Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2021/11/13
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
I uploaded it by mistake Pri2000 (talk) 21:15, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
- Should be COM:CSD#G7, but I note that it is in use on the uploader's own user page. @Pri2000: You might want to remove this from your user page. Brianjd (talk) 06:50, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, per G7. --Túrelio (talk) 11:35, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Ce lieu est privé et le proprietaire ne souhaite pas que la photo soit difusé sur internet la photo est prise sans avoir au préalable contacté le propriétaire Thomthom888 (talk) 05:54, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
Keep No valid reason ; the file is in use and I do not see any copyright issue Michel421 (talk) 10:45, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. User blocked. --Yann (talk) 18:13, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
photo d'un lieu privé, non consentement du propriétaire et ce n'est pas une photo de panorama, elle est utilisée et reprise par trop de site internet et les informations décrites sont fausses. Allony (talk) 06:54, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep The reason is not valid as it was said for the last deletion request. The way the request was written makes me think that Allony is or is close to Thomthom888 and other accounts he created to try to remove files about the building. Chabe01 (talk) 08:19, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep No known copyright issue ; in addition, the (so-called) owner of the building has to tell us how this picture is causing him any harm Michel421 (talk) 11:41, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:05, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
Chères Internaute, méfiez vous et lisez bien toutes les discutions avant de prendre au sérieux cette page. Elle est séquestrée par des trolls qui se feront un malin plaisir de vous faire bloquer pour que vous ne puissiez pas modifier le contenu. Ils ont un intérêt clairement explicite et le font savoir. Si vous modifiez ou annulé une de leur information, ils vous font bloqué, et ils ont les armes!! Que cachent-ils ? 'Cette page doit-être supprimé, elle est rempli de fausse informations et de photos prise dans le lieu privé, sans autorisation. Ils ont bloqué ceux qui ont pris les photos pour qu'ils ne puissent plus les supprimer. Ils agissent en toute impunité. Je vous appelle tous a l'aide pour faire arrêter ce scandale et pour supprimer cette page avant que je ne sois bloqué. 1Rames3 (talk) 17:09, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Speedy kept per previous keeps and that the nominator has offered no reason for deletion. (Repeated rants and allegations of false information and scandals, while never explaining what information is incorrect or what the supposed scandal is.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:28, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Chères Internaute, méfiez vous et lisez bien toutes les discutions avant de prendre au sérieux cette page. Elle est séquestrée par des trolls qui se feront un malin plaisir de vous faire bloquer pour que vous ne puissiez pas modifier le contenu. Ils ont un intérêt clairement explicite et le font savoir. Si vous modifiez ou annulé une de leur information, ils vous font bloqué, et ils ont les armes!! Que cachent-ils ? 'Cette page doit-être supprimé, elle est rempli de fausse informations et de photos prise dans le lieu privé, sans autorisation. Ils ont bloqué ceux qui ont pris les photos pour qu'ils ne puissent plus les supprimer. Ils agissent en toute impunité. Je vous appelle tous a l'aide pour faire arrêter ce scandale et pour supprimer cette page avant que je ne sois bloqué 89.156.12.25 18:23, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept per above. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:16, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
Ce lieu est privé et le proprietaire ne souhaite pas que la photo soit difusé sur internet, la photo est prise sans avoir au préalable contacté le propriétaire Thomthom888 (talk) 05:47, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep No valid reason ; the file is in use and I do not see any copyright issue Michel421 (talk) 10:37, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. User blocked. --Yann (talk) 18:25, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
photo d'un lieu privé, non consentement du propriétaire et ce n'est pas une photo de panorama, elle est utilisée et reprise par trop de site internet et les informations décrites sont fausses. Allony (talk) 06:56, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep The reason is not valid as it was said for the last deletion request. The way the request was written makes me think that Allony is or is close to Thomthom888 and other accounts he created to try to remove files about the building. Chabe01 (talk) 08:20, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep No known copyright issue ; in addition, the (so-called) owner of the building has to tell us how this picture is causing him any harm Michel421 (talk) 20:48, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:05, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
Chères Internaute, méfiez vous et lisez bien toutes les discutions avant de prendre au sérieux cette page. Elle est séquestrée par des trolls qui se feront un malin plaisir de vous faire bloquer pour que vous ne puissiez pas modifier le contenu. Ils ont un intérêt clairement explicite et le font savoir. Si vous modifiez ou annulé une de leur information, ils vous font bloqué, et ils ont les armes!! Que cachent-ils ? 'Cette page doit-être supprimé, elle est rempli de fausse informations et de photos prise dans le lieu privé, sans autorisation. Ils ont bloqué ceux qui ont pris les photos pour qu'ils ne puissent plus les supprimer. Ils agissent en toute impunité. Je vous appelle tous a l'aide pour faire arrêter ce scandale et pour supprimer cette page avant que je ne sois bloqué. 1Rames3 (talk) 17:10, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Speedy kept per previous keeps and that the nominator has offered no reason for deletion. (Repeated rants and allegations of false information and scandals, while never explaining what information is incorrect or what the supposed scandal is.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:37, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Bad permission, vandal keeps adding it to JG as a gay icon article at en-wiki, see lobods123 talk page HouseOfChange (talk) 19:28, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
- Hard to see what value this photo would add to any encyclopedia article, quite aside from its lack of appropriate permission status. HouseOfChange (talk) 19:30, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted clearly false claims, no evidence of free license status. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:33, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Blurry Image Pri2000 (talk) 21:32, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
Comment No, it is not. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:53, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted as copyright violation (unrelated to nomination) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:53, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
old and Blurry Pri2000 (talk) 21:51, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
Speedy kept it is neither, and it is parent photo of a cropped version in use in 8 projects. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:58, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
old and Blurry Pri2000 (talk) 21:52, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
Speedy kept, no not particularly, and currently in use in 8 projects. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:56, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Deez nutz 173.225.146.152 05:18, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Speedy closed kept, anon troll nomination -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:20, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
probably copyrighted Veracious (talk) 06:34, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted also unused and apparently OOS -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:22, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
probably copyrighted Veracious (talk) 06:35, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted Yes, way above TOO, also unused and apparently OOS -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:23, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Promotional image with likely incorrect attribution not used on any project. Was used on promotional userpage which is now deleted. Risker (talk) 05:36, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:37, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
Dubious ownwork Sahaib3005 (talk) 09:19, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted false license; work of recently deceased painter still under copyright by heirs. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:26, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Por error No está bien acreditada la autoría. Ajb1912 (talk) 20:02, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
lo he subido en color y debe ser blanco y negro Ajb1912 (talk) 10:40, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted prompt uploader request, unused. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:28, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope. Blur, unusable photo. Smooth O (talk) 15:32, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted per nom, apparent test image -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:35, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake عامرخان (talk) 15:43, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted prompt uploader request -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:37, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: photograph of a book cover and a page of a newspapaer CoffeeEngineer (talk) 16:58, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted Clear COM:DW. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:39, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Ce lieu est privé et le proprietaire ne souhaite pas que la photo soit difusé sur internet, la photo est prise sans avoir au préalable contacté le propriétaire Thomthom888 (talk) 05:46, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep No valid reason ; the file is in use and I do not see any copyright issue Michel421 (talk) 10:39, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. User blocked. --Yann (talk) 18:22, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
photo d'un lieu privé, non consentement du propriétaire et ce n'est pas une photo de panorama, elle est utilisée et reprise par trop de site internet et les informations décrites sont fausses. Allony (talk) 06:51, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep The reason is not valid as it was said for the last deletion request. The way the request was written makes me think that Allony is or is close to Thomthom888 and other accounts he created to try to remove files about the building. Chabe01 (talk) 08:19, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep No known copyright issue ; in addition, the (so-called) owner of the building has to tell us how this image is causing him any harm Michel421 (talk) 11:34, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:01, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
Chères Internaute, méfiez vous et lisez bien toutes les discutions avant de prendre au sérieux cette page. Elle est séquestrée par des trolls qui se feront un malin plaisir de vous faire bloquer pour que vous ne puissiez pas modifier le contenu. Ils ont un intérêt clairement explicite et le font savoir. Si vous modifiez ou annulé une de leur information, ils vous font bloqué, et ils ont les armes!! Que cachent-ils ? 'Cette page doit-être supprimé, elle est rempli de fausse informations et de photos prise dans le lieu privé, sans autorisation. Ils ont bloqué ceux qui ont pris les photos pour qu'ils ne puissent plus les supprimer. Ils agissent en toute impunité. Je vous appelle tous a l'aide pour faire arrêter ce scandale et pour supprimer cette page avant que je ne sois bloqué. 1Rames3 (talk) 17:11, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Speedy kept per previous keeps and no reason for deletion offered by nominator (nominator offers a vague rant while refusing to specify what the supposed misinformation is). -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:46, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Chères Internaute, méfiez vous et lisez bien toutes les discutions avant de prendre au sérieux cette page. Elle est séquestrée par des trolls qui se feront un malin plaisir de vous faire bloquer pour que vous ne puissiez pas modifier le contenu. Ils ont un intérêt clairement explicite et le font savoir. Si vous modifiez ou annulé une de leur information, ils vous font bloqué, et ils ont les armes!! Que cachent-ils ? 'Cette page doit-être supprimé, elle est rempli de fausse informations et de photos prise dans le lieu privé, sans autorisation. Ils ont bloqué ceux qui ont pris les photos pour qu'ils ne puissent plus les supprimer. Ils agissent en toute impunité. Je vous appelle tous a l'aide pour faire arrêter ce scandale et pour supprimer cette page avant que je ne sois bloqué 89.156.12.25 18:21, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept per above. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:20, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation:https://www.flickr.com/photos/christianvinces/16614506106/in/faves-75790393@N05/ MONUMENTA Talk 20:26, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted Blatant copyright violation, slightly cropped from copyrighted image on Flickr. (Too bad this wasn't noticed before image became used in multiple projects.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:05, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
misspelled empty category -Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 11:04, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted per nom -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:08, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
"alternate History" fictional map "for testing". Unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 21:00, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted per nom; uploader's caption "Testing something". -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:11, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
"alternate History" fictional map "for testing". Unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 21:01, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted per nom; uploader's caption "This is a trest" [sic] -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:10, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
已發布新聞稿聲明誤用受保全保護的圖片。A press release has been issued stating the misuse of protected images[1] 鐵路Railway (talk) 15:36, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 16:01, 13 November 2021 UTC: Copyright violation: 已發布新聞稿聲明誤用受保全保護的圖片。A press release has been issued stating the misuse of protected images[2] --Krdbot 21:16, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Ce lieu est privé et le proprietaire ne souhaite pas que la photo soit difusé sur internet, la photo est prise sans avoir au préalable contacté le propriétaire Thomthom888 (talk) 05:45, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep No valid reason ; the file is in use and I do not see any copyright issue Michel421 (talk) 10:41, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. User blocked. --Yann (talk) 18:25, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
photo d'un lieu privé, non consentement du propriétaire et ce n'est pas une photo de panorama, elle est utilisée et reprise par trop de site internet et les informations décrites sont fausses. Allony (talk) 06:55, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep The reason is not valid as it was said for the last deletion request. The way the request was written makes me think that Allony is or is close to Thomthom888 and other accounts he created to try to remove files about the building. Chabe01 (talk) 08:20, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep No known copyright issue ; in addition, the (so-called) owner of the building has to tell us how this picture is causing him any harm Michel421 (talk) 20:47, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:05, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
Chères Internaute, méfiez vous et lisez bien toutes les discutions avant de prendre au sérieux cette page. Elle est séquestrée par des trolls qui se feront un malin plaisir de vous faire bloquer pour que vous ne puissiez pas modifier le contenu. Ils ont un intérêt clairement explicite et le font savoir. Si vous modifiez ou annulé une de leur information, ils vous font bloqué, et ils ont les armes!! Que cachent-ils ? 'Cette page doit-être supprimé, elle est rempli de fausse informations et de photos prise dans le lieu privé, sans autorisation. Ils ont bloqué ceux qui ont pris les photos pour qu'ils ne puissent plus les supprimer. Ils agissent en toute impunité. Je vous appelle tous a l'aide pour faire arrêter ce scandale et pour supprimer cette page avant que je ne sois bloqué. 1Rames3 (talk) 17:11, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
- Keep This is a fevered rant that offers no reasons why the file should be deleted. Again and again I ask you: If some information is wrong, please explain what the correct information is. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:24, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 21:39, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Thierry 74 comment osez vous affirmer autant de bêtises dans vos écrit Chères Internaute, méfiez vous et lisez bien toutes les discutions avant de prendre au sérieux la page donjon du temple. Elle est séquestrée par des trolls qui se feront un malin plaisir de vous faire bloquer pour que vous ne puissiez pas modifier le contenu. Ils ont un intérêt clairemePage de trollsicite et le font savoir. Si vous modifiez ou annulé une de leur information, ils vous font bloqué, et ils ont les armes!! Que cachent-ils ? Cette page doit-être supprimé, elle est rempli de fausse informations et de photos prise dans le lieu privé, sans autorisation. Ils ont bloqué ceux qui ont pris les photos pour qu'ils ne puissent plus les supprimer. Ils agissent en toute impunité. Je vous appelle tous a l'aide pour faire arrêter ce scandale et pour supprimer cette page avant que je ne sois bloqué. 194.199.3.13 08:34, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
Speedy kept per above -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:17, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
Ce lieu est privé et le proprietaire ne souhaite pas que la photo soit difusé sur internet, la photo est prise sans avoir au préalable contacté le propriétaire Thomthom888 (talk) 05:45, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep No valid reason ; the file is in use and I do not see any copyright issue Michel421 (talk) 10:42, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. User blocked. --Yann (talk) 18:25, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
photo d'un lieu privé, non consentement du propriétaire et ce n'est pas une photo de panorama, elle est utilisée et reprise par trop de site internet et les informations décrites sont fausses. Allony (talk) 06:57, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep The reason is not valid as it was said for the last deletion request. The way the request was written makes me think that Allony is or is close to Thomthom888 and other accounts he created to try to remove files about the building. Chabe01 (talk) 08:20, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep No known copyright issue ; in addition, the (so-called) owner of the building has to tell us how this picture is causing him any harm Michel421 (talk) 21:01, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:07, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
Chères Internaute, méfiez vous et lisez bien toutes les discutions avant de prendre au sérieux cette page. Elle est séquestrée par des trolls qui se feront un malin plaisir de vous faire bloquer pour que vous ne puissiez pas modifier le contenu. Ils ont un intérêt clairement explicite et le font savoir. Si vous modifiez ou annulé une de leur information, ils vous font bloqué, et ils ont les armes!! Que cachent-ils ? 'Cette page doit-être supprimé, elle est rempli de fausse informations et de photos prise dans le lieu privé, sans autorisation. Ils ont bloqué ceux qui ont pris les photos pour qu'ils ne puissent plus les supprimer. Ils agissent en toute impunité. Je vous appelle tous a l'aide pour faire arrêter ce scandale et pour supprimer cette page avant que je ne sois bloqué. 1Rames3 (talk) 17:12, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Speedy keep troll nomination, vague allegations without offering any actual reasons why file should be deleted. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:36, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 21:40, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
"alternate History" fictional map "for testing". Unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 21:00, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted per nom; uploader description "testing something" -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:24, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
copyvio: https://twitter.com/RTFKTstudios/status/1313540578248814593 Nutshinou Talk! 21:58, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:20, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Загружено по ошибке Игорь александрович калмыков (talk) 11:48, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 16:00, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
photo d'un lieu privé, non consentement du propriétaire et ce n'est pas une photo de panorama, elle est utilisée et reprise par trop de site internet et les informations décrites sont fausses. Allony (talk) 06:57, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep The reason is not valid as the file is in use and I do not see any copyright issue. Chabe01 (talk) 08:22, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep No known copyright issue ; in addition, the (so-called) owner of the building has to tell us how this picture is causing him any harm Michel421 (talk) 21:05, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:07, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
Chères Internaute, méfiez vous et lisez bien toutes les discutions avant de prendre au sérieux cette page. Elle est séquestrée par des trolls qui se feront un malin plaisir de vous faire bloquer pour que vous ne puissiez pas modifier le contenu. Ils ont un intérêt clairement explicite et le font savoir. Si vous modifiez ou annulé une de leur information, ils vous font bloqué, et ils ont les armes!! Que cachent-ils ? 'Cette page doit-être supprimé, elle est rempli de fausse informations et de photos prise dans le lieu privé, sans autorisation. Ils ont bloqué ceux qui ont pris les photos pour qu'ils ne puissent plus les supprimer. Ils agissent en toute impunité. Je vous appelle tous a l'aide pour faire arrêter ce scandale et pour supprimer cette page avant que je ne sois bloqué. 1Rames3 (talk) 17:09, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept, bad faith nomination without specific reason for deletion; blocked troll user -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:55, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Studiopedia (talk · contribs)
[edit]extract of non free https://www.facebook.com/kapanamusic/photos/a.109409581058732/191612062838483
Habertix (talk) 23:10, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:58, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
COM:SELFIE of a non-contributing user, only userpage it is used in is obviously not serious Nutshinou Talk! 21:55, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: speedy deleted per G3. --clpo13(talk) 01:36, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
Unused COM:PORN low quality
- File:Desnudo moderno artístico.jpg
- File:Nalga masculina.jpg
- File:Male normal anus.jpg
- File:Ano hombre normal.jpg
- File:Ano masculino normal.jpg
- File:Esfinter masculino dilatado.jpg
- File:Esfinter masculino cerrado.jpg
- File:Pubic hair male with penis.jpg
- File:Masturbación masculina.gif
- File:Orgasmo masculino.gif
- File:Trabajo bio2.jpg
- File:Trabajo biologia hombre.jpg
—SpanishSnake (talk | contribs) ping me plz 02:05, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:47, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Harshini1840280 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused charts. Should be in tabular data, MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful.
- File:Continuos distributions.png
- File:Discrete distributions.png
- File:Bernoulli distribution.png
- File:Binomial distribution.png
- File:Hypergeomteric distribution.png
- File:Geometric distribution.png
- File:Negative binomial distribution.png
- File:Poisson distribution.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:54, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:48, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:WikimanEsq
[edit]- File:New Birth of Freedom election map 2020 v4.svg
- File:2024 IOWA.svg
- File:Jackson92 contingent.svg
- File:Jackson92.svg
- File:BeebevMcCain.svg
- File:Richardson v McCain.svg
- File:New Birth of Freedom election map 1892.svg
- File:New Birth of Freedom election map 1888.svg
- File:Freedom Party logo.png
- File:Nationalist Party logo.png
- File:ElectoralCollege2020(6)2.svg
- File:ElectoralCollege1840Clay.svg
- File:New Birth of Freedom primary election map 2020 v2.svg
- File:New Birth of Freedom primary election map 2020.svg
- File:New Birth of Freedom election map 1884.svg
- File:ElectoralCollege2020(4).svg
- File:New Birth of Freedom election map 1872 v33.svg
- File:New Birth of Freedom election map 1868 v66.svg
- File:New Birth of Freedom election map 1864 House.svg
- File:New Birth of Freedom election map 1864 v2.svg
- File:New Birth of Freedom election map 1864.svg
- File:New Birth of Freedom election map 1860.svg
- File:New Birth of Freedom election map 1856.svg
- File:New Birth of Freedom election map 1852 v2.svg
- File:New Birth of Freedom election map 1852.svg
- File:New Birth of Freedom election map 1880.svg
- File:New Birth of Freedom election map 2020 v24.svg
- File:New Birth of Freedom election map 2020 v23.svg
- File:New Birth of Freedom election map 2020 v22.svg
- File:2024 NUND primary.svg
- File:2022 NUND Gubernatorial.svg
- File:2022 NUND SENATE.svg
- File:2020 United States Senate elections results HARRIS.svg
- File:2020 US House Election ResultsHARRIS.svg
- File:Harris2020.svg
- File:2020 Dem Harris.svg
- File:ElectoralCollege2016alt222.svg
- File:House progressiveliberal caucus logo.png
- File:House Conservative Caucus logo.png
- File:House Centrist Caucus logo.png
- File:ElectoralCollege2020(2).svg
- File:Peoples circle.png
- File:Peoples party.png
- File:People's party logo.png
- File:DFLNPL.png
- File:US westminster style.svg
- File:2020 US as 2019 UK.svg
- File:SEYMOUR.svg
- File:New Birth of Freedom election map 1876.svg
Files by User:WikimanEsq. Fictional "alternate History" maps and logos. This is unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. In my opinion fake election maps are just inviting embarrassing mistakes by unsuspecting users. --Jahobr (talk) 20:36, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Delete per nom. Way OOS -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:25, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:49, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:Messr. Fancy Pants
[edit]- File:Pennsylvania2022.svg
- File:NorthCarolina2022.svg
- File:Ohio2022.svg
- File:Louisiana2022.svg
- File:FloridaSen2022.svg
- File:ElectoralCollege2020(1).svg
- File:2020 US House Election Results(7).svg
- File:2022 US Senate map ALT.svg
- File:WarrenLossSad2020.svg
- File:Cooper2024.svg
- File:Clinton2012.svg
- File:Clinton12.svg
- File:Clinton08.svg
- File:New Birth of Freedom election map 1916 house.svg
- File:New Birth of Freedom election map 1916.svg
- File:New Birth of Freedom election map 1872 v2.svg
- File:New Birth of Freedom election map 2000.svg
- File:RootCanal.svg
- File:Scoop76.svg
- File:New Birth of Freedom election map 1868.svg
- File:New Birth of Freedom senate election map.svg
- File:New Birth of Freedom election map.svg
- File:New Birth of Freedom congress.svg
- File:2021 NBoF Senate.svg
- File:2021 Congress NBoF.svg
- File:New Birth of Freedom election map 2020 v2.svg
- File:New Birth of Freedom election map 2020.svg
- File:New Birth of Freedom election map 1872.svg
Files by User:Messr. Fancy Pants. Fictional "alternate History" maps. This is unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. In my opinion fake election maps are just inviting embarrassing mistakes by unsuspecting users. --Jahobr (talk) 21:16, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom; OOS -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:22, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:50, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
Other versions with bigger size and higher quality is availble and also it seems this image is resized: https://toptourist.ir/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/6ciBIY1vOTla6lBA-1527743390157-e1569493251310.jpg, https://lidomatrip.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/%D9%85%D8%AC%D9%85%D9%88%D8%B9%D9%87-%D8%AA%D9%84%D9%87-%DA%A9%D8%A7%D8%A8%DB%8C%D9%86.jpg Rohalamin (talk) 10:37, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --4nn1l2 (talk) 17:38, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
This image is availble on the net while it is uploaded here today. e.g.: https://images.kojaro.com/2021/5/7e1b5573-7d4b-475a-9e5e-3656d6ff72e6.jpg Rohalamin (talk) 10:40, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --4nn1l2 (talk) 17:37, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
Again this user has uploaded an image yesterday while it's avalible on the net. Also, check the user history. another version of the image: https://www.top-travel.ir/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/39598376_1091222077711707_8166362834209341440_n.jpg Rohalamin (talk) 10:44, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --4nn1l2 (talk) 17:41, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
Ce lieu est privé et le proprietaire ne souhaite pas que la photo soit difusé sur internet la photo est prise sans avoir au préalable contacté le propriétaire Thomthom888 (talk) 05:44, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep No valid reason ; the file is in use and I do not see any copyright issue Michel421 (talk) 10:23, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. User blocked. --Yann (talk) 18:23, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
photo d'un lieu privé, non consentement du propriétaire et ce n'est pas une photo de panorama, elle est utilisée et reprise par trop de site internet et les informations décrites sont fausses. Allony (talk) 06:56, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep The reason is not valid as it was said for the last deletion request. The way the request was written makes me think that Allony is or is close to Thomthom888 and other accounts he created to try to remove files about the building. Chabe01 (talk) 08:21, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep No known copyright issue ; in addition, the (so-called) owner of the building has to tell us how this picture is causing him any harm Michel421 (talk) 20:57, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:06, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
Chères Internaute, méfiez vous et lisez bien toutes les discutions avant de prendre au sérieux cette page. Elle est séquestrée par des trolls qui se feront un malin plaisir de vous faire bloquer pour que vous ne puissiez pas modifier le contenu. Ils ont un intérêt clairement explicite et le font savoir. Si vous modifiez ou annulé une de leur information, ils vous font bloqué, et ils ont les armes!! Que cachent-ils ? 'Cette page doit-être supprimé, elle est rempli de fausse informations et de photos prise dans le lieu privé, sans autorisation. Ils ont bloqué ceux qui ont pris les photos pour qu'ils ne puissent plus les supprimer. Ils agissent en toute impunité. Je vous appelle tous a l'aide pour faire arrêter ce scandale et pour supprimer cette page avant que je ne sois bloqué. 1Rames3 (talk) 17:12, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
- Comment That is interesting opinion rant about supposed "trolls". You have not offered any reason why this image should be deleted. If something stated is wrong, please say what the correct information is.
Why do you keep refusing to explain? What are you hiding?(Pardon, I should not descend to such a low level of discussion, even if someone else has.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:21, 13 November 2021 (UTC) - Speedy close. Are there any more of these still left? They're disruptive DRs filed repeatedly by a sockpuppet. Andy Dingley (talk) 17:57, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
Closing as Kept -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:35, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
Biography Issue. This text includes inappropriate private talk. Reiro (talk) 11:55, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
- Delete While I can't read the language, seems unlikely that uploader has authority to license the other person's chat text. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:30, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
- Comment DuckDuckGo translation of title: "Mock-up conversation". Maybe everyone is coming at this the wrong way. Brianjd (talk) 05:52, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per COM:PCP. --Ankry (talk) 18:25, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
porn VictorCubillo (talk) 18:42, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
- Delete: Lack of COM:EDUSE due to poor quality. --Achim55 (talk) 16:20, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 17:39, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Derivative work copyright violations: there is no acceptable freedom of panorama in UAE that will permit free commercial uses of images of copyrighted public works like architecture by living or recently-deceased artists. These images of two recent architectures need correspondence of commercial license permission (via COM:VRT) from the ff. artists: architect Adrian Smith for the Burj Khalifa and DP Architects for the Dubai Mall. For Burj Khalifa, two prior deletion requests are found at COM:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Burj Khalifa and COM:Deletion requests/Images of Burj Khalifa.
- File:Dubai Mall (3884854156).jpg
- File:Dubai Mall (3884862840).jpg
- File:Dubai Mall (3884074125).jpg
- File:Dubai Mall (3884933636).jpg
- File:Burj Dubai (3884086129).jpg
- File:Dubai Mall (3884925922).jpg
- File:Burj Dubai (3884120903).jpg
- File:Dubai Mall (3884927586).jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 12:46, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:29, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
photos of graphic works are not ok as per COM:FOP US, i think?
- File:To Open a Portal (51379478450).jpg
- File:Koi Truck With Cyclist (50220602171).jpg
- File:Koi Truck (50193581138).jpg
- File:Goldfish Truck (49522304042).jpg
- File:Aquarium Mural I (46570096055).jpg
- File:Bait and Hook Mural (14323096482).jpg
- File:Urbanimal (36213245515).jpg
- File:Truck Goldfish (35408520453).jpg
RZuo (talk) 15:18, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:41, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
Out of Scope. Nutshinou Talk! 18:22, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:30, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. Out of project scope. ~Moheen (keep talking) 18:25, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:30, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
osceno VictorCubillo (talk) 18:38, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:PENIS. --4nn1l2 (talk) 10:26, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Most unlikely to be copyright of the uploader. They have been blocked on enWP as a sock of the farm which persists in their interest in Kiggundu. Even though there are camera details they are suspected of being overly similar to those of "other" uploader of this gentleman's picture.
Timtrent (talk) 19:04, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: also per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hamis Kiggundu 4.jpg. --Didym (talk) 21:33, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
Author request: this photo is not being used on any Wikiprojects and depicts people who may not consent to being on Commons. Out of scope as a personal photo. Di (they-them) (talk) 12:33, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
- Comment File uploaded in June, talk page indicates image has been reused by 3rd parties. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:33, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
- Reused or not, it's absurd to claim that this is "out of scope as a personal photo". I see that argument way too often.
- Weak delete It looks like it might be taken in a private place, and the author says there was no consent. On the other hand, I am not sure whether these count as identifiable people. Brianjd (talk) 05:57, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
- Delete based on COM:PEOPLE, not COM:SCOPE. We shouldn't be hosting photographs of people in private places unless we have their consent. A person receiving medical treatment certainly has a reasonable expectation of privacy. — Rhododendrites talk | 03:28, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: author request and privacy issues. --Geni (talk) 08:17, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Old and Blurry Image Pri2000 (talk) 21:35, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, not blurry, age irrelevant, and in use. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:54, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
- Keep per Infrogmation. Doesn't matter if the image is old or new and moreover the image is in use. Hulged (talk) 05:17, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, image is not that blurry and is freely sourced. KyloRen3 (talk) 16:06, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:44, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused photo of an unnotable person - out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 01:36, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:44, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
COM:PORN —SpanishSnake (talk | contribs) ping me plz 01:59, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Unused, no educational purpose, per COM:PORN -M.nelson (talk) 19:46, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
- --Luce333eeee (talk) 21:47, 11 December 2021 (UTC)Luce333eeee
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:44, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by HeleneFrench (talk · contribs)
[edit]Seems to violate COM:PORN, when taking into account the uploader's userpage.
- File:裸の女性.jpg
- File:女性は彼女の外陰部を示しています.jpg
- File:Original pic.jpg
- File:膣バイブレーター.jpg
- File:内側のボールは膣に適応します.jpg
- File:インナーボール.jpg
- File:アナルビーズと膣.jpg
- File:女性の肛門のアナルビーズ.jpg
- File:ディルドでオナニー.jpg
- File:足でオナニー.jpg
- File:Vulve et anus femme.jpg
- File:Vulve de femme.jpg
- File:女性の外陰部.jpg
- File:外陰部を開く.jpg
- File:安静時の外陰部.jpg
Zppix (talk) 15:39, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
Of course it's pornographic. They have been posted on pages about nudity, flashers, sextoys and other sexual subjects... — Preceding unsigned comment added by HeleneFrench (talk • contribs) 06:35, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 16:51, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by HeleneFrench (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused COM:PORN low quality
—SpanishSnake (talk | contribs) ping me plz 02:06, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
- Delete File:Naked girl at the beach.jpg - clear voyeurism angle, with face blurred, useless as illustration of beach nudity; for any other potential anatomical use Commons already has much better alternatives. (No opinion on the others) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:10, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:45, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sudhir dnyandeo raskar (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photos COM:SELFIE
—SpanishSnake (talk | contribs) ping me plz 02:13, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:45, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
small size. Masoud bukani (talk) 07:49, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Collage of unsourced photos -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:25, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:46, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Omar Kochar 191.119.82.106 02:37, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: no permission. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:00, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Work attributed to Aaron Bircher and Sebastian Stumpf, Jim Dine, Robbie Lawrence, and Diana Michener, not accompanied by any evidence that the respective author has copylefted the image.
- File:02 Dine Wiki.jpg
- File:10 Dine Wiki.jpg
- File:09 Dine Wiki.jpg
- File:08 Dine Wiki.jpg
- File:07 Dine Wiki.jpg
- File:06 Dine Wiki.jpg
- File:05 Dine Wiki.jpg
- File:04 Dine Wiki.jpg
- File:03 Dine Wiki.jpg
- File:01 Dine Wiki.jpg
- File:Steidl by RobbieLawrence2017.jpg
Hoary (talk) 11:36, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
- I thought I'd added File:Kunsthaus Bau Aufsicht.jpg to the list. Well, I hereby add it. -- Hoary (talk) 11:40, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:00, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:Benhartofyoloo
[edit]- File:ClintonManchin.png
- File:Bryans1908.png
- File:CarterWallace.png
- File:Benhartworker1896.png
- File:Baker2032.png
- File:Baker2028.png
- File:Benhart2024round2.png
- File:Benhart2024round1.png
- File:Benhart2020round2.png
- File:Benhart2020round1.png
- File:Benhart2016round2.png
- File:Benhart2016round1.png
- File:Benhart2012.png
- File:Doidl.png
- File:Benhart2008round2.png
- File:Benhart2008round1.png
- File:Trump2004.png
- File:Benhart2004round2.png
- File:Benhart2004round1.png
- File:DONOTUSE.png
- File:Benhart2000round2.png
- File:Benhart2000round1.png
- File:Benhart1996round2.png
- File:Benhart1996round1.png
- File:Benhart1992round2.png
- File:Benhart1992round1.png
- File:Benhart1988Round2.png
- File:Benhart1988round1.png
- File:Gravelanche.png
- File:Benhart19802.png
- File:Benahrt1980.png
- File:Benhart1976.png
- File:Benhart19722.png
- File:Benhart1972.png
- File:Benhart1968.png
- File:Benhart19642.png
- File:Benhart1964.png
- File:Benhart1960.png
- File:Benhart1956.png
- File:1952benhart.png
Files by User:Benhartofyoloo. Fictional "alternate History" maps. This is unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. In my opinion fake election maps just inviting embarrassing mistakes by unsuspecting users. --Jahobr (talk) 13:53, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:01, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:15, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:01, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private drawing album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:16, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:01, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:57, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:02, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely own work, as metadata carry Facebook/instagram code. -- Túrelio (talk) 16:04, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:01, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely own work due to fcebook/Instagram-code in metadata. -- Túrelio (talk) 16:07, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:02, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chart of questionable notability. Should be in tabular data, MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:26, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:02, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Poor quality photograph. Too dark. Tights4men (talk) 16:27, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:02, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal file, out of scope. GeorgHH • talk 17:01, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:02, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused screenshot with no indication of importance. Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 17:06, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:02, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
copyvio (c) Michal Chelbin Svajcr (talk) 17:36, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:02, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
commons:PACKAGING Sahaib3005 (talk) 17:40, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
- Delete, COM:TOO France has rather low threshold. (Image currently in use in multiple projects.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:55, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:02, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope Image used only on a non-contributor's userpage. Nutshinou Talk! 18:37, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:59, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:03, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope Image used only on a non-contributor's userpage. Nutshinou Talk! 18:37, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom; private joke image by non-contributor, inactive since 2016. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:01, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:03, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
porn VictorCubillo (talk) 18:38, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Unused, no educational purpose, per COM:PORN -M.nelson (talk) 19:46, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:03, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
out of scope; COM:SELFIE Nutshinou Talk! 18:38, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:03, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
i fail to see how this is in the project scope Nutshinou Talk! 18:42, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:03, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of Project scope: Commons is not private photo album —MdsShakil (talk) 18:55, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:03, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of Project scope: Commons is not private photo album
—MdsShakil (talk) 18:56, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:03, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope Image used only on a non-contributor's userpage. Nutshinou Talk! 18:37, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom; user only active briefly in 2016 and then only to post personal images to user page. OOS. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:00, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:03, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by PhiH as duplicate (duplicate) and the most recent rationale was: File:Bahnstation Moorbekhalle.JPG
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion as per Commons:Deletion policy#Duplicates (PNG -> JPEG). -- Túrelio (talk) 20:41, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
- Delete same as File:Bahnstation Moorbekhalle.JPG, no additional value. JPG is the better format for photos --Jahobr (talk) 21:37, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
- Delete as nominator. Didn't notice this is a png, regardless: This image was most likely downloaded from Commons (already compressed), converted to png and reuploaded. The user has already uploaded several images they found on the internet (always non-free, except this one) and claimes them as their own work. --PhiH (talk) 10:51, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: by Reinhard Kraasch. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:03, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Low quality, so badly blurred that birds unidentifiable MPF (talk) 00:23, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
- I certainly don't disagree that the photo is low quality, but the birds are identifiable as Phoenicopterus roseus by their distinctive shape (and lack of any other flamingo species in the area) - long legs, longish and narrowish wings, and especially the very long and thin, outstretched, slightly drooped and then raised neck with a shortish head (i.e., no long bill; the neck and head proportions are most clearly visible on one of the birds in the upper right) Spizaetus (talk) 04:43, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
- Keep as the birds are identifiable per Spizaetus and a rename will be enough for which,
Info, I have made a renaming request successfully.
- Contributers2020Talk to me here 10:37, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
- Also, this can be used for another type of scope such as a flock of birds. Contributers2020Talk to me here 10:39, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
- Keep per above; middling quality but unoffensive and in scope. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:00, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Per keeps - educational value at this time. If one wishes to renominate this file with another policy-based rationale, they are able to do so. I will defer to other administrators to review it. Happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 15:54, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Painting and the painter is mentioned in the file's details. It cannot stay in the Commons without a proper OTRS release note. Ldorfman (talk) 01:02, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleting per lack of permissions. Next time, please request COM:VRT before taking to deletion requests. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 15:55, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Likely not own work: EXIF data says: "Copyright holder 2017 Scott Wachter". Unreliable uploader. P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:06, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
- Delete as a Copyvio. The EXIF data states "SAN DIEGO, CA - MAY 30: San Diego Padres pregame ceremonies before a game against the Chicago Cubs at Petco Park in San Diego on Wednesday May 30, 2017. (Photo by Scott Wachter) *** Local Caption *** pregame; pre-game"
- If the uploader is the photographer then they may use COM:OTRS to verify that. COM:PCP applies. Timtrent (talk) 11:22, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 15:55, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
duplication of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:MountHornadayYNP.jpg Ron Clausen (talk) 02:31, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 15:58, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 49.106.186.19 as Copyvio (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F1|2=https://www.fwolf.jp/. COM:TOO? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:33, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Passes COM:TOO for me - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 15:58, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Miwako Sato as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Nothing in the source website says the picture was created in 1866; moreover, a website says the picture was from a modern textbook King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:36, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
- Additional finding: The uploader (@Patcha007) made a post on a webboard hours ago to fake information about the authorship of the file and then posted the link thereto in the file summary as the source of the file (see the file history also). --Miwako Sato (talk) 18:45, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvi o - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:01, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
See Template:PD-CSPAN. Work of C-SPAN is not federal government work, and committee hearings are only released for non-commercial use, from what I can see.
Ytoyoda (talk) 05:16, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:01, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
While {{PD-USGov}} applies to works of the federal government of the United States of America, it does not apply to the governments of the constituent sovereign states (see COM:USA#Works by the US Government, which notes that while a work created by the federal Government is in the public domain, works created by most state and local governments are subject to copyright). These photographs were taken by the Alexandria Sheriff's Office; the employees of that office are employees of the U.S. Commonwealth of Virginia, not the U.S. Federal Government. As such, the {{PD-USGov}} tag does not appear to apply to these photographs. As each photograph was created in the 2000s, the photographs are not presumed to be in the public domain on account of age. For these reasons, the photos do not appear to be in the public domain, and the photos should be deleted in light of COM:PRP for also lacking evidence of a valid free license.
— Red-tailed hawk (nest) 04:07, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
- As a friendly note, a discussion related to some of these files has been taking place on COM:VP/C. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 04:08, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: Here is the contact information for the Alexandria Sheriff's Office if anyone wants to request permission. Ixfd64 (talk) 17:03, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
- In each case, it appears to be the Alexandria Sheriff's Office making arrests on behalf of the United States government (they're all charged with federal crimes, I believe). Does that make a difference? Adeletron 3030 (talk) 20:27, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
- No difference; their employer is still the city of Alexandria and those photos are still works produced by Alexandria city employees. Unless these photographs were taken by federal employees acting in their course of duty (they do not appear to be, as all credits are attributed to the Sherrif's Office of Alexandria), then we can't host them under a claim of {{PD-USGov}}. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:33, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:56, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
"Own work" is claimed, but the photo looks too professional to be created by the uploader. Could have been copied from another source, but still searching for that source... George Ho (talk) 06:22, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Presumed copyvio. In the future, please request COM:VRT before nominating for deletion. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:02, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
COM:FOP SK 에 따라 비상업적 용도로 제한된 이미지 137.189.206.65 06:40, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: FOP - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:02, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
not possible to tie. this File:Knoten Weberknoten.gif correct version Zaripov999 (talk) 06:42, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:02, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Old photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
Estopedist1 (talk) 07:50, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Looks like a modern photo - copyvio without appropriate permissions - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:03, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Szombat78 (talk) 08:51, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:03, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Previously published at https://imageobjecttext.com/2012/09/05/matching-pairs/ and https://jctblog.wordpress.com/2011/01/18/gabriel-orozco-at-tate-modern/ mattbr 09:12, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:03, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Dubious ownwork Sahaib3005 (talk) 09:15, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyrighted - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:03, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Dubious ownwork Sahaib3005 (talk) 09:16, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 16:03, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Dubious ownwork Sahaib3005 (talk) 09:17, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:03, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Dubious ownwork Sahaib3005 (talk) 09:17, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:04, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Dubious ownwork Sahaib3005 (talk) 09:17, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Fixing is 10x easier than nominating. --RAN (talk) 01:39, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Public domain- can be fixed. If one wishes to renominate this file with another policy-based rationale, they are able to do so. I will defer to other administrators to review it. Happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 16:04, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Dubious ownwork Sahaib3005 (talk) 09:18, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
- Keep fix problems, its 10x faster. Every noob makes the same data entry mistake because it is confusing and has never been made clearer. They created the scan or uploaded an existing image, but did not create the original.
Kept: Can be fixed - If one wishes to renominate this file with another policy-based rationale, they are able to do so. I will defer to other administrators to review it. Happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 16:04, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Only file uploaded by User:Karel Huizinga. Nothing to do with the category Portreath. Commons is not a personal photo album. Jowaninpensans (talk) 09:33, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: File is in use on Wikitionary - If one wishes to renominate this file with another policy-based rationale, they are able to do so. I will defer to other administrators to review it. Happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 16:05, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
according to Commons:Threshold_of_originality#Hong_Kong, this logo may have copyright in Hong Kong. Kencola (talk) 09:43, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:05, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
The logo represents a Scottish rock band, The Exploited. More likely, the logo is British- or Scottish-made and may be copyrighted in the UK due to the country's very low originality standards; see COM:TOO UK. George Ho (talk) 10:02, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Fails COM:TOO - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:05, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
No evidence provided that the authors have copylefted this. (Added to Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Lexprofi.) Hoary (talk) 11:42, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:31, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
This is a user-generated fantasy flag, combining elements of several different genuine Byzantine symbols. As a result, it actively violates COM:EV, since it can mislead users. Constantine ✍ 12:17, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nominator's rationale. Veverve (talk) 14:04, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
- Comment: the image is sourced, it is on p. 9 of the PDF given as a source. Veverve (talk) 14:07, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
- Nevertheless, this flag never existed. The 'source' has a whole host of fanciful Byzantine flags that are entirely ahistorical, including several variants of the (in)famous double-headed eagle on a golden background pattern, that, despite widespread common belief in Greece, is nowhere attested in reality. Constantine ✍ 23:52, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
- I do not speak Greek. Is the source reliable? Veverve (talk) 15:16, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
- No. It rehashes a lot of 19th-century and more recent nationalist fantasy extrapolations with little basis in reality. No sources are given. FWIW, it is precisely because of the prevalence of such imaginary flags that I have started en:Byzantine flags and insignia. Constantine ✍ 19:57, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
- I do not speak Greek. Is the source reliable? Veverve (talk) 15:16, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
- Nevertheless, this flag never existed. The 'source' has a whole host of fanciful Byzantine flags that are entirely ahistorical, including several variants of the (in)famous double-headed eagle on a golden background pattern, that, despite widespread common belief in Greece, is nowhere attested in reality. Constantine ✍ 23:52, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nominator's rationale. Veverve (talk) 05:31, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:31, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deletion requested because image is low quality and descriptions not accurate. Descriptions should be accurate when referring to the human body. WikiFan (talk) 15:04, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
- Keep The nominator, Ringmaster32571, is also the uploader. They attempted to conceal their identity both here and in the file description. They were also warned about removing valid information from file descriptions. All this suggests that this request is actually a courtesy request for a file that seems very useful if the information is accurate, which it is, as far as I can tell. Brianjd (talk) 06:04, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
- Are we gonna fulfill the courtesy request?@Brianjd: --Trade (talk) 16:57, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Trade: That will be up to an administrator. Also note that this request has not even been open for 4 days, let alone the 7 days that requests should normally remain open for discussion. Brianjd (talk) 05:06, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
- I apologize that I wasn’t more clear when I nominated this file for deletion. Aside from previous reasons for removal, my intention is for the file to be removed as a courtesy deletion. I do not believe this site will be at a loss if my file is deleted since there are many other similar files that can be used as reference in lieu of my file. I also do not want to cause any confusion regarding my username. I did change it a while ago since I preferred the current rather than the older username. I am hoping with clarification and communication this file can be deleted by an administrator. Thank you. WikiFan (talk) 00:49, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- Are we gonna fulfill the courtesy request?@Brianjd: --Trade (talk) 16:57, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
Question Does it need separate source information for each photo? Brianjd (talk) 14:06, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Feeling charitable and I think we can survive with one less uncircumsized penis on Commons. There are plenty of higher quality photos of the same subject that can be used for "Educational purposes." Courtesy deletion. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:37, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Unknown publication date on source page - pd anon doesnt apply. Matlin (talk) 15:12, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
I'm sorry. It could be my mistake. You could delete it. Oooo93 (talk) 21:03, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 16:37, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Ce lieu est privé et le proprietaire ne souhaite pas que la photo soit difusé sur internet la photo est prise sans avoir au préalable contacté le propriétaire Thomthom888 (talk) 05:44, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep No valid reason ; the file is in use and I do not see any copyright issue Michel421 (talk) 10:44, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. User blocked. --Yann (talk) 18:24, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
photo d'un lieu privé, non consentement du propriétaire et ce n'est pas une photo de panorama, elle est utilisée et reprise par trop de site internet et les informations décrites sont fausses. Allony (talk) 06:53, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep The reason is not valid as it was said for the last deletion request. The way the request was written makes me think that Allony is or is close to Thomthom888 and other accounts he created to try to remove files about the building. Chabe01 (talk) 08:21, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep No known copyright issue. In addition, the (so called) owner of the building has just nothing to say on the picture ; or he has to tell us why it does matter. Michel421 (talk) 21:22, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
- PS - @Allony: Le propriétaire d'une chose ne dispose pas d'un droit exclusif sur l'image de celle-ci, il faut établir qu'il y a un trouble anormal : https://www.courdecassation.fr/jurisprudence_2/assemblee_pleniere_22/arr_ecirc_459.html Michel421 (talk) 19:04, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Per discussion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:04, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
Chères Internaute, méfiez vous et lisez bien toutes les discutions avant de prendre au sérieux cette page. Elle est séquestrée par des trolls qui se feront un malin plaisir de vous faire bloquer pour que vous ne puissiez pas modifier le contenu. Ils ont un intérêt clairement explicite et le font savoir. Si vous modifiez ou annulé une de leur information, ils vous font bloqué, et ils ont les armes!! Que cachent-ils ? 'Cette page doit-être supprimé, elle est rempli de fausse informations et de photos prise dans le lieu privé, sans autorisation. Ils ont bloqué ceux qui ont pris les photos pour qu'ils ne puissent plus les supprimer. Ils agissent en toute impunité. Je vous appelle tous a l'aide pour faire arrêter ce scandale et pour supprimer cette page avant que je ne sois bloqué. 1Rames3 (talk) 17:07, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy keep per previous keeps and that no actual reason for deletion offered. Nominator offers repeated rants about alleged "false information" and "scandal" while never explaining what information is wrong nor what the supposed "scandal" is. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:44, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: The nom has been blocked . Therefore, I am being bold and closing these as keeps. If one wishes to renominate this file with another policy-based rationale, they are able to do so. Happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 16:38, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Ce lieu est privé et le proprietaire ne souhaite pas que la photo soit difusé sur internet Thomthom888 (talk) 05:42, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep No valid reason ; the file is in use and I do not see any copyright issue ; Michel421 (talk) 10:22, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. User blocked. --Yann (talk) 18:23, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
photo d'un lieu privé, non consentement du propriétaire et ce n'est pas une photo de panorama, elle est utilisée et reprise par trop de site internet et les informations décrites sont fausses. Allony (talk) 06:54, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep The reason is not valid as it was said for the last deletion request. The way the request was written makes me think that Allony is or is close to Thomthom888 and other accounts he created to try to remove files about the building. Chabe01 (talk) 08:20, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep No known copyright issue ; in addition, the (so-called) owner of the building has to tell us how this picture is causing him any harm Michel421 (talk) 11:43, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:05, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
Chères Internaute, méfiez vous et lisez bien toutes les discutions avant de prendre au sérieux cette page. Elle est séquestrée par des trolls qui se feront un malin plaisir de vous faire bloquer pour que vous ne puissiez pas modifier le contenu. Ils ont un intérêt clairement explicite et le font savoir. Si vous modifiez ou annulé une de leur information, ils vous font bloqué, et ils ont les armes!! Que cachent-ils ? 'Cette page doit-être supprimé, elle est rempli de fausse informations et de photos prise dans le lieu privé, sans autorisation. Ils ont bloqué ceux qui ont pris les photos pour qu'ils ne puissent plus les supprimer. Ils agissent en toute impunité. Je vous appelle tous a l'aide pour faire arrêter ce scandale et pour supprimer cette page avant que je ne sois bloqué. 1Rames3 (talk) 17:08, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy keep per previous keeps and new nomination offering no reason for deletion, only vague ranting. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:44, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: The nom has been blocked . Therefore, I am being bold and closing these as keeps. If one wishes to renominate this file with another policy-based rationale, they are able to do so. Happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 16:38, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Ce lieu est privé et le proprietaire ne souhaite pas que la photo soit difusé sur internet, la photo est prise sans avoir au préalable contacté le propriétaire Thomthom888 (talk) 05:47, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep No valid reason ; the file is in use and I do not see any copyright issue Michel421 (talk) 10:33, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. User blocked. --Yann (talk) 18:21, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
photo d'un lieu privé, non consentement du propriétaire et ce n'est pas une photo de panorama, elle est utilisée et reprise par trop de site internet et les informations décrites sont fausses. Allony (talk) 06:54, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep The reason is not valid as it was said for the last deletion request. The way the request was written makes me think that Allony is or is close to Thomthom888 and other accounts he created to try to remove files about the building. Chabe01 (talk) 08:20, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep No known copyright issue ; in addition, the (so-called) owner of the building has to tell us how this picture is causing him any harm Michel421 (talk) 20:42, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Per discussion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:05, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
Chères Internaute, méfiez vous et lisez bien toutes les discutions avant de prendre au sérieux cette page. Elle est séquestrée par des trolls qui se feront un malin plaisir de vous faire bloquer pour que vous ne puissiez pas modifier le contenu. Ils ont un intérêt clairement explicite et le font savoir. Si vous modifiez ou annulé une de leur information, ils vous font bloqué, et ils ont les armes!! Que cachent-ils ? 'Cette page doit-être supprimé, elle est rempli de fausse informations et de photos prise dans le lieu privé, sans autorisation. Ils ont bloqué ceux qui ont pris les photos pour qu'ils ne puissent plus les supprimer. Ils agissent en toute impunité. Je vous appelle tous a l'aide pour faire arrêter ce scandale et pour supprimer cette page avant que je ne sois bloqué. 1Rames3 (talk) 17:10, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy keep Rant with unspecified allegations of misinformation without explaining what is incorrect; no actual reason for deletion offered. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:39, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
- Comment: I don't know the French laws. Looking at Google maps satellite it is obvious that the photographer didn't stand on a public road or the like but about 100 m or less southward of the depicted object. To be seen best on this image where the edge of the corn field is visible. --Achim55 (talk) 08:43, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy close. Disruptive DRs from a persistent sockpuppet. Andy Dingley (talk) 17:58, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: The nom has been blocked . Therefore, I am being bold and closing these as keeps. If one wishes to renominate this file with another policy-based rationale, they are able to do so. Happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 17:29, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
The one I uploaded on 2021-11-13T16:47:02 was a different image. Yoh-Plus (talk) 17:16, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Courtesy deletion - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 17:30, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo of non-notable website. Out of COM:SCOPE -sasha- (talk) 17:26, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 17:30, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
commons:PACKAGING Sahaib3005 (talk) 17:40, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 17:30, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Digistuffuk3 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely own works: disparate sizes and quality, unlikely uploader was present at these diverse places and times. Unreliable user with previously deleted uploads.
- File:Chris Gaffney surveying at Stonehenge December 2007.jpg
- File:Greek tower at Tor on Hvar.jpg
- File:Vincent Gaffney in Trogir, Croatia.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:06, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 17:30, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
News clipping, unlikely to be "own work" czar 18:13, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
- Delete, apparent DW. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:57, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
- driveby comment: Just wondering why this is unlikely to be "own work" — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ottawahitech (talk • contribs) 14:35, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 17:30, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
it is copyrighted (see en:File:Attempted restoration of Ecce Homo.jpg) - Nutshinou Talk! 18:29, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 17:31, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Copy Vio https://bonnierrights.se/contact/stefan-krakowski/ Skivsamlare (talk) 19:09, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 17:31, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
No own work of the uploader, maybe copyvio GerritR (talk) 19:40, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: We can undelete if proper sourcing can be provided. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 17:32, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Otávio Astor Vaz Costa (talk · contribs)
[edit]As per metadata "FBMD", the files were grabbed from facebook, unclear copyright status
- File:Policiais Militares em Protesto, imagem Otávio Astor Vaz Costa.jpg
- File:Ciclista passeando na Orla do Guaiba durante o final da tarde, por Otávio Astor.jpg
- File:Protesto em homenagem a João Alberto pixação, Fotografia Otávio Astor Vaz Costa.jpg
- File:Protesto em homenagem a João Alberto Cartaz, Fotografia Otávio Astor Vaz Costa.jpg
- File:Protesto em homenagem a João Alberto, Fotografia Otávio Astor Vaz Costa.jpg
- File:Otavio Astor Vaz Costa.jpg
Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:49, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
- Keep It is not unclear. It is a self-published work, but the user also uploaded here. Auréola (talk) 19:30, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Even though the user was involved in some copyright issues in the recent months, these files legitimately seem to be his own work. Parzeus (talk) 19:37, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Hello, I know that the photos can be found on social networks like Instagram and Facebook, but the photographer in question is me, and the pages where they are found are from my private portfolio, the photos taken are all mine and can be found because I uploaded them myself on the platforms where they are found (especially when I try to publicize my work outside of wikipedia!) sorry for the inconvenience Otávio Astor Vaz Costa (talk) 20:53, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete File:Otavio Astor Vaz Costa.jpg but, for now, Keep the others. Coltsfan (talk) 11:45, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 16:37, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Otávio Astor Vaz Costa (talk · contribs)
[edit]Marked as PD because {{PD-BrazilGov}}. However, PD-BrazilGov only covers works produced by these entities before 1983, which is not the case of these ones. @Otávio Astor Vaz Costa: The coats of arms and logos probably can be uploaded locally at wiki.pt under the exception policy, and possibly some of the other photos that may be essential for the articles.
- File:21BPM.jpg
- File:21BPM brasão.png
- File:20BPM brasão.png
- File:20BPM.jpg
- File:19BPM.jpg
- File:4RPOM brasão.png
- File:4RPOM.png
- File:19BPM brasão.jpg
- File:11° BPM BM Sede.jpg
- File:11° BPM BM 01.png
- File:9° BPM BM Sede.jpg
- File:9° BPM BM 01.png
- File:Batalhão de ferro.jpg
- File:Batalhão de ferro BPM.jpg
- File:CPC BM.png
- File:BABM Peixe.jpg
- File:BABM Pampa.jpg
- File:BABM Mirim.jpg
- File:Mapa CABM.jpg
- File:Comando Ambiental da Brigada Militar.png
- File:BPG RS.png
- File:BOPE BM Invasão.jpg
- File:Policia Fazendária da Brigada Militar.jpg
- File:Grupamento de Supervisão de Vigilância e Guardas BMRS.jpg
- File:Batalhão de Aviação BM.jpg
- File:BSVG BM.png
- File:BAvBM RS.jpg
- File:BOPE BMRS Membros.jpg
- File:Veyers BM.jpg
- File:Partner BM.jpg
- File:S10 BM.jpg
- File:Onibus BM.jpg
- File:Palio BM.jpg
- File:Micro onibus BM.jpg
- File:Base movel bm.png
- File:Blindado BM.jpg
- File:Choque BM.jpg
- File:Yamara BM 08.png
- File:Yamara BM 07.jpg
- File:Yamara BM 06.jpg
- File:Yamara BM 05.jpg
- File:Yamara BM 04.jpg
- File:Yamara BM 02.jpg
- File:Yamara BM 01.jpg
- File:Yamara BM 03.jpg
- File:Bike BM.jpg
- File:BPFaz.jpg
- File:COE BMRS.jpg
- File:Medalha BOPE RS.png
- File:BOPE BMRS.jpg
- File:Subcomandante-Geral da Brigada Militar Claudio dos Santos.jpg
- File:Chefe do Estado-Maior da Brigada Militar Rogerio STUMPF Pereira Junior.jpg
- File:BM Batalhão de Policia Fazendária.jpg
- File:Coronel Vanius Cesar Santarosa.jpg
Darwin Ahoy! 19:41, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 17:33, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Abdulrahman Akkad in Facebook 191.119.88.42 19:54, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: We're going to ask for permissions first before we delete. --Missvain (talk) 17:33, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
"alternate History" fictional map "for testing". Unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 21:00, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 17:34, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Túrelio as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: offered as "fair use" at source; fair-use not allowed on Commons May be old enough, but we need at least the date. Yann (talk) 21:35, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: We can undelete if more information can be provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 17:35, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Small file without metadata, user with a bad history, unlikely to be own work. Yann (talk) 21:59, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Likely copyvio. We can always undelete if COM:VRT is sent in and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 17:35, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
the sources indicates this screenshot was taken from a copyrighted video Nutshinou Talk! 22:08, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 17:35, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
According to the source page, the painter is unknown, but it is a 20th-century work. Therefore it is unclear whether we can assume public domain. By any means, the current "self" CC licence by the uploader is invalid. De728631 (talk) 22:22, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio at this time - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 17:36, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Low res, no EXIF; unlikely to be own work. Nehme1499 (talk) 22:26, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy via - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 17:36, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 97.113.14.2 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Photo of published specifications or product manual owned by someone else. Being a "bike owner" does not give permission to republish manuals. "Own work" claim is false. Unclear whether a table of facts is copyrightable. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:32, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio and not sure what value this has in our project. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 17:37, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Poorly sourced image; dubious license claim. More info needed to determine actual license. (Is this an old painting, a modern photoshop, or combination of both?) Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:08, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 17:37, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
there is no evidence and reference to the claim that this publication is CreativeCommons licenced Zblace (talk) 23:09, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 17:37, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Looks like it may well be PD-Old, but better sourcing needed; current cc-by-sa-4.0 license claim dubious. Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:16, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - We can always undelete if more information is provided. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 17:37, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
file is not displayed correctly JuanMRB.pe (talk) 18:36, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: see below. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:28, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
I am the creator of the file, but the site does not allow the correct display of the image. Therefore I request the immediate removal of this image JuanMRB.pe (talk) 18:47, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader reqeust of recent unused file. — billinghurst sDrewth 01:24, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
صاحبة الملف ترغب بحذفه Rawad2014 (talk) 23:39, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Courtesy deletion of personal photo - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 02:29, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
صاحبة الملف ترغب بحذفه. يحتوي معلومات غير دقيقة Rawad2014 (talk) 23:41, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: see above. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:28, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
صاحبة الملف ترغب بحذفه. يحتوي معلومات غير دقيقة Rawad2014 (talk) 23:42, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:29, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
(تعليل طلب الحذف) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.133.216.102 (talk • contribs) 15:02, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: see above. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:29, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Oyster2020 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused COM:PORN low quality
—SpanishSnake (talk | contribs) ping me plz 02:07, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
- Keep they look high resolution to me, and they are the same as what appear in any medical textbook I have. --RAN (talk) 07:17, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - If one wishes to renominate this file with another policy-based rationale, they are able to do so. I will defer to other administrators to review it. Happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 18:48, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
No corresponde al escudo oficial de la Diócesis de Tibú, es una invención creativa particular. Wiradija (talk) 01:31, 27 May 2021 (UTC) El ESCUDO VERDADERO, OFICIAL, se encuentra en https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/e3/Diocesis.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wiradija (talk • contribs) 01:33, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. Cualquier interpretación de la descripción heráldica de un escudo es válida, siempre y cuando se respeten las proporciones, colores, esmaltes y elementos. El que Wiradija señala como oficial no es más que una de las múltiples interpretaciones. --·×ald·es 03:18, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, aparte que usted subió una imagen con derechos de autor sobre esta de aquí File:Diocesis.jpg, la cual pertenece a otro usuario, y la tuve que revertir. --Milenioscuro (talk) 14:46, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 18:48, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Porque NO corresponde al ESCUDO que oficial e institucionalmente utiliza la DIÓCESIS DE TIBÚ, de la cual hago parte. Verificable en www.diocesisdetibu.org Wiradija (talk) 02:08, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 18:48, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Felicito el buen trabajo del autor, pero propongo dejar que en la Wikipedia solo aparezca el escudo oficial de la diócesis. Verificable en www.diocesisdetibu.org Wiradija (talk) 02:09, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
- Keep No new arguments. File depicts a coat of arms that's still heraldically correct.--·×ald·es 03:32, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Per keeps - still not seeing any evidence. Please stop nominating this file unless it's for something else. Happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 15:56, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Porque este escudo no es el original de la Conferencia Episcopal de Colombia 181.48.189.109 12:43, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
OpposeOlivier LPB (talk) 13:40, 28 May 2014 (UTC) When I says Oppose it is for says Keep Olivier LPB (talk) 07:57, 31 May 2014 (UTC)- Comment English: Sorry, but that coat of arms is an interpretation of the original, and the art of heraldry allows that. Español: Lo siento, pero el escudo es una interpretación del original, y ciencia de la heráldica permite eso.--Shadowxfox (talk) 20:08, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
- Keep, per above, and also the file is widely used and have several years in Commons. Amitie 10g (talk) 04:01, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
Kept: In use. Natuur12 (talk) 20:47, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Este archivo debe ser eliminado porque no es el lobo oficial de la Conferencia Episcopal de Colombia 190.242.99.162 12:31, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
- Comment English: Again ? If you insist, then please provide a large image of this coat of arms. Español: De nuevo ? Si tanto insiste, entonces por favor proveanos con una imagen que nos ilustre sobre este escudo de armas.--Shadowxfox (talk) 12:57, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
No valid reason given to undelete anything -FASTILY 06:29, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
Es un buen intento del autor de actualización del escudo de la Conferencia Episcopal de Colombia. Pero NO CORRESPONDE AL ESCUDO OFICIAL que jurídica e institucionalmente emplea la CEC en sus documentos y publicaciones. Verificable en www.cec.org.co Wiradija (talk) 02:11, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 18:48, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Considero que ya es hora de dar espacio al ESCUDO OFICIAL que encontramos en la página web oficial de la Conferencia Episcopal de Colombia, para honrar la verdad de las cosas. Wiradija (talk) 02:13, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
- Comment @Marcelo: Do not remove listing notice from image page unless deletion request has been closed. @Wiradija: Do not add additional requests for deletion while earlier requests are still open. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:18, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
- Keep No new arguments. File depicts a coat of arms that's still heraldically correct. --·×ald·es 03:29, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
- Comment See previous discussions. --Milenioscuro (talk) 13:39, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
- Keep I'm sorry, bu I'm not really into this particular project's conventions. In es.wikipedia, where I'm a sysop, we normally erase disruptive actions like these, specially when it's a from single-purpose account, editing in conflict of interest, like in this case: the user claims he's an employee of the Diocese of Tibú, which is a part of the Episcopal Conference of Colombia. Please note the same editor is asking the same kind of deletion for File:Escudo_de_la_Diócesis_de_Tibú.svg. Anyway, I emphatically ask not to delete this archive. Thank you, and have a nice week. --Marcelo
(Abre la puerta y entra a mi hogar) 20:23, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
2.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-2021-11-13T12:33:00.000Z-File:Person_receiving_COVID-19_vaccination.jpg){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Frese.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: Please stop nominating - we don't want to resort to other actions if this doesn't stop. --Missvain (talk) 15:57, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Licensing terms are not met. Information about the date of publication by the source is unknown. Maxinvestigator (talk) 08:05, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Sourcing and other information provided and is adequate for me. If one wishes to renominate this file with another policy-based rationale, they are able to do so. I will defer to other administrators to review it. Happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 18:49, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Λόγω ανάλυσης Φαίη Κουνάρα (talk) 08:49, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: User request - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 18:49, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Als de:Paul eckert wegen Irrelevanz bereits gelöscht. Jbergner (talk) 13:15, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Pesonal photo - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 18:50, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Höchstwahrscheinlich Fehllizenzierung ale "Eigenes Werk" Lutheraner (talk) 14:19, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 18:50, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Follow-up from COM:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Josedm. This photo was likely not yet in the public domain in Argentina by Jan 1 1996, meaning it remains copyrighted in the US per COM:URAA. This file was uploaded to Commons after the URAA exception cutoff of March 1 2012, per {{Not-PD-US-URAA}}. -M.nelson (talk) 10:28, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Photo dated 1970. As a result it was in the public domain in the US by 1992 at the very last. Bedivere (talk) 20:23, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: As shown by Bedivere, this photo was published in Argentina on a album cover in 1970. Hence, this photograph was in the public domain in Argentina on the URAA date (1 January 1996) per {{PD-AR-Photo}}. Hence, URAA is not an issue. --AFBorchert (talk) 08:31, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
