Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2023/02/13
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
|
|
The caption existing on the files clearly indicates a different name and a different organization rather than the uploader. This should be a clear copyrigh violation. Nahid Hossain (talk) 11:40, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — T. 12:51, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
It was only a test file Paula Mayumi (talk) 11:42, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 13:45, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
File:2022-12-10 Competition Women Benjamines and Jeunes Espoirs Floor exercise at CGC Bettembourg 2022 (Martin Rulsch) 006.jpg
[edit]Because it is Logo Hamdan8407 (talk) 04:05, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Test or nonsense request by another Android app user who could not resist. --Achim55 (talk) 11:38, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
File:2022-12-10 Competition Women Benjamines and Jeunes Espoirs Balance beam at CGC Bettembourg 2022 (Martin Rulsch) 591.jpg
[edit]Because it is A selfie Hamdan8407 (talk) 04:05, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Test or nonsense request by another Android app user who coud not resist. --Achim55 (talk) 11:42, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
169.139.8.211 15:41, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- Kept - Nomination by a sad individual who apparently has nothing better to do with their time. –Davey2010Talk 16:04, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Lack of EXIF makes personal work claim unlikely. Possible screenshot judging from the blurry image Trade (talk) 21:30, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:56, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
mogą zostać usunięte Filipshahnazaryan2012 (talk) 21:59, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
proszę to usunąć, bo to nie moje zdjęcie proszę usunąć jak nas szybciej Filipshahnazaryan2012 (talk) 22:01, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
to nie jest mój plik błagam usuńcie go Filipshahnazaryan2012 (talk) 22:36, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, speedied as copyvio (Copyright © 1996–2023 Medycyna Praktyczna). --Túrelio (talk) 07:57, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Marsel Ziad (talk · contribs)
[edit]Self-promotion of another famous youtuber, out of scope. No contribs to wm projects except vandalism.
- File:Marsel Ziad 4.jpg
- File:Marsel Ziad 3.jpg
- File:Marsel Ziad 2.jpg
- File:Marsel Ziad.jpg
- File:Marsel Ziad 6.jpg
Achim (talk) 18:04, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 08:20, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Marsel Ziad (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photo for non-wikipedian: out of Scope
- File:مهند وبتول العشق.jpg
- File:Mohanad Batoul.jpg
- File:RAPPER MOUDY ALARBE.jpg
- File:MOUDY ALARBE.jpg
- File:Marsel Ziad.jpg
- File:مارسيل زياد.jpg
Karim185.3 (talk) 19:48, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:32, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Marsel Ziad (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope.
--Karim talk to me :)..! 13:19, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:31, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Bastian climate files
[edit]Per User:Achim55/Sockpuppet investigations/Bastian, these are probably all fake / hoax maps and diagrams or at the very least rather questionable. I have previously kept one of them because the deletion rationale was nonsensical, but knowing the background now I think the files should be deleted per the precautionary principle.
- File:Thornthwaite climate Classification.png
- File:Camargo Climate Classification.png
- File:Latitudinal Zones.png
- File:Major Climatic Zones.png
- File:Strahler Climate Classification.png
- File:Temperate Zone Map.png
- File:Tropical Zone Map.png
- File:Polar Zone Map.png
Rosenzweig τ 13:06, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- Delete all, adding the following ones as they are nonsense (or to be polite, exercises). For reference see en:Geographical zone.
- File:Climates Zones.png
- File:Climates Zones.1.png
- File:Climates Zones 2.png
- File:Climates Zones.2.png
- File:Climates Zones 3.png
- File:Climates Zones 4.png
--Achim55 (talk) 22:20, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: If above files stay, they should be renamed. A09 (talk) 15:15, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Wow, seeing the amount of disruption, we don't want these on Commons. --Yann (talk) 20:55, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Roozhayebikhatere (talk · contribs)
[edit]Fake license. These photographs are Taken by w:Pardis Sabeti and lacks permission.
- File:انتشار عکس پرویز ثابتی پس از ۴۴ سال.jpg
- File:انتشار عکس پرویز ثابتی پس از ۴۴ سال در تظاهرات واشنکتن.jpg
HeminKurdistan (talk) 17:08, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: both files already deleted by Túrelio. --Rosenzweig τ 12:17, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
out of scope, file's description talks about her private outfit (like Instagram). Taichi (talk) 00:59, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:32, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Superseded by a file using a more compatible file format https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Veroaste_Suomessa_vuosina_1975%E2%80%932021.png Inehmo (talk) 23:47, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 08:10, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Likely use of non-free photo: https://www.justesublime.fr/tuto-beaute-chirurgie-esthetique-natoo/ Antimuonium (talk) 23:00, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:36, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/"Dove Cameron Vogue"
[edit]I cannot find any evidence of the claimed CC license. Please provide link to verify license
- File:Dove Cameron Vogue - 3.jpg
- File:Dove Cameron Vogue - 2.jpg
- File:Dove Cameron Vogue - 4.jpg
- File:Dove Cameron Vogue.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 08:25, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- Bot reviewed it and it was manually reviewed as having the stated license at the time of upload. It looks like the CC license was removed at the source. Those are not supposed to be revokable. The verification is in the edit summaries of the files noting the trusted users that added the tags. Geraldo Perez (talk) 16:07, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
ːWithdrawn My bad - i didn't scroll down far enough to see the YT license review 11:58, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 11:39, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
No proven notability https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCmT_dv_fnDOCcRR8CQMDOTg CoffeeEngineer (talk) 00:50, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:29, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
out of scope, for selfpromotion. Taichi (talk) 01:00, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:29, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Identical to File:DSC03719 (51384585614).jpg. To prevent possible reuploads maybe it could be made into a redirect. Sincerely, Taketa (talk) 01:31, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:29, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Poor quality still image from Flickr video, I don't think this is useful A1Cafel (talk) 03:14, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:29, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Poor quality still image from Flickr video, I don't think this is useful A1Cafel (talk) 03:20, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:29, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: Unused personal photo A1Cafel (talk) 03:21, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:29, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Poor quality still image from Flickr video, I don't think this is useful A1Cafel (talk) 03:26, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- Delete No reasonable educational use. The Quirky Kitty (talk) 10:19, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:29, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Per COM:PACKAGE A1Cafel (talk) 03:28, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:30, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Small and poor geometry. Have a ton of PNG and SVG in Category:Vitamin B1/Category:Thiamine DMacks (talk) 04:17, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:30, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Chemically incorrect. Intending to be Category:Cytidine triphosphate but is missing a double-bond in the upper ring in both structures. We have a ton if alternatives in that category. DMacks (talk) 04:26, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Analogous mistake in the unused composites:
If needed, composites could be made using high-quality files from Category:Pyrimidine nucleosides and Category:Pyrimidine nucleobases, respectively. DMacks (talk) 04:32, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. Incorrect chemical structures. There are plenty of correct, high quality alternatives. Marbletan (talk) 14:31, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:30, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Small jpeg. Have a ton of alts in Category:Pyridoxine DMacks (talk) 04:34, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:30, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Out-of-scope bad quality photo. Pierre cb (talk) 04:36, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:30, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Out of focus bad quality photo. Pierre cb (talk) 04:38, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:30, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Out of focus bad quality photo. Pierre cb (talk) 04:38, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:30, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: Unused personal photo A1Cafel (talk) 06:35, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:31, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: Unused personal photo A1Cafel (talk) 06:36, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:31, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: Unused personal photo A1Cafel (talk) 06:37, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:31, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Potential advertisement A1Cafel (talk) 06:45, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:31, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Potential advertisement A1Cafel (talk) 06:45, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:31, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The arrow on the picture indicates it comes from a video, but the source is unknown CoffeeEngineer (talk) 07:55, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:31, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Per COM:PACKAGING, the photo on the box is presumably recent and copyrighted. Rosenzweig τ 08:18, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:32, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Unused and incorrectly upscaled version of File:Alisov's classification of climate ru.jpg. 2001:7D0:81FD:BC80:4884:6220:9321:2AA2 13:20, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. --Achim55 (talk) 13:57, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:32, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope:Personal picture by one-time uploader Enyavar (talk) 13:39, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:32, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by FATMIR RESHANI (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal photo of non-contributor
Enyavar (talk) 13:52, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:32, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
company logo, unlikely to be CC Mannivu · ✉ 13:53, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:32, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Unused personal (?) photo of non-contributor Enyavar (talk) 13:54, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- delete it Rmered3382 (talk) 03:26, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:32, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Content created as advertisement (G10).
- File:فريم فيديو شاشة جديد copy.jpg
- File:مرشات2.jpg
- File:مرشات.jpg
- File:نخيل 23.jpg
- File:غلاف فيس copy2.jpg
--Karim talk to me :)..! 14:01, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:32, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
out of scope: personal picture by non-contributor Enyavar (talk) 14:17, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:32, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
out of scope: personal picture by non-contributor Enyavar (talk) 14:17, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:32, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Personal picture by non-contributor Enyavar (talk) 14:30, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:33, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by TalonsMaraud (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: Non-contributor profile pictures in order to declare a presidential run in 2024
Enyavar (talk) 14:34, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:33, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Unused personal picture of engineering student Enyavar (talk) 14:42, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:33, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Leidy Deschamps (talk · contribs)
[edit]photos of one person at different places, but all without exif. personal artworks. i tried google but couldnt find who this is. potential copyvio + personal artworks.
- File:Arte Contemporáneo.jpg
- File:Carta de Anaya hacia su abuelo fallecido.jpg
- File:Obra significado de dinero.jpg
- File:Susana Jiménez Anaya.jpg
- File:Creaciones de Anaya.jpg
- File:AICA-México.png
- File:Anaya y sus trabajos.jpg
- File:Trabajos Anaya.jpg
- File:Gustos artísticos.jpg
- File:Anaya motivación.jpg
- File:Firma de Anaya en sus obras.jpg
- File:Primeros trabajos de Anaya 1.3.jpg
- File:Primeros trabajos de Anaya 1.2.jpg
- File:Primeros trabajos de Susana Anaya.jpg
- File:Lienzo en aceite de Anaya.jpg
- File:Pinturas Anaya.jpg
- File:Benjamin Anaya.jpg
- File:Susana Anaya Artst.jpg
- File:Martha Susana Jiménez Anaya.jpg
- File:Susana Anaya.jpg
RZuo (talk) 14:43, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:33, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Matouš Kudrna (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal images of a non-notable person, article repeatedly deleted on cs-Wiki.
Gumruch (talk) 14:50, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:33, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Personal picture by one-time contributor, unused Enyavar (talk) 15:00, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:33, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Personal picture by one-time contributor, unused Enyavar (talk) 15:04, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:33, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Firstone321 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal images by (unsuccessful self-promoter)
- File:ANDREAS FIRST YALTA.jpg
- File:Андрей Алексеев2502.jpg
- File:WMIgRL6lexM.jpg
- File:JqqfukHDgum3U977QtsuIRylAc4EnQl7UJLp6CQxGosuOLFZwBzIJwqQfVuk9XtrDR8AQpW9ekAQbODZCXUCsc5d.jpg
Enyavar (talk) 15:09, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:33, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Files by Bccomms
[edit]- File:MK1 58504.jpg
- File:Boston Whaler Great White 4.jpg
- File:Boat Club Photo 2.jpg
- File:Boston Whaler Great White 1.jpg
- File:Foulkes Headshot - Sept 2019.jpg
Commons:License laundering --Cryptic-waveform (talk) 15:10, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:33, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Files by CNRNCXA
[edit]- File:Encore boston pic.jpg
- File:Wynn,Resorts gold.png
- File:Wynn,Resorts bw.logo.png
- File:Wynn Palace-01-Exterior.jpg
- File:Wynn Macau-01-Exterior.jpg
- File:Wynn Las Vegas-01-Exterior.jpg
- File:Encore boston logo.png
- File:Encore boston.jpg
- File:Wynn palace logo.jpg
- File:Wynn palace.png
Commons:License laundering --Cryptic-waveform (talk) 15:25, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:34, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope. --Matr1x-101Pinging me doesn't hurt! {user - talk? - useless contributions} 15:36, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:34, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Dubious provenence - lower res, no EXIF, close vantage of notable person, bars on top and bottom suggestive of cropping, all other user uploads copyvios - PRP issue. Эlcobbola talk 15:46, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:34, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Nice girl but photo of not an active contributor. Also, published before elsewhere and no permission supplied. Ignatus (talk) 15:46, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:34, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
unused, unlinked FAKE svg - identical jpg exists: may be a speedy -- sarang♥사랑 16:28, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:35, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
unused, unlinked FAKE svg - identical jpg exists: may be a speedy -- sarang♥사랑 16:30, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:35, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
unused, unlinked FAKE svg - identical jpg exists: may be a speedy -- sarang♥사랑 16:34, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:35, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
unused, unlinked FAKE svg - identical jpg exists: may be a speedy -- sarang♥사랑 16:35, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:35, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
not notable. out of com:PS. Hanooz 20:02, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:35, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
out of project scope
- File:Ok 2.jpg
- File:امتیازات meshienta.jpg
- File:ضمانت کار خواجه بارباراحافظ برای مایکت تا2030میلادی.jpg
- File:Qr-fAnA,manA.jpg
- File:کاشف,ال...???.jpg
- File:NAsAsosheintàAnA..jpg
- File:NA 2.png
Didym (talk) 20:13, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:35, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:Sensoorr
[edit]These images are not free, as they have been taken from the Gorilla Tag steam page. --NUMBRstation (talk) 21:40, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:36, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Other version of the same shot (uncropped and uncolorized) is available on the web eg. here. Dubious own work statement needs VRT permission. ~Cybularny Speak? 00:31, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:38, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
The depicted sculpture is the work of a 1960-born artist and thereby still in copyright. So, a permission by the sculptor is necessary or the image needs to be deleted. -- Túrelio (talk) 10:16, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:39, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Circa 1925 photograph that was taken by the Swedish Pentecostal Medical Mission in DR Congo. Might have been published in 1925 by Lars Johansson in “Hälsning från Kongo.” Evangelii Härold 10 no. 33 (1925). Julius Aspenlind could have been the photographer, he died in 1953. I am unsure if this is considered an artistic photograph or not. If artistic, it can be undeleted next year. If not artistic, it can be kept. Abzeronow (talk) 17:10, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:39, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Unused fantasy flag, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:23, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:39, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Small image, no EXIF, only contribution from this editor. Possibly not own work as claimed. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:56, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:40, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
unsourced, fantasy nazi flag MrGetYourFactsRightt (talk) 15:31, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:33, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
unsourced fantasy flag MrGetYourFactsRightt (talk) 14:20, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Minorax. --Rosenzweig τ 07:49, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Clearly a scan of a paper photograph. Probably not Own Work as claimed. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:04, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 07:48, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Jjjjjhjjjhhh 2607:FB91:19AC:4E39:AC39:60F7:67D3:BF7D 18:30, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep No understandable justification is given The Quirky Kitty (talk) 07:26, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. ??. --Kadı Message 20:12, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Hhhhhhhhhhh 2607:FB91:1984:783F:AC39:60F7:4E9E:6801 18:00, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination ;) uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 18:39, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Quién es este weon? 186.172.91.150 22:15, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. Personal file of a non-contributor. Marbletan (talk) 16:03, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 20:13, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Chemical mistake: title compound has no SO2 unit (N is as aniline, not arylsulfonamide)--credit User:Mfernflower who noted it at enwiki. File:OSU-03012.png isn't great quality but it's correct per SciFinder. No hits for the structure as drawn, so should just be deleted. DMacks (talk) 06:20, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. The structure was incorrect, but since the png replacement isn't great quality I fixed the svg. Innerstream (talk) 22:41, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Thanks! Looks great. Don't forget to give yourself credit in the file-description block. Should we delete the lousy PNG? DMacks (talk) 16:43, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Kept: the corrected SVG version, deleted the bad PNG version. --Leyo 11:08, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Tagged as own work, but identified as a work by en:Charles Radoff, died 1986. Still under copyright. Spokoyni (talk) 00:31, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:45, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Tagged as own work, but identified as by en:Antonio DeVity, died 1993. Still under copyright. Spokoyni (talk) 00:34, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:46, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Trabajo propio? 186.174.245.15 01:09, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused low res personal photo from non-contributor. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:47, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Joke, No encyclopedic value CoffeeEngineer (talk) 01:28, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (also DW unsourced modern face photos). --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:47, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Although ejaculation is in scope, this animation is in low quality and unused, and can be replaced by many alternatives in the category A1Cafel (talk) 04:11, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:50, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 04:25, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, very badly lit penis selfie. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:49, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Poor quality, same as File:View from Kuk fortress, Kučine, Solin 20230212 04.jpg, author's request Argo Navis (talk) 08:16, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- Delete This photo shows nothing that the better version doesn't. The Quirky Kitty (talk) 10:17, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per prompt uploader request. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:53, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
The Louvre pyramid is the main subject. This is not a public domain work. Miniwark (talk) 08:20, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:53, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
The Louvre Pyramid is the main subject. This is not a public domain building. Miniwark (talk) 08:22, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:54, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Image also located at https://www.facebook.com/shiacollegelucknow/, no evidence that the image is free as stated on Commons (see Commons:Licensing) Redtree21 (talk) 08:24, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:55, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
As Canada's freedom-of-panorama exception does not cover 2D-artworks, it needs to be evaluated whether the painting, depicted on the 2 banners at the building, is already in the public domain or not. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:10, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep The focus of the image is the building, so de minimus. I attempted to locate the painting via Google Lens but nothing came up. The Quirky Kitty (talk) 10:15, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Yeah, correct me if I'm wrong, but I think COM:DM Canada covers this. The banners are included incidentally. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:38, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep per others. The building is the focus of the photograph and the banners are incidental. Abzeronow (talk) 18:45, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:55, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
The coat of arms is not free but copyviol from http://www.araldicacivica.it/comune/matera/ GJo (talk) 15:25, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:04, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Not flag of the city but flag of province, the design is not free but copyviol from http://www.cisv.it/rosso/bandiere14.html GJo (talk) 15:27, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:04, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Not flag of the city but flag of province, the design is not free but copyviol from http://www.cisv.it/rosso/bandiere7.html GJo (talk) 15:29, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:04, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Unexplained photo with no indication of importance. Malcolma (talk) 16:36, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unused personal photo by non contributor. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:05, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Poor quality still image from Flickr video, I don't think this is useful A1Cafel (talk) 16:46, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. "Poor" is kind; nothing useful seen in image. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:07, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
fictionnal + no possible educationnal use => out of commons:scope 80.215.138.101 20:12, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:08, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Uploader - requesting deletion, uploaded under mistaken assumption work didn't satisfy copyright requirements at the time. 19h00s (talk) 22:12, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, DW of work by recent artist, not PD. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:13, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Too many similar edits as I initially made mistakes during the upload. I'd like to upload only the right one from the start. Mjrn92 (talk) 22:57, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per prompt uploader request. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:14, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Obvious copyright violation Hwi.padam (talk) 23:17, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:15, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The original photographer cited in the description is not the uploader, Possible jole or insult CoffeeEngineer (talk) 23:39, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:20, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:Literarus, Author: Deutsches Jugendherbergswerk
[edit]- File:Trier-Jugendherberge.jpg
- File:Pirmasens-Jugendherberge.jpg
- File:Thallichtenberg-Jugendherberge.jpg
- File:St-Goar-Jugendherberge.jpg
- File:Pirmasens-Jugendherberge.jpg
- File:Leutesdorf.jpg
- File:Koblenz-Jugendherberge.jpg
- File: Homburg-Jugendherberge.jpg
- File:Diez-jugendherberge.jpg
- File:Bacharach-Jugendherberge.jpg
- File:Bad Neuenahr-Ahrweiler.jpg
- File:Altleiningen.jpg
Reason: No verification of CC-License. --P170 (talk) 10:49, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: no verification of CC-License - what a pity!. --Emha (talk) 11:34, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Faze TV does not seem to share their work under Creative Commons https://www.youtube.com/@fazemag CoffeeEngineer (talk) 09:35, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Emha (talk) 11:59, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
duplicate of File:Dr. Mary Winter Fisher with her pet bear, Pickles in the 1880s.jpg Jochen Burghardt (talk) 09:39, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- OK to delete. Netherzone (talk) 14:02, 13 February 2023 (UTC) [copied from Commons_talk:Deletion_requests/File:Mary_Fisher,_1880s.jpg]
Deleted: per nomination. --Emha (talk) 12:00, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
LP cover, not PD Mannivu · ✉ 11:55, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Emha (talk) 12:09, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
probably a copyrighted logo, not PD Mannivu · ✉ 11:56, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Emha (talk) 12:11, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Das Bild ist von einem Privatgrundstück auf ein Privatgrundstück fotografiert. Es handelt sich weder um eine Scheune, noch ist das Haus denkmalgeschützt. Der Besitzer möchte nicht, dass ein Foto von seinem Privathaus im Internet existiert. Bitte löschen. Berlinschneid (talk) 12:07, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- Das Gebäude wurde von einer öffentlichen Straße fotografiert (Schulstraße). Es findet somit die Panoramafreiheit Anwendung. Laut Niedersächsischem Denkmalatlas handelt es sich sehr wohl um ein Baudenkmal. Ich erkenne daher keinen Grund für eine Löschung. Kiwi05 (talk) 13:11, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Berlinschneid. Das Denkmal mit der Nummer 34425483 ist im Denkmalatlas des Landes klar erkennbar und DORT als "Scheune" ausgewiesen. Schaltet man dort das Luftbild ein, sind auch die anderen Angaben von @Kiwi05 plausibel. Emha (talk) 12:51, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Emha (talk) 12:52, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
possible copyvio (painting by Dr. Norbert Tschirpke) M2k~dewiki (talk) 17:40, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Kept: We have Permission via ticket:2023020910008929 now. --Emha (talk) 13:04, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
wrong date, wrong source, wrong author Xocolatl (talk) 21:18, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- Might be PD. User:Vdivekar2013, your comments? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:41, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- Dinkar Vasudev Divekar is my grandfather and his photo is authentic. Let me know why you want to delete it Vdivekar2013 (talk) 01:26, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
- Vdivekar2013, I don't want to delete it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:56, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep I changed to PD-India and fixed errors. --RAN (talk) 06:40, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Pre-1958 photographs are public domain in India. Abzeronow (talk) 17:38, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: PD India. --Emha (talk) 13:06, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Subject name same as uploader who claims own work. It does not look like a selfie, so it is probably a copyright violation -- the copyright belongs to the actual photographer. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:01, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Jim, you're correct that I was not the photographer—my wife took this photo. However, I have asked her for her permission to release it under the creative commons license, which she has done in an email sent to me with the photo attached. If that's not sufficient for upload to creative commons, I could ask her to upload the photo instead and agree to the creative commons release herself. (Stefan.karpinski)
- Al parecer Stefan Karpinski no es bibliotecario, si no nadie se opondría a su foto personal. Stefan, porque exprimes limón a tus tacos, son de mariscos? 186.172.91.150 00:02, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Yes, they are seafood tacos (very delicious ones). (Stefan.karpinski)
A disfrutar! — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 186.172.91.150 (talk) 14:39, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion anymore after the explanation - thanks!. --Emha (talk) 13:10, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
I'm on sure how much of this fan art is taken from the original game Trade (talk) 21:38, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- just the logo is taken from the game Adamburns9 (talk) 14:43, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination--Trade (talk) 18:52, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Kept: nomination was withdrawn. --Rosenzweig τ 12:21, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
- Note: deleted as unambiguous derivative work of non-free content (CSD#F3). Эlcobbola talk 01:41, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
out of scope? BlinxTheKitty (talk) 00:51, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
- I'm creating a Wikipedia page for the Music website OC Music News and I will be using that picture in my article Punxskaoc (talk) 01:26, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio: complex logo without permission (used e.g. on facebook). --Wdwd (talk) 12:10, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
I, Rantemario, the uploader of this photo wants to delete this photo. Rantemario (talk) 10:49, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
Kept: The license cannot be revoked. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:51, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
I, as the author don't like it. Please delete, thank you! Rantemario (talk) 00:01, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- Delete on basis that there are better files at Category:Jakarta Cathedral. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:28, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per User:Minorax. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:29, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Images from copyrighted sites, I see no CC license there. Two other files by this user might pass PD-simple-logos.
Gumruch (talk) 00:39, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The logos are above TOO. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:30, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 03:12, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:31, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
No META proving the uploader is the source of photo. Pierre cb (talk) 04:53, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Kept: insufficient reason for deletion. Not found elsewhere using Google Images. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:48, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Cannot find the image on the source, unable to verify the copyright status A1Cafel (talk) 04:59, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, fails COM:LR. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:49, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
License page "You may not use content in any way that allows others to download, extract, or redistribute content as a standalone file" implies a no-derivative work restriction, and it is not allowed on Commons A1Cafel (talk) 05:05, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, incompatible license. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:56, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Cannot find the image on the source, unable to verify the copyright status A1Cafel (talk) 05:06, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:52, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Cannot find the image on the source, unable to verify the copyright status A1Cafel (talk) 05:06, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and incompatible license anyway on source website. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:55, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Cannot find the image on the source, unable to verify the copyright status A1Cafel (talk) 05:06, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and incompatible license anyway on source website. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:55, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
License page "You may not use content in any way that allows others to download, extract, or redistribute content as a standalone file" implies a no-derivative work restriction, and it is not allowed on Commons A1Cafel (talk) 05:06, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, incompatible license. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:55, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Possible ad CoffeeEngineer (talk) 08:03, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- It's my own photo. What's the problem? 185.21.84.75 10:22, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- The problem is that it is an ad for a tour, so it seems not to be able to be kept on Commons: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:What_Commons_is_not#Wikimedia_Commons_is_not_a_place_to_advertise. CoffeeEngineer (talk) 12:08, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- @CoffeeEngineer it's a band picture with tour dates from 2020. I don't see the advertising possibility because we have 2023. If this image is the bestillustration for an enyclopedia, that's doubtful in my opinion. Therefore: Weak delete Emha (talk) 11:46, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
- Emha, I understand your point, but it is on the fact that it is related to a tour with dates that it seems to me like an ad, regardless of the year. CoffeeEngineer (talk) 16:18, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
- You could crop it, @CoffeeEngineer. Emha (talk) 17:09, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
- For me, it is still an ad and cropping would not make the picture better. I question its use in the encyclopedia, as well. CoffeeEngineer (talk) 17:57, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
- You could crop it, @CoffeeEngineer. Emha (talk) 17:09, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
- Emha, I understand your point, but it is on the fact that it is related to a tour with dates that it seems to me like an ad, regardless of the year. CoffeeEngineer (talk) 16:18, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
- @CoffeeEngineer it's a band picture with tour dates from 2020. I don't see the advertising possibility because we have 2023. If this image is the bestillustration for an enyclopedia, that's doubtful in my opinion. Therefore: Weak delete Emha (talk) 11:46, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
- The problem is that it is an ad for a tour, so it seems not to be able to be kept on Commons: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:What_Commons_is_not#Wikimedia_Commons_is_not_a_place_to_advertise. CoffeeEngineer (talk) 12:08, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Not notable, deleted on pl.wp. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:01, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Image also located at https://www.facebook.com/206337736596974/photos/206341339929947/, no evidence that the image is free as stated on Commons (see Commons:Licensing) Redtree21 (talk) 08:17, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:22, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
no permission visible Alabasterstein (talk) 08:38, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Appears not to be under free license. The Quirky Kitty (talk) 10:16, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- Die Erlaubnis zur Verwendung wurde vom Fotostudio "Fotozentrum Filderstadt" eingeholt, das Foto wurde damals dort erstellt. Der Inhaber des Fotostudios ist ein Herr Jörg Rühle. Ulrich Drochner (talk) 14:15, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
- Das Foto entstammt einem privaten Fundus und ist digitalisiert worden. Jetzt ist nicht anderweitig im Internet zu finden oder verfügbar. Ulrich Drochner (talk) 14:17, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Ulrich Drochner: die Frage ist: wofür galt diese "Erlaubnis zur Verwendung" damals? Und: gibt es diese Erlaubnis auch schriftlich?
- Wo man die Datei sonst noch findet, ist absolut zweitrangig. Danke für Deine Antwort, Emha (talk) 11:50, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
- Ja, das stimmt dass das völlig irrelevant ist. Da hast du recht.
- Ich habe Herrn Rühle um Erlaubnis für den Wikipedia-Eintrag gebeten. Er antwortete mir, dass als Angabe seit 1984 "Fotozentrum Filderstadt" vermerkt wird. Die Freigabe liegt mir also vor.
- Viele Grüße Ulrich Drochner (talk) 11:35, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
- Die Erlaubnis zur Verwendung wurde vom Fotostudio "Fotozentrum Filderstadt" eingeholt, das Foto wurde damals dort erstellt. Der Inhaber des Fotostudios ist ein Herr Jörg Rühle. Ulrich Drochner (talk) 14:15, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Permission from photographer needs to be submitted to COM:VRT. Undelete if ever permission has been received. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:25, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Image sous droits d'auteur 6g9n7q (talk) 09:12, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Simple geometric shapes (including the small icons) and short text, below COM:TOO. --Thibaut (talk) 09:37, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- Delete - the small icons would be copyrighted as these aren't Simple geometric shapes. –Davey2010Talk 15:27, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- To me Conference room, Workspace Reservation, Apps, and Contact Centre (and possibly the Event APIs and SDKs icon) aren't generic enough - imho there's more to those than just simple geometric shapes.... Maybe I'm overreading this but to me those icons contain more than your average shapes.... –Davey2010Talk 10:39, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Same thought as Thibaut. The visual represents simple geometric shapes with small icons and short text, under COM:TOO. —— DePlusJean (Talk) 06:43, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Per Davey 2010. @DePlusJean: I really doubt if the "Workspace Reservation" one could also be geometric, it represents a hand with two fingers spreaded on a white button, so that icon looks like a 3D-ized animal action for me. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:44, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
- Comment : Hi Liuxinyu970226
Thank you for notifying me and possibly, provide you with some guidance on the concept of originality threshold. Taking the example of "Workspace Reservation", the image opposite illustrates the existing files which represents a 2D image assembly (vector or bitmap) and the finger of a hand as a pointing comes from the category:Pointing icons.
All of the icons on this image are an assembly of symbols that already exist on Commons or other royalty-free sites. The image conforms to the files that are present in the category:PD shape.
Best regards, —— DePlusJean (Talk) 15:44, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
- Comment : Hi Liuxinyu970226
- I still maintain these are more than your average shape irrespective of whether you can assembly the icons or not and imho to err on the side of caution this should still be deleted. –Davey2010Talk 17:18, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
- Indeed, such "example" isn't true because the icons within your "Image stitching" are CC-0 licensed, not original public domain, they are still copyrightable, at least de jure copyrightable, but just PDed by their copyright holders. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 00:05, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The image should be considered as a whole: yes, individual icons may be below TOO but the overal arrangement is not (far too many elements to consider this below TOO as a whole). --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:30, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Apparent copyright violation The Quirky Kitty (talk) 10:05, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:30, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
VOI.ID © 2023 VOI - Waktunya Merevolusi Pemberitaan Urang Kamang (talk) 10:07, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:32, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
VOI.ID © 2023 VOI - Waktunya Merevolusi Pemberitaan Urang Kamang (talk) 10:07, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:32, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Artwork of a living artist (Loredana Culea) – no proof of permission.
Gikü (talk) 10:21, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:33, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
self-advertisment image Jochen Burghardt (talk) 10:38, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: 23:40, March 6, 2023, by Krd (No permission since 27 February 2023). --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:35, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
possible copyvio (photo by Kevin Kada/Hungry Bear Photography) M2k~dewiki (talk) 11:04, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:36, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:The Backrooms levels
[edit]These are screenshots from backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com which has a footer of Unless otherwise stated, the content of this page is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License, but per https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Backrooms the piece of text being quoted here was written by an anonymous 4chan user.
Belbury (talk) 11:51, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. And text-only, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:39, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
I am the original uploader of this file. I have already uploaded another higher resolution photograph of this historical artwork and would like this inferior quality file to be deleted, please see here for the better version: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Bhai_Bachittar_Singh_fresco.jpg#%7B%7Bint%3Afiledesc%7D%7D ThethPunjabi (talk) 11:51, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, superseded. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:40, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Useless. It was for technical dispute in pl-Wiki Ciacho5 (talk) 12:29, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per self-nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:40, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
copyright Eemirrgs (talk) 12:48, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- I don't know how to add someone's photo so i looked to another photograph which is File:Okan Buruk.jpg and they added it same way. I don't know how to add a person's picture. Barisegebalci (talk) 13:52, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:44, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
As uploader is Adrian Soto Garcia, the file is not own work – and really it is not called own work. As this is 2011 upload, it is too young to be grandfathered old file. That means: VRT-permission from author Valentin Lopez Hernandez is needed. Taivo (talk) 12:51, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:44, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Questionable own work claim. no metadata, low resolution. HeminKurdistan (talk) 13:08, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, found online. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:48, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
COI from promotional editor, no evidence of CC licensing by AGCO-Fendt Acroterion (talk) 13:40, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:49, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Appears to have been uploaded by a COI editor, no evidence of CC licensing by AGCO-Fendt Acroterion (talk) 13:43, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:49, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
subido por error Estrategas Group (talk) 14:11, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: likely not own work, DW without source info. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:50, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Ich bin owner dieses Bildes und will sie aus Wikkipedia rauslöschen 217.255.150.85 14:24, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- delete 217.255.150.85 15:44, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- Every person could tell us, that he/she is the uploader and/or owner of an (unused) picture. Please log in as the uploader @Jahamm and declare that this is correct. Otherwise this request will be closed. Emha (talk) 12:57, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:51, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Personal profile picture by uploader, unused Enyavar (talk) 14:52, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Again, not a personal picture but a picture of a politician. A quick web search shows that he represented Bogotá as a member of the Liberal Party in the Colombia House of Representatives from 2014-2018. So I'd say he has sufficient notability for Commons. My issue would be how trustworthy the "own work" claim is. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:46, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. And likely not own work: subject is same as uploader. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:52, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Files by HibachiLover298
[edit]- File:Bruegger's Logo 2018.svg
- File:Boston Market logo 2019.svg
- File:Arctic Circle Restaurants Logo.svg
Commons:License laundering --Cryptic-waveform (talk) 15:32, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: unused logos, out of scope. Kept one: in use, and PD-textlogo. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:57, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Files by Directexchanges
[edit]- File:Yanni Bravo in Boston, Ma - January 27th 2019.jpg
- File:Yanni Bravo in Boston, Ma - January 27th, 2019.jpg
- File:Yanni Bravo in Mytilene, Greece - July 2021.jpg
- File:Yanni Bravo in Mytilene, Greece July 2021.jpg
Private image collection by non-contributor --Cryptic-waveform (talk) 16:06, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:57, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Manifestement une photo manuelle d'un ouvrage... sans indication de la source Sherwood6 (talk) 16:26, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Historical photo, missing essential info: original author, source, date, and permission. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:58, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
This is a receive photo, which means the Tasnim News Agency is not the copyright holder, invalid CC license A1Cafel (talk) 16:28, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- Commenting as the uploader, this was a good faith upload to find an image for damage in Syria. I wasn't aware what received means at the footer of the image. I've uploaded images from Tasnim News Agency before and didn't encounter this so based on that, assumed Tasnim was the copyright holder. Dora the Axe-plorer (talk) 02:33, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:59, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Copyvio. De minimis does not apply to photograph taken from an artwork HeminKurdistan (talk) 17:57, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:03, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Image obtained from the internet HeminKurdistan (talk) 18:04, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:04, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Copied from her Facebook page (see source) without written consent. Mondo (talk) 18:25, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:05, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
nieaktualne zdjęcie Małgorzata Skibińska (talk) 18:57, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of personal photo. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:08, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
This is just a picture of a Google Home appliance with some text over it (created as part of homework). I am assuming this is enough for a copyright violation. Antimuonium (talk) 20:46, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:08, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Copyright. This a cropped version of this photo where is mentioned "Photo: O País". Wouter (talk) 20:54, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:10, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Own work? This is a cropped version mentioned here. Wouter (talk) 20:58, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- I just found that the user has also an uncropped version as GIF File:Guiamba.gif. In both cases no metadata about a camera.
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:11, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Non-free content, derivative work, not in bounds of FOP. Image contains copyrighted film stills by John Akomfrah, photographed in the UK (no freedom of panorama for 2D art that is not "a work of artistic crafstmanship," video art does not qualify) --19h00s (talk) 21:25, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:11, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Non-free content, derivative work, no FOP. Image contains copyrighted film stills by John Akomfrah, photographed in the United States (no FOP) 19h00s (talk) 21:00, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:11, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Own work? This is a cropped version of the photo here Wouter (talk) 21:03, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:11, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Picture on the right is from Christopher Sadowski on a NY Post article https://nypost.com/2010/02/14/cantors-sour-note/ CoffeeEngineer (talk) 21:35, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:12, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Foox123456789 (talk · contribs)
[edit]The claimed license is obviously false. These images may qualify for public domain exemptions, but that cannot be determined just from these scans.
Pi.1415926535 (talk) 21:51, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:13, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Taken from a video per the description, missing source and copyright status of original video. Ixfd64 (talk) 22:25, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:14, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Can't be "personal work". Photo coming from a serie copyrighted by Kirsten Fenton (another from that serie here : https://inculte.fr/auteurs/olivier-bodart/) Hyméros --}-≽ ♥ Yes ? 23:00, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- This photo does not have copyright and is free of rights Lacgelé (talk) 01:50, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Needs permission from photographer via COM:VRT. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:16, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Own work not is. 186.172.91.150 23:37, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:16, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
per COM:FOP Japan. According to the news[1][2], this is the navigation board set up in 2021. The copyrights of the board's contents seems to be kept now. Commons can't accept this file. Netora (talk) 09:57, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yasu (talk) 15:12, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
The Symbol mark on the left side is above COM:TOO#Japan Halowand (talk) 03:23, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:20, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
Photo Provided by NATO, which means not a work from the US Federal Government, and the PD license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 07:57, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:21, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
Photo Provided by NATO, which means not a work from the US Federal Government, and the PD license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 07:57, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:21, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
Photo Provided by NATO, which means not a work from the US Federal Government, and the PD license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 07:57, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:21, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
Photo Provided by NATO, which means not a work from the US Federal Government, and the PD license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 07:58, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:21, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
File:Secretary Blinken Participates in a Meeting on "Russia, Arms Control, and Regional Security" (50999636880).jpg
[edit]Photo Provided by NATO, which means not a work from the US Federal Government, and the PD license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 07:58, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:21, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
File:Secretary Blinken Participates in a Meeting on "Russia, Arms Control, and Regional Security" (51068914802).jpg
[edit]Photo Provided by NATO, which means not a work from the US Federal Government, and the PD license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 07:58, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:21, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
File:Secretary Blinken Participates in a Meeting on "Russia, Arms Control, and Regional Security" (51068117608).jpg
[edit]Photo Provided by NATO, which means not a work from the US Federal Government, and the PD license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 07:58, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:21, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 11:42, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:22, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 11:43, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:22, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 11:43, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:22, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 12:40, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:22, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 12:41, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:22, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
Questionable own work claim. No metadata, low resolution HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:44, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:23, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
previusly published here: https://www.marioromano.info/ (cropped from this file) Bradipo Lento (talk) 21:19, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- Ticket:2023021310016715 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 07:01, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already by Krd. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:23, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
logo for a non-existent hoax video game Trade (talk) 22:44, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Keep This game exists, but it’s still in development. [[3]] - User:Cjamsla511
- That link is dead for me. --Trade (talk) 00:12, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Oops, fixed the link. Also, here’s the trailer: [[4]] - User:Cjamsla511
I withdraw my nomination --Trade (talk) 21:22, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already by Krd. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:23, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
No FOP in the US Elisfkc (talk) 21:00, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ✗plicit 07:01, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
The display in the upper part of this image is a 2D-artwork, which is not covered by Canada's freedom-of-panorama exception. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:38, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- Then crop it out? It feels like that's probably COM:DEMINIMIS, but whether cropped out or kept as de minimis, deletion is not the right answer. --B (talk) 16:45, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- That image is not the main subject of this photo. Raysonho @ Open Grid Scheduler / Grid Engine (talk) 16:01, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:21, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
File:Pomnik kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego przy bazylice mniejszej pw. Najświętszego Serca Jezusowego w AugustowieDSCF5095.jpg
[edit]The depicted statue seems to be rather recent and, per the filename, to be located inside a cathedral. Therefore, Poland's freedom-of-panorama exception is not applicable. -- Túrelio (talk) 10:09, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Unless polish native speakers say otherwise: Google Translate and other services translate with monument to Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński at the Minor Basilica of St. Sacred Heart of Jesus in Augustó – at (or by) - not in. -- Herbert Ortner (talk) 19:27, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:22, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
LP cover Mannivu · ✉ 11:47, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:22, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
LP cover Mannivu · ✉ 11:48, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:22, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
LP cover Mannivu · ✉ 11:48, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:22, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
Unknown location in Louvre museum ; No notability ; No use Tangopaso (talk) 17:12, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- I disagree. It's some kind of staircase, so we can learn something from it. My question would be whether it's a modern architectural element that although not highly original is copyrighted. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:39, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Looks modern to me, Weak delete based on COM:PCP. Abzeronow (talk) 18:49, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- Delete architectural element, commercially-licensed image file possibly violates French copyright law (no commercial freedom of panorama). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 00:06, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:23, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rakdarathaihk (talk · contribs)
[edit]unlikely to be own work
- File:ชาติ ชัยภูมิ.jpg
- File:เพชรา เชาวราษฎร์ นางเอกหนังไทย.jpg
- File:มิตร ชัยบัญชา พระเอกหนังไทย.jpg
- File:ลือชัย นฤนาท พระเอกตุ๊กตาทองคนแรกของไทย.jpg
- File:แก่นใจ มีนะกนิษฐ์ นักแสดงชาวไทย.jpg
- File:Man Thiraphon.jpg
Didym (talk) 19:51, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: Several of these probably are of expired copyright in Thailand now (50 years after publication), but not before 1996. --Paul_012 (talk) 16:51, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:23, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
This logo isn't a proper work, possibly the license is false; also the uploader has very serious issues about uploading logos. Taichi (talk) 04:40, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- Looks like this was fixed to pd-textlogo. Still, Weak delete: above COM:TOO US IMO. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:25, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, above the US ToO. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:31, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
No Meta data showing ownership by uploader Pierre cb (talk) 04:57, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- 36 KB, Delete, if not, rename. No Jesus there. 181.43.4.96 18:44, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. No metadata and an uninteresting picture of clouds. Definitely no Jesus there. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:33, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
The Romaji on top, color choice and curbed line below are above COM:TOO#Japan. Halowand (talk) 03:19, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Stifle (talk) 15:11, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
The Romaji on top, color choice and curbed line below are above COM:TOO#Japan Halowand (talk) 03:21, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Stifle (talk) 15:11, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
These geometric figure are not enough simple and are above COM:TOO#Japan Halowand (talk) 03:26, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Stifle (talk) 15:11, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
The Symbol mark on the left side is above COM:TOO#Japan Halowand (talk) 03:30, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Stifle (talk) 15:11, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
The Symbol mark on the right side is above COM:TOO#Japan Halowand (talk) 03:31, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Stifle (talk) 15:11, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
These figure are not enough simple and are above COM:TOO#Japan Halowand (talk) 03:33, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep "Logos composed merely of geometric shapes and texts are also not copyrightable in general." these are katakana and hiragana. 2804:14D:5C32:614F:4CBA:5485:4B69:A4D
- Delete Way above COM:TOO#Japan. Thibaut (talk) 10:16, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and remark of Thibaut. --Ellywa (talk) 23:05, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
أنا صاحب هذا الملف يحتوي على أشخاص لم يتم التشاور معهم من أجل نشرها على ويكي ميديا. شكرا Rifipure (talk) 17:03, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, Marocco is not mentioned on Commons:Country specific consent requirements, so deleted per COM:PRP. --Ellywa (talk) 23:10, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Oghab 44
[edit]No photographer is credited and this is not a work by Fars News Agency. This unveiling ceremony was exclusively reported by the Iranian state television, which is the source of these files.
- File:14011118000724638113782805089730 24799 PhotoX.jpg
- File:14011118000724638113782834933764 36873 PhotoX.jpg
- File:14011118000724638113782839621657 69426 PhotoX.jpg
- File:14011118000724638113782844777457 92207 PhotoX.jpg
- File:14011118000724638113782849621382 15212 PhotoX.jpg
- File:14011118000724638113782854621093 97987 PhotoX.jpg
- File:14011118000724638113782864621086 26942 PhotoX.jpg
- File:14011118000724638113782900559067 77494 PhotoX.jpg
- File:14011118000724638113782910714839 97036 PhotoX.jpg
- File:14011118000724638113782920558450 79583 PhotoX.jpg
- File:14011118000724638113782930402356 38452 PhotoX.jpg
- File:14011119000694 Test PhotoN.jpg
HeminKurdistan (talk) 17:21, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
- ممنون از دقت شما، درست گفتید یک گزارش خبری از مراسم توسط صدا سیما منتشر شد و اون مربوط به خبرنگاری بود که فیلمش هست و فقط اون خبرنگار و فرماندهان جلوی دوربین هویتشان معلوم بود، ولی به دلیل امنیتی فیلم بردارها و عکاس ها هویتشون معلوم نیست. خب الان فارس این عکس ها رو منتشر کرده و اسم عکاس رو هم منتشر نکرده ، و نگفته به نقل از تلوزیون ایران، پایین صفحه هم حق انتشار داره، از کجا میدونید این عکس ها حق کپی رایتش برای تلوزیون ایران هست و فارس خودش نگرفته و بدون اجازه منشر کرده به اسم خودش؟! لینک صفحه ای که قبل از فارس این عکس ها رو منتشر کرده رو لطف کنید برای بنده بفرستید، من در گوگل دیدم چند سایت دیگه به نقل از فارس هم عکس ، هایی منتشر کرده بودن
- فیلم گزارش فقط برای تلوزیون هست عکس ها رو من ندیدم
- تشکر@HeminKurdistan
- ~~~ 5.112.209.88 06:09, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- سلام و عرض ادب. سایت ارتش همین تصاویر رو با کیفیت بالاتر و بدون واترمارک منتشر کرده. [5] HeminKurdistan (talk) 12:01, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Same problem as above:
- File:بازدید+سرلشکر+باقری+از+پایگاه+هوایی+راهکنشی+عقاب+44+ارتش (6).jpg
- File:عقاب 44 ا.jpg
- File:عقاب 44 ب.jpg
- File:عقاب 44 ت.jpg
- File:عقاب 44 ث.jpg
- File:عقاب 44 ج.jpg
- File:عقاب 44 د.jpg
HeminKurdistan (talk) 17:15, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 22:51, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
Deletion requests/Archivos propios
[edit]For my own peace of mind and safety/ Por mi propia seguridad y tranquilidad
- File:Marta_Querol_Benèch_01.jpg
- File:Marta Querol-VC.jpg
- File:Fallera Mayor de Valencia 1988.jpg
- File:Gala del premio Planeta 2007.jpg
- File:Rosa de Sarajevo Detalle.jpg
- File:BunkerTito-Acceso.jpg
- File:BunkerTito-Entrada.jpg
- File:TeléfonoRojo-Bunker.jpg
- File:Hadid-NY-02.jpg
- File:Torre_del_agua-Vukovar.jpg
- File:Granja_de_Ovcara.jpg
- File:Memorial_World_Trade_Center-03.jpg
- File:Ria_Bilbao-Zorrotzaurre.jpg
- File:Puente_Euskalduna.jpg
- File:Puente_Bizkaia_Colgante.jpg
- File:Puente_La_Salve-1.jpg
- File:Bahía_de_Cullera_Atardecer_02.jpg
- File:Bahía_de_Cullera_Atardecer_03.jpg
- File:Bahía_de_Cullera_Atardecer_01.jpg
- File:Bahía_de_Cullera_Atardecer_04.jpg
- File:Bahía_de_Cullera_05.jpg
- File:Espolín_en_ocres.jpg
- File:Jubón_en_espolín.jpg
- File:Tejido_espolinado_sigloXVIII.jpg
- File:Cartel_informativo_Espolin.jpg
- File:Delphos_Mariano_Fortuny_01.jpg
- File:Delphos_Mariano_Fortuny_02.jpg
- File:Abanico_plumas_años_20.jpg
- File:Televisión_antigua.jpg
- File:Zootropo.jpg
- File:Gala_Premio_Planeta_2007-28.jpg
- File:Gala_Premio_Planeta_2007-29.jpg
- File:Guillermo_Montesinos_Valencia.jpg
- File:Joel_Dicker-Valencia.jpg
Reasons for deletion request: All pictures nominated are my own work or works I do have the complete rights for use (as finally I have demonstrated although I haven't even been able to find a unique criteria for accepting usage rights). When I started uploading pictures, I was not aware that they could become a new “problem” to me and that I would have to put up with new false complaints and accusations that would stay no matter they were falses. There is no way for me to contribute peacefully, I do not fit in this project and any contribution becomes a personal risk to my user and my name or a loss of time. Therefore, the best is to delete what I have contributed. I leave those images that are already incorporated into articles, I have no intention to harm the project, except if the person who appears in the picture is myself (to avoid further harassment). I keep my account with the remaining pictures. Thank you. Como me expreso mejor en español y no sé quién va a valorar este escrito, lo hago también en español. Todas las imágenes que nomino para borrado son mi propio trabajo o trabajos de los que soy la propietaria de todos los derechos de uso, como finalmente, con mucho esfuerzo, se ha demostrado ya que cada vez se me aplicaba un criterio y un formulario diferente. Cuando comencé a subir fotos no fui consciente de que podrían convertirse en una nueva arma arrojadiza por parte de aquellos que han venido hostigándome con bastante éxito en tiempos recientes en otros proyectos del conglomerado Wiki y que afrontar de nuevo acusaciones falsas y denuncias interesadas que, aunque se protesten y argumenten y haya usuarios veteranos que lo soliciten, ahí quedan. No hay forma de contribuir en paz y al final lo que siento es que no encajo en este proyecto y que mis contribuciones se convierten bien en un riesgo para mí, por acusaciones difamatorias que no se rectifican, o en pérdidas de tiempo (mío y de otros, incluidos los usuarios de Wikimedia Commons que tienen a bien atenderme) al no encontrar un criterio único para aceptar las imágenes. Por tanto, lo mejor es que se elimine todo aquello que he listado. Las imágenes que están incorporadas ya a algún artículo no están incluidas en la lista porque mi intención NO es dañar al proyecto, solo protegerme yo, salvo en el caso de que la protagonista de la foto sea yo misma ya que de estas prefiero borrarlas todas. Este último caso se da en una foto que alguien añadió a la ficha de Wikidata y ahora ilustra el artículo biográfico de mi nombre y que prefiero que se retire antes de que “alguien” me acuse (de nuevo) de lo que NO hago. Muchas gracias. MorenaClara (talk) 16:40, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
- fx. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:37, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
- I do not understand User:Minorax. What means fx? Thank you. No entiendo lo de fx. ¿Qué quiere decir? Gracias MorenaClara (talk) 17:14, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
- Sorry, I do understand now. You fixed html sintaxsis errors. I found out the changes. Thank you for your work User:Minorax. Perdón, ya entiendo lo que ha hecho. Errores de sintaxis que me ha corregido. Me ha costado encontrar los cambios. Gracias por el trabajo. MorenaClara (talk) 20:46, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- Hallo again, User:Minorax Is there any problem with my file deletion request? It's been over a month and I see later requests already solved. Also, from another file that I requested the recovery because it was linked to a Wikipedia article and it was deleted by a misunderstanding, I have not any news either. I have followed the steps other volunteers indicated me and I don't know if there is anything else I must do. Thank you so much. MorenaClara (talk) 17:21, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
- Info some files, eg File:BunkerTito-Acceso.jpg and File:Marta Querol-VC.jpg are used and do not qualify for courtesy deletion. Ankry (talk) 11:58, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you very much for your prompt answer. The picture File:BunkerTito-Acceso.jpg has been used in March the 7th. I had not verified every day every picture since I asked for deletion. I asked for it on February, the 12ve . I was not aware it has been used recently. There is no problem to keep it.
- About the other picture of myself (File:Marta Querol-VC), is a different point. As explained before and by email I preferred there are no pictures of me at all. When I uploaded them I did not expected what came later. I hope you can understand my point. Thank You again. MorenaClara (talk) 15:16, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
- Info I see no deletian warning template on the file pages. Ankry (talk) 13:15, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
- For not bothering you twice, I answered all by email. Thank you again. MorenaClara (talk) 15:17, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
- Now every file has the deletian warning template. I hope I have accomplished all the requirements. Thank you. MorenaClara (talk) 22:04, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, as these images are present on Commons too long for deletion per COM:Courtesy. @MorenaClara: please indicated which images are specifically damaging for you and why, so the request can be reconsidered. --Ellywa (talk) 23:14, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
Do not worry about that, I have talked with too many people about this issue with no results. My reasons have been exposed many times to different Commons volunteers. In fact, I thought it was already closed, I did not expected any answer. I am sorry you have lost your time with this. I just stopped uploading pictures. No contributions, no problems.