User talk:Lacrymocéphale

(Untitled/Claude6888)

Bonjour, il n'y a aucun droit d'auteur sur cette photo ; elle a été fournie par l'auteur et est utilisable par tous ceux qui le veulent. Cordialement, --Claude6888 (talk) 14:34, 22 February 2014 (UTC)claude6888

COM:DR/ADCIS

See the deletion request; the uploader has provided evidence that he has the right to release all of these images. Would you mind withdrawing the request? Nyttend (talk) 14:14, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

@Nyttend: I'm really surprised by a company placing its corporate logo under cc-by-sa-4.0. It sounds like they don't know exactly what they're doing. However, I've deleted the banners on File:AphelionApplication44.jpg and File:ADCISOfficeSCThumb.png. What elese I got to do to withdraw the request? --Lacrymocéphale (talk) 14:38, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

I too was surprised. Just asking that you add a statement to the DR saying basically "since copyright's cleared up, I withdraw this request". Of course, if you don't want to withdraw, that's different. Nyttend (talk) 15:01, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

@Nyttend: I talked to Damien ELIE about the free corporate logos. He may move them to fr.wikipedia.org and just keep illustrations on Commons. I'll update the request after his feedback. Thank you. --Lacrymocéphale (talk) 16:50, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

You're welcome, and of course I'll be happy to use admin tools if you or he ask me to; just let me know what's needed. Nyttend (talk) 16:53, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

(Untitled/MehrdadFR)

Hi, I saw your map request. Unfortunately I don't know how to fix SVG files. Do you know anyone? --MehrdadFR (talk) 21:18, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

File:Discrimination against atheists.png - this map is more comprehensive then others because beside death penalty it shows discriminatory laws also. In case of Iran it's correct and I can confirm it because according to the Constitution of Iran (article 115) president must be a believer (quote: ييس جمهور بايد از ميان رجال مذهبي و سياسي كه واجد شرايط زير باشند انتخاب گردد). --MehrdadFR (talk) 02:05, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Lavatory Service

Hello, Lacrymocéphale !

I own all the rights to these pictures, please cancel your deletion request. This is my one-man music project. I'm creating the WIKI page for it.

I'm talking about these:

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Lavatory-service-preview-2.png https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:LS_logo_and_the_name.png https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Lavatory-service-preview-_medium.png

Hi @SadigAlizada:

So, every one can freely use your band logo? You confirm you're statement File:Lavatory-service-preview-_medium.png#Licensing "You are free:

• to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
• to remix – to adapt the work"?

If so, do it on the deletion request. If there is effectively no problem, my request will be rejected.

And why uploading it several times?

For the wiki, be sure your band matchs w:WP:BAND.

Regards, --Lacrymocéphale (talk) 08:48, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

(Untitled/Charleywoltynski)

Hi there, please can you help me delete my picture I uploaded by accident?

Many thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Charleywoltynski (talk • contribs) 29 avril 2016 à 14:13‎ (UTC)

@Charleywoltynski: I've already asked for deletion and it will be deleted. Just be patient. Regards, --Lacrymocéphale (talk) 14:16, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Many thanks. Will the other picture be deleted also? If not, do you know how I can? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Charleywoltynski (talk • contribs) 29 avril 2016 à 14:17‎‎ (UTC)

@Charleywoltynski: Both have been nominated for deletion (wrong author and maybe copyright infringement) --Lacrymocéphale (talk) 14:23, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Thankyou, so they will no longer appear in my uploads? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Charleywoltynski (talk • contribs) 29 avril 2016 à 14:25 (UTC)

@Charleywoltynski: No, they won't appears anymore. That's what deleted means. --Lacrymocéphale (talk) 14:28, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Photo Burton

The picture of J-D Burton owned by the J-D Burton who approves its publication on Wikipedia! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hdh.gfi (talk • contribs) 14:48, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

@Hdh.gfi: Bonjour. Pouvez-vous, s'il vous plait, suivre la procédure Commons:OTRS/fr#Quand dois-je envoyer un courriel sur OTRS ? « Je ne suis pas l'auteur de l'image que je souhaite importer, mais j'ai reçu l'autorisation de son auteur » ? Merci. Cordialement, --Lacrymocéphale (talk) 15:52, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

(Untitled/Bullyboyskartel)

Bonjour a vous, je précise être l'auteur de ce cliché, ainsi que le propriétaire du chien en question !! Il est par ailleurs un très bon représentant de la race. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bullyboyskartel (talk • contribs) 17 mai 2016 à 11:32 (UTC196496909)

Bonjour @Bullyboyskartel:

Alors il faut suivre l'instruction Commons:OTRS/fr#Quand dois-je envoyer un courriel sur OTRS ? « Je suis l'auteur de l'image que je souhaite importer (ou son ayant-droit), mais elle a été publiée auparavant ».

Cordialement, --Lacrymocéphale (talk) 12:11, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

EDA logo

Dear Lacrymocéphale,

EDA owns all the rights to the EDA logo picture that was uploaded in Wikicommons, could you please cancel your deletion request ?

Thank you.

Dairyanton — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dairyanton (talk • contribs) 08:00, 07 July 2016 (UTC)

@Dairyanton:

EDA says that nobody can't use the logo without asking (http://www.eda2016.eu/fr/mentions-legales/). Commons says everyone can use it without asking. This is an inacceptable trap. If EDA want to have their Logo on Commons, EDA must change the licence of its logo to a licence compatible with Commons one and declare copyleft-like licence on http://www.eda2016.eu/fr/mentions-legales/ instead of the absolute contrary.

Owning means nothing: Commons is about giving freely.

Regards, --Lacrymocéphale (talk) 08:24, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

File:Logo GSLC.jpg et File:Benjamin Faleyras.jpg

Bonjour, Les deux images que j'ai mises sur le site pour illustrer mon article sont refusées car sur le site www.gospelsurlacolline.com La société gospel sur la Colline est propriétaire de ces images mais tout le monde peut les utiliser. J'ai regardé sur tous les articles d'explication mais je n'arrive pas à savoir quoi faire et quoi mettre sur les images pour pouvoir les garder. Comment faire ? Merci --Apolline FORT (talk) 12:48, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

Bonjour @Apolline FORT:

Il faut vraisemblablement suivre Commons:OTRS/fr#Quand dois-je envoyer un courriel sur OTRS ? si vous êtes dans un des deux premiers cas "j'ai reçu l'autorisation" ou "Je suis l'auteur". Sinon, elles ne pourrons être conservées.

Cordialement, --Lacrymocéphale (talk) 12:57, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

FIL world cup logo

Hi Lacrymocéphale, You appear to be blocking me uploading and updated logo for the 2019 FIL Rathbones Women's World Cup Lacrosse. I am part of the team supporting this event and if you look the new logo is simply an updated version of the original as the Sponsor, Rathbones, has updated its typography. You can contact me directly at giles.clark@2017worldlacrosse.com, if you have any further queries. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gileslax (talk • contribs) 13:06, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Hi @Gileslax: Please follow the instructions on COM:OTRS. Regards, --Lacrymocéphale (talk) 10:37, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

undeletion request

Hello, Lacrymocéphale ! I will excuse your French if you excuse my computer! I sent a bulk of photos of his works, copyrighted, by artist Carroll N. Jones. McCauls Florist was deleted. He has given me permission for all .jpg's he has sent to me over the years. The ticket number is [Ticket#2016012410007425] and I am preparing an email. It has been a long time since I last did this, and have forgotten some steps, I'm sure.

Thank you! Rose — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jrbwalk (talk • contribs) 00:01, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

oops...testing, testing

I'm sure I have used improper protocol. Sure as I am a newbie. But I am learning, thanks. jrbwalk (talk) 00:03, 26 July 2016 (UTC)jrbwalk

Hi @Jrbwalk:

Actually the main problem (from my point of view) is the apparent contradiction between

• "Source All are copyrighted materials of Carroll Jones III" and
• "This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license." (aka CC BY-SA 4.0)

You should also be aware of what it means for an artist to have is work placed under a licence such as CC BY-SA 4.0, maybe a loss of profit.

I'll ask for help later.

Regards, --Lacrymocéphale (talk) 10:57, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

File:CNNPH Network News logo.jpg

I mainly concern to you to why you delete the upload photo relevant to the article of this picture! so please gave me 5 reasons to you to block this upload photo and why is this important to me to make it non copyright upload, I'm sure that you understand my concern ang talk to me sometimes for more information that i make to not violate any wikimedia article rights

Thank you for concern! Pat — Preceding unsigned comment added by patpart1 (talk • contribs) 10:41, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

@Patpart1:

1. I didn't delete it. I ask for deletion and the deletion was confirmed and executed by Storkk
2. 5 reasons? 1 reason is enough: Copyright infringement. Trademark logos are copyrighted and can't be uploaded on Commons. See COM:Licensing and COM:Fair use.
3. You can upload them directly on the concerned Wikipedia if fair use is available there.

Regards --Lacrymocéphale (talk) 10:52, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

@Lacrymocéphale please gave me the Storkk talk page to gave his/her reason to why i voluntarly delete my picture File:CNNPH Network News logo.jpg on wikimedia . I hope that you understand me in my concern and thank you for giving me reason even though 1 reason only you gave and i appreciate your information you given to me

Regards -- User:patpart1 — Preceding unsigned comment added by patpart1 (talk • contribs) 11:08 AM, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

@Patpart1: We do not allow fair use claims for images on Commons, so can only accept images that are freely licensed. This obviously is not, and so you violated CNN's copyright. Please read and understand our licensing policy before uploading anything further. Failure to abide by it will result in you being blocked. Storkk (talk) 11:30, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

@Lacrymocéphale Thank you for youy concern about fair use ,but i matter of fact my photo is used with permission and CNN copyright is not included on this picture because this is fair used with permission from 9 Media Corp(who take respond to CNN PH) i wish t5hat you will not blocked my upload picture ,thanks! Regards -- User:patpart1 — Preceding unsigned comment added by patpart1 (talk • contribs) 11:00 AM, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

@Patpar1: please read COM:FAIRUSE: faire use is not allowed on Commons. It can be on some Wikipedia (not all) and the logo can be uploaded directly on a Wikipedia allowing it, like https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Non-free_content --Lacrymocéphale (talk) 11:14, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

WWA Logo

Hi @ThemeParkFan1988b:

Here, you're on Wikimedia Commons, not on Wikipedia. This rules from Wikipedia can't be used on Wikimedia Commons. There is no faire use on Wikimedia Commons.

Regards, --Lacrymocéphale (talk) 14:36, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

undeletion requests

Dear Lacrymocéphale I shot the following images and absolutely own the right to give to Wikipedia, I appreciate your understanding for the following images. Thanks João

— Preceding unsigned comment added by J.barbosa (talk • contribs) 06:31, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

Droits

I have granted rollback rights to your account; the reason for this is that after a review of some of your contributions, I believe I can trust you to use rollback correctly by using it for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Commons:Rollback. If you do not want rollback, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck and thanks. Thibaut120094 (talk) 02:03, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

@Thibaut120094: Merci, cela devrait me servir pour les fois où il faut annuler le robot qui attribue les messages non-signés avant de pouvoir annuler le vandale/spammer lui-même. --Lacrymocéphale (talk) 02:21, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

Suppression divers médias (v.Derreck)

Bonjour, j'apprécie grandement votre vigilance, vous pouvez en être certain. Mais j'apprécierai au préalable que vous me consultiez avant d'agir de façon irréversible sur ma contribution, il faut savoir que ces actes ont une répercussion sur d'autres utilisations des images. De plus je sais lire et si je stipule que ces images sont libres de droits c'est bien évidemment que c'est vrai. Et j'aimerais que vous justifier vos sources de doutes au préalable avant de m'obliger à recommencer mon travail de partage. Cordialement v.Derreck — Preceding unsigned comment added by V.derreck (talk • contribs) 10:21, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

Bonjour @V.derreck:

http://www.patriciakaas.nl/img/tours/Carnets/Band.png de http://www.patriciakaas.nl/tourcarnets.php ne semble pas libre de droit ("© Patricia Kaas Forever") et n'est pas clairement de vous. Si vous en êtes l'auteur, vous devez suivre les instructions de COM:OTRS.

Ce fichier a été proposé à la suppression le 10 août. Vous pouviez en discuter sur le moment. Wikimedia Commons ne conserve par contre pas 12 jours un fichier potentiellement violant un copyright.

Cordialement, --Lacrymocéphale (talk) 10:32, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

@-Lacrymocéphale:

Effectivement je comprends votre réticence, malheureusement il faut savoir que le copyrighte déposé sur le http://www.patriciakaas.nl/tourcarnets.php n'est pas réellement en droit de privilégier cette image précise elle a été réalisée par un membre de l'équipe, mise appart ça l'un des membres de cette photo ma stipulé par courrier et en communication direct que cette image ne leur appartiens en aucun cas elle tombe directement dans le domaine public comme toutes photos pouvant être réalisé par un fan.

De plus il faut préciser qu'aucune mention légale n'est mentionnée sur le site, il ne renvoie à aucun organisme professionnel, l'auteur du site lui-même étant "Johanna Ouwerling" rédactrice de http://www.libralion.com/index.php n'est pas graphiste professionnel et ou encore aucune mention professionnelle n'est indiquée.

Donc je suis en droit d'utiliser tout élément que ce site fournit.

En bref cette image n'est revendiquée par personne, une personne étant présente sur cette image et plus en droite de m'autoriser à l'utiliser que tout utilisateur actuel sur le web — Preceding unsigned comment added by V.derreck (talk • contribs) 11:15, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

@V.derreck:

1. Les droits d'une photo par une personne A d'une personne B n'appartient pas à B mais à A. B n'a que le droit de faire interdire l'image.
2. Quand il n'y a pas de mention légale, la mention légale par défaut est le copyright total.
3. COM:PCP

Je vais aller vérifier "elle tombe directement dans le domaine public comme toutes photos pouvant être réalisé par un fan" même s'il n'y a pas de preuve concrète que c'est la photo d'un fan.

Cordialement, --Lacrymocéphale (talk) 12:09, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

@V.derreck: aucune loi ne semble aller dans le sens de l'affirmation "elle tombe directement dans le domaine public comme toutes photos pouvant être réalisé par un fan". Il faut bien une autorisation du propriétaire des droits de la photo (son auteur en l'absence d'une transmission officiel de ses droits). --Lacrymocéphale (talk) 13:38, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

@Lacrymocéphale:

Et dans le cas ou une personne présente sur cette image m'autorise à la diffuser librement elle à entièrement le droit d'exercer son droit à l'image, je crois que c'est un droit absolu !, mais dans ce cas comment cela ce passe?

Cordialement, --V.Derreck — Preceding unsigned comment added by V.derreck (talk • contribs) 14:41, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

@V.derreck: Son droit à l'image se limite à pouvoir interdire la diffusion de l'image, il ne permet ni de pouvoir diffuser l'image à la place de l'auteur de l'image, ni de changer à sa guise la licence choisie par l'auteur. — cf. https://www.service-public.fr/particuliers/vosdroits/F32103 --Lacrymocéphale (talk) 14:49, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

@Lacrymocéphale:

Vraiment ce n'est pas pour débattre, mais cette article n'est pas très précis . ici plus de détail http://www.e-juristes.org/le-droit-a-l-image-des-personnes/, et je crois que dans tous les cas cela touche le droit à l'information étant donné que cette photo à était prise l'ors d'un événement comme l'indique la légende, j'aurais du y penser plus tôt. Cordialement V.Derreck — Preceding unsigned comment added by V.derreck (talk • contribs) 15:01, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

@V.derreck: Je ne vois pas en quoi le droit à l'information autorise à utiliser les photos appartenant à quelqu'un d'autre. --Lacrymocéphale (talk) 15:09, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

PS : apprenez à signer correctement s'il vous plait : User talk:V.derreck#Please sign your postings.

@Lacrymocéphale:

j'en prend bonne note. et bien c'est écrit noir sur blanc "Le droit à l’information autorise la publication d’images de personnes impliquées dans un événement" donc vraiment désolé mais cette acharnement ma bien assez suffit. Etant donné que cette élément est une photo prise par un tiers, jusqu’à preuve du contraire lors d'un événement public "un concert" dans le-quelle figure une et j'ajouterai même plusieurs personne dans cette image m'autorisant à la diffuser librement, et que jusqu’à présent elle n’appartiens à personne, désolé mais très sincèrement si il y à un problème j'en prend l’entière responsabilité. et vous m'excuserai mais j'ai franchement d'autres choses à faire que débattre avec vous, à ce niveau c'est de l'acharnement, rien n'est en votre faveur pour vous autoriser à refuser cette publication. Et sauf preuve du contraire dont vous ne disposez pas, j'ai tout les droits de mener à bien cette entreprise. Et si vous n'avez aucune réel preuve pour m'indiquer que je déblatère des bêtises, et croyez moi j'ai d'autres préoccupations que celle-ci , j’apprécierai assez d'en arrêter là et de stopper cette abus Cordialement V.Derreck --V.derreck (talk) 17:04, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

@V.derreck:

"Le droit à l’information autorise la publication d’images de personnes impliquées dans un événement"

Je ne vois rien là-dedans permettant de disposer des photos prises par les autres. Les photographes ne pourraient plus bosser qu'en studio alors ? L'image appartient au "tiers". Et ce n'est pas une image du concert mais une pose devant un rideau de fer non identifié.

COM:PCP toujours, vous ne pouvez pas prendre l'entière responsabilité puisque vous mettez en jeu les responsabilités de Wikimedia Commons et de tout ceux qui réutiliseraient l'image en suivant de bonne foi votre déclaration.

De toute manière, ce n'est pas moi qui efface les images et il y a une contre-expertise à ce moment là.

--Lacrymocéphale (talk) 17:25, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

@Lacrymocéphale:

Très bien dans ce cas l'image tombe dans l'oublie étant donné que personne ne peut apparemment justifier correctement de l'utiliser ?--V.derreck (talk) 17:41, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

@V.derreck:

Bonjour, je me permets d'intervenir. Par défaut, toute œuvre est protégée par le droit d'auteur classique, c'est-à-dire qu'on ne peut réutiliser une photo sans l'accord de son auteur. Voilà pourquoi existe les licences libres (Creative Commons, etc.) où l'auteur accepte que son œuvre soit réutilisée sans qu'on le contacte.

Il est donc illégale de réutiliser une photo trouvée sur le web si le site ne mentionne pas explicitement le contraire. Bien sûr, les particuliers ne courent aucun risque, mais Wikimedia Commons respecte la loi. La photo doit donc explicitement être placée sous une licence libre ou être dans le domaine public (son auteur doit être mort depuis plus de 70 ans).

Le droit à l'image n'a rien à voir avec le droit d'auteur / copyright mais est destiné à protéger la vie privée. Sauf exception, chaque personne a droit au respect de sa vie privée. Cf paparazzi, etc. Dans certains cas, le respect à la vie privée est mis de côté par les tribunaux parce que le droit à l'information l'emporte (photo de meeting politique, photo d'attentats, etc.). Mais faut dans tous les cas respecter le droit d'auteur.

Voilà, j'espère avoir été clair.

Du coup ce n'est pas simple d'illustrer tout une série d'article de Wikipédia car bien souvent faut faire soi même les photos. Pyb (talk) 03:37, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

KonaKart Wikipedia page

Thew new "swirl" logo has been loaded and is visible on the page at the moment. This is the one we want. The other one with the palm tree is the old one and no longer required.

About the references that you previously removed because you saw no reference to "KonaKart" on those pages. It's normal for the users of the KonaKart software not to show the word "KonaKart" anywhere on their sites. They are free to do that. The references were examples of what users of the software have done.

I'm sorry I don't know all the rules of Wikipedia. We are trying to conform but it's not always easy to know what to do.

I'm not even sure if this is the correct way to send you a message so please accept my apologies if this isn't the right way. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Janehearne (talk • contribs) 10:26, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

Copyright violations

Hello,

I saw your message that I have uploaded image several times and made copyright violation,

The image I am trying to upload belongs to us (Al Maskari Holding), I am giving reference of our website as a source and author the same company, still editors are rejecting it.

For me this is not understandable, you are trying to make wikipedia difficult for general contrubuters.

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zulqarnain.khan (talk • contribs) 10:22, 08 September 2016 (UTC)

@Zulqarnain.khan:

1. Here, you're not on Wikipedia, you're on Wikimedia Commons.
2. Every one can create an account and claim to be someone else. If you are who you claim to be, you got to prove it by following COM:OTRS instructions.
3. Sorry to protect your work. Thank you to not using Wikipedia and Wikimedia Commons to promote yourself.

Sincerely, --Lacrymocéphale (talk) 10:39, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

Hebrew Pixar logos

Hello, i wantd to ask why the pixar logos in hebrew are having problems. Theare no problem with the english one. Goodman13 (talk) 14:05, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

@Goodman13: Because they're hosted directly on en.wikipedia.org which hollow fair use (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:FAIRUSE). Wikimedia Commons does not hollow fair use (see COM:FAIRUSE). As an example, you can look at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Cars_2006.jpg --Lacrymocéphale (talk) 14:15, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Undeletion Request

Hi Lacrymocéphale, What's the problem with the images i upload, I want to know the reason for the deletion of the photos as all the photos i upload are not copyright protected, I want to know the problem so that i can correct it, Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Addytrump (talk • contribs) 11:05, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

@Addytrump:

You gave source that didn't contain the image but said "All right reserved"..

About File:Best Seo Networks.jpeg:

1. High Quality Photos of some Networks used for Social media/Internet Marketing

1. • What http://snapbackmarketing.com/ does here? Is it the source page? If it used on this site which states "Copyright © 2016 Snapback Marketing | All rights reserved.", the image doesn't seems to be un-protected.
2. The image can be found on several websites and, in particular, on http://www.botsume.com/img/getsocial.jpeg with the exact same dimensions (5,565 × 3,710 pixels). And Botsume states "Copyright © CollegeHaxcess, LLC 2016". The image doesn't seem un-protected.
   • As it used on several websites under several copyrights, as you said that you're the author, you have to prove that your the real author via COM:OTRS.
3. This image contains copyrighted logos and may not match COM:DERIV.
4. Is the image useful for the project? Actually, there are used. Why do you upload images to not use them on, as an exemple, a Wikipedia?

Sincerely, --Lacrymocéphale (talk) 12:21, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

Jack Holmes' illustrations

Hi, twitter user @jackhoimes had given my full authorisation to use these images in the article. If you would like proof, please send a tweet to him where he can confirm this.

Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Davidmarshall682 (talk • contribs) 22:35, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

@Davidmarshall682: Sorry but this your job to prove that you receive this authorisation by following COM:OTRS instructions. And does he know that he lost all rights on his images because you put them in the public domain? This got to be in the authorisation too. --Lacrymocéphale (talk) 22:39, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

I doubt it is allowed for me to leak private Twitter messages to a public page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Davidmarshall682 (talk • contribs) 22:41, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

That's why you must follow COM:OTRS instruction. --Lacrymocéphale (talk) 22:43, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Please see also File:Jack Holmes signature.png. Be advised that this Jack Holmes fella is a minor according to this. I doubt (altho not that familiar with British law on the subject) he has the legal standing to release anything. I have no idea how to contact oversite on commons but that whole page with his signature should IMO be speedy deleted and oversighted. Thanks. If you need me ping, as I don't watch my talk page on Commons. John from Idegon (talk) 02:45, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

Classic Drummer logo and cover

Hi, Lacrymocephale! Thanks for your concern about the Classic Drummer logo and cover on the Classic Drummer page. Prior to posting, I contacted the editor-in-chief and owner of the publication and copyright, Steve Bryant, and he has given express permission for these to be used. To verify, you can contact him via email (steve@classicdrummer.com) or via the Contact Us page on the official Classic Drummer website (www.classicdrummer.com). I respectfully request that these images, used with express permission, not be deleted.

Thanks! mikewhitaker22 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mikewhitaker22 (talk • contribs) 14:02, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

@Mikewhitaker22: Please, follow COM:OTRS instructions. --Lacrymocéphale (talk) 14:04, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Aide Fiche Anthony Cianni

Bonjour Lacrymocéphale, j'aurais besoin de votre aide pour y voir un peu plus clair, je viens de créer cette fiche sur ce joueur de Beach Soccer et j'ai plusieurs bandeaux qui s'affiche en tête de page et j'aurais aimé comprendre comment y remédier.

Le premier indique : L'admissibilité de cet article est à vérifier (janvier 2017). Motif : Vérifier Projet:Football/Critères d'admissibilité, WP:NPER ou WP:NGEN le second : La mise en forme de cet article est à améliorer (janvier 2017). La mise en forme du texte ne suit pas les recommandations de Wikipédia : il faut le « wikifier ».

Du coup je n'arrive pas à vraiment cibler où se situe les problèmes indiqués.

Concernant ton message vis à vis de la photo que j'ai posté je viens de la supprimer car en effet je l'ai récupérer depuis le site officiel de la Beach Soccer Worldwide mais elle n'était pas libre de droit. Je vais essayer d'en trouver une autre libre cette fois.

Je te remercie en tout cas pour ton aide — Preceding unsigned comment added by SauceChinoise (talk • contribs) 22:08, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

File:Les patriarches latins de Jérusalem entre les rois et les papes, 1099-1190.gif

Salut, on a reçu un ticket OTRS pour ce fichier (et d'autres semblables). Tu te souviens pourquoi tu l'avais marqué comme "missing permission"? --Ruthven (msg) 13:54, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

Bonsoir @Ruthven:

De mémoire, et, en regardant Special:Contributions/SireFlo et fr:Discussion utilisateur:SireFlo#Wikimedia Commons, je crois que ce fichier là avait une cartouche avec le nom de l'illustrateur (Florian Besson) et une date (2015) trop récente pour Public Domain. J'ai dû me dire qu'il fallait vérifier que l'uploader est bien celui qui a produit et signé l'image.

Visiblement, je ne suis pas allé au bout de l'idée dont je lui fait part à un moment sur ma page de discussion wikifr : je n'ai pas suivi COM:GOODFAITH, retiré le bandeau "missing permission" et assumé que SireFlo était vraisemblablement ce Florian Besson ; peut-être au nom de COM:PRP. Je suis désolé de ne pas avoir été plus cool avec lui et, par cascade, avec les gens d'OTRS.

Cordialement, --Lacrymocéphale (talk) 20:29, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

Pas de soucis. Juste pour être sûr que si on a une trace écrite d'autorisation à OTRS, ce ne serait pas un problème pour toi si on récupérait les fichiers. Je n'ai d'ailleurs pas trouvé d'images semblables sur le Net. --Ruthven (msg) 21:48, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

Open Source 2.0

Please decline two of these deletion there is no copyright infringements on these. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Open Source 2.0 (talk • contribs) 10:37, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

@Open Source 2.0: You are not the author or copyright holder of those packshots. And you find them on Internet. COM:NETCOPYRIGHT and COM:PRP. --Lacrymocéphale (talk) 10:45, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

Files deleted, warning issued to user. Report and tagging was completely right.  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:19, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

Usunięcie loga TPZ

Za przeproszeniem, Pana zachowanie jest niedopuszczalne. Jakim prawem zgłasza Pan logo organizacji społecznej z innego kraju do usunięcia? Za koga się Pan uważa, żeby usuwać logo do którego mam pełne prawa? Czy mam tak samo zgłaszać wszystkie loga z Marianną w Panu kraju? Żądam natychmiastowego przywrócenia loga Towarzystwa Przyjaciół Ząbek. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kamil.napoleone (talk • contribs) 22:36, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

Your VFC installation method is deprecated

Hello Lacrymocéphale, we are aware that using the old installation method of VFC (via common.js, which you are using) may not work reliably anymore and can break other scripts as well. A detailed explanation can be found here. Important: To prevent problems please remove the old VFC installation code from your common.js and instead enable the VFC gadget in your preferences. Thanks! --VFC devs (q) 16:24, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

File:Michel Temer Oficial.jpg

Bom dia, senhor!

Quero a autorização de vossa senhoria para inserção da foto oficial do Presidente Michel Temer (Brasil); a imagem se trata de um ato oficial que cai em domínio público conforme disposto em lei.

Inclusive já possui uma template no Wikimedia Commons a respeito do assunto proposto. {{PD-BrazilGov}}

Essa é a segunda foto; e a oficial. A primeira havia sido deletada por que não era oficial sim preliminar. Esta que carreguei é oficial conforme lei a abaixo:

LEI Nº 9.610, DE 19 DE FEVEREIRO DE 1998.

Art. 8º Não são objeto de proteção como direitos autorais de que trata esta Lei:

I - as idéias, procedimentos normativos, sistemas, métodos, projetos ou conceitos matemáticos como tais;

II - os esquemas, planos ou regras para realizar atos mentais, jogos ou negócios;

III - os formulários em branco para serem preenchidos por qualquer tipo de informação, científica ou não, e suas instruções;

IV - os textos de tratados ou convenções, leis, decretos, regulamentos, decisões judiciais e demais atos oficiais;

V - as informações de uso comum tais como calendários, agendas, cadastros ou legendas;

VI - os nomes e títulos isolados;

VII - o aproveitamento industrial ou comercial das idéias contidas nas obras.

Usuário:Expert Brasil (Conversa) 9:17 AM 19 de Julho de 2017 (UTC)

@Expert Brasil: So, why did you start with a fake description, you as the author and a CC BY-SA 4.0 license? --Lacrymocéphale (talk) 09:36, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

Lacrymocéphale vous validez que le fichier soit libre ? --Panam2014 (talk) 11:39, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

@Panam2014: Sans être spécialiste, je ne suis pas convaincu que ce soit dans le domaine publique. Tous les éléments avancés par Expert Brasil parlent soit de textes mais pas d'images soit d'éléments publiés avant 1983. De mon point de vue, il y a toujours soit une violation de copyright soit une erreur de license. --Lacrymocéphale (talk) 12:21, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

Donc tous les portraits officiels depuis Tancredo Neves sont à supprimer. Mais les fichiers sont là depuis longtemps. --Panam2014 (talk) 12:26, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

Il faudrait demander au Commons:Village pump/Copyright (ou sa version portugais brésilien si elle existe). --Lacrymocéphale (talk) 13:00, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

Thanks...

... for following up on my village pump help request (Andreas Klee file)! --91.34.46.5 20:50, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

Hi once more, since you seem to know what you are doing, would you mind taking a look at another one? I just stumbled across this one which I can hardly imagine to be "own work". Thanks! --91.34.44.147 10:32, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

@91.34.44.147: Effectively, it looks like the scan of a likely copyrighted map. --Lacrymocéphale (talk) 10:57, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

I'm pretty sure that what we can't read at the bottom of the legend is the true author and likely a kind of copyright. But I didn't found out yet what "LGN" could be. --Lacrymocéphale (talk) 11:16, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/ZADNA Board of Directors

"This changes by Naranv juste make ZADNA Board of Directors look like Category:ZADNA Board of Directors. Still no interest in a handmade category-like static page. Seems like we are dealing with newbies not knowing what they're doing."

While not common, it is certainly permitted to have a gallery with the same images as a category. The two have different purposes. I am afraid that your second sentence may be more true of you than of the creator of this gallery.

You might better have noted that all the images were copyvios -- they appear on the ZADNA web site with an explicit copyright notice. It looks like the Flickr page is {{COM:LL|license laundering]].

.     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:09, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

Smart City Magazine

Hello,

I receive this message from you - File:Smart City Magazine, Numărul 2.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content

Please, tell me what you want to send you to prove that this page (cover) is made by me.

Thank you,

Eduard — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eduard Dumitrașcu (talk • contribs) 08:56, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

(Eduard Dumitrașcu (talk) 09:03, 12 December 2017 (UTC))

Hi @Eduard Dumitrașcu: .

You must prove that you own the right of this magazine covers through COM:OTRS.

--Lacrymocéphale (talk) 09:04, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

Styline Press Shot

Hey there, Styline's Press Shot is actually fully licensed - see here: https://djstyline.com/press-shots — Preceding unsigned comment added by Electronicmusicguru (talk • contribs) 08:37, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

Now you know that evidence of permission must be exposed earlier, at creation time. --Lacrymocéphale (talk) 08:42, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

File:Sridevi 2017.jpg

As you may be aware already. The up-loader quickly removed your tag that we need an OTRS for this image. So, I have reinstated your tag. P.g.champion (talk) 18:44, 25 March 2018 (UTC)

File:GROUND 0101 / 0102 / 0103.png

Hello, I see you have made a request for deletion of these 3 files I uploaded. Please don't, they are under my protection and have the proper rights fro publish them. Thanks though... Junidererste (talk)

@Junidererste: Please, prove it by following COM:OTRS instructions as requested. --Lacrymocéphale (talk) 10:14, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

@Lacrymocéphale: Sorry, but I have a life to take care of, I am not here in this page pretending I am an intellectual, i work in an archive, so just take it as it is, the World is not limited to this website, and stop trolling. If I uploaded the pages,, it means I have the right over them, I created them. Thgat'S enough proof and if you want enterteinment, go find a girlfriend. Junidererste (talk) 10:20, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

Heir Apparent (band) Wikipedia page edits

Hi, I'm Terry Gorle, the founding guitarist, owner of the federally registered tradename/trademark of Heir Apparent since 1985, the heirapparent.com web domain since 1998, the publisher Apparently Music, and creator of the band artwork image you flagged as a possible copyright violation. I assure you it is my work. If Wikipedia requires complete documentation of my claims, I would be happy to provide them. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 50.35.111.20 (talk) 23:27, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

@50.35.111.20 and Tgorle:

Please, follow COM:OTRS instructions.

--Lacrymocéphale (talk) 23:31, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

Do not delete photos

You do not have to delete the following images File:Kira Reed.jpg–File:Leah Gotti.jpg They are important for the articles you belong to.Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fata Anik (talk • contribs) 14:18, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

File tagging File:Achilles tendonitis.svg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Achilles tendonitis.svg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

Smooth O (talk) 12:09, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

@Smooth O:

This is a SVG version of File:Achilles tendonitis.jpg taken from the same source page https://www.injurymap.com/free-human-anatomy-illustrations where is declared

You can freely download and use the illustrations for any purpose. All we ask in return is that you include the attribution link on your page when you one of our illustrations. We ask this so that as many people as possible will be able to find this page and help us increase awareness of musculoskeletal pain and injuries.

The illustrations can be downloaded in high-quality .jpg and .svg file formats to suit your specific needs.

See the full license here: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

If this declaration is not enough, you should treat all Special:Contributions/Seb5s march-april files, not only this one.

Kind regards, --Lacrymocéphale (talk) 12:17, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

File:834ff4f6gy1fsoenuugpaj20j60rz7cq.jpg

I think we can use the photo because other users upload the video in youtube.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xqg2MiItlg0 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stevencocoboy (talk • contribs) 07:19, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

@Stevencocoboy:

So many copyright infringements in this video...

Please, read COM:NETCOPYRIGHT. You must check that you are at the right source and that the owner gives the right license. In most case, you can't use image found on the web.

--Lacrymocéphale (talk) 07:27, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

@Lacrymocéphale:

The Commons licensing policy from cosmopolitian HK will be support so that other users can be use the photo.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Stevencocoboy (talk • contribs) 07:39, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

@Stevencocoboy: If you have permission from Cosmopolitian HK, please, provide it by following COM:OTRS instructions. But stop uploading the same images without permission. --Lacrymocéphale (talk) 15:10, 7 July 2018 (UTC)

File tagging File : Maleeka R Ghai.jpg

i have mailed written permission on permissions-commons@wikimedia.org User talk:Rajeevnandeshwar — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rajeevnandeshwar (talk • contribs) 08:34, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

Photo Stephane belgrand Rousson

bonjour Monsieur Lacrymocéphale

vous indiquez dans wiki commons que j'abuse , je me permet juste de vous expliquer que je decouvre wikipedia( depuis une semaine ! ) , en aucun cas je suis la pour abuser de quoi que ce soit. vous meme m avez ecris qu il fallait que je demande pour comprendre tellement il y a de regles à decouvrir, ce que j ai fait en postant la remarque pour savoir comment faire pour retirer la photo du telechargement alors que je ne trouve aucun texte la dessus pour le faire moi meme, ni bouton de suppression. vous pouvez supprimer toutes les photos si cela est necessaire, cela me gene en rien, je suis pas la pour la promo et j'ai eu la chance d avoir eu des centaines d 'article presse papier dans le monde , tv et film et millier d article web. J ai mis les photo pour illustrer le texte et pris soin de mettre des photos non promotionnelle sans publicité ou sponsor dessus. Je suis désolé que cela puisse choquer les wiki, et je m en excuse si vous pensez que j abuse de quoi que ce soit, ce n est en aucun ca ma volontée. Cordialement Stephane Belgrand Rousson --Aeroceanaute (talk) 08:36, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

@Aeroceanaute:

Pour supprimer, je vous ai donné la solution dans https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Aerosail_Monaco.jpg&diff=prev&oldid=315618173 Vous n'avez pas ce bouton ?

Je vous ai déjà parlé de fr:WP:AUTO. Ne participer essentiellement qu'à la page vous concernant n'est pas interdit mais, encore une fois, attention tout de même. Faites profiter Wikipédia de vos connaissances en participant au fr:Projet:Aéronautique, par exemple, au lieu de vous focaliser sur votre personne et vos amis. Et comme nous disons, la preuve de notoriété commence par ne pas avoir besoin de créer soi-même un article sur soi.

--Lacrymocéphale (talk) 09:02, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

Bonjour Lacrymocéphale , oui je veux bien participer au projet Aeronautique, j'ai de nombreux document en matiere de ballons dirigeable et travail sur le vol musculaire ou éolien . laissez moi le temps de comprendre le fonctionnement des divers wiki. Je souhaite partager mon livre, manuel de vol, etc que j'ai redigé afin que la nouvelle génération qui souhaitera faire du vol musculaire puisse beneficier d'une technique acquise si cela interesse les lecteurs du wikipedia.

Cordialement

Stephane --Aeroceanaute (talk) 14:44, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

File:Photo Françoise DUMONT (cropped).png

File:Photo Françoise DUMONT (cropped).png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/855345469379182592/jYyDHLMH_400x400.jpg Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:43, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

J'aurais dû m'en douter. --Lacrymocéphale (talk) 05:18, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Photo Nude Planet.jpg

We sent the commons license today. I will write the article again better. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Raven7777 (talk • contribs) 04:22, 3 October 2018 (UTC)

File:The Evil Marriage Poster.jpg

Hi, the image I uploaded has permission, which I also provided. So why is it still being removed? http://wbjmedia.com/TheEvilMarriage/License.html --Sunny Saab (talk) 14:22, 19 December 2018 (UTC)

I am asking for your help i dont know what i am doing please make me understand

Brother I have the proof that is required saying who they are and pictures of his Consecration and Crowned as a bishop a picture of ordain certificate --Samfisher9532 (talk) 23:11, 23 December 2018 (UTC)

@Samfisher9532:

As already said:

1. Do not call me "brother".
2. Here, this is Wikimedia Commons, there is no article here. Go back to the English Wikipedia to discuss about your editorial problems.

--Lacrymocéphale (talk) 23:16, 23 December 2018 (UTC)

Ok I am trying to figure this out I have proof just bare with me I am sorry I don't know this well I have downloaded where is saying they are an archdiocese and they have a College and Seminary please help me understand Samfisher9532 (talk) 23:22, 23 December 2018 (UTC)go back to English I do now if I can figure it out

what are you talking about I didn't say brother I am confused on what should I do please help me aren't you supposed to help or guide me I never done this before I and you can download off the Government website is for the public to see they are real Samfisher9532 (talk) 23:29, 23 December 2018 (UTC)

You removed the "Brother" here you liar. Do not talk to me again. --Lacrymocéphale (talk) 23:31, 23 December 2018 (UTC)

File:Johann Gutkauf.jpg

Why do you need a permission with a photo was made by the uploader himself? Sorry I don't understand. --K@rl (talk) 12:56, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

@Karl Gruber: Because many if not all of the images Aliens-birthday uploaded can be found on Internet (https://www.facebook.com/Aliens-Birthday-357670004264310/ http://www.johann-gutkauf.at.ua/ etc.), on copyrighted websites or pages which don't give a licence compatible with Wikimedia Commons (COM:NETCOPYRIGHT). We need Aliens-birthday to prove that he didn't pick on the Web but really take those photos himself by following COM:OTRS procedure. Thank you --Lacrymocéphale (talk) 13:06, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

Okay, I understand, many thx and regards K@rl (talk) 13:42, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

File:MirrorKhabar Logo.png why for deletion

this file or logo is created by me why for deletion??? — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 27.34.68.67 (talk) 14:05, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

@27.34.68.67 and Padamraj.joshi: Because you didn't provide any evidence of permission as asked. --Lacrymocéphale (talk) 07:58, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

File:Dominika Sobolska.jpg.

Hi, Thank you for your correction! I'm editing the page of my sister and I got this picture for it. I changed the source, is it correct now? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sobolskam (talk • contribs) 11:10, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

Hi @Sobolskam:

As we can't be sure about who you are, this is not enough. You got to follow COM:OTRS instructions to give proof (privately) that the photographer agrees to license compatible with Wikimedia Commons.

Best regards, --Lacrymocéphale (talk) 12:17, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

Utilisation photo

Bonjour,

Je viens de voir vos alertes concernant les fichiers olivier-saguez.jpg et Portrait-olivier-saguez.jpg. Ces photos n'appartiennent pas au site L'Opinion que vous avez référencé : https://www.lopinion.fr/sites/nb.com/files/styles/w_1000/public/images/2018/10/olivier_saguez_dr.jpg Il s'agit d'une photo appartenant à Olivier Saguez (prise par moi-même) et envoyée à ce média suite à une interview. Le crédit photo indiqué sur ce site est une erreur "© Sipa Press" cette photo ne leur appartient pas. Pourriez-vous m'indiquer comment une photo prise par mes soins puisse être validée par Wikipédia ?

Merci. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cindoustafa (talk • contribs) 09:26, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

Bonjour @Cindoustafa:

Merci de démontrer tout celà aurpès de COM:OTRS.

Cordialement, --Lacrymocéphale (talk) 09:28, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

Delted picture of the article "learning factory"

Hello, Lacrymocéphale!

All pictures I included in this picture are developed in the institute I work for (PTW of the TU Darmstadt). Because of this, there isn't any violation of copyright! Please remove your request. https://www.ptw.tu-darmstadt.de/landingpage_ptw/index.de.jsp — Preceding unsigned comment added by Akress17 (talk • contribs) 10:31, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

@Akress17: You got to prove it to COM:OTRS. --Lacrymocéphale (talk) 10:32, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

Colecho

Hola, si no hablas español, tradúcelo.

Me has borrado una imagen que he subido al artículo "COLECHO" por derechos de autor. Lo cual me parece bien porque viola la reglamentación del sitio. Pero me parece HORROROSO que la imagen que está publicada para un artículo académico y de esencia familiar, sea de una mujer vestida de hombre simulando ser el marido. Un travesti. A transvestite pretending to be a man with 2 childen attached to her: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/77/Barbora_Balkova_EveAdamIdealniSituaceBudemeVsichniSpat2006.jpg

Don't you think this is a much better option?? https://images.clarin.com/2015/03/19/BJglN1B0Xl_1256x620.jpg

Podrían encontrar una mejor representación para este artículo, en lugar de borrar contribuciones que se ajustan mucho más a la realidad. You could find a much better option to represent this article, instead of delete user's contributions that fits much closer to reality. Just saying... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andresvalbuena (talk • contribs) 13:10, 14 September 2019 (UTC)

@Andresvalbuena: So you're not only a thief but also homophobic? --Lacrymocéphale (talk) 13:27, 14 September 2019 (UTC)

You called me a thief. And you assumed that I'm homophobic because I'm not agree with this, an article related to the family with kids in a bed and a transvestite. I'm not homophobic u know? I'm just not politically correct and I think you're just another slave system, another sheep. You said that to me just because you're in front of a screen, not in front of me. You wouldn't say that to me in person.

I saw your other replies to other users. You're deffinitely the WORST Wikipedia's moderator ever. There you have! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andresvalbuena (talk • contribs) 13:38, 14 September 2019 (UTC)

@Andresvalbuena: You have stolen clarin.com intellectual property because you were behind a screen. You wouldn't have the courage to enter there building to pick up a frame from the wall and steel their work. --Lacrymocéphale (talk) 13:45, 14 September 2019 (UTC)

And, by the way, Commons is not Wikipedia, I'm not a moderator, and I didn't delete the stolen image. I ask for deletion and a moderator agree with me will delete it. --Lacrymocéphale (talk) 13:48, 14 September 2019 (UTC)

You are the one to accuse me to remove the image for political reason. I ask for image removal because of copyright infringement. --Lacrymocéphale (talk) 13:54, 14 September 2019 (UTC)

I don't mind if you're a moderator or just a snitch. You said I'm a thief and a homophobic, ok you're right. But I have a real job earning thousands of dollars at year with no worries if people do not DoNAtE MOneY YeAr aFtER YeAR tO KeEP My jOb you're just here, searching 24/7 who's violating intellectual property lol, and insulting people. Your life must to be so damn depressing dude. Good bye. Go tell to your daddy moderator to ban me for life if you want to. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andresvalbuena (talk • contribs) 13:59, 14 September 2019 (UTC)

@Andresvalbuena:

LOL. I asked a question. You are going very affirmative for someone still behind his screen.

I'm behind a screen too! I could tell that I'm so rich I don't need a job so here I'm. Many things to imagine.

While you were insulting me here, I was reestablishing your caption on https://es.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Colecho&action=history because a robot try to mimic me.

--Lacrymocéphale (talk) 14:08, 14 September 2019 (UTC)

It's ok. That last contribution wasn't ok, it was just a moment of anger, like these replays. All I just wanted to was to change the picture but if I can't do that because copyrights then I must to accept it. You can restore all changes back. Sorry if I bothered you with my stupidity. All you are doing is just your job. Bye. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andresvalbuena (talk • contribs) 14:21, 14 September 2019 (UTC)

@Andresvalbuena: You can change the image. You can find an existing image here or upload an image of your own. To find someone else image somewhere else than here needs to be very careful about image license. --Lacrymocéphale (talk) 14:30, 14 September 2019 (UTC)

Deletion of Kirsty Strain Official Headshot

Ok. This will be the SECOND time that Kirsty Strain's OFFICIAL headshot has been deleted from Wikipedia. I find it utterly perplexing that Wikipedia, and moderators from countries who have no idea who these people are, flag files for deletion. It's utterly ridiculous. I have personally confirmed with Kirsty Strain that the headshots are owned by her. Please remove the flag for deletion.

Wikipedia is getting absolutely preposterous in its logic. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Phil McCarron (talk • contribs) 22:20, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

@Phil McCarron:

Everybody can say that from behind a screen. You are anonymous.

Prove it to commons:COM:OTRS. Until you prove that you own the right to publish this photo here under Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International as you did or under another license compatible with Wikimedia Commons, this image is copyrighted and got to be deleted for copyright infringement.

Regards, --Lacrymocéphale (talk) 22:26, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

@Phil McCarron: The logic of Wikipedia is "free" (in its open-source meaning). Every Wikipedia content must free to use, reuse and transform, even commercially. Deleting copyrighted unfree content is this logic continuity. --Lacrymocéphale (talk) 22:36, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

Ahhh...so you are playing the "keyboard gangster" card. Interesting; I'm as anonymous as you are right now, mate, so you can get the fuck off your high-horse. Personally, couldn't give a f*ck with fascist regimes like Wikipedia anymore. So just keep her headshot deleted. I'm deleting my account from here as it proves utterly useless. Over the past 5 years, Wikipedia has fallen from a useful tool to that of utter irrelevance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Phil McCarron (talk • contribs) 22:46, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

@Phil McCarron: I know that I'm anonymous. That's not the point. The point is: This image is copyrighted, available elsewhere, easy to download elsewhere and reupload here so an unknown user can't claim to have ownership just like that. Respect of intellectual property is fascism? --Lacrymocéphale (talk) 05:35, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

Think we cleared possible uncertainty

	Think we cleared possible uncertainty
	Dear Lacrymocéphale, We thank you for making us aware of any uncertainty related to our first contribution. We as manufacturer of the item the photo shows, and photographer of the photo as part of a photo-shoot, cleared the possible issue with Wiki Commons. Kind Regards, CONA Factory A. Gezang & Co BV, www.cona.be Cona Coffeemaker (talk) 08:37, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

Abass Dodoo

Hello @lacrymocephale

One-Drum has ownership of all photo's of Abass Dodoo, so they can be shared freely but not edited. — Preceding unsigned comment added by One-drum (talk • contribs) 10:22, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

@One-drum:

Please, take the time to prove it to COM:OTRS.

Regards, --Lacrymocéphale (talk) 10:26, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

@One-drum:

It's seems that you've already done that. Your file are in an "OTRS email received but not processed yet" state.

Please, just be patient.

--Lacrymocéphale (talk) 15:41, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

File:Photo-1502395809857-fd80069897d0.jpg

File:Photo-1502395809857-fd80069897d0.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Commons2020 (talk) 21:14, 14 January 2020 (UTC)