Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2017/01/24

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive January 24th, 2017
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too blurry to be useful for educational purpose. Out of scope. BrightRaven (talk) 09:34, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Shizhao: Uploader requested deletion of a recently uploaded unused file - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad upload. Jasonanaggie (talk) 01:52, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 15:47, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shustov (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Bogus PD-USGov licenses. The Network for Earthquake Engineering Simulation (NEES) and its suborganizations (e.g., NEESit, NEESWood, etc.) are not federal entities (they are a nonprofit-- i.e. non-governmental--consortium). For example, the source for File:2009-0709-earthquake.jpg clearly says "Copyright © 2012 The College of Engineering at Colorado State University"; NEES.org clearly says "Copyright © 2009 NEEShub"; etc. NEES may well receive funding from the US government, just as public universities, railroads, etc. do -- such funding (mere financial support) is not tantamount to federal authorship. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kashiwazaki nuclear plant.jpg for another example of the same bogus NEES=PD-USGov claim.

Эlcobbola talk 14:52, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:02, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shustov (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The uploader is the subject of these images and therefore cannot be the photographer. The claim of "own work" is clearly not correct. See http://www.ecs.csun.edu/~shustov/LeisureWork.htm for photographs of the uploader.

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:29, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted subject obviously not photographer, per nomination. Unsigned, by Ellin Beltz, 22:33, 15 February 2015

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shustov (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Bogus self license claim - uploader is the subject in these images and therefore cannot be the photographer (author); permission from the latter is required. Uploader should be well aware of this issue, as this is identical the issue(s) above and to images uploaded by ShustovVal, this user's sockpuppet, and deleted per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by ShustovVal.

Эlcobbola talk 16:30, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Also, File:Jumping on platforms.gif looks familiar (i.e. a reupload of a deleted image), but there are too many to sift through. Ping @Jameslwoodward: in case his memory is better than mine. Эlcobbola talk 16:33, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
(ec) Found it: cut from File:Jumping on step platforms.gif to remove the reflection of the person recording it (!!!). Эlcobbola talk 16:42, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: In the last round we had trouble with terms of use of the service used to create the images. We have the same problem here -- the TOS amounts to an ND license and also requires us to indemnify the conversion service in case of problems. That makes these a {{Speedy}}. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:41, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shustov (talk · contribs)

[edit]

More of the same. Uploader is subject, and thus cannot be photographer.

Эlcobbola talk 22:07, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 14:08, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

a causa de los derechos Caroke27 (talk) 00:02, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 20:21, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

a causa de los derechos - me equivoqué Caroke27 (talk) 00:07, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 20:23, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sorry,my mistake, i don't own the rights. GabrieleBellucci (talk) 12:56, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by EugeneZelenko: Derivative of non-free content: Book cover

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sorry,my mistake, i don't own the rights. GabrieleBellucci (talk) 12:57, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by EugeneZelenko: Derivative of non-free content: Book cover

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of 2011 panoramio streams of rather poor quality and doubtful educational usefulness, hence, out of scope Wikimedia Commons, and, file not in use at Wikimedia projects ? Roland zh (talk) 19:49, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 03:25, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload panoramio streams, small-sized and of extremly bad quality, obviously randomly taken from car/bus etc, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons, and, file not in use at Wikimedia projects - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 20:06, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 03:25, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

looks like embeded movie MechQuester (talk) 01:36, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Magog the Ogre: Mass deletion of pages added by RUBEL SHAK PABNA: Copyright violation

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Can't be own work. Flickr-Washing. FightWe (talk) 11:07, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy keep @FightWe: I removed {{Own}} template, it was there because the extraction from OS is done by me. And the whole image is CC-by-2.0 as Microsoft published on Flickr images containing this wall. Same reason was in this DR: Files in Category:Microsoft Office logos. BTW what do you mean by saying "Flickr-Washing"? --Rezonansowy (talk) 15:28, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete: I don't think that Microsoft Corporation agree to release this well-known wallpaper under a free license, even if Microsoft Sweden published it at Flickr under a free license. These cases (files published by Microsoft Sweden) could be considered as Flickr washing, again, even if them has been published by a Microsoft subsidiary. --Amitie 10g (talk) 20:09, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    •  Comment @Amitie 10g: Well, IMO it doesn't matter if MS agreed to release this wallpaper under CC license. If images containing design of this wallpaper were published under a free license, then this design becomes free from the law's point. Similar example is given here: Windows 1.0 brochure. MS published them without proper copyright notice, so the whole Windows 1.0 GUI became PD. --Rezonansowy (talk) 21:56, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
No, Microsoft Corporation haven't been published it, but Microsoft Sweeden (a subsidiary if MS). Also, there is a big difference bewteen a photo of a laptop running Windows (where the wallpaper can be considered de minimis) and the wallpaper itself (that is copyrighted by Microsoft Corporation and is non-free; the CC license apply only to the photos of PCs but not for the wallpaper itself). --Amitie 10g (talk) 01:03, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment @Amitie 10g: Let me do a little research on it. Here it is:

I provided these images from Flickr as a source of the file indicating its CC license:

At first, Microsoft Sweden does not exist from the laws point. It's only the name used for commercial purposes. The real name of this subsidiary is Microsoft AB, you can check it on https://www.microsoft.com/sv-se/contact.aspx and on Bloomberg.

Second, from the law's point, if the parent does not maintain a separate corporate identity, the courts will perceive the subsidiary as merely a business conduit for the parent, and the two corporations will be viewed as one entity for liability purposes. You can read it on the Legal Dictionary. Microsoft Corporation is a multinational company and this status quo is a common thing.

So if Microsoft AB does something then the whole Microsoft is responsible for it as there's no separation between these companies. Microsoft AB has the full right to publish, sell, represent and manage all Microsoft services and products in Sweden as it is the part of the same multinational company. So in this case the license of these images has the legal consequences.

Third, It is nor Flickr washing or De minimis case if the uploader is the legal copyright holder of these works AND if the wallpaper image is a >50% of the photo. De minimis cannot be applied in that cases. In addition, we can assume that if these photos were published in album called "Microsoft Partner Day 2011" then they were taken to present MS products, not laptops.

BTW, the wallpaper consist of a Windows 7 logo and a simple blue background with gradient and some random lines. You claimed that the previous consensus already determined that the Windows 7 icon is bellow the COM:TOO in the U.S and you also agree that. In this DR the disputed Windows 7 logo file was kept. So using your arguments we could simply consider this wallpaper as PD-ineligible, because of the reasons mentioned above.

I'm still not sure where are DRs or something indicating this consensus. I started an Undeletion request on basis of this DR's result to undelete other files of Windows 7 logo and I asked you for this explanation, but you didn't reply. So please have your say on this now. --Rezonansowy (talk) 11:29, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: vandalism DR. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 11:34, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

To clarify: This closure was on procedural grounds, not a thorough investigation of the arguments brought forwards in the DR. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 12:09, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio - Image is the property of Microsoft, the source indicate is not enough to prove the free licence of the image Olivier LPB (talk) 23:19, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete: The previous DR has been closed under procedural grounds, but I still considering that:
  • Microsoft Corporation is very unlikely to agree to publish its wallpaper under a free license, even if one of its subsidiaries (Microsoft AB) published it by its official Flickr account (Microsoft Sweden)
  • At the "source" (the Microsoft Sweden's official Flickr account), the main subject of these photos are "PC" (aka., laptops running Windows), and the Windows desktop could be considered de minimis in that context, but that does not mean that the wallpaper itself has been released under a free license (this is just a misinterpretation of what was published at the Microsoft Sweden's official Flickr account).
  • The Windows 7 logo is considered too simple to meet the Threshold of originality, but the whole desing of the wallpaper is above the TOO, therefore, non-free.
--Amitie 10g (talk) 10:44, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Images from this account have previously been deleted (Commons:Deletion requests/File:Windows 10 start screen (16337613651).jpg). Elisfkc (talk) 23:43, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per above. --Sealle (talk) 06:51, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started to verify claimed 'own work', as imho potentially non-free content: rather thumbnail format and missing EXIF data to verify origin - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 21:11, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: http://www.sushmitabanerjee.com/images/sb%20mudra%20dance%20festival%20trivandrum.jpg. --Yann (talk) 12:40, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started to verify claimed 'own work', as imho potentially non-free content: rather thumbnail format and missing EXIF data to verify origin - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 21:11, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: http://www.sushmitabanerjee.com/images/3.gif. --Yann (talk) 12:41, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Heidi Giselle (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused personal image : out of scope

Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:28, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Heidi Giselle (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unclear copyright statut

Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:30, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Heidi Giselle (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No indication of user's own work on this fan gallery.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:08, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:16, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. Kaulder (contribs | talk) 08:59, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep This is a portrait of a Wikipedia editor and Wikimedian who is my wife. I have used it on my user page in the past, and may use it again in the future. My wife may wish to use it as well. I would like to preserve this photo. Cullen328 (talk) 00:10, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I would like my userpage from meta.wikimedia.org to be displayed here automatically. I understand that deletion of the page is neccessary in order for the GlobalUserPage extension to do its work. KaiKemmann (talk) 18:27, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Achim (talk) 21:27, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Diana 33 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal images, out of scope.

Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 01:42, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:39, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded by User:IOS31415926535897932384 20170113

[edit]

These images were posted by a sockpupet user. All his edits on jawiki were reverted by someone, so they are no longer used. I'm doubtful we need keep them. Darklanlan (talk) 05:11, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:39, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Inha staff (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Source is "Inha University", but it's not proven unless confirmed via OTRS.

— regards, Revi 16:32, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:41, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

PDF only contains image data. It has been converted now to PNG and SVG by jdx. This PDF is out of our project's scope because our scope only allows PDF for scans of historical documents. Poké95 12:44, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination+derivative work http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/rugby/rugby-union/international/six-nations-2014-wales-v-italy-leigh-halfpenny-feels-wales-are-better-than-last-year-9100523.html. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:41, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. --ghouston (talk) 00:20, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:41, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:59, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image --ghouston (talk) 00:29, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:58, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted tickets based on a copyrighted poster [1] Tbhotch 00:45, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:09, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, image bears "Everton TV" watermark Malpass93 (talk) 00:51, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:08, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Westfjords Heritage Museum

[edit]

All of these claim to be "own work", but the first three say, "This is a photo of Westfjords Heritage Museum from their public site" which seems to make "own work" unlikely. File:Byggðasafn Vestfjarða.jpg I'm less sure of, but the current image was uploaded over an entirely different image identical to File:Bátur og Byggðasafn.jpg. All come from the same uploader, who has no other contributions to Commons. --Jmabel ! talk 01:27, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, some older and higher resolution in the web e.g. https://www.heyiceland.is/asset/5410/heritage-museum3.jpg. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:07, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redirect to non-existed page ← Alex Great talkrus? 04:58, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb: Commons:Deletion requests/File:0PN Vy0flGU.jpg: Redirect to non-existed page

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. Kaulder (contribs | talk) 08:33, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:13, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. Kaulder (contribs | talk) 08:33, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:13, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. Kaulder (contribs | talk) 08:44, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:13, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. Kaulder (contribs | talk) 08:44, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:13, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source given ([2]) is copyrighted:"Copyright © 2017 The Indian Express [P] ltd. All Rights Reserved." No evidence that the image was released under CC BY-SA. clpo13(talk) 22:24, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:45, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused fictional flag without obvious purpose. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 22:26, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Fictional flag with 卐.svg. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 22:27, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:44, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Carl Mart2 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private images. Out of scope.

GeorgHHtalk   22:41, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:43, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image appears to be from https://skatecanada.ca/2015/01/photos-2015-canadian-tire-national-skating-championships/ Ytoyoda (talk) 18:48, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

And it seems likely this is the same user as the blocked user Patchy34 (talk · contribs) Ytoyoda (talk) 15:05, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:14, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like private image. Not used. Maybe not notable persons. Kulmalukko (talk) 18:48, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:13, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot, original source not indicated Ytoyoda (talk) 18:53, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:13, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Copyright violation, see
Till (talk) 18:57, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:13, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably private image, not used. Maybe not notable person. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:01, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:13, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Crop of a publicity photo found at http://www.marilu.com/?p=4492, no indication that Intel owns the copyright to this photo. Likely belongs to Maria Ytoyoda (talk) 19:04, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, this image has to be deleted. --Rashinseita (talk) 19:08, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:12, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not used. Maybe not notable person. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:05, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:12, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Maybe not educationally usable. Low quality image of hand. Not well focused. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:14, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:12, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution private image. Not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:16, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:12, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like a copyvio. Google/TinEye searches give a lot of links, but none to a AIWC's page. Higher resolution photo can be found here: http://www.brainparking.com/view/topic.cfm?key_or=1140821&lenta_type=4 jdx Re: 19:18, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:12, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:23, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:12, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably not educationally usable. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:31, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:11, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution private image, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:34, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:11, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not the author's own work Edjoerv (talk) 19:37, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:11, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No usage, and bad resolution PNG. Other files available at (such as File:Győr COA.png) are way better. ·×ald·es 20:11, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:11, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

http://imgur.com/dD4yxQw Uploaded there on Jan 31, 2013. Yann (talk) 20:14, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:11, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

http://imgur.com/kL0a0aV Uploaded there on Nov 15, 2015. Yann (talk) 20:17, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:11, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image. Possible out of scope. Senapa (talk) 20:18, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:10, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wiiilokan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own works (no Exifs, "FBMD" in the metadatas), other uploads already speedy deleted https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Wiiilokan&action=history

Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:20, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:10, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

http://imgur.com/xQYvVEz Uploaded there on Feb 26, 2015. Yann (talk) 20:20, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:10, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

http://imgur.com/eaY9SGc Uploaded there on Jan 7, 2016. Yann (talk) 20:21, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:10, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio 2011 streams, small-sized and of poor quality, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 20:24, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:09, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

http://imgur.com/uE1G22B Uploaded there on Oct 4, 2014. Yann (talk) 20:26, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:09, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio 2011 streams, small-sized and of poor quality, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 20:28, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:08, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio 2011 streams, small-sized and of poor quality and obviously taken from car/bus etc, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 20:32, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:08, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of 2011 panoramio streams of rather poor quality, small-sized and obviously randomly taken from car/bus etc, doubtful educational usefulness, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 20:34, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:08, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of 2011 panoramio streams of very poor quality, small-sized, and no educational usefulness, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 20:39, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:07, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of 2011 panoramio streams of rather small-sized, poor-quality file, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 20:40, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:07, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of 2011 panoramio streams of rather small-sized, poor-quality file, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons ? Roland zh (talk) 20:41, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:07, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

file not in use at Wikimedia projects, imho rather for personal use, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 21:27, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:07, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not in use. Maybe not notable person. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:34, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:07, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

as per source, and also serious personality right issues, Roland zh (talk) 21:37, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:07, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Valter Bitencourt Júnior

[edit]
  1. File:Aleilton Fonseca.jpg
  2. File:Academia Letras da Bahia.jpg
  3. File:Almandrade.jpg
  4. File:Estudantes no Instituto Socioambiental de Valéria (ISVA) .jpg
  5. File:Jornal Rascunho.jpg
  6. File:Gilberto Nogueira de Oliveira.jpg

Files uploaded by Valter Bitencourt Júnior (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information), that uploaded some obviously copyright violations, like a fac-simile of a newspaper page or an image of a painting of a living painter.

All fall in one or more of the following conditions:

  1. Low resolution and the Exif data point to the file being grabbed from Internet
  2. "Own work" of non existent users
  3. Fac-simile of logo
  4. Institutional or press portraits with low resolution
  5. Obviously scanned images from paper of recent themes

--Stego (talk) 22:04, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:06, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Valter Bitencourt Júnior

[edit]
  1. File:Aleilton Fonseca.jpg
  2. File:Academia Letras da Bahia.jpg
  3. File:Almandrade.jpg
  4. File:Estudantes no Instituto Socioambiental de Valéria (ISVA) .jpg
  5. File:Jornal Rascunho.jpg
  6. File:Gilberto Nogueira de Oliveira.jpg

Files uploaded by Valter Bitencourt Júnior (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information), that uploaded some obviously copyright violations, like a fac-simile of a newspaper page or an image of a painting of a living painter.

All fall in one or more of the following conditions:

  1. Low resolution and the Exif data point to the file being grabbed from Internet
  2. "Own work" of non existent users
  3. Fac-simile of logo
  4. Institutional or press portraits with low resolution
  5. Obviously scanned images from paper of recent themes

--Stego (talk) 22:04, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:06, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Valter Bitencourt Júnior

[edit]
  1. File:Aleilton Fonseca.jpg
  2. File:Academia Letras da Bahia.jpg
  3. File:Almandrade.jpg
  4. File:Estudantes no Instituto Socioambiental de Valéria (ISVA) .jpg
  5. File:Jornal Rascunho.jpg
  6. File:Gilberto Nogueira de Oliveira.jpg

Files uploaded by Valter Bitencourt Júnior (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information), that uploaded some obviously copyright violations, like a fac-simile of a newspaper page or an image of a painting of a living painter.

All fall in one or more of the following conditions:

  1. Low resolution and the Exif data point to the file being grabbed from Internet
  2. "Own work" of non existent users
  3. Fac-simile of logo
  4. Institutional or press portraits with low resolution
  5. Obviously scanned images from paper of recent themes

--Stego (talk) 22:04, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:06, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Valter Bitencourt Júnior

[edit]
  1. File:Aleilton Fonseca.jpg
  2. File:Academia Letras da Bahia.jpg
  3. File:Almandrade.jpg
  4. File:Estudantes no Instituto Socioambiental de Valéria (ISVA) .jpg
  5. File:Jornal Rascunho.jpg
  6. File:Gilberto Nogueira de Oliveira.jpg

Files uploaded by Valter Bitencourt Júnior (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information), that uploaded some obviously copyright violations, like a fac-simile of a newspaper page or an image of a painting of a living painter.

All fall in one or more of the following conditions:

  1. Low resolution and the Exif data point to the file being grabbed from Internet
  2. "Own work" of non existent users
  3. Fac-simile of logo
  4. Institutional or press portraits with low resolution
  5. Obviously scanned images from paper of recent themes

--Stego (talk) 22:04, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:06, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Valter Bitencourt Júnior

[edit]
  1. File:Aleilton Fonseca.jpg
  2. File:Academia Letras da Bahia.jpg
  3. File:Almandrade.jpg
  4. File:Estudantes no Instituto Socioambiental de Valéria (ISVA) .jpg
  5. File:Jornal Rascunho.jpg
  6. File:Gilberto Nogueira de Oliveira.jpg

Files uploaded by Valter Bitencourt Júnior (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information), that uploaded some obviously copyright violations, like a fac-simile of a newspaper page or an image of a painting of a living painter.

All fall in one or more of the following conditions:

  1. Low resolution and the Exif data point to the file being grabbed from Internet
  2. "Own work" of non existent users
  3. Fac-simile of logo
  4. Institutional or press portraits with low resolution
  5. Obviously scanned images from paper of recent themes

--Stego (talk) 22:04, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:06, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Valter Bitencourt Júnior

[edit]
  1. File:Aleilton Fonseca.jpg
  2. File:Academia Letras da Bahia.jpg
  3. File:Almandrade.jpg
  4. File:Estudantes no Instituto Socioambiental de Valéria (ISVA) .jpg
  5. File:Jornal Rascunho.jpg
  6. File:Gilberto Nogueira de Oliveira.jpg

Files uploaded by Valter Bitencourt Júnior (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information), that uploaded some obviously copyright violations, like a fac-simile of a newspaper page or an image of a painting of a living painter.

All fall in one or more of the following conditions:

  1. Low resolution and the Exif data point to the file being grabbed from Internet
  2. "Own work" of non existent users
  3. Fac-simile of logo
  4. Institutional or press portraits with low resolution
  5. Obviously scanned images from paper of recent themes

--Stego (talk) 22:04, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:06, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An archive of the now-offline source ([3]) doesn't provide evidence of the given license. The image can be found elsewhere on the Web ([4]) with it being attributed to Thakur Anoop Singh's Twitter account. Again, no evidence of a CC BY-SA license. clpo13(talk) 22:18, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:02, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SCOPE: encyclopaedic use at least quite difficult, does illustrate what? Herzi Pinki (talk) 22:45, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:01, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private low quality image. Maybe not notable persons. Kulmalukko (talk) 23:07, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:59, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission. Jcb (talk) 23:09, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:59, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mugshot? could be everyone Codc (talk) 23:25, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:58, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photos, with insufficient description Pippobuono (talk) 07:16, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 11:34, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Igor ABA

[edit]

COM:ADVERT, out of scope.

--XXN, 12:19, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 11:34, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not educationally useful, not used. HakanIST (talk) 13:43, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 11:34, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. --XXN, 14:49, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 11:34, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no EXIF, questionable own work. -- Geagea (talk) 15:04, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 11:34, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:25, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 11:33, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:26, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 11:33, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.instyle.de/sites/default/files/styles/og_image/public/Teaser_itsanuthida_levisjeans.jpg?itok=5l_b76L6. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:28, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 11:33, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://i34.servimg.com/u/f34/12/34/20/42/lastsc10.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:29, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 11:33, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope — regards, Revi 16:36, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 11:32, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. — regards, Revi 16:38, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 11:32, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. — regards, Revi 16:38, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 11:32, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. — regards, Revi 16:39, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 11:32, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. — regards, Revi 16:41, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 11:32, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cvbaze (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused screenshot of questionable educational value, furthermore categorization is currently not the good one. Texts and codes visible in some of the images are likely unfree too or at least of unclear copyright statut

Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:15, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Done by Mattbuck. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 11:33, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Raúl Cueto (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused, uncategorized personal images, out of scope.

Gauss (talk) 18:08, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 11:33, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Would appear to be from the website of a watch manufacturer, no indication of free license on their main page, and this doesn't have a direct URL so no way to check the license. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:26, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:52, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook size, no informative meta and appearance of COM:COPYVIO rather than own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:29, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:52, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"no comerciales" means Non-commercial and is incompatible with Commons licenses. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:40, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:53, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

One of the images in this collage is described as "magen "Sabana, África, naturraleza" de Rocko en http://imagenes.4ever.eu/animales/salvajes/sabana-134252#pic134252. El portal 4ever.eu autoriza el uso de las fotografías publicadas para usos no comerciales." "No Comerciales" means non-commercial and is incompatible with commons licenses. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:41, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:53, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An image of an unnotable person. Evolutionoftheuniverse (talk) 01:08, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:53, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An image of an unnotable person. Evolutionoftheuniverse (talk) 01:09, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:54, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no educational content, COMMONS:NOTHOST. Épico (talk)/(contribs) 05:48, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: I'm not entirely familiar with the word caking, but considering edits like this one I'd wager that it's likely meant to make fun of this teacher. I'm also not really comfortable with keeping an image that looks to have been taken without the teacher's consent. Tokyogirl79 (talk) 10:30, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:54, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No encyclopedic value - just some gradient background. (The image description reads: "Sorry about the photo that photo have followed by Wikipedia".) Used, for reasons unknown, in the deleted article en:Wwe brawl. Mike Rosoft (talk) 06:07, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:55, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal problem. Shofiul (talk) 06:50, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:55, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not necessary Frze > talk 07:05, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:56, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not necessary Frze > talk 07:06, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:56, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not necessary Frze > talk 07:31, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:58, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not "own work", this is an EMI record sleeve so presumably a copyright violation. John of Reading (talk) 08:11, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:58, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. This is part of a CD/record sleeve, compare http://www.tower.com/namagiripettai-krishnan-nadhaswaram-cd/wapi/117175832 John of Reading (talk) 08:25, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:58, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. Kaulder (contribs | talk) 08:45, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:58, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. Kaulder (contribs | talk) 08:48, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:58, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. Kaulder (contribs | talk) 08:55, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:58, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. Kaulder (contribs | talk) 08:57, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:59, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. Kaulder (contribs | talk) 08:58, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:59, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. Kaulder (contribs | talk) 09:01, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:59, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Errenous Title, File was moved Kritzolina (talk) 09:01, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:00, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. Kaulder (contribs | talk) 09:02, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:00, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. Kaulder (contribs | talk) 09:03, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:00, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. Kaulder (contribs | talk) 09:05, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:00, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. Kaulder (contribs | talk) 09:13, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:00, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader claims that he has got a permission but has no proof (ie OTRS) given 137.226.187.99 09:15, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Warum wollt ihr alle Bilder von Georg Otte wieder entfernen , die aus dem Archiv von Georg Otte stammen wieder löschen, obwohl ich eine Genehmigung geholt habe?

Hier noch einmal die Kopie der Genehmigung:

Hallo, ich gebe Euch die Kontaktperson wegen der Genehmigung für die Veröffentlichung im Anhang mit bei;

--Hallo Herr Haufe,--

mein Kontaktmann zu Frau Grundmann hat wie folgt geantwortet:


Weitergeleitete Nachricht --------

Betreff: Frau Grundmann Datum: Thu, 24 Nov 2016 00:09:40 +0100 Von: Bernd xxx> An: André Marks <andre.marks@gmx.de>--


In dem Schreiben, die von einer Kontaktperson von Frau Grundmann gekommen ist, die ich aber nicht kenne, wurde geschrieben, dass sie (Frau Grundmann) Ihre Einwilligung zur Veröffentlichung gibt. Das ist für mich eindeutig. Alles andere, was zwischen Herrn Marks und seinem Kontaktmann gesprochen wurde, entzieht sich meiner Kenntnis. Ihr könnt ihn ja einmal anschreiben, um ganz sicher zu gehen wegen der Veröffentlichung. Die Kontaktadresse habt Ihr ja.

Ich würde die Aufnahme aber auf jedem Fall aufheben, weil sie historisch sehr wertvoll ist. Zum einen, wo gibt es noch Fotos von Triebwagen aus der Vorkriegszeit mit Eilzugwagengrundriss und noch dazu in solch guter Qualität, und Betriebsfotos aus dem Bahnbetriebswerk Dresden-Pieschen findet man in Eurer Fotosammlung überhaupt nicht.

Wenn Ihr mir nicht glaubt, so erkundigt Euch bei dem Verantwortlichen für die Fotosammlung Grundmann, Herrn Marx, ich habe ihn auch noch einmal angeschrieben, dass Ihr alles löschen wollt.

--Rainerhaufe (talk) 09:42, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Einverständniserklärung (Rechte-Inhaber) fehlt

[edit]

Einverständniserklärung (Rechte-Inhaber)

Ich erkläre in Bezug auf das Bild

{{{ OBJEKTNAME }}}

Source: {{{ QUELLE/ WEBLINK ANGEBEN }}},

dass ich den Inhaber eines vollumfänglichen Nutzungsrechtes um Erlaubnis befragte und eine Zusage erhielt.

Ich erlaube hiermit jedermann die Weiternutzung des Bildes unter der freien Lizenz „Creative Commons Namensnennung-Weitergabe unter gleichen Bedingungen 3.0 Deutschland“ (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/de/legalcode).

Ich genehmige somit in urheberrechtlicher Hinsicht Dritten das Recht, das Bild (auch gewerblich) zu nutzen und zu verändern, sofern sie die Lizenzbedingungen wahren. Mir ist bekannt, dass ich diese Einwilligung üblicherweise nicht widerrufen kann.

Mir ist bekannt, dass sich die Unterstellung unter eine freie Lizenz nur auf das Urheberrecht bezieht und es mir daher unbenommen ist, aufgrund anderer Gesetze (Persönlichkeitsrecht, Markenrecht usw.) gegen Dritte vorzugehen, die das Bild im Rahmen der freien Lizenz rechtmäßig, auf Grund der anderen Gesetze aber unrechtmäßig nutzen.

Gleichwohl erwerbe ich keinen Anspruch darauf, dass das Bild dauerhaft auf der Wikipedia eingestellt wird.

{{{ DATUM }}},


Deleted: The actual copyright holder must send a free lciense using OTRS. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:02, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader claims that he has got a permission but has no proof (ie OTRS) given 137.226.187.99 09:17, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Warum wollt ihr alle Bilder von Georg Otte wieder entfernen , die aus dem Archiv von Georg Otte stammen wieder löschen, obwohl ich eine Genehmigung geholt habe?

Hier noch einmal die Kopie der Genehmigung:

Hallo, ich gebe Euch die Kontaktperson wegen der Genehmigung für die Veröffentlichung im Anhang mit bei;

--Hallo Herr Haufe,--

mein Kontaktmann zu Frau Grundmann hat wie folgt geantwortet:


Weitergeleitete Nachricht --------

Betreff: Frau Grundmann Datum: Thu, 24 Nov 2016 00:09:40 +0100 Von: Bernd xxx> An: André Marks <andre.marks@gmx.de>--


In dem Schreiben, die von einer Kontaktperson von Frau Grundmann gekommen ist, die ich aber nicht kenne, wurde geschrieben, dass sie (Frau Grundmann) Ihre Einwilligung zur Veröffentlichung gibt. Das ist für mich eindeutig. Alles andere, was zwischen Herrn Marks und seinem Kontaktmann gesprochen wurde, entzieht sich meiner Kenntnis. Ihr könnt ihn ja einmal anschreiben, um ganz sicher zu gehen wegen der Veröffentlichung. Die Kontaktadresse habt Ihr ja.

Ich würde die Aufnahme aber auf jedem Fall aufheben, weil sie historisch sehr wertvoll ist. Zum einen, wo gibt es noch Fotos von Triebwagen aus der Vorkriegszeit mit Eilzugwagengrundriss und noch dazu in solch guter Qualität, und Betriebsfotos aus dem Bahnbetriebswerk Dresden-Pieschen findet man in Eurer Fotosammlung überhaupt nicht.

Wenn Ihr mir nicht glaubt, so erkundigt Euch bei dem Verantwortlichen für die Fotosammlung Grundmann, Herrn Marx, ich habe ihn auch noch einmal angeschrieben, dass Ihr alles löschen wollt.

--Rainerhaufe (talk) 09:42, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: The actual copyright holder must send a free lciense using OTRS. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:03, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader claims that he has got a permission but has no proof (ie OTRS) given 137.226.187.99 09:20, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Warum wollt ihr alle Bilder von Georg Otte wieder entfernen , die aus dem Archiv von Georg Otte stammen wieder löschen, obwohl ich eine Genehmigung geholt habe?

Hier noch einmal die Kopie der Genehmigung:

Hallo, ich gebe Euch die Kontaktperson wegen der Genehmigung für die Veröffentlichung im Anhang mit bei;

--Hallo Herr Haufe,--

mein Kontaktmann zu Frau Grundmann hat wie folgt geantwortet:


Weitergeleitete Nachricht --------

Betreff: Frau Grundmann Datum: Thu, 24 Nov 2016 00:09:40 +0100 Von: Bernd xxx> An: André Marks <andre.marks@gmx.de>--


In dem Schreiben, die von einer Kontaktperson von Frau Grundmann gekommen ist, die ich aber nicht kenne, wurde geschrieben, dass sie (Frau Grundmann) Ihre Einwilligung zur Veröffentlichung gibt. Das ist für mich eindeutig. Alles andere, was zwischen Herrn Marks und seinem Kontaktmann gesprochen wurde, entzieht sich meiner Kenntnis. Ihr könnt ihn ja einmal anschreiben, um ganz sicher zu gehen wegen der Veröffentlichung. Die Kontaktadresse habt Ihr ja.

Ich würde die Aufnahme aber auf jedem Fall aufheben, weil sie historisch sehr wertvoll ist. Zum einen, wo gibt es noch Fotos von Triebwagen aus der Vorkriegszeit mit Eilzugwagengrundriss und noch dazu in solch guter Qualität, und Betriebsfotos aus dem Bahnbetriebswerk Dresden-Pieschen findet man in Eurer Fotosammlung überhaupt nicht.

Wenn Ihr mir nicht glaubt, so erkundigt Euch bei dem Verantwortlichen für die Fotosammlung Grundmann, Herrn Marx, ich habe ihn auch noch einmal angeschrieben, dass Ihr alles löschen wollt.

--Rainerhaufe (talk) 09:43, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: The actual copyright holder must send a free lciense using OTRS. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:03, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader claims that he has got a permission but has no proof (ie OTRS) given 137.226.187.99 09:20, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Warum wollt ihr alle Bilder von Georg Otte wieder entfernen , die aus dem Archiv von Georg Otte stammen wieder löschen, obwohl ich eine Genehmigung geholt habe?

Hier noch einmal die Kopie der Genehmigung:

Hallo, ich gebe Euch die Kontaktperson wegen der Genehmigung für die Veröffentlichung im Anhang mit bei;

--Hallo Herr Haufe,--

mein Kontaktmann zu Frau Grundmann hat wie folgt geantwortet:


Weitergeleitete Nachricht --------

Betreff: Frau Grundmann Datum: Thu, 24 Nov 2016 00:09:40 +0100 Von: Bernd xxx> An: André Marks <andre.marks@gmx.de>--


In dem Schreiben, die von einer Kontaktperson von Frau Grundmann gekommen ist, die ich aber nicht kenne, wurde geschrieben, dass sie (Frau Grundmann) Ihre Einwilligung zur Veröffentlichung gibt. Das ist für mich eindeutig. Alles andere, was zwischen Herrn Marks und seinem Kontaktmann gesprochen wurde, entzieht sich meiner Kenntnis. Ihr könnt ihn ja einmal anschreiben, um ganz sicher zu gehen wegen der Veröffentlichung. Die Kontaktadresse habt Ihr ja.

Ich würde die Aufnahme aber auf jedem Fall aufheben, weil sie historisch sehr wertvoll ist. Zum einen, wo gibt es noch Fotos von Triebwagen aus der Vorkriegszeit mit Eilzugwagengrundriss und noch dazu in solch guter Qualität, und Betriebsfotos aus dem Bahnbetriebswerk Dresden-Pieschen findet man in Eurer Fotosammlung überhaupt nicht.

Wenn Ihr mir nicht glaubt, so erkundigt Euch bei dem Verantwortlichen für die Fotosammlung Grundmann, Herrn Marx, ich habe ihn auch noch einmal angeschrieben, dass Ihr alles löschen wollt.

--Rainerhaufe (talk) 09:44, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Einverständniserklärung (Rechte-Inhaber) fehlt

[edit]

Einverständniserklärung (Rechte-Inhaber)

Ich erkläre in Bezug auf das Bild

{{{ OBJEKTNAME }}}

Source: {{{ QUELLE/ WEBLINK ANGEBEN }}},

dass ich den Inhaber eines vollumfänglichen Nutzungsrechtes um Erlaubnis befragte und eine Zusage erhielt.

Ich erlaube hiermit jedermann die Weiternutzung des Bildes unter der freien Lizenz „Creative Commons Namensnennung-Weitergabe unter gleichen Bedingungen 3.0 Deutschland“ (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/de/legalcode).

Ich genehmige somit in urheberrechtlicher Hinsicht Dritten das Recht, das Bild (auch gewerblich) zu nutzen und zu verändern, sofern sie die Lizenzbedingungen wahren. Mir ist bekannt, dass ich diese Einwilligung üblicherweise nicht widerrufen kann.

Mir ist bekannt, dass sich die Unterstellung unter eine freie Lizenz nur auf das Urheberrecht bezieht und es mir daher unbenommen ist, aufgrund anderer Gesetze (Persönlichkeitsrecht, Markenrecht usw.) gegen Dritte vorzugehen, die das Bild im Rahmen der freien Lizenz rechtmäßig, auf Grund der anderen Gesetze aber unrechtmäßig nutzen.

Gleichwohl erwerbe ich keinen Anspruch darauf, dass das Bild dauerhaft auf der Wikipedia eingestellt wird.

{{{ DATUM }}},


Deleted: The actual copyright holder must send a free lciense using OTRS. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:03, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In my opinion the cover surpasses threshold of originality and needs OTRS-permission from Jon Bon Jovi. Taivo (talk) 09:20, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:23, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader claims that he has got a permission but has no proof (ie OTRS) given 137.226.187.99 09:21, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Warum wollt ihr alle Bilder von Georg Otte wieder entfernen , die aus dem Archiv von Georg Otte stammen wieder löschen, obwohl ich eine Genehmigung geholt habe?

Hier noch einmal die Kopie der Genehmigung:

Hallo, ich gebe Euch die Kontaktperson wegen der Genehmigung für die Veröffentlichung im Anhang mit bei;

--Hallo Herr Haufe,--

mein Kontaktmann zu Frau Grundmann hat wie folgt geantwortet:


Weitergeleitete Nachricht --------

Betreff: Frau Grundmann Datum: Thu, 24 Nov 2016 00:09:40 +0100 Von: Bernd xxx> An: André Marks <andre.marks@gmx.de>--


In dem Schreiben, die von einer Kontaktperson von Frau Grundmann gekommen ist, die ich aber nicht kenne, wurde geschrieben, dass sie (Frau Grundmann) Ihre Einwilligung zur Veröffentlichung gibt. Das ist für mich eindeutig. Alles andere, was zwischen Herrn Marks und seinem Kontaktmann gesprochen wurde, entzieht sich meiner Kenntnis. Ihr könnt ihn ja einmal anschreiben, um ganz sicher zu gehen wegen der Veröffentlichung. Die Kontaktadresse habt Ihr ja.

Ich würde die Aufnahme aber auf jedem Fall aufheben, weil sie historisch sehr wertvoll ist. Zum einen, wo gibt es noch Fotos von Triebwagen aus der Vorkriegszeit mit Eilzugwagengrundriss und noch dazu in solch guter Qualität, und Betriebsfotos aus dem Bahnbetriebswerk Dresden-Pieschen findet man in Eurer Fotosammlung überhaupt nicht.

Wenn Ihr mir nicht glaubt, so erkundigt Euch bei dem Verantwortlichen für die Fotosammlung Grundmann, Herrn Marx, ich habe ihn auch noch einmal angeschrieben, dass Ihr alles löschen wollt.

--Rainerhaufe (talk) 09:44, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Einverständniserklärung (Rechte-Inhaber) fehlt

[edit]

Einverständniserklärung (Rechte-Inhaber)

Ich erkläre in Bezug auf das Bild

{{{ OBJEKTNAME }}}

Source: {{{ QUELLE/ WEBLINK ANGEBEN }}},

dass ich den Inhaber eines vollumfänglichen Nutzungsrechtes um Erlaubnis befragte und eine Zusage erhielt.

Ich erlaube hiermit jedermann die Weiternutzung des Bildes unter der freien Lizenz „Creative Commons Namensnennung-Weitergabe unter gleichen Bedingungen 3.0 Deutschland“ (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/de/legalcode).

Ich genehmige somit in urheberrechtlicher Hinsicht Dritten das Recht, das Bild (auch gewerblich) zu nutzen und zu verändern, sofern sie die Lizenzbedingungen wahren. Mir ist bekannt, dass ich diese Einwilligung üblicherweise nicht widerrufen kann.

Mir ist bekannt, dass sich die Unterstellung unter eine freie Lizenz nur auf das Urheberrecht bezieht und es mir daher unbenommen ist, aufgrund anderer Gesetze (Persönlichkeitsrecht, Markenrecht usw.) gegen Dritte vorzugehen, die das Bild im Rahmen der freien Lizenz rechtmäßig, auf Grund der anderen Gesetze aber unrechtmäßig nutzen.

Gleichwohl erwerbe ich keinen Anspruch darauf, dass das Bild dauerhaft auf der Wikipedia eingestellt wird.

{{{ DATUM }}},


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:23, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader claims that he has got a permission but has no proof (ie OTRS) given 137.226.187.99 09:21, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Warum wollt ihr alle Bilder von Georg Otte wieder entfernen , die aus dem Archiv von Georg Otte stammen wieder löschen, obwohl ich eine Genehmigung geholt habe?

Hier noch einmal die Kopie der Genehmigung:

Hallo, ich gebe Euch die Kontaktperson wegen der Genehmigung für die Veröffentlichung im Anhang mit bei;

--Hallo Herr Haufe,--

mein Kontaktmann zu Frau Grundmann hat wie folgt geantwortet:


Weitergeleitete Nachricht --------

Betreff: Frau Grundmann Datum: Thu, 24 Nov 2016 00:09:40 +0100 Von: Bernd xxx> An: André Marks <andre.marks@gmx.de>--


In dem Schreiben, die von einer Kontaktperson von Frau Grundmann gekommen ist, die ich aber nicht kenne, wurde geschrieben, dass sie (Frau Grundmann) Ihre Einwilligung zur Veröffentlichung gibt. Das ist für mich eindeutig. Alles andere, was zwischen Herrn Marks und seinem Kontaktmann gesprochen wurde, entzieht sich meiner Kenntnis. Ihr könnt ihn ja einmal anschreiben, um ganz sicher zu gehen wegen der Veröffentlichung. Die Kontaktadresse habt Ihr ja.

Ich würde die Aufnahme aber auf jedem Fall aufheben, weil sie historisch sehr wertvoll ist. Zum einen, wo gibt es noch Fotos von Triebwagen aus der Vorkriegszeit mit Eilzugwagengrundriss und noch dazu in solch guter Qualität, und Betriebsfotos aus dem Bahnbetriebswerk Dresden-Pieschen findet man in Eurer Fotosammlung überhaupt nicht.

Wenn Ihr mir nicht glaubt, so erkundigt Euch bei dem Verantwortlichen für die Fotosammlung Grundmann, Herrn Marx, ich habe ihn auch noch einmal angeschrieben, dass Ihr alles löschen wollt.

--Rainerhaufe (talk) 09:45, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Einverständniserklärung (Rechte-Inhaber) fehlt

[edit]

Einverständniserklärung (Rechte-Inhaber)

Ich erkläre in Bezug auf das Bild

{{{ OBJEKTNAME }}}

Source: {{{ QUELLE/ WEBLINK ANGEBEN }}},

dass ich den Inhaber eines vollumfänglichen Nutzungsrechtes um Erlaubnis befragte und eine Zusage erhielt.

Ich erlaube hiermit jedermann die Weiternutzung des Bildes unter der freien Lizenz „Creative Commons Namensnennung-Weitergabe unter gleichen Bedingungen 3.0 Deutschland“ (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/de/legalcode).

Ich genehmige somit in urheberrechtlicher Hinsicht Dritten das Recht, das Bild (auch gewerblich) zu nutzen und zu verändern, sofern sie die Lizenzbedingungen wahren. Mir ist bekannt, dass ich diese Einwilligung üblicherweise nicht widerrufen kann.

Mir ist bekannt, dass sich die Unterstellung unter eine freie Lizenz nur auf das Urheberrecht bezieht und es mir daher unbenommen ist, aufgrund anderer Gesetze (Persönlichkeitsrecht, Markenrecht usw.) gegen Dritte vorzugehen, die das Bild im Rahmen der freien Lizenz rechtmäßig, auf Grund der anderen Gesetze aber unrechtmäßig nutzen.

Gleichwohl erwerbe ich keinen Anspruch darauf, dass das Bild dauerhaft auf der Wikipedia eingestellt wird.

{{{ DATUM }}},


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:30, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader claims that he has got a permission but has no proof (ie OTRS) given 137.226.187.99 09:22, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Warum wollt ihr alle Bilder von Georg Otte wieder entfernen , die aus dem Archiv von Georg Otte stammen wieder löschen, obwohl ich eine Genehmigung geholt habe?

Hier noch einmal die Kopie der Genehmigung:

Hallo, ich gebe Euch die Kontaktperson wegen der Genehmigung für die Veröffentlichung im Anhang mit bei;

--Hallo Herr Haufe,--

mein Kontaktmann zu Frau Grundmann hat wie folgt geantwortet:


Weitergeleitete Nachricht --------

Betreff: Frau Grundmann Datum: Thu, 24 Nov 2016 00:09:40 +0100 Von: Bernd xxx> An: André Marks <andre.marks@gmx.de>--


In dem Schreiben, die von einer Kontaktperson von Frau Grundmann gekommen ist, die ich aber nicht kenne, wurde geschrieben, dass sie (Frau Grundmann) Ihre Einwilligung zur Veröffentlichung gibt. Das ist für mich eindeutig. Alles andere, was zwischen Herrn Marks und seinem Kontaktmann gesprochen wurde, entzieht sich meiner Kenntnis. Ihr könnt ihn ja einmal anschreiben, um ganz sicher zu gehen wegen der Veröffentlichung. Die Kontaktadresse habt Ihr ja.

Ich würde die Aufnahme aber auf jedem Fall aufheben, weil sie historisch sehr wertvoll ist. Zum einen, wo gibt es noch Fotos von Triebwagen aus der Vorkriegszeit mit Eilzugwagengrundriss und noch dazu in solch guter Qualität, und Betriebsfotos aus dem Bahnbetriebswerk Dresden-Pieschen findet man in Eurer Fotosammlung überhaupt nicht.

Wenn Ihr mir nicht glaubt, so erkundigt Euch bei dem Verantwortlichen für die Fotosammlung Grundmann, Herrn Marx, ich habe ihn auch noch einmal angeschrieben, dass Ihr alles löschen wollt.

--Rainerhaufe (talk) 09:45, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Einverständniserklärung (Rechte-Inhaber) fehlt

[edit]

Einverständniserklärung (Rechte-Inhaber)

Ich erkläre in Bezug auf das Bild

{{{ OBJEKTNAME }}}

Source: {{{ QUELLE/ WEBLINK ANGEBEN }}},

dass ich den Inhaber eines vollumfänglichen Nutzungsrechtes um Erlaubnis befragte und eine Zusage erhielt.

Ich erlaube hiermit jedermann die Weiternutzung des Bildes unter der freien Lizenz „Creative Commons Namensnennung-Weitergabe unter gleichen Bedingungen 3.0 Deutschland“ (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/de/legalcode).

Ich genehmige somit in urheberrechtlicher Hinsicht Dritten das Recht, das Bild (auch gewerblich) zu nutzen und zu verändern, sofern sie die Lizenzbedingungen wahren. Mir ist bekannt, dass ich diese Einwilligung üblicherweise nicht widerrufen kann.

Mir ist bekannt, dass sich die Unterstellung unter eine freie Lizenz nur auf das Urheberrecht bezieht und es mir daher unbenommen ist, aufgrund anderer Gesetze (Persönlichkeitsrecht, Markenrecht usw.) gegen Dritte vorzugehen, die das Bild im Rahmen der freien Lizenz rechtmäßig, auf Grund der anderen Gesetze aber unrechtmäßig nutzen.

Gleichwohl erwerbe ich keinen Anspruch darauf, dass das Bild dauerhaft auf der Wikipedia eingestellt wird.

{{{ DATUM }}},


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:31, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

license cannot be correct 137.226.187.99 09:24, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Das Foto war auf einem Werbeplakat, welches bei Messerschmitt Lokomotivtechnik im Bild abgedruck war. Solche Werbeplakat haben wir letztes Jahr massenhaft abgebildet.

--Rainerhaufe (talk) 09:48, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Copyright violation. --Frze > talk 14:32, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: The poster may have been shown widely, but there is no evidence that it was freely licensed and it certainly isn't PD. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:32, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

license cannot be correct 137.226.187.99 09:25, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Das Foto ist ein Werbeplakat von Siemens, welches bei Messerschmidt Lokomotivtechnik im Bild abgedruckt war. Solche ähnlichen Werbeprospekte haben wir letztes Jahr in Massen hoch geladen und sind alle durch gekommen.

--Rainerhaufe (talk) 09:50, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Copyright violation. --Frze > talk 14:34, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: The poster may have been shown widely, but there is no evidence that it was freely licensed and it certainly isn't PD. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:33, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative of Rebecca Blackwell's (AP) pic. Gyrostat (talk) 09:53, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:34, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

After moving the files into Category:Clapper Bridge which is about the same subject, and requesting a renaming of the latter to "Clapper Bridge, Hebble Hole", this category is now empty. It may, however, be kept as a redirect if an administrator deems it useful. -Schlosser67 (talk) 09:55, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: redirected. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:37, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

too small, out of scope MMFE (talk) 10:05, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: there are similar files, e.g. for Belgium and the Netherlands. I've also already made substantive remarks regarding the maps, see User talk:AHC300#Decriminalization of same-sex intercourse maps. SPQRobin (talk) 12:41, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
These three files show actually the ratio of occupied by Nazi Germany /non occupied territory of the three countries at the end of 1944. Henxter (talk) 13:07, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed, which may in a way be strictly correct, but it is misleading as it was legal since about 1795 in countries influenced by the French Revolution. I.e. the German occupation was only a short interruption, and the distinction 1944/1945 is also not really that significant. SPQRobin (talk) 20:51, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Far too small to be useful -- yes, of course the SVG can be enlarged, but there is far too little detail. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:40, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

derivative work [5] Darklanlan (talk) 10:16, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:40, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of com:EDUSE Pippobuono (talk) 10:19, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:40, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unfortunately this file is from DSS1 and only hosted by ESO. These files are copyrighted. Szczureq (talk) 10:25, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:40, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Insufficient quality: The main subject of this image is not the Cathedral of Madrid but rather a nondescript fence and some blurry vegetation. The cathedral may be visible in the back but it is small and completely blurry. Gauss (talk) 18:45, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Ellin Beltz: per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Catedral de la Almudena - panoramio.jpg

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No license info found in the page Rodrigolopes (talk) 23:43, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Ellin Beltz: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Yayamamo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

 Delete: very poor quality low resolution images are of no useful value and are of virtually no educational value

Ww2censor (talk) 11:16, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure why these are no useful values. They are to be used for presentation slides at academic conferences or in any materials.--Yayamamo (talk) 11:27, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Some of your other uploads are a little larger, though not by that much, and I did not nominate those but did think about it. As I stated above, these are very poor quality low resolution images of little use to this project and several images of the same subjects are already available in better quality here. Obviously others, who are happy to use such low quality images can find them elsewhere online. Ww2censor (talk) 14:51, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment I really think these images are of such low quality they are Out of Scope of the project, so refer to COM:NOTUSED and especially COM:NOTUSED#Discussion. Ww2censor (talk) 22:23, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Tm, I disagree and should hate to see what you consider to be poor quality images if you think these are good quality. Ww2censor (talk) 23:48, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • The icons are clearly labeled with NCBI Taxonomy IDs and also designed so that they bring out the essential features of the species even in small-size usage, and that is the whole point of icons. It seems to me that you are against the whole concept of icons in general, perhaps because they are "low-resolution". (Should we delete all Category:Hamburger icons as well in favor of Category:Hamburgers?) A distinction should be made from what COM:EDUSE actually intended to kick out, i.e. a low-resolution blurry photo of an unidentified bird, given as an example in that policy you cited. Commons is meant to be a repository of freely-usable educational media. Making a well-organized and self-consistent collection of taxonomy icons available as part of our content is well within this project's mission and is clearly in Commons scope. --朝彦 | asahiko (talk) 02:40, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: WMF projects do not and should not use images of this size. Instead, we use much larger images and make thumbnails as needed. This means that for most people, the thumbnail appears relatvely small, but for people with vision problems, it can be whatever size they want. Use of a small icon defeats that capability and is therefore against policy. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:47, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self promotion, unused Pippobuono (talk) 11:20, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:48, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. --XXN, 11:47, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:49, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work, no permission. --XXN, 11:49, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:49, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Babaega (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Logo+screenshot - copyrighted content.

--XXN, 11:51, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:50, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Romania. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:08, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:50, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Romania. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:10, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:50, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like a low resolution private image. Not used. Maybe not notable persons. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:26, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:50, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution private image. Maybe not notable person. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:33, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:50, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. --XXN, 12:52, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:50, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Architectual simulation that appears in more than a few websites (such as this one). It has no place in the Commons without a specific OTRS release note from the owners. Ldorfman (talk) 13:03, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:51, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The picture is taken from the website of an architects' firm. It has no place in the Commons without a specific OTRS release note from them. Ldorfman (talk) 13:10, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:51, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

it's blurry. there is a better version in commons: Arnaud Palastowicz (talk) 14:47, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept I'm not sure this is a good idea -- while focus stacking can be useful, it is always better to obtain better depth of field by other means. Also, of the three images, the focus on this one is not particularly useful. However, I respect Walter's opinion so I have kept it. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:54, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:14, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep That is good find Eureka Lott. I've updated the summary and licensing accordingly. —RP88 (talk) 15:14, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:02, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Derivative works from music. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:18, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:02, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source information is incorrect - photograph is taken by Stephen Slade, photographer for the University of Connecticut Athletic Department, not the White House Ytoyoda (talk) 15:20, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Given that this was a years ago, I can't be 100% sure that I can recall exactly what happened. However, in some years I have grabbed a screenshot of the White House feed which is clearly public domain; and some years I have written to the school and requested a copy of the White House photographers photo. My best guess is that I contacted the school, asked for the White House photographers photo but they sent me one taken by Steve Slade and I missed the fact that it was the school photographer not the White House photographer. All UConn photographers are required to sign over the copyrights to the athletic department, I will contact the athletic department and see if I can arrange to get a permission statement from the athletic department.--Sphilbrick (talk) 15:44, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for responding and your followthrough on this. Worst case scenario, you could replace the pic with a screen cap from the White House video. The image quality won't be as good and it doesn't show the jersey presentation, but it'll do the job, I think. Ytoyoda (talk) 15:55, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I sent in a request to the Sports Information Director.--Sphilbrick (talk) 16:12, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The sports information director at the UConn athletic department checked and confirmed that it is a Stephen Slade photograph, taken under contract with the athletic department and therefore the copyright is owned by the athletic department. The sports information director provided a valid permission statement. I modified the image information to reflect the correct license, the source and the author, and added the OTRS permission link. I'll leave it to someone else to clear the deletion notice.--Sphilbrick (talk) 18:59, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawing nomination Thanks to User:Sphilbrick for the speedy response. Ytoyoda (talk) 19:07, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: withdrawn by nom. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:04, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Provabben (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:22, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:05, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Part of mass upload, unused promotional image (everything except commercial sign blurry), out of scope. P 1 9 9   15:28, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:05, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm not using it anymore on my user page JGab12 (talk) 15:30, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete sısɐuuǝɔıʌ∀ (diskuto) 15:38, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:05, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm not using it anymore on my user page JGab12 (talk) 15:30, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:05, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:06, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Derivative works from poster. Should be blanked/cropped to keep. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:32, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:06, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this file does not show Andreas Kieling Frze > talk 15:32, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Ordinarily, a wrong file name is not a reason to delete. However, this is a poor image anyway. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:07, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a photo taken of an old text. While the text is not under copyright, the photograph is. There is no evidence that the photographer released his or her work into public domain or under appropriate CC license. Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 15:35, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Per our Bridgeman policy, a photogaph of a flat (2D) work has no copyright of its own. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:09, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ValeriaLourdes 28 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:09, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spam/out of scope Savhñ 15:52, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:09, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

erstellt als Kategorie statt Category >>> Category:Richard Ohnsorg Privat-User (talk) 16:14, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Wutsje, closed by. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:10, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of copyrighted content.    FDMS  4    16:15, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:10, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Statue of Eino Leino by finnishs sculptor Lauri Leppänen, who died in 1977. Not PD yet and no FOP in Finland for sculptures. Htm (talk) 17:22, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:10, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Statue "Fact and Fable, memorial to Topelius" by sculptor en:Gunnar Finne, who died in 1952, so not in PD yet. No FOP on Finland for sculptures. Htm (talk) 17:28, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:10, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Gunnar Finne works are now PD in Finland. "Fact and Fable" was published in 1932 so it will be PD as well in US in 2028. Platonides (talk) 14:17, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Marcoandres1997 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal images, out of scope.

Gauss (talk) 18:16, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:10, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture already published on this website. No OTRS authorization from the original author of the photo. Titlutin (talk) 20:24, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Français : Photo déjà publiée sur le site littleangelrecords.com, qui n'est pas libre de droits. Il faudrait un email d'autorisation de la part de l'auteur de la photo pour que Commons puisse héberger légalement cette image - voir pour cela Aide:Republication/Image --Titlutin (talk) 20:25, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Ce fichier appartient au label Little Angel Records FABIENNE ABELARD (talk) 23:19, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Bonjour @FABIENNE ABELARD:
Oui, mais le site de Little Angel Records n'est pas sous licence libre, et cela veut donc dire que la photo est protégée par le droit d'auteur. Or le projet Commons (et Wikipédia) ne peut héberger que des fichiers sous licence libre compatible. Héberger des fichiers protégés fait donc tomber Commons dans l'illégalité, d'où cette procédure de suppression par précaution. En effet, même si le photographe et/ou Little Angel Records sont d'accord pour que la photo soit placée sous licence libre et utilisée sur Wikipédia, on ne peut pas être sûr à 100% que cela soit vrai car vous n'êtes qu'un pseudo parmi d'autres ici (je ne dis pas bien sûr que vous mentez, mais on ne peut pas être sûr à 100%). D'où la nécessité pour le photographe et/ou les ayants-droits de la photo d'envoyer un email officiel d'autorisation pour que l'on puisse conserver légalement le fichier. Je remet ici le lien vers le modèle d'email que j'avais déjà placé ci-dessus : Aide:Republication/Image.
Bien cordialement --Titlutin (talk) 00:08, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:12, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A Public Domain Mark (PDM) license is incompatible with Common's licensing policies. The copyright owner retains full control over this image and does not give away any rights. Commons can be sued by the copyright owner. PDM is not really a license and therefore is not permitted on Commons except where it can be shown that the image is PD for known reasons such as a US Government image. Leoboudv (talk) 21:45, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Commons can also take images with a "no known copyright restrictions" license such as this image but usually the image is by a state or government institute and the image is 20-50+ years old. This situation doesn't apply here since the flickr source is not a state government. But to be safe, I'll ask an Admin for a second opinion since I see that the account mentions NORAD NORTHCOM PA Photography. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 21:55, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep: I think I made an error as the flickr account appears linked to NORAD Northern Command or NORAD which should be PD as it is US Military. I will have to pass this image after all. You learn a new thing every day. But I will leave the DR tag here in case someone wishes to make a comment. --Leoboudv (talk) 22:16, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    • Thanks, somehow I missed that as well. If I'd known, I would've tagged it PD-USGov-Mil it something similar. Ytoyoda (talk)<
  •  Keep - But next time if another image from a USGov flickr account is added as a PD, licence reviewers/admins should just change the licence to the USGov-PD related licenses available when reviewing--Stemoc 22:59, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: I note in passing that the woman in the picture is Lori Robinson, the highest ranking US military woman of all time. Arguably she is a far more important person than Bettman, but was unmentioned in the file name, file description, and categories. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:29, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Work of an artist which is stilla live, so need autorization Shev123 (talk) 21:49, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:31, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The "CC-BY-NC" statement contradicts the {{PD-self}} release. {{Noncommercial}} restrictions are incompatible with Commons:Licensing. It's not clear that the uploader actually indended to waive their copyright. LX (talk, contribs) 22:44, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:35, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The "cc-by-nc" statement contradicts the {{cc-by-sa-3.0}} licensing. {{Noncommercial}} restrictions are incompatible with Commons:Licensing. It's not clear that the uploader actually intended to publish this under a free license. LX (talk, contribs) 22:49, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:35, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The "cc-by-nc" statement contradicts the {{cc-by-sa-3.0}} licensing. {{Noncommercial}} restrictions are incompatible with Commons:Licensing. It's not clear that the uploader actually intended to publish this under a free license. LX (talk, contribs) 22:49, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:36, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, used on a non relevant article Triplecaña (talk) 22:50, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:36, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 23:04, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. I uploaded this picture as part of a Commons transfer drive at English Wikipedia several years ago on good faith based on the text in the file description page. In response to this deletion request I checked a Google Books preview of the book in question and found no picture on the cited page. Since I don't have physical access to the book in question, I have to consider verification failed and therefore there is no evidence supporting this picture is freely licensed. I apologize for the inconvenience. Grondemar 04:34, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: I happen to own a paperback copy of the cited book. The image credit reads "U.S. Navy photo, courtesy of Rafael C. Benitez". .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:43, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Japan. It was created in 1981. [6] G I Chandor (talk) 23:35, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:44, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Japan. It was created in 1981. [7] G I Chandor (talk) 23:37, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:44, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Japan. It was created in 1981. [8] G I Chandor (talk) 23:38, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:44, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. The explanation board is a copyrighted work. G I Chandor (talk) 23:39, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:44, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. The explanation board is a copyrighted work. G I Chandor (talk) 23:40, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:44, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. The explanation board is a copyrighted work. G I Chandor (talk) 23:40, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:45, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. The explanation board is a copyrighted work. G I Chandor (talk) 23:42, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:45, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. The explanation board is a copyrighted work. G I Chandor (talk) 23:43, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:45, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. The explanation board is a copyrighted work. G I Chandor (talk) 23:44, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:45, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. G I Chandor (talk) 23:45, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:45, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. The explanation panel is a copyrighted work. G I Chandor (talk) 23:46, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:45, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

La imagen es de 1966, de autor desconocido y se encuentran versiones de ella aquí: [9] - Enrique Cordero (talk) 23:38, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:46, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. The map is a copyrighted work. G I Chandor (talk) 23:47, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:46, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. The explanation board is a copyrighted work. G I Chandor (talk) 23:49, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:46, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Japan. It was created in 2004. G I Chandor (talk) 23:54, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:46, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Japan. It was created in 2004. G I Chandor (talk) 23:54, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:46, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Japan. It was created in 2004. G I Chandor (talk) 23:55, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:46, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. The photo and text are copyrighted works. G I Chandor (talk) 23:57, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:46, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. The pictures are copyrighted works. G I Chandor (talk) 23:59, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:46, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sandouno24 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Those flags exist in SVG

Lacrymocéphale (talk) 22:18, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Sandouno24 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

One is enough. May be copyrighted http://ema-koulikoro.com/mot-du-directeur-des-etudes/

Lacrymocéphale (talk) 22:20, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, two images don't exist in svg however, there are unused and of questionable EV + non free logos for the second part. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:52, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete very low resolution image is of no useful value - there are other images in the same category but this is of virtually no educational value Ww2censor (talk) 11:10, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Part of a larger request at Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_Yayamamo, and should be discussed there. 朝彦 | asahiko (talk) 10:32, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:29, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope per COM:SELFIE. Sam Walton (talk) 11:57, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:29, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope per COM:SELFIE. Sam Walton (talk) 11:59, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:29, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

http://imgur.com/eGJKu4R also out of scope. Yann (talk) 12:00, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete In scope IMHO, but a copyvio. --Jarekt (talk) 19:16, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:28, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A drawing by some children - out of scope. Also the authorship is questionable (compared to the file name). --XXN, 12:04, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:28, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright problems Nonander (talk) 13:03, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:27, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like a private image, not used. Maybe not notable person. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:12, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:27, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not used. Maybe not notable person. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:17, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:26, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image. Not used. Maybe not notable person. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:18, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:26, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not used. Maybe not notable person. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:20, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:26, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not used. Maybe not notable person. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:36, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:26, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not educationally useful; private image collection. Magnolia677 (talk) 13:43, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:26, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not educationally useful; private image collection. Magnolia677 (talk) 13:45, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:26, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not educationally useful; private image collection. Magnolia677 (talk) 13:45, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:26, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not educationally useful; private image collection. Magnolia677 (talk) 13:47, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:26, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not educationally useful; private image collection. Magnolia677 (talk) 13:47, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:26, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Лицензия не соответствует источнику. -- Tomasina (talk) 15:08, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: The cited license covers the photograph ( which does not actually need a license because it has no copyright of its own), but not the required permission from the painter. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:25, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per [10]. Yann (talk) 17:54, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

file not in use at Wikimedia projects, bad quality, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 21:21, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:23, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of permission; the uploader, Jordan.williams, is not the claimed copyright owner, DMA Europa. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 22:07, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I may be mistaken here. When editing File:The Knights of The Holy Grail by Tim Wallace-Murpy.jpg to add a speedy deletion tag, I saw that jordan.williams has piped his name to show "DMA Europa". Jordan, can you tell us why you would want to claim to be this sordid PR agency? Have you read and acted on our m:TOU, particularly the section "Paid contributions without disclosure"? Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 22:28, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:22, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. The explanation board is a copyrighted work. G I Chandor (talk) 23:33, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:21, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. G I Chandor (talk) 23:34, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:21, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в авторстве: http://nbahob.ru/en/page/about, а также разрешение, размер, данные о камере -- Tomasina (talk) 15:07, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Поясните, что означает замечание "...а также разрешение, размер, данные о камере"? --Ingvar rr (talk) 08:44, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    • Вы утверждаете, что этот портрет снимали Вы, и файл загружен Вами с оригинала, а не с сайта художника? ---- Tomasina (talk) 19:31, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
      • Это была ошибка, изображение загружено с сайта художника. Автор фотографии сам художник. В настоящее время получено разрешение на распространение в соответствии с условиями лицензии Cc-by-4.0. Проверить соответствие лицензии источнику можно по следующей ссылке http://nbahob.ru/ru/page/copyright

Kept: license information added. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:21, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Лицензия не соответствует источнику. -- Tomasina (talk) 15:08, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: license information added. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:18, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Лицензия не соответствует источнику. -- Tomasina (talk) 15:08, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: license information added. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:18, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Лицензия не соответствует источнику. -- Tomasina (talk) 15:08, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: license information added. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:18, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Лицензия не соответствует источнику. -- Tomasina (talk) 15:08, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: license information added. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:19, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Лицензия не соответствует источнику. -- Tomasina (talk) 15:09, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: license information added. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:19, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Лицензия не соответствует источнику. -- Tomasina (talk) 15:09, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: license information added. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:20, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Лицензия не соответствует источнику. -- Tomasina (talk) 15:09, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: license information added. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:20, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Лицензия не соответствует источнику. -- Tomasina (talk) 15:09, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: license information added. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:20, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Лицензия не соответствует источнику. -- Tomasina (talk) 15:09, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: license information added. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:19, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Лицензия не соответствует источнику. -- Tomasina (talk) 15:09, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: license information added. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:19, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 18:34, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:25, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader requested. I have uploaded a new more accurate version under File:SADC road sign W206.svg. Fry1989 eh? 01:04, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:55, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader requested. I have uploaded a new more accurate version under File:SADC road sign W207.svg. Fry1989 eh? 01:05, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:55, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Better version available (by the same uploader): File:Portail des relations franco-polonaises.JPG. --XXN, 11:56, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:55, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation http://www.uni-stuttgart.de/forschung-leben/forschung-persoenlich/persoenlich_artikel0009.html Frze > talk 12:52, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:56, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Obemat (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused figurative drawings, vector version available (by the same uploader): File:Atalanta 2-4.svg.

--XXN, 14:48, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:57, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrightable poster (tJosve05a (c) 17:50, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:58, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No idea where this image originates but it's widely available on the web at higher resolution: http://www.arrakeen.ch/hungary/085%20%20Keszthely%20castle.jpg Ytoyoda (talk) 18:36, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:58, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurry and backlighted, many better pictures at Category:Cathedral of Puebla. Gauss (talk) 18:40, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:58, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no referenciado Comarka (talk) 18:48, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:58, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No referenciado y ficticio Don Jose Bernal (talk) 18:57, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:58, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Part of mass upload, unremarkable greenery, no educational value, many better pictures of forests in Category:Brompton, Quebec P 1 9 9   17:03, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 15:56, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too complex logo to be under a free license (see en:File:FC Augsburg logo.svg). Bloody-libu (talk) 18:29, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 16:01, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams (taken with Nokia C3) of rather poor quality, obviously randomly taken from car/bus etc, doubtful educational usefulness, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 19:25, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 16:02, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplication of File:מגדל בר כוכבא BBC בני ברק.jpg in lower qulaity. Ldorfman (talk) 13:07, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: highest resolution available Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:04, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Part of mass upload, utterly unremarkable greenery, no educational value P 1 9 9   17:04, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: can't you see the beauty of the Inknow Basement?. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:07, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Part of mass upload, utterly unremarkable foliage/shrubs, no educational value P 1 9 9   17:05, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:07, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Part of mass upload, unusable due to watermarks, and little educational value P 1 9 9   17:06, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:07, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unklare Bildrechte, die im Nachhinein kaum geändert werden können Molgreen (Diskussion) 17:30, 24 January 2017 (UTC) Molgreen (talk) 17:40, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, also out of scope. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:08, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unklare Bildrechte, die im Nachhinein kaum geändert werden können Molgreen (Diskussion) 17:35, 24 January 2017 (UTC) Molgreen (talk) 17:43, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, also out of scope. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:08, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Josve05a as no permission (No permission since)

  • This file is form 207. It is missing a license review or OTRS, and the webpage does not mention Creative Commons ShareAlike 1.0.

If this file is deleted, please edit or delete File:2007-I-uncat.png. (tJosve05a (c) 18:11, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:09, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo of a company. Not in use. From user with one edit. I believe, from some deleted article. Out of SCOPE. Shakko (talk) 19:11, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:09, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams of rather poor quality, small-sized, imho randomly taken from car/bus etc, doubtful educational usefulness, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons ? Roland zh (talk) 19:28, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: georefed location, usable quality. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:10, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams of poor quality, hence, missing educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 19:30, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:10, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

as per File:Pothundi Dam - panoramio (2).jpg (quite the same pix), mass-upload of panoramio streams of rather poor quality, small-sized, imho randomly taken from car/bus etc, doubtful educational usefulness, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, hence also out of scope Wikimedia Commons ? Roland zh (talk) 19:32, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: georefed location, usable quality. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:10, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of 2011 panoramio streams of rather poor quality, obviously randomly taken from car/bus etc, doubtful educational usefulness, file alsot not in use at Wikimedia projects, hence, out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 19:34, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: georefed location, usable quality. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:11, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of 2011 panoramio streams of poor quality, obviously randomly taken from car/bus etc, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons, and, file not in use at Wikimedia projects - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 19:38, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: georefed location, usable quality. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:11, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of 2011 panoramio streams of poor quality, obviously randomly taken from car/bus etc, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons, and, file not in use at Wikimedia projects - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 19:42, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:11, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of 2011 panoramio streams of poor quality, obviously randomly taken from car/bus etc, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons, and, file not in use at Wikimedia projects - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 19:44, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: too foggy to see anything. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:11, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of 2011 panoramio streams of rather poor quality, obviously randomly taken from car/bus etc, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons, and, file not in use at Wikimedia projects - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 19:45, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: too foggy. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:12, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of 2011 panoramio streams of poor quality, obviously randomly taken from car/bus etc, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons, and, file not in use at Wikimedia projects - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 19:50, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:12, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of 2011 panoramio streams of poor quality, obviously randomly taken from car/bus etc, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons, and, file not in use at Wikimedia projects - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 19:51, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:12, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of 2011 panoramio streams, small-sized and (rather) poor quality, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons, and, file not in use at Wikimedia projects ? Roland zh (talk) 19:52, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:12, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of 2011 panoramio streams, small-sized and of poor quality, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons, and, file not in use at Wikimedia projects - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 19:54, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:12, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of 2011 panoramio streams, small-sized and of (rather) poor quality, obviously randomly taken from car/bus etc, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons, and, file not in use at Wikimedia projects - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 20:00, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: georefed location, usable quality. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:12, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of 2011 panoramio streams, small-sized and of poor quality, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons, and, file not in use at Wikimedia projects ? Roland zh (talk) 20:02, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:13, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload panoramio streams, small-sized and of poor quality, obviously randomly taken from car/bus etc, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons, and, file not in use at Wikimedia projects - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 20:05, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:16, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload panoramio streams, small-sized and of poor quality, obviously randomly taken from car/bus etc, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons, and, file not in use at Wikimedia projects - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 20:05, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:16, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload panoramio streams, small-sized and of poor quality, obviously randomly taken from car/bus etc, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons, and, file not in use at Wikimedia projects - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 20:05, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:18, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload panoramio streams, small-sized and of poor quality, obviously randomly taken from car/bus etc, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons, and, file not in use at Wikimedia projects - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 20:05, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:18, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload panoramio streams, small-sized and of poor quality (for instance, out of focus), hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons, and, file not in use at Wikimedia projects - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 20:06, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:18, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload panoramio streams, rather small-sized and of poor quality, obviously randomly taken from car/bus etc, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons, and, file not in use at Wikimedia projects - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 20:08, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:18, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload panoramio streams, small-sized and of poor quality, and also 'big-tagged', obviously randomly taken from car/bus etc, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons, and, file not in use at Wikimedia projects - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 20:08, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:19, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload panoramio streams, water-marked, rather small-sized and of poor quality, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons, and, file not in use at Wikimedia projects ? Roland zh (talk) 20:11, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:19, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This artwork is the sculpture of a giant blue whale created by Marlise Simons in december 2015. But there is No Fop in France Tangopaso (talk) 20:11, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:19, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This artwork is the sculpture of a giant blue whale created by Marlise Simons in december 2015. But there is No Fop in France Tangopaso (talk) 20:11, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:19, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload panoramio streams, tagged by potentially photographer, as well as rather small-sized and of poor quality, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons, and, file not in use at Wikimedia projects - other opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 20:12, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:19, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This artwork is the sculpture of a giant blue whale created by Marlise Simons in december 2015. But there is No Fop in France Tangopaso (talk) 20:13, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:19, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This artwork is the sculpture of a giant blue whale created by Marlise Simons in december 2015. But there is No Fop in France Tangopaso (talk) 20:14, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:19, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This artwork is the sculpture of a giant blue whale created by Marlise Simons in december 2015. But there is No Fop in France Tangopaso (talk) 20:14, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:19, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This artwork is the sculpture of a giant blue whale created by Marlise Simons in december 2015. But there is No Fop in France Tangopaso (talk) 20:15, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:19, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload panoramio streams, out of a series of tagged upload, rather small-sized and of poor quality, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons, and, file not in use at Wikimedia projects - other opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 20:16, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:20, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload panoramio streams, out of a series of tagged upload, rather small-sized and of poor quality, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons, and, file not in use at Wikimedia projects - other opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 20:16, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:20, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no EXIF data, http://imgur.com/zuYxbDQ Yann (talk) 20:24, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: looking at the user's other uploads, it looks suspiciously like a copyvio. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:21, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio 2011 streams, small-sized and of poor quality, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 20:28, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:27, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio 2011 streams, small-sized and of poor quality, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 20:30, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: georefed location, usable quality. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:27, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio 2011 streams, small-sized and of poor quality, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 20:32, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:28, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of 2011 panoramio streams, small sized and of poor quality, hence, doubtful educational usefulness, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 20:38, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:28, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doesn't qualify as PD-textlogo. Logo of a company. DatGuy (talk) 19:45, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:24, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1947. Jcb (talk) 23:12, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:25, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]