निर्वाचित चित्र उम्मीदवार वो चित्र (छवियाँ) हैं जिनके कॉमन्स पर सर्वोत्तम चित्रों में से एक होने के लिए समुदाय के लोग मतदान करेंगे। यह सूची उन उम्मीदवारों की है जो निर्वाचित चित्र हो सकते हैं। आज का चित्र निर्वाचित्र चित्रों में से चुनी हुई एक छवि होगी।
यदि आपको लगता है कि आपने एक महत्वपूर्ण चित्र प्राप्त अथवा निर्मित किया है जो उपयुक्त चित्र विवरण और मुद्राधिकार के साथ है, तब निम्न कार्य करें।
प्रथम चरण: चित्र का नाम निम्न खाने में उपस्थित पाठ के आगे लिखें, उदाहरण के लिए, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:आपके चित्र का नाम.jpg लिखें और "नया नामांकन आरम्भ करें।" बटन पर क्लिक करें।
सभी एकल फाइलें:
पुनः नामांकन के लिए चित्र के नाम 'के बाद केवल /2 लिखें। जैसे:– Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Foo.jpg/2
Set nominations ONLY
Sets are temporarily disallowed for technical reasons; will reopen soon.
द्वितीय चरण: आप जिस पृष्ठ पर पहुँचे हैं वहाँ के निर्देशों का पालन करें और पृष्ठ को संरक्षित करें।
वो सम्पादक जिनका खाता कम से कम १० दिन पुराना है और ५० सम्पादन कर चुके हैं, अपना मत दे सकते हैं। अपने नामांकन के लिए कोई भी मतदान कर सकता है। अज्ञात (आईपी) मतों की अनुमति नहीं है।
आप निम्न साँचे काम में ले सकते हो:
{{Support}} (Support),
{{Oppose}} (Oppose),
{{Neutral}} (Neutral),
{{Comment}} (Comment),
{{Info}} (Info),
{{Question}} (Question),
{{Request}} (Request).
You may indicate that the image has no chance of success with the template {{FPX|reason - ~~~~}}, where reason explains why the image is clearly unacceptable as a FP. The template can only be used when there are no support votes other than the one from the nominator.
Voting period ends on 30 Nov 2024 at 14:09:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:North Island saddleback (Philesturnus rufusater) head Tiritiri Matangi.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:North Island saddleback (Philesturnus rufusater) head Tiritiri Matangi.jpg
Info Yellow green fungi (tentative: Trametes sp.) on log, growing around silver oak leaves. The large fungi are about 7.5 cm (3 in) across. Green colour may be due to algal growth. Focus stack of 25 images. Singnally, Somwarpet, Coorg, Karnataka, India. Created by Tagooty - uploaded by Tagooty - nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 10:35, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period ends on 30 Nov 2024 at 00:44:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Field of Iceland poppies in the flower garden near Cheomseongdae Observatory in Gyeongju South Korea.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Field of Iceland poppies in the flower garden near Cheomseongdae Observatory in Gyeongju South Korea.jpg
Comment The white balance seems a bit too warm for the lighting conditions, especially the greens and reds in the foreground appear to have a strong yellow cast. I'm on an unfamiliar, uncalibrated monitor, though, so that may be just my perception being off. --El Grafo (talk) 11:11, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your comment. It's the original temperature, so I would expect accurate colors in this situation, at 8:22 am, almost golden hour. Colors also look normal on my calibrated screen. I agree it's quite warm, but I tend to believe that a colder temperature would correspond to a later time of day -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:26, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Info Night view of the Helix Bridge and the Marina Bay Sands Hotel, Marina Bay, Singapore. Note: I've already a featured image of this area, this one taken a different day, with different light, from a different location and with the ArtScience Museum in the compo. I opted for this nom after the discussion that took place here. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 20:45, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice and very nice place. May there are some stars, may they light spots are hot pixel. Please have a look. --XRay💬10:33, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
{{cmt}}Support I did just add some notes to identify the portion of the Milky Way visible in the star field. It is the Serpens–Aquila Rift. The two main stats are Altair in the center of the image and Alpha Ophiuchi on the right. The third one, lower on the left, is Jupiter, that in August 2021 was in the constellation Capricorn. Several star clusters are also visible. I agree with Cmao20 on the fact that there is a lot of chroma noise, but the picture has some value. --Harlock81 (talk) 11:36, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2024 at 19:14:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Wiewiórka w Parku Bednarskiego w Krakowie, 20241117 0903 2741.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Wiewiórka w Parku Bednarskiego w Krakowie, 20241117 0903 2741.jpg
Support I know I know I know: Just like “all sunsets are beautiful”, all squirrels are cute ;–), we already got quite some nice squirrel FPs and we are very demanding when it comes to photos of common animals. But I can’t resist to nominate this one. The light is so beautiful, the colours are so good, the pose is so nice. Since my last move I am watching these little rascals on my walks and this is a very typical posture and behaviour. Bon appétit, dear squirrel, and congratulations to the photographer! -- Aristeas (talk) 19:14, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good choice to nominate this irresistible rascal. Sometimes they can be very tame, the picture reminds me of the Łazienki Park in Warsaw, there they get incredibly close to people for a nut. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:52, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Aristeas. This is also a special squirrel, looking at viewer with giant eyes, ears stretched, paws on belly, its booty well buried in his mouth :-) Yum -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:34, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2024 at 13:43:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Basilique du Sacré-Cœur de Montmartre - Paris - GT-01 - 2024.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Basilique du Sacré-Cœur de Montmartre - Paris - GT-01 - 2024.jpg
Info Architect Paul Abadie was commissioned to design the basilica, initially (1875), in a Romanesque-Byzantine style. He died in 1884, and then other architects continued his work with the result that a structure was obtained without a predominant characteristic, and for this reason unique in the world. Since 1900 this place full of meaning has been a symbol of Montmatre in Paris. c/u/n by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 13:43, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Nice weather but the picture is not horizontal. See the two horses, not leveled. And not vertical either (see the walls leaning to the center on both sides) -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:25, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I willingly corrected the verticals because a very slight convergence was actually visible with three-point perspective. Instead, the majestic staircase with gardens that leads to the basilica, and consequently the balcony where people are looking out, is not aligned with the basilica, because they have different angles. For this reason there remains a slight perspective shape whereby the horse on the right is slightly higher than the other. By the way, thanks for your comment. Terragio67 (talk) 11:28, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2024 at 11:15:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Schwaigern - Massenbach - Baumgruppe am Wilhelmstaler Bach bei Sonnenuntergang (1).jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Schwaigern - Massenbach - Baumgruppe am Wilhelmstaler Bach bei Sonnenuntergang (1).jpg
Support As I walked past this little grove of trees again and again, I noticed that, together with the reduced forms of the surrounding landscape, it had a simple but well-formed appearance. Of course something was missing. On a December evening, the setting sun coloured the clouds and gave the grove a slightly dramatic background. I like it when simple things show their beauty. -- Aristeas (talk) 11:15, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2024 at 02:34:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Camp - Notes on Fashion at the Met - Moschino (73834).jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Camp - Notes on Fashion at the Met - Moschino (73834).jpg
Info Moschino ensemble from the fall 2014 ready-to-wear collection, on display at the Metropolitan Museum of Art in the Camp - Notes on Fashion exhibit. all by — Rhododendritestalk | 02:34, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2024 at 02:33:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Juvenile yellow-crowned night heron (12938).jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Juvenile yellow-crowned night heron (12938).jpg
Support Charming bridge with history and character; good light and atmosphere. I like how the statue of Saint (John of) Nepomuk seems to contemplate the facing wayside shrine … – Aristeas (talk) 09:54, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Nice subject (although it's a shame that we have no details about it) but I find the right crop too abrupt spoiling the compo, sorry Poco a poco (talk) 19:41, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2024 at 21:34:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Western wattled-honeyeater (Foulehaio procerior) on octopus tree (Heptapleurum actinophyllum) Colo-I-Suva.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Western wattled-honeyeater (Foulehaio procerior) on octopus tree (Heptapleurum actinophyllum) Colo-I-Suva.jpg
Support This is what Featured Pictures should be all about. Not only is the photo visually pleasing, bird is somewhat rare (not a pigeon, mallard or tit). Bonus points for interesting setting (awesome fruit) and insect in focus. This is all around awesome. I can see this picture in ~top 20 of next Picture of the Year.--Tupungato (talk) 22:10, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I think this matches very well with the introduction of her article: "American stand-up comedian, actress, author, musician, and visual artist, best known for her eccentric stage persona, self-deprecating humor, wild hair and clothes, and exaggerated, cackling laugh." -- Yann (talk) 16:25, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2024 at 10:09:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Camels at Aït Benhaddou, Saharan caravan route, Marocco (آيت بن حدّو, ⴰⵢⵜ ⵃⴰⴷⴷⵓ).jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Camels at Aït Benhaddou, Saharan caravan route, Marocco (آيت بن حدّو, ⴰⵢⵜ ⵃⴰⴷⴷⵓ).jpg
Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2024 at 05:39:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Zaaddozen van een beuk (Fagus sylvatica) 13-09-2024 (d.j.b.).jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Zaaddozen van een beuk (Fagus sylvatica) 13-09-2024 (d.j.b.).jpg
Voting period ends on 27 Nov 2024 at 20:36:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Dourdou river in Trou de Bozouls (14).jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dourdou river in Trou de Bozouls (14).jpg
Voting period ends on 27 Nov 2024 at 13:35:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Ridotto Teatro Grande Brescia volta di Francesco Zugno e Francesco Battaglioli.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ridotto Teatro Grande Brescia volta di Francesco Zugno e Francesco Battaglioli.jpg
Oppose Part of the painting is hidden at the right. We just see a bit of an arm and of a head, because the camera was not in the axis. Also black distracting shape at the right in the foreground. Problem of composition in my view, sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:54, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
CommentGood point :-) Sorry, I don't read Italian (for the title) though I think the word Trompe-l'œil is missing there. Still, there is "flat" and "flat", and the camera doesn't seem in the axis. The bottom and the sides are not symmetrical. To be honest, at first sight my eyes were attracted by the distracting black shape. That part could be cropped out. The two columns at the bottom are showing the same perspective, as if the picture was taken from the right -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:33, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm terribly sorry, I was tromped, the right part is missing. Trompe-l'oeil is in the English description, the other is just the filename. By the way I was going to delete my comment. You can see it in the other fotos of the painting.--Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 06:35, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like it the way it is. Not every single Featured Picture has to be in the axis. This is a photo depicting a three dimensional object with details in variety of levels. I appreciate the fact that I can see the sculpted balustrade, which would be invisible or almost invisible in symmetrical axis composition encouraged by many Commons users. This perspective allows me to appreciate the painted ceiling, but also to better understand the surrounding architecture, which is a great thing taking into account Wikimedia Commons image should be encyclopedically useful. Don't get discouraged in submitting unusual perspectives for Featured Pictures. Other voters, don't be intimidated by seasoned users who discourage unusual perspectives. --Tupungato (talk) 22:30, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Wow, “seasoned users” – I must remember that cultivated phrase. Very useful, as nobody can say for sure whether this is a respectful description or a refined insult. Well, every FPC regular knows that Basile and me often disagree, but when Basile is called a “seasoned user” I hope I am allowed to share this designation with him. Or am I already a rotten user, having been on Commons for six years longer? Who knows … ;–) But I agree that nobody should be intimidated by any other user, of course. Please take our arguments, check them, compare them, form your own opinion based on reasons, vote. Thank you. – Aristeas (talk) 10:12, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period ends on 27 Nov 2024 at 13:10:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:001 Greater flamingo in flight in the Camargue Photo by Giles Laurent.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:001 Greater flamingo in flight in the Camargue Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg
Support Certainly not the most romantic one of the many castles and manors of the Ukraine, but the longer I look at it the more I like the clear geometric construction and how the fortress hides an imposing palazzo in fortezza. One hint: On the roofs of the palace there is some blue/orange/red moiree. In Lightroom or Photoshop/ACR, paint a brush mask over it and set “Moiree removal” e.g. to +60; it may be useful to increase (with the same mask) the saturation a bit, e.g. +20, because moiree removal often decreases saturation. If this is unclear, just drop me a note. – Aristeas (talk) 19:31, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period ends on 27 Nov 2024 at 06:48:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Katsuo ji temple waterfall Osaka Japan by Don Ramey Logan.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Katsuo ji temple waterfall Osaka Japan by Don Ramey Logan.jpg
Oppose The composition itself would be good, but the image is a little shaken (unstable camera), and the level of blown highlights (white areas on water) is unacceptable for a Featured Picture. But don't get discouraged, I've been a photojournalist for ~18 years, and still have problems with waterfalls :D --Tupungato (talk) 22:35, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Info Paesens. For me soothing horizontal play of lines behind the sea wall at Paesens with a view of the Wadden, a unique tidal area (UNESCO World Heritage) All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:32, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I have changed the gallery link from Other objects in landscapes to Natural#Netherlands because most similar photos are on the “Natural” gallery pages. Your description (“horizontal play of lines behind the sea wall at Paesens with a view of the Wadden, a unique tidal area”) confirms that this is a photo of the landscape/nature. The dobbe and the fence are objects, but they are integral parts of the landscape, so we can still put this into the “Natural” gallery. (Thanks to Cart for the confirmation!) Hope it helps, – Aristeas (talk) 11:15, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period ends on 26 Nov 2024 at 22:48:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:2024-11-04 02 PACIFIC SCOUT - MMSI 316013431 – Ogden Point, Victoria BC CAN.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:2024-11-04 02 PACIFIC SCOUT - MMSI 316013431 – Ogden Point, Victoria BC CAN.jpg
Info It’s not a good day for sailors. Pilot boat, Pacific Scout, in lashing rain and gale force winds (70 - 90 km/hour, with gusts to 110), comes in off the Salish Sea into the protection of the breakwater at Ogden Point Light, Victoria, BC Canada. The container ships keep coming up from Seattle or Tacoma and if the Pacific Scout can’t take off the pilot, then it will be some days before the pilot will land. c/u/n by GRDN711 -- GRDN711 (talk) 22:48, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Zoomed quality is not perfect, but the overall wow factor, difficult weather is enormous, this is what Feature Pictures are all about! --Tupungato (talk) 22:37, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period ends on 26 Nov 2024 at 13:46:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:023 Glossy ibis fishing in the Camargue Photo by Giles Laurent.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:023 Glossy ibis fishing in the Camargue Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg
While I agree with the critic about the noise - it is indeed visible in the image - I cannot agree that the photo is underexposed. The directional light from above excellently reveals the object's texture and creates an interesting three-dimensional effect. This lighting is clearly an artistic choice, not a technical error. In photography, there is no 'right' or 'wrong' lighting, but rather different artistic choices that support the image's idea and mood. In this case, this directed lighting gives the photo its intended dramatic effect. Janeklass (talk) 04:47, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral impressive, but as with the other nom it seems like it could be improved with post-processing. the hard part -- capturing such a detailed image of a tiny object on a clean background -- is over, and done well, so I hope to upgrade both of these votes soon. — Rhododendritestalk | 22:19, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I modified this file a little. I didn't do anything with the lighting, but I cropped it a little and changed the aspect ratio from 2:3 to 4:5 Janeklass (talk) 17:56, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's impossible to agree with the claim that this image is underexposed. This is clearly proven by the excellent visibility of every detail on the head louse's body - its tiny hairs, complex body texture, and even various color shades. The dark, almost black background is not an exposure error, but rather serves to highlight the main subject more clearly. The image's tonality is well balanced - we can clearly see details in both lighter and darker areas, confirming that the exposure is not incorrect. This lighting choice is intentional here, designed to give the image a slightly dramatic effect. If the picture were truly underexposed, we wouldn't be able to see such fine details and color tones that are now clearly visible. Janeklass (talk) 04:19, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Disagree. You will see more details if the photo is better exposed. Currently the contrasts are very hard to distinguish, especially at thumbnail size.
Hard to hear that "it's impossible to agree with the claim that this image is underexposed" while the two first reviewers here both find the image too dark :-) Then above you write "This lighting choice is intentional here, designed to give the image a slightly dramatic effect" (by the way, I don't understand this dramatic intention. It's just a close-up of an animal, no special background / context). Sorry, clear light problem for me, in state -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:45, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have responded to the criticism and want the evaluators to know that the lighting choice here is clearly intentional. How you choose to evaluate it is up to you. Janeklass (talk) 04:56, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The subjects are different and unfortunately the same approach cannot be applied here. Increasing the light would also amplify surface reflections and this would ruin the image completely Janeklass (talk) 05:17, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think this would cause more issues for the image. Unfortunately, I can't make those changes to this photo. This image stays as is. If there's no support... no worries, I'll try with another photo in the future (maybe) :D Janeklass (talk) 05:45, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support It is a very fascinating image. The darkness is not a problem, as the object is clearly seen, and that seems more like a creative choice on this dark creature. I am thinking that maybe a square format would be better for this image... but I'm not sure. Kruusamägi (talk) 13:24, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry. I agree that there are dark photographs which do not tolerate an increasure of the exposure – reproductions of dark paintings, some gloomy atmospheric landcape photographs, low-key photos etc. However I fail to see why this would apply to this photo, despite of the explanations. I have played a bit with this JPEG file and can confirm that a careful increase of the brightness works very well when at the same time the light parts are dialed down a bit. If you have a raw image or a 16 bit TIFF file, this should work even better. Of course you have all right to keep your photo as you think it should be (so keep it!), but I cannot support it here. Sorry again, – Aristeas (talk) 10:25, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
As I mentioned before, this solution was intentional. I did try making changes but wasn't satisfied with the result. I can see that opinions are divided on this one - and I suppose not everyone has to like the picture. It's clear that I won't get much support for this image, but that's okay. I'm already looking forward to when this period ends and I can submit my next works 🙂 Janeklass (talk) 13:28, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Fascinating and maybe valued image but to me an obviously non-centered image where there is no clear compositional reason or limitation preventing from getting it centered is not outstanding enough for FP. Cmao20 (talk) 01:53, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period ends on 25 Nov 2024 at 17:34:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Петергоф, Нижний парк, Львиный каскад. Фонтанная статуя «Нимфа, льющая воду из кувшина» 2.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Петергоф, Нижний парк, Львиный каскад. Фонтанная статуя «Нимфа, льющая воду из кувшина» 2.jpg
Support I agree that the angle and composition is great. I do think the shadows have been lifted too much, though, or else the HDR has gone a bit far. The tree branches particularly on the right don't IMO look natural. Cmao20 (talk) 01:51, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Ghost leaves at the right. No metadata but I would doubt this is a long exposure shot. Thus, more a problem of processing or Photoshopping in my opinion. We can see sorts of diffuse clear halos behind the trees. (Probably same impression as Cmao20, evoking "lifted shadows" / "branches don't look natural") -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:05, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent reproduction of an excellent example for a progressive poster of the 1920s. (This reduced style was ultra-modern then, and unlike many advertisings from the 1950s [not even to mention the terrible Nazi kitsch] it still works well.) – Aristeas (talk) 11:21, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period ends on 25 Nov 2024 at 12:59:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Royal Air Force Falcons Royal International Air Tattoo 2024 02.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Royal Air Force Falcons Royal International Air Tattoo 2024 02.jpg
Neutral Yes I know it's very difficult to take pictures at a funfair. I would tend to support this one too, but to be frank I don't like the wheel at the right (although some would say it adds some context, in my view it clutters the composition) nor the deformed people and buildings at the bottom at full resolution, due to the perspective. The crispy sharp central part is very nice, and the management of the light too -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:42, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good reproduction of a beautiful exemplary stained-glass window. Now we just need to figure out which biblical or historic scene is depicted here; this should be added to the description and reflected by the categories. Can somebody help? – Aristeas (talk) 16:14, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I am not a fan of stained glass photographed like this. The contrast and saturation has been pumped up too high so that the colours of the glass are exaggerated, and the details around the window are completely black. It doesn't look natural. I agree that many of the stained glass photos in the gallery have similar processing, but I don't think they should be FP either. This to me is an example of it being done right. Cmao20 (talk) 01:46, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Dear Basile Morin, you have rated when, by what and under what conditions the photo was taken, but not any word about the image itself. Having read "Featured picture", I assumed that the pictures are rated here. Am I wrong? -- Ввласенко (talk) 09:41, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose And I'd like to add that "low resolution", "high ISO" and "narrow depth of field" directly concern the technical aspects of "the image itself", as you request. This photo was perhaps a fair candidate in 2012, but much less in 2024. And even at that time, a tripod would have helped to increase the quality. The edges are slightly blurry, especially at the top and at the left. The crop is very tight all around. Overall, it is a standard photo of stained glass, not an exceptional one, in my opinion -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:21, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The execution is fine but I cannot see why this stained glass, among thousands, should be featured. In fact it looks too simple to me. Poco a poco (talk) 18:22, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The value of this stained glass window is determined not by its artistic intricacy, but by the time of its creation – the 13th century.-- Ввласенко (talk) 22:06, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period ends on 25 Nov 2024 at 05:15:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Many colorful flowerpots in front of Bulguksa temple in Gyeongju South Korea.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Many colorful flowerpots in front of Bulguksa temple in Gyeongju South Korea.jpg
Support I love the juxtaposition of the old roof truss with its beautiful paintings in muted colours and the vivid colours of the flowers and their pots. – Aristeas (talk) 16:11, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Sorry to discent. Composition, lighting or detail are not outstanding here IMHO. A well executed photo with a pretty subject but not outstanding to me. Poco a poco (talk) 18:28, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment There are lens flares in the sky and in the rocks (in the middle). Also a dust spot in the sky. There's no source for this resolution, that seems slightly higher than the camera sensor -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:23, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Just a nerdy note regarding the resolution: Some camera sensors deliver some more pixels than officially supported by the manufacturer. These extra pixels at the margins of the sensor are cut off by the cameras when creating a JPEG image, but they are saved into the raw image files; normally we still do not seem them because most raw converters just cut them off, too, probably because some of these extra pixels are often faulty. If one opens a raw image file from the camera used here (α7R IV) with RawTherapee, some of the extra pixels are retained and we get an image of 9,560 × 6,368 pixels. This means that all pixels in this photo (9,557 × 6,336 pixels) could indeed come straight from a simple single shot. Of course the Exif data state that the photo was developed with “Adobe Photoshop 25.9 (Windows)”, i.e. probably with Adobe Camera RAW (ACR), and ACR cuts the raw images from the α7R IV always to the nominal 9504 × 6336 pixels. But it is possible that the raw image was first developed with another raw converter (like RawTherapee) and only then edited with Photoshop … That’s the theory. Of course it seems more likely that the photographer made some kind of projection/perspective correction and streched the image slightly during that process; this would also explain the extra pixels and the image would still be authentic. – Aristeas (talk) 16:56, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The same applies also to other camera bodies, with a varying amount of extra pixels. Checking e.g. a CR2 file from the Canon EOS 5D IV, RawTherapee shows me 6732 × 4492 pixels – a little bit more than the official 6720 × 4480 pixels. So if one ever finds oneself in the situation that “just a few pixels” are missing at a border to complete the composition, it’s worth to give it a try and to open the raw image with RawTherapee … ;–) End of digression, sorry. – Aristeas (talk) 11:57, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Question The nomination indicates the name Scosse as uploader, but according to the file page, the uploader is Civvì. And because this last version is significantly different from the original one, with heavy processing, lifted shadows and oversaturated colors, I wonder if these modifications have been approved by the photographer. This message suggests that Scosse is not at the initiative of the FP nomination -- Basile Morin (talk) 14:13, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Basile Morin, and also wonder where the high resolution version of the image came from. If it was not uploaded by or with the consent of the original photographer then this is a copyright violation - if the photographer has chosen only to release the 6megapixel version then we don't have the right to upload a larger version that wasn't explicitly released under a Creative Commons license over the top Cmao20 (talk) 15:24, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi all, during the first candidature as QI the original version of the picture was considered too small so I asked the author if they were willing to upload a larger version of the picture, instead of uploading it they sent it me via email and I uploaded it. Maybe I should forward this email exchange to VRTS? --Civvì (talk) 15:38, 15 November 2024 (UTC) Update, I just forwarded the emails to VRTS. --Civvì (talk) 15:49, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Vote and comment struck on that basis. I will have a think about whether the lens flare bothers me too much to support. The dust spot should be fixed though. Cmao20 (talk) 16:05, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Thanks for the clarification about the image source. The lens flares and dust spot are still a problem in my view, but more importantly, which person did manage the post-treatment here, Scosse or Civvì? Scosse could have sent the same image in larger size as requested, and Civvì handled the processing before uploading it? In any case the correct name of the uploader should be updated on this nomination -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:37, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Thanks for the notification and attempt to improve, but sorry to say the correction is not well handled in my opinion. First, the dust spot and lens flares are still there (I will add image notes to specify the exact locations), then the dark spot added to reduce the white spot in the center creates artificial shadows on the rocks. Moreover, in this last version, the contrasts have been reduced, or the clarity increased, compared to the original, it's really blueish in the background and at the top of the foreground -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:35, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period ends on 23 Nov 2024 at 14:23:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Open wing position of Vindula erota (Fabricius, 1793) - Cruiser butterfly sucking sweat from human socks ANK6537.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Open wing position of Vindula erota (Fabricius, 1793) - Cruiser butterfly sucking sweat from human socks ANK6537.jpg
Comment It's a beautiful capture but the background doesn't appeal to me. I know you can see it as a fresh take on this kind of photo, but it just isn't for me. Cmao20 (talk) 19:58, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I agree with Cmao20. In this case, the cropped shoes ruin the composition in my view. Please do bring more space around if you can. Although the full resolution of the camera has been reached here, perhaps a different shot as alternative? I will be happy to review again and perhaps change my vote -- Basile Morin (talk) 23:03, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Extremely sorry, actually this species gave me only 10 sec for clicking photographs. Suddenly it came and sit on my shoes and this moment I clicked only one photograph after clicking it move to land then I clicked another one and after clicking it was gone. I am using Tamron 90mm prime that why I am failed to click more wide image, I was standing for search another species suddenly it came and at that moment I was clicked photograph from where I was stand before. This species not give to me more time for clicking more images. Ankit0908 (talk) 02:57, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like this unusual take. Full quality on butterfly. I understand the compromise in partially cropping shoes. We still get the full context (the other shoe with visible sock inside), but the crop is tight enough that the butterfly is quite big. --Tupungato (talk) 22:44, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Agree that unusual takes are very welcome; and the butterfly itself is very sharp; just the crop partially spoils the effect. – Aristeas (talk) 10:16, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive church in beautiful winter scenery, good composition. The side light nicely emphasizes the shapes of the building. Large parts of the foreground are in the shadow, but IMHO this works well here because it gives a nice contrast to the bright walls and the golden domes (if everything on the photo was in the sun, it would probably look flat and boring). – Aristeas (talk) 19:48, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice composition and pleasant light. Possibly slightly tilted at the right, and presence of minor chromatic aberrations in the tree branches, though -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:40, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I enjoy to stroll along the paths through the ruins. Indeed the larger shadow areas are a bit unfortunate, but as they are shed by the high trees around the ruins it’s probably impossible to avoid them – if the photo was taken when the sky was overcast the whole image would look dull. Near the corners the quality deteriorates quickly, but that’s a typical problem with drone shots and has no impact on the main subject at all. – Aristeas (talk) 11:20, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Beautiful and very interesting view, but the verticals seem to be leaning in. Wouldn’t the photo profit from a perspective correction? – Aristeas (talk) 19:17, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Nov 2024 at 15:08:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
सीधे वर्तमान उम्मीदवार पर पहुँचें।
_head_Tiritiri_Matangi.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
_on_octopus_tree_(Heptapleurum_actinophyllum)_Colo-I-Suva.jpg)
.JPG)
.jpg)
_13-09-2024_(d.j.b.).jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
_01.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
_Upolu.jpg)
._Paris.jpg)
_-_Cruiser_butterfly_sucking_sweat_from_human_socks_ANK6537.jpg)
.jpg)
,_reserva_natural_Mas%C3%A1i_Mara,_Kenia,_2024-05-20,_DD_80.jpg)
,_reserva_natural_Mas%C3%A1i_Mara,_Kenia,_2024-05-20,_DD_79.jpg)
_head_Tiritiri_Matangi.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_on_octopus_tree_(Heptapleurum_actinophyllum)_Colo-I-Suva.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_13-09-2024_(d.j.b.).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_01.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_Upolu.jpg,_featured){kind=link}
._Paris.jpg){kind=link}
_-_Cruiser_butterfly_sucking_sweat_from_human_socks_ANK6537.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_head_Tiritiri_Matangi.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_head_Tiritiri_Matangi.jpg){kind=link}
_head_Tiritiri_Matangi.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![[1]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Kollie_-_Braunlage_01.jpg){kind=link}
![[2]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Kollie_-_Braunlage_03.jpg){kind=link}
![[3]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Drei_Annen_-_Wernigerode_01.jpg){kind=link}
![[4]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Schierke_-_Feuersteinklippe_01.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_on_octopus_tree_(Heptapleurum_actinophyllum)_Colo-I-Suva.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_on_octopus_tree_(Heptapleurum_actinophyllum)_Colo-I-Suva.jpg){kind=link}
_on_octopus_tree_(Heptapleurum_actinophyllum)_Colo-I-Suva.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_13-09-2024_(d.j.b.).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_13-09-2024_(d.j.b.).jpg){kind=link}
_13-09-2024_(d.j.b.).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_01.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_01.jpg){kind=link}
_01.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_Upolu.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_Upolu.jpg){kind=link}
_Upolu.jpg,_featured){kind=link}
_Upolu.jpg,_featured){kind=link}
._Paris.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
._Paris.jpg){kind=link}
._Paris.jpg){kind=link}
_06.jpg){kind=link}
_-_Cruiser_butterfly_sucking_sweat_from_human_socks_ANK6537.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_-_Cruiser_butterfly_sucking_sweat_from_human_socks_ANK6537.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
