User talk:Wiradija
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 15:04, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Diócesis PNG.png
[edit]Copyright status: File:Diócesis PNG.png
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Diócesis PNG.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Yours sincerely, Ahmadtalk 16:35, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
File:Escudo oficial de la Conferencia Episcopal de Colombia.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Marium Alberto (talk) 21:16, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
File:Escudo oficial de la Diócesis de Tibú.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Marium Alberto (talk) 21:42, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
File tagging File:Conferencia Episcopal de Colombia.png
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Conferencia Episcopal de Colombia.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Conferencia Episcopal de Colombia.png]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
LMLM (talk) 20:46, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
File tagging File:División eclesiástica 1908.png
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:División eclesiástica 1908.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:División eclesiástica 1908.png]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
LMLM (talk) 20:47, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Eliminación de archivos
[edit]Hola Wiradija!
Me alegra que este tan interesado en contribuir sobre la iglesia Católica en Colombia, pero su forma de querer resolver los problemas no es la adecuada, primero si una grafica (sea mapa, escudo, etc) tiene algún problema primero comuníquese con el autor y exprese sus puntos de vista, o sea primero llegue a un consenso con el autor antes de solicitar eliminar archivos, si un mapa tiene un error o esta desactualizado indíquelo, si el autor no responde o esta muy ocupado, puede solicitar a alguien del wikiproyecto grafico que lo corrija. Sobre los escudo de armas que usted tanto señala como "una invención creativa particular", primero lea, empápese que es la heráldica, o pregunte, hable con el autor. Le doy un ejemplo de un caso muy particular, no recuerdo si fue en la presidencia Pastrana o la primera de Uribe, que se hizo una nueva versión estética del escudo de Colombia, automáticamente muchos reaccionaron en contra, decían que "eso" no era el escudo del país y se formo una gran polémica, luego tuvieron que salir los historiadores y heraldistas a indicar que la nueva versión era correcta, pues cumple con lo señalado en la descripción heráldica, y el tema quedó zanjado.
Un escudo de armas puede tener mas de una versión estética y mientras todos cumplan con la descripción heráldica, todos son correctos, son validos. Vuelvo y repito lea sobre que es la heráldica. Otro tema, si una solicitud de borrado ya esté cerrada, no siga insistiendo, ya se tomo una decisión, respete la decisión que fue tomada por consenso. Ademas, usted esta subiendo material con derechos de autor, violando las políticas de Wikipedia, se que quiere contribuir y mejorar los artículos pero esa no es la forma.
Bueno eso es todo. Saludos. --SajoR (talk) 17:27, 16 November 2021 (UTC)