User talk:Norden1990
Szia! Ezt a képet törlésre jelölték. Mivel nem tudok angolul (sem), nem tudom megértetni magam a törlésre jelölővel. Segítenél lefordítani? Szelényi Károly 1943-ban született, Korniss Péter 1935-ben. A forrásként idézett könyvben sincs feltüntetve a szerző. Az összes kép, amely Balogh Edgárt ábrázolja nem említi meg a kép szerzőjét. Előre is köszönöm a segítségedet. Üdv. Tambo (talk) 10:05, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
File:Lukacsgyorgy.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 01:55, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
File:Marschall Ferenc Brunhuber.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 02:01, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
File tagging File:Goncz arpad.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Goncz arpad.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Goncz arpad.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Pallerti (talk) 11:56, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Jcb (talk) 06:46, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Urbános
[edit]Szia!
Ha gondolod, kérdezd meg Jcb-től, hogy neki meg nincs magyar nyelvtudása, honnan tudja, hogy érvénytelen az engedély? :-D
Komolyra fordítva a szót az alábbiakról van szó: Urbán Tamás neve alatt rengeteg fotó van a Fortepanon. Érdeklődésünkre elmondta, hogy igen, azok az ő képei, kivéve az első világháborúsokat, mert azokat csak gyűjtötte. A beküldött engedély annak alátámasztása, hogy valóban ő engedélyezte (adta) a képeit szabad licenc alatt a Fortepannak. Érdekes momentum, hogy csak azokat jelölte törlésre, amiket a szerzőjük alátámasztott, hogy igen, az övéi, és igen, ő adta a Fortepannak szabad licenc alatt, de azokat nem jelölte törlésre, amelyek ugyanúgy a Fortepanról származnak, de nincs rajtuk OTRS-sablon.
Ha gondolod, használd fel fentebbi hozzászólásomat (értsd fordítsd le nyugodtan a törlési megbeszélésre). Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 22:48, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- Köszi! Nem szeretnél hozzászólni a törlési megbeszéléshez? Ugyanis OTRS-kezelőként nagyobb szavad van, mint nekem. Ezek nagyon jó képek, kár lenne veszni hagyni. --Norden1990 (talk) 08:18, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
- Hozzászóltam, de nem hiszem, hogy sokra mennek a magyar nyelvű indoklással. Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 14:23, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
File:Sztranyavszky Sándor 1938.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Regasterios (talk) 08:21, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
A magyar wikire nyugodtan áttöltheted. A lényeg az, hogy Jelfy Gyulának csak az 1923 előtti művei tölthetők fel a Commonsba. --Regasterios (talk) 08:22, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
- Baromság, Jelfy Magyarországon alkotott, képei ott készültek. --Norden1990 (talk) 20:39, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
- Az USA-ban nem számít közkincsnek, ezt is figyelembe kell venni itt a Commonson. --Regasterios (talk) 21:30, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
File:NavayLajos1905.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Regasterios (talk) 15:20, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
File tagging File:Meggyes Tamás.JPG
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Meggyes Tamás.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Meggyes Tamás.JPG]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Regasterios (talk) 08:41, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
File:Vantara gyula portrekep.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Regasterios (talk) 22:18, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted content
[edit]
- use in any work, regardless of content
- creation of derivative works
- commercial use
- free distribution
See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons, and Commons:Image casebook for some specific examples. Some other Wikimedia projects have different licensing policies. For example, the English Wikipedia allows fair use of sounds and photographs. This is not the case on Wikimedia Commons; "fair use" materials are not acceptable here.
Please make sure that you only upload educational content you have created yourself, those which are out of copyright, or those for which you have the required permission for the work to be used in all the ways described above. Please note that derivative works of copyrighted material are also considered copyrighted. Again, please read through Commons:Licensing, which is quite crucial, to understanding how Wikimedia Commons works. Thanks for your contribution, and please do leave me a message if you have further questions.To undelete the file(s), the copyright holder must send a permission to the OTRS team.
Yours sincerely, Arthur Crbz (talk) 14:01, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Pálinkás József.JPG
[edit]This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Pálinkás József.JPG, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
And also:
Yours sincerely, BevinKacon (talk) 12:36, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Beata Szydło - Hungary 2016-02-08 (07).jpg
- File:V4 Prague 2015-12-03 - Viktor Orbán (1).jpg
- File:Beata Szydło - Hungary 2016-02-08 (14).jpg
- File:Beata Szydło - Hungary 2016-02-08 (13).jpg
- File:Beata Szydło - Hungary 2016-02-08 (02).jpg
- File:Beata Szydło - Hungary 2016-02-08 (12).jpg
- File:V4 Prague 2015-12-03 - Viktor Orbán (4).jpg
- File:Beata Szydło - Hungary 2016-02-08 (05).jpg
- File:Beata Szydło - Hungary 2016-02-08 (08).jpg
- File:V4 Prague 2015-12-03 - Viktor Orbán (2).jpg
- File:V4 Prague 2015-12-03 - Viktor Orbán (5).jpg
- File:V4 Prague 2015-12-03 - Viktor Orbán (3).jpg
- File:Beata Szydło - Hungary 2016-02-08 (15).jpg
- File:V4 Prague 2015-12-03 - Viktor Orbán (7).jpg
- File:Beata Szydło - Hungary 2016-02-08 (10).jpg
- File:V4 Prague 2015-12-03 - Viktor Orbán (6).jpg
- File:Beata Szydło - Hungary 2016-02-08 (09).jpg
Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 14:57, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Simonyi-Semadam.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Regasterios (talk) 18:41, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
File:Edelsheim-Gyulai Ilona c. 1940.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Regasterios (talk) 15:14, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Regasterios (talk) 19:00, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Stjepan II. Zagreb (1225-1247.).jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:Stjepan II. Zagreb (1225-1247.).jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Stjepan II. Zagreb (1225-1247.).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
And also:
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 22:06, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
File:Ader Obama 2012.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 13:13, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi Norden1990, I have added the file you requested on Concords talk page. Unfortunately, the original painting isn't by far as colourful as the reproduction in the Hungarian book you linked to. They must have done quite a lot of digital restoration there. It may also be that the original has deteriorated over time. My photo tries to give the optical appearance of the original as it is now as true as possible. Greetings --Jossi (talk) 11:24, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you very much! --Norden1990 (talk) 19:19, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
Two of your files have been nominated for deletion
[edit]These files were added to the Deletion Request Commons:Deletion requests/File:František Velecký.JPG. Please comment in the Deletion Request itself if you wish to reply. Rationale is "Donor is listed as Bojár Sándor, who could have taken the photograph. He died in 2000" Abzeronow (talk) 19:29, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, Bencemac (talk) 13:09, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Fake maps
[edit]Hi, I found this very strange thing
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hungarians slavs vlachs 10th 12th 02.png OrionNimrod (talk) 21:51, 26 July 2024 (UTC)