Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2018/06/20

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive June 20th, 2018
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This map seems to be made-up. "Hindley and Damon" didn't release any publications about this topic. The only research they did is "Some genetic traits in Solomon Island populations. IV. Mid‐phalangeai hair". See discussion on Reddit. fireattack (talk) 05:11, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: In use. --Yann (talk) 17:22, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This map seems to be made-up. "Hindley and Damon" didn't release any publications about this topic. The only research they did is "Some genetic traits in Solomon Island populations. IV. Mid‐phalangeai hair". fireattack (talk) 01:37, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

How "in use" a valid reason to block deletion requests? I can make up something and put it on Wikipedia, doesn't mean it should be kept.--fireattack (talk) 01:38, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Here it does, in fact, per COM:INUSE; for better or worse, other Wikimedia projects are ‘VIP clients’ and we don’t question their judgements of fitness for educational purposes—not this way, at least.—Odysseus1479 (talk) 02:20, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Tm: : My removal of this image from that three Wikis is because this image is inaccurate (for reasons I gave above), and therefore shouldn't be on Wikipedia to cause misinformation. It is independent from if this image itself is going to kept here or not. --fireattack (talk) 05:35, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Fireattack: You insist in removing a file that is in use in three wikipedias, despite what others have said? It was kept because was in use and so you attempt to remove its use by stealth? No, it is not "independent from if this image itself is going to kept here or not" as you know. Tm (talk) 05:40, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
What exactly "others have said"? People told me this image isn't going to be removed from Commons because we generally didn't remove an image because it's inaccurate, and I accept it. Now I'm just removing it form article because its misinformaiton. What is your reason for reverting my change on Wikipedia (not here)?--fireattack (talk) 05:43, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete - People look to Commons for images that conform to the rules of Commons, including COM:SCOPE. An image that is wrong or misleading has negative educational value. Why would we not assume that no project, upon learning it's inaccurate, would want to use it. In this case, the nom removed the files from use. If the projects see it as valuable they could restore it. Instead, we have someone else from Commons deciding for them that they want to display inaccurate information and reverting the removal. Many Wikimedia projects are all but inactive. That someone looked to Commons, assumed good faith that our images are accurate, and included it in an article, it is not reasonable to say that it must stay permanently regardless of its accuracy -- that we must wait for someone to realize it's inaccurate on that project and remove it themselves, and that we are forced into inaction until that point (and that we cannot take that step for them?). Even if not inactive, the right approach would be to leave a message on the article's talk page explaining it, pointing to this thread, and seeing if anyone objects (I cannot imagine anyone will). I'm not interested in upholding the letter of the rules just to keep an image at the expense of the reason we have rules. — Rhododendrites talk22:25, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Clarifying as per what I wrote at the Village Pump. COM:INUSE isn't the problem. The problem is not allowing a Commons user who sees it's problematic from acting like a Wikimedian and improving Wikimedia projects by removing it. Instead, they have been forced to display inaccurate information -- and why? To keep the file? Because they might want inaccurate/misleading information? Commons users are Wikimedians and, if aware of a problematic image, can edit those other projects. If those other projects disagree, they can just undo for themselves. — Rhododendrites talk22:35, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://www.amazon.com/Living-Existentialism-Essays-Honor-Thomas/dp/1498298516 Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:38, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: oops meant this as speedy. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:39, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no license ComputerHotline (talk) 08:47, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Jcb (talk) 15:40, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook image, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:11, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:00, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Karaaliboy (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text documents of questionable notability.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:02, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:32, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AHG266 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo-album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:16, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:50, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Fraoch as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Thats Kevin Cummins Work Yann (talk) 15:03, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[1] Picture 10/14. Image Credits: Kevin Cummins. Taken 1979-08-19.--Fraoch (talk) 15:11, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:54, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

http://www.thelightofgolrasharif.com/website/thelightofgolrasharif/picture_gallery/a6.htm. Same series as the deleted File:Syed Ghulam Moinuddin Gilani.jpg (allegedly taken 11 April 1967) Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:12, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:18, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP#Netherlands, freedom of panorama only applies to buildings, and 2D and 3D artwork. This billboard ad is not any of those. xplicit 11:10, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, Vera (talk) 09:35, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong upload - personal signature Svperbugoy (talk) 16:50, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Taivo at 07:50, 21 Juni 2018 UTC: Author requested deletion of page: author's request on creation day --Krdbot 12:42, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: In use. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:10, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

confusion of roles: this is not a self-portrait, Ujjawal Krishnam cannot be both subject and author/copyright owner. See also File:Ujjawal Krishnam.jpeg nominated for same reason. Ariadacapo (talk) 17:06, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It was subject's camera and conference rights reserved. 27.61.157.165 04:37, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

keep As said, subject has photo and there is no one claiming a copyright or confusing a role. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AchaksurvisayaUdvejin (talk • contribs) 11:12, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

…says who? Are you the author, the subject, the copyright holder? Ariadacapo (talk) 12:57, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:22, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 15:48, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Avant que de proposer à la suppression un quelconque fichier, veuillez vous donner la peine de cliquer sur les liens qui lui sont associés. En l'espèce, je pense que la notice Palissy est suffisamment explicite pour pouvoir répondre à vos pseudo-interrogations, mais aussi aurait-il fallu que vous daigniez la lire. Au surplus, j'avais bien pris le soin de recopier sur la catégorie "Baie 28 de l'église Notre-Dame de Beaufort-en-Vallée", ce après les avoir vérifiées, les informations parfaitement pertinentes qu'un autre contributeur avait judicieusement postées à l'appui de son versement préalable au mien d'une image de l’œuvre incriminée. Quand bien même tous ces renseignements n'auraient pas été portés à la communauté Wikipédia, rien ne vous dispensait du minimum d’honnêteté et de désintéressement intellectuels qui eût consisté à pallier un défaut de sources, de références, par l'apport d'une contribution corrective résultant de vos propres recherches sur la toile, ce qu'assurément vous n'avez même pas envisagé de faire. Navré que de devoir être désagréable, mais je passe suffisamment de temps à décrire, sourcer et géolocaliser les fichiers que je verse sur Commons pour éviter de voir mon travail réduit à néant par des contributions aussi inutiles que destructrices.--GO69 (talk) 18:19, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: OK now. --Yann (talk) 19:43, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

اثر اشتقاقی Hosseinronaghi (talk) 16:16, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 20:43, 22 Juni 2018 UTC: Uploader's request --Krdbot 00:41, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gulfaraz Ahmed (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:00, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Gulfaraz Ahmed (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:03, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 03:52, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nothing Sanaullah 06:03, 20 June 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Molla Sanaullah (talk • contribs) 06:03, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Unused personal file. --E4024 (talk) 08:01, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination by User:Magog the Ogre. --~Moheen (keep talking) 04:21, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am the person who uploaded this image with the wrong licensing, please delete it. IdkSam (talk) 12:35, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 09:11, 24 Juni 2018 UTC: CSD G7 (author or uploader request deletion) --Krdbot 12:39, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am the person who uploaded this image with the wrong licensing, please delete it. IdkSam (talk) 12:36, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 09:10, 24 Juni 2018 UTC: CSD G7 (author or uploader request deletion) --Krdbot 12:39, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

i uploaded it by accident Vkw.studiogood (talk) 13:29, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 10:01, 24 Juni 2018 UTC: CSD G7 (author or uploader request deletion) --Krdbot 12:39, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused gallery page, appears to be a typo, creator intended to create a category. Oxyman (talk) 19:26, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Oxyman. It was indeed a typo. Edwardx (talk) 09:03, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Empty. --Achim (talk) 16:27, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and no license since 17 June 2018. --Green Giant (talk) 00:07, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader has the nasty habit of upload files to third party sites, with bogus free licenses and then reuploads them to Commons, all in the same day. See previous deletion requests to see the context Tm (talk) 00:51, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:18, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader has the nasty habit of upload files to third party sites, with bogus free licenses and then reuploads them to Commons, all in the same day. See previous deletion requests to see the context Tm (talk) 00:52, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Fata Anik: Could explain how this image, uploaded today to the supposed source, was available before in another website? Tm (talk) 00:57, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Tm: It is under the cc0 license — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fata Anik (talk • contribs) 01:00, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • @Fata Anik: Who do you think you fool? I first tought that your uploads were made in simple and pure naivety, a simple and honest mistake of a rookie made all in good faith, but your last actions show it otherwise. You uploaded today to https://www.stockvault.net/photo/252553 with a bogus license, and in less than a day, you upload it to Commons, trying to wash the file? This file was available way before than today on the site i link above and you can only claim that the file is "under the cc0 license", license that yourself "imposed" on this file. In short your attitudes, made without any lack of error or naivety, are indefensible and could be called pure and simply theft of intelectual property. Tm (talk) 01:05, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Tm: Well I'll stop it ... I'm sorry — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fata Anik (talk • contribs) 01:12, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • @Fata Anik: Good, is really good that you admit that you made a mistake (we all do). Welcome aboard anyway. I see, if i´am not making a mistake. that your interested in themes of Lebanon. As you already know about Flickr and other sites that have images with free licenses, you can start by looking on that sites, for images with free licenses, albeit you have to be careful to some images that are upload by others that not the authors (~small number of files, files with completely different subjects, files that have totally diferent quality, photographic style, diferent cameras, etc). Or you can upload images taken by yourself, but be careful about a thing called freedom of panorama (in short you cannot images of buildings who the authors have died less then 50 years ago - 1968 or latter). Also you can sign your texts using ~~~~ in the end. Hope that this is usefull. Tm (talk) 01:27, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:17, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright vio Dr-Taher (talk) 01:14, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 15:53, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image violates personal criteria Fata Anik (talk) 11:38, 19 June 2018 (UTC) * Keep Freely licensed image of a internationaly famous and public person. Please explain what is "personal criteria" and how this image violates said "personal criteria", of a person, again, that is well known internationally? Tm (talk) 21:18, 19 June 2018 (UTC) On a second tought, this image uploaded today in source and in Commons, deserves a quick search on Googgle Images. And it shows that this is an license laundry attempt, as this image shows in several places way before the supposed source. Tm (talk) 21:21, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


The source for this image is missing Fata Anik (talk) 01:23, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Looks 404; but you uploaded this pic?.. --E4024 (talk) 07:51, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:16, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

We have many images both of the church and the rest of Heiligenblut. No need for a personal type (vacation pics) image here. E4024 (talk) 07:22, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 07:41, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal / Non used / Out scope Sturm (talk) 15:30, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 07:51, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Difficult to assert why this artwork copyright can be removed by the uploader. Unless a explicit release of rights is carried out by the owner of the copyright, this image can't be here Discasto talk 21:41, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jewelry designs are generally protected by copyright so long as they exhibit originality and creativity. See COM:CB. --Anna (Cookie) (talk) 00:27, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:31, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 09:30, 26 Juni 2018 UTC: No license since 18 June 2018 --Krdbot 12:37, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Used in here before with higher resolution. Copyrights violation. Rapsar (talk) 00:58, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:25, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It has more than simple geometric shapes and texts. Copyrights violation. Rapsar (talk) 00:59, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:26, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Used in here before, with higher resolution. Copyrights violation. Rapsar (talk) 01:01, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:26, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook download, architectural rendering likely belongs to developer/architect Ytoyoda (talk) 02:50, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:26, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

EXIF says All Rights Reserved, Stewart Gibbs Photography Ytoyoda (talk) 02:51, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:27, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by DollyDecadence (talk · contribs)

[edit]

non-notable individual, out of project scope

Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:55, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: From Facebook, no permission. --Yann (talk) 12:27, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurred and obscure image Afifa Afrin (talk) 03:15, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:28, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File is given now in de-wp, redundant for using Elmedinfeta (talk) 21:53, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree that this logo should be below threshold of originality. Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:43, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:28, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non used / Out of scope Sturm (talk) 05:13, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:28, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:29, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:29, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:29, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:30, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:30, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:30, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ninguna licencia justifica su uso. Viola los derechos de auto. Davidmejoradas (talk) 05:49, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: PD-textlogo. --Yann (talk) 13:23, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Duplicate. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 08:06, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ninguna licencia justifica su uso. Davidmejoradas (talk) 05:58, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: PD-textlogo. --Yann (talk) 13:24, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I have a privacy concern Sanaullah 06:18, 20 June 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Molla Sanaullah (talk • contribs) 06:18, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Unused personal file. --E4024 (talk) 08:02, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Out of scope. --Yann (talk) 13:21, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Magnolia677 (talk) 08:04, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:20, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for indoor works in PRC B dash (talk) 08:15, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

made in 1936, PD in China--shizhao (talk) 03:23, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 13:20, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no license ComputerHotline (talk) 08:46, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Grab from French TV. --Yann (talk) 13:25, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader and the photographer named in the EXIF data do not match. Appears to be a professional portrait in which copyright might belong to the initial photographer. Bilby (talk) 08:56, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:26, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is there a song contest like this? Why is the description " yessssssssssssss"? The uploader has another file in DRs. E4024 (talk) 09:14, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:27, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Kattenkruid (talk) 09:23, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:28, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The author is "Robert Wright" the uploader is user:DSall, needs permission via OTRS. + low quality and similar versions can be found on the Internet. Hanooz 09:28, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:30, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:31, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:48, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:31, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:49, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope personal file. (See previous "versions" also.) E4024 (talk) 07:57, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 19:49, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope personal file. E4024 (talk) 08:05, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:50, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Murky photo taken through car window Malcolma (talk) 09:47, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:51, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False date, unlikely to be own work. Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:34, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:30, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cenur.melad (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Last remaining files. No evidence of the claimed license.

Yann (talk) 18:57, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:33, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:39, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:56, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like self promotion but of course I may be wrong. What do you think? E4024 (talk) 07:45, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: personal photo, unused, out of scope. --Wdwd (talk) 13:56, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: unused personal/promo photos, out of scope. --Wdwd (talk) 13:58, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted image replaced by another. I guess the doc continues to be OoS. E4024 (talk) 12:50, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Mardetanha talk 13:27, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

double, bad quality, wrong address in filename GeorgDerReisende (talk) 09:57, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: "bad quality" is no valid reason for deletion; If double specifiy alternative filename; For wrong filename/address request a file rename. --Wdwd (talk) 14:03, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

double, bad quality, wrong address in filename GeorgDerReisende (talk) 09:59, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: "bad quality" is no valid reason for deletion; If double specifiy alternative filename; For wrong filename/address request a file rename. --Wdwd (talk) 14:03, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

double, bad quality, wrong address in filename GeorgDerReisende (talk) 09:59, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: "bad quality" is no valid reason for deletion; If double specifiy alternative filename; For wrong filename/address request a file rename. --Wdwd (talk) 14:04, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

double, bad quality, wrong address in filename GeorgDerReisende (talk) 10:00, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: "bad quality" is no valid reason for deletion; If double specifiy alternative filename; For wrong filename/address request a file rename. --Wdwd (talk) 14:04, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

double, bad quality, wrong address in filename GeorgDerReisende (talk) 10:00, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: "bad quality" is no valid reason for deletion; If double specifiy alternative filename; For wrong filename/address request a file rename. --Wdwd (talk) 14:04, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

double, bad quality, wrong address in filename GeorgDerReisende (talk) 10:01, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: "bad quality" is no valid reason for deletion; If double specifiy alternative filename; For wrong filename/address request a file rename. --Wdwd (talk) 14:04, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

double, bad quality, wrong address in filename GeorgDerReisende (talk) 10:01, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: "bad quality" is no valid reason for deletion; If double specifiy alternative filename; For wrong filename/address request a file rename. --Wdwd (talk) 14:04, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

double, bad quality, wrong address in filename GeorgDerReisende (talk) 10:02, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: "bad quality" is no valid reason for deletion; If double specifiy alternative filename; For wrong filename/address request a file rename. --Wdwd (talk) 14:04, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

double, bad quality, wrong address in filename GeorgDerReisende (talk) 10:02, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: "bad quality" is no valid reason for deletion; If double specifiy alternative filename; For wrong filename/address request a file rename. --Wdwd (talk) 14:04, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

double, bad quality, wrong address in filename GeorgDerReisende (talk) 10:03, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: "bad quality" is no valid reason for deletion; If double specifiy alternative filename; For wrong filename/address request a file rename. --Wdwd (talk) 14:04, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own works : small sizes without EXIFs

Christian Ferrer (talk) 10:59, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 14:05, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

clearly a non-free, professional image and not the work of the uploaded Lugnuts (talk) 11:21, 20 June 2018 (UTC) CAN YOU PROVIDE ME ANY COPY RIGHT ISSUE , THIS PIC IS TAKEN AS PERSONALLY WITH JERSEY YOU DONOT GET ANY COPYRIGHT ISSUE ANY WHERE . PLEASE FIND IT . tHANKYOU — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sushilxxx (talk • contribs) 14:30, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 14:10, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

SLOVENIA, PEKEL

[edit]

Source videos were deleted, it is no longer possible to verify the licenses. A search for archived links on the Wayback Machine and archive.is yielded no results.

xplicit 12:15, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, license review failed. --Wdwd (talk) 14:13, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These are all derivative works of the copyright images on the banners. The banners are in all cases the main subjects of the pictures, so not de minimis. The banners are graphic works, so Freedom of Panorama doesn't apply.

bjh21 (talk) 12:22, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:15, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook image, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:48, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:18, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted logo Gikü (talk) 13:18, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 14:19, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Natalitolstaya (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work. The depicted person cannot be an author of the photographs.

Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:07, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:41, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aldeas Infantiles SOS (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo images. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:41, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ashok.t.patel (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical books. Proper author/source and country of origin should be provided and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:41, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be moved to relevant project as wiki-text if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:42, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cjenm (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 17:13, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:42, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Melanielopez0214 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Questionable authorship claims based on the low resolutions, missing metadata, the uploader's history, and the nature of several of the images. Several of the images are apparent screenshots of presumably non-free content. Others are collages of unsourced images.

LX (talk, contribs) 19:33, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:42, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image, out of COM:SCOPE Eurodyne (talk) 19:33, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:42, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Thegastiinthedark (talk · contribs)

[edit]

A copyrighted video game character, ice cream with higher res online, see google image search. None of these users uploads are own work, but the paint images which are out of scope

BevinKacon (talk) 21:24, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:43, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Yaspimpi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No exif data, mix of watermarks, low quality, some have higher res via Google image search, suspect they've been lifted from social media account of subject

BevinKacon (talk) 21:24, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:44, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Estebanibal (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work, no exif data, pictures of art, newspaper scan, missing source information for rest of them

BevinKacon (talk) 21:24, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:44, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook image, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:46, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:23, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook image, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:09, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 17:10, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrights Andrzei111 (talk) 11:54, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:27, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo of unknown thing, maybe out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 09:53, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:01, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It’s been here for a while, but probably copyrighted. This file can be found on promotional sites of internet, and it’s about a razor that goes under the branding name of Rollingrazor. —Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 11:33, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:42, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in France. xplicit 11:28, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Aucun rapport !!! --ComputerHotline (talk) 11:47, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 21:30, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in France. xplicit 11:30, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Aucun rapport !!!! --ComputerHotline (talk) 11:47, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 21:31, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm not sure the mention "These photos are free to use in any way you see fit, but please include credits to the photographer. The photos are available as highres, the links are found below each phtoto." is sufficient for Commons. Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:35, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Released in CC-BY-SA 4.0 SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 21:32, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality. No links to it. Superceded by File:Window functions in the frequency domain.png Bob K (talk) 11:47, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: superseded by File:Window functions in the frequency domain.png. SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 21:34, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't know if this statue is OK under Fop, but with the two boys posing around it, it looks more like a vacation pic. (Probably for that reason not used.) IMHO OoS. E4024 (talk) 12:04, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: Out of Scope. SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 21:37, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

We have two of these; the other looks better. None are used nor categorized. E4024 (talk) 12:08, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, the above one is used, delete this one: File:Logo AMIGO.svg. --E4024 (talk) 12:09, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Both are different. The one queued here is the new official version of the logo (as I got it from Amigo to use it for the article), the other one is an earlier version that has been official before. -- Achim Raschka (talk) 12:12, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion: different from the SVG file. SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 21:38, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please see Commons:Deletion requests/File:AMIGO logo neu.jpg. E4024 (talk) 12:11, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Both logos are different. The one queued here is the older official version of the logo , the other one is the official version of today - Achim Raschka (talk) 12:14, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion: different from the JPG version. SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 21:38, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Useless file, company not encyclopedic BohemianRhapsody (talk) 13:02, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - out of scope for blatant lack of notability. SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 21:40, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Meaningless and useless file BohemianRhapsody (talk) 13:08, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: out of scope and unusable. SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 21:41, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 21:45, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - no educational value Time4ARevolution 05:10, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

COM:ADVERT, OOS.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 19:31, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   20:02, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm not sure the mention "These photos are free to use in any way you see fit, but please include credits to the photographer. The photos are available as highres, the links are found below each phtoto." is sufficient for Commons. Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:36, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: not sure how "any way you see fit" is unclear. This is a classic {{Attribution}} IMO. --Storkk (talk) 09:55, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by RedaktionSell (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF/different cameras, could be found with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for that, I am still practicing. I made my first user contribution (in german, I am much better in that language) and wanted to use pictures for that. So I uploaded these files. I thought, the pics would be hidden in the same way my first edit still is. Although I have the user rights for all of them, two of the pictures are indeed not my own work. Please delete the pictures an sorry for the inconvenience. For the next upload I will take more care. With best wishes, redaktionSell — Preceding unsigned comment added by RedaktionSell (talk • contribs) 20:59, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: photographers should confirm licenses by following the instructions on OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 09:53, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Unused personal image of two people traveling.--Kai3952 (talk) 15:42, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Author here. I was hoping that in almost a decade since I took this picture, someone would have made better use of it, and enhanced relevant Wikipedia articles at the same time. I parked it at Wikipedia:en:Jinguashi in a gallery. Sadly, enhancements haven't happened yet. This is actually a historically significant light railway line serving the famous (now decommissioned) gold mine at Jinguashi. Google (or Imagine Google) for 金瓜石 台車鐵道. I find that there were talks to resurrect this light railway to further promote tourism. This picture of the "abandoned" historical railway may become "historical" itself. I leave the decision to the community. For now, I added this picture to Wikipedia:en:Handcar and Wikipedia:en:Taiwanese push car railways. I made Wikipedia:zh:臺車 link to right commons category, and tagged this image with the category "Mining railways in Taiwan". That's what I can do for now. Cheers. Fred Hsu (talk) 01:16, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Fred Hsu: In this case, we have other better pictures which do support your claims, but I don't think this picture is educationally useful. Please look at these pictures carefully: File:Jinguashi 070909 7.jpg, File:新北-金瓜石神社 (32064466530).jpg, File:224, Taiwan, 新北市瑞芳區石山里 - panoramio (22).jpg, File:Tunnel at Jioufen 02.jpg...etc, we have so many pictures available, why do you insist on using "File:Taiwan 2009 JinGuaShi Historic Gold Mine Abadoned Railway Tracks FRD 8753.jpg"? If you can not prove that it is educationally useful, then I would think its just a "private travel picture". See: Out of scope policy.--Kai3952 (talk) 09:08, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Kai3952: Ah. That's cool. I looked at all pictures. I think File:新北-金瓜石神社 (32064466530).jpg is usable as a replacement. Some of what you mentioned as too small. Others have picture quality issues. But all are useful in my opinion. I see that you added category tags to a bunch of them. I remember seeing your changes before on my pictures, not just recently. Your work is much appreciated, including prompting me to spend a bit more time digging around for the right category tags to apply to this picture you want to delete.
So. I never did "insist on using" any of my pictures. Just like every other busy person trying to contribute to our common knowledge base, after I upload what I think will be useful media, I spend a bit of time looking for an article that can benefit from each picture. Most often there are already plenty of higher quality and more relevant pictures on relevant articles. Once in a blue moon some article can use my newly uploaded pictures. I then take a few more minutes to write a good caption and find the right place in the article to place the thumbnail. Now, could I have spent even more time finding related images on the Commons and use these images instead. Yes. Do I always do that? No. Often my addition of a picture prompts someone else monitoring an article to find that extra time to replace my thumbnail with a better one. The end result is that together we have made Wiki better.
I replaced by picture on the Wikipedia:en:Taiwanese push car railways article with File:新北-金瓜石神社 (32064466530).jpg. I think it goes very well with that poster image. Again, thanks. Feel free to make more replacements, as long as the context calls for the replacement. Honestly, my picture showing an abandoned light railway being used as a walking trail should have tourists in them. It is useful in some articles, and less useful in others. It's all about context. Don't you think? I enhanced the image description to make this point more explicit: 金瓜石運黃金的舊臺車鐵道成為旅客的必走的觀光景點. One day. One day I may still find time to actually revise related articles to catch up and provide textual context. Cheers. Fred Hsu (talk) 02:04, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
If this sentence("金瓜石運黃金的舊臺車鐵道成為旅客的必走的觀光景點") can prove that this photo is educationally useful, please translate into English.--Kai3952 (talk) 12:33, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: in use, therefore in scope. Editorial decisions about which photos are "best" to use in which articles are not made on Commons, but are left to the sister projects. --Storkk (talk) 09:51, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Zaydbinumar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Old images; may be PD by date, but more information needed.

Yann (talk) 07:12, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:19, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files recently uploaded by Zaydbinumar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Likely copyright violations. Some are watermarked, some are so old that I doubt "own work". Sources for the others:

I haven't checked all of Zaydbinumar's earlier uploads; some, at least, seemed genuinely "own work" to me.

Huon (talk) 23:26, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Where the photos are old enough to be PD, evidence should be provided of that. For the others, the original photographer(s) should confirm the license by following the instructions on OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 12:45, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Zaydbinumar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small files without EXIF data, user blocked for copyvios, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 17:21, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, likely copyright violations. --Storkk (talk) 09:49, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Zaydbinumar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:24, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 10:02, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small files without EXIF data, no evidence of a free license.

Yann (talk) 18:38, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Most of these are from Veronidae (talk · contribs), who has created a lot of galleries in her own user space. Yann (talk) 18:43, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Photographer(s) should confirm free licenses by following the instructions on OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 09:48, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See COM:FOP#Russia: there's insufficient FOP for sculptures (and this is presumably not a permanent installation anyway). Stefan2 (talk) 20:21, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nomination and per COM:PCP unless it can be shown that the mascot en:Zabivaka's likeness is not protected by copyright. Sport team and event mascots seem to be typically protected by copyright which tends to be held by the associated team or the organizing committee, and these mascots often appear on merchandise sold by the team or organizers. The mascot is the focus of the photo, so I don't think de minimis can be claimed here. So, there are two copyrights in play here the one for the photograph of mascot and the one for the mascot likeness/imagery. The former can be released under a free license by the photographer, but the photographer cannot claim copyright owenership over the latter. Just for reference, I did ask about this at COM:VPC#File:Zabivaka.jpg and it appears to have been brought to DR as a result of that post. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:24, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 09:47, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears it was taken ~24 hours ago at the World Cup (see similar), but the upload is listed as WP0 by the software. Web resolution, professional image, famous soccer star. Very unlikely self-created. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:37, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 01:19, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

definitely not own work; artist given as "Karin and Ernst van Leyden", who died 1977 - 1969 Joostik (talk) 16:07, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 01:20, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private picture. Out of project scope. Schlurcher (talk) 16:30, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 01:22, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Data? Archivo? Fichier? How? E4024 (talk) 14:41, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ops! I'm sorry for the sign. --Lucamodena (talk) 15:26, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This appears to be a monster gallery in the wrong namespace. Changing it to use "<gallery>" syntax would solve the first problem. Moving it to Roberto Brambilla would solve the second problem. It only needs to be deleted if @Lucamodena is not amenable.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 15:43, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oh, I just saw all your uploads have been DR'ed. If they are eventually deleted, I'm afraid even Jeff cannot help you. Let's wait for the outcome of that DR first; if you still have files I will show you how to make a cat and a gallery. Promesso. --E4024 (talk) 15:42, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@E4024 and Lucamodena: If the files are deleted per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Lucamodena, the subject page should also be deleted.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 15:49, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Jeff, today you remind me of Kızılmaske or The Phantom; so quick to reach everywhere... How many hours left to save the world? (Hey, I know you enjoy humour. :) --E4024 (talk) 15:55, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@E4024: If I am mentioned or pinged, I will read the surrounding material and will likely respond.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 15:59, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thank you so much @Jeff G.: and @E4024: for your answer. You are very kind. I'm a rookie and I make mistakes. What should I? Wait for the common outcome?

All, --Lucamodena (talk) 16:12, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Lucamodena: Yes, you can wait or ask for the photographer(s) to send permission via OTRS.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 17:19, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 04:45, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Artist with a cat with four files, all of which form this gallery page and none are used anywhere. I never claim that if someone is not in a WP we should ignore him/her, but keeping two pages for someone who may not be notable seems too much to me. IMHO let's bomb the gallery and stick to the cat only. E4024 (talk) 14:28, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: gallery and cat can happily coexist. --JuTa 05:06, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission mentioned ; Image found at https://www.facebook.com/squadra.corsa.ufficiale/ Tractopelle-jaune (talk) 13:49, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Non-free logo (COM:CSD#F1). --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 10:04, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission mentioned ; Image found at https://www.facebook.com/squadra.corsa.ufficiale/ Tractopelle-jaune (talk) 13:50, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Non-free logo (COM:CSD#F1). --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 10:03, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:29, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 07:25, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. No cats other than the photographer whom we do not really know. "Women screaming"? "Friends of Rodrigo Paredes"? What? E4024 (talk) 09:00, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 07:25, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"The logo of the 2018 Kdam Eurovision National Final" What is this, something in scope? E4024 (talk) 09:15, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Yes, it is. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 07:29, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photograph was taken deliberately to include the poster(we can clearly see the contents of the poster), there is likely to be copyright infringement.--Kai3952 (talk) 14:10, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, no freedom of panorama in source country, crop is not possible here. Taivo (talk) 09:08, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality image, thus not in scope Amada44  talk to me 19:39, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

seriosly? its underexposed and impossible to id (maybe a form of Clivia? but really difficult to say). I really can't think of a usage for this image except maybe as an example for an underexposed image. cheers, Amada44  talk to me 06:37, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep. An absurd reasoning – scope is not inferred from quality. Moreover, although the quality lags behind the pixel size (4000 × 6000), one who needs a pretty image can made, say, a bright 1000 × 1500 PNG from this dark JPEG. Commons will gain nothing from deletion. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 16:01, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, the plant is not identifiable. Actually I did not understand even, that this is a plant. Taivo (talk) 09:18, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work, no evidence of permission. Ubcule (talk) 14:16, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Edit; not sure how this falls with respect to US public domain. Ubcule (talk) 14:24, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Ubcule: It would have had to have been made by a federal employee during the course of their duties. Seeing as how there are campaign laws regarding using federal employees to work on tasks not related to their direct job (IE campaign work) I have my doubts that it falls under PD-USGov. --Majora (talk) 03:34, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Derivative work of File:Geraldine Ferraro 1984 (1).jpg SecretName101 (talk) 04:57, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: derivative of free File:Geraldine Ferraro 1984 (1).jpg.  JGHowes  talk 02:37, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File uploaded by Zunaid James

[edit]

Self-promotional pictures. --Harlock81 (talk) 23:17, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 10:24, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Technically it qualifies for the speedy deletion, but because it is widepsread I rather start a del req. Why it should be removed then? Because it isn't a "polish symbol", therefore PD-polishsymbol doesn't apply. Universities in Poland are self-governed bodies acting according to their own statutes. And this statutes (or other internal acts and regulations) regulates their logos. In other words, these are not government ("federal") regulations, therefore not "official documents". Such logos should be regarded as any other corporation logos. Masur (talk) 12:17, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination except for the last one, PD-textlogo seems fine to me for that file. --Jcb (talk) 17:57, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Prajaman (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:28, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Prajaman (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://academictree.org/photo/003/cache.029702.Forman_Williams.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 23:30, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Prajaman (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical drawings and photo. Proper author/source and country of origin should be provided and license tags corrected.

  1. File:Optimum height for the bursting of a 105mm shell, plot of figure 2.pdf
  2. File:Optimum height for the bursting of a 105mm shell, figure 1.jpg
  3. File:Optimum height for the bursting of a 105mm shell, plot of table 4.pdf
  4. File:Optimum height for the bursting of a 105mm shell, figure 2.jpg
  5. File:JF Clarke.jpg

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Images 1 through 4, are from a US military publication (here), so would be {{PD-USGov}} and keep. Image 5, no idea, would seem to not be a pre-1923 publication, so without further data 5. would be delete.  — billinghurst sDrewth 02:58, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: kept 4 images from US Government report; deleted unsourced portrait image.  — billinghurst sDrewth 04:22, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm not sure the mention "Photo by Bruno Bébert (France) Copyright free to use" is sufficient for Commons, http://www.kittorock.com/contact/ Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:38, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Patrick Thankyou for your message. I have done exerything i can to receive the permissions from the 2 or 3 photographers on all my uploads especially bruno bebert or Oliver Kuusk. they have given proofs on email and even written themselves to wiki as a declaration. The problem is that no one in wiki responded to un delete the pictures. This picture in question "Kitto performing live at Les Enfants Festival, Nice France July 8 2010" is a very important one taken especially for me to use.. copyright free by Bruno Bebert. He does not have a wikicommons account himself and just sent me an email to say "Please let them know to go ahead" Im sorry but its hard to follow your codes (Im ADHD and would just like to know we can save our honest photographs..) I have no one else to help me with the wiki commons.. unless i try to find another way to upload these special pictures for Wikipedia. please can you advise. Thanks Best regards jane missnoise@kittorock.com - Forwarded message ---------- From: BRUNO BEBERT <bebertphotos@wanadoo.fr> Date: 9 October 2017 at 16:03:12 +02:00 Subject: Re: Kitto photo for Wikipedia To: missnoise@kittorock.com Bruno Bebert Reporter PhotOgraphe bebertphotos@wanadoo.fr www.facebook.com/brunobebertphotographe +33 (0)6 07 71 10 42

also the other photographer..Oliver Kuusk


Forwarded message ---------

From: Oliver Kuusk <oliver.kuusk@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2018, 17:03 Subject: Declaration of consent To: <permissions-commons@wikimedia.org>


I hereby affirm that I, Oliver Kuusk, am the creator and/or sole owner of the exclusive copyright of the media work https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Perfect_Blue_Sky_Mailaul_Festival_Estonia_Photo_Oliver_Kuusk.jpg. I agree to publish the above-mentioned work under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International. I acknowledge that by doing so I grant anyone the right to use the work, even in a commercial product or otherwise, and to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws. I am aware that this agreement is not limited to Wikipedia or related sites. I am aware that the copyright holder always retains ownership of the copyright as well as the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be claimed to have been made by the copyright holder. I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the content may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project.

Oliver Kuusk 2018-06-24 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Missnoise (talk • contribs) 11:24, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:20, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Querying own work claim based on a caption for a simmilar image on w:Verge3D, which would suggest this is a demo from the relevant framework. How is this own work in respect of the UI elements shown as well as the model? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:58, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I'm an employee of the company behind this framework and fully authorized to share this image on Wikimedia.SantaWinsAgain (talk) 13:12, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Please provide confirmation of this via the OTRS queue then. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:24, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@SantaWinsAgain: , you should confirm that you're authorised by submitting a ticket to OTRS. -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 21:28, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - still no permission. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:40, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dmitri Dunaev's permission is needed. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:05, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me, @Well-Informed Optimist: , could you be more specific? -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 21:29, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
It's nor own work by the uploader. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 17:55, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: unlikel y to be own work. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:42, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOYS. xplicit 11:36, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:43, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that picture is free of use, http://www.kittorock.com/gallery/ Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:45, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you click the file in the website, says "Perfect Blue Sky Nov 8 2016 Photo by John Kye Copyright free to use". --Ganímedes (talk) 14:40, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - "copyright free to use" is too approximate. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:45, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted logo. See also File:Sch logo curtici.png, File:Sch logo coman.png Gikü (talk) 12:33, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:48, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I understand artistic works are not covered by FoP in Syria. E4024 (talk) 13:09, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:50, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

weil sie nur als Beleg dient Dyrehaven (talk) 13:29, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:51, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Urheber zieht Bild zurück Dyrehaven (talk) 13:39, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination+no permission case. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:51, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission mentioned ; Image found at https://www.facebook.com/squadra.corsa.ufficiale/ Tractopelle-jaune (talk) 13:49, 20 June 2018 (UTC) Si je ne suis pas autoriser à mettre le logo officiel de l'équipe corse de football , faites le dans les règles à ma place, parce que sans son Logo la page wikipédia de la squadra corsa est moche.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SQAC2A (talk • contribs) 17:06, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:52, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These pictures violate the copyright in the underlying Ordnance Survey map. The map is the main subject of the pictures, so not de minimis. The maps is a graphic work, so Freedom of Panorama doesn't apply.

bjh21 (talk) 13:52, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:53, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission mentioned. Tractopelle-jaune (talk) 13:56, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:54, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photos. Proper author/source and country of origin should be provided and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 20 June 2018 (UTC) Sorry Eugene, I'm still learning how to add content properly. On July 10th I am attending my first MeetUp. I will show an experienced Wikipedia user your Deletion request and ask them to explain it to me. Then I will be able to make any corrections that are needed. Thank you. --Displacing electrons (talk) 03:34, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:55, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small images without EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 14:37, 20 June 2018 (UTC) + out of COM:SCOPE (https://th.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E0%B8%9E%E0%B8%B4%E0%B8%A1%E0%B8%9E%E0%B9%8C%E0%B8%8A%E0%B8%99%E0%B8%81_%E0%B9%81%E0%B8%81%E0%B9%89%E0%B8%A7%E0%B8%A5%E0%B8%B8%E0%B9%88%E0%B8%A1%E0%B9%83%E0%B8%AB%E0%B8%8D%E0%B9%88). --Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:39, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:56, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small files without EXIF data, user blocked for copyvios, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 13:43, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:56, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical drawing. Proper author/source and country of origin should be provided and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:57, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:57, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved to relevant project as wiki-text if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:57, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

+ crop File:Sidya Touré 2009-09-05.jpg Small size, no EXIF data, bigger copy here. Yann (talk) 14:53, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - unlikel yt obe own work. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:58, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo-album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:58, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1007688592913600513/LcdPWGRP_400x400.jpg Yann (talk) 14:58, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

See file talk page. Please import the original file, or it will be deleted. Thanks, Yann (talk) 14:58, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
comment: see also Commons:Deletion requests/File:T Suneel Kumar IPS.jpg, thx, Roland zh (talk) 18:04, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment There can't be personality right issues here. Yann (talk) 18:18, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: unlikely to be own work. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:59, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ensayo personal; fuera del alcance del proyecto. Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:53, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:33, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:59, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:59, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:47, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:30, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal file I found in Category:Anil. E4024 (talk) 16:13, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:02, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work. Hanooz 16:20, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:03, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private picture. Out of project scope. Not used. Schlurcher (talk) 16:31, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:03, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private picture. Out of project scope. Not used. Schlurcher (talk) 16:32, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:03, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private picture. Out of project scope. Not used. Schlurcher (talk) 16:32, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:04, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely private picture. Out of project scope. Not used. Schlurcher (talk) 16:33, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:04, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope promotional image. Home Lander (talk) 16:38, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: anyway grabbed from facebook "FBMD". --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:04, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file appeared to be a corporate file for me so I tagged it with missing permission. Now the uploader insisted on my talk page to be the photographer.

  • Special:Diff/307314796
  • I'm unsure how to deal in this case because the photograph looks very similar to those on the company homepage.

--Zaccarias (talk) 16:56, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: anyway there are also derivative work issues (interior architecture, mural paintings) + maybe out of scope too. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:08, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It didn't fully upload Jeremygrossman92 (talk) 17:05, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: the file is uploaded. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:09, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small file without EXIF data. Please upload the original image, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. Yann (talk) 17:16, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unlikely to be own work. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:11, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

British film still : any reason for U.S. law to apply. Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:16, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:12, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non-notable logo Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:55, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: currently used. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:16, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

me equivoqué de foto y debo borrarla Paolo S 18:00, 20 June 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Irupetentorio (talk • contribs) 18:00, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. Es un error común. Laura Fiorucci (talk) 18:24, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:17, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SELFIE. Yann (talk) 18:22, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:17, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SELFIE. Also small file without EXIF data. Yann (talk) 18:35, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:17, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SELFIE. Also small file without EXIF data. Yann (talk) 18:35, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:17, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused raster duplicate of an earlier revision of File:Nine Men's Morris board.svg. LX (talk, contribs) 18:35, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:17, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SELFIE. Also small file without EXIF data. Yann (talk) 18:35, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:18, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small file without EXIF data, no evidence of a free license. Yann (talk) 18:35, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:18, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence to support the claim that this photograph was published anonymously and that the photographer's identity was never disclosed (as opposed to just being unknown to the uploader). (If kept, the full resolution version should be used instead of this scaled-down version.) LX (talk, contribs) 18:39, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

zase nemáte pravdu, ale raději to smažu ať máte klid--Martin wolf (talk) 19:40, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unclear copyright statut. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:19, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Of no educational use. Ham II (talk) 19:35, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete, though if it was titled something like "Aberystwyth seafront during the great midnight power-cut of June 2011" I might be more interested. But as such, without explanation, it could simply be the result of a camera fault. Not much use, per nom! Sionk (talk) 20:32, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:20, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Previously deleted File:Author Rohit Shetty.jpg Ronhjones  (Talk) 19:40, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:21, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self promotion, non notable Trade (talk) 12:39, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:24, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image quality is too poor. Russian Rocky (talk) 19:53, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:21, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Fantic 305 Trial brochure scan", so © image (no permission). Cjp24 (talk) 19:58, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:21, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image appears to be from a commercial website or brochure. No metadata. Cjp24 (talk) 20:05, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:21, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It says "source: www.sembrandoluz.com.ar" which could indicate that this wasn't created by the uploader. Stefan2 (talk) 20:28, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:22, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Technical drawing of unclear notability. Not used, bad format (PDF) and borders need to be removed for it to be useful. Anyone who would need a drawing like this would probably create a new one instead of looking for this one, so I'd say that this is out of scope. Stefan2 (talk) 20:30, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:22, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused graph. No foreseeable use. Would require cropping and references to be useful. Out of scope. Stefan2 (talk) 20:32, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:22, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work by the uploader. Also out of scope. Stefan2 (talk) 20:32, 20 June 2018 (UTC) The work is owned by the uploader - produced by DPZ, now managed by CATS but product is from DPZ. DPZ[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:22, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Stefan2 (talk) 20:38, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:22, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See COM:PS#Non-allowable reasons for PDF and DjVu formats. Stefan2 (talk) 20:39, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:23, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hec arredondo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

See COM:PS#Non-allowable reasons for PDF and DjVu formats.

Stefan2 (talk) 20:40, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:23, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, no evidence of permission. Stefan2 (talk) 20:42, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:23, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See COM:PS#Non-allowable reasons for PDF and DjVu formats. Stefan2 (talk) 20:43, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:24, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See COM:PS#Non-allowable reasons for PDF and DjVu formats. Stefan2 (talk) 20:43, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:24, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, contains non-free logos. Stefan2 (talk) 20:45, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:25, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Unlikely to be own work by the uploader. Stefan2 (talk) 20:46, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:25, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Metadata are empty. Dubious. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 20:46, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:25, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. See also w:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quark : Innovation Festival. Stefan2 (talk) 20:48, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:26, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See COM:PS#Non-allowable reasons for PDF and DjVu formats. Stefan2 (talk) 20:49, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:26, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See COM:PS#Non-allowable reasons for PDF and DjVu formats. Stefan2 (talk) 20:50, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:26, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Made5284 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

See COM:PS#Non-allowable reasons for PDF and DjVu formats.

Stefan2 (talk) 20:51, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:26, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See COM:PS#Non-allowable reasons for PDF and DjVu formats. Stefan2 (talk) 20:53, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:26, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Images of church in Stary Kryŭsk

[edit]

Files:

These images were all uploaded by User:Чаховіч Уладзіслаў. I believe they should be deleted because there is no Freedom of Panorama in Belarus. The church was built in 2012. It is a piece of modern architecture and requres a permission from the architect for the image to be published under cc-like license. Jarash (talk) 20:51, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:29, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Any metadate, found at https://www.pinterest.fr/pin/245164773450010724/ Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:23, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unlikely to be own work. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:27, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-promotional picture. Harlock81 (talk) 22:59, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:29, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:05, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:30, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:05, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:30, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Faizankhan33445

[edit]

These images were all uploaded by User:Faizankhan33445. I believe they should be deleted because self-promotional pictures. Harlock81 (talk) 23:26, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:31, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by НоуФрост as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://gazeta.net.ua/city/kremenchugskiy-khudozhnik-rubanov-sego.html = 09.11.2016 - Фото и организация встречи kg-ua.com Yann (talk) 15:02, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 08:13, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This has been published at this site (direct link to photo) where I do not see a release under a free license. This needs a written permission sent to our support team. AFBorchert (talk) 14:13, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

OTRS has received a permission statement but there are still some things that need to be sorted out.--Sphilbrick (talk) 18:01, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: OTRS permission was added. --Rosenzweig τ 22:52, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per http://photomami.tistory.com/notice/7, "please do not edit the photos or crop the logo out". That was posted on November 22, 2017. Any photos posted to that blog after that date have an unclear license as the statement conflicts with the Creative Commons license. Precedent when this happens with Tistory blogs is to COM:PCP delete the images per User:-revi/Tistory

Original 56 files

Majora (talk) 03:41, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


  • partial  Keep @Majora: as per this archived page, the notice page seems to be changed after april 7 2018. the archived version didn't say "please do not edit the photos or crop the logo out" but just talking about the attribution of the author of the images. images published on the blog before the notice was changed are no problem since cc-by license is irrevocable. Puramyun31 (talk) 11:43, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • and  Question although I have no objection of this DR (partially), Can I ask a question? If an user uploads the files unintensionally (he/she doesn't aware of changing situation, since cc-by icon still exist the source blog unlike flickr/youtube-style license change), Can it solely be a reason of blanket distrust or blocking against him/her? Puramyun31 (talk) 09:47, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    I doubt anything would come of it. Tistory is hard. That notice was buried in the footer and I almost missed it. Other reviewers actually missed it. That is why all these images are under license review anyways. Honest mistakes happen and I wouldn't support sanctions against anyone who fault is that they make a truly honest mistake every now and then. I don't expect people to be robots. --Majora (talk) 20:59, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete the following, which were uploaded after the blog's notice was changed to more restrictive terms:
I sent photomami a message using twitter about this matter. Please wait some days. Thanks. --Garam talk 08:58, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per explicit: Deleted pages in his list, and kept the remaining. — regards, Revi 11:48, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am the person who uploaded this image with the wrong licensing, please delete it. IdkSam (talk) 12:25, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am the person who uploaded this image with the wrong licensing, please delete it. IdkSam (talk) 12:29, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted, see log. --Wdwd (talk) 14:16, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted, see log. --Wdwd (talk) 14:16, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am the person who uploaded this image with the wrong licensing, please delete it. IdkSam (talk) 12:36, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am the person who uploaded this image with the wrong licensing, please delete it. IdkSam (talk) 12:42, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted, see log. --Wdwd (talk) 14:16, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted, see log. --Wdwd (talk) 14:17, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by HughJLF as Fair use (Non-free) and the most recent rationale was: historic image|Topsfield Hall Yann (talk) 15:10, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: PD-old-70-1923. --Yann (talk) 19:26, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Extended content
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I hate to do this, but see Commons:Deletion requests/Pictures of the Louvre Pyramid and Category:Louvre Pyramid-related deletion requests: The Louvre pyramid is a copyrighted artwork by I.M. Pei (still alive). France has no freedom of panorama. In these pictures, the pyramid is the main subject of the image, so unfortunately there's no exception like De minimis. There may be more problematic images in this category, I just picked the ones that seemed to be more or less clear cases for now.

El Grafo (talk) 13:42, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose deletion of File:P1030568 (5015328803).jpg. The main object is the old Louvre, seen through some glas. Marcus Cyron (talk) 14:07, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No Fop in France.

Thesupermat (talk) 16:46, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted, except those where the pyramid is not the main object. Materialscientist (talk) 03:16, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{NoFoP-France}}.

* File:Louvre at dusk.JPG * File:Louvre at dusk2.JPG already kept in previous DR --Denniss (talk) 13:03, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

* File:Louvre Museum - entrance.jpg per comment below --Denniss (talk) 13:03, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

* File:Louvre Museum Wikimedia Commons 2.jpg not main object --Denniss (talk) 13:07, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Josve05a (talk) 04:23, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: most are not DM. The pyramid is to prominent, captured intentionally or the images was even used to illustrate the pyramid. Doesn't fit DM. According to the Frech FOP-template "accessory compared to the main represented or handled subject". Natuur12 (talk) 16:36, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The pyramid is still covered by copyright (the architect, Ieoh Ming Pei, is alive), there is no FOP in France and COM:De minimis is not applicable for these files. Per archives, see Category:Louvre Pyramid-related deletion requests.

VIGNERON (talk) 14:22, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. INeverCry 00:41, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{NoFoP-France}} Some of these (~3-5) may have already been kept in an earlier DR, but under a false premise, such as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Louvre at dusk.JPG. I feellike it would be benificial to have a new and 'clean' disussion about these files.

Josve05a (talk) 11:42, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment As two pictures of mine are affected - with one even serving as the prime example for alleged false premises - I'd like to maintain that the principle of de minimis should be applied at least to File:Louvre at dusk.JPG and File:Louvre at dusk2.JPG. They are in fact very similar to the images used to illustrate De Minimis in France --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 12:08, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Therefore  Keep, also per above --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:28, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Same for my picture which was not even nominated for deletion in the last round where 5 others were removed. I find this repeated request is itself under false premises and object strongly. Dfg13 (talk) 16:30, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep File:Louvre Museum - entrance.jpg, as I already wrote in March: the pyramid is an "accessory to the main handled subject" - the entrance. It also has been discussed and excepted here and obove. --Euku: 07:22, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, after consulting Category:Louvre Pyramid-related deletion requests/kept I decided to delete all the photos. Object under construction can also be protected with copyright, if enough copyrightable details are seen. General views about museum can also be protected with copyright, if the museum is protected with copyright, that means, if enough copyrightable details are seen. Taivo (talk) 08:03, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{NoFoP-France}} As earlier DRs (above).

Josve05a (talk) 19:45, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: but kept one. From the perspeĉtive it becomes quite clear that the pyramid is there intentional and is indeed one of the main subjects. Natuur12 (talk) 14:08, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Commons:Freedom of panorama in France.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Support --The Photographer (talk) 14:56, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Blacked-out version kept, others deleted: none of these images complies with de minimis. For re-upload, please black out or crop. --Pitke (talk) 05:53, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pitke (talk) 05:53, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This building has been designed by Ieoh Ming Pei (b. 1917), an architect who is still alive. As there is no freedom of panorama in France, this picture should be removed from Commons.

Pymouss Let’s talk - 21:25, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:47, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France.

Thesupermat (talk) 09:09, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thesupermat (talk) 09:14, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment I deleted all files where the pyramid is the central element. For the rest, it could be argued that the pyramid is unavoidable (cf. the Terreaux case), or a secondary element. Regards, Yann (talk) 09:47, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, but some are  kept, because not enough copyrightable details can be seen. Taivo (talk) 19:13, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The Louvre pyramid is a copyrighted artwork by I. M. Pei. France has no freedom of panorama. In these pictures, the pyramid is one of the main subjects of the images, so there is no exception like De minimis.

Ras67 (talk) 18:04, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Nominator Ras67, the rationale for deletion you placed on ALL these images was "the pyramid is one of the main subjects of the images, so there is no exception like De minimis."
Frankly, I have found the closures of discussions that revolve around FOP and de minimis, in France, to be pretty inconsistent, and unpredictable. Some discussions where I thought the images were sure to be deleted ended up being kept because the closing administrator concluded the questionable element was merely "one of" the elements of those images.
I uploaded one of these images, one that shows the square in front of the Louvre, including the pyramid. The Pyramid takes up less than ten percent of that image's real estate, less than one third of the horizontal span of the image.
Did you intend everyone weighing in here to take a meaningful look at all two dozen images? Do you think it might have made sense for you to have further broken them down, separating the few where most of the image was of the pyramid, from those where the image was really of the square in front of the Louvre?
How about going back and adding your estimate of how much of each images' real estate is taken up the pyramid?
In my opinion, these two dozen images should not have been the subject of a single nomination, because they are not sufficiently alike. Geo Swan (talk) 21:55, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
You want a nomination for each picture alone? IMHO all pictures have the same problem. The question is, where is de minimis exceeded and where not. May the closing admin decide, therefor is this discusion. But you have right, this procedure is inconsistent and unpredictable like the whole subject. Regards --Ras67 (talk) 22:18, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
One has to understand the decision of the Cour de cassation in the Terreaux case to decide what is OK and what is not, which is a bit complex. In short, it says that if a copyrighted work appears unavoidable in a general picture, then it is acceptable.
I am surprised we don't have an article about this. In 2005, the Cour de cassation said that general pictures of the Terreaux square in Lyon, including the work of art by Daniel Buren are not violation of the author's copyright. Regards, Yann (talk) 23:10, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
We have a guideline, but how tight is the commentary. The pyramid as central element of the place is in almost every image unavoidable. To "freeing" a picture you have to photograph the whole place? Where is the threshold? To my nomination i've included the pyramid's space and in relation the space of all other (non copyrighted) elements. I don't know if this proceeding is correct.--Ras67 (talk) 13:26, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
IANA, but I think our interpretation of French is too strict. As it is said on the FOP page, a picture is not a derivative work if the work of art is a mere element blended into an architectural ensemble. Regards, Yann (talk) 22:47, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, apparently nobody wants to close the request and I must close it again. I keep all the photos previously kept or undeleted. File:January Mon Dieu Palais Louvre Paris - Master Earth Photography 2014 - series France saphir pictures - panoramio.jpg is de minimis.

I explain keeping file:Parisienne2002-1.jpg. Pyramid is simple geometrical figure and not copyrightable. Louvre Pyramid is not a simple geometrical figure and it is copyrightable. It's not allowed to use non-trivial details of copyrighted objects. But under some circumstances the photo has no copyrightable details, only simple geometrical figure, which isn't copyrightable. These photos can be in Commons. Taivo (talk) 12:26, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France

Thesupermat (talk) 09:46, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thesupermat: Half of these are already nominated. There is no need to do it again. Then images are acceptable if the pyramid is an unavoidable element in the whole composition (decision of the Cour de Cassation regarding the Terreaux case). Regards, Yann (talk) 09:49, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Yann: are you sure? "Paris Musée du Louvre - panoramio - Nikolai Karaneschev.jpg" is the only file I see already nominated (nothing on this page and nothing on the talk page of these file). I've put a gallery to show that in most of these photos the Pyramid is the main subject and not really an unavoidable element.
At least for the Paris Louvre Cour d'Honneur Pyramide 09 to 16 and for Paris, France (Unsplash QrpX-2tPmNY), I would say  Delete.
Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 10:16, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I am sure. I nominated them myself. I think File:Paris Louvre Cour d'Honneur Pyramide 03.jpg, File:Paris Louvre Cour d'Honneur Pyramide 04.jpg, File:Paris Louvre Cour d'Honneur Pyramide 05.jpg and File:Louvre Palace (5986775507).jpg could be kept. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:20, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted most of them. Kept the four mentioned by Yann and one additional that has already been deemed fine in two previous DRs on this page. --Majora (talk) 00:35, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:FOP France

Roy17 (talk) 14:32, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. Even the last one has the pyramid as a very prominent feature. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:42, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France, thus the Louvre Pyramid is still protected by copyright.

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 05:21, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@D-Kuru: pd ineligible is possible, but only if the object is really simple, like a flagpole or an obelisk.--Roy17 (talk) 20:53, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Roy17: And what is so special about a simple tetrahedron / pyramid? The general shape is ineligible for copyriht in my opinion. Close up images of the roof construction may be not. --D-Kuru (talk) 21:16, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep File:Automatic window cleaner, Louvre 11 December 2007.jpg.  Delete everything else since the pyramid is the primary subject.--Roy17 (talk) 20:53, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: most, except those Darwin pointed out. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:52, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France, thus the Louvre Pyramid is still protected by copyright.

Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 14:44, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Clear cases. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 00:01, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ahmadtalk 18:42, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France, thus the Louvre Pyramid is still protected by copyright. Don't think these can be considered as COM:DM

Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 12:13, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:53, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France, thus the Louvre Pyramid is still protected by copyright. Don't think these can be considered as COM:DM

 Keep --Tangopaso (talk) 19:54, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete --Tangopaso (talk) 19:54, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 15:53, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am the uploader. OK for suppression of File:Strikes at the Louvre Pyramid 2.jpg. But for File:Strikes at the Louvre Pyramid 1.jpg, the main subjects of the photo are the strike and the Louvre. Not the pyramid. This is a case of COM:DM. --Tangopaso (talk) 19:54, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep I cropped the file above to remove most of the pyramid. Regards, Yann (talk) 23:54, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why? On File:Strikes at the Louvre Pyramid 1.jpg, the pyramid is not totally visible. The bottom of the pyramid is hidden by people. It shows that the pyramid is not the main subject. This is a case of COM:DM. --Tangopaso (talk) 18:17, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Tangopaso: Are you willing to crop out the top of each photo, down to the top of the head of the tallest depicted person? I would accept that.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 22:27, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Jeff G.: I uploaded a new version. I hope it will please you. --Tangopaso (talk) 19:49, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Tangopaso: I think you did not crop enough from 1, and you didn't crop 2 at all. Pinging @Minorax as nom.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 15:39, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I said OK to delete the #1 picture. I cropped again File:Strikes at the Louvre Pyramid 2.jpg to preserve and save my photo. But I disagree, the precedent cropping was enough. --Tangopaso (talk) 17:20, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Tangopaso: Did you mean  Keep #1 and  Delete #2? I share your view. IMO image #1 is cropped enough to make the Louvre Pyramid in de minimis. Admins should delete the first two verson of File:Strikes at the Louvre Pyramid 1.jpg if you keep it. --A1Cafel (talk) 05:17, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@A1Cafel: Oops... I meant  Keep #1 (cropped with the pyramid in de minimis) and  Delete #2 (with the whole pyramid). --Tangopaso (talk) 18:24, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep First and  Delete second per above, the copyrighted parts should be cropped as like the first one to avoid FOP problems. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:51, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept Yann (talk) 23:58, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France, thus the Louvre Pyramid is still protected by copyright. Don't think these can be considered as COM:DM

Minoraxtalk 11:11, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Yann (talk) 23:59, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The building was completed by architect I. M. Pei (1917–2019) in 1989. Unfortunately, there is no freedom of panorama in France. The copyright term lasted for 70 years, and the images can be undeleted in 2090.

A1Cafel (talk) 14:29, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep for File:Palais du Louvre 003.jpg due to de minimis.
 Delete for all other --Ras67 (talk) 00:34, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete per nom, above sections.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 05:12, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nom. --Minoraxtalk 13:02, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

pyramid too big (main subject of the photo) to be a FoP exception

— Draceane talkcontrib. 08:22, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:56, 30 October 2021 (UTC)--[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Freedom of Panorama in France. COM:FOP France. Creator was Ieoh Ming Pei. He died 2019. The files can be restored in 2090.

Lukas Beck (talk) 10:06, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Lukas Beck, I think that before you propose this massive request, you should at least check if it was kept as File talk:South facade of the Richelieu Wing (162242079).jpg or if broke any rule...
All that I opened should be kept as the protected monument is not the main object or occupy a significant area of the photo.
Read the previous discussion before this propostions. -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m 23:45, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep for all, see quotation below. --Ras67 (talk) 00:34, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
“One has to understand the decision of the Cour de cassation in the Terreaux case to decide what is OK and what is not, which is a bit complex. In short, it says that if a copyrighted work appears unavoidable in a general picture, then it is acceptable.
I am surprised we don't have an article about this. In 2005, the Cour de cassation said that general pictures of the Terreaux square in Lyon, including the work of art by Daniel Buren are not violation of the author's copyright. Regards, Yann

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --VIGNERON (talk) 17:29, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in Greece. xplicit 12:00, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 03:18, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in Greece. xplicit 12:01, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 03:18, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in Greece. xplicit 12:01, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 03:18, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France; the Australian embassy building design at least (curved buildings at center left) and likely others in this view are under copyright. —David Eppstein (talk) 15:23, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Individiual buildings are de minimis per the definition given by the French government. What frwiki does with it is not our concern. You should bring it up with them. --Majora (talk) 21:30, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per Yann. Potentially in scope, sure, but there are permission issues with this image that cannot be ignored. --Majora (talk) 21:38, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Author Pranav Iyer" does not show "own work" and the description refers to it as a derivative work as well! Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:40, 20 June 2018 (UTC) This is my own work however i only put a source.I do say this is my own work i just used a source to say were i got the information on this animal--Bubblesorg (talk) 18:30, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Metadata "Pranav Iyer", not source. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:20, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 22:08, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author Pranav Iyer in Meta data Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:40, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I'm not sure if that warrants deletion, but the restoration has rather weird-looking teeth and eyes, a peculiar shape (like it was shaken forcefully), and appears to be a trace of [4]. Slate Weasel (talk) 14:12, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 22:08, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:PACKAGING Eurodyne (talk) 19:29, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 22:09, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for indoor works in PRC B dash (talk) 08:24, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination and our template on the matter, {{FoP-China}}, which does indeed specify an outdoor requirement. If that is wrong then it needs to be corrected but as of right now that is what I'm going off of. --Majora (talk) 20:30, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work, no evidence of permission. Ubcule (talk) 14:16, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Edit, thought the US "no notice" cutoff was 1977, but it's 1978. That said, not sure how this falls with respect to US public domain. Do we know that *this* badge doesn't have a copyright notice on the rear *and* what about the fact it's probably a secondary use of a photo previously published elsewhere? Ubcule (talk) 14:24, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Until it can be shown that the photo on the button is under an acceptable license. --Majora (talk) 20:19, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 15:53, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 20:58, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The stated source is http://www.wikiwand.com/es/Halsey_(cantante). Wikiwand is a Wikipedia mirror, and the source page is a copy of es:Halsey (cantante), which at the time contained File:Halseys.png (at the bottom of the infobox), which has been deleted. Possibly covered by {{PD-signature}}, but copyright issues aside, shouldn't a file claiming to depict someone's signature at least have an authoritative source confirming its authenticity to fall within our project scope? LX (talk, contribs) 19:14, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Definitely PD-signature. That's been updated. I also found another example that shows that this is the correct signature and added that to the page. That's good enough for me. --Majora (talk) 05:32, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication the drawing is PD in the United States. Parsecboy (talk) 12:09, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 03:26, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by LexICon as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: suspected copyvio; Picture is taken from https://www.imdb.com/name/nm9166578/ but claimed as "own work, author AndreasBarmann" HR with EXIF, let's have a proper DR. Yann (talk) 17:08, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Description indicates that it was an official press photo. Circumstances make me very wary of the copyright status of the image. Metadata and high resolution being included do not mean much if it was a press photo released by the person on an official website. Deleted per PCP. --Majora (talk) 03:20, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely copyright violation. No source is given and it is highly unlikely that the uploader took this picture himself. Rusf10 (talk) 20:44, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: undue suspicion, source clearly identified as the original uploader (Richard Arthur Norton (1958- )) at English Wikipedia. P 1 9 9   02:12, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This really doesn't look like an original Apple IPhone image, but rather a rephotograph of something or perhaps another photo and then the entire background cut off. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:43, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Photo is completely mine i took it at a shop.--Bubblesorg (talk) 18:29, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The overall image is grainy which I'm not a fan of, but I do think it has enough detail to illustrate a fossil species. However in this case I think the tooth in question belongs to Galeocerdo latidens rather than any of the Physogaleus species. Ryan shell (talk) 03:37, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Should we move it to Galeocerdo latidens tooth.--Bubblesorg (talk) 18:28, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Complete failure to address the issue. "Taking it at the shop" is illogical when the background and the edges of the tooth look like that. Feel free to reupload the full resolution image with everything intact so that it can be properly looked at. --Majora (talk) 00:33, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In category "Girls sitting on seats", this one (File:Pathfinder Uniform Canada circa 1980 (8203493448).jpg) is OK, because it has an educational use for the 80s uniform she wears. OTOH, this picture is only here due to the fact that we have uploaded too many images from an unnotable photographer, Rodrigo Paredes. For me we should sit down and "filter" (eliminate some of the) pics of this photographer. I know she is attractive and wears summer clothes; and may find defenders here; however, my understanding of OoS obliges me to propose it for deletion. Sorry if I abuse your time and energy. All for today. E4024 (talk) 16:13, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: I've been thinking about this for a few days now and I'm going to fall on the side of out of scope on this one. However, I won't oppose undeletion if someone could tell me what article this could potentially be used on. --Majora (talk) 05:41, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]