Commons:گزیدن نگاره برگزیده

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Shortcut
This project page in other languages:
گذشتن و رسیدن به کاندید‌ها گذشتن و رسیدن به کاندید‌ها

گزیدن نگاره برگزیده

گزید نگاره برگزیده are images that the community will vote on, to determine whether or not they will be highlighted as some of the finest on Commons. This page lists the candidates to become featured pictures. The picture of the day images are selected from featured pictures.

Old candidates for Featured pictures are listed here. There are also chronological lists of featured pictures: 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014 and current month.

For another overview of our finest pictures, take a look at our annual picture of the year election.

Formal things

[edit]

Nominating

[edit]

Guidelines for nominators

[edit]

<translate> Please read the Complete guidelines before nominating.

This is a summary of what to look for when submitting and reviewing FP candidates:

  • Scope – In addition to falling within the [[<tvar name="ps">Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Project scope</tvar>|Commons scope]], candidates must be static two-dimensional images. All other types of files should be nominated at Commons:Featured media candidates.
  • Licensing – Images licensed with solely "GFDL" or "GFDL and an NC-only license" are not acceptable due the restrictions placed on re-use by these licenses.
  • Resolution – Raster images of lower resolution than 2 million pixels (pixels, not bytes) are typically rejected unless there are strong mitigating reasons. This does not apply to vector graphics (SVGs).

</translate> <translate>

    • Graphics on Commons are not only viewed on conventional computer screens. They may be used in high-resolution print versions, and the images may be cropped to focus on portions of the image. See Commons:Why we need high resolution media for more information.
  • Scans – While not official policy, Help:Scanning provides advice on the preparation of various types of images that may be useful.
  • General quality – pictures being nominated should be of high technical quality.
  • Digital manipulations must not deceive the viewer. Digital manipulation for the purpose of correcting flaws in an image is generally acceptable, provided it is limited, well-done, and not intended to deceive.

</translate> <translate>

    • For photographs, typical acceptable manipulations include cropping, perspective correction, sharpening/blurring, and color/exposure correction. More extensive manipulations, such as removal of distracting background elements, should be clearly described in the image text, by means of the {{Retouched picture}} template. Undescribed or mis-described manipulations which cause the main subject to be misrepresented are never acceptable. For images made from more than one photo, you can use the {{Panorama}} or {{Focus stacked image}} templates.

</translate> <translate>

    • For historic images, acceptable manipulations might include digitally fixing rips, removal of stains, cleanup of dirt, and, for mass-produced artworks such as engravings, removal of flaws inherent to the particular reproduction, such as over-inking. Careful color adjustments may be used to bring out the original work from the signs of ageing, though care should be taken to restore a natural appearance. The original artistic intent should be considered when deciding whether it is appropriate to make a change. Edits to historic material should be documented in detail within the file description, and an unedited version should be uploaded and cross linked for comparison.
  • Value – our main goal is to feature most valuable pictures from all others. Pictures should be in some way special, so please be aware that:

</translate> <translate>

    • almost all sunsets are aesthetically pleasing, and most such pictures are not in essence different from others,

</translate> <translate>

    • night-shots are pretty but normally more details can be shown on pictures taken at daytime,

</translate> <translate>

    • beautiful does not always mean valuable.
Artworks, illustrations, and historical documents
[edit]

There are many different types of non-photographic media, including engravings, watercolors, paintings, etchings, and various others. Hence, it is difficult to set hard-and-fast guidelines. However, generally speaking, works can be divided into three types: Those that can be scanned, those that must be photographed, and those specifically created to illustrate a subject.

Works that must be photographed include most paintings, sculptures, works too delicate or too unique to allow them to be put on a scanner, and so on. For these, the requirements for photography, below, may be mostly followed; however, it should be noted that photographs which cut off part of the original painting are generally not considered featurable.

Works that may be scanned include most works created by processes that allow for mass distribution − for instance, illustrations published with novels. For these, it is generally accepted that a certain amount of extra manipulation is permissible to remove flaws inherent to one copy of the work, since the particular copy – of which hundreds, or even thousands of copies also exist – is not so important as the work itself.

Works created to serve a purpose include diagrams, scientific illustrations, and demonstrations of contemporary artistic styles. For these, the main requirement is that they serve their purpose well.

Provided the reproduction is of high quality, an artwork generally only needs one of the following four things to be featurable:

  • Notable in its own right: Works by major artists, or works that are otherwise notable, such as the subjects of a controversy.
  • Of high artistic merit: Works which, while not particularly well known, are nonetheless wonderful examples of their particular type or school of art.
  • Of high historic merit: The historical method values very early illustrations of scenes and events over later ones. Hence, a work of poor quality depicting a contemporaneous historical event can be nonetheless important, even if the artistic merit is relatively low. Likewise, scans or photographs of important documents – which may not be at all artistic – nonetheless may be highly valuable if the documents are historically significant. The reason for the image's historical importance should be briefly stated in the nomination, for those reviewers unfamiliar with the subject.
  • Of high illustrative merit: Works that illustrate or help explain notable subjects, for instance, illustrations of books, scientific subjects, or technical processes. The amount of artistic merit required for these will vary by subject, but, for instance, an illustration that makes the working of a complicated piece of machinery very clear need not be notable as a piece of artwork as well, whereas an illustration for a book might well be expected to reach much higher artistic standards.

Digital restorations must also be well documented. An unedited version of the image should be uploaded locally, when possible, and cross-linked from the file description page. Edit notes should be specified in detail, such as "Rotated and cropped. Dirt, scratches, and stains removed. Histogram adjusted and colors balanced."

Photographs
[edit]

On the technical side, we have focus, exposure, composition, movement control and depth of field.

  • Focus – every important object in the picture should normally be sharp.
  • Exposure refers to the shutter diaphragm combination that renders an image with a tonal curve that ideally is able to represent in acceptable detail shadows and highlights within the image. This is called latitude. Images can be on the low side of the tonal curve (low range), the middle (middle range) or high side (upper range). Lack of shadow detail is not necessarily a negative characteristic. In fact, it can be part of the desired effect. Burned highlights in large areas are a distracting element.
  • Composition refers to the arrangement of the elements within the image. The "Rule of thirds" is one useful guideline. Horizons should almost never be placed in the middle, where they "cut" the image in half. Often, a horizon creating a top or bottom third of the space works better. The main idea is to use space to create a dynamic image.

</translate> <translate>

    • Foreground and background – foreground and background objects may be distracting. You should check that something in front of the subject doesn't hide important elements and that something in background doesn't spoil the composition (for example that the streetlight doesn't "stand" on someone's head).
  • Movement control refers to the manner in which motion is represented in the image. Motion can be frozen or blurred. Neither one is better than the other. It is the intention of representation. Movement is relative within the objects of the image. For example, photographing a race car that appears frozen in relation to the background does not give us a sense of speed or motion, so technique dictates to represent the car in a frozen manner but with a blurred background, thus creating the sense of motion, this is called "panning". On the other hand, representing a basketball player in a high jump frozen in relation to everything else, due to the "unnatural" nature of the pose would be a good photograph.
  • Depth of field (DOF) refers to the area in focus in front of and beyond main subject. Depth of field is chosen according to the specific needs of every picture. Large or small DOF can either way add or subtract to the quality of the image. Low depth of field can be used to bring attention to the main subject, separating it from the general environment. High depth of field can be used to emphasize space. Short focal length lenses (wide angles) yield large DOF, and vice versa, long focal lenses (telephotos) have shallow DOF. Small apertures yield large DOF and conversely, large apertures yield shallow DOF.

On the graphic elements we have shape, volume, color, texture, perspective, balance, proportion, noise, etc.

  • Shape refers to the contour of the main subjects.
  • Volume refers to the three dimensional quality of the object. This is accomplished using side light. Contrary to general belief, front lighting is not the best light. It tends to flatten subject. Best light of day is early morning or late afternoon.
  • Color is important. Oversaturated colors are not good.
  • Texture refers to the quality of the surface of the subject. It is enhanced by side lighting… it is the "feel" to the touch.
  • Perspective refers to the "angle" accompanied by lines that disappear into a vanishing point that may or may not be inside the image.
  • Balance refers to the arrangement of subjects within the image that can either give equal weight or appear to be heavier on one side.
  • Proportion refers to the relation of size of objects in picture. Generally, we tend to represent small objects small in relation to others, but a good technique is to represent small objects large contrary to natural size relationship. For example, a small flower is given preponderance over a large mountain…. This is called inversion of scales.
Not all elements must be present. Some photographs can be judged on individual characteristics, that is, an image can be about color or texture, or color AND texture, etc.
  • Noise refers to unwanted corruption of color brightness and quality and can be caused by underexposure. It is not a desirable quality and can be grounds for opposition.
  • Symbolic meaning or relevance … Opinion wars can begin here … A bad picture of a very difficult subject is better than a good picture of an ordinary subject. A good picture of a difficult subject is an extraordinary photograph.
Images can be culturally biased by the photographer and/or the observer. The meaning of the image should be judged according to the cultural context of the image, not by the cultural context of the observer. An image "speaks" to people, and it has the capacity to evoke emotion such as tenderness, rage, rejection, happiness, sadness, etc. Good photographs are not limited to evoking pleasant sensations …

You will maximise the chances of your nominations succeeding if you read the Complete guidelines before nominating.

Video and audio
[edit]

Please nominate videos, sounds, music, etc. at Commons:Featured media candidates.

Set nominations
[edit]

If a group of images are thematically connected in a direct and obvious way, they can be nominated together as a set. A set should fall under one of the following types:

  • Faithful digital reproductions of works notable in their own right, which the original author clearly intended to be viewed as a set. Examples: pages in a pamphlet, crops (puzzle pieces) of a prohibitively large scan, a pair of pendant paintings. Not acceptable: Arbitrary selection of sample works by an artist.
  • A sequence of images showing the passage of time. They could depict frames of a moving/changing object or a static object during different times of day or different seasons. Examples: diagrams illustrating a process, steps of a dance, metamorphosis of an insect, maps/drawings/photos of the same subject over the years (frame of view should be more or less the same).
  • A group of images depicting the same subject from different viewpoints, preferably taken under the same lighting conditions when possible. Examples: Exterior and interior of a building, different facades of a building, different interior views, obverse and inverse of a banknote/coin. Not acceptable: A selection of different rooms in a skyscraper, the facade of a church plus an organ, any images of fundamentally different scopes.
  • A group of images which show all possible variations of a particular class of object. Examples: Male and female versions of an animal (preferably in the same setting), all known species of a genus. Not acceptable: A few breeds of cats (unless they share a defining characteristic and represent all possible examples of that).

</translate>

Adding a new nomination

[edit]

If you believe that you have found or created an image that could be considered valuable, with appropriate image description and licensing, then do the following.

Step 1: copy the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Your image filename.jpg. Then click on the "create new nomination" button.

All single files:

For renominations, simply add /2 after the filename. For example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Foo.jpg/2


Step 2: follow the instructions on the page that you are taken to, and save that page.

Step 3: manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list: Click here, and add the following line to the TOP of the nominations list:

{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Your image filename.jpg}}

Recommended: Please add a category from the list at COM:FP.

Optional: if you are not the creator of the image, please notify him/her using {{subst:FPC-notice|Your image filename.jpg}} -- ~~~~.

Voting

[edit]

Editors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote. Everybody can vote for his/her own nominations. Anonymous (IP) votes are not allowed.

You may use following templates:

  • {{Support}} ( Support),
  • {{Oppose}} ( Oppose),
  • {{Neutral}} ( Neutral),
  • {{Comment}} ( Comment),
  • {{Info}} ( Info),
  • {{Question}} ( Question),
  • {{Request}} ( Request).

You may indicate that the image has no chance of success with the template {{FPX|reason - ~~~~}}, where reason explains why the image is clearly unacceptable as a FP. The template can only be used when there are no support votes other than the one from the nominator.

A well-written review helps participants (photographers, nominators and reviewers) improve their skills by providing insight into the strengths and weaknesses of a picture. Explain your reasoning, especially when opposing a candidate (which has been carefully selected by the author/nominator). English is the most widely understood language on Commons, but any language may be used in your review. A helpful review will often reference one or more of the criteria listed above.

Unhelpful reasons for opposing include:

  • No reason
  • "I don't like it" and other empty assessments
  • "You can do better" and other criticisms of the author/nominator rather than the image

Remember also to put your signature (~~~~).

[edit]

Over time, featured picture standards change. It may be decided that for some pictures which were formerly "good enough", this is no longer the case. This is for listing an image which you believe no longer deserves to be a featured picture. For these, vote:

Text to use Displays as Meaning
{{Keep}}  Keep It deserves to remain a featured picture
{{Delist}}  Delist It does not deserve to be a featured picture anymore.

This can also be used for cases in which a previous version of an image was promoted to FP, but a newer version of the image has been made and is believed to be superior to the old version, e.g. a newly edited version of a photo or a new scan of a historical image. In particular, it is not intended for replacing older photos of a particular subject with newer photos of the same subject, or in any other case where the current FP and the proposed replacement are essentially different images. For these nominations, vote:

Text to use Displays as Meaning
{{Keep}}  Keep Do not replace the old image with the new image as an FP.
{{Delistandreplace}}  Delist and replace Replace the current FP with the proposed replacement.

If you believe that some picture no longer meets the criteria for FP, you can nominate it for delisting, copying the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box:


In the new delisting nomination page just created you should include:

  • Information on the origin of the image (creator, uploader);
  • A link to the original FP nomination (it will appear under "Links" on the image description page);
  • Your reasons for nominating the image and your username.

After that, you have to manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list.

As a courtesy, leave an informative note on the talk page(s) of the original creator, uploader(s), and nominator with a link to the delisting candidate. {{subst:FPC-notice-removal}} can be used for this purpose.

[edit]

General rules

[edit]
  1. The voting period is 9 complete days counted from the nomination. After the end of this period the result will be determined. Votes added on day 10 and after are not counted.
  2. Nominations by anonymous contributors are welcome.
  3. Contributions to discussion by anonymous contributors are welcome.
  4. Only registered contributors whose Commons accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote. Exception: registered users can always vote in their own nominations no matter the account age and number of edits.
  5. Nominations do not count as votes. Support must be explicitly stated.
  6. Nominators and authors can withdraw their nominated pictures at any time. This is done by adding the following template: {{Withdraw}} ~~~~. Also, remember that if more than one version is nominated, you should explicitly state which version you are withdrawing.
  7. Remember, the goal of the Wikimedia Commons project is to provide a central repository for free images to be used by all Wikimedia projects, including possible future projects. This is not simply a repository for Wikipedia images, so images should not be judged here on their suitability for that project.
  8. Rules of the 5th day based on vote counts on day number 5 (day of nomination + 5):
    1. Pictures are speedy declined if they have fewer than two support votes.
    2. Pictures are speedy promoted if they have 10 support votes or more and no oppose votes. (Note that if it takes more than five days to reach this threshold, the picture can be promoted as soon as it is reached.) This does not apply to nominations containing at least one ‘Alternative’ image – because it is possible that another image can overtake the one in the lead during the last days, such nominations are never closed early.
    3. Once either speedy criterion is reached, the voting period is considered closed, and no more votes may be added.
  9. Pictures tagged {{FPX}} may be removed from the list 24 hours after the tag was applied, provided there are no support votes other than that of the nominator.
  10. Pictures tagged {{FPD}} (FP-Denied) may be removed from the list 24 hours after the tag was applied.
  11. Only two active nominations by the same user (that is, nominations under review and not yet closed) are allowed. The main purpose of this measure is to contribute to a better average quality of nominations, by driving nominators/creators to choose carefully the pictures presented to the forum.

Featuring and delisting rules

[edit]

A candidate will become a featured picture in compliance with following conditions:

  1. Appropriate license (of course)
  2. At least seven  Support votes (or 7  Delist votes for a delist) at the end of nine days
  3. Ratio of supporting/opposing votes at least 2/1 (a two-thirds majority); same for delist/keep votes
  4. Two different versions of the same picture cannot both be featured, but only the one with higher level of support, as determined by the closer. Whenever the closer is not sure which version has consensus to be featured, they should attempt to contact the voters to clarify their opinions if not clear from the nomination page.
  5. Only two active delisting nominations per user, which is in addition to the limit of two active regular nominations.

The delisting rules are the same as those for FPs, with voting taking place over the same time period. The rule of the 5th day is applied to delisting candidates that have received no votes to delist, other than that of the proposer, by day 5.

The FPCBot handles the vote counting and closing in most cases, current exceptions are candidates containing multiple versions of the image as well as FPXed and withdrawn nominations. Any experienced user may close the requests not handled by the bot. For instructions on how to close nominations, see Commons:Featured picture candidates/What to do after voting is finished. Also note that there is a manual review stage between when the bot has counted the votes and before the nomination is finally closed by the bot; this manual review can be done by any user familiar with the voting rules.

Above all, be polite

[edit]

Please don't forget that the image you are judging is somebody's work. Avoid using phrases like "it looks terrible" and "I hate it". If you must oppose, please do so with consideration. Also remember that your command of English might not be the same as someone else's. Choose your words with care.

Happy judging… and remember... all rules can be broken.

See also

[edit]

Table of contents

[edit]
List may contain works considered Not Safe for Work (nudity).

Nominators are requested, out of courtesy, to include the {{Nsfw}} template with such images. Users may select the gadget in user preferences "Deferred display of images tagged with {{Nsfw}} on COM:FPC" to enable the template's effect of hiding the image until selected.

Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache
[edit]

File:Vesilest (Hydrachnidia).jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2024 at 07:38:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Close wing moisture sucking of Appias lalage (Doubleday, 1842) - Spot Puffin (Male) WLB.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2024 at 04:59:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Close wing moisture sucking of Appias lalage (Doubleday, 1842) - Spot Puffin (Male).

Image:The Milky Way over Germany.png

[edit]

Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2024 at 03:06:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The Milky Way

File:010 Greater flamingos male and female in the Camargue during mating season Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Dec 2024 at 22:57:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Greater flamingos male and female in the Camargue during mating season

File:Schloss Tambach Luftbild-20240901-RM-154500.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Dec 2024 at 22:32:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Tambach Castle, aerial view

File:Jaszczurówka at Winter.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Dec 2024 at 17:46:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Sacred Heart chapel in Zakopane Jaszczurówka

File:Svörtuloft Lighthouse.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Dec 2024 at 09:54:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Svörtuloft Lighthouse, western most end of Snæfellsnes, Iceland

File:RDAF General Dynamics F-16AM Fighting Falcon E-006 Royal International Air Tattoo 2024 01.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Dec 2024 at 10:00:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Royal Danish Air Force (RDAF) F-16AM at the RIAT 2024

File:Elefante africano de sabana (Loxodonta africana), parque nacional de Amboseli, Kenia, 2024-05-22, DD 07.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Nov 2024 at 20:55:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

African bush elephant (Loxodonta africana), Amboseli National Park, Kenya
  • Ok, fair, thank you for your feedback. I made some changes, please, have a look. To your question, please, don't upload versions on your own, that makes no sense. I have the RAW file as source and if somebody requests a change later one I wouldn't have the right version, so it makes sense that I do those changes. Furthermore I consider myself skilled enough to make a tilt or change the WB. I believe that uploading an own version is appropiate if the author requests for help of if the uploader is not active on Commons. Poco a poco (talk) 16:12, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I don't necessarily mean uploading the version to replace your version, but to upload a reference version to better illustrate what I mean. Tupungato (talk) 17:55, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Parkaden June 2017 08.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Nov 2024 at 18:17:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Parkaden, Stockholm.

File:Dominiiklaste klooster.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Nov 2024 at 14:37:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Cloister of former St. Catherine's Monastery in Tallinn

File:North Island saddleback (Philesturnus rufusater) head Tiritiri Matangi.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Nov 2024 at 14:09:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

North Island saddleback (Philesturnus rufusater)

File:Green Fungi Log Singanally Coorg Nov24 A7CR 04866-90 zsp.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Nov 2024 at 10:35:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Fungi and leaves on a dead log, Coorg, India

File:Field of Iceland poppies in the flower garden near Cheomseongdae Observatory in Gyeongju South Korea.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Nov 2024 at 00:44:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Field of Iceland poppies in the flower garden near Cheomseongdae Observatory in Gyeongju South Korea
:-) A divine hand placed many in that field. You have to wait less than one minute to get one (or two, three...) on any flower :-) Basile Morin (talk) 10:37, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thanks for your comment. It's the original temperature, so I would expect accurate colors in this situation, at 8:22 am, almost golden hour. Colors also look normal on my calibrated screen. I agree it's quite warm, but I tend to believe that a colder temperature would correspond to a later time of day -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:26, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Puente Helix, Marina Bay, Singapur, 2023-08-16, DD 144-146 HDR.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2024 at 20:45:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Жирафик.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2024 at 21:04:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Milky way in Elbrus.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2024 at 21:00:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Wiewiórka w Parku Bednarskiego w Krakowie, 20241117 0903 2741.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2024 at 19:14:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Red squirrel in Bednarski Park in Kraków

File:Lichtenfels Lokschuppen Orthophoto -20231001-RM-160347.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2024 at 16:11:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Basilique du Sacré-Cœur de Montmartre - Paris - GT-01 - 2024.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2024 at 13:43:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Basilique du Sacré-Cœur de Montmartre, Paris.
  • Thanks for the correction of the verticals. About the horizontal lines, I'm sorry to disagree, after having taken the time to listen the arguments (Aristeas's in particular) and looking at maps, I believe that such a distance of the camera associated to such a minor angle (to the right) cannot realistically justify a strong horizontal inclination. This could be calculable geometrically :-)
I think this aspect is correct. Top AND bottom -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:00, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Schwaigern - Massenbach - Baumgruppe am Wilhelmstaler Bach bei Sonnenuntergang (1).jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2024 at 11:15:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A group of trees at sunset on an evening in early December. Massenbach, Schwaigern, Germany

File:Braunlage - Wurmberg 01.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2024 at 10:42:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Dead spruce forest on the Wurmberg north of Braunlage, Harz, Lower Saxony, Germany

File:Camp - Notes on Fashion at the Met - Moschino (73834).jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2024 at 02:34:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Moschino ensemble from the fall 2014 ready-to-wear collection

File:Juvenile yellow-crowned night heron (12938).jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2024 at 02:33:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Juvenile yellow-crowned night heron

File:Seßlach Rodachbrücke-20180506-RM-191000.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2024 at 22:25:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Rodach bridge in Seßlach

File:Western wattled-honeyeater (Foulehaio procerior) on octopus tree (Heptapleurum actinophyllum) Colo-I-Suva.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2024 at 21:34:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Western wattled-honeyeater (Foulehaio procerior)

File:Phyllis Diller by Allan Warren.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2024 at 16:25:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Phyllis Diller by Allan Warren

File:020912 - Janel Manns - 3b - 2012 Summer Paralympics (01).JPG

[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2024 at 14:30:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Wheelchair tennis at the 2012 Summer Paralympics - Janel Manns

File:Felipe Gomes Rio2016b.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2024 at 13:53:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

2016 Summer Paralympics - Felipe Gomes and sighted guide at 400m T11

File:Camels at Aït Benhaddou, Saharan caravan route, Marocco (آيت بن حدّو, ⴰⵢⵜ ⵃⴰⴷⴷⵓ).jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2024 at 10:09:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Camels at Aït Benhaddou, Saharan caravan route, Marocco (آيت بن حدّو, ⴰⵢⵜ ⵃⴰⴷⴷⵓ)

File:Zaaddozen van een beuk (Fagus sylvatica) 13-09-2024 (d.j.b.).jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2024 at 05:39:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Dourdou river in Trou de Bozouls (14).jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 27 Nov 2024 at 20:36:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Dourdou river in Trou de Bozouls, Aveyron, France

File:Zona arqueológica de Cantona, Puebla, México, 2013-10-11, DD 43.JPG

[edit]

Voting period ends on 27 Nov 2024 at 15:16:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Ridotto Teatro Grande Brescia volta di Francesco Zugno e Francesco Battaglioli.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 27 Nov 2024 at 13:35:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Fresco of Apollon by Francesco Zugno in the foyer of the Teatro Grande in Brescia
 Comment I'm glad you say that, this is trompe-l'œil and the painter Francesco Battaglioli did a perfect job because the ceiling is flat. The black spots on the right are floodlights I could not hide.--Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 06:09, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Good point :-) Sorry, I don't read Italian (for the title) though I think the word Trompe-l'œil is missing there. Still, there is "flat" and "flat", and the camera doesn't seem in the axis. The bottom and the sides are not symmetrical. To be honest, at first sight my eyes were attracted by the distracting black shape. That part could be cropped out. The two columns at the bottom are showing the same perspective, as if the picture was taken from the right -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:33, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm terribly sorry, I was tromped, the right part is missing. Trompe-l'oeil is in the English description, the other is just the filename. By the way I was going to delete my comment. You can see it in the other fotos of the painting.--Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 06:35, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Re-updated comment Yes, after looking at this view I realized my first impression was rather right. And it seems also possible to take the picture from the center, like here. Thanks for your comment. -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:56, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
And at least I was fooled a short time at thinking it was a real trompe-l'oeil :-) Is maybe worth visiting again :-) Basile Morin (talk) 23:09, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Wow, “seasoned users” – I must remember that cultivated phrase. Very useful, as nobody can say for sure whether this is a respectful description or a refined insult. Well, every FPC regular knows that Basile and me often disagree, but when Basile is called a “seasoned user” I hope I am allowed to share this designation with him. Or am I already a rotten user, having been on Commons for six years longer? Who knows … ;–) But I agree that nobody should be intimidated by any other user, of course. Please take our arguments, check them, compare them, form your own opinion based on reasons, vote. Thank you. – Aristeas (talk) 10:12, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:001 Greater flamingo in flight in the Camargue Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 27 Nov 2024 at 13:10:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Greater flamingo in flight in the Camargue

File:61-224-0001 Zbarazh Castle RB 24.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 27 Nov 2024 at 11:51:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Aerial view on castle in Zbarazh, Ukraine.

File:Self portrait (8618889472).jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 27 Nov 2024 at 10:25:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Self portrait illustrating the mordançage technique of altering gelatin silver prints for artistic effect.

File:Katsuo ji temple waterfall Osaka Japan by Don Ramey Logan.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 27 Nov 2024 at 06:48:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Katsuo ji temple waterfall Osaka Japan

File:Paesens. Dobbe, 17-09-2024. (actm.) 01.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 27 Nov 2024 at 05:32:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  •  Comment I have changed the gallery link from Other objects in landscapes to Natural#Netherlands because most similar photos are on the “Natural” gallery pages. Your description (“horizontal play of lines behind the sea wall at Paesens with a view of the Wadden, a unique tidal area”) confirms that this is a photo of the landscape/nature. The dobbe and the fence are objects, but they are integral parts of the landscape, so we can still put this into the “Natural” gallery. (Thanks to Cart for the confirmation!) Hope it helps, – Aristeas (talk) 11:15, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:2024-11-04 02 PACIFIC SCOUT - MMSI 316013431 – Ogden Point, Victoria BC CAN.jpg, featured

[edit]

Voting period ends on 26 Nov 2024 at 22:48:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

pilot boat in bad weather


Unconfirmed results: (info)
Result: 23 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Inimese peatäi.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 25 Nov 2024 at 18:09:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  •  Underexposed Yes, though the picture looks interesting -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:21, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    It's impossible to agree with the claim that this image is underexposed. This is clearly proven by the excellent visibility of every detail on the head louse's body - its tiny hairs, complex body texture, and even various color shades. The dark, almost black background is not an exposure error, but rather serves to highlight the main subject more clearly. The image's tonality is well balanced - we can clearly see details in both lighter and darker areas, confirming that the exposure is not incorrect. This lighting choice is intentional here, designed to give the image a slightly dramatic effect. If the picture were truly underexposed, we wouldn't be able to see such fine details and color tones that are now clearly visible. Janeklass (talk) 04:19, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Disagree. You will see more details if the photo is better exposed. Currently the contrasts are very hard to distinguish, especially at thumbnail size.
Note that you can also see a lot of details here, although the photo is underexposed too. And that one was properly fixed.
Hard to hear that "it's impossible to agree with the claim that this image is underexposed" while the two first reviewers here both find the image too dark :-) Then above you write "This lighting choice is intentional here, designed to give the image a slightly dramatic effect" (by the way, I don't understand this dramatic intention. It's just a close-up of an animal, no special background / context). Sorry, clear light problem for me, in state -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:45, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have responded to the criticism and want the evaluators to know that the lighting choice here is clearly intentional. How you choose to evaluate it is up to you. Janeklass (talk) 04:56, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment It is too dark for my eyes. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:58, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support It is a very fascinating image. The darkness is not a problem, as the object is clearly seen, and that seems more like a creative choice on this dark creature. I am thinking that maybe a square format would be better for this image... but I'm not sure. Kruusamägi (talk) 13:24, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support --Yann (talk) 13:40, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose Sorry. I agree that there are dark photographs which do not tolerate an increasure of the exposure – reproductions of dark paintings, some gloomy atmospheric landcape photographs, low-key photos etc. However I fail to see why this would apply to this photo, despite of the explanations. I have played a bit with this JPEG file and can confirm that a careful increase of the brightness works very well when at the same time the light parts are dialed down a bit. If you have a raw image or a 16 bit TIFF file, this should work even better. Of course you have all right to keep your photo as you think it should be (so keep it!), but I cannot support it here. Sorry again, – Aristeas (talk) 10:25, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    As I mentioned before, this solution was intentional. I did try making changes but wasn't satisfied with the result. I can see that opinions are divided on this one - and I suppose not everyone has to like the picture. It's clear that I won't get much support for this image, but that's okay. I'm already looking forward to when this period ends and I can submit my next works 🙂 Janeklass (talk) 13:28, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Weak support but I agree it should be brightened. if it fails, anyone could just upload a new [separate] version and nominate it. — Rhododendrites talk |  22:17, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 03:10, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose Per Aristeas Poco a poco (talk) 12:10, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Петергоф, Нижний парк, Львиный каскад. Фонтанная статуя «Нимфа, льющая воду из кувшина» 2.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 25 Nov 2024 at 17:34:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Architectural monument, Lion Cascade, Peterhof, Saint Petersburg
[edit]

Voting period ends on 25 Nov 2024 at 15:23:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The Link-Lee House, Houston

File:Constancy - Julius Klinger.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 25 Nov 2024 at 14:05:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Constancy - London Underground poster by Julius Klinger.

File:Small stained glass window from Sainte-Chapelle (King). Paris.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 25 Nov 2024 at 07:55:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Small stained glass window from Sainte-Chapelle (King). Paris
  •  Oppose I am not a fan of stained glass photographed like this. The contrast and saturation has been pumped up too high so that the colours of the glass are exaggerated, and the details around the window are completely black. It doesn't look natural. I agree that many of the stained glass photos in the gallery have similar processing, but I don't think they should be FP either. This to me is an example of it being done right. Cmao20 (talk) 01:46, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Unfortunately an old image (2012) taken from an old camera (2008) with low resolution, no tripod, high ISO, and narrow DoF -- Basile Morin (talk) 08:03, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    •  Comment Dear Basile Morin, you have rated when, by what and under what conditions the photo was taken, but not any word about the image itself. Having read "Featured picture", I assumed that the pictures are rated here. Am I wrong? -- Ввласенко (talk) 09:41, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Oppose And I'd like to add that "low resolution", "high ISO" and "narrow depth of field" directly concern the technical aspects of "the image itself", as you request. This photo was perhaps a fair candidate in 2012, but much less in 2024. And even at that time, a tripod would have helped to increase the quality. The edges are slightly blurry, especially at the top and at the left. The crop is very tight all around. Overall, it is a standard photo of stained glass, not an exceptional one, in my opinion -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:21, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Among all these images there is not a single one FP from Sainte-Chapelle (Paris). -- Ввласенко (talk)

File:Many colorful flowerpots in front of Bulguksa temple in Gyeongju South Korea.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 25 Nov 2024 at 05:15:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Many colorful flowerpots in front of Bulguksa temple in Gyeongju South Korea

File:Val Montanaia.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 24 Nov 2024 at 08:07:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Montanaia Valley in the Parco naturale delle Dolomiti Friulane
  •  Comment Just a nerdy note regarding the resolution: Some camera sensors deliver some more pixels than officially supported by the manufacturer. These extra pixels at the margins of the sensor are cut off by the cameras when creating a JPEG image, but they are saved into the raw image files; normally we still do not seem them because most raw converters just cut them off, too, probably because some of these extra pixels are often faulty. If one opens a raw image file from the camera used here (α7R IV) with RawTherapee, some of the extra pixels are retained and we get an image of 9,560 × 6,368 pixels. This means that all pixels in this photo (9,557 × 6,336 pixels) could indeed come straight from a simple single shot. Of course the Exif data state that the photo was developed with “Adobe Photoshop 25.9 (Windows)”, i.e. probably with Adobe Camera RAW (ACR), and ACR cuts the raw images from the α7R IV always to the nominal 9504 × 6336 pixels. But it is possible that the raw image was first developed with another raw converter (like RawTherapee) and only then edited with Photoshop … That’s the theory. Of course it seems more likely that the photographer made some kind of projection/perspective correction and streched the image slightly during that process; this would also explain the extra pixels and the image would still be authentic. – Aristeas (talk) 16:56, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • The same applies also to other camera bodies, with a varying amount of extra pixels. Checking e.g. a CR2 file from the Canon EOS 5D IV, RawTherapee shows me 6732 × 4492 pixels – a little bit more than the official 6720 × 4480 pixels. So if one ever finds oneself in the situation that “just a few pixels” are missing at a border to complete the composition, it’s worth to give it a try and to open the raw image with RawTherapee … ;–) End of digression, sorry. – Aristeas (talk) 11:57, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support--UltimoGrimm (talk) 12:32, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Question The nomination indicates the name Scosse as uploader, but according to the file page, the uploader is Civvì. And because this last version is significantly different from the original one, with heavy processing, lifted shadows and oversaturated colors, I wonder if these modifications have been approved by the photographer. This message suggests that Scosse is not at the initiative of the FP nomination -- Basile Morin (talk) 14:13, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose per Basile Morin, and also wonder where the high resolution version of the image came from. If it was not uploaded by or with the consent of the original photographer then this is a copyright violation - if the photographer has chosen only to release the 6megapixel version then we don't have the right to upload a larger version that wasn't explicitly released under a Creative Commons license over the top Cmao20 (talk) 15:24, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hi all, during the first candidature as QI the original version of the picture was considered too small so I asked the author if they were willing to upload a larger version of the picture, instead of uploading it they sent it me via email and I uploaded it. Maybe I should forward this email exchange to VRTS? --Civvì (talk) 15:38, 15 November 2024 (UTC) Update, I just forwarded the emails to VRTS. --Civvì (talk) 15:49, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support very well --Msb (talk) 21:27, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Thanks for the clarification about the image source. The lens flares and dust spot are still a problem in my view, but more importantly, which person did manage the post-treatment here, Scosse or Civvì? Scosse could have sent the same image in larger size as requested, and Civvì handled the processing before uploading it? In any case the correct name of the uploader should be updated on this nomination -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:37, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The author uploaded a new version with reduced flares. --Civvì (talk) 17:34, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Thanks for the notification and attempt to improve, but sorry to say the correction is not well handled in my opinion. First, the dust spot and lens flares are still there (I will add image notes to specify the exact locations), then the dark spot added to reduce the white spot in the center creates artificial shadows on the rocks. Moreover, in this last version, the contrasts have been reduced, or the clarity increased, compared to the original, it's really blueish in the background and at the top of the foreground -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:35, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Open wing position of Vindula erota (Fabricius, 1793) - Cruiser butterfly sucking sweat from human socks ANK6537.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 23 Nov 2024 at 14:23:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Open wing position of Vindula erota (Fabricius, 1793) - Cruiser butterfly sucking sweat from human socks

File:80-391-9014 Kyiv Sofia 2 RB 24.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 23 Nov 2024 at 09:28:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Sunny winter morning near St. Sofia Cathedral, Kyiv, Ukraine.


Timetable (day 5 after nomination)

[edit]
Mon 18 Nov → Sat 23 Nov
Tue 19 Nov → Sun 24 Nov
Wed 20 Nov → Mon 25 Nov
Thu 21 Nov → Tue 26 Nov
Fri 22 Nov → Wed 27 Nov
Sat 23 Nov → Thu 28 Nov

Timetable (day 9 after nomination, last day of voting)

[edit]
Thu 14 Nov → Sat 23 Nov
Fri 15 Nov → Sun 24 Nov
Sat 16 Nov → Mon 25 Nov
Sun 17 Nov → Tue 26 Nov
Mon 18 Nov → Wed 27 Nov
Tue 19 Nov → Thu 28 Nov
Wed 20 Nov → Fri 29 Nov
Thu 21 Nov → Sat 30 Nov
Fri 22 Nov → Sun 01 Dec
Sat 23 Nov → Mon 02 Dec
[edit]

The bot

[edit]

Note that the description below is for manual closure, this is mostly not needed anymore as there exists a bot (FPCBot) that counts the votes and handles the process below. However after the bot has counted the votes a manual review step is used to make sure the count is correct before the bot again picks up the work.

Manual procedure

[edit]

Any experienced user may close requests.

  1. In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
    Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line with a space first)
    {{FPC-results-reviewed|support=x|oppose=x|neutral=x|featured=("yes" or "no")|gallery=xxx (leave blank if "featured=no")|sig=~~~~}}
     (for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:The Bridge (August 2013).jpg). See also {{FPC-results-reviewed}}.
  2. Also edit the title of the candidate image template and add after the image tag
    featured or not featured
    For example:
    === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
    becomes
    === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], featured ===
  3. Save your edit.
  4. If it is featured:
    • Add the picture to the list of the four most recently featured pictures of an appropriate gallery of Commons:Featured pictures, list as the first one and delete the last one, so that the number is four again.
    • Also add the picture to the appropriate gallery and section of Commons:Featured pictures, list. Click on the most appropriate link beneath where you just added it as one of the four images. An image should only appear ONE time in the galleries. After a successful nomination, the image can be placed in several of the Featured pictures categories.
    • Add the template {{Assessments|featured=1}} to the image description page.
      • If it was an alternative image, use the subpage/com-nom parameter: For example, if File:Foo.jpg was promoted at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bar.jpg, use {{Assessments|featured=1|com-nom=Bar.jpg}}
      • If the image is already featured on another wikipedia, just add featured=1 to the Assessments template. For instance {{Assessments|enwiki=1}} becomes {{Assessments|enwiki=1|featured=1}}
    • Add the picture to the chronological list of featured pictures. Put it in the gallery using this format: File:xxxxx.jpg|# - '''Headline'''<br>created by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], uploaded by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]
      • The # should be replaced by 1 for the first image nominated that month, and counts up after that. Have a look at the other noms on that page for examples.
      • You may simplify this if multiple things were done by the same user. E.g.: File:xxxxx.jpg|# - '''Headline'''<br>created, uploaded, and nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]
    • Add == FP promotion ==
      {{FPpromotion|File:XXXXX.jpg}} to the Talk Page of the nominator.
  5. As the last step (whether the image is featured or not; including {{FPX}}ed, {{FPD}}ed and withdrawn nominations), open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination you've just finished closing. It will be of the form:
    {{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}
    Copy it to the bottom of Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/November 2024), save that page, and remove it from the candidate list.

Closing a delisting request

[edit]
  1. In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
    Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line with a space first)
    '''Result:''' x delist, x keep, x neutral => /not/ delisted. ~~~~
    (for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/Image:Astrolabe-Persian-18C.jpg)
  2. Also edit the title of the delisting candidate image template and add after the image tag
    delisted or not delisted
    For example:
    === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] === becomes === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], delisted ===
  3. Move the actual template from Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list to the bottom of the actual month page on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/November 2024.
  4. If the outcome was not delisted, stop here. If it is delisted:
    1. Remove the picture from Commons:Featured pictures, list and any subpages.
    2. Edit the picture's description as follows:
      1. Replace the template {{Featured picture}} on the image description page by {{Delisted picture}}. If using the {{Assessments}} template, change featured=1 to featured=2 (do not change anything related to its status in other featured picture processes).
      2. Remove the image from all categories beginning with "Featured [pictures]" (example: Featured night photography, Featured pictures from Wiki Loves Monuments 2016, Featured pictures of Paris).
      3. Remove the "Commons quality assessment" claim (d:Property:P6731) "Wikimedia Commons featured picture" from the picture's Structured data.
    3. Add a delisting-comment to the original entry in chronological list of featured pictures in bold-face, e. g. delisted 2007-07-19 (1-6) with (1-6) meaning 1 keep and 6 delist votes (change as appropriate). The picture in the gallery is not removed.
  5. If this is a Delist and Replace, the delisting and promotion must both be done manually. To do the promotion, follow the steps in the above section. Note that the assessment tag on the file page and the promotion tag on the nominator's talk page won't pick up the /replace subpage that these nominations use.

Manual archiving of a withdrawn nomination

[edit]
  1. In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
    In the occasion that the FPCbot will not mark withdrawn nominations with a "to be reviewed" template and put them in Category:Featured picture candidates awaiting closure review just like if they were on the usual list, put the following "no" template:
    {{FPC-results-reviewed|support=X|oppose=X|neutral=X|featured=no|gallery=|sig=--~~~~}}
  2. Also edit the title of the candidate image template and add after the image tag
    not featured
    For example:
    === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
    becomes
    === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], not featured ===
  3. Save your edit.
  4. Open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination. It will be of the form:
    {{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}
    Copy it to the bottom of Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/November 2024), save that page, and remove it from the candidate list.
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:گزیدن_نگاره_برگزیده&oldid=871838886"