User talk:Funkyxian

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Funkyxian!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 14:20, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


العربية  català  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  eesti  français  galego  magyar  italiano  Nederlands  polski  română  svenska  ไทย  українська  +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.

Dear Funkyxian,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time.

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
Wiki Loves Monuments logo



العربية | català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | eesti | français | magyar | Nederlands | polski | svenska | ไทย | +/−

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!

Dear Funkyxian,

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests!

In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days.

And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy!

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
Wiki Loves Monuments logo
File:Romeo en Julia II in Rivierenhof.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 10:57, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Madek (Brons).JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Túrelio (talk) 12:43, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

photos of sculptures

[edit]

Hi Funkyxian, I have tagged several of your uploads erroneously as FoP-Nederland, because your description was in Dutch. But, now I see that at least some are from Belgium, which has no FOP-exception. So, we need information in which country the following images were taken.


For the following images, we need information about the original artist (year of death or installation of sculpture)

Thanks. --Túrelio (talk) 12:54, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


You will have to delete them all. I didn't know about this FOP, until I saw your first message. I won't upload images of statues/artwork anymore. Sorry for the extra work

Funkyxian (talk) 13:48, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This is only a problem if the sculptor is not dead for at least 70 years. --Túrelio (talk) 14:47, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Re:

[edit]
Hello, Funkyxian. You have new messages at Mathonius's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  বাংলা  català  čeština  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  suomi  français  galego  हिन्दी  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  ქართული  македонски  മലയാളം  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  Tagalog  Türkçe  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−

Automobiles with license plates of Belgium

[edit]

Hallo Funkyxian, de nummerplaat op de wagen is duidelijk zichtbaar. Wil je een nieuwe versie uploaden waarbij de nummerplaat onherkenbaar is. Bedankt. Lotje (talk) 14:58, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Er staat een nieuwe versie op Funkyxian (talk) 17:50, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2016

[edit]

Hallo Funkyxian,

In 2013 nam je deel aan de fotowedstrijd Wiki Loves Monuments. In België en Luxemburg wordt deze fotowedstrijd ook in 2016 gehouden. Wees welkom!

We organiseren ook vier fototochten in Gent, Mechelen, Antwerpen en Luik. Zie: http://www.wikilovesmonuments.be/w/index.php?title=Photo_tours_September_2016/nl&setlang=nl

We zien graag je foto's van monumenten verschijnen. Romaine 15:21, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ik upload het hele jaar door foto's van erfgoed zoals het mij uitkomt. Ik ben niet echt geïnteresseerd in een wedstrijd.

A beer for you!

[edit]
Mijn grote dank voor de vele foto's die je geüpload hebt van de sculpturen in het Middelheimmuseum. Ik ben ze systematisch op Wikidata aan het invoeren (voorbeeld). Heel tof! Spinster (talk) 13:03, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Graag gedaan. Jammer genoeg heb ik nog niet alle beelden kunnen fotograferen. Die wikidata codes die u creëert, kan ik dan weer toevoegen aan de OpenStreetMap objecten.
Oh, dat is super! Hier, via deze SPARQL query, kan je de lijst kunstwerken, met Wikidata-nummer, ophalen (klikken op 'Run'). Het zou fantastisch zijn om de coördinaten daarna uit OpenStreetMap weer te exporteren en dan in Wikidata toe te voegen, maar ik weet niet of dat mogelijk is. Spinster (talk) 08:41, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Volgens de wikidata page op de OpenStreetMap wiki, mag Wikidata geen OSM data copiëren, vanwege licentie verschillen. Maar die pagina bevat wel een aantal andere technieken om kaarten te maken op basis van Wikidata en OSM data. Bedankt voor de SPARQL query, ik had ook al een eenvoudiger versie gemaakt. Ik heb toen ik de beelden aan het mappen was in OpenStreetMap, ook al eens een kaartje gemaakt met umap.
Met deze Overpass Query kan ik gemakkelijk zien voor welke beelden ik nog geen wikidata heb in OpenStreetMap

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Ruthven (msg) 11:08, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kerken op Wikidata

[edit]
Voorbeeldkerk op Wikidata

Beste Funkyxian, naar aanleiding van jouw vraag op de mailing list ben ik even een Belgische kerk als voorbeeld op Wikidata gaan invoeren: de Wijnbergkerk van Wevelgem. Ik weet niet of dat de perfecte manier van invoeren is - we zijn nog zoekende op Wikidata - maar in elk geval is het een rijk voorbeeld (een kerk met een bekend architect, een gedocumenteerde ontwerpdatum, ze is onroerend erfgoed en kerkeninvlaanderen.be vermeldt de patroonheilige). We hebben er ook afbeeldingen en zelfs een categorie van op Commons. Ik denk dat je dit wel als voorbeeld kan gebruiken.

Ik merk dat je drie websites als bron kan gebruiken: de inventaris onroerend erfgoed, odis.be en kerkeninvlaanderen.be.

Verder vermoed ik dat niet alle Belgische architecten belangrijk genoeg zijn om een eigen item op Wikidata te krijgen, maar in dit geval waren er al items voor Dom van der Laan en Nico van der Laan (zij zijn zeker belangrijk genoeg) en ik heb ook een item aangemaakt voor Jozef Lietaert, omdat deze in een groot naslagwerk vermeld wordt (Repertorium van de architectuur in België, Mercatorfonds). Ik hoop dat dit je een beetje op weg helpt. Aarzel niet contact met me op te nemen als je vragen hebt, en een reminder te sturen in het geval dat ik je bericht even over het hoofd zou zien. Met vriendelijke groet, Spinster (talk) 19:22, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

[edit]
  1. This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
  2. Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

[edit]

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

File:Kerkhofstraat 28, Smetlede (voorkant).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

213.119.117.166 11:07, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kerkhofstraat 28, Smetlede (voorkant).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

213.119.117.166 11:07, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kerkhofstraat 28, Smetlede (achterkant).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

213.119.117.166 11:08, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kerkhofstraat 28, Smetlede (achterkant).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

213.119.117.166 11:09, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

[edit]
WMF Surveys, 18:22, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey

[edit]
WMF Surveys, 01:20, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

[edit]
WMF Surveys, 00:30, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Locatie Rik Pootbankje

[edit]

Dag Funkyxian, zou je kunnen aangeven in welke plaats dit bankje staat? Mvg, Encycloon (talk) 08:38, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

beste, de locatie is toegevoegd, je kan het bankje ook zien op OpenStreetMap: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2839292901

Community Insights Survey

[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 01:03, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 15:20, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 19:59, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Yuraily Lic (talk) 01:28, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Kapel in Louis Van Campenhoutstraat, Puurs.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

  — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 14:26, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]