User talk:Acroterion

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Southwest Boeing 737-700 N472WN BWI MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:39, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Frontier Airbus A321 N615FR BWI MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 02:59, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Amazon Air Boeing 767-300 N241AZ BK MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 02:04, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Francis Street Annapolis MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
This is has strong, strange noise in some (but not all) shadows. Was it AI processed or something? --Plozessor 04:17, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed, it was just some shadow noise that got enhanced when I lifted the shadows a little due to the dynamic range. --Acroterion 00:56, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Are you sure this wasn't AI-upscaled or something? There are some really strange effects. --Plozessor 15:07, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No upscaling needed, it's a 50 MP camera. All I did was denoise the shadows that got lifted, using a Topaz filter (which is an AI app). I'll try it with just the native Photoshop filters and see what I get. --Acroterion 19:37, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Are you looking at the wood shingles and rotten corner trim on the building at right? Those aren't artifacts. --Acroterion 23:43, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Proccessing without a third-party filter leaves an unacceptable amount of noise in the shadows. I'm not seeing any artifacts in the current version, just material textures that are present in the original.n --Acroterion 01:03, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Looking good to me now. Probably it was the Topaz filter that caused these strange distortions in the original version. --Plozessor 06:01, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! American Boeing 737-800 N923NN DCA VA1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Nice and Sharp too! --Needsmoreritalin 02:42, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! American Airbus 319 N749US DCA VA1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Bgag 02:37, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eurocopter UH-72A Lakota 13-72275 FDK MD2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 01:37, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Southwest Boeing 737-700 N491WN BWI MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --C messier 19:24, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Mickaël en résidence 07:25, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Frontier Airbus A320neo N353FR BWI MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 19:31, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Mickaël en résidence 07:25, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Netjets Bombardier Challenger 350 N757QS BWI MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 16:58, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Mickaël en résidence 07:25, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Southwest Boeing 737-700 N910WN BWI MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Drow male 17:14, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Mickaël en résidence 07:25, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Atlas Air Boeing 747-400 N322SG BWI MD2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:19, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good --FBilula 12:57, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Atlas Air Boeing 747-400 N322SG BWI MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:19, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality --FBilula 12:57, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:49, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bell AH-1Z 168964 of USMC HMLA-773 FDK MD3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Bgag 02:51, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bell AH-1Z 168964 of USMC HMLA-773 FDK MD2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 05:27, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:48, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bell AH-1Z 168964 of USMC HMLA-773 FDK MD4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 19:34, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good --FBilula 12:51, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bell AH-1Z 168964 of USMC HMLA-773 FDK MD5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Detailed --FBilula 12:51, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:52, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Southwest Boeing 737-700 N448WN BWI MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:58, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Southwest Boeing 737-800 N8699A BWI MD2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:58, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Douglas C-54D Skymaster N500EJ HGR MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 04:43, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! American Boeing 737-800 N359PX BWI MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 07:08, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Southwest Boeing 737-8 MAX N8796L BWI MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support A bit noisy at full resolution but still good quality. --Shougissime 19:14, 23 September 2024 (UTC) I see what you mean, I'll fix that. Acroterion 21:06, 23 September 2024 (UTC) De-noised. Acroterion 00:13, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:44, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cathedral of St Patrick Harrisburg PA2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:33, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cathedral of St Patrick Harrisburg PA3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:01, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cathedral of St Patrick Harrisburg PA4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:33, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cathedral of St Patrick Harrisburg PA6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:33, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! War Correspondent's Memorial Arch Gathland State Park MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --A. Öztas 01:08, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pennsylvania State Capitol west front PA1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --A. Öztas 01:08, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cathedral of St Patrick Harrisburg PA5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:07, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pennsylvania Capitol rotunda PA1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:47, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Smith-Remsberg farmstead MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:41, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!

[edit]

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you previously voted in the Picture of the Year contest. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2023.

Round 2 will end at UTC.

Click here to vote now!

If you have already voted for Round 2, please ignore this message.


Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:10, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cedar Creek reenactment VA25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:36, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cedar Creek reenactment VA4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:13, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20240920 53rd Street Hyde Park Chicago near equinox stacked rotated and recropped 4x3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cedar Creek reenactment VA28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:21, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cedar Creek reenactment VA6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:52, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rockland WV1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:38, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Morgan's Spring WV1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 02:01, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Casper Walper House WV1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:25, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cedar Creek reenactment VA31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Very good quality --Ptrump16 15:58, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:44, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! William Chapline House Sharpsburg MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:40, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Memorial Park Frederick MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:39, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Evangelical Lutheran towers Frederick MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --I.Mahesh 02:38, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St John tower Frederick MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --I.Mahesh 02:38, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trinity Chapel spire Frederick MD3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --I.Mahesh 02:38, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Middletown Main St MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:53, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pennsylvania Capitol rotunda PA2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --ReneeWrites 21:39, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! First Presbyterian Church Carlisle PA2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:42, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shafer Farm Burkittsville MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Rangan Datta Wiki 03:03, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Parpan House Shepherdstown WV1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 02:15, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 173 W Louther St Carlisle PA1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 06:00, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Frederick City Hall MD4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 03:36, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Court Square Frederick MD2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 03:36, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ross House Frederick MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 03:36, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mathias House Frederick MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 03:36, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Best Farm MNB MD2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:18, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Best Farm MNB MD3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:51, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Best Farm MNB MD5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:18, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Best Farm barn MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Bgag 03:15, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mumma Farm Antietam NB MD3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Seems to have a defect near the top, and also a small white area at upper edge. Otherwise good. --Plozessor 04:07, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Well spotted, cropped whatever that was out. --Acroterion 15:38, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Thx, good now! --Plozessor 16:39, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! UDC Confederate monument Monocacy NB MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Chroma noise and CA at the right side of the monument, also slightly tilted. Probably both fixable, otherwise it would be good. --Plozessor 04:11, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Chroma fixed, and rethought perspective crop and color balance. --Acroterion 01:36, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Thx, very good now! --Plozessor 10:24, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 101 Council St Frederick MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 10:41, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:44, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! U.S. Army Boeing CH-47F Chinook 11-08097 FDK MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Excellent --MB-one 13:58, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]