Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2021/01/19
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_Airbus_A320-200.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_Faculté_des_Sciences_-_Université_Paris-Saclay.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![214 File:Logo gazety "Bhutan Times".png](#File:Logo_gazety_"Bhutan_Times".png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_02.jpg){kind=link}
_01.jpg){kind=link}
_-_Adolf_Hitler_0000.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Special:Contribs/Honganc
[edit]
Obviously not own work as seen in file description. Techyan（Talk） 01:56, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 02:48, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
versehentlich hochgeladen — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rena Cori (talk • contribs) 00:01, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Speedy delete per nom as accidentally uploaded within 7 days, COM:CSD#G7. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 03:36, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 08:05, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Homemade attack image with no encyclopedic value 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco (talk) 06:53, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy deleted, COM:CSD#G3 applies here. --jdx Re: 08:28, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Oshrat Kotler
[edit]In Ticket:2021011610003747 we got a mail from person who claim to be the copyright holder.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-- Geagea (talk) 08:13, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
SpeedyDeleted: per COM:PCP until clarification. -- Geagea (talk) 08:19, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
I don't want this image on internet 195.20.146.189 15:08, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --jdx Re: 03:38, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
I am on this picture and I want it to be removed from Wikimedia commons. Anonymous.space (talk) 15:12, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
- Not a used file; I see no problem in deleting. --E4024 (talk) 15:22, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
- That's correct, however the picture appears when you google my name and I never approved to have this picture uploaded on wikimedia commons. So, if the picture is not used anywhere here, I see no reason why it could not be deleted. Anonymous.space (talk) 16:53, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
- Again "I see no problem in deleting." Could I not express myself well enough? --E4024 (talk) 17:00, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, i misread it. Please apologize and thank you for your comment. Anonymous.space (talk) 17:04, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
- Again "I see no problem in deleting." Could I not express myself well enough? --E4024 (talk) 17:00, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
- That's correct, however the picture appears when you google my name and I never approved to have this picture uploaded on wikimedia commons. So, if the picture is not used anywhere here, I see no reason why it could not be deleted. Anonymous.space (talk) 16:53, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused personal photo. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:13, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Facebook image per "FBMD", permission is required. Ninja✮Strikers «☎» 06:57, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 18:05, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:Mirtalebi.official
[edit]
These two images are the latest of a multitude of copyright violations by User:Mirtalebi.official. These two images are identical but for size. They are taken from the subject's Facebook/Twitter pages without any indication they are the work of the uploader nor any indication at the source that the image is available under the license stipulated, nor any license compatible with Commons. See search results of image. --Hammersoft (talk) 14:36, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 15:46, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Dear Admin,
Please close/delete our page to avoid unnecessary circumstances which we have never intended when we create this account.
Thank you.
Best Regards, The Team — Preceding unsigned comment added by Suara Rakyat Sabah (talk • contribs) 07:24, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Not done: User:Suara Rakyat Sabah doesn't exist. --Achim (talk) 17:47, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Advertising. Wont give the 4 reasons unless you click to their website. Image has no other use. Q0ywo (talk) 06:02, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Spam. --Herby talk thyme 14:25, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
This appears to be a copy of https://s3media.247sports.com/Uploads/Assets/806/289/8289806.JPG by Denon McMillan, 247Sports (view gallery on this page: https://247sports.com/coach/Jeff-Banks-756/). 108.56.139.120 19:58, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation, no indication of a free license on the source site (F1). --Эlcobbola talk 16:56, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
weil ich sie nicht mehr brauche Delphin 38nd (talk) 12:13, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Kept: there is a 2nd discussion. --Sanandros (talk) 06:18, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
The banknote in the photo was issued in 2020, so according to Commons: Currency, its photo cannot be here Jamnik z Tarnowa (talk) 07:55, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Ellin Beltz at 05:38, 23 Januar 2021 UTC: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing --Krdbot 09:18, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
The banknote in the photo was issued in 2020, so according to Commons: Currency, its photo cannot be here Jamnik z Tarnowa (talk) 07:55, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Ellin Beltz at 05:38, 23 Januar 2021 UTC: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing --Krdbot 09:18, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
Author died in 1962: copyright active Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:39, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jarekt (talk) 18:35, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by محمد حسونه إشهوب (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal images out of project scope see COM:SCOPE.
- File:محمد حسونه شهوب 30.jpg
- File:محمد حسونه شهوب 29.jpg
- File:محمد حسونه شهوب 28.jpg
- File:محمد حسونه شهوب 27.jpg
- File:محمد حسونه شهوب 26.jpg
- File:محمد حسونه شهوب 25.jpg
- File:محمد حسونه شهوب 24.jpg
- File:محمد حسونه شهوب 23.jpg
- File:محمد حسونه شهوب 22.jpg
- File:محمد حسونه شهوب 21.jpg
- File:محمد حسونه شهوب 20.jpg
- File:محمد حسونه شهوب 19.jpg
- File:محمد حسونه شهوب 18.jpg
- File:محمد حسونه شهوب 17.jpg
- File:محمد حسونه شهوب 15.jpg
- File:محمد حسونه شهوب 14.jpg
- File:محمد حسونه شهوب 13.jpg
- File:محمد حسونه شهوب 12.jpg
- File:محمد حسونه شهوب 11.jpg
- File:محمد حسونه شهوب 10.jpg
- File:محمد حسونه شهوب 9.jpg
- File:محمد حسونه شهوب 8.jpg
- File:محمد حسونه شهوب 7.jpg
- File:محمد حسونه شهوب 6.jpg
- File:محمد حسونه شهوب 5.jpg
- File:محمد حسونه شهوب 4.jpg
- File:محمد حسونه شهوب 3.jpg
- File:محمد حسونه شهوب.jpg
- File:B 2.jpg
- File:The 4.jpg
- File:Please 2.jpg
- File:Updated 2.jpg
- File:Kil.jpg
- File:From 2.jpg
- File:People 5.jpg
— D Y O L F 77[Talk] 18:44, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:34, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Hans Gottfried von Stockhausen
[edit]Stockhausen died in 2010, so all these artworks (glass paintings) in German churches are still protected until January 1, 2081. No freedom of panorama inside buildings in Germany.
- File:Bad Hersfeld - Stadtkirche - 02.JPG
- File:Chrkwbk pantokrator.jpg
- File:Chro altarfenster.jpg
- File:Chro rosette innen.jpg
- File:Chro taufe.jpg
- File:Felix.Mendelssohn.Bartholdy.Mosaikfenster.Thomaskirche.Leipzig.jpg
- File:Hersfeld stadtkirche fensterchor.jpg
- File:Mendelssohn Window Thomaskirche.jpg
- File:Nicolai-Kirche (Dortmund)156772.jpg
- File:Nicolai-Kirche (Dortmund)156779.jpg
- File:Nicolai-Kirche (Dortmund)156782.jpg
- File:Nicolai-Kirche (Dortmund)156789.jpg
- File:Nicolai-Kirche (Dortmund)156793.jpg
- File:Nicolai-Kirche (Dortmund)156797.jpg
- File:Nicolai-Kirche (Dortmund)156806.jpg
- File:Nicolai-Kirche (Dortmund)156811.jpg
- File:Nicolai-Kirche (Dortmund)156818.jpg
156772.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
156779.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
156782.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
156789.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
156793.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
156797.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
156806.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
156811.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
156818.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Rosenzweig τ 20:26, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 19:39, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
Files in Category:Hans Gottfried von Stockhausen
[edit]copyright violation; artist died in 2010; no freedom of panorama.
- File:00 6052 Florinskirche in Koblenz.jpg
- File:Altarraum Martinskirche Kassel 2017.jpg
- File:Bad Hersfeld Stiftskirche 90012.JPG
- File:Bad Hersfeld Stiftskirche GfP1190010.JPG
- File:Bad Hersfeld, Kirchplatz, Ev. Stadtkirche-20160425-014.jpg
- File:Bad Hersfeld, Stadtkirche, der Altar.jpg
- File:Hersfeld stadtkirche chorinnen.jpg
- File:Innenraum der evangelischen Stadtkirche Wolfhagen.JPG
- File:Interior of St. Katharinen, Hamburg (3).jpg
- File:Katharinen HH 5 2013 07.JPG
- File:Koblenz im Buga-Jahr 2011 - Liebfrauenkirche 06.jpg
- File:Maria zur Wiese - Westfenster.jpg
- File:Martinskirche Kassel Innenraum 01.jpg
- File:Martinskirche Kassel Innenraum 02.jpg
- File:Reinoldikirche, Dortmund, Germany (5681364243).jpg
- File:Stained Glass Window, Church of Our Lady, Koblenz - Germany..jpg
- File:Where angels fly (26357018665).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Martin Sg. (talk) 18:50, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:34, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Hans Gottfried von Stockhausen
[edit]copyvio, no fop.
- File:Murrhardt stadt chorfenster stockhausen452x1287 guntherseibold.jpg
- File:Stadtkirche Murrhardt Chorfenster.jpg
Martin Sg. (talk) 17:48, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:02, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Hans Gottfried von Stockhausen
[edit]copyvio; pd in 2018, no fop.
Martin Sg. (talk) 18:19, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:04, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
Unused personal artwork, no educational value, out of scope; or DW, missing permission.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:52, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:35, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
copyright violation; works by artist who died in 1999; no freedom of panorama.
- File:Fenster der Kath. Kirche St. Gallus in Merzhausen 2.jpg
- File:Fenster der Kath. Kirche St. Gallus in Merzhausen 3.jpg
- File:Fenster der Kath. Kirche St. Gallus in Merzhausen 4.jpg
- File:Fenster der Kath. Kirche St. Gallus in Merzhausen 5.jpg
- File:Freiburg Münster linkes Seitenschiff Rosettenfenster 01.jpg
- File:Glasfenster (Münster Freiburg) jm3559.jpg
- File:Muenster Ueberwasser Chorfenster.jpg
- File:Siegelsbach-kathkirche8.jpg
- File:Stift-Neuburg-03.JPG
- File:Wiesenbach-St-Michael-Glasfenster.JPG
_jm3559.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Martin Sg. (talk) 19:07, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:35, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own works: all inconsistent sizes and quality, missing EXIF; all photos of same person, unlikely that uploader was present at all these diverse places and times.
- File:T.R. Barque as Chief Guest.jpg
- File:T.R. Barque receiving memento.jpg
- File:T.R. Barque giving presidential address.jpg
- File:T.R. Barque delivering speech.jpg
- File:TALHA RIZVI BARQUE IN PAKISTAN.jpg
- File:A very old pics of Talha Rizvi Barque in Halqa-e-ahbab Mushaira at Ara, Bhojpur Bihar.jpg
- File:Talha Rizvi Barque in Karachi, Pakistan.jpg
- File:Talha Rizvi in Lucknow.jpg
- File:Talha Rizvi Barque In Karachi , Pakistan as an orator.jpg
- File:Talha Rizvi Barque at MMHAPU, Patna.jpg
- File:Talha Rizvi Barque in seminar at MMHAPU, Patna.jpg
- File:Prof.Talha Rizvi Barque as guest of honour in seminar held at MMHAPU, Patna.jpg
- File:Dr. Talha Rizvi Barque Receiving Award from President of India.jpg
- File:Talha Rizvi Barque in Chandigarh reciting Ghazal in presence of Mr. Darbara Singh C.M of Punjab.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:12, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:36, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:13, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:36, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal image, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:14, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:36, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
Unused photo of non-notable person, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:14, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:36, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
Certainly not own works: historical images without original author, source, date, and permission. It might be old enough, but no way of knowing that without original author, source, and date.
- File:Battle Line Up of Harvards.jpg
- File:Tiger Moth In Winter.jpg
- File:Runway Battle Line Up.jpg
- File:Various Planes.jpg
- File:Harvard and Passenger Plane.jpg
- File:No. 5 Hangar.jpg
- File:Overhead View.jpg
- File:RCAF Mossbank - No. 2 B &G -1942.jpg
- File:No. 2 Bombing and Gunnery School's mascot.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:27, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:37, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Нитрам Разама (talk · contribs)
[edit]obviously incorrect licenses
- File:Flag of Sudan (1956-1969).png
- File:Джафар-Нимейри.jpg
- File:Bwbvgst14o8.jpg
- File:TEV-DEM.jpg
- File:Tyc0z4gDkow.jpg
- File:DUFsBP5dvgQ.jpg
- File:3DfClF4nySI.jpg
- File:62vElNpwy c.jpg
- File:0TAeofDcWJY.jpg
- File:Prestuplenievkoree.jpg
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
rubin16 (talk) 09:23, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:04, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
Montages of copyrighted images from various sources. No permission.
- File:Nice-turkiye.png
- File:John Deere E120.png
- File:John Deere X350.png
- File:Bilisim-hukuku.png
- File:Bosanma-davasi.png
- File:Miras-paylari.png
- File:Mini Sewing Machine.png
- File:Handheld-sewing-machine.png
- File:Tv-8-canli-izle.png
- File:Almanca-dil-egitimi.png
- File:Dijital-donusum.png
- File:Seouzmani.png
- File:Bosanma-avukati.png
- File:Ceza-avukati.png
Smooth O (talk) 11:20, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:05, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal image, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:43, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:08, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
Unused screenshot, no educational value, advertising, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:48, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:08, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
Unused promotional logo and screenshot, no educational value, out of scope.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:48, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:08, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
Unused promotional logos and screenshots, no educational value, out of scope.
- File:Priority Matrix iPad v2.png
- File:Priority Matrix v2.png
- File:Priority Matrix iPad.png
- File:Priority Matrix.png
P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:49, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:08, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos. Should be in SVG if useful.
- File:KMRB 18 2021.png
- File:KMRB 19. Limited 2021.png
- File:KMRB 15 2021.png
- File:KMRB 1. ALL 2021.png
- File:KMRB 12 2021.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:08, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by HeyHeyBiden (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos. Should be in SVG if useful.
- File:Federal Europe.png
- File:Pirate.png
- File:Wampanoag.png
- File:RENAISSANCE.png
- File:Salve Regina Party.png
- File:GRIPP.png
- File:Commie.jpg
- File:Capital.png
- File:GREXIT.png
- File:COMMUNI.png
- File:Rally National.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:02, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 01:27, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by HeyHeyBiden (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:40, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:09, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Duplicate. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:09, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vasilis Galnt (talk · contribs)
[edit]Modern art. I think artist identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.
- File:Γκαλτέμης Αιτωλικό.jpg
- File:Christodoulos Gkaltemis, Plaka.jpg
- File:Πόρτα Νεοκλασσικού Γκαλντέμης.jpg
- File:Gkaltemis Christodoulos, still nature, oil on canvas.jpg
- File:Gkaltemis Christodoulos.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:45, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:09, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Joseph Rotter
[edit]Copyrighted until 2023 (1953 + 70).
- File:Artashes and Satenik.jpg
- File:Hayk and Bel.jpg
- File:HolyBukhara from Molla Nasreddin Azerbaijanian.jpg
- File:Molla Nasreddin 4.jpg
- File:Molla Nasreddin 5.jpg
- File:Molla Nasreddin 6.jpg
- File:Yervand IV.jpg
- File:Molla Nasreddin about Azeri women.jpg
Hanooz 16:30, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. There are no any sources claiming that Joseph Rotter died in 1953. The only source I found about him is the article in Azerbaijan Soviet Encyclopedia (1984, volume VIII, page 187). Dates of birth and death are unknown because the article states "Rotter Joseph (? - ?)". But it is written there that Rotter lived in the second half of 19th c. and first half of 20th c. First half of 20th c. is untill 1950. According to the source Rotter was born after 1850 and died till 1950. The works of Rotter also were published before 1950. For that reason I think we should keep these images as PD-old (author died before 1950, the correct date of his death is unknown and his works were published 70 years ago). --Interfase (talk) 06:41, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
- Also note, that the user who added the dates of birth and death into the article in Russian Wikipedia (21.12.1879 - 5.3.1953) was anonymous[1]. By the way, these dates are the dates of birth and death of another Joseph - Joseph Stalin (21.12.1879 - 5.3.1953). You can see that he also added the Stalin's patronymic name to the article. Seems to be someone's joke. --Interfase (talk) 10:03, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per Interfase. --Hanooz 09:32, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Federico Catizone (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:11, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:10, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by F.Charlotte (talk · contribs)
[edit]Modern art. I think artist identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.
- File:Portrait of the painter ORAZI' in 1927.jpg
- File:ORAZI', ALPHA-OMEGA, 1965ca.pdf
- File:ORAZI' Nebula on a turquoise background,1971.jpg
- File:ORAZI', Été – Summertime, 1959.jpg
- File:ORAZI', Paysages Parisiens - Avenue Parisienne, 1957-1958.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:12, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:11, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Prime college (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused logo and screengrab, out of scope and copyvios.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:07, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:11, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Emmetmclaughlin (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused screenshot, logos, and personal photo, no educational value, out of scope.
- File:Screenshot of Tustland.gif
- File:FamilyRefereeLogo.jpg
- File:ImageOfMouadGouzrou.jpg
- File:MobileDeviceDevelopersLLCLogo.png
P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:27, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:12, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nihonsahli (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused screenshots, no educational value, out of scope.
- File:Screenshot-All.png
- File:Screenshot-515149261.png
- File:Screenshot-Frame-1.png
- File:Screenshot-Frame.png
- File:Screenshot-dnaviewer.java3d-1.png
- File:Screenshot-dnaviewer.java3d.png
- File:Screenshot-DNA Scissor-8.png
- File:Screenshot-DNA Scissor-7.png
- File:Screenshot-DNA Scissor-6.png
- File:Screenshot-DNA Scissor-5.png
- File:Screenshot-DNA Scissor-4.png
- File:Screenshot-DNA Scissor-3.png
- File:Screenshot-DNA Scissor-2.png
- File:Screenshot-DNA Scissor-1.png
- File:Screenshot-DNA Scissor.png
- File:Screenshot--home-sahli-Desktop-Computer-Arapan-white tailed deer coronaviruskmers.seq-3.png
- File:Screenshot--home-sahli-Desktop-Computer-Arapan-white tailed deer coronaviruskmers.seq-2.png
- File:Screenshot--home-sahli-Desktop-Computer-Arapan-white tailed deer coronaviruskmers.seq-1.png
- File:Screenshot--home-sahli-Desktop-Computer-Arapan-white tailed deer coronaviruskmers.seq.png
P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:31, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:11, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Amir yaghini (talk · contribs)
[edit]The uploader has claimed web and social media as self made. I found a couple of the photos with creative commons licenses, but the rest are missing valid source information.
- File:Mohammad Qaderi.jpg
- File:Mohammad Moslemipoor.jpg
- File:Reza sef Ahmadi.png
- File:Hamid Buhamdan.png
- File:Sed Mohammad Khoram.png
- File:محمدمهدی قنبری.png
- File:MohammadReza Akhbari.jpg
- File:سعید واسعی.png
- File:وفا هخامنشی.png
- File:مهدی تیکدری.png
- File:Okacha Hamzaoui.png
- File:Saeed Mehri.png
- File:Akbar Imani .png
Ytoyoda (talk) 19:21, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:Ymblanter. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:13, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
Unused photo of an unnotable person – out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 22:29, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:14, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
Unused photo of an unnotable person – out of COM:SCOPE. There is even an appeal to follow them on Facebook. Mosbatho (talk) 18:47, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:36, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work of the uploader. jdx Re: 22:36, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:14, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
Unused photo of an unnotable person – out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 23:05, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:14, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
Unsourced on Albanian Wikipedia Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:33, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:14, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work. Hashmat56 (talk) 01:02, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:19, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
Facebook image per Metadata, permission is required. Hashmat56 (talk) 01:20, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:19, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
- File:Légi felvétel.jpg
- File:Récsei toborzó reklám a BX 58-96-os rendszámú buszon (BPO-483).jpg
- File:Vadonatúj Ikarus 435-ös a Récseiben .jpg
- File:A BKV első Ikarus 415-ös típusú autóbusza a Récseiben.jpg
- File:7-173Gyors autóbuszok újonnan a Récseiben 1998-ban.jpg
- File:A kiürített telephely.jpg
- File:A telephely légifelvételen.jpg
- File:Ikarus 180-as a Récsei Üzemegységben (1970-es évek) .jpg
- File:A Récsei Üzemegység Istvánmezei úti bejárata az 1970-es években.jpg
- File:A Récsei Üzemegység tárolótere az 1970-es években.jpg
- File:Récsei Üzemegység 1970-es években.jpg
- File:Récsei Üzemegység 1960-as években.jpg
- File:Récsei garázs szobrai.jpg
- File:Szent Domonkos utcai garázs szerelőcsarnoka.jpg
- File:Szent Domonkos utcai garázs a háború után.jpg
- File:A Szent Domonkos utcai garázs üzemi épülete.jpg
- File:A Szent Domonkos utcai garázs építése.jpg
- File:A Szent Domonkos utcai garázs építése 1930-ban.jpg
- File:Szent Domonkos utcai garázs az 1930-as években.jpg
- File:Récsei Üzemegység 1930-ban.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Wrong files per this edit. --Slazlo22 (talk) 17:43, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
Delete per nom. I fixed this page. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 03:22, 19 January 2021 (UTC)- Also at Commons:Help_desk#Copyright_claim. – BMacZero (🗩) 19:42, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Dear Slazlo22! You are copyrigth this pictures and i hope you get a worthy punishment for that. - Récsei93 (🗩) 20:56, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Please! Somebody delete's this files, because this user (Slazlo22) copyright violation! - (Récsei93 (🗩) 11:35, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:44, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
Unused historical photos, missing original author, source, date, and permission.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:08, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:47, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
Unused flow diagram with little context or educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:11, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:47, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
Unused flow diagram with little context or educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:12, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:47, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
Unused text doc, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:15, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:47, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
Unused graph without context or educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:16, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:48, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Doctorwhofan778 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Fictional flags and COA, no educational value, out of scope. Only used on userpage of non-contributing user.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:21, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:48, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
Unused screenshot, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:22, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:48, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
Unused text-only image, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:24, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:48, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
Unused screenshot, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:25, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:48, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Patrick295767 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused screenshots, no educational value, out of scope.
_(c).png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:28, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:49, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
Unused screenshot, no educational value, out of scope. And missing permission. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:28, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:49, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
Unused screenshot, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:30, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:49, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
Unused screenshot, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:31, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:49, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
Unused screenshot, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:32, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:49, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
Unused photo of non-notable person, no educational value, out of scope. And likely not own work but cropped from somewhere else. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:35, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:50, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
Unused photo of non-notable person, no educational value, out of scope. And likely not own work but scan or screengrab. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:36, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:50, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
Unused photo of non-notable person, no educational value, out of scope. And likely not own work but DW from somewhere else. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:37, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:50, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
Unused photo of non-notable person, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:37, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:50, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
Unused photo of non-notable person, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:38, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:50, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal clipart, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:38, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:50, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
Unused image (or cover of something) of nondescript sunset, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:44, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:50, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
Unused photo of non-notable person, no educational value, out of scope. And likely not own work but cropped from somewhere else. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:46, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:51, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
Logo above COM:TOO. Also included File:Escudocolegio.jpg. -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:46, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:51, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
Unused low quality image of nondescript flower, no educational value, out of scope. Likely test upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:49, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:51, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
Unused photo of non-notable person, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:53, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:22, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Gabriel Waisberg (talk · contribs)
[edit]Artist died in 1964, still under copyright (For Argentina: According to Law No. 11.723 as amended up to Law No. 26.570 of November 25, 2009, Ownership of intellectual works shall fall to the authors thereof during their lifetime, and to their heirs or legal successors for 70 years).
- File:El derecho de matar 3ra edicion - 0005p.jpg
- File:Punto Final - Llegara a robarle el suenio 522x745-001.jpg
- File:Punto Final Imágen página 107 - 003.png
- File:El Derecho de Matar.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:59, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:51, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
Unused low-res image without context or description, unusable and out of scope. And likely DW as well. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:04, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:51, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: transmission code in EXIF metadata. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:23, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:52, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:29, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:52, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
DW of copyrighted characters. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:31, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:52, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Unused user logo, uploader has no other live global contributions. Out of project scope. ƏXPLICIT 02:11, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:51, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Private image, no educational content. GeorgHH • talk 08:09, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:57, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Private image. No educational content. GeorgHH • talk 08:16, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:58, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
out of scope - plain text image with random photograph connected rather with poverty. Pibwl (talk) 10:44, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:58, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
File:Colored Aluminum Memorial Paracord Bracelet Engraved with Post Combat Related Incident.jpg
[edit]
Promotional image uploaded by a promotional account. See en:Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Promotional account. Un assiolo (talk) 11:30, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:01, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
Paris has no supreme court. Fantasy diagram, out of project scope. Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 12:17, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:01, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
Personal photo out of scope Drakosh (talk) 12:34, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:02, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:03, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Florian Lechner (Künstler)
[edit]copyright violation; living artist, no freedom of panorama.
Martin Sg. (talk) 12:36, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 00:23, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
copyvio, contemp. artwork, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 18:36, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 00:24, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
copyright violation; contemporary artworks; no freedom of panorama. Martin Sg. (talk) 19:27, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 00:27, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
See COM:CRT/Russia#Freedom of panorama. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:24, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
- Give it backfor crying out loud. See this is one of the reasons that Commons irritates me. It's not a free file and never was. That's why I uploaded it to the English Wikipedia and not here. It's legit on the English Wikipedia, probably because the English Wikipedia doesn't pay attention to Russian laws restricting stuff, and definitely because it's fair use. So anyway the process followed here is:
- I upload a non-free file locally to English Wikipedia. I don't don't don't want it uploaded to Commons, but there's no way to specify that
- It gets uploaded to Commons anyway (and thus automatically deleted from the English Wikipedia)
- It gets deleted from Commons for being non-free
- Now we don't have a picture in the article.
That's why I'm saying give it back. If you don't want to host it don't take in the first place. Move it back to the English Wikipedia, thanks. Herostratus (talk) 05:22, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
- Gie it back per Herostratus. There is actually a way to specify "do not upload to commons", you specify the file is being used under fair use.
However, Hero, my man, I must say, it looks like you were the one who uploaded it to Commons. So, um... yeah.--GRuban (talk) 19:43, 19 January 2021 (UTC)- @GRuban: It was moved to Commons by Commons is in a thing using FileImporter. Check the page history. Wikiacc (talk) 02:40, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
- Oh, that's interesting, I didn't realize FileImporter imported the file history from the other project and stuck it in this project. Thanks, Wikiacc. My apologies, Herostratus. --GRuban (talk) 02:45, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
- OK I was just informed that there are templates on the English Wikipedia to prevent images from being moved to commons or not locally deleted when moved there. Mea culpa, but it's hard to keep track of all that. Herostratus (talk) 05:18, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
- Oh, that's interesting, I didn't realize FileImporter imported the file history from the other project and stuck it in this project. Thanks, Wikiacc. My apologies, Herostratus. --GRuban (talk) 02:45, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
- @GRuban: It was moved to Commons by Commons is in a thing using FileImporter. Check the page history. Wikiacc (talk) 02:40, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per no COM:FOP Russia for non-architectural works. @Herostratus: even the solution above may fail: since enwiki follows U.S. FOP by default (w:Wikipedia:Freedom of panorama), it will be treated as unfree (w:WP:Non-free content) and an appropriate NFUR will be applied. This means reduced quality and resolution, however. Such unfree files will be deleted on enwiki if NFUR is insufficient or if unused for more than a week (7 days). Enwiki only allows unlimited image copies of copyrighted foreign buildings (that's why there's w:Template:FoP-USonly). For unfree non-U.S. sculptures and other artistic works, only one image per work (applying Non-free content guidelines) is allowed and should be reasonably used in one article only. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:54, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
- That's all right, the reduced quality and resolution means just large enough to be used in the article, which is all Herostratus wants. BTW, where do you see "one image per work" and "one article only" in the Non-free content guidelines? --GRuban (talk) 03:49, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
- Minimal use of non-free files is mandated, thus its very unusual if not forbidden for an image to be used in more than one article; it's pretty unlikely that two separate articles using the same image would be minimal use. Minimal use would normally apply to two images of the same thing in an article, because why would two be needed and how is that minimal? However, for this article, the two images, while both showing the statue, show it in two different modes (normal, and festooned), so that's legit. Anyway, this is an English Wikipedia thing, so we'll debate that there. Don't delete! Give it back! Herostratus (talk) 05:26, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
- @Herostratus and GRuban: for clarification, that is per my understanding of NFC policy on enwiki. This is like: w:MacArthur Landing Memorial National Park or w:Heritage of Cebu Monument in our country (which has no FOP too). And my wording of "one article only" means that those images cannot be used on "List of public art in X", "List of monuments in Y", or "History of Z". JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:19, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
- We're drifting here. This is a discussion about the deletion of one specific image on Commons, we can't decide general image policy on EN. --GRuban (talk) 03:32, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
- @Herostratus and GRuban: for clarification, that is per my understanding of NFC policy on enwiki. This is like: w:MacArthur Landing Memorial National Park or w:Heritage of Cebu Monument in our country (which has no FOP too). And my wording of "one article only" means that those images cannot be used on "List of public art in X", "List of monuments in Y", or "History of Z". JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:19, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
- Minimal use of non-free files is mandated, thus its very unusual if not forbidden for an image to be used in more than one article; it's pretty unlikely that two separate articles using the same image would be minimal use. Minimal use would normally apply to two images of the same thing in an article, because why would two be needed and how is that minimal? However, for this article, the two images, while both showing the statue, show it in two different modes (normal, and festooned), so that's legit. Anyway, this is an English Wikipedia thing, so we'll debate that there. Don't delete! Give it back! Herostratus (talk) 05:26, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
- That's all right, the reduced quality and resolution means just large enough to be used in the article, which is all Herostratus wants. BTW, where do you see "one image per work" and "one article only" in the Non-free content guidelines? --GRuban (talk) 03:49, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 03:00, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The tower was completed in 2012, there is no freedom of panorama in Georgia, thus permission from the architect is needed A1Cafel (talk) 03:40, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 06:46, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The tower was completed in 2012, there is no freedom of panorama in Georgia, thus permission from the architect is needed A1Cafel (talk) 03:40, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 06:46, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in Georgia A1Cafel (talk) 03:49, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 06:45, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Lizenz zu klären Sinesolenihil (talk) 14:16, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 18:21, 27 Januar 2021 UTC: No permission since 19 January 2021 --Krdbot 03:16, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
Lizenz zu klären Sinesolenihil (talk) 14:16, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 18:21, 27 Januar 2021 UTC: No permission since 19 January 2021 --Krdbot 03:16, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
Lizenz zu klären Sinesolenihil (talk) 14:17, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 18:21, 27 Januar 2021 UTC: No permission since 19 January 2021 --Krdbot 03:16, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
_Airbus_A320-200.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Airbus_A320-200.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Not interested for publishing CPBohn (talk) 01:05, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
_Airbus_A320-200.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:08, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
_Airbus_A320-200.jpg){kind=link}
It is doubtful that this image is the work of this user. Probably a screenshot from YouTube file. e.g. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QrYv6TQZTS8&t=33 Yuraily Lic (talk) 01:26, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:09, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Blurry, no location information; common species with thousands of better pics on Commons MPF (talk) 02:20, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:12, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Some random guy's music. Not helpful. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:27, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 11:31, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:12, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Image is very likely not the user's own work and the Creative Commons 4.0 license is being used falsely. This image is publicly accessible/searchable on Facebook with associated commentary by the Facebook user who uploaded the image which questions the use of the safety harness. Given the commentary associated with the image on the Facebook page versus the caption provided by the Wikimedia Commons user "Anomunus", is it very unlikely the Wikimedia Commons user "Anomunus" and the the Facebook user who uploaded the image to Facebook are the same person. This is also supported by the date of the image, which according to the Facebook page is dated April 11, 2010, while the image was uploaded to Wikimedia Commons on January 13, 2021 - over ten years apart. Heron5110 (talk) 05:06, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:23, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
NBA uniforms
[edit]- File:Kit body 2017-18 ATL association.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 ATL association.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 ATL icon.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 ATL icon.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 ATL statement.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 ATL statement.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 ATL city.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 ATL city.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 ATL classic.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 ATL classic.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 BOS association.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 BOS association.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 BOS icon.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 BOS icon.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 BOS statement.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 BOS statement.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 BOS city.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 BOS city.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 BRK association.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 BRK association.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 BRK icon.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 BRK icon.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 BRK statement.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 BRK statement.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 BRK city.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 BRK city.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 CHO association.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 CHO association.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 CHO icon.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 CHO icon.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 CHO statement.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 CHO statement.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 CHO city.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 CHO city.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 CHO classic.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 CHO classic.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 CHI association.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 CHI association.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 CHI icon.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 CHI icon.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 CHI statement.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 CHI statement.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 CHI city.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 CHI city.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 CLE association.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 CLE association.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 CLE icon.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 CLE icon.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 CLE statement.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 CLE statement.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 CLE city.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 CLE city.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 DAL association.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 DAL association.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 DAL icon.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 DAL icon.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 DAL statement.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 DAL statement.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 DAL city.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 DAL city.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 DEN association.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 DEN association.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 DEN icon.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 DEN icon.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 DEN statement.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 DEN statement.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 DEN city.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 DEN city.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 DET association.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 DET association.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 DET icon.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 DET icon.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 DET statement.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 DET statement.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 DET city.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 DET city.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 GSW association.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 GSW association.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 GSW icon.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 GSW icon.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 GSW statement.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 GSW statement.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 GSW city.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 GSW city.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 GSW classic.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 GSW classic.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 HOU association.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 HOU association.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 HOU icon.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 HOU icon.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 HOU statement.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 HOU statement.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 HOU city.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 HOU city.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 IND association.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 IND association.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 IND icon.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 IND icon.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 IND statement.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 IND statement.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 IND city.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 IND city.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 IND classic.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 IND classic.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 LAC association.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 LAC association.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 LAC icon.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 LAC icon.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 LAC statement.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 LAC statement.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 LAC city.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 LAC city.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 LAL association.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 LAL association.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 LAL icon.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 LAL icon.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 LAL statement.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 LAL statement.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 LAL city.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 LAL city.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 LAL classic.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 LAL classic.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 MEM association.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 MEM association.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 MEM icon.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 MEM icon.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 MEM statement.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 MEM statement.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 MEM city.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 MEM city.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 MIA association.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 MIA association.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 MIA icon.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 MIA icon.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 MIA statement.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 MIA statement.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 MIA city.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 MIA city.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 MIA classic.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 MIA classic.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 MIL association.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 MIL association.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 MIL icon.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 MIL icon.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 MIL statement.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 MIL city.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 MIL city.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 MIL classic.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 MIL classic.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 MIN association.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 MIN association.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 MIN icon.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 MIN icon.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 MIN statement.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 MIN statement.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 MIN city.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 MIN city.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 NOP association.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 NOP association.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 NOP icon.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 NOP icon.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 NOP statement.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 NOP statement.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 NOP city.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 NOP city.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 NYK association.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 NYK association.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 NYK icon.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 NYK icon.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 NYK statement.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 NYK statement.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 NYK city.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 NYK city.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 OKC association.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 OKC association.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 OKC icon.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 OKC icon.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 OKC statement.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 OKC statement.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 OKC city.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 OKC city.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 ORL association.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 ORL association.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 ORL icon.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 ORL icon.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 ORL statement.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 ORL statement.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 ORL city.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 ORL city.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 PHI association.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 PHI association.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 PHI icon.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 PHI icon.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 PHI statement.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 PHI statement.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 PHI city.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 PHI city.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 PHO association.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 PHO association.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 PHO icon.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 PHO icon.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 PHO statement.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 PHO statement.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 PHO city.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 PHO city.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 PHO classic.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 PHO classic.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 POR association.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 POR association.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 POR icon.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 POR icon.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 POR statement.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 POR statement.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 POR city.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 POR city.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 SAC association.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 SAC association.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 SAC icon.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 SAC icon.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 SAC statement.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 SAC statement.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 SAC city.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 SAC city.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 SAS association.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 SAS association.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 SAS icon.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 SAS icon.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 SAS statement.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 SAS statement.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 SAS city.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 SAS city.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 TOR association.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 TOR association.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 TOR icon.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 TOR icon.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 TOR statement.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 TOR statement.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 TOR city.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 TOR city.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 UTA association.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 UTA association.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 UTA icon.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 UTA icon.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 UTA statement.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 UTA statement.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 UTA city.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 UTA city.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 WAS association.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 WAS association.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 WAS icon.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 WAS icon.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 WAS statement.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 WAS statement.png
- File:Kit body 2017-18 WAS city.png
- File:Kit shorts 2017-18 WAS city.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 ATL association.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 ATL association.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 ATL icon.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 ATL icon.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 ATL statement.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 ATL statement.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 ATL city.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 ATL city.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 ATL classic.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 ATL classic.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 BOS association.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 BOS association.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 BOS icon.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 BOS icon.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 BOS statement.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 BOS statement.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 BOS city.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 BOS city.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 BOS earned.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 BOS earned.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 BRK association.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 BRK association.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 BRK icon.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 BRK icon.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 BRK statement.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 BRK statement.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 BRK city.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 BRK city.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 CHO association.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 CHO association.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 CHO icon.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 CHO icon.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 CHO statement.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 CHO statement.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 CHO city.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 CHO city.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 CHO classic.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 CHO classic.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 CHI association.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 CHI association.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 CHI icon.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 CHI icon.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 CHI statement.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 CHI statement.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 CHI city.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 CHI city.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 CLE association.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 CLE association.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 CLE icon.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 CLE icon.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 CLE statement.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 CLE statement.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 CLE city.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 CLE city.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 CLE earned.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 CLE earned.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 DAL association.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 DAL association.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 DAL icon.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 DAL icon.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 DAL statement.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 DAL statement.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 DAL city.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 DAL city.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 DEN association.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 DEN association.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 DEN icon.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 DEN icon.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 DEN statement.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 DEN statement.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 DEN city.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 DEN city.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 DET association.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 DET association.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 DET icon.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 DET icon.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 DET statement.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 DET statement.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 DET city.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 DET city.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 GSW association.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 GSW association.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 GSW icon.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 GSW icon.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 GSW statement.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 GSW statement.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 GSW city.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 GSW city.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 GSW classic.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 GSW classic.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 GSW earned.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 GSW earned.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 HOU association.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 HOU association.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 HOU icon.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 HOU icon.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 HOU statement.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 HOU statement.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 HOU city.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 HOU city.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 HOU earned.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 HOU earned.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 IND association.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 IND association.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 IND icon.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 IND icon.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 IND statement.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 IND statement.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 IND city.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 IND city.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 IND classic.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 IND classic.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 IND earned.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 IND earned.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 LAC association.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 LAC association.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 LAC icon.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 LAC icon.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 LAC statement.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 LAC statement.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 LAC city.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 LAC city.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 LAL association.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 LAL association.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 LAL icon.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 LAL icon.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 LAL statement.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 LAL statement.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 LAL city.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 LAL city.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 MEM association.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 MEM association.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 MEM icon.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 MEM icon.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 MEM statement.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 MEM statement.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 MEM city.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 MEM city.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 MIA association.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 MIA association.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 MIA icon.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 MIA icon.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 MIA statement.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 MIA statement.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 MIA city.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 MIA city.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 MIA earned.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 MIA earned.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 MIL association.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 MIL association.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 MIL icon.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 MIL icon.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 MIL statement.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 MIL city.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 MIL city.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 MIL earned.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 MIL earned.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 MIN association.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 MIN association.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 MIN icon.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 MIN icon.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 MIN statement.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 MIN statement.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 MIN city.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 MIN city.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 MIN classic.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 MIN classic.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 MIN earned.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 MIN earned.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 NOP association.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 NOP association.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 NOP icon.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 NOP icon.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 NOP statement.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 NOP statement.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 NOP city.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 NOP city.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 NOP earned.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 NOP earned.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 NYK association.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 NYK association.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 NYK icon.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 NYK icon.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 NYK statement.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 NYK statement.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 NYK city.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 NYK city.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 OKC association.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 OKC association.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 OKC icon.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 OKC icon.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 OKC statement.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 OKC statement.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 OKC city.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 OKC city.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 OKC earned.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 OKC earned.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 ORL association.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 ORL association.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 ORL icon.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 ORL icon.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 ORL statement.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 ORL statement.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 ORL city.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 ORL city.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 ORL classic.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 ORL classic.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 PHI association.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 PHI association.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 PHI icon.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 PHI icon.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 PHI statement.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 PHI statement.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 PHI city.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 PHI city.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 PHI earned.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 PHI earned.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 PHO association.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 PHO association.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 PHO icon.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 PHO icon.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 PHO statement.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 PHO statement.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 PHO city.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 PHO city.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 POR association.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 POR association.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 POR icon.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 POR icon.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 POR statement.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 POR statement.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 POR city.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 POR city.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 POR earned.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 POR earned.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 SAC association.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 SAC association.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 SAC icon.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 SAC icon.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 SAC statement.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 SAC statement.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 SAC city.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 SAC city.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 SAS association.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 SAS association.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 SAS icon.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 SAS icon.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 SAS statement.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 SAS statement.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 SAS city.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 SAS city.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 SAS earned.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 SAS earned.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 TOR association.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 TOR association.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 TOR icon.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 TOR icon.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 TOR statement.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 TOR statement.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 TOR city.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 TOR city.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 TOR earned.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 TOR earned.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 UTA association.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 UTA association.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 UTA icon.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 UTA icon.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 UTA statement.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 UTA statement.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 UTA city.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 UTA city.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 UTA classic.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 UTA classic.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 UTA earned.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 UTA earned.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 WAS association.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 WAS association.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 WAS icon.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 WAS icon.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 WAS statement.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 WAS statement.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 WAS city.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 WAS city.png
- File:Kit body 2018-19 WAS earned.png
- File:Kit shorts 2018-19 WAS earned.png
Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kit body 2017-18 MIL statement.png, File:Kit body raptors1995.png and COM:TO. These files (uploaded by me) meet the threshold of originality required for copyright protection. For example, File:Kit body 2018-19 UTA classic.png is a copyright violation because it uses a logo that is protected by copyright. --Wow (talk) 05:39, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Kept: nothing copyrightable here, merely a few pixels in the color of a logo, DM. See also Commons:Deletion requests/NBA Nike uniforms. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:28, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
This is a logo from www.prettyvirgin.com and obviously not a work of uploader. 223.18.231.23 06:17, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:30, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Incorrect metadata and filename. New correct version is uploaded Tagooty (talk) 07:05, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:31, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
This image is very fishy. Tagged as own work but has some watermark on it that usually is used by eg. tourist sites. Futhermore the EXIF info says "© 2020 Yurii Repalo, all rights reserved". The uploader has many images that are fishy like this one. Hangman'sDeath (talk) 07:55, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
- Я, Yurii-mr, є також автором watermark File:Мандруймо Полтавщиною.png на моїх фото. Цей watermark "Мандруймо Полтавщиною" додатково вказує в якій області (регіоні) зроблене фото а також має ціль популяризації туризму на Полтавщині. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yurii-mr (talk • contribs) 16:16, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Kept: actually, the EXIF data is consistent in all their uploads. As per Google Translate: "I, User:Yurii-mr, am also the author of watermark", apparent that the uploader is Yurii Repalo. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:35, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Derivative artwork, photographer is not the author Stolbovsky (talk) 08:14, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:44, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Derivative artwork, photographer is not the author Stolbovsky (talk) 08:15, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:44, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Derivative artwork, photographer is not the author Stolbovsky (talk) 08:16, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:44, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
useless image only used for vandalism on es.wikipedia Pippobuono (talk) 09:27, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:44, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope. Artwork without obvious educational use. SCP-2000 10:49, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
- One use is that you can use this instead in Wikipedia biography entries where there is no picture of the person.--Kitabc12345 (talk) 11:55, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
- Since this file not in use in any Wikimedia project now, I suspect whether or not your statement is real. If this file is not used in another Wikimedia project, then that should be deleted per COM:SCOPE. SCP-2000 13:40, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:45, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Unused photo of house with no indication of location. Without klnowing where it is the image is of no educational value. Malcolma (talk) 11:11, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
- Had a try at searching by the name given in the description. It's in Ireland--photographs on their website match (Google maps). --wqnvlz (talk | contribs) 07:36, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
Kept: now identified and categorized. In scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:48, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Unused photo of what appears to be personal artwork. Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 11:29, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:48, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Promotional image uploaded by a promotional account. See en:Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Promotional account. Un assiolo (talk) 11:30, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:48, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Unused photo. Too small and unclear to be of use. Malcolma (talk) 11:52, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:50, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
I uploaded the wrong size. TheUnionForever (talk) 12:01, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:50, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
fantasy diagram, out of project scope Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 12:18, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:51, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Unused project photograph without description. No educational value. Malcolma (talk) 13:32, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:58, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Unused diagram with unclear purpose. No meaningful description. No educational value. Malcolma (talk) 13:36, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:59, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Unused diagram with no obvious importance. Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 13:38, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:51, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Taken from FB per MD, needs OTRS Gbawden (talk) 13:44, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:52, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of project scope, no use in anywiki. (｀・ω・´) (talk) 14:00, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete per nominator's reasons. Also image uploaded by a banned sockpuppet account. --Leoboudv (talk) 09:56, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:52, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Copyrighted logo, out of scope, only used for promo (m:Special:CentralAuth/Nevoparudimos) Gikü (talk) 14:01, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:52, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Showroomdummies (talk · contribs)
[edit]useless image of a musical group of little reputation
Pippobuono (talk) 14:17, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:54, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
useless photo of musicians, and maybe copyvio Pippobuono (talk) 14:24, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:54, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
useless images of musical groups of low reknown
Pippobuono (talk) 14:28, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:54, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
I work for the European Cancer Organisation, and because this picture is out-to-date and was upload long time ago, we would like to ask to remove it as it does not correspond our brand and interests anymore. Please contact me at alberto.crespo@europeancancer.org for further confirmation if needed. 88.15.52.45 14:49, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:55, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
I work for the European Cancer Organisation, and because this picture is out-to-date and was upload long time ago, we would like to ask to remove it as it does not correspond our brand and interests anymore. Please contact me at alberto.crespo@europeancancer.org for further confirmation if needed. 88.15.52.45 14:53, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:55, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Gitika Gayan (talk) 14:59, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:55, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
I work for the European Cancer Organisation, and because this picture is out-to-date and was upload long time ago, we would like to ask to remove it as it does not correspond our brand and interests anymore. Please contact me at alberto.crespo@europeancancer.org for further confirmation if needed. 88.15.52.45 15:06, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Kept: former logos are kept for historical purposes. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:58, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
I work for the European Cancer Organisation, and because this picture is out-to-date and was upload long time ago, we would like to ask to remove it as it does not correspond our brand and interests anymore. Please contact me at alberto.crespo@europeancancer.org for further confirmation if needed. 88.15.52.45 15:08, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Kept: former logos are kept for historical purposes. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:58, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
I work for the European Cancer Organisation, and because this picture is out-to-date and was upload long time ago, we would like to ask to remove it as it does not correspond our brand and interests anymore. Please contact me at alberto.crespo@europeancancer.org for further confirmation if needed. 88.15.52.45 15:10, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: unusable, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:57, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
not free AwkwardChester (talk) 15:11, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:59, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
I work for the European Cancer Organisation, and because this picture is out-to-date and was upload long time ago, we would like to ask to remove it as it does not correspond our brand and interests anymore. Please contact me at alberto.crespo@europeancancer.org for further confirmation if needed. 88.15.52.45 15:11, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: DW, missing permission. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:58, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:49, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:59, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:53, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:59, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mikeward212 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Appear to be screenshots, not original photos
Ytoyoda (talk) 16:01, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:00, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Duplicate. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:03, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:59, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:08, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:59, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:23, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:01, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Unused and probably out of COM:SCOPE. Commons is not a personal image hosting service. Howhontanozaz (talk) 16:25, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:00, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:42, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:01, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private video hosting. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:50, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. --Achim (talk) 21:05, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
arguments against deletion
[edit]How's Doves' Cry is not outside the educational scope of Commons; it is a public domain file intended to be reused in future derivative artistic works of varying media (and thus imperative for artists contributing to the project). The film's educational presence is particularly significant because it is so unique; Commons:Project Scope states that "Where a subject is rare and/or difficult to capture, even a poor-quality file may be of significant educational value, especially if Commons has very few or no similar files already." The idea of a living artistic movement composed directly out of the human capital that alters it is novel, and the medium in which this idea is presented is distinct. Additionally, there are no other files pertaining to the How's Doves' Cry movement on Commons, making the preservation of the film itself a valuable source of information on a topic about which little is known. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Davidedgemon02 (talk • contribs) 21:15, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:01, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:53, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:02, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram. Duplicate. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:06, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:02, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:07, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:02, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Out of project scope - flag of a fictional country. Also see Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Pavel Porošecký, Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Vlastimil Burian, Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Orpener, Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Orpener (2) - all of these uploaders are from one group of people from https://cs.azurpedia.eu. Harold (talk) 17:10, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:04, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
No added value to keep this. Upirix (talk) 17:13, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:04, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Naimur Rahman Emon (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused and probably out of COM:SCOPE. Commons is not a personal image hosting service. Also, a likely copyvio since uploader and subject seem to be the same person and the photos are not selfies.
Howhontanozaz (talk) 17:31, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:04, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Advertisement for website GeorgHH • talk 17:36, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:05, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Please ! I am the photographer and the model represented had not given me her agreement to diffuse these precise images (law of the "right to the image" in France), I expose myself to legal attacks on his part for having diffused these images. I am well aware that you are under no obligation to remove these images, to support the request for courtesy deletion I would like to point out that these images do not provide any major encyclopaedic information, the photos concerned by the deletion are not used on any Wikipedia articles (not even on the model's Wikipedia page). It would be very kind of you to give a favourable response to this request for deletion, concerning the model I think she has the right to disagree on the use of her image, especially concerning photographs taken when she was in her twenties, some of which are a little explicit. Thank you very much in advance for your precious help... Tpr1 (talk) 17:53, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:07, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Please ! I am the photographer and the model represented had not given me her agreement to diffuse these precise images (law of the "right to the image" in France), I expose myself to legal attacks on his part for having diffused these images. I am well aware that you are under no obligation to remove these images, to support the request for courtesy deletion I would like to point out that these images do not provide any major encyclopaedic information, the photos concerned by the deletion are not used on any Wikipedia articles (not even on the model's Wikipedia page). It would be very kind of you to give a favourable response to this request for deletion, concerning the model I think she has the right to disagree on the use of her image, especially concerning photographs taken when she was in her twenties. Thank you very much in advance for your precious help... Tpr1 (talk) 17:54, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:07, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Please ! I am the photographer and the model represented had not given me her agreement to diffuse these precise images (law of the "right to the image" in France), I expose myself to legal attacks on his part for having diffused these images. I am well aware that you are under no obligation to remove these images, to support the request for courtesy deletion I would like to point out that these images do not provide any major encyclopaedic information, the photos concerned by the deletion are not used on any Wikipedia articles (not even on the model's Wikipedia page). It would be very kind of you to give a favourable response to this request for deletion, concerning the model I think she has the right to disagree on the use of her image, especially concerning photographs taken when she was in her twenties, some of which are a little explicit. Thank you very much in advance for your precious help... Tpr1 (talk) 17:54, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:07, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Please ! I am the photographer and the model represented had not given me her agreement to diffuse these precise images (law of the "right to the image" in France), I expose myself to legal attacks on his part for having diffused these images. I am well aware that you are under no obligation to remove these images, to support the request for courtesy deletion I would like to point out that these images do not provide any major encyclopaedic information, the photos concerned by the deletion are not used on any Wikipedia articles (not even on the model's Wikipedia page). It would be very kind of you to give a favourable response to this request for deletion, concerning the model I think she has the right to disagree on the use of her image, especially concerning photographs taken when she was in her twenties, some of which are a little explicit (this one is a double of another, less dark). Thank you very much in advance for your precious help... Tpr1 (talk) 17:56, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:07, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Please ! I am the photographer and the model represented had not given me her agreement to diffuse these precise images (law of the "right to the image" in France), I expose myself to legal attacks on his part for having diffused these images. I am well aware that you are under no obligation to remove these images, to support the request for courtesy deletion I would like to point out that these images do not provide any major encyclopaedic information, the photos concerned by the deletion are not used on any Wikipedia articles (not even on the model's Wikipedia page). It would be very kind of you to give a favourable response to this request for deletion, concerning the model I think she has the right to disagree on the use of her image, especially concerning photographs taken when she was in her twenties. Thank you very much in advance for your precious help dear Wikimedia users ... Tpr1 (talk) 17:57, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:07, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Please ! I am the photographer and the model represented had not given me her agreement to diffuse these precise images (law of the "right to the image" in France), I expose myself to legal attacks on his part for having diffused these images. I am well aware that you are under no obligation to remove these images, to support the request for courtesy deletion I would like to point out that these images do not provide any major encyclopaedic information, the photos concerned by the deletion are not used on any Wikipedia articles (not even on the model's Wikipedia page). It would be very kind of you to give a favourable response to this request for deletion, concerning the model I think she has the right to disagree on the use of her image, especially concerning photographs taken when she was that young. Thank you very much in advance for your precious help... Tpr1 (talk) 17:58, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:07, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Very blurry photo of a very common topic - thousands of better photos already on Commons, no use to Commons MPF (talk) 18:25, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
- We occlude photos, we not delete, this photo could have usage, and occlude it do not have any benefit to the community.
- -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m 20:30, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:08, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Daniel Sies (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope. Personal photos of a user with no contribs: m:Special:CentralAuth/Daniel Sies.
Gikü (talk) 18:46, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:09, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Source: "With the consent of the photographer" E4024 (talk) 18:48, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:09, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Young photo of me, not comfortable with it on here Dhf510 (talk) 19:25, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused personal photo. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:10, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Upload test, single file by this uploader: single page PDF with trivially composed "????" within a round-corner rectangular cartouche. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 21:56, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:11, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Unused joke image, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 23:34, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:12, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
I don't want this image on internet 195.20.146.189 15:08, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --jdx Re: 03:38, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
I am on this picture and I want it to be removed from Wikimedia commons. Anonymous.space (talk) 15:12, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
- Not a used file; I see no problem in deleting. --E4024 (talk) 15:22, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
- That's correct, however the picture appears when you google my name and I never approved to have this picture uploaded on wikimedia commons. So, if the picture is not used anywhere here, I see no reason why it could not be deleted. Anonymous.space (talk) 16:53, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
- Again "I see no problem in deleting." Could I not express myself well enough? --E4024 (talk) 17:00, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, i misread it. Please apologize and thank you for your comment. Anonymous.space (talk) 17:04, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
- Again "I see no problem in deleting." Could I not express myself well enough? --E4024 (talk) 17:00, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
- That's correct, however the picture appears when you google my name and I never approved to have this picture uploaded on wikimedia commons. So, if the picture is not used anywhere here, I see no reason why it could not be deleted. Anonymous.space (talk) 16:53, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused personal photo. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:13, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Unsourced crude photoshop fake. Ash_Crow (talk) 00:39, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
- Re above. Checked, could not find any other copies of image. Source link is dead. Rybkovich (talk) 20:17, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:40, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. PD-old? Didym (talk) 02:35, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Obvious PD-Old. --Ymblanter (talk) 21:08, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
This is an unattributed modern fabrication, with no info at the source provided, part of a campaign by an uncommunicative problem uploader. Eric talk 16:25, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
Keepchange to Delete- unattributed? certainly. uncommunicative problem uploader? if you say so. modern fabrication? not likely at all. Agricolae (talk) 19:10, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
- Agricolae, a brief glance at the archived discussions above, as well as at uploader's talkpage, might inform your opinion better. That link and other info here: Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Marjorie_Bruce,_Princess_of_Scotland.jpg#File:Marjorie_Bruce,_Princess_of_Scotland.jpg. Eric talk 19:26, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
- No, a brief glance at the above discussion and the contributor's Talk page is unlikely to inform my opinion better than the more extensive look I took at them before I registered my opinion that this is unlikely to be a modern fabrication. Agricolae (talk) 20:13, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
- The evidence for Каволо's uploaded images being modern fabrications is linked at the discussion in my previous post; here is the direct link: User_talk:Majora/Archive_2#PD_ART. Eric talk 22:39, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
- You are painting with a broad brush there. The Flickr account includes some of the montages you describe, but also a lot of original artwork. To say that "these images DO NOT depict the mentionned persons" as you did there, is a gross overstatement. I would be very much surprised if this image was not who it is claimed to be. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Agricolae (talk • contribs) 01:03, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
- Agricolae, if you are addressing that comment at me, you are only reinforcing my sense that you are not reading the evidence carefully. The anonymous IP editor who wrote the post from which you quote has yet to comment here, and writes in a considerably different style from mine. All of the above-linked images are modern contrivances. I would like to think that most people would suspect that just from looking at them. Following the IP editor's observations makes it obvious. Eric talk 14:05, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
- No evidence that this image is a fabrication, then. That is what I thought. Agricolae (talk) 16:29, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
- Image comes from Pinterest and/or Flickr, part of the so-called "Lost Gallery", which is full of similar photo-shopped works. Note that it is copyrighted "all rights reserved" on the Flickr site. Note that the source given by the uploader doesn't point to either one of these. Eric talk 19:38, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
- And it is also full of images that are not manipulated. As to the "all rights reserved", that means absolutely nothing, any more than the numerous book publishers who add copyright notices to public domain scans they have ripped off of Google Books and the Internet Archive, or for that matter, all of the YouTube profiles that claim to own the intellectual property of popular song or sporting event videos they are doing nothing but reposting. Such notices routinely appear on pages containing images for which the compiler most assuredly has no right to claim intellectual property protection. The boilerplate claim could just be referring to the arrangement of the site and not the individual images. Agricolae (talk) 16:25, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
- Image comes from Pinterest and/or Flickr, part of the so-called "Lost Gallery", which is full of similar photo-shopped works. Note that it is copyrighted "all rights reserved" on the Flickr site. Note that the source given by the uploader doesn't point to either one of these. Eric talk 19:38, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
- No evidence that this image is a fabrication, then. That is what I thought. Agricolae (talk) 16:29, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
- Agricolae, if you are addressing that comment at me, you are only reinforcing my sense that you are not reading the evidence carefully. The anonymous IP editor who wrote the post from which you quote has yet to comment here, and writes in a considerably different style from mine. All of the above-linked images are modern contrivances. I would like to think that most people would suspect that just from looking at them. Following the IP editor's observations makes it obvious. Eric talk 14:05, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
- You are painting with a broad brush there. The Flickr account includes some of the montages you describe, but also a lot of original artwork. To say that "these images DO NOT depict the mentionned persons" as you did there, is a gross overstatement. I would be very much surprised if this image was not who it is claimed to be. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Agricolae (talk • contribs) 01:03, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
- The evidence for Каволо's uploaded images being modern fabrications is linked at the discussion in my previous post; here is the direct link: User_talk:Majora/Archive_2#PD_ART. Eric talk 22:39, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
- No, a brief glance at the above discussion and the contributor's Talk page is unlikely to inform my opinion better than the more extensive look I took at them before I registered my opinion that this is unlikely to be a modern fabrication. Agricolae (talk) 20:13, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
- Agricolae, a brief glance at the archived discussions above, as well as at uploader's talkpage, might inform your opinion better. That link and other info here: Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Marjorie_Bruce,_Princess_of_Scotland.jpg#File:Marjorie_Bruce,_Princess_of_Scotland.jpg. Eric talk 19:26, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
Pinging potentially interested parties: @Ash Crow, Rybkovich, Ellin Beltz, and Jameslwoodward: please see above. Thanks, Eric talk 19:16, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
- Hi. I was pinged. I looked at both the pinterest and flickr images linked above and I see quite a bit of photoshop in the veil, the hands, the chains on her chest and bodice, the colored patches on shoulder, and so on. Neither pinterest nor flickr gives source of the base image. If the base image were old enough to be PD, and no alterations had been made, this would be a slam-dunk keep; however with the modifications and no base source, I still have to vote delete on this one. If by some chance this is resolved kept, would closing admin please add image to https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Blanche_I_of_Navarre, thanks! Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:07, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
- OK, unlike the parts I had been focusing on, the gold chain does look photoshopped, and I see a couple of other details I missed before. Enough for me to withdraw my !vote. Agricolae (talk) 04:08, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
- The goldchain does seem too vivid. Also since there is no source how do we know this is a picture of Blanca II de Navarra? Rybkovich (talk) 18:33, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- OK, unlike the parts I had been focusing on, the gold chain does look photoshopped, and I see a couple of other details I missed before. Enough for me to withdraw my !vote. Agricolae (talk) 04:08, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
Keep Unlike Marjorie Bruce, which was obviously lifted and modified from another source that doesn't see to me Marjorie Bruce, I can't find this image in any form but this one. A larger version of the painting appears at https://www.historyofroyalwomen.com/blanche-ii-of-navarre/blanche-ii-navarre/, so if this is closed as a keep, the closing Admin might upload that over this.
- The image no longer appears at the site I cited above, so I withdraw the comment. I'm inclined to agree with the arguments above. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:04, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for commenting, Jim. I suspect that blogger you linked got the image from here. The pixel ratio is the same; I think she just scaled it up (by 236%). I sent her a message asking where she got it and if she had info on the original. The fact that we cannot find any reference to the painting makes me think this image could be a paste-up, though it doesn't appear as obviously fake to me as most of the others from this uploader. I searched in a few languages for paintings of her, and couldn't find anything definitive. I would think that if the painting existed, we would find some mention of it being catalogued in a museum or collection somewhere. Eric talk 16:52, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
- Jim, thanks for making those deletions. Eric talk 12:22, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Like many others, this file comes from a flickr account which was called the lost gallery. All the pictures have nonetheless been removed a few months ago. And many are indeed Photoshop fakes. Some include very recognisable coats of arms from wikipedia. Kathisma (talk) 21:19, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
- Jim, thanks for making those deletions. Eric talk 12:22, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --ƏXPLICIT 06:24, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
re-appearance of image deleted after discussion; see discussions linked below Eric talk 02:40, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Amada44 talk to me 21:45, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kitabc12345 (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:DW of copyright work.
SCP-2000 11:43, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 17:45, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kitabc12345 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope.
- File:家課日誌 2020-11-27.jpg
- File:家課日誌 2020-11-25.jpg
- File:家課日誌 2020-11-24.jpg
- File:家課日誌 2020-11-23.jpg
- File:家課日誌 2020-11-20.jpg
- File:家課日誌 2020-11-19.jpg
- File:家課日誌 2020-11-16.jpg
- File:家課日誌 2020-11-13.jpg
- File:家課日誌 2020-11-12.jpg
- File:家課日誌 2020-11-11.jpg
- File:家課日誌 2020-11-10.jpg
- File:家課日誌 2020-11-09.jpg
- File:家課日誌 2020-11-06.png
- File:家課日誌 2020-11-05.jpg
- File:家課日誌 2020-11-04.jpg
- File:家課日誌 2020-11-03.jpg
- File:家課日誌 2020-11-02.jpg
- File:家課日誌 2020-10-30.jpg
- File:家課日誌 2020-10-29.jpg
- File:家課日誌 2020-10-28 19-51-38.jpg
SCP-2000 07:05, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
- @SCP-2000: Out of what scope? These are my works. --Kitabc12345 (talk) 07:29, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
- Imagine we could have a Wikipedia entry for a home lesson log and just use this actual home lesson log to put up as an introductory image, although it's a bit wrong to put that much on Wikimedia Commons, but this all has a sort of reasonable use.--Kitabc12345 (talk) 12:22, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
- In Hong Kong classrooms there is a homework column on the blackboard listing homework, thus this picture can used for educational purposes when introducing the classroom or the blackboard.--Kitabc12345 (talk) 12:22, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
- Then only keep these files 1 2 3. Other files are similar to these keeping file (i.e. shooting angle and content) and should be deleted per "Files that add nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject" and COM:HOST. SCP-2000 11:22, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Kept 3 as per above. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:17, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kitabc12345 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Complex design. Meet COM:TOO HK or COM:TOO China
- File:Transport Department.svg
- File:Sina Weibo Logo 03.png
- File:Sina Weibo Logo 02.png
- File:Sina Weibo Logo 01.png
- File:Hainan Broadcasting Satellite TV Station Logo.png
SCP-2000 03:53, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
- File:Hainan Broadcasting Satellite TV Station Logo.png must not be in the public domain, but File:Sina Weibo Logo 03.png, File:Sina Weibo Logo 02.png, File:Sina Weibo Logo 01.png just a simple pattern composed of two colors (I think).--Kitabc12345 (talk) 12:14, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
- The design inside the red circle is complex and meet Commons:TOO China SCP-2000 13:47, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 01:45, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kitabc12345 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Potential copyvio and seem not own work. Missing exifdata. Secondly, the uploader mass uploaded copyvio images between 2021-01-11 to 2021-01-14. Also, comparing some images which the uploader claimed own work 1 2, Composition are much different.
- File:洋浦经济开发区保税港区 海南澳斯卡国际粮油项目 施工场景.jpg
- File:QQ 20210113085446.webm
- File:QQ 20210113085417.jpg
- File:QQ 20210113085433.jpg
- File:QQ 20210113085428.jpg
- File:QQ 20210113085437.jpg
- File:钱铃双刀舞.jpg
- File:三亞排隊領取口罩 03.jpg
- File:三亞排隊領取口罩 02.jpg
- File:三亞排隊領取口罩 01.jpg
- File:遊客來到亞龍灣熱帶天堂森林公園 玩玻璃棧道體驗.jpg
- File:Li ladies dancing.jpg
- File:Large numbers of people love the CPC flag.jpg
- File:Team follows the CPC party flag.jpg
- File:母瑞山革命根據地 中學生緬懷烈士.jpg
- File:Evening in Hainan.jpg
- File:海垦南繁水稻育种基地的水稻.jpg
- File:工人們正包裝粽子定安「黃阿姨」粽子.jpg
- File:Green Home.jpg
- File:職工喂养野山猪.jpg
- File:荔海共享农庄.jpg
- File:Hainan Nongken High School study for NHEEE.jpg
- File:李军 2020.jpg
- File:Sanya Central Business District at a Glance.jpg
- File:三亚互联网信息产业园.jpg
- File:Sanya Sea Travel Duty-Free City.jpg
- File:吉阳区冬种设施.jpg
- File:吉阳区大茅远洋生态村.jpg
- File:Yewei Avenue, Yaxing Town, Danzhou City.jpg
- File:COVID-19 pandemic in Qionghai Boao Airport 07.jpg
- File:COVID-19 pandemic in Qionghai Boao Airport 06.jpg
- File:COVID-19 pandemic in Qionghai Boao Airport 05.jpg
- File:COVID-19 pandemic in Qionghai Boao Airport 04.jpg
- File:COVID-19 pandemic in Qionghai Boao Airport 03.jpg
- File:COVID-19 pandemic in Qionghai Boao Airport 02.jpg
- File:COVID-19 pandemic in Qionghai Boao Airport 01.jpg
- File:An international flight lands at Sanya Phoenix International Airport.jpg
- File:China Immigration Inspection in Sanya Phoenix International Airport.jpg
- File:Epidemic prevention and control education in Dongfang Middle School 04.jpg
- File:Epidemic prevention and control education in Dongfang Middle School 03.jpg
- File:Epidemic prevention and control education in Dongfang Middle School 02.jpg
- File:Epidemic prevention and control education in Dongfang Middle School 01.jpg
- File:Body Temperature in No. 4 Primary School 05.jpg
- File:Body Temperature in No. 4 Primary School 04.jpg
- File:Body Temperature in No. 4 Primary School 03.jpg
- File:Body Temperature in No. 4 Primary School 02.jpg
- File:Body Temperature in No. 4 Primary School 01.jpg
- File:居家隔离 封杀条.jpg
- File:A Trade Business District, Sanya CBD.jpg
- File:Zhongliao Village, Jiyang District, Photography activities 2020.jpg
- File:Zhou Lianfen 2020.jpg
- File:Tong Daochi 2020.jpg
- File:Sanya authorities promote the dangers of straw and rubbish burning.jpg
- File:Sanya Yazhou Bay.jpg
- File:冯飞 2020.jpg
- File:沈晓明 2020.jpg
- File:刘赐贵 2020.jpg
- File:沈晓明 2021.jpg
- File:田丽霞 2021.jpg
- File:Haikou section of G15 Shenhai Expressway, Pile foundation construction.jpg
- File:俯瞰毗邻松涛水库的白沙牙叉镇.jpg
- File:Toahu Terraces in Wuzhishan.jpg
- File:Vine taro attached to ancient tree, Baihualing, Qiongzhong.jpg
- File:A Pond in Jianfengling National Forest Park.jpg
- File:Egrets racing in Caiqiao Mangrove Reserve, Lingao.jpg
- File:Wuzhishan Forest area in Hainan Tropical Rainforest National Park.jpg
SCP-2000 11:43, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
- File:QQ 20210113085446.webm, File:QQ 20210113085417.jpg, File:QQ 20210113085433.jpg, File:QQ 20210113085428.jpg, File:QQ 20210113085437.jpg was provided to me by my friend, and he released the copyright to me. Since it is sent through social media and compressed, the resolution and exifdata are lost. I upload wikimedia commons myself and put it in the Wikipedia. If you have copyright concerns, you can delete the others. --Kitabc12345 (talk) 11:52, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. "was provided to me by my friend, and he released the copyright to me" is not acceptable on commons. In that case you need to provide permission via COM:OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 07:19, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kitabc12345 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Photos of non-free content (FoP doesn't apply to posters and text in Hong Kong) (undelete in 2116):
Screenshot of non-free software Google Meet:
沈澄心✉ 05:55, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 06:00, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kitabc12345 (talk · contribs)
[edit]These seem to be copyvios – see Mulan (2020 film). I may be wrong about this, however if they aren't copyvios they probably aren't good to have in this category with this title that suggests these are film stills or similar.
- File:Disney live-action movie Mulan 07.png
- File:Disney live-action movie Mulan 06.png
- File:Disney live-action movie Mulan 05.png
- File:Disney live-action movie Mulan 04.png
- File:Disney live-action movie Mulan 03.png
- File:Disney live-action movie Mulan 02.png
- File:Disney live-action movie Mulan 01.png
Prototyperspective (talk) 12:59, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
- @Prototyperspective. it not real on Mulan (2020 film), just a picture of Mulan this history people by AI. Kitabc12345 (talk) 16:52, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
- I think it's possible to change it to another name? Kitabc12345 (talk) 16:53, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
- Because in fact, this does not contain any pictures of the film, nor is it part of the real film, nor does it belong to Disney. Kitabc12345 (talk) 16:53, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
- In fact, I just want to create a real character of Mulan, not the real Mulan in Disney movies. Kitabc12345 (talk) 17:00, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
- Because I think this is a live-action version of Hua Mulan, but when I think of it, I think Disney have a Hua Mulan, so I added it by the way, but I think it's wrong to do so, so I shouldn't add the relevant labels of Disney movies Hua Mulan. Because he is just a real simulation of the ancient character of Hua Mulan, This is a reference photo of a real historical figure who once existed. Kitabc12345 (talk) 17:02, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
- I think all of it looks much too similar so it's a derivative. Think of new things that haven't been made yet and then upload with different titles if at all. Prototyperspective (talk) 17:24, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
- Because I think this is a live-action version of Hua Mulan, but when I think of it, I think Disney have a Hua Mulan, so I added it by the way, but I think it's wrong to do so, so I shouldn't add the relevant labels of Disney movies Hua Mulan. Because he is just a real simulation of the ancient character of Hua Mulan, This is a reference photo of a real historical figure who once existed. Kitabc12345 (talk) 17:02, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
- In fact, I just want to create a real character of Mulan, not the real Mulan in Disney movies. Kitabc12345 (talk) 17:00, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
- Because in fact, this does not contain any pictures of the film, nor is it part of the real film, nor does it belong to Disney. Kitabc12345 (talk) 16:53, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
- I think it's possible to change it to another name? Kitabc12345 (talk) 16:53, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: It's either COM:DW if it's too close or out of scope if it isn't. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:28, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
photographie © Alain ROBERT/SIPA (https://www.parismatch.com/Actu/Politique/Perpignan-dans-le-viseur-du-RN-1686916) ~ Antoniex (discuter) 18:14, 19 January 2021 (UTC) P.S. : fichier d'origine ~ Antoniex (discuter)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 11:22, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
copie https://www.moniquedemarco.fr/ (© Monique De Marco | Tous droits réservés) ~ Antoniex (discuter) 18:17, 19 January 2021 (UTC) P.S. : fichier d'origine ~ Antoniex (discuter) 00:29, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 23:00, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
copie (Créateur : Jc Milhet | Crédits : Jean-Christophe Milhet Droits d'auteur : Jean-Christophe Milhet / Hans Lucas) https://www.hanslucas.com/sheet.php?id=30323 : cliché HL_JCMILHET_991974 ~ Antoniex (discuter) 18:21, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 23:04, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Obvious screenshot, not own work. Uploaded exclusively for use on Wikipedia entries. Techyan（Talk） 13:35, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 02:20, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
被写体人物のTwitterからの画像ですが、自由に使えることが明記されておらず著作権侵害（Copyvio）の可能性。 運動会プロテインパワー (talk) 15:18, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: no license specified. --Yasu (talk) 15:16, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yasu (talk) 15:18, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
Not a free source. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:05, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
- Keep as ineligible for copyright. This map is purely a representation of data, with no creative element. See {{PD-map}}. Wikiacc (talk) 02:53, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: As a general rule maps have a copyright. If the base map were PD, then the comment above is probably correct, but there is no evidence that the base map is pd and no free license on the source site. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:18, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
Commons no longer accepts GFDL-only files. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:48, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:19, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
Restored: Per {{Davecskatingphoto.com}} the permission is also cc-by-sa-3.0. --MGA73 (talk) 16:34, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
Image from copyrighted Film poster. And you do not create them. KMBDENNISTRIDENT (talk) 05:37, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:20, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
Copyright infringement HaThanhPhuoc (talk) 07:47, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Roblox HQ is located in the US, so US is the source country. And this Roblox Health Bar is below US TOO. See Commons:Threshold of originality#United States — Preceding unsigned comment added by KMBDENNISTRIDENT (talk • contribs) 01:59, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:20, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
From a non-free video game. (The video game is roblox) Not just simple geometry, also from a non-free game. EVn if headquarters in US, this should still get deleted.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:40:c003:9550:254c:972c:a2ef:180a (talk • contribs) 18:23, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
- Keep simple geometry as it's essentially just a green circle on a blue background. it doesn't matter if it came from a non-free game so long as it doesn't contain any copyrightable elements. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nintendofan885 (talk • contribs) 11:04, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: no educational value, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:25, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Uploader suggests he is the person in the photo; the photographer's name is in the metadata; need their permission to license their photo. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 09:33, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:21, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Uploader suggests he is the person in the photo; the author and copyright holder is in the metadata, need their permission to license a their photo. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 09:49, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:21, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photo violates sculptor's copyright. This is 1992 sculpture. Taivo (talk) 12:26, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete --Микола Василечко (talk) 19:48, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:21, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photo violates sculptor's copyright. Taivo (talk) 12:35, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:21, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
_Facult%C3%A9_des_Sciences_-_Universit%C3%A9_Paris-Saclay.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Facult%C3%A9_des_Sciences_-_Universit%C3%A9_Paris-Saclay.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No COM:FOP in France. Subject is a building opened only in 2019 and designed by Dominique Lyon Architects. Howhontanozaz (talk) 13:54, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:21, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
No COM:FOP in Italy. Subject is a building opened only in 2008 and designed by en:Manfredi Nicoletti (1930—2017). Can be undeleted in 2088 (2017+71). Howhontanozaz (talk) 14:08, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:22, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
It is reaffirmed that there is no FoP in Italy, even the architect is already died A1Cafel (talk) 17:31, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:54, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
Commons no longer accepts GFDL-only files. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:48, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Comment This image has an OTRS permission, we need an OTRS volunteer to confirm the license. --Sreejith K (talk) 04:11, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
- Keep I had a look on the permission and it seems to me that the copyright holder accepted cc-by-sa-3.0. I think we can add {{Davecskatingphoto.com}} to fix this. --MGA73 (talk) 16:12, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Also cc-by-sa-3.0 per above. --MGA73 (talk) 16:30, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
No COM:FOP in France. Subject is a 2017 building by Dominique Coulon & associés. Howhontanozaz (talk) 10:55, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 06:34, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The bridge was completed in 2004, there is no freedom of panorama in France, thus permission from the architect is needed A1Cafel (talk) 15:48, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 06:31, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The bridge was completed in 2004, there is no freedom of panorama in France, thus permission from the architect is needed A1Cafel (talk) 15:48, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 06:31, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
The bridge was completed in 2004, there is no freedom of panorama in France, thus permission from the architect is needed A1Cafel (talk) 15:49, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 06:31, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
File:1. Athenian Magazine. First Issue, April 12,1974. Cover Art by Louie Silivridou-Palasari (easter edition).jpg
[edit].jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unless I am missing something, this magazine cover is still under copyright in its source country and in the US. Per COM:GREECE, Greece's copyright duration is 70 pma so if theoretically, the copyright holders died the same year this was published (1974), it won't be public domain until 2045. Howhontanozaz (talk) 17:17, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: non free cover, copyvio. --Ezarateesteban 23:17, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Uniempresarial (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused promotional or personal photos, no educational value, out of scope.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:40, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted per nomination. -- CptViraj (talk) 09:30, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
Potential CP 2001:569:7B92:5500:51D4:B396:1951:8056 16:49, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete because of very poor quality. --Achim (talk) 19:01, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 02:56, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
Out of Scope - Not Educationally Useful / Redundant Bakertaylor28 (talk) 06:03, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:41, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept. Incoherent nom by a sock with no support. oknazevad (talk) 22:28, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
Copyright legal reason, U.S. Government Worker, per U.S. law, as to other sites Phubber (talk) 18:15, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Can't understand what OP is trying say. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 23:02, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Since the Public Domain rationale is included at the file, and not addressed, I can't recommend deletion at this time.Shajure (talk) 03:24, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
Which film is this from? Probably not public domain. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:28, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Description says it's from a 1938 European magazine with no author disclosure, which should qualify per stated license. Precautionary principle doesn't mean we disbelieve a very likely claim, merely one we have reason to disbelieve. --GRuban (talk) 23:32, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
- All these Who's Who images are from films. No, it doesn't automatically become "anonymous" because someone was too lazy to properly include it in their upload. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:51, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, I feel, that Ogre is right. Taivo (talk) 16:27, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Photo is credited to the subject's Flickr account. Unlikely that the basketball player took a photograph of himself playing basketball Ytoyoda (talk) 15:12, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
- @Ytoyoda: That photo is improperly attributed. Revised Ausbasketvic (talk) 18:31, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —howcheng {chat} 19:23, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
no evidence the uploader on flickr actually is the copyright holder - there's no exif data and this looks to be taken by a pro and then filtered on instagram or similar, while the uploader's flickr doesn't appear to be an actual photographer but a bunch of flickrwashing. Praxidicae (talk) 14:09, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: procedural close: already deleted by Howcheng. --Gestumblindi (talk) 00:48, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
Per the file's metadata, the copyright holder of the photo is someone named Sombit Dey. Needs his/her permission/licensing confirmation via COM:OTRS Howhontanozaz (talk) 17:35, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --jdx Re: 15:30, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: Missing Metadata. Hashmat56 (talk) 01:23, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
- Very common pic of Gazi Osman Paşa, who died in 1900. The uploader could have coloured it or not. I doubt this file has any copyright issues. --E4024 (talk) 18:59, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted As I understand it colourizations can generate own copyrights; unclear who did it; insufficient info to determine. Blurry web resolution; dubious claim that uploader is copyright holder of the photo and that photo is from 2020.-- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:31, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyvio of the late architect I.M. Pei's copyright: there is no Commons-applicable FOP in France. Cannot be de minimis as its size in the image makes it an intentional part of the image instead of incidental part. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:47, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted per nom and previous discussions of similar photos. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:34, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This is a screenshot from Twitter, which is not a software with Wikimedia Commons-compatible licensing Di (they-them) (talk) 02:06, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
-2021-01-19T02:06:00.000Z-File:2021-01-08_Donald_Trump_tweets_via_POTUS_twitter_account.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep; the parts of the Twitter interface visible in the image are below the threshold of originality. Vahurzpu (talk) 05:14, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
- Keep; that were by thoughts, when I did the upload. We yet might remove the part with the little icons between the tweets? --Matthiasb (talk) 02:34, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Closed as Kept per above. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:36, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
I'm unsure about whether Bhutan has threshold of originality, and therefore, I'm nominating for deletion for not causing legal problems. Ahmetlii (talk) 05:27, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
![05:27, 19 January 2021 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2021/01/19#c-Ahmetlii-2021-01-19T05:27:00.000Z-File:Logo_gazety_"Bhutan_Times".png){kind=link}
Speedy keep Obviously match. (｀・ω・´) (talk) 14:22, 19 January 2021 (UTC)- Keep {{PD-text}} should apply. --Mosbatho (talk) 08:25, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
Closed as Kept; seems classic example of PD-text. (I have added trademark notice to the file page.) Note: Decision should not be assumed to prejudge if additional info is presented that Bhutan law would not allow simple PD-text. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:41, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
![19:41, 22 August 2021 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2021/01/19#c-Infrogmation-2021-08-22T19:41:00.000Z-File:Logo_gazety_"Bhutan_Times".png){kind=link}
tv station copyrights 197.129.140.126 07:45, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Closed as Kept. CC-by on Youtube; unclear what nominator sees as problem. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:45, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
Copyrighted book, (C)John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (US) Gbawden (talk) 15:30, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, has clear copyright notice. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:00, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Yi Sun-sin Bridge
[edit]The bridge was completed in 2012, there is no freedom of panorama in South Korea, thus permission from the architect is needed.
- File:Yi Sun-sin Bridge 18-04177.jpg
- File:Yi Sun-sin Bridge 18-04178.jpg
- File:Yi Sun-sin Bridge 18-04185.jpg
- File:Yi Sun-sin Bridge 20130517 161115 (14376287926).jpg
- File:Yi Sun-sin Bridge 20130517 161115 (14376287926)2.jpg
- File:Yi Sun-sin Bridge in construction1.jpg
- File:Yi Sun-sin Bridge in construction2.jpg
- File:Yi Sun-sin Bridge in construction3.jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
2.jpg){kind=link}
A1Cafel (talk) 15:35, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Boy, this is a really thin rational. The "Types of protected work" under Copyright rules by territory/South Korea clearly refers to works of art. This bridge is a public piece of infrastructure. The country/people of South Korea own this structure and is seen and used by thousands of people. How could pictures of government owned infrastructure possibly be misconstrued as violating a Copyright! Every inch of a road, a building, a sidewalk, any public infrastructure, is designed by an engineer somewhere. And their efforts are duly compensated and placed in the public domain for use by all.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Steve46814 (talk • contribs) 00:58, 20 January 2021 (UTC+8)
- According to enwiki, it was designed by Yooshin corporation and was constructed by Daelim Industrial Company. The only question @A1Cafel and Steve46814: , is Yooshin corporation an architectural firm or an engineering firm. But upon the first reading it seems that Yooshin is the architectural firm and Daelim is the engineering firm. In countries like France, bridges with distinct architecture (like suspension or cable-stayed bridges) are considered artistic works of architecture. Unsure about the case of SoKor. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:58, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
- According to the Yooshin website. [2] Yooshin Engineering Corporation is an "engineering" firm. Steve46814
Keep There is no freedom of panorama in South Korea. However, it seems that South Korea does not view bridges as copyrighted architectures. Ox1997cow (talk) 02:29, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Keep According to South Korean copyright law (see art. 4 no. 5) "Architectural works including buildings, architectural models and design drawings;" Non-building structures are not mentioned.Jklamo (talk) 20:28, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep As above, bridges aren't architectural works in South Korea. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:32, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep as per above inputs. The bridge is not designed by an architectural firm or architect (unlike many bridges in France like the Millau Viaduct), but an engineering firm as stated by Steve46814. Thus it has no artistic touch of an architect or architectural firm. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:01, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
Close as Kept per comments above. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:09, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
Encyclopedia article is not own work. In my opinion this is copyright violation.
Статья энциклопедии не собственная работа. По-моему здесь нарушают авторские права. Taivo (talk) 16:11, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, clear DW. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:12, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
Per the file's metadata, the copyright holder of the photo is someone named JAKUB WLODEK. Needs his/her permission/licensing via COM:OTRS. Howhontanozaz (talk) 16:32, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:13, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
Per the file's metadata, the copyright holder of the photo is someone named JAKUB WLODEK. Needs his/her permission/licensing via COM:OTRS. Howhontanozaz (talk) 16:51, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:14, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
gezeigtes Werk Ralf Roletschek 19:26, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- See Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Mein Kampf. Multichill (talk) 22:36, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
- Es geht um einen anderen Sachverhalt. Der Fotograf ist sehr wahrscheinlich Heinrich Hoffmann und der ist 1957 verstorben. Ein deutscher Fotograf, in Deutschland fotografiert und gesetzlich geschützt bis 1. 1. 2028 --Ralf Roletschek 13:55, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
- Keep The copyright on this edition has lapsed. Beyond My Ken (talk) 03:47, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
- Keep {{PD-US-alien property}}. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:10, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep as per above. Also useful in many articles. Zezen (talk) 06:18, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept per above (other than "useful" comment, which is irrelevant to copyright status). -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:17, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
File:Mijn kamp - Adolf Hitler - Steven Barends - De Amsterdamsche Keurkamer 1939 (1e druk).jpg
[edit].jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
gezeigtes Werk Ralf Roletschek 19:27, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
- Why are you nominating these and other files for deletion that have been kept before? See Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Mein Kampf. Multichill (talk) 22:34, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Weil die Argumente dort falsch sind. Hitler war nicht der Urheber. Der Fotograf ist nicht bekannt, wahrscheinlich nicht 70 Jahre tot. --Ralf Roletschek 12:33, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
- Keep I have to correct you on that. In the old (2012) deletion request I myself talked about the copyright of the photographer, not about the copyright of Hitler. I then even checked more than 2,000 photographs of Adolf Hitler, and found no photograph matching the image on this cover. This is the cover of a book published in the Netherlands, so you have to take Dutch copyright into account. In 1945, all German assets in the Netherlands were confiscated by the Dutch Government on the basis of the Besluit Vijandelijk Vermogen (BVV), Koninklijk Besluit 21 October 1944, that declared all German and German-friendly economic activities in the Netherlands from 1940 onwards confiscated by the Government of the Netherlands. Furthermore you have to look at the Dutch copyright act Art. 38 stipulating that if the photographer is unknown, the copyright ends 70+ years after publication. The result: no valid arguments for deletion of this image. Vysotsky (talk) 13:58, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
Kept per comments-- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:16, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
File:Advertentie voor Mijn Kamp - Adolf Hitler - Steven Barends - De Amsterdamsche Keurkamer 1939.jpg
[edit]
gezeigtes Werk Ralf Roletschek 19:29, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
- Why are you nominating these and other files for deletion that have been kept before? See Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Mein Kampf. Multichill (talk) 22:34, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
- Weil es um einen ganz anderen Sachverhalt geht. Der Fotograf ist sehr wahrscheinlich Heinrich Hoffmann und der ist 1957 verstorben. Ein deutscher Fotograf, in Deutschland fotografiert und gesetzlich geschützt bis 1. 1. 2028 --Ralf Roletschek 13:53, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
- : Keep At the time the old (rejected) deletion request in 2012 I checked more than 2,000 photographs of Adolf Hitler, and found no photograph matching the image on this cover. (Of course I especially checked for photos by Heinrich Hoffman, but to no avail. Is there any proof for your assumption ("sehr wahrscheinlich") of H.H. as photographer?) This is the cover of a book published in the Netherlands, so you have to take Dutch copyright into account. In 1945, all German assets in the Netherlands were confiscated by the Dutch Government on the basis of the Besluit Vijandelijk Vermogen (BVV), Koninklijk Besluit 21 October 1944, which declared all German and German-friendly economic activities in the Netherlands from 1940 onwards confiscated by the Government of the Netherlands. Furthermore you have to look at the Dutch Copyright Act Art. 38 stipulating that if the photographer is unknown, the copyright ends 70+ years after publication. The result: no valid arguments for deletion of this image. Vysotsky (talk) 14:49, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Vysotsky's explanaton is clear and convincing. I also wish an answer to Multichill's question. The answer given is not satsifactory, since no evidence is presented that Hoffman is "likely" the photographer. Beyond My Ken (talk) 03:51, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
- Keep {{PD-US-alien property}}. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:12, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept per above. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:19, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
It is not "simple text" per se. It is a letter send by then-Butlington, Ve, Mayor to then-President Reagan. If the coat of arms is copyrighted, it means that works published by official workers are not necessarily in the public domain. Tbhotch™ 19:58, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
- @Tbhotch: I have removed the seal so now the image is totally in the public domain. The letter uses simple text and there are no copyrighted images on it. Jon698 (talk) 14:07, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
- @Jon698: Although it is an improvement (which should be revdeleted at least), I was referring to the fact that this is not just text, it is a letter with a certain degree of creativity. Tbhotch™ 14:13, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
- @Tbhotch: I don't see how a letter with text is anything other than simple text. There is nothing unique or creative about this letter. Anybody could reproduce this on their computer (or a typewriter if you want to be authentic). Jon698 (talk) 14:14, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
- @Jon698: And I could do the same with every copyrighted book. That doesn't mean I can upload pictures or PDFs of their pages and tag them as "simple text". You claim that "There is nothing unique or creative about this letter", but the third paragraph, at least, is creative as Sanders expressed his own views on the incident; he did not used the typical pre-made legal template, he put his own creativity in the letter. Tbhotch™ 15:08, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
- @Tbhotch: Signatures are not copyrighted no matter what creative flair you put into them therefore some letter written with standard font isn't copyrightable. Jon698 (talk) 15:18, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
- I never said anything about a signature... nor fonts... Tbhotch™ 15:26, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted. PD-text is for simple words or common short phrases reproduced without originality. This is 3 substantial paragraphs, clearly copyrightable. Bernie Sanders retains the copyright of his writings unless he specifically states otherwise. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:25, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
It is a copy of the image that may not be freely available and may need to be deleted.
- Website that seems to be the source of reprint: https://ok-food.co.jp/chara/
- Image that seems to be the reprint source: https://ok-food.co.jp/img/character_img01.png
--Daraku K. (talk) 21:31, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:31, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
uploader is unlikely to be the photographer, image found on the web. Esprit Fugace (talk) 22:22, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted per nom. (Claimed 2021 photo of someone who died in 1991; small website size resolution photo seen multiple places online. Too bad, was in fairly wide use.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:36, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
There is nothing in the source that says that its content is released to the public domain. {cc-zero} is false. Creuzbourg (talk) 17:29, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Anatoliy (talk) 19:32, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
There is nothing in the source that says that its content is released to the public domain. {cc-zero} is false. Creuzbourg (talk) 17:32, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Anatoliy (talk) 19:33, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
There is nothing in the source that says that its content is released to the public domain. {cc-zero} is false. Creuzbourg (talk) 17:34, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Anatoliy (talk) 19:33, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
There is nothing in the source that says that its content is released to the public domain. {cc-zero} is false. Creuzbourg (talk) 17:35, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Anatoliy (talk) 19:33, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
There is nothing in the source that says that its content is released to the public domain. {cc-zero} is false. Creuzbourg (talk) 17:35, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Anatoliy (talk) 19:32, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Unused screenshot, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:26, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Anatoliy (talk) 19:33, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Another unsourced image from the problematic "Lost Gallery" on Pinterest; see Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Blanca_II_de_Navarra.jpg Eric talk 02:46, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
- This is actually a crop of a painting of Mencia de Mendoza with St. Dominic: https://bbcc.ibc.regione.emilia-romagna.it/pater/loadcard.do?id_card=185935 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aethelswyth (talk • contribs) 05:34, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
- No, it's similar, but not the same work. It almost looks like this could be a copy. Take a closer look. Eric talk 02:26, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Image in fairly wide use. Is there any actual doubt this is a PD-Art painting? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:35, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
- The uploader provided no info other than giving the "Lost Gallery" on Pinterest as a source, from which many other problematic images have been uploaded by users who appear more interested in volume than quality. Did you look at the deletion discussion linked above? Eric talk 11:42, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
- Delete as long as we have no reliable information about source, authorship and depicted person. The current use in Wikipedia is evidently just based on the blind assumption that it's a depiction of the person named in the filename, but we currently have no reason to assume that is true, especially given the fact of the obvious copying between this and the other painting pointed out above, which is claimed to depict a different person. We don't even know if this version is really an old work or a modern pastiche. Without this information there's no possibility of legitimate educational use. Fut.Perf. ☼ 11:45, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
- Actually, speedy delete as a re-upload of previously deleted content per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Catherine_I_of_Navarre.jpg. Fut.Perf. ☼ 17:47, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, discussion and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Catherine I of Navarre.jpg. --Elly (talk) 15:25, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Taken from ru:Файл:Engelgardt v6 p91.gif. Is this file actually free? Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:10, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
- Keep It's free. The design was made presumably a few hundred years ago. (I don't know when this actual file was made, but it's a mere depiction with no artistic effort). So how can it be still under copyright? If it is, it must certainly belong to the Russian state (after all, the "Englehardt family" presumably isn't a legal entity that can own things), and it says that Russian "state symbols and signs (flags, emblems, orders, any forms of money, and the like)" and the like are free. Or else, since it was made hundreds of years ago by a person or persons lost to history for centuries (I assume), it'd be free under the rubric of "works of folk art (folklore), which don't have specific authors." Herostratus (talk) 05:33, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The arguments in the discussion are not convincing. The fundamental design might be old, but the modern interpretation seems copyrighted. Also per COM:PRP. --Elly (talk) 06:59, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Not own work, no indication that the file was ever published under a free licence. This user has only uploaded many images tagged as own work which clearly are not. The deletion request is for all other images uploaded by this user: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:ListFiles/Mattruffoni some could be kept as PD-ineligible. Hangman'sDeath (talk) 08:21, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
- In scratch.mit.edu, Terms of use 4. there is the declaration of MIT. They agree to permit the upload of scratch image related. I'm a teacher and these images are connected with my teaching. In same cases the images of block are builded by me using [3], I followed these guidelines--Mattruffoni (talk) 14:51, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The terms of use of scratch do not state that the material is available with a free license. Consequently, the material can not be uploaded to Commons with a free license and has to be deleted. --Elly (talk) 07:03, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Pictures without camera details tend to be suspect. We require a very much better declaration of source and/or permissions. See COM:OTRS. Potential copyright violation. Alternatively it may be derived from a self taken photograph by the uploader, but this needs to be stated with clarity Timtrent (talk) 08:32, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Possible copyright violation, deleted per COM:PRP. The uploader did not comment. --Elly (talk) 07:05, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Photo of an older photo. Needs proof of permission. Gikü (talk) 02:03, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 21:32, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
At the end of the source page there is a c within a circle. E4024 (talk) 13:29, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
I have just accepted permission for “File:Razvan_Petrescu.jpg” under ticket:2021011910005409. --Ganímedes (talk) 12:37, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
Kept: permission received and listed on file page. --Elly (talk) 07:11, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
[4]: "I'm a sixteen-year old girl called Lucie." If the account owner is 16 years old at the time of joining (2006), it is 5 years old at the time of shooting, and this photo is unlikely to be taken. It seems to be copied from another website. (｀・ω・´) (talk) 14:07, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
- Hello, it could have been obtained from a friend. So it's not necessarily copied. I haven't found this photo anywhere else on the internet. -Artanisen (talk) 15:24, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete I have asked the Flickr user for more info, but they seem not to have been active there since 2007. Everything on their photo stream is marked as copyrighted, other than this and one other [5] with a clear watermark of a different website. I fear it unlikely that the Flickr user understood to correctly license this photo. (Unfortunate since image is in wide use; artist died in 1998, and most other images on Commons are of imitators or "cosplayers". en:w uses an "unfair free use" image.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:56, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and per COM:PRP, copyright situation is unclear and possibly this is not a free image. --Elly (talk) 07:14, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Per the discussion and deletion of File:Amir Mirza Hekmati USMC.png, we have explicit verification that the USMC contracts out its portrait photography, and therefore this needs better sourcing than just "US Marine Corps" to know it's PD-USGov-Military-Marines. — Fourthords | =Λ= | 15:32, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Hi everybody. Just to let you know that I have adjusted the description and provided a source. --Taterian (talk) 19:41, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- Checking the FDP's current state, the photo is now sourced to Facebook and the New York State Senate, the links to neither of which reliably verify that this photo is originally the work of a US Marine. Fourthords | =Λ= | 22:02, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and discussion. There are two URLs given as sources for the image. The source facebook cannot be used, because this is in general copyrighted material. The second given source, New York State senate, is licensed with Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 US). This license is incompatible with the CC-BY-SA license often used on commons, and certainly incompatible with the PD license currently on the file page. The image must consequently be deleted. --Elly (talk) 19:02, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The bridge was completed in 2004, there is no freedom of panorama in France, thus permission from the architect is needed A1Cafel (talk) 15:46, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Elly (talk) 19:02, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
The bridge was completed in 2004, there is no freedom of panorama in France, thus permission from the architect is needed A1Cafel (talk) 15:47, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Elly (talk) 19:03, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
File:Panorama Viadukt von Millau 2004 A75 Viaduc Viaduct 2460 m lang max 343 m Dep Aveyron Frankreich France - Foto Wolfgang Pehlemann DSC08281.jpg
[edit]
The bridge was completed in 2004, there is no freedom of panorama in France, thus permission from the architect is needed A1Cafel (talk) 15:47, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Elly (talk) 19:03, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Small photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Promotional image. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 16:00, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Uploader - who didnt comment - listed "Odri" is author. Permission should be obtained from this author. This has not been received, so the image must be deleted. --Elly (talk) 19:06, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by IsabellaDom as Speedy (Löschen) and the most recent rationale was: wrong file --IsabellaDom (talk) 16:07, 19 January 2021 (UTC). This is not uploader's request (uploader is IDomke), so regular deletion request is created. Taivo (talk) 16:17, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: assuming IsabellaDom is the same person as IDomke (uploader), deleted per COM:COURTESY by proxy. --Elly (talk) 19:07, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:37, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
- --EugeneZelenko На файлах Кікбоксинг К-1.jpg та Поінт-файтинг.jpg зображені друзі мого сина під час змагань з Кікбоксингу у м. Бровари 2020 року. Це роботи, які ми замовляли у фотографа на пам'ять та сплатили за них, а, значить, право власності належить мені.
Файл Deaflympics.jpg було передано товариством глухих України. Можна видалити, я заміню на власну роботу з Чемпіонату України з Дефтхеквондо. Bovvladua (обговорення) 03:49, 19 січня 2021 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bovvladua (talk • contribs) 23:25, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. @Bovvladua: sorry for my English. File:Кікбоксинг К-1.jpg and File:Поінт-файтинг.jpg are made by somebody else as you say. For use on Commons, please follow the procedure on COM:VRT to obtain permission of the photographer. If succesfull, the images can be undeleted. The other one can be deleted as you say. --Elly (talk) 16:54, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
The source video appears to have been uploaded onto YouTube by a fan and not Viz Media, given that the description outright says that "all rights belong to Viz Media" much like how many Internet works say "no copyright infringement intended". Furthermore, at the end of the video, the screen says "Copyright VIZ Media, LLC" with no mention of a CC license, so we'd have to go through OTRS even if this account is legitimate (which the channel description ("I make weird hxh videos"), below-1000 subscriber count, lack of verification, and lack of links to other official websites/channels suggest otherwise).
Tl;dr: license laundering.
For the record, the person depicted, Cristina Vee, expressed how "derpy" this image is on Twitter. -BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 16:47, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Elly (talk) 18:31, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
Ce logo est-il protégé par des droits d'auteur ? Cordialement. 6PO (talk) 17:03, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
- Bonjour, le logo est la propriété de l'entreprise Lifen, et a été créé en interne. Il convient effectivement que je modifie la source. Merci pour votre aide. Cordialement, Tyrolienne (talk)
Deleted: Per COM:PRP, logo appears copyrighted by the Lifen firm. --Elly (talk) 18:33, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:08, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
- EugeneZelenko: According to Commons:Project scope this applies in this case: "Commons can be used to host such material if included in a shareable media file that is of use to one of the other Wikimedia Foundation-hosted (WMF) projects". This document is a guide how to enter data about archives in Wikidata. Wikimedia CH is considering to dissiminate this file to archives in Switzerland to encourage them to participate actively in Wikidata. Please withdraw your deletion request. Thank you. What do you think Gestumblindi? --Hadi (talk) 16:40, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
- Why this guide could not be in wiki-text format + images? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:42, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
- On the one hand, I agree with EugeneZelenko that a Wikitext page (presumably in an appropriate location of Wikidata) would be preferable and, as an easily editable page, also more in the Wiki spirit (anyone could enter corrections and improvements) than a static PDF; but on the other hand, as Hadi points out, even if it's not ideal, the PDF is apparently "of use to one of the other Wikimedia Foundation-hosted (WMF) projects" and so can be kept for the time being. It may become obsolete if the suggestion to create a Wikitext page is followed, but I don't see an immediate reason for deletion. So in case you're not going to withdraw this deletion request, I vote Keep (will not process this DR as an admin because I'm now involved in the discussion). Gestumblindi (talk) 19:53, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
- On the one hand, I agree with EugeneZelenko that a Wikitext page (presumably in an appropriate location of Wikidata) would be preferable and, as an easily editable page, also more in the Wiki spirit (anyone could enter corrections and improvements) than a static PDF; but on the other hand, as Hadi points out, even if it's not ideal, the PDF is apparently "of use to one of the other Wikimedia Foundation-hosted (WMF) projects" and so can be kept for the time being. It may become obsolete if the suggestion to create a Wikitext page is followed, but I don't see an immediate reason for deletion. So in case you're not going to withdraw this deletion request, I vote
- Why this guide could not be in wiki-text format + images? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:42, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
- On Commons there are tons of PDFs with images on Wikidata-projects, for example: Link. To delete just this one would be unfair. Keep --Hadi (talk) 17:32, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
- On Commons there are tons of PDFs with images on Wikidata-projects, for example: Link. To delete just this one would be unfair.
Kept: per Gestumblindi. --Elly (talk) 18:50, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Luca M as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: From https://www.victoria-university.de/ Sreejith K (talk) 17:11, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Copyrighted logo. imho not a simple text logo. --Elly (talk) 18:52, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
Unless I am missing something, this magazine cover is still under copyright in its source country and in the US. Per COM:GREECE, Greece's copyright duration is 70 pma so if theoretically, the copyright holders died the same year this was published (1974), it won't be public domain until 2045. There is one Nikos Stavroulakis who died in 2017 so assuming this is the artist, the cover art won't be in the Greek public domain until 2088. Howhontanozaz (talk) 17:20, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Elly (talk) 18:52, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
There is nothing in the source that says that its content is released to the public domain. {cc-zero} is false. Creuzbourg (talk) 17:33, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Elly (talk) 18:54, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
There is nothing in the source that says that its content is released to the public domain. {cc-zero} is false. Creuzbourg (talk) 17:33, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Elly (talk) 18:55, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
There is nothing in the source that says that its content is released to the public domain. {cc-zero} is false. Creuzbourg (talk) 17:33, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Elly (talk) 18:55, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
There is nothing in the source that says that its content is released to the public domain. {cc-zero} is false. Creuzbourg (talk) 17:34, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Elly (talk) 18:55, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
There is nothing in the source that says that its content is released to the public domain. {cc-zero} is false. Creuzbourg (talk) 17:34, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and COM:TOO Sweden is fairly low. --Elly (talk) 18:57, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
There is nothing in the source that says that its content is released to the public domain. {cc-zero} is false. Creuzbourg (talk) 17:34, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and COM:TOO Sweden is fairly low. --Elly (talk) 18:58, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
There is nothing in the source that says that its content is released to the public domain. {cc-zero} is false. Creuzbourg (talk) 17:35, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Kept: I consider this image below threshold according COM:TOO Sweden, so this image can be kept. --Elly (talk) 18:59, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
There is a better SVG file, this poor PNG is not used anymore -- sarang♥사랑 17:43, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
No ATM 1F3E7.svg:
Delete I have any problem to suppress the PNG file. --Omondi (talk) 11:07, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
- Omondi intended to say "no problem" (or "not any problem") -- sarang♥사랑 17:43, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and COM:Redundant. Image not in use on the projects. --Elly (talk) 19:00, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 2600:1700:8B60:CA00:411D:43F7:3174:8853 as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: City seal on the flag is copyrighted.
Converted by me to regular DR to allow for discussion. Not sure whether nomination might be frivolous. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:08, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- "frivolous" - why it would be? Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 08:53, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Proof? – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 00:54, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
- Comment City seal doesn't look copyrighted, see this file. BTW: flag image is used 778x on Wiki. Vysotsky (talk) 09:32, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per seal file. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:10, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
copyrighted seal plus silver copyright, illegal per USA Law, as I am part ofthe U.S. Government Phubber (talk) 18:08, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Seal is copyrighted per, https://www.123rf.com/photo_85340202_stock-illustration-3d-seal-of-las-vegas-nevada-usa-3d-illustration-.html, and at least 8 more sites. Phubber (talk) 18:13, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
- The link is not to a government website stating the copyright status, but rather a private image repository. I must also question what you mean by "plus silver copyright", you can not copyright a colour. Fry1989 eh? 19:27, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
- Keep as per Fry -- MaxxL - talk 19:35, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
- Keep I can't see an argument for this being copryrighted. Perhaps the submitter may be able to add a more coherent explanation.Shajure (talk) 03:27, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, nominator has been confirmed as a sockpuppet. PyroFloe (talk) 02:59, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: apart from the sockpuppet nomination, my reasoning to keep the file is as follows: The website of Las Vegas, https://www.lasvegasnevada.gov/, has a copyright sign, so their opinion is, all work is copyrighted, including the seal. However, the notice on File:Seal of Las Vegas, Nevada.svg, says it is in PD. This flag is a simple derivative work of the seal. If the seal is in PD, the flag will also fall in PD. So the image of the flag can be kept. --Elly (talk) 19:15, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Sculptures by Ursula Querner
[edit]copyright violation, artist died i 1969, no freedom of panorama.
Martin Sg. (talk) 18:32, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
- This is a ridicolous deletion request. It makes reference to sculptures by Ursula Querner - On the picture in St. Andreas church in Hamburg-Eimsbüttel, the font ("Taufstein") is barely visible, an indistinct grey square and a black shape of the baptismal bowl on top. Surely, not even the minimal artistic details arre vsisbkle, and cannot be protected either. --Minderbinder (talk) 10:08, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
- Soweit esich diese Löschantrag auf das Innere eines Gebäudes nach deutschem Recht bezieht, gilt niemals FoP (§ 59 dUrhG). Der Löschantrag ist fehlerhaft gestellt und zurückzuweisen.
Deleted: Citing from COM:FOP Germany: Buildings such as … churches … are not "public" within the meaning of the statute, and thus photographs of works exhibited in their interior do not qualify for § 59. The second image can be undeleted in 2040. The first image is indeed de minimis for the work of Ursula Querner but it shows prominently the work of , who died in 1997, so this image is copyrighted until 2068. --Elly (talk) 19:26, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
_02.jpg){kind=link}
_02.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
copyright violation; stained glass window is contemporary artwork; no freedom of panorama. Martin Sg. (talk) 18:42, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
_02.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Photos made in churches do not fall within the FOP, per COM:FOP Germany. --Elly (talk) 19:36, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
_02.jpg){kind=link}
_01.jpg){kind=link}
_01.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
copyright violation; stained glass window is contemporary artwork; no freedom of panorama. Martin Sg. (talk) 18:42, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
_01.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Photos made in churches do not fall within the FOP, per COM:FOP Germany. --Elly (talk) 19:36, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
_01.jpg){kind=link}
Likely a video screenshot, not an original photograph Ytoyoda (talk) 18:55, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Uploader did not comment. --Elly (talk) 19:37, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
No proof that uploader owns image. *Treker (talk) 19:14, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Uploader did not comment. --Elly (talk) 19:38, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
Missing legal info Fixertool (talk) 22:54, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and per COM:PRP. Uploader did not comment. --Elly (talk) 19:58, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Joachim Klos
[edit]copyright violation; artist died in 2007; no freedom of panoarama.
- File:2020 04 01 Gustav-Adolf-Kirche (Kempen-St. Hubert) (13).jpg
- File:2020 04 01 Gustav-Adolf-Kirche (Kempen-St. Hubert) (14).jpg
- File:2020 04 01 Gustav-Adolf-Kirche (Kempen-St. Hubert) (15).jpg
- File:2020 04 01 Gustav-Adolf-Kirche (Kempen-St. Hubert) (16).jpg
- File:2020 04 01 Gustav-Adolf-Kirche (Kempen-St. Hubert) (17).jpg
- File:2020 04 01 Gustav-Adolf-Kirche (Kempen-St. Hubert) (18).jpg
- File:2020 04 01 Gustav-Adolf-Kirche (Kempen-St. Hubert) (19).jpg
- File:2020 04 01 Gustav-Adolf-Kirche (Kempen-St. Hubert) (20).jpg
- File:2020 04 01 Gustav-Adolf-Kirche (Kempen-St. Hubert) (21).jpg
- File:2020 04 01 Gustav-Adolf-Kirche (Kempen-St. Hubert) (23).jpg
- File:2020 04 01 Gustav-Adolf-Kirche (Kempen-St. Hubert) (25).jpg
- File:2020 04 01 Gustav-Adolf-Kirche (Kempen-St. Hubert) (26).jpg
- File:2020 04 01 Gustav-Adolf-Kirche (Kempen-St. Hubert) (27).jpg
- File:Emmerich-Liebfrauenkirche 03.png *see comment below
- File:Emmerich-Liebfrauenkirche 04.png *see comment below
- File:Emmerich-Liebfrauenkirche PM15-09.jpg
- File:Emmerich-Liebfrauenkirche PM15-13.jpg
- File:Emmerich-Liebfrauenkirche PM15-14.jpg
- File:Rees-Bienen - Kirche St. Cosmas und Damian 06 PM14.jpg
- File:Rees-Bienen - Kirche St. Cosmas und Damian 07 PM14.jpg
- File:Rees-Bienen - Kirche St. Cosmas und Damian 08 PM14.jpg
- File:Rees-Bienen - Kirche St. Cosmas und Damian PM18-04.jpg
- File:Rees-Bienen - Kirche St. Cosmas und Damian PM18-10.jpg *see comment below
_(13).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(14).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(15).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(16).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(17).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(18).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(19).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(20).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(21).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(23).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(25).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(26).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(27).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Martin Sg. (talk) 19:49, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Gustav-Adolf-Kirche (Kempen-St. Hubert) - Löschung aus den o.a. Gründen korrekt, o.a. Aufnahmen entstanden in der Kirche, daher z.Zt. keine Panoramafreiheit. Sorry, Fehler von uns.Rudolfo42 (talk) 19:59, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
I agree as far as the windows are the sole topic. But I think in these 2 files his windows shown are not the main subject and could be seen as a case of 'de minimis'. Die Fenster sind dermaßen unscharf im Bilde das gewinnbringende kommerzielle Weiterverwendung dieser Bilder in Bezug auf 'Klos' als monographisches Thema praktisch ausgeschlossen ist. Peli (talk) 10:55, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
Same counts, with a little bit of doubt, for this next file. Although the window is in center focus the file actually shows an overview of the architecture including some gothic arches, a stained glass window partially covered by a hanging lamp, the speaker of the sound system, reflections of light on the wall and the manifacture style of the wooden benches and the wooden floor.
Regards Peli (talk) 10:55, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
- de minimis if the subject is the architecture of the church, outside FoP if the window is the subject. Andy Dingley (talk) 23:22, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
- Da im Inneren eines Gebäudes nach deutschem Recht niemals FoP gilt (§ 59 dUrhG), ist dieser Löschantrag fehlerhaft gestellt und zurückzuweisen.
- Since FoP never applies inside a building under German law (§ 59 dUrhG), this request for deletion is incorrect and must be rejected. BR, Asurnipal (talk) 19:27, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
- It's not true that German FoP never applies inside a building, but there is clear support that it doesn't apply inside churches. So then we have to look at the subject of the photo: photos of the windows would fail FoP. Photos of the architecture though would fail FoP, be de minimis for the windows, and have nothing protected within the architecture itself (so we can host them). Andy Dingley (talk) 00:27, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
- Please read Section 59 (German copyright law) Works in Public Places
- (1) It is permissible to reproduce, distribute and publicly reproduce works that are permanently located on public paths, streets or squares by means of painting or graphics, photography or film. In the case of Buildings, these powers only apply to the external appearance.
- (2) The reproductions may not be made on a building.
- Is there anything incomprehensible? In the present cases (there are a lot of such incorrect deletion requests currently up to date ), FoP does not apply in buildings, the request for deletion is therefore not permitted. BR, Asurnipal (talk) 20:10, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you Andy for the support here, and demonstrating use of VisualFileChange.
- Hi Asurnipal, which would be the correct way to state a deletion request to get pictures like these removed? Because apart from the technical/formal 'non-FoP in interiors' notion, we all seem to agree that no permission was granted which could exclude close-ups of these windows from copyrights held be the creator. Ty Peli (talk) 16:12, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you Andy for the support here, and demonstrating use of VisualFileChange.
- Please read Section 59 (German copyright law) Works in Public Places
- Hallo Peli, da Du sehr gut Deutsch sprichst, werde ich es auf Deutsch schreiben. Ich bin mir nicht sicher, ob ich auf Englisch alles richtig und verständlich ausdrücken kann. Ich ersuche deswegen um Verständnis.
- Die erste Frage ist, sind alle diese Bilder pauschal zu löschen oder nicht. Oder gibt es vielleicht Ausnahmen? Denn wir wollen hier ja ein Bilderarchiv für Wikipedia haben und nicht Löschdiskussionen. Also ist mein erster Zugang, wie können diese Bilder für unser Projekt erhalten bleiben? Also suche ich nach Möglichkeiten im deutschen Urheberechtsgesetz (dUrhG). Nachdem § 59 dUrhG als gesetzliche Ausnahmebestimmung nicht zur Anwendung gelangt, weil dieser § nur Dinge regelt, die von Straßen, Plätzen und anderen öffentlichen Orten zu sehen sind und es sich hier um einen Innenraum handelt, gibt es unter Umständen andere Ausnahmemöglichkeiten.
- Dies wäre zB die Frage, ob der Fotograf ein besonderes Recht hatte, diese Bilder anzufertigen, weil er z. B. eine Genehmigung hatte? Dies wurde meines Wissens vom Löschantragsteller gar nicht gefragt. Dies wäre mal die erste und wichtigste Ausnahmemöglichkeit. Unter Umständen kann der Fotograf diese Genehmigung auch noch beistellen. Doch auch dies hat der Löschantragsteller erst gar nicht gefragt. Er hat mW eigentlich gar nicht mit dem Fotografen kommuniziert bzw. so, dass es darum ging, Bilder zu erhalten und nicht zu löschen.
- Zweitens ist die Frage, ist ein urheberrechtliche geschütztes Werk vielleicht uU nur Beiwerk. Also ist der urheberrechtlich geschützte Teil im Verhältnis zum Gesamteindruck nur nebensächlich. Auch dies wurde vom Löschantragsteller mW gar nicht geprüft. Dies ist eine sehr schwierige Frage und sie ist nicht mit wenigen Sätzen zu erledigen. Da muss man die aktuelle Rechtsprechung in Deutschland heranziehen, was meines Wissens gar nicht passiert ist. Und es ist meines Erachtens wirklich unzulässig, Wikipediaartikel heranzuziehen um zu argumentieren, was richtig ist. Dazu können ausschließlich das Gesetz, die aktuelle Rechsprechung und allenfalls noch aktuelle juristische Kommentare dienen.
- Dann, ist die Frage, ob vielleicht § 51 dUrhG anzuwenden ist (Bildzitat). Wird eines oder werden mehrere Bilder in einem Artikel verwendet? Falls ja, greift die Ausnahme nach § 51 dUrhG? Ist es wirklich richtig, wie Gestumblindi ausführt, dass dies pauschal in Commons unzulässig sei? Falls dies so ist, so ist dies meines Erachtens auf Commons vielleicht nicht ordentlich durchgedacht und ich habe dies auch mit ihm erörtert. Da müsste dringend mal von Juristen die Sache (neu) geprüft werden. Auch das Urheberrecht ändert sich dauernd. Ich mir ziemlich sicher, dass da einiges anders zu verstehen ist, als dies derzeit auf Grundlage von älteren Wikipediaartikeln derzeit als „richtig“ von einigen verstanden wird.
- Und so wären noch einige Prüfschritte zu setzen. Dies immer mit dem Hintergrund, Bilder zu erhalten und nicht zu löschen. Daher ist für mich ein solcher Löschantrag mit der Begründung": "copyright violation; artist died in 2007; no freedom of panoarama" einfach unzulässig und viel zu simpel in so einer komplexe Materie. Wenn jemand sich nicht mit den Grundsätzen zum Erhalt der Blder auseinandersetzt, sondern hier nur immer wieder pauschal Löschanträge stellt, hat er meines Erachtens auch das Wiki-Prinzip leider nicht verstanden. SG, Asurnipal (talk) 18:30, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
- Danke deine Antwort. Ja ich denke auch das das anders gehen sollte. Das dienen von berechtigte und verständliche menschliche Anliegen und geduldige Kommunikation darüber sollte viel mehr im Vordergrund stehen, nicht das überstürzte und blinde dienen eines teilweise obsoleten Regelwerks. Nicht selten gibt es auch Fälle von Fehlalarm da die Bilder von den Erben selber bereitgestellt wurden. Panikmache und Schickane um Nichts. Da sollte an erster Stelle gelten: assume good faith. Der Antragsteller hat hier vielleicht mal 11 eigene Bilder hochgeladen in 11 Jahre, wenn ich das richtig zähle. Ansonsten ist seine Hobby wohl das durchforsten von Kategorien zum tausendfachen "Verbessern" bzw. Löschen der Bilder anderer Leute. Dabei agiert er sehr pauschal und ungenau und kümmert sich nicht mal darum ein Satz von 10 Wörter ohne Tippfehler zu publizieren, wie hier oben schon zu sehen ist ("panoarama"). Dann 'zitiert' (sprich: klaut) er selber auch noch Textteile anderer Leute. Hier z.B. publiziert er ein unveränderter Satz von glasmalerei-ev.net obwohl diese Webseite im Impressum deutlich von einem Copyrightvermerk versehen ist. Ich denke sein Punkt, Bekämpfung von "Schindluderei" auf Commons mit urheberrechtlich geschützte Werke, wäre sehr gedient mit weniger Kleinkrämerei über Bilder wo die Fenster oder Kunstwerke allenfalls nur Beiwerk sind und striktere Fokus auf HQ Bilder wo wirklich einsichtig von UhV die Rede sein könnte. Oft bliebe dabei m.E. noch Ermessungsspielraum bestehen bis zum höchsten Gerichtshof. Peli (talk) 00:50, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and comment of uploader. There is no Freedom of Panorama in churches in Germany. This means you cannot publish photo's of copyrighted work, such as these stained glass windows. Regarding the discussion in German: Perhaps a judge would rule otherwise, but currently we have to base decisions on our guidelines, e.g. Com:FOP Germany. Most files are deleted. Two could be kept because the windows have a minimal part in the image, per COM:De minimis. All deleted files can be undeleted in 2078, 70 years after the death of the author. --Elly (talk) 22:00, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
Duplicate CzarJobKhaya (talk) 23:02, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Kept: This file has information and is listed in other categories. Therefore I consider the file not fully COM:Redundant and decided to keep it, untill these problems with the SVG version have been solved. --Elly (talk) 14:13, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
Duplicate, unused CzarJobKhaya (talk) 23:05, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and COM:Redundant. --Elly (talk) 14:15, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
Uploader requests deletion. Htm (talk) 23:43, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
- In this file I first removed time stamp by covering it with MS Paint. Then I tried to upload a version where time stamp was removed with Inpaint. Can't do it because of "this file is an exact duplicate of...". But it is not. So the only way for me to upload a better retouched version is to delete the old ones first.--Htm (talk) 20:21, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: has been deleted january 2021. --Elly (talk) 14:16, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
Some fictional ethnic flags or logos
[edit]
- (Chinese) 没有任何证据证明撒拉族真的使用这个标志或旗帜。撒拉族是一个中国民族，中国是不允许少数民族使用民族旗帜的。我对这个图片进行相似搜索，结果全部来自于维基媒体网站，我在百度和谷歌上用中文进行关键字搜索则找不到。显然，这些图片系原创研究。但已经被很多的条目引用了。这些旗帜没有教育意义，不应当出现在维基百科条目之中。如果这不能删除，那么也应该重新命名，命名为类似于“某某某为撒拉族设计的旗帜”，以防止被错误的引用。
- (English by machine translation) There is no evidence that the Salars actually use these symbols or flags. Salar is a ethnic group in China, China does not allow ethnic minorities to use the ethnic flag. I did a search for these images based on similarity, and all valid results come from Wikimedia sites. I searched Baidu and Google for keywords in Chinese, but the search engine did not return valid results. Obviously, these are maked by original research. However, it is used by many article. These flags are not educational and should not appear in Wikipedia articles. If these images can't be deleted, they should also be renamed, which is similar to "xxx flag designed for Salar People" to prevent being quoted by the article.--Ngguls(UTC) 15:57, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
- Keep per COM:INUSE. That should be discussed in local community, not here. Also, renaming a file should meet COM:FNC. SCP-2000 01:14, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete original reserch should be kept on Wikiversity, not here. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:09, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep This is clearly an attempt of censorship made by the Chinese dictatorship, which is known to oppress ethnic minorities.
Ignore it ! Djampa (talk) 11:11, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
- @Djampa: It seems that you know the origin of this flag? Can you provide it?----Ngguls(UTC) 16:09, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
- @Djampa: I'm trying to remove the banner of fictional, original research, or seek to change his name so as not to be misled, but you accuse me of political censorship, which is disgusting. I can't believe you are really a senior user.----Ngguls(UTC) 16:10, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Flags are used on several project articles. --Elly (talk) 14:18, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
Category:Ted Kaczynski family photographs
[edit]The depicted photographs cannot be public domain without evidence of prior publication by their copyright holder
czar 22:27, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
- A complex case. The photos have been published by an official account of the Office of Public Affairs, a US government agency, so being the work of US government, they may automatically be in public domain. (The authenticity of the Flickr account can be confirmed e.g. here). Still, the photos are marked as copyrighted on Flickr and one wonders whether the US Office of Public Affairs had sought permission from the original copyright holders before publishing a copy of their work. I have no answer. — kashmīrī 08:31, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
- Without evidence that the copyright is held by someone else, we should assume good faith that it was correctly released to PD by the US Government. If the copyright holder steps forward, it can be deleted. Dgies (talk) 20:45, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. We have to assume the US goverment is aware of copyright issues. Slippery slope if the Commons community starts to contest that point. --Elly (talk) 08:22, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
File:Mein Kampf - The Stalag Edition - The Only Complete and Officially Authorised English Translation Ever Issued (1940) - Adolf Hitler 0000.jpg
[edit]_-_Adolf_Hitler_0000.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_Adolf_Hitler_0000.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
gezeigtes Werk, Hitler ist nicht der Urheber. Ralf Roletschek 19:23, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
- See Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Mein Kampf. Multichill (talk) 22:37, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
- Es geht um einen anderen Sachverhalt. Der Fotograf ist sehr wahrscheinlich Heinrich Hoffmann und der ist 1957 verstorben. Ein deutscher Fotograf, in Deutschland fotografiert und gesetzlich geschützt bis 1. 1. 2028 --Ralf Roletschek 13:56, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
- Keep {{PD-US-alien property}}. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:12, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep as stated above Wikibhai110 (talk) 03:07, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per policy, Wikipedia Commons files are required to be free in US and in the country of origin. While US copyright status is clear per {{PD-US-alien property}}, the cover is copyrighted in Germany, the country of origin. This book seems to be published by Zentral Verlag der NSDAP. I think, Undelete in 2028 will be OK. Ankry (talk) 09:53, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
- Delete, because the photo of Hitler is probably copyrighted, per COM:PRP. And please note: in Category:Mein Kampf, bookcovers with the same photo should be deleted as well. Elly (talk) 19:44, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, photo is by Heinrich Hoffmann and still protected in Germany. Can be restored in 2028. --Rosenzweig τ 16:26, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
See en:Mein Kampf#United States, so it has copyright in the US until 2020, because it was first published in 1925. Category:Undelete in 2021 Habitator terrae 🌍 20:54, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
- Delete According to the info, the first publication of part of this book was in 1927; so PD in US in 2023. Ankry (talk) 04:31, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
Kept: pure URAA deletions are not done anymore. --JuTa 07:04, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
Delete gezeigtes Werk, Hitler ist nicht der Urheber. Ralf Roletschek 19:24, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
- Keep As far as I know: unknown photographer, unknown designer. Vysotsky (talk) 00:12, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
- Eben deshalb keine 70 Jahre pma. --Ralf Roletschek 12:35, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Unknown photographer, so not 70 years pma (post mortem), but 70 years after publication. Urheberrecht in Deutschland: § 66 Anonyme und pseudonyme Werke, (1) Bei anonymen und pseudonymen Werken erlischt das Urheberrecht siebzig Jahre nach der Veröffentlichung. Vysotsky (talk) 14:21, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
- Please read paragraph 2. Habitator terrae 🌍 11:44, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
- I did read § 66 par. 2, before posting the URL here. Both clauses in par. 2 are not applicable to this case. Vysotsky (talk) 12:01, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
- Please read paragraph 2. Habitator terrae 🌍 11:44, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
- Eben deshalb keine 70 Jahre pma. --Ralf Roletschek 12:35, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Copyright of the book passed to the state government of Bavaria in 1945 and expirated in 2016.
Heinrich Hoffmann, the only and exclusive photographer of the author died in 1957 ("No other photographer but Hoffmann was allowed to take pictures of Hitler"). --angerdan (talk) 22:30, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, cover photo is by Heinrich Hoffmann and still protected in Germany. Can be restored in 2028. --Rosenzweig τ 16:29, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
gezeigtes Werk Ralf Roletschek 19:25, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keepunsure why this was nominated. Evrik (talk) 00:45, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
- Keep {{PD-US-alien property}}. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:12, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Elly (talk) 09:23, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Pardon, bitte nicht löschen!
Bitte Dateinamen korrigieren, richtig ist: File:01 Satz des Pythagoras, Zhoubi suanjing.svg
Begründung: Die korrekte Bezeichnung des mathematischen Klassikers ist: Zhoubi suanjing.
Für die Bemühungen ein Dankeschön im Voraus! Gruß Petrus3743 (talk) 12:30, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Kept: already renamed as requested. --Rosenzweig τ 09:40, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
gezeigtes Werk Ralf Roletschek 19:25, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per the precautionary principle. We simply don't know enough about the cover photo to keep this file. {{PD-US-alien property}} may be true or not, it isn't what is important here because this is the cover of a book that was published in Spain in 1935. There is {{PD-Spain-photo}} for "simple photographs", but I don't think this is one of those. I also don't know if this is an "anonymous" photo, since (among other things) I cannot see the context (the photographer might be noted in the book). I'll put it up for restoration with {{PD-old-assumed}} in 2056. --Rosenzweig τ 06:43, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
- Note: The photograph is by Heinrich Hoffmann, see [6] and also File:Mi lucha - Primera y segunda páginas - Adolf Hitler - 1937.jpg, where it clearly says "Foto: Hoffmann, Munich". Since this was published in Spain and Hoffmann died in 1957 (before 7 December 1987), a protection time of life + 80 applies. So restoration in 2038. --Rosenzweig τ 10:56, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
File:Nazi propaganda. Hitler Mein kampf, Des Führers Kampf um den Weltfrieden, Dr. Goebbels Dressig Kriegsartikel für das deutsche Volk. Münchner Stadtmuseum, Munich, Germany 2014.jpg
[edit]
gezeigtes Werk Ralf Roletschek 19:27, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
- See Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Mein Kampf. Multichill (talk) 22:35, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
- Weil es um einen ganz anderen Sachverhalt geht. Der Fotograf ist sehr wahrscheinlich Heinrich Hoffmann und der ist 1957 verstorben. Ein deutscher Fotograf, in Deutschland fotografiert und gesetzlich geschützt bis 1. 1. 2028 --Ralf Roletschek 13:54, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
- Keep {{PD-US-alien property}}. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:10, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Copyright of the book on the left expired in 2016. It is unclear if the photo is included in this expiration. If not, the copyright of the photo expired 70 years after publication. Urheberrecht in Deutschland: § 66 Anonyme und pseudonyme Werke, (1) Bei anonymen und pseudonymen Werken erlischt das Urheberrecht siebzig Jahre nach der Veröffentlichung. I have never seen any proof (other than circumstancial) that this photo was made by Heinrich Hoffmann - and his name would surely be mentioned if he was the photographer, as he was Hitler's favourite photographer. Vysotsky (talk) 18:22, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per the precautionary principle. {{PD-US-alien property}} may be true or not, it isn't what is important here because these are covers of books that were published in Germany. If the photo on the "Mein Kampf" cover is by Hoffmann, it is still protected in Germany until the end of 2027. If it isn't, we simply don't know enough about the cover photo to keep this file. The paragraph Vysotsky is citing from German law (UrhG) is the current version, but that does not apply to anonymous works from before mid-1995. For those, the old version still applies, and that is worded in a way that it is de facto useless for those works (which is noted in {{PD-anon-70-EU}} and similar tags). Plus, the drawing on the right is clearly signed "Mjölnir", that is de:Hans Herbert Schweitzer, who died in 1980, meaning that drawing is still protected until the end of 2050 in Germany. I don't know which edition of "Mein Kampf" this is, but assuming it was published no later than 1944, I'll put it up for restoration with {{PD-old-assumed}} in 2065. --Rosenzweig τ 06:58, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
- Edit: Found the Mein Kampf cover image in the Hoffmann collection of the Bavarian State Library at [7], so it is by Hoffmann. That part could be restored in 2028, the Mjölnir drawing in 2051. I don't know about the photo in the middle, but assuming that one was also published no later than 1944, I'll keep the restoration with {{PD-old-assumed}} in 2065. --Rosenzweig τ 08:47, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
- Edit 2: The photo in the middle is the cover of "Des Führers Kampf um den Weltfrieden" [8], published in 1936. So restoration in 2057. --Rosenzweig τ 09:13, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
File:Display of Copies of Hitlers Mein Kampf - Documentation Center in Congress Hall - Nuremberg-Nurnberg - Germany.jpg
[edit]
gezeigtes Werk Ralf Roletschek 19:28, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
- Why are you nominating these and other files for deletion that have been kept before? See Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Mein Kampf. Multichill (talk) 22:34, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
- Weil es um einen ganz anderen Sachverhalt geht. Der Fotograf ist sehr wahrscheinlich Heinrich Hoffmann und der ist 1957 verstorben. Ein deutscher Fotograf, in Deutschland fotografiert und gesetzlich geschützt bis 1. 1. 2028 --Ralf Roletschek 13:54, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
- Keep {{PD-US-alien property}}. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:12, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Copyright of the book expired in 2016. It is unclear if the photo is included in this expiration. If not, the copyright of the photo expired 70 years after publication. Urheberrecht in Deutschland: § 66 Anonyme und pseudonyme Werke, (1) Bei anonymen und pseudonymen Werken erlischt das Urheberrecht siebzig Jahre nach der Veröffentlichung. I have never seen any proof (other than circumstancial) that this photo was made by Heinrich Hoffmann - and his name would surely be mentioned if he was the photographer, as he was Hitler's favourite photographer. Vysotsky (talk) 18:19, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per the precautionary principle. {{PD-US-alien property}} may be true or not, it isn't what is important here because this is the cover of a book that was published in Germany. If the photo is by Hoffmann, it is still protected in Germany until the end of 2027. If it isn't, we simply don't know enough about the cover photo to keep this file. The paragraph Vysotsky is citing from German law (UrhG) is the current version, but that does not apply to anonymous works from before mid-1995. For those, the old version still applies, and that is worded in a way that it is de facto useless for those works (which is noted in {{PD-anon-70-EU}} and similar tags). I don't know which edition of the book this is, but assuming it was published no later than 1944, I'll put it up for restoration with {{PD-old-assumed}} in 2065. --Rosenzweig τ 06:52, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
- Edit: Found the image in the Hoffmann collection of the Bavarian State Library at [9]. So it is by Hoffmann. The file can be restored in 2028. --Rosenzweig τ 08:40, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
No evidence that file copyright was not renewed per COM:RENEWAL, or that the uploader even attempted to check. The copyright was probably renewed given the author is Paramount pictures. P,TO 19104 (pls ping!) 01:27, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
- Keep {{PD-US-no notice}} - publicity photos were never or basically never registered, as the financial incentive was to spread the fame, not to protect the creativity of the photograph. I'm not aware of any cases where a publicity photo was renewed. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:25, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 08:55, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
The drawing of the women in the upper part of the image is not the own work of the person who uploaded this file. Look at the given sources, there you can find the same drawings but withou a free Creative Commons license. 2A02:810D:4ABF:CE84:2851:1949:F72C:C552 21:08, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
- Ich habe meine Grafik mit Paint erstellt. Ich habe die Vorlage als Untergrund genommen, vergrößert, und dann alle Bereiche komplett mit meinen Farbflächen übermalt, teilweise habe ich die Pixel einzeln gesetzt, um Farbübergänge zu bekommen. In der von mir erstellten neuen Grafik ist kein einziges Pixel von der Vorlage mehr vorhanden, weil ich alles komplett übermalt halbe. Ich habe auch viele Details verändert. Die Haare neu, die Augen neu, die Masken, die freiliegende Haut, den Hals, alles. Ich habe viele Tage daran gearbeitet. Deshalb ist es echte eine Neuzeichnung. Bitte schaut genau hin. Die zuerst hochgeladenen Versionen kann man löschen, weil sie noch Ähnlichkeit mit der Vorlage haben. Ich habe so lange daran weitergearbeitet, bis alle Details auch in der Form deutlich verändert waren und kein einziges Pixel von der Vorlage mehr übrig war.
- I created my graphic with Paint. I used the template as a background, enlarged it and then painted over all the areas completely with my coloured areas, in some cases I set the pixels individually to get colour transitions. In the new graphic I created, there is not a single pixel left from the template, because I painted over everything completely. I also changed many details. The hair completely redrawn, the eyes redrawn, the masks, the exposed skin, the neck, everything. I worked on it for many days. That's why it's really a new drawing. Please look carefully. You can delete the first uploaded versions because they still have similarities to the original. I worked on it until all the details were clearly changed also in the shape and there was not a single pixel left from the original.
Sciencia58 (talk) 07:30, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
- Die Augen, die Augenbrauen, der Abstand der Augen, die Augenumgebung, der Haaransatz, die einzelnen Haare, die Höhe des Kopfes, die Höhe der Stirn, der Nasenansatz, alles ist anders und von mir selbst gezeichnet.
- The eyes, the eyebrows, the distance between the eyes, the area around the eyes, the hairline, the individual hairs, the height of the head, the height of the forehead, the base of the nose, everything is different and drawn by myself.
- Ich finde es übrigens nicht in Ordnung, wenn Leute ohne sich einzuloggen etwas behaupten. Sie drücken sich damit davor, dass man ihren Benutzer-Account erkennt und dass sie für ihre Handlungen Rede und Antwort stehen müssen.
- By the way, I don't think it's okay when people claim something without login. They avoid having their user account recognised and having to answer for their actions.
Sciencia58 (talk) 13:48, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
- Keep The faces on [10] look similar (mainly because of the hair color), but are not the same face. Nobody can have the rights to "all generic female faces with masks on". Comment Deletion requests are (or at least should be) discussed on the basis of the facts. Nobody has to be logged in to start them, nobody has "to answer for their actions". This is a completely valid discussion about a file which IS quite similar to its source. Greetings --Jahobr (talk) 17:00, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. The uploader has done a lot of effort to change the image. However, the basic idea is not changed. Imho this is a matter of en:Plagiarism. This should not be maintained on Commons. I assume the uploader was not aware of this. Elly (talk) 22:12, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per Elly - though no longer a carbon copy, this is still a derivative work of the design of the initial diagram. -M.nelson (talk) 21:10, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: While the file is still reminiscent of the original image, I don't think that the basic idea is above the German threshold of originality. --Rosenzweig τ 14:47, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
