist. --Achim55 (talk) 13:01, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Nonsense, Blurry, A selfie Spirius.universal (talk) 00:21, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Test or nonsense by another Android app user who could not resist. --Achim55 (talk) 13:02, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Blurry Intermerker (talk) 08:30, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyright violation like the other uploads. --Polarlys (talk) 19:30, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Used in antisemitc posts. 50.46.236.10 09:39, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 15:55, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
kept
No reason for deletion. File is renamed too. - ✓ Done - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 15:55, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Delete redirect as its name contains offensive (antisemitic) content. Ђидо (talk) 21:39, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No understand this tongue. If antisemitic Delete, if antiNetanyahu Keep. 186.174.149.107 22:06, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You could have used Google Translate, like I did. "File:Photography of the Jewish TC Rajićev in Biograd with the letter Z - Zion, Zion, Zionists.jpg". Very odd, to say the least. It seems like "Jew, Jew, Jew," and I don't see how that could be a useful redirect to anything. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:21, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Non-machine translation: Photography of Jewish* shopping center Rajićeva in Belgrade, with letter Z - Sion, Zion, zionists
A) "жидовски" is archaic word which is pejorative today. Correct term in Serbian is "јеврејски".
B) Shopping center is not affiliated with Jews, nor Israel, nor anything like that.
Title of the photo was showing antisemitic leanings of the author. File was renamed a while back, but redirect should be gone, too. Ђидо (talk) 21:32, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 11:41, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is a duplicate. See File:VisualEditor citoid Cite button-sl.png and File:VisualEditor citoid Cite button-sl (cropped).png. I didn't know the former existed until it was too late. GeographieMan (talk) 12:13, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: {{Duplicate}}. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:07, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I want to delete this file because of my mistake  A l p h a m a  Talk 04:05, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 21:11, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal EXIF Data in File / persönliche EXIF-Daten in der Datei Nomygon (talk) 19:02, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

should have thought of that beforehand. --Zenwort (talk) 20:17, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion, in use, and no longer qualifies for courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9   20:02, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bitte ursprüngliche Fassung löschen (personenbezogene Daten in EXIF) / please delete original version (personal data in EXIF) Nomygon (talk) 11:10, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: kept the file, deleted the first version as requested. --Rosenzweig τ 21:03, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bitte ursprüngliche Fassung löschen (personenbezogene Daten in EXIF) / please delete original version (personal data in EXIF) Nomygon (talk) 11:14, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: kept the file, deleted the first version as requested. --Rosenzweig τ 21:01, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Datei existiert schon als File:Grenzgraben Duebener Heide (3).jpg Lutzto (talk) 12:50, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 20:59, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Datei existiert schon als File:Grenzgraben Duebener Heide (4).jpg Lutzto (talk) 12:52, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 20:59, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Datei existiert schon als File:Grenzgraben Duebener Heide (5).jpg Lutzto (talk) 12:53, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 20:59, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Нарушение авторских прав MB&MNO (talk) 14:20, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 20:58, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

My mistake. {{User|POS78}}talk 17:29, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 20:56, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

dublicate upload from android app, same as https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Northern_vestibule_of_Pechatniki_9.jpg Svetlov Artem (talk) 20:09, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 20:54, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

dublicate upload, same as https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Northern_vestibule_of_Pechatniki_11.jpg Svetlov Artem (talk) 20:11, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 20:54, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

dublicate upload, same as https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Northern_vestibule_of_Pechatniki_8.jpg Svetlov Artem (talk) 20:13, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 20:54, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

dublicate upload, same as https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Northern_vestibule_of_Pechatniki_7.jpg Svetlov Artem (talk) 20:14, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 20:53, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fuera del escope. Borrar Wikidata tb. 181.203.24.242 11:38, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Polarlys. --Rosenzweig τ 12:46, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a derivation of an older map of mine ( see https://tolkiengateway.net/wiki/File:Steven_White_Jr._-_Valinor.gif ). The copyright issue is unclear. Cush (talk) 23:01, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. The source website mentions "fair use". Ruthven (msg) 11:38, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(different file uploaded on 28 February 2023) The uploader does not hold any rights to this depiction. The original map was created by David Day for his book "A Tolkien Bestiary" (1979) and revised in subsequent publications of his, and it is generally considered a very bad rendition of the geography of Arda. See David Day at TolkienGateway. Cush (talk) 20:53, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, obvious copyvio. --Rosenzweig τ 14:31, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

By:COM:Taiwan, it is still copyrightable as it is from news(https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/local/paper/527084) of newspaper within 15 years. Cmsth11126a02 (talk) 09:18, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, from 2011. --Túrelio (talk) 08:41, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False license. Right in the screenshot it says All Rights Reserved. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:43, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:44, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably too complex for {{PD-textlogo}}. See COM:TOO US. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:47, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:44, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source, fanart out of project scope. ·×ald·es 03:05, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:45, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Permission from "Jason Clarke Photography" needed. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:20, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:45, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in Crimea A1Cafel (talk) 07:05, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:50, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in Crimea A1Cafel (talk) 07:05, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:50, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in Crimea A1Cafel (talk) 07:05, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:50, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 3D works in Crimea. Artist Greiser Pavel Pavlovich is still alive at this point A1Cafel (talk) 07:08, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:50, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurry and unused image, unlikely to be useful A1Cafel (talk) 07:12, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:50, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Ukraine A1Cafel (talk) 07:26, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:50, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Ukraine A1Cafel (talk) 07:26, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:50, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Ukraine A1Cafel (talk) 07:26, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:50, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality COM:PENIS photo, unlikely to be useful A1Cafel (talk) 07:44, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:50, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:FOP Iraq is not OK. --Karim talk to me :)..! 07:54, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:51, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Микола Василечко as Dw no source since (dw no source since)

This is not eligible for speedy deletion as the supposed derivative work is a public space artwork, as per COM:CSD#F3. This must be judged if too recent enough to be considered as a copyrightable artwork as Ukraine does not have freedom of panorama. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:43, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate painters copyright. Created after 2008. Derivatives of work. No Permission from the painter. --Микола Василечко (talk) 08:59, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:51, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Artemesia (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Artworks by living/recent artists (1998 and 2004) without OTRS.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:29, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:17, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Artemesia (talk · contribs)

[edit]

copyright violation; works by living artist; no freedom of panorama.

Martin Sg. (talk) 09:48, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:51, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 10:06, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:52, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 10:07, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:52, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Elenanowak (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope. What's the educational use of these QR codes?

Yann (talk) 10:08, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:52, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I have deleted a dozen of maps uploaded by this user as a copyright violation. For this one I cannot find the source but this is not an own work for sure. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 11:53, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:46, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author is DCCHUNG, not uploader, see EXIF shizhao (talk) 12:12, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:46, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author is Kili PENG, not uploader, see EXIF shizhao (talk) 12:16, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:46, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Iran A1Cafel (talk) 15:31, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


There was no prohibition limits in the area for photography, this is a general photo by mobile phone in a public place around the building containing street and trees. There is no special details in the picture. Safa Daneshvar (talk) 10:24, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Safa.daneshvar: The design of the facade of the building is subject to copyright and We can not upload and keep this file in commons. For more information please read ویکی‌انبار:آزادی پانوراما .--MehdiTalk 14:31, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
What if I put the copy rights and names of designer(s) and project owners (managers) ? Safa Daneshvar (talk) 14:57, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Safa.daneshvar: :This is not enough. The designer or copyright holder must send this permission to the foundation. --MehdiTalk 20:14, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:53, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Well above TOO; more than just text and a few lines/shapes DMacks (talk) 15:47, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:47, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm unsure if Randy Tunggeleng is notable enough for Commons and I cannot find CV. Hokitika Auto Accesories (or Accessories) in a search. The closest thing search turned up was a mechanic in Hokitika, New Zealand called Auto Super Shoppes Hokitika. There's also a slide by Tungeleng in the photograph but that might be de minimis. Abzeronow (talk) 18:31, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:47, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a scan, not own work by the uploader. Proper source and license information needed. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:31, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:47, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 22:51, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:47, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 22:56, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:47, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 23:28, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:47, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Blurry, Nonsense Spirius.universal (talk) 00:17, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Póster sin permiso. Algunos tienen la cabeza Blurry. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 181.203.24.242 (talk) 00:21, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:03, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyviol: no indication about a free release from the linked source ( https://www.giuliaottonello.it/ ) — danyele 01:09, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:03, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

clearly a copyviol, cf. Google Images — danyele 01:10, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:04, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Beacuse it's wrong OWL1999 (talk) 02:13, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion. --Krd 10:04, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Terrible quality, not useful (for anything apart from userpage, however probably not intended as a userpage image). A.Savin 02:13, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use. --Krd 10:05, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


@Krd: But please mind COM:INUSE, from 3rd sentence: "aside from use on talk pages or user pages..." Fact is, the picture is only used on a couple of userpage galleries of self-uploaded images (that means, deleting this one would not affect the gallery as a whole), while the User:Enzo1940 has not been active since 2009 (!). Thanks --A.Savin 14:30, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Terrible quality, no potential usefulness, never been used in articles or project pages, not in use anywhere. A.Savin 14:05, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 22:07, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Unused personal picture ·×ald·es 03:24, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete per nominator because that image has a few serious issues that bled my eyes due to horrifying imagery but derived from copyrighted and non-libre media, including Peppa Pig and more.
The Harvett Vault (user; talk) 13:23, 4 March 2023 (UTC); edited: 13:28, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:05, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors' and architects' copyright. Created after 1991. Derivatives of work. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 06:44, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:05, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Someone who is not a Wikipedian Osama Eid (talk) 07:43, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:50, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of the scope Michel Bakni (talk) 18:18, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:06, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 10:05, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:06, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ayodeji Talub (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope

Didym (talk) 22:46, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:07, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Exceeds COM:TOO IagoQnsi (talk) 22:48, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:07, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Farhanhridoy05 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope

Didym (talk) 22:48, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:07, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

And also

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors' and architects' copyright. Created after 1991. Derivatives of work. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 06:45, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 21:54, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-quality chemical structure; opaque (white) background & colored atom labels. We have File:3-Oxetanol-2D-skeletal.svg as high-quality vector replacement. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 11:18, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:15, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, useless, no encyclopedic value, etc F (talk) 12:35, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:20, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No es necesario. Ni lo son las otras fotos en la misma categoria inventada por el personaje. 181.203.24.242 13:36, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:21, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Selfie of non-contributor Guerillero Parlez Moi 14:16, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:22, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like randomly found on the Internet and uploaded here. Possible copyvio. Nanahuatl (talk) 06:35, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 19:07, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Image first appears on https://www.interviewmagazine.com/music/ice-spice-is-rethinking-rap-stardom , and gives no indictation of a free license. Image is also uncategorized. FromtheEndofElo (talk) 08:26, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 09:19, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small/pixelated. Have File:L-Tyrosin - L-Tyrosine.svg among other high-quality alternatives in Category:L-Tyrosine DMacks (talk) 10:55, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And also:

that is just slightly larger but no higher resolution. DMacks (talk) 10:56, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:24, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This have errors OWL1999 (talk) 02:23, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:31, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, out of scope fantasy map Enyavar (talk) 08:00, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

same uploader same reason: File:Pollen1566.svg --Enyavar (talk) 11:58, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:25, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"image from pixbay.com" in image Mykhal (talk) 10:11, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:24, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

stock image, stock.adobe.com/search?k=angels+in+heaven&asset_id=96313816 Mykhal (talk) 10:19, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:25, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo/selfie. Out of commons scope. Yahya (talk) 11:05, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:24, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work, no PD. Tekstman (talk) 11:16, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:23, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work, no PD. Tekstman (talk) 11:16, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:24, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work, no PD. Tekstman (talk) 11:16, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:24, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted work ( https://artfacts.net/exhibition/yan-pei-ming-mona-lisa%27s-funeral/168561 ) which is a derivate of a public domain work Multichill (talk) 11:45, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:18, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I have deleted a dozen of maps uploaded by this user as a copyright violation. For this one I cannot find the source but this is not an own work for sure. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 11:53, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:18, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Threshold of originality too high for PD-textlogo Adjoka (talk) 12:46, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The file must be saved — Wealszy (talk) 15:22, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Sure, but not on Commons.  Delete per nom. You can look into the fair use policies of different Wikipedias. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:58, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:18, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

crop for the original cover = clearly a copyviol — danyele 16:02, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:20, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

original cover = clearly a copyviol — danyele 16:03, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:20, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

a 1978-dated photo, inelegible under the PD-Italy licence — danyele 16:09, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:19, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

clearly a copyviol = original artwork; also a 1985-dated photo, inelegible under the PD-Italy licence — danyele 16:11, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:19, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

a 1978-dated photo, inelegible under the PD-Italy licence — danyele 16:17, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:19, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ARmyLov (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Cross-wiki spam, see m:Talk:Wikiproject:Antispam#Papa2004, or Wikibusines again.

MER-C 17:20, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:21, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Abdulsomod21 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

spam on wikidata

--Minorax«¦talk¦» 17:29, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:21, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of the scope Michel Bakni (talk) 18:17, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:21, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of the scope Michel Bakni (talk) 18:17, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:22, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of the scope Michel Bakni (talk) 18:18, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:22, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality image 2600:100C:A206:F6CD:DD14:12D2:F6BB:D5CC 22:45, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep - in use on multiple wikis. This photo could be better, but it's the one we have. Omphalographer (talk) 00:55, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:22, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm concerned about the extent to which this photo is text, and whether it's in compliance with Indian law on Freedom of Panorama. DS (talk) 18:37, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, anyway a copyvio from Flickr. --Túrelio (talk) 07:52, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo taken by the Office of the President of Ethiopia, not a work of the Estonian Foreign Ministry, invalid CC license A1Cafel (talk) 06:46, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:00, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo taken by the Office of the President of Ethiopia, not a work of the Estonian Foreign Ministry, invalid CC license A1Cafel (talk) 06:46, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:00, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo taken by the Office of the President of Ethiopia, not a work of the Estonian Foreign Ministry, invalid CC license A1Cafel (talk) 06:46, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:00, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Georgia has a copyright length of 70 years, still under copyright protection A1Cafel (talk) 16:44, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:00, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cross-wiki spam, see m:Talk:Wikiproject:Antispam#Papa2004, or Wikibusines again.

MER-C 17:18, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 19:02, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

UP Secretary is not notable for wikipedia. This was uploaded by her husband and the wikipedia page is nominated for speedy deletion. Nahid Hossain (talk) 02:01, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Speedy keep, at least for now, as it's in use. You mean the Secretary of Uttar Pradesh? Why would that not be a significant enough position for a useful picture on Commons, which I remind you is not Wikipedia? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:28, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    No, she is just a government employee at a local union parishad in Bangladesh. More like a office secretary for a village council. Not notable and been created for promotional activities. Her page was deleted from wikipedia. -- Nahid Hossain (talk) 04:03, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   22:06, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality, watermark, uncategorized since uploaded, not used on any wiki article, unknown location Threecharlie (talk) 06:16, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   22:11, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very Bad Qualität, very LOL Resolution, wie habe 2 better Filets from the Full Version File: Fra Angelico - St Nicholas of Bari.jpg, File: Św. Mikołaj z Bari.jpg Oursana (talk) 11:42, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   22:12, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image is for advertising purposes only, which is considered a violation Osama Eid (talk) 12:18, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per User:Ikan. --P 1 9 9   22:14, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Maximir13 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:NOTUSED. Seems to be an unnotability icon.

Netora (talk) 13:55, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   22:15, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

بی‌کیفیت بودن و وجود جایگزین

POS78 (talk) 17:49, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Deleted a few low quality ones, kept the rest. There aren't that many in that cat. --Gbawden (talk) 11:43, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SuperBowlfan123 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Website images

SuperBowlfan123 (talk) 16:48, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   22:17, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo uploaded as part of Flickr set; not useful. Almost identical photo of location but without the tourist standing in front of the view is at File:Uxmal (Mexico, December 2019) - 83 (50096613561).jpg. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:53, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   22:17, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by User1042 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

User request/ small images are pointless without the ability to show enlarged versions of them in wiki. I think I'm technically supposed to use speedy delete for user request maybe but its not an option for visual file change which I need to use because there are so many.

User1042 (talk) 16:49, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already (by me). —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:38, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://vpctn.gov.vn/tin-tuc-su-kien/chu-tich-nuoc-vo-van-thuong-gap-mat-van-phong-chu-tich-nuoc.html 2603:8000:3F01:BB2B:8C60:60B3:28C2:2077 08:25, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This source-site shows indeed no evidence for the claimed free license. Strangly, it also carry no trace of any copyright-claim. --Túrelio (talk) 10:32, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Túrelio: The anon nominator above is me - I tried to add the image to the copyvio list but it didn't appear to be an option when you're not logged in. There is no free license for Vietnamese government works. DHN (talk) 21:01, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:08, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image need to be deleted. This image seems to be a copyright violation and the uploader has no profile and evenprior record of posting ant pictures. The uploader should provide copyright permission and proof for authentic workl. The person in the image hasnot clicked the image and the uploader is in the image. So how can a person in the image click this picture. - Thanks James 122.171.19.31 01:29, 4 March 2023 (UTC) Important link for the youth and society. Should not be taken off the record. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adilusman009 (talk • contribs) 01:36, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The pic was taken by one of the media/press at the rally, however eventually uploaded now. This pic aligns with Mohammad Usman [Mohammad_Usman_%28Veteran_Congress_Leader]
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Mohammad_Usman_%28Veteran_Congress_Leader%29.jpg 73.243.141.211 20:57, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The pic was taken by one of the media/press at the rally, however eventually uploaded now. This pic aligns with Mohammad Usman [Mohammad_Usman_%28Veteran_Congress_Leader]
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Mohammad_Usman_campaigning_for_Mayor_election_of_Prof._Manzoor_Ahmad.jpg
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Mohammad_Usman_and_Mayor_candidate_from_Lucknow_Prof._Manzoor_Ahmad.jpg
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/07/Senior_Congress_leaders%2C_Salman_Khurshid%2C_Mohammad_Usman_and_Sanjay_Singh.jpg Adilusman009 (talk) 21:02, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The pic was taken by one of the media/press at the rally, however eventually uploaded now. Adilusman009 (talk) 21:02, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: needs permission via COM:VRT from the photographer. --P 1 9 9   22:01, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work. Even if the youtube clip is licensed CC BY, it depicts this unsourced photograph of unclear provenance and rights. The depicted person died in 1996. Achim55 (talk) 17:37, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:04, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work. Even if the youtube clip is licensed CC BY, it depicts this unsourced photograph of unclear provenance and rights. The depicted person died in 2006. Achim55 (talk) 17:38, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:04, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Yoyoyo114514 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Collage containing copyrighted material

あんつつ (talk) 06:32, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 InfoFile:室内 2018年5月 - .jpgにはCoat Corporation Ltd.それ以外にはCOVER Corp.の著作物が含まれています — Preceding unsigned comment added by あんつつ (talk • contribs) 07:50, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Assuming you're talking about the album covers? If so,  Keep all as COM:DM. If not, are you claiming these are not own work? —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:43, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Forgot ping: @あんつつ. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:43, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I have determined that the user's purpose was to promote it as an album cover, and the clock display, which contradicts the Exif, proves it:
4:45 is the online streamer's weight(Minato Aqua 44.5), and 0:35 is the fandom name in Japanese pun(Sakura Miko 35P), and 8:10 is a Japanese porn actor's nickname pun(Yajuu Senpai 810)
Sorry if it is difficult to understand because I am using a machine translation.--あんつつ (talk) 12:48, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: COM:DM. 画像中におけるアルバムジャケットが占める割合はきわめて限定的で、許容できる範囲内と考えられます. --Yasu (talk) 15:16, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Wcquidditch as no permission (No permission since). COM:TOO? King of ♥ 03:18, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, cf. American Airlines logo. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:55, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:15, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Wcquidditch as no permission (No permission since). COM:TOO? King of ♥ 03:18, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, cf. American Airlines logo. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:55, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:15, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No free licence found (http://www.avona.org/) Adjoka (talk) 12:21, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - No evidence of a free license. No proper source provided and as noted above, the web site of the credited organisation is copyrighted with no free license. -- Whpq (talk) 00:39, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:17, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files left over from the Altman sockpuppetry case surrounding Christopher Altman a few years back. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christopher_Altman and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard/Archive_127#Altman_sockfarm and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Altman/Archive . All uploaded by User Altman and their socks, all unused except to illustrate Wikidata item Q47485839 about non-notable person. A final cleanup and deletion of the corresponding category would be nice. Thank you.

Ariadacapo (talk) 14:27, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep — I thought there was something fishy about you linking the SPI, but not the very article in question, Wikidata item Q47485839. From the referenced Talk Page: you have a documented history of defacing and vandalizing this subject, including the deletion of multiple perfectly valid peer-reviewed references, followed by nominating the deletion of the article itself. Note in particular this series of diffs from Bobof2000 alerting to the activity. Very shady. -- 103.14.26.130 05:28, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:18, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Es necesario? 191.126.28.30 17:14, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:18, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

While this is listed on Vimeo as CCBY, It is an advert made by/for T-Mobile. The uploader Chameleon describes itself as "multi discipline, full service post facility, specializing in short films for ads, promos and branded content [and in] in editorial, color and finishing."[1] While technically possible, I don't think a post-processing/colour grading company would normally get the full-copyright over the final ad (and therefore be able to release it a free-licence). Cakelot1 (talk) 17:22, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment For the record, I reviewed the license at the source which is free (and not really COM:LL), but the concern above is valid, although I don't know if it is sufficient to delete this file. I won't oppose deletion. Yann (talk) 19:37, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:18, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality, of no use Jan Myšák (talk) 18:35, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

OK. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:15, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:18, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's like this photo has been taken while being shown on another device. I think the source and licensing is not clear. So this file will be deleted. Uncitoyen (talk) 13:50, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination and per COM:PRP. Looks like a photograph of a photograph. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 22:07, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. As author is pointed Vanco Dzambaski while the uploader is User:Gurther. Jingiby (talk) 17:04, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination, no COM:EVIDENCE of permission. The flickr source is CC BY-NC-SA, but we can't host under that license. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 22:10, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Better image available and copyright uncertain Zzuuzesz (talk) 14:11, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Yann. --Rosenzweig τ 19:50, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably too complex for {{PD-textlogo}}. See COM:TOO US. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:44, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Many examples of more complex files list at Category:SVG logos of companies of the United States. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:47, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep, about as creative as the Nikken example at COM:TOO US. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:52, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:42, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I've uploaded a higher resolution version at File:Satchel Paige 1970.tif. I couldn't upload it as a new version of the existing file because I was getting some kind of error message relating to the file extension. Denniscabrams (talk) 04:52, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No issues with the deletion. Oaktree b (talk) 05:10, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:43, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gurgaon Anmuyto (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:FOP HK tagged for speedy by Solomon203, converting to DR per COM:CSD#F3. Adding some others that I found.

King of ♥ 17:49, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:45, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this relatively-modern-style artwork was photographed in an auction house in hong kong by someone who photographed tons of artworks and then uploaded them all as "own work", paying no attention to copyright issues. Many are properly PD due to copyrights having expired, many others are not. I can't identify this one, but I feel the precautionary principle means we should take it down. DS (talk) 17:59, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:45, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted Materials Michel Bakni (talk) 18:18, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:46, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted materials Michel Bakni (talk) 18:20, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:46, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio; depict. works by living artist Martin Sg. (talk) 09:43, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep This collection of (a few random and 'unreadable' pixels of) "depicted artworks" can never be used to make any interesting copy of his works of art. Peli (talk) 21:41, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: de minimis applies here. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:54, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The web archive capture of the site shows that it has copyrighted contents with statement Goralı 1945 © 2020.[2] The original file has been deleted for this reason. So this file will be deleted. Uncitoyen (talk) 11:17, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:55, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong date, wrong author Xocolatl (talk) 15:37, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: license and information corrected by RAN. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:55, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inappropriate, spam 75.164.63.233 06:04, 4 March 2023 (UTC)][reply]


COM:PENE — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 181.203.24.242 (talk) 10:06, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Captain-tucker (talk) 11:30, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

上传作者请求删除 颐园居 (talk) 06:08, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 11:32, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The artist died in 1953. Her works are not in the public domain yet in France. OTRS permission of the legal successors is necessary.

BrightRaven (talk) 08:58, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

OTRS received, we need time to check it. kvardek du (la plej bela nombro) 21:49, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Kvardek du: Please move the ticket to a permissions queue. Storkk (talk) 09:10, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: for now, leaving it to the OTRS process. --Jcb (talk) 15:42, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nori Malo-Renault died in 1953. No OTRS.

Chassipress (talk) 15:59, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,
Please try to contact the uploader: these are obviously coming from his family's ressources.
He's probably not able to prepare an OTRS, and it would be more constructive to help him with that.
Regards, --Daehan (talk) 20:38, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Bonjour Monsieur Chassipress,
Pouvez-vous donner, s'il vous plait, la traduction en français de tout le texte concernant la suppression des fichiers listés ci-dessus.
Remarque : cette suppression aurait pour conséquence irrémédiable la "fermeture" de la page Wikipédia Nori Malo-Renault (1871-1953).
De plus il existe déjà un avertissement par un bandeau que: l'on ne doit pas (ou ne peut pas ?) copier ces fichiers à partir de ce "Commons", est-ce insuffisant?
Cordialement.--François Malo-Renault (talk) 04:50, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Bonjour. Pour publier ces œuvres sur Commons et sur Wikipédia en français, il faut que les ayant-droit de Nori Malo-Renault donnent leur autorisation pour une publication sous une licence compatible. Cette autorisation doit nous parvenir via cette procédure : COM:OTRS/fr. Si vous n'avez pas l'autorisation des ayant droit, il n'est pas possible de publier ces images ici. Cordialement, BrightRaven (talk) 11:23, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 19:45, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Prints by Nori Malo-Renault (died in 1953). No OTRS.

Chassipress (talk) 21:09, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: the reproduction of a 2D work does not entitle to a new copyright. Ruthven (msg) 12:56, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I re-nominate these 3 files, because the previous decision is wrong imho. These are not photographs or scans of artworks (which, in some cases, do not create new copyright), but engravings and etchings, which are derivative works (see Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter#Engravings) and generate new copyright. So these artworks will enter the PD in France in 2024.

BrightRaven (talk) 08:24, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: BrightRaven is correct. The notion that "reproduction of a 2D work does not entitle to a new copyright" misses two related points: 1) it is the slavish reproduction of a two-dimensional work that does not create a new copyright and 2) the court decision that serves as the basis of this notion, Bridgeman Art Library v. Corel Corp., found no copyright in the photographic reproduction of a two-dimensional public-domain work of art, for lack of originality. Indeed, engravings are not photographic reproductions and are not generally slavish. As Nori Malo-Renault died in 1953, this would not be PD in France until 01.01.2024 (1953 + 70 + 1) and would not be PD in the US until 95 years after publication date (which has not been provided). --Эlcobbola talk 17:27, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nori Malo-Renault died in 1953. No OTRS.

Chassipress (talk) 20:25, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: As Nori Malo-Renault died in 1953, these would not be PD in France until 01.01.2024 (1953 + 70 + 1) and would not be PD in the US until 95 years after publication date (which has not been provided). --Эlcobbola talk 17:28, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Public domain only in 2024, as the author died in 1953.

Yann (talk) 10:41, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

*File:Le Chateau des Merveilles 1893, décor-couv lamé par Nori MR.jpg also/aussi. Abzeronow (talk) 17:13, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Bonjour,@Yann@Abzeronow,
statut des droits d'auteur du créateur
droits d'auteurs ne pouvant plus être enfreints
ressort territorial
pays avec 70 ans PMA ou plus court François Malo-Renault (talk) 07:05, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
En France, tous les droits d'auteur des auteurs décédés en 1953 expirent le 1er janvier 2024. Abzeronow (talk) 16:50, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Bonsoir @Yann, j'aimerai avoir l'article de loi qui s'applique précisément. François Malo-Renault (talk) 17:40, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Voyez Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/France/fr et {{PD-France}} qui a des liens vers les textes de lois. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 19:48, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
L123-1 C.p.i.. -- Asclepias (talk) 16:18, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
== Article L123-1 ==
@Abzeronow@Asclepias@Yann
====== Version en vigueur depuis le 01 juillet 1995 ======
Modifié par Loi n°97-283 du 27 mars 1997 - art. 5 () JORF 28 mars 1997 en vigueur le 1er juillet 1995
L'auteur jouit, sa vie durant, du droit exclusif d'exploiter son oeuvre sous quelque forme que ce soit et d'en tirer un profit pécuniaire.
Au décès de l'auteur, ce droit persiste au bénéfice de ses ayants droit pendant l'année civile en cours et les soixante-dix années qui suivent.] François Malo-Renault (talk) 18:35, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oui, ce qui est important ici est pendant l'année civile en cours, c'est-à-dire jusqu'au 31 décembre. Yann (talk) 17:07, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

BONJOUR; dans le droit français l'oeuvre de Nori Malo-Renault est das le domaine public depuis.le 29 janvier 2023. Voir le Code de la propriété intellectuelle : Chapitre III : Durée de la protection https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/codes/article_lc/LEGIARTI000006278937--François Malo-Renault (talk) 06:17, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Non. Voir Article 21 : Au décès de l'auteur, ce droit persiste au bénéfice de ses ayants droit pendant l'année civile en cours et les cinquante années qui suivent. Les 50 ans ont été allongés à 70 ans en 1992, mais le reste est inchangé. Yann (talk) 17:04, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Bonjour @Yann,
Donc je ne numérise plus d’œuvre de Nori Malo-Renault pour les télécharger à partir de maintenant sur https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Nori_Malo-Renault?uselang=fret pour au moins 10 mois, également les 2 pages https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nori_Malo-Renault et https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nori_Malo-Renault vont se dégrader et je sais pas si je pourrait les restaurer un jour.... François Malo-Renault (talk) 05:04, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Donc encore 300 jours environ.... François Malo-Renault (talk) 08:39, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Pour info j'ai noté deux fichiers en cc-zero qui sont d’ailleurs dans des collections muséalesː Musée de Bretagne et Musée des Beaux arts de Quimper..
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Salom%C3%A9_eau-forte_de_Nori_Malo_Renault_sign%C3%A9.jpg
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Marie-Annick_e-f_originale_Nori_MR,_version_coul.jpg
Cordialement François Malo-Renault (talk) 13:29, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Bonjour, Par sa nature même, une déclaration CC0 de renonciation volontaire à ses droits d'auteur ne peut être émise que par le titulaire de ces droits d'auteur. Donc, à moins d'une preuve vérifiable que le titulaire des droits d'auteur sur ces oeuvres de Nori Malo-Renault a émis une déclaration CC0 de renonciation volontaire à ses droits d'auteur sur ces oeuvres, personne ne peut appliquer une étiquette CC0 à ces oeuvres. Si un photographe fait une reproduction photographique d'une oeuvre dont il n'est pas le titulaire des droits d'auteur, ce photographe ne peut émettre une déclaration CC0 de renoncement seulement qu'à l'égard de son propre travail de photographe, déclaration qui pourrait s'appliquer dans des juridictions où de telles reproductions photographiques pourraient générer des droits d'auteur distincts de ceux de l'oeuvre photographiée. Mais une déclaration CC0 par ce photographe ne peut pas s'appliquer à l'oeuvre photographiée. Pour qu'une reproduction photographique d'une oeuvre d'art puisse être hébergée sur Wikimedia Commons, il faut que l'oeuvre d'art photographiée soit libre (ou au moins que le titulaire des droits d'auteur sur l'oeuvre photographiée autorise explicitement que cette reproduction photographique particulière soit libre). On peut distinguer trois types de situations. A- Si l'oeuvre d'art photographiée est libre et que le photographe-téléverseur sur Comons ne prétend pas avoir de droits d'auteur sur le travail de reproduction photographique, alors l'image peut être hébergée sur Commons. B- Si l'oeuvre d'art photographiée est libre et que la reproduction photographique provient d'une source sans lien avec Wikimedia, alors l'image peut être hébergée sur Commons avec l'addition d'un bandeau d'avertissement dans les cas où il existe une possibilité que le travail de reproduction photographique ne soit pas libre dans certains pays. C- Si l'oeuvre photographiée n'est pas déjà elle-même libre, alors l'image de la reproduction photographique ne peut de toutes façons pas être hébergée sur Commons, quel que puisse être le statut du travail du photographe. -- Asclepias (talk) 16:50, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Bonjour,Asclepias@Yann
Merci pour vos explications précises et détaillées, j’ hésite à utiliser une déclaration CC0 qui m’obligerait à prouver que je suis ayant droit. Les admin de Wikipédia n’ont pas remarqué la documentation et les fichiers que j'ai fourni pour Émile et Nori.(Cf user Daehan) Le plus simple c’est d’attendre, mois de 300 jours.
Une question toutefois qu'elle est la différence pour le droit moral sur les œuvres (estampe, pastel ...) entrées dans le domaine public par (70 ans+1) ou CC-0 ? Et que permet le droit moral?
Merci.
user François Malo-Renault (talk) 06:09, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Les droits moraux sont décrits dans les lois des différents pays. Ainsi, leur nature et leur durée peut différer selon les pays. Par exemple, au Canada, ils sont décrits à l'article 14.1 de la Loi sur le droit d'auteur et ils ont la même durée que les droits patrimoniaux. En France, ils sont décrits aux articles L121-1 à L121-9 du C.p.i., certains de ces droits y subsistent après l'expiration des droits patrimoniaux et certains y sont inaliénables (art. L121-1). Par une déclaration CC0, le déclarant renonce à ses droits d'auteur, patrimoniaux et moraux, dans toute la mesure où cela ne contrevient pas aux lois applicables. -- Asclepias (talk) 15:12, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Merci beaucoup@Asclepias;
Votre réponse est précise et bien documentées, les articles L121-1 à L121-9 sont clairs et donc mon choix est simple pas domaine public (avec CC-0), il suffit de donner du temps au temps (PD-France).
PS je vais vérifier si je n'ai pas mis par ignorance quelques œuvre Émile Malo-Renault en CC0.
Cordialement François Malo-Renault (talk) 16:46, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Merci @Asclepias; copie @Yann,
Votre réponse sur les Droit Moraux en France est claire, articles L121-1 à L121-9, c'est ça l’important donc le choix est simple pas domaine public par CC-zéro, mais attendre le 31 décembre 2023 pour PD-France. Cordialement. François Malo-Renault (talk) 15:13, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: several, per nomination and Asclepias (one had already deleted by Krd as missing permission, probably because of an aborted VRT attempt). The nomination of 4 files had already been withdrawn. The files can be restored in 2024; apparently none of them has an URAA problem as the works are pre-1929. --Rosenzweig τ 08:55, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Undeleted except for duplicate files and images stored as PDFs. holly {chat} 05:41, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copy of https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fichier:Logo_elysee.fr.svg Riad Salih (talk) 17:10, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep They're nothing alike. Fry1989 eh? 17:27, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Fry1989. --Gestumblindi (talk) 13:58, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong date, wrong author Xocolatl (talk) 15:38, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per RAN. --Gbawden (talk) 14:20, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Permission from "Jason Clarke Photography" needed. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:20, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. UCD Library has full rights over the photograph in question, given by Jason Clarke Photography, as part of the contract during the photo session. Ucdlibrary (talk) 13:23, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Ucdlibrary Could you please send permission to COM:VRT? See also COM:RELGEN. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:26, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: No permission received. --Herby talk thyme 11:50, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Studio photo 191.126.28.30 17:38, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 11:51, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio (photo by Jason Quang Vo) M2k~dewiki (talk) 21:51, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Zweifelsfrei Fehllizenzierung als "Eigenes Werk" - laut Metadaten aber Fotograf Jason Quang Vo Lutheraner (talk) 21:51, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Jetzt könnt ihr euch aussuchen, ob ihr's lieber charmant auf Englisch ("great minds think alike") oder uncharmant auf Deutsch ("zwei Doofe, ein Gedanke") haben wollt. :-) In jedem Fall dürfte die Sache eindeutig sein, und man kann euch nur zustimmen. --2003:C0:8F3C:4000:7D0A:E6F6:46C0:ADEF 22:05, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; Exif data mentions a photographer "Jason Quang Vo" and a copyright holder "ON VOCUS", relation of both to uploader is unclear, also possibly out of scope unused picture. --Gestumblindi (talk) 15:22, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo taken by Andres Putting of Delfi, not a work from the Estonian Foreign Ministry, thus the CC license is invalid

A1Cafel (talk) 06:51, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:29, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D artworks in the United States.

A1Cafel (talk) 10:11, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep Loss of access to such a cultural resource is unfortunate, these are free images. I'd also argue that these are photos of building facades, and buildings are covered in the Freedom of Panorama. ɱ (talk) 11:52, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Is that an opinion or is it codified somewhere? And if they are used in articles, I fully expect that these that insist on removing them from Commons at least have the courtesy to transfer or reupload on enwiki under a fair use license. ɱ (talk) 21:55, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Read COM:FOP United States, specifically the "Artworks and sculptures" section. It's U.S. law. You can say that A1Cafel should move all these images (though presumably smaller copies thereof, per en.wiki rules) to en.wiki, but they won't, so you should do so or enlist other Wikipedians to do so. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:48, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It is essential that this becomes a standard for the nominator to handle, and I insist that A1Cafel do that. I am not going to clean up the mess that you create following a decision I wholeheartedly disagree with, nor will I even have access to the files or accompanying data to do this once the discussion closes. ɱ (talk) 16:35, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
That's not a valid comment or assumption. These are derivative works with not enough original authorship. ɱ (talk) 16:35, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
My remark about how these things have gone in the past is not valid? OK, enjoy arguing with yourself, as I neither make US laws, adjudicate cases or make decisions on what is deleted. We'll see what happens. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:57, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, so any closer must retain the murals for American Gothic, Cliff Dwellers, Café Terrace at Night, and Mona Lisa. ɱ (talk) 22:19, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:29, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

original artwork for 1995 "Io sono qui" album's photoshoot = clearly a copyviol — danyele 16:06, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:30, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyviol = photo from Totò Martello (mayor of Lampedusa) official Facebook page, cf. ilfattoquotidiano.it — danyele 16:07, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:30, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect flag File:Flag of Ladakh, India.svg Shebejeyebeb (talk) 09:16, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I might make another version of this one but better and not copying the file . Flag Creator (talk) 15:27, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, uploader, Flag Creator, agreed to delete the file. Not in use on the projects, no educational value. --Ellywa (talk) 20:30, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

German cruiser in French service off China. Yet this image was created by the US military according to the source? Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:28, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep The correct license is "PD-EU-no author disclosure", I changed it. --RAN (talk) 05:10, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete - source credits "Courtesy of Frederick Cornman, Valois, New York, 1971", so no-author disclosure doesn't apply. And even if no individual was listed, us not knowing who took the photo in 2023 is not the same thing as the photo having been published without credit in the 1920s. Parsecboy (talk) 10:09, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep The subject is not the photographer. Why are the French and German connections of the subject assumed to be related to the person on the other side of the camera? Andy Dingley (talk) 00:07, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: We don't know when and where this was first published nor who the photographer was. COM:PCP delete. Undelete in 2044, which would be 120 years from 1923 which would be the approximate end point for "early 1920s". --Abzeronow (talk) 18:53, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Wcquidditch as no permission (No permission since). COM:TOO? King of ♥ 03:23, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Seems to be below the US ToO. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:55, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

the center of the drawing correctly seems to be his own work, but the outline where it is inserted is taken from the banner File:Mineo-Gonfalone.png which is not free ZioNicco (talk) 09:42, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:58, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tellinski (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Certainly not own work as stated. Some of the files might be PD, but are missing author and/or date.

Didym (talk) 23:09, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep All are PD-EU anonymous except File:Werner von Kieckebusch.jpg in which the German Federal Archive has acquired and released the images by Baur under a cc license. --RAN (talk) 00:39, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete File:Faz.de.jpg contemporary with no exif date. and File:Hans Josef Graf von Matuschka Konsul a. D..jpg (1963) --RAN (talk) 01:01, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept and deleted as suggested by RAN. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 22:39, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong date, probably wrong author Xocolatl (talk) 15:38, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per [COM:PCP]], no information on when and where this photograph was first published. --Abzeronow (talk) 16:03, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be copied from Facebook, and I don't see any license mentioned there. If the uploader is the same person, we would need some verification via the COM:VRT process, sent from the Facebook account (or a license added there). Carl Lindberg (talk) 16:10, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 16:04, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

original artwork from the 1977 "Solo" album's photoshoot = clearly a copyviol — danyele 16:19, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Clearly artistic photograph, not public domain in Italy or the U.S. --Abzeronow (talk) 16:05, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

clearly a copyviol = original artwork from the 1981 "Strada facendo" album, cf. [5] — danyele 16:21, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Artistic photograph, not PD in Italy or US. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:38, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

a 1985-dated photo, inelegible under the PD-Italy licence — danyele 16:22, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:39, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

a 1979-dated photo, inelegible under the PD-Italy licence — danyele 16:23, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. URAA restored copyright on it. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:40, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

clearly a copyviol = original cover of the 1985 "Claudio" LP — danyele 16:24, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:40, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

probably a copyviol = photo with watermark — danyele 16:26, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Low resolution, looks grabbed from somewhere. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:41, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Trabajo propio? 191.126.28.30 17:15, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Looks like a crop of a cellphone photograph, no hits on TinEye. --Abzeronow (talk) 16:04, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Trabajo propio? 191.126.28.30 17:24, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This photo has been sent directly to me from Alfonso Farina himself Rfulcoli (talk) 08:34, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, uploader admits it is not an own work. --Abzeronow (talk) 16:04, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Trabajo propio? 191.126.28.30 17:26, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Very low resolution and no EXIF, duck for netcopyvio. --Abzeronow (talk) 16:06, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Separar las imágenes por favor 191.126.28.30 17:40, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

La persona que subió la segunda versión cometió violación de derechos de autor en otros.191.126.28.30 22:41, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Link the image they violated the copyright of. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:50, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • OK, I understand now. The point being made is that the first version and this one should be under different filenames. That will be very inconvenient, as it will break a lot of links, but it's probably the right thing to do. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:53, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Abzeronow (talk) 16:07, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

porque atenta contra mi privacidad personal Gerardo-Soria.P-22020095 (talk) 19:26, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, but you have uploaded this file by yourself, 3 months ago. Anyway, what are the sources/authors of all the images used in this montage? --Túrelio (talk) 08:37, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per COM:PCP. Sources not given for images in montage. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:05, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright? This is the only contribution of the user mentioning "own work". The meta data mentions "Auteursrechtenhouder Sabine Bernert". Is Sabine Bernert = Van den Sande? Wouter (talk) 20:57, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Metadata indicates Sabine Bernert is the photographer, who is not the uploader. VRT permission from Bernert would be needed. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:09, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No es una bandera correcta o apropiada para el municipio, incluso el logo es anticuado 181.229.238.231 21:15, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ik begrijp niet wat je zegt. Alexphangia Talk 21:33, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, he's saying that "is not a correct or appropriate flag for the municipality, even the logo is outdated". To me, that is not a reason for the deletion of this file.  Keep Instead, we should keep it and then change the name of the file, because Tigre never had an official flag, and this was the logo of a particular administration of Tigre. —Frodar (talk) 13:24, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It was an old logo, let me fix it for you. 2marco4 (talk) 01:05, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Being "old" is not a valid reason to be deleted. Moreover, the emblem does not surpass the TOO Fma12 (talk) 09:11, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: In Use, and no copyright issues. We don't delete logos because they're outdated, we treat them as historical. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:10, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nahral/a som to omylom Blanka Luppová (talk) 12:10, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 16:56, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possibly too complex for {{PD-textlogo}}. See COM:TOO Switzerland. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:50, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Borderline keep IMO. I would be interested to hear other people's thoughts on this. Auguel (talk) 23:21, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Weak delete as unfree in US due to the brushstroke. Unclear on COM:TOO Switzerland. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:54, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and remark of Mdaniels5757, per COM:PRP. --Ellywa (talk) 21:29, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Anachronist as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Clearly not "own work" as claimed|source=https://vignette.wikia.nocookie.net/logopedia/images/9/90/Zee_World_Extraordinary._Everyday..jpg. COM:TOO? King of ♥ 03:00, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as this is clearly a copy of an image found online. A {{PD-logo}} argument could be made for it, however, if the source of the work was corrected. ~Anachronist (talk) 03:04, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    @Anachronist: While a source is nice to have (and should be fixed as a normal editing concern), "ineligible for copyright" is an argument which does not depend at all on the provenance of the image; the only two things that matter are 1) which country the logo is from; and 2) whether the logo is below that country's threshold of originality. Therefore, unlike the vast majority of images, a source is not strictly required to retain a simple image. -- King of ♥ 03:28, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    @King of Hearts: If it matters, the country of origin for that logo is South Africa. I would argue that the logo could be kept on the basis that it is composed of a circle with some text in a simple font, although a case could probably be made for the artistic juxtapositions of the circle and the text. ~Anachronist (talk) 03:38, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Overall poor quality image in a format we discourage uploads for, and a bad image name. As the entity is incorporated in India, their copyright law should be used for reference rather than SA's. Nate (chatter) 02:32, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and per holly, below TOO of India. --Ellywa (talk) 21:32, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Arnie97 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Photo of copyrighted material. COM:TOO / PD-PRC-exempt? King of ♥ 07:09, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete According to Google Translate, it's a timetable for a train or bus line, so it could be {{PD-ineligible}}, but without knowing the location or when this was applicable, I don't see how this within scope. holly {chat} 16:55, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination.Image with text only. Per COM:SCOPE, excluded educational content are files that contain nothing educational other than raw text. Purely textual material such as plain-text versions of recipes, lists of instructions, poetry, fiction, quotations, dictionary definitions, lesson plans or classroom material, and the like are better hosted elsewhere, for example at Wikibooks, Wikiquote, Wiktionary, Wikiversity or Wikisource. The file has therefore be deleted from Commons. Can be undeleted temporarily if somebody wants to convert it to one of the other projects. In addition, the visible watermark might be copyrighted. --Ellywa (talk) 21:39, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jeremy.toma (talk · contribs)

[edit]

© copyright 2019 Commune de Pregny-Chambésy

Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:47, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:07, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jeremy.toma (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These images are either:

  • photos/scans which are correctly sourced, but re-licensed under CC-by-sa. Some evidence of permission is needed for that licensing. Example: File:Peugeot 404 catalogue 5.jpg
  • 20th-Century photos where the author is marked as unknown, yet the copyright is marked as PD-old (70 years after the death of the author). Those documents are not old enough to reasonably assume that PD-old applies (e.g. a 1945 photo by a 20 year-old photographer who died at 80 would enter public domain in 2075). Example: File:Vue aérienne Chambésy autrefois.jpg
If the author is anonymous in the EU, copyright law doesn't speculate, the clock starts when the image was "made public" and goes for 70 years. Images pre-1953 are PD-EU-no disclosure. --RAN (talk) 00:36, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yes they are, and they should be either dated and tagged correctly, or deleted. Ariadacapo (talk) 07:20, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Read the terms of {{PD-EU-no author disclosure}} there is no such rule as "1945 photo by a 20 year-old photographer who died at 80". --RAN (talk) 20:31, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
What I mean with this example is that undated photos from the 20th Century with unknown author can’t be tagged with PD-old. If you want to check each of those files and fix their date and licensing one by one, by all means do so. Ariadacapo (talk) 07:32, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • 20th-Century photos where the author is named, that are marked as PD-old, but there is no easy way to check that the author died before 1953. Example: File:Château de Tournay 1943 (1).jpg

In all three cases, more work is needed to source those photos and make sure that we are not license-laundering these (valuable) images. -- Ariadacapo (talk) 14:12, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ariadacapo (talk) 14:10, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, some other files need checking:
All files are by Max Oettli and are tagged with PD-old, but the pictures were taken from 1986 to 2001. From what I could find, Oettli is still alive. I asked Jeremy.toma the reason behind this but he is yet to answer. Kind regards, Espandero (talk) 17:57, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not all files are copyright violations.

File:Château de L'Impératrice autrefois (3).png
I fixed the licensing on that one, please fix the licensing on the other postcards you are refering to. --Ariadacapo (talk) 07:19, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, deleted all, except those striked by @Ariadacapo: , thanks so much for your help. --Ellywa (talk) 21:44, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The illustration was downloaded from a website (link in the description of file) and modyfied by the uploader. On the website we can see the illustration was used in some publications. It is doubful that the licence of file is correct. Most probably it is a copyright violation. Wiktoryn (talk) 15:44, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Wiktoryn: Per {{PD-Poland}}, all photographs published without a clear copyright notice before May 23, 1994, are public domain. The subject of this photo died in 1980, so wouldn't this presumably apply? Unless the photo was sitting in a desk drawer for nearly 40 years and not published until 2019 (the date on the book cover), that is. holly {chat} 17:11, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: highly likely the image is in PD, per holly. --Ellywa (talk) 21:48, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Most countries have a copyright exemption for national symbols. Algeria has such an exemption, but only for non-commercial use. This empblem therefore cannot be kept on Commons.

See COM:Algeria Where it says:

"Not protected
  • [snip]
  • State works, legally made available for public use in non-profit generating purposes, may be freely used subject to maintaining the work wellbeing and highlighting its source...."

"non-profit generating purposes" is an NC license, which Commons does not permit. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:54, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The license should be changed, this file is here since 2008 and the emblem has been used in more than 1000 Wikipedia pages and templates.
Else we should remove the emblem of all countries Algeria isn't an exception. Riad Salih (talk) 14:00, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Is this actually the government drawing? If not, how would this be any different from Template:Coa blazon which applies to many (if not most) of our national emblems? Fry1989 eh? 14:08, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This was the official emblem of Algeria used since 1976 and it's has been updated in 2019 by this emblem Riad Salih (talk) 14:12, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Riad Salih The golden version of the emblem is best treated as a variant, not a separate emblem. It literally has the exact same layout and elements as the colored version. 98.213.225.105 20:05, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
work is under this license it was first published in 1976
{{PD-Algeria-photo-except}}
Riad Salih (talk) 17:01, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: We can make a version solely based on the blazon, as long as the new emblem is different than the version used by the armiger. Therefore, if we upload a new version, we can keep that and delete all preceding versions. 98.213.225.105 23:57, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I agree that the best solution is that it will be considered as an adaptation of the work, and not the work itself, which by the creative license of commonce does not apply Dezedien (talk) 12:17, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete based on above discussion. In addition Alamy states about this image: For the editorial use only. Not for advertising or other commercial use! Copyright by Peter Probst. Ellywa (talk) 21:04, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:33, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Still deleted but changing the rationale to: ultimately a copyvio of https://vector-images.com/image.php?epsid=7041 (as all the other considerations are irrelevant comparing to the copyvio). Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 14:06, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]