User talk:ZioNicco

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
1, 2, 3, 4

File tagging File:Energy Drink mix.jpg

[edit]
العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Energy Drink mix.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Energy Drink mix.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Trade (talk) 17:34, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Black bloc 2002.jpg

[edit]
File:Black bloc 2002.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Günther Frager (talk) 23:00, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Louvre di notte.JPG

[edit]
File:Louvre di notte.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 04:44, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Loghi Chievo

[edit]

Ciao ZioNicco, ho visto il tuo commento, c'è una guida su quale sia il tipo di licenza da usare per loghi passati di società ancora esistenti? Per altre società ogni foto ha qualcosa di diverso. Per le due foto anni 90 ho trovato il riferimento di copyright TMDN da aggiungere, mentre il logo Paluani è assente da qualsiasi fonte online, l'ho trovato su foto d'epoca e l'ho creato da solo. Da dove mi invento una licenza? Grazie El passs (talk) 10:08, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@El passs tutto dipende se superano la soglia di originalità Commons:Threshold_of_originality/it in ogni caso sicuramente non puoi dire che sia opera tua e che tu sei l'autore. ZioNicco (talk) 10:12, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
sì di certo ho sbagliato il tipo di copyright. Se prendo a modello la licenza del simbolo AC Milan che non supera la soglia di originalità, allora credo di poter proporre lo stesso tipo di licenza, dato che le ho create io a mano. --El passs (talk) 18:47, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Domenica Sportiva Ugo Frigerio.jpg

[edit]

Ciao, ho visto quello che hai scritto. Una domanda: che differenza c'è tra Domenica Sportiva Ugo Frigerio e queste prime pagine?

Sentruper (talk) 21:56, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Sentruper quella segnalata è del 1924 autore del disegno sconosciuto quindi si applicano 120 anni dalla foto ovvero 2044, le altre 2 entrambre sono prima del 1904 quindi i 120 sono passati, in più una non è nemmeno illustrata ma solo testo. ZioNicco (talk) 07:59, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Sentruper aggiungo la stessa immagine era su it.wiki it:File:Domenica Sportiva Ugo Frigerio.jpeg ma è stata cancellata per lo stesso motivo. ZioNicco (talk) 08:02, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Si tratta di una testata giornalistica, supplemento della «Gazzetta dello Sport». Leggi per favore la voce su it.wikipedia.org, cui ho contribuito in gran parte. In particolare il riquadro Il supplemento illustrato della «Gazzetta» all'interno del paragrafo «Gli anni della consacrazione». Si applicano le regole delle testate giornalistiche. Il detentore dei diritti è il direttore responsabile della Gazzetta dello Sport dell'epoca. Si tratta di Emilio Colombo, che assunse la direzione nel giugno 1924, un mese prima dei Giochi olimpici. Colombo nacque nel 1884 e morì nel 1947. Con questo ritengo di aver chiarito definitivamente. Un saluto,--Sentruper (talk) 12:11, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Sentruper ma anche no, se vuoi apri la procedura oridnaria in cui indichi le tue ragioni ZioNicco (talk) 13:42, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:ZioNicco&oldid=924419120"