Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2020/07/15

Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Year	Jan	Feb	Mar	Apr	May	Jun	Jul	Aug	Sep	Oct	Nov	Dec
2004	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2005	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2006	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2007	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2008	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2009	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2010	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2011	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2012	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2013	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12

Year	Jan	Feb	Mar	Apr	May	Jun	Jul	Aug	Sep	Oct	Nov	Dec
2014	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2015	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2016	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2017	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2018	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2019	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2020	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2021	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2022	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2023	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2024	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12

Archive July 15^th, 2020

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Album Better Day.jpg

Sorry i'm put wrong tittle ខ្ញុំចង់ដឹង (talk) 00:17, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by EugeneZelenko at 04:55, 15 Juli 2020 UTC: Commons:Licensing: album cover --Krdbot 08:44, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Jorge floyd 1.jpg

Used for vandalism only on w:nl:Dood van George Floyd ErikvanB (talk) 02:12, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by Wutsje at 02:33, 15 Juli 2020 UTC: Content intended as a threat or attack (G3) --Krdbot 08:44, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Musée Unterlinden en automne.jpg

Doublon avec un autre fichier ALINE COCO 67 (talk) 13:44, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate with another file :

Gzen92 ^[discuter] 14:56, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - It is not the same kind of light and texture. It can't hurt to have both, can it? --Edelseider (talk) 13:55, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per Edelseider. --lNeverCry 21:25, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Развалины залвской лютеранской церкви Zalves luterāņu baznīcas drupas (2) - Bontrager - Panoramio.jpg

{{Duplicate|Zalves_baznica.jpg|later upload, lower resolution cropped version}} Dāvis Kļaviņš (talk) 14:09, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; duplicate-processed. --Túrelio (talk) 14:17, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:ErosPyramide20090221 243.jpg

Not educationally useful Fixpol (talk) 13:40, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep immediately. Fixpol seems unaware that Commons is not censored and can also illustrate adult topics such as sexuality or eroticism. So the deletion requests s/he launched are probably all invalid and abusive. See Commons:Project scope (and particularly COM:CENSORSHIP) and Commons:Sexual content. Also note that s/he should have launch a mass DR instead of a separate DR for each file. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 14:02, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per TwoWings. Green Giant (talk) 15:31, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:ErosPyramide20090221 243.jpg

What exactly is educational about this photo? I wish uploaders had to explain the education use for each one rather than just uploading hundreds of soft porn pics. 2A04:4A43:4C7F:A7DC:A458:D936:1FAD:D4C2 00:50, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Blocked anonymous vandal, that opens invalid deletion requests, was blocked a few days ago with IP 2A02:C7D:3C1A:7300:9CDC:793:5A8B:1702, but now is back under IP 2A04:4A43:4C7F:A7DC:A458:D936:1FAD:D4C2 opening dozens of deletion requests as vandalism, in some using sexually vulgar and demeaning sexist language and in others accusing Commons of having porn (in contradiction to each other). Also not valid reason to delete. Tm (talk) 01:39, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: No valid reason for nomination. — Huntster (t @ c) 01:55, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Erica - nude photo shoot.jpg

What exactly is educational about this photo? I wish uploaders had to explain the education use for each one rather than just uploading hundreds of soft porn pics. 2A04:4A43:4C7F:A7DC:A458:D936:1FAD:D4C2 00:48, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Blocked anonymous vandal, that opens invalid deletion requests, was blocked a few days ago with IP 2A02:C7D:3C1A:7300:9CDC:793:5A8B:1702, but now is back under IP 2A04:4A43:4C7F:A7DC:A458:D936:1FAD:D4C2 opening dozens of deletion requests as vandalism, in some using sexually vulgar and demeaning sexist language and in others accusing Commons of having porn (in contradiction to each other). Also not valid reason to delete. Tm (talk) 01:38, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: No valid reason for nomination. — Huntster (t @ c) 01:55, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:ErosPyramide20090221 222.jpg

What exactly is educational about this photo? I wish uploaders had to explain the education use for each one rather than just uploading hundreds of soft porn pics. 2A04:4A43:4C7F:A7DC:A458:D936:1FAD:D4C2 00:49, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Blocked anonymous vandal, that opens invalid deletion requests, was blocked a few days ago with IP 2A02:C7D:3C1A:7300:9CDC:793:5A8B:1702, but now is back under IP 2A04:4A43:4C7F:A7DC:A458:D936:1FAD:D4C2 opening dozens of deletion requests as vandalism, in some using sexually vulgar and demeaning sexist language and in others accusing Commons of having porn (in contradiction to each other). Also not valid reason to delete. Tm (talk) 01:39, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: No valid reason for nomination. — Huntster (t @ c) 01:55, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Brianna_Beach_04.jpg

Pornographic. There can't be an educational use for this The Cleaner (talk) 18:18, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, not really pornographic (it's just nudity), but I don't see why it can't be both (pornographic and educational). –Tryphon ^☂ 18:27, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Invalid reason as Commons is not censored. Tabercil (talk) 03:26, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep As Tryphon and Tabercil. Jacopo Werther (talk) 08:01, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Not pornographic (using european standards), image of a porn actress who, by definition of her job, tends to be a lot naked (so it has intrinsic educational value), and most importantly image was provided with OTRS clearance, so there is not a personality rights (as far i see). Tm (talk) 03:29, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Not pornographic (using european standards). That's "only Pinup-level". In Germany, Pinup-Callendars with such images can be bought on market squares. Antonsusi (talk) 22:50, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kept. –Tryphon ^☂ 22:52, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Brianna Beach 04.jpg

Not used pornograhpic image of not notable porno star. Instead last del req reasons, my main reason is out of scope. Herr Kriss (talk) 03:32, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Out of scope. Ryan Vesey Review me! 04:05, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - we don't require that every single person we have a photo of be notable: this is Commons, not en.wp. -mattbuck (Talk) 09:47, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Not being in use doesnt make an image out of scope (why is it that this argument is almost brought it this kind of deletion requests and not in trains or cats deletion requests?). Per last deletion requests this is not pornographic (using european standards), image of a porn actress who, by definition of her job, tends to be a lot naked (so it has intrinsic educational value), and most importantly image was provided with OTRS clearance, so there is not a personality rights question. Also, even more the fact that being or not notable (per wikipedia standards, irrelevant to commons) does not make this actresses a complete stranger in this sector of entertainment, so this isnt a random image of a random person, is a good quality photo of a actress in a niche (?) market. tThis image is clearly in scope in the depiction of pornographic actresses and the performance of some part their jobs, it is of good quality and has OTRS in it, it is also in scope as it depicts "Nude people in swimming pools", "Nude porn actresses", "Nude standing women", "Nude women with blond hair", "Women touching their breasts". Also this isnt a pornographic image and even if it was it would be in scope (or because of its pornographic content it woukd be more in scope in what is related to pornography). Could also the two users that think that this image is out of scope, expain better why is out of scope instead of just saying "out of scope". Tm (talk) 10:59, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep What Tm said... <G> Tabercil (talk) 12:42, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per above. Reasonably well photographed; categories show usefulness. Infrogmation (talk) 04:28, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kept Yann (talk) 08:35, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:040- Studio J. Mandel, c.1905.jpg

Cos I demand a gallon of TITTY MILK every day! Hey @Achim55 and Tm: lend me your Momma's Whale-Tit-Pumps! 2A04:4A43:4C7F:AE6D:EDD8:D4D6:5865:6F80 18:24, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Vandalism by a kid or a retarded from the UK. --Achim (talk) 18:53, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Jules Soulan.png

copyvio : https://business.facebook.com/Le16emeHommeColumerin/photos/pcb.3099984156757666/3099984066757675/?type=3&theater Supertoff (talk) 16:35, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by Túrelio at 18:57, 15 Juli 2020 UTC: copyvio : https://business.facebook.com/Le16emeHommeColumerin/photos/pcb.3099984156757666/3099984066757675/?type=3&theater --Krdbot 02:47, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Cartoon Network OK K.O. Comic-Con 2017.jpg

Copyright violation. My deepest apologies in advance. TaurusEmerald (talk) 15:21, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 10:16, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:החציל המצוי.jpg

non-real license; the photo uploaded for bulling Euro know (talk) 19:21, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I've tagged this for speedy deletion because it's pure vandalism/personal attacks. Frood (talk) 22:40, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; speedied. --Túrelio (talk) 07:42, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Hot Wheels Van SDCC 2019.jpg

DW of copyrighted logo - a self-acknowledged error TaurusEmerald (talk) 23:13, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; as no FoP in the US for such works. --Túrelio (talk) 10:07, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sajith Thomas

all images nominated Quakewoody (talk) 11:25, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:00, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Withdrawing my nomination as per the below comment, and no delete votes made. Non-admin closure. - Harsh 15:38, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:カメ君 (3726966290).jpg

It's a photo of a bread / Not educationally useful :) - Harsh 11:52, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Melonpan is culture of food. It's educationally respectable. --Benzoyl (talk) 11:18, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(non-admin closure) - Harsh 15:38, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ramy Khodeir Live It Up.jpg

New artwork is available. This is the old one 2600:1700:6CB0:4BC0:7C48:ED9C:A6EB:FC1D 19:01, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Old artwork. 2600:1700:6CB0:4BC0:C16E:1DC4:584D:5FBA 00:17, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Album cover, no fair use on Commons. --Achim (talk) 08:11, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is the incorrect artwork for Khodeir's "Live It Up." The correct artwork is in Ramy Khodeir's category. This one needs to be removed. Flexfinesse00 (talk) 04:14, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect artwork for "Live It Up - EP" Flexfinesse00 (talk) 02:48, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect artwork for "Live It Up - EP" Flexfinesse00 (talk) 02:00, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete per Achim, COM:CSD#F4. — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 05:56, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:17, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hmkwfrance (talk · contribs)

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 07:56, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hmkwfrance (talk · contribs)

Dubious claim of own work, no exif, look like photoss of photos

Gbawden (talk) 06:30, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Add files uploaded today

At this point, I think everything they've uploaded is bad, no response to warnings or directed questions and I've got zero good faith left. Everything they've uploaded should be removed. Ravensfire (talk) 20:07, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 07:58, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hmkwfrance (talk · contribs)

More copyvios by this user, claimed as own work

Gbawden (talk) 07:02, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 11:23, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:P&M Movies by Pawan ChawlaLogo.png

out of scope Quakewoody (talk) 09:57, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by Gbawden at 09:51, 19 Juli 2020 UTC: Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work (F1) --Krdbot 14:38, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Editor priyanshu dwivedi (talk · contribs)

Self promo on en.wp

Minorax^talk _{(formerly 大诺史)} 08:46, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 05:45, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Astronacci International (talk · contribs)

Author Gema Goeyardi Copyright holder www.eienniminni.com - needs permission as these arent own work

Gbawden (talk) 10:08, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 05:46, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kotanag12345 (talk · contribs)

Unused user photos. Out of project scope.

Ə XPLICIT 10:31, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 05:46, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mmehdin (talk · contribs)

not own work as claimed

Gbawden (talk) 10:38, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 05:46, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:St. Wolfgang (Kümmersbruck)

Copyright violation, contemporary artworks (church from 1977), no freedom of panorama.

Martin Sg. (talk) 10:48, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 05:47, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shoaibtollywood123 (talk · contribs)

Seems to have been intended for use on the English Wikipedia, where the uploader was blocked for hijacking the article about the cricketer of the same name. Additionally, as the user appears to be the subject photographed, COM:OTRS permission is required by the original photographer(s).

Ə XPLICIT 10:49, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 05:48, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MackinzieDae (talk · contribs)

xwiki vanity spam, all highly likely to be own work.

Praxidicae (talk) 12:31, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 05:52, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Radost Babadzhanova (talk · contribs)

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused advertisement of company of questionable notability. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:00, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 05:54, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Acikm (talk · contribs)

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 05:54, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mikelfrankart (talk · contribs)

Modern art. I think artist identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:34, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 04:52, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cmppp (talk · contribs)

Out of Commons:Project scope: what new could be added to existing collection of explicit materials?

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 04:52, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cmppp (talk · contribs)

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. E4024 (talk) 05:00, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 05:33, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cmppp (talk · contribs)

Out of project scope and COM:PENIS. New, low-quality and unused images.

A1Cafel (talk) 17:26, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:32, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Razif13 (talk · contribs)

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 05:34, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ahmedxalkatheri (talk · contribs)

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:41, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 05:37, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Omeraftab99 (talk · contribs)

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 05:38, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kapuria123 (talk · contribs)

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Used in vanity Wikidata item.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:50, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 05:38, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Eddiejackson113 (talk · contribs)

OoS, only used for promotion on WP

Gbawden (talk) 16:00, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 05:39, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Timothy Rorie Meeks.jpg

Probably OoS but needs permission from the studio photographer who took the photo Gbawden (talk) 10:15, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 06:22, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Pankaj Gurjar.jpg

Likely Out of scope Gbawden (talk) 10:16, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 06:22, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nicolas Gallardo Fernandez (talk · contribs)

Bogus CC licenses by serial copyvio uploader. May or may not be PD, but actual evidence needed

Эlcobbola _talk 18:38, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 06:20, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Saint Emmeram of Regensburg Church (Waidhaus)

Copyright violation, contemporary paintings, no freedom of panorama. (Artist Tobias Kammerer born in 1968; see [1].)

Martin Sg. (talk) 18:50, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 06:20, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Lắc.jpg

out of scope - private photo with unknown man Adelfrank (talk) 21:14, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

see also: File:Hằng.jpg Adelfrank (talk) 21:18, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:33, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Journalist naeem qureshi.jpg

Unused personal image. Out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 00:00, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:44, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Joey salads.jpg

Low quality. Probably derivative work. Per COM:NOTUSED BriefEdits (talk) 00:07, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:44, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Akdeniz Bölgesi, Antalya Bölümü, Adana Bölümü.jpg

Copyvio (the source can be seen from the watermark). Nanahuatl (talk) 00:10, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:44, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Plaj Dilimi.jpg

Copyvio Nanahuatl (talk) 00:26, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:44, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Proyecto “Desierto florido de cuerpos pintados“ 2002.jpeg

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:44, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:About-as-1.jpg

Low-quality image uploaded only for the purpose of advertising by a single-purpose account. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 00:41, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:45, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Asidoxin.jpg

Advertising. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 00:42, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:45, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:BIOGOLD Apple Stemcell Jakarta.png

Advertising. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 00:43, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:45, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Cassandra Cassin.jpg

See EXIF: “Author SOUDIER Christophe” ≠ uploader (Hollyjames2) Эlcobbola _talk 17:26, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:52, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:汉族历代迁徙路线图.png

Copyright Issue: original file at https://i.guancha.cn/bbs/2019/07/20/20190720223155378.jpg?imageView2/2/w/500/format/jpg Timmyboger (talk) 17:49, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:52, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Avefigueroa.jpg

Bogus self claim and CC license. Actual author/date/provenance needed. Эlcobbola _talk 19:03, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:52, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Grbnpr1.jpg

Personal photos for non-wikipedian - out of scope --Alaa :)..! 19:12, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:51, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sofistadium july2020.jpg

this file was from my private instagram - will reupload original file. Troutfarm27 (talk) 20:18, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:51, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:20160511 081747000 iOS (2).jpg

Is she in scope? E4024 (talk) 20:32, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:51, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:3 9uAayGHs.jpg

Scope? 120 kb. E4024 (talk) 20:35, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:50, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Allison Altiero.jpg

Not a real Wikipedian; just made a short stopover in WP. E4024 (talk) 20:39, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:51, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:V P Singh by Arjun.jpg

COM:DW/COM:LL - merely a pencil rendering of this image. Flickr user cannot license underlying photo. Эlcobbola _talk 21:02, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:50, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Hằng.jpg

out of scope - private photo with unknown woman Adelfrank (talk) 21:15, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

see also: File:Lắc.jpg Adelfrank (talk) 21:17, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:49, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Thomas Sowell Hoover Institution.jpg

Copyright violation Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 21:17, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:49, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Young Hommie Jr.pdf

User page as pdf, out of scope Achim (talk) 21:35, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:49, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:MichealTarver.tif

unlikely to be own work Didym (talk) 22:16, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:49, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Edmonton NE LRT scans

Unlikely that original photos are by the same author as the owner of the Flickr account, so no evidence that they are freely licensed. Conifer (talk) 22:23, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:49, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Emmanuel Bonini.jpg

L'article a été refusé par Wikipédia Ricochet (talk) 22:56, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:48, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:راز یک جنایت جلد سوم.jpg

Out of COM:SCOPE - Self-promotion. Article on fa.wiki is up for deletion. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:20, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:46, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:راز یک جنایت 2.jpg

Out of COM:SCOPE - Self-promotion. Article on fa.wiki is up for deletion. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:20, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:46, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Topic-u-1565004811-51.jpg

Out of COM:SCOPE - Self-promotion. Article on fa.wiki is up for deletion. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:20, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:46, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:51vHXDKx3DL. AC SL1180.jpg

Image Taken from Amazon: https://www.amazon.com/Flylife-Large-Oromo-Liberation-banner/dp/B01M7SJIBO BlinxTheKitty (talk) 23:29, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:45, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:China-flag-monochrome-on-white-background-vector-10930879.jpg

Uploaded by blocked account. User spammed this vandalistic image across some China-related talk pages. Does not seem to have any other beneficial purposes on this project. Nkon21 (talk) 00:32, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: attack page. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 00:18, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ziabicure.jpg

Advertising. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 00:35, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Add for the same reason File:Gumheal.jpg and File:Halwagheekwar.jpg from the user

Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 00:38, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 00:20, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Stasiun cikawung.jpg

Probably COM:SELFIE RaFaDa20631 (talk) 02:21, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: however, it is in use to illustrate the article about that train station. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 00:22, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Monument aux morts de Mers-les-Bains 6.jpg

erreur d'importation, photo mal cadrée Bycro (talk) 07:11, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 00:25, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Piyush Joshigggg.jpg

Also to delete:
- File:BodyEditor.jpg
Image only used for self promotion by a not notable person on YouTube --Hangman'sDeath (talk) 08:33, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per COM:HOST. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 00:27, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Москвина Лидия Павловна (2008).jpg

Непонятки с лицензией, не позволяет разместить на странице Julee mus (talk) 09:43, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyright violation. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 00:32, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Москвина Лидия Павловна (1983).jpg

Непонятки с лицензией Julee mus (talk) 09:44, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyright violation. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 00:32, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Austin zajur.jpg

Only intended for use on the Spanish Wikipedia, where the subject's userpage was speedily deleted in August 2017 for violating userspace policy. Out of project scope. Ə XPLICIT 10:28, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyright violation, screenshot from the movie. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 00:36, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:U6eXaCdGu-I.jpg

Out of project scope. Ə XPLICIT 10:59, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 00:37, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Stasiun Ngujang.jpg

Copyright infringement Rizal Febri (talk) 12:31, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 00:40, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Khatia dos.jpg

I seriously doubt that this picture features Khatia Buniatishvili, as stated. Furthermore, there is no evidence that person on the photo gave consent to publish it publicly. romanm (talk) 14:04, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: intended to attack the person (the uploader tried to place it in the article instead of her face). --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 00:44, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Wp ss 20150919 0012.png

Out of Scope Gbawden (talk) 14:25, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as a content uploaded for advertising. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 00:46, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:MD ROKIBUL ISLAM.jpg

Not a real user. E4024 (talk) 16:29, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of scope of the project. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 00:49, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Глава Якутии Айсен Николаев.jpg

Нет согласования на размещение с человеком на фотографии Якупова Инна (talk) 19:19, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: cropped copy of File:Глава Республики Саха (Якутия) Айсен Николаев.jpg. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 00:54, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Allaži, Allažu pagasts, LV-2154, Latvia - panoramio (1).jpg

Duplicate of File:Allaži.jpg later upload, without straightened horizon Dāvis Kļaviņš (talk) 20:25, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: duplicate. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 00:55, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Dr. Hala El Miniawi.png

Looks like a scan of a copyright photo, perhaps retouched. Poor quality. Timtrent (talk) 12:59, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ə XPLICIT 06:35, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:3d Sodium cacodylate.png

Incorrect structure: sodium is not covalently bound. Leyo 00:02, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This looks to have been changed. Though I would like to see the anion drawn more like what you see in File:Ammonium-acetate-3D-balls.png with a dotted line across the two oxygens. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:39, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Ball-and-stick models absolutely need to have an accurate geometry and size of atoms. Otherwise, they are misleading like in this case. Hence, still Delete. --Leyo 17:06, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: This, and the remaining similar files below, are all in use. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:38, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:3d Sodium cacodylate.png

Chemically incorrect: this structure has an extra atom between the As and one of the O, so I removed it from its use-cases. Also (as others have noted) it's a crazy mix of styles, and problems regarding the fundamental way to depict a salt. That's because it's an uncited composite of uncited originals (license fail). DMacks (talk) 05:15, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. This structure is indeed a complete mess & composite of different other uncited files. The result is an inferior quality with opaque (white) background. Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 22:11, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - now unused. --Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 11:06, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Niousha modaber.jpg

uploader is globally blocked. subject is questionable. nominated for deletion across all projects. Quakewoody (talk) 10:22, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by Ahmad252 at 05:48, 26 Juli 2020 UTC: No permission since 18 July 2020 --Krdbot 14:29, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Profane Trump Sign with Protestor.jpeg

Transmission location code appears to be a Facebook image, permission is required A1Cafel (talk) 07:00, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not my image, and it's been a while. But I'm pretty sure @Ritchie333: was at this protest at the time and took a ton of images there. GMG ^talk 12:31, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I took the picture and released it under a free licence. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 12:57, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion -- Own work by trusted user. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:38, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:López-Gatell.jpg

The source of the photo doesn't show the license of this imagen. Luisalvaz (talk) 19:32, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: @Luisalvaz: Below where it says "Términos y Condiciones" you can see the license of the image. --I Mertex I (talk) 20:03, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: PD released. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:50, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:López-Gatell (cropped).jpg

The source of the photo doesn't show the license of this imagen. Luisalvaz (talk) 19:33, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: @Luisalvaz: Below where it says "Términos y Condiciones" you can see the license of the image. --I Mertex I (talk) 20:02, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: PD released. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:50, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:OracleDataScienceServices.png

test file and can be found on other Oracle web pages Ntoscano01 (talk) 18:30, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: just a copyright violation. --Ju Ta 13:42, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Gina Keys.jpg

selfpromotion Adelfrank (talk) 12:33, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ə XPLICIT 01:09, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Elijah Canlas.jpg

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Used in unapproved draft. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 15 July 2020 (UTC)\[reply]

own work? I do'nt believe - facebook-copy - copyright ? *2017: https://www.facebook.com/pg/Elijahs-Squad-140824409978446/posts/ Adelfrank (talk) 14:20, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ə XPLICIT 01:05, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Стадников.jpeg

licencing dubious PlanespotterA320 (talk) 00:51, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 10:23, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Takatsuki Center Gai.JPG

Wikipediaをやめることにしたため Monadaisuki (talk) 14:51, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Not in reason. It is thought that the person who requests this deletion request does not understand the licensing and deletion policy on Wikimedia Commons.--G I Chandor2 (talk) 08:58, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Takatsuki Center Gai.JPG

Redundant : This picture is not used from any pages. Monadaisuki (talk) 05:58, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:43, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Takatsuki Center Gai.JPG

"Copyright violation" Sorry, I got this picture from other site. This picture is not mine. Monadaisuki (talk) 04:19, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:06, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Takatsuki Center Gai.JPG

I'm not the copyright holder of this picture. I stole this picture from other site. COM:LRV is no valid reason to keep it. Monadaisuki (talk) 16:43, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:07, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Microsoft Edge.jpg

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Microsoft Edge logo (2019).svg Pseudo Classes (talk) 16:22, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by 1989 at 04:48, 15 August 2020 UTC: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing --Krdbot 14:09, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Φωτογραφία Νίκος Πατσιώρας.jpg

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:45, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted, source – Facebook. Taivo (talk) 14:18, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SerAntoniDeMiloni (talk · contribs)

Historical photos, publications, coat of arms. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Strongly disagree with the above. All relating to the LSSP, BLPI and Leslie Goonewardene have had the correct permissions given, with the dates estimated. All LSSP related photos have been released by the LSSP, of which I have permission from, and the personal photos have been released by the Goonewardene Family Library, via Wikimedia. The photos below, running from JosefBW to Nelly Weissel, have also had correct permissions given by the photo owners. SerAntoniDeMiloni (talk) 14:57, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Physical copy ownership doesn't mean copyrights ownership. See Commons:Copyright rules by territory for relevant country if works are in public domain by age. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:58, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@EugeneZelenko – I've gone ahead and meticulously changed every permission to one that is correct. Please look at closing this deletion suggestion. Many thanks, SerAntoniDeMiloni (talk) 18:00, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Clams about publishing at particular date must mentioned actual publication. Owning physical copies doesn't assume owning of copyrights. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:13, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@EugeneZelenko All published regarding "Schmitt" were either published prior to 1925 or unpublished, as the respective death dates of the Individuals were 1908 and 1909 (the back of the images are marked 1895). The article on the "Bolshevik–Leninist Party of India, Ceylon and Burma" has been correctly cited and falls under PD (the party collapsed without a successor in 1948, hence copyright on its publication was not renewed). All relating to Skossyreff have had the correct Public Domain conditions noted. As has Hugh Boustead. The Panadura Methodist Church opening took place before the turn of the 19th Century, hence being under Public Domain in the US. Some of the remaining LSSP images have been correctly released as per CC 3.0. Regardless, these can be dealt with separately. All images under and including "Panadura Methodist Church Opening . png" clearly fall under PD. If you could close the deletion request for those, we could then discuss the other images separately. SerAntoniDeMiloni (talk) 15:25, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

For File:LeslieGoonewardenePortrait.jpg and other from same source: authorship confirmation and license should be confirmed via Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). And such files are definitely not your own work. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

EugeneZelenko – I'll try and contact the photo owners to see if I can get hold of the original photographer/copyright holder. In the meantime, can you clear the other photos not from this source. SerAntoniDeMiloni (talk) 21:47, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

EugeneZelenko. I've gotten the copyright owner to submit permissions via email for the Goonewardene and LSSP related files that they took/own. It would be great if we could close this deletion nom now. Thanks, SerAntoniDeMiloni (talk) 12:27, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure how File:Hugh Boustead in the Middle East.png can be copyright, presumably taken before 1965 — Preceding unsigned comment added by C.cohen (talk • contribs) 11:47, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi C.cohen. Yep; it's under Public Domain in both the UK and US as it was taken by the UK Govt. before this period. Best, SerAntoniDeMiloni (talk) 20:59, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ticket:2020080710005144 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 05:00, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Can someone please review File:LeslieGoonewardenePortrait.jpg Evrik (talk) 15:56, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I've been following the case and, sincerely, there's no way to verify authorship.

For example: File:Panadura_Methodist_Church_Opening.png it's PD because "Unknown author (came from a family book). I was told this could be added as the photo is over 100 years old and the Author died over 70 years ago." But, if the author is unknown, how can we know that 70 years are past since his death? If the file has never been published before, so the 100 years from the first publication are not past. And IMHO, the file looks like scanned from an old newspaper, not a family photo. The other photos have got similar problems IMHO, so I've released the ticket to see if someone else can verify someway the information. Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 20:29, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Ill-advised batch nomination with wildly varying copyright statuses. Please unbundle and renominate. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:51, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SerAntoniDeMiloni (talk · contribs)

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi EugeneZelenko. I'm happy to have these removed. Thanks SerAntoniDeMiloni (talk) 14:55, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 05:53, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Plantas-medicinales.jpg

The link is dead but this is a stock photo found on many websites such as this, would be hard to find the original source or license. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 00:51, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyright violation, several sources. --Ezarateesteban 23:38, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Willyrex FS.jpg

COM:DW of the copyright work. SCP-2000 01:21, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyright violation. --Ezarateesteban 23:36, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bruno Oberle IUCN.jpg

53 KB dubious "own work" by a newcomer. E4024 (talk) 01:39, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: COM:PCP. --Ezarateesteban 23:36, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Final del Eclipse Lunar del 04-07-2020.png

Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 02:32, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yo la tomé con mi celular y con mis propias manos. -- The Omniversal Man (talk) 22:30, 31 July 2020 (UTC). --[reply]

Deleted: COM:PCP. --Ezarateesteban 23:39, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Miyakoda-eki-1.jpg

This photo from 2006 is outdated. I have uploaded a new one from 2020 to replace it. Dtrmmll (talk) 03:04, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as a historical photograph.--そらみみ (talk) 04:02, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ezarateesteban 23:39, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ferdinand - Uranus moon.gif

No evidence for PD-NASA license Nrco0e (talk) 03:44, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: COM:PCP. --Ezarateesteban 23:40, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Map of US lethal injection usage - October 2018.svg

Duplicate of Map of US lethal injection usage Fluffy89502 ~ talk 04:17, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Not original source provided to verify if duplicated. --Ezarateesteban 23:42, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Selena gomez relaxing.jpg

copyvio, part of an advertising campaign for "Dream out loud" https://www.myfacehunter.com/2014/07/selena-gomez-poses-for-dream-out-loud.html DGtal (talk) 06:53, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyright violation. --Ezarateesteban 23:43, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Fake news by godi media.jpg

Low quality image of copyrighted content which lacks an educational purpose. This was brought to my attention because it was used in a page that is now deleted on the English Wikipedia which forms the basis for sanctions at w:en:WP:AE. Kevin (aka L235 · t · enwiki) 07:12, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ezarateesteban 23:44, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Steve at desk.jpg

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:41, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. JGHowes ^talk 18:37, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Turkey map 1.jpg

We have many similar maps with higher resolutions. No reason to keep a jpej map, since it's not being used. Nanahuatl (talk) 04:55, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: I would gladly delete this ugly map, but it's in use. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:26, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:İZBAN MAP.PNG

We have a better, corrected and updated version, and this one is not being used. Nanahuatl (talk) 04:59, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:26, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Turkiye ve Irak haritasi.png

We have many alterative maps and this one is not being used. Nanahuatl (talk) 05:00, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:27, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sm34.jpg

Taken from the official website of the school. Copyvio Nanahuatl (talk) 05:41, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:28, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Karaköy Cami.jpg

Copyvio Nanahuatl (talk) 07:47, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:28, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Generali Han.jpg

Copyvio Nanahuatl (talk) 07:47, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:28, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:FLOTAN2 - Flickr - Osvaldo Gon.jpg

This image is outside of the project scope. This image is by a private artist that uploaded the image on flickr. If a not notable artist uploads a self painted image to Commons the image gets deleted. Commons is not myspace/instagram/facebook Hangman'sDeath (talk) 08:42, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:32, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ps6 34 aki3-002.jpg

The image is a copyright violation. The image clearly has a watermark in the bottom left corner. It is highly unlikely that the image is the uploader's own work. It is also highly unlikely that S-Cute ever released this image under a free licence. It was already tagged as F1, User:Billinghurst disagreed. Hangman'sDeath (talk) 08:47, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Hangman'sDeath: supporting evidence is better than just putting a label on a file that does not allow a proper evaluation, like a DR can do. So informing the discussion about S-Cute or indicating where else the image exists on the web. — billinghurst sDrewth 21:36, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The watermark is clearly visible even in the 400x600px preview. The uploader has only this one upload. www.s-cute.com is a porn website with japanese girls that has a clear copyright notice on it. If I see the watermark within 10 seconds and in less than one minute I see the bigger picture just as ordinary user, an experienced admin should do much better here. --Hangman'sDeath (talk) 09:58, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:33, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:La Ausencia Cortometraje Costarricense Realizado Por William Sanz Anderseen.jpg

own work? I do'nt believe - copyright? Adelfrank (talk) 09:04, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:33, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:1984-10 Schloss Scharfenberg, Informationsblatt zur Ausstellung.jpg

Unclear copyright on picture Mahlzahn (talk) 09:08, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:34, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Jonny butt.jpg

Out of project scope panda kekok 9 Junk the Philippine anti-terror law! 10:00, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:34, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Martin Švehla, nar. 18.2.1951.jpg

Author Simeon Lichnovsky - not own work Gbawden (talk) 10:08, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, I had a camera borrowed from Simeon Lichnovsky, but I took the picture. I'll add another one. The picture is me personally, I'm listed on wikipedia, but it says that the picture is missing ... so I wanted to add. But he doesn't have to be there, I don't want to influence anything. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Martinsvehla51 (talk • contribs) 09:29, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per above; superseded by File:M Svehla 1951.jpg . --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:37, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ernaportr.jpg

1940 photograph claimed own work, unclear copyright status Buidhe (talk) 10:08, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:40, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sarala das.jpg

Looks like a book cover. Also the picture depicted in the image is of Category:Manoj Das Psubhashish (talk) 10:13, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, missing permission. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:40, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Dan Libenson.jpg

Low quality, unlikely to be own work. A version found here - https://www.judaismunbound.com/podcast/2018/5/1/judaism-unbound-episode-116-passion - needs OTRS Gbawden (talk) 10:20, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This should not be deleted. Dan Libenson is well-known in the Jewish world which is under-represented in the media. An editor can do some research to make it better, but this page must go through. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Miriam3254 (talk • contribs) 05:00, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:41, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:20180602 FIFA Friendly Match Austria vs. Germany Leroy Sané 850 0668 (cropped).jpg

no improvement of the original version Granada (talk) 11:13, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

cropped useless background up top Urgal (talk) 11:17, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The original crop is following the rule of thirds and the background on top is not useless at all, it's the necessary headroom. --Granada (talk) 11:27, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:43, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sophia Flörsch, 2019.png

This is from Google. https://www.scmp.com/sport/motorsport/article/3033061/miracle-crash-survivor-sophia-floersch-hints-return-2019-macau 2A02:A453:F0B9:1:2108:A329:98EA:BD0C 11:45, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:44, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Puppy love Nagarjun Thyagaraj.jpg

Not educationally useful / Out of scope - Harsh 11:51, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:45, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sabaton 'S' logo.svg

Fanmade, nonofficial. Merkið (talk) 12:04, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is the new version:

. You can see the differences at the "S" for example. --Merkið (talk) 18:38, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:48, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:動画紹介サムネイル全員集合写真.jpg

Advertisement of YouTube channel. Out of SCOPE. 運動会プロテインパワー (talk) 12:44, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:48, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ilir Ikonomi.jpg

Professional portrait whose copyright donation needs to be asserted. Until then likely Copyright Violation Timtrent (talk) 13:11, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this image was donated by the subject himself, who owns it and is free to use/distribute as needed. Please don't delete! Hestrada84 (talk) 15:10, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hestrada84 proof of that is required, Please see commons:copyrights and work from there. Timtrent (talk) 16:03, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; needs COM:OTRS. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:49, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Two Ties.jpg

Unused logo, probably OoS Gbawden (talk) 14:21, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:50, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Tinida Profile Pic From Reverbnation.jpg

Not own work,Tinida Profile Pic From Reverbnation, Facebook, Twitter, Instagram & Google, needs permission Gbawden (talk) 14:23, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:51, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Heading back home county ((MSP✈NOV14)) INST INT happenings @WalkerArtCenter ((SFO✈NOV17)) hmu (photo by j bizzie).jpg

Map of some personal journey, unused and no EDUSE IMO, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 14:25, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:51, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Alex toussaint.jpg

Facebook image, requires OTRS verification Ytoyoda (talk) 14:36, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:52, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Alex toussaint.png

Video screenshot, not an original photo Ytoyoda (talk) 14:37, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:52, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Gamut. Smart Media from Cox. Logo.png

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Duplicate. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:52, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Barbour-tartan-wash-bag-uba0313tn11-(2)-5272-p.jpg

Unused JPG version of File:Barbour Brand Logo.svg, even if it is pd-textlogo. Ich (talk) 14:42, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:52, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Field Studies Council logo.jpg

duplicate uploaded at wrong size Fieldstudiescouncil (talk) 14:57, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:56, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Field Studies Council Logo.jpg

duplicate uploaded at wrong size Fieldstudiescouncil (talk) 14:58, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:56, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Paulo Murunga Malaya.pdf

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:05, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:56, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Marie Hennerez.pdf

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:07, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:56, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Elsa Esnoult.jpg

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:08, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, taken from FB. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:57, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Elsa Esnoult.jpg

Doesn't look like an own work. 186.173.149.62 02:05, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I can't find a larger or older version of this on Google Lens, but their other upload was deleted as a crop of an image from Facebook (cropping out the watermark), so I am disinclined to believe this is one work either. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:32, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@The Squirrel Conspiracy, could you please clarify your meaning?

Are you asserting this image should be deleted because it has the same name as an earlier image, that was deleted because it was found to be a copyright violation of an image found on facebook?
Or are you asserting that this image and the earlier deleted image are the same?
Are you asserting you have reasons to suspect the two different userids that uploaded the two images are a single individual? Geo Swan (talk) 06:43, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Geo Swan, Sorry. The uploader of the current image also uploaded a second image, which was deleted as an obvious copyvio at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Elsa Pleyel.jpg. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 14:07, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I see, File:Elsa Pleyel.jpg is the other image you referred to, and it undermined their credibility?
I'm afraid our nominator has strained their credibility, in my eyes. Thanks for the clarification. Geo Swan (talk) 17:04, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This one is a crop from Facebook, where in the original photo there is a guitar beside her. Is this uploader an LTA? (I don't know what the feck it means but you guys use it for good and bad IPs without distinction when you feel like insulting them.)

186.172.206.145 13:50, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

186.172.206.145, for crying out loud. If you know the URL for a webpage where this image can be found, and its date precedes when this image was uploaded, then why the heck didn't you include that URL in your DR?

If you have the URL that shows this image is a copyright violation, you should have used speedy deletion, not a DR.

Fans take pictures at concerts. If all you are saying is that this image is similar to one you think you remember seeing on a facebook page, then, do us all a big favour, and stop initiating, or weighing in at, DR, until you understand what you are doing. Please. Geo Swan (talk) 21:06, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:WIKI AAC July 14 2017.pdf

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:09, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:59, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:GUIA 6 Ciclo celular y Mitosis.pdf

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:09, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:59, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Obsessive-Compulsive Personality Disorder.pdf

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused presentation of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:10, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This presentation confuses OCPD (a personality disorder) and OCD (an anxiety disorder). MissLunaRose12 (talk) 02:47, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:59, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Statstree.pdf

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:11, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:59, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Vía Bariloche.pdf

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:59, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Entorno de Desarrollo Integrado (IDE).pdf

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:33, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:59, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:MR ELGOTYO.jpg

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:44, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:02, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Marwane Benzagnoun.jpg

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:45, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:02, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Dawlat Waziri Ji.jpg

Unlikely to be own work: missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, taken from FB. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:03, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mr Thuyein.jpg

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:55, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:02, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Philippe Longchamps.jpg

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:56, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:02, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:20170531 Juan y Lucho.jpg

Taken from Insta, needs permission Gbawden (talk) 16:04, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:04, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Close-up-view-of-a-tree-bark-3093183.jpg

Pexels licenses do not meet our requirements and are not acceptable. For example, terms include "Don't sell unaltered copies of a photo or video, e.g. as a poster, print or on a physical product without modifying it first" and "Don't redistribute or sell the photos and videos on other stock photo or wallpaper platforms." Эlcobbola _talk 19:32, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:17, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mariakirka interiør.jpg

wrong image uploaded Øyvind Holmstad (talk) 20:20, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:16, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sen The Hon Mrs. Brigid Annisette-George.jpg

Name is wrong 744cody (talk) 10:25, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tell me the correct name and let's move it. We don't need to delete it. --E4024 (talk) 20:38, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: File moved to correct name. --Minorax^talk 13:09, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sabaton.svg

Fanmade, nonofficial. The official version is this one: Https www.sabaton.net wp-content uploads 2020 07 Black-Logotype-PNG-1.png Merkið (talk) 18:51, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is the new version:

. You can see the differences at the "S" for example. --Merkið (talk) 18:36, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Superseded by File:Sabaton Black Logo.png. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 12:29, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:PrincessChristina2017.jpg

none free license Victuallers (talk) 16:23, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I only upload images from YouTube if photos or videos have a Creative Commons license. (It's part of my selection process.) When I uploaded this still to Commons on 18 June 2020, there must have been a CC license attached to the video, otherwise the filter wouldn't have let the video pass. Immediately after the upload I asked for a license review. There is no license visible at all at this moment. Vysotsky (talk) 18:12, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Totaaly AGF for your uploads, but there is no archived information on the video, and no CC-BY license on it any more. --Ciell (talk) 17:51, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Fertile vagina filled with sperm after creampie.jpg

Low-quality and unsharp image with no realistic educational use within the Wikimedia projects, see Commons:Nudity Emha (talk) 14:45, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Lower quality than existing images of same subject. - Just Some Wikipedian (talk) 14:36, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Mys_721tx (talk) 17:40, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:IMG-20180724-WA0023.jpg

unlikely own work of the uploader as claimed. Ju Ta 08:29, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What about File:IMG-20180724-WA0021.jpg, their only other contribution? --E4024 (talk) 18:53, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:37, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:L3MNXX0LXNBirta.jpg

Clearly not own work of uploader. Probable copyright by Miss Universe Iceland. Jjj1238 (talk) 12:56, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:36, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:B&B-Hotels-Logo.svg

Logo nicht mehr aktuell - dies ist unser altes Logo Alutik (talk) 11:27, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Didym (talk) 18:14, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:B&B-Hotels-Logo.svg

The logo is no longer current. Under https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/B%26B_Hotels you can find the current logo of us. Therefore please delete the old logo immediately, otherwise it will still be used by partners, service providers or employees by mistake. 95.91.216.36 15:08, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion; old logos may be kept as historical records. --Gbawden (talk) 09:36, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:B&B-Hotels-Logo.svg

ancien logo B&B HOTELS qui n'est plus utilisable par la marque 176.124.40.10 16:43, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Not a valid reason for deletion. A09 (talk) 20:56, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep And already kept twice for the same reason. Stop asking Commons to memory-hole history! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:55, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rosenzweig τ 21:21, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:B&B-Hotels-Logo.svg

update logo Caroline Lengline (talk) 09:26, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep This is no reason for deletion, and that won't change with a 4th, 5th, 6th or 7th deletion request. --Rosenzweig τ 09:52, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep There have already been 3 other discussions about this where all the consensus is "Keep". It is a historical logo, and is in scope and in use on Commons and other Wikimedia projects. --QuickQuokka ^{[⁠talk • contribs]} 00:47, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Krd 07:41, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Gaze (32610037).jpeg

It's me. I never gave permission to publish the photo. Fünfmalfünf (talk) 15:16, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That's me. I never gave permission to anyone to publish the photo Fünfmalfünf (talk) 15:17, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:35, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Belky Arizala Premios TVyNovelas 2018.png

authorship unclear Victuallers (talk) 15:38, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Hell no, what's your fuckin' problem with that screenshots? These come from a YouTube account of Sarah Lee Mendez, she is the trustly uploader of these videos, there's no valid reason for deletion, stop with this now!!! RevengerTime (talk) 22:37, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Has a cc license at source. Is there any reason to doubt source?. --Gbawden (talk) 09:34, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Danialhalim680 (talk · contribs)

All of these files appear to be from a brochure, print or online, for the product. Logically they cannot be owned by the uploader, therefore they are a copyright violation

Timtrent (talk) 16:48, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note that the uploader has commented on the talk page here Timtrent (talk) 07:48, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; unlikely to be own work and a screenshot falls under COM:SS. --Gbawden (talk) 09:31, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Secretary of Defense Melvin Laird and MACV Commander General Creighton Abrams.jpg

Flickr user is not the owner. Bettmann/CORBIS copyright is likely still valid. Ytoyoda (talk) 18:54, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:27, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:K Shanmugam (cropped).jpg

the original image which this is derived from has no copyright release, and the same image was uploaded on facebook before the upload here. https://www.facebook.com/k.shanmugam.page/photos/a.203524989694039/203524993027372 Robertsky (talk) 09:25, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67^T★C 12:56, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Akuta Gawa Shoten Gai.JPG

Wikipediaをやめることにしたため Monadaisuki (talk) 14:52, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Not in reason. It is thought that the person who requests this deletion request does not understand the licensing and deletion policy on Wikimedia Commons.--G I Chandor2 (talk) 08:59, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant : This picture is not used from any pages. Monadaisuki (talk) 05:58, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:44, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Akuta Gawa Shoten Gai.JPG

"Copyright violation" Sorry, I got this picture from other site. This picture is not mine. Monadaisuki (talk) 04:20, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no new infos, no reason for deletion. see above. Please see COM:LRV. --Wdwd (talk) 11:56, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Akuta Gawa Shoten Gai.JPG

I'm not the copyright holder of this picture. I stole this picture from other site. COM:LRV is no valid reason to keep it. Monadaisuki (talk) 16:45, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: I don't believe the copyvio claim (based on the original reason and the related DR's) but I did a courtesy deletion because there is a close alternative (File:Akutagawa-shotengai.jpg). --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:54, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Villa mit Einfriedung Schmöllner Weg 7.jpg

Falsches Haus, kein Schutzstatus. Conny (talk) 17:28, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Just change description and/or filename. Image is in scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:57, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Wohnstallhaus und winklig angebaute Scheune eines ehemaligen Bauernhofes Uferweg 1.jpg

Falsches Gebäude, kein Schutzstatus. Conny (talk) 17:29, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Just change description and/or filename. Image is in scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:57, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Princess Mako on the birthday of the reigning Emperor, 2016.jpg

Wikipediaをやめることにしたため Monadaisuki (talk) 14:50, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Not in reason. It is thought that the person who requests this deletion request does not understand the licensing and deletion policy on Wikimedia Commons.--G I Chandor2 (talk) 08:57, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:42, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Princess Mako on the birthday of the reigning Emperor, 2016.jpg

"Copyright violation" Sorry, I got this picture (all versions) from other site. This picture is not mine. Monadaisuki (talk) 04:11, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no new infos, no reason for deletion. see above. Please see COM:LRV. --Wdwd (talk) 11:52, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Princess Mako on the birthday of the reigning Emperor, 2016.jpg

I'm not the copyright holder of this picture. I stole this picture from other site. COM:LRV is no valid reason to keep it. Monadaisuki (talk) 16:39, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Monadaisuki: Where do you download the image? Indeed, the image doesn't have EXIF data, which caused doubt on the copyright ownership. However, Google Search and Tineye didn't yield any results before 27 December 2016. Pinging @Jameslwoodward and Wdwd: as the closing admin. --A1Cafel (talk) 14:29, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Small, no EXIF, unknown author, appears in many places on the Web. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:01, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Abendmahl Jesu.svg

Inhalte falsch -donald- (talk) 13:59, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Request by author granted. --MB-one (talk) 10:01, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Trump Day IMG 1144 (41612852560).jpg

COM:DW of copyrighted "sculpture", non-permanent so no COM:FOP#UK Rodhullandemu (talk) 14:06, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Trump is a public figure. Beyond My Ken (talk) 03:06, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

How does that have a bearing on the copyright status of this sculpture? Rodhullandemu (talk) 06:15, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --MB-one (talk) 10:01, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Slide6 Gamut Logo.png

Company logo - claim of being the copyright holder is not credible. However, the logo may be too simple for copyright and might qualify as PD. Whpq (talk) 14:09, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: kept one version as PD-textlogo, deleted duplicates. --MB-one (talk) 10:13, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Prajakta Mali.jpg

From Prajakta's instagram account (prajakta_official) - needs permission Gbawden (talk) 14:17, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --MB-one (talk) 10:13, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Chaturbate logo.svg

It seems to be a copyrighted font, exceeding the copyright threshold. 轻语者 (talk) 14:23, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --MB-one (talk) 10:13, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Chaturbate logo.svg

This file was initially tagged by Jonteemil as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G4 (recreation of content previously deleted per community consensus)|Commons:Deletion requests/File:Chaturbate logo.svg EEIM (talk) 01:29, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep PD-textlogo COM:TOO in USA .--EEIM (talk) 01:33, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep the word “chaturbate” is not a literary work and therefore not copyrightable, and I’m not sure how you could copyright a font when a font is below the threshold of originality since it’s just the Latin alphabet and nobody can own the latin alphabet. It’s not even a truly original font like This, it’s just a bog-standard cursive font. Chaturbate is a US company so there’s no concern about totalitarian copyright laws like Australia and its aboriginal flag nonsense— no court in the US is going to look at this and say it’s above the TOO.Dronebogus (talk) 15:17, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: While the wording in US law about the threshold of originality for wordmarks doesn't require that the letterforms be drawn directly from a typeface -- that would exclude hand-lettered logos, contradicting the fact that they are indeed PD if simple enough as judged by a court -- this one is: https://myfonts.com/fonts/sudtipos/candy-script with 'stylistic sets' 2 & 3 turned on (OpenType contextual alternate forms) and background #0C5874 and foreground #FCB755 gets it pretty close. Arlo James Barnes 09:19, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: PD-textlogo. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 09:26, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Riot.im 1.0.1 Screenshot.png

Apparent copyvio. Riot 1.0.1 seems to be released under Apache 2.0 license. https://github.com/vector-im/riot-web/blob/v1.0.1/LICENSE Licensing issue: The burden is on the uploader to meet the license's § 4 redistribution conditions, which was not done here. Info File:Riot 1 Screenshot.png exists as an example and more legit example. 84.250.17.211 14:42, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Should not it be enough to simply add {{free screenshot|license={{Apache|New Vector Limited}}}} like in the other screenshot? —Dexxor (talk) 11:19, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You're not the uploader (thus not "You" under the license) and the uploader didn't follow § 4, so the license (those rights) were not granted by the licensor under Apache 2.0 (§ 2) for redistribution. The Apache 2.0 license doesn't have an automatic termination clause or a clause about automatically reinstating rights, like CC BY 3.0 -like licenses would do (and CC BY 4.0 -like licenses would do so with a delay). It may be easier or more easily acceptable to tag for those CC BY 4.0 -like licenses, but IMO inapplicable to Apache 2.0. We, users of Commons, did not receive this screenshot legitimately under those Apache 2.0 conditions from the licensor (or the uploader), and as far as copyright should go you're expected to acquire a copy legitimately – unless something like fair use applies, which isn't allowed on Commons (COM:FAIRUSE). It's possible to replace this screenshot with a legitimately acquired copy, and I pointed out a seemingly legitimate copy already exists on Commons.

Copyright is the exclusive right for its holder (owner) to make copies of a work, and this is apparently infringing for a technicality which I don't believe Commons users – anyone else than the uploader – to be able to resolve by tagging. Now the COM:EVID lies here to demonstrate that consent was obtained (in conditions where the copyright license was not granted prior to this DR). 84.250.17.211 22:40, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

So in other words, we can't grant the copyright license (for the uploader) on the copyright holder's behalf (without their permission). 84.250.17.211 22:56, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Re: {{Apache|New Vector Limited}}, I believe the correct form to be New Vector Ltd without a trailing period. (Legally the company seems to be New Vector Ltd., but the copyright seems to be assigned without a period.) 84.250.17.211 23:31, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --MB-one (talk) 10:15, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Old ATA Carnet format.png

Does not appear to be the copyright property of the uploader. Stifle (talk) 15:10, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --MB-one (talk) 10:15, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Jumbo Respeggt shelf talker.jpg

~50% of the work (on the left) is DW. acagastya 15:57, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Suppose that it is, would it be okay for me to photograph the egg box itself or would that also be a problem? Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 16:00, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure what you mean by "suppose that it was", however, you can take the photo of egg box and release it under a free license. But you can't take a photo of someone else's photo of the egg box.
acagastya 19:45, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough, then you are justified in deleting it. I'll try to make a photo of the egg box myself once they start selling them again. Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 15:36, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --MB-one (talk) 10:16, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:The top of the HP 50g graphing calculator.jpg

必要がなくなったため Monadaisuki (talk) 14:48, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipediaをやめることにしたため Monadaisuki (talk) 14:50, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Not in reason. It is thought that the person who requests this deletion request does not understand the licensing and deletion policy on Wikimedia Commons.--G I Chandor2 (talk) 08:57, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:41, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:The top of the HP 50g graphing calculator.jpg

"Copyright violation" Sorry, I got this picture (all versions) from other site. This picture is not mine. Monadaisuki (talk) 04:11, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no new infos, no reason for deletion. see above. Please see COM:LRV. --Wdwd (talk) 11:51, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:The top of the HP 50g graphing calculator.jpg

I'm not the copyright holder of this picture. I stole this picture from other site. COM:LRV is no valid reason to keep it. Monadaisuki (talk) 16:39, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --MB-one (talk) 10:16, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:An example of a stack on RPL programming language.jpg

Wikipediaをやめることにしたため Monadaisuki (talk) 14:50, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Not in reason. It is thought that the person who requests this deletion request does not understand the licensing and deletion policy on Wikimedia Commons.--G I Chandor2 (talk) 09:01, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicates : This was replaced by "File:RPL objects in the stack (HP 50g).jpg" Monadaisuki (talk) 06:59, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:42, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:An example of a stack on RPL programming language.jpg

"Copyright violation" Sorry, I got this picture (all versions) from other site. This picture is not mine. Monadaisuki (talk) 04:12, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no new infos, no reason for deletion. see above. Please see COM:LRV. --Wdwd (talk) 11:53, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:An example of a stack on RPL programming language.jpg

I'm not the copyright holder of this picture. I stole this picture from other site. COM:LRV is no valid reason to keep it. Monadaisuki (talk) 16:40, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --MB-one (talk) 10:17, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:RPL objects in the stack (HP 50g).jpg

"Copyright violation" Sorry, I got this picture (all versions) from other site. This picture is not mine. Monadaisuki (talk) 04:14, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: No reason for deletion. Please see COM:LRV. --Wdwd (talk) 11:54, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:RPL objects in the stack (HP 50g).jpg

I'm not the copyright holder of this picture. I stole this picture from other site. COM:LRV is no valid reason to keep it. Monadaisuki (talk) 16:41, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --MB-one (talk) 10:17, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Blick vom Innenhof auf das Rundfunkgebäude.jpg

no longer needed Adierks (talk) 17:56, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --MB-one (talk) 10:21, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Penumbral lunar eclipse 2006 March 14 Warrenton VA.jpg

This file was initially tagged by A1Cafel as no permission (No permission since) Tomruen (talk) 07:59, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The original photo location is no longer functional. I'll try to find the author by other means and ask for email verification from him again. Tomruen (talk) 08:00, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:54, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:HP 12c Platinum.jpg

必要がなくなったため Monadaisuki (talk) 14:47, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Not in reason. It is thought that the person who requests this deletion request does not understand the licensing and deletion policy on Wikimedia Commons.--G I Chandor2 (talk) 08:56, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:41, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:HP 12c Platinum.jpg

"Copyright violation" Sorry, I got this picture (all versions) from other site. This picture is not mine. Monadaisuki (talk) 04:14, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no new infos, no reason for deletion. see above. Please see COM:LRV. --Wdwd (talk) 11:50, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:HP 12c Platinum.jpg

I'm not the copyright holder of this picture. I stole this picture from other site. COM:LRV is no valid reason to keep it. Monadaisuki (talk) 16:38, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:53, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Takatsuki Hondori.JPG

Wikipediaをやめることにしたため Monadaisuki (talk) 14:51, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Not in reason. It is thought that the person who requests this deletion request does not understand the licensing and deletion policy on Wikimedia Commons.--G I Chandor2 (talk) 08:58, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:43, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Takatsuki Hondori.JPG

Redundant : This picture is not used from any pages. Monadaisuki (talk) 05:59, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:43, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Takatsuki Hondori.JPG

"Copyright violation" Sorry, I got this picture (all versions) from other site. This picture is not mine. Monadaisuki (talk) 04:17, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not the copyright holder of this picture. I stole this picture from other site. COM:LRV is no valid reason to keep it. Monadaisuki (talk) 16:43, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The original deletion reason was をやめることにしたため (Google Translate: "Because I decided to quit"). So this user simply wants to remove all their images from Commons. Because courtesy deletion is no longer possible, (s)he now merely changes tactics to get the image deleted and claims copyvio, which is likely not the case (all their uploads are taken with same camera in the same general area). This particular image is in scope for which there is no alternative. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:33, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:52, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Johoku Dori.JPG

Wikipediaをやめることにしたため Monadaisuki (talk) 14:51, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Not in reason. It is thought that the person who requests this deletion request does not understand the licensing and deletion policy on Wikimedia Commons.--G I Chandor2 (talk) 08:58, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:43, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Johoku Dori.JPG

Redundant : This picture is not used from any pages. Monadaisuki (talk) 05:58, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:44, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Johoku Dori.JPG

"Copyright violation" Sorry, I got this picture from other site. This picture is not mine. Monadaisuki (talk) 04:19, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no new infos, no reason for deletion. see above. Please see COM:LRV. --Wdwd (talk) 11:55, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Johoku Dori.JPG

I'm not the copyright holder of this picture. I stole this picture from other site. COM:LRV is no valid reason to keep it. Monadaisuki (talk) 16:44, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep All their uploads were originally tagged as をやめることにしたため (Google Translate: "Because I decided to quit"). So this user simply wants to remove all their images from Commons. Because courtesy deletion is no longer possible, (s)he now merely changes tactics to get the image deleted and claims copyvio, which is likely not the case (most of their uploads are taken with same camera in the same general area). This particular image is in scope for which there is no alternative. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:42, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:52, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Hankyu Takatsuki Minami Ekimae Dori.JPG

Wikipediaをやめることにしたため Monadaisuki (talk) 14:51, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Not in reason. It is thought that the person who requests this deletion request does not understand the licensing and deletion policy on Wikimedia Commons.--G I Chandor2 (talk) 08:58, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant : This picture is not used from any pages. Monadaisuki (talk) 05:58, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:44, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Hankyu Takatsuki Minami Ekimae Dori.JPG

"Copyright violation" Sorry, I got this picture from other site. This picture is not mine. Monadaisuki (talk) 04:20, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no new infos, no reason for deletion. see above. Please see COM:LRV. --Wdwd (talk) 11:55, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Hankyu Takatsuki Minami Ekimae Dori.JPG

I'm not the copyright holder of this picture. I stole this picture from other site. COM:LRV is no valid reason to keep it. Monadaisuki (talk) 16:44, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. All their uploads were originally tagged as をやめることにしたため (Google Translate: "Because I decided to quit"). So this user simply wants to remove all their images from Commons. Because courtesy deletion is no longer possible, (s)he now merely changes tactics to get the image deleted and claims copyvio, which is likely not the case (most of their uploads are taken with same camera in the same general area). This particular image is in scope for which there is no alternative. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:42, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:52, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:ACT MALL.JPG

Wikipediaをやめることにしたため Monadaisuki (talk) 14:52, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Not in reason. It is thought that the person who requests this deletion request does not understand the licensing and deletion policy on Wikimedia Commons.--G I Chandor2 (talk) 08:59, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:ACT MALL.JPG

Redundant : This picture is not used from any pages. Monadaisuki (talk) 05:57, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:44, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:ACT MALL.JPG

"Copyright violation" Sorry, I got this picture from other site. This picture is not mine. Monadaisuki (talk) 04:27, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no new infos, no reason for deletion. see above. Please see COM:LRV. --Wdwd (talk) 11:58, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:ACT MALL.JPG

I'm not the copyright holder of this picture. I stole this picture from other site. COM:LRV is no valid reason to keep it. Monadaisuki (talk) 16:45, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. All their uploads were originally tagged as をやめることにしたため (Google Translate: "Because I decided to quit"). So this user simply wants to remove all their images from Commons. Because courtesy deletion is no longer possible, (s)he now merely changes tactics to get the image deleted and claims copyvio, which is likely not the case (most of their uploads are taken with same camera in the same general area). This particular image is in scope for which there is no alternative. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:45, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:52, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:View of Takatsuki city central.JPG

Wikipediaをやめることにしたため Monadaisuki (talk) 14:52, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Not in reason. It is thought that the person who requests this deletion request does not understand the licensing and deletion policy on Wikimedia Commons.--G I Chandor2 (talk) 08:59, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant : This picture is not used from any pages. Monadaisuki (talk) 05:56, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:44, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:View of Takatsuki city central.JPG

"Copyright violation" Sorry, I got this picture from other site. This picture is not mine. Monadaisuki (talk) 04:21, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no new infos, no reason for deletion. see above. Please see COM:LRV. --Wdwd (talk) 11:56, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:View of Takatsuki city central.JPG

I'm not the copyright holder of this picture. I stole this picture from other site. COM:LRV is no valid reason to keep it. Monadaisuki (talk) 16:45, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. All their uploads were originally tagged as をやめることにしたため (Google Translate: "Because I decided to quit"). So this user simply wants to remove all their images from Commons. Because courtesy deletion is no longer possible, (s)he now merely changes tactics to get the image deleted and claims copyvio, which is likely not the case (most of their uploads are taken with same camera in the same general area). This particular image is in scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:47, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:51, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:View of Takatsuki city 4.jpg

Wikipediaをやめることにしたため Monadaisuki (talk) 14:53, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Not in reason. It is thought that the person who requests this deletion request does not understand the licensing and deletion policy on Wikimedia Commons.--G I Chandor2 (talk) 08:59, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant : This picture is not used from any pages. Monadaisuki (talk) 05:55, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:44, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:View of Takatsuki city 4.jpg

"Copyright violation" Sorry, I got this picture from other site. This picture is not mine. Monadaisuki (talk) 04:22, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no new infos, no reason for deletion. see above. Please see COM:LRV. --Wdwd (talk) 11:56, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:View of Takatsuki city 4.jpg

I'm not the copyright holder of this picture. I stole this picture from other site. COM:LRV is no valid reason to keep it. Monadaisuki (talk) 16:46, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. All their uploads were originally tagged as をやめることにしたため (Google Translate: "Because I decided to quit"). So this user simply wants to remove all their images from Commons. Because courtesy deletion is no longer possible, (s)he now merely changes tactics to get the image deleted and claims copyvio, which is likely not the case (most of their uploads are taken with same camera in the same general area). This particular image is in scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:48, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:51, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:View of Takatsuki city 2.jpg

Wikipediaをやめることにしたため Monadaisuki (talk) 14:53, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Not in reason. It is thought that the person who requests this deletion request does not understand the licensing and deletion policy on Wikimedia Commons.--G I Chandor2 (talk) 09:00, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant : This picture is not used from any pages. Monadaisuki (talk) 05:55, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: This file is in use on arz:محافظه اوساكا, en:Osaka Prefecture, and tl:Prepektura ng Osaka. Under COM:INUSE that means it's not redundant. Leaving Wikipedia doesn't mean you get to take your pictures away with you. --bjh21 (talk) 12:50, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

CommentSorry, I didn't realize it. But I don't recommend this picture. Now there are more skyscrapers in Takatsuki city. This picture is old.--Monadaisuki (talk) 05:38, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:44, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:View of Takatsuki city 2.jpg

"Copyright violation" Sorry, I got this picture from other site. This picture is not mine. Monadaisuki (talk) 04:22, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no new infos, no reason for deletion. see above. Please see COM:LRV. --Wdwd (talk) 11:57, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:View of Takatsuki city 2.jpg

I'm not the copyright holder of this picture. I stole this picture from other site. COM:LRV is no valid reason to keep it. Monadaisuki (talk) 16:46, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. All their uploads were originally tagged as をやめることにしたため (Google Translate: "Because I decided to quit"). So this user simply wants to remove all their images from Commons. Because courtesy deletion is no longer possible, (s)he now merely changes tactics to get the image deleted and claims copyvio, which is likely not the case (most of their uploads are taken with same camera in the same general area). This particular image is in scope and in use. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:49, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:51, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:View of Takatsuki city 3.jpg

Wikipediaをやめることにしたため Monadaisuki (talk) 14:53, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Not in reason. It is thought that the person who requests this deletion request does not understand the licensing and deletion policy on Wikimedia Commons.--G I Chandor2 (talk) 09:00, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant : This picture is not used from any pages. Monadaisuki (talk) 05:54, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: This file is in use on ja:Portal:日本の都道府県/大阪府/新着画像ギャラリー/新着画像保管庫2012年3月分, so it's not redundant. --bjh21 (talk) 12:54, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:45, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:View of Takatsuki city 3.jpg

"Copyright violation" Sorry, I got this picture from other site. This picture is not mine. Monadaisuki (talk) 04:23, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no new infos, no reason for deletion. see above. Please see COM:LRV. --Wdwd (talk) 11:57, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:View of Takatsuki city 3.jpg

I'm not the copyright holder of this picture. I stole this picture from other site. COM:LRV is no valid reason to keep it. Monadaisuki (talk) 16:47, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. All their uploads were originally tagged as をやめることにしたため (Google Translate: "Because I decided to quit"). So this user simply wants to remove all their images from Commons. Because courtesy deletion is no longer possible, (s)he now merely changes tactics to get the image deleted and claims copyvio, which is likely not the case (most of their uploads are taken with same camera in the same general area). This particular image is in scope and in use. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:49, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:51, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:View of Takatsuki city 1.jpg

Wikipediaをやめることにしたため Monadaisuki (talk) 14:53, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Not in reason. It is thought that the person who requests this deletion request does not understand the licensing and deletion policy on Wikimedia Commons.--G I Chandor2 (talk) 09:00, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant : This picture is not used from any pages. Monadaisuki (talk) 05:54, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:45, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:View of Takatsuki city 1.jpg

"Copyright violation" Sorry, I got this picture from other site. This picture is not mine. Monadaisuki (talk) 04:24, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no new infos, no reason for deletion. see above. Please see COM:LRV. --Wdwd (talk) 11:58, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:View of Takatsuki city 1.jpg

I'm not the copyright holder of this picture. I stole this picture from other site. COM:LRV is no valid reason to keep it. Monadaisuki (talk) 16:47, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Uploader is trying to get several uploads deleted stating this reason, but most of them, including this one, have consistent camera Exif data (taken with a Sony DSC-HX5V), with few exceptions, such as some newer ones taken with a DSC-HX60V. As they were trying to get their pictures deleted with a different reason in the past (Google translates をやめることにしたため as "Because I decided to quit"), this rather looks like an attempt to find a reason that we would accept. In this specific case, it is also indicative of own work that the file was originally uploaded with a camera-generated file name (XDSC02418.JPG). Well, if they're so desperate to have their pictures deleted, I think we could consider a courtesy deletion, but some are in use. Gestumblindi (talk) 20:15, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I had lied because I have a guilty conscience about uploading stolen pictures. However, it is true that I stole the pictures. It is not uncommon for Japanese people to upload pictures with camera-generated file names into theirown sites. If you don't delete the pictures that I uploaded, you will help my wrongdoing. Please consider deleting the pictures.--Monadaisuki (talk) 02:28, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. All their uploads were originally tagged as をやめることにしたため (Google Translate: "Because I decided to quit"). So this user simply wants to remove all their images from Commons. Because courtesy deletion is no longer possible, (s)he now merely changes tactics to get the image deleted and claims copyvio, which is likely not the case (most of their uploads are taken with same camera in the same general area). This particular image is in scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:51, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:51, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Pubic and anal hair.jpg

Not educationally useful Fireabend (talk) 18:36, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - too much hair around. E4024 (talk) 18:28, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 18:53, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Cosplayer of Isuzu Sento, Amagi Brilliant Park at FF26 20150830a.jpg

Per COM:Redundant (shut eyes). Better photo at File:Cosplayer of Isuzu Sento, Amagi Brilliant Park at FF26 20150830c.jpg. BriefEdits (talk) 21:57, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 18:53, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Portrait of Mikhail Kalinin (1922).jpeg

no indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be PD PlanespotterA320 (talk) 01:13, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 18:00, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Toynami booth (36079036816).jpg

Derivative of copyright posters. FredWalsh (talk) 09:52, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 18:01, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Clemenskirche Köln-Mülheim Südapside.jpg

Copyright violation, contemporary artwork, no freedom of panorama. Martin Sg. (talk) 12:01, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Der Löschantrag des Antragstellers Martin Sg. bezeichnet die im Juni 2012 auf meinem Foto dargestellte Dekoration in der kleinen Südabside der Clemenskirche als Zeitgenössische Kunst . So wie ich damals ermitteln konnte, soll die abgebildete, den kleinen Raum dominierende Casel (Messgewand) im Zusammenhang mit der um 2005 inkorporierten Indischen (Thomasgemeinde) Mülheims stehen.

Aber auch wenn es sich um eine Form Zeitgenössischer Kunst handeln würde, setzt dies Voraus, dass der LA einen Künstler benennt, dessen Urheberrecht beeinträchtigt worden sein solle. Macht er nicht, aber eine nur vermutete Urheberrechtsverletzungen (URV) ist kein Löschgrund.--HOWI (talk) 15:19, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 18:23, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Monseñor Baudelio Pelayo.jpg

This image seems to be a screenshot or scan from print, per the visible pattern. In addition, the underlying photography or painting seems to be identical to this one from 2014. -- Túrelio (talk) 13:48, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 18:24, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:COVID-19 en Loreto.png

Çünkü o Saçmalık Sahilacabbar (talk) 15:05, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: I don’t agree with the phrase used but the image lacks sources of information and is not used anywhere. --rubin16 (talk) 18:26, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Image teaser of an upcoming SDK 2020 event..jpg

Surely this is copyrighted by Fomalhaut TV not by the uploader? Probably copyvio Timtrent (talk) 16:45, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 18:26, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:A Surge of Power (Jen Reid) 15th July 2020.jpg

I have removed a speedy deletion template and opened this regular deletion discussion as required. There is an important, and not easy, questions as to whether the Freedom of Panorama in the UK includes this sculpture or if this is a CV. UL FoP allows for photographs of permanent 3D works in public places - the question here is whether this work is sufficiently "permanent" to warrant this. It seems that this sculpture is intended to be put up indefinitely but not necessarily permanently. It seems that UK news orgs are not worried about copyright when using photos of this sculpture. Please consider me neutral on this question.

File:A Surge of Power (50115756351).jpg

92.170.20.154 17:30, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - it seems that 'freedom of panorama' in the UK (specifically the exception in UK copyright law that permits taking photographs, etc. of sculptures which are located in a public place) only applies to sculptures if they are permanently situated in a public place or in premises open to the public and Marc Quinn, the creator of this work, explicitly states on his website that this sculpture installation is "a new temporary, public installation" (my emphasis).[2] And as this sculpture was erected without the appropriate permission and the mayor of Bristol, where the statue is, has said it will be removed,[3] it seems very likely to have a very non-permanent status indeed. -- DeFacto (talk). 19:44, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I have posted this elsewhere, and read Marc Quinns state3ments, which add to the confusion. In normal cases the fop law is simple- if it is transient it must be deleted, if it is permanent it stays. The problem is the word permanent which can have the meaning of not transient, or there for ever. Marc is clear that this work is not permanent and and could eventually be removed, but clear that it is permanent as it is designed no resist easy removal. He is also clear that no criminal damage has been done to the plinth- and as it it is not designed to be there for ever, it has not criminally defaced a listed monument which would could be criminal. The artifact is permanent even if the location is not

Another monument that we photograph happily is the Elgin Marbles, which Greece will tell you are not permanent in the British Museum (OK they are out of copyright by 2400 years so we wont get sued). This does need to be cleared up by Marc Quinn declaring them CC-BY-SA, or by a judgement in a UK higher court which won't be happening any time soon. Quinn has described the construction technique of 3D scan, 3D printer and steel resin, which raise additional issue in the future. He has said that it is a staue for the people, which is very close to a PD declaration. The Mayor of Bristol is obliged to make a statement- but as the statue is there 16 hours later it appears that it has achieved fop permanent status if not permanence. The delete arguement is predicated on this one WP and UK fop concept, and that seems very shaky. The File:Edward Colston 1895 statue.jpg has been copyrighted under the same license- similarly it was not permanent ( I think it was)- its gone. At the moment its replacement is still there (at 22.00 15th July).ClemRutter (talk) 21:10, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - "permanent" here means the artwork is always there, ie it isn't moved at night to another location, or it isn't sat on the back of a truck being driven around all day. So in that sense, yes this sculpture is permanently positioned. Thus under section 62 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act it is perfectly fine to take a photograph of it and host it here. Mujinga (talk) 00:09, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Per COM:FOP UK the test for the exception from copyright protection is "if permanently situated in a public place or in premises open to the public". It was never intended (according to the sculptor) to be permanently situated on that plinth, and indeed it has now been removed from that public place - so it was not permanently placed. -- DeFacto (talk). 09:35, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree with your interpretation, per my reading of Commons:Village_pump/Archive/2013/09#Freedom_of_Panorama_for_transient_sculptures, but the problem is that the precedent is not legally established in the UK as far as I know. Mujinga (talk) 18:03, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

On a tangent, this debate and recent questions about the status of graffiti are stimulating me to look deeper into the UK freedom of panorama information at Commons:Copyright rules by territory/United Kingdom, which I don't think is currently 100% correct, so I put a suggestion for improvement at Commons_talk:Copyright_rules_by_territory#UK_Freedom_of_panorama if anyone is interested. Mujinga (talk) 12:53, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Info - just to note that this statue is no longer in a public place or on public display as the local authority has now removed it from its temporary location into storage.[4]
Info - another similar image has just been deleted as a copyvio on the same FOP grounds as given here. -- DeFacto (talk). 10:24, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

it's been restored and added to this discussion Mujinga (talk) 18:12, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep As per the extremely cogent arguments by ClemRutter. The current image is difficult to reproduce for obvious reasons - the photograph is therefore historically significant. No Swan So Fine (talk) 10:53, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Question As things stand, this image is not propeprly licenced. This raises two important questions:

How can it be properly licenced in a manner whereby the sculptor agrees to the photograph being pyublished under Creative Commons. The guidance at Commons:Derivative works is rather vague about the details. (In the flow chart associated with that page, how is the question "Did you get the creator's permission ...." actually implemented).
Has any attempt been made to get the creator's permission?

Until these two questions can be answered, the image should, in my view, be kept and if the guidance is unclear, then the guidance must be clarified. Martinvl (talk) 11:32, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I was not aware of the nuances of the Freedom of Panorama law with temporary vs permanent installations prior to the upload of the photo, so the photo was uploaded in good faith. However, I have attempted to contact Marc Quinn and will shared any responses (with his approval) whether granting permission or not. Thanks AlexJRichards (talk) 13:08, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Info. I have emailed mail@ marcquinn.com and got a bot directing me to studio contact I have copied the email onto the requested form- it took it. Interestingly he requests you to select from a series of predefined headings- the first is Using images of Marc Quinn artwork so it looks if the question has been asked before and why the Guardian and others are happy to use them. ClemRutter (talk) 13:36, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Info. Less importantly- but important for the transience- permanence debate is that it was on the plinth for just over 24 hours, very kind of Bristol City to wait until 5.00am. ClemRutter (talk) 13:36, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- @ClemRutter: re "... and why the Guardian and others are happy to use them.". Marc Quinn makes his living by executing commissions for sculptures and by selling reproduction rights of his work.Template:Cn The Guardian almost certainly paid him a sum of money for the right to use a photograph of the sculpture{{cn}{ - that is what the copyright laws are all about - they are not about stifling reproduction of other people's works, they are about regulating the circumstances in which the original author gets paid when somebody else uses his works. Martinvl (talk) 15:10, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There is a lot of supposition masquerading as fact in the last post. With great respect can we stick to the truth. I am posting an update below.--ClemRutter (talk) 20:30, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Guardian will not be paying for photographs taken in a public space, newspaper usage is permitted quite clearly by section 30 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act (Criticism, review, quotation and news reporting) Mujinga (talk) 18:10, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral The example of ice sculptures (Commons:Freedom of panorama#Permanent vs temporary) shows that public art may be considered permanent even if it is not actually permanent, indeed, regardless of the creator's intentions (the sculpture will melt no matter what). However, if the creator intends to remove a sculpture themselves, then it is clearly temporary. What is not clear is whether a creator's reasonable expectation that the statue will be removed by a government, not necessarily with the creator's permission, is more similar to the former or the latter. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 15:33, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
We have numerous other images of temporary artworks like the Trump blimp etc that are useful in their societal context. The name of the game is exposure and visibility - I would be surprised if artists seek to regulate images of their works on Instagram etc.No Swan So Fine (talk) 15:39, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The Trump blimp is not at all comparable - it is meant to be carried by protestors instead of permanently affixed to a post. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 15:45, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@King of Hearts: The real question is what the courts would rule if, hypothetically, the sculptor tried to get Wikimedia Commons to pay a royalty to him for the use of his creation. The courts would check the law to see when money is due and when it is not.Template:Cn Wikimedia Commons' approach is that any image on Commons is "free to use", which is why only images on which no royalty is payable (plus a few other conditions) are permitted on Commons.Template:Cn Martinvl (talk) 16:25, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The situation is complex enough without adding unsourced hypothetical speculation. ClemRutter (talk) 20:30, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Info I have contacted Marc Quinn's studio, and they have replied offering us Free(Kostenlos) use of all the beautiful photos in the press pack. There is a statement from the co-artists that any donations go to two charities. Marc retains a CC-SA type copyright on the photos in the pack. He appears to be unconcerned by FoP, which we have been debating. There is an implications that any image of his work fine. I realise that none of this is precise enough to satisfy the letter of our license so I will be writing back in the morning (11.00 UTC ish) to continue the dialogue.ClemRutter (talk) 20:30, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That's great. In case you haven't done that before, you will find a permission-template here Commons:Email_templates#Declaration_of_consent_for_all_inquiries. --Túrelio (talk) 20:44, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Túrelio: Thanks. I have sent of the reply, with the proforma- begging their indulgence. @DeFacto: The press pack they have sent us is to be found at: https://drive.google.com/drive/u/1/folders/1871OhRS-NP_pbnwt5Yy0ddtoD9sqHG2Z, lovely images but not yet free enough either. ClemRutter (talk) 11:24, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. As others have argued, it was permanently positioned in the sense that it could have been left as it was. SarahSV ^(talk) 22:03, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment the arguments for 'keep' seem to rely only on the fact that this sculpture is not transient (in that it won't melt, dissolve or evaporate anytime soon). But that isn't the only factor which is relevant in this case.

We need to determine too whether it is also on permanent public display (see Section 62 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 for the exact wording).

If we answer 'yes' to that, we need to be able to reconcile that with the fact that, per the sculptor,[5] the statue was put there as a temporary installation, and that it has now been removed into non-public storage.[6] -- DeFacto (talk). 07:01, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. And 'permanent' does not mean that is could have stayed on public display (even though it wasn't intended to and did not) it means it was intended to and for all intents and purposes could be considered to actually be on permanent public display. -- DeFacto (talk). 13:06, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete My reading of the Section 62 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 tells me that the Wikimedia summary of the law is fair. If this matter were to be brought to court (where ultimately copyright issues are decided), I doubt that any judge would rule this statue had been permanently erected. I therefore come to the conclusion that it breaches copyright. However, if the file were to be transferred to Wikipeda then, in my opinion, it would met all ten requirements for Non-free content which are consistent with both US fair use and British fair dealing criteria when used in conjunction with the article A Surge of Power (Jen Reid) 2020. It would of course have to be flagged using the Non-free_use_rationale template, the overriding criteria being that it is being used to illustrate a "review" of the statue. It is however a moot point as to whether both images could be used or if just one could be used. Martinvl (talk) 16:51, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Colston turned out not to be permanent. Intention is more important than what may happen in the future (after the photograph was taken). The intention of the artist was to publicly display the statue permanently. The material is irrelevant, as per ice sculptures. Chalk drawings on a sidewalk are permanent. -- Petri Krohn (talk) 21:14, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Petri Krohn: if you read the artist's statement about the installation here you will see that it was never intended to be permantent, the statement is explicit on this, it says: "Artist Marc Quinn and Bristol resident Jen Reid unveil a new temporary, public installation, A Surge of Power (Jen Reid) 2020, on top of Edward Colston’s empty plinth in Bristol, England" (my emphasis). -- DeFacto (talk). 21:37, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I consulted The Design and Artists Copyright Society (DACS) website. The page "Sculpture and works of artistic craftmanship on public display" states "Permanence excludes temporary displays or any relevant work which may be removed from time to time." Since DACS are professionals working in the field, their opinion should be taken seriously. Anybody who wants to get more information about them should consult DACS home page. This backs up User:DeFacto's statement (above). May I reiterate that the correct way to use these images is to transfer them to the English Wikipedia as "non-free-to-use" images which can be justified on grounds that they are being used as part of a review. Martinvl (talk) 15:12, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's been a really thought-provoking debate. I still think (as above) that permanence is related to the artwork staying fixed in place as opposed to intended use or removal, and I could see that being argued in court. In any case, this suggestion from Martinvl to upload to EN wikipedia instead of commons seems like the best solution. Mujinga (talk) 16:18, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Martinvl: thanks for that valuable contribution to the discussion, that takes it beyond doubt for me, and I think both files should now be deleted without hesitation. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:35, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@DeFacto: : Not deleted, but transferred to the English Wikipedia where they are catalogued as "non-free-to-use" and all the appropriate documentation filled in. Remember, the policy of all Wikimedia projects is to repair rather than to delete. This file should also be transferred to the Catalan Wikipedia where it must comply with their local requirements while this file will have to also be transferred to the French and Portuguese Wikipedias and also flagged as a "non-free-to-use" image there. I have not yet had a chance to check what the procedure is for Wikidata. Once both files are in the English Wikipedia, it will be nececssary to check whether both can remain or whether fair dealing woudl only permit one to stay. Martinvl (talk) 20:00, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Reuploading the file locally as non-free content may be a possibility under the license en: Template:Non-free 3D art, but things are not as simple as they seem. English Wikipedia’s non-free content use policy is quite restrictive and it’s likely only the file’s use in the stand-alone article about the work itself would be considered policy compliant per en:WP:NFCCP and item 6 of en:WP:NFC#UUI, and the file would need to be removed from all of the other articles/pages where it’s currently being used. Moreover, two copyright licenses would be still needed: one for the work and one for the photo. Although the license for the statue could be non-free, it would be very hard to justify a non-free license for the photo per en:WP:FREER. Moreover, even with a free license provided for the photo, the fact that the statue is licensed as non-free means that the file as a whole (photo + statue) will be treated as non-free. — Marchjuly (talk) 05:12, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Martinvl: this discussion is only related to what happens here on Commons. Here copyvio images must be deleted. Whether someone chooses to copy them or otherwise upload them to other Wikimedia projects (English Wikipedia, for example) is of no concern to us here. -- DeFacto (talk). 09:33, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@DeFacto: : User:Lord Belbury and User:AlexJRichards both spent time and effort posting images on Commons for use in the English Wikipedia. Both images have also been used in Wikipedias in other languages. To have these images unceremoniously deleted due to what they could rightfully conisder a technicallity is a real slap in the face. I made my suggestions as a means of calming the situation and helping them have a face-saving way out of the situation. It is of course up to them to do the transfer to the English Wikipedia and also to the other language WIkipedias where they have been used. If you go here, you will see that one of the editors is already grappling with the ins and outs copyright law. Martinvl (talk) 20:32, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Martinvl, I hope these users do not take this as a "slap in the face". Unfortunately, as pernickety as this seems, this discussion concerns whether we are staying on the safe side of copyright law, or are exposing ourselves to potential legal penalties. I expect almost everyone in this discussion would agree with me that copyright law is terribly broken. However, until it is fixed, we will have to have these discussions. These deletion discussions are not meant as an insult to anyone. --LukeSurl (talk) 13:13, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@LukeSurl: I am fully aware of the restrictions relating to the law on copyright. However, unlike Defacto who just said "delete", I am willing to look at the big picture and in so doing found a way to achieve the photographer's objects without breaching copyright. The point where we differ is whether or I should "looking outside the Commons box" in order to find a solution that is satisfactory for everyone. Martinvl (talk) 17:52, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And yet the DACS themselves note, "It is not clear that any degree of permanence is required where works are displayed in premises which are "open to the public". Experts are divided on the point. " Andy Dingley (talk) 10:42, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not permanent, never intended to be permanent. Buidhe (talk) 01:39, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Mujinga. "Permanent" here is meaning intended to be permanent, in the sense of 'not transient', even if later over-ruled by another body.

I'm disappointed to see that Alison Lapper now appears to be up for deletion too Commons:Deletion requests/File:Fourth plinth, Trafalgar Square, London - geograph.org.uk - 440045.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:The 'Empty Plinth' in Trafalgar Square - geograph.org.uk - 923062.jpg (and scatter-gunned as separate DRs, so that at least some will get through). Yet none of the other works on ther Fourth plinth are similarly targetted, because they have no connection to Marc Quinn or BLM. Andy Dingley (talk) 09:37, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Andy Dingley: have you read Section 62 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988? It says the exemption only applies to photos of a work if it is "permanently situated in a public place or in premises open to the public." That is clearly related to the permanence of its location. This statue was never permanently situated in such a place, so photos of it are not exempt from normal copyright protection. Indeed the artist himself acknowledged it was only ever meant to be there temporarily (see his statement here), and it has now been moved off public display. -- DeFacto (talk). 10:02, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it was permanently situated in a public place. It was placed there, there were no plans to remove it in the future. This was no "Summer Exhibition" by Quinn, the statue was placed there in an open-ended arrangement where it would be permanent, for as far as could be foreseen. After (crucially) this point, the council constructed a plan to remove it.

English law permits a notion of reasonableness in its interpretation. "Permanent" in this sense does not mean "forever", because we can neither predict this, nor expect it. The meaning is instead, "Without the existence of some plan to remove it in the future" or for that display to be time-limited. I see no call to delete photos of Colston's statue, where that display turned out to be impermanent. Nor the statue of Neptune which has travelled around a variety of sites at Bristol Harbour. Even Stonehenge has some degree of impermanence to it, if we wait long enough.

The definition of "permanence" applicable here is one where the status of the statue is open-ended and without any pre-planned end. As was the case here. Bristol Council reacted to its appearance and removed it, but they had not planned that beforehand. Even if Quinn had taken a reasonable expectation that the Council's response would be to remove it, in reaction, that would still be a future response, not a pre-ordained impermanence. Andy Dingley (talk) 10:39, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Andy Dingley, unless there's a cogent argument to refute this. -- The Anome (talk) 20:08, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep There's no such thing as ever-lasting permanence – see iconoclasm and Ozymandias. Amateur legal opinions about this are original research, attempting to practice law without a licence, and so improper. Andrew (talk) 15:23, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per COM:FOP UK, permanently situated in a public place. Regards, ZI Jony ^(Talk) 07:35, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Keep piece of history.a very important contemporary document --Qwertzu111111 (talk) 18:56, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, as per some of the above, concerning what "permanent" means. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 23:25, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Info: Please do not misunderstand the process, regardless of the direction you vote: This is not about the importance or uniqiueness of this photo, this is not about scope, not about fair use. This is only about interpretation of copyright law. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 23:25, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep High quality image of a notable and historic event. Wjfox2005 (talk) 13:17, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep great photo, iconic, a piece of history --Qwertzu111111 (talk) 18:59, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- @Wjfox2005 and Qwertzu111111: importance or significance of the photo is not relevant here if this "very valuable image" violates Mr. Quinn's copyright (sculptor of the artistic object shown). The main point here: does this sculpture qualify for permanence according to the British freedom of panorama? JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:32, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: The matter here is the intention. We can’t predict how long a monument will stand, but we can talk about intentions when it is placed. Here the status was placed secretly, it was more of a demonstration than a particular permanent installation. As a proof, it was quickly removed by the city council and still got no permission to be installed. Can be uploaded to local wiki as fair use, probably. --rubin16 (talk) 18:47, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Always there - the remarkable life of Ruth Lillian Kirschstein, M.D. (IA alwaysthereremar00davi).pdf

Copyright claim and notice in work. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 19:01, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This seems confusing, do you have an understanding of why this scan was in the Fedlink collection? --Fæ (talk) 08:47, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

" IA Collections: nihlibrary;" - I'd been checking more than the IA tags. I was checking the actual works for notice claims. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:08, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, the issue is how to make this more detectable during a batch upload. It may be that the NIH collection has been a bit haphazard in copyright statements compared to other scanned collections. --Fæ (talk) 11:40, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think there is an 'easy' method, manual review will still be needed.ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:53, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No apparent rationale for why this work would be public domain or compatibly licensed. --Xover (talk) 10:50, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 19:18, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Unveiling US-SAN sign.jpg

Derivative of copyright logos including Wikipedia logo without attribution (as required for example by File:Wikipedia-logo-v2.svg). The file was nominated for copyright violation but the uploader disagrees. FredWalsh (talk) 23:22, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Banner created by a Wikimedia affiliate. If attribution is required why not add it, rather than than propose deleting it per w:WP:BEFORE, criteria C "Consider whether the article could be improved rather than deleted".--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 23:59, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

We are not questioning who made the banner. They may have had permission from the WMF to use the Wikipedia logo. We are questioning your apparent right to license logos that you do not own the copyright for. The onus for the attribution lay solely with you as the uploader of the file. You should not point at others and deflect responsibility - I did not upload it, so why should I correct it?

As for the remainder of your comment, WP:BEFORE does not apply on Commons because this is not Wikipedia and we are not discussing an encyclopaedic article. Try to focus on using Commons policies and guidelines for Commons deletion processes. FredWalsh (talk) 00:12, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That does not sound right. The above is not civil or assuming good faith.

Thus, if attribution is added (by anyone), the deletion requests will be dropped?--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 01:11, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It is quite common to expect Wikipedia policies, guidelines and ideas to be used here but Commons has its own policies and guidelines. You linked to a page about Article Deletion on the English Wikipedia. It has absolutely no relevance or authority in Commons file deletion processes.

The problem with copyright is that a lot of people do not understand it although they think they do. The creative commons licenses are legal documents which bind re-users to certain requirements. One of those is the Attribution requirement, which means you should have pointed out who the original authors were when you uploaded these files. The failure to do this means you have broken the legal requirement of the license for the Wikipedia logo. That invalidates the license from the WMF/authors for you to include the logo in your photo and it must be removed immediately unless you obtain permission from the WMF to keep the photo. Please have a careful read of sections 4(c) for attribution requirements and 7(a) for the automatic termination of the license at Creative Commons. FredWalsh (talk) 12:04, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

My 2 cents: this is an honest volunteers' attempt at helping the movement grow. Maybe adding a comment in the talk page such as "Next time remember to add the correct attribution in your banner" would suffice, instead of using a jackhammer and crushing volunteers' spirits? Vahidmasrour (talk) 04:50, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 19:21, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Unveiling US-SAN sign 2.jpg

Derivative of copyright logos including Wikipedia logo without attribution (as required for example by File:Wikipedia-logo-v2.svg). The file was nominated for copyright violation but the uploader disagrees. FredWalsh (talk) 23:23, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please see ongoing related discussion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Unveiling US-SAN sign.jpg. In my humble opinion, discussion should be centralized there.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 00:06, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 19:21, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]