Commons:Кандидати за изабране слике

Ово су кандидати за изабране слике. Уочите да ово није исто што и слика дана.

За архиву претходних номинација, погледајте: Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log

Постоји такође хронолошки списак изабраних слика.

Формалности

Номинација

Ако мислите да сте нашли или направили слику која може да се сматра вредном, онда је додајте испод у секцију номинације, на врх стране путем овог линка.(Упутства)

Пре него што то урадите, осигурајте да сте унели одговарајући опис слике, као и прикладну лиценцу.

Молимо гласајте користећи реч из вашег језика или одговарајуће шаблоне:

За - Yes, Sim, Ja, Oui, Sí, Kyllä, 支持 , Tak,...
Против - No, Não, Nein, Non, Ei, 反对 , Nie,...

Такође можете користити шаблоне {{Oppose}}( Oppose) и {{Support}}( Support). Такође можете изразити да волите слику са {{I love}}( Support) или да сте неутрални {{Neutral}}( Neutral).

Молимо покушајте да укључите неколико речи о томе зашто вам се (није) свидела слика, посебно када гласате против.

Политика за кандидате за изабране слике

На крају гласања, резултати ће бити одређени петнаестог дана од номинације.
Номинације од анонимних корисника су добродошле
Доприноси у разговорима од стране анонимних корисника су добродошли
Гласови анонимних корисника се не рачунају
Номинације се не рачунају као гласови. Подршка мора да буде експлицитно изречена.
Номинатори могу да повуку своју номинацију било када.
Запамтите, циљ Викимедијине Оставе је да пружи централну базу за слободне слике које би се могле користити у свим Викимедијиним пројектима, укључујући и могуће будуће пројекте. Ово није проста остава за википедијине слика, тако да о сликама не треба судити према томе да ли одговарају неком пројекту.
Слике могу да се уклоне са списка уколико немају подршке (не рачунајући номинаторов глас) после седмог дана.

Кандидат ће постати изабрана слика у складу са следећим условима:

Одговарајућа лиценца (наравно)
Најмање 7 гласова подршке
Однос гласова за и против мора да буде најмање 2:1 (двотрећинска већина)
Код две различите верзије исте слике, не могу обе бити изабране, већ само она са већим бројем гласова.

За упутства о томе како се процесују старе номинације, погледајте Template talk:Featured pictures candidates#What to do after voting is finished.

Кандидати за уклањање статуса изабране слике

Током времена, стандарди за изабране слике се мењају. Може бити одлучено да за неке слике које су некада биле "довољно добре", ово више није случај. Овде се наводе слике за које сматрате да више не заслужују да буду изабране. Ово захтева двотрећинску већину (и минимум од 5 гласова) за уклањање статуса. Ако нема 2/3 за уклањање, слика остаје изабрана. За ове радње, гласајте са {{Keep}} Keep (заслужује да остане изабрана слика) или or {{Delist}} Delist (не заслужује да више буде изабрана слика). Молимо пружите и линк ка оригиналној номинацији за изабрану слику (појавиће се под "Links" на страни са описом слике). За остало, иста правила важе као и изнад. Молимо користите овај линк како бисте додали новог кандидата за уклањање статуса

Освежавање стране: purge this page's cache

Кандидати за изабране слике

Featured picture candidates

File:Общественная баня в Тюмени.jpg

Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2024 at 13:14:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Russia
Info created and uploaded by Ted.ns - nominated by FBilula (talk) 13:14, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- FBilula (talk) 13:14, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:32, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:VNovgorod TradeArcades 4959.JPG

Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2024 at 13:13:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Russia
Info created and uploaded by Ludvig14 - nominated by FBilula (talk) 13:13, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- FBilula (talk) 13:13, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good composition of somewhere with a fascinating history Cmao20 (talk) 13:32, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

World Maps by Abraham Ortelius, 1572

Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2024 at 09:48:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page

America
Europe
Asia
Africa
World

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Maps#Maps of the world
Info created by Abraham Ortelius, uploaded and nominated by Yann
Info Theatrum Orbis Terrarum, world maps by Abraham Ortelius, 1572. First edition in German. Each of the five maps here were the standards for their time, drawn from the most important wall maps produced by Mercator, Ortelius and other leading European mapmakers.
Support It is quite exceptional to have a whole set in such a good quality and high resolution. Each of the maps may be in the relevant FP subcategory. -- Yann (talk) 09:48, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Famous maps, definitely need to be featured Cmao20 (talk) 13:30, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:NE View Stongdey Zanskar Jun24 A7CR 00966.jpg

Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2024 at 04:10:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#India
Info The green fields surrounding Stongde village are a refreshing contrast from the stark treeless central Zanskar valley and the snow-capped 6,000 m (20,000 ft) Zanskar Range. Elevation of Stongde 3,530 m (11,580 ft). Created by Tagooty - uploaded by Tagooty - nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 04:10, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tagooty (talk) 04:10, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Better at full size than thumbnail Cmao20 (talk) 13:30, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:La vuelta de Martín Fierro cover - 1879-restored.jpg

Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2024 at 23:49:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Printed
Info created by Jose Hernandez- uploaded by Shooke - restored/nominated by Ezarate -- Ezarateesteban 23:49, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support restoration based on a very damaged original-- Ezarateesteban 23:49, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Saslonch da Sacun Gherdëina.jpg

Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2024 at 18:03:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Italy#Trentino-Alto Adige
Info The Saslonch group from the hamlet Sacun in Urtijëi, South Tyrol all by Moroder -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 18:03, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 18:03, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 22:00, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Image is quite beautiful but the left side seems too empty – The People's Internet (talk) 09:12, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Apollo 11 bootprint.jpg (delist and replace)

Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2024 at 17:18:26

Info Same image in higher resolution (Original nomination)
Delist and replace -- Yann (talk) 17:18, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delist and replace Cmao20 (talk) 21:59, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The file name "AS11-40-5877 (21472308758).jpg" does not seem to comply with COM:I. Also a Question: why is the resolution lower at the source on Flickr than on Commons? Has the image been upsampled or is it a display limitation? -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:57, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with a renaming. Image on Fickr is 4,048 × 3,968, so it is not lower resolution. Yann (talk) 08:55, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delist and replace You're right, I can download it at this resolution on my mobile phone (but apparently not on my computer). Please rename the file -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:04, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done Yann (talk) 09:11, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Natural History Museum London South Facade 2020 01.jpg

Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2024 at 14:17:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#United_Kingdom
Info Southern facade of the Natural History Museum in London in morning light, c/u/n by me. — Julian H.^✈ 14:17, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Julian H.^✈ 14:17, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support Absolutely beautiful. A different and sensitive composition for an amazing building. Cmao20 (talk) 16:50, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:16, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support The beautiful lighting creates a special atmosphere. -- Radomianin (talk) 20:30, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Oddly, the building looks hazy, at thumbnail size. Especially at the top. It is almost a contrejour (see the shadows of the tree in the center, leaning towards us), so I would say the light was not so cooperative at the beginning. Composition has potential but the colors are washed out -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:08, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:2022-08-19 European Championships 2022 – Table Tennis by Sandro Halank–007.jpg

Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2024 at 12:17:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Sports#Individual sports
Info created, uploaded and nominated by Sandro Halank -- Sandro Halank (talk) 12:17, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Sandro Halank (talk) 12:17, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Great look! Some of the EXIF data are missing. I'd like to know the shutter speed. Yann (talk) 12:44, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately, I have a problem with the Canon EOS R3, when converting CR3 to JPG this data gets lost. It is 200 mm, 1/1,000 sec., F/3.5 and ISO 6,400. Sandro Halank (talk) 12:52, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You could add this manually, but Support anyway. Yann (talk) 16:49, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice action shot, good composition and background Cmao20 (talk) 13:36, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:57, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 15:49, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per Cmao20. -- Radomianin (talk) 19:24, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Well frozen at high speed, but I agree with Yann the metadata could be added manually on the file page (about the conversion from RAW to JPG, it is certainly a matter of parameters) -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:15, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Madrid cathedral 2020 - view from the dome.jpg

Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2024 at 10:52:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Spain
Info all by me Fernando -- Fernando (talk) 10:52, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Panorama of the views from the dome of the Almudena Cathedral in Madrid. Pictures taken here at sunset are rare, since the regular visiting hours end before, and only limited, city hall-sponsored visits are allowed during the evening. -- Fernando (talk) 10:52, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support There is a lot of colour noise but I think it's forgiveable because of very high resolution, perfect composition (beautifully centered), nice light, and as you say difficulty of taking the photo; any improvement you can make would be appreciated though Cmao20 (talk) 13:35, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:55, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 15:51, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Improved version at SwissTransfer: I took the liberty of removing the color noise, as well as significantly reducing the general noise without affecting the sharpness. If you/the community like the result, please feel free to use it for an update :) Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 20:24, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:SE Facade Phuktal Zanskar Ladakh Jun24 A7CR 00617.jpg

Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2024 at 09:45:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#India
Info Phuktal Monastery perched on a cliff above the Tsarap River. Elevation 3,940m (12,927ft). Zanskar, Ladakh, India. Created by Tagooty - uploaded by Tagooty - nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 09:45, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tagooty (talk) 09:45, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:32, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:53, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Question Great place, but isn't it a bit dark? Yann (talk) 16:53, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Yann: It was an overcast afternoon and I underexposed to bring out the range of colours in the rocks. I've increased the exposure a bit. Please see the new version. --Tagooty (talk) 03:17, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Yes, good. --Yann (talk) 08:29, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Spectacular subject and nice viewpoint. -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:01, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Picturesque and vertiginous place, well captured. – Aristeas (talk) 10:18, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -Moroder

File:Akiem BB 37024 Port-la-Nouvelle - Leucate la Franqui.jpg

Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2024 at 06:14:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles#Rail vehicles
Info created by Kabelleger - uploaded by Kabelleger - nominated by Bruce1ee -- —Bruce1ee^talk 06:14, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- —Bruce1ee^talk 06:14, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Yann (talk) 07:57, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:46, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:31, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:50, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:49, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 15:51, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 19:27, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Well frozen at 1/1,600 sec, nice golden light -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:24, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Basile. – Aristeas (talk) 10:16, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:RNoAF Saab MFI-15 Safari 806 Royal International Air Tattoo 2024 01.jpg

Voting period ends on 10 Nov 2024 at 13:56:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Air_transport#Propeller_aircraft
Info Saab MFI-15 Safari of the Yellow Sparrows display team, c/u/n by me. — Julian H.^✈ 13:56, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Julian H.^✈ 13:56, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Outstanding panning shot! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 00:26, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 06:18, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Frank. —Yann (talk) 07:56, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Superb action shot. --Tagooty (talk) 09:47, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 11:04, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:45, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:30, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:49, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 15:51, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support Extraordinary panning, making the subject popping up from the background. Impressive settings, at 1/60 sec only, for a moving subject located far away. The plane is surprisingly sharp -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:30, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Basile. – Aristeas (talk) 10:15, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Qal'at al-Bahrain, Karbabad, Baréin, 2024-08-18, DD 67.jpg

Voting period ends on 10 Nov 2024 at 13:53:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#Bahrain
Info Qal'at al-Bahrain, Karbabad, Bahrain. The archaeological site, also known as the “Fort of Bahrain”, was the capital of the Dilmun civilization and a place of consistent human settlement and occupation from c. 2300 BC to the present. A Portuguese fort stands today atop the site and it became a UNESCO World Heritage Site in 2005. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 13:53, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 13:53, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Superb Cmao20 (talk) 13:29, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 10:15, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Páření čápů bílých.jpg

Voting period ends on 10 Nov 2024 at 13:53:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Ciconiidae (Storks)
Info created by Lubomír Dajč – uploaded by Lubomír Dajč – nominated by Draceane
Info White stork (Ciconia ciconia) mating ~~five~~ ten to twelve, Nové Veselí, Czechia — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 13:53, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 13:53, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very eye-catching and pleasing composition, great capture. -- Radomianin (talk) 15:47, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 00:28, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Yann (talk) 07:58, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support A really nice and rare capture. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:44, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Captured an unusual moment precisely. --Tagooty (talk) 09:48, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fernando (talk) 09:54, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:44, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:28, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:48, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:46, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:15, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent action of wild life. High level of detail -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:32, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Tagooty and Basile. – Aristeas (talk) 10:14, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Чинки плато Устюрт. Урочище Бозжыра.jpg

Voting period ends on 10 Nov 2024 at 06:50:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Kazakhstan
Info created by Максат79 - uploaded by Максат79 - nominated by Екатерина Борисова -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 06:50, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 06:50, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It's my first try to nominate image to FP, so I ask for help from experienced nominators If I made any mistakes. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 07:07, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You did everything right, thank you for the nomination. About the picture: Great subject, the sky is a bit noisy which could be fixed. Unfortunately, there is a probable stitching error in the lower area that has created a blurred part (please see annotation). Suggested solution: Either contact the author and ask for help, or carry out extensive retouching on this file. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 09:02, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot for your review. I'll try to contact the author. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 16:44, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Optimized version at SwissTransfer: I took the liberty of denoising the sky a bit and reducing the above mentioned blurry (presumably) stitching error to an acceptable level. If the author is not available, please feel free to use this version for an update :) Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 11:02, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Great thanks! Екатерина Борисова (talk) 15:32, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Sette-quattro (talk) 21:58, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Yann (talk) 07:58, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:43, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I think the colours are a bit overprocessed but it's cool anyway Cmao20 (talk) 13:27, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:46, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:45, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:14, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Wow is there but I agree with Cmao20 the picture is overprocessed. -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:34, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20. Thanks to Radomianin for the editing! – Aristeas (talk) 10:14, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rijpe vruchten van Hertshooi (Hypericum). 17-08-2024 (d.j.b.).jpg

Voting period ends on 10 Nov 2024 at 05:23:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Hypericaceae
Info Ripe berries of a (Hypericum androsaemum) Focus stack of 23 photos.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:23, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:23, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 05:10, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 07:11, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lovely composition, colours and detail. --Tagooty (talk) 09:49, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fernando (talk) 11:05, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 11:09, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:42, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:25, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:43, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:13, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support High level of detail -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:37, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 10:13, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Río Ameca.jpg

Voting period ends on 10 Nov 2024 at 02:02:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Mexico
Info: the Ameca River, forming the natural border between the states of Jalisco and Nayarit, taken from a window of a commercial aircraft; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:02, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:02, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I think it's a bit hazy but the composition is good enough for FP and it's a challenging shot of course Cmao20 (talk) 13:15, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support For the commercial aircraft photography it's outstanding. — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 15:52, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Yes, if the picture was shot from the window of a commercial aircraft, it should be mentioned somewhere on the file page. Currently poor categorization and description for a FP nomination. -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:42, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Слияние Оми и Иртыша в Омске.jpg

Voting period ends on 10 Nov 2024 at 02:02:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Russia
Info: a woman is waving at the departing Moskva-112 cruise ship at the confluence of the Om and Irtysh rivers in Omsk; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:02, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:02, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I'm not seeing any big wow factor here, sorry. --Peulle (talk) 09:24, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, not FP material for me. Uninteresting bush in the foreground and flat simple background. --Fernando (talk) 09:53, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry but per above, good quality but not FP composition or light Cmao20 (talk) 13:34, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Moving with archers defending livestock scene.jpg

Voting period ends on 9 Nov 2024 at 15:48:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Others#Frescos and murals
Info all by me -- IssamBarhoumi (talk) 15:48, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain as author -- IssamBarhoumi (talk) 15:48, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:14, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tagetes2.jpg

Voting period ends on 9 Nov 2024 at 15:28:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A photo of an orange Tagetes flower, slightly obscured by the surrounding dark green leaves

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Asterales#Subfamily : Asteroideae
Info created by The People's Internet - uploaded by The People's Internet Legacy Assets - nominated by User:The People's Internet -- The People's Internet (talk) 15:28, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- The People's Internet (talk) 15:28, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:21, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry but IMO this is a QI not an FP. Beautiful flower and nice colours but not sharp enough for a photo of a large flower. Cmao20 (talk) 13:14, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Low quality and boring composition -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:43, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Agree with Cmao20. Image has merit but not FP. --GRDN711 (talk) 15:21, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Iglesia de Saint-Merri, París, Francia, 2022-10-31, DD 157-159 HDR.jpg

Voting period ends on 9 Nov 2024 at 12:19:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Paris
Info Very high quality church interior with a special atmosphere. Note that the darkness of this church is correct for a photo taken at 5:47pm in October, I would not want it brightened because I think the twilight lighting conditions make it special. created by Poco a poco - uploaded by Poco a poco - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 12:19, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 12:19, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Niiiicceee :) thank you Poco a poco (talk) 18:17, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:13, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:21, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 08:42, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:40, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 15:53, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very atmospheric and authentic. – Aristeas (talk) 10:12, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:07, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Rbrechko (talk) 12:29, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:একজন মাদ্রাসার ছাত্র বায়তুল মকারাম মসজিদে নামাজ আদায় করছে.jpg

Voting period ends on 9 Nov 2024 at 12:19:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Bangladesh
Info Yes I know that the quality of this image is a little flawed but I think it should be FP anyway because of the composition, colours, wonderful high-key and minimalist surroundings, and the fact that it is a lovely portrait of personal devotion and prayer. created by Sultan Ahmed Niloy - uploaded by Sultan Ahmed Niloy - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 12:19, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 12:19, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:31, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Анастасия Львова^ru/en 20:26, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:13, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Striking composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 07:08, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Basile. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:05, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:44, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:21, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 00:30, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 05:36, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Yann (talk) 07:59, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support The compo kinda makes up for its flaws. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:43, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly my thoughts. Cmao20 (talk) 13:42, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Llez (talk) 12:39, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice compo, but sharpness a bit soft and the white areas seems lacking of almost any details because it was likely a bit overexposed. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 20:55, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that it's a bit soft. It is maybe a little bit of motion blur. I nominated it because I think the composition outweighs that. I disagree that it's overexposed though. Bright light shining through a large arch window will appear white to the naked eye. I think this photo would be much less interesting if you reduced the highlights. Cmao20 (talk) 13:28, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Weak support per SHB2000. – Aristeas (talk) 10:10, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pacific reef heron (Egretta sacra) dark morph Rarotonga.jpg

Voting period ends on 9 Nov 2024 at 09:34:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Pelecaniformes#Genus : Egretta
Info One nice recent FP of a bird in non-breeding plumage. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:34, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:34, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 12:05, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:30, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 14:20, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Even though I know that there surely will be accusations of revenge voting, this is a matter of principle for me: as long as the categories aren't properly fixed, oppose. --A.Savin 15:51, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Which categories should be fixed @A.Savin: ? Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:58, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can anyone else tell me what I need to do on categories please? The oppose vote could be inhibiting other voters. Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:19, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You don't give a shit, right? Exactly same problem as back in Jan 2020 --A.Savin 12:43, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have found one error. I created a new Category:Pelecaniformes of the Cook Islands and placed it Category:Pelecaniformes by country. I did not categorize it under Category:Birds of the Cook Islands. Naughty me. I have now done so. I do wonder why the category structure places the Cook Islands under New Zealand. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:46, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:26, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 21:59, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like how you included the habitat. Nice shot! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 07:13, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fernando (talk) 09:52, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Frank. -- Radomianin (talk) 11:07, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:39, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 15:56, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Frank. – Aristeas (talk) 10:09, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:White dog sleeping on the floor with puppies after nursing in Don Det Laos.jpg

Voting period ends on 9 Nov 2024 at 02:03:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family : Canidae (Canids)
Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:03, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:03, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Sensitive, beautiful, and well composed Cmao20 (talk) 04:13, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 09:29, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 14:20, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 11:08, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:43, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:21, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support this IMO is just adorable. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:43, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Pictures of puppies is cheating. --Fernando (talk) 09:48, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:33, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Admont - Ortsansicht.JPG

Voting period ends on 8 Nov 2024 at 20:01:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#Austria
Info created by Bwag – uploaded by Bwag – nominated by Draceane — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 20:01, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 20:01, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Big wow for me Cmao20 (talk) 04:11, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 06:05, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 06:11, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 08:27, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:13, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:00, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful veduta. – Aristeas (talk) 11:07, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:21, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – The People's Internet (talk) 09:12, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pumpkin festival - Ludwigsburg 2024 - 30.jpg

Voting period ends on 8 Nov 2024 at 15:36:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Food and drink#Vegetables (raw)
Info Happy Halloween!
Created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 15:36, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 15:36, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:34, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 19:47, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Really a huge bunch! But is the white balance correct? Kind of orange cast -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:56, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful Cmao20 (talk) 04:11, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 06:06, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 07:12, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 14:07, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:13, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:30, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:58, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice diverse texture. – Aristeas (talk) 11:05, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:23, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Close wing Basking of Neopithecops zalmora (Butler, 1870) - Common Quaker (7) WLB.jpg

Voting period ends on 8 Nov 2024 at 11:51:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Lycaenidae (Blues, coppers and hairstreaks)
Info created by Anitava Roy - uploaded by Anitava Roy - nominated by Anitava Roy -- Anitava Roy (talk) 11:51, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Anitava Roy (talk) 11:51, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 19:47, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Great composition but I think the focus has been missed on the head Cmao20 (talk) 04:10, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:23, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nautilus by Edward Weston.jpg

Voting period ends on 8 Nov 2024 at 11:40:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Shells#Class : Cephalopoda (will need a new subsection if promoted)
Info created by Edward Weston, uploaded and nominated by Yann
Support "One of the most famous photographs ever made" and "a benchmark of modernism in the history of photography", according to Nautilus. -- Yann (talk) 11:40, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 19:46, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Another famous work by Weston. A pity that the resolution is relatively low. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:58, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Radomianin -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:50, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose This image could look much better from another photo angle, the best 90 °, IHMO. -- Karelj (talk) 11:27, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Karelj: This is a notable work by a notable photographer who died in 1958, so you cannot choose another angle. Yann (talk) 11:42, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- @Yann: Anyway it is not good enough from my point of view. --Karelj (talk) 11:56, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support More than “good enough”. It’s a classic, and for a good reason. – Aristeas (talk) 11:04, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:23, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Комплекс Пир-Сиддик 4.jpg

Voting period ends on 8 Nov 2024 at 08:41:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Traditions
Info created and uploaded by Arina Pan - nominated by Красный -- Красный ^{wanna talk?} 08:41, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Красный ^{wanna talk?} 08:41, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 19:45, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Not sure this is the perfect crop but I definitely find this interesting and unusual enough for FP Cmao20 (talk) 04:10, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I think the framing is good, the open door on the left and the pigeons flying up on the bottom right are part of the story and form a whole. -- Radomianin (talk) 08:33, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 09:30, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Interesting and kind image. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 14:22, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Анастасия Львова^ru/en 14:40, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin 15:57, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:33, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Unusual, different from other nominations, nice light -- Basile Morin (talk) 07:09, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:57, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Basile and Radomianin. – Aristeas (talk) 11:00, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:23, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 14:01, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:35, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Pleasing composition. --Tagooty (talk) 04:13, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Samanea saman on an island with orange clouds and blue sky at sunrise from Don Det Si Phan Don Laos.jpg

Voting period ends on 8 Nov 2024 at 02:07:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Clouds
Info 2 FPs of this island, but none on that day and none with these clouds.. Created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:07, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:07, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 09:12, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:35, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 17:35, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 19:43, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support This one is really impressive, I have to admit. Suitable for a whole wall as a photo wallpaper :) -- Radomianin (talk) 21:52, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The light is absolutely stunning but doesn't it need a perspective correction? Particularly when you look at the horizon on the left it looks like it's leaning to me. Cmao20 (talk) 04:09, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done I agree, Cmao20, because of the reflection that should be vertical. Thank you very much for your enthusiasm and constructive suggestion -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:39, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Thanks! Cmao20 (talk) 12:03, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --SHB2000 (talk) 06:06, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Stunning. – Aristeas (talk) 13:37, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:13, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:35, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:56, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:23, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 14:01, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:35, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Extraordinary sunrise and reflections. --Tagooty (talk) 04:15, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Road R104 in Anti-Atlas mountains, Tiznit Province, Morocco.jpg

Voting period ends on 7 Nov 2024 at 12:05:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#Morocco
Info created by Tupungato - uploaded by Tupungato - nominated by Tupungato -- Tupungato (talk) 12:05, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tupungato (talk) 12:05, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose A truck, like here, or something is missing, sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:54, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Resolution could be higher, but I like the scene. --Harlock81 (talk) 19:42, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's 24 megapixels, this seems pretty high to me Cmao20 (talk) 04:06, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Interesting landscape Cmao20 (talk) 04:06, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:13, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:23, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Agree with Basile, something is missing here, but I'd rather see the road vanishing in the far back Poco a poco (talk) 13:57, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not out of the ordinary. --Tagooty (talk) 04:16, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Taj and people framed.jpg

Voting period ends on 7 Nov 2024 at 10:17:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#India
Info Taj Mahal and crowd of people to see magnificent Taj Mahal. created by Sdnphotoholic - uploaded by Sdnphotoholic - nominated by Sumit Surai -- Sumit Surai (talk) 10:17, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Sumit Surai (talk) 10:17, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Sette-quattro (talk) 15:13, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support The resolution could be higher, but I love the composition, excellent framing --Kritzolina (talk) 20:47, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Off-centered, unfortunate crop of the towers, disturbing heads, frindge around the frame, and yes, far too low res. Poco a poco (talk) 15:44, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I do not generally like pictures where people are ahead of the main subject, but in this case they are clearly part of the composition. The viewer becomes part of that crowd. Effective choice of the silhouette effect. --Harlock81 (talk) 19:38, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 20:18, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Poco. BigDom (talk) 02:47, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I don't get the reasons for the support here, honestly. I agree with all of Poco's criticisms. The building is of course amazing and the picture is fine but it isn't FP in either composiiton or quality, IMO. Cmao20 (talk) 04:05, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose very off-centre – not even a QI to me. --SHB2000 (talk) 06:07, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. --Yann (talk) 09:31, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wadi Bani Khalid, Omán, 2024-08-17, DD 36-42 PAN.jpg

Voting period ends on 6 Nov 2024 at 15:32:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Oman
Info Panoramic view of the Wadi Bani Khalid, Ash Sharqiyah Region, Oman. Wadi is an arabic word that stands for "river valley", of which there are very few in this arid country. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 15:32, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 15:32, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Definitely one that you have to view in full size. I thought the light was a bit grey at first but looking at it for longer, i really like the colours Cmao20 (talk) 20:42, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 23:49, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 09:44, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:47, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:38, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Well done panorama and the icing on the cake is a photographer who takes pictures :) -- Radomianin (talk) 22:05, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:52, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:33, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Andalusian wall of Rabat, Marocco (السور الأندلسي بالرباط).jpg

Voting period ends on 6 Nov 2024 at 11:30:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#Morocco
Info Andalusian wall of Rabat, Marocco (السور الأندلسي بالرباط). My shot. -- Mile (talk) 11:30, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mile (talk) 11:30, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Compared to your other recent FP I find this one less satisfying. The entrance itself is obviously a lot less eye-catching, but the main issue for me is that the half-pedestrian here gives the impression that she just wandered across your shot. To me, she is blocking our view of the subject, rather than being part of the composition like in the previous photo. BigDom (talk) 01:22, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 16:55, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per BigDom. --Yann (talk) 09:32, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Weininsel Sommerach Luftbild-20221027-RM-155807.jpg

Voting period ends on 5 Nov 2024 at 21:20:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Agriculture#Germany
Info Vines on the wine island near Sommerach. All by Ermell -- Ermell (talk) 21:20, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ermell (talk) 21:20, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 22:35, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:55, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 03:41, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Buidhe (talk) 04:23, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 08:20, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Graphically appealing composition! -- Radomianin (talk) 09:48, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 10:07, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:54, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 15:37, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Νικόλαος Κυριακάκης (talk) 19:53, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 23:50, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Radomianin and for the long shadows -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:30, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Sumit Surai (talk) 12:00, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:44, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:39, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Radomianin. – Aristeas (talk) 13:36, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:33, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Party-poop oppose. No wow for me, with a drone such views are very easy to capture. Sorry --A.Savin 12:55, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hollywood-1923-Poster-restored.jpg

Voting period ends on 4 Nov 2024 at 21:13:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Poster for the 1923 film, Hollywood with Hope Drown as Angela.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Entertainment#Film
Info created by Paramount Pictures - uploaded by WFinch - restored/nominated by Ezarate -- Ezarateesteban 21:13, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ezarateesteban 21:13, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment There seems to be a weird join in the middle of the poster. Is that accurate to the source material? Cmao20 (talk) 23:31, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it's in the original Ezarateesteban 00:10, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Please remove the white line at the left. Yann (talk) 08:23, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done thanks!!! --Ezarateesteban 13:45, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Yann (talk) 14:00, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 09:43, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:40, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:37, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bottrop (DE), Tetraeder -- 2022 -- 0402.jpg

Voting period ends on 4 Nov 2024 at 19:52:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers#Germany
Info created, uploaded and nominated by me. I'm not sure if it also could fit into the FP gallery "Sculptures", as the Tetrahedron is somehow both – one and a tower. -- A. Öztas 19:52, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Addendum: This is a renomination. -- A. Öztas 11:13, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- A. Öztas 19:52, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great motif and good light Cmao20 (talk) 23:30, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 00:27, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Ikan Kekek and Daniel Case here. And it should be mentioned somewhere that it is the third nomination of this structure after this one and that one -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:59, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just to be complete at this point: One nomination did not reach the necessary total number of votes and the other was a different version of this picture, whose nomination I had withdrawn after less than a day. Without going any further into the discussion here, I should have included the reference above (as I subsequently did) when I nominated it. I didn't have in mind at the time that the photo had already been here before. -- A. Öztas 11:13, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is no strict rule about it but it is generally the case that we don't renominate a picture that has failed unless significant improvements have been made to it since the previous nomination. My support still stands in this case, but it isn't normally something we would do. Cmao20 (talk) 13:57, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, see this case for example, a few days ago -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:30, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You didn't have in mind that the structure had already been nominated twice? It's surprising. Anyway, too dark in my opinion -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:30, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The brief nomination that I withdrew after less than a day and the subsequent one felt like a single attempt to me and this was over a year ago – and quite a lot has happened since then. So yes, it simply slipped my mind. There's no reason to be surprised by that. It was pointed out, the reference was added, and that should suffice. As for the image, I understand that it might indeed appear a bit too dark. Whilst it can always change, at the moment it's just right for me, whether it's enough for an excellence rating or not. I appreciate your perspective and the time you've taken to review it. -- A. Öztas 16:43, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome to discuss here. "Brief nomination" but still three oppose, one question and one comment during this short time. Thus quite a logical withdrawal, in my opinion. We can of course AGF, but reciprocally, we, reviewers, remember that the two similar nominations failed not so long ago, for assumed fair reasons. As Ikan Kekek rightly said in a similar case "Not voting also counts as a lack of interest". Usually, it is obvious to the nominators that a photo has already been nominated, because they need to add "/2" at the end of the file name to create a new FPC, but here the file page has been renamed twice recently. With still no metadata. Of course, since the voters are not always the same at FPC every month, it can happen that a picture which failed the first time is finally promoted by insisting. But you should also understand, as you wrote after the first nomination "I will nominate the original as FP with the reasonable assumption that it will be rejected anyway", that the picture will struggle to pass, even though several of us reiterate their efforts to evaluate again. -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:14, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Discuss about what? After the first answer from you and me, everything was already said, or am I wrong? Of course, we are welcome to deepen the discussion, precisely because it is a topic that affects many aspects of the FP nomination processes and often offers room for different perspectives. In this context, I would like to address a few points that touch on both the past of previous nominations and the general guidelines for repeat submissions. As I mentioned, the first nomination was over a year ago. This distance in the time frame plays a role in my opinion, as it makes it clear that I did not submit the nomination of the structure out of a constant repetition so that it would, as you wrote, "finally be promoted by insisting". The motivation lies more in the fact that I continued to reflect on the image over time and adapted my own view of it. As a photographer, I often experience such processes; a certain development of my own view of the image. Photography, after all, is a medium through which we capture not just what we see, but what we feel at a given moment. And as those feelings evolve, so too can our interpretations of our own work. This growth is natural and, I believe, valuable to the community's understanding of a work as it evolves through the eyes of its creator. At the same time, I understand that for reviewers like you and others who regularly participate in the discussions, there is a certain habit and reminder value when similar or identical images are up for discussion again. What this has to do with AGF here is beyond me. I'm not as familiar with the practice in this area, I'm only on my fourth photo here. I see your references to a previous nomination as a helpful addition and not a criticism per se. The process of weighing up between a possible repetition and the search for new qualities in an image is essential and is shown in the current case by the different feedback and views. I would also like to note that my decision to quickly withdraw the previous nomination should not be understood as an endorsement of a "logical withdrawal". There were several factors at the time, including personal considerations, that led me to withdraw the nomination. It is true that this first nomination was - albeit briefly - on the table and led to reactions, but the circumstances were more complex than they appear at first glance. In my opinion, such a withdrawal should not be seen as a weakening factor for the quality of the picture itself, but as part of the individual process that each artist has to deal with. Furthermore, I would suggest having a broader discussion about the weighting of nominations that have already failed. Of course, there is no doubt that a clear majority should decide the relevance and quality of an image, but there may be cases where an image changes its relevance and quality over time. This could be due to technical improvements, a change in the community's perspective or simply time showing the work in a new light. Such an approach may well make sense for some FPC nominations, particularly for those images that have failed in the past but could potentially find new appreciation. After all, everything and nothing is set in stone here. With regard to the question about the brightness of the image, I agree that this is a subjective judgement and certainly open to discussion. The incidence of light and the colour scheme reflect the mood that I wanted to capture when taking the photograph and are not just technical parameters for me, but part of the aesthetic that I want to convey. Of course, the comment that the image may be perceived as too dark is justified and a question of personal taste - however, it is precisely this difference between subjective perception and objective quality that often leads to divergent assessments. Light plays a powerful role in shaping the emotional resonance of an image, influencing how viewers perceive and connect with it on a deeper level. By intentionally choosing a darker, more subdued lighting, I aimed to create an atmosphere that goes beyond a straightforward representation of the structure itself. This darkness, though perhaps unconventional, allows subtle textures and contrasts to emerge, lending the image a mysterious quality that invites viewers to look closer and consider the piece in a contemplative way. The interplay between shadows and faint highlights, in my view, captures a sense of introspection and draws attention to the sculptural lines of the structure. While brighter lighting may provide more clarity or detail, this more moody approach aligns with the feeling I experienced when taking the photograph, reflecting a quieter, almost meditative atmosphere. Shadows add depth and a sense of timelessness to the scene, suggesting that the image captures not just a single moment but a feeling that could exist outside of time. This play of light and shadow is a deliberate choice, one intended to evoke curiosity and to invite viewers into the scene, allowing them to experience the piece not merely as an architectural object but as a structure with an almost enigmatic presence. At least that's how I feel about this one. In the end, I understand that every image will resonate differently with each person who views it, and I fully respect the diverse perspectives within this community. The beauty of these discussions lies in their ability to reveal new interpretations and insights, both for the artist and for those who critique the work. I look forward to read more of your perspectives in other discussions as well, as these exchanges are invaluable not only for our individual growth but also for enriching the shared vision of what we seek to highlight here. -- A. Öztas 05:02, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Invaluable also is novelty :-) -- Basile Morin (talk) 07:52, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per above, sorry --A.Savin 08:09, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:56, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 08:31, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:40, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Basile Poco a poco (talk) 10:38, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Basile. -- Karelj (talk) 11:18, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per others.--Ermell (talk) 10:01, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cañon del Río Sil desde el mirador de Vilouxe.jpg

Voting period ends on 4 Nov 2024 at 09:57:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Spain#Galicia (section doesn't exist yet)
Info all by me -- Fernando (talk) 09:57, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Fernando (talk) 09:57, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I realise this may have been unavoidable, but the out of focus rocks in the foreground bother me a little, especially because they are not symmetrical. Cmao20 (talk) 10:45, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 08:26, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 22:36, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 12:47, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:37, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tui (Prosthemadera novaeseelandiae) Tiritiri Matangi.jpg

Voting period ends on 3 Nov 2024 at 20:42:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Meliphagidae (Honeyeaters)
Info A New Zealand endemic. Both males and females have two distinctive white throat tufts which often appear to be just one tuft. No FPs. of the species. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:42, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:42, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:21, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Crown is blurry. White feathers near neck overexposed. --Tagooty (talk) 04:14, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I don't think it's overexposed. I'm not a big fan of reducing bright white highlights so that they are a dull grey. There is a tiny bit of colour fringing around that area that you could work on but really a very minor point. Cmao20 (talk) 10:41, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:38, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose I agree with Tagooty Poco a poco (talk) 14:09, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great composition Henrysz (talk) 02:28, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 08:29, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Tagooty. - Karelj (talk) 15:51, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20. Beautiful composition and colours, excellent posture and background. – Aristeas (talk) 13:29, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lovely shot. --Fernando (talk) 10:59, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Assisi - Chiesa di San Pietro - Crocifisso - 2023-09-05 01-25-30 001.jpg (delist)

Voting period ends on 3 Nov 2024 at 16:37:46

Info - Reason to delist and replaceː Last year I took some photos in this very dark abbey from the year 1000 located in Assisi, but in the past I had no idea how to stitch two pictures into one. Only recently have I been able to propose what I really had in mind: to see great part of the austere medieval internal apse of the Abbey of St. Peter (Assisi, Italy). (Original nomination)
Delist and replace -- Terragio67 (talk) 16:37, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delist and replace Really better. --Yann (talk) 09:30, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delist and replace Cmao20 (talk) 10:39, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delist and replace –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:39, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delist and replace --SHB2000 (talk) 12:43, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delist and replace --GRDN711 (talk) 05:17, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delist and replace --MZaplotnik^(talk) 17:48, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delist and replace per Yann. --Harlock81 (talk) 13:43, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Keir Hardie by George Grantham Bain.jpg

Voting period ends on 3 Nov 2024 at 16:54:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1900-1909
Info created by George Grantham Bain - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 16:54, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 16:54, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 09:31, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:39, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 16:51, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Buidhe (talk) 03:25, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:33, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:20, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support The informtion on this image should note that this is an image of James Keir Hardie (15 August 1856 – 26 September 1915), a Scottish trade unionist and politician, taken in 1909 by the photographer, George Grantham Bain. --GRDN711 (talk) 20:45, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@GRDN711: I added a little more information about Hardie (and linked to his Wikipedia page for any further info), but other than a description of him, I'm not sure what of that isn't in the file description page. Adam Cuerden (talk) 18:08, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support No obvious artifacts from the cloned-out text. — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 08:25, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Agricultural terraces in Anti-Atlas mountains near Tafraoute, Morocco.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Nov 2024 at 12:44:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Agriculture#Morocco (section doesn't exist yet)
Info created by Tupungato - uploaded by Tupungato - nominated by Tupungato -- Tupungato (talk) 12:44, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tupungato (talk) 12:44, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 14:52, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The subject doesn' really stand out, I'd have probably cropp a chunk at the bottom. Pretty but I don't consider that architecture extraordinary Poco a poco (talk) 17:09, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Nice weather but according to the shadows of the bushes at the right, and my overall impression, the orientation of the light was not so cooperative, like a bit dull or hazy. Also the bottom-up viewpoint is highlighting a lot of the foreground with shadowy sides and not so much of the buildings. The houses at the right are in the shadow, hard to distinguish. I think another viewpoint, more from the left, and perhaps also higher in altitude, would have improved content enhancement -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:04, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose As per Poco a Poco. --Fernando (talk) 09:05, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose per Basile Morin –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:39, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support The so called "foreground" is what this image is about - for me this is an excellent documentation of an agricultural method for arid climates. --Kritzolina (talk) 15:19, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Kritzolina. – Aristeas (talk) 13:28, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unconfirmed results: (info)
Result: 4 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Grand Mosque at Constantine (15676686960).jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Nov 2024 at 12:09:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings/Ceilings#Algeria (section doesn't exist yet)
Info The ceiling adornment at the Emir Abdelkader Mosque (built in 1994). It's the second-largest mosque in Algeria. Created by Dan Sloan - uploaded by Ser Amantio di Nicolao - nominated by Riad Salih -- Riad Salih (talk) 12:09, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Riad Salih (talk) 12:09, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very cool, although I wish it was more perfectly centered. Cmao20 (talk) 13:16, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Indeed really cool, quality degrades a bit towards the borders, but all in all very impressive. I took the liberty to change the gallery link to our special gallery for ceilings of religious buildings. I will add a section for Algeria there if this nomination succeeds. – Aristeas (talk) 15:57, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Strong oppose Below the quality bar I'd expect for FP and the bottom crop is unfortunate causing also a lack of symmertry. If the subject would be complete I'd have gone for a square crop Poco a poco (talk) 17:07, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Aristeas.--Ermell (talk) 22:25, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment A tripod would have helped, here. Unfortunately, a hand shot with high ISO and low depth of field impacts the quality -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:50, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Poco a poco. If you don't have a tripod at hand, simply place the camera on the floor, select ISO100 and a medium aperture. Je-str (talk) 11:02, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support crop sucks but this will do. --SHB2000 (talk) 12:43, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 15:48, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose In addition to the technical problems caused by the absence of tripod, the viewpoint was not in the center. As a consequence, the circles are not concentric. And the crop is tighter at the bottom than at the top, making the composition unbalanced -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:18, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support At least crop sides - shadow part. It could be better, but tripod in Mosque, normally not possible. Even camera-photo can be problem. --Mile (talk) 11:41, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No need for a tripod to a get a HQ shot from a ceiling. I have done it so many times... I'm surprised and disappointed by the support this image is getting. The camera was off-centered, so that the arches on left and right are not symmetrical at all, the cop is a mess and the quality low. Poco a poco (talk) 14:06, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Weak oppose In the top left corner (please see annotation) there is a yellow coloration on the white surface, which indicates a subsequent coloring within a poorly made selection. However, this is only an assumption. Also, the saturation of the image seems too high to me. I would also suggest a square crop in favor of a more balanced composition. Also, I have to partially agree with the opponents above that the FP standard for church interiors is higher than this one. Nevertheless, the subject is great, and with careful reworking it would have a chance of becoming FP. I am very sorry. -- Radomianin (talk) 15:15, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Addendum: If you look at the original version, you can see a more natural coloring. Another indication of subsequent editing, which in my opinion was not done carefully enough. I would like to ask the nominator/editor to place a retouching template with the done work on the file page. Many thanks in advance. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 15:33, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, feel free to edit the image and add the template. I have done my best to ensure that the picture aligns with the FP standards. Riad Salih (talk) 21:01, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your reply, Riad Salih. I am sure you have done your best to meet the FP standard. For this, the community thanks you, because every volunteer is needed to keep this project alive. And your work is just as valuable as that of any other volunteer. But participation in this forum thrives on constructive criticism that helps the volunteers maintain the professional standards of the FP project. I too have evolved over the past few years by trying to accept criticism and develop my skills. My suggestion was only meant as an advice to provide with the template the necessary transparency on the file page. If my criticism was perceived as disrespectful, I sincerely apologize. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 21:29, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unconfirmed results: (info)
Result: 7 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Château du Haut-Koenigsbourg (755 m) (Orschwiller) (19).jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Nov 2024 at 09:12:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#France
Info created by Gzen92 - uploaded by Gzen92 - nominated by Gzen92 -- Gzen92 (talk) 09:12, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Gzen92 (talk) 09:12, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Nice compo but unsharp. Probably f/11 is a bit to much for 1 inch. --Mile (talk) 09:31, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support I agree with Mile, but the composition is great Cmao20 (talk) 10:52, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alternate version (sharpness)

Support Better sharpness. Gzen92 (talk) 12:05, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:40, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 02:35, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 13:28, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:12, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unconfirmed results: (info)
Result: X support, X oppose, X neutral → not featured. /Note: this candidate has several alternatives, thus if featured the alternative parameter needs to be specified. /FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 3 November 2024 (UTC))[reply]

Кандидати за брисање

Featured picture candidates

File:Общественная баня в Тюмени.jpg

Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2024 at 13:14:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Russia
Info created and uploaded by Ted.ns - nominated by FBilula (talk) 13:14, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- FBilula (talk) 13:14, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:32, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:VNovgorod TradeArcades 4959.JPG

Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2024 at 13:13:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Russia
Info created and uploaded by Ludvig14 - nominated by FBilula (talk) 13:13, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- FBilula (talk) 13:13, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good composition of somewhere with a fascinating history Cmao20 (talk) 13:32, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

World Maps by Abraham Ortelius, 1572

Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2024 at 09:48:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page

America
Europe
Asia
Africa
World

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Maps#Maps of the world
Info created by Abraham Ortelius, uploaded and nominated by Yann
Info Theatrum Orbis Terrarum, world maps by Abraham Ortelius, 1572. First edition in German. Each of the five maps here were the standards for their time, drawn from the most important wall maps produced by Mercator, Ortelius and other leading European mapmakers.
Support It is quite exceptional to have a whole set in such a good quality and high resolution. Each of the maps may be in the relevant FP subcategory. -- Yann (talk) 09:48, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Famous maps, definitely need to be featured Cmao20 (talk) 13:30, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:NE View Stongdey Zanskar Jun24 A7CR 00966.jpg

Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2024 at 04:10:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#India
Info The green fields surrounding Stongde village are a refreshing contrast from the stark treeless central Zanskar valley and the snow-capped 6,000 m (20,000 ft) Zanskar Range. Elevation of Stongde 3,530 m (11,580 ft). Created by Tagooty - uploaded by Tagooty - nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 04:10, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tagooty (talk) 04:10, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Better at full size than thumbnail Cmao20 (talk) 13:30, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:La vuelta de Martín Fierro cover - 1879-restored.jpg

Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2024 at 23:49:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Printed
Info created by Jose Hernandez- uploaded by Shooke - restored/nominated by Ezarate -- Ezarateesteban 23:49, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support restoration based on a very damaged original-- Ezarateesteban 23:49, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Saslonch da Sacun Gherdëina.jpg

Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2024 at 18:03:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Italy#Trentino-Alto Adige
Info The Saslonch group from the hamlet Sacun in Urtijëi, South Tyrol all by Moroder -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 18:03, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 18:03, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 22:00, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Image is quite beautiful but the left side seems too empty – The People's Internet (talk) 09:12, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Apollo 11 bootprint.jpg (delist and replace)

Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2024 at 17:18:26

Info Same image in higher resolution (Original nomination)
Delist and replace -- Yann (talk) 17:18, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delist and replace Cmao20 (talk) 21:59, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The file name "AS11-40-5877 (21472308758).jpg" does not seem to comply with COM:I. Also a Question: why is the resolution lower at the source on Flickr than on Commons? Has the image been upsampled or is it a display limitation? -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:57, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with a renaming. Image on Fickr is 4,048 × 3,968, so it is not lower resolution. Yann (talk) 08:55, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delist and replace You're right, I can download it at this resolution on my mobile phone (but apparently not on my computer). Please rename the file -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:04, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done Yann (talk) 09:11, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Natural History Museum London South Facade 2020 01.jpg

Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2024 at 14:17:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#United_Kingdom
Info Southern facade of the Natural History Museum in London in morning light, c/u/n by me. — Julian H.^✈ 14:17, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Julian H.^✈ 14:17, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support Absolutely beautiful. A different and sensitive composition for an amazing building. Cmao20 (talk) 16:50, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:16, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support The beautiful lighting creates a special atmosphere. -- Radomianin (talk) 20:30, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Oddly, the building looks hazy, at thumbnail size. Especially at the top. It is almost a contrejour (see the shadows of the tree in the center, leaning towards us), so I would say the light was not so cooperative at the beginning. Composition has potential but the colors are washed out -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:08, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:2022-08-19 European Championships 2022 – Table Tennis by Sandro Halank–007.jpg

Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2024 at 12:17:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Sports#Individual sports
Info created, uploaded and nominated by Sandro Halank -- Sandro Halank (talk) 12:17, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Sandro Halank (talk) 12:17, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Great look! Some of the EXIF data are missing. I'd like to know the shutter speed. Yann (talk) 12:44, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately, I have a problem with the Canon EOS R3, when converting CR3 to JPG this data gets lost. It is 200 mm, 1/1,000 sec., F/3.5 and ISO 6,400. Sandro Halank (talk) 12:52, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You could add this manually, but Support anyway. Yann (talk) 16:49, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice action shot, good composition and background Cmao20 (talk) 13:36, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:57, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 15:49, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per Cmao20. -- Radomianin (talk) 19:24, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Well frozen at high speed, but I agree with Yann the metadata could be added manually on the file page (about the conversion from RAW to JPG, it is certainly a matter of parameters) -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:15, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Madrid cathedral 2020 - view from the dome.jpg

Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2024 at 10:52:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Spain
Info all by me Fernando -- Fernando (talk) 10:52, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Panorama of the views from the dome of the Almudena Cathedral in Madrid. Pictures taken here at sunset are rare, since the regular visiting hours end before, and only limited, city hall-sponsored visits are allowed during the evening. -- Fernando (talk) 10:52, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support There is a lot of colour noise but I think it's forgiveable because of very high resolution, perfect composition (beautifully centered), nice light, and as you say difficulty of taking the photo; any improvement you can make would be appreciated though Cmao20 (talk) 13:35, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:55, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 15:51, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Improved version at SwissTransfer: I took the liberty of removing the color noise, as well as significantly reducing the general noise without affecting the sharpness. If you/the community like the result, please feel free to use it for an update :) Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 20:24, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:SE Facade Phuktal Zanskar Ladakh Jun24 A7CR 00617.jpg

Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2024 at 09:45:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#India
Info Phuktal Monastery perched on a cliff above the Tsarap River. Elevation 3,940m (12,927ft). Zanskar, Ladakh, India. Created by Tagooty - uploaded by Tagooty - nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 09:45, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tagooty (talk) 09:45, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:32, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:53, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Question Great place, but isn't it a bit dark? Yann (talk) 16:53, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Yann: It was an overcast afternoon and I underexposed to bring out the range of colours in the rocks. I've increased the exposure a bit. Please see the new version. --Tagooty (talk) 03:17, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Yes, good. --Yann (talk) 08:29, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Spectacular subject and nice viewpoint. -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:01, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Picturesque and vertiginous place, well captured. – Aristeas (talk) 10:18, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -Moroder

File:Akiem BB 37024 Port-la-Nouvelle - Leucate la Franqui.jpg

Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2024 at 06:14:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles#Rail vehicles
Info created by Kabelleger - uploaded by Kabelleger - nominated by Bruce1ee -- —Bruce1ee^talk 06:14, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- —Bruce1ee^talk 06:14, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Yann (talk) 07:57, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:46, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:31, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:50, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:49, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 15:51, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 19:27, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Well frozen at 1/1,600 sec, nice golden light -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:24, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Basile. – Aristeas (talk) 10:16, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:RNoAF Saab MFI-15 Safari 806 Royal International Air Tattoo 2024 01.jpg

Voting period ends on 10 Nov 2024 at 13:56:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Air_transport#Propeller_aircraft
Info Saab MFI-15 Safari of the Yellow Sparrows display team, c/u/n by me. — Julian H.^✈ 13:56, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Julian H.^✈ 13:56, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Outstanding panning shot! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 00:26, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 06:18, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Frank. —Yann (talk) 07:56, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Superb action shot. --Tagooty (talk) 09:47, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 11:04, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:45, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:30, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:49, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 15:51, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support Extraordinary panning, making the subject popping up from the background. Impressive settings, at 1/60 sec only, for a moving subject located far away. The plane is surprisingly sharp -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:30, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Basile. – Aristeas (talk) 10:15, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Qal'at al-Bahrain, Karbabad, Baréin, 2024-08-18, DD 67.jpg

Voting period ends on 10 Nov 2024 at 13:53:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#Bahrain
Info Qal'at al-Bahrain, Karbabad, Bahrain. The archaeological site, also known as the “Fort of Bahrain”, was the capital of the Dilmun civilization and a place of consistent human settlement and occupation from c. 2300 BC to the present. A Portuguese fort stands today atop the site and it became a UNESCO World Heritage Site in 2005. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 13:53, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 13:53, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Superb Cmao20 (talk) 13:29, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 10:15, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Páření čápů bílých.jpg

Voting period ends on 10 Nov 2024 at 13:53:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Ciconiidae (Storks)
Info created by Lubomír Dajč – uploaded by Lubomír Dajč – nominated by Draceane
Info White stork (Ciconia ciconia) mating ~~five~~ ten to twelve, Nové Veselí, Czechia — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 13:53, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 13:53, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very eye-catching and pleasing composition, great capture. -- Radomianin (talk) 15:47, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 00:28, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Yann (talk) 07:58, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support A really nice and rare capture. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:44, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Captured an unusual moment precisely. --Tagooty (talk) 09:48, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fernando (talk) 09:54, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:44, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:28, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:48, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:46, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:15, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent action of wild life. High level of detail -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:32, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Tagooty and Basile. – Aristeas (talk) 10:14, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Чинки плато Устюрт. Урочище Бозжыра.jpg

Voting period ends on 10 Nov 2024 at 06:50:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Kazakhstan
Info created by Максат79 - uploaded by Максат79 - nominated by Екатерина Борисова -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 06:50, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 06:50, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It's my first try to nominate image to FP, so I ask for help from experienced nominators If I made any mistakes. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 07:07, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You did everything right, thank you for the nomination. About the picture: Great subject, the sky is a bit noisy which could be fixed. Unfortunately, there is a probable stitching error in the lower area that has created a blurred part (please see annotation). Suggested solution: Either contact the author and ask for help, or carry out extensive retouching on this file. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 09:02, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot for your review. I'll try to contact the author. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 16:44, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Optimized version at SwissTransfer: I took the liberty of denoising the sky a bit and reducing the above mentioned blurry (presumably) stitching error to an acceptable level. If the author is not available, please feel free to use this version for an update :) Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 11:02, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Great thanks! Екатерина Борисова (talk) 15:32, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Sette-quattro (talk) 21:58, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Yann (talk) 07:58, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:43, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I think the colours are a bit overprocessed but it's cool anyway Cmao20 (talk) 13:27, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:46, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:45, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:14, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Wow is there but I agree with Cmao20 the picture is overprocessed. -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:34, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20. Thanks to Radomianin for the editing! – Aristeas (talk) 10:14, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rijpe vruchten van Hertshooi (Hypericum). 17-08-2024 (d.j.b.).jpg

Voting period ends on 10 Nov 2024 at 05:23:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Hypericaceae
Info Ripe berries of a (Hypericum androsaemum) Focus stack of 23 photos.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:23, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:23, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 05:10, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 07:11, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lovely composition, colours and detail. --Tagooty (talk) 09:49, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fernando (talk) 11:05, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 11:09, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:42, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:25, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:43, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:13, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support High level of detail -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:37, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 10:13, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Río Ameca.jpg

Voting period ends on 10 Nov 2024 at 02:02:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Mexico
Info: the Ameca River, forming the natural border between the states of Jalisco and Nayarit, taken from a window of a commercial aircraft; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:02, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:02, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I think it's a bit hazy but the composition is good enough for FP and it's a challenging shot of course Cmao20 (talk) 13:15, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support For the commercial aircraft photography it's outstanding. — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 15:52, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Yes, if the picture was shot from the window of a commercial aircraft, it should be mentioned somewhere on the file page. Currently poor categorization and description for a FP nomination. -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:42, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Слияние Оми и Иртыша в Омске.jpg

Voting period ends on 10 Nov 2024 at 02:02:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Russia
Info: a woman is waving at the departing Moskva-112 cruise ship at the confluence of the Om and Irtysh rivers in Omsk; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:02, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:02, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I'm not seeing any big wow factor here, sorry. --Peulle (talk) 09:24, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, not FP material for me. Uninteresting bush in the foreground and flat simple background. --Fernando (talk) 09:53, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry but per above, good quality but not FP composition or light Cmao20 (talk) 13:34, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Moving with archers defending livestock scene.jpg

Voting period ends on 9 Nov 2024 at 15:48:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Others#Frescos and murals
Info all by me -- IssamBarhoumi (talk) 15:48, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain as author -- IssamBarhoumi (talk) 15:48, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:14, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tagetes2.jpg

Voting period ends on 9 Nov 2024 at 15:28:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Asterales#Subfamily : Asteroideae
Info created by The People's Internet - uploaded by The People's Internet Legacy Assets - nominated by User:The People's Internet -- The People's Internet (talk) 15:28, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- The People's Internet (talk) 15:28, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:21, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry but IMO this is a QI not an FP. Beautiful flower and nice colours but not sharp enough for a photo of a large flower. Cmao20 (talk) 13:14, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Low quality and boring composition -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:43, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Agree with Cmao20. Image has merit but not FP. --GRDN711 (talk) 15:21, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Iglesia de Saint-Merri, París, Francia, 2022-10-31, DD 157-159 HDR.jpg

Voting period ends on 9 Nov 2024 at 12:19:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Paris
Info Very high quality church interior with a special atmosphere. Note that the darkness of this church is correct for a photo taken at 5:47pm in October, I would not want it brightened because I think the twilight lighting conditions make it special. created by Poco a poco - uploaded by Poco a poco - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 12:19, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 12:19, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Niiiicceee :) thank you Poco a poco (talk) 18:17, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:13, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:21, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 08:42, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:40, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 15:53, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very atmospheric and authentic. – Aristeas (talk) 10:12, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:07, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Rbrechko (talk) 12:29, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:একজন মাদ্রাসার ছাত্র বায়তুল মকারাম মসজিদে নামাজ আদায় করছে.jpg

Voting period ends on 9 Nov 2024 at 12:19:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Bangladesh
Info Yes I know that the quality of this image is a little flawed but I think it should be FP anyway because of the composition, colours, wonderful high-key and minimalist surroundings, and the fact that it is a lovely portrait of personal devotion and prayer. created by Sultan Ahmed Niloy - uploaded by Sultan Ahmed Niloy - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 12:19, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 12:19, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:31, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Анастасия Львова^ru/en 20:26, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:13, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Striking composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 07:08, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Basile. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:05, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:44, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:21, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 00:30, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 05:36, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Yann (talk) 07:59, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support The compo kinda makes up for its flaws. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:43, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly my thoughts. Cmao20 (talk) 13:42, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Llez (talk) 12:39, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice compo, but sharpness a bit soft and the white areas seems lacking of almost any details because it was likely a bit overexposed. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 20:55, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that it's a bit soft. It is maybe a little bit of motion blur. I nominated it because I think the composition outweighs that. I disagree that it's overexposed though. Bright light shining through a large arch window will appear white to the naked eye. I think this photo would be much less interesting if you reduced the highlights. Cmao20 (talk) 13:28, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Weak support per SHB2000. – Aristeas (talk) 10:10, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pacific reef heron (Egretta sacra) dark morph Rarotonga.jpg

Voting period ends on 9 Nov 2024 at 09:34:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Pelecaniformes#Genus : Egretta
Info One nice recent FP of a bird in non-breeding plumage. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:34, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:34, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 12:05, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:30, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 14:20, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Even though I know that there surely will be accusations of revenge voting, this is a matter of principle for me: as long as the categories aren't properly fixed, oppose. --A.Savin 15:51, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Which categories should be fixed @A.Savin: ? Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:58, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can anyone else tell me what I need to do on categories please? The oppose vote could be inhibiting other voters. Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:19, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You don't give a shit, right? Exactly same problem as back in Jan 2020 --A.Savin 12:43, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have found one error. I created a new Category:Pelecaniformes of the Cook Islands and placed it Category:Pelecaniformes by country. I did not categorize it under Category:Birds of the Cook Islands. Naughty me. I have now done so. I do wonder why the category structure places the Cook Islands under New Zealand. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:46, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:26, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 21:59, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like how you included the habitat. Nice shot! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 07:13, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fernando (talk) 09:52, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Frank. -- Radomianin (talk) 11:07, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:39, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 15:56, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Frank. – Aristeas (talk) 10:09, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:White dog sleeping on the floor with puppies after nursing in Don Det Laos.jpg

Voting period ends on 9 Nov 2024 at 02:03:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family : Canidae (Canids)
Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:03, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:03, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Sensitive, beautiful, and well composed Cmao20 (talk) 04:13, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 09:29, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 14:20, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 11:08, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:43, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:21, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support this IMO is just adorable. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:43, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Pictures of puppies is cheating. --Fernando (talk) 09:48, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:33, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Admont - Ortsansicht.JPG

Voting period ends on 8 Nov 2024 at 20:01:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#Austria
Info created by Bwag – uploaded by Bwag – nominated by Draceane — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 20:01, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 20:01, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Big wow for me Cmao20 (talk) 04:11, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 06:05, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 06:11, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 08:27, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:13, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:00, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful veduta. – Aristeas (talk) 11:07, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:21, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – The People's Internet (talk) 09:12, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pumpkin festival - Ludwigsburg 2024 - 30.jpg

Voting period ends on 8 Nov 2024 at 15:36:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Food and drink#Vegetables (raw)
Info Happy Halloween!
Created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 15:36, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 15:36, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:34, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 19:47, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Really a huge bunch! But is the white balance correct? Kind of orange cast -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:56, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful Cmao20 (talk) 04:11, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 06:06, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 07:12, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 14:07, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:13, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:30, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:58, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice diverse texture. – Aristeas (talk) 11:05, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:23, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Close wing Basking of Neopithecops zalmora (Butler, 1870) - Common Quaker (7) WLB.jpg

Voting period ends on 8 Nov 2024 at 11:51:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Lycaenidae (Blues, coppers and hairstreaks)
Info created by Anitava Roy - uploaded by Anitava Roy - nominated by Anitava Roy -- Anitava Roy (talk) 11:51, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Anitava Roy (talk) 11:51, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 19:47, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Great composition but I think the focus has been missed on the head Cmao20 (talk) 04:10, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:23, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nautilus by Edward Weston.jpg

Voting period ends on 8 Nov 2024 at 11:40:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Shells#Class : Cephalopoda (will need a new subsection if promoted)
Info created by Edward Weston, uploaded and nominated by Yann
Support "One of the most famous photographs ever made" and "a benchmark of modernism in the history of photography", according to Nautilus. -- Yann (talk) 11:40, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 19:46, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Another famous work by Weston. A pity that the resolution is relatively low. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:58, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Radomianin -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:50, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose This image could look much better from another photo angle, the best 90 °, IHMO. -- Karelj (talk) 11:27, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Karelj: This is a notable work by a notable photographer who died in 1958, so you cannot choose another angle. Yann (talk) 11:42, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- @Yann: Anyway it is not good enough from my point of view. --Karelj (talk) 11:56, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support More than “good enough”. It’s a classic, and for a good reason. – Aristeas (talk) 11:04, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:23, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Комплекс Пир-Сиддик 4.jpg

Voting period ends on 8 Nov 2024 at 08:41:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Traditions
Info created and uploaded by Arina Pan - nominated by Красный -- Красный ^{wanna talk?} 08:41, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Красный ^{wanna talk?} 08:41, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 19:45, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Not sure this is the perfect crop but I definitely find this interesting and unusual enough for FP Cmao20 (talk) 04:10, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I think the framing is good, the open door on the left and the pigeons flying up on the bottom right are part of the story and form a whole. -- Radomianin (talk) 08:33, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 09:30, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Interesting and kind image. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 14:22, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Анастасия Львова^ru/en 14:40, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin 15:57, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:33, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Unusual, different from other nominations, nice light -- Basile Morin (talk) 07:09, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:57, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Basile and Radomianin. – Aristeas (talk) 11:00, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:23, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 14:01, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:35, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Pleasing composition. --Tagooty (talk) 04:13, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Samanea saman on an island with orange clouds and blue sky at sunrise from Don Det Si Phan Don Laos.jpg

Voting period ends on 8 Nov 2024 at 02:07:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Clouds
Info 2 FPs of this island, but none on that day and none with these clouds.. Created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:07, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:07, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 09:12, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:35, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 17:35, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 19:43, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support This one is really impressive, I have to admit. Suitable for a whole wall as a photo wallpaper :) -- Radomianin (talk) 21:52, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The light is absolutely stunning but doesn't it need a perspective correction? Particularly when you look at the horizon on the left it looks like it's leaning to me. Cmao20 (talk) 04:09, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done I agree, Cmao20, because of the reflection that should be vertical. Thank you very much for your enthusiasm and constructive suggestion -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:39, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Thanks! Cmao20 (talk) 12:03, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --SHB2000 (talk) 06:06, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Stunning. – Aristeas (talk) 13:37, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:13, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:35, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:56, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:23, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 14:01, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:35, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Extraordinary sunrise and reflections. --Tagooty (talk) 04:15, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Road R104 in Anti-Atlas mountains, Tiznit Province, Morocco.jpg

Voting period ends on 7 Nov 2024 at 12:05:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#Morocco
Info created by Tupungato - uploaded by Tupungato - nominated by Tupungato -- Tupungato (talk) 12:05, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tupungato (talk) 12:05, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose A truck, like here, or something is missing, sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:54, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Resolution could be higher, but I like the scene. --Harlock81 (talk) 19:42, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's 24 megapixels, this seems pretty high to me Cmao20 (talk) 04:06, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Interesting landscape Cmao20 (talk) 04:06, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:13, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:23, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Agree with Basile, something is missing here, but I'd rather see the road vanishing in the far back Poco a poco (talk) 13:57, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not out of the ordinary. --Tagooty (talk) 04:16, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Taj and people framed.jpg

Voting period ends on 7 Nov 2024 at 10:17:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#India
Info Taj Mahal and crowd of people to see magnificent Taj Mahal. created by Sdnphotoholic - uploaded by Sdnphotoholic - nominated by Sumit Surai -- Sumit Surai (talk) 10:17, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Sumit Surai (talk) 10:17, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Sette-quattro (talk) 15:13, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support The resolution could be higher, but I love the composition, excellent framing --Kritzolina (talk) 20:47, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Off-centered, unfortunate crop of the towers, disturbing heads, frindge around the frame, and yes, far too low res. Poco a poco (talk) 15:44, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I do not generally like pictures where people are ahead of the main subject, but in this case they are clearly part of the composition. The viewer becomes part of that crowd. Effective choice of the silhouette effect. --Harlock81 (talk) 19:38, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 20:18, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Poco. BigDom (talk) 02:47, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I don't get the reasons for the support here, honestly. I agree with all of Poco's criticisms. The building is of course amazing and the picture is fine but it isn't FP in either composiiton or quality, IMO. Cmao20 (talk) 04:05, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose very off-centre – not even a QI to me. --SHB2000 (talk) 06:07, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. --Yann (talk) 09:31, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wadi Bani Khalid, Omán, 2024-08-17, DD 36-42 PAN.jpg

Voting period ends on 6 Nov 2024 at 15:32:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Oman
Info Panoramic view of the Wadi Bani Khalid, Ash Sharqiyah Region, Oman. Wadi is an arabic word that stands for "river valley", of which there are very few in this arid country. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 15:32, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 15:32, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Definitely one that you have to view in full size. I thought the light was a bit grey at first but looking at it for longer, i really like the colours Cmao20 (talk) 20:42, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 23:49, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 09:44, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:47, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:38, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Well done panorama and the icing on the cake is a photographer who takes pictures :) -- Radomianin (talk) 22:05, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:52, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:33, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Andalusian wall of Rabat, Marocco (السور الأندلسي بالرباط).jpg

Voting period ends on 6 Nov 2024 at 11:30:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#Morocco
Info Andalusian wall of Rabat, Marocco (السور الأندلسي بالرباط). My shot. -- Mile (talk) 11:30, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mile (talk) 11:30, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Compared to your other recent FP I find this one less satisfying. The entrance itself is obviously a lot less eye-catching, but the main issue for me is that the half-pedestrian here gives the impression that she just wandered across your shot. To me, she is blocking our view of the subject, rather than being part of the composition like in the previous photo. BigDom (talk) 01:22, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 16:55, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per BigDom. --Yann (talk) 09:32, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Weininsel Sommerach Luftbild-20221027-RM-155807.jpg

Voting period ends on 5 Nov 2024 at 21:20:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Agriculture#Germany
Info Vines on the wine island near Sommerach. All by Ermell -- Ermell (talk) 21:20, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ermell (talk) 21:20, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 22:35, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:55, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 03:41, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Buidhe (talk) 04:23, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 08:20, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Graphically appealing composition! -- Radomianin (talk) 09:48, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 10:07, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:54, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 15:37, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Νικόλαος Κυριακάκης (talk) 19:53, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 23:50, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Radomianin and for the long shadows -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:30, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Sumit Surai (talk) 12:00, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:44, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:39, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Radomianin. – Aristeas (talk) 13:36, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:33, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Party-poop oppose. No wow for me, with a drone such views are very easy to capture. Sorry --A.Savin 12:55, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hollywood-1923-Poster-restored.jpg

Voting period ends on 4 Nov 2024 at 21:13:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Entertainment#Film
Info created by Paramount Pictures - uploaded by WFinch - restored/nominated by Ezarate -- Ezarateesteban 21:13, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ezarateesteban 21:13, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment There seems to be a weird join in the middle of the poster. Is that accurate to the source material? Cmao20 (talk) 23:31, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it's in the original Ezarateesteban 00:10, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Please remove the white line at the left. Yann (talk) 08:23, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done thanks!!! --Ezarateesteban 13:45, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Yann (talk) 14:00, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 09:43, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:40, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:37, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bottrop (DE), Tetraeder -- 2022 -- 0402.jpg

Voting period ends on 4 Nov 2024 at 19:52:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers#Germany
Info created, uploaded and nominated by me. I'm not sure if it also could fit into the FP gallery "Sculptures", as the Tetrahedron is somehow both – one and a tower. -- A. Öztas 19:52, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Addendum: This is a renomination. -- A. Öztas 11:13, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- A. Öztas 19:52, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great motif and good light Cmao20 (talk) 23:30, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 00:27, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Ikan Kekek and Daniel Case here. And it should be mentioned somewhere that it is the third nomination of this structure after this one and that one -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:59, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just to be complete at this point: One nomination did not reach the necessary total number of votes and the other was a different version of this picture, whose nomination I had withdrawn after less than a day. Without going any further into the discussion here, I should have included the reference above (as I subsequently did) when I nominated it. I didn't have in mind at the time that the photo had already been here before. -- A. Öztas 11:13, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is no strict rule about it but it is generally the case that we don't renominate a picture that has failed unless significant improvements have been made to it since the previous nomination. My support still stands in this case, but it isn't normally something we would do. Cmao20 (talk) 13:57, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, see this case for example, a few days ago -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:30, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You didn't have in mind that the structure had already been nominated twice? It's surprising. Anyway, too dark in my opinion -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:30, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The brief nomination that I withdrew after less than a day and the subsequent one felt like a single attempt to me and this was over a year ago – and quite a lot has happened since then. So yes, it simply slipped my mind. There's no reason to be surprised by that. It was pointed out, the reference was added, and that should suffice. As for the image, I understand that it might indeed appear a bit too dark. Whilst it can always change, at the moment it's just right for me, whether it's enough for an excellence rating or not. I appreciate your perspective and the time you've taken to review it. -- A. Öztas 16:43, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome to discuss here. "Brief nomination" but still three oppose, one question and one comment during this short time. Thus quite a logical withdrawal, in my opinion. We can of course AGF, but reciprocally, we, reviewers, remember that the two similar nominations failed not so long ago, for assumed fair reasons. As Ikan Kekek rightly said in a similar case "Not voting also counts as a lack of interest". Usually, it is obvious to the nominators that a photo has already been nominated, because they need to add "/2" at the end of the file name to create a new FPC, but here the file page has been renamed twice recently. With still no metadata. Of course, since the voters are not always the same at FPC every month, it can happen that a picture which failed the first time is finally promoted by insisting. But you should also understand, as you wrote after the first nomination "I will nominate the original as FP with the reasonable assumption that it will be rejected anyway", that the picture will struggle to pass, even though several of us reiterate their efforts to evaluate again. -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:14, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Discuss about what? After the first answer from you and me, everything was already said, or am I wrong? Of course, we are welcome to deepen the discussion, precisely because it is a topic that affects many aspects of the FP nomination processes and often offers room for different perspectives. In this context, I would like to address a few points that touch on both the past of previous nominations and the general guidelines for repeat submissions. As I mentioned, the first nomination was over a year ago. This distance in the time frame plays a role in my opinion, as it makes it clear that I did not submit the nomination of the structure out of a constant repetition so that it would, as you wrote, "finally be promoted by insisting". The motivation lies more in the fact that I continued to reflect on the image over time and adapted my own view of it. As a photographer, I often experience such processes; a certain development of my own view of the image. Photography, after all, is a medium through which we capture not just what we see, but what we feel at a given moment. And as those feelings evolve, so too can our interpretations of our own work. This growth is natural and, I believe, valuable to the community's understanding of a work as it evolves through the eyes of its creator. At the same time, I understand that for reviewers like you and others who regularly participate in the discussions, there is a certain habit and reminder value when similar or identical images are up for discussion again. What this has to do with AGF here is beyond me. I'm not as familiar with the practice in this area, I'm only on my fourth photo here. I see your references to a previous nomination as a helpful addition and not a criticism per se. The process of weighing up between a possible repetition and the search for new qualities in an image is essential and is shown in the current case by the different feedback and views. I would also like to note that my decision to quickly withdraw the previous nomination should not be understood as an endorsement of a "logical withdrawal". There were several factors at the time, including personal considerations, that led me to withdraw the nomination. It is true that this first nomination was - albeit briefly - on the table and led to reactions, but the circumstances were more complex than they appear at first glance. In my opinion, such a withdrawal should not be seen as a weakening factor for the quality of the picture itself, but as part of the individual process that each artist has to deal with. Furthermore, I would suggest having a broader discussion about the weighting of nominations that have already failed. Of course, there is no doubt that a clear majority should decide the relevance and quality of an image, but there may be cases where an image changes its relevance and quality over time. This could be due to technical improvements, a change in the community's perspective or simply time showing the work in a new light. Such an approach may well make sense for some FPC nominations, particularly for those images that have failed in the past but could potentially find new appreciation. After all, everything and nothing is set in stone here. With regard to the question about the brightness of the image, I agree that this is a subjective judgement and certainly open to discussion. The incidence of light and the colour scheme reflect the mood that I wanted to capture when taking the photograph and are not just technical parameters for me, but part of the aesthetic that I want to convey. Of course, the comment that the image may be perceived as too dark is justified and a question of personal taste - however, it is precisely this difference between subjective perception and objective quality that often leads to divergent assessments. Light plays a powerful role in shaping the emotional resonance of an image, influencing how viewers perceive and connect with it on a deeper level. By intentionally choosing a darker, more subdued lighting, I aimed to create an atmosphere that goes beyond a straightforward representation of the structure itself. This darkness, though perhaps unconventional, allows subtle textures and contrasts to emerge, lending the image a mysterious quality that invites viewers to look closer and consider the piece in a contemplative way. The interplay between shadows and faint highlights, in my view, captures a sense of introspection and draws attention to the sculptural lines of the structure. While brighter lighting may provide more clarity or detail, this more moody approach aligns with the feeling I experienced when taking the photograph, reflecting a quieter, almost meditative atmosphere. Shadows add depth and a sense of timelessness to the scene, suggesting that the image captures not just a single moment but a feeling that could exist outside of time. This play of light and shadow is a deliberate choice, one intended to evoke curiosity and to invite viewers into the scene, allowing them to experience the piece not merely as an architectural object but as a structure with an almost enigmatic presence. At least that's how I feel about this one. In the end, I understand that every image will resonate differently with each person who views it, and I fully respect the diverse perspectives within this community. The beauty of these discussions lies in their ability to reveal new interpretations and insights, both for the artist and for those who critique the work. I look forward to read more of your perspectives in other discussions as well, as these exchanges are invaluable not only for our individual growth but also for enriching the shared vision of what we seek to highlight here. -- A. Öztas 05:02, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Invaluable also is novelty :-) -- Basile Morin (talk) 07:52, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per above, sorry --A.Savin 08:09, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:56, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 08:31, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:40, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Basile Poco a poco (talk) 10:38, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Basile. -- Karelj (talk) 11:18, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per others.--Ermell (talk) 10:01, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cañon del Río Sil desde el mirador de Vilouxe.jpg

Voting period ends on 4 Nov 2024 at 09:57:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Spain#Galicia (section doesn't exist yet)
Info all by me -- Fernando (talk) 09:57, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Fernando (talk) 09:57, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I realise this may have been unavoidable, but the out of focus rocks in the foreground bother me a little, especially because they are not symmetrical. Cmao20 (talk) 10:45, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 08:26, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 22:36, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 12:47, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:37, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tui (Prosthemadera novaeseelandiae) Tiritiri Matangi.jpg

Voting period ends on 3 Nov 2024 at 20:42:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Meliphagidae (Honeyeaters)
Info A New Zealand endemic. Both males and females have two distinctive white throat tufts which often appear to be just one tuft. No FPs. of the species. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:42, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:42, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:21, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Crown is blurry. White feathers near neck overexposed. --Tagooty (talk) 04:14, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I don't think it's overexposed. I'm not a big fan of reducing bright white highlights so that they are a dull grey. There is a tiny bit of colour fringing around that area that you could work on but really a very minor point. Cmao20 (talk) 10:41, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:38, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose I agree with Tagooty Poco a poco (talk) 14:09, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great composition Henrysz (talk) 02:28, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 08:29, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Tagooty. - Karelj (talk) 15:51, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20. Beautiful composition and colours, excellent posture and background. – Aristeas (talk) 13:29, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lovely shot. --Fernando (talk) 10:59, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Assisi - Chiesa di San Pietro - Crocifisso - 2023-09-05 01-25-30 001.jpg (delist)

Voting period ends on 3 Nov 2024 at 16:37:46

Info - Reason to delist and replaceː Last year I took some photos in this very dark abbey from the year 1000 located in Assisi, but in the past I had no idea how to stitch two pictures into one. Only recently have I been able to propose what I really had in mind: to see great part of the austere medieval internal apse of the Abbey of St. Peter (Assisi, Italy). (Original nomination)
Delist and replace -- Terragio67 (talk) 16:37, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delist and replace Really better. --Yann (talk) 09:30, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delist and replace Cmao20 (talk) 10:39, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delist and replace –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:39, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delist and replace --SHB2000 (talk) 12:43, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delist and replace --GRDN711 (talk) 05:17, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delist and replace --MZaplotnik^(talk) 17:48, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delist and replace per Yann. --Harlock81 (talk) 13:43, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Keir Hardie by George Grantham Bain.jpg

Voting period ends on 3 Nov 2024 at 16:54:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1900-1909
Info created by George Grantham Bain - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 16:54, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 16:54, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 09:31, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:39, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 16:51, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Buidhe (talk) 03:25, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:33, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:20, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support The informtion on this image should note that this is an image of James Keir Hardie (15 August 1856 – 26 September 1915), a Scottish trade unionist and politician, taken in 1909 by the photographer, George Grantham Bain. --GRDN711 (talk) 20:45, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@GRDN711: I added a little more information about Hardie (and linked to his Wikipedia page for any further info), but other than a description of him, I'm not sure what of that isn't in the file description page. Adam Cuerden (talk) 18:08, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support No obvious artifacts from the cloned-out text. — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 08:25, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Agricultural terraces in Anti-Atlas mountains near Tafraoute, Morocco.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Nov 2024 at 12:44:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Agriculture#Morocco (section doesn't exist yet)
Info created by Tupungato - uploaded by Tupungato - nominated by Tupungato -- Tupungato (talk) 12:44, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tupungato (talk) 12:44, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 14:52, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The subject doesn' really stand out, I'd have probably cropp a chunk at the bottom. Pretty but I don't consider that architecture extraordinary Poco a poco (talk) 17:09, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Nice weather but according to the shadows of the bushes at the right, and my overall impression, the orientation of the light was not so cooperative, like a bit dull or hazy. Also the bottom-up viewpoint is highlighting a lot of the foreground with shadowy sides and not so much of the buildings. The houses at the right are in the shadow, hard to distinguish. I think another viewpoint, more from the left, and perhaps also higher in altitude, would have improved content enhancement -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:04, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose As per Poco a Poco. --Fernando (talk) 09:05, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose per Basile Morin –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:39, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support The so called "foreground" is what this image is about - for me this is an excellent documentation of an agricultural method for arid climates. --Kritzolina (talk) 15:19, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Kritzolina. – Aristeas (talk) 13:28, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unconfirmed results: (info)
Result: 4 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Grand Mosque at Constantine (15676686960).jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Nov 2024 at 12:09:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings/Ceilings#Algeria (section doesn't exist yet)
Info The ceiling adornment at the Emir Abdelkader Mosque (built in 1994). It's the second-largest mosque in Algeria. Created by Dan Sloan - uploaded by Ser Amantio di Nicolao - nominated by Riad Salih -- Riad Salih (talk) 12:09, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Riad Salih (talk) 12:09, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very cool, although I wish it was more perfectly centered. Cmao20 (talk) 13:16, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Indeed really cool, quality degrades a bit towards the borders, but all in all very impressive. I took the liberty to change the gallery link to our special gallery for ceilings of religious buildings. I will add a section for Algeria there if this nomination succeeds. – Aristeas (talk) 15:57, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Strong oppose Below the quality bar I'd expect for FP and the bottom crop is unfortunate causing also a lack of symmertry. If the subject would be complete I'd have gone for a square crop Poco a poco (talk) 17:07, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Aristeas.--Ermell (talk) 22:25, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment A tripod would have helped, here. Unfortunately, a hand shot with high ISO and low depth of field impacts the quality -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:50, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Poco a poco. If you don't have a tripod at hand, simply place the camera on the floor, select ISO100 and a medium aperture. Je-str (talk) 11:02, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support crop sucks but this will do. --SHB2000 (talk) 12:43, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 15:48, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose In addition to the technical problems caused by the absence of tripod, the viewpoint was not in the center. As a consequence, the circles are not concentric. And the crop is tighter at the bottom than at the top, making the composition unbalanced -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:18, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support At least crop sides - shadow part. It could be better, but tripod in Mosque, normally not possible. Even camera-photo can be problem. --Mile (talk) 11:41, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No need for a tripod to a get a HQ shot from a ceiling. I have done it so many times... I'm surprised and disappointed by the support this image is getting. The camera was off-centered, so that the arches on left and right are not symmetrical at all, the cop is a mess and the quality low. Poco a poco (talk) 14:06, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Weak oppose In the top left corner (please see annotation) there is a yellow coloration on the white surface, which indicates a subsequent coloring within a poorly made selection. However, this is only an assumption. Also, the saturation of the image seems too high to me. I would also suggest a square crop in favor of a more balanced composition. Also, I have to partially agree with the opponents above that the FP standard for church interiors is higher than this one. Nevertheless, the subject is great, and with careful reworking it would have a chance of becoming FP. I am very sorry. -- Radomianin (talk) 15:15, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Addendum: If you look at the original version, you can see a more natural coloring. Another indication of subsequent editing, which in my opinion was not done carefully enough. I would like to ask the nominator/editor to place a retouching template with the done work on the file page. Many thanks in advance. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 15:33, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, feel free to edit the image and add the template. I have done my best to ensure that the picture aligns with the FP standards. Riad Salih (talk) 21:01, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your reply, Riad Salih. I am sure you have done your best to meet the FP standard. For this, the community thanks you, because every volunteer is needed to keep this project alive. And your work is just as valuable as that of any other volunteer. But participation in this forum thrives on constructive criticism that helps the volunteers maintain the professional standards of the FP project. I too have evolved over the past few years by trying to accept criticism and develop my skills. My suggestion was only meant as an advice to provide with the template the necessary transparency on the file page. If my criticism was perceived as disrespectful, I sincerely apologize. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 21:29, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unconfirmed results: (info)
Result: 7 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Château du Haut-Koenigsbourg (755 m) (Orschwiller) (19).jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Nov 2024 at 09:12:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#France
Info created by Gzen92 - uploaded by Gzen92 - nominated by Gzen92 -- Gzen92 (talk) 09:12, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Gzen92 (talk) 09:12, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Nice compo but unsharp. Probably f/11 is a bit to much for 1 inch. --Mile (talk) 09:31, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support I agree with Mile, but the composition is great Cmao20 (talk) 10:52, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alternate version (sharpness)

Support Better sharpness. Gzen92 (talk) 12:05, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:40, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 02:35, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 13:28, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:12, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unconfirmed results: (info)
Result: X support, X oppose, X neutral → not featured. /Note: this candidate has several alternatives, thus if featured the alternative parameter needs to be specified. /FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 3 November 2024 (UTC))[reply]

Commons:Кандидати за изабране слике

Формалности

Номинација

Политика за кандидате за изабране слике

Кандидати за уклањање статуса изабране слике

Кандидати за изабране слике

Featured picture candidates

World Maps by Abraham Ortelius, 1572

File:Apollo 11 bootprint.jpg (delist and replace)

File:Assisi - Chiesa di San Pietro - Crocifisso - 2023-09-05 01-25-30 001.jpg (delist)

File:Agricultural terraces in Anti-Atlas mountains near Tafraoute, Morocco.jpg, not featured

File:Grand Mosque at Constantine (15676686960).jpg, not featured

Alternate version (sharpness)

Кандидати за брисање

Featured picture candidates

World Maps by Abraham Ortelius, 1572

File:Apollo 11 bootprint.jpg (delist and replace)

File:Assisi - Chiesa di San Pietro - Crocifisso - 2023-09-05 01-25-30 001.jpg (delist)

File:Agricultural terraces in Anti-Atlas mountains near Tafraoute, Morocco.jpg, not featured

File:Grand Mosque at Constantine (15676686960).jpg, not featured

Alternate version (sharpness)

Navigation menu

Search