User talk:Polimerek

atrapa pieca Scheiblera

Witam :) zwróciłem uwagę na tytuł tego zdjęcia: Muzeum kinematografii atrapa pieca Sheiblera.jpg Proponuję zmienić - o ile to możliwe - na: "Muzeum Kinematografii piec w pałącu K. Scheiblera". Ja pod słowem "atrapa" rozumiem, że jest to niefunkcjonalny zamiennik, kopia, co w tym przypadku jest mylne, bo jest, a moze do tej pory jest, piec jak najbardziej użytkowy. Fakt, używa się słowa "atrapa", np. na określenie przodu maski auta. Aha, czy mógłby Pan podmienić mój mylny podpis w plikach: File:Lodz mozaika Salviateego w palacu K. Scheiblera.2.jpg i File:Lodz mozaika Salviateego w palacu K. Scheiblera.1.jpg. Nazwisko winno brzmieć "Salviati" !!!! A daloby to radę jeszcze skategoryzować? Auslodz (talk) 08:02, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:WM Pl board meeting 2006 3.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:WM Pl board meeting 2006 3.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}} to release it under the GFDL or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Rüdiger Wölk 06:12, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Biuret.png

Please do not change the license when uploading files from other Wikis to Commons. --gildemax 13:16, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Wikimania_2006_Parry.jpg

Thanks for taking that picture - I neglected to take one of my own. I hope you enjoyed the presentation. :-) GreenReaper 03:56, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your lecture was very interesting. I have one more picture of you. See:

http://www.poli.toya.net.pl/Wikimania_2006_galeria/pages/100-0070_IMG.html

Fill free to copy it if you want. --Polimerek

Thanks again! I'll do that. :-) GreenReaper 20:39, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Octan etylu.svg

Poprawione. MesserWoland COM PL 10:34, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Paris.montparnasse.500pix.jpg

Pay attention to copyright

Image:Paris.montparnasse.500pix.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Petrusbarbygere 06:45, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Chatzilla start.png

Image deletion warning

Image:Chatzilla start.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

--Damian Yerrick (☎) 16:28, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion

I have proposed at least one image you uploaded for deletion at Commons:Deletion requests/Images of skyscrapers in France. Jackaranga 22:25, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Polypterus species

The label on the tank said P. weeksii, but it wouldn't be the first time a species was mislabelled. Are the photos detailed enough to allow a precise id? Stan Shebs 14:44, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If he doesn't have any details on how to do species id, then I'd just ignore. Stan Shebs 20:29, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Zdjęcia Kwietniewskiego

On wysłał zgodę na OTRS i potwierdził ją kilka razy drogą mejlową (był też na IRC). Joystick dzwonił też do niego w tej sprawie. Trzeba tam dopisać te dane z OTRS. Pozdrawiam, Szwedzki 12:26, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ech, dla nieobeznanych z internetem starszych gości to jest czarna magia niestety - bardzo źle nam ten system działa. Opisze to chyba na liście wiki ogólnej, bo przy Kwietniewskim w zasadzie wyszły wszystkie błędy. Pozdrawiam, Szwedzki 13:24, 11 June 2008 (UTC) PS: Julo nie umie jeszcze obsługiwać OTRS - szczepan go prosił o pomoc i Julo się poddał Szwedzki 13:25, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Rh catawbiense.jpg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Mifter) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 22:54, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OTRS

Could you please add the proper license to Image:Tworczosc Zdzislaw Beksinski 02.jpg and Image:Tworczosc Zdzislaw Beksinski 003.jpg? I can't read polish, so I don't know which license applies. -- Bryan (talk to me) 13:09, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Grubbs Catalyst 2nd Generation.png

Just so you know, I have added the {{Disputed chem}} tag to Image:Grubbs Catalyst 2nd Generation.png because it contains an incorrect nitrogen heterocycle. Feel free to correct it, or it may be deleted eventually. Thanks. Edgar181 (talk) 15:58, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Image:Zezary Zak.jpg

Niestety, nie mam tu admina, zobacz listę, ABX - (O mnie dyskutuj) 12:17, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Polimerek!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 06:16, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Anna Garwolinska.jpg is uncategorized since 19 February 2009. BotMultichillT 06:16, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Siergii Krasulenko.jpg is uncategorized since 19 February 2009. BotMultichillT 06:16, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Ognisko w Sokolce 4.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Wyrzezbieni w piaskowcu.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Tabela w pigułce 1.PNG was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Commons Upload Wizzard screen 8 pl.png was uncategorized on 10 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 16:25, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Commons Upload Wizzard screen 4 pl.png was uncategorized on 10 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 16:25, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Maciej Kowalewski by Hubert Komerski.jpg was uncategorized on 21 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:30, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Zgoda na publikację

Witam serdecznie

Do autorów dzieł oraz właścicieli praw do zdjęć - następujących osób i instytucji: Henryk Waniek, Paweł Warchoł, Łukasz Mazur, Dom Generalny Zgromadzenia Córek Matki Bożej Bolesnej Krakowie, Komendant Hufca ZHP Oświęcim im. Więźniów Oświęcimia.phm. Marek Tarnowski, Miejska Biblioteka Publiczna w Oświęcimiu, Miejska i Powiatowa Biblioteka Publiczna w Nowym Tomyślu.

wysłałem ponownie (żenujące!) prośbę o ponowne potwierdzenie zgody na wykorzystanie ich dzieł na łamach Wikipedii i przesłanie na adres permissions-commons-pl@wikimedia.org. oświadczenia następującej treści:

OŚWIADCZENIE

Niniejszym zaświadczam, ze jestem twórcą i jedynym właścicielem wyłącznych praw autorskich do PRAC:

Wyrażam zgodę na ich publikację na łamach Wikipedii na licencjach:

GNU Free Documentation License http://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_Free_Documentation_License

Creative Commons http://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creative_Commons

Podpis autora (właściciela)

Skoro wcześniej takiej zgody udzielili, to mam nadzieję, że przez uprzejmość dla mnie niebawem to potwierdzą. Proszę zatem na razie wstrzymać się z kasacją wprowadzonych przeze mnie grafik. A swoją drogą coraz więcej na Wikipedii pojawia się niepotrzebnych zupełnie dla nikogo utrudnień, które nikomu i niczemu nie są potrzebne. Na Wikipedii zaczyna zupełnie niepokojąco, ale wyraźnie, cuchnąć czasami komunistycznej biurokracji. Żenująca jest np. dla mnie prośba o ponowne wyrażenie zgody, bo zmieniły się przepisy i to co było kiedyś już się nie liczy. Jeżeli na Wikipedii „prawo działa wstecz i jest to w porządku” (to cytat jednego z administratorów), zaczynam się zastanawiać i jednocześnie obawiać, czy nie jest to stopniowe dążenie do wprowadzenia kontroli wszystkich i wszystkiego poprzez utworzenie funkcji Generalnego Cenzora Wikipedii. Uważam, że grafiki załadowane kilka lat temu zostały przez kogoś zaakceptowane (zatwierdzone) i trudno nieustannie do nich wracać. Dojdzie do tego, że autor hasła nie będzie chciał bawić się w załatwianie kolejnych potwierdzeń, zwłaszcza u twórców o znanych nazwiskach i nowo powstające hasła pozostaną bez grafik co niewątpliwie znacznie je zuboży.

Mam nadzieję, że przesłane w takiej formie oświadczenia wystarczą i nie będzie potrzeby ich poświadczenia przez notariusza.

Pozdrawiam Andrzej Montezuma (talk) 11:34, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wątpliwości i rozbieżności

Witam

Kilka wątpliwości i rozbieżności:

Jeden z admin. pisał do mnie, że powinienem w szablonie wyrażającym zgodę na publikację, (którego adres mi przesłał: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Szablon_zapytania_o_prawa_autorskie) podać adresy stron na których grafiki się znajdują – wynika z tego że powinny być wcześniej załadowane.

Z tego co Ty piszesz wynika z kolei, że autor np. fotografii wyrażając zgodę powinien wysłać swoje zdjęcia w postaci JPG w celu ich rejestracji na OTRS.

Jak mam rozumieć skasowanie jeszcze przez innego admin. z 13 wstawionych przeze mnie grafik do hasła „Pałac w Kamieńcu (województwo śląskie)” nie wiadomo dlaczego 5. Wszystkie grafiki powstały na bazie współcześnie wykonanych, dobrym aparatem, doskonałej jakości zdjęć, zrobionych tego samego dnia przez tą samą osobę. Wszystkie 13 grafik zostało opisane identycznie i z taką samą licencją. Owemu admin. nie spodobała się Kaplica Pałacowa i Mysia Wieża.

Zgromadzenie Sióstr poprosiłem o zgodę na publikację tylko przez grzeczność – zdjęcia które chciałem wykorzystać na Wikipedii są powszechnie dostępne w publikacjach polskich i zagranicznych, których strony podałem w opisie do zdjęć.

Kto ma udzielić zgody na publikację zdjęcia, którego autora nie da się ustalić, lub zostało ono zrobione na zamówienie.

Jeżeli już liczymy dokładnie i zdjęcie zostało wykonane w 1910 r. a fotograf żył przez dalsze 40, to przeważnie zmarł w 1950 r.

To tylko kilka wybranych wątpliwości i rozbieżności.

Co można o tym sądzić?

Pozdrawiam. Andrzej Montezuma (talk) 15:50, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

konferencja 2009

Jak byś szukał jakiejś kategorii na zdjęcia, to stworzyłem Category:Polish Wikimedia Meetup - Jadwisin 2009

Julo (talk) 10:20, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Witaj! Tak na przyszłość proszę zwracaj uwagę na pole "Author" podczas przesyłania grafik ;-) Przed chwilą poprawiłem 36 plików :) [1] Pozdrawiam, Patrol110 talk 20:48, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nie ma problemu! Polecam się na przyszłość :-) Patrol110 talk 09:49, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Licencja

Na drugi raz jak masz jakieś wątpliwości to możesz się zapytać a nie samowolnie zmieniać licencje moich grafik do których mam pełne prawo autorskie ... [2] Mathiasrex (talk) 16:28, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

To nie jest prosta reprodukcja dwuwymiarowego dzieła. Nigdy nie oznaczam swoich skanów, lub zdjęć reprodukcji w książkach jako własnych fotografii. Portret Bema to zdjęcie, które zrobiłem oryginałowi w muzeum i jako takie jest chronione licencją creative commons tak jak inne zdjęcia autorskie. Zuważ, że np. Adam Bujak robiąc album Madonny Europy, składający się ze zdjęć dwuwymiarowych obrazów Matki Boskiej sprzed XX wieku, nie musiał mieć zgody na zrobienie tych zdjęć ale chroni je swoimi prawami autorskimi.

Co do PD-art to się zgadzam, gdy chodzi o autora obrazu, jednak autorstwo zdjęcia oryginału to dwie różne rzeczy. Już w pierwszym zdaniu jest napisane, że chodzi o uploadowanie zdjęć dwuwymiarowych obrazów, których nie jest się autorem (tych zdjęć oczywiście). In a nutshell, PD-Art may be used by the uploader of a photograph taken by somebody else... Dlatego w ramkach na dole wpisuję autorstwo zdjęcia oryginału, ekspirację praw autorskich autora obrazu i moje creative commons.

Mathiasrex (talk) 20:23, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Całe to zamieszanie wokół licencji nie ma sensu, bo dotyczy ono praw autorskich copyrights, których autor zdjęcia licencji creative commons i tak się zrzeka pod warunkiem podania autorstwa zdjęcia. Ładowanie czyichś zdjęć obrazów co do których prawa autorskie wygasły i ładowanie swoich zdjęć na licencji commons to dwie różne rzeczy. W dodatku The U.S. case of Bridgeman v. Corel dotyczy tylko USA.

A mere mechanical reproduction of some other image, such as an unmodified photocopy or scan of a drawing, cannot attract additional copyright protection over and above that of the original... a fundacja jasno określa WMF's position has always been that faithful reproductions of two-dimensional public domain works of art are public domain, and that claims to the contrary represent an assault on the very concept of a public domain...

Oryginalność własnych reprodukcji mogę łatwo wykazać. Możemy się umówić w Muzeum Wojska Polskiego w Warszawie i pokażę Ci ten portret(Bema) w jakim jest on stanie (lekko wyblakły, zaciemniony werniksem itp.). Wszystkie moje zdjęcia obrazów są przeze mnie modyfikowane tak by cokolwiek było na nich widać i jako takie nie podlegają tym zaleceniom co do niezmodyfikowanych fotokopii.

Mathiasrex (talk) 20:19, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fso polonez sx.jpg

Witam

Chciałbym się dowiedzieć dlaczego jeszcze nie został usunięty szablon informujący o braku źródła zgody autora ? e-mail został wysłany z pozwoleniem 18 czerwca. Fsopolonezcaro rozmowy kontrolowane 19:57, 21 cze 2009 (CEST)

mail został wysałny z pozwoleniem, wiem że autor zdjęcia dostał odpowiedź "dziekujemy za dostarczenie zgody". Fsopolonezcaro rozmowy kontrolowane 17:36, 24 cze 2009 (CEST)

Dobra te zdjęcie można usunąc autora poprosiłem żeby sam je umieścił, i jeszcze proszę o skasowanie tej fotki File:Poldek mr89.jpg --Fsopolonezcaro rozmowy kontrolowane 20:15, 26 cze 2009 (CEST)

File:Radio_Zachód_logo.png

Witam.

Mam problem... Gdy wrzucałem loga różnych firm - nie było problemu, widziałem również, że inni też wrzucają takie rzeczy na commons, ale dziś wrzuciłem logo Radia Zachód i Eusebiusowi coś się nie spodobało. Licencja jest jak najbardziej prawidłowa dla tego typu obrazków, gdyż dokładnie opisuje, jakie są warunki udostępniania znaków towarowych. Nie widzę potrzeby, by w takich sytuacjach uzyskiwać zgodę od firm będących właścicielami tych znaków.

Bardzo proszę o usunięcie tej prośby a także usunięcie zbędnego szablonu na stronie File:Radio_Zachód_logo.png.

Pozdrawiam, Tomem (talk) 16:33, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chearleaders from Sejny 2.jpg, File:Chearleaders from Sejny 1.jpg

Nie są to chearleaderki, a mażoretki. Choć funkcja podobna, to jednak nie to samo. :) Zwiadowca ²¹ 13:29, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Zwiadowca21#wielkosc zdjecia

Chciałbym, żebyś odpowiedział Kerimowi. Ja nie czuję się na siłach, a ty jesteś specjalistą. Zwiadowca ²¹ 20:19, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

dzieki. Tak tez odpowiem moim koleżankom i kolegom z kółka foto.--keriM (talk) 13:32, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Kryszewski.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Kryszewski.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

User:Zscout370 ^{(Return fire)} 19:59, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Beaujolais_Nouveau_bottle.jpg

File:Beaujolais_Nouveau_bottle.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Schlurcher (talk) 12:53, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mass-tagging for Copyvio

Please. Maybe Eugene was wrong in deleting your picture, I do not know. But mass-tagging for copyvio with rationale "Label is probably under copyright, uploader must prove that is not" looks childish to me. There are other ways, such as asking for input at COM:VP or COM:CQ, or opening a Deletion Request. Tagging without discussion when you precisely think this is the wrong way to do it definitely looks like en:WP:POINT to me.

I must say I am very surprised to see such a behaviour from such an experienced contributor (according to your user page, you've clearly been around longer than me and many others).

Sincerly, Jean-Fred (talk) 00:42, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I happen to agree with you about the image, that it was deleted in haste and deserved a discussion. However, it seems like the situation could have been managed better, especially between two longtime Wikimedians. Maybe you can bring it up to COM:UNDEL and we can have a civil discussion about it. Bastique ^demandez 03:24, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, but I have been around for a little while too, and I have my own beliefs about what is « special, common and acceptable behavior ». I happen to have done this once in the past (mass-copyvio tagging, though the circumstances were very different), and have been scolded by two sysops for doing so. And now that I am sysop, I understand why.

Firstly, as clearly stated at CAT:CV and COM:SPEEDY, tagging for copyvio is only for obvious cases. The very fact that you question the Beaujolais file deletion is sufficient to show it is not obvious.

Secondly, if we have to mass-delete all those files, then it is certainly a better idea to list all the suspect files in one dedicated place, rather than to clutter the copyvio category and let maybe ten sysops sort it out.

Per above, I speedy declined what I found and opened a mass-deletion request on Commons:Deletion requests/Wine labels.

I have read your comments on COM:UNDEL. You complain that deletion is random, but you tag tens of files to be handled by different sysops. You complain that sysops judgement call is bad, but you submit files to their judgement. You say that there may be a better picture with deletion of hundreds of files, but still you tag individual files...

Please state your rationale on the Deletion request, feel free to add more files to it. Let's have a civil talk on this.

Sincerly, Jean-Fred (talk) 21:46, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Licencja OTRS

Witaj, czy mogę prosić cię o uzupełnienie licencji OTRS zdjęć, które załadowałem parę miesięcy temu? Wysłałem wówczas (19 listopada 2009) mail z potwierdzeniem licencji, tytuł "[Ticket#2009110810036491] Zezwolenie na opublikowanie zdjęc pod licencją", niestety z jakichś powodów licencje niektórych z tych grafik nie zostały potwierdzone. Wczoraj zwrócił mi na to uwagę Bdk. Jeśli potrzebujesz kopii tego maila chętnie wyślę. Dzięki za pomoc i pozdrawiam, Konradm (talk) 12:24, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bardzo dziękuję. Konradm (talk) 13:46, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sony Librie EBR 1000

File source is not properly indicated: File:Sony Librie EBR 1000.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Sony Librie EBR 1000.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Sony Librie EBR 1000.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

--65.49.2.154 15:10, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Gmina Słaboszów

No tak, masz rację, tyle tylko, że ja skądś wziąłem ten wzór i daję głowę, że źródłem byłą Wikipedia. Był taki plik w artykule (Plik:Gmina Słaboszów.jpg) na licencji PD, ja go tylko zwektoryzowałem. W grudniu dostałem taką informację więc grafikę zdjąłem czekając na właściwy wzór, który miał się pojawić w niedługim czasie. Oczywiście nic nie stoi na przeszkodzie żeby tę grafikę usunąć, bo pewnie poza tarczą, cała reszta będzie inna, więc żaden z niego pożytek. Dziękuję za sygnał i jeśli możesz usuń plik lub oznacz go do usunięcia. Ja ostatnio mam bardzo mało czasu i sił, więc wolę je poświęcić na zrobienie czegoś nowego. Najlepiej byłoby usunąć go z pominięciem procedury, ponieważ wiem, że ona zbyt długo trwa. Pozdrawiam. Bastianow (talk) 16:28, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

brak OTRS

vide [3]. Pozdrawiam JDavid (talk) 12:51, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Łódź

Monitor ustawiony jest OK, większy problem to moja oczy i kiepskie umiejętności jeśli chodzi o obróbkę grafiki :/ Ale spróbuję się poprawić :) Nemo5576 (talk) 12:34, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous photographer working for

W EXIF-ie tego pliku jako autor znajduje się "Igor Miszczk", więc czy powinniśmy to przedstawić jako "Anonymous photographer"? Pozdrawiam JDavid (talk) 07:58, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

W zdjęciu tego artykułu widać, że fotograf to Igor Miszczuk. Pewnie był wynajęty na ten dzień. JDavid (talk) 10:39, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ja je dostałem mejlem (jak od większości kandydatów) i chyba na stronie są w mniejszej rozdzielczości. JDavid (talk) 14:56, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Port Nowa Pasłęka

Witaj. Nie sądziłem, że tak daleko zajedziecie. A czy do portu Nowa Pasłęka też wstąpicie cyknąć fotkę? JDavid (talk) 14:19, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No to dziwne, myślałem, że File:Braniewo Pasleka.jpg to zrobiłeś dzisiaj. Pzdr. JDavid (talk) 14:49, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Back

I've returned back from Serbia, so I continued with work on pictures from Wikiexpedition. For this reason, all files with no categories/description/other info are in this category (I've uploaded yesterday something from Belgrade and Valjevo as well). It is important not to remove this category until the data are inserted, otherwise I would loose touch with how many things I have still to do. I hope the work will be finished till early September. --Aktron (talk) 11:29, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Franciszek Barnert.jpg

Brakuje OTRS, uzupełnij w wolnej chwili.Plushy (talk) 20:41, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Perpetual calendar

Dzień dobry Polimerek, niestety nie mówię po polski, a nie angielski, nie rosyjskim. Spójrz wykonaj następujące czynności: http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%92%D0%B5%D1%87%D0%BD%D1%8B%D0%B9_%D0%BA%D0%B0%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B4%D0%B0%D1%80%D1%8C Tabelle/File: Variante 2, i http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikitable_calendar pozdrawiam Ing.Karl Nimtsch (LenderKarl für deutsche und russische Seiten) --LenderCarl (talk) 08:02, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Source:

The first print was by C.H.Beck-Munic 1992 "Juristenkalender/Steuerberaterkalender". The next print by "Max-Planck-Institut" Heidelberg, see by "Sterne und Weltraum" 5/93. The next print was a poster in special nr.5 from march in year 2000 by "Sterne und Weltraum". I am the dokument for "the first perpedual and permanent calendar" from "Guinnessbuch-Verlag" oct/1998, --LenderKarl (talk) 09:57, 12 February 2011 (UTC) --LenderCarl (talk) 10:23, 12 February 2011 (UTC) --LenderKarl (talk) 15:26, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Pkuczynski/Marek Szczepanek/Signature

Please give a very little more information about the OTRS ticket there. --Martin H. (talk) 12:58, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Zdaje się, że ten ticket to było nieporozumienie, więc wycofałem Twoją edycję. Sp5uhe (talk) 01:43, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Najlepszym rozwiązaniem byłaby chyba bezpośrednia próba pozyskania zgody od autora. Jeśli się uda to ok, a jeśli nie trzeba usunąć fotografie. Takich niedokończonych spraw jest trochę - sprawdzałem zgody na Wikipedii. Powinien się tym zająć ktoś obsługujący OTRS z uprawnieniami admina na Commons. Trzeba popisać maile, podzwonić, poprosić. Zająłbym się tym, ale brak mi uprawnień. W sumie dlatego w 2009 nie pociągnąłem tego wątku. Sp5uhe (talk) 19:27, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wikimedia_Wroclaw_2011_Robert_Niedzwiedzki_2.jpg

File:Wikimedia_Wroclaw_2011_Robert_Niedzwiedzki_2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Robert Niedźwiedzki (talk) 13:26, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re:File:Sasha strunin 2011 (2).jpg

Cześć! Przez kilka dni czekałem na odpowiedź Oddera (obsługiwał pierwsze zdjęcie i wówczas uciął moją wątpliwość odnośnie niepodania nazwiska w zgodzie na udostępnienie zdjęcia). Na początku tygodnia napisałem do autora zdjęcia z informacją. Jeżeli ponownie wyrazi zgodę, to jeszcze raz załaduję zdjęcie. Pozdrawiam, Wiktoryn (talk) 11:47, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Upadek...

Witaj. Nie wiem czy dotarł do Ciebie mój majl, bo ja przesłałem Ci skan tego rysunku wraz z prośbą Wikipedysty o wykonanie tej grafiki w svg. W opisie pliku podałem tytuł i autorkę książki jako podstawę do wykonania tej geafiki. Autora grafiki nie znałem, więc podałem tylko książkę wraz ISBN. Dziwne, że błędów nie zauważył zamawiający i przyznam, że nic już z tego nie pamiątam. No cóż, nie było moim zamiarem przypisywanie sobie autorstwa rysunku poglądowego z tematu, o którym nie mam zielonego pojęcia. Pozdrawiam. Bastianow (talk) 14:37, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No i jeszcze jedno. W końcu nazwisko tej pani widniało w opisie grafiki choć pewnie niezbyt precyzyjnie wskazywało ją jako autorkę. Zobacz wymianę zdań w mojej dyskusji tuż powyżej Twojego wpisu. Tutaj znów oburzony pan poprosił o usunięcie swojego nazwiska jako autora grafiki źródłowej. I bądź tu mądry... Pozdrawiam. Bastianow (talk) 16:24, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A tak nawiasem... Grubosć linii jest w tej grafice obecnie za duża. Bastianow (talk) 16:29, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nice to see you at Wikimania

And perhaps we'll see each other again next year! -Reagle (talk) 15:48, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Lubi Zabytki

Hmm, właśnie patrzę na regulamin i faktycznie... To jest dosyć bez sensu, bo potem to trzeba będzie usuwać te szablony zabytków w przypadku, gdy szablon {{Zabytek}} jest już w kategorii. Nie da się tego naciągnąć na kategorię? Źle to widzę na przyszłość... Yarl ✉ 17:45, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No faktycznie - w takim przypadku rzeczywiście można uznać, że numer zabytku został pośrednio dodany. Trochę głupi zwyczaj jest IMHO z tym przenoszeniem szablonu do kategorii. Jak ktoś np: w Wikipedii kliknie na obrazek to się nie dowie, że przedstawia on chroniony prawem zabytek :-( Polimerek (talk) 19:52, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:AnnaRiveiro1.jpg

[4] (fot. Piotr Szymanik), zatem publikowane gdzie indziej. Chyba, że ticket już wpadł. Masur (talk) 06:19, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

więc zasadniczo nawet jak coś opublikował wcześniej, może i tutaj, skoro to jego twórczość - o ile potwierdzi, że on to on. Dzięki. Masur (talk) 05:45, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished

Dear Polimerek,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help.
You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 00:32, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Biuret.png

File:Biuret.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Leyo 13:48, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Thalidomide_structure.png

File:Thalidomide_structure.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Leyo 23:02, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Praktyk

Spoko, już odblokowuję. Kwestia tylko co do odtwarzania. Możesz mi podrzucić te linijki, które mówią o jakie pliki chodzi? Żebym mógł zerkać na źródła/autora, przy odtwarzaniu. Oraz licencje oczywiście, na jaka się zgadzają? Bo coś mi się wydaje, że dane z opisu będą do poprawy. Masur (talk) 15:00, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Piotr Szulkin 2003.jpg

To sobie zobacz daty szablonu i Twojej odpowiedzi~~, mądralo~~. Herr Kriss (talk) 09:38, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fakt, pewnie masz rację. Zwyczajnie zabolał mnie fakt, że sugerujesz rzeczy, których nie zrobiłem. Herr Kriss (talk) 21:32, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Zobaczę co się da zrobić. Pozdrawiam, Herr Kriss (talk) 21:53, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:GDJ 2010 grupowe 2.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:GDJ 2010 grupowe 2.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Tomasz Wachowski (talk) 20:54, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:GDJ 2010 grupowe 2.jpg

File:GDJ 2010 grupowe 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Tomasz Wachowski (talk) 20:56, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

odp

zgoda jest tylko utrudniasz, jakby zdjęcie pochodziło z sesji Madonny, wymieniłem naście maili żeby uzyskać to zdjęcie, sama autorka też się zgodziła, tylko jak widać ma w dupie tą biurokracje którą uprawiacie skoro nie przesłała jeszcze zgody, ale pewnie tez zgoda byłaby nie pełna bo niby skąd wiadomo że jest autorką zdjęcia i ma do niego prawa, śmiechu wart ten OTRS DingirXul (talk) 21:32, 22 June 2012 (UTC) PS. sam nawet się w mailach nie podpisujesz DingirXul (talk) 21:41, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Amanlostinlife13

W tych skasowanych przeze mnie, jako autora wskazał kolejno: Kizo, S, Suchy (i tylko dlatego wstawiłem do nich "npd"). Biorąc pod uwagę, że raczej uczciwie podaje autorów, to są to kolejne 2-3 osoby od których wypada uzyskać zgodę.

W tych co załadował teraz, sam napisał, że Zdjęcie wcześniej opublikowane na stronie http://www.agrofoto.pl/ i twierdzi, że ma zgodę. Wszędzie, niemniej jednak, wstawił licencję -self. Widzę tu dużo odkręcania. Masur (talk) 05:48, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Scientific journals.jpg

File:Scientific journals.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Antemister (talk) 17:36, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Prawa

Hej! Ustawiłem Ci prawa do edytowania upload campaign. Nawet nie wiedziałem, że można. Możesz mi dać na privie numer do siebie? Bym powiedział co z tą wystawą. Tak w skrócie to z chęcią nas przyjmą, lubią tam wolne licencje, barman z którym gadałem zna ludzi z Wiki i ogólnie ją bardzo popiera, mają osobny pokój na wystawy. Knajpa porządna, są stoły z krzesłami jak i dywan, gdzie można sobie usiąść na rzyci ;) Dużo herbat, dużo piw, ale bez mainstreamowych, tylko te regionalne i zagraniczne, każde kosztuje 2 zł + (rand(5)+1)), czyli rzut kostką ;) Krzysiu (talk) 21:09, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Odpiszesz mi? Dziś byłem tam znowu, zauważyłem, że na ścianach są namalowane grafiki, podpisany jest autor i podpis "CC-BY-SA 3.0". Chyba lepszego miejsca nie może być. Jestem nim zachwycony, wystawa byłaby świetnym pomysłem. Do tego klub jest gay friendly i ogólnie "friendly" dla różnych subkulturowców, geeków itd. Krzysiu (talk) 22:32, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

NTactics

Gotowe. Uzupełnij proszę autora/źródło/licencje wg danych z OTRS. Masur (talk) 06:29, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

BTW, o ile do tych: File:Box stalowej policji.jpg, File:Dodatki do nstactics.jpg PA może mieć wydawca (o ile zlecił wykonanie zdjęcia w pierwszym przypadku), o tyle tutaj: File:Zdjęcie figurek do nstactics.jpg, File:Koksu z NSTactics.jpg coś do powiedzenia ma nie tylko fotograf, ale i malujący figurki, a ostatni wypadek: File:Concept art cyborga.png to już zupełnie nie bardzo wierzę, by PA należały do wydawcy. Co mnie także dziwi, to poza pierwszym przypadkiem, bardzo mały rozmiar i jakość tych zdjęć, tak jakby ładujący nie dysponował oryginałami. Masur (talk) 06:32, 6 September 2012 (UTC) ps. wszystkie te zdjęcia są także szalenei rozpowszechnione w necie, zatem podwójna ostrożność wskazana.[reply]
- Spoko loko - po prostu zwróciłem uwagę, by się przyjrzeć. Masur (talk) 11:14, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kopia obrazu Matejki

Najpierw przerobiłem na regularne deletion, a potem dopiero zobaczyłem Twoją wzmiankę o ewentualności działań prawnych ze strony malarza-kopisty... Jak już wytacza ciężkie działa, to albo podsunąć mu COM:DMCA, albo zamknę szybciej dyskusję, bo nie sądzę aby były kontrowersje dla usunięcia. Pozdrawiam, A.J. (talk) 15:49, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Matejko

Sprawdź czy dobre ciachnąłem. Masur (talk) 05:24, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Daj kilka chwil, żeby baza się zaktualizowała. Zasadniczo te wersje nie powinny być dostępne. Nawet dodatkowo je ukryłem. Zacznę działać jak wciąż będą. Masur (talk) 15:56, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- FYI: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard#Deleting_archived_version_of_files. Masur (talk) 12:32, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sebastian Kawa piloting over the Aconcagua.JPG

Pytanie: czy "wolno mi" poprawić autorstwo (p. Kawa mowi że zdjęcia z tej serii byly robione przez niego i/lub jego syna Sebastiana, więc chcialem zmienic "autor" na "Tomasz Kawa, Sebastian Kawa")? Czy opisy zdjęć mozna (ja ladowalem) dowolnie edytowac i poprawiac, bez naruszenia tym zweryfikowanej legalnosci umieszczenia zdjęcia w Commons? To nie duzy problem, ale jeżeli mozna to chcialem zeby bylo jak najscislej... Szafranpl (talk) 15:07, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dzieki. Ale nie chce za bardzo tym ludziom zawracać glowy, i tak robią dużą uprzejmość. P Tomasz powiedzial "ja i Sebastian", juz tak bym zostawil, to bardzo rozrywani ludzie, nazawracalem im dosc glowy z redakcja formalnej licencji (to bylo z 10 e-maili). Szafranpl (talk) 15:22, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Karol Borysowicz

I nic nie rozumiem ??? Czy możesz wytłumaczyć ??? Wysłałem zgodę na opublikowanie zdjęcia od fotografa Renau w Piasecznie 09:32, 25 June 2012 (UTC). Dlaczego pomimo to zdjęcie zostało usunięte przez FASTILY 13 September 2012 (UTC)?

Pozdrawiam, Roman Kurowski (talk) 19:43, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Karol Borysowicz.JPG

Rozumiem. Dzięki ! Roman Kurowski (talk) 08:58, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 Exhibition

Hello Polimerek,

Where you said “8-20 December 2013” maybe you meant “8-20 December 2012” ? Otherwise, I don't understand it.

Platonides (talk) 18:10, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Usunięcie grafiki

Witam, zamieściłem na commons mapę (oto ona), jednak później zauważyłem, że nie dokończyłem przy niej legendy. Poprawiłem i zamieściłem nową mapę (oto ona). W związku z tym można usunąćtę pierwszą, gdyż jest ona zbędna. Pozdrawiam. Tournasol7 (talk) 21:06, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, dzięki za podpowiedź. Mam jeszcze jedno pytanie. Te mapki, które robię rysowane są w Paincie. Znasz może jakieś lepsze programy do tworzenia map? Najlepiej darmowe :) Tournasol7 (talk) 14:31, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Masz nową wiadomość

"Namieszałem" z tym plikiem Masz nową wiadomość. Wstawiłem kopertę, tak jak w nowym powiadomieniu i wszystko się ładnie podmieniło (na innych stronach), ale nie wiem czy prawidłowo to zrobiłem, bo nie jest tak ładnie i jasno jak Ty zrobileś z plikiem Marka M., że to to nowa wersja itd. Jeśli można to proszę popraw to tak jak powinno być. Z góry przepraszam, Blackfish (talk) 15:15, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You for the Wikipedia Picture

Hello, My name is Duane Hurst and I recently made a free (non-commercial) English web site to share information with people. I added links to your Wikipedia/Wikimedia freeware picture (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Maltan_knights_castle_in_rh.jpg). I also gave credit to you on my web pages for your work. Thank you for sharing with the public. My website is:

http://www.freeenglishsite.com/

I add pictures such as yours to one of the following major sections of my site: 1. World section - contains information and over 10,000 images of every world country and territory. Link at: http://www.freeenglishsite.com/world/index.htm

2. USA section - contains information and images of every USA state and territory. Link at: http://www.freeenglishsite.com/world/usa/index.htm

3. English section - "Mel and Wes" lessons in conversation format. Stories are located in various USA states and world countries such as China, England, Germany, Japan, Mexico and Thailand. Each lesson has many slang terms and idioms, which I link to my Slang Dictionary. This eventually will have over 5,000 terms. Currently, it has about 3,000 slang and idioms. I regularly add new lessons and slang terms. Link at: http://www.freeenglishsite.com/english/lessons/index.htm Slang Dictionary link at: http://www.freeenglishsite.com/english/slang/Eslang_a.htm

Prior to retirement, I taught English at several private and public universities in the United States.

Please share this free site with your friends. I hope all will enjoy the pictures and find the English information useful. Sincerely, Duane Hurst in Utah, USA

Email address: duanerhurst@freeenglishsite.com --71.219.46.200 17:19, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bilobalide.png

File:Bilobalide.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Leyo 12:51, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 10:08, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year[reply]

File:Justyna Steczkowska autoryzowane 2.jpg

Hello,

Please add a license and the ticket. Regards, Yann (talk) 06:37, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I undeleted File:Seweryn Krajewski.jpg. Please add a license and the ticket. You are supposed to send the permission before uploading the image, and you need to add a license when you upload an image, not after, which you didn't in both cases. The 7-day delay means that you have some time to ensure that the ticket is processed. Regards, Yann (talk) 17:44, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OTRS noticeboard

Hi Polimerek. Please have a look at Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard#Ticket:2012122110008498 on File:2013 plaka FG.png and reply there. Trijnstel_talk 12:04, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:DingirXul

Hi, can you have a look at User talk:DingirXul#setting OTRS permision. and/or this. I noticed edits by him flagged with (OTRS permission added by non-OTRS member) and changed that back to {{OTRS pending}}. In the edit comments he wrote somthing about an email by you. Can you please confirm that the OTRS release is valid for these images or change them to i.e. {{OTRS received}} or what ever the (current) status of this ticket is. Thx and regards. --Ju Ta 18:25, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sucralose structure nih.gif

File:Sucralose structure nih.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Yikrazuul (talk) 11:00, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Archiwum TVP

Zatem mamy tak:

File:Pierwsza w Polsce naziemna stacja łączności satelitarnej.jpg - |source=http://foto.tvp.com.pl/pat/Search.php |author=archiwum Telewizji Polskiej (czarno-białe zdjęcie/skan)
File:Ośrodki regionalne na przełomie lat 50 i 60.jpeg - |source=Muzeum Telewizji Polskiej |author=Hubert Waliszewski (plansze "startowe" regionalnych TVP/screenshoty)
File:Na zdj. Kazimierz Rudzki prezentuje odbiornik telewizyjny "Leningrad"12.03.1954 r..jpg |source=http://foto.tvp.com.pl/pat/Search.php |author=Zygmunt Januszewski PAT Prasowa Agencja Telewizyjna (czarno-białe zdjęcie/skan)
File:Budynek Towarzystwa The Prudential Assurence w Warszawie.jpg |source=http://foto.tvp.com.pl/pat/Search.php |author=archiwum Telewizji Polskiej (czarno-białe zdjęcie/skan)

Ogólnie b. wątpie, że ktokolwiek kto nadesłał zgodę jest rzeczywiście dysponującym mater. PA we wszystkich tych przypadkach. W przypadku 1, 3 i 4 to nawet wątpie czy TVP w ogóle posiada prawo pełnego dysponowania tymi pracami, bo brak autorów (1 i 4) albo to autor (3) pewnie dalej je ma. Nr 2 z kolei - to o ile pamietam to regionalne ośrodki TVP mają osobne osobowości prawne i po raz kolejny - to są plansze startowe, zatem materiały co do których nie spodziewałbym się, że zostaną ot tak sobie uwolnione przez świadomą konsekwencji osobę. Masur (talk)

A, to oki doki. Nie wiedziałem że to aż taka skala :) Jak coś to mów to poodtwarzam. Masur (talk) 10:50, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- To zerknij czy wszystko z licencją, autorami etc poprawnie. Właściwie to uzupełnij licencje, bo nie ma. Masur (talk) 19:20, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Herb Rudnika

Witaj, bardzo chętnie poprawię. Kiedyś na ich stronie był herb mniej więcej taki jak narysowałem. Później zmienili na ten zgodny z uchwałą ale w zbyt kiepskiej rozdzielczości aby to wektoryzować. Jeśli mógłbyś podesłać uchwałę będę bardzo wdzięczny. Postaram się w weekend poprawić. Mail: wikipedysta.poznaniak (małpka) wp (kropeczka) pl Pozdrawiam Poznaniak (dyskusja) 08:40, 2 September 2013 (UTC) P.S. Przepraszam, że tak późno ale byłem na urlopie.[reply]

Cześć, zrobię w pierwszej wolnej chwili, ale potrzebowałbym tę uchwałę bo ten zrzut ze stronki jest trochę za słaby żeby poprawnie to zwektoryzować. Pozdrawiam Poznaniak (dyskusja) 18:48, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Jakbyś mógł wysłaś jeszcze raz bo niestety nic nie dostałem :(. Pozdrawiam Poznaniak (dyskusja) 07:11, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Poprawiłem na podstawie tego co miałem ale jestem średnio zadowolony z efektu. Pozdrawiam Poznaniak (dyskusja) 16:38, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kisieliczyn

File:File:Kisieliczyn1.jpg to skan wycinka z gazety (tekst i zdjęcie). Skasowałem od razu, bo szanse na zgodę od właściciela PA są właściwie zerowe. Masur (talk) 14:21, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Zdjęcia sieczkarni

Witam.

Tak jak prosiłeś wkleiłem szablon w odpowiednim polu i pod zdjęciem widnije już potwierdzenie, że pozwolenie na wykorzystanie zdjęć dotarło tam gdzie powinno. Jeśli jest możliwość proszę żebyś sprawdził czy to co zrobiłem jest tak jak powinno być.

Mam natomiast małe pytanie: Chodzi o zdjęcie: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sieczkarnia_Z350_3_%284%29.jpg

Dodałem 5 zdjęć od jednego Autora, z tego co wiem zgodził się na publikację wszytskich. Jednak to powyższe nie ma nadal tego OTRS pod zdjęciem. Dla przykładu jedno ze zdjęć tegoż autora i tej maszyny z OTRS: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sieczkarnia_Z350_3_%285%29.jpg Autor nie przesłał zgody czy jest jakaś inna przyczyna?

Podobną sytauację mam ze zdjęciami również jednego autora:

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sieczkarnia_Orkan_Z340_%28I%29.JPG

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sieczkarnia_Orkan_Z340_%28II%29.JPG

https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plik:Sieczkarnia_Z350_2_%281%29.JPG

https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plik:Z350_3_%26_przyrz%C4%85d_Z341.jpg

Autor twierdzi, iż przesłał zgodę na adres OTRS jednak do tej pory pod zdjęciem nie ma charkterystycznego OTRS.

Proszę o odpowiedź i pozdrawiam

User:Amanlostinlife13 (talk) 21:53, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Chyba rozumiem, czyli mogę do tego pominiętego zdjęcia skopiować tak po prostu numer maila do OTRS, który widnieje pod innym zdjęciem (zdjęcia były przesłane serią, autorem jest jeden fotograf)? User:Amanlostinlife13 (talk) 21:40, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sieczkarnie ciąg dalszy

Witam. Wysłałem do Ciebie maila z tym, że zamiast "at" wpisałem @ bo mi poczta nie chciała wysłać wiadomości na adres z at. User:Amanlostinlife13 (talk) 20:31, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Zdjęcia z Piaśnicy

Dziękuję za wyjaśnienie[5]. Dopilnuję tego następnym razem. Pozdrawiam.Dreamcatcher25 (talk) 08:14, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fotki z listy User talk:Grover ldz

File:Ewa Majchrzak.jpg - wszystkie są opisane w identyczny sposób. Masur (talk) 10:55, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Odtworzę, jak będę mieć chwilę wolną. Masur (talk) 21:07, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard#ticket_.232007082310009699

Jeden z twoich biletów OTRS jest dyskutowany. Pozdrowienia --Jarekt (talk) 17:39, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Herbarz

Hej. Wystarczy rzucić okiem na cztery herby z okładki. Styl nie do pomylenia. Porównaj z pl:Doliwa (herb szlachecki), pl:Zaremba (herb szlachecki), pl:Kietlicz (herb szlachecki). Natomiast info o herbach we wnętrzu książki mam tylko z "trzeciej ręki". Pozdrawiam. Avalokitesvara (talk) 22:00, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hm, rozumiem, że pewnie bez wzięcia tego w rękę się nie obejdzie... Tym niemniej może przyda się ta dyskusja:

https://www.facebook.com/tadeusz.gajl

Wpis z 29 listopada. Gdzieś dalej w dyskusji jest, że źródło podają tylko na końcu. Domyślam się, że jest zbiorcza informacja o zaczerpnięciu ilustracji z Commons, a to chyba trochę za mało. Pozdrawiam. Avalokitesvara (talk) 15:50, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Gajl, a także być może nasi Bastianow i Steifer. Ale najpierw spróbuję dostać tę książkę do rąk, żeby mieć pewność. Pozdrawiam. Avalokitesvara (talk) 10:27, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!

⧼Wikibase-terms/Polimerek⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, ‎français, magyar, ‎italiano, македонски, ‎‎日本語, ‎‎‎русский, ‎‎‎svenska

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Request for removing your upwizcampeditors

Hello Polimerek, there is a discussion about a request regarding your Upload Wizard Campaign Editor userright, which have never been used or not used recently. You can participate discussion in Commons:Requests for rights#General request. If you have a reason that your upwizcampeditor be kept, please let us know. This is just a notification of discussion you may be involved. Best regards, — 레비 Revi.

Delivered on behalf of 레비 Revi by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:56, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tioacetamid.png

File:Tioacetamid.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

DMacks (talk) 04:48, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stocznia Gdańska - Erazm Ciołek - 1980-08.jpg etc.

Hi Polimerek, when requesting files for deletion, the more when they are not new files and/or from an established user, never forget to notify the uploader. --Túrelio (talk) 16:11, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Okragly Stol 1989.jpg

[6] - a konkretne zdjęcie to chyba na jego stronie www było, albo jakoś podobnie (tu wiarygodne źródło też [7]), bo było o nim głośno przy okazji jego śmierci. Tam tylko była kwestia kadru. Bo było coś takiego, że z tego samego punktu było kilka podobnych fotek, ale tę można bezwględnie przypisać Ciołkowi. Masur (talk) 19:33, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No jak nie PD-PRL to nie ma o czym rozmawiać. Masur (talk) 19:41, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement

Picture of the Year 2013 Results

In other languages: Deutsch, ‎español, ‎français, ‎日本語, Nederlands, русский, ‎svenska, ‎Türkçe, ‎українська

Dear Polimerek,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Witold Wirpsza Polish poet.jpg

Rzuciłbyś okiem na to zgłoszenie na WP:ZB. Czy dobrze myślę? -- Blackfish (talk) 09:22, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wstawiłem zdjęcie Twojego autorstwa.

Zrobiłeś świetne zdjęcie, a ja je odkryłem. Mógłbys przejrzeć? https://pl.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lu%C4%87mierz-Las&action=history

File:Ludwik Konarzewski Senior - "Portret żony Jadwigi Konarzewskiej z synem Ludwikiem".jpg

Wszystko OK z tym OTRSem? Bo nie wstawiał OTRS-operator, stąd chciałem się upewnić. Inne pliki z tym ticketem to:

File:J. Żaczek.jpg

Hej. Czy podana tam zgoda OTRS obejmuje ten plik (tj. autorstwa Ryszarda Hołubowicza), bowiem ta sama zgoda widnieje np. w File:Kaczynski Jaroslaw 1 083.JPG, gdzie ten autor nie jest już wyszczególniony. W jednym wypadku wstawiałem ją ja (Kaczyński), ale w innych sam user, zatem chciałem się upewnić, na co ona jest. Masur (talk) 06:30, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Re-edition of the Photowikimeetup in Wikimania 2014

Hello Polimerek! in the case that you are also visiting this year's Wikimania in London, you may be interested in attending the new edition of the photowikimeetup that took place in Hong Kong last year, and where you listed up. As the preparation is not yet settled, you are more than welcomed to take part in the discussion here. All the best, Poc o² 17:38, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dżochar Dudajew (Mural, ul. Raszyńska w Warszawie) 1.jpg

Witam, dopiero wróciłem z przerwy wakacyjnej, zatem dopiero teraz śpieszę z odpowiedzią. Jestem autorem jedynie zdjęcia, autorem muralu jest o ile mnie pamięć nie myli grupa Trzecia Fala, natomiast mural na dużym zbliżeniu widoczny jest z drogi publicznej przez ogrodzenie od szkoły gdzie się znajduje, niemniej nie pamiętam w jakich okolicznościach wykonałem zdjęcie. Z uszanowaniem Mateusz Opasiński 03:40 1 wrz 2014

Rozumiem, nie znam na tyle prawa autorskiego i przyjmuję bezdyskusyjnie przedstawione przez Ciebie uzasadnienie. Jeśli idzie o dodatkowe szczegóły pragnę podkreślić, że wprawdzie nie podałem autorów muralu (co bym dzisiaj z pewnością uczynił), ale nie spotkałem się też z faktem aby dodawano takowych w opisach. To tylko moja luźna uwaga, ale myślę że w tym zakresie pozostało jeszcze wiele do zrobienia, bo póki co wiele tego typu prac traktuje się jak całkowicie bezpańskie. Z uszanowaniem Mateusz Opasiński 15:15 1 wrz 2014

Logo From the Depths

Hello Polimerek. You confirmed the permission for File:Logo From the Depths.jpg but could you give some more information please? In particular, the file page says "anonymous work for hire" as author but did the emails contain any indication of who the author(s) is/are? If possible could you tell if there was a date of creation although this isn't so crucial. Thanks in advance. Green Giant (talk) 21:45, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ak grupa kampinos cm01.jpg

Witaj! W związku z wnioskiem o skasowanie tytułowego pliku zastanawiam się, czy w przypadku zdjęcia mapy z ogólnie dostępnej tablicy informacyjnej na cmentarzu wojennym rzeczywiście można mówić o naruszeniu praw autorskich (w świetle prawa PL)? Byłbym wdzięczny, gdybyś mógł rzucić okiem na tę sprawę. Pozdrawiam.Dreamcatcher25 (talk) 07:21, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:DDP 2013 Lukasz Kozak 1.jpg

File:DDP 2013 Lukasz Kozak 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

91.238.85.132 11:03, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:DDP 2013 Lukasz Kozak 2.jpg

File:DDP 2013 Lukasz Kozak 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

91.238.85.132 11:04, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Metathesis.gif

File:Metathesis.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

DMacks (talk) 04:42, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

zdjęcie Henryk Rafalski

Witaj – te dwa zdjęcia [8], [9] mają mieć według wstawiającego pliki ten sam OTRS – przy Henryku Rafalskim jest to opisane pod "Licensing" jako Zgoda na publikowanie zdjęć prof. Indulskiego i Rafalskiego – spójrz proszę, na czy polega problem z drugim plikiem? – czy tylko chodzi o jakiś mały problem tachniczny ze złym wstawieniem szablonu, czy też zgoda na użycie dotyczy tylko pierwszego zdjęcia – Wesołych Świąt – Darekm135 (talk) 12:20, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Krówki Milanówek.jpg

Yours sincerely, 🎂CAKE🎂 23:48, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tęcza na placu Zbawiciela 2014 018.JPG

No właśnie, z tego co prasa pisze taki termin był z góry ustalony (tyle, że raz przedłużony). I to moim zdaniem różni tęczę od bydynków czy pomników, których z zasady nie stawia się z założeniem, że zostaną rozebrane w określonym terminie. Co prawda termin był długi, natomiast moje wątpliwości co do zasadności stosowania FoP w tym przypadku bydzi fakt, że był on od początku określony. Może warto po prostu wystąpić o zgodę do aktualnego posiadacza praw?

Nie zależy mi na usunięciu tych zdjęć, a na merytorycznej dyskusji. Bo jeśli są wątpliwości, to ktoś je prędzej czy później wyciągnie. A może zacząć od PRP+DR.

Ankry (talk) 10:52, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

OTRS

Hi! Could you please have a look at ticket:2015080610012924 and let User:Marta Malina Moraczewska know what's going on? I already deleted one of here uploads because the OTRS pending tag was overdue. Sorry, but Google translator doesn't make much sense translating PL-EN. :-) Thanks for your time! --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 05:23, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done File restored and OTRS ticket added. Thanks for helping! --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 18:22, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Acrylonitrile.png

File:Acrylonitrile.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Ed (Edgar181) 20:25, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The File:Wikipe-tan PME 1.svg contains raster elements

The SVG image File:Wikipe-tan PME 1.svg you uploaded contains embedded raster graphics^[10] and is now listed in Category:SVG images with embedded raster graphics. Such images are liable to produce inferior results when scaled to different sizes. If appropriate, please replace the raster graphics with vector graphics. You can either upload an improved version or simply allow the file to be deleted. In all cases, please do not take this message personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! ↔ User: Perhelion (Commons: = crap?) 01:16, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The File:Wikipe-tan PME 2.svg contains raster elements

The SVG image File:Wikipe-tan PME 2.svg you uploaded contains embedded raster graphics^[11] and is now listed in Category:SVG images with embedded raster graphics. Such images are liable to produce inferior results when scaled to different sizes. If appropriate, please replace the raster graphics with vector graphics. You can either upload an improved version or simply allow the file to be deleted. In all cases, please do not take this message personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! ↔ User: Perhelion (Commons: = crap?) 01:16, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Zdjęcie Łukasz Jakóbiaka

Witam, wysłałam zgodę ze zdjęciem na maila, który podany jest w informacjach i chciałabym wiedzieć, ile trzeba czekać na oficjalne przeniesienie, bo autor zdjęcia, Piotr Szafran chce wiedzieć, czy wszystko jest ok, z pozdrowieniami, Milagros aal (talk) 15:14, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logo PPS.jpg

File:Logo PPS.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Wojsław Brożyna (talk) 09:30, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Thymolphthalein.gif

File:Thymolphthalein.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

DMacks (talk) 19:04, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Zapytanie

Witam, mimo przesłanej zgody autora na permissions-pl@wikimedia.org, pozwolenie przez Kolegę nie zostało zarchiwizowane [12]. Pozdrawiam Wlodek k1 (talk) 15:38, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ticket:2016092610004375

There we have permission from photographer but not from author of work in ticket:2016092610004375. For example File:2133 Anna i Jozef Hulka maska Śmierci 1984.jpg see w:pl:Józef Hulka. Please could you clarify. See also: Commons:Deletion requests/Files of User:Amudena Rutkowska. There may be the same problem. --sasha (krassotkin) 16:02, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Some baklava for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Hello no movie of food Jawaid2017 (talk) 17:57, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jurors for WikiScienceCompetition 2017

Hi. I was so busy finding jurors outside Europe this year, I did not check the old competition page. I think it would be rude not to inform you that we have organized a new jury this year.

You can still join for the second-level jury since Poland has no national jury. Only if I find another strong profile outside Europe I can promote another European to the main jury.

Let me know and sorry I did find you before, it would have been a different story.--Alexmar983 (talk) 06:45, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Update, I see from the map Poland has a national jury now. You could still contact those organizer.--Alexmar983 (talk) 15:06, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Informacje prawne

Commons:Informacje prawne has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this project page, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Ju Ta 17:16, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Krystian Czerwinski.JPG

File:Krystian Czerwinski.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Taivo (talk) 11:13, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Mały problem licencyjny - a właściwie 2

1. Zależy mi na ściągnięciu 4 obrazków z http://raspi.tv/2012/high-resolution-raspberry-pi-photos do kategorii Category:Raspberry Pi: Past, Present, and Future; na stronie widać "© Alex Eames 2012 (Creative Commons)"
2. Obrazek ze strony http://raspi.tv/2017/new-raspberry-pi-family-photo-28-feb-2017 idealnie ilustruje główny Artykuł / Element / Galerię Raspberry Pi ale... "I make this photo available to the world at this resolution under CC-BY-NC-SA4"; nie wiem co tym "this" autor miał na myśli - obrazek w pełnej rozdzielczości, czy ten który widać na stronie
W obu przypadkach wpisałem mu się na blogu z prośbą o doprecyzowanie (1) lub udostępnienie czegoś w mniejszej rozdzielczości na CC-BY-SA (2). Wygląda na to, że autor zignorował obie prośby - czy można z tym coś zrobić, czy jedyne wyjście to odlinkować i zgłosić do usunięcia plik z (2)? Pozdrowienia, --Jasc PL (talk) 11:30, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hej @Polimerek: , dzięki za odpowiedź - a co z tym pierwszym? Można ściągać, czy nie dotykać? :) --Jasc PL (talk) 21:15, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Polimerek: . Nie wiadomo - dlatego pytam eksperta :). Zależy mi na tych 4 obrazkach ale... zdecyduj proszę - ściągać, czy nie? --Jasc PL (talk) 21:25, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

OK, załatwione, dzięki --Jasc PL (talk) 21:47, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Beata

Hi Polimerek, I noticed you put OTRS permission template into File:BeataFoto.jpg. Can you please check if the OTRS permission is applicable to other files uploaded by user MHDyg? See Special:ListFiles/MHDyg. It seems like the user uploaded a portrait of the artist Beata Nehring and some of Beata's work, too. Thank you! --Podzemnik (talk) 14:25, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Platonic solid STL licenses

Hi. I noticed that two of the STL files of platonic solids you uploaded are licensed under the default CC-by-sa 4.0 license. (File:Dodecahedron.stl and File:Hexahedron.stl)

Would you mind if the license was changed to PD-ineligible instead? TilmannR (talk) 19:28, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Zdjęcia - prawa autorskie

Witajǃ Wstawiłem niedawno zdjęcia dwóch encyklopedycznych postaci (za ich wiedzą i zgodą) - tłumacza Jana Marii Kłoczowskiego i pisarki Anny Piwkowskiej. Przesłali już potwierdzenia, ale widzę, że formalnościom jeszcze nie stało się zadość. Co konkretnie powinni jeszcze przesłać i do kogo? Pozdrawiam Ablakok (podpis tyldami chyba tu nie działa)

Witaj

Zauważyłem, że wgrałeś zdjęcia p. Ewy Wanat. Byłoby bardzo miło, gdyby udało się Tobie „wystarać” zdjęcie do tego hasła: Ewa Ewart.
Pozdrawiam.

Artur Andrzej (talk) 17:26, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Willys-Jeep-Jay-Hardy.stl

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Willys-Jeep-Jay-Hardy.stl, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

ChoHyeri (talk) 10:41, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The problem was in the previous url given as source, which returned an "unavailable blend" error page, thus preventing me to verify the license. I've seen that you have corrected it, so now I can proceed. Thank you. --ChoHyeri (talk) 07:34, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A question that needs an answer

Hello, can you please check this question? The best thing would be to write them from OTRS and ask for details, linking the email to the other ticket. If you need support, let's talk about this on the OTRS wiki. --Ruthven (msg) 11:50, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Stare widokówki, a domena publiczna

Czy mógłbyś mi odpowiedzieć, jak wygląda kwestia przesłania na Commons fotografii np. starych pocztówek z lat 1890—1920? Z tego co zaobserwowałem jest takich już wiele i są podciągnięte pod domenę publiczną. Chciałem zilustrować kilka haseł i nie jestem pewien, czy przesyłając takie fotografie nie popełnię jednak błędu. Skierował mnie do Ciebie "Cybularny". Z góry dziękuję. Pozdrawiam. Four.mg (talk) 16:47, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dziękuję za odpowiedź. Chodzi mi głównie o pocztówki i zdjęcia wykonane w Poznaniu w czasach pruskich (do 1918). Raczej będą podlegać pod prawo niemieckie. Nie wiesz jak to jest rozwiązane w niemieckim prawie autorskim? Four.mg (talk) 21:05, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sorbic acid.png

File:Sorbic acid.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Wostr (talk) 20:18, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Aleksandra Konieczna by Liubov Gorobiuk.jpg

Copyright status: File:Aleksandra Konieczna by Liubov Gorobiuk.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ हिन्दी ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Aleksandra Konieczna by Liubov Gorobiuk.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Jcb (talk) 17:25, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Berlin 2010.pdf

File:Berlin 2010.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Yann (talk) 05:38, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Gettyimages

Dzien dobry. Mam prośbę o pomoc w zakresie praw autorskich. Znalazłem przypadkiem w commons zdjęcie [13] przejęte z Gettyimages [14]. Jest to źródło komercyjne, ale plik ma w detalach zapisane tylko: "No commercial uses without permission". Autor edycji na commons w polu Permission podał "PD-Japan-organization" i "Not-PD-US-URAA|country=Japan". Moje pytanie brzmi: czy decydujący w pozwoleniu na wykorzystanie w commons jest zapis z Gettyimeges, czy te detale japońskiego prawodawstwa? Jest to olbrzymie źródło zdjęć i ciekawi mnie, czy można z niego czerpać, a jeśli tak to w jakim zakresie? Wiedza moja w tym temacie jest zbyt skromna, a nie chcę eksperymentować. Byłbym wdzięczny za pomoc. Pozdrawiam serdecznie --Zorro2212 (talk) 09:52, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Białowieża - mapa satelitarna

Witam, Skasowałem zdjęcie po negocjacjach. Pytanie; czy będzie można zamieścić tą mapę w postaci miniaturki i linku do naszych zbiorów (serwera). Wówczas ja odpowiadam, czy też Wikipedia? A.Domaszewicz (talk) 21:30, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Karolina Gorczyca selfie.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Karolina Gorczyca selfie.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:55, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Franciszek Surmiński.jpg

Nie rozumiem. Autor filmu na YouTube zmienił jego licencję na moją prośbę (licencję można zobaczyć w opisie filmu). Przesłałem plik i wybrałem szablon licencji YouTube CC-BY, który powinien być poprawny. Oznaczałem pliki tak samo już wcześniej i nigdy nie było z tym problemów. --ElCet (talk) 16:00, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Beata Igielska.jpg

Just a note that you don't need to proactively nominate files pending OTRS for speedy deletion. These files have at least 30 days for verification, and it's already in Category:OTRS received as of 30 December 2019. Once 30 days has elapsed, someone can come through and clean up the files still in that category. GMG ^talk 20:53, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Usunięte pliki autobusów Solaris

(Ad tematu rozpoczętego tu: [15])

Witaj,

właścicielem plików, o których mówimy jest przedsiębiorstwo Solaris Bus & Coach S.A., z w porozumieniu z którym umieściłem fotografie pojazdów tego producenta w zasobach na commons. Chciałbym przytoczyć tu fragment mojej korespondencji mailowej z Panem Marcinem Napierałą, który stanowił osobę kontaktową ze strony ww. spółki:

Dzień dobry,

przesłałem maila. W odpowiedzi na wcześniejsze otrzymywałem pytanie o autorów poszczególnych ujęć. W tym zestawieniu są ujęcia, których przypisanie do konkretnego fotografa (pracuje ich dla nas dość wielu) może być dość trudne, ze względu na czas, który minął od ich wykonania.

Pozdrawiam

Chciałbym nadmienić, iż te same fotografie w większości wykorzystywane są na stronie internetowej przedsiębiorstwa, w jej materiałach reklamowych, a także w niektórych portalach branżowych, za każdym bez podania autora fotografii - zostały one wykonane na zlecenie Solaris Bus & Coach S.A. i taka informacja też przy nich widnieje, jeśli nie są to materiały bezpośrednio Solarisa. Pliki ilustrowały wiele dobrych i medalowych artykułów w polskiej Wikipedii, a w wielu przypadkach zastąpienie ich innymi grafikami z zasobów commons.wikimedia.org jest niemożliwe (pewne modele pojazdów nie są w ogóle sfotografowane przez innych użytkowników), bądź znacząco pogorszy jakość ilustracji w artykułach.

W 2013 r. w porozumieniu z tą samą firmą (tylko nie przez moje pośrednictwo) do zasobów commons.wikimedia.org trafiło także wiele innych zdjęć przedstawiających pojazdy tego przedsiębiorstwa – wszystkie nie mają dokładnie podanego fotografa z imienia i nazwiska, a mimo to na stronie każdego z tych plików wisi od 7 lat szablon poprawnego pozwolenia OTRS (#2013012810003249).

Mógłbyś zatem wyjaśnić, dlaczego w tym przypadku wymagane jest podanie fotografa z imienia i nazwiska, a także jakie środki należałoby podjąć, by zdjęcia przywrócić do bazy na commons?

Pozdrawiam serdecznie, Michozord (talk) 16:58, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Skoro Solaris korzysta z tych zdjęć w swoich materiałach promocyjnych, na swojej stronie internetowej, a także udostępnia je wielu portalom branżowym, to zakładam, że robi to jednak zgodnie z prawem autorskim i ma to w jakiś sposób uregulowane z fotografami, którzy te zdjęcia wykonali. Przy poprzednich zdjęciach nie mamy podanego autora z imienia i nazwiska, dlaczego więc tu tego potrzebujemy? Czy fakt, że firma korzysta z tych zdjęć w swoich materiałach bez podania autora, a także wyraża nam zgodę na udostępnienie ich na licencji CC BY-SA, to dlaczego nie możemy ich także wykorzystać? Szczególnie biorąc pod uwagę, jak dużą stratą dla jakości artykułów na wiki jest utrata tych ilustracji. Michozord (talk) 13:47, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Jolanta-Turczynowicz-Kieryłło-2018.jpg

Szanowny Pan nie usunął z rozpędu za dużo? Szablony "Author permission" "self|Cc-by-sa-3.0" chyba jednak powinny się znajdować w opisie pliku, nie uważa Pan Szanowny? VanWiel (talk) 06:49, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bardzo Pan uprzejmy, dziękuję! VanWiel (talk) 06:12, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puchar Wikipedia 10 cm.stl, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good --PantheraLeo1359531 14:23, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

odp. Sposób ładowania zdjęć

Hej!

Dzięki za wiadomość i miłe słowo. Staram się nie używać szablonu "self" ani tym bardziej usuwać pola "permission =". Te dwa zdjęcia przedstawiające Tatianę Czekalską ładowałem w nietypowy sposób, bo zostały ostatnio usunięte przez admina, tzn. zamieściłem je w miejsce usuniętych zamiast pisać prośbę o ich przywrócenie i kreator był faktycznie nietypowy, pewnie temu się to pokasztaniło. Na co dzień używam standardowej metody czyli UploadWizard poprzez „Prześlij plik” i wtedy chyba wszystko jest ok. Ja Cię również bardzo podziwiam z uwagi na staż, wkład w Wiki oraz zaangażowanie i bardzo Ci dziękuję za taką mrówczą robotę jaką jest OTRS :)

Pozdrawiam serdecznie --Gower (talk) 10:00, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Filip Kaczynski.jpg

Wskaż proszę autora i źródło zgodnie z ticketem. Dzięki. Masur (talk) 05:38, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Magdalena Świerczek-Gryboś B&W.jpg

Zrobione. Uzupełnij proszę źródło/autora/otrs wg danych. Dzięki. Masur (talk) 11:59, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Prezydent Miasta Lublin Krzysztof Żuk(2).jpg

File:Prezydent Miasta Lublin Krzysztof Żuk(2).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:17, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ हिन्दी ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Elżbieta Kossewska 2021.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 16:05, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Andrzej_Wiktor_Portrait

I have been trying to help Piotr Sura make the copyright available for https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Andrzej_Wiktor_portrait.png. I prepared and copied the template letter for him to send, which he told me he has, and I see that you have dealt with this today, but judged it insufficient. Please could you let me know what the issue was, both so that I can further assist Piotr and so that I know what to do better next time. Thanks, Jmchutchinson (talk) 15:19, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It is solved. He put wrong name of file in the agreement File:Wiktor.JPG instead of File:Andrzej Wiktor portrait.png, so it needed to be clarified. Polimerek (talk) 10:01, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ticket:2022021910004773

Hi. I'm VRT agent, reviewing old open tickets. Can you please review this case and tag the file for finish it? Thanks. Ganímedes (talk) 13:42, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This ticket seems to be finished. The tagged picture is: File:Tadeusz Ptaszyński - Ciechocinek 2010c.jpg. The ticket started with another picture of the same person: File:Tadeusz Ptaszyński.jpg, but there were problems with authorship of it, therefore the person who uploaded it had found another picture of which authorship was known, so the story ended with deletion of the problematic picture and taging the right one. Cheers, Polimerek (talk) 21:29, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Park kieszonkowy na Mokotowie przy rondzie Unii Europejskiej.jpg

Mam pytanie odnośnie do zgody na wykorzystanie tego zdjęcia – oznaczyłeś, że taka zgoda wpłynęła. Zdjęcie pochodzi jednak ze strony Zarządu Zieleni m.st. Warszawy, a tam nie ma podanego, że autorem tego zdjęcia jest Magda Sierzputowska, a zamieszczony na dole strony zapis "© 2022 Zarząd Zieleni m.st. Warszawy" sugeruje, że właścicielem treści z tej strony (autorskich praw majątkowych) jest Zarząd Zieleni m.st. Warszawy, a nie osoba prywatna (Magda Sierzputowska). W związku z tym mam wątpliwość, czy zgoda na wykorzystanie tego zdjęcia jest prawidłowa, tzn. wydana przez dysponenta autorskich praw majątkowych do tego zdjęcia. Aotearoa (talk) 19:04, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Autor i właściciel praw autorskich to nie to samo. Autorka jest pracownicą tego zarządu i wykonała to zdjęcie w ramach obowiązków służbowych, więc jako utwór pracowniczy ma do tego prawa majątkowe zarząd, ale autorką jest ona. Polimerek (talk) 19:51, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Czy w takim razie ta zgoda wpłynęła od Zarządu Zieleni? Jeśli tak, to może warto by to wyraźnie zaznaczyć, kto udzielił zgody i jest właścicielem praw. Aotearoa (talk) 05:27, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Zarząd zieleni nie ma sam w sobie osobowości prawnej, także to co jest w stopce na ich stronie (© 2022 Zarząd Zieleni m.st. Warszawy) - nie ma najmniejszego sensu prawnego. Jak już to właścicielem praw majątkowych może być jednostka samorządowa jako całość - czyli w tym przypadku miasto stołeczne Warszawa. W jego imieniu zgodę wydała kierowniczka działu promocji tegoż miasta, więc wygląda, że wszystko jest OK. Dopisałem tam przy autorstwie, że to praca wykonana na rzecz miasta. Polimerek (talk) 11:26, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dzięki za wyjaśnienia. Aotearoa (talk) 12:07, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dimethylmercury.png

File:Dimethylmercury.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Leyo 08:56, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your help is required

Hello @Polimerek: I have just mentioned you on VRT noticeboard where we need your assistance. Best, ─ The Aafī (^talk) 15:01, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Permission

Hi Polimerek, regarding Commons:Undeletion_requests/Archive/2023-03#File:Josef_Hedinger_(cropped).jpg_and_File:TRIBBS_Polish_music_producer_(cropped).jpg: could you add permission ticket #2023032610003721 to both File:Josef Hedinger.jpg and its derivative file File:Josef_Hedinger_(cropped).jpg too? See also my talk page and User talk:Myan1948. Thanks in advance and regards, Wutsje 12:32, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2022 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the seventeenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the two most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on 1 May 2023, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2021 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:15, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ हिन्दी ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Włodzimierz Piwkowski 2014.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 15:12, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Brak wstawionego szablonu z udzieloną licencją

Uprzejmie proszę o wstawienie brakującego szablonu na udzieloną licencję dla nw. zdjęć [16] i [17]. Ww. zdjęcia są wykorzystane w tym artykule [18]. Zgodę dał Wojciech Kielar wgkielar@gmail.com. Z góry dziękuję. Wlodek k1 (talk) 11:09, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Zapytanie o usunięty plik

Cześć, zostało usunięte zdjęcie z mojego artykułu o Brunonie Widuchu. Była wysłana, 25.01.2024r, zgoda autora zdjęcia a mimo to plik usunięto. Plik ma nazwę; Fotografia Brunon Widuch - autor Aleksandra Cadelska.jpg Bardzo proszę o sprawdzenie dlaczego i jeśli jest to możliwe to proszę o przywrócenie. Pozdrawiam Grzeglop Grzeglop (talk) 17:33, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nie ma w systemie zgody do pliku o tej nazwie - szukałem też po nazwisku "Widuch" i po nazwisku autorki. Może jak podasz adres E-mail z którego to przyszło da się to odnaleźć o ile taka zgoda wogóle była... Polimerek (talk) 11:51, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Bunsen burner.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Bunsen burner.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Bunsen burner.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

廣九直通車 (talk) 03:19, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests#File:Neil_Doljanchi_2024_622.jpg_and_all_others_from_the_series_listed_below

Dziękuję. Jeszcze trzeba zrobić updejt tego szablonu, że nie ma dokończonego procesu, bo za 30 dni pliki znowu wylecą... :> A nie wiem jak to zrobić. Botem da się? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 03:14, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Popieluszko Europena (07).jpg

File:Popieluszko Europena (07).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

95.160.119.11 08:01, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2023 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighteenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and top 5% of most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on 14 October 2024, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2022 Picture of the Year contest.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:02, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you previously voted in the Picture of the Year contest. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2023.

Round 2 will end at 28 October 2024, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

If you have already voted for Round 2, please ignore this message.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:14, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thank you for guiding the author\artist copyright of the Powalka 'Jesus Painting' file to a successful conclusion with the removal of the deletion tag! SM:!) (talk) 11:00, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]