User talk:GO69

[Archives 2019-2020] [Archives 2018] [Archives 2017] [Archives 2012-2016] [Archives 2010-2011]

Adele Bloch Bauer

Thank you for the rename, you can also delete the redirect File:Adele Bloch-Bauwer et the Woman in gold (1907).jpg. Best regards, --Madelgarius (talk) 11:21, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

37.164.111.218 14:35, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Merry-sur-Yonne (89) Église Saint-Denis - Extérieur - 05.jpg

File:Merry-sur-Yonne (89) Église Saint-Denis - Extérieur - 05.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Mahbubur (talk) 03:57, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Madame, Monsieur,

Cette photo a été prise le 10 juillet 2021. Toutes les caractéristiques sont listées dans les métadonnées. Par souci d'honnêteté élémentaire, vous voudrez bien indiqué à l'ensemble des contributeurs et lecteurs de Commons le lien Random qui selon vous infirmerait le fait que j'ai pris cette photo. Le moindre que je puis attendre de votre part sont vos plus plates excuses. Cordialement. --GO69 (talk) 04:23, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

We need your feedback!

Hello. Apologies if this message is not in your native language: please feel free to respond in the language of your choice. Thank you!

I am writing to you because we are looking for feedback for a new Wikimedia Foundation project, Structured Data Across Wikimedia (SDAW). SDAW is a grant-funded programme that will explore ways to structure content on wikitext pages in a way that will be machine-recognizable and -relatable, in order to make reading, editing, and searching easier and more accessible across projects and on the Internet. We are now focusing on designing and building image suggestion features for experienced users.

We have some questions to ask you about your experience with uploading images here on Wikimedia Commons and then adding them to Wikipedia. You can answer these questions on a specific feedback page on Mediawiki, where we will gather feedback. As I said, these questions are in English, but your answers do not need to be in English! You can also answer in your own language, if you feel more comfortable.

Once the collecting of feedback will be over, we will sum it up and share with you a summary, along with updated mocks that will incorporate your inputs.

Also, if you want to keep in touch with us or you want to know more about the project, you can subscribe to our newsletter.

Hope to hear from you soon! -- Sannita (WMF) (talk to me!) 09:56, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Saint-Pol-de-Léon (29) Monument aux morts 01.JPG

Yours sincerely, Rehabmamet (talk) 16:10, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Les fichiers présents sur Commons ont des historiques qu'il serait peut-être opportun de consulter ! Ces fichiers ont déjà été proposés à la suppression. Donnez vous la peine de lire les réponses ayant déjà été faites. Cordialement.

Pour mémoire : " Quitte à vouloir supprimer un fichier en apportant un complément d'information, autant essayer d'être exhaustif. Il convient donc de rendre à César ce qui appartient à César. Le projet émane de l'architecte Charles Chaussepied (1866-1930) et réemploie dans l'hémicycle des stations du chemin de Croix du sculpteur Yann Larhantec (1829-1913). A priori, seul le gisant porté par 4 femmes est de Quillivic. Si l’œuvre s'organise certes autour de ce gisant, le fichier ne constitue aucunement un gros plan sur cette sculpture mais s'attache bien plus à cerner dans sa globalité une composition monumentale faisant dialoguer architecture et sculpture. Par ailleurs, la résolution disponible ne permet pas d'appréhender les détails sculptés par Quillivic (le poilu, la fiancé, l'épouse, la mère et l'aïeule du soldat)." GO69 Lisez également les commentaires sur la page de catégorie des fichiers : "The Quillivic's sculpture is de minimis."--GO69 (talk) 16:46, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Rejoignez le jury WLM de l’édition 2021

Bonjour GO69

La nouvelle édition de WLM est en cours de préparation comme vous pouvez le voir sur rétro-planning Wiki_Loves_Monuments - 2021
La composition du jury est en cours de constitution.
En tant que lauréat de l'édition précédente, accepteriez-vous de participer cette année ?

Votre rôle consistera principalement à sélectionner les lauréats de l'édition 2021 selon ce qui expliqué sur le fonctionnement du jury et, si vous avez le temps, de participer à l'animation du concours durant le mois de septembre avec la photo du jour.

Il consistera également à accompagner le/la président/e du jury pour la rédaction du discours comme dans l'exemple de 2018

Au plaisir de vous lire,
Pour le concours français de WLM, ArkéoTopia (talk) 10:39, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour ArkéoTopia et merci d'avoir pensé à moi pour le jury de WLM 2021. Je suis partant pour cette aventure : ce sera une manière supplémentaire de m'engager pour le patrimoine français. J'avais fait part à VIGNERON de mon intention de m'impliquer davantage pour WLM en aidant à l'organisation du concours, en particulier pour "checker" les fichiers versés. Je donnerai un coup de main pour ce travail fastidieux et, pour booster le nombre de fichiers français, je verserai cette année tous mes clichés dans la catégorie "Out of competition images from Wiki Loves Monuments 2021 in France" ce qui les excluera de fait du concours. A vous lire.--GO69 (talk) 16:23, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour GO69. Super. Bienvenue à bord et merci pour le coup de main supplémentaire sur le check des fichiers versés. Y en a besoin ! Êtes-vous inscrit sur la liste WLM ? Si ce n'est pas encore le cas, merci de vous y inscrire afin de faciliter les échanges qui commenceront soit début octobre soit dès la première semaine de septembre si vous souhaitez participer à la sélection de l'image du jour. Merci d'avoir préciser la catégorie à utiliser pour éviter que les photos soient intégrées dans le concours durant le mois de septembre. Une information qui va intéresser User:Tournasol7. Au plaisir de vous retrouver sur la liste WLM ArkéoTopia (talk) 19:29, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Portrait

Bonjour, la page que j’avais invité à renommer a été refusée. Donc les deux portraits sont séparés non? Une représentation de la duchesse de Parme Maria Amalia et l’autre représente Philippines de Brandebourg droit? Faut-il aussi charger celui de la duchesse de Parme? — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 109.52.56.13 (talk) 20:23, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Madame, Monsieur,

Le fichier que j'ai refusé de renommé participe d'un corpus cohérent d’œuvres clairement dérivées d'un tableau conservé au Musée de Cassel qui représente Philippine de Brandebourg-Schwedt, landgravine consort de Hesse-Cassel. La catégorie Commons "Philippine of Brandenburg-Schwedt" recense ainsi plusieurs tableaux très approchants, manifestement copies d'un original qui se trouve dans la résidence des landgraves de la Hesse, et l'introduction d'un nom de fichier alternatif n'aurait pas manqué d'interroger les lecteurs sur le pourquoi d'un sort particulier fait à un fichier plus qu'aux autres. Je ne crois pas d'ailleurs qu'il soit souhaitable d'induire le doute dans l'esprit des utilisateurs de la Wikipédia en leur proposant de choisir le sujet représenté, sachant que le lien vers Auction, en contradiction avec d'autres pointés par le fichier, pourrait bien fournir une identification erronée. Enfin, merci de bien vouloir signer vos messages et de ne pas utiliser plusieurs comptes sur la Wikipédia (5.171.120.0, 109.52.56.13). Il suffit juste de créer votre compte personnel qui permettra de mieux retrouver vos contributions sur les projets de la Wikipédia et de plus facilement dialoguer avec les autres contributeurs. Bien cordialement.--GO69 (talk) 21:32, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Abbatiale Saint-Serge d'Angers

@ MonsieurMadame GO69,

en WM Commons il-y-a seulement images des clefs et des chapiteaaux des colatérales. Avez vous aussi des vues totales de chaque collatérale de cette abbatiale?
Et qu' est aux façades latérales ? Façade du nord, Google maps

Cordialement,Ulamm (talk) 17:26, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Armes de Jean Gicquel. Vitrail de la métropole Saint-Pierre de Rennes (35).

Bonjour, Je me permets de vous contacter au sujet de l'illustration des Armes de Jean Gicquel. Vitrail de la métropole Saint-Pierre de Rennes (35) dont vous êtes l'auteur.

Ce vitrail est-il présent à la Cathédrale Saint-Pierre de Rennes ? Je pensais qu'il avait été détruit pendant la guerre et jamais reconstruit à l'identique.

Je vous remercie pour votre retour. Cordialement,

File:Auxerre (89) Cathédrale Saint-Étienne - Intérieur - Baie 133 - 02.jpg et suivants

Bonjour. Vandalisme est beaucoup écrire. Premièrement : comme vous avez oublié de faire précéder la référence chiffrée des lettres PM, vos fichiers correspondants ont été directement dirigés vers la catégorie de maintenance pour Palissy with incorrect ID. Deuxièmement : il est en général inutile, même si ce n'est pas une règle absolue, d'ajouter le bandeau Palissy (ou modèle) à chaque fichier à partir du moment où ils appartiennent à une catégorie spécifiquement dédiée comportant déjà ce bandeau. En effet l'apposition de ce modèle crée automatiquement un lien direct vers le fichier et multiplie donc inutilement les occurrences vers un même sujet ou objet, à l'heure où il nous est demandé de ne pas surcharger les serveurs informatiques par des liens et redirections redondants et par la-même limiter les nuisances environnementales qu'ils induisent. Cordialement. Finoskov (talk) 07:57, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Monsieur,

Inutile de vouloir faire fi de décisions collégiales avec lesquelles vous savez parfaitement être en contradiction. Vos règles soit disant absolues ne sont aucunement celles de la communauté wikipédienne. Inutiles de les mettre en gras : cela ne leur confèrera pas plus force probante. Si vous souhaitez les faire évoluer, il existe la page de discussion du projet MH pour ce faire. Je vous rappelle d'ailleurs que lorsque s'est posé la question d'apposer ou non le bandeau Mérimée sur les catégories intermédiaires des MH, vous avez voulu faire glisser la discussion sur le retrait à votre sens nécessaire du template sur l'ensemble des fichiers contenus dans une catégorie afférente à un MH. Vigneron vous a répondu que ce n'était pas le sujet. Si vous avez perdu de vue les discussions traitant de l'apposition des templates Mérimée et Palissy sur les fichiers de MH, je peux vous les indiquer. L'édiction de vos règles personnelles comme absolues risque de surprendre Vigneron, EdouardHue, Bzh-99, quoique, dès 2015 était souligné votre défaut de concertation avec le projet préalablement à vos retraits massifs de templates des fichiers de MH. Cordialement. GO69 (talk) 12:20, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Saint-Malo (35) Cathédrale Statue de ND de la Grande-Porte.jpg

Salut GO69,

nous avons reçu une plainte de la part de l'équipe de support VRT : Une autre personne revendique la paternité de la photo. Est-il possible que tu aies téléchargé par erreur une photo d'un autre auteur ? Si tu es sûr d'être le photographe, tu as peut-être encore la version originale de l'appareil photo ? La photo ici est en basse résolution et n'est probablement pas l'originale.

Merci, --Mussklprozz (talk) 20:46, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Le procédé dans le support se déroule sous Ticket:2022041410009247. Salut, Mussklprozz (talk) 20:54, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Saint-Malo (35) Cathédrale Statue de ND de la Grande-Porte.jpg

File:Saint-Malo (35) Cathédrale Statue de ND de la Grande-Porte.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

JohnNewton8 (talk) 08:38, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sylva Koscina 1973.jpg

Hi GO69, you did a mistake. You have to move File:Sylva Koscina 1973.jpg to the right year (1969) as I explained in the request. Martin Mystère (talk) 12:07, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Renaming a file

Why did you rename this image?

There are policy reasons why this should not have been done. Are you aware of them?

You should know that a 'fae' scraping bot uploaded the image direct from the museum site. Therefore it is named as the museum did. Another reason why it should not be changed.

As it happens the recognised method of "commons" naming these files for length reasons was not followed in this case. If there were a case for shortening the name then ID number should have been included as a suffix.

As it is, you corrected the least important spelling error, and ignored the only important one. Again, as it happens those spelling errors were the museums, and I corrected it by assigning a correct category. Another reason why it did not need changing.

Why rename the file? --Broichmore (talk) 11:23, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Madame, Monsieur,

Je ne sais pas qui vous pensez être pour vous permettre d'invectiver un autre contributeur sans avoir la plus élémentaire correction de commencer votre message par une civilité ou une salutation. Vous vous départissez d'autant plus des règles de bienséance que vous vous croyez investi d'une mission de donneur de leçon. Sachez que vos procès d'intention et votre dogmatisme n'engagent que vous. Croyez bien qu'oeuvrant depuis plus de 12 ans sur la Wikipédia je suis parvenu quand même à entendre la pluspart de ses règles : je ne pense donc pas que l'attitude qui consiterait à se faire un bouclier de vertus du mépris d'autrui doive avoir sa place sur les différents projets. Je ne crois pas d'ailleurs que votre réaction épidermique puisse trouver à s'inscrire dans une démarche wikipédienne contributive et respectueuse. La moindre des choses serait au minimum de vous excuser. Cordialement. --GO69 (talk) 12:56, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi BGO69, I apologize profusely for not giving you a salutation.

Allow me to rephrase the question.

Why did you think that that it was advantageous to rename a file which has been on commons for more than 5 years. When you know that other websites not on the project could be accessing it directly via embedded code, thereby introducing link rot into their work? Excuse my pedantry. Broichmore (talk) 13:52, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Re-bonjour,

Il reste beaucoup de travail à accomplir sur Wikipédia et les bonnes volontés ne sont pas légions. L'antériorité d'un fichier sur Commons ou d'une déclaration dans un article ne garantit aucunement que le titre du fichier soit exempt d'une erreur orthographique, dans le premier cas, ou que, pour le second, celle-ci ne s'avère totalement fausse. La durée n'induit aucunement la véracité. Au cas d'espèce, nous sommes deux a avoir jugé qu'il convenait de rectifier l'orthographe d'"Unnamed" : le postulant et moi-même en tant que renommeur de fichiers. Nous savons pertinemment quel outil pédagogique est la Wikipédia. Aussi, en ce qui me concerne, je ne suis pas du tout partisan de réitérer l'erreur orthographique qu'aurait commis une institution dans la mesure où les projets de la wikipédia s'adressent à tous publics, compris des enfants et jeunes, et que leur consultation doit conforter les apprentissages de lecture, d'orthographe ou encore grammaticaux. Pour ce qui est des liens intégrés, des liaisons entre la Wikipédia et les autres sites web, mes connaissances rudimentaires en informatique ne me permettent pas d'avoir une opinion approfondie sur ces sujets. Espérant avoir répondu à votre question, je vous prie d'agréer, Madame, Monsieur, mes plus cordiales salutations.--GO69 (talk) 14:28, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GO69, you popped up on my watchlist on Wikidata. You seem to be doing quite a few renames that are not in line with the policy at Commons:File renaming. Are you aware of this policy? Can you please stick to it? Multichill (talk) 12:50, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Multichill. J'avoue ne pas très bien comprendre l'objet de votre message. Concerne-t-il Wikidata, Commons, ou les deux ? Sinon, je ne trouve pas très pédagogique de m'indiquer que m'échapperaient certaines règles de renommage sans me donner d'exemples de ce qui serait à corriger. Me renvoyer simplement à la lecture des règles ne risque pas de m'être alors très profitable. Sous entendre que certaines de mes contributions ne sont pas en conformité avec certaines préconisations sans l'illustrer confère malheureusement à vos propos une certaine gratuité. L'objectif, si je suis fautif, est, nous sommes bien d'accord, de pouvoir m'amender en connaissance de causes. Ce qui m'ennuie au surplus, est le fait que vous ne sollicitez aucune explication des contributions qui vous gênent. Chacun à ses modes de pensée, mais au cas d'espèce vous ne me permettez pas l'échange, le débat contradictoire. Je suis bien évidemment disposé à expliciter certains choix que j'ai opérés et qui vous poseraient problème. Je vous remercie par avance pour les observations dont vous voudrez bien me gratifier et vous prie de croire en mes plus cordiaux sentiments.

GO69 (talk) 14:58, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:GO69#Renaming_a_file. Don't spread discussions around. Multichill (talk) 15:01, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi GO69, I have studied your valuable uploads, and see that files from institutions are not your specialisation. It’s not usual practise or advantageous to rename files that are spelt by institutions incorrectly or with ancient spelling, especially files which have been on commons for years. Art, historical and institutionally curated files are treated differently from modern user originated uploads. The spelling error/s were the museums, or the auction house’s, i.e. the source, and we correct them by assigning a correct category, and a note in the description. If we change names we need to leave an audit trail in the description box of the old name we may have corrected. --Broichmore (talk) 11:23, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gloeden, Wilhem von (1856-1931) - n. 0142.jpg

File:Gloeden, Wilhem von (1856-1931) - n. 0142.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion. (Reason: No page no longer points here.)

Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images or best videos, sounds and 3D models. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk.

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : G.dallorto.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 13:37, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Basilique de Quintin

Bonjour GO69,

Je suis en train d’écrire un livre sur le patriarche de Jérusalem Robert de Nantes. Selon la légende, Robert aurait donné à Geoffroi Boteril une relique de la Sainte Vierge, qui était conservée à la basilique de Quintin. Cette histoire est représentée dans une sculpture sur la basilique, dont vous avez téléchargé une photo.

Le livre fait partie d’une série portant sur les “leaders” des croisades et des états latins de l’orient (“Rulers of the Latin East”), publiée par la presse académique anglaise Routledge.

Je suis pas certain des droits et des licences (vous l’avez téléchargée sous une licence CC BY-SA 3.0), mais est-ce que vous croyez qu’il serait possible d’utiliser cette photo dans mon livre? Avec attribution bien sûr.

Merci et bien cordialement, Adam Bishop (talk) 15:54, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour GO69,

Je vous remercie de votre autorisation. Moi aussi j'ai vu certains de mes fichiers utilisés sur internet, ou même dans des livres, sans attribution (ou attribués simplement à "Wikipedia").

Je vérifierai avec la maison d'édition si elle a besoin d'une d'autorisation autre que la licence CC. Je dois remplir un "registre d'autorisations" mais, à ma connaissance, ce message suffira.

D'ailleurs, préféreriez-vous que j'utilise votre nom d'utilisateur ou que l'attribution soit sous votre vrai nom? (Dans ce dernier cas, et que vous ne voulez pas divulguer votre vrai nom ici, n'hésitez pas à me contacter en privé à l'adresse ambishop@gmail.com)

Merci encore une fois, et bien cordialement, Adam Bishop (talk) 17:50, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, je voulais juste vous informer que le livre a enfin été publié ! et je note avec beaucoup d'amusement que votre photo a bien été attribuée à "Utilisateur GO69". Merci encore et bien cordialement, Adam Bishop (talk) 12:03, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Dijon (21) Jardin de l'Arquebuse - Buste d'Aloysius Bertrand.jpg

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 03:15, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Montauban-de-Bretagne (35) Monument aux morts 01.jpg

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 03:19, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Piré-sur-Seiche (35) Monument aux morts.jpg

File:Piré-sur-Seiche (35) Monument aux morts.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 03:23, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Bussy-le-Grand (21) Église Saint-Antonin - Intérieur - Vitrail - 04.jpg

Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 03:56, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Église Saint-Hilaire de la Salle Aubry

Category:Église Saint-Hilaire de la Salle Aubry is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:

CSD C2 (unuseful empty category)

If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted).
All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log.
If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

العربية ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ 日本語 ∙ português ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

Prototyperspective (talk) 17:44, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Église Saint-Martin de la chapelle Aubry

Category:Église Saint-Martin de la chapelle Aubry is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:

CSD C2 (unuseful empty category)

If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted).
All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log.
If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

العربية ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ 日本語 ∙ português ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

Prototyperspective (talk) 17:44, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Église de la Nouvelle-Alliance de Bourgneuf-en-Mauges

Category:Église de la Nouvelle-Alliance de Bourgneuf-en-Mauges is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:

CSD C2 (unuseful empty category)

If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted).
All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log.
If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

العربية ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ 日本語 ∙ português ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

Prototyperspective (talk) 17:44, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How to ask for speedy-delete of an empty category

When you want to ask for speedy-delete of an empty category, best practice is to mark it with {{SD|C2}} if it would be OK to re-create it in the future, given that appropriate content becomes available or {{SD|C1}} if it is an inappropriate category name that should not be reused. In particular, this is better practice than just blanking the category page, as you did at Category:Exterior of Église de la Nouvelle-Alliance de Bourgneuf-en-Mauges. ("C1" and "C2" come from Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion). Jmabel ! talk 19:25, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Cimetière du Voide.

Category:Cimetière du Voide. is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:

CSD C2 (unuseful empty category)

If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted).
All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log.
If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

العربية ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ 日本語 ∙ português ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

Prototyperspective (talk) 20:26, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Huelgoat (29) Chapelle Notre-Dame-des-Cieux Blochets et sablières 13.JPG

File:Huelgoat (29) Chapelle Notre-Dame-des-Cieux Blochets et sablières 13.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Tggyggu (talk) 23:26, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mes bêtises...

Hello !

Merci pour tes corrections de mes bourdes sur mes derniers fichiers ! Je crois que je suis allé un peu vite en besogne... Lol.

Merci aussi pour les classement plus précis.

Bonne continuation. LW² \m/ ^{(Lie ² me...)} 21:19, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Utilisation Photo basilique Notre-Dame-de-la-joie de Pontivy

Bonjour,

Ecrivant un petit livre sur Quelneuc et ses environs (livre auto-édité à but non lucratif), m'autorisez-vous à utiliser votre photo de la basilique de Pontivy ? Merci beaucoup d'avance pour votre réponse. A Bientôt,

Rémi 31.32.49.123 13:20, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour.

Pas de souci pour utiliser le fichier conformément à la licence choisie. Bien cordialement. GO69 (talk) 03:42, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Joseph Turmel

Bonjour.

Je viens de développer quelque peu l'article sur le prêtre rennais Joseph Turmel et je me suis mis en quête d'illustrations... pour faire choux blanc. Ayant constaté que vous êtes l'auteur de la photo de sa sépulture et que celle-ci comporte un portrait en médaillon, je me demandais si vous n'en aviez pas une définition plus précise qui permettrait de cadrer l'image de manière à obtenir un potrait pour l'infobox de ce monsieur à l'histoire assez singulière.

Je vous remercie de votre éventuelle réponse, qu'elle soit positive ou négative. Cordialement, Mogador (talk) 21:57, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Dol-de-Bretagne (35) Cathédrale Maîtresse-vitre 00.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 06:22, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

Just an FYI since you be having a mental breakdown over this for some reason that I don't want to needlessly contribute to, but I wouldn't personally nominate images of the Notre-Dame-de-Paris for deletion because it's pretty well document how much and to what degree it was restored after the fire. That's not the case with random church windows though. They aren't at all well document and it's pretty easy for a "restoration" to involve original work on the part of the artist doing it, which at least IMO would be copyrighted. Adamant1 (talk) 10:54, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

COM:AN/U

Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ العربية ∙ +/−

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems. Making threats and having French administrator's close DRs out of process on your behalf --Adamant1 (talk) 11:06, 26 June 2024 (UTC).[reply]

Revert

It's super conceding to criticize how someone else does something if you can't even be bothered to format the comment your doing it in properly. So maybe just skip the condescension next time. Or at least have the brain cells to do it properly. Thanks. Adamant1 (talk) 21:52, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How to ask for speedy-delete of an empty category

When you want to ask for speedy-delete of an empty category, best practice is to mark it with {{SD|C2}} if it would be OK to re-create it in the future, given that appropriate content becomes available or {{SD|C1}} if it is an inappropriate category name that should not be reused. In particular, this is better practice than just blanking the category page, as you did at Category:Parloir de l'abbaye de Hambye. ("C1" and "C2" come from Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion). Jmabel ! talk 05:09, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:GO69

Contents

Adele Bloch Bauer

Notification about possible deletion

File:Merry-sur-Yonne (89) Église Saint-Denis - Extérieur - 05.jpg

We need your feedback!

Notification about possible deletion

Rejoignez le jury WLM de l’édition 2021

Portrait

Abbatiale Saint-Serge d'Angers

Armes de Jean Gicquel. Vitrail de la métropole Saint-Pierre de Rennes (35).

File:Auxerre (89) Cathédrale Saint-Étienne - Intérieur - Baie 133 - 02.jpg et suivants

File:Saint-Malo (35) Cathédrale Statue de ND de la Grande-Porte.jpg

File:Saint-Malo (35) Cathédrale Statue de ND de la Grande-Porte.jpg

File:Sylva Koscina 1973.jpg

Renaming a file

File:Gloeden, Wilhem von (1856-1931) - n. 0142.jpg

Basilique de Quintin

Notification about possible deletion

Notification about possible deletion

File:Piré-sur-Seiche (35) Monument aux morts.jpg

Notification about possible deletion

Category:Église Saint-Hilaire de la Salle Aubry

Category:Église Saint-Martin de la chapelle Aubry

Category:Église de la Nouvelle-Alliance de Bourgneuf-en-Mauges

How to ask for speedy-delete of an empty category

Category:Cimetière du Voide.

File:Huelgoat (29) Chapelle Notre-Dame-des-Cieux Blochets et sablières 13.JPG

Mes bêtises...

Utilisation Photo basilique Notre-Dame-de-la-joie de Pontivy

Joseph Turmel

Notification about possible deletion

FYI

COM:AN/U

Revert

How to ask for speedy-delete of an empty category

Navigation menu

User talk:GO69

Adele Bloch Bauer

Notification about possible deletion

We need your feedback!

Notification about possible deletion

Rejoignez le jury WLM de l’édition 2021

Portrait

Abbatiale Saint-Serge d'Angers

Armes de Jean Gicquel. Vitrail de la métropole Saint-Pierre de Rennes (35).

File:Auxerre (89) Cathédrale Saint-Étienne - Intérieur - Baie 133 - 02.jpg et suivants

File:Sylva Koscina 1973.jpg

Renaming a file

Basilique de Quintin

Notification about possible deletion

Notification about possible deletion

Notification about possible deletion

How to ask for speedy-delete of an empty category

Mes bêtises...

Utilisation Photo basilique Notre-Dame-de-la-joie de Pontivy

Joseph Turmel

Notification about possible deletion

FYI

COM:AN/U

Revert

How to ask for speedy-delete of an empty category

Navigation menu

Search