User talk:鐵路1
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 09:33, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
|
File:TRA E405 鳴日彩繪車頭.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Solomon203 (talk) 06:51, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
Hi. Regarding your edit here. May I ask why you removed Category:TRA Jinlun Station from the Trains at Jinlun Station page?--Kai3952 (talk) 18:07, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
- @Kai3952: Sorry, I didn't find the wrong touch using the mobile phone. Orz --鐵路Railway (talk) 01:36, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
File:蔡英文總統今(1)日下午前往基隆車站出席「EMU900型空調通勤電聯車首航典禮」.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Solomon203 (talk) 11:25, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
我看照片中顯示鐵路上有個標示牌是「!」符號,你知道這代表什麼意思嗎?--Kai3952 (talk) 10:11, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
- @鐵路1: 在嗎?--Kai3952 (talk) 00:16, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
- 抱歉,我不知道0.0-- 🚊。鐵路Railway Talk 07:48, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
- 我察覺到,原本會理我的人,在我說中文之後就不理我了,更有趣的是,他們都是台灣人,不知道我語言上是不是有問題?--Kai3952 (talk) 18:14, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
- @Kai3952: 應該是你太長寄送留言導致別人凡感吧…就如你在維基百科被封禁。 🚊。鐵路Railway Talk 03:14, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
- 太「長」寄?你是說我信中內容寫太多嗎?--Kai3952 (talk) 04:56, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
- 可是我對他們那些人都是在討論頁留言,而且都只有詢問照片上問題,就像現在我在這裡對你詢問照片是一樣,所以我不知道你是怎麼想出是我電郵中封禁之事造成如此現象?--Kai3952 (talk) 05:03, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
- @Kai3952: 是個人的聯想。若在下經常被打擾到後面也是會不想回復,應該是其他人回復到煩了吧(個人猜測。-- 🚊。鐵路Railway Talk 13:39, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
- 我知道,但是有一大半的人是我從來沒看過,更不用說我煩他們。既然有這麼多人都是我第一次上前詢問他自己上傳照片有關的問題,卻是沒一個人回應,這似乎很奇怪。我看我們不用再猜了,想得到的可能原因都想了,卻沒有一個能解釋這種奇怪。最怕就是遇到我編輯下去,對方立刻衝過來找我,斥責我亂改,像這種等人跳進陷阱、放馬後炮的人,就是將他自己責任推到我頭上,塑造出好像是我沒問過他的那種。目前我遇過幾位,全部是台灣人,所以搞到我現在不知道該怎麼辦?--Kai3952 (talk) 21:11, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
- @Kai3952: 是個人的聯想。若在下經常被打擾到後面也是會不想回復,應該是其他人回復到煩了吧(個人猜測。-- 🚊。鐵路Railway Talk 13:39, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
- @Kai3952: 應該是你太長寄送留言導致別人凡感吧…就如你在維基百科被封禁。 🚊。鐵路Railway Talk 03:14, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
Category:Train-like Service has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
--Kai3952 (talk) 09:19, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:20220329嘉義市區鐵路高架化計畫宏仁工區施工現況.jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:20220329嘉義市區鐵路高架化計畫宏仁工區施工現況.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:20220329嘉義市區鐵路高架化計畫宏仁工區施工現況.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 13:06, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
COM:AN/U
[edit]
--Kai3952 (talk) 06:00, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
File:20220717 高鐵臺中站車站大廳 07.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
🚊。鐵路Railway Talk 05:35, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
分類建議
[edit]您好:
以File:2022年12月4日行政院長蘇貞昌出席扇形車庫啟用100週年慶祝活動7.jpg為例,
若已添加分類「EMU3000 at TRA Changhua Roundhouse」,
即可不必再添加分類「TRA Changhua Roundhouse」(因前一分類屬於此分類之下);
又以File:臺鐵彰化扇形車庫100週年-05.jpg為例,
添加分類「CK124 at TRA Changhua Roundhouse」會比「TRA CK124」來得更精確。
Lokseng01 (talk) 05:57, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
- 當初是想說還有其他車型沒有去建立扇型車庫的分類所以先放「TRA Changhua Roundhouse」之後有空再來整理。-- 🚊。鐵路Railway Talk 06:22, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
- 了解,感謝您。 Lokseng01 (talk) 16:52, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
File:20230331 TRA TEP2028 interior 12.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Solomon203 (talk) 01:16, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
請停止破壞
[edit]如果對分類有異議,可以提出來說,但是請不要繼續做出這種編輯行為: [1]。因為對他人的正確分類進行回退會被視為「破壞」,因此我不建議你回退。我所謂「正確分類」是指分類依照照片顯示的畫面而添加,比如File:E500電力機車駛入南方小站.jpg顯示列車正駛向南方小站,而被拍攝當時列車所在的位置也剛好是位處彎道上,所以添加 Trains at South Station 和 Trains on curves in Pingtung 這二個分類是符合照片顯示,這種符合就是稱為「正確分類」,更何況照片是大家都能看見的,是否真如我所言正確分類,你可以請別人公論,如此就能知道我回退你的編輯是否正當合理。--125.230.90.54 10:39, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
- 把分類分到已重定向的分類?
- 分到的類別確定是指臺鐵的車站?
- 🚊。鐵路Railway Talk 11:38, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
- 即便如此,依然是不可回退,而是應該針對 Trains at South Station 這個分類進行修改,畢竟這種連帶將 Trains on curves in Pingtung 也移除的舉動,你再怎麼樣有理,也會變成是無理,因為人家會認為你說的那關 Trains on curves in Pingtung 這個分類是什麼事,因此你還是會理虧,所以別人會當你是破壞,也是在情理預料當中。既然你提出這問題,我猜你八成是想叫我幫你解決,所以我已經幫你解決好了,在後面加上(Taiwan)就能與另一同名車站區分。不過,我還是很納悶,因為 Rail vehicles at South Station 是你建立,按理來說,你建立也就是你自己會比我早知道有另一個同名車站,那麼為何當時沒去解決呢?--125.230.64.8 14:55, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
我知道你有寫蔗箱車三字,但我仍然對於分類名稱「Sugarcane Box Truck」感到有疑問,因此想請問是怎麼來的?--125.230.64.8 14:18, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
- 時間久遠已忘了當初怎麼來的,合併上章回覆,我也是你更改了才知道有相同站名的車站,該分類只是很單純的把其他車站相同的類型的分類把站名更換而已。另外,就您說話的語氣和User:Kai3952很像,如果是請遵守規定不要使用IP傀儡,有空我會仔細比對編輯紀錄並提報。 🚊。鐵路Railway Talk 15:12, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
- @鐵路1: 此張臺鐵官方照片EXIF資訊中的日期疑似有誤。2012年的杜微與2021年接任臺鐵局長以後的杜微樣貌幾乎沒變?--Solomon203 (talk) 11:27, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
- 剛剛查了一下,2012網路上似乎也還沒有相關的照片以及相關新聞,不確定會不會是相機參數設定有誤。 🚊。鐵路Railway Talk 01:35, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- @鐵路1: 來源網址已無法使用,作者資訊明顯有誤。Solomon203 (talk) 13:17, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Solomon203: 到網路檔案館有備份,可以去那裡查證[2],當初在上傳時是可以查證的並且有去備份。 🚊。鐵路Railway Talk 13:35, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
- 但欠缺文字說明。 Solomon203 (talk) 13:45, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
中央氣象局已經更新地震報告,如果你看到這條消息,請上傳新的版本,謝謝![3] Jasper201434 (talk) 13:35, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
請提供KEG-0003車頭照片,以利檢查分類。 Solomon203 (talk) 14:06, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
- 抱歉,沒有拍到有車頭的照片,因為裡面是管制區,我是重圍牆外拍攝到的,最近路過沒有看到有車頭朝外的時候。-- 🚊。鐵路Railway Talk 14:16, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
Dingshan Street Station has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
--125.230.83.184 22:16, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Damage caused by Typhoon Krathon in Taiwan has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |