User talk:Ron Clausen

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Ron Clausen!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 09:55, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

Autopatrol given

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. ~riley (talk) 05:26, 25 March 2020 (UTC)

Hopkins/Stanford mixup?

I see you've labeled the mountain in File:Pioneer Basin sunset.jpg as Stanford and the mountain in File:Mount_Hopkins.jpg as Hopkins, despite the original photographers having labeled them as the reverse (Hopkins and Stanford, respectively).

Hopkins lies to the west of Pioneer Basin (see, e.g., [1]), and so it makes sense the the mountain in File:Pioneer Basin sunset.jpg is actually Hopkins (since Hopkins is to the west of Pioneer Basin and Stanford is to the north). This would make the original photographer correct.

Perhaps you are misremembering which mountain is which? Overriding two separate photographers' identification of mountains may require more sourcing than your own memory. — hike395 (talk) 05:58, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

My memory has nothing to do with this as I have never been there. The original photographer has the memory issue. I identified it using Google Earth 3D. The peaks can look similar, however the pattern of trees on the ridge near the saddle to left confirms the identity as Stanford. Also, "if" it were Hopkins, there would be mountains to the left in the distance, instead of the ridge we see. If you have never used Google Earth 3D, please start now. Then clean up your good-faith but mistaken changes. Also please restore the correct photo to Mount Hopkins page. Thanks. ̴ Ron Clausen (talk) 06:18, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

(Edit conflict) Later --- I think it's clear that File:Mount Stanford, Pioneer Basin Lakes.jpg from Tom Hilton and File:Pioneer Basin sunset.jpg by Fred Hsu are the same mountain taken at different times of the day, so there's disagreement about the identification. Given that the sun is setting behind the mountain in the Hsu photograph, I think it's likely to be Hopkins.

I can Google Earth 3D to check. I'm not convinced yet. — hike395 (talk) 06:22, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Please also refer to the original photo of Hilton's that I uploaded to Commons and used for derivation photos of Hopkins and Stanfordː

File:Mt. Stanford, South aspect.jpg

I labeled the derivations, not the original photographer, Hilton.

̴̴ Ron Clausen (talk) 06:40, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

(Edit conflict) I'm poking around the Basin trying to figure out the viewpoint -- there are many possible lakes, and so far I'm not getting a great match for either Hopkins or Stanford for the Hilton/Hsu combination.. Could you post the URLs to Google 3D Earth that you used to determine the difference? That would be helpful. — hike395 (talk) 06:44, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Here is the url for Stanford identification, again look at the pattern of trees on ridge to left of summitː

google.com/maps/place/Mt+Hopkins/@37.4616305,-118.80391,453a,35y,6.05h,77.53t/data=!3m1!1e3!4m5!3m4!1s0x8095fba77e54c7c9:0xdd9375d0defd7b4b!8m2!3d37.4638238!4d-118.8129018

You need to add " https://www. " in front as the entire url doesn't display in this talk box.

Now here is the url for the original Hilton photo (File:Mt. Stanford, South aspect.jpg) that I took derivationsː

google.com/maps/place/Mt+Hopkins/@37.4449409,-118.7898503,425a,35y,327.14h,77.59t/data=!3m1!1e3!4m5!3m4!1s0x8095fba77e54c7c9:0xdd9375d0defd7b4b!8m2!3d37.4638238!4d-118.8129018

This last url is what Hopkins would look like if viewed from Pioneer Basin. Note that there is no long ridge to the left of it, and mountains would be visible in the distanceː

google.com/maps/place/Mt+Hopkins/@37.4877204,-118.7998667,107a,35y,207.53h,77.03t/data=!3m1!1e3!4m5!3m4!1s0x8095fba77e54c7c9:0xdd9375d0defd7b4b!8m2!3d37.4638238!4d-118.8129018

̴̴ Ron Clausen (talk) 07:08, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

So this looks like a match, hovering above the south end of the main lake: [2] It appears that you are correct and Hsu is incorrect. (I guess the sunset glow was spread throughout half of the sky). I'll fix. — hike395 (talk) 06:57, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!

2022 Picture of the Year: Saint John Church of Sohrol in Iran.

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2022 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the seventeenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the two most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on 1 May 2023, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2021 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:15, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Ab Jenkins.jpg

Yours sincerely, The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:25, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Silver Peak in the Boulder Mountains.jpg

Copyright status: File:Silver Peak in the Boulder Mountains.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Silver Peak in the Boulder Mountains.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 10:33, 21 July 2024 (UTC)