Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2021/06/14

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive June 14th, 2021
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused File 2601:644:4401:4DE0:87:C88E:E9E8:813D 06:26, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Speedily kept as it is in use. Nonsense nomination Rodhullandemu (talk) 07:19, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The Korea Summit changed the license from KOGL v1 to v4 in September 2018, which disallowed commercial use and derivative works. The KOGL v1 license was last available on 30 August 2018. So sorry that images published in or after September 2018 don't fulfill Commons:Licensing requirement. A1Cafel (talk) 02:19, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 08:26, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Caitlyn.456 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The usual case of SPA claiming own work of photos which are 99.99% not theirs. One photo predates WWII, one is taken shortly after, and one is from the 1990s. The first photo is taken from http://www.auschwitz.dk/bilecki.htm or similar website. As usual, the SPA just copied photos from random websites and claimed them as their own.

Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 03:49, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, otrs confirmation needed. — Racconish💬 16:12, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Scarolz

[edit]

Photographs of the artwork of a living artist taken from his website. It looks like the website has no licensing information so would need the artist's permission, and potentially that of whoever actually took the photos.--Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 07:39, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, OTRS confirmation needed. — Racconish💬 16:09, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Girma adnew (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All claimed as own work but... some have FBMD, others are clearly photos of photos and other DW including book covers. None have Exif. I suggest nuking the lot. User cannot be trusted

Gbawden (talk) 10:58, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of scope and/or dubious authorship. — Racconish💬 16:07, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Girma adnew (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Questionable copyright status. Lot of scans, screenshots and images without sources or permission.

Smooth O (talk) 10:59, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:57, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Girma adnew (talk · contribs)

[edit]

User already blocked twice for copyvios. Very unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 11:50, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom and likely scope issues. "Articles" where these are used are being nuked at amwiki; account has been globally locked. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 13:40, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, and account has been globally locked. --Yann (talk) 18:40, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is copyrighted from https://www.time8.in/breaking-congress-veteran-ardhendu-kumar-dey-quits-party-cites-dishonesty-in-party/ Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 11:03, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, speedied as clear copyvio (© Fifth Pillar Media Pvt. Ltd. All rights reserved). --Túrelio (talk) 14:52, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kristinapia (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unllike that own work. Very likely photographed from some television channel. Hint: File:Tiit Härm.png

Estopedist1 (talk) 12:12, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, screenshot. — Racconish💬 16:14, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons is not a place to host tourism photographs or snapshots.

Missvain (talk) 14:49, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 16:04, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dixbly (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Files by this user showing him or his nick/name, they are only usable for his private webpage. All unused, out of scope.

GeorgHHtalk   15:34, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 16:03, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by EstrellaSuecia as Copyvio (copyvio)
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as drawing on cover might eventually be in the public domain. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:59, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete: Túrelio, the presumed author died on October 9, 1952 which means that by Swedish law the copyright remains until at least October 9, 2022 (70 years). In Sweden copyright is valid for 70 years after the authors death. So for another 16 months or so this is most definitely a copyvio. Here is the exact paragraph of the Swedish law mentioning "drawings" among other things as part of this law. Also the picture has a watermark in the left corner that does not make any sense in any regard to the subject or the username that uploaded the picture, which makes me think it's also not "Own work". But that assumption is irrelevant, the copyvio is more than enough reason to delete. EstrellaSuecia (talk) 16:27, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the research. I've put the image into cat:Undelete in 2023. When it finally will have reached PD status, as a 2-dimens. reproduction it can stay on Commons under PD-Art. --Túrelio (talk) 18:07, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 18:07, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fork: File:Arnould Suharev Tower.jpg Lesless (talk) 16:26, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, duplicate-processed. --Túrelio (talk) 19:28, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleting Covid-19 2601:644:4401:4DE0:C090:6FE8:DD7D:57CF 20:25, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 03:42, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleting Image 2601:644:4401:4DE0:C090:6FE8:DD7D:57CF 19:25, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Any reason to delete an img used in multiple articles?
Looks like it's been corrupted, but that's a reason to fix, not delete.
I asked at the map workshop if they could clean it up. It looks fine at full size, only the preview is messed up.
Kwamikagami (talk) 19:56, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I have uploaded a new version were the preview works. Kwamikagami will check so the content is still correct. --always ping me-- Goran tek-en (talk) 11:50, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
One minor omission, mentioned on the workshop page, otherwise it looks good. Kwamikagami (talk) 17:27, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: I'm involved, but closing per other closures of DR's by this anon user: no valid reason for deletion. Kwamikagami (talk) 17:32, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PENIS Déjà vu 16:28, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:32, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low qualitiy image of human penis. 2003:DC:F70D:4E00:50B7:3536:ED2E:E4D1 18:49, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by D-Kuru: low quality penis image - per {{Nopenis}}

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality image of human penis. 2003:DC:F70D:4E00:50B7:3536:ED2E:E4D1 18:51, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by D-Kuru: low quality penis image - per {{Nopenis}}

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No encylopaedic relevance. Possible personality rights vio. 62.216.207.31 20:32, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept Housekeeping. Bundle at Commons:Deletion requests/File:177.Before.DykeMarch.WDC.7June2019 (51240382990).jpg (non-admin closure)--A1Cafel (talk) 15:19, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No encylopaedic relevance. Possible personality rights vio. 62.216.207.31 20:32, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept Housekeeping. Bundle at Commons:Deletion requests/File:177.Before.DykeMarch.WDC.7June2019 (51240382990).jpg (non-admin closure)--A1Cafel (talk) 15:20, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No encylopaedic relevance. Possible personality rights vio. 62.216.207.31 20:33, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept Housekeeping. Bundle at Commons:Deletion requests/File:177.Before.DykeMarch.WDC.7June2019 (51240382990).jpg (non-admin closure)--A1Cafel (talk) 15:20, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No encylopaedic relevance. Possible personality rights vio. 62.216.207.31 20:33, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept Housekeeping. Bundle at Commons:Deletion requests/File:177.Before.DykeMarch.WDC.7June2019 (51240382990).jpg (non-admin closure)--A1Cafel (talk) 15:20, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No encylopaedic relevance. Possible personality rights vio. 62.216.207.31 20:33, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept Housekeeping. Bundle at Commons:Deletion requests/File:177.Before.DykeMarch.WDC.7June2019 (51240382990).jpg (non-admin closure)--A1Cafel (talk) 15:21, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No encylopaedic relevance. Possible personality rights vio. 62.216.207.31 20:34, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept Housekeeping. Bundle at Commons:Deletion requests/File:177.Before.DykeMarch.WDC.7June2019 (51240382990).jpg (non-admin closure)--A1Cafel (talk) 15:21, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Unused personal photo A1Cafel (talk) 03:23, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:35, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Unused personal photo A1Cafel (talk) 03:24, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:35, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Unused personal photo A1Cafel (talk) 03:24, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:35, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image of a non-notable musical group. Out of scope. Johnj1995 (talk) 04:54, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:38, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Zhang contruction (talk · contribs)

[edit]

image of an unnotable person, unclear source (one from facebook), advertising

Migebert (talk) 07:37, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:39, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope photoshop - Nutshinou Talk! 10:35, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:42, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self-advertisement/profile picture (uploaded by YokoTari themselves) - Nutshinou Talk! 10:38, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:43, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self-advertisement/profile picture (uploaded by YokoTari themselves) - Nutshinou Talk! 10:38, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:43, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo. Out of focus version of Taller de los sentidos.JPG. Malcolma (talk) 10:49, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:44, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo Spicy (talk) 13:52, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:45, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:11, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:47, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:48, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:49, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:02, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:49, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Skbuddhavarapu (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams/ Some are duplicates. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:45, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:50, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SofiaGoncharuk (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. Used on user page.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:52, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. Used on user page. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:52, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chart of questionable notability. Should be in tabular data, MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:49, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:54, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Laura Geib (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as w:En:Help:Table to relevant project if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:56, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:55, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chart of questionable notability. Should be in tabular data, MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:56, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:56, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial flag. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:59, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:57, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ytgames55 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Logos and crests seemingly for a group of friends - COM:OOS.

Kissa21782 (talk) 18:53, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:58, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurry picture of a screen, no value. Kissa21782 (talk) 18:58, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:59, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:00, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by BeritaSelebgram (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photos, no educational value, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   20:48, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:11, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by The Uyata 2.0 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Bad qualily symbols/logos. Out of scope: Neither realistically useful for an educational purpose, nor legitimately in use.

Urara Haru 麗春 22:36, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:13, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No proof of permission of the copyright holder or the portrayed person to publicly transmit or display the photograph. The image has been previously published in other media with no indication of a license that allows use for third parties. Examples of previous publication: 1, 2, 3. Awikimate (talk) 11:12, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and no license at all. --JuTa 05:34, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by John.Koutsogiannis (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:03, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and no licennse at all. --JuTa 09:37, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and no license at all. --JuTa 09:58, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio. Search image on Google. NMW03 (talk) 13:24, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:58, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

License on this page indicates KOGL v3, which disallowed the production of derivative works A1Cafel (talk) 02:28, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 06:58, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

License on this page indicates KOGL v3, which disallowed the production of derivative works A1Cafel (talk) 02:28, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 06:58, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work violation: contemporary Angono monuments and there is no FOP in the Philippines yet. The city (municipality of Angono) doesn't hold copyright over these as the uploader Judgefloro falsely claimed before.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:25, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. plicit 06:56, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These two are more problematic: DW of tarpaulins. These may be government commissioned but, see COM:COMM Philippines.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:26, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. plicit 06:56, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non-free image, no permission to be uploaded to commons Lugnuts (talk) 09:24, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 06:56, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright no own work Rameshe999 (talk) 10:01, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: complex logo. --plicit 06:57, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This sculpture was created by artist David L. Spellenberg in 1999 as a commission for Black Stallion Winery. It is NOT in the public domain and is copyrighted. This is per COMMONS:FOP in the US. You can read more about the artwork here.

Missvain (talk) 20:41, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete COM:FOP US shows that 3-d artworks are not subject to freedom of panorama in the US. As this is a 1999 work, there was also no need for any copyright marks or registrations, so these are derivative photos of a non-free work. De728631 (talk) 21:02, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. plicit 06:59, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small photo without metadata, the user's only upload. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 08:34, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Official Photo from Website. The other photo is more than 7 Years old!!Commons — Preceding unsigned comment added by Torsten Neufeld (talk • contribs) 13:56, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation. Source --Bubo 13:44, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No Copyright Violation. They want to change the picture! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Torsten Neufeld (talk • contribs) 11:42, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, first image-version deleted as copyvio. --Túrelio (talk) 18:54, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably screenshot of the TV serial RadhaKrishn Junior Jumper (formerly ) 11:08, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 09:01, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Label appears to be the focus here - the graphic is a copyright violation. Missvain (talk) 00:02, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted, the wine company was founded in 1979, so label artwork would not be PD. DW by Flickr photographer. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:42, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This map with flags is full of inaccuracies. First, not all districts shown here have flags. Second, some of them have coat of arms instead of flags in this map. Third, some are the symbols of other places in Argentina of similar name. Frodar (talk) 00:57, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per nom. Dubious, unused, uncat. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:44, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Russia for monuments. EugeneZelenko (talk) 03:39, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted per above. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:46, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image grabbed from Google Maps NinjaStrikers «» 03:42, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete obvious copyvio. The author of the image from Google Maps is "Yote Shin Premium" who is certainly not the user "Min Chit Thu (Netso)". JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:08, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted per above. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:47, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ramon FVelasquez (talk · contribs) 1

[edit]

No freedom of panorama in the Philippines. Some photos show other photos and it is possible that some of those other photos might be old. The uploader has also uploaded photos of lots of buildings and 3D artworks in the Philippines. Is there some site where architects and dates of death of architects can be located so as to determine if the buildings are in the public domain or not?

Stefan4 (talk) 19:40, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"Alien" and "UFO" files by Ramon FVelasquez

Photos of flash reflecting of dust that are presented as photos of aliens and UFO's. Hoax, patent nonsense, utterly unusable, garbage.

List of files

P199 (talk) 03:16, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

They could (or are already) be sorted into Category:Photographical orbs - examples of that. Not sure about that mass and quality (if we can/should talk about quality while illustratic a photographic error)... The comment at File:911 unknown objectjf8.JPG ("Considering the essence of the picture, I humbly submit and request that this photo be nominated as candidate for Picture of the Day of 2012 Year.") is a bit strange, indeed... --Saibo (Δ) 11:59, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The first set deleted as derived works of other copyrighted works (photographs, plaques etc) where no exception according to Philippine law appears to exist, see COM:FOP#Philippines. There are some comments on Ramon FVelasquez's talk page in response to this DR which I have read. One quote:

In fact, Filipino journalists take picture of these daily, and I did so like them.

This is surely correct and even legal as the Philippine law provides a fair use clause in Section 184 Limitations on Copyright. But fair use requires a context under which such derived works are permitted, for example as part of reports of current events by means of photography or for teaching purposes. Wikimedia Commons, however, does not provide such a context as this is a separate project from en-wp and other Wikimedia projects. It is just a media archive where all the content must be free of such context restrictions. Some of these pictures which are currently used at en-wp could be possibly transfered to en-wp under this policy.

I've deleted the second set of supposed ufos etc. as well as being out of scope as they mostly consist of single spots of uncertain origin. To me some of them appear to be even simple dust spots. Exceptions like File:Alien33jf.JPG or File:Orbsaliensjfn.JPG that depict childs are a problem due to personality rights and would require documented parental consent. Likewise File:Orbsaliensjf.JPG appears to be a violation of COM:PEOPLE, too. --AFBorchert (talk) 19:51, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Files uploaded by Ramon FVelasquez (talk · contribs) 3

[edit]

No FOP in the Phillipines.

List of files

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:31, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 18:23, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Files uploaded by Ramon FVelasquez (talk · contribs) 4

[edit]

Unused images of tarpaulins (2 images) and an advertising banner (one image). Out of COM:SCOPE.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:03, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also (by the same uploader): File:Naicjf9776 08.JPG (an advertising board). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:10, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Naicjf9776 07.JPG is a derived work of a plaque which includes a photograph. Unfortunately, there is no freedom of panorama in the Philippines. --AFBorchert (talk) 14:50, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@AFBorchert: it is not a plaque actually, but a kind of tarpaulin. The camera's angle is upwards so it looked like a plaque. But, it contains an underlying portrait of the bishop, so violation of COM:DW. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 15:40, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
In line with foregoing Legal Discussions I humbly beg the Commons Community to Put on Hold and or DEFER Any and All Mass Nominations for Deletions in My Talk Pages by Herein Mass Nominator; I humbly Suggest that Any User of Commons may Re-Nominate Objectively and in Line with the cited a) Legal, b) Moral Reasons and in the c) LIGHT OF the Universal Code of Conduct of Users inter alia
  • CONSOLIDATED Strongest CONTINUING Legal Objection Ever to the Non-Stop Mass Deletions Requests by herein Nominator: Counter-argument: the Supreme Court’s Revised Rules on IP Cases which aimed for Litigation, Driving Innovation and Creativity December 23, 2020: "The Intellectual Property of the Philippines (IPOPHL) said the Supreme Court’s (SC) 2020 Special Rules on the Prosecution of Intellectual Property (IP) Cases is testament to the whole-of-society work in ensuring an effective and speedy adjudication of IP rights cases – essential in creating an environment that fosters innovation, investments and entrepreneurship; it was participated and signed by "IPOPHL Deputy Director General Nelson P. Laluces IPOPHL’s Bureau of Patents Director IV Lolibeth R. Medrano Former IPOPHL DG Ricardo R. Blancaflor IP Rights Practitioner Atty. Ferdinand M Negre IP RIghts Practitioner Atty. Ramon S. Esguerra";
  • The Supreme Court solely interprets the law when a ripe case reaches it via Stare Decision or Obiter Dictum;
  • However, its S.C. Circulars and Memoranda especially En Banc is Law; it is not mere interpretation but obeying its Constitutional Mandate on its Judicial Supremacy; now, the MOMENT has come, UNPRECEDENTED that it was joined by Great Minds including the "IPOPHL Deputy Director General Nelson P. Laluces IPOPHL’s Bureau of Patents Director IV Lolibeth R. Medrano Former IPOPHL DG Ricardo R. Blancaflor IP Rights Practitioner Atty. Ferdinand M Negre IP RIghts Practitioner Atty. Ramon S. Esguerra";
  • Your statement that "SC circular you're pertaining to cannot overwrite Sec. 172.2, xxx is highly misplaced and without any legal support; for the cited 2019 Circular never erased or even interpreted the law but it IMPLEMENTS it enumerating the Formal and Substantive Requirement;
  • On your statement that my "your interpretation of the burden of evidence xxx", I submitted to the Commons Community my Legal Treatise, as User with One Vote, like anyone here, even if I am a Wikimedia Lawyer and Judge; for I hold that I leave the legal policies to foreign Wikimedia Lawyers to vote on Deletion and Non-Deletion;
  • When a Nominator tags for Deletion, even say he or she is an administrator or mere user, as such, he or she cannot be the Prosecutor, the Arbiter, the Trial Judge and Justice who will decide on deletion or keeping; it would turn Commons to “Juez de Cuchillo” - “Law of the Knife”, a Juez de Cuchillo or moral farce, Censorship so to speak;
  • I am 6 of Commons most active editor and uploader; but in my totalt al edit count: 1,700,373+ user has been on Wikimedia Commons for 13 years, 8 months and 2 days, I do Upload and few edits but ZERO tagging of Deletions; I leave that matter to Commons Community;
  • It is a sad day for Commons if a) the Smart One b) a Check user previously on hold c) and now, a Starter of Mass Deletion Requests, flooding my talk pages with Mass Deletions on FOP:
  • If you argue via discussion that I am legally wrong, my fish vendor and hired Trike Drivers joined many open mouths and told me this or that, but they do not have Evidence;
  • Any one can cherry pick Commons Policies to tailormade their stance, however, the Supreme Court and the IPO et Bureau of Copyright already Spoke fully implementing the FOP rules on Copyright Infringement;
  • As Legal Challenge, I demand you to Email the IPO and Bureau of Copyrights and submit all my Legal Contradictions to your Stance, put your cards on the table, since in the Webinar and Communications I had, they are open to Reply as Mandated by the Strict provisions of R.A. 6713, and then let the IPO and Bureau of Copyrights Rule as to Whose Legal Stance on FOP on Commons Uploading is Correct Mine or Yours; then and there, if it will say Delete, then I will appeal the matter to the IBP and or DOJ Secretary for final ruling; Commons is not in a hurry to Grant or Deny your Mass Deletions Request; Commons administrators do Balance the Rights of Commons, the benefits to the Cultural Heritage of Filipinos and the Commons Policies;
  • The Mass Deletion Requests by herein Nominator, I underscore, for clarity's sake - Mass Deletion Requests by herein Nominator are NULL and VOID ab Initio as they are a) Unlawful under Philippine Laws, and b) contrary to the Universal Code of Conduct of Users inter alia;
  • The Mass Deletion Requests by herein Nominator is a Virtual and Desperate Attempt to Erase Valued Images or Most Important Cultural Heritage Treasures of the Philippines from Commons Ownership without any Valid Legal Basis, but just mere copy paste citations or Provisos of Laws, without any Jurisprudential Support - to be specific - rather trying so hard to get the uploads of what seems a fellow countryman deleted, but anyhow I don't think these files should be deleted ...
  • In-scope. Any files that are used by the projects for their own functioning can be in-scope. This extends to useful information that supports Commons deletion discussions;
  • WHEREFORE, premises considered, your Mass Nominations for Deletions, including your legal sayings without any Jurisprudential either Phil or US are hereby DENIED with finality for utter lack of merit in Philippines Law and Fact;
  • In line with foregoing Legal Discussions I humbly beg the Commons Community to Put on Hold and or DEFER Any and All Mass Nominations for Deletions of Herein Nominator; I humbly Suggest that Any User of Commons may Re-Nominate Objectively and in Line with the cited Legal, Moral Reasons and in the LIGHT OF the Universal Code of Conduct of Users inter alia;
  •  Keep I humbly submit the Unabridged Legal Treatise, ONLY as persuasion to Keep; I underscore that amid my Legal Expertise, I have just One Commons Editor Vote co-equal with any Nominator or Opposing Uploader under the Commons Admin who will keep or delete; the foregoing Legal Submissions are not meant to touch upon Commons Legal Policy on FOP;
  •  Keep PREMISES CONSIDERED, I humbly submit and register a the Strongest Legal Objections EVER to the Requested Mass Non-Stop Deletions of herein Nominator and Fervently Appeal to Commons Community to wait for the Supreme Court Ruling on the Matter of FOP and I guess that would be my starting point... I reiterate with all due respect, that I respectfully and humbly submit to the Sound Discretion of the Commons Community considering that the subject photos are National Cultural Treasures Most Valued Photos for present and future generations, very sincerely Judgefloro (talk) 07:09, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
      • a) Your opinion - like that of my b) fish vendor which had tons of wisdom not only in Fish but in Commerce, of my c) Trike Driver who is expert in Transportation - may be believed by the onlookers or Voters in Elections Periods; but without Citation of Philippine Jurisprudence, without basing you argument on any USA or Federal ruling, and worst, without supporting your above Repeated opinions-comments-mirror replies, whatever you may term them - is not worth a Lawyer's salt, or here, a Commons Community Policy on keeping or deleting; rest assured that if you are believed, I never filed or would ever file any Undeletions Requests, for I know my limitations in time and effort; I would rather go inside the corridors of the DOJ, the IPO and or Bureau of Copyright for Official Statements, PROMISE Judgefloro (talk) 11:22, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 04:57, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ramon FVelasquez (talk · contribs) 5

[edit]

Derivative works: see the ff. identifications

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:30, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:47, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ramon FVelasquez (talk · contribs) 6

[edit]

The Ricni Building in Tarlac City is modern (dates to circa early 2010s). There is no freedom of panorama yet in the Philippines, and the need of permission from the architect of this building is still required.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:37, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 04:57, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ramon FVelasquez (talk · contribs) 7

[edit]

Possible COM:Derivative work problems. Tarpaulins, posters, billboard ads, many more. Possibly out of COM:SCOPE too.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:26, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per nom; DW, no FOP in Philippines. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:54, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Tagged as speedy copyviol "COM:DW per the original version" by User:A1Cafel Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:43, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@A1Cafel: Doesnt answer posts. Broichmore (talk) 10:03, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • So what? It's a 1988 image. So this is likely to be a scan of a chemical film print. If by "appears to be a photo of a photo" (it doesn't) you mean that there are the sort of vertical line artifacts we'd expect from a retail-grade flatbed scanner, then that's just what we'd expect to be there. Andy Dingley (talk) 12:26, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • @A1Cafel: , are you aware that before digital cameras, photos were physical objects? Note the date is 1988 - so original clearly would have been a film camera photo. To upload anything pre-digital online, one needs to make a digital scan or photo of the old physical photograph print or film negative. The first upload of the photo did not tightly crop the border - is that what you saw as a problem? Note that if you look at the category 1988 in Beijing, you will see that this is one of series the photographer took at that time and place (and generously has shared with Wikimedia Commons). I see nothing remotely problematic nor suspicious, but I am old enough to remember film photography. If you were uncertain of what was going on here, I'd like to suggest asking, or if you considered it suspicious listing it for deletion discussion where others can give input. I consider your tagging this image for speedy deletion to be inappropriate. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:03, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • The original edit summary on the speedy deletion request was "Marking as possible copyvio because COM:DW per the original version" (emphasis mine). No speedy deletion should ever be opened on that basis. A DR is our basic mechanism for deletions. If (and only if) the reasoning is so straightforward that there is no plausible scope for disagreement (within reasonable margins for shortage of psychic precognition) then this can be accelerated by using a speedy instead. But if the reasoning is no more than a copyvio is "possible", this is nothing like strong enough for an undiscussed speedy. I do not believe that A1Cafel understands this, nor the basis for real deletion reasons, and their actions as a result (a vast stream of deletions) are harmful to the project. Andy Dingley (talk) 14:48, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • A further reason why this is a problematic DR is that we still have no rationale as to why this is claimed to be a copyvio. Sure, we don't keep copyvios. No-one is claiming that we should. But when the nominator still fails to give us any rationale for why they would think so, so that we could consider it, support it or refute it - then that's an abuse of our DR process and a deliberate waste of time for other editors. Andy Dingley (talk) 14:50, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Closing as kept. Overwhelming support for keep. (As far as I can tell, tagged for "speedy deletion" due to some misunderstanding by the nominator about scanning pre-digital photo prints. I see no reason to continue to waste other Wikimedians time and efforts on this.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:39, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is not my own work. Mohd Sarim Ashrafi (talk) 20:03, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per uploader nom -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:08, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No encylopaedic relevance. Possible personality rights vio. 62.216.207.31 20:31, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

See the following, which should have been bundled as a single DR.
Andy Dingley (talk) 20:47, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept. People in public place before public event in USA, no personality rights problem. Part of set related to event, while not highest value depicting event, illustrates the time and place. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:18, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No encylopaedic relevance of person depicted. Low res image. 62.216.207.31 20:36, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is a congressman and president of the economic commision of Ecuador. It has enciclopedic relevance. It's not a copy if anything the name could be changed but that's it--Skulljujos (talk) 21:22, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept per Skulljujos and is in use in es:w. Category:Politicians of Ecuador added. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:28, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Does not contain a license as I initially thought Btspurplegalaxy (talk) 21:23, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted, prompt uploader request. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:33, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Does not contain a license as I initially thought Btspurplegalaxy (talk) 21:24, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted, prompt uploader request. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:34, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free image that Netflix presumably holds copyright on. Could be transferred locally to en.wiki for fair use, but article was moved to Draft space there. I don't know the rules at es.wiki, but it's used there as well, and perhaps could be transferred there locally? 2pou (talk) 21:44, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted, Copyright violation with false license claim. (en.w can worry about it's own fair use images; here on Commons it is simply a blatant copyright violation that we cannot allow.)-- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:37, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by User:Jeanba91

[edit]

No FOP in the UK for paintings that are not permanently situated. This was a temporary exhibition.

No FOP in France. The paintings may not be "De minimis".

No source. Needs permission. Johnj1995 (talk) 00:28, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:09, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded by mistake, it is an enlarged copy of File:Peter Lely (1618-1680) - Elizabeth, Countess of Kildare - T00070 - Tate.jpg Ecummenic (talk) 01:05, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:09, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The quality of this image does not allow to use it in reasonable way (it is a portrait of a certain Bertram A. Pemberton, the soldier of WWI, taken from a 1919 newspaper). Andrei Romanenko (talk) 01:30, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:10, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own work doubtful per uploader's history here and on ptwiki; lens used "iPhone SE front camera 2.15mm f/2.4" indicates a selfie.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 01:31, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:10, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The Blue House changed the license from KOGL v1 to v4 in early September 2018, which disallowed commercial use and derivative works. The KOGL v1 license was last available on 29 August 2018. So sorry that images published in or after September 2018 don't fulfill Commons:Licensing requirement. A1Cafel (talk) 02:20, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:10, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The Blue House changed the license from KOGL v1 to v4 in early September 2018, which disallowed commercial use and derivative works. The KOGL v1 license was last available on 29 August 2018. So sorry that images published in or after September 2018 don't fulfill Commons:Licensing requirement. A1Cafel (talk) 02:21, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:11, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The Blue House changed the license from KOGL v1 to v4 in early September 2018, which disallowed commercial use and derivative works. The KOGL v1 license was last available on 29 August 2018. So sorry that images published in or after September 2018 don't fulfill Commons:Licensing requirement. A1Cafel (talk) 02:21, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:11, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The Blue House changed the license from KOGL v1 to v4 in early September 2018, which disallowed commercial use and derivative works. The KOGL v1 license was last available on 29 August 2018. So sorry that images published in or after September 2018 don't fulfill Commons:Licensing requirement. A1Cafel (talk) 02:21, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:12, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The Blue House changed the license from KOGL v1 to v4 in early September 2018, which disallowed commercial use and derivative works. The KOGL v1 license was last available on 29 August 2018. So sorry that images published in or after September 2018 don't fulfill Commons:Licensing requirement. A1Cafel (talk) 02:22, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:12, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The Blue House changed the license from KOGL v1 to v4 in early September 2018, which disallowed commercial use and derivative works. The KOGL v1 license was last available on 29 August 2018. So sorry that images published in or after September 2018 don't fulfill Commons:Licensing requirement. A1Cafel (talk) 02:22, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:12, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The Blue House changed the license from KOGL v1 to v4 in early September 2018, which disallowed commercial use and derivative works. The KOGL v1 license was last available on 29 August 2018. So sorry that images published in or after September 2018 don't fulfill Commons:Licensing requirement. A1Cafel (talk) 02:22, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:12, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The Blue House changed the license from KOGL v1 to v4 in early September 2018, which disallowed commercial use and derivative works. The KOGL v1 license was last available on 29 August 2018. So sorry that images published in or after September 2018 don't fulfill Commons:Licensing requirement. A1Cafel (talk) 02:22, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:12, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The Blue House changed the license from KOGL v1 to v4 in early September 2018, which disallowed commercial use and derivative works. The KOGL v1 license was last available on 29 August 2018. So sorry that images published in or after September 2018 don't fulfill Commons:Licensing requirement. A1Cafel (talk) 02:22, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:12, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The Blue House changed the license from KOGL v1 to v4 in early September 2018, which disallowed commercial use and derivative works. The KOGL v1 license was last available on 29 August 2018. So sorry that images published in or after September 2018 don't fulfill Commons:Licensing requirement. A1Cafel (talk) 02:22, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:12, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The Blue House changed the license from KOGL v1 to v4 in early September 2018, which disallowed commercial use and derivative works. The KOGL v1 license was last available on 29 August 2018. So sorry that images published in or after September 2018 don't fulfill Commons:Licensing requirement. A1Cafel (talk) 02:22, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:11, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The Blue House changed the license from KOGL v1 to v4 in early September 2018, which disallowed commercial use and derivative works. The KOGL v1 license was last available on 29 August 2018. So sorry that images published in or after September 2018 don't fulfill Commons:Licensing requirement. A1Cafel (talk) 02:22, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:11, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The Blue House changed the license from KOGL v1 to v4 in early September 2018, which disallowed commercial use and derivative works. The KOGL v1 license was last available on 29 August 2018. So sorry that images published in or after September 2018 don't fulfill Commons:Licensing requirement. A1Cafel (talk) 02:22, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:11, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The Blue House changed the license from KOGL v1 to v4 in early September 2018, which disallowed commercial use and derivative works. The KOGL v1 license was last available on 29 August 2018. So sorry that images published in or after September 2018 don't fulfill Commons:Licensing requirement. A1Cafel (talk) 02:23, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:11, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The Blue House changed the license from KOGL v1 to v4 in early September 2018, which disallowed commercial use and derivative works. The KOGL v1 license was last available on 29 August 2018. So sorry that images published in or after September 2018 don't fulfill Commons:Licensing requirement. A1Cafel (talk) 02:23, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:11, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The Blue House changed the license from KOGL v1 to v4 in early September 2018, which disallowed commercial use and derivative works. The KOGL v1 license was last available on 29 August 2018. So sorry that images published in or after September 2018 don't fulfill Commons:Licensing requirement. A1Cafel (talk) 02:23, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:11, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The Blue House changed the license from KOGL v1 to v4 in early September 2018, which disallowed commercial use and derivative works. The KOGL v1 license was last available on 29 August 2018. So sorry that images published in or after September 2018 don't fulfill Commons:Licensing requirement. A1Cafel (talk) 02:23, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:11, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The Blue House changed the license from KOGL v1 to v4 in early September 2018, which disallowed commercial use and derivative works. The KOGL v1 license was last available on 29 August 2018. So sorry that images published in or after September 2018 don't fulfill Commons:Licensing requirement. A1Cafel (talk) 02:23, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:11, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The Blue House changed the license from KOGL v1 to v4 in early September 2018, which disallowed commercial use and derivative works. The KOGL v1 license was last available on 29 August 2018. So sorry that images published in or after September 2018 don't fulfill Commons:Licensing requirement. A1Cafel (talk) 02:23, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:11, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

License on this page indicates KOGL v3, which disallowed the production of derivative works A1Cafel (talk) 02:28, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:11, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

License on this page indicates KOGL v3, which disallowed the production of derivative works A1Cafel (talk) 02:28, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:11, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The Blue House changed the license from KOGL v1 to v4 in early September 2018, which disallowed commercial use and derivative works. The KOGL v1 license was last available on 29 August 2018. So sorry that images published in or after September 2018 don't fulfill Commons:Licensing requirement. A1Cafel (talk) 02:30, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:11, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fails the criteria of {{PD-KoreaGov}} A1Cafel (talk) 02:33, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:13, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced to the subject’s Flickr account but the metadata credits Jiri Prokop Ytoyoda (talk) 03:29, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:14, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Questionable claim of authorship. Studio photo; uploader has no other contributions. Rameshe999 (talk) 03:49, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:14, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Questionable claim of authorship. Studio photo; uploader has no other contributions. Rameshe999 (talk) 03:50, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:15, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Target with the 2018 logo. 2601:644:4401:4DE0:87:C88E:E9E8:813D 04:15, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - In use, and, we generally keep obsolete logos for historical purposes. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:15, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unnecessary png duplicate of others, incorrectly licensed. QuickQuokka [⁠talkcontribs] 01:41, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. No longer in use, false license. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:22, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own-work: small size, currency Rohalamin (talk) 11:45, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: PD Iranian currency. --Hanooz 22:21, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Johnj1995 as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10  — billinghurst sDrewth 10:29, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:03, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative works of artworks (wall paintings and a mural of some sort) that appear to have been created by people who were not regular employees of the city (municipality of Taytay, Rizal). Furthermore, there is no FOP yet in the Philippines.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:33, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 17:30, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader claims to be the person in the photo, the name of the author is in the metadata; need their permission to license their photo. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 07:02, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 17:46, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Hemplivingwholesale07

[edit]

Blatant advertising by a single purpose account. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 07:05, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 17:45, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Trimere

[edit]

Uploader claims to be the person in the photos, the name of the author and copyright holder is in the metadata; need their permission to license their photos. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 07:13, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I am the uploader and the person depicted in all three photographs, which has been widely used with my permission. I am the copyright holder. The photographer was Rebecca Douglas. Thank you for pointing out that the meta-data records Rebecca as the "author" (photographer) and copyright holder. The latter is incorrect and she would certainly not object to the photos being used here. I am a relatively new user and would appreciate suggestions on the correct remedy. Can I edit the "author" to reflect that is Rebecca?

Thank you!

Sure, Commons can accept the files if there is evidence that the author has given permission for them to be given a free license. You can obtain permission from the author and send it via email according to the directions on the page Commons:OTRS. Thanks for your help Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 23:12, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, OTRS validation needed. — Racconish💬 17:45, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation (©Tous droits réservés Assemblée nationale ) Esprit Fugace (talk) 07:28, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 17:44, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Charlie Ziemelis (talk · contribs)

[edit]

old photos, all need permission

Gbawden (talk) 10:41, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 17:43, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These appear to be scans of postcards, not the Flickr user's original work.

Paul_012 (talk) 12:14, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 17:43, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of mural painting. -- Asclepias (talk) 13:37, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 17:42, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of mural painting. -- Asclepias (talk) 14:01, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 17:42, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of mural painting. -- Asclepias (talk) 14:24, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 17:41, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Somewhat unlikely own work by uploader, considering the thumb-size and the metadata of the image as well as the upload-history of the user. -- Túrelio (talk) 15:03, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fotografie pořízená pomocí fotoaparátu na jejím koncertě (Vondřich Matěj)


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 17:41, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

my own pic Lamia Yared (talk) 15:57, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No permission. — Racconish💬 17:40, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private files storage. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:00, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 17:40, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not in any way a portrait of this person, who died 400 years ago. It is an ameteurish watercolor based on nothing at all, and is frankly just terrible and without any educational value. This is "fan art" for people who like to think having sex with dogs is pretty great. While they are entitled to that opinion, Commons does not need to host their imaginary visualizations of people who practiced it. This is the uploader's sole contribution to Commons, basically they spammed their pro-bestiality art onto Commons and that was that. It is currently not in use on any project. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:00, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 17:39, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Daphinevadhera (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused logos above COM:TOO, an unused copyvio advertisement, and a probably copyvio image of a text paragraph.

Kissa21782 (talk) 18:32, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, except one too simple. — Racconish💬 17:38, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The model in the picture requested the picture be taken down. The license was subsequently changed to All Rights Reserved. 621PWC (talk) 19:20, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — Racconish💬 17:37, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sudhakar komakula (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Missing permission of Photographer Shareef Nandyala. Submit permission through COM:OTRS (as well as proof that this account belongs to said actor).

P 1 9 9   20:53, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 17:36, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Some years ago the license was changed to All Rights Reserved. Model pictured wants the picture taken offline. 621PWC (talk) 21:02, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Nonsense. CC licences are irrevocable. She's had 13 years to do something about it. Live with your mistakes. I do. Rodhullandemu (talk) 22:01, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Same. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 07:37, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Change of license on Flickr is not a reason for deletion if image was free licensed when copied to Commons. As image seems mostly illustration of fashion of time and place rather than the person/model per se, I would support editing photo description and file-name to remove model's personal name as a courtesy. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:32, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — Racconish💬 17:35, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fekj (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low res, no camera EXIF, screenshots per descriptions, uploader serial copyright violator, etc. Duck/COM:PRP issue.

Эlcobbola talk 21:44, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 17:35, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Exif lists copyright holder FRANCES ANDRIJICH, a professional photographer. Without OTRS it should be deleted. M.nelson (talk) 22:52, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 17:33, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo was taken in en:Enoshima, Japan. No FoP in Japan for 3D works. Yuraily Lic (talk) 23:10, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 17:33, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Japan for 3D works. Yuraily Lic (talk) 23:15, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 17:33, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Japan for 2D works. Yuraily Lic (talk) 23:19, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 17:32, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOYS. Yuraily Lic (talk) 23:21, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Per DM, none of the toys can be seen in full. — Racconish💬 17:32, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The duration of copyright in Vietnam is Life + 50 years. Work is not anonymous and the author died in 1994 (27 years ago) Urara Haru 麗春 23:55, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 17:31, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I request to delete this image, from china, due to copyright issues. I had no knowledge about its copyright status and this cannot be in Wikimedia. Also, in the English Wikipedia there is and warning about not uploading the image to Wikimedia.
Carel3DS (talk) 08:28, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Per author's request, beyond TOO China. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 13:14, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 14:42, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This logo has no clear copyright status Carel3DS (talk) 07:35, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Already deleted by @Minorax: , if someone re-uploaded again and again, {{d|G4}} applies and feel free to report via COM:ANU. (non-admin closure) --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 09:46, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own-work: small size Rohalamin (talk) 11:58, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You are doubtful of the "I, the copyright holder of this work" part of my upload? Really??? Anyway, the size of the photo was a combination of available camera pixels (they were not so big as today), cropping, and Wikipedia's limited resizing options at the time (once upon a time, one had to upload different sizes if you wanted thumbnails, etc). Stan Shebs (talk) 12:53, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Stan Shebs cropping with 600 pixels in width! OMG! You're a Katana, Stan! Rohalamin (talk) 15:53, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep. Size by itself is irrelevant. --MarcoSwart (talk) 08:11, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep. Come on, really? A claim that a file uploaded in 2005 is suspiciously small? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:22, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ikan Kekek, Agree but this camera supports pixel resolutions of 640x480, 1024x768, 1280x960 and 1600x1200 as written here and I was really curious that if s/he is the owner why didn't s/he upload the orginal version? Rohalamin (talk) 15:53, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep I don't understand the reason for this action. What is basis for the claim that uploader ownership is dubious? And, there are many smaller images on Commons. -- Jim Evans (talk) 12:56, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ikan Kekek Thank you for your comment. Some details added but I think it could be better to upload the original version.Rohalamin (talk) 15:53, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Photos aren't supposed to be downsized on this site, but that's not a copyright issue nor is it a reason for deletion, right? Is there some obscure, unenforced policy of deleting photos smaller than the capacity of cameras that you can point to? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:17, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ikan Kekek Woops! I refered to you instead of Jim Evans in this line, wrongly. pardon me. Obscure policy? yeah yeah, a couple weaks ago I nominated this image but a moderator kept it based on the "User is in good standing" rule. Poor photographer, probably "The Mammoth" isn't avialabe in Kermanshah. such rules don't work over here in Iran. We need some changes in rules. That's what I think. Rohalamin (talk) 07:04, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Deletion is a severe sanction, and I don't think mere relatively small size, especially for a 16-year-old photo, is a sufficient reason. No cause for an apology, though, as your remark addressed my opinion as much as Jim's. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:09, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The work you pointed to, though, is really tiny and was uploaded 5 years after this one. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:11, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Agree that nature of deletion is a bit nasty to people but bear in mind that they are free to take photo themselves. Aren't they? They can take thier photos and upload their original works here and definitely there is no problem. They can even upload the works of other people BUT permision should be provided, clearly. That's what I'm saying. Undoubtedly we are here to protect of people's rights. Rohalamin (talk) 07:47, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If there were a reasonable basis for claiming that this is not original work, we'd be having an entirely different discussion. You haven't established a reasonable basis so far. Do you have any basis other than it being perhaps downsized? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:46, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Aaammm... No. Rohalamin (talk) 10:33, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
So please stop. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:25, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep. We don't apply photo size assumptions of today to photographs shot 15 years ago. The owner of a photo can upload itin any size s/he wishes. If the camera used shoots at sizes different from the size uploaded, that doesn't preclude the owner --for whatever reason-- to manipulate the photo and upload it at a different size than the original. Such manipulation isn't grounds for a delete based on a presumption of copyvio. Mercy11 (talk) 03:35, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --4nn1l2 (talk) 09:17, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Also


Church wall art showing the Seven Sacraments. Missing COM:OTRS permission from the artists. There is also no FOP in the country where it is located too. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:37, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:44, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not a newer image. 2601:644:4401:4DE0:87:C88E:E9E8:813D 04:43, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 20:44, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleting on Commons. 2601:644:4401:4DE0:87:C88E:E9E8:813D 04:53, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why? --Sreejith K (talk) 13:44, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 20:44, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused in any article, out of scope. 2601:644:4401:4DE0:87:C88E:E9E8:813D 05:19, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 20:44, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused in any article, out of scope. 2601:644:4401:4DE0:87:C88E:E9E8:813D 05:20, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 20:44, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused in any article, out of scope. 2601:644:4401:4DE0:87:C88E:E9E8:813D 05:20, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 20:44, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleting 2601:644:4401:4DE0:87:C88E:E9E8:813D 05:51, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why?--Mbazri (talk) 05:15, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 20:45, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{SD|F10}} Vitang56 (talk) 06:01, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:45, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Due to an Unused File. 2601:644:4401:4DE0:87:C88E:E9E8:813D 06:23, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 20:46, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:46, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

G12
I request the deletion of this file, due to copyright issues: I had no knowledge about its copyright status
Carel3DS (talk) 08:45, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Per author's request, beyond TOO Taiwan. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 13:14, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This logo has no clear copyright status Carel3DS (talk) 07:35, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Carel3DS: We are already discussing to delete it, no need to repeat via a new section. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 05:09, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:46, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

en:Slayy Point was thrice deleted and en:Draft:Slayy Point was rejected. Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 08:50, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:46, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fictious third reich pennants should not be on Commons Discostu (talk) 09:15, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The user has uploaded many more Nazi flags and pennants that should be checked if they are inside of project scope. -- Discostu (talk) 09:17, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:46, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photo from facebook. Rameshe999 (talk) 09:44, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as out of scope. Existence of FBMD tags is not reason for deletion, but this image appears to be a personal photo and I don't see potential encyclopedic value. While used on a user page, the user is not an active contributor, thus COM:INUSE does not apply. --Paul_012 (talk) 16:03, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:46, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photo from facebook Rameshe999 (talk) 09:44, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as out of scope. Existence of FBMD tags is not reason for deletion, but this image appears to be a personal photo and I don't see potential encyclopedic value. While used on a user page, the user is not an active contributor, thus COM:INUSE does not apply. --Paul_012 (talk) 16:03, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:46, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photo from facebook Rameshe999 (talk) 09:45, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as out of scope. Existence of FBMD tags is not reason for deletion, but this image appears to be a personal photo and I don't see potential encyclopedic value. While used on a user page, the user is not an active contributor, thus COM:INUSE does not apply. --Paul_012 (talk) 16:03, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:46, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright no own work. Rameshe999 (talk) 10:00, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as out of scope. While I don't see reason to seriously doubt the uploader's claim of authorship (reverse image search doesn't find anything), this appears to be a web banner for a government office, and I don't think there's potential encyclopedic value. --Paul_012 (talk) 16:11, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:47, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOYS. Yuraily Lic (talk) 10:01, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:47, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{BadJPG}}, orphaned. Leyo 10:02, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep - Not a valid reason. The file is in use in the article Exoplanetology --Sreejith K (talk) 13:40, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 20:47, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photo from facebook Rameshe999 (talk) 10:06, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 20:57, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photo from facebook Rameshe999 (talk) 10:06, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 20:57, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photo from facebook Rameshe999 (talk) 10:06, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 20:57, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photo from facebook Rameshe999 (talk) 10:11, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 20:57, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted (https://minecraft.fandom.com/wiki/File:Netherite_Scrap_JE2_BE1.png#Licensing) - Nutshinou Talk! 10:27, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:57, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope; edit of the Nintendo Seal of Quality. - Nutshinou Talk! 10:33, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:57, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own-work: small size Rohalamin (talk) 11:43, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 20:57, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own-work: small size Rohalamin (talk) 11:45, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 20:57, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own-work: small size Rohalamin (talk) 11:46, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 20:57, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own-work: small size Rohalamin (talk) 11:46, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 21:00, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own-work: small size Rohalamin (talk) 11:46, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 21:01, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own-work: small size Rohalamin (talk) 11:48, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 21:01, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own-work: small size Rohalamin (talk) 11:49, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 21:01, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own-work: small size Rohalamin (talk) 11:49, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 21:01, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own-work: small size Rohalamin (talk) 11:49, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 21:01, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own-work: small size Rohalamin (talk) 11:49, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 21:01, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own-work: small size Rohalamin (talk) 11:49, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Please provide policy based rationale. Being small doesn't mean it's "dubious.". --Missvain (talk) 21:01, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own-work: small size Rohalamin (talk) 11:49, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Please provide policy based rationale. Being small doesn't mean it's "dubious.". --Missvain (talk) 21:01, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own-work: small size Rohalamin (talk) 11:50, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Please provide policy based rationale. Being small doesn't mean it's "dubious.". --Missvain (talk) 21:01, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own-work: small size Rohalamin (talk) 11:50, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Please provide policy based rationale. Being small doesn't mean it's "dubious.". --Missvain (talk) 21:01, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own-work: small size Rohalamin (talk) 11:50, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Please provide policy based rationale. Being small doesn't mean it's "dubious.". --Missvain (talk) 21:01, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own-work: small size Rohalamin (talk) 11:50, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Please provide policy based rationale. Being small doesn't mean it's "dubious.". --Missvain (talk) 21:01, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own-work: small size Rohalamin (talk) 11:50, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Please provide policy based rationale. Being small doesn't mean it's "dubious.". --Missvain (talk) 21:01, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own-work: small size Rohalamin (talk) 11:50, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Please provide policy based rationale. Being small doesn't mean it's "dubious.". --Missvain (talk) 21:01, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own-work: small size Rohalamin (talk) 11:51, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Please provide policy based rationale. Being small doesn't mean it's "dubious.". --Missvain (talk) 21:02, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own-work: small size Rohalamin (talk) 11:51, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Please provide policy based rationale. Being small doesn't mean it's "dubious.". --Missvain (talk) 21:02, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own-work: small size Rohalamin (talk) 11:51, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Please provide policy based rationale. Being small doesn't mean it's "dubious.". --Missvain (talk) 21:02, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own-work: small size Rohalamin (talk) 11:51, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Please provide policy based rationale. Being small doesn't mean it's "dubious.". --Missvain (talk) 21:03, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own-work: small size Rohalamin (talk) 11:54, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Please provide policy based rationale. Being small doesn't mean it's "dubious.". --Missvain (talk) 21:03, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own-work: small size Rohalamin (talk) 11:54, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Please provide policy based rationale. Being small doesn't mean it's "dubious.". --Missvain (talk) 21:03, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own-work: small size Rohalamin (talk) 11:55, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Please provide policy based rationale. Being small doesn't mean it's "dubious.". --Missvain (talk) 21:03, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own-work: small size Rohalamin (talk) 11:56, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Please provide policy based rationale. Being small doesn't mean it's "dubious.". --Missvain (talk) 21:03, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own-work: small size Rohalamin (talk) 11:59, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Please provide policy based rationale. Being small doesn't mean it's "dubious.". --Missvain (talk) 21:03, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own-work: small size Rohalamin (talk) 11:59, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Please provide policy based rationale. Being small doesn't mean it's "dubious.". --Missvain (talk) 21:03, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own-work: small size Rohalamin (talk) 12:00, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Please provide policy based rationale. Being small doesn't mean it's "dubious.". --Missvain (talk) 21:03, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

©2021 The Children's Commissioner's Office at source, needs evidence of the PD claim Gbawden (talk) 12:01, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:03, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own-work: small size Rohalamin (talk) 12:02, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Please provide policy based rationale. Being small doesn't mean it's "dubious.". --Missvain (talk) 21:04, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own-work: small size Rohalamin (talk) 12:03, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Please provide policy based rationale. Being small doesn't mean it's "dubious.". --Missvain (talk) 21:04, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own-work: small size Rohalamin (talk) 12:03, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Please provide policy based rationale. Being small doesn't mean it's "dubious.". --Missvain (talk) 21:04, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own-work: small size Rohalamin (talk) 12:03, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Please provide policy based rationale. Being small doesn't mean it's "dubious.". --Missvain (talk) 21:04, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Was asked to suppress the photo. Philarm (talk) 03:42, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No permission. — Racconish💬 17:42, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please detelte picture (wrong picture). thnak youy Philarm (talk) 13:22, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:05, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shanuka Shehan Kumara (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

IIRC, these are his re-uploads of files we've already deleted. Delete and block editor for chronic copyvio. Elizium23 (talk) 15:55, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:05, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Luis_Su%C3%A1rez_vs._Netherlands.jpg FMSky (talk) 14:53, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:06, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tamara Weißmann (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as w:en:Help:Table to relevant project if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:49, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:06, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not owner's original work: copyright from Civ 5 Mod by Sukritact: https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=219159373 EmeraldRange (talk) 17:07, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:06, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong colors. I've tried to update it but it didn't work. there is a correct version here File:Brasão Mosconi antigo.jpg tetraktys (talk) 17:30, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:06, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright: Image has clear copyright watermarks from someone else EmeraldRange (talk) 18:02, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:06, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
File:Xelajú M.C.jpg
Xelajú M.C
SethFlores (talk) 18:50, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:07, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
File:Artworks-000122737595-uhbj47-t500x500.jpg
Artworks-000122737595-uhbj47-t500x500
SethFlores (talk) 18:51, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:07, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sock of Sathish Kathiravan, no copyright source, no exif data to prove own work -- DaxServer (talk) 19:12, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

delete low res, no encyclopaedic relevance, watermarked --62.216.207.31 20:52, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:07, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A picture used as a self-promotion article. --Rowingbohe♬(Talk/Work) 20:02, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:07, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A picture used as a self-promotion article. --Rowingbohe♬(Talk/Work) 20:02, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:07, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No encylopaedic relevance of person depicted. 62.216.207.31 20:35, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:08, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No encylopaedic relevance of person depicted. Low res image. 62.216.207.31 20:37, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is a congresswoman of Ecuador. It has enciclopedic relevance. It's not a copy if anything the name could be changed but that's it--Skulljujos (talk) 21:22, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 21:08, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No encylopaedic relevance of person depicted. Low res image. 62.216.207.31 20:37, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is a congresswoman of Ecuador. It has enciclopedic relevance. It's not a copy if anything the name could be changed but that's it--Skulljujos (talk) 21:22, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Please provide policy-based rationale for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 21:08, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No encylopaedic relevance of person depicted. Low res image. 62.216.207.31 20:38, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is a congressman and former mayor of Ecuador. It has enciclopedic relevance. It's not a copy if anything the name could be changed but that's it--Skulljujos (talk) 21:21, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Please provide policy-based rationale for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 21:08, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No encylopaedic relevance of person depicted. Low res image. 62.216.207.31 20:38, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is a congresswoman of Ecuador. It has enciclopedic relevance. It's not a copy if anything the name could be changed but that's it. It's a cropped image--Skulljujos (talk) 21:21, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Please provide policy-based rationale for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 21:09, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No encylopaedic relevance of person depicted. Low res image. Copyvio of text? 62.216.207.31 20:39, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is a congresswoman of Ecuador. It has enciclopedic relevance. It's not a copy if anything the name could be changed but that's it--Skulljujos (talk) 21:20, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Please provide policy-based rationale for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 21:09, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't want this to be posted anymore. RisteSpiroski1 (talk) 21:31, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:09, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low res, no metadata, pic already published here = dubious ownership claim Gyrostat (talk) 22:44, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:09, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted by either Morgan Couturier or Marco Polisson, not own work Gyrostat (talk) 22:47, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:09, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Here it says the photo is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license. However the website it is sourced from states "Copyright ©2018. All Rights Reserved." Gab4gab (talk) 22:55, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:09, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Consider reading the deletion debate –Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2019/03/27– that links to this page. 2601:644:4401:4DE0:87:C88E:E9E8:813D 05:44, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: See other nominations by this IP - vandalism. --King of ♥ 04:43, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/ce/Safeway_Logo.svg/1280px-Safeway_Logo.svg.png 2601:644:4401:4DE0:87:C88E:E9E8:813D 05:47, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Vandalism nomination. --King of ♥ 04:43, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleting, See https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4035/4553725626_e52fb2edd7_z.jpg 2601:644:4401:4DE0:87:C88E:E9E8:813D 05:51, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Vandalism nomination. --King of ♥ 04:43, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DERIV (Commons:Copyright_rules_by_subject_matter#Drawings_based_on_photographs), tracing or other close single-source copy of the copyrighted stock photo the meme was made from. Lord Belbury (talk) 06:54, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 04:46, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poorly framed picture. Also pictures without camera details tend to be suspect. We require a very much better declaration of source and/or permissions. See COM:OTRS. Potential copyright violation. COM:PCP applies. Timtrent (talk) 09:52, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: High-res image with no reverse image results. --King of ♥ 04:49, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative of contemporary artwork (plaque), no FoP in Russia A.Savin 20:43, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:08, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

If this image shows the same literary work (plaque text) as that of the deleted file, then sorry but there is no commercial freedom of panorama for non-architectural works in Russia. Noncommercial licensing from the author or his heirs is not OK and does not comply COM:Licensing. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:48, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: procedural close: already deleted by Missvain. --Gestumblindi (talk) 00:01, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Irrtümlich hochgeladen, uploaded mistakenly Micha1918 (talk) 09:21, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: COM:CSD#G7 was applicable at the time of nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 00:02, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Irrtümlich hochgeladen, uploaded mistakenly Micha1918 (talk) 09:22, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: COM:CSD#G7 was applicable at the time of nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 00:02, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Irrtümlich hochgeladen, uploaded mistakenly Micha1918 (talk) 09:22, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: COM:CSD#G7 was applicable at the time of nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 00:03, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image if wine bottles at Beringer is so bad you can't even tell what the labels say etc. We have better photographs of bottles at the winery and also other wines from around the world, including Napa County. I can't imagine how this could even be educationally valuable in our projects. Thanks. Missvain (talk) 15:54, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; quality is too low. --Gestumblindi (talk) 00:04, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Terrible quality photograph that isn't able to be used in an educational manner in any projects. Besisdes, we have a clearer version of the same subjects: File:Beringer Vineyards, Napa Valley, California, USA (8308361753).jpg. Missvain (talk) 16:17, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; quality too low and virtually identical photograph with better quality exists. --Gestumblindi (talk) 00:05, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The lack of a source URL is suspicious, and contrary to what the "own work" claim suggests, I highly doubt the uploader is Olivia Rodrigo herself. Should be deleted due to a lack of evidence that it's authentic. SNUGGUMS (talk) 18:39, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per User:King of Hearts. --P 1 9 9   01:17, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self promo on enwp Minoraxtalk 03:21, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 11:32, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
  1. a larger version can be found on https://open33.ntpc.gov.tw/dateview_inside?dateid=364
  2. ©新北市政府捷運工程局版權所有--鐵路Railway (talk) 11:50, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: already deleted by someone else. --Rosenzweig τ 21:52, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a very crappy image and I have a much better one of the same mirror in this collection. Gary Lee Todd (talk) 06:51, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:05, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a duplicate of another photo of mine, but this one was uploaded from a website that no longer exists, while my other photo is better quality and cites the current Flickr album as the source. Gary Lee Todd (talk) 08:39, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:05, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a duplicate of another photo at this site, but the other photo is better quality, and this one was uploaded from a website which no longer exists. Gary Lee Todd (talk) 08:45, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:05, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a duplicate of another photo at this site, but the other photo is better quality, and this one was uploaded from a website which no longer exists. Gary Lee Todd (talk) 08:48, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:05, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a duplicate of another photo at this site, but the other photo is better quality, and this one was uploaded from a website which no longer exists. Gary Lee Todd (talk) 08:49, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:05, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a duplicate of another photo at this site, but the other photo is better quality, and this one was uploaded from a website which no longer exists. Gary Lee Todd (talk) 09:02, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:05, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a duplicate of another photo at this site, but the other photo is better quality, and this one was uploaded from a website which no longer exists. Gary Lee Todd (talk) 09:04, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:05, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a duplicate of another photo at this site, but the other photo is better quality, and this one was uploaded from a website which no longer exists. Gary Lee Todd (talk) 09:04, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:05, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality and photoshopped image of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Louis-Francois_Bertin.jpg Investigatio (talk) 10:25, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:05, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own-work: small size Rohalamin (talk) 11:51, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:05, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own-work: small size Rohalamin (talk) 11:51, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:05, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own-work: small size Rohalamin (talk) 12:07, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:06, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a duplicate of another photo of mine, but this one was uploaded from a website that no longer exists, while my other photo is better quality and cites the current Flickr album as the source. Gary Lee Todd (talk) 12:50, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:07, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a duplicate of another photo of mine, but this one was uploaded from a website that no longer exists, while my other photo is better quality and cites the current Flickr album as the source. Gary Lee Todd (talk) 12:50, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:07, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a duplicate of another photo of mine, but this one was uploaded from a website that no longer exists, while my other photo is better quality and cites the current Flickr album as the source. Gary Lee Todd (talk) 12:51, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:07, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a duplicate of another photo of mine, but this one was uploaded from a website that no longer exists, while my other photo is better quality and cites the current Flickr album as the source. Gary Lee Todd (talk) 12:52, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:07, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a duplicate of another photo of mine, but this one was uploaded from a website that no longer exists, while my other photo is better quality and cites the current Flickr album as the source. Gary Lee Todd (talk) 12:53, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:07, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a duplicate of another photo of mine, but this one was uploaded from a website that no longer exists, while my other photo is better quality and cites the current Flickr album as the source. Gary Lee Todd (talk) 12:56, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:07, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a duplicate of another photo of mine, but this one was uploaded from a website that no longer exists, while my other photo is better quality and cites the current Flickr album as the source. Gary Lee Todd (talk) 12:57, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:07, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a duplicate of another photo of mine, but this one was uploaded from a website that no longer exists, while my other photo is better quality and cites the current Flickr album as the source. Gary Lee Todd (talk) 12:57, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:07, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a duplicate of another photo of mine, but this one was uploaded from a website that no longer exists, while my other photo is better quality and cites the current Flickr album as the source. Gary Lee Todd (talk) 12:58, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:07, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a duplicate of another photo of mine, but this one was uploaded from a website that no longer exists, while my other photo is better quality and cites the current Flickr album as the source. Gary Lee Todd (talk) 12:58, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:07, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a duplicate of another photo of mine, but this one was uploaded from a website that no longer exists, while my other photo is better quality and cites the current Flickr album as the source. Gary Lee Todd (talk) 13:00, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:07, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a duplicate of another photo of mine, but this one was uploaded from a website that no longer exists, while my other photo is better quality and cites the current Flickr album as the source. Gary Lee Todd (talk) 13:00, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:07, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a duplicate of another photo of mine, but this one was uploaded from a website that no longer exists, while my other photo is better quality and cites the current Flickr album as the source. Gary Lee Todd (talk) 13:01, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:07, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a duplicate of another photo of mine, but this one was uploaded from a website that no longer exists, while my other photo is better quality and cites the current Flickr album as the source. Gary Lee Todd (talk) 13:02, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:07, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a duplicate of another photo of mine, but this one was uploaded from a website that no longer exists, while my other photo is better quality and cites the current Flickr album as the source. Gary Lee Todd (talk) 13:03, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:07, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a duplicate of another photo of mine, but this one was uploaded from a website that no longer exists, while my other photo is better quality and cites the current Flickr album as the source. Gary Lee Todd (talk) 13:40, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:07, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a duplicate of another photo of mine, but this one was uploaded from a website that no longer exists, while my other photo is better quality and cites the current Flickr album as the source. Gary Lee Todd (talk) 13:47, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:07, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a duplicate of another photo of mine, but this one was uploaded from a website that no longer exists, while my other photo is better quality and cites the current Flickr album as the source. Gary Lee Todd (talk) 13:48, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:07, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a duplicate of another photo of mine, but this one was uploaded from a website that no longer exists, while my other photo is better quality and cites the current Flickr album as the source. Gary Lee Todd (talk) 13:48, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:07, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Even the uploader may be a paid editor. It seems not sufficient to prove the logo is really released to the public using CC license Matthew hk (talk) 06:02, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Looks simple enough. --Gbawden (talk) 10:21, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small photo without metadata, the photo is found with Google image search multiple times outside Wikipedia and its mirror sites. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 07:40, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

https://elcot.in/special-economic-zone/salem-sez#lg=1&slide=0 but I do not see publication date. Taivo (talk) 11:24, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 10:25, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Johnj1995 as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10  — billinghurst sDrewth 10:29, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; unlikely to be own work. --Gbawden (talk) 10:27, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self promo on enwp Minoraxtalk 12:04, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Gbawden at 10:27, 2 January 2022 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Abdur Rahman Al Asad.jpg --Krdbot 13:18, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low res, no camera EXIF, visual characteristics suggest screenshot of video, user serial copyvio uploader including of this subject (see File:Representative Sherman Packard.jpg) - Duck/COM:PRP issue. Эlcobbola talk 14:21, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, COM:PRP. --Rosenzweig τ 18:47, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Totally out of scope, uploaded to make a point Bidgee (talk) 09:39, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Bidgee: Unfortunately the user was so new she failed to write an adequate description and also failed to realise that opinions are not descriptions. I think she has now uploaded almost same image (having lost her password) under a different user name. I believe this was the best of her images. The image was not out of scope of either the competition or of the commons. Although we still need to get an adequate description to show it to be so.
If you check the coordinates given on open street map, the image appears to be of a private reserve, which may reserve both saltmarsh and and a marine area, in the estuary of the Coal River in Tasmania. Hopefully we will get a better description which will make this image usable. MargaretRDonald (talk) 19:41, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@MargaretRDonald: The biggest problem is the png is just a blank file, there is no photograph of the reserve, which would’ve made it in project scope. Bidgee (talk) 21:45, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, @Bidgee: . (And I thought the lack of image must have been part of the deletion process). So nothing to be done. She was struggling with forgotten passwords, changed password and new usernames, so the uploading process was a nightmare.... Hopefully this discussion will stay for a bit as I would like her to be able to see (in part) what has happened, and in particular, the fact that files are not deleted out of hand. MargaretRDonald (talk) 22:15, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@MargaretRDonald: could reupload as a photograph, though I'd recommend that it be jpg (png isn't really for photographs). Also if she makes a mistake, {{speedy|Recent upload, made a mistake}} can be used within a few days of the upload and anything longer than a few days will need a deletion request (DR). I don't take files to a DR unless I think the file has no added value to the projects as a whole. The DR discussions are never deleted (only time that happens is if there is personal information, attacks ect but very rarely happens). Bidgee (talk) 02:33, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, @Bidgee: . MargaretRDonald (talk) 02:41, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: obviously something went wrong here, this is just a blank rectangle with no actual content. --Rosenzweig τ 11:58, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Diese Datei soll nicht gelöscht werden. Friedo (talk) 11:29, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Da es keinen erkennbaren Grund für eine Löschung gibt, beabsichtige ich, den Löschbaustein demnächst zu entfernen. --Friedo (talk) 09:01, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done --Friedo (talk) 10:05, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: As I see it, this is not the official coat of arms, but a redrawn version done by someone named Massimo Ghirardi, taken from https://www.araldicacivica.it/provincia/belluno/. That site appears to be copyrighted, and I don't see any PD templates for Italian CoA here on Commons either. There apparently is an official CoA of Belluna Province which does look different. @FkMohr: When converting a speedy deletion request to a regular DR, please DO NOT remove the rationale of the speedy request in favor of writing "This file should not be deleted". This is borderline deception, please don't do that again. Thanks. --Rosenzweig τ 12:15, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unnecessarily detailed map, if not redundant to File:Anglospeak.svg, Soumya-8974 (he) (talkcontribs) 07:45, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: Per Commons:INUSE. SCP-2000 15:09, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion, is different from the other map, in use and not redundant. --Ellywa (talk) 18:54, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photo from facebook Rameshe999 (talk) 10:03, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, today no other versions found on the internet. Next time, please give a link for the other version on the web. --Ellywa (talk) 18:56, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Не в тот раздел загрузил Stevitlex (talk) 10:05, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per COM:COURTESY, uploader request. --Ellywa (talk) 18:57, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Delete the portrait of Chiyoko Yamaguchi. {{|13:29, 16 July 2021|Sammelbar}} The Jikiden Reiki Institute will not display the portrait of Chiyoko Yamaguchi. The portrait was replaced by the main entrance of the institute. Das Jikiden Reiki Institut möchte das Porträt von Chiyoko Yamaguchi nicht abbilden. Das Porträt wurde bereits durch den Haupteingang des Instituts ersetzt. Bitte das Porträt von Chiyoko Yamaguchi komplett löschen, das Porträt soll nicht mehr ersichtlich sein. Template:Sammelbar

{{speedydelete|<G11>}} Das Urheberrecht des Bildes von Chiyoko Yamaguchi ist beim Jikiden Reiki Institut, Tadao Yamaguchi, Kyoto, Japan — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.55.225.168 (talk • contribs)

{{speedydelete|<G11>}} Das Urheberrecht des Bildes von Chiyoko Yamaguchi ist beim Jikiden Reiki Institut, Tadao Yamaguchi, Kyoto, Japan. Sie möchten das Bild nicht veröffentlichen. Template:Sammelbar


Deleted: per nomination, uploader request. They will know best the image is copyrighted. --Ellywa (talk) 18:59, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Statement "請隨便使用612東京大鬧的照片。不註明來源也可以。" (English: Please feel free to use 612 photos of Tokyo's bustle. It does not matter if the source is not specified.) ia vague, with no indication of commercial use and the production of derivative works A1Cafel (talk) 14:18, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please feel free to use means also allow indication of commercial use and production of derivative works.--Banetkool (talk) 14:57, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Per Banetkool. It is similar to {{The Stand News}}. SCP-2000 15:00, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per remark of SCP-2000 and text on facebook page, listed as source on the file page. --Ellywa (talk) 21:26, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Metadata says "Photo by "BG", which is not Studio Incendo A1Cafel (talk) 14:21, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: According to [2], Studio Incendo are a group of journalists & photographers, like other media organizations. "Photo by someone" in metadata is not a sufficient reason for claiming not created by Studio Incendo. --Baycrest (Talk) 17:37, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Protester build roadblock in HKIA road view 20190901.jpg--A1Cafel (talk) 03:02, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Per Baycrest. SCP-2000 15:03, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. Source on facebook gives license CC-BY-SA4. --Ellywa (talk) 21:29, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Metadata says "Photo by "BG", which is not Studio Incendo A1Cafel (talk) 14:21, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: According to [3], Studio Incendo are a group of journalists & photographers, like other media organizations. "Photo by someone" in metadata is not a sufficient reason for claiming not created by Studio Incendo. --Baycrest (Talk) 17:37, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Protester build roadblock in HKIA road view 20190901.jpg--A1Cafel (talk) 03:02, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. Source on facebook gives license CC-BY-SA4. --Ellywa (talk) 21:29, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Metadata says "Photo by "BG", which is not Studio Incendo A1Cafel (talk) 14:21, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: According to [4], Studio Incendo are a group of journalists & photographers, like other media organizations. "Photo by someone" in metadata is not a sufficient reason for claiming not created by Studio Incendo. --Baycrest (Talk) 17:38, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Protester build roadblock in HKIA road view 20190901.jpg--A1Cafel (talk) 03:02, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. Source on facebook gives license CC-BY-SA4. --Ellywa (talk) 21:30, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clearly bogus self/CC claim - actual evidence/provenance info needed if free Эlcobbola talk 15:03, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 10:19, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Beyond COM:TOO Japan. Complex design and not meet {{PD-textlogo}} SCP-2000 15:07, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's ok, but I don't oppose the request.たけとう (talk) 06:31, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oh my, I just vectorized this logo. Now I am not sure whether it is meaningful...
If this image gets deleted in the end, I may upload my vectorized version in my home wiki... Milky·Defer 13:39, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 10:20, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader (Ramactor purports to be subject (actor Ram Mohan). Copyright initially vests in the author (photographer), not the mere subject. Evidence of permission from the actual author needed. Also COM:PRP as uploader is serial copyvio uploader related to this subject (see talk/deleted contribs) Эlcobbola talk 15:26, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 10:21, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

侵權,不滿足美國版權規定。 葉又嘉 (talk) 16:48, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Looks plausibe as far as 50 years is concerned. Alas low res of little value. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 62.216.207.31 (talk) 20:55, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 10:21, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Messy network diagram, either a copyvio or COM:NOTUSED. Kissa21782 (talk) 18:37, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 10:21, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The model in the picture asked for the picture to be taken down. Some years ago the license was changed to All Rights Reserved. 621PWC (talk) 19:23, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment We might as a courtesy, but (a) we've hosted this image for 13 years. Who knows how many times its been used on other sites? (b) The status of the licence now is irrelevant. It was properly licensed when uploaded, and that licence is irrevocable here (c) Is she really recognisable from the image? Rodhullandemu (talk) 20:00, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment - The image is in use on other projects. -mattbuck (Talk) 21:30, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Image was free licensed when copied here. Due to motion-blur multiple exposure, the model seems not particularly recognizable if not identified. I don't see this as requiring deletion. Image is in use. I suggest, as a courtesy, rename the file to remove the personal name; rename file "File:Disco Lights Dancer.jpg" or something similar. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:00, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep per commentary above and overall guidance at COM:COURTESY - per that page, this situation does not meet the criteria for a courtesy deletion (non-revokable license, in use, meets scope, file has been in on the project and in use for a long time, etc). I agree with Infrogmation's suggestion to rename the file and remove any personal information about the model. -M.nelson (talk) 10:13, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --rubin16 (talk) 10:22, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No information on when this statue was created or by whom. Questionable if it is in the public domain or not. Missvain (talk) 20:02, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 10:22, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No clear statement that the website from which this map originated published its content under CC license. There is also a copyright notice at the end of the page: © Copyright 2011–2021 Omniatlas Urara Haru 麗春 22:42, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • File is licensed under Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 New Zealand (CC BY-NC 3.0 NZ)
    "If you publish, distribute or otherwise disseminate works on this website that are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial licence (as set out above) to the public without adaptation, attribution to Omniatlas or omniatlas.com should be made in the form given at the foot of each page."
    https://omniatlas.com/about/copyright/
    Attribution is included in the file description so it's legit.
    LambdofGod (talk) 12:35, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 11:54, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image contains a calligraphic logo that is copyright protected. Wcam (talk) 20:27, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to break the rule, but Wcam, do you know how to keep the file? Can I cover the related logo with mosaics? --MintCandy♬(Talk/Work) 20:33, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Government document, thus "PD-PRC-exempt" --20:47, 14 June 2021 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 62.216.207.31 (talk) 20:47, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The logo is not created by the government but by the applicant which is a private party. Merely being on a government document does not automatically nullify the logo's copyright. --Wcam (talk) 21:52, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep: Referring to Article 5 and Article 24 item (7) in Copyright Law of PRC and Commons:De minimis, It could be kept. However, if the community thinks that it does not meet the criteria of De Minimis, it should be deleted. --DreamerBlue (talk) 12:54, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. The file is according to google tranlsate "Trademark Registration Certificate of the People's Republic of China - Zuo Ming". So the trademark is the main part of the document. This cant be seen as "de minimis" imho. However, if somebody thinks it useful to hide the logo/trademark from the image, the file can be temporary undeleted. --Ellywa (talk) 20:50, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]