User talk:Rena Cori

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Rena Cori!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 22:28, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:1948-06 JEDERMANN Plakat+Besetzungsflyer KD Bock Dresden.pdf

Copyright status: File:1948-06 JEDERMANN Plakat+Besetzungsflyer KD Bock Dresden.pdf

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:1948-06 JEDERMANN Plakat+Besetzungsflyer KD Bock Dresden.pdf. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

• File:1946-10-05 MONIKA Volksoper Dresden Programmflyer.jpg
• File:1946-09-01 MONIKA Volksoper Dresden Plakat Premiere.jpg
• File:1946-02-02 SCAMPOLO Volksoper Dresden Plakat Premiere.jpg

Yours sincerely EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

File:1946-02-02 SCAMPOLO Volksoper Dresden Plakat Premiere.jpg

File:1946-02-02 SCAMPOLO Volksoper Dresden Plakat Premiere.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

  — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 03:34, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

File:1946-02-02 SCAMPOLO Volksoper Dresden Plakat Premiere.jpg

File:1946-02-02 SCAMPOLO Volksoper Dresden Plakat Premiere.jpg is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified: COM:CSD#G7, own work within a week per https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Deletion_requests/File:1946-02-02_SCAMPOLO_Volksoper_Dresden_Plakat_Premiere.jpg&oldid=526770490. If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log. If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

  — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 03:37, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Warning

Hi Rena Cori. I noticed that you've made a malformed deletion request. When you want to delete a file with the {{Delete}} template, you must follow the instructions in the template, including the "Click here to show further instructions" portion. Alternatively, you can click the "Nominate for deletion" link in the left sidebar, under the "tools" section, which does all of the work for you. Please do one of these, otherwise you create a lot of work for other people. If you don't see the "Nominate for deletion" link in the left sidebar, you can use the JavaScript method of enabling AjaxQuickDelete on Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-gadgets once and then refresh once.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 03:42, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Thank you

Hi Jeff G., thank you for your message. I'm a new user in Wikipedia and in Wikimedia Commons. And I'm not sure, what to do when I like to delete the above-mentioned file. The reason is, that I've found another method for making itemization (Einzelnachweise) which I like to use. And I have problems with the different Namensräume etc. That's why I like to delete all my uploaded files to Wikimedia Commons. And I like to make a new start with imbedded links for my Wikipedia article. Sorry for making a lot of work - I hope that I can do it better at the next time. Sorry oncemore for my mistakes. I also don't know whether my Thank to you is written here at the right address. Hopefully that you will get it, Yours sincerely Rena Cori (talk) 11:46, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:2021-01-25-AS-RR Belege zum Zille-Programm, UA 1975.pdf

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:2021-01-25-AS-RR Belege zum Zille-Programm, UA 1975.pdf, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

And also:

• File:2021-01-25-AS Belege des Schaffens zur Lotte-Lehmann-Woche.pdf
• File:2021-01-25-AS Belege des Schaffens in DD 1945-1950.pdf

Yours sincerely EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:03, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

Dear EugeneZelenko! I have done it to the best of my knowledge and belief. Rena Cori (talk) 08:52, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:2021-01-25-AS-RR Belege zum Zille-Programm, UA 1975.pdf

And also:

• File:2021-01-25-AS Belege des Schaffens zur Lotte-Lehmann-Woche.pdf
• File:2021-01-25-AS Belege des Schaffens in DD 1945-1950.pdf

Yours sincerely,   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 09:52, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi   — Jeff G. ツ !

Thx for your message. I created this file (PDF) File:2021-01-25-AS Belege des Schaffens in DD 1945-1950.pdf (and also the other two, but they are no longer relevant) as a summary of evidence for the Wikipedia article "Annemarie Siemank" (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Annemarie_Siemank) in order to link to this PDF from there. Obviously I chose the wrong way. The photos contained in the PDF are copies of theater posters, flyers, etc. which are all in the artist's estate in paper form. So I assumed that the documents contained are also my own work because I am the artist's heir myself.

I recently added the detailed descriptions to all included photos.

If it is possible to use this file with the detailed photos descriptions in the intended way, I request that the file File:2021-01-25-AS Belege des Schaffens in DD 1945-1950.pdf shall be restored.

If not, then I have to change the mentioned Wikipedia article (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Annemarie_Siemank) - namely, delete the relevant individual evidence. And I have learned something more about the functioning of Wikimedia Commons.

Thank you once again. Yours sincerely, Rena Cori (talk) 12:49, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

You may request undeletion by posting at User talk:Rubin16 or COM:UDR.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 13:40, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

Thank you very much. But now first I want to wait to see what the support of the article in question says. If I need the PDF for any evidence, I'll try again. If not, then I'm done with it. --Rena Cori (talk) 14:09, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

You're welcome.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 14:15, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:1974-09-17 Rolf Ripperger.jpg

Copyright status: File:1974-09-17 Rolf Ripperger.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:1974-09-17 Rolf Ripperger.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 22:07, 15 February 2021 (UTC)