Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2022/06/17
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
![46 File:"Wikipedia weet nu alles van sokpopperij" (11174129846).png](#File:"Wikipedia_weet_nu_alles_van_sokpopperij"_(11174129846).png){kind=link}
![67 File:.jpg"Ramithabethasansaleh".jpg](#File:.jpg"Ramithabethasansaleh".jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
While this film was produced in 1926 (and incidentally the copyright on the film itself is dated 1926), it premiered on January 9, 1927, according to its Wikipedia article. So this is really a 1927 film. Its copyright registration and renewal (yes, it was renewed) registration say that the film was copyrighted initially on January 10, 1927. Renewal entry: https://archive.org/details/catalogofcopyrig381213lib/page/114/mode/1up?view=theater @Racconish: Is there any evidence this was published prior to 1927? If so, it would make the 1954 renewal no longer apply, but if not I guess it'd have to be deleted until 2023. PseudoSkull (talk) 03:36, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Keep The film premiered in December 1926 in New York and Los Angeles. There is some discrepancy between sources whether it was December 25 or December 26 [1] [2]. — Racconish 💬 06:08, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
- Retracted—there does appear to be some evidence after all that it was released in 1926, even beyond the sources mentioned above. Google Books has several 1926 journals mentioning the film. So it's reasonable to say that the OP claim was incorrect. The Wikipedia article should be updated. PseudoSkull (talk) 06:20, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Withdrawn. — Racconish 💬 06:22, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Trabajo propio? 181.203.101.233 00:51, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Speedy delete per nom and COM:CSD#F4, License review NOT passed: Found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 09:40, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 13:53, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Trabajo propio? 181.203.101.233 00:52, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per nom and COM:CSD#F4, License review NOT passed: Found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 09:41, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 13:54, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
No es trabajo propio 181.203.101.233 02:11, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 06:46, 17 June 2022 UTC: [[[Commons:CSD#F10|CSD F10]] (personal photos out of COM:SCOPE --Krdbot 13:28, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Nishanth Duraisamy (talk) 07:28, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:58, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
https://www.arsenal.com/men/players/aaron-ramsdale Mattythewhite (talk) 22:01, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 23:07, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused file Bedivere (talk) 17:11, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
- Bedivere, please, remove it. I'm the autor of the copyright and I want you remove it from Wikimedia Commons. Thanks.
- Signed, Wiki López Antón (talk) 19:07, 17 June 2022 (UTC).
- Bueno, acabo de ver que hablas español, así que mejor hablemos en español. Wiki López Antón (talk) 19:10, 17 June 2022 (UTC).
- La etiqueté para borrado rápido. Bedivere (talk) 20:45, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
- Bueno, acabo de ver que hablas español, así que mejor hablemos en español. Wiki López Antón (talk) 19:10, 17 June 2022 (UTC).
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 08:24, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
Uploader is presumably not Owen Sweeney, whose photo is available on the AP site: https://www.apimages.com/metadata/Index/APTOPIX-Eddie-Van-Halen-attends-What-It-Means-/8aef0188301c47c08258405532040fc6/1/0 Freelance-frank (talk) 18:27, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. -- 32X (talk) 18:59, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
Veraltet + Rechteinhaber (FBB) widerspricht Nutzung, da Nutzung Logo und CD zu ähnlich // outdated + Copyright Infringement CellarDoord85 (talk) 18:44, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. -- 32X (talk) 18:57, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
Rechteinhaber (FBB) widerspricht Nutzung // Copyright Infringement CellarDoord85 (talk) 18:45, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. -- 32X (talk) 18:49, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
Rechteinhaber (FBB) widerspricht Nutzung // Copyright Infringement CellarDoord85 (talk) 18:49, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. -- 32X (talk) 18:25, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
AJKJGNNA 2001:4450:833B:A800:7098:3BE1:FA5C:3919 12:31, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Nonsense request. --Achim55 (talk) 16:33, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
Veraltet + Rechteinhaber (FBB) widerspricht Nutzung Logo / CD zu ähnlich // outdated + Copyright Infringement CellarDoord85 (talk) 18:50, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: As long as the uploader has to interact with lawyers, it’s better to reduce the risk. There are alternatives for this file. -- 32X (talk) 20:23, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
Rechteinhaber (FBB) widerspricht Nutzung // Copyright Infringement CellarDoord85 (talk) 18:52, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: As long as the uploader has to interact with lawyers, it’s better to reduce the risk. There are alternatives for this file. -- 32X (talk) 20:23, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
Rechteinhaber (FBB) widerspricht Nutzung // Copyright Infringement CellarDoord85 (talk) 18:52, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: As long as the uploader has to interact with lawyers, it’s better to reduce the risk. There are alternatives for this file. -- 32X (talk) 20:23, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
Rechteinhaber (FBB) widerspricht Nutzung // Copyright Infringement CellarDoord85 (talk) 18:53, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: As long as the uploader has to interact with lawyers, it’s better to reduce the risk. There are alternatives for this file. -- 32X (talk) 20:24, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
Rechteinhaber (FBB) widerspricht Nutzung // Copyright Infringement CellarDoord85 (talk) 18:53, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: As long as the uploader has to interact with lawyers, it’s better to reduce the risk. There are alternatives for this file. -- 32X (talk) 20:24, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
Rechteinhaber (FBB) widerspricht Nutzung // Copyright Infringement CellarDoord85 (talk) 18:53, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: As long as the uploader has to interact with lawyers, it’s better to reduce the risk. There are alternatives for this file. -- 32X (talk) 20:24, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
Rechteinhaber (FBB) widerspricht Nutzung // Copyright Infringement CellarDoord85 (talk) 18:54, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: As long as the uploader has to interact with lawyers, it’s better to reduce the risk. There are alternatives for this file. -- 32X (talk) 20:24, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
Rechteinhaber (FBB) widerspricht Nutzung // Copyright Infringement CellarDoord85 (talk) 18:54, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: As long as the uploader has to interact with lawyers, it’s better to reduce the risk. There are alternatives for this file. -- 32X (talk) 20:24, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
Rechteinhaber (FBB) widerspricht Nutzung // Copyright Infringement CellarDoord85 (talk) 18:55, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: As long as the uploader has to interact with lawyers, it’s better to reduce the risk. There are alternatives for this file. -- 32X (talk) 20:24, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
Rechteinhaber (FBB) widerspricht Nutzung // Copyright Infringement CellarDoord85 (talk) 18:55, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: As long as the uploader has to interact with lawyers, it’s better to reduce the risk. There are alternatives for this file. -- 32X (talk) 20:24, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
Rechteinhaber (FBB) widerspricht Nutzung // Copyright Infringement CellarDoord85 (talk) 18:55, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: As long as the uploader has to interact with lawyers, it’s better to reduce the risk. There are alternatives for this file. -- 32X (talk) 20:24, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
Rechteinhaber (FBB) widerspricht Nutzung // Copyright Infringement CellarDoord85 (talk) 18:56, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: As long as the uploader has to interact with lawyers, it’s better to reduce the risk. There are alternatives for this file. -- 32X (talk) 20:24, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
Rechteinhaber (FBB) widerspricht Nutzung // Copyright Infringement CellarDoord85 (talk) 18:56, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: As long as the uploader has to interact with lawyers, it’s better to reduce the risk. There are alternatives for this file. -- 32X (talk) 20:24, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
Rechteinhaber (FBB) widerspricht Nutzung // Copyright Infringement CellarDoord85 (talk) 18:56, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: As long as the uploader has to interact with lawyers, it’s better to reduce the risk. There are alternatives for this file. -- 32X (talk) 20:25, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
Rechteinhaber (FBB) widerspricht Nutzung // Copyright Infringement CellarDoord85 (talk) 18:57, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: As long as the uploader has to interact with lawyers, it’s better to reduce the risk. There are alternatives for this file. -- 32X (talk) 20:25, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
Rechteinhaber (FBB) widerspricht Nutzung // Copyright Infringement CellarDoord85 (talk) 18:57, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: As long as the uploader has to interact with lawyers, it’s better to reduce the risk. There are alternatives for this file. -- 32X (talk) 20:25, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
Rechteinhaber (FBB) widerspricht Nutzung // Copyright Infringement CellarDoord85 (talk) 18:57, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Too simple to be copyrighted. It is an arrow on a brown background. --RAN (talk) 20:56, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: As long as the uploader has to interact with lawyers, it’s better to reduce the risk. There are alternatives for this file. -- 32X (talk) 20:25, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
Rechteinhaber (FBB) widerspricht Nutzung // Copyright Infringement CellarDoord85 (talk) 18:57, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: As long as the uploader has to interact with lawyers, it’s better to reduce the risk. There are alternatives for this file. -- 32X (talk) 20:25, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
Rechteinhaber (FBB) widerspricht Nutzung // Copyright Infringement CellarDoord85 (talk) 18:58, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: As long as the uploader has to interact with lawyers, it’s better to reduce the risk. There are alternatives for this file. -- 32X (talk) 20:25, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
Rechteinhaber (FBB) widerspricht Nutzung // Copyright Infringement CellarDoord85 (talk) 18:58, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: As long as the uploader has to interact with lawyers, it’s better to reduce the risk. There are alternatives for this file. -- 32X (talk) 20:25, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
Appears to be a copy of copright material here: https://eyesafe.com/rpf/, although claimed as "own work" PamD (talk) 17:01, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
- Requested speedy because of copyvio. 0xDeadbeef (talk) 22:40, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 08:06, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
- Files in Category:Sheikh Zayed Mosque
Violates COM:FOP#United Arab Emirates. es:Mezquita Sheikh Zayed tells that the building was finished in 2007.
Some of the images of people might be de minimis.
- File:Abu Dhabi Sheikh Zayed Mosque - Prayer Hall 01.jpg
- File:Abu Dhabi Sheikh Zayed Mosque - Prayer Hall 02.jpg
- File:Abu Dhabi Sheikh Zayed Mosque.jpg
- File:Beautiful Chandelier.jpg
- File:Crystal Chandelier in the Entrance Hall of Sheikh Zayed Mosque.jpg
- File:Defense.gov News Photo 100311-D-7203C-002.jpg
- File:Defense.gov photo essay 100311-D-7203C-003.jpg
- File:Defense.gov photo essay 100311-D-7203C-004.jpg
- File:Defense.gov photo essay 100311-D-7203C-005.jpg
- File:Defense.gov photo essay 100311-D-7203C-006.jpg
- File:Defense.gov photo essay 100311-D-7203C-017.jpg
- File:Defense.gov photo essay 100311-D-7203C-018.jpg
- File:Defense.gov photo essay 100311-D-7203C-019.jpg
- File:Defense.gov photo essay 100311-D-7203C-021.jpg
- File:Defense.gov photo essay 100311-D-7203C-022.jpg
- File:Defense.gov photo essay 100311-D-7203C-023.jpg
- File:Minaret Schaich-Zayid-Moschee.jpg
- File:One of the 7 imported chandeliers..jpg
- File:Opulence and Majestic.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Mosque Courtyard Arcade 01.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Mosque Courtyard Arcade 02.jpg
- File:Soft beautiful carpet..jpg
- File:Swarovski Crystal Chandelier in Abu Dhabi Sheikh Zayed Mosque 01.jpg
- File:Swarovski Crystal Chandelier in Abu Dhabi Sheikh Zayed Mosque 02.jpg
- File:The Entrance Hall of Sheikh Zayed Mosque 01.jpg
- File:The Entrance Hall of Sheikh Zayed Mosque 02.jpg
Stefan4 (talk) 22:43, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
- We seem to be stuck in a merry-go-round of images of this mosque being deleted and then a whole load more being uploaded again. Commons:Deletion requests/Images of Sheikh Zayed Mosque only happened in July. If the category is kept because of some images being de minimis, then a note should be put-up on the category page about the lack of FOP - that might of least slow down the amount of inappropriate uploads. CT Cooper · talk 21:16, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
- I've added {{Nouploads}}. Let's see if that helps. --Stefan4 (talk) 21:28, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 18:56, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
- Files in Category:Sheikh Zayed Mosque
See discussions immediately above. These images weren't included in the previous nomination because they hadn't been added to the relevant category when I nominated the other files for deletion.
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque Entrance Gate.JPG
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque Side View.JPG
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque taken from the opposite side..JPG
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque taken from the roadside. 01.JPG
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque taken from the roadside. 03.JPG
- File:The sun setting behind the Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque..JPG
Stefan4 (talk) 19:49, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:49, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Files in Category:Sheikh Zayed Mosque
[edit]In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in United Arab Emirates.
- File:Abu Dhabi- Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque (14281040608).jpg
- File:Grand mosque Abu Dhabi (44438067762).jpg
- File:Oasis of Dignity.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque (37567364540).jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque (37567370080).jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque (37825596581).jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque (52566909455).jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque @ Abu Dhabi (15424401753).jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque @ Abu Dhabi (15856605778).jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque @ Abu Dhabi (15858086109).jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque @ Abu Dhabi (16018361986).jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque @ Abu Dhabi - 15421779894.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque @ Abu Dhabi - 15424399703.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque @ Abu Dhabi - 15424413633.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque @ Abu Dhabi - 15424487883.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque @ Abu Dhabi - 15424491923.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque @ Abu Dhabi - 15856606508.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque @ Abu Dhabi - 15856767520.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque @ Abu Dhabi - 15856771020.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque @ Abu Dhabi - 15856856690.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque @ Abu Dhabi - 15856858080.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque @ Abu Dhabi - 15858000519.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque @ Abu Dhabi - 15858082909.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque @ Abu Dhabi - 15858084459.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque @ Abu Dhabi - 15858084649.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque @ Abu Dhabi - 15858277597.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque @ Abu Dhabi - 15858281077.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque @ Abu Dhabi - 15858284077.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque @ Abu Dhabi - 15858367487.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque @ Abu Dhabi - 16018267226.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque @ Abu Dhabi - 16018268376.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque @ Abu Dhabi - 16018270486.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque @ Abu Dhabi - 16018271336.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque @ Abu Dhabi - 16018274396.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque @ Abu Dhabi - 16043350652.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque @ Abu Dhabi - 16043434852.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque @ Abu Dhabi - 16043436562.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque @ Abu Dhabi - 16044044755.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque @ Abu Dhabi - 16044048725.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque @ Abu Dhabi - 16044136375.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque @ Abu Dhabi - 16044137955.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque @ Abu Dhabi - 16044141545.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque in Abu Dhabi DSF3637-HDR FUJIFILM X-T1 + Mitakon Zhongyi Lens Turbo Focal II Reducer Adapter for M42 + M42 Tokina RMC 17mm f3.5 (37961413742).jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Mosque 1.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Mosque 10.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Mosque 11.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Mosque 12.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Mosque 13.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Mosque 14.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Mosque 15.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Mosque 16.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Mosque 17.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Mosque 18.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Mosque 19.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Mosque 2.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Mosque 20.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Mosque 21.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Mosque 22.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Mosque 23.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Mosque 24.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Mosque 25.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Mosque 3.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Mosque 4.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Mosque 5.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Mosque 6.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Mosque 7.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Mosque 8.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Mosque 9.jpg
- File:Sunset at Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque.jpg
- File:The Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
A1Cafel (talk) 03:39, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:02, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hosmetalfab (talk · contribs)
[edit]Advertising (see file descs), product portfolio.
- File:Wire mesh, metal fencing mesh.jpg
- File:Tumbler stand.jpg
- File:Ss-dining-table-set-500x500.jpg
- File:Punching-jobwork-cncmachine.png
- File:Sheet metal fabricators in Bangalore.jpg
- File:Plant-stand-for-terrace-gardening-500x500.jpg
- File:Pedestal storage lockers.jpg
- File:Pedestal storage lockers (2).jpg
- File:Metal storage bins.jpg
- File:Metal Pallets.jpg
- File:Metal Bunker Cots Manufacturers.jpg
- File:Manufacturers for Bunker cot.jpg
- File:Junction box manufacturers hosmetalfab.jpg
- File:Garden bench hosmetalfab.jpg
- File:Csm IBC-SOLAR-Product-Catalogue ae445c8ffa.jpg
- File:Cable tray manufacturers.jpg
- File:Mezzanine Flooring manufacturers, Metal Storage Bins manufacturers, Garden bench Manufacturers.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Achim55 (talk) 19:45, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:12, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
Everything appears to be copied from https://www.cornelianoroerosga.it/storia-corneliano-roero-sga/
- File:Rivista-alba calcio1024x655.jpg
- File:Spriesport-pag.-1-10-gennaio-2022- alba calcio.jpg
- File:MMP alba calcio 0265-1024x685.jpg
- File:2002-2003 alba calcioswe.jpg
- File:Alba calcio uwvdfyu.jpg
- File:Sprint-e-sport-26-aprile-2021-768x1024.jpg
- File:14300-300x225 alba calcio.png
- File:Anni-60-1-1-1024x661 alba calcio.jpg
Adeletron 3030 (talk) 12:28, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 09:39, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
Not enough information to identify what is being graphed here. From the title I might guess it's low-pressure xenon gas, but the "7j8" designation must mean something significant? Uploader's only contributions are a sandbox 8+ years ago that does not appear related. And it's clearly an experimental result with no cited source but instead low-quality image. DMacks (talk) 17:19, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Delete: This image is completely useless without description, context, or explanation. Since the account that uploaded it was only active for a few days nearly ten years ago, that information is not going to be forthcoming. Innerstream (talk) 20:23, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --Leyo 09:10, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
The product of this reaction will be ethyl vinyl ether, but this image incorrectly shows the product as propyl vinyl ether. Marbletan (talk) 17:23, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Leyo 09:11, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
copyvio upload - no permission see metadata that read "Author William Wolfenden Copyright holder Seawolf Productions" Hoyanova (talk) 08:36, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 20:51, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
copyvio - no permission see metadata that read "Seawolf Productions Author William Wolfenden. Copyright status Copyrighted" Hoyanova (talk) 08:38, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 20:53, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
copyvio - no permission see metadata that read "Seawolf Productions Author William Wolfenden. Copyright status Copyrighted" Hoyanova (talk) 08:38, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 20:53, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
copyvio - no permission see metadata that read "Seawolf Productions Author William Wolfenden. Copyright status Copyrighted" Hoyanova (talk) 08:39, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 20:53, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
copyvio - no permission see metadata that read "Seawolf Productions Author William Wolfenden. Copyright status Copyrighted" Hoyanova (talk) 08:39, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 20:53, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
copyvio - no permission see metadata that read "Seawolf Productions Author William Wolfenden. Copyright status Copyrighted" Hoyanova (talk) 08:40, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 20:53, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
copyvio - no permission see metadata that read "Seawolf Productions Author William Wolfenden. Copyright status Copyrighted" Hoyanova (talk) 08:40, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 20:53, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
copyright violation - newspaper scan Xocolatl (talk) 08:41, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
![08:41, 17 June 2022 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2022/06/17#c-Xocolatl-2022-06-17T08:41:00.000Z-File:"Wikipedia_weet_nu_alles_van_sokpopperij"_(11174129846).png){kind=link}
- Delete, an image of a page from the Dutch newspaper de Volkskrant, which is unlikely to be available with a free license. The file could be cropped to show only the illustration, which does have a free license. However, we already have this illustration in File:Wikipedia by Giulia Forsythe.jpg. Verbcatcher (talk) 07:22, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 20:54, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
![20:54, 24 June 2022 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2022/06/17#c-Captain-tucker-2022-06-24T20:54:00.000Z-File:"Wikipedia_weet_nu_alles_van_sokpopperij"_(11174129846).png){kind=link}
Author's request Onlyashis (talk) 09:04, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 20:55, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
Suspected copyright violation: file EXIF shows "Author Simon Olley olleydesign.co.uk Copyright holder OlleyDesign". VRT permission from Simon Olley needed. MKFI (talk) 10:05, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 20:56, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
I realized that there are some mistakes in the photo. I'd like to upload the corrected version. Dondiver (talk) 13:06, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 21:03, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
And also:
As freedom-of-panorama exception in the U.S. is valid only for buildings, the depicted "sign" is hardly covered, while being clearly above COM:TOO. -- Túrelio (talk) 14:10, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete - per nom. Moreover, uploader has a history of uploading copyvios on Commons and Wikipedia; images have no exif data, likely not own work. – Pbrks (t • c) 16:34, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per above. Claim of own work is dubious. -- Whpq (talk) 11:33, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 18:45, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
Lower resolution version of image appeared in a 2017 article (https://www.portsanantonio.us/Job-growth) prior to both upload date here and claimed photo date, uploader has a history of copyvios. Lord Belbury (talk) 18:15, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete - per nom. – Pbrks (t • c) 18:06, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 18:47, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
Doubtful if this is the uploader's own work. In any event, this is an improper use of Commons to publish a book. Use of Wikimedia for promotion. See, for example: "(Page 70), "would like to thank you for purchasing my Ebook and hope you were satisfied just like my many other customers." Geoff Who, me? 15:25, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
- This document contains information on committing postal and refund fraud, targeting Evri (formerly Hermes). Please assist to remove this document. 77.102.111.82 16:36, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 14:11, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
User:Ciszema
[edit]- File:Ptasia Studnia plan.jpg
- File:Ptasia Studnia przekrój.jpg
- File:Jaskinia Mała w Mułowej plan.jpg
- File:Jaskinia Mała w Mułowej przekrój.jpg
- File:Jaskinia Lejbusiowa plan.jpg
- File:Jaskinia Lejbusiowa przekrój.jpg
- File:Jaskinia Turoniowa plan.jpg
These images were all uploaded by User:Ciszema. I believe they should be deleted because [These files, along with all descriptive documentation, have been removed from the download pages by User:Ciszema because they were created in violation of copyright after the deceased Anna Antkiewicz as dependent works, without the consent of the heir. The Polish Geological Institute - National Research Institute and Marek Lorczyk do not have any copyrights to the original graphics and source files used by Anna Antkiewicz. The deletion of these files and documentation from the PGI-NRI website was due to the submitted request for their removal by Anna Hancbach, the daughter of the deceased, legal heir. The original files of the deceased Anna Antkiewicz are currently made available by the heir under the Creative Commons BY NC ND license on the website at https://antkiewiczjaskinie.pl/. User:Ciszema by publishing the indicated files violates the copyright of the deceased Anna Antkiewicz on 22 pages of Commons-Wikimedia, Wikipedia and Wikiwand.]
Uzasadnienie po polsku: Wszystkie wskazane obrazy, które zostały przesłane przez User:Cszema uważam, że należy je usunąć, ponieważ: Pliki te wraz z całą dokumentacją opisową zostały i już usunięte ze stron pobrania przez User:Ciszema bo powstały z naruszeniem praw autorskich po zmarłej Annie Antkiewicz jako dzieła zależne, bez zgody spadkobiercy. Państwowy Instytut Geologiczny - Państwowy Instytut Badawczy oraz Marek Lorczyk nie posiadają żadnych praw autorskich do wykorzystanych oryginalnych grafik i plików źródłowych, których autorem była Anna Antkiewicz. Usunięcie tych plików i dokumentacji ze stron internetowych PIG-PIB nastąpiło na skutek złożonego żądania ich usunięcia przez Annę Hancbach córkę zmarłej, prawnego spadkobiercę. Oryginalne pliki zmarłej Anny Antkiewicz są obecnie udostępnione przez spadkobiercę na licencji Creative Commons BY NC ND na stronach internetowych pod adresem https://antkiewiczjaskinie.pl/. User: Ciszema publikując wskazane pliki narusza prawa autorskie po zmarłej Annie Antkiewicz na 22 stronach Commons-Wikimedia, Wikipedia i Wikiwand.
Fill in reason for deletion here! --11:58, 18 June 2022 (UTC)Termida (talk)
- Proponuję usunąć wszystkie te pliki tak jak to zrobił Państwowy Instytut Geologiczny. Ciszema (talk) 07:38, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
- @Termida and Ciszema: In this case the crucial question is whether the maps are "works" protected by copyright law, or "official materials" (materiały urzędowe) that are excluded from copyright protection in art. 4. pkt. 2. of Polish copyright law. Could you, please, elaborate in this context? I think, that without resolving this problem, we cannot go on. Ankry (talk) 17:43, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
- Pliki te nie są "materiałami urzedowymi" a dziełami kartograficznymi:
- utwór - kartografia - mapy plany - mapy topograficzne - kartografia jaskiniowa, plany i przekroje
- Określają to przepisy prawa polskiego:
- Prawo autorskie - Dz.U. 2006 nr 90 poz. 631: Art. 1 ust. 2 pkt. 1
- Prawo geodezyjne i kartograficzne - Dz.U. 2005 nr 240 poz. 2027: Art. 4 ust. 1a pkt. 9 oraz ust. 1e pkt. 2
- Instrukcją wykonywania dokumentacji jaskiń, MOŚ Warszawa 1994: rozdz. II. C, a. pkt. 1-3
- Pliki te powstały jako prawie wierne kopie oryginalnych (utworów-dzieł) planów i przekrojówów, jako dzieła zależne z naruszeniem praw autorskich twórcy i jednoczesną zmianą autorstwa. Termida (talk) 05:26, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
- Jeżeli dotyczyły nakazanej prawem działalności urzędu i w związku z nią były przez jakikolwiek urząd wykorzystywane, mogły stać się materiałami urzędowymi i tym samym utracić status utworu, zwłaszcza, jeśli urząd je przetwarzał za zgodą autorki. Jako, że działo się to przed 1994 rokiem, musimy tu się opierać na prawie autorskim z 1952 r. Ustawa z 1994 nic w tej materii nie zmieniła: jeśli przed wejściem ustawy w życie były materiałami urzędowymi, to nadal są wyłączone spod ochrony prawnoautorskiej. Natomiast nie dysponuję orzecznictwem, które pozwoliłoby rozstrzygnąć, kto ma rację. Być może wystarczyłaby jasna deklaracja urzędu odnośnie statusu tych map? Ale takiej nigdzie nie widziałem. Zgłaszam więc jedynie wątpliwość, pozostawiając decyzję innym administratorom. Fakt, że znalazły się w pewnym momencie na stronach urzędu, świadczy o tym, że znajdowały się w jego dokumentacji. Natomiast ich usunięcie może świadczyć jedynie, że zaistniał spór odnośnie ich statusu, a nie że są utworami; więc samo w sobie niczego nie dowodzi. Moim zdaniem, rozstrzygnięcie tej kwestii wymagałoby wskazania oświadczenia urzędu odnośnie ich statusu lub decyzji sądu w tej albo w podobnej sprawie. Ankry (talk) 20:27, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
- Złożyłem wniosek według procedury – prośba o masowe usunięcie z uzasadnieniem ewidentnego naruszenia praw autorskich. Teraz widzę, że powinienem zastosować procedurę szybkiego usuwania, co zamierzam uczynić w przypadku dalszego kierowania dyskusji na ślepe tory. Zmuszony jestem odnieść się do podniesionych wątków:
- 1. To był zewnętrzny projekt przyjęty do realizacji przez urząd w 2008 r. Nawet jakby był nakazany to użyte w nim materiały objęte prawami autorskimi nie mogły stracić statusu utworu a urząd nie może naruszać prawa. W tym czasie autorka już nie żyła a ze spadkobiercą nie podpisano aneksu do umowy o rozszerzenie pól eksploatacji i prawa zależne.
- Autorska dokumentacja Jaskini Małej w Mułowej została opublikowana pośmiertnie drukiem (początek 2005 r.), bez jakiejkolwiek wiedzy i umowy ze spadkobiercą. Do publikacji drukiem wykorzystano bezprawnie przejęte oryginalne pliki z komputera autorki przez nieuprawnioną osobę trzecią.
- 2. Nie działo się to przed rokiem 1994 r a od 2008 r. Nigdy autorskim dokumentacją jaskiniowym w tym planom i przekrojem nie zmieniano status utworu czy dzieła kartograficznego na materiały urzędowe.
- 3. Jasna pisemna deklaracja i przyznanie się do naruszeń praw autorskich jest w posiadaniu spadkobiercy (obowiązuje tajemnica korespondencji). Na tej podstawie została usunięta cała dokumentacja nie tylko kartografia. Urząd został też wezwany do usunięcia skutków naruszeń w tym usunięcia plików publikowanych w Wikipedii, sprostowania oświadczenia na stronach usuniętych dokumentacji i przeproszenia, nic z tego nie zrealizował, tym samym kolejny raz złamał przepisy prawa autorskiego.
- 4. Fakt, że znalazły się w pewnym momencie na stronach urzędu, nie świadczy o tym, że znajdowały się w jego dokumentacji. Dokumentację dwukrotnie przekazywano kolejnym różnym podmiotom pomimo, że początkowy nie miał zdolności prawnych i nie dysponował pełnią praw autorskich, bo umowy z autorami były podpisywane na jednorazowy wydruk.
- 5. Nie wiem skąd wniosek, że to tylko spór o to, że dzieła kartograficzne nie są utworami.
- 6. Procedura usuwania plików nie przewiduje dostarczania wyroków sądu, oświadczeń urzędów (w prywatnych postępowaniach) do publicznej dyskusji.
- Sprawa jest prosta cała dokumentacja i pliki graficzne na uzasadnione żądanie spadkobiercy zostały usunięte ze stron urzędu. Coommons Wikimedia w obecnej chwili nie może już potwierdzić źródła, statusu własności jak i rodzaju licencji usuniętych przez urząd plików i tym samym nie ma prawa ich dalej publikować. Coommons Wikimedia nie może dla utrzymania swojego stanu posiadania naruszać praw autorskich po zmarłym autorze publikując plagiaty jego utworów-dzieł.
- W mojej prośbie do Administratorów z dn. 27.06.2022 jest link do strony https://antkiewiczjaskinie.pl/autorstwo-jaskiniowych-dokumentacji-anny-antkiewicz/, na której są odpowiedzi na wszystkie Pana Administratora wątpliwości, zamieszczone linki prowadzą do zagadnień realizacji projektu. Na stronie każda dokumentacja jaskini wraz z kartografią posiada dokładny opis naruszeń. Jeszcze raz bardzo proszę o zamknięcie tej dyskusji i usunięcie wskazanych plików. Pozdrawiam! Termida (talk) 14:47, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
- Prawdopodobnie można w tym przypadku zastosować COM:PCP. Osobiście nie jestem jednak przekonany co do statusu tych map. Moje wątpliwości wywodzę z braku niezależnych informacji nt. ich statusu: zarówno serwis antkiewiczjaskinie, jak i oświadczenia wnioskującego są informacjami pochodzącymi od jednej strony: zainteresowanej uznaniem ich za utwory chronione i usunięciem. Brak jakichkolwiek wiarygodnych informacji pochodzących od państwowego instytutu, który je upublicznił, jak też wiarygodnej analizy ich statusu przez podmiot niezależny. Ankry (talk) 18:51, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
- Od dnia 30 lipca 2021 roku do odwołania, z przyczyn niezależnych od Instytutu i TPN, dane opisowe i opracowania graficzne Jaskini Małej w Mułowej T.E-11.18 będą niedostępne.
- Prawdopodobnie można w tym przypadku zastosować COM:PCP. Osobiście nie jestem jednak przekonany co do statusu tych map. Moje wątpliwości wywodzę z braku niezależnych informacji nt. ich statusu: zarówno serwis antkiewiczjaskinie, jak i oświadczenia wnioskującego są informacjami pochodzącymi od jednej strony: zainteresowanej uznaniem ich za utwory chronione i usunięciem. Brak jakichkolwiek wiarygodnych informacji pochodzących od państwowego instytutu, który je upublicznił, jak też wiarygodnej analizy ich statusu przez podmiot niezależny. Ankry (talk) 18:51, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
- Jeżeli dotyczyły nakazanej prawem działalności urzędu i w związku z nią były przez jakikolwiek urząd wykorzystywane, mogły stać się materiałami urzędowymi i tym samym utracić status utworu, zwłaszcza, jeśli urząd je przetwarzał za zgodą autorki. Jako, że działo się to przed 1994 rokiem, musimy tu się opierać na prawie autorskim z 1952 r. Ustawa z 1994 nic w tej materii nie zmieniła: jeśli przed wejściem ustawy w życie były materiałami urzędowymi, to nadal są wyłączone spod ochrony prawnoautorskiej. Natomiast nie dysponuję orzecznictwem, które pozwoliłoby rozstrzygnąć, kto ma rację. Być może wystarczyłaby jasna deklaracja urzędu odnośnie statusu tych map? Ale takiej nigdzie nie widziałem. Zgłaszam więc jedynie wątpliwość, pozostawiając decyzję innym administratorom. Fakt, że znalazły się w pewnym momencie na stronach urzędu, świadczy o tym, że znajdowały się w jego dokumentacji. Natomiast ich usunięcie może świadczyć jedynie, że zaistniał spór odnośnie ich statusu, a nie że są utworami; więc samo w sobie niczego nie dowodzi. Moim zdaniem, rozstrzygnięcie tej kwestii wymagałoby wskazania oświadczenia urzędu odnośnie ich statusu lub decyzji sądu w tej albo w podobnej sprawie. Ankry (talk) 20:27, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
Przepraszamy za zaistniałą sytuację wszystkich użytkowników serwisu Jaskinie Polski.- coś jest na rzeczy, bo sam serwis wycofał te plany. Do skasowania. Masur (talk) 10:58, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Masur (talk) 10:58, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
Wrong license 2.135.65.132 05:02, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
- What license should it have? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:29, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
- license correct ZhangaliY (talk) 04:59, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
не указан точный адрес-источник, лицензионный статус сомнителен. Jim Hokins (talk) 05:26, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
Добавлен точный адрес-источник, лицензионный статус корректный. ZhangaliY (talk) 11:05, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
- Я не вижу на указанной Вами странице https://portal.esaulet.kz/ru/2019/12/04/нурлан-уранхаев-провел-прием-граждан/ атрибутации фотографии по Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International. Jim Hokins (talk) 11:17, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:24, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
Selfie of non-contributor Guerillero Parlez Moi 23:05, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Gbawden at 08:30, 14 July 2022 UTC: Personal photo by non-contributors (F10) --Krdbot 13:40, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
間違えたアップロード Binetoile (talk) 12:03, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete - This image is a copyright infringement. This is a copy from the school introduction section of the official website. In addition, the footer of this site clearly states that "* It is prohibited to copy or reprint the articles and photographic images posted on this site without permission." In addtion, At the time this image was created, Japanese copyright law has a 50-year protection period, and this image is copyrighted.––春春眠眠 (talk) 14:29, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: 1998 logo. Not in PD. --Yasu (talk) 15:20, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Hoaxes. See en:Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#An_urgent_report_about_a_user:折毛's_hoaxes, zh:Wikipedia:傀儡調查/案件/折毛, zh:Wikipedia:2022年古羅斯相關條目偽造事件
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
shizhao (talk) 08:06, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
- en:Wikipedia:Fabricated_Articles_and_Hoaxes_of_Russia_in_2022 shizhao (talk) 12:01, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
- Comment: Need to be checked. Those pics are not real?--Beta Lohman※Office box 13:56, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. The photo is real. It is in Chinatown in Vladivostok.--Beta Lohman※Office box 14:13, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
- 知乎上曝光，折毛为了造假甚至可以自己画假地图或画假画（莫斯科-特维尔战争词条），这个还有些可能是其他城市的--Azure2022 (talk) 07:11, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Suspected hoaxes with unclear copyright status. --Natuur12 (talk) 11:38, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
There is no confirmation that the photo is free. It seems incredible that his photo was taken after his supposed death. Kursant504 (talk) 06:47, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, false claims etc. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:37, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
Fichier pas complet. Nécessité de faire un nouveau fichier pdf VegaLyre (talk) 08:51, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per prompt uploader request. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:38, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation. This photo is also on https://residences-decoration.com/nellyrodi-devoile-son-nouvel-ecrin-historique/ (scroll down). This is a photo made by a professional photographer. I cannot imagine that he/she wants it on Commons. I do not see (1) technical details of the photo, (2) a VRT ticket. JopkeB (talk) 12:01, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:39, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
no useful description, probably wrong date... Xocolatl (talk) 12:02, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; OOS personal photo or joke. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:55, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
Uploaded in another author name Barkave Balusamy (talk) 12:04, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: both deleted, copyviol. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:54, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
probably copyright violation, wrong licence Xocolatl (talk) 12:12, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:58, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
Infographic claims "own work", includes what appears to be a GoogleMaps CopyVio Enyavar (talk) 12:20, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:57, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
Appears to be taken from the web. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 12:29, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:58, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope Lotje (talk) 12:43, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
- I don't see why it would be out of scope; why would an image of a puppet that was a YouTube craze be off-limits for the universal repository of images for all wikis? Please think more broadly about that. However, I don't see how the file page addresses copyright issues, so the image could be deleted for that reason. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:35, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per above, DW, dubious license claim. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:02, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
Personal photo for non-wikipedian: out of Scope. No notability! --Karim talk to me :)..! 14:01, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
![14:01, 17 June 2022 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2022/06/17#c-Karim185.3-2022-06-17T14:01:00.000Z-File:.jpg"Ramithabethasansaleh".jpg){kind=link}
- Delete per nom. Uninteresting photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:37, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unused personal photo. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:02, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
![23:02, 18 July 2022 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2022/06/17#c-Infrogmation-20220718230200-File:.jpg"Ramithabethasansaleh".jpg){kind=link}
Files in Category:Jaroslav Háša
[edit]As the painter died in 1968, the images are copyrighted until the end of 2038. Undelete in 2039.
- File:J. Mánes.jpg
- File:Kampa - oltáříček p. Marie.jpg
- File:Kaple a hrob sv. Václava.jpg
- File:Mikoláš Aleš.jpg
- File:Pražské Jezulátko.jpg
- File:Rašínová Karla.jpg
- File:Trosky.jpg
- File:Ulička v Tangeru Maroko.jpg
Gumruch (talk) 14:33, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; still under copyright by heirs of artist. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:04, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
commercial logo for a deleted promo-article in ru-wiki Khinkali (talk) 14:41, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
- this is my logo. I create this logo for my site. Why i can't use? Савва Бартеньев (talk) 14:08, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:OOS. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:04, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Looks more like an original research than a true empire (aggregation of territories subject to a single government). Sbb1413 (he) (talk • contribs) 15:05, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- Delete per nom. Not used in any article, only in what seem like polemical personal pages on two Wikipedias, and as you said, this is an odd lineup of countries, considering some of those that are included and some that are excluded. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:42, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:05, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
screenshot , no evidence that it is a free program. GeorgHH • talk 15:16, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:05, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
Piaz died 1966 - https://portal.dnb.de/opac/simpleSearch?query=Teddy+Piaz&cqlMode=true Xocolatl (talk) 15:54, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
- Hello !
- I agree to delete this file, I had completely forgotten that this photographer hasn't yet fallen into the public domain, excuse me for my clumsiness! I'll be more careful next time.
- Sincerely,
- Naïs. Naïs NOLIBOS (talk) 00:17, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per above. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:06, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
Previously published at https://www.instagram.com/p/CMVGEn2HVty/?hl=en, unclear who the photographer is. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 15:56, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:08, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
wrong date, wrong author/source. where is the picture from? Xocolatl (talk) 16:06, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, bad photoshop, personal joke/troll. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:07, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
This is a *SUPERSEDED* file, see File:TVR 2 (2004).svg. Logopedia SUCKS (talk) 04:58, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- Keep, no valid reason for deletion. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 15:16, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:08, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
Most of the image are copyrighted images: from a film and the brand Coca Cola Psubhashish (talk) 17:59, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete as it has copyrighted 2D (the non-free movie poster) and thus fails COM:FOP India. I don't know about the Coca Cola brand whether it also fails the FOP India -- DaxServer (talk) 15:10, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:17, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
LIFE magazine watermark suggests the claimed license of CC4.0 "Own Work" is not correct. Muzilon (talk) 19:00, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; clearly bogus license & authorship claim. Disturbing that this has been on Commons since 2016 and was in use in multiple projects. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:16, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
I think it's a copyrighted image from https://wol.jw.org/en/wol/d/r1/lp-e/1001072235 Ske (talk) 19:13, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:17, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Photograph of a newpaper CoffeeEngineer (talk) 19:14, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; DW. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:14, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
Per COM:DW and COM:TOYS: "...Consensus on Commons has found that sex dolls are copyrightable, as their design elements are separable from their utilitarian function." However I have to point it out the design (or structure) of this sex toy is pretty hard to be considered apart from its utility function, which makes me a little hesitate... So I filled a DR for further discussion. Stang★ 19:15, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
- As the uploader of this picture, I can tell its story. I bought it in 2019,The merchant said that these feet came from a 5-year-old girl. There are two kinds of manufacturing techniques for sex toys. One is to take materials from people, and the other is to draw pictures on the computer. These feet belong to taking materials from people.
I think that only sex toys produced by "computer drawing" are protected by copyright. A pair of feet made from a 5-year-old girl is not protected by copyright. Assifbus (talk) 00:40, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Unclear DW; unused blurry poor quality photo. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:14, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
Yo lo subí, pero contiene errores Juan Ignacio Sal (talk) 21:43, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per prompt uploader request. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:12, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
Screengrab of copyrighted software and the english wikipedia without attribution Guerillero Parlez Moi 22:53, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. The file falls outside COM:SCOPE too. Seems to be some type of test or joke. Marbletan (talk) 16:22, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:11, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
The gears and the sword are probably just above the threshold of originality under Feist Guerillero Parlez Moi 23:09, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
- So does this fall under cc-by-sa-3.0 instead? RootOfAllLight (talk) 15:24, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:10, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
The photo was previously published on the Internet: [3]. There are doubts that the user is the author and will be able to prove it through VRT system. Kursant504 (talk) 06:51, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Earlier published online, VRTS permission needed. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 23:21, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
low quality, probably wrong date, wrong author, wrong source... Xocolatl (talk) 10:28, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: This picture together with 3 other uploadings of this user is taken in 1977 after the well known Bucharest earthquake. It is not impossible that this is an own work, Google does not see these photographs anywhere else. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 23:30, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Trabajo propio? 181.203.101.233 00:23, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Pequeña, única contribución, etc. Es un caso similar a File:Prof.Mario Nuzzo.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 181.203.101.233 (talk) 00:26, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Comment The other one is a 2010 photo, so its size is not a red flag. This photo isn't tiny, either. It would really be best to show that these photos are also somewhere else on the Web. As it is, the lack of Exif data is unfortunate but not proof of copyright violation. What level of proof of authorship is required for a photo not to be deleted based on a precautionary principle? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:24, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per User:Ikan Kekek, insufficient reason for deletion. Not found using Google Images. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:11, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
Page and file created as advertisements (G10) --Karim talk to me :)..! 01:21, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep I don't see us overwhelmed with copies of this type of document. --RAN (talk) 02:38, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Delete bad Title, unused and useless file also.--Karim talk to me :)..! 06:18, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
- I'd tend to support Keeping the photo. The filename should indeed be changed, but even if the photo was uploaded to promote Dr. Abdulaziz, this could be useful documentation and might even be relevant to news coverage. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:28, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and COM:WEBHOST. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:12, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
سلام. مالک این تصویر بنده هستم، نام این تصویر غلط املایی دارد، حذف می کنم و مجددا تصحیح می کنم. Bestbiowriter (talk) 08:24, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: already renamed. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:16, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
a photo taken in 1926 can't be "own work". source? author? Xocolatl (talk) 08:27, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
- Yes it can, when you scan an object or photograph an object the derivative copy is your "own work". The original is "PD-EU-no author disclosure". --RAN (talk) 20:53, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Inferior duplicate of File:BERICAP Holding GmbH-BERICAP History 1926 IP-060718BC-003509 1.jpg. --Rosenzweig τ 00:47, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per User:Rosenzweig. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:17, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
F10. Used for cross-wiki spam on fr.wp and WD. Gyrostat (talk) 08:29, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:17, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
Due to code in metadata likely copied from Facebook or Instagram. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:52, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:17, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
Il faut faire un unique fichier en pdf de la lettre VegaLyre (talk) 09:05, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:18, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
Taken from https://www.othmankhunji.com/, claimed CC license which is not found on the source website. File:Othman Khunji.jpg is taken from Facebook.
- File:The Ramadan Circle.webp
- File:The Clean Slate.webp
- File:The Purifying Hourglass.webp
- File:The Testimony Embodiment.webp
- File:The Prayary.webp
- File:The Holy & The Broken.webp
- File:Perpetual Affirmation.webp
- File:Sacred Unity.webp
- File:Laa wa ila.webp
- File:Inhumane.webp
- File:Rawa artwork.webp
- File:Recycle, Revive, Relive.webp
- File:2f59d7 7e6f03ecdaed402a8164bdf05bf50da6 mv2.webp
- File:Othman Khunji.jpg
MKFI (talk) 10:13, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:19, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
VRT-permission from author and copyright holder SG Photography Ltd is needed. Taivo (talk) 10:55, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:20, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
This looks like copyright violation. It was made in 2021, so the artist cannot be dead for 70+ years and I do not see a VRT ticket, nor the name of the maker/artist. JopkeB (talk) 11:42, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:21, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
These images appear to be taken from https://docplayer.es/92708102-Introduction-asgm-clase-1-introduccion-a-la-mape.html document.
- File:Refining of gold.png
- File:Crushing of stone.png
- File:Milling of stone.png
- File:Cluishes of gold.png
- File:Accumulation of gold.png
- File:Heating gold.png
- File:Rusau dutse.jpg
- File:RUSAU.jpg
- File:Rusau na dutse.jpg
MKFI (talk) 11:52, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:40, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Maeverywhere (talk · contribs)
[edit]Either out of scope (photos 1 + 3, SD|F10 (personal photos by non-contributors) or copyright violation (at least the second one, probably all three). The personal photos look like they are made by a professional, but I do not see a VRT ticket. Photo 1 is also on https://duyendangvietnam.net.vn/nguoi-mau-phuong-oanh-co-den-tay-ai-nguoi-nay-phat.html (scroll down, model Dahan). Photo 3 is also on https://thanhnien.vn/sieu-mau-anh-thu-khong-hoi-han-khi-roi-san-dien-de-sinh-con-post1431506.html.
JopkeB (talk) 12:10, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:41, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
Not encyclopedical. 07 (talk) 14:05, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
- Ben düzenlerken silindi. Tekrar düzeltiri. Lütefen silmeyiniz 195.142.245.248 14:40, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Question Aren't Wikimedians allowed to upload one personal photo? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:39, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
- COM:INUSE does say "but by custom the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal Commons user page is allowed", but this image is not in use on a user page. Captain-tucker (talk) 21:10, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
- True. I was going to ask how long a grace period a user who joined in March would get, but the English translation of the contents of his tr.wikipedia.org user talk page is not at all promising, so I think we are indeed safe in deleting this picture. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:34, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
- COM:INUSE does say "but by custom the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal Commons user page is allowed", but this image is not in use on a user page. Captain-tucker (talk) 21:10, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Captain-tucker (talk) 14:27, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Still not used. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:42, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
File seems to be out of scope COM:PS. While the image might be freely licensed as it is work of an employee of the European Union, I don't think it serves Wikimedia Common's purpose - it isn't used in any pages either. Aimarekin (talk) 15:29, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:42, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
privacy violation 2A02:1812:2419:9A00:C588:B02C:98FE:1ADF 15:42, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:43, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
Image was copied from the online source http://www.talkingwithtami.com/wardrobe-breakdown-lori-harvey-at-instyle-magazine-award-show/ Binksternet (talk) 16:18, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:43, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
This photograph was probably taken around 1900. Where does it come from, who made it? Xocolatl (talk) 16:59, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep El Salvador grants anonymous works a 70 year license. --RAN (talk) 21:11, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: old enough for PD-old-assumed (120 years). --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:44, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
Copy-pasted from this copyrighted paper:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/254315197_Postcranial_Morphology_of_Notopithecus_Ameghino_1897_Notoungulata_Interatheriidae_from_the_Middle_Eocene_of_Patagonia_Argentina Patachonica (talk) 17:25, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: 01:48, 23 July 2022, by King of Hearts (Copyright violation). --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:45, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Probably screenshot from an online map 07 (talk) 17:33, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:46, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Hjart as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: copied from Facebook This is not copied from Facebook. Yann (talk) 18:04, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
- The Google query just finds a bunch of uses on Facebook and nowhere else. Hjart (talk) 18:08, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
- Sure, but Facebook is not the source. A proper DR is better here. Yann (talk) 21:09, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per description: Foto: Marius Troy. Needs COM:VRT. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:47, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
Uploader is presumably not Joshua Roberts, who took this photo for the AP: https://pictures.reuters.com/CS.aspx?VP3=SearchResult&ITEMID=GM1E65K0MAY01. Freelance-frank (talk) 18:25, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:48, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
A person of no notability, the article is just deleted from ru.wiki. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 18:50, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:49, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
Derivate work, no source given, probably copyvio Discostu (talk) 18:59, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:49, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
Much better quality version here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Eug%C3%A8ne_Boudin,_Fair_in_Brittany,_1874,_NGA_178080.jpg 𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 (talk) 19:54, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Indeed. No need to keep this. Yann (talk) 21:10, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and redirected. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:50, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
Selfie of non-contributor Guerillero Parlez Moi 22:07, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:53, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose Guerillero Parlez Moi 22:22, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:53, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
Selfie of non-contributor Guerillero Parlez Moi 22:28, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per description: Photo by LV Imagery. Needs COM:VRT. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:53, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
Selfie of non-contributor Guerillero Parlez Moi 22:29, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:56, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
Selfie of non-contributor Guerillero Parlez Moi 22:29, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:56, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Selfie of blocked sock on enwiki Guerillero Parlez Moi 22:35, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:56, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Selfie of blocked sock on enwiki Guerillero Parlez Moi 22:36, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:56, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose Guerillero Parlez Moi 22:37, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:56, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
Selfie of non-contributor Guerillero Parlez Moi 22:57, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:56, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
I hereby withdraw my permission for this to be posted Henry L Hunt (talk) 19:00, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
- It's not your own work, but by JaQuan Allen. So you cannot revoke anything. In addition, image is in COM:SCOPE.--Túrelio (talk) 19:22, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per User:Túrelio, doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:04, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Archivo de Facebook. En la pagina Facebook no se ve el permiso (?) 181.203.4.97 22:59, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, taken from FB per EXIF data (I should have seen that when closing it the 1st time). --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:58, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose Guerillero Parlez Moi 23:06, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:59, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 23:09, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy delete From https://twitter.com/StephenCurry30/status/1537677040597483525/photo/1. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 03:19, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:59, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The gears and the sword are probably just above the threshold of originality under Feist Guerillero Parlez Moi 23:10, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
- So does this fall under cc-by-sa-3.0 instead? RootOfAllLight (talk) 15:24, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: 16:24, 21 July 2022, by Ellin Beltz (Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing). --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:00, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Out of scope: poor quality, no description. Sitacuisses (talk) 23:29, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:00, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose Guerillero Parlez Moi 23:29, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:01, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose Guerillero Parlez Moi 23:29, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:01, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
Some private old photos sent by User:FML
[edit]- File:FML Wikipedian photo.jpg
- <name elided for privacy>
- File:Autorização FML.png
- <name elided for privacy>
- File:Bluepillwikipedia.png
- File:Red pill wikipedia.png
- File:WikiSampa 001.jpg
- <name elided for privacy>
- <name elided for privacy>
- <name elided for privacy>
- <name elided for privacy>
- File:Barretos-SP 11.jpg
- File:Cosmópolis 0008.jpg
- <name elided for privacy>
- <name elided for privacy>
- <name elided for privacy>
- <name elided for privacy>
These ~20 years old files contains personal information and can be used to harm me personally. Privacy concern. --FML hello 20:39, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: files in use; deleted ones out of use + categories containing full name. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:00, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
zeigt private Räume; wurde nicht vom Besitzer genehmigt; wurde nicht beim Besitzer angefragt; Besitzer wurde nicht informiert; Besitzer möchte nicht dass dieses Foto veröffentlicht wird 62.93.29.131 08:06, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
- → de:Recht am Bild der eigenen Sache. --Achim55 (talk) 16:19, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
- Eine neue Version des Bildes wurde erstellt. Auf der sind Innenräume oder auch Teile davon nicht mehr zu erkennen.
- Ansonsten gilt in Deutschland die Panoramafreiheit. Barghaan (talk) 17:29, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rosenzweig τ 02:15, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Does Commons:Freedom of panorama in source country allow this? EugeneZelenko (talk) 23:04, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: Section 62 of the UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 is broader than the corresponding provisions in many other countries, and allows photographers to take pictures of
buildings, and sculptures, models for buildings and works of artistic craftsmanship (if permanently situated in a public place or in premises open to the public). --Gbawden (talk) 09:12, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Does Commons:Freedom of panorama in source country allow this? EugeneZelenko (talk) 23:05, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: Section 62 of the UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 is broader than the corresponding provisions in many other countries, and allows photographers to take pictures of
buildings, and sculptures, models for buildings and works of artistic craftsmanship (if permanently situated in a public place or in premises open to the public). --Gbawden (talk) 09:12, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Complex logos can be in Commons only with VRT-permission. Taivo (talk) 09:33, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:34, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Cyrus noto3at bulaga (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:Derivative works of product packaging. While these photos date to 2017, it is difficult to judge when the packaging designs were first made public or published, which means there is no way to categorize under a pre-set undeletion date (like "Category:Undelete in 2090"). The packaging of the products here exceed COM:Threshold of originality, making the designs complex and warrant the packaging artists their full economic rights over photos of the packaging. Needs COM:VRTS correspondence of commercial license permission from the packaging designers.
- File:Head and Shoulders in Taguig, Metro Manila.jpg
- File:Surf fabric conditioner - Southside Makati.jpg
- File:Joy dishwashing - Taguig, Metro Manila.jpg
- File:Bear Brand Swak Pack in Makati.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:35, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
- @JWilz12345, it is okay. Now I know before that there are also copyrights on brand packaging. Cyrus noto3at bulaga Talk to me 12:18, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:34, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
the image is taken from the forum and doesn't have a normal license Kazman322 (talk) 16:12, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:34, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Gleb Leo as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: editor's rights King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:22, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
- Editor is Vincent Žuk-Hryškievič (1903 – 1989) Gleb Leo (talk) 17:25, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:34, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Does Commons:Freedom of panorama in source country allow this? EugeneZelenko (talk) 23:05, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: looks like permanently in public space. --Krd 07:33, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Does Commons:Freedom of panorama in source country allow this? EugeneZelenko (talk) 23:05, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: looks like permanently in public space. --Krd 07:33, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Does Commons:Freedom of panorama in source country allow this? EugeneZelenko (talk) 23:05, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: looks like permanently in public space. --Krd 07:33, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Does Commons:Freedom of panorama in source country allow this? EugeneZelenko (talk) 23:05, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: looks like permanently in public space. --Krd 07:33, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
non-free logo for deleted article in ru-wiki Khinkali (talk) 16:19, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
- see also File:Логотип Протон-Импульс.jpg same problem. --Drakosh (talk) 11:47, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. In addition, these logos do not have educational value and are therefore out of COM:SCOPE. --Ellywa (talk) 15:06, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Brian Patrick Butler
[edit]In ticket:2022061410009529, the subject asks the deletion of these files because 'they were uploaded by without my permission' and 'my appearance has changed so drastically to the point where I am no longer recognizable in them'. This DR was created because some of the files are protected.
- File:Brian Patrick Butler and Kerry Rossall at OIFF 2017.png
- File:Brian Patrick Butler and Letizia Baker at San Diego Film Week 2017.jpg
- File:Brian Patrick Butler at OIFF 2017.png
- File:Brian Patrick Butler at San Diego Film Week 2017.jpg
- File:Brian Patrick Butler at San Diego Film Week Red Carpet 2017.jpg
- File:Brian Patrick Butler in June 2017.jpg
Bencemac (talk) 17:44, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
As the subject associated with them, I have requested removal of these photos for the following reasons:
Irrelevance/redundancy: Six outdated, low quality, personal photos uploaded by the same individual without my consent from trivial/personal events taken by friends/family rather than legitimate sources.
Libelous/Affecting my ability to make a living: Potential employers have given feedback that 1. My online presence is over-inflated with these excessive photos in relation to my relatively unknown status as an actor. 2. For the past four years, my physical appearance has been drastically different from what is depicted in these photos. I have also missed work opportunities because I am continuously and mistakenly identified by the appearance depicted in these photos. Because there have not yet been accurate or relevant photos of me submitted by sources other than the lone individual who uploaded these against my wishes (who has since been blocked from the English Wikipedia), these six outdated, unprofessional images that do not represent me in context or appearance now take up 100% of my Wikidata and Wikimedia Commons file catalog. Because these were uploaded without my consent, the professional damages I have experienced are a result of the uploader’s actions and not my own, as I have taken great measures to maintain an appropriate online presence in accordance with my career.
Until I am notable enough to have professional photos submitted by legitimate sources rather than low quality, irrelevant/redundant images by friends/family members, having these six questionable images associated with my name will continue to be detrimental to my profession and online presence. --2603:8001:8500:226F:BD05:A5FE:9FA6:993 18:26, 21 June 2022 (UTC) Brian Patrick Butler
- Keep rights cannot be revoked, the uploader and copyright holder was made aware of this when they "donated" the items (which they did so they could self promote xwiki) and now they're regretting their decision. This isn't how the deletion process works. Praxidicae (talk) 13:52, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
- I mentioned initially that I did not upload these photos. They were taken by a local promoter who uploaded them without my permission before I was eligible for a Wikipedia page. My request for deletion of these photos is due to the fact that I am experiencing professional issues as a result of the actions of the person who uploaded these photos after I have taken great care to maintain an appropriate online presence. 2603:8001:8500:226F:24D5:F2FF:5632:D141 17:28, 21 July 2022 (UTC) Brian Patrick Butler
- Keep These photos are not low quality for encyclopedia and educational purpose. Consent of taking and publishing photos of a person are not required in US per this table. Please note that "Generally, images are not removed simply because the subject does not like them". Thank you for your understanding. --SCP-2000 16:02, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. In addition, I think I should remark similar photos are found on IMDB, https://m.imdb.com/name/nm0743953/mediaindex?ref_=m_nm_pv_mi_sm. --Ellywa (talk) 15:14, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Nahian as Logo. Does it exceed COM:TOO Bangladesh? Jonteemil (talk) 19:32, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: Per nomination. COM:Bangladesh does not specify a level of originality. To determine whether a design is below TOO is always a bit subjective. Imho this image – with a combination of two leaves – is showing a creativity of the designer and it is therefore copyrighted. In addition, I couldnot find a logo of another Canadian University which might be the source. The image has to be deleted as a consequence. --Ellywa (talk) 15:24, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Shows non-free text extracted from a 2015 book [4]. -- Asclepias (talk) 20:26, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 15:25, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Pokemon Types
[edit]- File:Logo Type Dragon Pokemon JCC.png
- File:Logo Type Eau Pokemon JCC.png
- File:Logo Type Métal Pokemon JCC.png
- File:Logo Type Obscurite Pokemon JCC.png
- File:Logo Type Plante Pokemon JCC.png
- File:Logo Type Psy Pokemon JCC.png
- File:Logo Type Incolore Pokemon JCC.png
- File:Logo Type Feu Pokemon JCC.png
- File:Logo Type Fée Pokemon JCC.png
- File:Logo Type Electrik Pokemon JCC.png
- File:Logo Type Combat Pokemon JCC.png
- File:Logo Type Inconnu Pokemon.png
Sprites directly from the Pokemon games and owned by The Pokemon Company --Guerillero Parlez Moi 23:39, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep File:Logo Type Obscurite Pokemon JCC.png, File:Logo Type Incolore Pokemon JCC.png, File:Logo Type Electrik Pokemon JCC.png, File:Logo Type Fée Pokemon JCC.png, File:Logo Type Inconnu Pokemon.png, and potentially File:Logo Type Psy Pokemon JCC.png as under COM:TOO. Delete the rest. (Oinkers42) (talk) 18:40, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination.Imho also the list of Oinkers42 is showing designs above TOO. So also these have to be deleted, regrettably. --Ellywa (talk) 15:27, 6 November 2022 (UTC)