Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2020/04/18
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
_cmd.exe_Command_Prompt_648x327.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_-_panoramio_(12).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_-_panoramio_(10).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Because the another logo is needed. I would like to delete this file. Vacuum manifold (talk) 01:16, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Speedy delete Marked for speedy deletion. And even without this DR it's still eligible for speedy anyway, as South Korea's TOO is very low. --pandakekok9 09:45, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio. pandakekok9 11:11, 18 April 2020 (UTC) (non-admin closure)
bad quality image (totally blurred and unfavorable crop), there are much better portrait photos in Category:Alina Butaeva Sandro Halank (talk) 22:09, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Delete – I uploaded this cropped image due to a lack of other fitting resources. Thanks to your uploads last month, this image has since become redundant. — Tuxipεdia(talk) 22:24, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Marcus Cyron (talk) 23:08, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
non-free image, stolen from https://www.telegraph.co.uk/cricket/2019/06/07/hazratullah-zazai-went-tape-ball-street-cricketer-afghanistans/ Lugnuts (talk) 09:28, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 19:17, 18 April 2020 UTC: Copyright violation: all uploads clearly copied from other websites, not own work --Krdbot 01:33, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
obvious non-free image/promo shot Lugnuts (talk) 09:51, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 19:20, 18 April 2020 UTC: Copyright violation: all uploads clearly copied from other websites, not own work --Krdbot 01:34, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
_cmd.exe_Command_Prompt_648x327.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_cmd.exe_Command_Prompt_648x327.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
uploaded wrong file Ghettoblaster (talk) 14:10, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 18:53, 18 April 2020 UTC: uploaded wrong file --Krdbot 01:34, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
Uploaded in error Bamanrauf (talk) 16:17, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 18:52, 18 April 2020 UTC: CSD G7 (author or uploader request deletion) --Krdbot 01:34, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
Out of the project scope. Promotional. Edslov (talk) 17:04, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Copyright violation, would need to progress through Commons:OTRS with permission of the artist. — billinghurst sDrewth 05:45, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
Out of the project scope. Promotional. Edslov (talk) 17:04, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Copyright violation,would need to progress through Commons:OTRS with permission of the artist. — billinghurst sDrewth 05:43, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
Per COM:PRP and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sacramento Kings game postponed, 2020-03-11.jpg; the Kings logo and Golden 1 Center logo (on the floor), and the NBA logo and faint designs behind the alternate logo (on the screens) are protected by copyright? Wow (talk) 07:01, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Seriously? The Golden 1 logo makes up 1% of the image. I had to look for almost a minute to even find the NBA logo. No one is disputing that these logos are copyrighted but this is definitely de minimis. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:14, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- Keep. This is going way too far. If you have to play "Where's Waldo?" to find the copyrighted material you are way past any reasonable interpretation of intellectual property law. --Guy Macon (talk) 10:06, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- Keep. Clearly de minimis. --Yarnalgo (talk) 19:40, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Withdrawn per COM:DM. --Wow (talk) 08:14, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
personal photo, file name = author name? Mjrmtg (talk) 19:12, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 13:37, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
Copyright Material Wna247 (talk) 23:16, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 08:13, 19 April 2020 UTC: Copyright violation: All rights reserved at source, no evidence that it was under a free license before (no WayBack archive) --Krdbot 13:51, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 18:50, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 12:33, 19 April 2020 UTC: CSD F10 (personal photos out of COM:SCOPE --Krdbot 19:40, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 18:51, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 12:33, 19 April 2020 UTC: CSD F10 (personal photos out of COM:SCOPE --Krdbot 19:40, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 18:53, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 12:33, 19 April 2020 UTC: CSD F10 (personal photos out of COM:SCOPE --Krdbot 19:41, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 19:10, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 12:33, 19 April 2020 UTC: CSD F10 (personal photos out of COM:SCOPE --Krdbot 19:41, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 19:11, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 12:33, 19 April 2020 UTC: CSD F10 (personal photos out of COM:SCOPE --Krdbot 19:41, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 19:11, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 12:33, 19 April 2020 UTC: CSD F10 (personal photos out of COM:SCOPE --Krdbot 19:41, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
false Sascha Bausen (talk) 13:15, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: and redirected as duplicate. --JuTa 04:30, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
Uploader’s request IM3847 (talk) 20:19, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Regasterios at 07:43, 21 April 2020 UTC: No permission since 13 April 2020 --Krdbot 13:31, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hamzamathiw (talk · contribs)
[edit]Not own work. Should be relicensed/souced if in public domain
- File:100 DH 2002 FRONT SIDE.jpg
- File:50 DH 2002 BACK SIDE.jpg
- File:50 DH 2002.jpg
- File:100 DH 2002.jpg
- File:100 DH BACK SIDE.jpg
- File:200 DH FRONT SIDE.jpg
- File:200 DH BACK SIDE.jpg
- File:20 DH FRONT SIDE.jpg
- File:20 DH BACK SIDE.jpg
- File:50 DH BACK SIDE.jpg
- File:50 DH FRONT SIDE.jpg
- File:100DH.jpg
大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 07:42, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 05:49, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hamzamathiw (talk · contribs)
[edit]Official symbol and document. Proper license tag should be used if in public domain.
- File:شعار جهة الداخلة وادي الذهب.jpg
- File:GIS Sudan (New Logo).jpg
- File:البطاقة الوطنية للتعريف الإلكترونية (المغرب).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:21, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:35, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hamzamathiw (talk · contribs)
[edit]Official symbols. Proper license tag should be used if in public domain.
- File:شعار المجلس الإقليمي لزاكورة.png
- File:شعار شركة الشرڭي.png
- File:شعار المجلس الإقليمي لآسا الزاك.jpg
- File:شعار المجلس الإقليمي لتارودانت.png
- File:شعار جماعة بئر كندوز.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:59, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:35, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hamzamathiw (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:مشروع مجمع الحرف والمهارات بتارودانت.jpg
- File:صورة قديمة للمحاربين في تارودانت.jpg
- File:صورة قديمة لشخصيات سياسية في مدينة تارودانت.jpg
- File:صورة قديمة لحديقة إبراهيم الروداني (تارودانت).jpg
- File:صورة قديمة لساحة أسراك (تارودانت).jpg
- File:صورة قديمة لقصبة تارودانت.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:00, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:35, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hamzamathiw (talk · contribs)
[edit]Some have FBMD, but were left in this nomination to be part of it. Those and the rest are unlikely own work on maps, photos and logos. Many are 960x720 and other typical facebook sizes - even if they don't have FBMD in the metadata There are several cameras and an iPhone given as meta, others have no meta at all. Seems more like a gallery of local photos than own work.
- File:مسجد الشيخ ماء العينين في السمارة.jpg
- File:إستخدام الطاقة الشمسية لإستخراج الماء الصالح للشرب بدوار أوزليضا.jpg
- File:دوار أوزليضا - جماعة تافراوتن.jpg
- File:خريطة التقسيم الإداري (إقليم زاكورة).jpg
- File:خريطة إقليم زاكورة (باللغة العربية).jpg
- File:الواجهة الرئيسية لمطار بني ملال.jpg
- File:الخراجات.jpg
- File:مقر جماعة أحمر لڭلالشة.jpg
- File:دوار البيضة بجماعة أحمر لڭلالشة.jpg
- File:شعار شركة رفيع.png
- File:مدرسة اللوز في أولوز.jpg
- File:مجموعة مدارس أوميكا بتارودانت.jpg
- File:الكلية متعددة التخصصات بتارودانت.jpg
- File:لحظة إحتراق الجامع الكبير.jpg
- File:ملاعب التنس في حي لاسطاح بتارودانت.jpg
- File:قصر كلوديو برافو.jpg
- File:ثانوية محمد الخامس في تارودانت.jpg
- File:Logo-mefra768.jpg
- File:شعار التعاونية الفلاحية كوباك.png
- File:Air Ocean Maroc Logo.png
- File:التقسيم الإداري لإقليم تارودانت.jpg
- File:CTM Drivers with Neoplan bus.jpg
- File:CTM Bus Station in Marrakech City.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:36, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 11:13, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
Not my photo, mistake uploading to Wikimedia Commons Jpmasi (talk) 00:09, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Not my photo, mistake uploading to Wikimedia Commons Jpmasi (talk) 00:11, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- Speedy delete Marked file for speedy deletion. --pandakekok9 09:47, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: by Túrelio. --Ahmadtalk 04:16, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
copyvio from https://independentmusicnews24.com/releases/twizm-whyte-piece-betrayal-a-creative-rapper-with-a-palette-of-strengths-and-technical-savvy RoySmith (talk) 00:43, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per nom. --pandakekok9 09:43, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: by Túrelio. --Ahmadtalk 04:17, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Taken from https://kknews.cc/history/re2vvxv.html (2017) or http://www.qulishi.com/news/201601/57150_4.html (2016) Gun Powder Ma (talk) 00:48, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 05:26, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MauricioBulgarelli218 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope.
pandakekok9 02:23, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. I looked to see if the user intended to use this on another wiki, but it doesn't seem to be so. If the user participated in legitimate activity here, and later made a category with the prefix "User:" to place these two personal photographs in, it would have been reasonable. PseudoSkull (talk) 02:00, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 05:26, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
out of scope Quakewoody (talk) 03:37, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 05:26, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
This is not "own work" as the uploader is stating. Furthermore, this logo is above the threshold of originality. – Sabbatino (talk) 08:58, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per nom. Obvious copyvio. --pandakekok9 09:17, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: by Túrelio. --Jianhui67 T★C 05:28, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
{{db-f9|source=https://www.aljazeera.net/news/politics/2020/1/7/%d8%b9%d8%a8%d8%af-%d8%a7%d9%84%d9%84%d9%87-%d8%a7%d9%84%d9%86%d9%81%d9%8a%d8%b3%d9%8a-%d8%a7%d9%84%d9%83%d9%88%d9%8a%d8%aa-%d8%a7%d9%84%d9%86%d9%8a%d8%a7%d8%a8%d8%a9-%d8%a7%d9%84%d8%b9%d8%a7%d9%85%d8%a9-%d8%a7%d9%84%d8%a5%d9%85%d8%a7%d8%b1%d8%a7%d8%aa}} Goldsztajn (talk) 11:22, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: done by Túrelio. --Jianhui67 T★C 05:29, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Small, low res, no EXIF. Unlikely to be own work. Solomon203 (talk) 13:49, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 05:29, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Small, low res, no EXIF. Unlikely to be own work. Solomon203 (talk) 13:50, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 05:29, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. Out of project scope. ~Moheen (keep talking) 14:43, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 05:29, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 05:29, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 05:30, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 05:30, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 05:30, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused presentation of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 05:30, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Abhishekrajyaduvanshi (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
- File:Aarti Raj Yaduvanshi Official Image.jpg
- File:Abhishek Raj Yaduvanshi Official Image.jpg
- File:Abhishek Raj Yaduvanshi official Image.jpg
- File:Abhishek Raj Yaduvanshi Image.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 05:30, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:53, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 05:30, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Personal picture. Out of scope. SirEdimon (talk) 23:53, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 05:31, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:41, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:29, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Modern art. I think artist identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.
- File:Mihr by Armine Tumanyan.jpg
- File:Aramazd by Armine Tumanyan.jpg
- File:Vahagn by Armine Tumanyan.jpg
- File:Tyr God.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:57, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Modern art. I think artist identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.
- File:Main armenian god Aramazd.jpg
- File:Ancient armenian god Mihr.jpg
- File:Vahagn by Armine Tumanyan.jpg
- File:Tyr god.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:55, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 08:24, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Donia elnashar (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Donia elnashar.jpg
- File:الممثلة دنيا النشار.jpg
- File:كواليس مسلسل خط ساخن.jpg
- File:دنيا النشار.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:57, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:30, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own works: inconsistent sizes and qualities, missing or FB in EXIF data. Unreliable uploader.
- File:Construction site in January 2020.jpg
- File:30,000 people to attend Bersih 5 at Petronas Twin Towers.jpg
- File:Bersih 5 on 19 November 2016.jpg
- File:KLCC on 19 November.jpg
- File:Bombardier INNOVIA Metro 300.jpg
- File:KOMTAR Year 2016 April.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:12, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 08:02, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Turcu Roxana (talk · contribs)
[edit]Mostly small size, and / or low quality images. No two cameras the same where there is camera data. Various file sizes including a series of "FB IMG..." at the usual Facebook size. No indication of own work.
- File:Bust Stan Ioan Pătraș.jpg
- File:Mâmăstirea Peri - interior.jpg
- File:Casa ciocanesti jpeg.jpg
- File:Casa Memorială Pătraș interior.jpg
- File:Mânăstirea Bârsana jpeg.jpg
- File:Casa Memorială Ion Stan Pătraș.jpg
- File:Cimitirul Vesel din Săpânța jpeg.jpg
- File:Opinci jpeg.jpg
- File:FB IMG Linguri de lemn.jpg
- File:Traistă confecționată manual.jpg
- File:Meșter popular.jpg
- File:FB IMG Casa Memorială " Ion Creangă" din Humulești.jpg
- File:FB IMG ouă încondeiate.jpg
- File:Țesut la razboi.jpg
- File:FB IMG Meșter popular comunitatea rușilor lipoveni.jpg
- File:Muzeul de artă populară din Constanța.jpg
- File:FB IMG jpeg .jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:32, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 08:05, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by عبد العظيم غانم (talk · contribs)
[edit]A series of logos and images unlikely to be created by uploader due to size, quality, and logo creation.
- File:فورة.jpg
- File:تصوير.jpg
- File:وزارة.jpg
- File:مدونة نتائج الامتحانات الكليه الحربيه وزارة الدفاع - Copy.png
- File:تنزيلم.jpg
- File:وزارة التخطيط.jpg
- File:FB IMG 1572526411405 - Copy.jpg
- File:847 - Copy.jpg
- File:وزارة الصحة في مصر.png
- File:وزارة التربية والتعليم.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:34, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 08:09, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
File names are "FB IMG" and sizes are consistent with being harvested from that platform.
- File:FB IMG 1525865851660 05.jpg
- File:FB IMG 1525865851660 04.jpg
- File:FB IMG 1525865851660 03.jpg
- File:FB IMG 1525865851660 02.jpg
- File:FB IMG 1525865851660 01.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:47, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 08:10, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hassan09shahid (talk · contribs)
[edit]FBMD in metadata and file image names.
- File:Image012e.jpg
- File:FB IMG 1527560154071 13.jpg
- File:FB IMG 1527560154071 12.jpg
- File:FB IMG 1527560154071 10.jpg
- File:FB IMG 1527560154071 09.jpg
- File:FB IMG 1527560154071 06.jpg
- File:FB IMG 1527560154071 05.jpg
- File:FB IMG 1527560154071 11.jpg
- File:FB IMG 1527560154071 02.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:48, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 08:11, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
FBMD in metadata, also "FB IMG" in filenames.
- File:Tree on the trail in Wales Elan Valley FB IMG 1565106579084.jpg
- File:Amnleside wall in UK Lake Ditrict FB IMG 1565106347859.jpg
- File:Emerald Lake Canada July 2018 FB IMG 1565106989731.jpg
- File:Birch trees on Great Head FB IMG 1565106827082.jpg
- File:Ascent of Snowdon in spring FB IMG 1565106509575.jpg
- File:Famous fishing shack 8n Rockport Mass summer FB IMG 1565106891028.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:49, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 08:11, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Duplicate File:Mount Chōkai (2017-05-19) - Flickr.jpg Ntsctalk (talk) 08:24, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- Speedy delete Marked the file as a duplicate. --pandakekok9 09:30, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Processed as a dup. --Gbawden (talk) 09:39, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
The uploader is on the photo, probably not to be own work. Regasterios (talk) 09:22, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:40, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Non notable person Tekstman (talk) 11:43, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:38, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Village lahar (talk) 12:07, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Already deleted. --Gbawden (talk) 09:38, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
The unused and uncategorised file. Commons is not the private media repository. Will Daurat, seems to be absent in Google search? Estopedist1 (talk) 12:12, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:38, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
A similar image found at https://www.livingcircular.veolia.com/fr/industrie/venturi-vbb-la-voiture-electrique-au-record-mondial-de-vitesse Cjp24 (talk) 12:27, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- Image description: "© 2013 Venturi Automobiles. All rights reserved" on this Veolia page. --Cjp24 (talk) 12:34, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:38, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
The unused and uncategorised file. Commons is not the private media repository. Estopedist1 (talk) 12:30, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:38, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
The unused and uncategorised file. Commons is not the private media repository. Estopedist1 (talk) 12:30, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:37, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Found at: https://www.venturi.com/fr/mission-jamais-contente/ Cjp24 (talk) 12:51, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:37, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Uploaded by mistake from unauthorized source Susandam227 (talk) 14:12, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:37, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 05:29, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
telif hakkı İzbakbay (talk) 15:19, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by Jianhui. --Gbawden (talk) 09:36, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
out of scope / non-free logo — Ирука13 14:58, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:36, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
out of scope — Ирука13 14:58, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:36, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
out of scope, probably non-free — Ирука13 15:00, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:36, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:01, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:36, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Duplicate. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:09, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:35, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:09, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:35, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Logo of a football club, no simple geometric shapes. KeepingWikiClean (talk) 15:23, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Keep "The historic first logo from the Servette FC", dates to 1890. So {{PD-old-100}} applies, which I have added. Careless nomination. Rodhullandemu (talk) 15:32, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- Keep As explained above. PD-Old applied. --Brgesto (talk) 11:03, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:31, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:34, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:31, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Source says the license is CC-BY-NC-ND 3.0, not suitable for Commons. KeepingWikiClean (talk) 15:35, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:31, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Source says the license is CC-BY-NC-ND 3.0, not suitable for Commons. KeepingWikiClean (talk) 15:45, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:29, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:27, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Bosque-Entrada.jpg
- File:Bosque-Arquibancada.jpg
- File:Bosque-Arquibancada2.jpg
- File:Bosque-Aérea.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:03, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:26, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
User has uploaded a ton of photos clearly taken from elsewhere and claimed ownership. These are likely from the web, but at the very least require more information to verify that they’re free.
- File:Pontiac grand prix.jpg
- File:Yacht taken at 2012.jpg
- File:Fu Bao panda.jpg
- File:Mei Lan Panda.jpg
- File:Giant panda walking.jpg
- File:Giant panda at garden.jpg
- File:Jinjang station.jpg
- File:Bts skytrain train.jpg
- File:Bts skytrain set 18.jpg
- File:Dior shop.jpg
- File:Kelana Jaya Line set 47.jpg
- File:Kelana Jaya Line set 15.jpg
- File:Kelana Jaya line set 62.jpg
- File:Kelana Jaya Line set 18.jpg
- File:Kelana Jaya Line set 22.jpg
Ytoyoda (talk) 16:19, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- Editing to add File:Blue thunder.jpg
Ytoyoda (talk) 16:49, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 09:29, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
bad quality ДолбоЯщер (talk) 18:31, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:25, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 18:47, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:24, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 18:47, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:24, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 18:52, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:23, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Stevenmartinez1311 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal photo, out of scope
Mjrmtg (talk) 18:56, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by FitIndia. --Gbawden (talk) 09:23, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
The unused and uncategorised file. Commons is not the private media repository. Estopedist1 (talk) 19:09, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:23, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal images Ninja✮Strikers «☎» 19:16, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:23, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The unused and uncategorised file. Out of the project scope? Estopedist1 (talk) 19:19, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:23, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Duplicate of File:Nuclear nonproliferation discussion 130417-D-NI589-107.jpg The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:38, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: Processed as a dup. --Gbawden (talk) 09:22, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Looks like a showoff profile picture from some dating site. Poor quality, not useful as an illustration. Syrio posso aiutare? 20:58, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:21, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 21:11, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:19, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: seems to be a copy-paste of a lot of non-free pictures CoffeeEngineer (talk) 21:17, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:18, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
This U.S. Army shoulder sleeve insignia I created was passed on photographs I could find on the Internet. Now that the U.S. Army Institute of Heraldry has published the correct version of this insignia, at File:US Army Financial Management Command SSI.png, this incorrect version should be deleted so bad information is not proliferated on this platform. McChizzle (talk) 21:49, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:18, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
An identified non-notable minor without clear consent. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Paulina_Evangelista Nick Moreau (talk) 21:50, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:16, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Dlzcfjkiopppi 98.110.166.190 22:26, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:15, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Non-notable people in unused apparently personal image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:28, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:15, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Unused logo which incorporates an image without source. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:29, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:14, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely own work, see image name and also big scanning line at bottom. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:36, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:14, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
No metadata, facebook sized, also contains the back side of statuary. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:37, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:14, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely own works on this poster & a file named "FB IMG" which appears to be a CD cover or something.
Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:39, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:13, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Chapu Ramua (talk · contribs)
[edit]This series of images of stadiums appears to be harvested from the internet. The images do not appear to be the work of one photographer, they are facebook or smaller in size. The titles also appear to support internet acquisition.
- File:Estadio Centenario de Chimbote.jpg
- File:Complejo deportivo Ollantaytambo.jpg
- File:Images(1).jpg
- File:FB IMG 1586913197871(1).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:41, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:13, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
File size, subject, quality, name - appears to be from Facebook. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:42, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:12, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kingdom nn (talk · contribs)
[edit]Two images apparently collected from the internet. One has FBMD, the other one has a transmission data which appears very much like Instagram or Facebook.
Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:45, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:02, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Non-notable people in a photo from flickr. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:51, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:01, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Non-notable people in a flickr image Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:51, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:01, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Non-notable person in Flickr image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:51, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:01, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Non-notable people in image from Flickr. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:52, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:01, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Non-notable people in a Flickr image Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:52, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:01, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
FBMD in meta Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:55, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:01, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Out of Scope. No encyclopaedic use. Dandelo (talk) 23:04, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:01, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Out of Scope. No encyclopaedic use. Dandelo (talk) 23:05, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:00, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
COM:DW of copyrighted works. No FoP in US for artworks. Yuraily Lic (talk) 02:15, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 12:42, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:Pauledork
[edit]- File:“Mankind can do no great things, only little things with great love.”.jpg
- File:“In freedom”.jpg
- File:“It’s easy. All we need is LOVE.”.jpg
- File:“YES, I can fly—find courage and soar above adversity.”.jpg
- File:“Morningstar”.jpg
- File:ART-shoes.jpg
Looks like some sort of personal artwork. Commons is not the private media repository.--Estopedist1 (talk) 13:45, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 11:01, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:H. R. Giger
[edit]Copyrighted artwork by H. R. Giger.
Yuraily Lic (talk) 01:40, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. – Kwj2772 (talk) 14:11, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
The unused and uncategorised file. Commons is not the private media repository. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 17:26, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. – Kwj2772 (talk) 14:16, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:Thu45rT
[edit]- File:Žene s kišobranima SM.jpg
- File:Rovinj III SM.jpg
- File:Rovinj II SM.jpg
- File:More SM.jpg
- File:Kozmos SM.jpg
- File:Vaza SM.jpg
- File:Šuma SM.jpg
- File:Rovinj SM.jpg
unused and uncategorised files. Looks like some sort of personal artwork. --Estopedist1 (talk) 05:20, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 16:40, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Doctor jafar (talk · contribs)
[edit]Per privacy issues. The filenames and the categories smack of abuse. For example, [1] calls the woman a "bitch". These may be attack pages. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:دختر برهنه.jpg.
![[1]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File%3A%D8%B2%D9%86_%D8%B2%DB%8C%D8%A8%D8%A7_%D8%A8%D8%A7_%D9%84%D8%A8%D8%A7%D8%B3_%DA%A9%D8%B1%D8%AF%DB%8C.jpg&type=revision&diff=412464847&oldid=412236699){kind=link}
- File:زنی در کنار رودخانه.jpg
- File:مرد با لباس کردی،زن با لباس کردی.jpg
- File:عروس و داماد.jpg
- File:زن زیبا با لباس کردی.jpg
4nn1l2 (talk) 07:45, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Categories added to these files suggest that they are not unlikely to be attack pages. --Ahmadtalk 18:47, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyrighted poster. Solomon203 (talk) 08:46, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 18:52, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
COM:PACKAGING, the main subject in this photo is the packaging with the copyrighted logo, which is too complex to fall below the threshold of originality. The logo is neither minimal nor incidental, and is therefore an unacceptable derivative work. This version of the logo made in 2005. Regasterios (talk) 08:47, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Also: File:Guinness, a gift from God (281374700).jpg. --Regasterios (talk) 08:49, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 18:51, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Solomon203 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyrighted toys.
Converted by me to regular DR, mainly for formal reasons. Image is still under the same license on Flickr as at the time of upload. However, nominator's rationale seems to be valid to me. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:32, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete as derivative work of non-free toys. The Minions as such are copyrighted characters and the toys may have their own copyright as well, so the Flickr licence for the photo is irrelevant. De728631 (talk) 11:59, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 18:55, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
copyrighted poster. Solomon203 (talk) 07:55, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 21:25, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
no permission from the artist http://www.atelier-rencontre-artiste.com/annuaire/82/82C/CAHUE.htm Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:27, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 21:29, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Copyright violation: lifted from Twitter: https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1213680532250251264/xuK-11V2_400x400.jpg Dorsetonian (talk) 13:38, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 21:29, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:05, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 20:37, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:16, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 20:44, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely own work Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:57, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Seems to be out of COM:SCOPE. --Ahmadtalk 20:50, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by WikiFirearms (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikly to be own works by the Flickr account. Looks like a flickr account recently created in the purpose to upload images here. I suggest to list it with the bad Flickr authors
- File:Charleville 1774.jpg
- File:Charleville Musket.jpg
- File:Charleville 1766.jpg
- File:Charleville 1777.jpg
- File:Charleville 1717.jpg
- File:Charleville 1763.jpg
- File:Charleville 1728.jpg
- File:Frank Wesson Rifle.jpg
- File:Russian Berdan No2 Rifle.jpg
- File:Russian Berdan No1 Rifle.jpg
- File:Springfield Model 1840.jpg
- File:Springfield Model 1835.jpg
- File:Springfield Model 1822.jpg
- File:Springfield Model 1812 Musket.jpg
- File:Springfield Model 1795.jpg
- File:Lorenz Rifle Repro.jpg
- File:Springfield Model 1842.jpg
- File:Springfield Model 1861 Repro.jpg
- File:Springfield Model 1861.jpg
- File:1842T Minie.png
- File:MurataType22.jpg
- File:Hanyang88.jpg
- File:Belgian 1889 Mauser.jpg
- File:MurataType18.jpg
- File:Lorenz Rifle.jpg
- File:1847Colt Walker.jpg
- File:Various Baker's.gif
- File:Springfield Trapdoor.jpg
- File:Mauser-Vergueiro.jpg
- File:Nepalese Snider.jpg
- File:Springfield 1863.jpg
- File:Springfield Model 1865.jpg
- File:Springfield Model 1866.jpg
- File:Springfield Model 1868.jpg
- File:Winchester Model 1894.jpg
- File:Springfield Model 1855 2nd Model.jpg
- File:Springfield Model 1812.jpg
- File:Springfield Model 1835 diagram.jpg
- File:1795 Musket.jpg
- File:Arisaka rifle family.jpg
- File:Enfield Musket..jpg
- File:Mondragón rifle.jpg
- File:Wanzl rifle.jpg
- File:Lorenz Musket.jpg
- File:Hanyang 88.jpg
- File:Lee-Enfield No.1 Mk.III.png
- File:Richmond rifle.jpg
- File:Lee Enfield No.4.png
- File:Springfieldmodel1869.jpg
- File:Brown Bess.png
- File:Ferguson-rifle.jpg
- File:Baker rifle.png
- File:Baker rifle (no bayonet).png
- File:Verndl rifle.jpg
- File:Serbian Mauser.jpg
- File:SKS carbine.jpg
- File:Type 44 carbine.jpg
- File:Springfield Model 1866 transparent.png
- File:Brunswick rifle.png
- File:Winchester Model 1894 transparent.png
- File:Ross rifle.png
- File:Whitworth rifle transparent.png
- File:Kammerlader rifle.jpg
- File:Springfield Model 1868 transparent.png
- File:Russian-Berdan-No 1.jpg
- File:Springfieldmodel1871.jpg
- File:Type 30 B&W Rifle.jpg
- File:Brown Bess.jpg
- File:RSC Mle 1917 rifle.jpg
- File:Siamese Mauser Model 1903 (4262693443).jpg
- File:Charleville 1866.jpg
- File:Corrige an ix.jpg
- File:Mannlicher M1895.jpg
- File:Mannlicher M1888.jpg
- File:Mannlicher M1886 rifle.jpg
- File:Mannlicher M1885 rifle.jpg
- File:Turkish Mauser (3346758793).jpg
- File:SVT-40 rifle.jpg
- File:Mukden Mauser (4263444330).jpg
- File:Argentinean Mauser (3808895358).jpg
- File:Gew98.jpg
- File:Whitworth rifle.jpg
- File:Volkssturmgewehr (Sketch).jpg
- File:Winchester Model 1895 Lee.jpg
- File:Mosin Nagant Family.jpg
- File:Lee Metford No.1 Mk.II.jpg
- File:M91.JPG
- File:M1891 Dragoon.JPG
- File:M1907 Carbine.JPG
- File:M38 Mosin.JPG
- File:M44 Mosin.JPG
- File:Arisaka Type 30.jpg
- File:Model 1886 Lebel rifle.jpg
- File:Fayetteville Musket.jpg
- File:Kb wz. 98a.jpg
- File:Richmond musket.jpg
- File:Carcano Model 91.jpg
- File:Lebel Model 1886.jpg
- File:German GEW 88.jpg
- File:Hall Rifle.jpg
- File:Kentucky's.jpg
- File:Springfield Model 1863.jpg
- File:Mauser Model 187184.jpg
- File:Portuguese Kropatschek.jpg
- File:Russian Berdan Type II Model 1870.jpg
- File:Finnish Model 1891.jpg
- File:Martini Henry Mk IV.jpg
- File:Short Land Pattern.jpg
- File:India 3rd Pattern Brown Bess.jpg
- File:Sea Pattern Brown Bess.jpg
- File:Brown Bess Carbine.jpg
- File:New Land Pattern.jpg
- File:Long Land Pattern.jpg
- File:Brunswick.jpg
- File:Karabiner 98k.jpg
- File:Karabiner 98b (Sketch).jpg
- File:Karabiner 98a (Sketch).jpg
- File:Russian Krnka.jpg
- File:Yugoslavian M48 rifle.gif
- File:Mosin Nagant Model 1891 (Sketch).jpg
- File:Mosin Nagant 1891.jpg
- File:Mosin Nagant Model 1891 "Dragoon" (Sketch).jpg
- File:Mosin Nagant Model 1959 Carbine.jpg
- File:Mosin Nagant M38.jpg
- File:Mosin Nagant M1944.jpg
- File:Prussian Musket.jpg
- File:Polish Wz 29.jpg
- File:Springfield M1873 "Trapdoor".jpg — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 108.20.216.21 (talk) 06:07, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
- File:Mosin Nagant series of rifles.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 108.20.216.21 (talk) 06:11, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:49, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- The original file of the File:Belgian 1889 Mauser.jpg seems to be there: https://modernfirearms.net/ru/vintovki/magazinnye-vintovki/belgija-magazinnye-vintovki/mauser-m1889/. Looks like copyvio.--Le Petit Chat (talk) 20:26, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- So my old Flickr account from 10 years ago is perfectly fine but my new one isn't? Care to explain the differences and why my attempt to help the community is to be shunned? WikiFirearms (talk)
- https://www.flickr.com/photos/36224933@N07/
- @WikiFirearms: thanks for your reply. Can you confirm that modernfirearms.net reused your image without giving you credit ([2] and File:Belgian 1889 Mauser.jpg) and not the inverse? Are you the author of all these photographs?--Le Petit Chat (talk) 07:48, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
- There are several files obviously not own works on this second Flickr account, it should likely be blacklisted too. See [3], [4], [5]. In fact all the images are doubtful IMO. Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:58, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
- I don't think IMFDB is freely licensed. And even if it is freely licensed, then it is not a trustable source regarding copyright (license laundering), as it seems that this website accept screenshots, ect... They do a kind of fair use, and that is not allowed here. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:36, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
@Christian Ferrer: If that's the case then please delete the pictures. I really don't want anything to do with this anymore. I deleted the Flickr account and I also contacted them to delete the old account also. I'd like my Wiki account permanently deleted or blocked and please delete every single picture uploaded by here [6] as well since those are also from Flickr and not free. I'm sorry I wasn't able to help and goodbye. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WikiFirearms (talk • contribs) 01:37, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
@Le Petit Chat: “The original file of the File:Belgian 1889 Mauser.jpg seems to be there: https://modernfirearms.net/ru/vintovki/magazinnye-vintovki/belgija-magazinnye-vintovki/mauser-m1889/. Looks like copyvio.” - I don't see this photo, on the page you linked. They are similar but not the same. This is't same photo. Sumek101 (talk) 10:42, 23 April 2020 (UTC) EDIT: Ok now I see that in wiki commons are two diferent versions of this file Sumek101 (talk) 10:47, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
@Le Petit Chat: @Christian Ferrer: @Sumek101: I'm one of the original uploaders and if you could delete these images alongside the other ones I uploaded and nominated as quickly as possible, that'll be great. Thank you. https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions/108.20.216.21&offset=&limit=500&target=108.20.216.21 — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 108.20.216.21 (talk) 23:44, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: obvious case - the uploader comfirm himself that almost the images comes from another source, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_WikiFirearms&diff=413620151&oldid=413603043&diffmode=source. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:13, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
Derivatives of non-free packaging (COM:PACKAGING). Sealle (talk) 07:52, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 00:50, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Parco Natura Viva - Bussolengo, Verona, Italy (www.parconaturaviva.it) - panoramio (12).jpg
[edit]_-_panoramio_(12).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_panoramio_(12).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Models in Italy which does not have freedom of panorama. FunkMonk (talk) 08:41, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. The sculptures/models are copyrighted so we can't have this derivative photo. De728631 (talk) 12:16, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 23:02, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by GabrielDorneles (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos and paintings. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Louiselle E.jpg
- File:Louiselle D.jpg
- File:Louiselle C.jpg
- File:Louiselle B.jpg
- File:Domani e festa.jpg
- File:Louiselle A.jpg
- File:29340128 158979766111louiselle.jpg
- File:Wrtt7louiselle.jpg
- File:Sem título louiselle.png
- File:S-l1600 (3)louiselle.jpg
- File:Sedrtu.jpg
- File:Sedrthu.png
- File:Louisellehjk.jpg
- File:Louisle-piano.jpg
- File:Louiselle (3).jpg
- File:Louiselle (2).jpg
- File:Kihlouiselle.jpg
- File:Jiklouiselle.jpg
- File:Kilouiselle.jpg
- File:Gdslouiselle.jpg
- File:Io-pl.png
- File:Ertuilouiselle.jpg
- File:Cantlouiselle.jpg
- File:Awelouiselle.jpg
- File:Cicciocare.jpg
- File:2949398894louiselle.jpg
- File:43571557 4887285louiselle.jpg
- File:60c3d9cc-103b-4301-98elouiselle.jpg
- File:25399143 1501313989964043 4106louiselle.jpg
- File:Ujikllouiselle.jpg
- File:51421272louiselle.jpg
- File:513975louiselle.jpg
- File:50574103 357978041460933 4186061828909957120 n Colorized.png
- File:R-7088032-1433432259-3416.jpeg.jpg
- File:Il vazio.png
- File:51054dforse.jpg
- File:50932973 2l.jpg
- File:50846371 13247ll.jpg
- File:50606loui.jpg
- File:44louiselle.jpg
- File:44louisele.jpg
- File:476823loui.jpg
- File:PçLouiselle.jpg
- File:51316425 23976Louiselle 7436933116 3975883962147930112 n.jpg
- File:P´´(Louiselle.jpg
- File:47442151Louiselle.jpg
- File:9iolpç.jpg
- File:10jkl.jpg
- File:Louiselle face.jpg
- File:Thereza.png
- File:Teresa Cristina of the Two Sicilies in Art2.jpg
- File:Teresa Cristina of the Two Sicilies.jpg
- File:Pedro II of Brazil1.jpg
- File:Louis Bonaparte.jpg
- File:Pia 2.jpg
- File:PrincesaMariaPia.png
- File:Maria Pia67.jpg
- File:Piahug123.jpg
- File:Princess Théodelinde de Beauharnais 5.jpg
- File:Princess Théodelinde de Beauharnais 3.jpg
- File:Princess Théodelinde de Beauharnais2.jpg
- File:Princess Théodelinde de Beauharnais.jpg
- File:Princess Beauharnais.jpg
- File:Eugenia.jpg
- File:Eugénie de Beauharnais.jpg
- File:Eugénie de Beauharnaisrr.png
- File:Amélie de Beauharnais Leuchtenberg.png
- File:Amélie de Beauharnais.png
- File:Portrait paintings of Maria Leopoldin.jpg
- File:PortraitMaria Leopoldina of Austria.jpg
- File:Januária, Princess Imperial of Brazil346.jpg
- File:Januária, Princess Imperial of Brazil34.jpg
- File:Januarieofbrezil.jpg
- File:Princess Francisca of Brazil66.jpg
- File:PaulaMariana.jpg
- File:Princess Paula Mariana.jpg
louiselle.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:39, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 09:52, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by GabrielDorneles (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical paintings. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:KingAlbertI.jpg
- File:Francisca 2 do Brasil.jpg
- File:Francisca 1 of joinville.jpg
- File:Januaria of brazil young.jpg
- File:PedroIIdoBrasil.jpg
- File:Marie-Louise of Austria, empress.jpg
- File:LuisaDiAustria.jpg
- File:Archduchess Marie Clementine of Austria.jpg
- File:Francisca de Bragança princesa de Joinville.jpg
- File:Candida Maria da Pureza.jpg
- File:Carlos Jose Botelho.jpg
- File:Imperatriz Dona Teresa Cristina por Édouard Viénot.jpg
- File:Imperador Pedro II por Édouard Viénot.jpg
- File:Diogo Antônio Feijó, o Regente Feijó.jpg
- File:Princess Maria Amélia of Brazil young.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:37, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
- Keep For File:Carlos Jose Botelho.jpg I've been able to find missing data easily and quickly, but that not the case for the other I looked for. QTHCCAN (talk) 16:07, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:24, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by GabrielDorneles (talk · contribs)
[edit]Who is (are) the painter(s)? Permissions?
Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:08, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:30, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by GabrielDorneles (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos, drawings, paintings. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Leopoldina (2).jpg
- File:Leopoldina.jpg
- File:Princesa Dona Leopoldina do Brasil.jpg
- File:Leopoldina do Brasil.jpg
- File:Leopoldine of Brazil 1.jpg
- File:Leopoldine of Brazil.jpg
- File:4 leopoldine of Brazil.jpg
- File:3 leopoldine of Brazil.jpg
- File:2 leopoldine of Brazil.png
- File:1 leopoldine of Brazil.jpg
- File:Empress of mexico anna.jpg
- File:Empress Anna.jpg
- File:Don Pedro du Brésil - Atelier Nadar.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:51, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:30, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by GabrielDorneles (talk · contribs)
[edit]no permission
- File:Tony Marshall 70s.jpg
- File:Tony Marshall in Vinyl Cover.jpg
- File:Tony Marshall and Dog.jpg
- File:Singer Tony Marshall.jpg
- File:Singer Tony Marshall in Concert.jpg
- File:Singer Tony Marshall in Rare Photo.jpg
- File:David Anthony, Actor of TitanMen.jpg
- File:David Anthony TatanMen.jpg
Mutter Erde (talk) 14:22, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:11, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
The real author is unknown, the date of death of the author is unknown, the date of publication is unknown: the license status of the image is unknown. — Ирука13 05:05, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 02:23, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
This agent does not exist Basquyati (talk) 00:31, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Deletion request by uploader of an orphaned image. --Leyo 20:02, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
Vintage photos of photos, not own work, please explain why public domain.
- File:Бурятский санитарный поезд 1915 г..jpg
- File:Вампилова.jpg
- File:Савранна Яковлевна с товарищами.jpg
- File:Данчинова с родителями.jpg
- File:Данчинова.jpg
- File:Осодоева.jpg
- File:Сагадарова.jpg
- File:Ербанов М.Н. .jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:35, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
- Эти фотографии сделаны в музеях, а некоторые принадлежат мне лично. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AAltaeva (talk • contribs) 11:57, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
- @AAltaeva: Photographying an existing photography doesn't make you the "owner" of the work. You have to explain why original images are public domain in the country of origin. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:34, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
- Текст статьи говорит о выдающихся женщинах регионального масштаба. Вся информация в открытом доступе. Что вы можете посоветовать? — Preceding unsigned comment added by AAltaeva (talk • contribs) 15:43, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:51, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
Historical photos and newspapers. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Г. Улан-Удэ. Министры здравоохранения..jpg
- File:Бабушкина У.А..jpg
- File:Памяти сестры.png
- File:Строки сердца.png
- File:Б-М правда.jpg
- File:Кацель.jpg
- File:Газетный рисунок.jpg
- File:Сахьянова.jpg
- File:Газета 1925 года.jpg
- File:Бурят-Монгольская правда.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:02, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- Эти фотографии кроме File:Памяти сестры.png и File:Строки сердца.png сделаны автором в музее и библиотеке.
- Обладание физической копией и авторство - разные вещи. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:09, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:52, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
La imagen viola derechos de autor, pues procede de un video en youtube sin la licencia adecuada: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F5zDEHggiMg&feature=emb_title Luisalvaz (talk) 00:13, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. --MarioGom (talk) 20:32, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:59, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
This agent does not exist Basquyati (talk) 00:30, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused upload. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:00, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
Too informative equation. Requesting exclusion Basquyati (talk) 00:38, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused upload. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:01, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Mazbel – 02:15, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Comment estimados buen dia considero que tiene que ser eliminado por solicitud propia y lo elabore y soy yo el la foto Zacariaspc (talk) 02:19, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- Comment @Zacariaspc: perfecto, pero no es necesario nominar dos veces la imagen para su borrado (Tu petición la dejé como un comentario). Puedes reemplazar la plantilla {{Comment}} por {{Vote delete}} (obviamente, en lo escrito por ti) y un administrador lo eliminará en la brevedad posible. Saludos Mazbel – 02:29, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:02, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
COM:DW of copyrighted works. Yuraily Lic (talk) 02:19, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:02, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Derivative work of a copyrighted board A1Cafel (talk) 02:55, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:02, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Link provides no proof of free use 47.223.78.205 03:38, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:03, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
looks like a screenshot Mutter Erde (talk) 05:51, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:04, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Gbielcunha (talk · contribs)
[edit]https://logodix.com/logo/941226.png
Copyvio. --Wright Streetdeck 07:24, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- Keep If this is in COM:SCOPE, this logo seems below COM:TOO to me. --pandakekok9 09:19, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: no educational value, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:05, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
copyrighted poster. Solomon203 (talk) 07:57, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:05, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
The unused and uncategorised file. Commons is not the private media repository. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 11:07, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:07, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ga-massoni (talk · contribs)
[edit]historical images of unclear copyright status
Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:41, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:08, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
As said, the picture is from Srirangam, not from Srirangapatna. So it should be put there. 94.218.199.99 13:55, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Just fix description and category. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:09, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
Copyright?!?!? 87.14.62.83 14:13, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Under the Threshold of originality. --Marco Chemello (BEIC) (talk) 10:17, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per above. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:10, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
Low resolution, non Exif data, copyviol? Threecharlie (talk) 15:01, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unreliable uploader, see Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by ViggianoSpiritoLucano. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:16, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
obviously non-free image — Ирука13 15:04, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, screengrab from somewhere else. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:16, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:15, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:16, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Johnnormanball (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status.
- File:Cor Meibion Gwalia History - Charmans Introduction and Contents.pdf
- File:Cor Meibion Gwalia History - Chapter 02 of 10.pdf
- File:Cor Meibion Gwalia History - Chapter 03 of 10.pdf
- File:Cor Meibion Gwalia History - Chapter 04 of 10.pdf
- File:Cor Meibion Gwalia History - Chapter 05 of 10.pdf
- File:Cor Meibion Gwalia History - Chapter 07 of 10.pdf
- File:Cor Meibion Gwalia History - Chapter 06 of 10.pdf
- File:Cor Meibion Gwalia History - Chapter 09 of 10.pdf
- File:Cor Meibion Gwalia History - Chapter 08 of 10.pdf
- File:Cor Meibion Gwalia History - Chapter 10 of 10.pdf
- File:Cor Meibion Gwalia History - Chapter 01 of 10.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- Note: Uploader has left a note at en:User talk:Johnnormanball. @Johnnormanball: Concerns regarding this discussion or the files in this discussion are welcome here, not on some other wiki, as nobody will find them (You got luckily here). Victor Schmidt (talk) 17:33, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, text docs are out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:18, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
The unused and uncategorised file. Should be converted to wikitext not image file. Out of scope? Estopedist1 (talk) 17:55, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:19, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
The unused and uncategorised file. Should be converted to wikitext. Not suitable for Commons. Out of scope? Estopedist1 (talk) 17:58, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:19, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
COM:DW of copyrighted works. Yuraily Lic (talk) 18:03, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:19, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by BEAR chocomint (talk · contribs)
[edit]
Yuraily Lic (talk) 18:16, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:28, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
COM:DW. Not own work. Yuraily Lic (talk) 18:19, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:27, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
COM:DW. Not own work. Yuraily Lic (talk) 18:19, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:27, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was tagged as Public Domain Mark, which is not an acceptable licence on Commons. At the Flickr source, in addition to having PD-Mark 1.0, it is also included in an album marked "Creative Commons", which is clearly acceptable for Commons. Mindmatrix 19:43, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Comment: https://www.flickr.com/photos/95911850@N07/albums/72157652408901575 is the "Creative Commons" album, but the description there doesn't clearly identify which CC license the author intended: "Here are photos you can use for free of charge, just please use me as reference! ;) (AND let me know you are using it! :D)" - this sounds like CC-BY, but CC has no "let me know you are using it" clause, and the CC license version is not identified. See COM:PDM for why the PD-Mark isn't generally an acceptable license; in this case, the request for attribution in the album description makes me think the Flickr user didn't intend to release the image as PD. Alex Cohn (talk) 20:38, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
- I agree about how Commons treats PD-Mark images. Note that the Flickr source includes the following tags: free, CC, public, domain. I would assume these are intentionally added by the user when uploading to Flickr. All other images by that user are marked "All rights reserved", and no other image has the indicated tags. Mindmatrix 20:54, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
- I see the tags now - thanks for pointing that out. I think the easiest and safest thing to do in this case is to ask the Flickr user to clarify the license? I don't think we have a canned appeal for the PD Mark issue though. In any case, without an affirmative response from them, I'm slightly leaning keep here; there's a lot of evidence they intended to freely license the image, even if they didn't fully understand how to do so. Alex Cohn (talk) 03:27, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
- I agree about how Commons treats PD-Mark images. Note that the Flickr source includes the following tags: free, CC, public, domain. I would assume these are intentionally added by the user when uploading to Flickr. All other images by that user are marked "All rights reserved", and no other image has the indicated tags. Mindmatrix 20:54, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Speedy keep Now CC0. --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 20:30, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept: CC0 now. --Jarekt (talk) 01:08, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files in Category:Sculptures by Yasuo Mizui
[edit]These photos are from books, maybe. Seems like not own work.
- File:04057斜陰陽.JPG
- File:04097水井康雄マクロミクロ.JPG
- File:04105斜陰陽.JPG
- File:04106斜陰陽.JPG
- File:04110斜陰陽.JPG
- File:04111斜陰陽.JPG
- File:04114斜陰陽.JPG
- File:04115斜陰陽.JPG
- File:04116斜陰陽.JPG
- File:04118斜陰陽.JPG
- File:04119斜陰陽.JPG
- File:04120斜陰陽.JPG
- File:04121斜陰陽.JPG
- File:04123斜陰陽.JPG
- File:04124斜陰陽.JPG
- File:04125斜陰陽.JPG
- File:04126斜陰陽.JPG
- File:04128水井康雄彫刻.JPG
- File:04129ジブザグ.JPG
- File:04130雲の番人.JPG
- File:04135ネケブ.JPG
- File:04136水井康雄彫刻.JPG
- File:04137星座.JPG
- File:04138風をはらむ石.JPG
- File:04139水井康雄彫刻.JPG
- File:04140賀石.JPG
- File:04141水井康雄彫刻.JPG
- File:04142発芽の門.JPG
- File:04143太陽の番人.JPG
- File:04144水井康雄彫刻.JPG
- File:04145水井康雄彫刻.JPG
- File:04146水井康雄彫刻.JPG
- File:04147水井康雄彫刻.JPG
- File:04148水井康雄彫刻.JPG
- File:04149水のカーテン.JPG
- File:04150コスモス.JPG
- File:04153開く壁.JPG
- File:04158綾柱.JPG
- File:04159水登.JPG
- File:04160位には呼ぶ.JPG
- File:04161マンガン.JPG
- File:04163集宇.JPG
- File:04164開空.JPG
- File:04165対喜.JPG
- File:04166弥祝.JPG
- File:04167水井デート6.JPG
- File:04169ラコスト庭.JPG
- File:04176悠飛.JPG
- File:04177希望の扉.JPG
- File:04178笑石Ⅱ.JPG
- File:04179舞窓.JPG
- File:04180カマルグ.JPG
- File:04181祝福.JPG
- File:041ラコスト.JPG
- File:4109斜陰陽.JPG
- File:Amiral Yasuo mizui.JPG
- File:Arc de nuage.JPG
- File:Arc famillial.JPG
- File:Coupe - vent.JPG
- File:Fountain square mizui d'asq.jpg
- File:Fête de la mer.JPG
- File:Jet d'eau pétrifiée.JPG
- File:La Saône.JPG
Yuraily Lic (talk) 05:41, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 18:40, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Sculptures by Yasuo Mizui
[edit]These photos are from books, maybe. Seems like not own work.
- File:04100開く壁.JPG
- File:Dialogue.JPG
- File:Le gardien du soleil.JPG
- File:Le mer YasuoMizui.JPG
- File:Le Mistral YasuoMizui.JPG
- File:Le mur de l'espoir.JPG
- File:Le point de rencontre.JPG
- File:Le signe de la Vie.JPG
- File:Les crêtes Ⅱ.JPG
- File:Les germes - Berlin.jpg
- File:Naissance.JPG
- File:Oscillo - escalier.JPG
- File:Oscillo Cascade Ⅱ.JPG
- File:Oscillo-escalier Yasuo Mizui.JPG
Yuraily Lic (talk) 20:40, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Certainly taken from some publication: printing artifacts and pixelization visible in some. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:55, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Sculptures by Yasuo Mizui
[edit]These photos are from books, maybe. Seems like not own work.
- File:02 Noir modifié-1.jpg
- File:04170白煙.JPG
- File:C04152水井康雄彫刻.JPG
- File:Fontaine au filet d'eau.JPG
- File:Mizui scans 198.jpeg
- File:Oscillo- Crêtes.JPG
- File:Sagesse.JPG
- File:Soleil - Forêt - Fête.JPG
- File:Symbole de vie.JPG
- File:Trois traces Mizui.JPG
File:Yasuo Mizui, De Witte Vlam, 1975.jpg- File:Yasuo Mizui.JPG
Yuraily Lic (talk) 01:27, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
The Photo Yasuo Mizui, De Witte Vlam, 1975.jpg is taken in the Middelheim museum, by me. I don't understand why you think it was taken from a book. No reason to mark it for deletion.Funkyxian (talk) 13:19, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for your comment. It's my mistake. I canceled about File:Yasuo Mizui, De Witte Vlam, 1975.jpg. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 11:59, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Certainly taken from some publication: printing artifacts and pixelization visible in some. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:56, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Sculptures by Yasuo Mizui
[edit]Sculptures created by Yasuo Mizui. He died in 2008. These sculptures are in France. No FoP in France.
- File:000717希望の壁.JPG
- File:00339水井エクスポ.JPG
- File:00375水井エクスポ.JPG
- File:00396石の彫刻陰陽.JPG
- File:03775ルネッサンス.JPG
- File:1000640陰陽.JPG
- File:Chat Mizui 01フェノザの猫.jpg
Yuraily Lic (talk) 06:33, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Fitindia (talk) 06:02, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Sculptures by Yasuo Mizui
[edit]These photos are from books, maybe. Seems like not own work.
Yuraily Lic (talk) 06:46, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 06:01, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Sculptures by Yasuo Mizui
[edit]A sculpture created by Yasuo Mizui. He died in 2008. This sculpture is in Japan. No FoP in Japan for artistic works.
Yuraily Lic (talk) 06:52, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 06:01, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This model is from France, which only has no freedom of panorama. Monsieur X (talk) 04:18, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:14, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This model is from Italy, which has no freedom of panorama. Monsieur X (talk) 04:26, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:14, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
No FoP in Ukraine. — Ирука13 05:26, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:15, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status. Source link does not state copyright status. It's unclear if this was published or created in 1942 as stated. Since German copyright runs for at least 70 years after publication, this would need to qualify as {{PD-Polish}} to have been PD in source country on the URAA date. Buidhe (talk) 07:53, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- Keep It was an official document created by the Bauleitung der Waffen-SS un Polizeu of Auschwitz, Poland. As the SS and all of their suborganisations are forbidden and dissolved after Neurenberg in 1945 it can't be from a later date. The source is the official Auschwitz Museum.. --Hannolans (talk) 09:20, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- How do you know that the Bauleitung is the source? The linked source doesn't say so. Buidhe (talk) 09:45, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- In the drawing is stated 'Bauleitung der Waffen-SS und Polizei'. The source of the image is Auschwitz Museum, that keeps the archive and post their archive on their Twitter-account. Do you disapprove their Twitter-account as a reliable source or their accompanying text? Or is it about the photo of the barack of https://instagram.com/andreaollie/ that was also included in the tweet? --Hannolans (talk) 10:23, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- All the tweet says is "Between 700-1000 prisoners were crowded inside every brick barracks at Auschwitz II-Birkenau. Those inhuman conditions were created by architects who knew exactly that they were designing spaces of dehumanization." — nothing about copyright, author, or when the document was published. Remember, copyright is counted from publication rather than creation date. It's hard for me to believe that this document would have been published during WWII. Buidhe (talk) 10:53, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- There are only 140 characters in a tweet. This is an official document and was distributed during the war in the SS-organisation. If those drawings were not distributed those buildings couldnt exist. --Hannolans (talk) 12:32, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- If it wasn't released to the public, it doesn't count as publication. Are you saying that these plans were released to the public? Evidence? Buidhe (talk) 23:04, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- There are only 140 characters in a tweet. This is an official document and was distributed during the war in the SS-organisation. If those drawings were not distributed those buildings couldnt exist. --Hannolans (talk) 12:32, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- All the tweet says is "Between 700-1000 prisoners were crowded inside every brick barracks at Auschwitz II-Birkenau. Those inhuman conditions were created by architects who knew exactly that they were designing spaces of dehumanization." — nothing about copyright, author, or when the document was published. Remember, copyright is counted from publication rather than creation date. It's hard for me to believe that this document would have been published during WWII. Buidhe (talk) 10:53, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- In the drawing is stated 'Bauleitung der Waffen-SS und Polizei'. The source of the image is Auschwitz Museum, that keeps the archive and post their archive on their Twitter-account. Do you disapprove their Twitter-account as a reliable source or their accompanying text? Or is it about the photo of the barack of https://instagram.com/andreaollie/ that was also included in the tweet? --Hannolans (talk) 10:23, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- How do you know that the Bauleitung is the source? The linked source doesn't say so. Buidhe (talk) 09:45, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- Keep When uploading, I always wonder if I could meet any court case or takedown request regarding the uploaded file. Literally no one could or would claim copyright on this building plan. Copyright of anything made by the nazi's was claimed by the respective German and Polish states after the war, and as the author is anonymous, this image is clearly in the public domain. Vysotsky (talk) 18:38, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Vysotsky: "if I could meet any court case or takedown request regarding the uploaded file?" is not the question you should be asking myself. See Commons:Project scope/Precautionary principle #1: "The copyright owner will not bother to sue or cannot afford to." Copyright of anything made by the nazi's was claimed by the respective German and Polish states after the war—citation needed. The only question that's relevant is whether it's copyrighted or not according to Commons:Copyright rules by territory. Anonymous photographs are not necessarily PD; most jurisdictions protect copyright for a certain number of years after publication. Buidhe (talk) 23:04, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- Keep As per Hannolans and Vysotsky, Ecritures (talk) 20:27, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - It must have been copyrighted until later than 1996, so the URAA applies. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:18, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
Appears to be a picture of an Italian Holocaust memorial. Not FoP Italy and therefore protected. Buidhe (talk) 07:55, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:18, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Auschwitz II-Birkenau - Death Camp - Processing Center - Family Photo of Jewish Couple with Star of David Armbands - Oswiecim, Poland (4106628229).jpg
[edit].jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
- File:Auschwitz II-Birkenau - Death Camp - Processing Center - Jewish Couple with Star of David Armbands - Oswiecim - Poland.jpg
It's unlear that the flickr user has the rights to this image. There have been copyright issues with some of their other uploads. Buidhe (talk) 08:01, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:18, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
Auschwitz photo montage
[edit]- File:בירקנאו - מבנה הטיהור והקבלה. פינת זכרון (1).jpg
- File:בירקנאו - מבנה הטיהור והקבלה. פינת זכרון (2).jpg
- File:בירקנאו - מבנה הטיהור והקבלה. פינת זכרון (3).jpg
- File:בירקנאו - מבנה הטיהור והקבלה. פינת זכרון (4).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama for interiors in Poland. Underlying images are likely copyright. --Buidhe (talk) 08:04, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- Note: none of these images are properly tagged for deletion. Renata3 (talk) 10:48, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:18, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
Creative Commons License The text and audio are offered under the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. The picture is titled: 'Kapila burns the 60.000 sons' © Pieter Weltevrede (commercial use prohibited). Baddu676 (talk) 08:16, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- Comment The source no longer shows this image. On September 2008 it did have this photo, but there's no copyright status indicated for this image, only the other one which is noncommercial. So Delete per COM:PRP. --pandakekok9 09:27, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:19, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
a CreativeCommons licence for a ca. 1970s-80s photo...?! — danyele 00:35, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- Comment That's of course possible; there are people active on Commons who took photographs back then and scan them. But I do think that it's rather likely that the uploader is not the creator of this rather small sized photo; I think at least a plausible statement of authorship, if not an OTRS permission would be in order here. Gestumblindi (talk) 00:49, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:16, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
a CreativeCommons licence for a ca. 1970s-80s photo...?! — danyele 00:36, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:16, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
Picture of 1956 and shows the given rightholder as baby. It could not be own work. No permission. Brotfried (talk) 15:48, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
i agree it should be deleted but not for the reasons above. it is clearly a derivative work. we dont know who took the original photo in 1956 but without proof to the contrary, i think we assume it is not in the public domain. --Headlock0225 (talk) 14:03, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:53, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:José Gutiérrez Solana
[edit]This file was initially tagged by Enrique Cordero as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Las obras del pintor José Gutiérrez Solana no están en el dominio público. Ver aviso en su categoría: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Jos%C3%A9_Guti%C3%A9rrez_Solana
- File:José Gutiérrez Solana - Chorus Girls - c 1927 - Museo CarmenThyssen Málaga.jpg
- File:José Gutiérrez Solana - Dragging Out the Bull (the Mule Team) - c 1936 - Santander Foundation.jpg
- File:José Gutiérrez Solana - El Lechuga and His Team - c 1915-17 - Santander Bank Foundation.jpg
- File:José Gutiérrez Solana - La costurera (The Seamstress) - c 1943 - Museo Nacional Centro de Arte Reina Sofía.jpg
- File:José Gutiérrez Solana - La Visita del Obispo (The Bishop's Visit) - c 1926 - Museo Nacional Centro de Arte Reina Sofía.jpg
- File:José Gutiérrez Solana - La Vitrinas (The Showcases) - c 1910 - Museo Nacional Centro de Arte Reina Sofía.jpg
- File:José Gutiérrez Solana - Masks (Masks with Donkey, Carnival Scenes or Masks and Wicker Fan) - c 1932 - Santander Bank Foundation.jpg
- File:José Gutiérrez Solana - Mexican Clay Figurines - c 1930-32 - Santander Bank Foundation.jpg
- File:José Gutiérrez Solana - Miguel de Unamuno (Portrait of Miguel de Unamuno with a View of Salamanca) - c 1935-36 - Santander Bank Foundation.jpg
- File:José Gutiérrez Solana - The Slum Brothel (The Slum Girls) - c 1934 - Santander Bank Foundation.jpg
- File:José Gutiérrez Solana - The Émigré's Return - c 1924 - Santander Bank Foundation.jpg
_-_c_1936_-_Santander_Foundation.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_c_1943_-_Museo_Nacional_Centro_de_Arte_Reina_Sof%C3%ADa.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_c_1926_-_Museo_Nacional_Centro_de_Arte_Reina_Sof%C3%ADa.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_c_1910_-_Museo_Nacional_Centro_de_Arte_Reina_Sof%C3%ADa.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_c_1932_-_Santander_Bank_Foundation.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_c_1935-36_-_Santander_Bank_Foundation.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_c_1934_-_Santander_Bank_Foundation.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Regasterios (talk) 16:58, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Spain: "works of authors who died before 7 December 1987 (or were published before that date, in case of anonymous works) are dealt with by the 1879 law, which sets a protection time of 80 years post mortem auctoris." --Regasterios (talk) 16:59, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:51, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
SpaceX does not release its patches under a free licence. The licence here was "given" by the uploader without SpaceX's permission! Ras67 (talk) 17:36, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:50, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
The original artwork is from here. The licence was "given" by the uploader without Boeing's permission, COM:PCP! Ras67 (talk) 17:42, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:49, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
Per previous discussion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Beaumont-Hamel statue du soldat écossais 1.jpg, sculptural work by George Henry Paulin (d. 1962) is not for in public domain. Labattblueboy (talk) 19:48, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:34, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Pennsylvania Memorial
[edit]I was doing some wikidata work and noticed this is a joint work between Paul Philippe Cret (d.1945) and Thomas H. Atherton (d.1978), not simply Cret. File:Pennsylvania Memorial 5.jpg makes this quite clear. Alas I would argue these images are not PD, due to French FOP, until 2049. PS. The State of Pennsylvania ws the commissioner of the work via a monument commission.
- File:Monument de Pennsylvanie.jpg
- File:Monument offensive Argonne Varennes.JPG
- File:Pennsylvania Memorial 1.jpg
- File:Pennsylvania Memorial 3.jpg
- File:Pennsylvania Memorial 4.jpg
- File:Pennsylvania Memorial at Varennes en Argonne 081510.JPG
- File:The Pennsylvania Memorial at Varennes en Argonne.jpg
- File:Varennes-en-Argonne Le mémorial de Pennsylvanie.JPG
- File:VarennesMémorial.JPG
Labattblueboy (talk) 21:12, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
- An official French website (the cultural one for the departement of Meuse) gives Philippe Cret as the only architect of this monument as it was also reported in the small nearby museum. As far as I know the story of WWI American monuments in the East of France, Philippe Cret and Thomas H. Atherton worked together for preliminary works (for example they flight together over the areas to spot the place where they would build monuments, but they designed individually the different monuments, even if their two names (sometimes even on wall plates on this monuments) were often linked. But if you have more accurate informations that shows a significant Atherton role in the Pennsylvania monument, you're right, this monument should not be considered as public domain. TCY (talk) 21:39, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
- Bodies of War: World War I and the Politics of Commemoration in America by Baker, Symbolic Space: French Enlightenment Architecture and Its Legacy by Etin (p. 175), and this thesis[7] (covers elements of their relationship fairly well) all appear to indicated a collaborative effort. If you have a source that indicates efforts were split between sites and in fact this site is Cret that would be helpful; I haven't seen anything of that nature.--Labattblueboy (talk) 22:39, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. and discussion, undelete in 2049 sadly :(. --PierreSelim (talk) 21:12, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:Pennsylvania Memorial
[edit]Per Commons:Deletion_requests/Category:Pennsylvania_Memorial.
- File:Monument américain aux morts de Pennsylvanie - Varennes-en-Argonne.jpg
- File:Varennes en Argonne Pennsylvania American Memorial 01.jpg
- File:Varennes en Argonne Pennsylvania American Memorial 02.jpg
Labattblueboy (talk) 20:06, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:33, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
Derivitive work of a file that was deleted for having an invalid license (PD-CERN-CMS) The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:13, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:32, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
No source, based on a single individual's fantasy, reductionist and with obvious inaccuracies. Nonetheless used all over as if it were accurate. 42.61.217.253 00:32, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: Widely in use. No valid reason for deletion. --Amitie 10g (talk) 01:51, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, Widely in use. Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:38, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
- What does "roughly following Samuel P. Huntingon" mean in this map's description? Either you follow the source or this is Original Research.
- I'm not sure the nomination for deletion is appropriate, as there is no rule against uploading Original Research to Wikimedia as far as I know. But this map clearly shouldn't be including in Wikipedia articles.
- Here is the original map found in The Clash of Civilizations for comparison: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Clash_of_Civilizations_mapn2.png.
- Forget the nomination for deletion. I've removed it from the English Wikipedia; this is probably enough.
2A01:CB1C:854:3600:8C44:2FB9:7F5E:75AC 20:43, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - the file is widely used. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:30, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
Collage of pictures with no source 181.209.233.188 20:52, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
All the pictures used in the file come from Wikipedia, which means they are free of copyright and to use by everybody. All the sources used are listed in order below:
File:Iglesia Del Carmen Sta Tecla LL 2012.jpg
File:Palacio Municipal de Santa Tecla La Libertad.jp
File:Paseo El Carmen Santa tecla 2012.JPG
Therefore, I request a deletion to the deletion request template--Ezecr1s305 (talk) 06:20, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:28, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
Because Woolf died in 1941, it was not PD in the UK until 2011, which means that its copyright was restored in the US (because it was not PD in 1996), so this is not public domain in the USA until 2028 (95 years from the date of publication, 1933). The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:04, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- @The Squirrel Conspiracy In the USA => means in France & UK OK => this is a CC BY 2.0 on FlickR. Thanks for your answer.--Bakelith (talk) 13:03, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
- Hi. All files on Commons must be public domain in both the United States and the origin country. This is because Commons' servers are in the US, so Commons is bound by US law. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:23, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
- @The Squirrel Conspiracy In the USA => means in France & UK OK => this is a CC BY 2.0 on FlickR. Thanks for your answer.--Bakelith (talk) 13:03, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
- It says By Virginia Woolf With four Original Drawings by Vanessa Bell and six other Illustrations. If this is one of the four Original Drawings, then it would seem that the copyright term depends on the death year of w:Vanessa Bell (died in 1961). If this is one of the six other Illustrations, then it would depend on whoever made those illustrations. Note that there is no text by Virginia Woolf on the cover, so her death year is irrelevant. --Stefan2 (talk) 17:14, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:27, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
Similar published photo as a jpeg was deleted 11/2019 with consensus Commons:Deletion requests/File:Fawn E Weaver.jpg Jooojay (talk) 22:04, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- Appears to be used on these webpages for PR and news:
- https://www.t-g.com/story/2595317.html
- https://neworleansbourbonfestival20.sched.com/event/KZVw/the-story-of-uncle-nearest-the-first-african-american-distiller
- https://www.wgnsradio.com/uncle-nearest-whiskey-ceo-to-keynote-2019-equali-tea-in-murfreesboro-cms-50076
- https://www.cuisinenoirmag.com/uncle-nearest-1856-premium-whiskey/
- https://charlestonwineandfood.com/participants/fawn-weaver/fawn-weaver_thumbnail/
Jooojay (talk) 08:15, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:25, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
The original photography is from Boeing. The licence was "given" by the uploader without Boeing's permission, COM:PCP! Ras67 (talk) 23:05, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:25, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
copyvio, artworks from 1959, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 23:25, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Info I have pixelized the artwork, therefore I think the image can be kept now. Raymond 08:44, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
- Danke, danit dürfte das Foto urheberrechtlich O.K. sein.--HOWI (talk) 09:19, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination -- The building also has a copyright. We do not have dates for the architects, Ferdinand Pasmann and Joseph Bonn, but even if they died immediately after the building was built in 1930, it would still be under copyright in the USA due to URAA. If either of them died after 1950, it is still under copyright in Germany. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:23, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
Delete Jean Cocteau (1889–1963) works are still in copyright until 70 years pma. Ww2censor (talk) 23:39, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:17, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
Logo of a sports club, no simple geometric shapes. KeepingWikiClean (talk) 15:14, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- I wrote to the club. They replied, that logo was uploaded according to their will. They didn't do OTRS, but they intend to do it. Let's give them few days :) Grzegorz B. (talk) 05:35, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
There is an OTRS email received for “File:Juvenia_Kraków_Logo.png” but not processed yet, ticket:2020050610005053. --Polimerek (talk) 09:10, 7 May 2020 (UTC)- I have just accepted permission for “File:Juvenia_Kraków_Logo.png” under ticket:2020050610005053. --Polimerek (talk) 09:07, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept: OTRS accepted. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 16:12, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
René Léraud died in 2010, copyright violation. 86.249.238.223 20:11, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
This portrait is not supposed to be from René Léraud. It is from René Léraud.
I am his grand son. And his heir. René Léraud gave me this portait. It is 100% similar to his face in 1946. And now located in Paris. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Qp37 (talk • contribs) 19:43, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Autoportrait_René_Léraud.jpg” under ticket:2020050610007561. Ìch heiss Nat ùn ìch redd e wenig Elsässisch!Talk to me in EN, FR, PL, GSW-FR(ALS). 03:59, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept: OTRS accepted. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 16:12, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
Copyrighted toy. FunkMonk (talk) 08:38, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:07, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
Copyrighted toy. FunkMonk (talk) 08:38, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:07, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
Copyrighted toy. FunkMonk (talk) 08:38, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:07, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
Copyrighted toy. FunkMonk (talk) 08:39, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:07, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
Copyrighted toy. FunkMonk (talk) 08:39, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:07, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
File:Parco Natura Viva - Bussolengo, Verona, Italy (www.parconaturaviva.it) - panoramio (10).jpg
[edit]_-_panoramio_(10).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_panoramio_(10).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Models in Italy which does not have freedom of panorama. FunkMonk (talk) 08:41, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:05, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
Models in Italy which does not have freedom of panorama. FunkMonk (talk) 08:42, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:05, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
Models in Sweden which does not have freedom of panorama. FunkMonk (talk) 08:43, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:05, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
Models in Sweden which does not have freedom of panorama. FunkMonk (talk) 08:43, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:05, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
Obviously not own work, historical photo. Regasterios (talk) 09:02, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Also:
- File:Szabó Erzsébet 23 évesen.jpg (made in 1953)
- File:Karácsonyi pásztorjáték 1954-ben a napközi otthonban.JPG (made in 1954)
--Regasterios (talk) 09:07, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:05, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Cuatro Remos as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: No EXIF, unlikely own work
Converted by me to regular DR, as no convincing evidence for a copyvio. Neither Google-Images search nor TinEye did yield any hits. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:47, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: PCP. Used as part of a poster on March 2 https://www.facebook.com/1554694261465983/photos/a.1554769084791834/2473655479569852/?type=3&theater - only upload of user - unlikely to be own work. --Gbawden (talk) 11:12, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by The bellman (talk · contribs)
[edit]These have no useful description or categories. They are very low quality. I think they are not useful for any educational purpose on both grounds.
. Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:13, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Agreed. Also, no evidence of free license (but this possibly can be omitted per granndfathering). Ankry (talk) 08:50, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:05, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
copyvio, artist born in 1936, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 11:28, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:04, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
copyvio, artist born in 1936, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 11:28, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:04, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
copyvio, artist born in 1936, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 11:29, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:04, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
das ist Falsche bild Nazar-wellness (talk) 12:21, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:04, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
This is a copyrightable poster, and there is no freedom of panorama in Estonia. So we cannot keep this derivative photo. De728631 (talk) 13:16, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete, see also: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Avjoska. --VLu (talk) 12:12, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:04, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
Source says that the photo is from a forum www.skyscrapercity.com. There's no indication that this it was published under this license. KeepingWikiClean (talk) 15:27, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:03, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
Historical newspaper. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:36, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:03, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
There's no indication that it was published under this license. KeepingWikiClean (talk) 15:41, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:03, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
There's no indication that it was published under this license. KeepingWikiClean (talk) 15:42, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:03, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
There's no indication that it was published under this license. KeepingWikiClean (talk) 15:43, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:03, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
There's no indication that it was published under this license. KeepingWikiClean (talk) 15:44, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:03, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
Trademarked logo & not enough simple for {{PD-trivial}} Otourly (talk) 16:24, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:02, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by علاء as no permission (No permission since) Regasterios (talk) 16:38, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Not own work. --Gbawden (talk) 11:02, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
Needs replacing on the Bari page. It does not give a fair representation of the tribe. It ridicules the whole tribe. The Austro Hungarian citizen (Austrian) Richard Buchta did photograph a nude musician in 1879. Such a picture should best be used in a historical context, not as a representation of a tribal group. It does not in anyway whatsoever give a representation of the tribe as we see it today. A facial portrait with head gear, which is also available in Buchta's collection would be appropriate, and fair. I cannot rely on this page to teach a class about this ethnic group. It ridicules the tribe. Respect the tribe and respect the students or anyone who would be reading about the people. Danlop017 (talk) 17:40, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 11:01, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
COM:DW of a copyrighted work. Yuraily Lic (talk) 17:42, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:00, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This picture is personnal and represent a member of my family. It was published without any consent whereas I am the copyright owner. We ask you please to delete it from wikipedia. Sofiaaspe (talk) 11:38, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
- Keep This is not a valid reason for asking for deletion. --Shev123 (talk) 12:22, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
- So this could mean "copyright owner requests deletion of his/her image uploaded by another unauthorised person without consent" but it could equally be "random family member requests deletion of photo correctly uploaded and licensed by copyright owner". Keep per lack of clear rationale. Prince of Thieves (talk) 11:46, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 23:50, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
Publication of a private picture of a member of my family without consent of the subject and the author. Infringment of the photographer right on its picture. 85bakerstreet (talk) 18:12, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Not a valid reason for deletion. --Shev123 (talk) 20:10, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- Why the fact that this private picture was illegaly published without any consent of the photographer is not considered as "as valid reason for deletion" ? It is an intellectual property infringement punishable by law. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85bakerstreet2 (talk • contribs) 16:45, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Legally valid. Deletion. --Jamespaultaa
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 11:00, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
Copyright violation ( https://www.bravo-jet.com/ ) Basileús (LeContributeurParisien) (talk) 20:24, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
This user is using a photography from a website, which copyrighted it materials : https://www.bravo-jet.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/aeroport-dAlger-intern2.jpg
--Basileús (LeContributeurParisien) (talk) 20:26, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
-2020-04-18T20:24:00.000Z-File:Pr_img_alger3.jpg){kind=link}
-2020-04-18T20:26:00.000Z-File:Pr_img_alger3.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:00, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
Logo of a football club, no simple geometric shapes. KeepingWikiClean (talk) 15:10, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Yes, logo of a historical, non-existent football club. So? (There are thousands active clubs logos in the wiki - chase NFL, NHL logos etc. and dont waste my time). This logo was drawn by artist who give license to use it on wiki IjonTihy (talk) 15:46, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: no OTRS confirmation yet. --JuTa 03:42, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Looking at the file history, this has been made redundant by Template:On Wikidata. Now it's only being misused to create inappropriate autobiographies by users thinking they're on Wikipedia. Would recommend substituting all uses before deletion. BevinKacon (talk) 16:02, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- Just a note: I didn't create this template. I was just apparently the last person to edit it on enwiki before Sreejithk2000 imported it here, and for some reason the software credits me for it. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 16:50, 18 April 2020 (UTC)- @Ahecht: It's possible to import only the latest revision or all of the history in MediaWiki, and Sreejithk2000 decided to use the former (maybe so that the history won't get too big I guess), which is why the template's local history here lists your edit as the first revision. pandakekok9 12:05, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept: heavily in use mainly on user pages. --JuTa 08:34, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
The author is unknown, the date of death of the author is unknown, the date of publication is unknown: the license status of the image is unknown. — Ирука13 05:03, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- You know {{PD-RusEmpire}}? --A.Savin 13:48, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
- Yes. — Ирука13 13:50, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
- Fine. Keep --A.Savin 13:55, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
- On what basis? — Ирука13 14:04, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
- So difficult to understand? Russian Empire had no copyright limitations and only the Soviets joined the Berne Convention about 1918. (And apart from that, the likelihood that the photographer of this 1900s street scene has not been dead for 70 years yet, is near zero anyway.) Commons doesn't delete Russian Empire pictures made before 1917. --A.Savin 14:16, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
- Commons doesn't delete Russian Empire pictures
madewas published before 1917. — Ирука13 14:19, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
- Commons doesn't delete Russian Empire pictures
- So difficult to understand? Russian Empire had no copyright limitations and only the Soviets joined the Berne Convention about 1918. (And apart from that, the likelihood that the photographer of this 1900s street scene has not been dead for 70 years yet, is near zero anyway.) Commons doesn't delete Russian Empire pictures made before 1917. --A.Savin 14:16, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
- On what basis? — Ирука13 14:04, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
- Fine.
- Yes. — Ирука13 13:50, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
Kept: PD-RusEmpire. --Anatoliy (talk) 17:24, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
not own, this deviant work, don't identification author or source Чорний Кіт (talk) 07:43, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Anatoliy (talk) 17:26, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Logo of a football club, no simple geometric shapes. KeepingWikiClean (talk) 15:10, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Anatoliy (talk) 17:25, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Logo of a sports club, no simple geometric shapes. KeepingWikiClean (talk) 15:14, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:43, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
Logo of a sports club, no simple geometric shapes. KeepingWikiClean (talk) 15:14, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:43, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
Logo of a sports club, no simple geometric shapes. KeepingWikiClean (talk) 15:17, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:43, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
Logo of a sports club, no simple geometric shapes. KeepingWikiClean (talk) 15:17, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:44, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
Perché non rispecchia davvero l'immagine del prodotto "Mandorlato". Posso farvi avere 'reali' immagini. Ditemi come posso fare per inviarle. Grazie 94.166.220.213 15:20, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:43, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
Not the uploader’s own work. Same photo has been at https://locomotive.fandom.com/wiki/Class_962_Shinkansen since 2017. Ytoyoda (talk) 15:22, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- If that's the case then there may be a copyright issue in which case it should be deleted and a substitute should be found. If there is no copy rights issue, then it should be kept. Peter Horn (talk) 17:12, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:44, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
Logo of a football club, no simple geometric shapes. KeepingWikiClean (talk) 15:23, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:45, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
a CreativeCommons licence for a document from... 1919?! — danyele 00:00, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- The original document should be in the public domain in the United States. It probably is in Italy too: Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Italy. If someone can confirm that the Società Ginnastica Andrea Doria is a non-profit society, then Template:PD-ItalyGov could apply. --MarioGom (talk) 20:30, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:45, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Apple Inc. software logos
[edit]Seems to be above COM:TOO US
- File:Apple-swift-logo.png
- File:Swift logo with text.svg
- File:Swift logo.png
- File:Swift logo.svg
- File:סוויפט - לוגו.jpg
Jonteemil (talk) 02:42, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- Although borderline, I think this logo is a bit too simple to be above COM:TOO US as a shillouette of a swallow lacking significant gradients/shadows.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 17jiangz1 (talk • contribs) 10:43, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
- Copyright office ruled File:CarCreditCity.png to be below the TOO but a slightly more complex version was ruled to be above. These logos are according to me more than slightly more complex than File:CarCreditCity.png, hence they are above the TOO.Jonteemil (talk) 20:14, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:45, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
This mosque is not an institution, it's just a building. Thus the criteria stated here is not met.--BSRF (talk) 07:30, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Could be valid if the mosque hosts an artwork collection, but currently unused. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:46, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
Not clear if this is displayed inside or outside; if inside, it wouldn't qualify for FoP exemption. Out of scope as a cut-off photgraph of an information display which shows widely known information, and therefore has little educational purpose. Buidhe (talk) 07:48, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:48, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
Models in Italy which does not have freedom of panorama. FunkMonk (talk) 08:40, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:55, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 153.169.18.49 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.humanswin.com/hwartists
Converted by me to regular, to allow for discussion. Image was uploaded to :en in 2012. External hit is undated. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:39, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- This photo was uploaded first by Smba44 at en:wp who has a long history of copyvios. This photo is low-resolution and without EXIF data. --AFBorchert (talk) 16:12, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- Whoever the uploader was, they left Stacy Shwartz's name which allowed me to find where the image was first(?) posted, the author's website (click the Portraits link and scroll about 25 images in; direct link here). This version of the image has some EXIF data indicating it was scanned which makes sense considering the character of the blur in the photo and the small white strip at the top left. However, the image was created in 2011 (before first being uploaded to English Wikipedia in 2012, after which point I migrated it over to Commons) yet the date for the photo given in the description is 2010 which makes me wonder if the uploader is also the photographer? Her email is listed at her site if anyone wants to reach out. Bobamnertiopsis (talk) 21:50, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:54, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
Old writing not allowed anymore of puer https://www.lod.lu/?PUER3 Soued031 (talk) 11:22, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:58, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
Logo of a football club, no simple geometric shapes. KeepingWikiClean (talk) 15:07, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Keep I think this is a very simple logo. --Regasterios (talk) 15:26, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- Comment I think it's below COM:TOO US, but I'm not sure about Poland: "Polish copyright law has quite a long tradition of setting the threshold rather low, which may encourage frivolous lawsuits forcing courts to ponder whether simple graphic designs, short lines of text or even names should or should not be protected by copyright law". Ahmadtalk 20:40, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:55, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
Logo of a football club, no simple geometric shapes. KeepingWikiClean (talk) 15:07, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:55, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
Logo of a football club, no simple geometric shapes, copy of File:Legia Warszawa.svg KeepingWikiClean (talk) 15:08, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:55, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
Logo of a football club, no simple geometric shapes. KeepingWikiClean (talk) 15:10, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- But it's not fake svg. I made it few years ago, this shape is like it is probably because of my technique at that time. There's no another logo of the club. Batorry (talk) 16:24, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:56, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
Logo of a football club, no simple geometric shapes. KeepingWikiClean (talk) 15:10, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:56, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
Logo of a football club, no simple geometric shapes. KeepingWikiClean (talk) 15:11, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:56, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
COM:FOP Argentina (1971) — Ирука13 15:13, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 07:09, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
COM:FOP Argentina (1977) — Ирука13 15:13, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Oppose This is a baseless request. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sanya3 (talk • contribs) 02:52, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 07:18, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Not PD according to Russian copyright.[8] FunkMonk (talk) 10:13, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:39, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Not PD according to Russian copyright.[9] FunkMonk (talk) 10:13, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:39, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Not PD according to Russian copyright.[10] FunkMonk (talk) 10:13, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:39, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No FoP in Georgia (2007) — Ирука13 15:08, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:39, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
No FoP in Georgia (2007) — Ирука13 15:08, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:39, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
No FoP in Georgia (2007) — Ирука13 15:10, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:40, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
Logo of a football club, no simple geometric shapes. KeepingWikiClean (talk) 15:22, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- Keep The logo is including the insignia of Wülflingen, which is an official work, the rest are simple shapes. Fundriver (talk) 23:57, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
- Info: This file was initially tagged by Glorious 93 as Copyvio (copyvio), another deletion request with the rationale „NOT a simple logo. Still under copyrights by its rightful owner.“ was merged into this one. Fundriver (talk) 19:19, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Per fundriver. --Gbawden (talk) 09:41, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
Logo of a football club, no simple geometric shapes. KeepingWikiClean (talk) 15:22, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- Keep The logo is including the insignia of Wülflingen, which is an official work, the rest are simple shapes. Fundriver (talk) 23:57, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
- Info: This file was initially tagged by Glorious 93 as Copyvio (copyvio), another deletion request with the rationale „NOT a simple logo. Still under copyrights by its rightful owner.“ was merged into this one. Fundriver (talk) 19:19, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:42, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works from music. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:40, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:41, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
Official symbol. Proper license tag should be used if in public domain.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:02, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- The first file is updated with proper licensing tags. The second one may be deleted. Edits12pm (talk) 10:04, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
Delete until evidence is provided that this logo is more than 60 years old, in order to satisfy the requirements of {{PD-India}}. The police force itself is quite old, but that does not automatically mean this logo is that old. This could be a modern logo. We need proof. --Hammersoft (talk) 01:42, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:41, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
The author is unknown, the date of death of the author is unknown, the date of publication is unknown - the license status of the image is unknown. — Ирука13 16:51, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- I changed the license. The picture shows a postcard made before 1918. For postcards, the author of the photo is not always given.Magen (talk) 18:43, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Kept: The vast majority of postcards do not have an author listed, so they can be safely treated as anonymous. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:41, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
copyvio, artwork from 1993, no fop (see https://www.kathwil.ch/kirchen-orte/rickenbach/kirche-st-verena/) Martin Sg. (talk) 17:09, 18 April 2020 (UTC) Diese ganze Diskussion hatten wir bereits einmal und dabei wurde ganz klar belegt, dass Kirchen öffentliche Räume darstellen und die Aufnahme in denselben unter die Panoramafreiheit fällt. Bevor Du da irgendeinen unsinnigen Löschantrag stellst, möchte ich Dich auf die vor fünf Jahren geführten Debatten hinweisen. Der Löschantrag ist selbstverständlich als komplett unsinnig und missbräuchlich abzuweisen. Herzliche Grüsse DidiWeidmann (Diskussion) 18:19, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- PS Kommt noch hinzu, dass ich die Bilder in der katholischen Kirche Rickenbach 2011 mit ausdrücklicher Genehmigung der Pfarrei gemacht hatte, welche die Fotos begrüsst hatte und welche ja im konkreten Fall die Besitzerin der Urheberrechte wäre.DidiWeidmann (talk) 18:44, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- Käme zudem dazu, dass sogar wenn eine Urheberrechtsverletzung vorgelegen hätte, die Publikation dieses Bildes vor mehr als 5 Jahren (defacto 9 Jahren) erfolgt ist. Eine allfällige Urheberrechtsverletzung ist in dieser Zeit nicht geltend gemacht worden. Nach 5 Jahren hat aber die Wikipedia das Urheberrecht nach Schweizer Rechtsverständnis "ersessen". Somit könnte das Bild bleiben, selbst wenn damals die Panoramafreiheit nicht anwendbar gewesen wäre.DidiWeidmann (talk) 18:49, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- Eine "Ersitzung des Urheberrechts" kann ich in meiner Literatur zum Schweizer Urheberrecht nirgends als Konzept finden, wo nimmst du das her? Gestumblindi (talk) 22:21, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
- Käme zudem dazu, dass sogar wenn eine Urheberrechtsverletzung vorgelegen hätte, die Publikation dieses Bildes vor mehr als 5 Jahren (defacto 9 Jahren) erfolgt ist. Eine allfällige Urheberrechtsverletzung ist in dieser Zeit nicht geltend gemacht worden. Nach 5 Jahren hat aber die Wikipedia das Urheberrecht nach Schweizer Rechtsverständnis "ersessen". Somit könnte das Bild bleiben, selbst wenn damals die Panoramafreiheit nicht anwendbar gewesen wäre.DidiWeidmann (talk) 18:49, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- Hallo DidiWeidmann; das Problem mit diesen Innenaufnahmen (betrifft auch Commons:Deletion requests/File:Rickenbach TG katolika preghejo 177.JPG und Commons:Deletion requests/File:Rickenbach TG katolika preghejo 176.JPG) ist halt, dass es in der Schweiz tatsächlich keine Panoramafreiheit für Innenräume gibt; das wird hier genau und mit Belegen aus der Literatur beschrieben ("Following the majority view in the legal literature, freedom of panorama does not apply to interior spaces", beachte die vielen Nachweise in Beleg 14). Es ist also leider das Gegenteil deiner Annahme klar belegt; die juristische Literatur ist da erdrückend eindeutig. Das kannst du auch der deutschen Wikipedia im dritten Absatz dieses Abschnitts entnehmen: "Kirchenräume dürften nach überwiegender Ansicht aber nicht mehr erfasst sein" (von der Panoramafreiheit). Somit würde ich selber nie Aufnahmen von Innenräumen (eben auch nicht aus Kirchen) hochladen, deren Urheber vor weniger als 70 Jahren gestorben ist. Commons akzeptiert keine geschützten Werke ohne ausdrückliche Freigabe der Rechteinhaber; da reicht es nicht, wenn der Pfarrer die Erlaubnis gibt, der ja üblicherweise nichts mit den Rechten an den Bildern in "seiner" Kirche zu tun hat. Im Falle dieser Kirche ist die Ausstattung wohl grösstenteils alt genug, um gemeinfrei zu sein, bis auf das Bild von 1993 an der Chorwand... eine Lösung wäre es eventuell, dieses Bild unkenntlich zu machen, dann könnten die Fotografien behalten wären, aber unschön wäre das auch. Eine weitere Möglichkeit wäre es, sich per COM:DM auf den Standpunkt zu stellen, dass das Bild auf der Chorwand unvermeidliches "Beiwerk" einer Innenaufnahme der Kirche, aber nicht das eigentliche Motiv sei... Gestumblindi (talk) 22:15, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
- Summary in English for two possibilities to keep this and the other two images nominated by Martin Sg.: We could either obscure/blur the copyrighted 1993 painting in the apse, or we could argue that it falls under COM:DM as part of the interior of a church that it is otherwise most likely out of copyright due to age, as the church was built in 1845. There is no freedom of panorama for interior spaces in Switzerland in any case, as thoroughly referenced at Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Switzerland#Freedom_of_panorama (see the literature in reference 14). Gestumblindi (talk) 22:20, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
- Selbst, wenn Du mit Deinen Ausführungen (Du schreibst "nach überwiegender Ansicht" tatsächlich Recht hättest, so solltest Du endlich einmal zur Kenntnis nehmen, dass es in der Schweiz bisher kein einziges Gerichtsurteil, dass Deine Ansicht stützt. Was die Rechte anbelangt, so hat der Urheber diese im konkreten Fall mit dem Werkvertrag, der Kirche übertragen und diese ist wiederum eine öffentlich-rechtliche Körperschaft. Was meine Fotos anbelangt, so habe ich diese grundsätzlich im Einverständnis mit den entsprechenden Kirchgemeinden gemacht. Dazu kommt im konkreten Fall dazu, dass diese Bilder bereits für 9 Jahren (also 2011) mit einer GNU-Lizenz (wohl verstanden im Einverständnis mit der Kirchgemeinde als Inhaberin der Rechte und mit deren Wissen hochgeladen wurde). Nebst dem Urheberrecht kommt nun für alle Bilder die bereits seit mehr als 5 Jahren hochgeladen sind ein völlig anderer Passus zur Anwendung: Wikimedia konnte ja bisher in gutem Glauben davon ausgehen, dass die Bilder rechtmässig hochgeladen worden sind. Wenn nun mehr als 5 Jahre niemand allfällige Rechte geltend gemacht hat, dann hat inzwischen Wikimediea die Rechte ersessen! Somit kannst Du Dir zumindest für jene Bilder, die bereits seit mehr als fünf Jahren hochgeladen sind, jede weitere (doch ziemlich absurde Massnahme ersparen). - Bei neuen Bildern können wir die Rechtslage dann problemlos erneut klären.77.56.67.98 18:26, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
- Im vorliegenden konkreten Fall kommt übrigens noch ein weiterer Faktor hinzu: Die Skulptur, die Du hier monierst (der ganze Rest ist ja mehrere Jahrhunderte alt und fällt damit sowieso nicht unter das Urheberrecht) ist durch die geöffnete Eingangstüre zu sehen und die meisten der Bilder sind sogar genau aus dieser Perspektive geschossen (also von ausserhalb der Kirche vom öffentlichen Platz aus - gilt auf jeden Fall für das Bild 175, aber (wenn ich mich richtig entsinne) auch für die Bilder 176 und 177 - nur das Bild 181 entstand im Innern der Kirche), die fallen also gar nicht unter die Diskussion. 77.56.67.98 18:26, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
- Fazit: Ich bitte darum, diesen Löschantrag als überflüssig zu stornieren!77.56.67.98 18:26, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
- Im vorliegenden konkreten Fall kommt übrigens noch ein weiterer Faktor hinzu: Die Skulptur, die Du hier monierst (der ganze Rest ist ja mehrere Jahrhunderte alt und fällt damit sowieso nicht unter das Urheberrecht) ist durch die geöffnete Eingangstüre zu sehen und die meisten der Bilder sind sogar genau aus dieser Perspektive geschossen (also von ausserhalb der Kirche vom öffentlichen Platz aus - gilt auf jeden Fall für das Bild 175, aber (wenn ich mich richtig entsinne) auch für die Bilder 176 und 177 - nur das Bild 181 entstand im Innern der Kirche), die fallen also gar nicht unter die Diskussion. 77.56.67.98 18:26, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
- Selbst, wenn Du mit Deinen Ausführungen (Du schreibst "nach überwiegender Ansicht" tatsächlich Recht hättest, so solltest Du endlich einmal zur Kenntnis nehmen, dass es in der Schweiz bisher kein einziges Gerichtsurteil, dass Deine Ansicht stützt. Was die Rechte anbelangt, so hat der Urheber diese im konkreten Fall mit dem Werkvertrag, der Kirche übertragen und diese ist wiederum eine öffentlich-rechtliche Körperschaft. Was meine Fotos anbelangt, so habe ich diese grundsätzlich im Einverständnis mit den entsprechenden Kirchgemeinden gemacht. Dazu kommt im konkreten Fall dazu, dass diese Bilder bereits für 9 Jahren (also 2011) mit einer GNU-Lizenz (wohl verstanden im Einverständnis mit der Kirchgemeinde als Inhaberin der Rechte und mit deren Wissen hochgeladen wurde). Nebst dem Urheberrecht kommt nun für alle Bilder die bereits seit mehr als 5 Jahren hochgeladen sind ein völlig anderer Passus zur Anwendung: Wikimedia konnte ja bisher in gutem Glauben davon ausgehen, dass die Bilder rechtmässig hochgeladen worden sind. Wenn nun mehr als 5 Jahre niemand allfällige Rechte geltend gemacht hat, dann hat inzwischen Wikimediea die Rechte ersessen! Somit kannst Du Dir zumindest für jene Bilder, die bereits seit mehr als fünf Jahren hochgeladen sind, jede weitere (doch ziemlich absurde Massnahme ersparen). - Bei neuen Bildern können wir die Rechtslage dann problemlos erneut klären.77.56.67.98 18:26, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per Gestumblindi. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 21:09, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
copyvio, artwork from 1993, no fop (see https://www.kathwil.ch/kirchen-orte/rickenbach/kirche-st-verena/) Martin Sg. (talk) 17:10, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Diese ganze Diskussion hatten wir bereits einmal und dabei wurde ganz klar belegt, dass Kirchen öffentliche Räume darstellen und die Aufnahme in denselben unter die Panoramafreiheit fällt. Bevor Du da irgendeinen unsinnigen Löschantrag stellst, möchte ich Dich auf die vor fünf Jahren geführten Debatten hinweisen. Der Löschantrag ist selbstverständlich als komplett unsinnig und missbräuchlich abzuweisen. Herzliche Grüsse DidiWeidmann (Diskussion) 18:19, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- PS Kommt noch hinzu, dass ich die Bilder in der katholischen Kirche Rickenbach 2011 mit ausdrücklicher Genehmigung der Pfarrei gemacht hatte, welche die Fotos begrüsst hatte und welche ja im konkreten Fall die Besitzerin der Urheberrechte wäre.DidiWeidmann (talk) 18:44, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- Käme zudem dazu, dass sogar wenn eine Urheberrechtsverletzung vorgelegen hätte, die Publikation dieses Bildes vor mehr als 5 Jahren (defacto 9 Jahren) erfolgt ist. Eine allfällige Urheberrechtsverletzung ist in dieser Zeit nicht geltend gemacht worden. Nach 5 Jahren hat aber die Wikipedia das Urheberrecht nach Schweizer Rechtsverständnis "ersessen". Somit könnte das Bild bleiben, selbst wenn damals die Panoramafreiheit nicht anwendbar gewesen wäre.DidiWeidmann (talk) 18:48, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Comment Please see my comments at the related deletion request Commons:Deletion requests/File:Rickenbach TG katolika preghejo 181.JPG. Gestumblindi (talk) 22:24, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
- Siehe meine Antwort ebendaa! Kommt noch zusätzlich dazu, dass obiges Bild vom Eingang aus aufgenommen wurde - durch die offene Tür, also einem Ort der unter die Panoramafreiheit fällt!77.56.67.98 18:30, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per Gestumblindi. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 21:09, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
copyvio, artwork from 1993, no fop (see https://www.kathwil.ch/kirchen-orte/rickenbach/kirche-st-verena/) Martin Sg. (talk) 17:11, 18 April 2020 (UTC) Diese ganze Diskussion hatten wir bereits einmal und dabei wurde ganz klar belegt, dass Kirchen öffentliche Räume darstellen und die Aufnahme in denselben unter die Panoramafreiheit fällt. Bevor Du da irgendeinen unsinnigen Löschantrag stellst, möchte ich Dich auf die vor fünf Jahren geführten Debatten hinweisen. Der Löschantrag ist selbstverständlich als komplett unsinnig und missbräuchlich abzuweisen. Herzliche Grüsse DidiWeidmann (Diskussion) 18:19, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- PS Kommt noch hinzu, dass ich die Bilder in der katholischen Kirche Rickenbach 2011 mit ausdrücklicher Genehmigung der Pfarrei gemacht hatte, welche die Fotos begrüsst hatte und welche ja im konkreten Fall die Besitzerin der Urheberrechte wäre.DidiWeidmann (talk) 18:44, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- Käme zudem dazu, dass sogar wenn eine Urheberrechtsverletzung vorgelegen hätte, die Publikation dieses Bildes vor mehr als 5 Jahren (defacto 9 Jahren) erfolgt ist. Eine allfällige Urheberrechtsverletzung ist in dieser Zeit nicht geltend gemacht worden. Nach 5 Jahren hat aber die Wikipedia das Urheberrecht nach Schweizer Rechtsverständnis "ersessen". Somit könnte das Bild bleiben, selbst wenn damals die Panoramafreiheit nicht anwendbar gewesen wäre.DidiWeidmann (talk) 18:49, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Comment Please see my comments at the related deletion request Commons:Deletion requests/File:Rickenbach TG katolika preghejo 181.JPG. Gestumblindi (talk) 22:24, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per Gestumblindi. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 21:09, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Dream out loud as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Official New York City Subway map, copyrighted by the MTA Yann (talk) 17:39, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
- Keep. It is copyrighted by the MTA and also published by the MTA under a free license. See the Source link on the page of the file. Vcohen (talk) 17:52, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
- Keep. There are some rights reserved. The license is a Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic license. It says: "You are free to: Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format; for any purpose, even commercially" under the one condition that it is properly attributed, which it is. This photo was released by the MTA after they put the copyright on all other NYC Subway maps. For this reason, the image can be kept. Epicgenius (talk) 14:03, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- Keep: while other versions of the NYCS map have all rights reserved, this specific version was released under the stated license by the MTA. It does not constitute a copyright violation. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 17:55, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Flickr account is MTA, with free license. Yann (talk) 11:22, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
While its true that the original version of this file was uploaded to Flickr by the MTA under an acceptable license, it has since been overwritten by a variety of clearly copyrighted images, and a quick Google search shows that the MTA considers their map copyrighted. Personally, I'm not a lawyer and know little about NY State laws, however its clear the current license is inaccurate for this version of the file. EoRdE6(Come Talk to Me!) 19:39, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- That means that I was right when I was trying to revert the file to its original version (there are two such attempts in the file history). There must be a way to avoid changes in licensed maps. Vcohen (talk) 19:49, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- Keep: Well then let me inform you that copyright law covers changes like these minor adjustments. This has been discussed before. Why do you even care about this? If MTA had a problem with it they'd reach out. It really is not a significant enough derivative to be in copyright. ɱ (talk) 19:54, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- "Why do you even care about this? If MTA had a problem with it they'd reach out." You well know that has never been how Commons works, we don't wait for the copyright holder to come complain. And if you could point me to where copyright law lets you take a completely different image from someone because they released a similar one without copyright that would be great. EoRdE6(Come Talk to Me!) 20:02, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- "Completely different image"??? It's exactly the same graphic, released under CC BY, just with minor service changes, meaning really only a few small lines have been changed. This isn't a different enough image, a substantially different work, to warrant a new license. ɱ (talk) 22:01, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- The burden of proof lies on you, in stating your claim of copyright violation, to back up your claims. Show me the legal code that describes the level of alterations necessary to issue a completely different copyright statement. Because as far as I've found, if the original is so similar to the reproduction that it can easily be thought of as the same image, you cannot issue a new or different license for it. ɱ (talk) 22:06, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- "The burden of proof lies on you, in stating your claim of copyright violation, to back up your claims." The new image very clearly says "© 2019 MTA", there's my claim of copyright violation. EoRdE6(Come Talk to Me!) 22:30, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- Also because the original image was CC by 2.0, not CC by SA, meaning any adaptation to the original work could be licensed or copyrighted differently. CC by SA 2.0 would allow what you are referring to. EoRdE6(Come Talk to Me!) 22:35, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- Great, you proved the MTA is inconsistent with their licensing but you'll find that lots of places. All of the flickr photos are CC BY, yet all their images posted on the website or Instagram have no such license statement, sometimes even a blanket All Rights Reserved. This is not the evidence you need, which I was referring to - that this is enough of a change to warrant a new license. ɱ (talk) 23:00, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- @EoRdE6: By the way, that is a misunderstanding of SA - the copyright holder (MTA) can always do whatever they want. What SA means is that other people can only release derivatives under the same license, absent special permission from the copyright holder. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:13, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
- Keep but revert to free version. That should solve any copyright issues. epicgenius (talk) 20:56, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- Keep as is. Per Ɱ. Minor update revisions do not render a change in the copyright sufficient to invalidate the license. oknazevad (talk) 21:53, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- Interesting argument. That this seems to have escalated quickly suggests there may be some backstory to the nomination, but I'm interested in the argument itself. My default would be "new publication of different creative work = new evidence required". But if we reduce the keep argument here, what if the MTA released the same image in a different resolution? Or just increased the size of the font? Or fixed a misspelling? Seems like that would be unlikely to raise red flags (maybe I'm mistaken). Not going to weigh in with a !vote at this time, but I've mentioned it at VPC here: Commons:Village_pump/Copyright#New_license_needed_for_updated_version_of_the_same_map? — Rhododendrites talk | 22:29, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- Here's some evidence that there needs to be a significant difference between the files in order to license it separately. en:Rogers v. Koons, a US copyright case, set a precedent that the works need to be different enough so that the average person would recognize the copying (basically verbatim from the article). The images in question are vastly different, and yet they were deemed similar enough to still be in the original copyright. Yes this is not an exact parallel, but that's incredibly unlikely to find. It shows, however, that small changes like some expected reroutes are definitely minor enough to retain the original copyright statement. ɱ (talk) 23:05, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- The argument to keep is certainly a novel argument, but I think it is misguided. The "substantial similarity" test is used to determine if one work is a derivative of another work. Applying the "substantial similarity" test to the images shows us that yes, the new map is a derivative work of the old map. All that says is that the new map contains copyrightable authorship from the old map and does not tell us anything about the overall copyright status of the new map. Because a derivative work contains the original authorship and the new authorship, the copyright status of both the original work and the changes determine the copyright status of the overall work. The original work was released under the CC-BY-2.0 license and is freely license. There is no evidence that the changes were released under such a license.
Without evidence of a free license, we must consider if the changes are trivial (de minimis) or below the threshold of originality. The Compendium of US Copyright Office Practices § 919 provides some guidance here. Overlaying the two maps shows the extension of the 7 to 34 St Hudson Yds, transit connections incl. at 207 St, the Second Avenue Subway project, small changes to labels, changes to the basemap including the removal of streets in Brooklyn and the Bronx, changes to bus services near LaGuardia, and a revision to the legend. The basemap road deletions are inconsequential, and can probably be ignored. The changes to label positioning, like the hypothetical changes Rhododendrites mentions, are certainly below the threshold of originality, so they get ignored too. The changes to the transit information, including the legend, can't be ignored as de minimis, as they're the central focus of the map. That leaves originality. I would say that the changes to the legend are likely to be above the threshold on their own. As for the actual map changes, the Copyright Office says A derivative map may be eligible for registration if the author added a sufficient amount of new authorship to the preexisting material, such as creative depictions of new roads, historical landmarks, or zoning boundaries. The new map contains more than a few additions, and I believe that they are original and substantial enough to be copyrightable. Because the new map is not completely covered by free licenses, it is non-free and unsuitable for Commons. Unless evidence is provided that the MTA has released the new map under a free license, the file should be reverted and the intervening revisions deleted. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 01:30, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
- Keep and revert: While there may be an interesting and complicated question of copyright law here, there is a very simple question of Commons policy. Commons:Overwriting files says that if someone thinks that an update isn't a minor update, they can revert it and the reversion should be honoured. Here, Vcohen has (repeatedly) reverted to the original version. If Ɱ and others wish to upload the new version, they should do so under a different filename. Once the file has been reverted, it can obviously be kept. --bjh21 (talk) 10:23, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
- Keep and downsample to the same size as the original because the latest version is higher resolution than the original. While the Creative Commons people believe that their license applies to the "work" and cannot be restricted based on resolution, we as a community have largely decided to ignore that advice per COM:PRP. In terms of the differences in substance, I think the changes to the map itself are below COM:TOO. The changes in the lines, I feel, are merely mechanical changes that can be inferred from the creative choices taken from the rest of the map. The legend is a bigger change, but it appears to be a mere restatement of facts without much creativity in either the wording or the layout. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:10, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
Kept: The 2013 version is unquestionably available under the CC license. More recent versions are not; even if the changes from the 2013 version are minor, the MTA claims copyright on them. The safest course of action, and the one that seems to best fit consensus here, is to revert the file to the 2013 version. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:55, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
in der Quelle https://vier-jahreszeiten.de ist nirgendwo etwas von CC-Lizenz zu finden. 213.225.14.141 21:21, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:58, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
