User talk:XalD

English: Welcome to the Commons, Hiperion93!

First steps tutorial Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki ‒ it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities. All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page, write this: `[[:Image:Foo.jpg]]`, it makes this: `Image:Foo.jpg` If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: `{{bad name\|Correct name}}` For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

Fil nik 17:11, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Salto del tequendamita.jpg

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which information may be missing. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Fil nik 17:11, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Tequendamita2.jpg

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which information may be missing. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Fil nik 18:11, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Cerro Tusa .jpg

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which information may be missing. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Fil nik 19:13, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Medellin_desdelaspalmas.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Medellin_desdelaspalmas.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. ^{__ ABF __} ϑ 15:26, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Exposición Bonsai 2008 Feria de Flores-04.JPG

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Fil nik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Fil nik 03:29, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Exposición Bonsai 2008 Feria de Flores-07.JPG

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Fil nik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Fil nik 03:47, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Copacabana-iglesia06.jpg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Fil nik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Fil nik 17:07, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Copacabana-iglesia05.jpg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Fil nik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Fil nik 17:07, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Catedral de Caldas-exterior.JPG

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Fil nik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Fil nik 15:30, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Catedral de Caldas-agua bendita.JPG

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Fil nik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Fil nik 15:38, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please link images

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello XalD!

Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images uploaded to Commons should be useful to all users of Wikimedia projects. This is possible only if the images can be found by other people.

To allow others to find the images you uploaded here, the images should be in some place that can be found by navigating the category structure. This means that you should put the images into appropriate topic pages, categories, optionally galleries, or both of them (see Commons:Categories). To find good categories for your images, the CommonSense tool may help.

You can find a convenient overview of your uploaded files in this gallery.

The important point is that the images should be placed in the general structure somewhere. There are a large number of completely unsorted images on Commons right now. If you would like to help to place some of those images where they can be found, please do!

Thank you. BotMultichillT (talk) 06:33, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:IIglesia de San Francisco de Asís, Buga - 2.jpg is uncategorized since 3 December 2008. BotMultichillT (talk) 06:33, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TUSC token 32794ae4e205283788e591e0bad3e88b

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

RE: Licencias

Lo encuentro bien :), lo que podrias hacer sería crear algo como esto Template talk:PD-Chile, donde se especifica el material, su procedencia y la duración de los derechos. Xexito (talk) 17:59, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:H1N1 South America Map.svg

Listo, Trinidad y Tobago no sólo no es parte de Venezuela, sino tampoco de Sudamérica. Saludos! --Dexxter (talk) 04:07, 29 May 2009 (UTC) PD: qué detallista...[reply]

No, por nada. Y gracias por la corrección, es que no la tengo clara ni siquiera con el español.... =(

Saludos! --Dexxter (talk) 21:15, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ayuda

XalD ¡Hola! Me gustaría saber cómo editar el mapa del mundo de la gripe, en caso necesario. Me gustaría hacer mi contribución si sé de algunas noticias.

--Lightwarrior2 (talk) 02:41, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Gracias por tu ayuda! Sin embargo, Voy a ver mejor los programas que he hablado...Soy un principiante en este campo...Yo no quiero cometer errores!

Y por una parte, espero que ni yo ni el cambio de este mapa ... porque si hay cambios, es mala señal,

un fuerte abrazo.

Saludos --Lightwarrior2 (talk) 18:11, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GFDL

Hi XalD, cc-by-sa-3.0 is now the default license. Could you possible upload your images under both GFDL and cc-by-sa-3.0? You can do this by adding {{Self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-3.0}}. Multichill (talk) 20:35, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The lazy works twice (El perezoso trabaja doble). :S Thanks for advice me. ~~×α£đ~~^es 20:38, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

My bot can do it for you if you like. Multichill (talk) 20:46, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

:) I like it. ~~×α£đ~~^es 21:27, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Flickr reviewing

Hello XalD, and thank you for your application to be a flickr reviewer. The application has been removed as successful, and you've been added to the list of reviewers. Congratulations! Please see Commons:Flickr images if you haven't done so already, and the backlogs at Category:Flickr images needing human review and Category:Flickr review needed. A helpful script for easy-tagging flickr images is at importScript('User:Patstuart/Flickrreview.js'); (which you can add to your monobook.js), and you can add {{User reviewer}} or {{User trusted}} to your user page if you wish. Thank you for your work on Commons! –Juliancolton | ^Talk 18:04, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Juliancolton. ~~×α£đ~~^es 18:24, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christimas

The most beautiful verses of Christmas, are those that are delivered by friendly people who have not forgotten for a whole year and we can always count on. By Light Warrior ^{Conspiracy?!?} 14:49, 25 December 2009 (UTC) All the best!![reply]

Mapa del mundo en cuatro colores

Hey, he visto una imagen subida por ti del mapa mundi en cuatro colores...

Realmente está en cinco; para ser coherentes con el teorema de los cuatro colores, debes considerar el agua como un territorio (azul, ya que estamos) lo que te deja otros tres para los paises... Serás capaz de hacerlo? :)

Hasta luego!!

P.D: ah, puedes usar tambien azul para paises no costeros, claro...

What the?????????????

What in the world took place with the photos of John Quinlan (wrestler) on wikimedia commons?????????? All the nice photos in the gallery have been deleted!!!!! What gives? I took these photos of John myself and I am proud of that. What did you do? I looked at his Wikipedia page and in place of his profile photo is a photo file name in red letters which means you deleted it. Looks horrible and a bunch more photos were deleted as well. Those have been there for quite some time now. Could you please explain what gives here and I would really appreciate it if you could return them as they were. I uploaded a new one today and I don't see that one anywhere, what's going on.

Confused,

Jaderocker (talk) 03:50, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jaderocker (talk) 03:51, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry XaID, I just dug a bit deeper and found that --Túrelio (talk) was the one who deleted all of the good photos by mistake. All these photos did not apply to being uploaded without the owners consent. I consent 100% to all the ones (36) that were in there this morning and the one I uploaded this morning as well (total of 37). I took those photos, I am his wife. Could you please help me restore them and notify --Túrelio (talk) that what he did was a mistake. No worries, it was a mistake and he thought these photos were like some in the past that had no consent and were properly deleted. These photos should be put back because I took them ALL and I am the sole owner of them. I noticed on --Túrelio (talk) talk page that it says "This user is busy in real life and may not be available", so I'll send him a quick message about his mistake but just in case he is not around could you correct this issue. Thank you and sorry for being a bit mad at first, just had no idea why somebody would go in for no reason and delete material like this but now I understand it was a mistake and just want it fixed asap. thank you XaID, I look forward to a speedy resolution.

Jaderocker (talk) 04:32, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi XaID, I've listed all those files on his/her talkpage, so you could discuss about the missing permissions etc. Thanks. --Túrelio (talk) 07:26, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The files that --Túrelio (talk) just listed on my talk page should NEVER have been deleted. They were there for a couple months after all the ones that were deleted properly a couple months back due to upload without owner consent. I do understand completely where --Túrelio (talk) is coming from, I understand completely. It makes sense to me, that as the copyright owner of these photos I should re-upload them under the license that states I, Mrs. Quinlan, am the owner. I noticed that the photos that say underneath them for a license:

This file has been (or is hereby) released into the public domain by its author, Mrs. Quinlan. This applies worldwide.*

In case this is not legally possible: Mrs. Quinlan grants anyone the right to use this work for any purpose, without any conditions, unless such conditions are required by law.*

     **********All these photos are properly licensed and were never deleted**********

So with that in mind I should re-upload the photos with the correct license like the other ones that did not get deleted so this is never a question again. I can see now and understand that I need to upload them under the correct license, something I did incorrectly with these files --Túrelio (talk) just listed on my talk page. Message me back when you read this, and I would be more than happy to re-upload them under the correct license like the ones with the license label stated above tagged on them.*

Thank You,

Jaderocker (talk) 09:53, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello XaID, I just messaged and spoke with --Túrelio (talk) and he said to just send you a message to let you know he would look the photos over and either undelete them or suggest re-uploading them. It would be 100x easier for an editor to just go in and un-delete them with the new proper correct license tag that states, Mrs. Quinlan is the copyright owner. Message me back when you get this and I am so sorry for this error, it is my fault that I didn't upload these photos with the correct license tags like the others that are still in the Commons gallery that are properly tagged with this.

Thank You & Sorry for bothering you XaID, just want this mishap corrected once and for all,

Jaderocker (talk) 11:55, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I will answer in your talkpage to keep the discussion at one place. ·×α£đ·^es 18:49, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good. Thank you so much XaID, again, sorry for the confusion. The photos need to be correctly tagged with the proper license and undeleted to be displayed where they were before in the Commons gallery. My fault for not tagging these like the rest that were properly tagged. Sorry again!

Jaderocker (talk) 19:19, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Gracias XalD

...aunque es más que nada una anécdota. Me han dado tantos palos (como puedes ver en mi página de discusión :-)) que quiero aprender un poco más y ponerme al día sobre cosas como Freedom of Panorama y demás, una buena forma de hacerlo es patrullando, saludos! --Poco a poco (talk) 17:14, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Publicidad iPod.JPG

File:Publicidad iPod.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Vera (talk) 12:15, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

5 colour world map - Malawi, Africa Great Lakes Problem

Hi There, There is no reason you had to make Malawi a special case and give it another colour. Any planar map can be coloured with just 4 colours. Malawi, nor any country, causes a problem!

File:Visa-free travel for Colombians.png

File:Visa-free travel for Colombians.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Luisfege (talk) 06:00, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

OTRS permissions queues

Hello XalD. You are receiving this message as a license reviewer. As you know, OTRS processes a large amount of tickets relating to image releases (called "permissions"). As a license reviewer, you may have the skills necessary to contribute to this team. If you are interested in learning more about OTRS or to volunteer please visit Meta-Wiki. Tell your friends! Thank you. Rjd0060 18:59, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome, Dear Filemover!

العربيَّة ∙ Deutsch ∙ español ∙ English ∙ français ∙ português ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ кыргызча ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（中国大陆）‎ ∙ 中文（台灣）‎ ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hi XalD, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:

Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{Rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one. Or, if there was no rename-request, please use the Move & Replace-tab.
Please leave a redirect behind unless you have a valid reason not to do so. Other projects, including those using InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references. Please see this section of the file rename guideline for more information.
Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.

Revent^talk 10:36, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Revent. --·×ald·^es 23:21, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Autoverificado

Muchas gracias por la propuesta para que sea autoverificado. Últimamente me he dado cuenta que debería ayudar más a commons y estoy bastante activo, me alegra saber que hay gente que se ha dado cuenta de ello. Un saludo. Vanbasten 23 (talk) 13:31, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Palacio de la Cultura Rafael Uribe Uribe, 2011.jpg

File:Palacio de la Cultura Rafael Uribe Uribe, 2011.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

–Davey2010^Talk 18:27, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DR

Hi, Just wanted to say don't worry about the image upload as you wasn't to know - In all honestly you did what anyone would've done which was check the license and then upload assuming all is fine,
Anyway all's cool :), Happy editing :), –Davey2010^Talk 02:52, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Isla Pelícano vista desde Playa Blanca.JPG

And also:

Yours sincerely, Felipe Restrepo Acosta (talk) 22:56, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rudy Mancuoso April 2019.png

Please see the video description, which clearly states that it was uploaded under a CC license. This page, linked from the video, links to the CC BY 3.0 license. CoolSkittle (talk) 15:46, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@CoolSkittle: I'm really sorry. Please notice I just removed the template and moved the file. ·×ald·^es 23:35, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, no worries. CoolSkittle (talk) 02:50, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Gonzalo Escovar Gaviria

Hola, muchas gracias por subir las fotos de este autor. Saludos, --Pedro Felipe (talk) 16:45, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hola, las usé acá, acá y acá. Saludos, --Pedro Felipe (talk) 14:10, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Important message for file movers

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
To perform file name swaps.
When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Seminario Diocesano La Santa Cruz, Caldas.jpg

Copyright status: File:Seminario Diocesano La Santa Cruz, Caldas.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ हिन्दी ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Seminario Diocesano La Santa Cruz, Caldas.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 23:05, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Berrío, Pedro Justo.jpg

File:Berrío, Pedro Justo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

201.234.75.121 17:32, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Arciniegas, Ismael Enrique.jpg

File:Arciniegas, Ismael Enrique.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

201.234.75.121 17:32, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

How?

You placed a notice saying After replacing all instances with the preferred file, this file will be speedily deleted on this image File:St.Mary's Catholic Church -- Victoria, Texas.jpg

How will these replacements be made? -- Jim Evans (talk) 13:29, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Flickr2Commons

I have just come across a few images you have recently uploaded from Flickr. I would appreciate it if in the future, you used the Flickr2Commons tool. This tool allows images to be moved to Commons from Flickr without having to download the images to your own computer. It also brings in the largest resolution of the image, as well making sure to list the correct license and url, making it easy for the automated Flickr Review system. Also, it is fairly easy to categorize images with this tool. To use it, you just need to go to the url and authorize it (where it says "authorise first").--A1Cafel (talk) 02:23, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@A1Cafel: I'm sorry, I don't quite get it. I haven't downloaded any Flickr file recently, I have been just using UploadWizard instead, which already uploads the larger version available. --·×ald·^es 08:24, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Respetuoso pedido

Hola XalD. Veo que eres revisor de licencias acá en Commons y aprovechando la coincidencia de idiomas, quería preguntarte si es posible solicitar una revisión "manual" de la licencia de un archivo para confirmar que efectivamente lo que he señalado es correcto. Te explico: la Presidencia de Costa Rica usa la licencia CC BY-SA 4.0 como puede verse aquí. Su archivo fotográfico lo suben con la cuenta fotografia[arroba]presidencia.go.cr a Google Drive y de ahí se envía a los medios de comunicación y demás personas. Entonces, he subido algunas de las fotografías de esta carpeta, sobre el inicio de la vacunación contra la COVID-19 en Costa Rica, usando el biológico de AstraZeneca, coloqué la licencia correspondiente, el enlace de la fuente de las fotos y el enlace donde consta la licencia. No sé si eso sea suficiente, o si por tratarse de fotos descargadas de Google Drive deben o pueden someterse a ese proceso de revisión de licencia. Te agradezco la orientación, ya que sé que el tema de las licencias acá en Commons es suuuuuper estricto y no quiero problemas o malentendidos. Saludo cordial! --LuchoCR (talk) 05:42, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

También preguntarte sobre la viabilidad de hacer una plantilla de licencia específica para el material audiovisual que hace la Presidencia de Costa Rica, dado que tienen licencia Creative Commons. O si con las estándares que ya existen, es suficiente. Nuevamente gracias. --LuchoCR (talk) 05:42, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@LuchoCR: ¡Hola! Aunque es cierto que según las Políticas de Confidencialidad de Presidencia "el contenido de este sitio web, sin restricción, está bajo la licencia de Creative Commons: Atribución-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional" (por lo cual la licencia sería compatible con Wikimedia Commons), no veo dónde dice que las fotos de Drive están publicadas bajo la misma licencia (presidencia.go.cr y Google Drive son sitios web diferentes). Salvo que se explicite que las imágenes en Google Drive tienen la mencionada licencia, creo que lo mejor sería contactar a la Presidencia, y crear un ticket en OTRS, como ocurre en {{PD-AustraliaGov}}. No hace falta hacerlo, pero si deseas acudir a un miembro de OTRS (no es mi caso) que hable español para evitar inconvenientes con la barrera del idioma, usuarios como AlvaroMolina y Ganímedes podrían ayudarte.

Respecto a la plantilla específica de Costa Rica, creo que es buena idea dado que muchas de sus imágenes serán útiles en los proyectos. Te puedes basar en cualquiera de las disponibles en Category:PD license tags by country, en particular, las de Category:PD-Gov license tags. Un saludo, --·×ald·^es 05:46, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

¡Tercer lugar en la categoría mejor fotografía! [Wikivacaciones 2021]

Hola XalD Muchas gracias por participar en nuestro Wikiconcurso Wikivacaciones 2021. La imagen Támesis panorámica hacia el norte obtuvo el tercer lugar en la categoría mejor fotografía. Para entregar el premio necesitamos algunos datos personales tuyos, podrías por favor enviarnos un correo a: contacto@wikimediacolombia.org con tu nombre, dirección de correo electrónico y número de celular. ¡Muchas gracias por participar! Cordialmente,

Wikimedia Colombia

Wikimedia Colombia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Monica Bonilla (WMCO) (talk • contribs) 19:38, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

¡Foto con más likes en Facebook! [Wikivacaciones 2021]

Hola XalD Muchas gracias por participar en nuestro Wikiconcurso Wikivacaciones 2021. La imagen Puente de Occidente obtuvo el premio en la categoría Foto con más like's en Facebook. Para entregar el premio necesitamos algunos datos personales tuyos, podrías por favor enviarnos un correo a: contacto@wikimediacolombia.org con tu nombre, dirección de correo electrónico y número de celular. ¡Muchas gracias por participar! Cordialmente,

Wikimedia Colombia

Wikimedia Colombia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Monica Bonilla (WMCO) (talk • contribs) 19:39, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

¡Gracias por participar de Wikivacaciones 2022!

Muchos saludos, XalD:

Desde Wikimedia Colombia queremos agradecerte por participar del Concurso fotográfico Wikicavaciones 2022, sumando imágenes de tus vacaciones por Colombia en Wikimedia Commons del 1 de diciembre de 2022 al 30 de enero de 2023.

En esta versión del concurso sumamos más de 3000 imágenes de destinos turísticos en Colombia. Y tú fuiste parte del grupo de personas que nos permitió conseguir esto. Esperamos que nos sigas acompañando en próximas actividades.

¡Gracias por contribuir al conocimiento libre desde Colombia! Cordialmente, Monica Bonilla en nombre de Wikimedia Colombia.

Monica Bonilla (WMCO) (talk) 21:30, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:XalD

Image Tagging Image:Medellin_desdelaspalmas.jpg

Please link images

TUSC token 32794ae4e205283788e591e0bad3e88b

RE: Licencias

Ayuda

GFDL

Flickr reviewing

Merry Christimas

Mapa del mundo en cuatro colores

What the?????????????

Gracias XalD

5 colour world map - Malawi, Africa Great Lakes Problem

OTRS permissions queues

Welcome, Dear Filemover!

Autoverificado

DR

Notification about possible deletion

Gonzalo Escovar Gaviria

Important message for file movers

Copyright status: File:Seminario Diocesano La Santa Cruz, Caldas.jpg

How?

Flickr2Commons

Respetuoso pedido

¡Tercer lugar en la categoría mejor fotografía! [Wikivacaciones 2021]

¡Foto con más likes en Facebook! [Wikivacaciones 2021]

¡Gracias por participar de Wikivacaciones 2022!

Navigation menu

Search