Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2017/01/24
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
|
|
Too blurry to be useful for educational purpose. Out of scope. BrightRaven (talk) 09:34, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Shizhao: Uploader requested deletion of a recently uploaded unused file - Using VisualFileChange.
Bad upload. Jasonanaggie (talk) 01:52, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 15:47, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Bogus PD-USGov licenses. The Network for Earthquake Engineering Simulation (NEES) and its suborganizations (e.g., NEESit, NEESWood, etc.) are not federal entities (they are a nonprofit-- i.e. non-governmental--consortium). For example, the source for File:2009-0709-earthquake.jpg clearly says "Copyright © 2012 The College of Engineering at Colorado State University"; NEES.org clearly says "Copyright © 2009 NEEShub"; etc. NEES may well receive funding from the US government, just as public universities, railroads, etc. do -- such funding (mere financial support) is not tantamount to federal authorship. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kashiwazaki nuclear plant.jpg for another example of the same bogus NEES=PD-USGov claim.
- File:090806 Stanford-UIUC NEESR-SG Controlled Rocking -- E-Defense Specimen Overview 3.jpg
- File:Two wooden houses-1.jpg
- File:Two wooden houses-0.jpg
- File:2009-0709-earthquake.jpg
Эlcobbola talk 14:52, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:02, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
The uploader is the subject of these images and therefore cannot be the photographer. The claim of "own work" is clearly not correct. See http://www.ecs.csun.edu/~shustov/LeisureWork.htm for photographs of the uploader.
- File:Pool jumping.jpg
- File:UPSTREAM FITNESS-20.jpg
- File:UPSTREAM FITNESS-19.jpg
- File:UPSTREAM FITNESS-18.jpg
- File:UPSTREAM FITNESS-17.jpg
- File:UPSTREAM FITNESS-16.jpg
- File:UPSTREAM FITNESS-15.jpg
- File:Shock Evader for FEMA.jpg
- File:UPSTREAM FITNESS-14.jpg
- File:UPSTREAM FITNESS-13.jpg
- File:UPSTREAM FITNESS-12.jpg
- File:UPSTREAM FITNESS-11.jpg
- File:UPSTREAM FITNESS-10.jpg
- File:UPSTREAM FITNESS-9.jpg
- File:UPSTREAM FITNESS-8.jpg
- File:UPSTREAM FITNESS-7.jpg
- File:UPSTREAM FITNESS-6.jpg
- File:UPSTREAM FITNESS-2.jpg
- File:UPSTREAM FITNESS-3.jpg
- File:UPSTREAM FITNESS.jpg
- File:UPSTREAM FITNESS-1.jpg
- File:UPSTREAM FITNESS-5.jpg
. Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:29, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
Deleted subject obviously not photographer, per nomination. Unsigned, by Ellin Beltz, 22:33, 15 February 2015
Bogus self license claim - uploader is the subject in these images and therefore cannot be the photographer (author); permission from the latter is required. Uploader should be well aware of this issue, as this is identical the issue(s) above and to images uploaded by ShustovVal, this user's sockpuppet, and deleted per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by ShustovVal.
- File:Chin-up on one.gif
- File:Jumping with a load.gif
- File:Jumping on platforms.gif
- File:Stand on head only.jpeg
- File:Headstand training.jpg
- File:Legs-up video.gif
- File:Pull-ups on two hands.gif
- File:Stay on Head only Video.gif
- File:Headstanding.jpeg
- File:Pull-ups on a single hand.gif
Эlcobbola talk 16:30, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
- Also, File:Jumping on platforms.gif looks familiar (i.e. a reupload of a deleted image), but there are too many to sift through. Ping @Jameslwoodward: in case his memory is better than mine. Эlcobbola talk 16:33, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
- (ec) Found it: cut from File:Jumping on step platforms.gif to remove the reflection of the person recording it (!!!). Эlcobbola talk 16:42, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: In the last round we had trouble with terms of use of the service used to create the images. We have the same problem here -- the TOS amounts to an ND license and also requires us to indemnify the conversion service in case of problems. That makes these a {{Speedy}}. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:41, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
More of the same. Uploader is subject, and thus cannot be photographer.
Эlcobbola talk 22:07, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 14:08, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
a causa de los derechos Caroke27 (talk) 00:02, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 20:21, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
a causa de los derechos - me equivoqué Caroke27 (talk) 00:07, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 20:23, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Sorry,my mistake, i don't own the rights. GabrieleBellucci (talk) 12:56, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by EugeneZelenko: Derivative of non-free content: Book cover
Sorry,my mistake, i don't own the rights. GabrieleBellucci (talk) 12:57, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by EugeneZelenko: Derivative of non-free content: Book cover
mass-upload of 2011 panoramio streams of rather poor quality and doubtful educational usefulness, hence, out of scope Wikimedia Commons, and, file not in use at Wikimedia projects ? Roland zh (talk) 19:49, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 03:25, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
mass-upload panoramio streams, small-sized and of extremly bad quality, obviously randomly taken from car/bus etc, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons, and, file not in use at Wikimedia projects - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 20:06, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 03:25, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
looks like embeded movie MechQuester (talk) 01:36, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Magog the Ogre: Mass deletion of pages added by RUBEL SHAK PABNA: Copyright violation
Can't be own work. Flickr-Washing. FightWe (talk) 11:07, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
- Speedy keep @FightWe: I removed {{Own}} template, it was there because the extraction from OS is done by me. And the whole image is CC-by-2.0 as Microsoft published on Flickr images containing this wall. Same reason was in this DR: Files in Category:Microsoft Office logos. BTW what do you mean by saying "Flickr-Washing"? --Rezonansowy (talk) 15:28, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
- Delete: I don't think that Microsoft Corporation agree to release this well-known wallpaper under a free license, even if Microsoft Sweden published it at Flickr under a free license. These cases (files published by Microsoft Sweden) could be considered as Flickr washing, again, even if them has been published by a Microsoft subsidiary. --Amitie 10g (talk) 20:09, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
- Comment @Amitie 10g: Well, IMO it doesn't matter if MS agreed to release this wallpaper under CC license. If images containing design of this wallpaper were published under a free license, then this design becomes free from the law's point. Similar example is given here: Windows 1.0 brochure. MS published them without proper copyright notice, so the whole Windows 1.0 GUI became PD. --Rezonansowy (talk) 21:56, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
- No, Microsoft Corporation haven't been published it, but Microsoft Sweeden (a subsidiary if MS). Also, there is a big difference bewteen a photo of a laptop running Windows (where the wallpaper can be considered de minimis) and the wallpaper itself (that is copyrighted by Microsoft Corporation and is non-free; the CC license apply only to the photos of PCs but not for the wallpaper itself). --Amitie 10g (talk) 01:03, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
- Comment @Amitie 10g: Let me do a little research on it. Here it is:
- No, Microsoft Corporation haven't been published it, but Microsoft Sweeden (a subsidiary if MS). Also, there is a big difference bewteen a photo of a laptop running Windows (where the wallpaper can be considered de minimis) and the wallpaper itself (that is copyrighted by Microsoft Corporation and is non-free; the CC license apply only to the photos of PCs but not for the wallpaper itself). --Amitie 10g (talk) 01:03, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
I provided these images from Flickr as a source of the file indicating its CC license:
- https://www.flickr.com/photos/microsoftsweden/6398775555
- https://www.flickr.com/photos/microsoftsweden/6398775887
- https://www.flickr.com/photos/microsoftsweden/6398776219
- https://www.flickr.com/photos/microsoftsweden/6398776545
At first, Microsoft Sweden does not exist from the laws point. It's only the name used for commercial purposes. The real name of this subsidiary is Microsoft AB, you can check it on https://www.microsoft.com/sv-se/contact.aspx and on Bloomberg.
Second, from the law's point, if the parent does not maintain a separate corporate identity, the courts will perceive the subsidiary as merely a business conduit for the parent, and the two corporations will be viewed as one entity for liability purposes. You can read it on the Legal Dictionary. Microsoft Corporation is a multinational company and this status quo is a common thing.
So if Microsoft AB does something then the whole Microsoft is responsible for it as there's no separation between these companies. Microsoft AB has the full right to publish, sell, represent and manage all Microsoft services and products in Sweden as it is the part of the same multinational company. So in this case the license of these images has the legal consequences.
Third, It is nor Flickr washing or De minimis case if the uploader is the legal copyright holder of these works AND if the wallpaper image is a >50% of the photo. De minimis cannot be applied in that cases. In addition, we can assume that if these photos were published in album called "Microsoft Partner Day 2011" then they were taken to present MS products, not laptops.
BTW, the wallpaper consist of a Windows 7 logo and a simple blue background with gradient and some random lines. You claimed that the previous consensus already determined that the Windows 7 icon is bellow the COM:TOO in the U.S and you also agree that. In this DR the disputed Windows 7 logo file was kept. So using your arguments we could simply consider this wallpaper as PD-ineligible, because of the reasons mentioned above.
I'm still not sure where are DRs or something indicating this consensus. I started an Undeletion request on basis of this DR's result to undelete other files of Windows 7 logo and I asked you for this explanation, but you didn't reply. So please have your say on this now. --Rezonansowy (talk) 11:29, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
Kept: vandalism DR. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 11:34, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
- To clarify: This closure was on procedural grounds, not a thorough investigation of the arguments brought forwards in the DR. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 12:09, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
Copyvio - Image is the property of Microsoft, the source indicate is not enough to prove the free licence of the image Olivier LPB (talk) 23:19, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
- Delete: The previous DR has been closed under procedural grounds, but I still considering that:
- Microsoft Corporation is very unlikely to agree to publish its wallpaper under a free license, even if one of its subsidiaries (Microsoft AB) published it by its official Flickr account (Microsoft Sweden)
- At the "source" (the Microsoft Sweden's official Flickr account), the main subject of these photos are "PC" (aka., laptops running Windows), and the Windows desktop could be considered de minimis in that context, but that does not mean that the wallpaper itself has been released under a free license (this is just a misinterpretation of what was published at the Microsoft Sweden's official Flickr account).
- The Windows 7 logo is considered too simple to meet the Threshold of originality, but the whole desing of the wallpaper is above the TOO, therefore, non-free.
- --Amitie 10g (talk) 10:44, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
- Delete I agree with Amitie. This image was not sourced from Flickr. Just because it is visible as a de-minimis element in those images does not mean we can assume this image to be under the same license. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 16:33, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per Amitie10g and Sebari. MS Sweden did not licence the start screen but only various derivative photos wherein the screen is rathe trivial. De728631 (talk) 22:44, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per above. For a broader discussion about the Flickr account in question, please see Commons:Village pump/Copyright#Microsoft Sweden Flickr Account. Elisfkc (talk) 20:53, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
- Images from this account have previously been deleted (Commons:Deletion requests/File:Windows 10 start screen (16337613651).jpg). Elisfkc (talk) 23:43, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per everyone here. Do we really need to dignify this blatant copyright violation with a DR? —Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 07:16, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per above. --Sealle (talk) 06:51, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work', as imho potentially non-free content: rather thumbnail format and missing EXIF data to verify origin - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 21:11, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: http://www.sushmitabanerjee.com/images/sb%20mudra%20dance%20festival%20trivandrum.jpg. --Yann (talk) 12:40, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work', as imho potentially non-free content: rather thumbnail format and missing EXIF data to verify origin - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 21:11, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: http://www.sushmitabanerjee.com/images/3.gif. --Yann (talk) 12:41, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Heidi Giselle (talk · contribs)
[edit]unused personal image : out of scope
Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:28, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Heidi Giselle (talk · contribs)
[edit]unclear copyright statut
Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:30, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Heidi Giselle (talk · contribs)
[edit]No indication of user's own work on this fan gallery.
Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:08, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:16, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image. Kaulder (contribs | talk) 08:59, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
- Keep This is a portrait of a Wikipedia editor and Wikimedian who is my wife. I have used it on my user page in the past, and may use it again in the future. My wife may wish to use it as well. I would like to preserve this photo. Cullen328 (talk) 00:10, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
- Note: Non-admin closure, Request Withdrawn as per above keep vote. Kaulder (contribs | talk) 12:18, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
I would like my userpage from meta.wikimedia.org to be displayed here automatically. I understand that deletion of the page is neccessary in order for the GlobalUserPage extension to do its work. KaiKemmann (talk) 18:27, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Achim (talk) 21:27, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
Personal images, out of scope.
Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 01:42, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:39, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Uploaded by User:IOS31415926535897932384 20170113
[edit]- File:Male scrotum.jpg
- File:Uncovered foreskin of human penis when not erection.jpg
- File:Huma penis frenulum.jpg
- File:Male ejaculation.jpg
- File:Cowper's fluid.jpg
- File:Male Penis Corona and Glans.jpg
- File:Uncovered foreskin of human penis.jpg
- File:Male penis glans.jpg
- File:Human penis and pubic hair.jpg
- File:Erect Male Penis.jpg
- File:Semi-Erect Male Penis.jpg
These images were posted by a sockpupet user. All his edits on jawiki were reverted by someone, so they are no longer used. I'm doubtful we need keep them. Darklanlan (talk) 05:11, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:39, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Inha staff (talk · contribs)
[edit]Source is "Inha University", but it's not proven unless confirmed via OTRS.
- File:프로필인하090.jpg
- File:캠퍼스소개.jpg
- File:정석4.jpg
- File:인경호1.jpg
- File:인하대-전경.jpg
- File:ZH1I7435.jpg
- File:ZH1I7886.jpg
- File:공과대대컷2.jpg
- File:ZH1I7203.jpg
- File:ZH1I6977.jpg
- File:ZH1I7169.jpg
- File:ZH1I1890.jpg
- File:INHA University Hospital.jpg
- File:Economics.jpg
- File:2014 3월(비룡탑).jpg
- File:11heidegger.jpg
- File:2014 1월(비룡탑).jpg
- File:10mainbuilding.jpg
- File:4open.jpg
- File:5월-경영대봄.jpg
- File:인하대 전경.jpg
- File:학교전경 2.jpg
- File:학교전경 1.jpg
- File:제2생활관.jpg
- File:정석학술정보관1.jpg
- File:인하대 대운동장.jpg
- File:제1생활관.jpg
- File:60주년 기념관 4.jpg
- File:60주년 기념관 3.jpg
- File:60주년 기념관 2.jpg
- File:60주년 기념관 1.jpg
- File:캠퍼스 전경.jpg
- File:본관 앞 조형물.jpg
- File:공과대학 2호관.jpg
- File:정석학술정보관 모습.jpg
- File:인경호의 여름.jpg
- File:인하의 상징 비룡탑.jpg
- File:하이데거숲의 봄.jpg
- File:정석학술정보관의 봄.jpg
- File:인경호와 하이테크관.jpg
- File:정석학술정보관과 벚꽃.jpg
- File:정석학술정보관 앞.jpg
- File:비룡탑과 목련.jpg
- File:해질녘의 비룡탑.jpg
- File:경영대학 6호관 봄.jpg
- File:정석학술정보관 로비.jpg
- File:하이데거 숲.jpg
- File:참 진.jpg
- File:비룡.jpg
- File:인하대학교 엠블럼.png
- File:인하대학교 심볼마크.png
- File:60주년 기념 엠블럼.png
— regards, Revi 16:32, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:41, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
PDF only contains image data. It has been converted now to PNG and SVG by jdx. This PDF is out of our project's scope because our scope only allows PDF for scans of historical documents. ★ Poké95 12:44, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination+derivative work http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/rugby/rugby-union/international/six-nations-2014-wales-v-italy-leigh-halfpenny-feels-wales-are-better-than-last-year-9100523.html. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:41, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image. --ghouston (talk) 00:20, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
- Delete – per nom. --Dэя-Бøяg 00:34, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:41, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
- .pdf file which appears to be out of scope. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:28, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:59, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image --ghouston (talk) 00:29, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:58, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Copyrighted tickets based on a copyrighted poster [1] Tbhotch™ 00:45, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:09, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Copyright violation, image bears "Everton TV" watermark Malpass93 (talk) 00:51, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:08, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Westfjords Heritage Museum
[edit]- File:Turnhús Westfjords Heritage Museum.jpg
- File:Turnhús Heritage Museum.jpg
- File:Bátur og Byggðasafn.jpg
- File:Byggðasafn Vestfjarða.jpg
All of these claim to be "own work", but the first three say, "This is a photo of Westfjords Heritage Museum from their public site" which seems to make "own work" unlikely. File:Byggðasafn Vestfjarða.jpg I'm less sure of, but the current image was uploaded over an entirely different image identical to File:Bátur og Byggðasafn.jpg. All come from the same uploader, who has no other contributions to Commons. --Jmabel ! talk 01:27, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, some older and higher resolution in the web e.g. https://www.heyiceland.is/asset/5410/heritage-museum3.jpg. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:07, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Redirect to non-existed page ← Alex Great talkrus? 04:58, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb: Commons:Deletion requests/File:0PN Vy0flGU.jpg: Redirect to non-existed page
Out of scope - unused personal image. Kaulder (contribs | talk) 08:33, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:13, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image. Kaulder (contribs | talk) 08:33, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:13, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image. Kaulder (contribs | talk) 08:44, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:13, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image. Kaulder (contribs | talk) 08:44, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:13, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Source given ([2]) is copyrighted:"Copyright © 2017 The Indian Express [P] ltd. All Rights Reserved." No evidence that the image was released under CC BY-SA. clpo13(talk) 22:24, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:45, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Unused fictional flag without obvious purpose. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 22:26, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
- See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Fictional flag with 卐.svg. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 22:27, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:44, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Carl Mart2 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Private images. Out of scope.
GeorgHH • talk 22:41, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:43, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Image appears to be from https://skatecanada.ca/2015/01/photos-2015-canadian-tire-national-skating-championships/ Ytoyoda (talk) 18:48, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
- And it seems likely this is the same user as the blocked user Patchy34 (talk · contribs) Ytoyoda (talk) 15:05, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:14, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Looks like private image. Not used. Maybe not notable persons. Kulmalukko (talk) 18:48, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:13, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Screenshot, original source not indicated Ytoyoda (talk) 18:53, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:13, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:13, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Probably private image, not used. Maybe not notable person. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:01, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:13, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Crop of a publicity photo found at http://www.marilu.com/?p=4492, no indication that Intel owns the copyright to this photo. Likely belongs to Maria Ytoyoda (talk) 19:04, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
- Indeed, this image has to be deleted. --Rashinseita (talk) 19:08, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:12, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Private image, not used. Maybe not notable person. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:05, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:12, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Maybe not educationally usable. Low quality image of hand. Not well focused. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:14, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:12, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Low resolution private image. Not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:16, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:12, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Looks like a copyvio. Google/TinEye searches give a lot of links, but none to a AIWC's page. Higher resolution photo can be found here: http://www.brainparking.com/view/topic.cfm?key_or=1140821&lenta_type=4 jdx Re: 19:18, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:12, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Private image, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:23, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:12, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Probably not educationally usable. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:31, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:11, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Low resolution private image, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:34, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:11, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Not the author's own work Edjoerv (talk) 19:37, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:11, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
No usage, and bad resolution PNG. Other files available at (such as File:Győr COA.png) are way better. ·×ald·es 20:11, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:11, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
http://imgur.com/dD4yxQw Uploaded there on Jan 31, 2013. Yann (talk) 20:14, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:11, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
http://imgur.com/kL0a0aV Uploaded there on Nov 15, 2015. Yann (talk) 20:17, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:11, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal image. Possible out of scope. Senapa (talk) 20:18, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:10, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own works (no Exifs, "FBMD" in the metadatas), other uploads already speedy deleted https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Wiiilokan&action=history
Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:20, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:10, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
http://imgur.com/xQYvVEz Uploaded there on Feb 26, 2015. Yann (talk) 20:20, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:10, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
http://imgur.com/eaY9SGc Uploaded there on Jan 7, 2016. Yann (talk) 20:21, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:10, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
mass-upload of panoramio 2011 streams, small-sized and of poor quality, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 20:24, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:09, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
http://imgur.com/uE1G22B Uploaded there on Oct 4, 2014. Yann (talk) 20:26, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:09, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
mass-upload of panoramio 2011 streams, small-sized and of poor quality, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 20:28, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:08, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
mass-upload of panoramio 2011 streams, small-sized and of poor quality and obviously taken from car/bus etc, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 20:32, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:08, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
mass-upload of 2011 panoramio streams of rather poor quality, small-sized and obviously randomly taken from car/bus etc, doubtful educational usefulness, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 20:34, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:08, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
mass-upload of 2011 panoramio streams of very poor quality, small-sized, and no educational usefulness, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 20:39, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:07, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
mass-upload of 2011 panoramio streams of rather small-sized, poor-quality file, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 20:40, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:07, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
mass-upload of 2011 panoramio streams of rather small-sized, poor-quality file, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons ? Roland zh (talk) 20:41, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:07, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
File:Carmel Apologetics Trust Receives OCP Society Delegation , Secretary Lauds Pan-Orthodox nature & commitment of the Trust.jpeg
[edit]file not in use at Wikimedia projects, imho rather for personal use, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 21:27, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:07, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Private image, not in use. Maybe not notable person. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:34, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:07, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
as per source, and also serious personality right issues, Roland zh (talk) 21:37, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:07, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Valter Bitencourt Júnior
[edit]- File:Aleilton Fonseca.jpg
- File:Academia Letras da Bahia.jpg
- File:Almandrade.jpg
- File:Estudantes no Instituto Socioambiental de Valéria (ISVA) .jpg
- File:Jornal Rascunho.jpg
- File:Gilberto Nogueira de Oliveira.jpg
Files uploaded by Valter Bitencourt Júnior (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information) , that uploaded some obviously copyright violations, like a fac-simile of a newspaper page or an image of a painting of a living painter.
All fall in one or more of the following conditions:
- Low resolution and the Exif data point to the file being grabbed from Internet
- "Own work" of non existent users
- Fac-simile of logo
- Institutional or press portraits with low resolution
- Obviously scanned images from paper of recent themes
--Stego (talk) 22:04, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:06, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Valter Bitencourt Júnior
[edit]- File:Aleilton Fonseca.jpg
- File:Academia Letras da Bahia.jpg
- File:Almandrade.jpg
- File:Estudantes no Instituto Socioambiental de Valéria (ISVA) .jpg
- File:Jornal Rascunho.jpg
- File:Gilberto Nogueira de Oliveira.jpg
Files uploaded by Valter Bitencourt Júnior (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information) , that uploaded some obviously copyright violations, like a fac-simile of a newspaper page or an image of a painting of a living painter.
All fall in one or more of the following conditions:
- Low resolution and the Exif data point to the file being grabbed from Internet
- "Own work" of non existent users
- Fac-simile of logo
- Institutional or press portraits with low resolution
- Obviously scanned images from paper of recent themes
--Stego (talk) 22:04, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:06, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Valter Bitencourt Júnior
[edit]- File:Aleilton Fonseca.jpg
- File:Academia Letras da Bahia.jpg
- File:Almandrade.jpg
- File:Estudantes no Instituto Socioambiental de Valéria (ISVA) .jpg
- File:Jornal Rascunho.jpg
- File:Gilberto Nogueira de Oliveira.jpg
Files uploaded by Valter Bitencourt Júnior (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information) , that uploaded some obviously copyright violations, like a fac-simile of a newspaper page or an image of a painting of a living painter.
All fall in one or more of the following conditions:
- Low resolution and the Exif data point to the file being grabbed from Internet
- "Own work" of non existent users
- Fac-simile of logo
- Institutional or press portraits with low resolution
- Obviously scanned images from paper of recent themes
--Stego (talk) 22:04, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:06, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Valter Bitencourt Júnior
[edit]- File:Aleilton Fonseca.jpg
- File:Academia Letras da Bahia.jpg
- File:Almandrade.jpg
- File:Estudantes no Instituto Socioambiental de Valéria (ISVA) .jpg
- File:Jornal Rascunho.jpg
- File:Gilberto Nogueira de Oliveira.jpg
Files uploaded by Valter Bitencourt Júnior (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information) , that uploaded some obviously copyright violations, like a fac-simile of a newspaper page or an image of a painting of a living painter.
All fall in one or more of the following conditions:
- Low resolution and the Exif data point to the file being grabbed from Internet
- "Own work" of non existent users
- Fac-simile of logo
- Institutional or press portraits with low resolution
- Obviously scanned images from paper of recent themes
--Stego (talk) 22:04, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:06, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Valter Bitencourt Júnior
[edit]- File:Aleilton Fonseca.jpg
- File:Academia Letras da Bahia.jpg
- File:Almandrade.jpg
- File:Estudantes no Instituto Socioambiental de Valéria (ISVA) .jpg
- File:Jornal Rascunho.jpg
- File:Gilberto Nogueira de Oliveira.jpg
Files uploaded by Valter Bitencourt Júnior (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information) , that uploaded some obviously copyright violations, like a fac-simile of a newspaper page or an image of a painting of a living painter.
All fall in one or more of the following conditions:
- Low resolution and the Exif data point to the file being grabbed from Internet
- "Own work" of non existent users
- Fac-simile of logo
- Institutional or press portraits with low resolution
- Obviously scanned images from paper of recent themes
--Stego (talk) 22:04, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:06, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Valter Bitencourt Júnior
[edit]- File:Aleilton Fonseca.jpg
- File:Academia Letras da Bahia.jpg
- File:Almandrade.jpg
- File:Estudantes no Instituto Socioambiental de Valéria (ISVA) .jpg
- File:Jornal Rascunho.jpg
- File:Gilberto Nogueira de Oliveira.jpg
Files uploaded by Valter Bitencourt Júnior (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information) , that uploaded some obviously copyright violations, like a fac-simile of a newspaper page or an image of a painting of a living painter.
All fall in one or more of the following conditions:
- Low resolution and the Exif data point to the file being grabbed from Internet
- "Own work" of non existent users
- Fac-simile of logo
- Institutional or press portraits with low resolution
- Obviously scanned images from paper of recent themes
--Stego (talk) 22:04, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:06, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
An archive of the now-offline source ([3]) doesn't provide evidence of the given license. The image can be found elsewhere on the Web ([4]) with it being attributed to Thakur Anoop Singh's Twitter account. Again, no evidence of a CC BY-SA license. clpo13(talk) 22:18, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:02, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
COM:SCOPE: encyclopaedic use at least quite difficult, does illustrate what? Herzi Pinki (talk) 22:45, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:01, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Private low quality image. Maybe not notable persons. Kulmalukko (talk) 23:07, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:59, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
No permission. Jcb (talk) 23:09, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:59, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
mugshot? could be everyone Codc (talk) 23:25, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:58, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
unused personal photos, with insufficient description Pippobuono (talk) 07:16, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 11:34, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Igor ABA
[edit]COM:ADVERT, out of scope.
- File:Small version of ABA Point logo.jpg
- File:ABA Priority Lounge.jpg
- File:Logo of ABA Point discount program.png
- File:ABA Bank logo 2013-11-04 11-06.jpg
- File:ABA Bank main logo 2013-11-04 11-02.jpg
--XXN, 12:19, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 11:34, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Not educationally useful, not used. HakanIST (talk) 13:43, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 11:34, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Out of project scope. --XXN, 14:49, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 11:34, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Small size, no EXIF, questionable own work. -- Geagea (talk) 15:04, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 11:34, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:25, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 11:33, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:26, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 11:33, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.instyle.de/sites/default/files/styles/og_image/public/Teaser_itsanuthida_levisjeans.jpg?itok=5l_b76L6. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:28, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 11:33, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://i34.servimg.com/u/f34/12/34/20/42/lastsc10.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:29, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 11:33, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
out of scope — regards, Revi 16:36, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 11:32, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope. — regards, Revi 16:38, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 11:32, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope. — regards, Revi 16:38, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 11:32, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope. — regards, Revi 16:39, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 11:32, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope. — regards, Revi 16:41, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 11:32, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
unused screenshot of questionable educational value, furthermore categorization is currently not the good one. Texts and codes visible in some of the images are likely unfree too or at least of unclear copyright statut
Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:15, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Done by Mattbuck. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 11:33, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Raúl Cueto (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused, uncategorized personal images, out of scope.
Gauss (talk) 18:08, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 11:33, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Would appear to be from the website of a watch manufacturer, no indication of free license on their main page, and this doesn't have a direct URL so no way to check the license. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:26, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:52, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Facebook size, no informative meta and appearance of COM:COPYVIO rather than own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:29, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:52, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
"no comerciales" means Non-commercial and is incompatible with Commons licenses. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:40, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:53, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
One of the images in this collage is described as "magen "Sabana, África, naturraleza" de Rocko en http://imagenes.4ever.eu/animales/salvajes/sabana-134252#pic134252. El portal 4ever.eu autoriza el uso de las fotografías publicadas para usos no comerciales." "No Comerciales" means non-commercial and is incompatible with commons licenses. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:41, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:53, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
An image of an unnotable person. Evolutionoftheuniverse (talk) 01:08, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:53, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
An image of an unnotable person. Evolutionoftheuniverse (talk) 01:09, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:54, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
File:The good ole benn at work.jpg, File:Robert BEnn Physics teacher at American High School.jpg
[edit]no educational content, COMMONS:NOTHOST. Épico (talk)/(contribs) 05:48, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
- Comment: I'm not entirely familiar with the word caking, but considering edits like this one I'd wager that it's likely meant to make fun of this teacher. I'm also not really comfortable with keeping an image that looks to have been taken without the teacher's consent. Tokyogirl79 (talk) 10:30, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
- Looks like it's slang for flirting. Tokyogirl79 (talk) 10:31, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:54, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
No encyclopedic value - just some gradient background. (The image description reads: "Sorry about the photo that photo have followed by Wikipedia".) Used, for reasons unknown, in the deleted article en:Wwe brawl. Mike Rosoft (talk) 06:07, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:55, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Personal problem. Shofiul (talk) 06:50, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:55, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
not necessary Frze > talk 07:05, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:56, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
not necessary Frze > talk 07:06, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:56, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
not necessary Frze > talk 07:31, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:58, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Not "own work", this is an EMI record sleeve so presumably a copyright violation. John of Reading (talk) 08:11, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:58, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Copyright violation. This is part of a CD/record sleeve, compare http://www.tower.com/namagiripettai-krishnan-nadhaswaram-cd/wapi/117175832 John of Reading (talk) 08:25, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:58, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image. Kaulder (contribs | talk) 08:45, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:58, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image. Kaulder (contribs | talk) 08:48, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:58, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image. Kaulder (contribs | talk) 08:55, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:58, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image. Kaulder (contribs | talk) 08:57, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:59, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image. Kaulder (contribs | talk) 08:58, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:59, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image. Kaulder (contribs | talk) 09:01, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:59, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Errenous Title, File was moved Kritzolina (talk) 09:01, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:00, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image. Kaulder (contribs | talk) 09:02, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:00, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image. Kaulder (contribs | talk) 09:03, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:00, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image. Kaulder (contribs | talk) 09:05, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:00, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image. Kaulder (contribs | talk) 09:13, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:00, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Uploader claims that he has got a permission but has no proof (ie OTRS) given 137.226.187.99 09:15, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Warum wollt ihr alle Bilder von Georg Otte wieder entfernen , die aus dem Archiv von Georg Otte stammen wieder löschen, obwohl ich eine Genehmigung geholt habe?
Hier noch einmal die Kopie der Genehmigung:
Hallo, ich gebe Euch die Kontaktperson wegen der Genehmigung für die Veröffentlichung im Anhang mit bei;
--Hallo Herr Haufe,--
mein Kontaktmann zu Frau Grundmann hat wie folgt geantwortet:
Weitergeleitete Nachricht --------
Betreff: Frau Grundmann Datum: Thu, 24 Nov 2016 00:09:40 +0100 Von: Bernd xxx> An: André Marks <andre.marks@gmx.de>--
In dem Schreiben, die von einer Kontaktperson von Frau Grundmann gekommen ist, die ich aber nicht kenne, wurde geschrieben, dass sie (Frau Grundmann) Ihre Einwilligung zur Veröffentlichung gibt. Das ist für mich eindeutig. Alles andere, was zwischen Herrn Marks und seinem Kontaktmann gesprochen wurde, entzieht sich meiner Kenntnis. Ihr könnt ihn ja einmal anschreiben, um ganz sicher zu gehen wegen der Veröffentlichung. Die Kontaktadresse habt Ihr ja.
Ich würde die Aufnahme aber auf jedem Fall aufheben, weil sie historisch sehr wertvoll ist. Zum einen, wo gibt es noch Fotos von Triebwagen aus der Vorkriegszeit mit Eilzugwagengrundriss und noch dazu in solch guter Qualität, und Betriebsfotos aus dem Bahnbetriebswerk Dresden-Pieschen findet man in Eurer Fotosammlung überhaupt nicht.
Wenn Ihr mir nicht glaubt, so erkundigt Euch bei dem Verantwortlichen für die Fotosammlung Grundmann, Herrn Marx, ich habe ihn auch noch einmal angeschrieben, dass Ihr alles löschen wollt.
--Rainerhaufe (talk) 09:42, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Einverständniserklärung (Rechte-Inhaber) fehlt
[edit]Einverständniserklärung (Rechte-Inhaber)
Ich erkläre in Bezug auf das Bild
{{{ OBJEKTNAME }}}
Source: {{{ QUELLE/ WEBLINK ANGEBEN }}},
dass ich den Inhaber eines vollumfänglichen Nutzungsrechtes um Erlaubnis befragte und eine Zusage erhielt.
Ich erlaube hiermit jedermann die Weiternutzung des Bildes unter der freien Lizenz „Creative Commons Namensnennung-Weitergabe unter gleichen Bedingungen 3.0 Deutschland“ (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/de/legalcode).
Ich genehmige somit in urheberrechtlicher Hinsicht Dritten das Recht, das Bild (auch gewerblich) zu nutzen und zu verändern, sofern sie die Lizenzbedingungen wahren. Mir ist bekannt, dass ich diese Einwilligung üblicherweise nicht widerrufen kann.
Mir ist bekannt, dass sich die Unterstellung unter eine freie Lizenz nur auf das Urheberrecht bezieht und es mir daher unbenommen ist, aufgrund anderer Gesetze (Persönlichkeitsrecht, Markenrecht usw.) gegen Dritte vorzugehen, die das Bild im Rahmen der freien Lizenz rechtmäßig, auf Grund der anderen Gesetze aber unrechtmäßig nutzen.
Gleichwohl erwerbe ich keinen Anspruch darauf, dass das Bild dauerhaft auf der Wikipedia eingestellt wird.
{{{ DATUM }}},
Deleted: The actual copyright holder must send a free lciense using OTRS. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:02, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Uploader claims that he has got a permission but has no proof (ie OTRS) given 137.226.187.99 09:17, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Warum wollt ihr alle Bilder von Georg Otte wieder entfernen , die aus dem Archiv von Georg Otte stammen wieder löschen, obwohl ich eine Genehmigung geholt habe?
Hier noch einmal die Kopie der Genehmigung:
Hallo, ich gebe Euch die Kontaktperson wegen der Genehmigung für die Veröffentlichung im Anhang mit bei;
--Hallo Herr Haufe,--
mein Kontaktmann zu Frau Grundmann hat wie folgt geantwortet:
Weitergeleitete Nachricht --------
Betreff: Frau Grundmann Datum: Thu, 24 Nov 2016 00:09:40 +0100 Von: Bernd xxx> An: André Marks <andre.marks@gmx.de>--
In dem Schreiben, die von einer Kontaktperson von Frau Grundmann gekommen ist, die ich aber nicht kenne, wurde geschrieben, dass sie (Frau Grundmann) Ihre Einwilligung zur Veröffentlichung gibt. Das ist für mich eindeutig. Alles andere, was zwischen Herrn Marks und seinem Kontaktmann gesprochen wurde, entzieht sich meiner Kenntnis. Ihr könnt ihn ja einmal anschreiben, um ganz sicher zu gehen wegen der Veröffentlichung. Die Kontaktadresse habt Ihr ja.
Ich würde die Aufnahme aber auf jedem Fall aufheben, weil sie historisch sehr wertvoll ist. Zum einen, wo gibt es noch Fotos von Triebwagen aus der Vorkriegszeit mit Eilzugwagengrundriss und noch dazu in solch guter Qualität, und Betriebsfotos aus dem Bahnbetriebswerk Dresden-Pieschen findet man in Eurer Fotosammlung überhaupt nicht.
Wenn Ihr mir nicht glaubt, so erkundigt Euch bei dem Verantwortlichen für die Fotosammlung Grundmann, Herrn Marx, ich habe ihn auch noch einmal angeschrieben, dass Ihr alles löschen wollt.
--Rainerhaufe (talk) 09:42, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: The actual copyright holder must send a free lciense using OTRS. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:03, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Uploader claims that he has got a permission but has no proof (ie OTRS) given 137.226.187.99 09:20, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Warum wollt ihr alle Bilder von Georg Otte wieder entfernen , die aus dem Archiv von Georg Otte stammen wieder löschen, obwohl ich eine Genehmigung geholt habe?
Hier noch einmal die Kopie der Genehmigung:
Hallo, ich gebe Euch die Kontaktperson wegen der Genehmigung für die Veröffentlichung im Anhang mit bei;
--Hallo Herr Haufe,--
mein Kontaktmann zu Frau Grundmann hat wie folgt geantwortet:
Weitergeleitete Nachricht --------
Betreff: Frau Grundmann Datum: Thu, 24 Nov 2016 00:09:40 +0100 Von: Bernd xxx> An: André Marks <andre.marks@gmx.de>--
In dem Schreiben, die von einer Kontaktperson von Frau Grundmann gekommen ist, die ich aber nicht kenne, wurde geschrieben, dass sie (Frau Grundmann) Ihre Einwilligung zur Veröffentlichung gibt. Das ist für mich eindeutig. Alles andere, was zwischen Herrn Marks und seinem Kontaktmann gesprochen wurde, entzieht sich meiner Kenntnis. Ihr könnt ihn ja einmal anschreiben, um ganz sicher zu gehen wegen der Veröffentlichung. Die Kontaktadresse habt Ihr ja.
Ich würde die Aufnahme aber auf jedem Fall aufheben, weil sie historisch sehr wertvoll ist. Zum einen, wo gibt es noch Fotos von Triebwagen aus der Vorkriegszeit mit Eilzugwagengrundriss und noch dazu in solch guter Qualität, und Betriebsfotos aus dem Bahnbetriebswerk Dresden-Pieschen findet man in Eurer Fotosammlung überhaupt nicht.
Wenn Ihr mir nicht glaubt, so erkundigt Euch bei dem Verantwortlichen für die Fotosammlung Grundmann, Herrn Marx, ich habe ihn auch noch einmal angeschrieben, dass Ihr alles löschen wollt.
--Rainerhaufe (talk) 09:43, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: The actual copyright holder must send a free lciense using OTRS. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:03, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Uploader claims that he has got a permission but has no proof (ie OTRS) given 137.226.187.99 09:20, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Warum wollt ihr alle Bilder von Georg Otte wieder entfernen , die aus dem Archiv von Georg Otte stammen wieder löschen, obwohl ich eine Genehmigung geholt habe?
Hier noch einmal die Kopie der Genehmigung:
Hallo, ich gebe Euch die Kontaktperson wegen der Genehmigung für die Veröffentlichung im Anhang mit bei;
--Hallo Herr Haufe,--
mein Kontaktmann zu Frau Grundmann hat wie folgt geantwortet:
Weitergeleitete Nachricht --------
Betreff: Frau Grundmann Datum: Thu, 24 Nov 2016 00:09:40 +0100 Von: Bernd xxx> An: André Marks <andre.marks@gmx.de>--
In dem Schreiben, die von einer Kontaktperson von Frau Grundmann gekommen ist, die ich aber nicht kenne, wurde geschrieben, dass sie (Frau Grundmann) Ihre Einwilligung zur Veröffentlichung gibt. Das ist für mich eindeutig. Alles andere, was zwischen Herrn Marks und seinem Kontaktmann gesprochen wurde, entzieht sich meiner Kenntnis. Ihr könnt ihn ja einmal anschreiben, um ganz sicher zu gehen wegen der Veröffentlichung. Die Kontaktadresse habt Ihr ja.
Ich würde die Aufnahme aber auf jedem Fall aufheben, weil sie historisch sehr wertvoll ist. Zum einen, wo gibt es noch Fotos von Triebwagen aus der Vorkriegszeit mit Eilzugwagengrundriss und noch dazu in solch guter Qualität, und Betriebsfotos aus dem Bahnbetriebswerk Dresden-Pieschen findet man in Eurer Fotosammlung überhaupt nicht.
Wenn Ihr mir nicht glaubt, so erkundigt Euch bei dem Verantwortlichen für die Fotosammlung Grundmann, Herrn Marx, ich habe ihn auch noch einmal angeschrieben, dass Ihr alles löschen wollt.
--Rainerhaufe (talk) 09:44, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Einverständniserklärung (Rechte-Inhaber) fehlt
[edit]Einverständniserklärung (Rechte-Inhaber)
Ich erkläre in Bezug auf das Bild
{{{ OBJEKTNAME }}}
Source: {{{ QUELLE/ WEBLINK ANGEBEN }}},
dass ich den Inhaber eines vollumfänglichen Nutzungsrechtes um Erlaubnis befragte und eine Zusage erhielt.
Ich erlaube hiermit jedermann die Weiternutzung des Bildes unter der freien Lizenz „Creative Commons Namensnennung-Weitergabe unter gleichen Bedingungen 3.0 Deutschland“ (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/de/legalcode).
Ich genehmige somit in urheberrechtlicher Hinsicht Dritten das Recht, das Bild (auch gewerblich) zu nutzen und zu verändern, sofern sie die Lizenzbedingungen wahren. Mir ist bekannt, dass ich diese Einwilligung üblicherweise nicht widerrufen kann.
Mir ist bekannt, dass sich die Unterstellung unter eine freie Lizenz nur auf das Urheberrecht bezieht und es mir daher unbenommen ist, aufgrund anderer Gesetze (Persönlichkeitsrecht, Markenrecht usw.) gegen Dritte vorzugehen, die das Bild im Rahmen der freien Lizenz rechtmäßig, auf Grund der anderen Gesetze aber unrechtmäßig nutzen.
Gleichwohl erwerbe ich keinen Anspruch darauf, dass das Bild dauerhaft auf der Wikipedia eingestellt wird.
{{{ DATUM }}},
Deleted: The actual copyright holder must send a free lciense using OTRS. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:03, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
In my opinion the cover surpasses threshold of originality and needs OTRS-permission from Jon Bon Jovi. Taivo (talk) 09:20, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:23, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Uploader claims that he has got a permission but has no proof (ie OTRS) given 137.226.187.99 09:21, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Warum wollt ihr alle Bilder von Georg Otte wieder entfernen , die aus dem Archiv von Georg Otte stammen wieder löschen, obwohl ich eine Genehmigung geholt habe?
Hier noch einmal die Kopie der Genehmigung:
Hallo, ich gebe Euch die Kontaktperson wegen der Genehmigung für die Veröffentlichung im Anhang mit bei;
--Hallo Herr Haufe,--
mein Kontaktmann zu Frau Grundmann hat wie folgt geantwortet:
Weitergeleitete Nachricht --------
Betreff: Frau Grundmann Datum: Thu, 24 Nov 2016 00:09:40 +0100 Von: Bernd xxx> An: André Marks <andre.marks@gmx.de>--
In dem Schreiben, die von einer Kontaktperson von Frau Grundmann gekommen ist, die ich aber nicht kenne, wurde geschrieben, dass sie (Frau Grundmann) Ihre Einwilligung zur Veröffentlichung gibt. Das ist für mich eindeutig. Alles andere, was zwischen Herrn Marks und seinem Kontaktmann gesprochen wurde, entzieht sich meiner Kenntnis. Ihr könnt ihn ja einmal anschreiben, um ganz sicher zu gehen wegen der Veröffentlichung. Die Kontaktadresse habt Ihr ja.
Ich würde die Aufnahme aber auf jedem Fall aufheben, weil sie historisch sehr wertvoll ist. Zum einen, wo gibt es noch Fotos von Triebwagen aus der Vorkriegszeit mit Eilzugwagengrundriss und noch dazu in solch guter Qualität, und Betriebsfotos aus dem Bahnbetriebswerk Dresden-Pieschen findet man in Eurer Fotosammlung überhaupt nicht.
Wenn Ihr mir nicht glaubt, so erkundigt Euch bei dem Verantwortlichen für die Fotosammlung Grundmann, Herrn Marx, ich habe ihn auch noch einmal angeschrieben, dass Ihr alles löschen wollt.
--Rainerhaufe (talk) 09:44, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Einverständniserklärung (Rechte-Inhaber) fehlt
[edit]Einverständniserklärung (Rechte-Inhaber)
Ich erkläre in Bezug auf das Bild
{{{ OBJEKTNAME }}}
Source: {{{ QUELLE/ WEBLINK ANGEBEN }}},
dass ich den Inhaber eines vollumfänglichen Nutzungsrechtes um Erlaubnis befragte und eine Zusage erhielt.
Ich erlaube hiermit jedermann die Weiternutzung des Bildes unter der freien Lizenz „Creative Commons Namensnennung-Weitergabe unter gleichen Bedingungen 3.0 Deutschland“ (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/de/legalcode).
Ich genehmige somit in urheberrechtlicher Hinsicht Dritten das Recht, das Bild (auch gewerblich) zu nutzen und zu verändern, sofern sie die Lizenzbedingungen wahren. Mir ist bekannt, dass ich diese Einwilligung üblicherweise nicht widerrufen kann.
Mir ist bekannt, dass sich die Unterstellung unter eine freie Lizenz nur auf das Urheberrecht bezieht und es mir daher unbenommen ist, aufgrund anderer Gesetze (Persönlichkeitsrecht, Markenrecht usw.) gegen Dritte vorzugehen, die das Bild im Rahmen der freien Lizenz rechtmäßig, auf Grund der anderen Gesetze aber unrechtmäßig nutzen.
Gleichwohl erwerbe ich keinen Anspruch darauf, dass das Bild dauerhaft auf der Wikipedia eingestellt wird.
{{{ DATUM }}},
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:23, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Uploader claims that he has got a permission but has no proof (ie OTRS) given 137.226.187.99 09:21, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Warum wollt ihr alle Bilder von Georg Otte wieder entfernen , die aus dem Archiv von Georg Otte stammen wieder löschen, obwohl ich eine Genehmigung geholt habe?
Hier noch einmal die Kopie der Genehmigung:
Hallo, ich gebe Euch die Kontaktperson wegen der Genehmigung für die Veröffentlichung im Anhang mit bei;
--Hallo Herr Haufe,--
mein Kontaktmann zu Frau Grundmann hat wie folgt geantwortet:
Weitergeleitete Nachricht --------
Betreff: Frau Grundmann Datum: Thu, 24 Nov 2016 00:09:40 +0100 Von: Bernd xxx> An: André Marks <andre.marks@gmx.de>--
In dem Schreiben, die von einer Kontaktperson von Frau Grundmann gekommen ist, die ich aber nicht kenne, wurde geschrieben, dass sie (Frau Grundmann) Ihre Einwilligung zur Veröffentlichung gibt. Das ist für mich eindeutig. Alles andere, was zwischen Herrn Marks und seinem Kontaktmann gesprochen wurde, entzieht sich meiner Kenntnis. Ihr könnt ihn ja einmal anschreiben, um ganz sicher zu gehen wegen der Veröffentlichung. Die Kontaktadresse habt Ihr ja.
Ich würde die Aufnahme aber auf jedem Fall aufheben, weil sie historisch sehr wertvoll ist. Zum einen, wo gibt es noch Fotos von Triebwagen aus der Vorkriegszeit mit Eilzugwagengrundriss und noch dazu in solch guter Qualität, und Betriebsfotos aus dem Bahnbetriebswerk Dresden-Pieschen findet man in Eurer Fotosammlung überhaupt nicht.
Wenn Ihr mir nicht glaubt, so erkundigt Euch bei dem Verantwortlichen für die Fotosammlung Grundmann, Herrn Marx, ich habe ihn auch noch einmal angeschrieben, dass Ihr alles löschen wollt.
--Rainerhaufe (talk) 09:45, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Einverständniserklärung (Rechte-Inhaber) fehlt
[edit]Einverständniserklärung (Rechte-Inhaber)
Ich erkläre in Bezug auf das Bild
{{{ OBJEKTNAME }}}
Source: {{{ QUELLE/ WEBLINK ANGEBEN }}},
dass ich den Inhaber eines vollumfänglichen Nutzungsrechtes um Erlaubnis befragte und eine Zusage erhielt.
Ich erlaube hiermit jedermann die Weiternutzung des Bildes unter der freien Lizenz „Creative Commons Namensnennung-Weitergabe unter gleichen Bedingungen 3.0 Deutschland“ (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/de/legalcode).
Ich genehmige somit in urheberrechtlicher Hinsicht Dritten das Recht, das Bild (auch gewerblich) zu nutzen und zu verändern, sofern sie die Lizenzbedingungen wahren. Mir ist bekannt, dass ich diese Einwilligung üblicherweise nicht widerrufen kann.
Mir ist bekannt, dass sich die Unterstellung unter eine freie Lizenz nur auf das Urheberrecht bezieht und es mir daher unbenommen ist, aufgrund anderer Gesetze (Persönlichkeitsrecht, Markenrecht usw.) gegen Dritte vorzugehen, die das Bild im Rahmen der freien Lizenz rechtmäßig, auf Grund der anderen Gesetze aber unrechtmäßig nutzen.
Gleichwohl erwerbe ich keinen Anspruch darauf, dass das Bild dauerhaft auf der Wikipedia eingestellt wird.
{{{ DATUM }}},
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:30, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Uploader claims that he has got a permission but has no proof (ie OTRS) given 137.226.187.99 09:22, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Warum wollt ihr alle Bilder von Georg Otte wieder entfernen , die aus dem Archiv von Georg Otte stammen wieder löschen, obwohl ich eine Genehmigung geholt habe?
Hier noch einmal die Kopie der Genehmigung:
Hallo, ich gebe Euch die Kontaktperson wegen der Genehmigung für die Veröffentlichung im Anhang mit bei;
--Hallo Herr Haufe,--
mein Kontaktmann zu Frau Grundmann hat wie folgt geantwortet:
Weitergeleitete Nachricht --------
Betreff: Frau Grundmann Datum: Thu, 24 Nov 2016 00:09:40 +0100 Von: Bernd xxx> An: André Marks <andre.marks@gmx.de>--
In dem Schreiben, die von einer Kontaktperson von Frau Grundmann gekommen ist, die ich aber nicht kenne, wurde geschrieben, dass sie (Frau Grundmann) Ihre Einwilligung zur Veröffentlichung gibt. Das ist für mich eindeutig. Alles andere, was zwischen Herrn Marks und seinem Kontaktmann gesprochen wurde, entzieht sich meiner Kenntnis. Ihr könnt ihn ja einmal anschreiben, um ganz sicher zu gehen wegen der Veröffentlichung. Die Kontaktadresse habt Ihr ja.
Ich würde die Aufnahme aber auf jedem Fall aufheben, weil sie historisch sehr wertvoll ist. Zum einen, wo gibt es noch Fotos von Triebwagen aus der Vorkriegszeit mit Eilzugwagengrundriss und noch dazu in solch guter Qualität, und Betriebsfotos aus dem Bahnbetriebswerk Dresden-Pieschen findet man in Eurer Fotosammlung überhaupt nicht.
Wenn Ihr mir nicht glaubt, so erkundigt Euch bei dem Verantwortlichen für die Fotosammlung Grundmann, Herrn Marx, ich habe ihn auch noch einmal angeschrieben, dass Ihr alles löschen wollt.
--Rainerhaufe (talk) 09:45, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Einverständniserklärung (Rechte-Inhaber) fehlt
[edit]Einverständniserklärung (Rechte-Inhaber)
Ich erkläre in Bezug auf das Bild
{{{ OBJEKTNAME }}}
Source: {{{ QUELLE/ WEBLINK ANGEBEN }}},
dass ich den Inhaber eines vollumfänglichen Nutzungsrechtes um Erlaubnis befragte und eine Zusage erhielt.
Ich erlaube hiermit jedermann die Weiternutzung des Bildes unter der freien Lizenz „Creative Commons Namensnennung-Weitergabe unter gleichen Bedingungen 3.0 Deutschland“ (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/de/legalcode).
Ich genehmige somit in urheberrechtlicher Hinsicht Dritten das Recht, das Bild (auch gewerblich) zu nutzen und zu verändern, sofern sie die Lizenzbedingungen wahren. Mir ist bekannt, dass ich diese Einwilligung üblicherweise nicht widerrufen kann.
Mir ist bekannt, dass sich die Unterstellung unter eine freie Lizenz nur auf das Urheberrecht bezieht und es mir daher unbenommen ist, aufgrund anderer Gesetze (Persönlichkeitsrecht, Markenrecht usw.) gegen Dritte vorzugehen, die das Bild im Rahmen der freien Lizenz rechtmäßig, auf Grund der anderen Gesetze aber unrechtmäßig nutzen.
Gleichwohl erwerbe ich keinen Anspruch darauf, dass das Bild dauerhaft auf der Wikipedia eingestellt wird.
{{{ DATUM }}},
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:31, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
license cannot be correct 137.226.187.99 09:24, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Das Foto war auf einem Werbeplakat, welches bei Messerschmitt Lokomotivtechnik im Bild abgedruck war. Solche Werbeplakat haben wir letztes Jahr massenhaft abgebildet.
--Rainerhaufe (talk) 09:48, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Delete. Copyright violation. --Frze > talk 14:32, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: The poster may have been shown widely, but there is no evidence that it was freely licensed and it certainly isn't PD. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:32, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
license cannot be correct 137.226.187.99 09:25, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Das Foto ist ein Werbeplakat von Siemens, welches bei Messerschmidt Lokomotivtechnik im Bild abgedruckt war. Solche ähnlichen Werbeprospekte haben wir letztes Jahr in Massen hoch geladen und sind alle durch gekommen.
--Rainerhaufe (talk) 09:50, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Delete. Copyright violation. --Frze > talk 14:34, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: The poster may have been shown widely, but there is no evidence that it was freely licensed and it certainly isn't PD. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:33, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Derivative of Rebecca Blackwell's (AP) pic. Gyrostat (talk) 09:53, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:34, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
After moving the files into Category:Clapper Bridge which is about the same subject, and requesting a renaming of the latter to "Clapper Bridge, Hebble Hole", this category is now empty. It may, however, be kept as a redirect if an administrator deems it useful. -Schlosser67 (talk) 09:55, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Kept: redirected. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:37, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
too small, out of scope MMFE (talk) 10:05, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
- Note: there are similar files, e.g. for Belgium and the Netherlands. I've also already made substantive remarks regarding the maps, see User talk:AHC300#Decriminalization of same-sex intercourse maps. SPQRobin (talk) 12:41, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
- These three files show actually the ratio of occupied by Nazi Germany /non occupied territory of the three countries at the end of 1944. Henxter (talk) 13:07, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
- Indeed, which may in a way be strictly correct, but it is misleading as it was legal since about 1795 in countries influenced by the French Revolution. I.e. the German occupation was only a short interruption, and the distinction 1944/1945 is also not really that significant. SPQRobin (talk) 20:51, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Far too small to be useful -- yes, of course the SVG can be enlarged, but there is far too little detail. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:40, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
derivative work [5] Darklanlan (talk) 10:16, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:40, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
out of com:EDUSE Pippobuono (talk) 10:19, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:40, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Unfortunately this file is from DSS1 and only hosted by ESO. These files are copyrighted. Szczureq (talk) 10:25, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:40, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Insufficient quality: The main subject of this image is not the Cathedral of Madrid but rather a nondescript fence and some blurry vegetation. The cathedral may be visible in the back but it is small and completely blurry. Gauss (talk) 18:45, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Ellin Beltz: per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Catedral de la Almudena - panoramio.jpg
No license info found in the page Rodrigolopes (talk) 23:43, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Ellin Beltz: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing
Delete: very poor quality low resolution images are of no useful value and are of virtually no educational value
- File:Hystrix cristata NL.png
- File:Nyctereutes procyonoides NL.png
- File:Nicotiana tabacum NL.png
- File:Allium cepa NL.png
- File:Medicago truncatula NL.png
- File:Xenoturbella bocki NL.png
- File:Chinchilla lanigera NL.png
- File:Pan troglodytes NL.png
- File:Orycteropus afer NL.png
- File:Tyrannosaurus rex NL.png
- File:Pinus taeda NL.png
- File:Capsicum annuum NL.png
- File:Zea mays NL.png
- File:Toxoplasma gondii NL.png
- File:Rangifer tarandus NL.png
- File:Columba livia NL.png
- File:Rattus norvegicus NL.png
- File:Solanum lycopersicum NL.png
- File:Panthera tigris NL.png
- File:Takifugu rubripes NL.png
- File:Triceratops horridus NL.png
- File:Trypanosoma brucei NL.png
- File:Crocodylus niloticus NL.png
- File:Papilio xuthus NL.png
- File:Dugesia japonica NL.png
- File:Branchiostoma floridae NL.png
- File:Aquilegia formosa NL.png
- File:Oncorhynchus mykiss NL.png
- File:Mustela itatsi NL.png
- File:Capricornis crispus NL.png
- File:Macaca fuscata NL.png
- File:Cervus nippon NL.png
- File:Schistosoma japonicum NL.png
- File:Eumeces latiscutatus NL.png
- File:Sciurus lis NL.png
- File:Aedes aegypti NL.png
- File:Pomacentrus moluccensis NL.png
- File:Xenopus tropicalis NL.png
- File:Lepus brachyurus NL.png
- File:Prosopocoilus inclinatus NL.png
- File:Diplazium tomitaroanum Masam NL.png
- File:Capra aegagrus NL.png
- File:Monodelphis domestica NL.png
- File:Loris lydekkerianus NL.png
- File:Brassica rapa NL.png
- File:Myxine glutinosa NL.png
- File:Mus musculus NL.png
- File:Prunus persica NL.png
- File:Glandiceps hacksi NL.png
- File:Anopheles stephensi NL.png
- File:Tachyglossus aculeatus NL.png
- File:Triticum aestivum NL.png
- File:Tursiops truncatus NL.png
- File:Casuarius casuarius NL.png
- File:Ursus arctos NL.png
- File:Ovis canadensis NL.png
- File:Ovis aries NL.png
- File:Homo sapiens NL.png
- File:Camelus dromedarius NL.png
- File:Hydra magnipapillata NL.png
- File:Helianthus annuus NL.png
- File:Ptychodera flava NL.png
- File:Physcomitrella patens subsp patens NL.png
- File:Pimephales promelas NL.png
- File:Cynocephalus volans NL.png
- File:Trichosurus vulpecula NL.png
- File:Sus scrofa domestica NL.png
- File:Camelus ferus NL.png
- File:Choloepus didactylus NL.png
- File:Pteranodon longiceps NL.png
- File:Brachiosaurus altithorax NL.png
- File:Populus trichocarpa NL.png
- File:Antilocapra americana NL.png
- File:Fundulus heteroclitus NL.png
- File:Alces alces NL.png
- File:Pan paniscus NL.png
- File:Carcharodon carcharias NL.png
- File:Polypterus endlicheri NL.png
- File:Delphinus delphis NL.png
- File:Gorilla beringei NL.png
- File:Anas platyrhynchos NL.png
- File:Spheniscus magellanicus NL.png
- File:Physeter macrocephalus NL.png
- File:Halocynthia roretzi NL.png
- File:Tapirus indicus NL.png
- File:Schistosoma mansoni NL.png
- File:Papio hamadryas NL.png
- File:Mandrillus sphinx NL.png
- File:Daphnia pulex NL.png
- File:Mirounga leonina NL.png
- File:Manis pentadactyla NL.png
- File:Lotus japonicus NL.png
- File:Sphenodon punctatus NL.png
- File:Strongylocentrotus purpuratus NL.png
- File:Haliclona permollis NL.png
- File:Oryzias latipes NL.png
- File:Sorghum bicolor NL.png
- File:Petromyzon marinus NL.png
- File:Ctenolepisma villosa NL.png
- File:Ciona savignyi NL.png
- File:201701 Trachea and Bronchial tree.png
- File:Larus ridibundus NL.png
- File:Vitis vinifera NL.png
- File:Paracentrotus lividus NL.png
- File:Ramazzottius NL.png
- File:Paramecium tetraurelia NL.png
- File:Panthera leo NL.png
- File:Gossypium raimondii NL.png
- File:Arachis hypogaea NL.png
- File:Lama glama NL.png
- File:Gossypium hirsutum NL.png
- File:Malus pumila NL.png
- File:Cycas rumphii NL.png
- File:Lactuca sativa NL.png
- File:Phaeodactylum tricornutum NL.png
- File:Bacillus subtilis NL.png
- File:Aeropyrum pernix K1 NL.png
- File:Saccharomyces cerevisiae NL.png
- File:Escherichia coli NL.png
- File:Plasmodium falciparum NL.png
- File:Schizosaccharomyces pombe NL.png
- File:Monosiga brevicollis NL.png
Ww2censor (talk) 11:16, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
I am not sure why these are no useful values. They are to be used for presentation slides at academic conferences or in any materials.--Yayamamo (talk) 11:27, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
- Some of your other uploads are a little larger, though not by that much, and I did not nominate those but did think about it. As I stated above, these are very poor quality low resolution images of little use to this project and several images of the same subjects are already available in better quality here. Obviously others, who are happy to use such low quality images can find them elsewhere online. Ww2censor (talk) 14:51, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
- They are icon images, and there are no others like these images that can be useful when embedded in articles, especially when multiple images are used as they have a same touch or manner. In addition, the resolution of File:201701 Trachea and Bronchial tree.png is higher than the other nominees while you think not useful. --Yayamamo (talk) 16:01, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
- Keep These files were created and meant to be used as icons. See source page's media collection title "生物アイコン (NBDC 生命科学系データベースアーカイブ)" [Organism icons (NBDC Biological Database Archives)]. The collection has since relocated the following URL: http://togodb.biosciencedbc.jp/togodb/view/taxonomy_icon 朝彦 | asahiko (talk) 07:22, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
- Additional info: DOI for this "Taxonomy Icon" database is doi:10.18908/lsdba.nbdc00805-000. They were created methodically with funding from the Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT). Arguments that they are not useful will not apply. I will be trying to license-review them and categorize them accordingly over the next several days. 朝彦 | asahiko (talk) 09:31, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
- For now, the nominated files have been categorized into Category:Taxonomy icons by NBDC, save one: File:201701 Trachea and Bronchial tree.png, which went into Category:Life science icons from DBCLS. 朝彦 | asahiko (talk) 10:36, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Comprehensive and well-curated collection of animal, plant and microorganism pictures. See original site (http://togodb.biosciencedbc.jp/togodb/view/taxonomy_icon_en). --114.160.88.231 05:03, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
- Thank you very much for your supports. I'd like to upload other icon images after a while. --Yayamamo (talk) 15:47, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
Comment I really think these images are of such low quality they are Out of Scope of the project, so refer to COM:NOTUSED and especially COM:NOTUSED#Discussion. Ww2censor (talk) 22:23, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Images in scope and good quality. Tm (talk) 22:31, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
- Tm, I disagree and should hate to see what you consider to be poor quality images if you think these are good quality. Ww2censor (talk) 23:48, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
- I read COM:NOTUSED#Discussion. The sizes of these icon images are relatively small, and some species have their larger size images. However, there are cases of no such images as Category:Hemichordata, and as I mentioned above, they can be especially useful when used as a set of the images such as when you draw a taxonomic tree with the icons. --Yayamamo (talk) 02:02, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
- The icons are clearly labeled with NCBI Taxonomy IDs and also designed so that they bring out the essential features of the species even in small-size usage, and that is the whole point of icons. It seems to me that you are against the whole concept of icons in general, perhaps because they are "low-resolution". (Should we delete all Category:Hamburger icons as well in favor of Category:Hamburgers?) A distinction should be made from what COM:EDUSE actually intended to kick out, i.e. a low-resolution blurry photo of an unidentified bird, given as an example in that policy you cited. Commons is meant to be a repository of freely-usable educational media. Making a well-organized and self-consistent collection of taxonomy icons available as part of our content is well within this project's mission and is clearly in Commons scope. --朝彦 | asahiko (talk) 02:40, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: WMF projects do not and should not use images of this size. Instead, we use much larger images and make thumbnails as needed. This means that for most people, the thumbnail appears relatvely small, but for people with vision problems, it can be whatever size they want. Use of a small icon defeats that capability and is therefore against policy. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:47, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
self promotion, unused Pippobuono (talk) 11:20, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:48, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope. --XXN, 11:47, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:49, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Derivative work, no permission. --XXN, 11:49, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:49, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Logo+screenshot - copyrighted content.
--XXN, 11:51, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:50, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
No FOP in Romania. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:08, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:50, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
No FOP in Romania. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:10, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:50, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Looks like a low resolution private image. Not used. Maybe not notable persons. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:26, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:50, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Low resolution private image. Maybe not notable person. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:33, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:50, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of scope. --XXN, 12:52, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:50, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Architectual simulation that appears in more than a few websites (such as this one). It has no place in the Commons without a specific OTRS release note from the owners. Ldorfman (talk) 13:03, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:51, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
The picture is taken from the website of an architects' firm. It has no place in the Commons without a specific OTRS release note from them. Ldorfman (talk) 13:10, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:51, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
it's blurry. there is a better version in commons: Arnaud Palastowicz (talk) 14:47, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
- Keep It is a source image for a focus stack, File:Mimulus alsinoides 1906f.JPG and is identified as such in the image description. Source images may be used to identify processing artifacts. Leaf margins and hairs are sharp and are often important distinguishing features of plant species. Walter Siegmund (talk) 17:01, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
Kept I'm not sure this is a good idea -- while focus stacking can be useful, it is always better to obtain better depth of field by other means. Also, of the three images, the focus on this one is not particularly useful. However, I respect Walter's opinion so I have kept it. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:54, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:14, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
- Found it! It's an image of what might be the first traffic light in action, published in a 1914 issue of Engineering News. - Eureka Lott 16:57, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
- Keep That is good find Eureka Lott. I've updated the summary and licensing accordingly. —RP88 (talk) 15:14, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:02, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works from music. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:18, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:02, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Source information is incorrect - photograph is taken by Stephen Slade, photographer for the University of Connecticut Athletic Department, not the White House Ytoyoda (talk) 15:20, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
- Given that this was a years ago, I can't be 100% sure that I can recall exactly what happened. However, in some years I have grabbed a screenshot of the White House feed which is clearly public domain; and some years I have written to the school and requested a copy of the White House photographers photo. My best guess is that I contacted the school, asked for the White House photographers photo but they sent me one taken by Steve Slade and I missed the fact that it was the school photographer not the White House photographer. All UConn photographers are required to sign over the copyrights to the athletic department, I will contact the athletic department and see if I can arrange to get a permission statement from the athletic department.--Sphilbrick (talk) 15:44, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks for responding and your followthrough on this. Worst case scenario, you could replace the pic with a screen cap from the White House video. The image quality won't be as good and it doesn't show the jersey presentation, but it'll do the job, I think. Ytoyoda (talk) 15:55, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
- I sent in a request to the Sports Information Director.--Sphilbrick (talk) 16:12, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
- The sports information director at the UConn athletic department checked and confirmed that it is a Stephen Slade photograph, taken under contract with the athletic department and therefore the copyright is owned by the athletic department. The sports information director provided a valid permission statement. I modified the image information to reflect the correct license, the source and the author, and added the OTRS permission link. I'll leave it to someone else to clear the deletion notice.--Sphilbrick (talk) 18:59, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks for responding and your followthrough on this. Worst case scenario, you could replace the pic with a screen cap from the White House video. The image quality won't be as good and it doesn't show the jersey presentation, but it'll do the job, I think. Ytoyoda (talk) 15:55, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Withdrawing nomination Thanks to User:Sphilbrick for the speedy response. Ytoyoda (talk) 19:07, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Kept: withdrawn by nom. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:04, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Anonymoushacker98 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: unused files, self-promotion, personal images.
- File:Daniel diaz ibañez wikipedia.jpg
- File:Daniel diaz ibañez 5.jpg
- File:Daniel diaz ibañez amigo.jpg
- File:Biker banner julian lopez.jpg
- File:Daniel diaz ibañez joker.jpg
- File:Biker banner motocyclista.jpg
- File:Biker banner julian.jpg
- File:Biker banner 3.jpg
- File:Biker banner 2.jpg
- File:Biker banner oficial.jpg
- File:Biker banner racing.jpg
- File:Biker banner.jpg
- File:Biker Banner.jpg
- File:Daniel diaz ibañez hacker.jpg
- File:Daniel diaz ibañez artista.jpg
- File:Daniel Diaz Ibañez.jpg
- File:Daniel diaz ibañez oficial.jpg
- File:Daniel diaz ibañez wiki.jpg
Cjp24 (talk) 15:20, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:05, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
- File:The seniors at there junior time....(Adamjee Cantonment Public School ).jpg
- File:Bangladesh Scouts(Adamjee Cantonment Public School).jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:22, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:05, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Part of mass upload, unused promotional image (everything except commercial sign blurry), out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:28, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:05, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
I'm not using it anymore on my user page JGab12 (talk) 15:30, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:05, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
I'm not using it anymore on my user page JGab12 (talk) 15:30, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:05, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:06, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works from poster. Should be blanked/cropped to keep. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:32, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:06, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
this file does not show Andreas Kieling Frze > talk 15:32, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Ordinarily, a wrong file name is not a reason to delete. However, this is a poor image anyway. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:07, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
This is a photo taken of an old text. While the text is not under copyright, the photograph is. There is no evidence that the photographer released his or her work into public domain or under appropriate CC license. Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 15:35, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Kept: Per our Bridgeman policy, a photogaph of a flat (2D) work has no copyright of its own. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:09, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ValeriaLourdes 28 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.
- File:Ángel Benítez.jpg
- File:Susana DE Ninnis.jpg
- File:Susana DE Ninnis y René DE Ninnis.jpg
- File:Susana DE Ninnis y Ángel Benítez.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:09, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Spam/out of scope Savhñ 15:52, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:09, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
erstellt als Kategorie statt Category >>> Category:Richard Ohnsorg Privat-User (talk) 16:14, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: by Wutsje, closed by. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:10, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Derivative work of copyrighted content. FDMS 4 16:15, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:10, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Statue of Eino Leino by finnishs sculptor Lauri Leppänen, who died in 1977. Not PD yet and no FOP in Finland for sculptures. Htm (talk) 17:22, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:10, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Statue "Fact and Fable, memorial to Topelius" by sculptor en:Gunnar Finne, who died in 1952, so not in PD yet. No FOP on Finland for sculptures. Htm (talk) 17:28, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:10, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
- Gunnar Finne works are now PD in Finland. "Fact and Fable" was published in 1932 so it will be PD as well in US in 2028. Platonides (talk) 14:17, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Marcoandres1997 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal images, out of scope.
Gauss (talk) 18:16, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:10, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Picture already published on this website. No OTRS authorization from the original author of the photo. Titlutin (talk) 20:24, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
- Français : Photo déjà publiée sur le site littleangelrecords.com, qui n'est pas libre de droits. Il faudrait un email d'autorisation de la part de l'auteur de la photo pour que Commons puisse héberger légalement cette image - voir pour cela Aide:Republication/Image --Titlutin (talk) 20:25, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
- Ce fichier appartient au label Little Angel Records FABIENNE ABELARD (talk) 23:19, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
- Bonjour @FABIENNE ABELARD:
- Oui, mais le site de Little Angel Records n'est pas sous licence libre, et cela veut donc dire que la photo est protégée par le droit d'auteur. Or le projet Commons (et Wikipédia) ne peut héberger que des fichiers sous licence libre compatible. Héberger des fichiers protégés fait donc tomber Commons dans l'illégalité, d'où cette procédure de suppression par précaution. En effet, même si le photographe et/ou Little Angel Records sont d'accord pour que la photo soit placée sous licence libre et utilisée sur Wikipédia, on ne peut pas être sûr à 100% que cela soit vrai car vous n'êtes qu'un pseudo parmi d'autres ici (je ne dis pas bien sûr que vous mentez, mais on ne peut pas être sûr à 100%). D'où la nécessité pour le photographe et/ou les ayants-droits de la photo d'envoyer un email officiel d'autorisation pour que l'on puisse conserver légalement le fichier. Je remet ici le lien vers le modèle d'email que j'avais déjà placé ci-dessus : Aide:Republication/Image.
- Bien cordialement --Titlutin (talk) 00:08, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
- Ce fichier appartient au label Little Angel Records FABIENNE ABELARD (talk) 23:19, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:12, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
A Public Domain Mark (PDM) license is incompatible with Common's licensing policies. The copyright owner retains full control over this image and does not give away any rights. Commons can be sued by the copyright owner. PDM is not really a license and therefore is not permitted on Commons except where it can be shown that the image is PD for known reasons such as a US Government image. Leoboudv (talk) 21:45, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
- Comment: For most modern images, see this flickr license table, where Commons can only take flickr images with Attribution, Attribution-ShareAlike or public domain dedication licenses. With the PDM license, the copyright owner still owns full rights over the image. --Leoboudv (talk) 21:48, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
- Comment: The image was previously marked CC-0] and I copied the source information using Flinfo. I don't see any evidence to support the CC-0 claim so I have no issues with deleting. Ytoyoda (talk) 21:51, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
- Comment: Dear Ytoyoda,
- Commons can also take images with a "no known copyright restrictions" license such as this image but usually the image is by a state or government institute and the image is 20-50+ years old. This situation doesn't apply here since the flickr source is not a state government. But to be safe, I'll ask an Admin for a second opinion since I see that the account mentions NORAD NORTHCOM PA Photography. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 21:55, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
- Keep: I think I made an error as the flickr account appears linked to NORAD Northern Command or NORAD which should be PD as it is US Military. I will have to pass this image after all. You learn a new thing every day. But I will leave the DR tag here in case someone wishes to make a comment. --Leoboudv (talk) 22:16, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
- Keep - But next time if another image from a USGov flickr account is added as a PD, licence reviewers/admins should just change the licence to the USGov-PD related licenses available when reviewing--Stemoc 22:59, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Kept: I note in passing that the woman in the picture is Lori Robinson, the highest ranking US military woman of all time. Arguably she is a far more important person than Bettman, but was unmentioned in the file name, file description, and categories. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:29, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Work of an artist which is stilla live, so need autorization Shev123 (talk) 21:49, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:31, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
The "CC-BY-NC" statement contradicts the {{PD-self}} release. {{Noncommercial}} restrictions are incompatible with Commons:Licensing. It's not clear that the uploader actually indended to waive their copyright. —LX (talk, contribs) 22:44, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:35, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
The "cc-by-nc" statement contradicts the {{cc-by-sa-3.0}} licensing. {{Noncommercial}} restrictions are incompatible with Commons:Licensing. It's not clear that the uploader actually intended to publish this under a free license. —LX (talk, contribs) 22:49, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:35, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
The "cc-by-nc" statement contradicts the {{cc-by-sa-3.0}} licensing. {{Noncommercial}} restrictions are incompatible with Commons:Licensing. It's not clear that the uploader actually intended to publish this under a free license. —LX (talk, contribs) 22:49, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:36, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
out of scope, used on a non relevant article Triplecaña (talk) 22:50, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:36, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 23:04, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. I uploaded this picture as part of a Commons transfer drive at English Wikipedia several years ago on good faith based on the text in the file description page. In response to this deletion request I checked a Google Books preview of the book in question and found no picture on the cited page. Since I don't have physical access to the book in question, I have to consider verification failed and therefore there is no evidence supporting this picture is freely licensed. I apologize for the inconvenience. –Grondemar 04:34, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Kept: I happen to own a paperback copy of the cited book. The image credit reads "U.S. Navy photo, courtesy of Rafael C. Benitez". . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:43, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
No FOP in Japan. It was created in 1981. [6] G I Chandor (talk) 23:35, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:44, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
No FOP in Japan. It was created in 1981. [7] G I Chandor (talk) 23:37, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:44, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
No FOP in Japan. It was created in 1981. [8] G I Chandor (talk) 23:38, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:44, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Copyright violation. The explanation board is a copyrighted work. G I Chandor (talk) 23:39, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:44, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Copyright violation. The explanation board is a copyrighted work. G I Chandor (talk) 23:40, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:44, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Copyright violation. The explanation board is a copyrighted work. G I Chandor (talk) 23:40, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:45, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Copyright violation. The explanation board is a copyrighted work. G I Chandor (talk) 23:42, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:45, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Copyright violation. The explanation board is a copyrighted work. G I Chandor (talk) 23:43, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:45, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Copyright violation. The explanation board is a copyrighted work. G I Chandor (talk) 23:44, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:45, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Copyright violation. G I Chandor (talk) 23:45, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:45, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Copyright violation. The explanation panel is a copyrighted work. G I Chandor (talk) 23:46, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:45, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
File:José Duarte, en el centro, junto a los pintores Pedro Guillén y Emilio Serrano. Córdoba, 1966.jpg
[edit]La imagen es de 1966, de autor desconocido y se encuentran versiones de ella aquí: [9] - Enrique Cordero (talk) 23:38, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:46, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Copyright violation. The map is a copyrighted work. G I Chandor (talk) 23:47, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:46, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Copyright violation. The explanation board is a copyrighted work. G I Chandor (talk) 23:49, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:46, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
No FOP in Japan. It was created in 2004. G I Chandor (talk) 23:54, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:46, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
No FOP in Japan. It was created in 2004. G I Chandor (talk) 23:54, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:46, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
No FOP in Japan. It was created in 2004. G I Chandor (talk) 23:55, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:46, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Copyright violation. The photo and text are copyrighted works. G I Chandor (talk) 23:57, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:46, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Copyright violation. The pictures are copyrighted works. G I Chandor (talk) 23:59, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:46, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sandouno24 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Those flags exist in SVG
- File:Ema-france.jpg
- File:Ema-mali.jpg
- File:Drapeau-franco-malienne.jpg
- File:Coorperation-MF.png
- File:Drapeau-ma.png
Lacrymocéphale (talk) 22:18, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sandouno24 (talk · contribs)
[edit]One is enough. May be copyrighted http://ema-koulikoro.com/mot-du-directeur-des-etudes/
Lacrymocéphale (talk) 22:20, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, two images don't exist in svg however, there are unused and of questionable EV + non free logos for the second part. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:52, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Delete very low resolution image is of no useful value - there are other images in the same category but this is of virtually no educational value Ww2censor (talk) 11:10, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
- Part of a larger request at Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_Yayamamo, and should be discussed there. 朝彦 | asahiko (talk) 10:32, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:29, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope per COM:SELFIE. Sam Walton (talk) 11:57, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:29, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope per COM:SELFIE. Sam Walton (talk) 11:59, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:29, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
http://imgur.com/eGJKu4R also out of scope. Yann (talk) 12:00, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
- Delete In scope IMHO, but a copyvio. --Jarekt (talk) 19:16, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:28, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
A drawing by some children - out of scope. Also the authorship is questionable (compared to the file name). --XXN, 12:04, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:28, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Copyright problems Nonander (talk) 13:03, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:27, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Looks like a private image, not used. Maybe not notable person. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:12, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:27, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Private image, not used. Maybe not notable person. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:17, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:26, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Private image. Not used. Maybe not notable person. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:18, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:26, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Private image, not used. Maybe not notable person. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:20, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:26, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Private image, not used. Maybe not notable person. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:36, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:26, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Not educationally useful; private image collection. Magnolia677 (talk) 13:43, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:26, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Not educationally useful; private image collection. Magnolia677 (talk) 13:45, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:26, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Not educationally useful; private image collection. Magnolia677 (talk) 13:45, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:26, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Not educationally useful; private image collection. Magnolia677 (talk) 13:47, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:26, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Not educationally useful; private image collection. Magnolia677 (talk) 13:47, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:26, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Лицензия не соответствует источнику. -- Tomasina (talk) 15:08, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
- Проверить соответствие лицензии источнику можно по следующей ссылке http://nbahob.ru/ru/page/copyright --Ingvar rr (talk) 20:39, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: The cited license covers the photograph ( which does not actually need a license because it has no copyright of its own), but not the required permission from the painter. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:25, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
- Restored: as per [10]. Yann (talk) 17:54, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
file not in use at Wikimedia projects, bad quality, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 21:21, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
- I do believe this is species:Ambalaparambil Vasu Sudhikumar (per http://eol.org/info/102). It is therefore in scope, as on of only three images of him in Category:Sudhikumar Ambalaparambil. (t) Josve05a (c) 21:26, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:23, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
No evidence of permission; the uploader, Jordan.williams, is not the claimed copyright owner, DMA Europa. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 22:07, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
- OK, I may be mistaken here. When editing File:The Knights of The Holy Grail by Tim Wallace-Murpy.jpg to add a speedy deletion tag, I saw that jordan.williams has piped his name to show "DMA Europa". Jordan, can you tell us why you would want to claim to be this sordid PR agency? Have you read and acted on our m:TOU, particularly the section "Paid contributions without disclosure"? Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 22:28, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:22, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Copyright violation. The explanation board is a copyrighted work. G I Chandor (talk) 23:33, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:21, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Copyright violation. G I Chandor (talk) 23:34, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:21, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Сомнения в авторстве: http://nbahob.ru/en/page/about, а также разрешение, размер, данные о камере -- Tomasina (talk) 15:07, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
- Проверить соответствие лицензии источнику можно по следующей ссылке http://nbahob.ru/ru/page/copyright
Поясните, что означает замечание "...а также разрешение, размер, данные о камере"? --Ingvar rr (talk) 08:44, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
- Вы утверждаете, что этот портрет снимали Вы, и файл загружен Вами с оригинала, а не с сайта художника? ---- Tomasina (talk) 19:31, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
- Это была ошибка, изображение загружено с сайта художника. Автор фотографии сам художник. В настоящее время получено разрешение на распространение в соответствии с условиями лицензии Cc-by-4.0. Проверить соответствие лицензии источнику можно по следующей ссылке http://nbahob.ru/ru/page/copyright
- Вы утверждаете, что этот портрет снимали Вы, и файл загружен Вами с оригинала, а не с сайта художника? ---- Tomasina (talk) 19:31, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
- Ок, закрыто. ---- Tomasina (talk) 12:10, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
Kept: license information added. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:21, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Лицензия не соответствует источнику. -- Tomasina (talk) 15:08, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
- Снято. В источнике указали лицензию. ---- Tomasina (talk) 08:11, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
Kept: license information added. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:18, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Лицензия не соответствует источнику. -- Tomasina (talk) 15:08, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
- Проверить соответствие лицензии источнику можно по следующей ссылке http://nbahob.ru/ru/page/copyright --Ingvar rr (talk) 08:37, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
- Спасибо, что проставили на сайте лицензию. Номинацию снимаю. ---- Tomasina (talk) 19:59, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
Kept: license information added. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:18, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Лицензия не соответствует источнику. -- Tomasina (talk) 15:08, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
- Проверить соответствие лицензии источнику можно по следующей ссылке http://nbahob.ru/ru/page/copyright --Ingvar rr (talk) 08:36, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
- Спасибо, что проставили на сайте лицензию. Номинацию снимаю. ---- Tomasina (talk) 20:01, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
Kept: license information added. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:18, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Лицензия не соответствует источнику. -- Tomasina (talk) 15:08, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
- Проверить соответствие лицензии источнику можно по следующей ссылке http://nbahob.ru/ru/page/copyright --Ingvar rr (talk) 08:35, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
- Спасибо, что проставили на сайте лицензию. Номинацию снимаю. ---- Tomasina (talk) 20:02, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
Kept: license information added. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:19, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Лицензия не соответствует источнику. -- Tomasina (talk) 15:09, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
- Проверить соответствие лицензии источнику можно по следующей ссылке http://nbahob.ru/ru/page/copyright --Ingvar rr (talk) 08:32, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
- Спасибо, что проставили на сайте лицензию. Номинацию снимаю. ---- Tomasina (talk) 20:04, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
Kept: license information added. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:19, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Лицензия не соответствует источнику. -- Tomasina (talk) 15:09, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
- Проверить соответствие лицензии источнику можно по следующей ссылке http://nbahob.ru/ru/page/copyright --Ingvar rr (talk) 08:31, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
- Спасибо, что проставили на сайте лицензию. Номинацию снимаю. ---- Tomasina (talk) 20:04, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
Kept: license information added. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:20, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Лицензия не соответствует источнику. -- Tomasina (talk) 15:09, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
- Проверить соответствие лицензии источнику можно по следующей ссылке http://nbahob.ru/ru/page/copyright --Ingvar rr (talk) 08:30, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
- Спасибо, что проставили на сайте лицензию. Номинацию снимаю. ---- Tomasina (talk) 20:06, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
Kept: license information added. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:20, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Лицензия не соответствует источнику. -- Tomasina (talk) 15:09, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
- Проверить соответствие лицензии источнику можно по следующей ссылке http://nbahob.ru/ru/page/copyright --Ingvar rr (talk) 08:33, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
- Спасибо, что проставили на сайте лицензию. Номинацию снимаю. ---- Tomasina (talk) 20:03, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
Kept: license information added. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:20, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Лицензия не соответствует источнику. -- Tomasina (talk) 15:09, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
- Проверить соответствие лицензии источнику можно по следующей ссылке http://nbahob.ru/ru/page/copyright --Ingvar rr (talk) 08:25, 26 January 2017 (UTC)Ingvar_rr
- Спасибо, что проставили на сайте лицензию. Номинацию снимаю. ---- Tomasina (talk) 20:07, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
Kept: license information added. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:19, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Лицензия не соответствует источнику. -- Tomasina (talk) 15:09, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
- Проверить соответствие лицензии можно по этой ссылке http://nbahob.ru/ru/page/copyright --Ingvar rr (talk) 08:21, 26 January 2017 (UTC)User:Ingvar_rr
- Спасибо, что проставили на сайте лицензию. Номинацию снимаю. ---- Tomasina (talk) 20:07, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
Kept: license information added. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:19, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 18:34, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:25, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Uploader requested. I have uploaded a new more accurate version under File:SADC road sign W206.svg. Fry1989 eh? 01:04, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:55, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Uploader requested. I have uploaded a new more accurate version under File:SADC road sign W207.svg. Fry1989 eh? 01:05, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:55, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Better version available (by the same uploader): File:Portail des relations franco-polonaises.JPG. --XXN, 11:56, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:55, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
copyright violation http://www.uni-stuttgart.de/forschung-leben/forschung-persoenlich/persoenlich_artikel0009.html Frze > talk 12:52, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:56, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Unused figurative drawings, vector version available (by the same uploader): File:Atalanta 2-4.svg.
--XXN, 14:48, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:57, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
COM:DW of copyrightable poster (t) Josve05a (c) 17:50, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:58, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
No idea where this image originates but it's widely available on the web at higher resolution: http://www.arrakeen.ch/hungary/085%20%20Keszthely%20castle.jpg Ytoyoda (talk) 18:36, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:58, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Blurry and backlighted, many better pictures at Category:Cathedral of Puebla. Gauss (talk) 18:40, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:58, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
no referenciado Comarka (talk) 18:48, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:58, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
No referenciado y ficticio Don Jose Bernal (talk) 18:57, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:58, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Part of mass upload, unremarkable greenery, no educational value, many better pictures of forests in Category:Brompton, Quebec P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:03, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Good quality image and in scope. Tm (talk) 21:21, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 15:56, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Too complex logo to be under a free license (see en:File:FC Augsburg logo.svg). Bloody-libu (talk) 18:29, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 16:01, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
mass-upload of panoramio streams (taken with Nokia C3) of rather poor quality, obviously randomly taken from car/bus etc, doubtful educational usefulness, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 19:25, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 16:02, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Duplication of File:מגדל בר כוכבא BBC בני ברק.jpg in lower qulaity. Ldorfman (talk) 13:07, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Kept: highest resolution available Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:04, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Part of mass upload, utterly unremarkable greenery, no educational value P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:04, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: can't you see the beauty of the Inknow Basement?. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:07, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Part of mass upload, utterly unremarkable foliage/shrubs, no educational value P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:05, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:07, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Part of mass upload, unusable due to watermarks, and little educational value P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:06, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:07, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
unklare Bildrechte, die im Nachhinein kaum geändert werden können Molgreen (Diskussion) 17:30, 24 January 2017 (UTC) Molgreen (talk) 17:40, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, also out of scope. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:08, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
unklare Bildrechte, die im Nachhinein kaum geändert werden können Molgreen (Diskussion) 17:35, 24 January 2017 (UTC) Molgreen (talk) 17:43, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, also out of scope. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:08, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Josve05a as no permission (No permission since)
- This file is form 207. It is missing a license review or OTRS, and the webpage does not mention Creative Commons ShareAlike 1.0.
If this file is deleted, please edit or delete File:2007-I-uncat.png. (t) Josve05a (c) 18:11, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:09, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Logo of a company. Not in use. From user with one edit. I believe, from some deleted article. Out of SCOPE. Shakko (talk) 19:11, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:09, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
mass-upload of panoramio streams of rather poor quality, small-sized, imho randomly taken from car/bus etc, doubtful educational usefulness, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons ? Roland zh (talk) 19:28, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Kept: georefed location, usable quality. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:10, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
mass-upload of panoramio streams of poor quality, hence, missing educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 19:30, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:10, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
as per File:Pothundi Dam - panoramio (2).jpg (quite the same pix), mass-upload of panoramio streams of rather poor quality, small-sized, imho randomly taken from car/bus etc, doubtful educational usefulness, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, hence also out of scope Wikimedia Commons ? Roland zh (talk) 19:32, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Kept: georefed location, usable quality. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:10, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
mass-upload of 2011 panoramio streams of rather poor quality, obviously randomly taken from car/bus etc, doubtful educational usefulness, file alsot not in use at Wikimedia projects, hence, out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 19:34, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Kept: georefed location, usable quality. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:11, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
mass-upload of 2011 panoramio streams of poor quality, obviously randomly taken from car/bus etc, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons, and, file not in use at Wikimedia projects - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 19:38, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Kept: georefed location, usable quality. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:11, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
mass-upload of 2011 panoramio streams of poor quality, obviously randomly taken from car/bus etc, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons, and, file not in use at Wikimedia projects - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 19:42, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:11, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
mass-upload of 2011 panoramio streams of poor quality, obviously randomly taken from car/bus etc, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons, and, file not in use at Wikimedia projects - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 19:44, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: too foggy to see anything. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:11, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
mass-upload of 2011 panoramio streams of rather poor quality, obviously randomly taken from car/bus etc, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons, and, file not in use at Wikimedia projects - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 19:45, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: too foggy. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:12, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
mass-upload of 2011 panoramio streams of poor quality, obviously randomly taken from car/bus etc, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons, and, file not in use at Wikimedia projects - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 19:50, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:12, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
mass-upload of 2011 panoramio streams of poor quality, obviously randomly taken from car/bus etc, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons, and, file not in use at Wikimedia projects - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 19:51, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:12, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
mass-upload of 2011 panoramio streams, small-sized and (rather) poor quality, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons, and, file not in use at Wikimedia projects ? Roland zh (talk) 19:52, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:12, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
mass-upload of 2011 panoramio streams, small-sized and of poor quality, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons, and, file not in use at Wikimedia projects - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 19:54, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:12, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
mass-upload of 2011 panoramio streams, small-sized and of (rather) poor quality, obviously randomly taken from car/bus etc, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons, and, file not in use at Wikimedia projects - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 20:00, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Kept: georefed location, usable quality. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:12, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
mass-upload of 2011 panoramio streams, small-sized and of poor quality, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons, and, file not in use at Wikimedia projects ? Roland zh (talk) 20:02, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:13, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
mass-upload panoramio streams, small-sized and of poor quality, obviously randomly taken from car/bus etc, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons, and, file not in use at Wikimedia projects - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 20:05, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:16, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
mass-upload panoramio streams, small-sized and of poor quality, obviously randomly taken from car/bus etc, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons, and, file not in use at Wikimedia projects - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 20:05, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:16, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
mass-upload panoramio streams, small-sized and of poor quality, obviously randomly taken from car/bus etc, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons, and, file not in use at Wikimedia projects - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 20:05, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:18, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
mass-upload panoramio streams, small-sized and of poor quality, obviously randomly taken from car/bus etc, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons, and, file not in use at Wikimedia projects - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 20:05, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:18, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
mass-upload panoramio streams, small-sized and of poor quality (for instance, out of focus), hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons, and, file not in use at Wikimedia projects - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 20:06, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:18, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
mass-upload panoramio streams, rather small-sized and of poor quality, obviously randomly taken from car/bus etc, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons, and, file not in use at Wikimedia projects - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 20:08, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:18, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
mass-upload panoramio streams, small-sized and of poor quality, and also 'big-tagged', obviously randomly taken from car/bus etc, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons, and, file not in use at Wikimedia projects - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 20:08, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:19, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
mass-upload panoramio streams, water-marked, rather small-sized and of poor quality, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons, and, file not in use at Wikimedia projects ? Roland zh (talk) 20:11, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:19, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
This artwork is the sculpture of a giant blue whale created by Marlise Simons in december 2015. But there is No Fop in France Tangopaso (talk) 20:11, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:19, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
This artwork is the sculpture of a giant blue whale created by Marlise Simons in december 2015. But there is No Fop in France Tangopaso (talk) 20:11, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:19, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
mass-upload panoramio streams, tagged by potentially photographer, as well as rather small-sized and of poor quality, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons, and, file not in use at Wikimedia projects - other opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 20:12, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:19, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
This artwork is the sculpture of a giant blue whale created by Marlise Simons in december 2015. But there is No Fop in France Tangopaso (talk) 20:13, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:19, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
This artwork is the sculpture of a giant blue whale created by Marlise Simons in december 2015. But there is No Fop in France Tangopaso (talk) 20:14, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:19, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
This artwork is the sculpture of a giant blue whale created by Marlise Simons in december 2015. But there is No Fop in France Tangopaso (talk) 20:14, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:19, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
This artwork is the sculpture of a giant blue whale created by Marlise Simons in december 2015. But there is No Fop in France Tangopaso (talk) 20:15, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:19, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
mass-upload panoramio streams, out of a series of tagged upload, rather small-sized and of poor quality, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons, and, file not in use at Wikimedia projects - other opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 20:16, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:20, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
mass-upload panoramio streams, out of a series of tagged upload, rather small-sized and of poor quality, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons, and, file not in use at Wikimedia projects - other opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 20:16, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:20, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Small size, no EXIF data, http://imgur.com/zuYxbDQ Yann (talk) 20:24, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
- Comment Only 15 views at Imgur after we've hit it a few times, so likely the same uploader at Commons. Dispenser (talk) 15:06, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: looking at the user's other uploads, it looks suspiciously like a copyvio. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:21, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
mass-upload of panoramio 2011 streams, small-sized and of poor quality, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 20:28, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:27, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
mass-upload of panoramio 2011 streams, small-sized and of poor quality, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 20:30, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Kept: georefed location, usable quality. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:27, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
mass-upload of panoramio 2011 streams, small-sized and of poor quality, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 20:32, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:28, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
mass-upload of 2011 panoramio streams, small sized and of poor quality, hence, doubtful educational usefulness, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 20:38, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:28, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Doesn't qualify as PD-textlogo. Logo of a company. DatGuy (talk) 19:45, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:24, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1947. Jcb (talk) 23:12, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:25, 5 February 2017 (UTC)