निर्वाचित चित्र उम्मीदवार वो चित्र (छवियाँ) हैं जिनके कॉमन्स पर सर्वोत्तम चित्रों में से एक होने के लिए समुदाय के लोग मतदान करेंगे। यह सूची उन उम्मीदवारों की है जो निर्वाचित चित्र हो सकते हैं। आज का चित्र निर्वाचित्र चित्रों में से चुनी हुई एक छवि होगी।
यदि आपको लगता है कि आपने एक महत्वपूर्ण चित्र प्राप्त अथवा निर्मित किया है जो उपयुक्त चित्र विवरण और मुद्राधिकार के साथ है, तब निम्न कार्य करें।
प्रथम चरण: चित्र का नाम निम्न खाने में उपस्थित पाठ के आगे लिखें, उदाहरण के लिए, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:आपके चित्र का नाम.jpg लिखें और "नया नामांकन आरम्भ करें।" बटन पर क्लिक करें।
सभी एकल फाइलें:
पुनः नामांकन के लिए चित्र के नाम 'के बाद केवल /2 लिखें। जैसे:– Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Foo.jpg/2
Set nominations ONLY
Sets are temporarily disallowed for technical reasons; will reopen soon.
द्वितीय चरण: आप जिस पृष्ठ पर पहुँचे हैं वहाँ के निर्देशों का पालन करें और पृष्ठ को संरक्षित करें।
वो सम्पादक जिनका खाता कम से कम १० दिन पुराना है और ५० सम्पादन कर चुके हैं, अपना मत दे सकते हैं। अपने नामांकन के लिए कोई भी मतदान कर सकता है। अज्ञात (आईपी) मतों की अनुमति नहीं है।
आप निम्न साँचे काम में ले सकते हो:
{{Support}} (Support),
{{Oppose}} (Oppose),
{{Neutral}} (Neutral),
{{Comment}} (Comment),
{{Info}} (Info),
{{Question}} (Question),
{{Request}} (Request).
You may indicate that the image has no chance of success with the template {{FPX|reason - ~~~~}}, where reason explains why the image is clearly unacceptable as a FP. The template can only be used when there are no support votes other than the one from the nominator.
Info created by Abraham Ortelius, uploaded and nominated by Yann
InfoTheatrum Orbis Terrarum, world maps by Abraham Ortelius, 1572. First edition in German. Each of the five maps here were the standards for their time, drawn from the most important wall maps produced by Mercator, Ortelius and other leading European mapmakers.
Support It is quite exceptional to have a whole set in such a good quality and high resolution. Each of the maps may be in the relevant FP subcategory. -- Yann (talk) 09:48, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Info The green fields surrounding Stongde village are a refreshing contrast from the stark treeless central Zanskar valley and the snow-capped 6,000 m (20,000 ft) Zanskar Range. Elevation of Stongde 3,530 m (11,580 ft). Created by Tagooty - uploaded by Tagooty - nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 04:10, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delist and replace You're right, I can download it at this resolution on my mobile phone (but apparently not on my computer). Please rename the file -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:04, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2024 at 14:17:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Natural History Museum London South Facade 2020 01.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Natural History Museum London South Facade 2020 01.jpg
Comment Oddly, the building looks hazy, at thumbnail size. Especially at the top. It is almost a contrejour (see the shadows of the tree in the center, leaning towards us), so I would say the light was not so cooperative at the beginning. Composition has potential but the colors are washed out -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:08, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2024 at 12:17:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:2022-08-19 European Championships 2022 – Table Tennis by Sandro Halank–007.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:2022-08-19 European Championships 2022 – Table Tennis by Sandro Halank–007.jpg
Unfortunately, I have a problem with the Canon EOS R3, when converting CR3 to JPG this data gets lost. It is 200 mm, 1/1,000 sec., F/3.5 and ISO 6,400. Sandro Halank (talk) 12:52, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Well frozen at high speed, but I agree with Yann the metadata could be added manually on the file page (about the conversion from RAW to JPG, it is certainly a matter of parameters) -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:15, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2024 at 10:52:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Madrid cathedral 2020 - view from the dome.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Madrid cathedral 2020 - view from the dome.jpg
Support Panorama of the views from the dome of the Almudena Cathedral in Madrid. Pictures taken here at sunset are rare, since the regular visiting hours end before, and only limited, city hall-sponsored visits are allowed during the evening. -- Fernando (talk) 10:52, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support There is a lot of colour noise but I think it's forgiveable because of very high resolution, perfect composition (beautifully centered), nice light, and as you say difficulty of taking the photo; any improvement you can make would be appreciated though Cmao20 (talk) 13:35, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Improved version at SwissTransfer: I took the liberty of removing the color noise, as well as significantly reducing the general noise without affecting the sharpness. If you/the community like the result, please feel free to use it for an update :) Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 20:24, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Yann: It was an overcast afternoon and I underexposed to bring out the range of colours in the rocks. I've increased the exposure a bit. Please see the new version. --Tagooty (talk) 03:17, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period ends on 10 Nov 2024 at 13:56:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:RNoAF Saab MFI-15 Safari 806 Royal International Air Tattoo 2024 01.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:RNoAF Saab MFI-15 Safari 806 Royal International Air Tattoo 2024 01.jpg
Strong support Extraordinary panning, making the subject popping up from the background. Impressive settings, at 1/60 sec only, for a moving subject located far away. The plane is surprisingly sharp -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:30, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
InfoQal'at al-Bahrain, Karbabad, Bahrain. The archaeological site, also known as the “Fort of Bahrain”, was the capital of the Dilmun civilization and a place of consistent human settlement and occupation from c. 2300 BC to the present. A Portuguese fort stands today atop the site and it became a UNESCO World Heritage Site in 2005. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 13:53, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period ends on 10 Nov 2024 at 06:50:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Чинки плато Устюрт. Урочище Бозжыра.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Чинки плато Устюрт. Урочище Бозжыра.jpg
You did everything right, thank you for the nomination. About the picture: Great subject, the sky is a bit noisy which could be fixed. Unfortunately, there is a probable stitching error in the lower area that has created a blurred part (please see annotation). Suggested solution: Either contact the author and ask for help, or carry out extensive retouching on this file. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 09:02, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Optimized version at SwissTransfer: I took the liberty of denoising the sky a bit and reducing the above mentioned blurry (presumably) stitching error to an acceptable level. If the author is not available, please feel free to use this version for an update :) Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 11:02, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Info: the Ameca River, forming the natural border between the states of Jalisco and Nayarit, taken from a window of a commercial aircraft; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:02, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Yes, if the picture was shot from the window of a commercial aircraft, it should be mentioned somewhere on the file page. Currently poor categorization and description for a FP nomination. -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:42, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period ends on 9 Nov 2024 at 15:48:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Moving with archers defending livestock scene.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Moving with archers defending livestock scene.jpg
Oppose Sorry but IMO this is a QI not an FP. Beautiful flower and nice colours but not sharp enough for a photo of a large flower. Cmao20 (talk) 13:14, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period ends on 9 Nov 2024 at 12:19:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Iglesia de Saint-Merri, París, Francia, 2022-10-31, DD 157-159 HDR.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Iglesia de Saint-Merri, París, Francia, 2022-10-31, DD 157-159 HDR.jpg
Info Very high quality church interior with a special atmosphere. Note that the darkness of this church is correct for a photo taken at 5:47pm in October, I would not want it brightened because I think the twilight lighting conditions make it special. created by Poco a poco - uploaded by Poco a poco - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 12:19, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Info Yes I know that the quality of this image is a little flawed but I think it should be FP anyway because of the composition, colours, wonderful high-key and minimalist surroundings, and the fact that it is a lovely portrait of personal devotion and prayer. created by Sultan Ahmed Niloy - uploaded by Sultan Ahmed Niloy - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 12:19, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I agree that it's a bit soft. It is maybe a little bit of motion blur. I nominated it because I think the composition outweighs that. I disagree that it's overexposed though. Bright light shining through a large arch window will appear white to the naked eye. I think this photo would be much less interesting if you reduced the highlights. Cmao20 (talk) 13:28, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Even though I know that there surely will be accusations of revenge voting, this is a matter of principle for me: as long as the categories aren't properly fixed, oppose. --A.Savin15:51, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have found one error. I created a new Category:Pelecaniformes of the Cook Islands and placed it Category:Pelecaniformes by country. I did not categorize it under Category:Birds of the Cook Islands. Naughty me. I have now done so. I do wonder why the category structure places the Cook Islands under New Zealand. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:46, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period ends on 9 Nov 2024 at 02:03:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:White dog sleeping on the floor with puppies after nursing in Don Det Laos.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:White dog sleeping on the floor with puppies after nursing in Don Det Laos.jpg
Support I think the framing is good, the open door on the left and the pigeons flying up on the bottom right are part of the story and form a whole. -- Radomianin (talk) 08:33, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period ends on 8 Nov 2024 at 02:07:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Samanea saman on an island with orange clouds and blue sky at sunrise from Don Det Si Phan Don Laos.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Samanea saman on an island with orange clouds and blue sky at sunrise from Don Det Si Phan Don Laos.jpg
Comment The light is absolutely stunning but doesn't it need a perspective correction? Particularly when you look at the horizon on the left it looks like it's leaning to me. Cmao20 (talk) 04:09, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I do not generally like pictures where people are ahead of the main subject, but in this case they are clearly part of the composition. The viewer becomes part of that crowd. Effective choice of the silhouette effect. --Harlock81 (talk) 19:38, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I don't get the reasons for the support here, honestly. I agree with all of Poco's criticisms. The building is of course amazing and the picture is fine but it isn't FP in either composiiton or quality, IMO. Cmao20 (talk) 04:05, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Definitely one that you have to view in full size. I thought the light was a bit grey at first but looking at it for longer, i really like the colours Cmao20 (talk) 20:42, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Compared to your other recent FP I find this one less satisfying. The entrance itself is obviously a lot less eye-catching, but the main issue for me is that the half-pedestrian here gives the impression that she just wandered across your shot. To me, she is blocking our view of the subject, rather than being part of the composition like in the previous photo. BigDom (talk) 01:22, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Info created, uploaded and nominated by me. I'm not sure if it also could fit into the FP gallery "Sculptures", as the Tetrahedron is somehow both – one and a tower. -- A. Öztas19:52, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Just to be complete at this point: One nomination did not reach the necessary total number of votes and the other was a different version of this picture, whose nomination I had withdrawn after less than a day. Without going any further into the discussion here, I should have included the reference above (as I subsequently did) when I nominated it. I didn't have in mind at the time that the photo had already been here before. -- A. Öztas11:13, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There is no strict rule about it but it is generally the case that we don't renominate a picture that has failed unless significant improvements have been made to it since the previous nomination. My support still stands in this case, but it isn't normally something we would do. Cmao20 (talk) 13:57, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The brief nomination that I withdrew after less than a day and the subsequent one felt like a single attempt to me and this was over a year ago – and quite a lot has happened since then. So yes, it simply slipped my mind. There's no reason to be surprised by that. It was pointed out, the reference was added, and that should suffice. As for the image, I understand that it might indeed appear a bit too dark. Whilst it can always change, at the moment it's just right for me, whether it's enough for an excellence rating or not. I appreciate your perspective and the time you've taken to review it. -- A. Öztas16:43, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You're welcome to discuss here. "Brief nomination" but still three oppose, one question and one comment during this short time. Thus quite a logical withdrawal, in my opinion. We can of course AGF, but reciprocally, we, reviewers, remember that the two similar nominations failed not so long ago, for assumed fair reasons. As Ikan Kekek rightly said in a similar case "Not voting also counts as a lack of interest". Usually, it is obvious to the nominators that a photo has already been nominated, because they need to add "/2" at the end of the file name to create a new FPC, but here the file page has been renamedtwice recently. With still no metadata. Of course, since the voters are not always the same at FPC every month, it can happen that a picture which failed the first time is finally promoted by insisting. But you should also understand, as you wrote after the first nomination "I will nominate the original as FP with the reasonable assumption that it will be rejected anyway", that the picture will struggle to pass, even though several of us reiterate their efforts to evaluate again. -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:14, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Discuss about what? After the first answer from you and me, everything was already said, or am I wrong? Of course, we are welcome to deepen the discussion, precisely because it is a topic that affects many aspects of the FP nomination processes and often offers room for different perspectives. In this context, I would like to address a few points that touch on both the past of previous nominations and the general guidelines for repeat submissions. As I mentioned, the first nomination was over a year ago. This distance in the time frame plays a role in my opinion, as it makes it clear that I did not submit the nomination of the structure out of a constant repetition so that it would, as you wrote, "finally be promoted by insisting". The motivation lies more in the fact that I continued to reflect on the image over time and adapted my own view of it. As a photographer, I often experience such processes; a certain development of my own view of the image. Photography, after all, is a medium through which we capture not just what we see, but what we feel at a given moment. And as those feelings evolve, so too can our interpretations of our own work. This growth is natural and, I believe, valuable to the community's understanding of a work as it evolves through the eyes of its creator. At the same time, I understand that for reviewers like you and others who regularly participate in the discussions, there is a certain habit and reminder value when similar or identical images are up for discussion again. What this has to do with AGF here is beyond me. I'm not as familiar with the practice in this area, I'm only on my fourth photo here. I see your references to a previous nomination as a helpful addition and not a criticism per se. The process of weighing up between a possible repetition and the search for new qualities in an image is essential and is shown in the current case by the different feedback and views. I would also like to note that my decision to quickly withdraw the previous nomination should not be understood as an endorsement of a "logical withdrawal". There were several factors at the time, including personal considerations, that led me to withdraw the nomination. It is true that this first nomination was - albeit briefly - on the table and led to reactions, but the circumstances were more complex than they appear at first glance. In my opinion, such a withdrawal should not be seen as a weakening factor for the quality of the picture itself, but as part of the individual process that each artist has to deal with. Furthermore, I would suggest having a broader discussion about the weighting of nominations that have already failed. Of course, there is no doubt that a clear majority should decide the relevance and quality of an image, but there may be cases where an image changes its relevance and quality over time. This could be due to technical improvements, a change in the community's perspective or simply time showing the work in a new light. Such an approach may well make sense for some FPC nominations, particularly for those images that have failed in the past but could potentially find new appreciation. After all, everything and nothing is set in stone here. With regard to the question about the brightness of the image, I agree that this is a subjective judgement and certainly open to discussion. The incidence of light and the colour scheme reflect the mood that I wanted to capture when taking the photograph and are not just technical parameters for me, but part of the aesthetic that I want to convey. Of course, the comment that the image may be perceived as too dark is justified and a question of personal taste - however, it is precisely this difference between subjective perception and objective quality that often leads to divergent assessments. Light plays a powerful role in shaping the emotional resonance of an image, influencing how viewers perceive and connect with it on a deeper level. By intentionally choosing a darker, more subdued lighting, I aimed to create an atmosphere that goes beyond a straightforward representation of the structure itself. This darkness, though perhaps unconventional, allows subtle textures and contrasts to emerge, lending the image a mysterious quality that invites viewers to look closer and consider the piece in a contemplative way. The interplay between shadows and faint highlights, in my view, captures a sense of introspection and draws attention to the sculptural lines of the structure. While brighter lighting may provide more clarity or detail, this more moody approach aligns with the feeling I experienced when taking the photograph, reflecting a quieter, almost meditative atmosphere. Shadows add depth and a sense of timelessness to the scene, suggesting that the image captures not just a single moment but a feeling that could exist outside of time. This play of light and shadow is a deliberate choice, one intended to evoke curiosity and to invite viewers into the scene, allowing them to experience the piece not merely as an architectural object but as a structure with an almost enigmatic presence. At least that's how I feel about this one. In the end, I understand that every image will resonate differently with each person who views it, and I fully respect the diverse perspectives within this community. The beauty of these discussions lies in their ability to reveal new interpretations and insights, both for the artist and for those who critique the work. I look forward to read more of your perspectives in other discussions as well, as these exchanges are invaluable not only for our individual growth but also for enriching the shared vision of what we seek to highlight here. -- A. Öztas05:02, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period ends on 4 Nov 2024 at 09:57:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Cañon del Río Sil desde el mirador de Vilouxe.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cañon del Río Sil desde el mirador de Vilouxe.jpg
Comment I realise this may have been unavoidable, but the out of focus rocks in the foreground bother me a little, especially because they are not symmetrical. Cmao20 (talk) 10:45, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I don't think it's overexposed. I'm not a big fan of reducing bright white highlights so that they are a dull grey. There is a tiny bit of colour fringing around that area that you could work on but really a very minor point. Cmao20 (talk) 10:41, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Info- Reason to delist and replaceː Last year I took some photos in this very dark abbey from the year 1000 located in Assisi, but in the past I had no idea how to stitch two pictures into one. Only recently have I been able to propose what I really had in mind: to see great part of the austere medieval internal apse of the Abbey of St. Peter (Assisi, Italy). (Original nomination)
Voting period ends on 3 Nov 2024 at 16:54:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Keir Hardie by George Grantham Bain.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Keir Hardie by George Grantham Bain.jpg
Support The informtion on this image should note that this is an image of James Keir Hardie (15 August 1856 – 26 September 1915), a Scottish trade unionist and politician, taken in 1909 by the photographer, George Grantham Bain. --GRDN711 (talk) 20:45, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@GRDN711: I added a little more information about Hardie (and linked to his Wikipedia page for any further info), but other than a description of him, I'm not sure what of that isn't in the file description page. Adam Cuerden (talk) 18:08, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Nov 2024 at 12:44:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Agricultural terraces in Anti-Atlas mountains near Tafraoute, Morocco.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Agricultural terraces in Anti-Atlas mountains near Tafraoute, Morocco.jpg
Oppose The subject doesn' really stand out, I'd have probably cropp a chunk at the bottom. Pretty but I don't consider that architecture extraordinary Poco a poco (talk) 17:09, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Nice weather but according to the shadows of the bushes at the right, and my overall impression, the orientation of the light was not so cooperative, like a bit dull or hazy. Also the bottom-up viewpoint is highlighting a lot of the foreground with shadowy sides and not so much of the buildings. The houses at the right are in the shadow, hard to distinguish. I think another viewpoint, more from the left, and perhaps also higher in altitude, would have improved content enhancement -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:04, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support The so called "foreground" is what this image is about - for me this is an excellent documentation of an agricultural method for arid climates. --Kritzolina (talk) 15:19, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Nov 2024 at 12:09:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Grand Mosque at Constantine (15676686960).jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Grand Mosque at Constantine (15676686960).jpg
856
133
836
796
4912
3264
Irregular yellow coloring on white surface, possibly indicating subsequent coloration within a selection that was not carefully prepared. -- Radomianin (talk) 14:59, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Indeed really cool, quality degrades a bit towards the borders, but all in all very impressive. I took the liberty to change the gallery link to our special gallery for ceilings of religious buildings. I will add a section for Algeria there if this nomination succeeds. – Aristeas (talk) 15:57, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Strong oppose Below the quality bar I'd expect for FP and the bottom crop is unfortunate causing also a lack of symmertry. If the subject would be complete I'd have gone for a square crop Poco a poco (talk) 17:07, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose In addition to the technical problems caused by the absence of tripod, the viewpoint was not in the center. As a consequence, the circles are not concentric. And the crop is tighter at the bottom than at the top, making the composition unbalanced -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:18, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support At least crop sides - shadow part. It could be better, but tripod in Mosque, normally not possible. Even camera-photo can be problem. --Mile (talk) 11:41, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No need for a tripod to a get a HQ shot from a ceiling. I have done it so many times... I'm surprised and disappointed by the support this image is getting. The camera was off-centered, so that the arches on left and right are not symmetrical at all, the cop is a mess and the quality low. Poco a poco (talk) 14:06, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose In the top left corner (please see annotation) there is a yellow coloration on the white surface, which indicates a subsequent coloring within a poorly made selection. However, this is only an assumption. Also, the saturation of the image seems too high to me. I would also suggest a square crop in favor of a more balanced composition. Also, I have to partially agree with the opponents above that the FP standard for church interiors is higher than this one. Nevertheless, the subject is great, and with careful reworking it would have a chance of becoming FP. I am very sorry. -- Radomianin (talk) 15:15, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Addendum: If you look at the original version, you can see a more natural coloring. Another indication of subsequent editing, which in my opinion was not done carefully enough. I would like to ask the nominator/editor to place a retouching template with the done work on the file page. Many thanks in advance. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 15:33, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your reply, Riad Salih. I am sure you have done your best to meet the FP standard. For this, the community thanks you, because every volunteer is needed to keep this project alive. And your work is just as valuable as that of any other volunteer. But participation in this forum thrives on constructive criticism that helps the volunteers maintain the professional standards of the FP project. I too have evolved over the past few years by trying to accept criticism and develop my skills. My suggestion was only meant as an advice to provide with the template the necessary transparency on the file page. If my criticism was perceived as disrespectful, I sincerely apologize. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 21:29, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Nov 2024 at 09:12:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Château du Haut-Koenigsbourg (755 m) (Orschwiller) (19).jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Château du Haut-Koenigsbourg (755 m) (Orschwiller) (19).jpg
Featured picture candidates/File:Château du Haut-Koenigsbourg (755 m) (Orschwiller) (19).jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Château du Haut-Koenigsbourg (755 m) (Orschwiller) (19).jpg
Unconfirmed results: (info) Result: X support, X oppose, X neutral → not featured. /Note: this candidate has several alternatives, thus if featured the alternative parameter needs to be specified. /FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 3 November 2024 (UTC))[reply]
सीधे वर्तमान उम्मीदवार पर पहुँचें।
._17-08-2024_(d.j.b.).jpg)
_dark_morph_Rarotonga.jpg)
_-_Common_Quaker_(7)_WLB.jpg)
.jpg)
,_Tetraeder_--_2022_--_0402.jpg)
_Tiritiri_Matangi.jpg)
.jpg)
_(Orschwiller)_(19).jpg)
_(Orschwiller)_(19)_edited_(1).jpg)
.jpg)
._17-08-2024_(d.j.b.).jpg){kind=link}
_dark_morph_Rarotonga.jpg){kind=link}
_-_Common_Quaker_(7)_WLB.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
,_Tetraeder_--_2022_--_0402.jpg){kind=link}
_Tiritiri_Matangi.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg,_not_featured){kind=link}
_(Orschwiller)_(19).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
._17-08-2024_(d.j.b.).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
._17-08-2024_(d.j.b.).jpg){kind=link}
._17-08-2024_(d.j.b.).jpg){kind=link}
_dark_morph_Rarotonga.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_dark_morph_Rarotonga.jpg){kind=link}
_dark_morph_Rarotonga.jpg){kind=link}
_-_Common_Quaker_(7)_WLB.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_-_Common_Quaker_(7)_WLB.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
,_Tetraeder_--_2022_--_0402.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
,_Tetraeder_--_2022_--_0402.jpg){kind=link}
,_Tetraeder_--_2022_--_0402.jpg){kind=link}
_edited_(1).jpg){kind=link}
,_Tetraeder_--_2022_--_0402.jpg&diff=next&oldid=949773583){kind=link}
_Tiritiri_Matangi.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_Tiritiri_Matangi.jpg){kind=link}
_Tiritiri_Matangi.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg,_not_featured){kind=link}
.jpg,_not_featured){kind=link}
_(Orschwiller)_(19).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_(Orschwiller)_(19).jpg){kind=link}
_(Orschwiller)_(19).jpg){kind=link}
_(Orschwiller)_(19).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}