Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2021/08/03
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
I uploaded the file by mistake. The file is actually private. MCSaftey (talk) 09:25, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
{{subst:delete2|image=File:Ordnerstruktur.pdf
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 09:43, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
I dont want Themantool (talk) 10:13, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 11:39, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Falsch eingesetzt Jens Keilbach (talk) 16:26, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 17:16, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Low res, no EXIF, all other user uploads copyvios of this subject matter. Duck/COM:PRP issue. Эlcobbola talk 17:04, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Nevermind--found here Copyright violation (F1). --Эlcobbola talk 17:13, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Image is copyrighted per https://www.flickr.com/photos/persianpainting/30304251645/in/album-72157646290713050/ HistoryofIran (talk) 09:31, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Contemporary painting, DW of File:Illustrerad Verldshistoria band I Ill 058.jpg, ARR @ flickr. --Achim (talk) 20:16, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
carte tronquée Nacermek (talk) 23:03, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 21:28, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
Cette carte ne représente pas le Maroc dans toutes ses frontières. 195.36.239.236 08:50, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Keep Same request as last year. The situation has not changed since. Ydecreux (talk) 12:21, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
- The "missing part" has not been recognised as belonging to Morocco by any country except Morocco. Neither is it recognised as belonging to another country or as an autonomous territory. This unclear situation is depicted by the dotted line in the South part of the map. Besides, this map is perfect to locate any large Moroccan city and as such is useful. Ydecreux (talk) 12:58, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
- Keep of course, per Ydecreux, and still (and will be) in use. NNW 09:40, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Storkk (talk) 10:21, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
Morocco isnot complteted with his sahara 105.188.66.36 23:01, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Same as usual. Tiring demands. Sting (talk) 00:08, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Senseless to discuss anything. NNW 07:17, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Use File:Morocco Western Sahara location map.png if you don't like this version. --Achim (talk) 08:35, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
la carte géographique du Maroc est erronée 160.179.58.194 05:53, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Groundhog day. NNW 06:55, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Use File:Morocco Western Sahara location map.png if you don't like this version. --Achim55 (talk) 12:14, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: low resolution, no exif data, uploader's record 4ing (talk) 08:54, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by AFBorchert at 09:14, 4 August 2021 UTC: Copyright violation: https://www.arabnews.com/node/1760676/media --Krdbot 14:22, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
Insertion of deliberately false information. Plagiarized from Aoyama Gakuin University's Website. --49.98.90.15 10:34, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: SD, copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 20:37, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation; copied from https://papamuscle.fr/recuperation/courbature-musculation/ Wilhelm Tell DCCXLVI (talk) 17:05, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 09:22, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
Завантажено помилково Марія Яцимірська (talk) 17:47, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 11:14, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 09:10, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Materialscientist at 06:28, 5 August 2021 UTC: Mass deletion of pages added by Garilai --Krdbot 14:08, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
Invalid CC claim; the uploader is not the author of this work NatureBoyMD (talk) 20:46, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by DMacks at 06:41, 5 August 2021 UTC: Presumed-nonfree logos, tagged for speedy using various similar rationales. --Krdbot 14:09, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
Copyright issue Uday88mandal (talk) 06:41, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:45, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:Ltn12345
[edit]- File:Irrigated flower production, Vietnam.jpg
- File:Terraced paddy fields, Vietnam (3).jpg
- File:Terraced paddy fields, Vietnam - 49660896308.jpg
- File:Terraced paddy fields, Vietnam (2).jpg
- File:Paddy fields, Vietnam.jpg
- File:Paddy fields, Ha-giang, Vietnam.jpg
- File:Temple festival and waterscape, Vietnam.jpg
These images were all uploaded by myself. I uploaded these images a couple months ago. At that time, I made some mistakes. The user uploading these files had "pro" account ([here https://www.flickr.com/photos/water_alternatives/]), so I did not double check. Now I realize the 7 files above are not suitable for Wikimedia Commons. They came from Pexels, all were uploaded after 5 July 2018, and did not fulfil Commons license requirement. Sorry for any problem caused. Ltn12345 (talk) 15:16, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 07:45, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
I cannot see from the Pixaby site that this photograph was uploaded prior to 9 Januari 2019. Lymantria (talk) 13:54, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
- I was mistaken. You can take the picture down for deletion. I don't know what i was thinking while uploading this file.
- Warm regards,
- By the way, I don't understand that when I uploaded this picture on July, how is it coming as August. Its fundamentally impossible. You may decide on this statement as well
- Warm Regards,
- Contributers2020 (talk) 16:08, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 18:42, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
This is just a fictional flag created in Reddit's vexillology subreddit and has never been used by the koryo saram as national symbol. 171.48.49.210 06:28, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:56, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
LTA upload; no evidence that this flag was ever used by the Koryo-Saram, and no TinEye results that would suggest that either. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 11:38, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
Redeleted per del req -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:57, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
File uploaded by suspected x-wiki LTA - Jurisdrew, as well as most likely a fictional flag SHB2000 (talk) 02:51, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. Appears to be a repost as well, if I remember the previous upload under this name correctly. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 07:24, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:42, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
Quality not very good Anna N Chapman (talk) 10:00, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. High quality and very encyclopedic content. IronGargoyle (talk) 02:31, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:44, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, the uploader's only contribution. Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 10:05, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:45, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Cristopher Solorzano (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons is not a personal photo gallery, out of scope
- File:Image 2021-02-09 at 21.00.49.jpg
- File:Image 2021-02-09 at 21.13.45 (1).jpg
- File:Image 2021-02-09 at 21.13.45.jpg
- File:Image 2021-02-09 at 20.59.11.jpg
- File:Image 2021-02-09 at 20.23.02 (1).jpg
- File:Image 2021-02-09 at 20.24.19.jpg
- File:Image 2021-02-09 at 20.16.47.jpg
Mjrmtg (talk) 10:23, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:48, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:43, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:47, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:28, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:49, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:31, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:49, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope. Looks like advertising at best to me. SHB2000 (talk) 12:11, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:49, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
Out of project scope and patent nonsense. Achim (talk) 09:32, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
- Delete this, see also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Research papers by Anshuman Burman having the same information.pdf (the same thing with a different filename), check uploads by the same person and perform any needed whack-a-mole, and firmly educate that person. -- Hoary (talk) 12:11, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Out of commons scope. I can think of no conceivable project use for some random person's nonsensical attempt at proving Einstein wrong. Commons is not a host for essays or a publisher of "scientific" papers. 192.76.8.91 18:00, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:34, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
Promotional article page in PDF, out of scope. Achim (talk) 13:13, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:38, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
out of scope Bodhisattwa (talk) 14:31, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:38, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
out of scope Bodhisattwa (talk) 14:34, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:39, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
out of scope Bodhisattwa (talk) 14:34, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:39, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
out of scope Bodhisattwa (talk) 14:34, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:39, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
out of scope Bodhisattwa (talk) 14:35, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:40, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
out of scope Bodhisattwa (talk) 14:35, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:40, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
out of scope Bodhisattwa (talk) 14:35, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:40, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
out of scope Bodhisattwa (talk) 14:35, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:41, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:41, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal photo A1Cafel (talk) 17:15, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:42, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
Poor quality/resolution, replaced by File:Piperin.svg. Leyo 17:24, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. The opaque background is another quality issue as well, File:Piperin.svg has transparent background. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 20:08, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:42, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
Extremely low-quality photo of a well-photographed beetle; no realistic educational use -> out of COM:SCOPE. Sneeuwschaap (talk) 23:31, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:46, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
Extremely low-quality photo of a well-photographed species, no realistic educational use -> out of COM:SCOPE. Sneeuwschaap (talk) 23:45, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:46, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope photo of non-notable person. Not an actual Mayan healer. Apparently uploaded for advertising purposes, judging by the photo description. Spicy (talk) 23:48, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:45, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
There is an extra double bond in the indole ring. There are plenty of correct alternatives in Category:5-MeO-DMT. Marbletan (talk) 14:52, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. That extra double bond leads to a Texas carbon which is factually incorrect and violates basic rules of organic chemistry. Replaced by File:5-Methoxy-N,N-dimethyltryptamine-2D-structure.svg. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 21:33, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --Leyo 16:38, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Tuqay Abdullayeva99 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Looks like official photos of military people. Unlikely to be own work. Some of them also with copyrighted backgrounds.
- File:Ayxan2.jpg
- File:Elmar2.jpg
- File:Basit11.jpg
- File:Kəmalədin2.jpg
- File:Aslan12.jpg
- File:Sekil12.jpg
- File:Salam123456.jpg
Smooth O (talk) 12:12, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Better be safe than sorry. SHB2000 (talk) 12:28, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Clearly copyrighted backgrounds. –Davey2010Talk 10:48, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:39, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:18, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:36, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
out of scope Bodhisattwa (talk) 14:31, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:36, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
Obvious copyvio Dronebogus (talk) 14:58, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:36, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ArtistsGrove (talk · contribs)
[edit]Paintings claimed own work by uploader, starting from 1947 painting. Probably intended as works by M. S. Chandrasekhar, but in that case they are definitely copyrighted and need an OTRS permission from Chandrasekhar, or his heirs.
- File:Clouds over cityscape 2004, watercolour.jpg
- File:M.S.Chandrasekhar at his studio in Bangalore, 2000.jpg
- File:'Yoshodhara' cave1, reproduction by M.S.Chandrasekhar in watercolour.jpg
- File:'Birth of Buddha' cave1Ajanta mural Reproduction by M.S.Chandrasekhar painted in watercolour.jpg
- File:Black princess reproduction by M.S.Chandrasekhar in watercolour.jpg
- File:A rural landscape in watercolour 1982.jpg
- File:Pen & Ink Drawing 2001.jpg
- File:Landscape Of Ooty, 1965.jpg
- File:Ruralscape Of Mysore, 1950.jpg
- File:Portrait Of M.S Chandrasekhar.jpg
- File:Temple Of Kolar, 1947.jpg
- File:Melkote Watercolor Landscape, 1985.jpg
- File:Reproduction Process by M.S Chandrasekhar at Ajanta, 1960.jpg
- File:Padmapani (Reproduced By M.S Chandrasekhar), 1970.jpg
- File:Krishnadevaraya Panel, 1983.jpg
- File:M.S Chandrasekhar at Ajanta, 1983.jpg
MKFI (talk) 14:43, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 16:55, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ArtistsGrove (talk · contribs)
[edit]Same situation as in the previous deletion request: Paintings claimed own work by uploader. Probably intended as works by M. S. Chandrasekhar, but in that case they are definitely copyrighted and need an OTRS permission from Chandrasekhar, or his heirs.
- File:M.S.Chandrasekhar Reproduction at National Museum, New Delhi.jpg
- File:Toilet scene Ajanta watercolour M.S.Chandrasekhar 2006.jpg
- File:'Flying Gandharvas' Ajanta cave 17 watercolour M.S.Chandrasekhar 2003.jpg
- File:'Mother and Child' Ajanta cave 19 watercolour M.S.Chandrasekhar 2006.jpg
- File:'The Queen Mahamaya' Ajanta cave 2 watercolour M.S.Chandrasekhar 1960.jpg
- File:'Bandstand at Cubbon Park' Pen and ink M.S.Chandrasekhar 1999.jpg
- File:Signature of M.S.Chandrasekhar.jpg
- File:'Sacred steps' Melukote Karnataka watercolour M.S.Chandrasekhar.jpg
- File:'Hampi' Pen and Ink sketch M.S.Chandrasekhar.jpg
- File:'Temple at Madugiri' Karnataka Pen and Ink sketch M.S.Chandrasekhar.jpg
- File:'Gulmohar Bloom' watercolour M.S.Chandrasekhar 2002.jpg
- File:'View from Badami caves' watercolour M.S.Chandrasekhar 1970.jpg
- File:'Way to Badami caves' watercolour M.S.Chandrasekhar 1970.jpg
- File:'Pen and Ink wash' Hampi M.S.Chandrasekhar.jpg
- File:'Pen and Ink wash' at Aihole M.S.Chandrasekhar.jpg
- File:'Rain' Ajanta village watercolour M.S.Chandrasekhar 1970.jpg
- File:'On the Banks of Cauvery River' watercolour M.S.Chandrasekhar 2002.jpg
- File:M.S.Chandrasekhar sketching on the spot.jpg
- File:'Attendant holding flowers' Ajanta Reproducion water colour by M.S.Chandrasekhar 1990.jpg
- File:Pen & Ink Drawing 2001.jpg
MKFI (talk) 17:30, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:36, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by StevenLZB11 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Dubious claim of authorhip by uploader of multiple copyvios.
— Racconish 💬 17:34, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:35, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
see water mark Sérgio Castelar (talk) 21:01, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no free license, taken from Insta. --Gbawden (talk) 11:33, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
This is a picture of the uploader. No evidence that the image is under an acceptable free licence. Ownership or possession of a photo, proprietorship of the equipment used to take the photo, or being the subject of the photo does not equate holding the copyright. The copyright holder is the photographer (i.e. the person who took the photo), rather that the subject (the person who appears in the photo) or the person possessing the photo, unless transferred by operation of law (e.g. inheritance, etc.) or by contract (written and signed by the copyright holder, and explicitly transfers the copyright). Timtrent (talk) 21:04, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and scope. --Gbawden (talk) 11:34, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
Flickr upload is plagiarism, here's an occurence three days prior. PtM 21:40, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
- The JPEG has no licensing notice on the source wiki either.--PtM 11:14, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by Turelio. --Gbawden (talk) 11:33, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
Uploaded by spammer. Unused and suspicious notability. Out of COM:SCOPE Netora (talk) 09:47, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:08, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
Self-promotion of another famous rapper, out of project scope. Commons is not a social media site. No contributions to wm projects.
- File:Mc Sourav Kolkata.jpg
- File:Mc Sourav Kolkata Rapper.jpg
- File:MC Sourav Kolkata.jpg
- File:Mc Sourav Kolkata .jpg
- File:Mc Sourav.jpg
Achim (talk) 13:28, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:09, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sahiphopmusic (talk · contribs)
[edit]Self-promotion of another famous rapper, out of project scope. Commons is not a social media site. No contributions to wm projects.
Achim (talk) 13:33, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:09, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
Low-quality chemical structure with opaque (white) background. The uploader has already replaced it with File:M-Carborane.png. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 11:23, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:06, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
Files of User:Tyler G Holland
[edit]- File:Iszland Economy.png
- File:Us economy.png
- File:DollarFiat.png
- File:Un iso.png
- File:Lands2.png
- File:Land Deeds.png
- File:City Life.png
- File:Lands 2.png
- File:Lands.png
- File:Iszlanders.png
- File:Laeain.png
- File:Assets.png
- File:Ba prom1.png
- File:Bahi k.jpg
- File:100money.png
- File:Bapromo.png
- File:Nyse ins.png
- File:ID Card Data.png
- File:Iszland Account.png
- File:Federal R.png
- File:Us busnie.png
- File:Magnetic Sorce.png
- File:Military dog.png
- File:Tylertwitter.png
- File:Good buy Tesla.png
- File:Llktec.png
- File:Ehead.png
- File:Traffic cars.png
- File:Good buy.png
- File:Good buy 2.jpg
- File:Good Buy.png
- File:Technology & Natural Resources 6.png
- File:Technology & Natural Resources 5.png
- File:Technology & Natural Resources 4.png
- File:Technology & Natural Resources 3.png
- File:Technology & Natural Resources 2.png
- File:Technology & Natural Resources.png
- File:Foreign policy.png
- File:War Flag.jpg
- File:Greater Nation Seal.png
- File:ID Back.png
- File:Iszland Id.png
- File:Iszland Map.png
- File:The Crown.png
- File:Iszland Mammal.png
- File:King Pharo.jpg
- File:Iszland Flag.png
Collection of personal files, such as user's personal twitter, maps and flags and economic statistics of an imaginary country, screenshots, incomprehensible text files with no context or description; all out of scope with no potential educational value. Commons is not free webspace for personal ramblings. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 02:39, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: personal files with no future educational use; see also the user's indef block for block evasion on ENWP related to these upload topics. czar 13:11, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lillianaletshabo (talk · contribs)
[edit]Random internet images. No permission.
- File:Emma Wareus.jpg
- File:Gaositwe Keagakwa Chiepe.jpg
- File:Isaac Makwala.jpg
- File:Amantle Montsho.jpg
- File:Diphetogo Selolwane and Wife Marang .jpg
Smooth O (talk) 12:16, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: websized and watermarked images unlikely to be "own work" as uploaded. czar 13:18, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
replaced with a table in Wikisource Vadimzer (talk) 00:15, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per self-nomination. --James F. (talk) 22:10, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
This image is an advertisement of an event and wiki is not the right place to post this image. Nskjnv (talk) 03:25, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; out of scope. --James F. (talk) 22:12, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
Because I uploaded this image without the owners permission Kentrailobserver37 (talk) 21:47, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --James F. (talk) 22:15, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
Because I uploaded this image without the owners permission Kentrailobserver37 (talk) 21:49, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --James F. (talk) 22:15, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
Because I uploaded this image without the owners permission Kentrailobserver37 (talk) 21:49, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --James F. (talk) 22:15, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
A lower-quality duplicate of File:Insectz 9125.jpg. Sneeuwschaap (talk) 23:48, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --James F. (talk) 22:18, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
wrong version uploaded Sophie Elisabeth (talk) 20:38, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:30, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
wrong version Sophie Elisabeth (talk) 21:14, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Closing duplicate DR. Original here.--Contributers2020Talk to me here 03:31, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
Copyvio (we can't know the uploader is the owner of the website, its content is under copyvio protection). Nanahuatl (talk) 01:03, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:59, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
outdated 2003:E5:9718:F600:C0E4:1BF3:5510:7423 08:08, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Unlikely to be own work. --Gbawden (talk) 12:57, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: low resolution, no exif data, several versions available on internet (e.g. [1]). 4ing (talk) 08:09, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; found here https://www.thelineofbestfit.com/new-music/discovery/vargas-lagola-rolling-stone before upload. --Gbawden (talk) 12:58, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
Low resolution with no EXIF data. Considering the other files uploaded by the user, possible copyvio. Nanahuatl (talk) 08:41, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; probably from FB. --Gbawden (talk) 12:58, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: no exif data, availablr at http://takreem.org/ar/profile-details-296 4ing (talk) 08:49, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:55, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: low resolution, no exif data, available at http://www.nawforum.com/ar/speakers/cyba-audi 4ing (talk) 08:51, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:55, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
Copyvio. It was uploaded to Facebook first. Nanahuatl (talk) 09:00, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:55, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation Prawdziwy Mikołajek (talk) 09:13, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:54, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
Much too small to be useful, thus unused for years. Fl.schmitt (talk) 09:31, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:55, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
Some of the files that this participant uploaded were found on the Internet. I put them up for quick deletion. Here are the files that are not googled on the Internet. I don't believe that the participant who uploaded these images drew it himself. According to the first file, this is a photo of this picture. The picture is most likely written recently, when Kazakhstan after the separation from the USSR began to write its own history. GAndy (talk) 19:01, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - Images have all be photographed from another device (obvious in the first image). Either way these images clearly don't belong to them. –Davey2010Talk 18:40, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by Rubin16. --Gbawden (talk) 12:54, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
copyvio. https://swachhbharat.mygov.in/ ArnabSaha (talk) 19:25, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
- Delete The Terms & Conditions linked on the website says You will not copy, modify, reproduce, republish, distribute, display, or transmit for commercial, non-profit or public purposes all or any portion of MyGov, except to the extent permitted by the copyright policy of this terms of use. -- DaxServer (talk) 19:15, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:53, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
Just spam? LevandeMänniska (talk) 19:51, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; OoS. --Gbawden (talk) 12:53, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
Picture is a back seat view of a car however no car model is given so pretty much a useless image, Thanks –Davey2010Talk 20:21, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; out of scope. --Gbawden (talk) 12:53, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
Promotional, outside project COM:SCOPE.
Ytoyoda (talk) 20:50, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Hello Ytoyoda,User:Ytoyoda
first of all thank you to warning me about the 3 images. I already asked the owner of the images to send an email to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org with the format found in the license guide because is want to create a page for this NGO. Is this enough or we need something else? Msofianop (talk) 07:05, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
- Delete delete for now because there is as yet no article where these could be used, so OOS is correct. When and if an article is created AND file permission is verified they can be restored. Ww2censor (talk) 11:52, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:52, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
Appear to be professional photos, unlikely to be the uploader's own work.
- File:President Abdelkader Bensalah.jpg
- File:الرئيس اليمين زروال.jpg
- File:الرئيس علي كافي.jpg
- File:الرئيس محمد بوضياف.jpg
- File:الرئيس رابح بيطاط.jpg
- File:السيد الرئيس.jpg
-M.nelson (talk) 21:54, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 12:52, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Rilakkuma
[edit]Copyrighted character. [[2]]
- File:Dancing Child and Bear (46699778).jpg
- File:Diamonhead ocean view.jpg
- File:Hanauma bay (2).jpg
- File:Rilakkuma in a bag.jpg
- File:リラックマ 2016 (28488301831).jpg
G I Chandor (talk) 04:26, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:01, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Rilakkuma
[edit]Copyrighted characters.
- File:Akihabara in Tokio - 004.jpg
- File:LaLa Bear Coffee Truck in CWT41 20151212.jpg
- File:Lawson Shanghai.jpg
- File:Rilakkuma Display Kiddyland.jpg
- File:Rilakkuma store 2015 (17055362265).jpg
- File:Whats in this bag?.jpg
G I Chandor (talk) 23:39, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 19:56, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Rilakkuma
[edit]COM:TOYS. COM:DW of copyrighted characters.
- File:Korilakkuma plush toy in wisteria garden.JPG
- File:リラックマ・キイロイトリ・正面.jpg
- File:リラックマ・コリラックマ・顔.jpg
- File:リラックマ・リラックマ・顔.jpg
Yuraily Lic (talk) 04:36, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yasu (talk) 15:38, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
No FoP in Japan for 3D works. Yuraily Lic (talk) 04:38, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. --Contributers2020Talk to me here 08:07, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yasu (talk) 15:38, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
COM:PACKAGING. COM:DW of copyrighted characters. Yuraily Lic (talk) 04:45, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yasu (talk) 15:38, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
No FoP in Japan for 2D works. Yuraily Lic (talk) 04:50, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yasu (talk) 15:40, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
No FoP in Japan for 3D works. Yuraily Lic (talk) 04:51, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yasu (talk) 15:40, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope/ used for advertising only Hoo man (talk) 00:17, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Info Associated article on enwiki has actually been kept, so this one might actually be in scope for now. --Hoo man (talk) 18:48, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:17, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
Copyright is issued at time of creation; if the company is defunct, someone still holds the copyright unless specifically cleared czar 03:29, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:25, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
COM:TOYS. Yuraily Lic (talk) 04:41, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
- Sorry, you must first stop photo-challenges like this: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Photo_challenge/2021_-_July_-_Baby_related_equipment best regards --Gordito1869 (talk) 07:44, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
- Delete unfortunately it seems like toys are copyrighted in the US. There seem to be some exemptions for toys that do not meet threshold of originality or are exact replicas of full scaled objects, but this photo is neither. Probably Commons:Photo_challenge/2021_-_July_-_Baby_related_equipment should have warning about it. --Jarekt (talk) 02:48, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:26, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
Copyrighted image uploaded to Commons by someone who is likely not the copyright holder 172.115.30.178 04:49, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:26, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
has multiple copyrighted images Iambatman2022 (talk) 05:02, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Kept: all source images are properly attributed. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:29, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
Unused photo of an unnotable person – out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 05:17, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:28, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
FB photo, no original author or permission. Other uploads from same user are also without permission. Smooth O (talk) 07:11, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:30, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:A BUS ON THE TEL AVIV - JERUSALEM - BEIRUT LINE. אוטובוס הנוסע בקו תל אביב- ירושלים- ביירות.D26-018.jpg, uploaded under wrong license Keren - WMIL (talk) 07:36, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:30, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:A BUCHARIAN DANCE PERFORMED BY MEMBERS OF THE RINA NIKOVA BALLET IN THE CITADEL IN JERUSALEM. ריקוד בוכרי בביצוע להקת המחול של רינה ניקובה, על רקע חומD12-103.jpg uploaded with wrong license Keren - WMIL (talk) 07:38, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:30, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
Copyvio. It was uploaded to Facebook first. Nanahuatl (talk) 08:59, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:31, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
Quality not very good Anna N Chapman (talk) 10:00, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. High quality and very encyclopedic content. IronGargoyle (talk) 02:30, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:32, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
Quality not very good Anna N Chapman (talk) 10:01, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. High quality and very encyclopedic content. IronGargoyle (talk) 02:31, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
Kept: doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:33, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
Quality not very good Anna N Chapman (talk) 10:02, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
After looking at heaps of such content, I'd want all users to have your standards of quality! Sneeuwschaap (talk) 02:34, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
![54 File:"Vice president.png".jpg](#File:"Vice_president.png".jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_10.jpg){kind=link}
_-_title_page_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_1970.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
![21:04, 3 August 2021 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2021/08/03#c-Timtrent-2021-08-03T21:04:00.000Z-File:"Vice_president.png".jpg){kind=link}
![11:34, 10 August 2021 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2021/08/03#c-Gbawden-2021-08-10T11:34:00.000Z-File:"Vice_president.png".jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep. High quality and very encyclopedic content. IronGargoyle (talk) 02:32, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
Kept: doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:33, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
Quality not very good Anna N Chapman (talk) 10:02, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. High quality and very encyclopedic content. IronGargoyle (talk) 02:32, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
Kept: doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:33, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
Quality not very good Anna N Chapman (talk) 10:02, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. High quality and very encyclopedic content. IronGargoyle (talk) 02:33, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
Kept: doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:33, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
Quality not very good Anna N Chapman (talk) 10:03, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. High quality and very encyclopedic content. IronGargoyle (talk) 02:33, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
Kept: doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:33, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
Credited to someone other than the uploader, need that person's permission to license the photo Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 10:31, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:34, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
The name of author and copyright holder is in the metadata of the file, it does not appear to be the uploader, need the permission of the copyright holder to license the photo Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 10:43, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:34, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
The author and copyright holder are in the metadata, it does not appear to be the uploader, need permission from the copyright holder to license the photo Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 10:54, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:34, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
Uploader suggests they are the person in the photo, the copyright holder is listed in the metadata, need their permission to license the photo Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 11:00, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:34, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
COM:NOTHOST 176.99.71.2 12:53, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep Why would NOTHOST apply here? Seems to be within SCOPE. Andy Dingley (talk) 14:10, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
- Keep High resolution image, fulfills multiple categories of interest. Aavindraa (talk) 15:58, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Clearly in scope. --A1Cafel (talk) 17:16, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per above. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:35, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Contient une erreur EnzoC7139 (talk) 14:35, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:36, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
Fautes d'Orthographe EnzoC7139 (talk) 14:47, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Fautes d'Orthographe EnzoC7139 (talk) 14:48, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:36, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
This image is downloaded from Facebook, See. No metadata found. Requesting speedy delete. Shaji issac (talk) 15:13, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:37, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
COM:PACKAGING and COM:DW of copyrighted advertisements. Yuraily Lic (talk) 15:41, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. --Contributers2020Talk to me here 08:04, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:37, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
Low quality, requested by author 姒姓賢寧 (talk) 17:55, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:37, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
low quality, requested by author 姒姓賢寧 (talk) 06:05, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: sufficient quality, doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:09, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
Low quality, requested by author 姒姓賢寧 (talk) 17:56, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no new reason as last time. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:38, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
Low quality, requested by author 姒姓賢寧 (talk) 17:56, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Kept: more than sufficient quality, doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion, and in use. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:42, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
Low quality, requested by author 姒姓賢寧 (talk) 17:57, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:42, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
Low quality, requested by author 姒姓賢寧 (talk) 17:58, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Kept: more than sufficient quality, doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion, and in use. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:42, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
Low quality, requested by author 姒姓賢寧 (talk) 17:59, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Kept: more than sufficient quality, doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:43, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
Low quality, requested by author 姒姓賢寧 (talk) 18:00, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: close duplicate of Part 4, redundant. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:44, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
Low quality, requested by author 姒姓賢寧 (talk) 18:00, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: close duplicate of part 4, redundant. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:44, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
Low quality, requested by author 姒姓賢寧 (talk) 18:01, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Kept: more than sufficient quality, doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:45, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
Low quality, requested by author 姒姓賢寧 (talk) 18:02, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: close duplicate of part 31, redundant. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:45, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
Low quality, requested by author 姒姓賢寧 (talk) 18:03, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: close duplicate of part 31, redundant. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:45, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
low quality, requested by author 姒姓賢寧 (talk) 06:10, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: more than sufficient quality, doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:05, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
Low quality, requested by author 姒姓賢寧 (talk) 18:04, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no new reason as last time. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:39, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
low quality, requested by author 姒姓賢寧 (talk) 06:13, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: more than sufficient quality, doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:02, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
Low quality, requested by author 姒姓賢寧 (talk) 18:04, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no new reason as last time. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:39, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
low quality, requested by author 姒姓賢寧 (talk) 06:15, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: more than sufficient quality, doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:02, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
Low quality, requested by author 姒姓賢寧 (talk) 18:05, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no new reason as last time. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:39, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
Low quality, requested by author 姒姓賢寧 (talk) 18:06, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Kept: more than sufficient quality, doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:41, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
low quality, requested by author 姒姓賢寧 (talk) 06:18, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: more than sufficient quality, doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:58, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
Low quality, requested by author 姒姓賢寧 (talk) 18:07, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no new reason as last time. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:39, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
low quality, requested by author 姒姓賢寧 (talk) 06:18, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: more than sufficient quality, doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:58, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
Low quality, requested by author 姒姓賢寧 (talk) 18:07, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no new reason as last time. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:40, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
low quality, requested by author 姒姓賢寧 (talk) 05:50, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: more than sufficient quality, doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:41, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
Low quality, requested by author 姒姓賢寧 (talk) 18:08, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no new reason as last time. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:40, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:46, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Post-1978 US sculpture. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:31, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The tower was completed in 1976 by Sune Lindström (1906–1989). Sadly, there is no freedom of panorama in Kuwait. The copyright terms of the country lasted for 50 years, and the image can be restored in 2040 A1Cafel (talk) 04:51, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete - I would've !voted Keep if the image quality was clear and that the car in the image could be identified but unfortunately it's not. Shame as it's a nice picture but that's copyright for ya. Delete per nom. –Davey2010Talk 23:14, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. --ILoveCommonsOkay? (talk) 09:33, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
- — User:ILoveCommonsOkay? (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
- Delete per nomination. Satrar (talk) 19:00, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
- — Satrar (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:29, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Inofficial logo, does not follow the Visual identity guidelines, should be in SVG if at all useful. Krd 08:47, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
- KEEP and SNOW CLOSE this DR. VRT members can see the discussion at VRT-Wiki. Unfortunately, I am feeling the brunt of no good deed goes unpunished, whether it was intentional or otherwise. I already filed for the "Quick License" which protects my design and the WMF work per policy. The WMF are the only licensors, not Commons admins, editors or VRT members/admins. I feel confident that I followed procedures to the "T". There appears to be a misunderstanding about the WMF's trademark policy, and confusion about the rules associated with the Wikipedia globe vs the WMF circle logo (which is public domain) and the wordmark. My design focused only on the free standing WMF circle logo, not the full trademark or wordmark design. I did not alter or distort the wordmark or circle logo design. The text that comprises the wordmark is not included in my design. I simply added the VRT text in front of the logo; the logo remains untouched and unaltered in the background. The WMF's Quick License #4 states: states: We are also thinking creatively about how we can make it easier for community members to use the marks to further the Wikimedia mission. To that end, we have introduced a liberal solution in the trademark policy for particular uses of Wikimedia marks called the "Quick License." It is a Quick License because instead of requesting a license and waiting for it to be prepared, community members just need to fill it out and email it to trademarks@wikimedia.org. While the Quick License makes trademark use easier for common community uses, it includes some measures to maintain trademark protection of the Wikimedia marks. The license includes a quality control requirement and a reservation of a right to terminate the license if a mark is used in a way that is inconsistent with the Wikimedia mission. I filled it out and emailed it, so until the WMF says otherwise, it is a WMF licensed design. Also see Wikimedia trademarks, keeping in mind that it requires all of the elements (the logo + wordmark = trademark or wordmark). Atsme Talk 📧 15:00, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
- Adding the following which I hope will prove useful, as all of it supports my position; however, I'm not infallible so if the WMF revokes my Quick License for reasons I am not currently aware of, I will be the first to request deletion of the image. In the interim, I feel it is proper for me to defend my work as follows:
- Visual Identity Guidelines – to begin, #18 does not apply at all to my design; rather, it applies to the Wikipedia globe which is why this RfD should be snow closed. As for references to the WMF trademark and/or independent logo (and the wordmark which I did not use) please see: #11, #14, #16, & #20.
- Trademark Policy – please see #1.41 Community Members; #3.1 Use of trademarks on the Wikimedia sites – "You may use and remix the Wikimedia marks on the Wikimedia sites as you please"; #4.1 Quick License for special community uses – You can start using the marks as stated in the Quick License as soon as you email a filled-in Quick License to trademarks@wikimedia.org. There is no need to wait for approval.
- WMF's Q&A: relevant to the WMF circle log, fair use, and trademarks please see #3.9 What does fair use mean?; #6.4 Can I send a cease and desist letter on behalf of the Wikimedia Foundation when I find misuse? #8.3 How do the Visual Identity Guidelines relate to the trademark policy?
- With regards to the current full trademark that VRT has unofficially adopted, and that Krd used to replace my design on en.WP, calling it the "official logo", actually violates the Visual Identity Guidelines per #14 which states the minimum size is .5in (12mm, 36px). Also see - this diff which produced a logo topicon so tiny, {{OTRS topicon2}} one cannot read it. There is also a userbox with the same size violation.
- With reference to the above with unquestioned acceptance of 2 violative WMF trademark usages in the OTRS topicon2 and compact user box vs my compliant design and the actions that were taken against it may indicate a potential problem that may need further review. Thank you for your consideration. Atsme Talk 📧 17:34, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
- Keep The Commons deletion process checks for copyright violations. It does not comment on trademark violations or file format. Even if anyone does not like this logo, it is suitable for hosting here as a proposed logo. Blue Rasberry (talk) 00:12, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
- Keep - Unless this has legal implications and or WMF explicitly state this logo is not okay than I don't really see a reason to delete it, As far as I know images here can be freely adapted and remixed so what they want or request is sort of irrelevent ?.
- On an unrelated tangent I'd rather this topicon be used over this and this which cannot even be read! - At least with Atsme's version here it can actually be read without the need for binoculars!. –Davey2010Talk 20:02, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Trademark issues are not relevant here. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:33, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
Fake SVG, will only cause problems if someone tries to derive work from this. Also out of date and only has certain subdivisions. Also redundant to File:Blank Map World Secondary Political Divisions.svg — Berrely • T∕C 11:21, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:46, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
The photo passed the automatic Flickr review, but its description states: "Photos are strictly not for commercial purposes. © All Rights Reserved." (Uploads from the same Flickr account may have the same problem, but I can't check them at the moment) Chiyako92 (talk) 14:37, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:11, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
Copyvio (we can't know the uploader is the owner of the website, its content is under copyvio protection). Nanahuatl (talk) 01:01, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:53, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
Copyvio (we can't know the uploader is the owner of the website, its content is under copyvio protection). Nanahuatl (talk) 01:02, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:53, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
Copyvio (we can't know the uploader is the owner of the website, its content is under copyvio protection). Nanahuatl (talk) 01:04, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:53, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
Copyvio (we can't know the uploader is the owner of the website, its content is under copyvio protection). Nanahuatl (talk) 01:05, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:53, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
Copyvio (we can't know the uploader is the owner of the website, its content is under copyvio protection). Nanahuatl (talk) 01:05, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:54, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
Copyvio (we can't know the uploader is the owner of the website, its content is under copyvio protection). Nanahuatl (talk) 01:06, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Hi there! I don´t even know how to answer properly here. I am the owner of this picture and some others tagged with the same issue. I don´t know how to solve it, I just wanted to collaborate as I have been helped by wokimedia so many times in my life. This is my web but I have no clue about how to verify my identity or what kind of protection my web has... sorry about that. Let me know if there is a proper way to share my work or I would just stop uploading. Thanks in advance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Carmen PG Granxeiro (talk • contribs) 14:57, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
- Hi @Carmen PG Granxeiro: . Thanks for your uploads. Because your images are published on carmenpggranxeiro.com, we need confirmation that you are indeed the same person as the website owner. Please submit an email as per instructions at COM:VRTS. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:24, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: You could change Legal Copyright © 2019. All rights reserved to CC-BY. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:55, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
I have concerns that this logo was uploaded without proper permission from its owner. The logo was uploaded under CC-BY-SA 4.0, but no evidence was given to verify that. The artful fish is the cause of my concerns; it exceeds the United States' threshold of originality. This should be reuploaded to Wikipedia as a vector graphic instead. FreeMediaKid! 02:50, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
- Edit: Having viewed the Long John Silver's website, I have just discovered that the fish in the logo is not easily available as a vector graphic, just the text. FreeMediaKid! 02:57, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:56, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
Copyright concerns: while the base text is obviously PD, there is a large section at the end (page 604-616, dealing mostly with recitation rules) that is of more recent date. In particular, page 616 mentions the Islamic lunar year 1420 (۱٤۲۰), corresponding to 1999-2000 CE, as well as that this was published in Medina at the Cat:King Fahd Complex for the Printing of the Holy Quran. COM:SAUDI ARABIA suggest a 50-year copyright term, meaning this document will not be PD before 2050. HyperGaruda (talk) 05:23, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Even if we could prune the copyrighted pages, the typesets, fonts, or calligraphy is probably copyrightable in SA. Regardless, recommend we redirect to another version after deletion since this file is in broad use. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:44, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
- I've gone through the file's interwiki transclusions. Most of the time the file was inserted haphazardly into the article, seemingly without taking into account whether there was already another image with the same purpose (such as the PDF series [File:Sura#.pdf]). I removed redundant instances, or replaced it with a file of more artistic and historical value when there was nothing else. --HyperGaruda (talk) 07:16, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:57, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
Derivative work of various tarpaulins and political paraphernalia. See also COM:COMM Philippines. In accordance with COM:PRP, we must assume that these are commissioned works copyrighted by the authors. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:35, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:57, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
This image was originally posted to Flickr by paukrus at https://flickr.com/photos/26244825@N05/4222296712. It has been reviewed on 2021-08-01 07:16:40 by FlickreviewR 2, who found the author on the bad authors list. This means that the Flickr user is known to upload images with possibly problematic license information. The image should be checked carefully because some Flickr users are blacklisted for only a limited portion of their uploads. Wasa Kawasaker (talk) 10:50, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:00, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
Democratic party of Georgia isn't a US federal government agency so this isn't necessarily in the public domain, need info about the original source Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 11:17, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:00, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
File:Martin Luther King shot this photograph of Ralph David Abernathy and his young daughter Donzaleigh while Coretta Scott King talks on the telephone in the Abernathy's Montgomery Alabama Home.jpg
[edit]
"Photograph was taken by Martin Luther King", not in the public domain yet Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 11:19, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:00, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
Not yet PD-US recording, because this recording is licensed as {{Cc-by-nc-sa-3.0}} 49.150.110.214 11:35, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:00, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
This is a still from a video of “KING OF RAP TOP40” – a talent search contest in Vietnam, copyrighted by Time Symphony (UK). This is unlikely the work by the uploader (except that this has been copied out of some video). AFBorchert (talk) 11:50, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
- See also Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Dungnguyen80 for some background of this serial uploader of copyvios. --AFBorchert (talk) 15:50, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:00, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Pranav Mhatre (talk · contribs)
[edit]Not own work. Photos can be found on-line. No original authors or permission.
Smooth O (talk) 12:17, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:01, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
_10.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_10.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
There is no freedom of panorama in Italy. Ox1997cow (talk) 12:19, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
_10.jpg){kind=link}
Speedy delete as serious derivative work copyvio. The author is the infamous sculptor w:Claes Oldenburg who once sent a take down notice against Wikimedia way back in 2012, and we don't expect that he will accept free culture licensing of Wikipedians' images of his copyrighted "public" artworks, meaning to say recourse to COM:VRT method is useless. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:48, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:01, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
_10.jpg){kind=link}
Appears to be a TV screenshot, not an original photograph Ytoyoda (talk) 12:38, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:01, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
Probably a copyright violation. On en.wiki as a non-free image (with the text at the bottom cropped out) here. Number 57 (talk) 13:07, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:02, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
Copyrighted map which can be recreateable using free maps. Soumya-8974 (he) (talk • contribs) 13:26, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
- I am sure the map in the image is copyrighted but the creator obviously released it in the CC license. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 03:16, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - CC-BY-SA license in lower left corner. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:03, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
The author and copyright holder listed in the metadata does not appear to be the uploader; need permission from the copyright holder to license the photo. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 13:27, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:04, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
A new file of this map was made with better higher resolution and shadings of the county’s margin. TylerKutschbach (talk) 13:28, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:04, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
Source does not indicate that modifications are allowed, so in my opinion this image is not suitable for commons. Lymantria (talk) 13:59, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Kept: "hese images are released under Creative Commons CC0. Copyright and related or neighboring rights to this images has been waived. You are free to adapt and use them for commercial purposes without attributing the original author or source. " "You are free to adapt" covers it. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:06, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
Previously published at http://powerlifting.life/useful-calisthenics-for-powerlifting/, requires OTRS verification Ytoyoda (talk) 14:35, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:06, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:Carmochepe
[edit]
All other uploads of this user were speedied as obvious copyright violations (primarily from www.jetphotos.com). Could not find sources for these images, but they are probably not the user's "own work". Johnj1995 (talk) 14:39, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:07, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
The metadata contains detailed copyright information, need clarification that the uploader is the copyright holder or has permission to license someone else's copyrighted photo Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 14:49, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:07, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
_-_title_page_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
_-_title_page_(cropped).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Haven't entered the PD due to COM:URAA A1Cafel (talk) 15:05, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
_-_title_page_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
- @A1Cafel: It is the exact reprint of the 16th-century edition. Veverve (talk) 15:17, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, as Veverve Andy Dingley (talk) 09:38, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
- Keep making an exact copy does not reset the copyright clock. --RAN (talk) 23:37, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:08, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
_-_title_page_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
Image may not be original work as claimed; note History.com logo on uncropped image. Basketcase2022 (talk) 16:33, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Dear basket case, if you are not sure that image may or may not be original or whatsoever, what is the need to vandalise someone's contribution by creating a new user account on Wikipedia just to mark an image for deletion ? This looks like vandalism to me. Superimposition (talk) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Superimposition (talk • contribs) 21:40, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
I don't understand the need to nominate this file for deletion without any proper need or reason. It certainly doesn't fit in with some point of view or an alternative opinion of a different kind of map. But all opinions and views should be equally respected. Deleting an image that doesn't match a point of view doesn't look to be in good taste. Superimposition (talk) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Superimposition (talk • contribs) 23:00, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:08, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
Un Accurate map. There are Several Arabic Accents in this region not just a single one. Many of the areas highlighted don't share the same accent. باسم (talk) 20:45, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
As far as I know, in the Antakya region, they speak Turkish. there is no use for any dialect of Arabic in the region. what is the source of your information?--Michel Bakni (talk) 20:51, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Support Incorrect map, there are many dialects, but the Arabic is a mother language of all Levant, and there are also Turkish regions that don't speak Arabic in this map. --Omar kandil (talk) 20:59, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
- Support This map does not reflect anything on the ground. For example, it is not possible to distinguish the dialect of the inhabitants of Daraa (Syria) from the dialect of Ramtha (Jordan), which are located within the Hauran Plain, and are separated on this map. Freedom's Falcon (talk) 21:02, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
- Support As mentioned before, I, as a person who lives in the levant, see this map incorrect and doesn’t reflect the real distribution of accents in the area. سامي (talk) 21:10, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
- Keep The file description mentions the sources used to design this map, namely:
- w:Ethnologue (the standard reference in linguistics, published by w:SIL International, the registration authority for the w:ISO 639-3 international standard for language codes), and
- the chapter "Levantine Arabic" in "The Semitic Languages" (edited by w:John Huehnergard, a reference in the categorization of Semitic languages). This chapter was written by Kristen Brustad (also the co-author of the "Al-Kitaab" series, the reference book to teach Modern Standard Arabic to English speakers) and Emilie Zuniga.
- So these are quality sources. That's why there is no reason to delete this map.
- Then, different contributors think this map is not accurate (which may be true, because it's impossible for a linguistic map to be 100% correct: the map is not the territory). But these contributors fail to provide anything else than their own experience. They also fail to provide any alternative source or map.
- Regarding Turkey specifically (mentioned by @Michel Bakni: and @Omar kandil: ), here are two additional sources: Cilician Arabic, Antiochia Arabic, and Turkey in the Encyclopedia of Arabic Language and Linguistics.
- I also notice that the previous version (File:Levantine Arabic Map.jpg), created in 2018 without Israel, wasn't opposed by anyone.
- For all these reasons, this map should be kept as it is and contributors who think this map is inaccurate can for instance:
- Write an email to Ethnologue, Pr Huehnergard or Pr Brustad to ask them to update their map or book, and/or;
- Find other sources to upload another map of Arabic dialects spoken in the Levant.
- A455bcd9 (talk) 15:16, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
- Support Incorrect and inaccurate. people in Antioch region speak turkish, they do not understand Arabic nor its dialits at all.--Michel Bakni (talk) 16:42, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
- Have you read my above message? I provided various sources according to which there are more than 500,000 indigenous Arabic speakers in Hatay (Antioch/Antakya region). Of course Turkish is spoken there and is the main indigenous language today, but this doesn't mean that there are no indigenous Arabic speakers there. A455bcd9 (talk) 18:27, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
- Here are some other sources regarding Arabic in Turkey:
- AN INVESTIGATION ON SEDENTARY ARABIC OF HATAY: TRANSFER AND SHIFT OF LANGUAGE WITHIN TURKISH-ARABIC SPEAKING GENERATIONS
- Inside the Turkish Arabic speaking town that Syrian refugees dare not enter
- An ethnolinguistic portrayal of the Arabic-speaking Orthodox Christian community of Antakya, Turkey: "Results of the last census in Turkey showed that the total number of Arabic speaking population was 1.20% that is 5% less than the results of the 1960 census. One third of all Arabic speakers in Turkey reside in Antakya (Antioch)." A455bcd9 (talk) 18:33, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
- Here are some other sources regarding Arabic in Turkey:
- Have you read my above message? I provided various sources according to which there are more than 500,000 indigenous Arabic speakers in Hatay (Antioch/Antakya region). Of course Turkish is spoken there and is the main indigenous language today, but this doesn't mean that there are no indigenous Arabic speakers there. A455bcd9 (talk) 18:27, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
- * 1.2% of the population is in acordnece with your map? your map shows that it is a dominated langague in the region (city and courtyside).--Michel Bakni (talk) 19:26, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
- This is not "my map" but a map based on quality sources. This map may have flaws but as far as I know, it is based on the best available references. If you know any other academic references please provide them. Otherwise, it's just your opinion. A455bcd9 (talk) 09:07, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
- To be more precise: yes I created this map (so in this meaning it is "my map") but it is based on @Nehme1499: 's map, created in 2018: File:Levantine Arabic Map.jpg (I wonder why you don't ask the deletion of this other map by the way? The only difference is the presence of Israel, and this map is used on many Wikipedias, including the Modern Standard Arabic Wikipedia.) A455bcd9 (talk) 09:09, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
- By the way @Michel Bakni: you did not understand the above article: 1.2% is the percentage of Arabic speakers in the whole of Turkey. But in the Antakya region, this percentage is way higher (about 1.6M inhabitants in the Hatay province, and more than 500,000 indigenous Arabic speakers among them according to Ethnologue and the Encyclopedia of Arabic Language and Linguistics, so at least 31%). A455bcd9 (talk) 09:18, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
- To be more precise: yes I created this map (so in this meaning it is "my map") but it is based on @Nehme1499: 's map, created in 2018: File:Levantine Arabic Map.jpg (I wonder why you don't ask the deletion of this other map by the way? The only difference is the presence of Israel, and this map is used on many Wikipedias, including the Modern Standard Arabic Wikipedia.) A455bcd9 (talk) 09:09, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
- This is not "my map" but a map based on quality sources. This map may have flaws but as far as I know, it is based on the best available references. If you know any other academic references please provide them. Otherwise, it's just your opinion. A455bcd9 (talk) 09:07, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
- * 1.2% of the population is in acordnece with your map? your map shows that it is a dominated langague in the region (city and courtyside).--Michel Bakni (talk) 19:26, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
- Keep I don't think it's a good map & certain points such as re: the Hauran plain are correct. I agree that coloring things in such a binary fashion according to modern political borders is overly simplistic. However, several of the arguments in favor of deletion are completely beside the point. The fact that only a large minority of speakers in Hatay are native Arabic speakers has nothing to do with the classification of their dialect; it would be likewise absurd not to color in Israel proper just because the majority of the state's citizens are Hebrew speakers (hence why the map was updated from its previous form, which did not color in Israel proper). Anyway, while I think it is a bad map, it's completely based off of reputable sources. Better sources may be available with which the map can be further refined, but as-is the argument in favor of the map's deletion is not sufficiently justified, in my view. By the way, I echo the critique of Ethnologue, who I think is more at fault here; after all the North vs. South Levantine distinction is theirs & they do basically break it down as is shown on the map. One very important thing to note is that, while there are certainly many Levantine Arabic sub-dialects in the region, this is not what the map is meant to show in the first place. For instance, "Aleppine" Arabic (i.e. which I believe forms a continuum including the dialects of Hatay, etc.) has distinct features that make it similar to Mesopotamian Arabic; however, it still belongs within the North Levantine family, at least according to Ethnologue's classification. It would be great to have a map that distinguishes between these different subdialects, but again that would be a different map with a different core purpose, whereas this is one is merely meant to indicate the distribution of the North & South Levantine dialect families. In view of that, this map is largely accurate, even if I agree that the North / South split is somewhat vague & simply not very informative — but again that's really an issue with how Ethnologue has classified things & the eternal question of language vs. dialect vs. accent, etc. In sum, the map should be updated to more accurately reflect linguistic distribution (i.e. by not simply drawing lines across country borders & showing more spotty distribution), but it makes no sense to delete it as a whole.AdrianAbdulBaha (talk) 15:04, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
- I agree this map (like any linguistic map) is a simplification of reality. It would be amazing to improve it with color shades or dots to show the "sub-dialects" of Levantine. However, I don't know any reliable source that we could use to do that. So we use the current one that could be renamed "Levantine Arabic Map according to Ethnologue" if some people are unhappy with it. But in any case, there is no reason to delete it. A455bcd9 (talk) 17:06, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
- Support Hello @A455bcd9: it looks like you did not read the book "The Semitic Languages" before because it did not mention the south or north Levantine Arabic "at all" as this map is made of. In addition, the map on page 404 which is titled "THE SPEECH AREA OF LEVANTINE ARABIC" from the book includes the whole Levante in addition to part of Turkey and Egypt nowadays, please find out that in the book. The book is saying clearly in the first sentence in the introduction "Levantine Arabic (LA) is best described as a dialect bundle whose varieties are spoken across the Levant" and not mentioning anything about having south or north as this map is made from.--Sandra Hanbo (talk) 21:24, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
- I read the book "The Semitic Languages" and I used it to color Israel only. The rest of the map is based on Ethnologue:
- Turkey: Ethnologue, Map
- Syria: Ethnologue, Map
- Lebanon: Glottolog, Ethnologue
- Jordan: Ethnologue, Map
- Palestine: Glottolog, Ethnologue A455bcd9 (talk) 09:02, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
- I read the book "The Semitic Languages" and I used it to color Israel only. The rest of the map is based on Ethnologue:
- Support This map is clearly based on modern political borders, which is clearly inaccurate. Dialects do NOT stop abruptly, but rather change as a gradient. Also, there is no such north vs south Levantine. For example, the dialects spoken in Nablus is much closer to Damascus than it is to the neighboring villages and towns in Palestine. Likewise, southern Lebanon dialects are closer to northern Palestine than to Beirut. Amr ibnu Kulthoum عمرو بن كلثوم (talk) 05:49, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
- What you say is true, Levantine (like most dialects and languages in the world) is a dialect continuum. I agree that the classification South vs North has many flows, but it is the one used by most (if not all) Western scholars, and especially by Ethnologue. If you have another source please feel free to use it to create another file. For instance, it would be great to have an image on Wikimedia Commons with the map of the Levant and "rural" vs "urban" vs "bedouins" areas. A455bcd9 (talk) 09:04, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
- @A455bcd9: This map is inaccurate as there are several dialects for each area and could not be draws this way, if the map is correct why we don't find it in any of the resources above, where as mentioned before the book drawn a map for whole levant Arabic and the others don't draw any thing related to the suggested map. --Sandra Hanbo (talk) 13:40, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
- If you create a free account on Ethnologue and click on the above link you'll see what is on these maps:
- Ethnologue Map of Turkey => "North Levantine Spoken Arabic" on the map. Then this page says: "Arabic, North Levantine Spoken [apc] Adana, Hatay, and Mersin provinces. Users: 1,250,000 in Turkey (2019)."
- Ethnologue, Map of Syria and Jordan: number 1 = "North Levantine Spoken Arabic" and number 2 = "South Levantine Spoken Arabic"
- Ethnologue North Levantine in Lebanon: "Widespread" (there's also a map but I don't have a subscription as I only have a free account)
- Ethnologue South Levantine in Palestine: "Widespread" (there's also a map but I don't have a subscription as I only have a free account) A455bcd9 (talk) 14:22, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
- If you create a free account on Ethnologue and click on the above link you'll see what is on these maps:
- As I also have free account, I could not find more, but according to this one by example (Jordan and Syria) it is not as commons map, in addition, You can't say that the language of Syrian Arab Republic is North Levantine Arabic like here, it is Arabic, the same for each country in the Arab world, if this website mention the language of any country with "one of its dialects" then it is unreliable and inaccurate.--Sandra Hanbo (talk) 14:49, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
- Hi! "Arabic, the same for each country in the Arab world": this seems to me to be an ideological statement not backed by any source. All linguistics sources I checked on the subject confirm the diglossia in the Levant (and the rest of the Arab world): two languages, the official Modern Standard Arabic and the non-official local colloquial/vernacular/variety/dialect. The map on Ethnologue shows the spoken languages in each region and not the official language at the state level. This is the case in many other countries, for instance, in France, French is the only official language at the state level but many local languages are spoken across the territory and each of them has its own "border", which is not official neither strictly delimited and can evolve over time. A455bcd9 (talk) 17:12, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
- Ideological?
that's the fact, that's what we as Arabic speaking people believe, and that's how it was for centuries. In short: claiming that every Arabic accent is a separate language is not true and not what the general people believe. Funny how I was able to understand the "Palestinian language" and "Egyptian language" since I was 5! We all know those who are claiming that accents are separate languages are just trying to create a new identity for themselves due to the fact that they connect all wrongs in the Arab world to their cultural heritage and (maybe) government actions (I say maybe because we all know many of these people are more than happy to be ruled by a dictator who gives them false nationalism than a real democrat who would protect the nation's real identity). We are not going to allow our language to be targeted in this manner, no matter who says the opposite. Go ahead and learn some Arabic and contribute with us in building ar.wiki instead of creating new projects that make people laugh when reading them. Don't ping me, I'll repeat the same thing--باسم (talk) 16:23, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
- Hi باسم,
- You wrote "that's what we as Arabic speaking people believe". That's exactly what I meant by ideology. Indeed, to "believe" means, according to Oxford Languages: "accept that (something) is true, especially without proof."
- I do agree that most Arabic speaking people consider that there's one single Arabic language with many different accents. However, there are also several native Arabic speakers who think differently than this majority, for instance: How Arabs Have Failed Their Language and No, Levantine is not a “dialect of” Arabic.
- That being said, individual opinions (including yours and mine) on the status (accent, dialect, language, etc.) of varieties of Arabic don't matter for this map and for this request. Wikipedia is based on reliable sources. This map represents the view of Ethnologue (the standard reference in linguistics) and of the vast majority of (Western?) scholars. So it deserves being on Wikimedia Commons for this reason.
- You are free to disagree with these scholars and to develop another point of view. You are also free to find other sources and to upload another map presenting these sources' alternative point of view. However, there's no place here for such a debate. I find it extremely surprising that you do not seem to understand that as I see on your profile that you're an administrator on the ar.wiki and on Wikidata... A455bcd9 (talk) 09:50, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
- @A455bcd9: Arabic is a single language, no matter what any group of people or organization say. We, the speakers and the children of this culture are the ones who determine what is acceptable and not. We will not allow anyone else to tell us otherwise. Yes, I'm an admin, and I will defend my language and culture with all my heart. We won't allow this stupidity to go on anymore--باسم (talk) 09:59, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks @باسم: for your clear answer. Just to be sure that I understand your point well, by "stupidity", do you refer to projects such as the Egyptian Arabic Wikipedia and the Moroccan Arabic Wikipedia? Or entries in the Wiktionary for Arabic "dialects"? Or is it just that in the case of this specific map you do not want the opinion of scholars who argue that there are several Arabic languages (instead of just accents and dialects) to be displayed on Wikipedia or any other Wikimedia projects such as Wikimedia Commons? A455bcd9 (talk) 10:13, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
- @A455bcd9: i thought my answer was clear--باسم (talk) 10:52, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
- @باسم: I'm sorry, I wasn't clear myself, the first part of your answer was indeed really clear but I wondered what the last sentence ("We won't allow this stupidity to go on anymore") was exactly referring to. That's why I asked you in my previous message what you meant. So did you refer to projects such as arz.wiki and ary.wiki, and/or to the ajp entries in en.wikt, and/or to the mention on Wikimedia projects (such as this map) of some scholars' opinions who argue that Arabic accents are separate languages? A455bcd9 (talk) 11:24, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
- Hi @باسم: , did you have any time to read my message? I'd love to know your opinion. Thanks! A455bcd9 (talk) 10:17, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
- @باسم: I'm sorry, I wasn't clear myself, the first part of your answer was indeed really clear but I wondered what the last sentence ("We won't allow this stupidity to go on anymore") was exactly referring to. That's why I asked you in my previous message what you meant. So did you refer to projects such as arz.wiki and ary.wiki, and/or to the ajp entries in en.wikt, and/or to the mention on Wikimedia projects (such as this map) of some scholars' opinions who argue that Arabic accents are separate languages? A455bcd9 (talk) 11:24, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
- @A455bcd9: i thought my answer was clear--باسم (talk) 10:52, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks @باسم: for your clear answer. Just to be sure that I understand your point well, by "stupidity", do you refer to projects such as the Egyptian Arabic Wikipedia and the Moroccan Arabic Wikipedia? Or entries in the Wiktionary for Arabic "dialects"? Or is it just that in the case of this specific map you do not want the opinion of scholars who argue that there are several Arabic languages (instead of just accents and dialects) to be displayed on Wikipedia or any other Wikimedia projects such as Wikimedia Commons? A455bcd9 (talk) 10:13, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
- @A455bcd9: Arabic is a single language, no matter what any group of people or organization say. We, the speakers and the children of this culture are the ones who determine what is acceptable and not. We will not allow anyone else to tell us otherwise. Yes, I'm an admin, and I will defend my language and culture with all my heart. We won't allow this stupidity to go on anymore--باسم (talk) 09:59, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
- Ideological?
- Hi! "Arabic, the same for each country in the Arab world": this seems to me to be an ideological statement not backed by any source. All linguistics sources I checked on the subject confirm the diglossia in the Levant (and the rest of the Arab world): two languages, the official Modern Standard Arabic and the non-official local colloquial/vernacular/variety/dialect. The map on Ethnologue shows the spoken languages in each region and not the official language at the state level. This is the case in many other countries, for instance, in France, French is the only official language at the state level but many local languages are spoken across the territory and each of them has its own "border", which is not official neither strictly delimited and can evolve over time. A455bcd9 (talk) 17:12, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
- The Arabic dialects are not languages, These are accents, I was wondering why we do not have the same thing for English or French as Texan English or Quebec French or even every language has separate accent in the same country, Why are you insisting on Arabic dialects to call them languages and not looking at yours to call it language??!! and again according to your resource mentioned above the map is not accurate and in Arabic studies which should be looking for to know about this language there is nothing called northern or southern levantine language. --Sandra Hanbo (talk) 16:48, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
- Hi @Sandra Hanbo: , I'm afraid you do not understand what this request is about. This request is NOT about the status of Arabic varieties as accents, dialects, or languages. And by the way, I do not defend the point of view of this map. I do think that there are many issues in this map, including the classification of "Northern" vs "Southern" Levantine. I do not say that this map represents reality. This maps represents the view of Ethnologue, the standard reference in linguistics, and the registration authority for the ISO 639-3 international standard for language codes. These international organizations decided that there were two languages in the region: ajp (South Levantine Arabic) and apc (North Levantine Arabic) and we represent the geographical distribution of these two languages according to these organizations on a map. That's it. Nothing more. That's why this map has to stay on Wikipedia/Wikimedia, whether you like it or not, whether you disagree with it or not. And whether it's true or not! Because "Truth" is not the criteria used to decide whether an image should be uploaded on Wikimedia Commons or not.
- Then you (and others) are free to create many other maps presenting alternative points of view, based on other reliable sources (or on the same ones if Ethnologue changes their view on the subject). That's how Wikipedia works. Censoring alternative points of view from established scholars because you disagree with them is not how Wikimedia projects work I think.
- Do you understand my point of view? A455bcd9 (talk) 17:16, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
- Keep I went through the resources cited and there's a clear delineation between the Northern, and Southern Levant. That said, given the sources, there's still reason to think it's not the best of maps given that there's a spectrum of dialects, and also a distinction between urban and rural pronunciation noted in "Idioms and Idiomatic Expressions in Levantine Arabic" by Elham Alzoubi. Anyways, here are more references supporting the map. The North, especially Lebanon, was more French influenced, thus the ة (taa marbuta) is pronounced with an é sound. They say medinay instead of medina."Mastering Arabic 2," 2nd edition, Wightwick and Gaafar, p. 106. Another example is the سوّى and عمل distinction to express to do. "Syrian Colloquial Arabic: A Functional Course," Liddicoat, Lennane & Rahim, p. 235 --Barce (talk) 23:50, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
- Keep No reason to delete, the map is fully-sourced. North and South Levantine are "macro dialects" which include other dialects. Showing the distinction between the two is not incorrect, even though the map could obviously be made more detailed. Nehme1499 (talk) 11:24, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
Kept: THe map is widely used, so policy forbids deletion on these grounds. Note that using Support in a DR is confusing -- to you support keeping or deleting? Please use {{Vk}} and {{Vd}} instead. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:11, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
Photograph is probably younger than 50 years, so PD-Thailand does not apply. Bujo (talk) 13:58, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. --Paul_012 (talk) 18:47, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
- No se ha cerrado desde 2021? 181.43.1.187 15:02, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
Unlikely that User:Mixvasuvadh is indeed the author of the photo, it was previously published elsewhere. The PD tag was not even added by Mixvasuvadh, but by User:223.24.185.129. Thus, the authenticity of the licence is highly dubious. Bujo (talk) 23:12, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
- The uploader User:Annop Nakabut states that the image was taken from this website where it was uploaded by a user named น้ำเกลือยอดเยี่ยม ("excellent salt water") in February 2006 without any copyright notice. After my first deletion request, User:223.24.185.129 added a PD tag, claiming that Thai Wikipedia user User:Mixvasuvadh had released the image into public domain. It is however highly unlikely that this user was indeed the author of the photograph (unfortunately Thai Wikipedia is quite lax on image rights). Indeed, the image seems to be an official photograph from the time General Suchinda was commander-in-chief of the Royal Thai Army from 1990 to 1992. --Bujo (talk) 14:34, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted per above, also machine translation of source page shows no evidence of free license nor of blogger claiming authorship of image. (too bad, was in fairly wide use; finding genuinely free licensed good photo of Suchinda Kraprayoon would be useful for Wikimedia.)-- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:39, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
While the source video itself is CC-By licensed, it is composed of still images from other sources. The screen capture would thus be a derivative of the presumably copyrighted photo. Rameshe999 (talk) 13:49, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
- Este archivo no había sido borrado? 181.43.1.187 15:02, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
- * Comment - different image from 2 images of same name previously deleted. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:27, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:26, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
Image may not be original work as claimed; note History.com logo on uncropped image at https://www.pinterest.com/pin/323977766926398800 Basketcase2022 (talk) 16:32, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: by Jameslwoodward. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:23, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
This is Apple Inc.'s work, not the uploader's, and it seems to pass COM:TOO. IagoQnsi (talk) 18:54, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:56, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Я не знал, что это станет доступным публично Bekjanbektenbai (talk) 16:34, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
- Google translate: "I didn't know it would be publicly available".
- Courtesy deletion, same-day nomination by uploader. Thuresson (talk) 20:03, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
duplicate of another file Øyvind Holmstad (talk) 07:54, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. Next time, please use {{Duplicate}}. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 14:28, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Image non libre, autorisation nécessaire 37.170.73.135 16:47, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
- Delete The description says this picture was taken by the agency "Réa". The exif indicates the photographer is "Jean Nicholas GUILLO". This deletion request has been opened since August, but no authorization was sent. --Titlutin (talk) 19:55, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by {[u|Fitindia}}. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 18:52, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
Imagen editada del original, usada para vandalizar AntoFran (talk) 03:27, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —howcheng {chat} 01:03, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
Imagen editada del original, usada para vandalizar AntoFran (talk) 03:27, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —howcheng {chat} 01:03, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
deleted please 2806:102E:A:D38F:A8E4:BB67:A292:8637 05:51, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —howcheng {chat} 01:04, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
wrong image name Øyvind Holmstad (talk) 08:23, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —howcheng {chat} 01:05, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
Le portrait n'est pas celui de Claude Goudimel, mais celui d'Adrain Le Roy. Il est extrait de Les Pseaumes de David, composez en musique à quatre parties, par Cl. Goudimel. Mis en tablature sur le leut par Adrian Le Roy. – Paris, Adrian Le Roy et Robert Ballard, 1567. Il a été légendé à tort sur l'original de cette partition comme celui de Goudimel. Il existe un autre portrait attesté de Goudimel. Fortitou (talk) 10:08, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
- @Fortitou: Using English would be nice, so everybody can follow. It would be nice if you could provide more information, maybe a link to a verified picture of Goudimel. In the print there is no indication that this is indeed Adrian Le Roy. And if it is, why delete it instead of simply moving it back? --Rettinghaus (talk) 10:19, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
This portrait named "Claude Goudimel 1562.jpg" is actually a portrait of the composer Adrian Le Roy. We know it comes from a music print by Le Roy in 1567 where he uses and mentions Goudimel melodies (see "Les Pseaumes de David, composez en musique à quatre parties, par Cl. Goudimel. Mis en tablature sur le leut par Adrian Le Roy. – Paris, Adrian Le Roy et Robert Ballard, 1567.) In the copy of the National Library in France, the portrait has been erroneously ascribed to Goudimel by a XIXth century hand but we know now that it shows Le Roy. See JM Noailly dissertation, Tours, 1988. There is a portrait of Goudimel in New York PL, Drexel collection, which is already available in Wikimedia commons (Claude Goudimel.jpg). Obviously not the same guy... Actually, everything was correct in WP + WD + WMC, since you and Buidhe changed this a few days ago... Thanks, Fortitou — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fortitou (talk • contribs) 11:02, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
- see same portrait as File:Adrian_Le_Roy_1567.jpg --Hsarrazin (talk) 18:57, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and set CommonsDelinker to do a global replace with the other file. —howcheng {chat} 01:09, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
File:Internet censorship in Iran - Internet shutdown in Iran - National Information Network of Iran - سانسور اینترنت در ایران - قطع اینترنت در ایران - شبکه ملی اطلاعات ایران (3).png
[edit].png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
unrealistic non educational doesnt better understanding Baratiiman (talk) 12:43, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. Currently in use. IronGargoyle (talk) 13:55, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —howcheng {chat} 01:09, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
File:Internet censorship in Iran - Internet shutdown in Iran - National Information Network of Iran - سانسور اینترنت در ایران - قطع اینترنت در ایران - شبکه ملی اطلاعات ایران (3).png
[edit]Possible copyright violation. Image available on many websites, Uploader has uploaded many problematic files. HeminKurdistan (talk) 20:49, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
- Also please consider deleting this file for same reason: File:Internet censorship in Iran - Internet shutdown in Iran - National Information Network of Iran - - سانسور اینترنت در ایران - قطع اینترنت در ایران - شبکه ملی اطلاعات ایران (2).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:05, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
비자유 저작물입니다. 위키백과:파일 업로드 요청에 요청해야 합니다. Hajoon0102 (talk) 13:31, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Similar in complexity to other BSOD messages. If you want to have a detailed discussion, all of them should be nominated together. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:38, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
The eagle flame is not a simple geometric shape, and is elegible for copyright protection. ― Tartan357 Talk 18:51, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Based on the other more complex exmaples in the US threshold of originality library. Fry1989 eh? 23:30, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
- Keep because I don't find any reason why is elegible for copyright... --Gabomiranda (talk) 22:11, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
- The logo at Libertarian Party (United States) was uploaded as fair use, as is the case with all other state affiliates. I don't believe this discussion should override that longstanding consensus. ― Tartan357 Talk 05:29, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
- Just because an image is uploaded under fair use does not mean the correct license was selected. There's an entire (backlogged) category dedicated to images that may be eligible to be transfered to Commons. Fry1989 eh? 13:53, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
- The logo at Libertarian Party (United States) was uploaded as fair use, as is the case with all other state affiliates. I don't believe this discussion should override that longstanding consensus. ― Tartan357 Talk 05:29, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
- Delete i think the eagle+flame part involves more creative input than Prince logo.svg (VA0000832222). RZuo (talk) 09:46, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. To determine whether a logo is below TOO is always a bit subjective. Imho this image shows a creative effort of the designer. The eagle which appears like a flame is imho a careful design of a creative mind. Therefore I decided to delete the image, par COM:TOO US. --Ellywa (talk) 23:14, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
