Commons:Segnalazioni per la vetrina
Segnalazioni per la vetrina in altre lingue:
Alemannisch | asturianu | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | English | فارسی | español | suomi | français | galego | हिन्दी | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | молдовеняскэ | norsk bokmål | português | polski | română | русский | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | українська | Tiếng Việt | 粵語 | 中文(中国大陆) | 中文(简体) | 中文(繁體) | հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia |+/− |
Shortcut: [[:]] |
Queste immagini sono candidate per la vetrina. Fare attenzione a non confondere questa pagina con le immagini del giorno.
Guida
[edit]Candidare un immagine
[edit]Linee guida per candidare un'immagine
[edit]È importante leggere le linee guida prima di candidare un'immagine.
A seguito è riportato un riassunto dei punti essenziali per candidare e valutare le immagini candidate:
- Risoluzione - Le fotografie con una risoluzione inferiore a 2 milioni di pixel vengono generalmente rifiutate e rimosse ad eccezione di motivi contrari di particolare importanza. Si noti che le immagini con risoluzione 1600 x 1200 hanno 1.92 Mpx, appena inferiore al limite minimo di 2Mpx.
- Ricordiamo che le immagini caricate su Commons vengono visualizzate non solo su schermi tradizionali di PC ma sono utilizzate anche per stampa e visualizzazione su schermi ad alta risoluzione. Non possiamo certo prevedere quali tecnologie verranno utilizzate nel futuro quindi è importante che le immagini scelte per la vetrina abbiano una risoluzione quanto più alta è possibile.
- Scansioni - È consigliabile seguire la guida alla scansione, che propone suggerimenti per l'ottenimento di immagini ottimali
- Fuoco - ovviamente ogni oggetto significativo dell'immagine deve essere ben definito e a fuoco.
- Primo piano e sfondo - Oggetti in primissimo piano o di sfondo possono distrarre dalla vista dal oggetto principale dell'immagine. È il caso di controllare se qualche elemento in primo piano non copra nessun elemento importante e che lo sfondo non distolga l'attenzione e renda confusa l'immagine (per esempio evitare che vi sia una luce forte alle spalle di un viso)
- Qualità generale - le immagini candidate devono essere di alta qualità tecnica.
- Le manipolazioni digitali non devono essere effettuate per ingannare, ma vanno usate solo limitatamente e con cura per correggere difetti fotografici. Le manipolazioni comunemente accettate sono il ritaglio e la correzione di prospettiva, focale, colore ed esposizione. Manipolazioni più estese, come può essere la rimozione di un elemento di distrazione dello sfondo, vanno chiaramente descritte nel testo di descrizione per mezzo del template {{Retouched picture}}. Manipolazioni non descritte o descritte in modo insufficiente non permettono la candidatura alla vetrina.
- Valore - il nostro principale obiettivo è eleggere le immagini con il maggior valore rispetto a tutte le loro simili. Le immagini devono essere in qualche modo speciali, perciò fai attenzione:
- quasi tutti i tramonti sono esteticamente piacevoli, infatti molte immagini sono simili alle altre,
- gli scatti notturni sono gradevoli ma generalmente le foto scattate di giorno mostrano molti più dettagli,
- non tutte le belle foto hanno in realtà un valore che non sia esclusivamente personale.
Per quanto riguarda l'aspetto tecnico abbiamo come parametri l'esposizione, la composizione, il controllo del movimento e la profondità di campo.
- L'esposizione si riferisce alla combinazione tra tempo di esposizione e diaframma. Questa combinazione permette generalmente di avere una curva di tono che è in grado di rappresentare ombre e luci con un dettaglio accettabile. Questa curva viene detta latitudine di posa. Un'immagine può essere nella banda bassa, media o alta. Le fotocamere digitali (e le loro foto) hanno una latitudine di posa più stretta delle macchine a pellicola. La mancanza di dettagli nelle zone d'ombra non è necessariamente una caratteristica negativa. Infatti questa può essere parte dell'effetto desiderato, mentre ampie zone eccessivamente sovraesposte possono distrarre la vista.
- La composizione si riferisce alla distribuzione degli elementi nell'immagine. La “Regola dei Terzi” è una buona linea guida per la composizione e eredita molto dagli studi di disegno. Il concetto principale considera l'immagine divisa con due linee orizzontali e due verticali, che dividono l'immagine in tre parti. Generalmente se l'oggetto viene centrato si ha un effetto poco interessante, mentre se l'oggetto viene posizionato in uno dei punti di interesse, ovvero l'intersezione delle quattro linee, si ottiene un effetto decisamente migliore. Le linee dell'orizzonte infatti non dovrebbero essere posizionate nel centro, perché taglierebbero la foto a metà; è invece preferibile scegliere una delle linee orizzontali. Complessivamente bisogna tendere a creare un'immagine dinamica.
- Il controllo del movimento si riferisce al modo viene rappresentato il movimento nell'immagine. Il movimento può essere bloccato (seguito dalla fotocamera) oppure può essere lasciato scorrere, tuttavia l'oggetto principale dell'immagine deve essere visibile. Nessuna delle due tecniche è migliore dell'altra, la buona riuscita dipende esclusivamente dal tipo di effetto ricercato. Per esempio, fotografando una vettura da corsa che appare statica in relazione allo sfondo, che invece scorre sul retro, si ottiene l'oggetto principale in una condizione statica mentre lo sfondo crea il senso di movimento. (questa tecnica è chiamata "panning"). D'altra parte, fotografando un giocatore di basket in salto, bloccato in relazione a tutto il resto dello sfondo, si otterrebbe un buono scatto proprio per la posa innaturale.
- La profondità di campo (PdC o DOF dall'inglese depth of field) è la distanza davanti e dietro il soggetto principale che appare nitida (a fuoco). Questo parametro viene scelto a seconda delle necessità di ogni immagine e può parimenti migliorare o peggiorare la qualità di una fotografia. Generalmente viene utilizzata una PdC ridotta per mettere al centro dell'attenzione il soggetto principale, separandolo da tutto il resto dello sfondo. Invece viene utilizzata una grande PdC per enfatizzare la profondità di un immagine. Gli obiettivi grandangolari in genere una grande PdC mentre i teleobiettivi ne hanno una decisamente ridotta. In gran parte la PdC dipende dall'apertura del diaframma: aumenta con il diminuire dell'apertura e viceversa.
Per quanto riguarda l'aspetto grafico prendiamo invece in considerazione nitidezza, profondità, colore, superficie, prospettiva, bilanciamento, proporzione, ecc.
- La nitidezza si riferisce alle linee di contorno del soggetto principale.
- La profondità si riferisce alla qualità dell'aspetto tridimensionale del soggetto. Ciò si ottiene soprattutto tramite un'adeguata illuminazione laterale (come quella della prima mattinata o del tardo pomeriggio) e non esclusivamente frontale, al fine di evitare l'appiattimento del soggetto.
- Il colore è un elemento molto importante e non deve essere né troppo né poco saturo.
- La superficie si riferisce alla qualità della superficie degli oggetti fotografati.
- La prospettiva si riferisce all'angolazione dalla quale è stata scattata la fotografia. Essa crea una serie di rette immaginarie che seguono gli spigoli paralleli degli oggetti e si incontrano in un punto che può essere dentro o fuori l'immagine.
- Il bilanciamento si riferisce alla disposizione degli oggetti nell'immagine e può essere equilibrato o porre maggior peso verso una direzione.
- La proporzione si riferisce alla relazione tra le dimensioni degli oggetti all'interno dell'immagine. Generalmente si tende a rappresentare oggetti con ridotta relazione, ma una buona tecnica è quella di rappresentare gli oggetti di dimensioni minori in modo più esteso, contrariamente a quanto è in realtà. Per esempio, un piccolo fiore che viene rappresentato con le stesse dimensioni di una grande montagna: questa tecnica viene chiamata inversione di scala.
- Ovviamente, non tutte le caratteristiche devono essere necessariamente presenti. Le immagini possono essere giudicate sia per una sola caratteristica che per diverse caratteristiche, anche contemporaneamente.
- Significato simbolico o rilevanza particolare …Le guerre d'opinione possono iniziare!…. Va ricordato che una pessima fotografia di un soggetto difficilissimo da fotografare è sicuramente migliore di un'immagine ordinaria e tradizionale (come un comune tramonto).
- Le immagini possono essere scelte da un fotografo o da un osservatore anche per motivi culturali, tenendo però sempre conto del contesto dello scatto e non di quello dell'osservatore. Un'immagine inoltre può "parlare" alle persone e avere la capacità di evocare emozioni, che tuttavia non devono essere necessariamente piacevoli.
Per ottimizzare le possibilità di successo delle candidature delle tue immagini è consigliabile leggere le linee guida complete.
Come candidare un'immagine
[edit]Se credi di aver trovato o creato un immagine che può essere presa in considerazione per la vetrina, che abbia una appropriata descrizione e una licenza adeguata, allora segui queste indicazioni.
Punto 1: copia il nome dell'immagine dentro la casella di testo (includendo anche il prefisso Image: ) a seguito del testo già presente nella casella (per esempio Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:IL-NOME-DELLA-TUA-IMMAGINE.JPG.) ed infine clicca il pulsante candida una nuova immagine.
Punto 2: segui le istruzioni della pagina alla quale vieni collegato e salva le modifiche apportate.
Punto 3: inserisci manualmente un collegamento alla pagina creata in cima alla lista candidati:
Clicca qui e aggiungi il testo che segue all'inizio della lista di candidature:
- {{Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:IL-NOME-DELLA-TUA-IMMAGINE.JPG}}
Votare
[edit]Per votare puoi usare i seguenti templates:
- {{A favore}} ( Support) per supportare la candidatura,
- {{Contrario}} ( Oppose) per opporsi alla candidatura,
- {{Neutrale}} ( Neutral) per esprimere un parere neutrale,
- {{Commento}} ( Comment) per esprimere solo un commento,
- {{Info}} ( Info) per aggiungere delle informazioni riguardanti l'immagine,
- {{Domanda}} ( Question) per chiedere informazioni.
Puoi inoltre evidenziare che l'immagine non ha possibilità di essere eletta con il template {{FPX|motivo}}, inserendo al posto di motivo le ragioni per cui è chiaramente inaccettabile per la vetrina.
Ogni votante è pregato di motivare il proprio voto con qualche parola, in particolar modo se si vota contro. Ricorda inoltre di aggiungere la tua firma (~~~~). I voti anonimi non sono accettati.
Candidare un'immagine alla rimozione dalla vetrina
[edit]Gli standard della vetrina cambiano col tempo. Può succedere che un'immagine che era stata eletta per la vetrina non sia più adatta agli standard attuali.
Questa lista è perciò composta dalle immagini considerate non più adatte a rimanere nella vetrina. Vota:
- {{Mantenere}} Keep per far sì che l'immagine rimanga nella vetrina.
- {{Rimuovere}} Oppose per far sì che l'immagine venga rimossa dalla vetrina.
Se consideri che un'immagine non rispetti più i criteri delle immagini in vetrina, candidala per la rimozione copiando il nome dell'immagine dentro questa casella di testo (includendo il prefisso dell' Image:) a seguito del testo già presente in essa:
Nella pagina appena creata includi:
- Le informazioni sull'origine dell'immagine (autore dell'immagine, autore della candidatura);
- Un collegamento all'iniziale candidatura per l'inserimento nella vetrina (che va inserito sotto ==Collegamenti== nella descrizione dell'immagine);
- Il motivo per cui l'hai candidata per la rimozione dalla vetrina e il tuo Nome utente.
Dopo aver fatto ciò devi inserire manualmente un collegamento alla pagina creata all'inizio della lista di rimozione dalla vetrina.
Politica di elezione per la vetrina
[edit]Regole generali
[edit]- Il periodo di votazione è di 9 giorni completi, a partire dalla candidatura. I risultato verrà determinato alla fine di questo periodo. I voti aggiunti il decimo giorno o a seguito non verranno considerati.
- Sono benvenuti i contributori anonimi.
- I contributi di anonimi alle discussioni sono benvenuti.
- I voti di contributori anonimi non saranno accettati.
- La candidatura non conta come voto. Il voto di supporto va esplicitato.
- Gli autori delle candidature possono ritirare le loro immagini candidate in ogni momento. Questo si ottiene scrivendo semplicemente "I withdraw my nomination" (in inglese: ritiro la mia candidatura)
o aggiungendo il testo{{withdraw|~~~~}}
. - Ricorda che l'obiettivo del progetto Wikimedia Commons è di costruire una raccolta di immagini utilizzabili da tutti i progetti Wikimedia, inclusi possibili progetti futuri. Perciò non bisogna pensare che questo sia una raccolta dedicata esclusivamente al progetto Wikipedia e per tanto le immagini non vanno valutate in funzione di ciò.
- Le immagini vengono rimosse dalla lista di candidature se non hanno voti a supporto (escluso quello dell'autore della candidatura) entro il quinto giorno dalla candidatura (La regola del quinto giorno)
- Le immagini dotate del template {{FPX}} non devono essere rimosse dalla lista entro le 48 ore successive al momento in cui è stato applicato il template, purchè non vi sia nessun voto a supporto oltre quello dell'autore della candidatura.
Regole di ammissione e rimozione dalla vetrina
[edit]Un'immagine candidata viene ammessa alla vetrina se si verificano le seguenti condizioni:
- La licenza è adeguata (ovviamente).
- Se ha almeno 5 voti a supporto.
- Se il rapporto tra voti pro/contro è almeno 2/1 (se ha due terzi di maggioranza).
- Non possono essere ammessi alla vetrina diverse versioni della stessa immagine, ne deve essere scelta una sola versione.
I criteri per la rimozione dalla vetrina sono gli stessi per l'ammissione ad essa, compreso il periodo di voto e la regola del quinto giorno (vedi nelle Regole generali).
Ogni utente esperto può portare a termine una votazione: per istruzioni su come compiere questa operazione vedi la guida per portare a termina la votazione.
Infine, sii cortese
[edit]Per piacere non dimenticare che l'immagine che stai giudicando è frutto del lavoro di qualcuno. Evita di usare frasi come è orribile: se devi opporti non fare spiacevoli considerazioni. Inoltre ricorda che è necessario scrivere in inglese se vuoi essere compreso dagli altri utenti e che il tuo utilizzo di questa lingua e quello degli altri utenti può comunque generare incomprensioni se non si ha un'ottima conoscenza, perciò scegli le parole con cura.
Buon voto… e ricorda che.... tutte le regole possono avere qualche eccezione.
Vedi anche
[edit]- Per modificare la lista di candidature: Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list
- Per una lista cronologica delle candidature: Commons:Featured_pictures/chronological
- Per un archivio delle precedenti candidature: Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log
- Per istruzioni su come portare a termine una procedura di voto: Commons:Featured picture candidates/What to do after voting is finished
- Lista di termini base del linguaggio fotografico
- Candidature per le immagini di qualità
- Critica fotografica
- Guida alla scansione
Indice
[edit]Candidati per la vetrina
[edit]Featured picture candidates
[edit]Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2024 at 14:24:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family : Bovidae (Bovids)
- Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:24, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:24, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2024 at 12:39:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Black and White#Portraits
- Info created by crommelincklars - uploaded by Cybertrip - nominated by ★ -- ★ 12:39, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ★ 12:39, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2024 at 11:43:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/In_their_habitats#Carnivora_(Carnivores)
- Info All by -- Wilfredor (talk) 11:43, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2024 at 11:37:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Reptiles#Family : Emydidae (Pond Turtles)
- Info created, uploaded, nominated by George Chernilevsky -- George Chernilevsky talk 11:37, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 11:37, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Li Phi falls with colorful sky from elevated zip line platform at sunset in Don Khon Si Phan Don Laos.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2024 at 05:52:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Laos
- Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:52, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:52, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 08:43, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:30, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 14:38, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --BigDom (talk) 15:21, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2024 at 04:22:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings/Ceilings#Switzerland
- Info Zernez, decoration on the vaults of the Reformed Church San Mauritius. The church can first be seen at the end of the 13th century. These rich decorations were probably applied from 1609 onwards. See Reformierte Kirche Zernez
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:22, 16 September 2024 (UTC) - Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:22, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Unexceptional subject for me. Roughly made and not well painted -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:56, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, we can no longer hold the craftsmen of the year 1609 accountable for the (in your eyes) poor work they delivered.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:15, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2024 at 22:32:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Monuments_and_memorials
- Info created by Tracychapmanfan5 - uploaded by Tracychapmanfan5 - nominated by Henrysz -- Henrysz (talk) 22:32, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Henrysz (talk) 22:32, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Crop too tight at the top -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:58, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2024 at 22:22:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Machines
- Info created by National Institute for Fusion Science - uploaded by National Institute for Fusion Science - nominated by Henrysz -- Henrysz (talk) 22:22, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Henrysz (talk) 22:22, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Water reflection of a boy feeding hay to a cow in a paddy field at golden hour in Laos.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2024 at 20:39:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Reflections
- Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 20:39, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 20:39, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Of course --Wilfredor (talk) 22:55, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice golden hour light -- Terragio67 (talk) 00:45, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Captured the moment. --Tagooty (talk) 03:27, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 08:43, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 09:15, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 11:32, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:29, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very nice! BigDom (talk) 15:21, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2024 at 19:22:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Brazil
- Info created and uploaded by Bruno Tamm, nominated by me. RodRabelo7 (talk) 19:22, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- RodRabelo7 (talk) 19:22, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Neutral Perspective correction required. ★ 19:55, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Corrected. ★ 01:09, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- wide-angle don't need perspective fix, you changed it to another image completely different from the original author conception, IMHO, should be uploaded in another image Wilfredor (talk) 02:37, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Gorgeous colors and light Henrysz (talk) 22:35, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2024 at 16:27:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#1850-1899
- Info created by Charles Marville (1813–1879), restored, uploaded, and nominated by Yann, after a suggestion of LucaLindholm
- Support Old picture of Paris, before the time of Haussman's renovation. -- Yann (talk) 16:27, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Yann, Thank you so much for having done it by yourself. In the last two weeks I switched to Mac from Windows and I'm also developing also a little web site, so I was mentally occupied with those and other things. ;D LucaLindholm (talk) 18:03, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --LucaLindholm (talk) 18:03, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2024 at 16:23:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family_:_Caprimulgidae_(Nightjars)
- Info created, uploaded and nominated by Chuck Homler -- Needsmoreritalin (talk) 16:23, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Needsmoreritalin (talk) 16:23, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 14:38, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2024 at 11:50:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1900-1909
- Info Mark Twain photo portrait. Created by Unknown - uploaded by Grendelkhan - partially restored by Yann - nominated by ★ -- ★ 11:50, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Abstain Calling for Adam Cuerden to help to complete this restoration. -- ★ 11:50, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2024 at 06:44:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications
- Info Kasbah Amridil, Marocco (قصبة امريديل), old Fortress in Marocco. My shot. -- Mile (talk) 06:44, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mile (talk) 06:44, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Captures the large subject in a single exposure without artifacts or atmospheric distortion. The only things missing from the image are Joe Strummer, Mick Jones, Paul Simonon and Topper Headon. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 15:55, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:29, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2024 at 22:19:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Italy
- Info The entire decoration of the apse dates back to around the mid-6th century (549 consecration). This picture was created by stitching 32 photographs, 4 rows and 8 columns. As it is a very large image, it's easier to browse it with ZoomViewer. All by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 22:19, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 22:19, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support, but technically not perfect due to strange camera settings. Did you use a tripod?!--Uoaei1 (talk) 11:33, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Inside the basilica it is forbidden to use the tripod. Yes, you're right, camera settings chosen are not ideal. I tried to perform the only possible parameters with the Canon lens available to me for photography, trying to keep my hand still and photographing several photos. The bright parts (enlightened by the two windows at the top) are very beautiful, however the ones in the shade are not perfect, which fortunately are at the edges of the photo... To conclude, the good thing is that the mosaic tiles which measure between 1⁄2 and 1 inch square, can almost all be seen quite well, because I positioned myself at an appropriate distance in the center of the basilica, 30 meters from the apse mosaic, also considering the height of the ceiling which is 30 metres too. Terragio67 (talk) 16:22, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2024 at 21:45:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family : Canidae (Canids)
- Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:45, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:45, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support If it were better developed this image would really be a gem, but due to the size of the JPG and evaluating what the RAW would be like, this photo should have greater potential. --Wilfredor (talk) 21:50, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Elaborate further. Wolverine XI 13:03, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- If I understand well, Wilfredor is not very happy that the image wheighs "only" 16.11 MB and is saying that I should have uploaded a version that weighs more MB. It is true that I uploaded a version that was compressed with Photoshop to a quality of 11 out of 12. But I strongly disagree with his statement for many reasons :
- 1) The rules don't forbid small jpg compression (they only forbid strong compression). Actually the rules even recommend using a jpg compression of minimum 80 or 90% and this is what was done here with a 92% compression ;
- 2) A compression of 11 out of 12 has a result of pratically no difference compared to a 12/12 quality export. Even zooming at 200% and comparing pixel by pixel I never saw any difference between the two with the naked eye ;
- 3) Usually I only do the 11/12 instead of letting the 12/12 when the image size is above 20 MB. Excessive file sizes are bad for many reasons ;
- 4) Wiki Commons has available storage issues and uploading files with excessive size will only make it worse ;
- 5) Excessive file size will take a lot longer to load for people with slow internet ;
- 6) Excessive file size might make some old smartphones crash when opening the file ;
- 7) Excessive file size is bad for bandwidth and will slow down the server ;
- 8) Many of my images have been loaded more than 1 million times per file, if you multiply this number with excessive file size it would be a waste of bandwidth. Examples : 4M views in 4 years, 2.6M views in 1 year, 1.4M views in 1 year, 2.1M views in 1 year 2.3M views in 1 year, etc.
- 9) If there was a policy of only accepting only loseless uploads we would only be uploading PNG format, which is not the case here and is on the contrary to be avoided.
- Best regards, -- Giles Laurent (talk) 20:38, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- I'm not saying that this is the case and also every photographer should be free to edit their photos as they see fit, and we enter a grey area where it can be a decision of the photographer or a technical error according to some. Destructive editing does not only involve compression of JPGs, but also very strong noise reduction or sharpness filters, or saturation or color changes that were not real (except for black and white images or specific cases). I come from Venezuela, a country with very limited internet access where almost no one can see our work even with the highest compressions, but should we limit ourselves in an attempt to be inclusive?, This is just a image, imagine all the bandwidth that is spent on watching streaming videos, which is becoming more common every day. IMHO As a general rule, I always suggest uploading the best possible version of your work, because the quality in which you share it today will be how it’s remembered tomorrow. If someone prefers a smaller version, there are several size options available on the image description page, but that should not be your limitation when creating. Don’t set up barriers that others can easily overcome. Show your art in all its splendor and detail. You might think now that it’s enough to upload an optimized or more modest version, but I assure you, over time, you’ll regret it. Technology and quality standards advance quickly. The best way to contribute your work to humanity is by sharing it in the highest quality possible. In the end, it’s a matter of respecting your own creation and those who will enjoy it Wilfredor (talk) 22:53, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Elaborate further. Wolverine XI 13:03, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 22:58, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 06:05, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:23, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:58, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 07:54, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Fine, nice colors. --Mile (talk) 09:05, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 13:41, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --PierreSelim (talk) 13:49, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 20:15, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice light -- Basile Morin (talk) 20:41, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 00:42, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:10, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2024 at 18:20:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Agriculture
- Info created by FBilula - uploaded by FBilula - nominated by FBilula (talk) 18:20, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- FBilula (talk) 18:20, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Wilfredor (talk) 18:58, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Weak Support Good composition, but DoF too small. Sharpness could be better. --XRay 💬 09:42, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 13:43, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good lighting and composition. The leading (meandering) line of the path towards the steep hill in the background adds invokes, to me at least, a parallel to the myth of Sisyphus. A compelling image --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 16:02, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 20:15, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 22:25, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:11, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:27, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2024 at 17:44:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements
- Info created by Riad Salih - uploaded by Riad Salih - nominated by Riad Salih -- Riad Salih (talk) 17:44, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Riad Salih (talk) 17:44, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice, considering it was taken from a cell phone. ★ 17:51, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Agree with ★. --Mile (talk) 09:00, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Weak Support Really nice composition, but details looks flat (due to taking with a cell phone) --XRay 💬 09:40, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Close wing mud-puddling position of Charaxes bharata C. & R. Felder, 1867 - Indian Nawab 10.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2024 at 13:04:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Nymphalidae (Brush-footed Butterflies)
- Info created by Atanu Bose Photography - uploaded by Atanu Bose Photography - nominated by Atudu -- Atudu (talk) 13:04, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Atudu (talk) 13:04, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose You present an impressive collection of beautiful butterfly images here but in this case I think the detail is not at FP level. Sorry. --Ermell (talk) 20:59, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment IQ is fine, but position and left crop - more space. --Mile (talk) 09:08, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2024 at 19:35:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#Spain
- Info View of the Alcázar of Segovia during sunrise, Segovia, Castile and León, Spain. The UNESCO World Heritage Site dates from the 12th century and has been home to twenty-two kings. The Alcazar of Segovia has made its mark on cinema and popular culture. It was used by Orson Welles in the film "Chimes at Midnight" and served as inspiration for Cinderella castle in the Walt Disney movie and also in the Disneyworld sites. It's one of the most renowed medieval castles in the world and one of the most visited landmarks in Spain. c/u/n by me, Poco a poco (talk) 12:52, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 19:35, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Not the best perspective, IMO. Wolverine XI 16:44, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good interplay of light, clouds and the building.--Ermell (talk) 20:52, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose the composition feels aimless. The lighting makes the castle appear flat Henrysz (talk) 21:03, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Interesting to see a different perspective of a much-photographed building, but the lighting here isn't really working for me, sorry. I agree with Henrysz regarding the 'flat'ness. BigDom (talk) 02:39, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral per above. --SHB2000 (talk) 06:05, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support I am fine. Would say fort is very good and sharp. I wish other around could be similar sharp. Those 2-3 storks on trees solved. --Mile (talk) 09:04, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support I like the light and the perspective/angle. ★ 22:26, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Ravenna - Basilica di Sant'Apollinare in Classe - Vista esterna - 2024-09-13 23-38-55 001.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2024 at 22:19:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Italy
- Info The Basilica of Sant'Apollinare in Classe, located in Ravenna, is truly a jewel surrounded by greenery. Internally, the mosaic of the apse also depicts Sant'Apollinare in a lush green lawn, surrounded by trees, flowers and animals, creating an atmosphere of peace and serenity. This scenario symbolizes heaven and eternal life, making the basilica a place of great beauty and spirituality. All by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 22:19, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
* Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 22:19, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support I find both versions attractive, but I personally like this one better. The group of sculptures on the left adds to the overall appeal of the scene. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:29, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks, you are right. I decided to upload a new version in order to preserve the full scenery. I will correlate the two images as other version. I also really like this image, but I decided to opt for the alternative image because the depiction being too broad becomes difficult to interpret and perhaps even distracting. Terragio67 (talk) 07:54, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Alternative cropped version
[edit]- Info I decided to crop the left part of the image above to give centrality and the right importance to the basilica immersed in the greenery of nature, trying in the same way to represent an atmosphere of peace and serenity, similar to the internal mosaic of the apse where the tone of the colors resemble each other. This scenario symbolizes paradise and eternal life, making the basilica a place of great beauty and spirituality. Created, 2nd version uploaded, and nominated by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 19:36, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 19:36, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support For me this crop is better.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:02, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:33, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:54, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support, clearly better than the original crop. --PierreSelim (talk) 14:19, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:26, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2024 at 08:30:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers#France
- Info created by Gzen92 - uploaded by Gzen92 - nominated by Gzen92 -- Gzen92 (talk) 08:30, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Gzen92 (talk) 08:30, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:30, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2024 at 06:53:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Sweden
- Info 101 year old Högalidskyrkan in winter. No FP of this church in Stockholm. All by ThibautRe -- ThibautRe (talk) 06:53, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ThibautRe (talk) 06:53, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:29, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Too soft and too much sky --Uoaei1 (talk) 17:26, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Good light but a common motif. I also agree with Uoae1.--Ermell (talk) 21:07, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Very nice light as Ermell says, but I also agree that the composition and sharpness are not up to FP level, sorry. BigDom (talk) 02:43, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination Thank you everyone for the constructive criticism. Will be back with other candidates :) -- ThibautRe (talk) 07:36, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2024 at 01:50:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Anseriformes#Genus_:_Aix
- Info Sleepy male mandarin duck (Aix galericulata) in eclipse plumage (outside of breeding season). all by — Rhododendrites talk | 01:50, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 01:50, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support I love him Henrysz (talk) 13:32, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:29, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 21:39, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 13:22, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 16:42, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:48, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:30, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:53, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 00:55, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Msb (talk) 14:59, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 21 Sep 2024 at 21:40:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Italy
- Info All by -- Wilfredor (talk) 21:40, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Angle and composition don't work for me -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:13, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --RodRabelo7 (talk) 19:24, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 21 Sep 2024 at 15:29:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Austria#Tyrol
- Info Gschnitzer Tribulaun and Goldkappl seen from the Pflerscher Scharte, Stubai Alps, Tyrol, border Austria/Italy. All by me. -- Milseburg (talk) 15:29, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Milseburg (talk) 15:29, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good light and composition, interesting mountains. Yann (talk) 16:03, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Agree with Yann, well depicted, interesting point of view. --Terragio67 (talk) 07:48, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:15, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:29, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:49, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 13:22, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:47, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:35, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Mile (talk) 09:19, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good exposure, the image captures the texture of the subject and documents the glacial striation on the peak behind it. What is the obelisk, what is on the plaque, and what kind of bird is soaring above? --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 16:07, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 07:57, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 21 Sep 2024 at 11:49:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Lighting devices
- Info Lantern in Prelate's courtyard of former Gaming Charterhouse, Lower Austria. All by me. --Uoaei1 (talk) 11:49, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 11:49, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, but several things serve to ruin this one for me: the modern lightbulb in contrast to the older lamp and wall; the difference in the shadow vs. the lamp; the crack in the lamp glass... I'm just not feeling it.--Peulle (talk) 11:57, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support For me, the composition with the prominent shadows works very well. -- Radomianin (talk) 19:22, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support I like it too. --BigDom (talk) 03:28, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Yep. --Terragio67 (talk) 07:51, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Yes, the shadow makes it. Have taken the liberty to change the gallery link to the Lighting devices section where most similar FPs are collected. – Aristeas (talk) 09:43, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks, that fits perfectly! --Uoaei1 (talk) 10:38, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:15, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:28, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:48, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 21:40, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:47, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support :-) --XRay 💬 08:50, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Joalpe (talk) 13:02, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- SupportGood geometrical projection. It's hilarious for me, that "Gaming" exists as a village :). Many older Bavarians may refer to this name than for the term "Gaming" of playing video games --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 08:32, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 21 Sep 2024 at 10:27:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other
- Info created by Mounir Neddi - uploaded by Mounir Neddi - nominated by Mounir Neddi -- Mounir Neddi (talk) 10:27, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mounir Neddi (talk) 10:27, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Chromatic abberations everywhere... --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 13:01, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Technical it doesn't meet the FP standards. Motf is not that breathtaking.--Milseburg (talk) 15:33, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The colors are gorgeous but the picture is quite noisy and a bit soft. Sorry. -- ThibautRe (talk) 17:09, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose It's like starring into a wall; nothing exciting about that. Wolverine XI 20:21, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per above. --SHB2000 (talk) 11:49, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 20 Sep 2024 at 13:56:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Entertainment#Film
- Info created by Roger Kastel, uploaded by Crisco 1492, nominated by Yann
- Support Iconic film poster. Due to copyright, very few documents from this period. -- Yann (talk) 13:56, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 14:56, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support the movie is free too? --Wilfredor (talk) 16:49, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Nope. You need to pay some cash. Wolverine XI 20:23, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ezarateesteban 18:02, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:46, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Yann. --Terragio67 (talk) 07:43, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Exemplary movie poster for its era. – Aristeas (talk) 10:16, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Aristeas. -- Radomianin (talk) 11:05, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:13, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:47, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:47, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 20 Sep 2024 at 12:59:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Germany
- Info Main altar and tabernacle of St. Ursula, Munich, Germany. The so called "Schwabing Cathedral" was inaugurated in 1897 and its exterior appearance is similar to the ta’ Pinu Basilica (Malta). c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 12:59, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 12:59, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 15:38, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 10:25, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Milseburg (talk) 15:37, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:46, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 22:29, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 07:41, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Mile (talk) 07:47, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Kudos to the responsible people for the tasteful lighting; kudos to Poco for the excellent photo. – Aristeas (talk) 10:15, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 11:21, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:12, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:46, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 13:23, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 17:27, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:47, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --BigDom (talk) 02:44, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:04, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 20 Sep 2024 at 10:42:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Domes
- Info Stained glass dome in the Royal Portuguese Cabinet of Reading, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Created and uploaded by Donatas Dabravolskas - nominated by ★ -- ★ 10:42, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ★ 10:42, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Kadellar (talk) 20:46, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very good quality and interesting perspective. BigDom (talk) 09:28, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support A stunning place. The author wanted to show the beautiful galleries with their innummerable books, the chandelier, and the glass dome — all in a single photo. This is much and has led to an unusal, somewhat forced perspective which unavoidably causes significant distortions; personally I may have preferred separate photos of the various elements; but I must also admit that the result is exciting and impressive, and the difficult contrast between very dark and very bright elements has been handled successfully, so IMHO the photo deserves the star. Wilfredor has carefully reduced the noise and improved the sharpness, thanks for that. – Aristeas (talk) 10:13, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you Wilfredor (talk) 12:51, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 11:23, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:11, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:45, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 21:42, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:43, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 16:09, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:46, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --RodRabelo7 (talk) 19:25, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
File:070 Dark-capped bulbul at Bwindi Impenetrable Forest National Park Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period ends on 20 Sep 2024 at 10:07:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Pycnonotidae (Bulbuls)
- Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 10:07, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 10:07, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:20, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 15:51, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support sharp photo, evenly exposed. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 02:43, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:01, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 10:26, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Peulle (talk) 11:58, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:47, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:46, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support High-quality bird image. Wolverine XI 20:25, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 22:30, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Wilfredor (talk) 02:02, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --BigDom (talk) 03:29, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 05:05, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 07:03, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Bijay Chaurasia (talk) 07:09, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 07:33, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Also very nice composition, reminds me of the beautiful painted illustrations in some old biology books. – Aristeas (talk) 09:56, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 11:25, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:43, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:11, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great capture! High level of detail, good focus and interesting action -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:15, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 20 Sep 2024 at 07:03:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Croatia
- Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 07:03, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 07:03, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Milseburg (talk) 15:38, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support A simple photo, but the colors and the atmosphere make this photo special to me.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:45, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Yes, too simple in terms of subject, lighting, compo, I don't believe this is one of our finest shots, sorry. Poco a poco (talk) 07:03, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Refurbished clocktower VS unrefurbished buildings: I like this contrast. --Terragio67 (talk) 07:30, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:10, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:42, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Poco a poco. -- Karelj (talk) 10:04, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 20 Sep 2024 at 07:01:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Italy
- Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 07:01, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 07:01, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support This photo deserves a little love. Yes, at the first glance the lateral view of the façade appears unusual and somewhat irritating. But (a) sometimes a little irritation is good, it shakes us out of our well-meaning lethargy and makes us look closer; (b) the lateral view reveals parts of the domes of the church which are shining in the sunlight; (c) this way we get a beautiful contrast between the shady, bluish piazza and the warm light on the domes. All in all I learn much about the location and the beauty of the church from this photo, much more than from the usual symmetric frontal view, and therefore the photo is IMHO successful and deserves the star. – Aristeas (talk) 10:03, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:10, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:44, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 12:31, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose composition feels unbalanced Henrysz (talk) 21:09, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Looks too distorted and unnatural in my eyes, sorry. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 01:16, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 09:31, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Sep 2024 at 21:37:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Poland
- Info Warsaw Presidential Palace, with the statue of Jozef Poniatowski in front. all by — Rhododendrites talk | 21:37, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 21:37, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support verticals need fix, see the windows in the right side --Wilfredor (talk) 21:40, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks. Will fix shortly. — Rhododendrites talk | 21:48, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- New version uploaded — Rhododendrites talk | 22:53, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Excellent! Wilfredor (talk) 23:08, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Stitching prpblems in the roof, see note. Not sure about CAs. Motif is great. --Milseburg (talk) 15:42, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oh nooo. Ok thanks for the note; I'll fix tomorrow. — Rhododendrites talk | 01:50, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination It doesn't look like I'll have time to properly fix this quickly, so withdrawing and will renominate later. Thanks, all. — Rhododendrites talk | 13:58, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
post-withdrawal votes
|
---|
|
Voting period ends on 19 Sep 2024 at 16:38:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Egypt
- Info Art on Nubian house, Nagaa Suhayl Gharb, Egypt. My shot. Previous was on right side. -- Mile (talk) 16:38, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mile (talk) 16:38, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 18:38, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 21:29, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support For a moment I thought it was the Virgin of Guadalupe --Wilfredor (talk) 23:20, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Nubians are of Islam religion. Saw 2 mosques near, will try edit some in future. Nubians are very friendly, one invited me to coffee at his house. Very nice interior, like museum. --Mile (talk) 07:53, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Coffee is that coffee that is heated with sand? I hope you also enjoyed the cult Wilfredor (talk) 22:58, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment It was in his house, it was "normally" - in dzezva. Sand perhaps in desert, on dry camels waste. --Mile (talk) 08:29, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 08:45, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cool variant of pop art with traditional elements and refreshing subject. – Aristeas (talk) 09:52, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:06, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 09:30, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Sep 2024 at 15:04:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Nymphalidae (Brush-footed Butterflies)
- Info created by SVKMBFLY - uploaded by SVKMBFLY - nominated by SVKMBFLY -- SVKMBFLY (talk) 15:04, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- SVKMBFLY (talk) 15:04, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 21:31, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Excellent sharpnes --Wilfredor (talk) 21:41, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 07:07, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:22, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 15:52, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 10:28, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 00:45, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sharpness is fine but the setup, environment with humanmade elements spoils it to me, sorry Poco a poco (talk) 07:05, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very beautiful. Would prefer a natural environment, too, but we live in a world dominated by human beings, so IMHO it’s just realistic that even nature photos show human artefacts, too. – Aristeas (talk) 09:48, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:06, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 21:44, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:51, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Close wing puddling position of Graphium antiphates (Cramer, 1775) - Five-bar Swordtail WLB MG 2022.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 19 Sep 2024 at 14:56:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Papilionidae (Swallowtails)
- Info created by SVKMBFLY - uploaded by SVKMBFLY - nominated by SVKMBFLY -- SVKMBFLY (talk) 14:56, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- SVKMBFLY (talk) 14:56, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 21:33, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 10:10, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 00:40, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Distracting background, I'm afraid that the third butterfly spoils it Poco a poco (talk) 07:09, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 09:29, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Kritzolina (talk) 05:42, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Poco a poco. -- Karelj (talk) 10:01, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Sep 2024 at 08:46:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Austria#Carinthia
- Info Panoramic view from Ulrichsberg in SSE direction to the Karawanks and the Klagenfurt Basin, Carinthia, Austria. All by me. --Uoaei1 (talk) 08:46, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 08:46, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful and high-quality panorama, very educative. I love how the clouds appear nicely draped over the mountains. – Aristeas (talk) 07:47, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Aristeas. --Milseburg (talk) 15:44, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 18:11, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Aristeas. --Terragio67 (talk) 07:12, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 07:58, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 22:23, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Per Aristeas and well handled. Panorama-stitching can be very tough, but this result is top tier. --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 06:04, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Sep 2024 at 06:14:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Poland
- Info created by Emptywords - uploaded by Emptywords - nominated by Bruce1ee -- —Bruce1eetalk 06:14, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- —Bruce1eetalk 06:14, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 21:30, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 18:11, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Sep 2024 at 22:08:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/People#Paintings
- Info created by Raimundo Madrazo - uploaded by Isha - restored/nominated by Ezarate -- Ezarateesteban 22:08, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ezarateesteban 22:08, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 11:53, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Looks like at least one error added in the restoration process. Added a note. In a couple other places it looks like a mark may have been modified rather than removed. — Rhododendrites talk | 12:45, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment @Rhododendrites: fixed the annotation you did and anothers I found, thanks!!! Ezarateesteban
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 17:00, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Sep 2024 at 20:22:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Pelecaniformes#Genus : Ardea
- Info created by El Golli Mohamed - uploaded by El Golli Mohamed - nominated by El Golli Mohamed -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 20:22, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 20:22, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose sorry, the second bird isn't sharp and not in focus Ezarateesteban 22:15, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support I agree – worst case be the second bird can be cropped. --SHB2000 (talk) 04:07, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Some px on both side would be helpfull, especially on right side since that bird is in focus. --Mile (talk) 08:05, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral Agree with Mile. And definitely don't crop -- the photo is about a confrontation. Regarding sharpness of the egret, it is in a middle-ground area where it would be better for it to be blurrier or sharper, but I enjoy the drama of the heron's pose. All-in-all that brings me to neutral. :) — Rhododendrites talk | 12:48, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Kadellar (talk) 16:07, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 08:00, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support The main subject is the heron so I have no problem with the egret beeing out of focus. Also I think that the egret adds to the scene because it's looking at the heron -- Giles Laurent (talk) 15:53, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:01, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:55, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 23:41, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 07:08, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice focus control. ★ 01:45, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 13:50, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Sep 2024 at 14:40:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Poland
- Info created by Emptywords - uploaded by Emptywords - nominated by EUPBR -- EUPBR (talk) 14:40, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- EUPBR (talk) 14:40, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 19:58, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support —Bruce1eetalk 00:50, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Wilfredor (talk) 03:55, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose It's undoubtedly a useful pic, but no FP for me. Because of chromatic aberrations and perspective distortion I would not even promote it as QI. And overall the composition seems a bit unbalanced, with the harsh shadow at the right, the scaffold-like structure at the bottom. Sorry --A.Savin 06:45, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Mile (talk) 16:29, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per A.Savin --Tagooty (talk) 01:24, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per others --Uoaei1 (talk) 07:26, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:59, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per A.Savin --Milseburg (talk) 15:48, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per others -- Karelj (talk) 09:56, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Candidati per la rimozione dalla vetrina
[edit]Featured picture candidates
[edit]Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2024 at 14:24:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family : Bovidae (Bovids)
- Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:24, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:24, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2024 at 12:39:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Black and White#Portraits
- Info created by crommelincklars - uploaded by Cybertrip - nominated by ★ -- ★ 12:39, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ★ 12:39, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2024 at 11:43:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/In_their_habitats#Carnivora_(Carnivores)
- Info All by -- Wilfredor (talk) 11:43, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2024 at 11:37:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Reptiles#Family : Emydidae (Pond Turtles)
- Info created, uploaded, nominated by George Chernilevsky -- George Chernilevsky talk 11:37, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 11:37, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Li Phi falls with colorful sky from elevated zip line platform at sunset in Don Khon Si Phan Don Laos.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2024 at 05:52:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Laos
- Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:52, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:52, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 08:43, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:30, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 14:38, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --BigDom (talk) 15:21, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2024 at 04:22:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings/Ceilings#Switzerland
- Info Zernez, decoration on the vaults of the Reformed Church San Mauritius. The church can first be seen at the end of the 13th century. These rich decorations were probably applied from 1609 onwards. See Reformierte Kirche Zernez
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:22, 16 September 2024 (UTC) - Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:22, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Unexceptional subject for me. Roughly made and not well painted -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:56, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, we can no longer hold the craftsmen of the year 1609 accountable for the (in your eyes) poor work they delivered.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:15, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2024 at 22:32:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Monuments_and_memorials
- Info created by Tracychapmanfan5 - uploaded by Tracychapmanfan5 - nominated by Henrysz -- Henrysz (talk) 22:32, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Henrysz (talk) 22:32, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Crop too tight at the top -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:58, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2024 at 22:22:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Machines
- Info created by National Institute for Fusion Science - uploaded by National Institute for Fusion Science - nominated by Henrysz -- Henrysz (talk) 22:22, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Henrysz (talk) 22:22, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Water reflection of a boy feeding hay to a cow in a paddy field at golden hour in Laos.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2024 at 20:39:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Reflections
- Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 20:39, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 20:39, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Of course --Wilfredor (talk) 22:55, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice golden hour light -- Terragio67 (talk) 00:45, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Captured the moment. --Tagooty (talk) 03:27, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 08:43, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 09:15, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 11:32, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:29, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very nice! BigDom (talk) 15:21, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2024 at 19:22:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Brazil
- Info created and uploaded by Bruno Tamm, nominated by me. RodRabelo7 (talk) 19:22, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- RodRabelo7 (talk) 19:22, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Neutral Perspective correction required. ★ 19:55, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Corrected. ★ 01:09, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- wide-angle don't need perspective fix, you changed it to another image completely different from the original author conception, IMHO, should be uploaded in another image Wilfredor (talk) 02:37, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Gorgeous colors and light Henrysz (talk) 22:35, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2024 at 16:27:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#1850-1899
- Info created by Charles Marville (1813–1879), restored, uploaded, and nominated by Yann, after a suggestion of LucaLindholm
- Support Old picture of Paris, before the time of Haussman's renovation. -- Yann (talk) 16:27, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Yann, Thank you so much for having done it by yourself. In the last two weeks I switched to Mac from Windows and I'm also developing also a little web site, so I was mentally occupied with those and other things. ;D LucaLindholm (talk) 18:03, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --LucaLindholm (talk) 18:03, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2024 at 16:23:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family_:_Caprimulgidae_(Nightjars)
- Info created, uploaded and nominated by Chuck Homler -- Needsmoreritalin (talk) 16:23, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Needsmoreritalin (talk) 16:23, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 14:38, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2024 at 11:50:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1900-1909
- Info Mark Twain photo portrait. Created by Unknown - uploaded by Grendelkhan - partially restored by Yann - nominated by ★ -- ★ 11:50, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Abstain Calling for Adam Cuerden to help to complete this restoration. -- ★ 11:50, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2024 at 06:44:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications
- Info Kasbah Amridil, Marocco (قصبة امريديل), old Fortress in Marocco. My shot. -- Mile (talk) 06:44, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mile (talk) 06:44, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Captures the large subject in a single exposure without artifacts or atmospheric distortion. The only things missing from the image are Joe Strummer, Mick Jones, Paul Simonon and Topper Headon. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 15:55, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:29, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2024 at 22:19:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Italy
- Info The entire decoration of the apse dates back to around the mid-6th century (549 consecration). This picture was created by stitching 32 photographs, 4 rows and 8 columns. As it is a very large image, it's easier to browse it with ZoomViewer. All by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 22:19, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 22:19, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support, but technically not perfect due to strange camera settings. Did you use a tripod?!--Uoaei1 (talk) 11:33, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Inside the basilica it is forbidden to use the tripod. Yes, you're right, camera settings chosen are not ideal. I tried to perform the only possible parameters with the Canon lens available to me for photography, trying to keep my hand still and photographing several photos. The bright parts (enlightened by the two windows at the top) are very beautiful, however the ones in the shade are not perfect, which fortunately are at the edges of the photo... To conclude, the good thing is that the mosaic tiles which measure between 1⁄2 and 1 inch square, can almost all be seen quite well, because I positioned myself at an appropriate distance in the center of the basilica, 30 meters from the apse mosaic, also considering the height of the ceiling which is 30 metres too. Terragio67 (talk) 16:22, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2024 at 21:45:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family : Canidae (Canids)
- Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:45, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:45, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support If it were better developed this image would really be a gem, but due to the size of the JPG and evaluating what the RAW would be like, this photo should have greater potential. --Wilfredor (talk) 21:50, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Elaborate further. Wolverine XI 13:03, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- If I understand well, Wilfredor is not very happy that the image wheighs "only" 16.11 MB and is saying that I should have uploaded a version that weighs more MB. It is true that I uploaded a version that was compressed with Photoshop to a quality of 11 out of 12. But I strongly disagree with his statement for many reasons :
- 1) The rules don't forbid small jpg compression (they only forbid strong compression). Actually the rules even recommend using a jpg compression of minimum 80 or 90% and this is what was done here with a 92% compression ;
- 2) A compression of 11 out of 12 has a result of pratically no difference compared to a 12/12 quality export. Even zooming at 200% and comparing pixel by pixel I never saw any difference between the two with the naked eye ;
- 3) Usually I only do the 11/12 instead of letting the 12/12 when the image size is above 20 MB. Excessive file sizes are bad for many reasons ;
- 4) Wiki Commons has available storage issues and uploading files with excessive size will only make it worse ;
- 5) Excessive file size will take a lot longer to load for people with slow internet ;
- 6) Excessive file size might make some old smartphones crash when opening the file ;
- 7) Excessive file size is bad for bandwidth and will slow down the server ;
- 8) Many of my images have been loaded more than 1 million times per file, if you multiply this number with excessive file size it would be a waste of bandwidth. Examples : 4M views in 4 years, 2.6M views in 1 year, 1.4M views in 1 year, 2.1M views in 1 year 2.3M views in 1 year, etc.
- 9) If there was a policy of only accepting only loseless uploads we would only be uploading PNG format, which is not the case here and is on the contrary to be avoided.
- Best regards, -- Giles Laurent (talk) 20:38, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- I'm not saying that this is the case and also every photographer should be free to edit their photos as they see fit, and we enter a grey area where it can be a decision of the photographer or a technical error according to some. Destructive editing does not only involve compression of JPGs, but also very strong noise reduction or sharpness filters, or saturation or color changes that were not real (except for black and white images or specific cases). I come from Venezuela, a country with very limited internet access where almost no one can see our work even with the highest compressions, but should we limit ourselves in an attempt to be inclusive?, This is just a image, imagine all the bandwidth that is spent on watching streaming videos, which is becoming more common every day. IMHO As a general rule, I always suggest uploading the best possible version of your work, because the quality in which you share it today will be how it’s remembered tomorrow. If someone prefers a smaller version, there are several size options available on the image description page, but that should not be your limitation when creating. Don’t set up barriers that others can easily overcome. Show your art in all its splendor and detail. You might think now that it’s enough to upload an optimized or more modest version, but I assure you, over time, you’ll regret it. Technology and quality standards advance quickly. The best way to contribute your work to humanity is by sharing it in the highest quality possible. In the end, it’s a matter of respecting your own creation and those who will enjoy it Wilfredor (talk) 22:53, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Elaborate further. Wolverine XI 13:03, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 22:58, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 06:05, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:23, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:58, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 07:54, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Fine, nice colors. --Mile (talk) 09:05, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 13:41, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --PierreSelim (talk) 13:49, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 20:15, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice light -- Basile Morin (talk) 20:41, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 00:42, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:10, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2024 at 18:20:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Agriculture
- Info created by FBilula - uploaded by FBilula - nominated by FBilula (talk) 18:20, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- FBilula (talk) 18:20, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Wilfredor (talk) 18:58, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Weak Support Good composition, but DoF too small. Sharpness could be better. --XRay 💬 09:42, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 13:43, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good lighting and composition. The leading (meandering) line of the path towards the steep hill in the background adds invokes, to me at least, a parallel to the myth of Sisyphus. A compelling image --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 16:02, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 20:15, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 22:25, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:11, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:27, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2024 at 17:44:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements
- Info created by Riad Salih - uploaded by Riad Salih - nominated by Riad Salih -- Riad Salih (talk) 17:44, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Riad Salih (talk) 17:44, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice, considering it was taken from a cell phone. ★ 17:51, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Agree with ★. --Mile (talk) 09:00, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Weak Support Really nice composition, but details looks flat (due to taking with a cell phone) --XRay 💬 09:40, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Close wing mud-puddling position of Charaxes bharata C. & R. Felder, 1867 - Indian Nawab 10.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2024 at 13:04:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Nymphalidae (Brush-footed Butterflies)
- Info created by Atanu Bose Photography - uploaded by Atanu Bose Photography - nominated by Atudu -- Atudu (talk) 13:04, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Atudu (talk) 13:04, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose You present an impressive collection of beautiful butterfly images here but in this case I think the detail is not at FP level. Sorry. --Ermell (talk) 20:59, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment IQ is fine, but position and left crop - more space. --Mile (talk) 09:08, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2024 at 19:35:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#Spain
- Info View of the Alcázar of Segovia during sunrise, Segovia, Castile and León, Spain. The UNESCO World Heritage Site dates from the 12th century and has been home to twenty-two kings. The Alcazar of Segovia has made its mark on cinema and popular culture. It was used by Orson Welles in the film "Chimes at Midnight" and served as inspiration for Cinderella castle in the Walt Disney movie and also in the Disneyworld sites. It's one of the most renowed medieval castles in the world and one of the most visited landmarks in Spain. c/u/n by me, Poco a poco (talk) 12:52, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 19:35, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Not the best perspective, IMO. Wolverine XI 16:44, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good interplay of light, clouds and the building.--Ermell (talk) 20:52, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose the composition feels aimless. The lighting makes the castle appear flat Henrysz (talk) 21:03, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Interesting to see a different perspective of a much-photographed building, but the lighting here isn't really working for me, sorry. I agree with Henrysz regarding the 'flat'ness. BigDom (talk) 02:39, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral per above. --SHB2000 (talk) 06:05, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support I am fine. Would say fort is very good and sharp. I wish other around could be similar sharp. Those 2-3 storks on trees solved. --Mile (talk) 09:04, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support I like the light and the perspective/angle. ★ 22:26, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Ravenna - Basilica di Sant'Apollinare in Classe - Vista esterna - 2024-09-13 23-38-55 001.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2024 at 22:19:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Italy
- Info The Basilica of Sant'Apollinare in Classe, located in Ravenna, is truly a jewel surrounded by greenery. Internally, the mosaic of the apse also depicts Sant'Apollinare in a lush green lawn, surrounded by trees, flowers and animals, creating an atmosphere of peace and serenity. This scenario symbolizes heaven and eternal life, making the basilica a place of great beauty and spirituality. All by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 22:19, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
* Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 22:19, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support I find both versions attractive, but I personally like this one better. The group of sculptures on the left adds to the overall appeal of the scene. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:29, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks, you are right. I decided to upload a new version in order to preserve the full scenery. I will correlate the two images as other version. I also really like this image, but I decided to opt for the alternative image because the depiction being too broad becomes difficult to interpret and perhaps even distracting. Terragio67 (talk) 07:54, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Alternative cropped version
[edit]- Info I decided to crop the left part of the image above to give centrality and the right importance to the basilica immersed in the greenery of nature, trying in the same way to represent an atmosphere of peace and serenity, similar to the internal mosaic of the apse where the tone of the colors resemble each other. This scenario symbolizes paradise and eternal life, making the basilica a place of great beauty and spirituality. Created, 2nd version uploaded, and nominated by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 19:36, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 19:36, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support For me this crop is better.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:02, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:33, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:54, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support, clearly better than the original crop. --PierreSelim (talk) 14:19, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:26, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2024 at 08:30:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers#France
- Info created by Gzen92 - uploaded by Gzen92 - nominated by Gzen92 -- Gzen92 (talk) 08:30, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Gzen92 (talk) 08:30, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:30, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2024 at 06:53:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Sweden
- Info 101 year old Högalidskyrkan in winter. No FP of this church in Stockholm. All by ThibautRe -- ThibautRe (talk) 06:53, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ThibautRe (talk) 06:53, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:29, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Too soft and too much sky --Uoaei1 (talk) 17:26, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Good light but a common motif. I also agree with Uoae1.--Ermell (talk) 21:07, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Very nice light as Ermell says, but I also agree that the composition and sharpness are not up to FP level, sorry. BigDom (talk) 02:43, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination Thank you everyone for the constructive criticism. Will be back with other candidates :) -- ThibautRe (talk) 07:36, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2024 at 01:50:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Anseriformes#Genus_:_Aix
- Info Sleepy male mandarin duck (Aix galericulata) in eclipse plumage (outside of breeding season). all by — Rhododendrites talk | 01:50, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 01:50, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support I love him Henrysz (talk) 13:32, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:29, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 21:39, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 13:22, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 16:42, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:48, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:30, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:53, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 00:55, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Msb (talk) 14:59, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 21 Sep 2024 at 21:40:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Italy
- Info All by -- Wilfredor (talk) 21:40, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Angle and composition don't work for me -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:13, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --RodRabelo7 (talk) 19:24, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 21 Sep 2024 at 15:29:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Austria#Tyrol
- Info Gschnitzer Tribulaun and Goldkappl seen from the Pflerscher Scharte, Stubai Alps, Tyrol, border Austria/Italy. All by me. -- Milseburg (talk) 15:29, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Milseburg (talk) 15:29, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good light and composition, interesting mountains. Yann (talk) 16:03, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Agree with Yann, well depicted, interesting point of view. --Terragio67 (talk) 07:48, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:15, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:29, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:49, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 13:22, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:47, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:35, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Mile (talk) 09:19, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good exposure, the image captures the texture of the subject and documents the glacial striation on the peak behind it. What is the obelisk, what is on the plaque, and what kind of bird is soaring above? --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 16:07, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 07:57, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 21 Sep 2024 at 11:49:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Lighting devices
- Info Lantern in Prelate's courtyard of former Gaming Charterhouse, Lower Austria. All by me. --Uoaei1 (talk) 11:49, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 11:49, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, but several things serve to ruin this one for me: the modern lightbulb in contrast to the older lamp and wall; the difference in the shadow vs. the lamp; the crack in the lamp glass... I'm just not feeling it.--Peulle (talk) 11:57, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support For me, the composition with the prominent shadows works very well. -- Radomianin (talk) 19:22, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support I like it too. --BigDom (talk) 03:28, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Yep. --Terragio67 (talk) 07:51, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Yes, the shadow makes it. Have taken the liberty to change the gallery link to the Lighting devices section where most similar FPs are collected. – Aristeas (talk) 09:43, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks, that fits perfectly! --Uoaei1 (talk) 10:38, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:15, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:28, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:48, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 21:40, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:47, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support :-) --XRay 💬 08:50, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Joalpe (talk) 13:02, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- SupportGood geometrical projection. It's hilarious for me, that "Gaming" exists as a village :). Many older Bavarians may refer to this name than for the term "Gaming" of playing video games --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 08:32, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 21 Sep 2024 at 10:27:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other
- Info created by Mounir Neddi - uploaded by Mounir Neddi - nominated by Mounir Neddi -- Mounir Neddi (talk) 10:27, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mounir Neddi (talk) 10:27, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Chromatic abberations everywhere... --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 13:01, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Technical it doesn't meet the FP standards. Motf is not that breathtaking.--Milseburg (talk) 15:33, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The colors are gorgeous but the picture is quite noisy and a bit soft. Sorry. -- ThibautRe (talk) 17:09, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose It's like starring into a wall; nothing exciting about that. Wolverine XI 20:21, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per above. --SHB2000 (talk) 11:49, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 20 Sep 2024 at 13:56:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Entertainment#Film
- Info created by Roger Kastel, uploaded by Crisco 1492, nominated by Yann
- Support Iconic film poster. Due to copyright, very few documents from this period. -- Yann (talk) 13:56, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 14:56, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support the movie is free too? --Wilfredor (talk) 16:49, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Nope. You need to pay some cash. Wolverine XI 20:23, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ezarateesteban 18:02, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:46, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Yann. --Terragio67 (talk) 07:43, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Exemplary movie poster for its era. – Aristeas (talk) 10:16, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Aristeas. -- Radomianin (talk) 11:05, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:13, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:47, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:47, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 20 Sep 2024 at 12:59:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Germany
- Info Main altar and tabernacle of St. Ursula, Munich, Germany. The so called "Schwabing Cathedral" was inaugurated in 1897 and its exterior appearance is similar to the ta’ Pinu Basilica (Malta). c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 12:59, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 12:59, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 15:38, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 10:25, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Milseburg (talk) 15:37, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:46, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 22:29, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 07:41, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Mile (talk) 07:47, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Kudos to the responsible people for the tasteful lighting; kudos to Poco for the excellent photo. – Aristeas (talk) 10:15, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 11:21, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:12, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:46, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 13:23, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 17:27, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:47, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --BigDom (talk) 02:44, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:04, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 20 Sep 2024 at 10:42:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Domes
- Info Stained glass dome in the Royal Portuguese Cabinet of Reading, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Created and uploaded by Donatas Dabravolskas - nominated by ★ -- ★ 10:42, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ★ 10:42, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Kadellar (talk) 20:46, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very good quality and interesting perspective. BigDom (talk) 09:28, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support A stunning place. The author wanted to show the beautiful galleries with their innummerable books, the chandelier, and the glass dome — all in a single photo. This is much and has led to an unusal, somewhat forced perspective which unavoidably causes significant distortions; personally I may have preferred separate photos of the various elements; but I must also admit that the result is exciting and impressive, and the difficult contrast between very dark and very bright elements has been handled successfully, so IMHO the photo deserves the star. Wilfredor has carefully reduced the noise and improved the sharpness, thanks for that. – Aristeas (talk) 10:13, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you Wilfredor (talk) 12:51, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 11:23, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:11, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:45, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 21:42, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:43, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 16:09, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:46, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --RodRabelo7 (talk) 19:25, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
File:070 Dark-capped bulbul at Bwindi Impenetrable Forest National Park Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period ends on 20 Sep 2024 at 10:07:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Pycnonotidae (Bulbuls)
- Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 10:07, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 10:07, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:20, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 15:51, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support sharp photo, evenly exposed. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 02:43, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:01, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 10:26, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Peulle (talk) 11:58, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:47, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:46, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support High-quality bird image. Wolverine XI 20:25, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 22:30, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Wilfredor (talk) 02:02, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --BigDom (talk) 03:29, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 05:05, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 07:03, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Bijay Chaurasia (talk) 07:09, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 07:33, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Also very nice composition, reminds me of the beautiful painted illustrations in some old biology books. – Aristeas (talk) 09:56, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 11:25, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:43, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:11, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great capture! High level of detail, good focus and interesting action -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:15, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 20 Sep 2024 at 07:03:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Croatia
- Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 07:03, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 07:03, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Milseburg (talk) 15:38, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support A simple photo, but the colors and the atmosphere make this photo special to me.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:45, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Yes, too simple in terms of subject, lighting, compo, I don't believe this is one of our finest shots, sorry. Poco a poco (talk) 07:03, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Refurbished clocktower VS unrefurbished buildings: I like this contrast. --Terragio67 (talk) 07:30, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:10, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:42, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Poco a poco. -- Karelj (talk) 10:04, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 20 Sep 2024 at 07:01:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Italy
- Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 07:01, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 07:01, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support This photo deserves a little love. Yes, at the first glance the lateral view of the façade appears unusual and somewhat irritating. But (a) sometimes a little irritation is good, it shakes us out of our well-meaning lethargy and makes us look closer; (b) the lateral view reveals parts of the domes of the church which are shining in the sunlight; (c) this way we get a beautiful contrast between the shady, bluish piazza and the warm light on the domes. All in all I learn much about the location and the beauty of the church from this photo, much more than from the usual symmetric frontal view, and therefore the photo is IMHO successful and deserves the star. – Aristeas (talk) 10:03, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:10, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:44, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 12:31, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose composition feels unbalanced Henrysz (talk) 21:09, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Looks too distorted and unnatural in my eyes, sorry. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 01:16, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 09:31, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Sep 2024 at 21:37:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Poland
- Info Warsaw Presidential Palace, with the statue of Jozef Poniatowski in front. all by — Rhododendrites talk | 21:37, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 21:37, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support verticals need fix, see the windows in the right side --Wilfredor (talk) 21:40, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks. Will fix shortly. — Rhododendrites talk | 21:48, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- New version uploaded — Rhododendrites talk | 22:53, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Excellent! Wilfredor (talk) 23:08, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Stitching prpblems in the roof, see note. Not sure about CAs. Motif is great. --Milseburg (talk) 15:42, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oh nooo. Ok thanks for the note; I'll fix tomorrow. — Rhododendrites talk | 01:50, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination It doesn't look like I'll have time to properly fix this quickly, so withdrawing and will renominate later. Thanks, all. — Rhododendrites talk | 13:58, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
post-withdrawal votes
|
---|
|
Voting period ends on 19 Sep 2024 at 16:38:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Egypt
- Info Art on Nubian house, Nagaa Suhayl Gharb, Egypt. My shot. Previous was on right side. -- Mile (talk) 16:38, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mile (talk) 16:38, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 18:38, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 21:29, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support For a moment I thought it was the Virgin of Guadalupe --Wilfredor (talk) 23:20, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Nubians are of Islam religion. Saw 2 mosques near, will try edit some in future. Nubians are very friendly, one invited me to coffee at his house. Very nice interior, like museum. --Mile (talk) 07:53, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Coffee is that coffee that is heated with sand? I hope you also enjoyed the cult Wilfredor (talk) 22:58, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment It was in his house, it was "normally" - in dzezva. Sand perhaps in desert, on dry camels waste. --Mile (talk) 08:29, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 08:45, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cool variant of pop art with traditional elements and refreshing subject. – Aristeas (talk) 09:52, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:06, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 09:30, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Sep 2024 at 15:04:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Nymphalidae (Brush-footed Butterflies)
- Info created by SVKMBFLY - uploaded by SVKMBFLY - nominated by SVKMBFLY -- SVKMBFLY (talk) 15:04, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- SVKMBFLY (talk) 15:04, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 21:31, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Excellent sharpnes --Wilfredor (talk) 21:41, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 07:07, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:22, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 15:52, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 10:28, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 00:45, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sharpness is fine but the setup, environment with humanmade elements spoils it to me, sorry Poco a poco (talk) 07:05, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very beautiful. Would prefer a natural environment, too, but we live in a world dominated by human beings, so IMHO it’s just realistic that even nature photos show human artefacts, too. – Aristeas (talk) 09:48, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:06, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 21:44, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:51, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Close wing puddling position of Graphium antiphates (Cramer, 1775) - Five-bar Swordtail WLB MG 2022.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 19 Sep 2024 at 14:56:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Papilionidae (Swallowtails)
- Info created by SVKMBFLY - uploaded by SVKMBFLY - nominated by SVKMBFLY -- SVKMBFLY (talk) 14:56, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- SVKMBFLY (talk) 14:56, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 21:33, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 10:10, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 00:40, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Distracting background, I'm afraid that the third butterfly spoils it Poco a poco (talk) 07:09, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 09:29, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Kritzolina (talk) 05:42, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Poco a poco. -- Karelj (talk) 10:01, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Sep 2024 at 08:46:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Austria#Carinthia
- Info Panoramic view from Ulrichsberg in SSE direction to the Karawanks and the Klagenfurt Basin, Carinthia, Austria. All by me. --Uoaei1 (talk) 08:46, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 08:46, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful and high-quality panorama, very educative. I love how the clouds appear nicely draped over the mountains. – Aristeas (talk) 07:47, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Aristeas. --Milseburg (talk) 15:44, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 18:11, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Aristeas. --Terragio67 (talk) 07:12, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 07:58, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 22:23, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Per Aristeas and well handled. Panorama-stitching can be very tough, but this result is top tier. --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 06:04, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Sep 2024 at 06:14:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Poland
- Info created by Emptywords - uploaded by Emptywords - nominated by Bruce1ee -- —Bruce1eetalk 06:14, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- —Bruce1eetalk 06:14, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 21:30, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 18:11, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Sep 2024 at 22:08:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/People#Paintings
- Info created by Raimundo Madrazo - uploaded by Isha - restored/nominated by Ezarate -- Ezarateesteban 22:08, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ezarateesteban 22:08, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 11:53, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Looks like at least one error added in the restoration process. Added a note. In a couple other places it looks like a mark may have been modified rather than removed. — Rhododendrites talk | 12:45, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment @Rhododendrites: fixed the annotation you did and anothers I found, thanks!!! Ezarateesteban
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 17:00, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Sep 2024 at 20:22:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Pelecaniformes#Genus : Ardea
- Info created by El Golli Mohamed - uploaded by El Golli Mohamed - nominated by El Golli Mohamed -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 20:22, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 20:22, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose sorry, the second bird isn't sharp and not in focus Ezarateesteban 22:15, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support I agree – worst case be the second bird can be cropped. --SHB2000 (talk) 04:07, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Some px on both side would be helpfull, especially on right side since that bird is in focus. --Mile (talk) 08:05, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral Agree with Mile. And definitely don't crop -- the photo is about a confrontation. Regarding sharpness of the egret, it is in a middle-ground area where it would be better for it to be blurrier or sharper, but I enjoy the drama of the heron's pose. All-in-all that brings me to neutral. :) — Rhododendrites talk | 12:48, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Kadellar (talk) 16:07, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 08:00, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support The main subject is the heron so I have no problem with the egret beeing out of focus. Also I think that the egret adds to the scene because it's looking at the heron -- Giles Laurent (talk) 15:53, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:01, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:55, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 23:41, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 07:08, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice focus control. ★ 01:45, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 13:50, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Sep 2024 at 14:40:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Poland
- Info created by Emptywords - uploaded by Emptywords - nominated by EUPBR -- EUPBR (talk) 14:40, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- EUPBR (talk) 14:40, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 19:58, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support —Bruce1eetalk 00:50, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Wilfredor (talk) 03:55, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose It's undoubtedly a useful pic, but no FP for me. Because of chromatic aberrations and perspective distortion I would not even promote it as QI. And overall the composition seems a bit unbalanced, with the harsh shadow at the right, the scaffold-like structure at the bottom. Sorry --A.Savin 06:45, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Mile (talk) 16:29, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per A.Savin --Tagooty (talk) 01:24, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per others --Uoaei1 (talk) 07:26, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:59, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per A.Savin --Milseburg (talk) 15:48, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per others -- Karelj (talk) 09:56, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Tabella dei periodi di voto per la regola del quinto giorno (5 giorni dopo la candidatura)
[edit]Wed 11 Sep → Mon 16 Sep Thu 12 Sep → Tue 17 Sep Fri 13 Sep → Wed 18 Sep Sat 14 Sep → Thu 19 Sep Sun 15 Sep → Fri 20 Sep Mon 16 Sep → Sat 21 Sep
Tabella dei periodi di voto (9 giorni dopo la candidatura)
[edit]Sat 07 Sep → Mon 16 Sep Sun 08 Sep → Tue 17 Sep Mon 09 Sep → Wed 18 Sep Tue 10 Sep → Thu 19 Sep Wed 11 Sep → Fri 20 Sep Thu 12 Sep → Sat 21 Sep Fri 13 Sep → Sun 22 Sep Sat 14 Sep → Mon 23 Sep Sun 15 Sep → Tue 24 Sep Mon 16 Sep → Wed 25 Sep