Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2021/06/18
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
![111 File:"Catalyst" Minnetrista, Muncie, Indiana.jpg](#File:"Catalyst"_Minnetrista,_Muncie,_Indiana.jpg){kind=link}
_British_India_Army_(1906).jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
_all-in-one_zoom_lens.jpg){kind=link}
_on_June_18.png){kind=link}
,_Rheinstraße_4.jpg){kind=link}
The user requests to delete his own user page. —— Eric Liu（留言．百科用戶頁） 05:24, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Per user request. --AFBorchert (talk) 07:59, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Probably not own work : professional pic uploaded by new user. But not find any clue. Supertoff (talk) 05:01, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: taken from FB, permission needed. — Racconish 💬 09:55, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
copyvio - not own work Supertoff (talk) 05:04, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 09:56, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Unused photo of an unnotable person – out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 06:21, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Speedy delete per nom and COM:CSD#F4, License review NOT passed: Came via Facebook; their Terms of Use are incompatible with publishing here. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 06:28, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 09:57, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mut6sch01ar (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope, unused non-notable logos.
George Chernilevsky talk 07:38, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 09:52, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Per exif, author is Bartosz Wolinski www.wolisphoto.com (｀・ω・´) (talk) 01:47, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 19:46, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Khmergfn15 (talk) 02:06, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 19:46, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope, personal artwork with logos George Chernilevsky talk 07:39, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 19:46, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope unused personal artwork George Chernilevsky talk 07:42, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 19:47, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
Source website has "© 2017 Mehr News Agency. All rights reserved", no indication of free license. MKFI (talk) 07:47, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 19:47, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
- Restored per undeletion request: license change plus successful license review. Taivo (talk) 11:36, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope personal artwork logo George Chernilevsky talk 07:50, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 19:47, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope personal photo of non-contributor George Chernilevsky talk 07:51, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 19:48, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
Personal photo without educational use Drakosh (talk) 08:22, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 19:48, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
I am the person on the photo and I don't want this photo offered for distribution. 46.83.127.245 09:57, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 19:49, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Persida vega explosion de iquitos (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal files, out of scope.
- File:PERSIDA VEGA SOL VEGA EXPLOSION DE IQUITOS 07.jpg
- File:PERSIDA VEGA SOL VEGA EXPLOSION DE IQUITOS 09.jpg
- File:PERSIDA VEGA SOL VEGA EXPLOSION DE IQUITOS 13.jpg
- File:PERSIDA VEGA SOL VEGA EXPLOSION DE IQUITOS 12.jpg
- File:PERSIDA VEGA SOL VEGA EXPLOSION DE IQUITOS 11.jpg
- File:PERSIDA VEGA SOL VEGA EXPLOSION DE IQUITOS 10.jpg
- File:PERSIDA VEGA SOL VEGA EXPLOSION DE IQUITOS 08.jpg
- File:PERSIDA VEGA SOL VEGA EXPLOSION DE IQUITOS 06.jpg
- File:PERSIDA VEGA SOL VEGA EXPLOSION DE IQUITOS 05.jpg
- File:PERSIDA VEGA SOL VEGA EXPLOSION DE IQUITOS 04.jpg
- File:PERSIDA VEGA SOL VEGA EXPLOSION DE IQUITOS 03.jpg
- File:PERSIDA VEGA SOL VEGA EXPLOSION DE IQUITOS 02.jpg
- File:PERSIDA VEGA SOL VEGA EXPLOSION DE IQUITOS 01.jpg
MiguelAlanCS (talk) 10:32, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 19:37, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
Copyvio (no given proof of PD permission) ManuRoquette (talk) 15:07, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 19:36, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP in Japan for 2D works. Yuraily Lic (talk) 17:44, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 19:33, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP in Japan for 2D works. Yuraily Lic (talk) 17:45, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 19:34, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
COM:PACKAGING. Yuraily Lic (talk) 17:46, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 19:34, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Copyvio (photographer's name provided but no given proof of PD permission) ManuRoquette (talk) 15:09, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Racconish at 19:36, 19 June 2021 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Dernier Vermouth photo GG.png --Krdbot 02:16, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
A formal PR picture and the photographer is mentioned in the file's details. It cannot stay in the Commons without a proper OTRS release note. Ldorfman (talk) 22:47, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
I have just accepted permission for “File:Tal gilboa 333.jpg” under ticket:2020081610004039. -- Geagea (talk) 12:56, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Ldorfman, no valid reason for deletion. Next time please try not to use the bot alike deletion reational - "A formal PR picture and the photographer is mentioned in the file's details. It cannot stay in the Commons without a proper OTRS release note." This is not a formal PR picture, just a photo taken by her husband which is a photographer and a user in our wiki project. -- Geagea (talk) 13:04, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
A formal PR picture and the photographer is mentioned in the file's details. It cannot stay in the Commons without a proper OTRS release note. Ldorfman (talk) 22:48, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Tal gilboa111.jpg” under ticket:2020081610004039. -- Geagea (talk) 12:56, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Ldorfman, no valid reason for deletion. Next time please try not to use the bot alike deletion reational - "A formal PR picture and the photographer is mentioned in the file's details. It cannot stay in the Commons without a proper OTRS release note." This is not a formal PR picture, just a photo taken by her husband which is a photographer and a user in our wiki project. -- Geagea (talk) 13:04, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
A formal PR picture and the photographer is mentioned in the file's details. It cannot stay in the Commons without a proper OTRS release note. Ldorfman (talk) 22:48, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Tal gilboa 22.jpg” under ticket:2020081610004039. -- Geagea (talk) 12:56, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Ldorfman, no valid reason for deletion. Next time please try not to use the bot alike deletion reational - "A formal PR picture and the photographer is mentioned in the file's details. It cannot stay in the Commons without a proper OTRS release note." This is not a formal PR picture, just a photo taken by her husband which is a photographer and a user in our wiki project. -- Geagea (talk) 13:05, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
ownership is by the subject's company, ASE Global, as seen in the caption of a cropped version of the image in here: https://www.forbes.com/profile/jason-chang/?sh=23d368d3e502 Robertsky (talk) 04:28, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 03:06, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
duplicate Shantanuo (talk) 08:53, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Commons:Derivative works from newspaper. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Infringement of copyright, text copied and pasted from another work. Uploaded by mistake. AnkyLose (talk) 13:21, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. -- Darwin Ahoy! 14:26, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Copyright Infringement AnkyLose (talk) 12:34, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --VIGNERON (talk) 12:48, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Theguitarwizard (talk · contribs)
[edit]Pictures without camera details tend to be suspect. We require a very much better declaration of source and/or permissions. See COM:OTRS. Potential copyright violation. COM:PCP applies.
Timtrent (talk) 12:08, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
I am sorry, it's pretty clear I don't have a good enough understanding of the copyright process for uploading pics on Wikipedia. I do not oppose deletion and I'll take care of inform myself better. For the time being I already deleted the images from the drafts I used them in. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Theguitarwizard (talk • contribs) 14:35, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:45, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Theguitarwizard (talk · contribs)
[edit]Pictures without camera details tend to be suspect. We require a very much better declaration of source and/or permissions. See COM:OTRS. Potential copyright violation. COM:PCP applies.
Timtrent (talk) 12:09, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
I am sorry, it's pretty clear I don't have a good enough understanding of the copyright process for uploading pics on Wikipedia. I do not oppose deletion and I'll take care of inform myself better. For the time being I already deleted the images from the drafts I used them in. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Theguitarwizard (talk • contribs) 14:36, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:45, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
Low resolution, missing EXIF suggest that this may be taken from the web. Possibly from inesdecastilho.fr, compare Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bijou de peau ines de castilho.jpg (same batch of upload). In addition to photography- related copyright issues, copyright situation for the depicted body art is unclear als well. El Grafo (talk) 08:04, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by DMacks at 15:47, 22 June 2021 UTC: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jaipur bijou de peau ines de castilho.jpg: Low resolution, missing EXIF suggest that this may be taken from the web. Possibly from inesdecastilho.fr, compare Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bijou de peau ines de castilho.jpg (same batch of upload). In addition to photography- related copyright issues, copyright situation for the depicted body art is unclear als well. --Krdbot 20:13, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
Poor-quality chemical structure with watermark and opaque (white) background. Have File:Docosane-linear-2D-skeletal.svg as high-quality vector replacement. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 19:09, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Delete. I agree that this is a low quality image with several high quality alternatives. Marbletan (talk) 12:30, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --Leyo 22:29, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
self promo on enwp Minoraxtalk 00:36, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:24, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
unused company advertisement Jochen Burghardt (talk) 09:36, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:31, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
unused company advertisement Jochen Burghardt (talk) 09:36, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:32, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Subhrajeet Gautam (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope personal files - only used on enwiki in a userpage that looks like an advert, user has no other contributions.
Elli (talk) 13:33, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:34, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Airborne0532 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope promotional files - also potential copyright violations (thought the uploader looks to be a publicist so, it's iffy). Regardless, these aren't useful to keep around.
- File:"Story Avenue." Jermaine "JB Gudda" Brooks. © 2021. Supreme Soundz Entertainment.jpg
- File:"Editing & Composition". Jermaine "JB Gudda" Brooks. © 2021. Supreme Soundz Entertainment.jpg
- File:"Music Video Filming". Jermaine "JB Gudda" Brooks. © 2021. Supreme Soundz Entertainment.jpg
- File:"Turnt Up". Jermaine "JB Gudda" Brooks. © 2021. Supreme Soundz Entertainment.jpg
- File:"Live & Raw." Jermaine "JB Gudda" Brooks. © 2021. Supreme Soundz Entertainment.jpg
- File:"New York, NY." Jermaine "JB Gudda" Brooks. © 2021. Supreme Soundz Entertainment.jpg
- File:"CW3 Brooks, Afghanistan". Jermaine "JB Gudda" Brooks. © 2021. Supreme Soundz Entertainment.jpg
Elli (talk) 13:50, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:36, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
Unused for several years but also in regards to a recent Afd which deleted the mainspace the image was used for. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 14:06, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:37, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Duplicate. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
- No complaints, that's a sketch. There's a
better version that is used as a russian wikiproject logo. Mike like0708 (talk) 17:54, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:38, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Josebarcelona (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram. Duplicates. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:39, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Helen McDowell (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
- File:Izzy Alvarez.jpg
- File:Piercen Sturdavant.jpg
- File:Piercen Sturdavant (Pasty P).jpg
- File:Piercen Sturdavant Actor.jpg
- File:Spinner Set.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:03, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:40, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation and out-of-scope. Eaaaaugh (talk) 19:53, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:42, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope, non-notable promo logo George Chernilevsky talk 07:41, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 11:41, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
Google shows multiple hits for this at https://www.inesdecastilho.fr, although I cannot find a direct link. File:CLEOPATRA-PORTE.jpg form the same upload batch was clearly taken from there, though [1] El Grafo (talk) 08:01, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
- In addition to photography- related copyright issues, copyright situation for the depicted body art is unclear as well. --El Grafo (talk) 08:05, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: by Dmacks. --Minoraxtalk 11:41, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
https://lakansining.wordpress.com/2020/06/16/diliman-quadrangle-quezon-city-the-history-and-art-collections-of-the-national-kidney-and-transplant-institute-and-lung-center-of-the-philippines/ - BUILDING: National Kidney and Transplant Institute opened in 1983 designed by Arch. Augusto Concio, alive. SCULPTURE: “The Kidney”, 1986, by Solomon Saprid, dead 2003. No freedom of panorama in the philippines
- File:05350jfLung Center Kidney Transplant Institute Philippinesfvf 08.JPG
- File:05350jfLung Center Kidney Transplant Institute Philippinesfvf 09.JPG
- File:05350jfLung Center Kidney Transplant Institute Philippinesfvf 10.JPG
- File:05350jfLung Center Kidney Transplant Institute Philippinesfvf 11.JPG
- File:05350jfLung Center Kidney Transplant Institute Philippinesfvf 12.JPG
- File:05350jfLung Center Kidney Transplant Institute Philippinesfvf 13.JPG
- File:05350jfLung Center Kidney Transplant Institute Philippinesfvf 14.JPG
- File:05350jfLung Center Kidney Transplant Institute Philippinesfvf 16.JPG
- File:05350jfLung Center Kidney Transplant Institute Philippinesfvf 17.JPG
- File:05350jfLung Center Kidney Transplant Institute Philippinesfvf 18.JPG
- File:05350jfLung Center Kidney Transplant Institute Philippinesfvf 19.JPG
- File:05350jfLung Center Kidney Transplant Institute Philippinesfvf 20.JPG
- File:05350jfLung Center Kidney Transplant Institute Philippinesfvf 21.JPG
- File:05350jfLung Center Kidney Transplant Institute Philippinesfvf 24.JPG
- File:05375jfLung Center Kidney Transplant Institute Quezon Cityfvf 03.JPG
- File:05375jfLung Center Kidney Transplant Institute Quezon Cityfvf 04.JPG
- File:05375jfLung Center Kidney Transplant Institute Quezon Cityfvf 07.JPG
- File:05375jfLung Center Kidney Transplant Institute Quezon Cityfvf 08.JPG
- File:05375jfLung Center Kidney Transplant Institute Quezon Cityfvf 09.JPG
- File:05375jfLung Center Kidney Transplant Institute Quezon Cityfvf 11.JPG
- File:05375jfLung Center Kidney Transplant Institute Quezon Cityfvf 12.JPG
- File:05375jfLung Center Kidney Transplant Institute Quezon Cityfvf 14.JPG
Mrcl lxmna (talk) 17:32, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Can be undeleted when COM:FOP is introduced in the Philippines. Photos of the sculpture can be undeleted in 2074 (2003+70+1). Howhontanozaz (talk) 03:19, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 11:42, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Stained class windows of the National Shrine of Our Lady of the Holy Rosary of La Naval de Manila
[edit]https://lakansining.wordpress.com/2020/10/29/quezon-avenue-quezon-city-the-history-santo-domingo-church-and-the-nuestra-senora-del-santisimo-rosario-de-la-naval-de-manila/ - STAINED GLASS WINDOWS by noted modernist painter, architect and heraldrist Galo B. Ocampo, dead 1985 and executed by the renowned Kraut Art Glass. No freedom of panorama in the philippines
- File:0368jfNational Shrine Our Lady Holy Rosary La Naval de Manila Santo Domingofvf 01.jpg
- File:0368jfNational Shrine Our Lady Holy Rosary La Naval de Manila Santo Domingofvf 02.jpg
- File:0368jfNational Shrine Our Lady Holy Rosary La Naval de Manila Santo Domingofvf 03.jpg
- File:0381jfNational Shrine Our Lady Holy Rosary La Naval de Manila Santo Domingofvf 01.jpg
- File:0381jfNational Shrine Our Lady Holy Rosary La Naval de Manila Santo Domingofvf 02.jpg
- File:0381jfNational Shrine Our Lady Holy Rosary La Naval de Manila Santo Domingofvf 03.jpg
- File:0381jfNational Shrine Our Lady Holy Rosary La Naval de Manila Santo Domingofvf 04.jpg
- File:0381jfNational Shrine Our Lady Holy Rosary La Naval de Manila Santo Domingofvf 05.jpg
- File:0381jfNational Shrine Our Lady Holy Rosary La Naval de Manila Santo Domingofvf 06.jpg
- File:0381jfNational Shrine Our Lady Holy Rosary La Naval de Manila Santo Domingofvf 07.jpg
- File:0381jfNational Shrine Our Lady Holy Rosary La Naval de Manila Santo Domingofvf 08.jpg
- File:0381jfNational Shrine Our Lady Holy Rosary La Naval de Manila Santo Domingofvf 09.jpg
- File:0381jfNational Shrine Our Lady Holy Rosary La Naval de Manila Santo Domingofvf 10.jpg
- File:0381jfNational Shrine Our Lady Holy Rosary La Naval de Manila Santo Domingofvf 11.jpg
- File:0381jfNational Shrine Our Lady Holy Rosary La Naval de Manila Santo Domingofvf 12.jpg
- File:0381jfNational Shrine Our Lady Holy Rosary La Naval de Manila Santo Domingofvf 13.jpg
- File:0381jfNational Shrine Our Lady Holy Rosary La Naval de Manila Santo Domingofvf 14.jpg
- File:0396jfNational Shrine Our Lady Holy Rosary La Naval de Manila Santo Domingofvf 07.jpg
- File:0396jfNational Shrine Our Lady Holy Rosary La Naval de Manila Santo Domingofvf 08.jpg
- File:0396jfNational Shrine Our Lady Holy Rosary La Naval de Manila Santo Domingofvf 09.jpg
- File:0396jfNational Shrine Our Lady Holy Rosary La Naval de Manila Santo Domingofvf 10.jpg
- File:0396jfNational Shrine Our Lady Holy Rosary La Naval de Manila Santo Domingofvf 11.jpg
- File:0396jfNational Shrine Our Lady Holy Rosary La Naval de Manila Santo Domingofvf 12.jpg
- File:0411jfNational Shrine Our Lady Holy Rosary La Naval de Manila Santo Domingofvf 03.jpg
- File:0411jfNational Shrine Our Lady Holy Rosary La Naval de Manila Santo Domingofvf 04.jpg
- File:0411jfNational Shrine Our Lady Holy Rosary La Naval de Manila Santo Domingofvf 05.jpg
- File:0411jfNational Shrine Our Lady Holy Rosary La Naval de Manila Santo Domingofvf 08.jpg
- File:0411jfNational Shrine Our Lady Holy Rosary La Naval de Manila Santo Domingofvf 10.jpg
- File:0446jfNational Shrine Our Lady Holy Rosary La Naval de Manila Santo Domingofvf 07.jpg
- File:0446jfNational Shrine Our Lady Holy Rosary La Naval de Manila Santo Domingofvf 08.jpg
- File:0446jfNational Shrine Our Lady Holy Rosary La Naval de Manila Santo Domingofvf 09.jpg
- File:0446jfNational Shrine Our Lady Holy Rosary La Naval de Manila Santo Domingofvf 10.jpg
- File:0446jfNational Shrine Our Lady Holy Rosary La Naval de Manila Santo Domingofvf 11.jpg
- File:0446jfNational Shrine Our Lady Holy Rosary La Naval de Manila Santo Domingofvf 12.jpg
- File:0446jfNational Shrine Our Lady Holy Rosary La Naval de Manila Santo Domingofvf 13.jpg
- File:0446jfNational Shrine Our Lady Holy Rosary La Naval de Manila Santo Domingofvf 14.jpg
- File:0446jfNational Shrine Our Lady Holy Rosary La Naval de Manila Santo Domingofvf 15.jpg
- File:0446jfNational Shrine Our Lady Holy Rosary La Naval de Manila Santo Domingofvf 16.jpg
Mrcl lxmna (talk) 17:36, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Undelete in 2056 (1985+70+1). Howhontanozaz (talk) 03:21, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 11:43, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/SM_City_Sta._Mesa - SM CITY SAN LAZARO BLDG - 1990 bldg. No freedom of panorama in the philippines Mrcl lxmna (talk) 17:49, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 11:44, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/SM_City_Sta._Mesa - SM CITY STA MESA - 1990 bldg. No freedom of panorama in the philippines Mrcl lxmna (talk) 17:50, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 11:44, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
This user doesn't exist ProfessorX (talk) 17:50, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minoraxtalk 11:44, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/SM_City_Sta._Mesa - SM CITY STA MESA - 1990 bldg. No freedom of panorama in the philippines Mrcl lxmna (talk) 17:50, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 11:44, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/SM_City_Sta._Mesa - SM CITY STA MESA - 1990 bldg. No freedom of panorama in the philippines Mrcl lxmna (talk) 17:51, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 11:44, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/SM_City_Sta._Mesa - SM CITY STA MESA - 1990 bldg. No freedom of panorama in the philippines Mrcl lxmna (talk) 17:52, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 11:44, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/SM_City_Sta._Mesa - SM CITY STA MESA - 1990 bldg. No freedom of panorama in the philippines Mrcl lxmna (talk) 17:52, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 11:44, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The film director died in 1976, so photo is not free Kharkivian (talk) 20:34, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Kharkivian, советские фильмы, созданные до 1951 года, в не зависимости от дат жизни его создателей, перешли в общественное достояние.--RetroRave (talk) 20:42, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
- No, that films in PD if director have died before 1951. --Kharkivian (talk) 21:02, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
- Kharkivian, Вы не разбираетесь в правилах, так зачем лезете?--RetroRave (talk) 21:10, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
- this's Belarusfilm. Why "Министерство культуры РФ"?--Чорний Кіт (talk) 21:36, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
- The country of origin for this film is Belarus, not Russia. The Belarusian copyright legislation must be examined. Alex Spade (talk) 10:26, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: by Racconish. --Minoraxtalk 11:45, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No additional educational value beyond File:DSC 0350 (49257684233).jpg. Tokfo (talk) 20:54, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 11:45, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No additional educational value beyond File:DSC 0355 (49257675748).jpg. (Uploader request.) Tokfo (talk) 20:57, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 11:45, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Watermarked, incomplete EXIF Ganímedes (talk) 23:20, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 11:45, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
Photo already taken down. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bull-Doser (talk • contribs) 15:29, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 17:59, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
DELETE AS SOON AS POSIBLE!!! • Copyright Mateo.Hernandez.06 (talk) 02:51, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. — Racconish 💬 18:00, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
The map of the state is too small. TylerKutschbach (talk) 18:12, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, just use crop tool. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:36, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
The map is too small TylerKutschbach (talk) 03:04, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per precedent. — Racconish 💬 18:00, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
The map is too small TylerKutschbach (talk) 03:19, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
Speedy keep see above. --Ras67 (talk) 16:44, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 18:36, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Looks as if is copied from elsewhere (book?). Doubt if the uploader is the real maker. Why else should this Dutch uploader make this file in English language, in order to use in the Dutch Wikipedia? (And why the French title?) Erik Wannee (talk) 05:51, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (PCP). — Racconish 💬 18:01, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Leonid Brezhnev in 1972
[edit]it seems that Commons:Nationaal Archief doesn't actually own copyright on these photos. It is some Soviet photosession which Nationaal Archief isn't likely to perform. For example, File:Staatshoofden, portretten, Bestanddeelnr 925-6564.jpg. RIAN says that this photo belong to them, they even have author details and so on. Yes, RIAN version is a little retouched but it is not surprising as it is a Soviet photo of the leader. The original underlying shot is the same for them anyway
- File:Leonid Brezhnev.jpg
- File:Leonid Brezjnev.jpg
- File:Staatshoofden, portretten, Bestanddeelnr 925-6563.jpg
- File:Staatshoofden, portretten, Bestanddeelnr 925-6564.jpg
rubin16 (talk) 06:28, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. As the Nationaal Archief (which is the source of the these images) says under the "Direct Download"-button: "You can copy, modify and distribute the image, even for commercial purposes, all without asking permission." See here and here. If there is some problem with the copyrights, RIAN should contact the Nationaal Archief, and ask to remove this text. We can have a discussion around these files on Commons after that happened.Jeff5102 (talk) 11:47, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
- That is not the right way of thinking from my point of view to say that "unless author writes somewhere, we consider it free". We have COM:PCP and we have reasonable doubt here that the photo of the Soviet leader was made not by the main Soviet agency but some agency from abroad. rubin16 (talk) 12:25, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
- COM:PCP is about the "significant doubt about the freedom of a particular file." The Nationaal Archief is a reknowned, reliable institution. It states on it's website it is the copyrightholder. I have no reason to doubt they did have any reason to make false claims about that. Is there any discussion on Commons on matters like a "shared copyright" or something? If so, please show it to me. If not: feel free to start one at the correct noticeboard. Regards,Jeff5102 (talk) 13:23, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
- Even reliable institutions make mistakes as there are just the same humans inside... there are various examples here in DRs like NASA copyrighted photos made by others (Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2006/01#Venera_images_after_1973, Commons:Deletion requests/Buran photos), other institutions are also there, you can just browse through the histories of DRs. rubin16 (talk) 13:54, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
- Good point. Now, let's see what the administrators have to say. Regards,Jeff5102 (talk) 14:06, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
- Even reliable institutions make mistakes as there are just the same humans inside... there are various examples here in DRs like NASA copyrighted photos made by others (Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2006/01#Venera_images_after_1973, Commons:Deletion requests/Buran photos), other institutions are also there, you can just browse through the histories of DRs. rubin16 (talk) 13:54, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
- COM:PCP is about the "significant doubt about the freedom of a particular file." The Nationaal Archief is a reknowned, reliable institution. It states on it's website it is the copyrightholder. I have no reason to doubt they did have any reason to make false claims about that. Is there any discussion on Commons on matters like a "shared copyright" or something? If so, please show it to me. If not: feel free to start one at the correct noticeboard. Regards,Jeff5102 (talk) 13:23, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: We have many photos from the Anefo collection and I see no reason ti doubt these. But the so called extracted versions in colour are clearly not extractred from the BW and it seems reasonable to apply PCP to these. — Racconish 💬 17:42, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
COM:Derivative work of an announcement/poster with illustration. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:40, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 17:29, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by HAMMER Sport AG (talk · contribs)
[edit]Files apparently uploaded by a company account for de:Hammer Sport – thanks for that, but please be aware that for this kind of image we require a written permission from the copyright holder. This is to make sure that it's really the company releasing their images rather than some kind of fan breaking copyright laws. Please refer to COM:OTRS (deutsche Version hier) for instructions.
- File:Hammer logo black.jpg
- File:Hammer image 2.jpg
- File:MIKASA LOGO NEU 2010 Kopie.jpg
- File:HAMMER Store.jpg
- File:Hammer image.jpg
- File:HAMMER basketball.jpg
- File:Finnlo.jpg
- File:HAMMER BOXING.jpg
El Grafo (talk) 08:34, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, except logos too simple. — Racconish 💬 17:28, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
Not a work of US Gov. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:48, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 17:27, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
File:The Conservation atlas of tropical forests - Asia and the Pacific (IA conservationatla91coll).pdf
[edit]Not a work of US Gov. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:49, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 17:27, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
File:Beaver-Swift-Skyles timber sale project - environmental assessment (IA beaverswiftskyle2009mont).pdf
[edit]State agency in Montana produced this, Not a federal entitiy? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:50, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 17:25, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
Not a work os US Govt. UK publication ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:50, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 17:26, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
wrong name DiAuras (talk) 09:58, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — Racconish 💬 17:25, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
copyright AndLikeThings (talk) 12:05, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
- Keep no valid reason for deletion. M.Bitton (talk) 13:35, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — Racconish 💬 17:23, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Actia Group (talk · contribs)
[edit]Low quality marketing images. File:Les engagements du groupe ACTIA.jpg looks like it is a stock photo, very widely available.
- File:Les engagements du groupe ACTIA.jpg
- File:Le savoir-faire du groupe ACTIA.jpg
- File:Division telecom.jpg
- File:Division automotive.jpg
- File:Actia - Our market.png
MKFI (talk) 13:14, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 17:23, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
Infringement of copyright, text copied and pasted from another work. Uploaded by mistake. AnkyLose (talk) 13:20, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 17:22, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
Copyrighted book cover. MKFI (talk) 13:55, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 17:21, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
wrong name DiAuras (talk) 14:18, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — Racconish 💬 17:21, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
The licence info says that someone else took this photo, no evidence they released it under an appropriately free licence. Joseph2302 (talk) 15:02, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 17:21, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
wrong name DiAuras (talk) 15:39, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — Racconish 💬 17:20, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
wrong name DiAuras (talk) 15:49, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — Racconish 💬 17:20, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Wrong Name Pmeenaloshini (talk) 16:02, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — Racconish 💬 17:19, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
Wrong Name Pmeenaloshini (talk) 16:03, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — Racconish 💬 17:20, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
_(cropped).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Per COM:PACKAGE A1Cafel (talk) 16:16, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 17:19, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
Lo sentimos, esta imagen no es interesante para una enciclopedia DizzyWithSuccess (talk) 16:56, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 17:18, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This statue was built in 2014. [2] No FoP in Japan for 3D works. Yuraily Lic (talk) 17:34, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 17:18, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files in Category:Fujiko･F･Fujio Museum
[edit]COM:DW of copyrighted works. No FoP in Japan for 2D works.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yuraily Lic (talk) 17:43, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 17:18, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
Photo by Associated Press (see [3]), not by U.S. military or Department of Defense employee, therefore not in public domain. Urara Haru 麗春 19:25, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
![[3]](https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-6CM3i9TXalY/WyE2NHfiMwI/AAAAAAAALbs/sAQIMhmsbMQ2BADGQz_mZNEZF0HSa7AuwCEwYBhgL/s640/134.png)){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 17:17, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope unused personal logo George Chernilevsky talk 20:00, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 17:15, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
No more picture Navigator84 (talk) 20:31, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 17:15, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
German publication , Not a work of US Gov. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:53, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Racconish at 17:26, 25 June 2021 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bonner zoologische Monographien (IA bonnerzoologisc472000bonn).pdf --Krdbot 02:10, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
https://www.philstar.com/business/real-estate/2005/07/08/285557/sm-city-san-lazaro-opens - SM CITY SAN LAZARO BLDG - 2005 bldg by Jose Siao Ling and Associates. No freedom of panorama in the philippines Mrcl lxmna (talk) 17:42, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ✗plicit 04:50, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
https://www.philstar.com/business/real-estate/2005/07/08/285557/sm-city-san-lazaro-opens - SM CITY SAN LAZARO BLDG - 2005 bldg by Jose Siao Ling and Associates. No freedom of panorama in the philippines Mrcl lxmna (talk) 17:43, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ✗plicit 04:50, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
https://www.philstar.com/business/real-estate/2005/07/08/285557/sm-city-san-lazaro-opens - SM CITY SAN LAZARO BLDG - 2005 bldg by Jose Siao Ling and Associates. No freedom of panorama in the philippines Mrcl lxmna (talk) 17:44, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ✗plicit 04:49, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Tayuman Center
[edit]Mall bldg. No freedom of panorama in the phils.
- File:06064jfSan Lazaro Catholic Trade Center Espirtu Santo School Santa Cruz Manilafvf 08.jpg
- File:06064jfSan Lazaro Catholic Trade Center Espirtu Santo School Santa Cruz Manilafvf 09.jpg
- File:06064jfSan Lazaro Catholic Trade Center Espirtu Santo School Santa Cruz Manilafvf 10.jpg
- File:06064jfSan Lazaro Catholic Trade Center Espirtu Santo School Santa Cruz Manilafvf 11.jpg
- File:06064jfSan Lazaro Catholic Trade Center Espirtu Santo School Santa Cruz Manilafvf 12.jpg
- File:06098jfSan Lazaro Catholic Trade Center Espirtu Santo School Santa Cruz Manilafvf 01.jpg
- File:06098jfSan Lazaro Catholic Trade Center Espirtu Santo School Santa Cruz Manilafvf 02.jpg
- File:06098jfSan Lazaro Catholic Trade Center Espirtu Santo School Santa Cruz Manilafvf 06.jpg
- File:06098jfSan Lazaro Catholic Trade Center Espirtu Santo School Santa Cruz Manilafvf 07.jpg
- File:06098jfSan Lazaro Catholic Trade Center Espirtu Santo School Santa Cruz Manilafvf 08.jpg
- File:06109jfSan Lazaro Tayuman Espirtu Santo School Santa Cruz Manilafvf 03.jpg
- File:06109jfSan Lazaro Tayuman Espirtu Santo School Santa Cruz Manilafvf 05.jpg
- File:06109jfSan Lazaro Tayuman Espirtu Santo School Santa Cruz Manilafvf 06.jpg
- File:06109jfSan Lazaro Tayuman Espirtu Santo School Santa Cruz Manilafvf 07.jpg
- File:06109jfSan Lazaro Tayuman Espirtu Santo School Santa Cruz Manilafvf 08.jpg
- File:09478 jfTayuman Street School Tondo Buildings Manilafvf 07.jpg
- File:09478 jfTayuman Street School Tondo Buildings Manilafvf 08.jpg
- File:09704jfRoads Rizal Avenue Santa Cruz Schools Churches Landmarksfvf 07.JPG
- File:09704jfRoads Rizal Avenue Santa Cruz Schools Churches Landmarksfvf 08.JPG
- File:09704jfRoads Rizal Avenue Santa Cruz Schools Churches Landmarksfvf 09.JPG
- File:09704jfRoads Rizal Avenue Santa Cruz Schools Churches Landmarksfvf 10.JPG
- File:09704jfRoads Rizal Avenue Santa Cruz Schools Churches Landmarksfvf 13.JPG
- File:09704jfRoads Rizal Avenue Santa Cruz Schools Churches Landmarksfvf 14.JPG
- File:09704jfRoads Rizal Avenue Santa Cruz Schools Churches Landmarksfvf 15.JPG
- File:09725jfRoads Rizal Avenue Santa Cruz Schools Churches Landmarksfvf 01.JPG
- File:09725jfRoads Rizal Avenue Santa Cruz Schools Churches Landmarksfvf 06.JPG
Mrcl lxmna (talk) 17:54, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ✗plicit 04:19, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Duplication of File:1 Heathgate, Hampstead Garden Suburb, June 2021.jpg No Swan So Fine (talk) 13:38, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 14:37, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
Copyrighted book cover. MKFI (talk) 13:56, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 14:37, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by A1Cafel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derived from a deleted file — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 16:05, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Keep Image in use. --— D Y O L F 77[Talk] 16:06, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Source file wasn't deleted due to copyright problems. --Minoraxtalk 14:37, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
its from copyvios BotLachis (talk) 15:41, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep In use and copyvios don't generally have EXIFs. Rodhullandemu (talk) 17:30, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
Kept: File is in use (in scope) and source file wasn't deleted due to copyright problem. --Wdwd (talk) 13:00, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope unused personal photo of non-contributor George Chernilevsky talk 19:32, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 14:36, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope unused personal photo of non-contributor George Chernilevsky talk 19:33, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 14:36, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
COM:DW of a copyrighted work. Yuraily Lic (talk) 17:39, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Yasu (talk) 15:46, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
COM:DW of a copyrighted map. No FoP in Japan for 2D works. Yuraily Lic (talk) 17:47, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Yasu (talk) 15:48, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Юлія Слободянюк (talk · contribs)
[edit]Author info, "FBMD" or other information in metadata that indicates these images are not the uploader's work.
- File:Селищний голова.jpg
- File:Спорт Авангард.jpg
- File:Житло дітям.jpg
- File:Колектив ЦНАП.jpg
- File:Скейт-парк, с. Прилиманське.jpg
- File:КЗ “Центр безпеки громадян”.jpg
- File:ЦНАП Авангардівської селищної ради.jpg
- File:Zvit 2019 08.jpg
- File:Авангардівська-селищна-рада-адмінбудівля.jpg
- File:Изображение viber 2020-10-20 15-50-52.jpg
- File:Лого Авангард33 curv (1) — копия.jpg
_%E2%80%94_%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%BF%D0%B8%D1%8F.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Ytoyoda (talk) 15:59, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:05, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Юлія Слободянюк (talk · contribs)
[edit]“FBMD” in metadata. Previously published photographs require COM:OTRS verification.
- File:Будівництво ЗОШ на 240 місць.jpg
- File:ЗДО "Мадагаскар", смт Авангард.jpg
- File:Сквер імені В. Добрянського.jpg
- File:Село Прилиманське.jpg
Ytoyoda (talk) 11:51, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - also published in other websites. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:27, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
Als Bildschirmfoto ganz sicher kein eigenes Werk. Es ist zu klären, ob wenigstens die Quelle gemeinfrei war (Gründung des Corps1864, das kann demnach durchaus sein, muss aber geklärt werden) GerritR (talk) 12:24, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - unlikely to be own work. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:29, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Domaine Carneros Winery
[edit]Words are also copyrighted - and these three plaques ARE NOT public domain. They were placed on Domaine Carneros by the owners of the property - Champagne Tattinger, as if to make it into a faux-historic property. These plaques are not from the California Historical Landmarks or National listings - so they aren't PD.
- File:Domaine Carneros Vineyards & Winery, Sonoma Valley, California, USA (5373863357).jpg
- File:Domaine Carneros Vineyards & Winery, Sonoma Valley, California, USA (5571166472).jpg
- File:Domaine Carneros, Napa Valley, CA USA - panoramio (4).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Missvain (talk) 13:55, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:30, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
In regards to a recent Afd which deleted the mainspace the image was used for. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 14:06, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:31, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:41, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
Copyvio (no given proof of PD permission) ManuRoquette (talk) 15:08, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:42, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
_(cropped).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Date of publishing needs to be verified to check if the PD license is correct A1Cafel (talk) 15:49, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination - unclear copyright status. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:44, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
Copyright violation? This photo is also on https://ruralexploration.co.za/Kroondal.html, where I could not find that you may reuse photos; I think it was made by Horst Müller: AND I do not see an OTRS permission JopkeB (talk) 16:12, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: no permission. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:45, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
What's the value of this template? Timk70 (talk) 01:00, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept: National rationale for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 22:39, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
Derivative work copyright violation: there is no freedom of panorama for any copyrighted public art in the United States (post-1989 artworks).
- Details
- Name: Catalyst
- Date unveiled: June 24, 2004
- Artist: Beverly Stucker Precious (COM:OTRS correspondence of permission from her is a must, if she agrees the image of her artwork to be licensed commercially).
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:15, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
![01:15, 18 June 2021 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2021/06/18#c-JWilz12345-2021-06-18T01:15:00.000Z-File:"Catalyst"_Minnetrista,_Muncie,_Indiana.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 22:39, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
![22:39, 26 July 2021 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2021/06/18#c-Missvain-2021-07-26T22:39:00.000Z-File:"Catalyst"_Minnetrista,_Muncie,_Indiana.jpg){kind=link}
Files in Category:Vdara
[edit]Derivative work copyright violation: there is no freedom of panorama for any copyrighted public art in the United States (post-1989 artworks).
- Details
- Name: Big Edge
- Date created/unveiled: 2009
- Artist: Nancy Rubins (COM:OTRS correspondence of permission from her is a must, if she agrees the image of her artwork to be licensed commercially).
- Source: [4]
- File:Vdara Hotel (7982858943).jpg
- File:Vdara Hotel (7982871926).jpg
- File:Vdara Hotel (7982875097).jpg
- File:Vdara Hotel (7982885014).jpg
- File:Vdara Hotel (7982889164).jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:30, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 22:39, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
non-free image, from youtube channel Barbarian (talk) 06:03, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:40, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
License on this page indicates KOGL v4, which disallowed commercial use and the make of derivative works A1Cafel (talk) 07:39, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:40, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
License on this page indicates KOGL v4, which disallowed commercial use and the make of derivative works A1Cafel (talk) 07:39, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:40, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
Not used. PNG and JPG exist and SVG is available here https://www.gruen-weiss-mannheim.de/fileadmin/Publikationen/Klubmagazin_2017.pdf Nordat (talk) 08:11, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:40, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
Delete there was no need to make and upload this image of a sent email and to even have it in the media file being just a copy of what was sent to the Volunteer Response Team. {{OTRS pending}} would have been fine. Ww2censor (talk) 10:26, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:40, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
this file is not suitable for uploud Raja Adeel Janjua (talk) 10:41, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Please provide a policy-based rationale for deletion. Thank you. --Missvain (talk) 22:41, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
this file is not perfect for uploud Raja Adeel Janjua (talk) 10:44, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Please provide a policy-based rationale for deletion. Thank you. --Missvain (talk) 22:41, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
_British_India_Army_(1906).jpg){kind=link}
_British_India_Army_(1906).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
this is not a complete and perfect file Raja Adeel Janjua (talk) 10:47, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Please provide a policy-based rationale for deletion. Thank you. --Missvain (talk) 22:41, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D signs in Singapore. Per Template:FoP-Singapore, freedom of panorama in Singapore does not apply to, among other things, two-dimensional works such as billboards, murals, paintings in art galleries and museums, posters and signs. Seloloving (talk) 11:22, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:41, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D signs in Singapore. Per Template:FoP-Singapore, freedom of panorama in Singapore does not apply to, among other things, two-dimensional works such as billboards, murals, paintings in art galleries and museums, posters and signs. Seloloving (talk) 11:26, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:41, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Vikrantjit Saikia (talk) 11:58, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:41, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
The autor of this file will upload it Joveperla (talk) 16:15, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:41, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
https://lakansining.wordpress.com/2020/06/12/east-avenue-quezon-city-the-art-collection-of-the-philippine-heart-center/ PHILIPPINE HEART CENTER - 1975 by Arch. Jorge Yatco Ramos (born 1937). No freedom of panorama in the philippines. Mrcl lxmna (talk) 17:37, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:42, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
Per Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/New_Zealand#Government_works, works of the New Zealand government (which I presume includes the NZ police) are under crown copyright, not PD. Source website has a copyright notice and does not explicitly indicate that the image is PD, and since it does not attribute an author to this headshot it's not clear whether it's theirs to license anyway. GeneralNotability (talk) 17:42, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:42, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
https://www.philstar.com/business/real-estate/2005/07/08/285557/sm-city-san-lazaro-opens - SM CITY SAN LAZARO BLDG - 2005 bldg by Jose Siao Ling and Associates. No freedom of panorama in the philippines Mrcl lxmna (talk) 17:44, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:42, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:168 Shopping Mall
[edit]https://asyadesign.com.ph/projects/168-shopping-mall/ - 168 MALL - by ASYA DESIGN ARCHITECTS. No freedom of panoeama in the philippines
- File:WTMP A-trio b14 2.JPG
- File:WTMP caladcarens B-14.JPG
- File:WTMP Flashbang b14.JPG
- File:WTMP po-kus 0169.JPG
- File:WTMP po-kus 0170.JPG
- File:WTMP po-kus 0172.JPG
- File:WTMP Team Waka Waka B-14.JPG
Mrcl lxmna (talk) 17:58, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. Building not in public domain; per w:168 Shopping Mall, this was opened in mid-2000s. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:29, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:42, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
copyvio; artist died in 2004; no fop. Martin Sg. (talk) 18:04, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. There is no FOP for any copyrighted indoor works in Germany. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 12:00, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:42, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I was trying to upload the source SVG of this map but I did not manage to do so. This file was a placeholder and is no longer necessary. I uploaded the PNG version of this map here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Islamic_State_Offensive_in_Iraq_(June_2014).png Rr016 (talk) 18:20, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:42, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Townsend died in 2013. His artworks are copyrighted in the UK until 2084. DrKay (talk) 19:31, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:43, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
_all-in-one_zoom_lens.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_all-in-one_zoom_lens.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
"Tamron USA" & "Own work". Yeah sure (aka I heavily doubt that) D-Kuru (talk) 20:24, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:43, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
_on_June_18.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_on_June_18.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
no use, superseded by https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:03L_2021-06-18_1625Z.jpg FleurDeOdile (talk) 22:08, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
_on_June_18.png){kind=link}
- Delete Horrible quality image. Can be replaced. --A1Cafel (talk) 03:25, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:43, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
_on_June_18.png){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by 1989 as {{Logo}}
- Keep IMHO within {{PD-textlogo}} Ras67 (talk) 00:07, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept: PD-textlogo. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:38, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
No exif info, seems not uploader's own work. (｀・ω・´) (talk) 01:43, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:SCOPE: Unidentified person. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:39, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
No exif info, seems not uploader's own work.
(｀・ω・´) (talk) 01:44, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:SCOPE: Unidentified person. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:39, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
looks kinda pointless to me, the same logo already exists as File:Wikisource-logo-en.png or even File:Wikisource-logo-fr-en.svg, the colors are incorrect and there is too much jpeg artefacts (with very small size) for it to be useful. - Nutshinou Talk! 22:15, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
- Keep These aren't identical and it was made as part of the design process for Wikisource's logo. Did you even look at the usages? —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:00, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
- I did, and noticed the .png version of this logo was deleted for being superseded by File:Wikisource-logo.svg, a bunch of other icons on the wikisource page were also deleted with the reason "contest is over". - Nutshinou Talk! 15:25, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept: In use = automatically in COM:SCOPE. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:40, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
I doubt these are photos are done by the uploader as stated. Different sizes, different Mete-Data. But all with the same date. And the only uploads by te user.
- File:F-5EM 4th GEN - Brazil FAB.jpg
- File:Brazil F-5 EM cockpit 2.jpg
- File:Brazil F-5 EM cockpit 1.jpg
- File:Brazil F-5 EM cockpit 3.jpg
Avron (talk) 07:26, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:50, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
False identification, duplicate of File:Vera Effigies Turcorvm Imperatoris Ibrahim Filii, Et Sultanæ, Eiusdem Matris (1707).jpg Phso2 (talk) 07:44, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:51, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
Je viens de le vectoriser, voir https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Retroingenierie_-_Byrne.svg Link Mauve (talk) 14:34, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:52, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Regrettably, I believe this license is laundered. The Flickr album that contained this is full of 1980s culture-related photographs, many of which are admittedly not taken by the uploader. This appears no different, and, given that many of the photographs in this album have extensive descriptions, one would expect this to have one as well if the uploader had been fortunate enough to photograph Ms. Bush. Additionally, I found a better version of this photograph on Tumblr with an upload date two years before this was uploaded to Flickr. Rebbing 08:30, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
Keep The Flickr image was reviewed by FlickreviewR and has proven that the stated license is valid. There is no need for deleting any images that were reviewed by the FlickreviewR bot that say that the license is valid (check marks in the permissions section). --173.55.239.44 19:27, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
Comment I think FlickreviewR just verifies that the claimed license was active on flickr when the file was uploaded, not that the license claim on flickr is valid. Mlpearc (open channel) 21:03, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
Comment- possible permission from original copyright holder needed! --173.55.239.44 04:28, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:30, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
appears to be a case of flickrwashing. user's photo gallery is not similar to this photo 웃OO 17:48, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:54, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
- File:Deshabandhu Bidyapith HS High School, Hojai.jpg
- File:Don Bosco High School, Hojai.jpg
- File:Ardhendu Kumar Dey.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 21:45, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:54, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Boredathome101 (talk · contribs)
[edit]The Flickr's account name is David Lehre, which is Chad Future's real name, the subject depicted in these photos. There is no evidence that the Flickr account belongs to him. Even if it did, we would still require COM:OTRS permission from the original photographers, as they are the ones who hold the copyright to these portraits. At least two of these were previously published in his Instagram account (File:David Lehre.jpg in 2014 and File:Chad Future David Lehre.jpg in 2015). If the account does not belong to him, then it is a case of license laundering.
✗plicit 07:12, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 07:01, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
Έγινε ένα λάθος Ioannis Simitas (talk) 11:36, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 06:59, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Panam2014 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.aljazeera.net/news/reportsandinterviews/2011/11/26/%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AC%D9%86%D8%B2%D9%88%D8%B1%D9%8A-%D8%A8%D9%8A%D9%86-%D8%B9%D9%87%D8%AF%D9%8A%D9%86. File on claimed source has been cropped differently. Per TinEye, Reuters looks to be the original source, but the earliest TinEye has is 2013 broken links. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 22:56, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Ours is from 2012. If you find a pic earlier than 2012 then we can discuss it again. --Sanandros (talk) 20:56, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
This file was uploaded April 2012. It is actually a cropped version of a photo which has been used before 2012, see this post from November 24, 2011 and this post from the next day, which both credit Reuters and the Middle East News Agency as attribution – the second link (for CBC News) stated that the photo was taken on the preceding Thursday (November 24, 2011).
While I could not dig up the original Reuters report nor the Middle East News Agency file, I think it is safe to say that this file was taken before April 2012 and that the copyright belongs to the Middle East News Agency. TGHL ↗ talk 02:09, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Full image at link provided and sourced at link. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:38, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
- @Ellin Beltz: not actually deleted? — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 17:47, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
- Deletion error, file renamed into File:Deletion error 083.jpg. Ellywa (talk) 22:06, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
The file is a screenshot from ANOM, a bait mobile messaging app used in an FBI operation. Although the application is likely to be developed by U.S. federal employees, the contents are likely not made by U.S. federal employees, a prerequisite when declaring a work to be PD-USGov of any kind.
As the contents in the file (a combination of complex sentences in a dialogue) are quite likely to exceed the threshold of originality, the file may actually be copyrighted. 廣九直通車 (talk) 02:42, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
- Comment, the largest sentence doesn't seem to exceed the character limit of file captions set by WMF Legal, which I believe (but could be misremembering) that it's too short for the TOO. That aside, if this genuinely would be copyrighted I would actually be surprised how fucked up copyright systems truly are as these sentences are really short, but then again, almost everything is copyrighted. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 05:44, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
- Comment, new to all this, but per Commons:De_minimis case 3 it seems it should be allowed? The chat app would be unexplainable without chat messages, and each bit of text is so minimal it would be hard to argue copyright. I would be interested to see if @Donald Trung: could uncover the bit of policy he referenced. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Scaledish (talk • contribs) 17:03, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
- Not policy, some vague statements by WMF Legal that were referenced when the "File captions"
bugfeature was introduced, can't recall where I saw the references, but half of those discussions usually happen on the Meta-Wiki and I ain't searching anything over yonder. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 18:10, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
- Not policy, some vague statements by WMF Legal that were referenced when the "File captions"
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Nomination not compelling. No indication that it is not a work of USGov. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:37, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
This is a duplicate of another photo in this album. However, this copy was uploaded when I still used a photo service and website which are no longer in existence. The other photo has all the correct information. Gary Lee Todd (talk) 08:19, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
- Please provide link to the other photo. Thanks. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:52, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. No other image was found in Category. No reply from nominator. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:36, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
No evidence that the image is under an acceptable free licence. Ownership or possession of a photo, proprietorship of the equipment used to take the photo, or being the subject of the photo does not equate holding the copyright. The copyright holder is the photographer (i.e. the person who took the photo), rather that the subject (the person who appears in the photo) or the person possessing the photo, unless transferred by operation of law (e.g. inheritance, etc.) or by contract (written and signed by the copyright holder, and explicitly transfers the copyright). Timtrent (talk) 10:04, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:35, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
No evidence that the image is under an acceptable free licence. Ownership or possession of a photo, proprietorship of the equipment used to take the photo, or being the subject of the photo does not equate holding the copyright. The copyright holder is the photographer (i.e. the person who took the photo), rather that the subject (the person who appears in the photo) or the person possessing the photo, unless transferred by operation of law (e.g. inheritance, etc.) or by contract (written and signed by the copyright holder, and explicitly transfers the copyright). Timtrent (talk) 10:06, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:35, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
Screenshot from another Wikipedia. Additionally No evidence that the image is under an acceptable free licence. Ownership or possession of a photo, proprietorship of the equipment used to take the photo, or being the subject of the photo does not equate holding the copyright. The copyright holder is the photographer (i.e. the person who took the photo), rather that the subject (the person who appears in the photo) or the person possessing the photo, unless transferred by operation of law (e.g. inheritance, etc.) or by contract (written and signed by the copyright holder, and explicitly transfers the copyright). Timtrent (talk) 10:06, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:35, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
Original file File:ErikaMorri.png was deleted due to lack of source for the derivative work A1Cafel (talk) 16:21, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
- The original deletion is inconsistent and this RfD has no reason to exist. The photograph was loaded by Erika Morri herself, a capped player of the Italian natioanl rugby union team. -- Blackcat
16:23, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Take the original deletion to UNDEL if you have issues with this close. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:34, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
,_Rheinstra%C3%9Fe_4.jpg){kind=link}
,_Rheinstra%C3%9Fe_4.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Weil das mein Haus ist, vor dem mein Auto, mit gut erkennbarem Nummernschild steht und ich nicht meine Einwilligung gegeben habe, dieses Bild für die Öffentlichkeit freizugeben. Außerdem stehen noch die Koordinaten dabei, wo ich mit meiner Familie wohne, dreister geht es kaum! 93.200.244.215 14:25, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
,_Rheinstraße_4.jpg){kind=link}
- Nach deutschem Recht ist es zulässig, Aufnahmen von öffentlichem Grund zu machen, ein "Recht am Bild am eigenen Haus" gibt es nicht (siehe dazu auch de:Recht am Bild der eigenen Sache). Da das Haus unter Denkmalschutz steht, besteht darüber hinaus ein enzyklopädisches Interesse an dem Haus und damit auch dem Bild. Ein Löschgrund besteht daher nicht. Ein Interesse an dem Autokennzeichen besteht nicht. Ich habe daher eine neue Version mit verpixeltem Kennzeichen hochgeladen.--Karsten11 (talk) 15:02, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Rosenzweig τ 12:22, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
,_Rheinstraße_4.jpg){kind=link}
,_Rheinstra%C3%9Fe_4.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
Herr Ratzke, schön, dass sie mein Kennzeichen verpixelt haben. Trotzdem steht mein Haus immer noch im Netz, mit Geodaten und Adresse! Löschen Sie das Bild unverzüglich! 93.200.245.241 08:53, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rosenzweig τ 12:22, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Nach meinem Verständnis kann eine CreativeCommons-Lizenz nur vom Rechteinhaber vergeben werden. Das passt mit anonymem Autor nicht zusammen. Da die Warte erst 1953 erbaut wurde, kann der Fotograf auch noch nicht seit 70 Jahren tot sein. Das angegebene Datum ist offensichtlich das Hochladedatum. Würde mich freuen, wenn jemand die Daten ergänzen kann, aber derzeit sehe ich die nötigen Lizenzkriterien als nicht erfüllt an. Andreas Stiasny (talk) 07:50, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
- Die Bilder von der angegebenen Quelle topothek.com sind urheberrechtlich geschützt und nur im Ausnahmefall unter einer CreativeCommons-Lizenz, was für das konkrete Bild nicht der Fall ist. -- Andreas Stiasny (talk) 07:14, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Translation: The uploader has chosen a CreativeCommons license, but the image is not his own work. Images from the source topothek.com are usually not subject to this license, unless this is explicitely stated, which is not the case. The building is from 1953, so it is not possible that the photographer died more than 70 years ago. -- Andreas Stiasny (talk) 21:12, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 21:32, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
