Commons:特色图片评选

COM:FPC

This project page in other languages:

跳转至评选区

此处的图片评选区交流主要使用英语，如果需要中文交流区，请前往中文维基百科的本地评选区。

特色图片评选

欢迎来到特色图片评选！社群将在此投票决定图片是否会被选为维基共享资源最优秀的图片之一，即特色图片，每日图片的图像便是从特色图片中选取的。特色图片是中文维基百科最令人感到印象深刻，也是最具百科性的图片或图表。谚语有云：“一画胜千言。”特色图片能够让条目的内容更加清楚丰富。如果你认为你已经创作或找到了一张可能有价值的图像，请把它加到“提名”部分。如果在10天后达成了共识，图像就会成功入选。

这里列出了特色图片的评选记录，你也可以在下方查看按时间顺序列出的图片：2004年、2005年, 2006年、2007年、2008年、2009年、2010年、2011年、2012年、2013年、2014年、2015年、2016年、2017年、2018年、2019年、2020 以及本月。

关于我们最好的照片的另一个概述，请参阅我们的年度评选。

你可以：

增加一个新提名
查阅图像评估指南
了解现在的评选
重申特色图片
查看目前的除名
阅览特色图片评选标准
参阅目录

规范

投票周期为10天，之后的投票将无效。
欢迎匿名用户提名并参与讨论。
提名者可以随时撤回提名。
每个注册用户都可以投票，匿名用户的票将不统计。
如果提名5天后没有支持票，该提名将提前结束。
通过的标准：至少5个支持票，支持票与反对票比例大于2/1。
完成的投票保存在存档。
参见投票结束后操作指引。

提名

如果您认为您已经找到或拍摄了一张可能符合标准的图像，并使用了适当的图像描述和版权标记许可，那么请按照如下步骤操作：

1. 按照括号内的格式（Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:提名图像名称.jpg）在下方的文本框输入图像名称，然后点击“创建新提名”按钮。

如果本次提名为第n次提名，请按照括号内的格式（Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:提名图像名称.jpg/2）展开操作。

所有的新图片集提名页面都应按照括号内的格式（Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/My nomination）进行。

2. 按照编辑页面上的说明进行操作并保存页面。（注：打开编辑页面后，您在上方看到的“LIST OF NOMINATIONS (Put your nominations to the TOP of this section (after this comment))”大意为“这里是候选图片列表，请将您的提名提交到本节的顶部（在本行后）”；您在下方看到的“DO NOT ADD NEW NOMINATIONS ABOVE THIS LINE, BUT ON TOP”大意为“不要在本行上方添加新的贴士（除了顶部）”。）

3. 点击此处并按如下格式在图片候选区的顶端加入新内容：

{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:提名图像名称.jpg}}

推荐操作：请COM:FP的列表处添加一个分类。

可选操作：如果您不是图像的创建者，请通知在他/她的讨论页添入“{{subst:FPC-notice|Your image filename.jpg}} -- ~~~~”（不含括号）。

注意，你的荧光屏可能未调校妥当！

光暗度

在讨论图像的光暗度的时候，投票者有必要知道他们的屏幕显示有否被适当地调整。不同的屏幕显示，它们显示阴影细节的能力亦大有不同。旁边为一幅画了四个暗灰色的圆圈的图片。如果您能辨明其中三个（甚至四个）圈子，那表示你的的屏幕可以正确地显示阴影细节。如果你只能够看到三个以下的圈子，你可能需要调整你的屏幕以及/或者电脑显示设置。一些显示设备可能无法被调整至观察阴影细节的最理想度数，故此请在投票的时候考虑这点。如果可行的话，也可以考虑把它打印出来。

色彩度

在伽玛调整的屏幕显示上从几尺之外观看右图，图中四个不同颜色的圈子会自然混入背景之中。如果他们完全跟背景混合，你则须要调校你的伽玛设置（在电脑的输出设置上，而不在于屏幕显示），直到它们能彼此融合。调校的过程也许会非常困难，然而轻微的偏差并不是致命伤。未能更正的个人电脑显示通常会显示出比背景深色的圈子。请注意，在液晶显示（无论膝上电脑或者平面屏幕）上观看图片，你的观看角度有很大可能影响屏幕上的图像质素。如有需要，请点击图像以获得更多技术信息。

Featured picture candidates

File:Dominiiklaste klooster.jpg

Voting period ends on 30 Nov 2024 at 14:37:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#Estonia
Info created & uploaded by Kalev Kuljus - nominated by Kruusamägi (talk) 14:37, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kruusamägi (talk) 14:37, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:North Island saddleback (Philesturnus rufusater) head Tiritiri Matangi.jpg

Voting period ends on 30 Nov 2024 at 14:09:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Callaeidae (New Zealand wattlebirds)
Info Translocations, which started in the 1980s, have helped secure the future of this near-threatened New Zealand endemic. No FPs of this family. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:09, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:09, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Green Fungi Log Singanally Coorg Nov24 A7CR 04866-90 zsp.jpg

Voting period ends on 30 Nov 2024 at 10:35:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Fungi#Family_:_Polyporaceae
Info Yellow green fungi (tentative: Trametes sp.) on log, growing around silver oak leaves. The large fungi are about 7.5 cm (3 in) across. Green colour may be due to algal growth. Focus stack of 25 images. Singnally, Somwarpet, Coorg, Karnataka, India. Created by Tagooty - uploaded by Tagooty - nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 10:35, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tagooty (talk) 10:35, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Field of Iceland poppies in the flower garden near Cheomseongdae Observatory in Gyeongju South Korea.jpg

Voting period ends on 30 Nov 2024 at 00:44:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#South Korea
Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:44, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:44, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 02:10, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I just love the pet insect you placed on the flower! Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:25, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

:-) A divine hand placed many in that field. You have to wait less than one minute to get one (or two, three...) on any flower :-) Basile Morin (talk) 10:37, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --XRay 💬 10:33, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support amazing detail for such a large expanse. --Tagooty (talk) 10:38, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The white balance seems a bit too warm for the lighting conditions, especially the greens and reds in the foreground appear to have a strong yellow cast. I'm on an unfamiliar, uncalibrated monitor, though, so that may be just my perception being off. --El Grafo (talk) 11:11, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your comment. It's the original temperature, so I would expect accurate colors in this situation, at 8:22 am, almost golden hour. Colors also look normal on my calibrated screen. I agree it's quite warm, but I tend to believe that a colder temperature would correspond to a later time of day -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:26, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's great as it is, but I reduced yellow a bit and that worked nicely. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:14, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support--Ermell (talk) 11:13, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Puente Helix, Marina Bay, Singapur, 2023-08-16, DD 144-146 HDR.jpg

Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2024 at 20:45:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Singapore
Info Night view of the Helix Bridge and the Marina Bay Sands Hotel, Marina Bay, Singapore. Note: I've already a featured image of this area, this one taken a different day, with different light, from a different location and with the ArtScience Museum in the compo. I opted for this nom after the discussion that took place here. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 20:45, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 20:45, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Outstanding. Very different to the other FP in composition and light. Cmao20 (talk) 00:24, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Nice but perspective should be improved. You can see pillars leaning and the reflections in the water are not vertical -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:48, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'll look into it this evening CET Poco a poco (talk) 08:22, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 06:57, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per Cmao20. -- Radomianin (talk) 07:35, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice and very nice place. May there are some stars, may they light spots are hot pixel. Please have a look. --XRay 💬 10:33, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Жирафик.jpg

Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2024 at 21:04:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family : Giraffidae (Giraffes)
Info created by SanNikGar - uploaded by SanNikGar - nominated by JukoFF -- JukoFF (talk) 21:04, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- JukoFF (talk) 21:04, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Useful picture, but bad crop and weird colours Cmao20 (talk) 00:28, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Cmao20. And weird vignetting -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:45, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Artificial background... Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:33, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Milky way in Elbrus.jpg

Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2024 at 21:00:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Astronomy#Sky – Milky Way over the Elbrus, Russiа
Info created by Oliwok - uploaded by Oliwok - nominated by JukoFF -- JukoFF (talk) 21:00, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- JukoFF (talk) 21:00, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Анастасия Львова^ru/en 22:34, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Quite a lot of chroma noise. I don't feel strongly either way, but I'm not sure this is the quality we'd expect. Cmao20 (talk) 00:29, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
~~{{cmt}}~~ Support I did just add some notes to identify the portion of the Milky Way visible in the star field. It is the Serpens–Aquila Rift. The two main stats are Altair in the center of the image and Alpha Ophiuchi on the right. The third one, lower on the left, is Jupiter, that in August 2021 was in the constellation Capricorn. Several star clusters are also visible. I agree with Cmao20 on the fact that there is a lot of chroma noise, but the picture has some value. --Harlock81 (talk) 11:36, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 13:37, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wiewiórka w Parku Bednarskiego w Krakowie, 20241117 0903 2741.jpg

Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2024 at 19:14:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family : Sciuridae (Squirrels)
Info Red squirrel (Sciurus vulgaris) in Bednarski Park in Kraków, Poland. Created and uploaded by Jakub Hałun, nominated by – Aristeas (talk) 19:14, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I know I know I know: Just like “all sunsets are beautiful”, all squirrels are cute ;–), we already got quite some nice squirrel FPs and we are very demanding when it comes to photos of common animals. But I can’t resist to nominate this one. The light is so beautiful, the colours are so good, the pose is so nice. Since my last move I am watching these little rascals on my walks and this is a very typical posture and behaviour. Bon appétit, dear squirrel, and congratulations to the photographer! -- Aristeas (talk) 19:14, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good choice to nominate this irresistible rascal. Sometimes they can be very tame, the picture reminds me of the Łazienki Park in Warsaw, there they get incredibly close to people for a nut. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:52, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Анастасия Львова^ru/en 22:33, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 23:56, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Aristeas. This is also a special squirrel, looking at viewer with giant eyes, ears stretched, paws on belly, its booty well buried in his mouth :-) Yum -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:34, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 11:56, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lichtenfels Lokschuppen Orthophoto -20231001-RM-160347.jpg

Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2024 at 16:11:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Transport#Rail tracks
Info IMO superb composition, quality, and subject. created by Ermell - uploaded by Ermell - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 16:11, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 16:11, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent idea and realization. One of my favourites from WLM 2024/Germany. – Aristeas (talk) 16:38, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I love geometric structures, clear lines and shapes in photography. Saubere Arbeit, Ermell! -- Radomianin (talk) 21:41, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 22:24, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Анастасия Львова^ru/en 22:34, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thanks for the nom.--Ermell (talk) 23:15, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Geometrical shapes and patterns of the composition, and also rusty / decaying materials at full resolution -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:25, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 06:14, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 06:58, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:22, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Basilique du Sacré-Cœur de Montmartre - Paris - GT-01 - 2024.jpg

Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2024 at 13:43:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#France
Info Architect Paul Abadie was commissioned to design the basilica, initially (1875), in a Romanesque-Byzantine style. He died in 1884, and then other architects continued his work with the result that a structure was obtained without a predominant characteristic, and for this reason unique in the world. Since 1900 this place full of meaning has been a symbol of Montmatre in Paris. c/u/n by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 13:43, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 13:43, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 23:55, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Nice weather but the picture is not horizontal. See the two horses, not leveled. And not vertical either (see the walls leaning to the center on both sides) -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:25, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I willingly corrected the verticals because a very slight convergence was actually visible with three-point perspective. Instead, the majestic staircase with gardens that leads to the basilica, and consequently the balcony where people are looking out, is not aligned with the basilica, because they have different angles. For this reason there remains a slight perspective shape whereby the horse on the right is slightly higher than the other. By the way, thanks for your comment. Terragio67 (talk) 11:28, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flamsteed House Greenwich 2023 01.jpg

Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2024 at 13:44:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#United Kingdom
Info Flamsteed House, the original observatory building at the Royal Observatory, Greenwich. C/u/n by me. — Julian H.^✈ 13:44, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Julian H.^✈ 13:44, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Resolution, quality, and light Cmao20 (talk) 23:54, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The bottom is underexposed. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 07:45, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Disturbing shadow. --Tagooty (talk) 10:40, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination I can see that the points on the shadow. — Julian H.^✈ 12:00, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Schwaigern - Massenbach - Baumgruppe am Wilhelmstaler Bach bei Sonnenuntergang (1).jpg

Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2024 at 11:15:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Germany#Baden-Württemberg
Info A small grove of trees at sunset on an evening in early December. Massenbach district, Schwaigern, Germany. All by -- Aristeas (talk) 11:15, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support As I walked past this little grove of trees again and again, I noticed that, together with the reduced forms of the surrounding landscape, it had a simple but well-formed appearance. Of course something was missing. On a December evening, the setting sun coloured the clouds and gave the grove a slightly dramatic background. I like it when simple things show their beauty. -- Aristeas (talk) 11:15, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Composition, pastels colors of the clouds, and the foreground that is like a painter's brushstroke -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:50, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per Basile. -- Radomianin (talk) 13:35, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 13:49, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:29, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:37, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:36, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 22:24, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 23:17, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Basile Morin. Cmao20 (talk) 23:52, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lovely colours --Tagooty (talk) 10:42, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Braunlage - Wurmberg 01.jpg

Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2024 at 10:42:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Pinaceae
Info It's depressing: Almost all of the spruce forests in the Harz National Park have died in recent years, and over long distances only dead trees can be seen (see also [1], [2], [3], [4]); created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 10:42, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 10:42, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 22:18, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Indeed very sad Cmao20 (talk) 23:51, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Special texture -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:19, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 06:59, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 07:23, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Could wish for a bit more detail resolution on the frontmost trunks, but this does not diminish the impressive texture effect. – Aristeas (talk) 15:28, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Camp - Notes on Fashion at the Met - Moschino (73834).jpg

Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2024 at 02:34:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects#Clothing_and_textiles
Info Moschino ensemble from the fall 2014 ready-to-wear collection, on display at the Metropolitan Museum of Art in the Camp - Notes on Fashion exhibit. all by — Rhododendrites ^talk | 02:34, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 02:34, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:14, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Eye-catching, appealing composition and subject. -- Radomianin (talk) 13:39, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:37, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:23, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 15:26, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Juvenile yellow-crowned night heron (12938).jpg

Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2024 at 02:33:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Pelecaniformes#Genus_:_Nyctanassa
Info Juvenile yellow-crowned night heron (Nyctanassa violacea). I prefer the version that shows more of the habitat, but it didn't go over well. Giving the alternative a shot. all by — Rhododendrites ^talk | 02:33, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 02:33, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:15, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:56, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Sharp, attractive environmental portrait. – Aristeas (talk) 11:22, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per Aristeas. -- Radomianin (talk) 13:42, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 13:50, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:27, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:37, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:37, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 23:19, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 23:50, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Big eye. Good quality -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:16, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Seßlach Rodachbrücke-20180506-RM-191000.jpg

Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2024 at 22:25:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges#Germany
Info Rodach bridge in Seßlach. All by me -- Ermell (talk) 22:25, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ermell (talk) 22:25, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 01:54, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:16, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charming bridge with history and character; good light and atmosphere. I like how the statue of Saint (John of) Nepomuk seems to contemplate the facing wayside shrine … – Aristeas (talk) 09:54, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:56, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 13:44, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 13:51, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 15:08, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:26, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:37, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Nice subject (although it's a shame that we have no details about it) but I find the right crop too abrupt spoiling the compo, sorry Poco a poco (talk) 19:41, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Western wattled-honeyeater (Foulehaio procerior) on octopus tree (Heptapleurum actinophyllum) Colo-I-Suva.jpg

Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2024 at 21:34:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Meliphagidae (Honeyeaters)
Info A bird endemic to Fiji. One other image on Commons. Found it sharing fruit with a parrot. All by Charlesjsharp-- Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:34, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:34, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support This is what Featured Pictures should be all about. Not only is the photo visually pleasing, bird is somewhat rare (not a pigeon, mallard or tit). Bonus points for interesting setting (awesome fruit) and insect in focus. This is all around awesome. I can see this picture in ~top 20 of next Picture of the Year.--Tupungato (talk) 22:10, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 01:02, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Excellent capture / story / action. I will happily support once the blue CA is removed from the branch and from the leg -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:41, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

will sort when I can. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:02, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Superb Cmao20 (talk) 01:53, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:17, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 07:26, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 09:50, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:55, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 13:52, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 15:10, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:25, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:37, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:42, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 21:55, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Phyllis Diller by Allan Warren.jpg

Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2024 at 16:25:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1970-1979
Info created by Allan Warren, uploaded and nominated by Yann
Support I think this matches very well with the introduction of her article: "American stand-up comedian, actress, author, musician, and visual artist, best known for her eccentric stage persona, self-deprecating humor, wild hair and clothes, and exaggerated, cackling laugh." -- Yann (talk) 16:25, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Анастасия Львова^ru/en 16:53, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:44, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support :-) Basile Morin (talk) 23:00, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Expressive portrait with wow-factor. -- Radomianin (talk) 23:08, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:17, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 09:48, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:55, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:020912 - Janel Manns - 3b - 2012 Summer Paralympics (01).JPG

Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2024 at 14:30:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Sports#Individual sports
Info Wheelchair tennis at the 2012 Summer Paralympics - Janel Manns. Created by Sport the Library - uploaded by Laurenrobertson1 - nominated by Zquid -- Zquid (talk) 14:30, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Zquid (talk) 14:30, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Paracel63 (talk) 14:47, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:41, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:14, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Very interesting. Unfortunately the crop is too tight at the top -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:53, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Agree with Basile and in fact the issue is making me oppose --Poco a poco (talk) 19:36, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Felipe Gomes Rio2016b.jpg

Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2024 at 13:53:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Sports#Individual sports
Info 2016 Summer Paralympics - Felipe Gomes and sighted guide at 400m T11. Created by Fernando Frazão/Agência Brasil - uploaded by Materialscientist - nominated by Zquid -- Zquid (talk) 13:53, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Zquid (talk) 13:53, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Paracel63 (talk) 14:47, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:17, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tupungato (talk) 22:21, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sport -- Striking capture, taken at the right moment -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:51, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 23:10, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 01:53, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:18, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Peulle (talk) 08:29, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 09:41, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:54, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 13:53, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:23, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:37, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:49, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 22:24, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Camels at Aït Benhaddou, Saharan caravan route, Marocco (آيت بن حدّو, ⴰⵢⵜ ⵃⴰⴷⴷⵓ).jpg

Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2024 at 10:09:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family_:_Camelidae_(Camelids)
Info Camels at Aït Benhaddou, Saharan caravan route, Marocco (آيت بن حدّو, ⴰⵢⵜ ⵃⴰⴷⴷⵓ). My shot. -- Mile (talk) 10:09, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mile (talk) 10:09, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 01:52, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:19, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:53, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:37, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Zaaddozen van een beuk (Fagus sylvatica) 13-09-2024 (d.j.b.).jpg

Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2024 at 05:39:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Fagaceae
Info Half-opened seed pods of a beech (Fagus sylvatica) Focus stack of 57 photos.}}
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:39, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:39, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:02, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:58, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--PaestumPaestum (talk) 16:18, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:41, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:16, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 23:14, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 01:51, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:20, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good, IIRC much better than some earlier attempt at focus-stacking of a beech seed pod. – Aristeas (talk) 09:38, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:53, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 13:54, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:48, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dourdou river in Trou de Bozouls (14).jpg

Voting period ends on 27 Nov 2024 at 20:36:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/France (the subsection “#Aveyron” for the department does not exist yet, will be created after promotion)
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 20:36, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 20:36, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Looks a bit chaotic at thumbnail but when viewed at full size it's really good. Cmao20 (talk) 20:44, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Full screen works convincingly. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:30, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support By others.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:44, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good perspective and light. --Mile (talk) 10:13, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 10:32, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:59, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:57, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--PaestumPaestum (talk) 16:17, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:40, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 19:06, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:21, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:52, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:48, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:16, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 13:38, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Zona arqueológica de Cantona, Puebla, México, 2013-10-11, DD 43.JPG

Voting period ends on 27 Nov 2024 at 15:16:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Mexico
Info IMO a dramatic composition that really gets across how spectacular this site must be. created by Poco a poco - uploaded by Poco a poco - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 15:16, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 15:16, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 15:36, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ohh, that's a while ago, nice view :) I made some improvements (alone the export with a current processing algorithm helps) Poco a poco (talk) 18:36, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:39, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 21:12, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:10, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:45, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great composition. --Yann (talk) 10:31, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:58, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 11:35, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--PaestumPaestum (talk) 16:18, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:40, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great panorama, nice juxtaposition of the building (left) and the mountain (right). – Aristeas (talk) 19:01, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:21, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:52, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 22:25, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ridotto Teatro Grande Brescia volta di Francesco Zugno e Francesco Battaglioli.jpg

Voting period ends on 27 Nov 2024 at 13:35:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Painted ceilings
Info all by Moroder -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 13:35, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 13:35, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 21:14, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Part of the painting is hidden at the right. We just see a bit of an arm and of a head, because the camera was not in the axis. Also black distracting shape at the right in the foreground. Problem of composition in my view, sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:54, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I'm glad you say that, this is trompe-l'œil and the painter Francesco Battaglioli did a perfect job because the ceiling is flat. The black spots on the right are floodlights I could not hide.--Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 06:09, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment ~~Good point :-)~~ Sorry, I don't read Italian (for the title) though I think the word Trompe-l'œil is missing there. Still, there is "flat" and "flat", and the camera doesn't seem in the axis. The bottom and the sides are not symmetrical. To be honest, at first sight my eyes were attracted by the distracting black shape. That part could be cropped out. The two columns at the bottom are showing the same perspective, as if the picture was taken from the right -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:33, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm terribly sorry, I was tromped, the right part is missing. Trompe-l'oeil is in the English description, the other is just the filename. By the way I was going to delete my comment. You can see it in the other fotos of the painting.--Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 06:35, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Re-updated comment Yes, after looking at this view I realized my first impression was rather right. And it seems also possible to take the picture from the center, like here. Thanks for your comment. -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:56, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And at least I was fooled a short time at thinking it was a real trompe-l'oeil :-) Is maybe worth visiting again :-) Basile Morin (talk) 23:09, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support I like it the way it is. Not every single Featured Picture has to be in the axis. This is a photo depicting a three dimensional object with details in variety of levels. I appreciate the fact that I can see the sculpted balustrade, which would be invisible or almost invisible in symmetrical axis composition encouraged by many Commons users. This perspective allows me to appreciate the painted ceiling, but also to better understand the surrounding architecture, which is a great thing taking into account Wikimedia Commons image should be encyclopedically useful. Don't get discouraged in submitting unusual perspectives for Featured Pictures. Other voters, don't be intimidated by seasoned users who discourage unusual perspectives. --Tupungato (talk) 22:30, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment @Tupungato: "don't be intimidated by seasoned users" who spread unusual perspectives through optical illusions! -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:24, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Wow, “seasoned users” – I must remember that cultivated phrase. Very useful, as nobody can say for sure whether this is a respectful description or a refined insult. Well, every FPC regular knows that Basile and me often disagree, but when Basile is called a “seasoned user” I hope I am allowed to share this designation with him. Or am I already a rotten user, having been on Commons for six years longer? Who knows … ;–) But I agree that nobody should be intimidated by any other user, of course. Please take our arguments, check them, compare them, form your own opinion based on reasons, vote. Thank you. – Aristeas (talk) 10:12, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I'm afraid I'm a "seasoned user" too: born in the first half of last century A.D. 1947, with commons for 17 years, 150 FP and 7000 QI hahaha --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 11:19, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Welcome to the club of seasoned users, Wolfgang! ;–) We should request a privileged users group with many “members only” features … – Aristeas (talk) 12:38, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:001 Greater flamingo in flight in the Camargue Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg

Voting period ends on 27 Nov 2024 at 13:10:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family_:_Phoenicopteridae_(Flamingos)
Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:10, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:10, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:21, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support An insect photographer (talk) 17:45, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:12, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:39, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 21:15, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:13, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Fantastic angle of view, good focus and high level of detail. Striking composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:58, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:47, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:59, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Peulle (talk) 08:51, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 10:28, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Basile. Also beautiful light. – Aristeas (talk) 10:46, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:57, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:40, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:21, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:51, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 13:55, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jakubhal 19:21, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:45, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:61-224-0001 Zbarazh Castle RB 24.jpg

Voting period ends on 27 Nov 2024 at 11:51:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#Ukraine
Info created, uploaded and nominated by Rbrechko -- Rbrechko (talk) 11:51, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Rbrechko (talk) 11:51, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Certainly not the most romantic one of the many castles and manors of the Ukraine, but the longer I look at it the more I like the clear geometric construction and how the fortress hides an imposing palazzo in fortezza. One hint: On the roofs of the palace there is some blue/orange/red moiree. In Lightroom or Photoshop/ACR, paint a brush mask over it and set “Moiree removal” e.g. to +60; it may be useful to increase (with the same mask) the saturation a bit, e.g. +20, because moiree removal often decreases saturation. If this is unclear, just drop me a note. – Aristeas (talk) 19:31, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Self portrait (8618889472).jpg

Voting period ends on 27 Nov 2024 at 10:25:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Styles and Techniques#Photo art
Info created by Stacey Svendsen, uploaded by Victorgrigas, nominated by Yann
Info Self portrait illustrating the mordançage technique of altering gelatin silver prints for artistic effect.
Support No FP for this technique yet. -- Yann (talk) 10:25, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very impressive result with a poetic touch. – Aristeas (talk) 11:11, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:08, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:19, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support An insect photographer (talk) 17:42, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per Aristeas. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:27, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Special for me.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:50, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:55, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:34, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:50, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 13:55, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Katsuo ji temple waterfall Osaka Japan by Don Ramey Logan.jpg

Voting period ends on 27 Nov 2024 at 06:48:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Fountains
Info created by WPPilot - uploaded by WPPilot - nominated by WPPilot -- Don (talk) 06:48, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Don (talk) 06:48, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Good composition but most of the picture is not in focus Cmao20 (talk) 15:18, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose lacks wow and oof. --SHB2000 (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The composition itself would be good, but the image is a little shaken (unstable camera), and the level of blown highlights (white areas on water) is unacceptable for a Featured Picture. But don't get discouraged, I've been a photojournalist for ~18 years, and still have problems with waterfalls :D --Tupungato (talk) 22:35, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Paesens. Dobbe, 17-09-2024. (actm.) 01.jpg

Voting period ends on 27 Nov 2024 at 05:32:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Netherlands
Info Paesens. For me soothing horizontal play of lines behind the sea wall at Paesens with a view of the Wadden, a unique tidal area (UNESCO World Heritage)
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:32, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:32, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very simple but IMO satisfying Cmao20 (talk) 15:17, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I agree with Cmao20, it looks like a beautiful painting to me. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:25, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support the minimalism is what makes this photo really nice. --SHB2000 (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Radomianin and SHB2000. – Aristeas (talk) 10:42, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I have changed the gallery link from Other objects in landscapes to Natural#Netherlands because most similar photos are on the “Natural” gallery pages. Your description (“horizontal play of lines behind the sea wall at Paesens with a view of the Wadden, a unique tidal area”) confirms that this is a photo of the landscape/nature. The dobbe and the fence are objects, but they are integral parts of the landscape, so we can still put this into the “Natural” gallery. (Thanks to Cart for the confirmation!) Hope it helps, – Aristeas (talk) 11:15, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cart and Aristeas, Thank you very much for all the effort. I am happy with that.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:23, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 16:27, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:40, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:36, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:49, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 13:57, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:2024-11-04 02 PACIFIC SCOUT - MMSI 316013431 – Ogden Point, Victoria BC CAN.jpg

Voting period ends on 26 Nov 2024 at 22:48:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water transport#Boats
Info It’s not a good day for sailors. Pilot boat, Pacific Scout, in lashing rain and gale force winds (70 - 90 km/hour, with gusts to 110), comes in off the Salish Sea into the protection of the breakwater at Ogden Point Light, Victoria, BC Canada. The container ships keep coming up from Seattle or Tacoma and if the Pacific Scout can’t take off the pilot, then it will be some days before the pilot will land. c/u/n by GRDN711 -- GRDN711 (talk) 22:48, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- GRDN711 (talk) 22:48, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support spectacular to me.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:38, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – nice composition (fixed gallery category) —Bruce1ee^talk 06:30, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per Famberhorst. There seems to be some chrominance noise, but I still find it acceptable. -- Radomianin (talk) 08:39, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 09:58, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 11:53, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 12:09, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:11, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 13:38, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:08, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice Cmao20 (talk) 15:17, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:08, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:39, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Special mood and light -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:50, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mile (talk) 10:15, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Famberhorst, Radomianin, Basile. – Aristeas (talk) 10:37, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:54, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Zoomed quality is not perfect, but the overall wow factor, difficult weather is enormous, this is what Feature Pictures are all about! --Tupungato (talk) 22:37, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:37, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ǃ -- Terragio67 (talk) 13:58, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:44, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:023 Glossy ibis fishing in the Camargue Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg

Voting period ends on 26 Nov 2024 at 13:46:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Pelecaniformes#Genus_:_Plegadis
Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:46, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:46, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:14, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:55, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good catch! --GRDN711 (talk) 19:51, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:50, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Open beak, weightless prey and trickle of water make this photo special -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:55, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:58, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support A very good image of a Plegadis falcinellus. --Zzzs (talk) 04:09, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:39, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 09:58, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 11:27, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 11:56, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support —-Llez (talk) 13:36, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:07, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 18:20, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:39, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 21:16, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Basile. – Aristeas (talk) 10:36, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:52, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Even if it was just the bird, it would be quite good, but with the prey it's definitely Featured worthy. --Tupungato (talk) 22:39, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Basile -- Terragio67 (talk) 13:59, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mwanza flat-headed rock agama

Voting period ends on 25 Nov 2024 at 20:54:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page

Full body view
Detail front view

Set following the criteria #3 A group of images depicting the same subject from different viewpoints

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Reptiles#Family_:_Agamidae_(Dragon_Lizards)
Info Mwanza flat-headed rock agama (Agama mwanzae), Masai Mara, Kenya. The species has become a fashionable pet due to the male's coloration, which resembles the comic-book superhero Spider-Man. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 20:54, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 20:54, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Front view is really amazing. --Rbrechko (talk) 23:13, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Both amazing to me. Another very good set. Cmao20 (talk) 01:54, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Sharpness and focus very good in both. Striking colors, yes, with a cape, it could inspire a new superhero called "agama-man" :-) -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:35, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support for the set. -- Radomianin (talk) 08:17, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:32, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:55, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 20:16, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 23:00, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Анастасия Львова^ru/en 06:32, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 06:52, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 09:59, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support —-Llez (talk) 13:34, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:07, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:39, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Basile. – Aristeas (talk) 10:36, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:50, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:38, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 14:00, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Peatäi muna (ting).jpg

Voting period ends on 25 Nov 2024 at 18:36:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods#Family : Pediculidae (Lice)
Info created by Janeklass - uploaded by Janeklass - nominated by Janeklass -- Janeklass (talk) 18:36, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Janeklass (talk) 18:36, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Very noisy and too dark in my opinion -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:24, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
While I agree with the critic about the noise - it is indeed visible in the image - I cannot agree that the photo is underexposed. The directional light from above excellently reveals the object's texture and creates an interesting three-dimensional effect. This lighting is clearly an artistic choice, not a technical error. In photography, there is no 'right' or 'wrong' lighting, but rather different artistic choices that support the image's idea and mood. In this case, this directed lighting gives the photo its intended dramatic effect. Janeklass (talk) 04:47, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Compare with the FP of the same gallery, from 2010, much better light, almost no noise, and higher level of detail at full resolution -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:14, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's the head louse itself, not the egg. :) Janeklass (talk) 05:26, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hard to distinguish :-) -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:45, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My picture has an egg and the link you provided has a head lice. :D Janeklass (talk) 05:47, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe, but I would like to see it also :-) And it's from 2024 -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:50, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment It is too dark for my eyes. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:59, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral impressive, but as with the other nom it seems like it could be improved with post-processing. the hard part -- capturing such a detailed image of a tiny object on a clean background -- is over, and done well, so I hope to upgrade both of these votes soon. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 22:19, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Inimese peatäi.jpg

Voting period ends on 25 Nov 2024 at 18:09:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods#Family : Pediculidae (Lice)
Info created by Janeklass - uploaded by Janeklass - nominated by Janeklass -- Janeklass (talk) 18:09, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Janeklass (talk) 18:09, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I modified this file a little. I didn't do anything with the lighting, but I cropped it a little and changed the aspect ratio from 2:3 to 4:5 Janeklass (talk) 17:56, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Perhaps a bit dark? Cmao20 (talk) 01:54, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Underexposed Yes, though the picture looks interesting -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:21, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's impossible to agree with the claim that this image is underexposed. This is clearly proven by the excellent visibility of every detail on the head louse's body - its tiny hairs, complex body texture, and even various color shades. The dark, almost black background is not an exposure error, but rather serves to highlight the main subject more clearly. The image's tonality is well balanced - we can clearly see details in both lighter and darker areas, confirming that the exposure is not incorrect. This lighting choice is intentional here, designed to give the image a slightly dramatic effect. If the picture were truly underexposed, we wouldn't be able to see such fine details and color tones that are now clearly visible. Janeklass (talk) 04:19, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disagree. You will see more details if the photo is better exposed. Currently the contrasts are very hard to distinguish, especially at thumbnail size.

Note that you can also see a lot of details here, although the photo is underexposed too. And that one was properly fixed.

Hard to hear that "it's impossible to agree with the claim that this image is underexposed" while the two first reviewers here both find the image too dark :-) Then above you write "This lighting choice is intentional here, designed to give the image a slightly dramatic effect" (by the way, I don't understand this dramatic intention. It's just a close-up of an animal, no special background / context). Sorry, clear light problem for me, in state -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:45, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have responded to the criticism and want the evaluators to know that the lighting choice here is clearly intentional. How you choose to evaluate it is up to you. Janeklass (talk) 04:56, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:47, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per above. Please fix the light as you did here -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:00, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The subjects are different and unfortunately the same approach cannot be applied here. Increasing the light would also amplify surface reflections and this would ruin the image completely Janeklass (talk) 05:17, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think so, but the same was said here. At least one stop could be easily gained in that case IMO -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:26, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think this would cause more issues for the image. Unfortunately, I can't make those changes to this photo. This image stays as is. If there's no support... no worries, I'll try with another photo in the future (maybe) :D Janeklass (talk) 05:45, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:47, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment It is too dark for my eyes. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:58, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support It is a very fascinating image. The darkness is not a problem, as the object is clearly seen, and that seems more like a creative choice on this dark creature. I am thinking that maybe a square format would be better for this image... but I'm not sure. Kruusamägi (talk) 13:24, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 13:40, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry. I agree that there are dark photographs which do not tolerate an increasure of the exposure – reproductions of dark paintings, some gloomy atmospheric landcape photographs, low-key photos etc. However I fail to see why this would apply to this photo, despite of the explanations. I have played a bit with this JPEG file and can confirm that a careful increase of the brightness works very well when at the same time the light parts are dialed down a bit. If you have a raw image or a 16 bit TIFF file, this should work even better. Of course you have all right to keep your photo as you think it should be (so keep it!), but I cannot support it here. Sorry again, – Aristeas (talk) 10:25, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
As I mentioned before, this solution was intentional. I did try making changes but wasn't satisfied with the result. I can see that opinions are divided on this one - and I suppose not everyone has to like the picture. It's clear that I won't get much support for this image, but that's okay. I'm already looking forward to when this period ends and I can submit my next works 🙂 Janeklass (talk) 13:28, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support but I agree it should be brightened. if it fails, anyone could just upload a new [separate] version and nominate it. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 22:17, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 03:10, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:RUS-2016-Aerial-SPB-Grand Menshikov Palace.jpg

Voting period ends on 25 Nov 2024 at 17:32:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#Russia
Info Grand Menshikov Palace, Saint Petersburg created by Godot13 - uploaded and nominated by -- FBilula (talk) 17:32, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- FBilula (talk) 17:32, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Fascinating and maybe valued image but to me an obviously non-centered image where there is no clear compositional reason or limitation preventing from getting it centered is not outstanding enough for FP. Cmao20 (talk) 01:53, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Петергоф, Нижний парк, Львиный каскад. Фонтанная статуя «Нимфа, льющая воду из кувшина» 2.jpg

Voting period ends on 25 Nov 2024 at 17:34:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Fountains
Info Lion Cascade, Peterhof, Saint Petersburg created by Игорь Гордеев - uploaded and nominated by -- FBilula (talk) 17:34, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- FBilula (talk) 17:34, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Анастасия Львова^ru/en 18:23, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Interesting place, good composition + light Cmao20 (talk) 01:52, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:55, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 20:15, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support —-Llez (talk) 13:32, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support —- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 23:45, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 01:31, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:39, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I like it but I think that taking the picture from the back of the scultpure is not the best idea Poco a poco (talk) 19:52, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Link-Lee House (HDR).jpg

Voting period ends on 25 Nov 2024 at 15:23:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#United_States
Info created by Euthman - uploaded by Euthman - nominated by DragonflySixtyseven. We have other images of the Link-Lee House, but this is the only one that combines high resolution, interesting angle (it would not look anywhere near as interesting seen head-on), and interesting light (File:Link-Lee House at an Angle.jpg was taken on an overcast day). -- DS (talk) 15:23, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- DS (talk) 15:23, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I agree that the angle and composition is great. I do think the shadows have been lifted too much, though, or else the HDR has gone a bit far. The tree branches particularly on the right don't IMO look natural. Cmao20 (talk) 01:51, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Ghost leaves at the right. No metadata but I would doubt this is a long exposure shot. Thus, more a problem of processing or Photoshopping in my opinion. We can see sorts of diffuse clear halos behind the trees. (Probably same impression as Cmao20, evoking "lifted shadows" / "branches don't look natural") -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:05, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not sharp enough and a bit distorted. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 23:44, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Constancy - Julius Klinger.jpg

Voting period ends on 25 Nov 2024 at 14:05:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Non-photographic_media/Printed#Posters_and_advertisements
Info created by Julius Klinger - uploaded by Balkanique - nominated by EUPBR -- EUPBR (talk) 14:05, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- EUPBR (talk) 14:05, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Анастасия Львова^ru/en 14:44, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent reproduction of an excellent example for a progressive poster of the 1920s. (This reduced style was ultra-modern then, and unlike many advertisings from the 1950s [not even to mention the terrible Nazi kitsch] it still works well.) – Aristeas (talk) 11:21, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:07, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 01:31, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:39, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Royal Air Force Falcons Royal International Air Tattoo 2024 02.jpg, featured

Voting period ends on 25 Nov 2024 at 12:59:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Air transport#Others
Info Royal Air Force Falcons parachute display team. C/u/n by me. — Julian H.^✈ 12:59, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Julian H.^✈ 12:59, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent. Cmao20 (talk) 01:49, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support They are so close to each other, I hope their strings don't get tangled :-) Basile Morin (talk) 02:08, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great scene and composition. -- Radomianin (talk) 08:20, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:57, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:04, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:55, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 20:28, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 23:02, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:40, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Radomianin. – Aristeas (talk) 11:17, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support —-Llez (talk) 13:31, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:39, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:38, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 14:01, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:40, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Air transport#Others

File:Narva Hermanni linnus 2020 01.jpg, featured

Voting period ends on 25 Nov 2024 at 12:52:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#Estonia
Info created & uploaded by Vaido Otsar - nominated by Kruusamägi (talk) 12:52, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kruusamägi (talk) 12:52, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Анастасия Львова^ru/en 14:44, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 15:19, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 16:59, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice colours + composition. Cmao20 (talk) 01:48, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like the management of the space in this composition, and the special light -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:57, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per Cmao20 and Basile. -- Radomianin (talk) 08:23, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 08:32, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:56, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:04, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:55, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Basile Morin. --ArildV (talk) 21:21, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 23:05, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Despite the similar viewpoint very different to the existing FP thanks to light, water and mood. – Aristeas (talk) 11:15, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:04, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:39, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:41, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Oh, that bridge reminds me to a lot of experiences 12 years ago Poco a poco (talk) 19:53, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:38, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#Estonia

File:Flat-billed kingfisher (Todiramphus recurvirostris) Upolu.jpg, featured

Voting period ends on 25 Nov 2024 at 09:27:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Alcedinidae (Kingfishers)
Info A Samoan endemic with one other photo on Commons. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:27, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support I prefer this one to the other :-) Basile Morin (talk) 01:55, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:27, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 10:23, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:21, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Pretty bird, great composition + quality Cmao20 (talk) 01:47, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:51, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 20:52, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 23:20, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 11:16, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 11:29, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support —-Llez (talk) 13:29, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:03, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:39, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:39, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:54, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:35, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds#Family : Alcedinidae (Kingfishers)

File:Münster, Schlossplatz, Herbstsend, Kettenkarussell -- 2024 -- 6459.jpg, featured

Voting period ends on 25 Nov 2024 at 09:16:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Machines
Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay 💬 09:16, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- XRay 💬 09:16, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Good to see your 30-vote barbed wire photo again on the Main Page. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:32, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--ArildV (talk) 10:16, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 10:23, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 10:24, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 15:19, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:21, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 16:15, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow Cmao20 (talk) 01:46, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:54, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:04, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 23:39, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:41, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 06:51, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice! --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:40, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Yes I know it's very difficult to take pictures at a funfair. I would tend to support this one too, but to be frank I don't like the wheel at the right (although some would say it adds some context, in my view it clutters the composition) nor the deformed people and buildings at the bottom at full resolution, due to the perspective. The crispy sharp central part is very nice, and the management of the light too -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:42, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:40, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:55, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:34, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects#Machines

File:Small stained glass window from Sainte-Chapelle (King). Paris.jpg

Voting period ends on 25 Nov 2024 at 07:55:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Single stained glass windows
Info created by Ввласенко - uploaded by Ввласенко - nominated by Ввласенко -- Ввласенко (talk) 07:55, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 11:04, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good reproduction of a beautiful exemplary stained-glass window. Now we just need to figure out which biblical or historic scene is depicted here; this should be added to the description and reflected by the categories. Can somebody help? – Aristeas (talk) 16:14, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

According to Vitraux de la Sainte-Chapelle du Palais, the stained glass windows were built on the order of Louis IX of France. Anyway, this is one of the kings of France, as shown by his sceptre. Yann (talk) 19:25, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose I am not a fan of stained glass photographed like this. The contrast and saturation has been pumped up too high so that the colours of the glass are exaggerated, and the details around the window are completely black. It doesn't look natural. I agree that many of the stained glass photos in the gallery have similar processing, but I don't think they should be FP either. This to me is an example of it being done right. Cmao20 (talk) 01:46, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Unfortunately an old image (2012) taken from an old camera (2008) with low resolution, no tripod, high ISO, and narrow DoF -- Basile Morin (talk) 08:03, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Dear Basile Morin, you have rated when, by what and under what conditions the photo was taken, but not any word about the image itself. Having read "Featured picture", I assumed that the pictures are rated here. Am I wrong? -- Ввласенко (talk) 09:41, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You're not wrong, but comments are allowed too, as part of this "rating process" -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:33, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose And I'd like to add that "low resolution", "high ISO" and "narrow depth of field" directly concern the technical aspects of "the image itself", as you request. This photo was perhaps a fair candidate in 2012, but much less in 2024. And even at that time, a tripod would have helped to increase the quality. The edges are slightly blurry, especially at the top and at the left. The crop is very tight all around. Overall, it is a standard photo of stained glass, not an exceptional one, in my opinion -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:21, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 17:02, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:03, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 13:56, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Question What is shown in this scene, who are the persons? --Uoaei1 (talk) 13:56, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As I said above, the person with the crown on the left is most probably Louis IX of France. Yann (talk) 15:53, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose The execution is fine but I cannot see why this stained glass, among thousands, should be featured. In fact it looks too simple to me. Poco a poco (talk) 18:22, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment The value of this stained glass window is determined not by its artistic intricacy, but by the time of its creation – the 13th century.-- Ввласенко (talk) 22:06, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There are more in the Category:13th-century stained-glass windows. And also from the 12th century and the 11th century -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:30, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

- - Comment Among all these images there is not a single one FP from Sainte-Chapelle (Paris). -- Ввласенко (talk)

File:Many colorful flowerpots in front of Bulguksa temple in Gyeongju South Korea.jpg

Voting period ends on 25 Nov 2024 at 05:15:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#South Korea
Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:15, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:15, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I love the juxtaposition of the old roof truss with its beautiful paintings in muted colours and the vivid colours of the flowers and their pots. – Aristeas (talk) 16:11, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Aristeas. Lovely photo. The different colours of the pots is the cherry on top of the cake. Cmao20 (talk) 01:44, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:54, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support —-Llez (talk) 13:27, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 17:01, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Sorry to discent. Composition, lighting or detail are not outstanding here IMHO. A well executed photo with a pretty subject but not outstanding to me. Poco a poco (talk) 18:28, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:40, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Val Montanaia.jpg

Voting period ends on 24 Nov 2024 at 08:07:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Italy (section 'Friuli-Venezia Giulia' doesn't exist yet)
Info created by Scosse - uploaded by Scosse - nominated by Civvì -- Civvì (talk) 08:07, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Civvì (talk) 08:07, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 08:09, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment There are lens flares in the sky and in the rocks (in the middle). Also a dust spot in the sky. There's no source for this resolution, that seems slightly higher than the camera sensor -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:23, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Just a nerdy note regarding the resolution: Some camera sensors deliver some more pixels than officially supported by the manufacturer. These extra pixels at the margins of the sensor are cut off by the cameras when creating a JPEG image, but they are saved into the raw image files; normally we still do not seem them because most raw converters just cut them off, too, probably because some of these extra pixels are often faulty. If one opens a raw image file from the camera used here (α7R IV) with RawTherapee, some of the extra pixels are retained and we get an image of 9,560 × 6,368 pixels. This means that all pixels in this photo (9,557 × 6,336 pixels) could indeed come straight from a simple single shot. Of course the Exif data state that the photo was developed with “Adobe Photoshop 25.9 (Windows)”, i.e. probably with Adobe Camera RAW (ACR), and ACR cuts the raw images from the α7R IV always to the nominal 9504 × 6336 pixels. But it is possible that the raw image was first developed with another raw converter (like RawTherapee) and only then edited with Photoshop … That’s the theory. Of course it seems more likely that the photographer made some kind of projection/perspective correction and streched the image slightly during that process; this would also explain the extra pixels and the image would still be authentic. – Aristeas (talk) 16:56, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Very interesting. Thank you for this information regarding this camera body -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:37, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The same applies also to other camera bodies, with a varying amount of extra pixels. Checking e.g. a CR2 file from the Canon EOS 5D IV, RawTherapee shows me 6732 × 4492 pixels – a little bit more than the official 6720 × 4480 pixels. So if one ever finds oneself in the situation that “just a few pixels” are missing at a border to complete the composition, it’s worth to give it a try and to open the raw image with RawTherapee … ;–) End of digression, sorry. – Aristeas (talk) 11:57, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support--UltimoGrimm (talk) 12:32, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Question The nomination indicates the name Scosse as uploader, but according to the file page, the uploader is Civvì. And because this last version is significantly different from the original one, with heavy processing, lifted shadows and oversaturated colors, I wonder if these modifications have been approved by the photographer. This message suggests that Scosse is not at the initiative of the FP nomination -- Basile Morin (talk) 14:13, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Basile Morin, and also wonder where the high resolution version of the image came from. If it was not uploaded by or with the consent of the original photographer then this is a copyright violation - if the photographer has chosen only to release the 6megapixel version then we don't have the right to upload a larger version that wasn't explicitly released under a Creative Commons license over the top Cmao20 (talk) 15:24, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi all, during the first candidature as QI the original version of the picture was considered too small so I asked the author if they were willing to upload a larger version of the picture, instead of uploading it they sent it me via email and I uploaded it. Maybe I should forward this email exchange to VRTS? --Civvì (talk) 15:38, 15 November 2024 (UTC) Update, I just forwarded the emails to VRTS. --Civvì (talk) 15:49, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Vote and comment struck on that basis. I will have a think about whether the lens flare bothers me too much to support. The dust spot should be fixed though. Cmao20 (talk) 16:05, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support very well --Msb (talk) 21:27, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Thanks for the clarification about the image source. The lens flares and dust spot are still a problem in my view, but more importantly, which person did manage the post-treatment here, Scosse or Civvì? Scosse could have sent the same image in larger size as requested, and Civvì handled the processing before uploading it? In any case the correct name of the uploader should be updated on this nomination -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:37, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'll ask the author to re-upload the image. --Civvì (talk) 23:12, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The author uploaded a new version with reduced flares. --Civvì (talk) 17:34, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Thanks for the notification and attempt to improve, but sorry to say the correction is not well handled in my opinion. First, the dust spot and lens flares are still there (I will add image notes to specify the exact locations), then the dark spot added to reduce the white spot in the center creates artificial shadows on the rocks. Moreover, in this last version, the contrasts have been reduced, or the clarity increased, compared to the original, it's really blueish in the background and at the top of the foreground -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:35, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 17:00, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support on reflection Cmao20 (talk) 16:13, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support +1 -- Radomianin (talk) 22:08, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support on reflection. – Aristeas (talk) 10:57, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Open wing position of Vindula erota (Fabricius, 1793) - Cruiser butterfly sucking sweat from human socks ANK6537.jpg

Voting period ends on 23 Nov 2024 at 14:23:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Nymphalidae (Brush-footed Butterflies)
Info created by Ankit0908 - uploaded by Ankit0908 - nominated by Atudu -- Atudu (talk) 14:23, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Atudu (talk) 14:23, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Анастасия Львова^ru/en 14:37, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support A different take, I like it --Kritzolina (talk) 19:51, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It's a beautiful capture but the background doesn't appeal to me. I know you can see it as a fresh take on this kind of photo, but it just isn't for me. Cmao20 (talk) 19:58, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I agree with Cmao20. In this case, the cropped shoes ruin the composition in my view. Please do bring more space around if you can. Although the full resolution of the camera has been reached here, perhaps a different shot as alternative? I will be happy to review again and perhaps change my vote -- Basile Morin (talk) 23:03, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Basile Morin. -- Karelj (talk) 15:48, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Extremely sorry, actually this species gave me only 10 sec for clicking photographs. Suddenly it came and sit on my shoes and this moment I clicked only one photograph after clicking it move to land then I clicked another one and after clicking it was gone. I am using Tamron 90mm prime that why I am failed to click more wide image, I was standing for search another species suddenly it came and at that moment I was clicked photograph from where I was stand before. This species not give to me more time for clicking more images. Ankit0908 (talk) 02:57, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Understood. Thanks for the notification. Try the same smell next time, if they like it, they may visit again? :-) -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:19, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Lupe (talk) 08:05, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 16:25, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like this unusual take. Full quality on butterfly. I understand the compromise in partially cropping shoes. We still get the full context (the other shoe with visible sock inside), but the crop is tight enough that the butterfly is quite big. --Tupungato (talk) 22:44, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Agree with Basile Poco a poco (talk) 23:01, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:47, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Agree that unusual takes are very welcome; and the butterfly itself is very sharp; just the crop partially spoils the effect. – Aristeas (talk) 10:16, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:80-391-9014 Kyiv Sofia 2 RB 24.jpg

Voting period ends on 23 Nov 2024 at 09:28:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Ukraine
Info created, uploaded and nominated by Rbrechko -- Rbrechko (talk) 09:28, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Rbrechko (talk) 09:28, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive church in beautiful winter scenery, good composition. The side light nicely emphasizes the shapes of the building. Large parts of the foreground are in the shadow, but IMHO this works well here because it gives a nice contrast to the bright walls and the golden domes (if everything on the photo was in the sun, it would probably look flat and boring). – Aristeas (talk) 19:48, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Aristeas. Cmao20 (talk) 19:53, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:19, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice composition and pleasant light. Possibly slightly tilted at the right, and presence of minor chromatic aberrations in the tree branches, though -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:40, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Aristeas —Bruce1ee^talk 06:55, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Nikride (talk) 08:43, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The buildings is nice and the weather a plus but those trees spoil the composition IMHO Poco a poco (talk) 11:55, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:42, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:38, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:41, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 12:40, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:02, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 18:38, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:57, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:49, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Burg Raueneck Orthophoto-20240922-RM-164730.jpg

Voting period ends on 22 Nov 2024 at 09:38:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications/Germany#Bavaria
Info Raueneck Castle ruins, orthophoto. All by -- Ermell (talk) 09:38, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ermell (talk) 09:38, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 15:19, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 16:33, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose This one is not working for me, the profile is not really standing out and the right side in shadow isn't helping, either IMHO Poco a poco (talk) 18:37, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I enjoy to stroll along the paths through the ruins. Indeed the larger shadow areas are a bit unfortunate, but as they are shed by the high trees around the ruins it’s probably impossible to avoid them – if the photo was taken when the sky was overcast the whole image would look dull. Near the corners the quality deteriorates quickly, but that’s a typical problem with drone shots and has no impact on the main subject at all. – Aristeas (talk) 11:20, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Sette-quattro (talk) 15:26, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 00:38, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:38, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:05, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 12:37, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:58, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:53, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:47, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Los Arcos de Mismaloya.jpg

Voting period ends on 22 Nov 2024 at 02:40:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Mexico
Info: the Mismaloya Arches, Puerto Vallarta; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:40, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:40, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, not enough "wow" for FP in my opinion, and the picture isn't really sharp. --Benji 22:40, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 08:33, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 17:59, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:49, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ksar of Taourirt, Ouarzazate, Morocco (قصبة تاوريرت, ⵜⴰⵡⵔⵉⵔⵜ).jpg

Voting period ends on 21 Nov 2024 at 16:43:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#Morocco
Info Ksar of Taourirt, Ouarzazate, Morocco (قصبة تاوريرت, ⵜⴰⵡⵔⵉⵔⵜ). My shot. -- Mile (talk) 16:43, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mile (talk) 16:43, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 17:07, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:41, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Beautiful and very interesting view, but the verticals seem to be leaning in. Wouldn’t the photo profit from a perspective correction? – Aristeas (talk) 19:17, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support איז「Ysa」 23:10, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:44, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:26, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 16:51, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Aristeas, for me a dealbreaker. I'd support when fixed. Poco a poco (talk) 18:47, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 08:08, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Yes, perspective correction necessary (see pole and walls at the compared with the walls at the right). --Llez (talk) 12:34, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done --Mile (talk) 17:01, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Thank you! – Aristeas (talk) 19:22, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Harlock81 (talk) 21:18, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gythio Port, Greece - Diliff.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Nov 2024 at 15:08:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#Greece
Info created by Diliff - uploaded by Diliff - nominated by Tupungato -- Tupungato (talk) 15:08, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tupungato (talk) 15:08, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Great photo and good light. But maybe slightly tilted? Cmao20 (talk) 17:07, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Yes, the light is nice in a part of it but the shadowed area, which is more than half of the image sp,oils it. --Poco a poco (talk) 18:50, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 08:08, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Poco a poco. -- Karelj (talk) 15:54, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tilisuna Schwarzhorn.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Nov 2024 at 15:11:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Austria#Vorarlberg
Info created by Böhringer Friedrich - uploaded by Böhringer Friedrich - nominated by Tupungato -- Tupungato (talk) 15:11, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tupungato (talk) 15:11, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:48, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Amazing mood and good composition but IMO oversharpening and JPEG artefacts preclude it from FP. Cmao20 (talk) 17:06, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I concur Poco a poco (talk) 18:50, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:特色图片评选

规范

提名

注意，你的荧光屏可能未调校妥当！

光暗度

色彩度

Featured picture candidates

Mwanza flat-headed rock agama

File:Royal Air Force Falcons Royal International Air Tattoo 2024 02.jpg, featured

File:Narva Hermanni linnus 2020 01.jpg, featured

File:Flat-billed kingfisher (Todiramphus recurvirostris) Upolu.jpg, featured

File:Münster, Schlossplatz, Herbstsend, Kettenkarussell -- 2024 -- 6459.jpg, featured

Navigation menu

Search