Commons:Кандидати за изабране слике

Ово су кандидати за изабране слике. Уочите да ово није исто што и слика дана.

За архиву претходних номинација, погледајте: Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log

Постоји такође хронолошки списак изабраних слика.

Формалности

Номинација

Ако мислите да сте нашли или направили слику која може да се сматра вредном, онда је додајте испод у секцију номинације, на врх стране путем овог линка.(Упутства)

Пре него што то урадите, осигурајте да сте унели одговарајући опис слике, као и прикладну лиценцу.

Молимо гласајте користећи реч из вашег језика или одговарајуће шаблоне:

За - Yes, Sim, Ja, Oui, Sí, Kyllä, 支持 , Tak,...
Против - No, Não, Nein, Non, Ei, 反对 , Nie,...

Такође можете користити шаблоне {{Oppose}}( Oppose) и {{Support}}( Support). Такође можете изразити да волите слику са {{I love}}( Support) или да сте неутрални {{Neutral}}( Neutral).

Молимо покушајте да укључите неколико речи о томе зашто вам се (није) свидела слика, посебно када гласате против.

Политика за кандидате за изабране слике

На крају гласања, резултати ће бити одређени петнаестог дана од номинације.
Номинације од анонимних корисника су добродошле
Доприноси у разговорима од стране анонимних корисника су добродошли
Гласови анонимних корисника се не рачунају
Номинације се не рачунају као гласови. Подршка мора да буде експлицитно изречена.
Номинатори могу да повуку своју номинацију било када.
Запамтите, циљ Викимедијине Оставе је да пружи централну базу за слободне слике које би се могле користити у свим Викимедијиним пројектима, укључујући и могуће будуће пројекте. Ово није проста остава за википедијине слика, тако да о сликама не треба судити према томе да ли одговарају неком пројекту.
Слике могу да се уклоне са списка уколико немају подршке (не рачунајући номинаторов глас) после седмог дана.

Кандидат ће постати изабрана слика у складу са следећим условима:

Одговарајућа лиценца (наравно)
Најмање 7 гласова подршке
Однос гласова за и против мора да буде најмање 2:1 (двотрећинска већина)
Код две различите верзије исте слике, не могу обе бити изабране, већ само она са већим бројем гласова.

За упутства о томе како се процесују старе номинације, погледајте Template talk:Featured pictures candidates#What to do after voting is finished.

Кандидати за уклањање статуса изабране слике

Током времена, стандарди за изабране слике се мењају. Може бити одлучено да за неке слике које су некада биле "довољно добре", ово више није случај. Овде се наводе слике за које сматрате да више не заслужују да буду изабране. Ово захтева двотрећинску већину (и минимум од 5 гласова) за уклањање статуса. Ако нема 2/3 за уклањање, слика остаје изабрана. За ове радње, гласајте са {{Keep}} Keep (заслужује да остане изабрана слика) или or {{Delist}} Delist (не заслужује да више буде изабрана слика). Молимо пружите и линк ка оригиналној номинацији за изабрану слику (појавиће се под "Links" на страни са описом слике). За остало, иста правила важе као и изнад. Молимо користите овај линк како бисте додали новог кандидата за уклањање статуса

Освежавање стране: purge this page's cache

Кандидати за изабране слике

Featured picture candidates

File:כיכר עין השמש (היובל) באשדוד, דצמבר 2023 06.jpg

Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2024 at 19:35:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Sculptures outdoors
Info created by מקף־עברי - uploaded by מקף־עברי - nominated by מקף־עברי -- מקף־עברי (talk) 19:35, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- מקף־עברי (talk) 19:35, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Family of lions during the mating season.jpg

Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2024 at 16:01:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family : Felidae (Felids)
Info Good quality, a different composition to any of the lion pictures currently in the category, and taken on safari. created by Byrdyak - uploaded by Byrdyak - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 16:01, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 16:01, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support Ain't no way was I going to pass the chance of supporting this absolutely magnificent, perfectly captured piece of art. Woah!! You have no idea how good this image is man. I don't think FP is enough! Wolverine X-eye 18:10, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Wolverine Je-str (talk) 19:57, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:British Columbia Regiment 1940.jpg

Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2024 at 16:01:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#1940-1949
Info created by Claude Dettloff, restored, uploaded, and nominated by Yann
Support Notable historical image with its own article. This was a delicate restoration. It was heavily damaged. Apparently the print was scratched with a sharp tool. All copies on the Net have the same defect. -- Yann (talk) 16:01, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Historical or not, this is an atrocious image. Wolverine X-eye 18:13, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:П'ятницька церква вночі.jpg

Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2024 at 12:18:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Ukraine
Info created by Andrew4you - uploaded by Andrew4you - nominated by George Chernilevsky -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:18, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:18, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Big tilt. Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:59, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Checked, image not tilted -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:08, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Cmao20 (talk) 16:27, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support You got the lighting spot on! Well done! Wolverine X-eye 18:15, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vesilest (Hydrachnidia).jpg

Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2024 at 07:38:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Arachnida#Others
Info created by Janeklass - uploaded by Janeklass - nominated by Janeklass -- Janeklass (talk) 07:38, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Janeklass (talk) 07:38, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:06, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 12:31, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:37, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 14:02, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive shot considering the subject you had to work with. Wolverine X-eye 18:19, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Close wing moisture sucking of Appias lalage (Doubleday, 1842) - Spot Puffin (Male) WLB.jpg

Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2024 at 04:59:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Pieridae (Whites and Sulphurs)
Info created by Anitava Roy - uploaded by Anitava Roy - nominated by Atudu -- Atudu (talk) 04:59, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Atudu (talk) 04:59, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:06, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:36, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 14:02, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment What is the blurry object in the background beneath the wing? Cmao20 (talk) 16:26, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Image:The Milky Way over Germany.png

Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2024 at 03:06:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Astronomy#Sky
Info created by Zwiebackgesicht - uploaded by Zwiebackgesicht - nominated by Zwiebackgesicht -- Zwiebackgesicht (talk) 03:06, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Zwiebackgesicht (talk) 03:06, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:06, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Why PNG? I would support a JPEG version. Yann (talk) 12:31, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:35, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I've never seen the Milky Way look anything like this. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:00, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Per Charles, the colours certainly do look very strange. I'd like to know more about how this picture was taken. Was it during an aurora, or is a special filter being used? Cmao20 (talk) 16:09, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The image was strongly edited : the milky way was brightened a lot and everything else extremely darkened with a painting brush. Also the stars are sadly out of focus (these shots always require manual focus and usually to achieve a good focus on the stars the cursor must be set just slightly before infinity because at infinity the focus is always missed, at least on Sony cameras but I don't know what camera was used for this one since the exif data are missing). As for the colors they are either a side effect of the strong edits or were painted in the image with a brush -- Giles Laurent (talk) 17:09, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Je-str (talk) 19:59, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:010 Greater flamingos male and female in the Camargue during mating season Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg

Voting period ends on 1 Dec 2024 at 22:57:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Phoenicopteridae (Flamingos)
Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:57, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:57, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent focus on the pair, appealing light and composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:40, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 06:04, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:06, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:25, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:35, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:44, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 14:02, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Basile. – Aristeas (talk) 16:06, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 16:07, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Zero complaints from me. Wolverine X-eye 18:17, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Schloss Tambach Luftbild-20240901-RM-154500.jpg

Voting period ends on 1 Dec 2024 at 22:32:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications/Germany#Bavaria
Info All by me -- Ermell (talk) 22:32, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ermell (talk) 22:32, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Subject, composition and weather -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:42, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:06, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:43, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 14:01, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Superb Cmao20 (talk) 16:03, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Basile, and excellent quality for a drone photo. – Aristeas (talk) 16:06, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jaszczurówka at Winter.jpg

Voting period ends on 1 Dec 2024 at 17:46:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Poland
Info created by Jakub T. Jankiewicz - uploaded by Jakub T. Jankiewicz - nominated by EUPBR -- EUPBR (talk) 17:46, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- EUPBR (talk) 17:46, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow. Great atmosphere Cmao20 (talk) 19:47, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 20:46, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Nice but too dark IMHO Poco a poco (talk) 22:09, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Underexposed Agree with Poco. Even an atmospheric image needs to offer a little more distinguishable content. The roof and the trees are currently too dark in my opinion -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:36, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Heavily manipulated image. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:38, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question Frank, this is a very important hint, can you elaborate a bit on the manipulation? Thank you! – Aristeas (talk) 08:25, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The overprocessing (in particular with regard to the colors) makes this look super artificial to me. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 09:45, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your assessment, Frank! It seems the photographer was after a very painterly look … – Aristeas (talk) 16:05, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I hear you. I guess it's more a matter of taste and what the image is being used for. In my opinion, for a piece of art to be hung on the wall, it would be wonderful. But in an encyclopedic context, the heavy-handed processing is just to much. At least for me. Given the artistic merit, I'd be perfectly ok with it being promoted.--Frank Schulenburg (talk) 16:37, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral I’m torn on this one: on the one hand I am conviced by Frank’s assessment, on the other hand I can’t deny the atmosphere and effect of the result. After looking at other photos of the church it seems not totally unrealistic to me, so I am inclined to regard the editing as within the creative freedom of the photographer. – Aristeas (talk) 16:05, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support The image looks natural to me (eventhough it's a bit underexposed in my opinion, hence the weak support) and I honestly think the image was not edited much from what was captured with the camera. In night photography long exposure shots like this one (6sec exposure) often lead to such colors and such light effects -- Giles Laurent (talk) 18:24, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Svörtuloft Lighthouse.jpg

Voting period ends on 1 Dec 2024 at 09:54:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Iceland#Western Region (Vesturland)
Info created by C-M - uploaded by C-M - nominated by Tupungato -- Tupungato (talk) 09:54, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tupungato (talk) 09:54, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great selfie! ;o) Yann (talk) 10:43, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Is the author near the table near the lighthouse? -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:22, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Rbrechko (talk) 15:22, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Анастасия Львова^ru/en 15:37, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --EUPBR (talk) 17:58, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:01, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 19:43, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 20:47, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:12, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Composition and viewpoint -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:22, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 05:59, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:06, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Apparently a stitched pano, should be marked and categorized as such. --A.Savin 08:17, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:28, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:41, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive landscape, impressive photo. The lighthouse is slightly leaning to the right, so maybe a tiny rotation or perspective correction would be useful. And obviously A.Savin is right that {{Panorama}}, Category:Panoramics in West-Iceland etc. should be added. – Aristeas (talk) 15:39, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:RDAF General Dynamics F-16AM Fighting Falcon E-006 Royal International Air Tattoo 2024 01.jpg

Voting period ends on 1 Dec 2024 at 10:00:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Air_transport#Military_jet_aircraft
Info created by Julian Herzog - uploaded by Julian Herzog - nominated by Tupungato -- Tupungato (talk) 10:00, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tupungato (talk) 10:00, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 11:02, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 19:42, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:47, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:12, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive view of the cockpit -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:17, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thank you for the nomination! — Julian H.^✈ 07:41, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:06, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:26, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:40, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 14:01, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Well frozen, beautiful colour contrast. – Aristeas (talk) 15:33, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Elefante africano de sabana (Loxodonta africana), parque nacional de Amboseli, Kenia, 2024-05-22, DD 07.jpg

Voting period ends on 30 Nov 2024 at 20:55:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family_:_Elephantidae_(Elephants)
Info African bush elephant (Loxodonta africana), Amboseli National Park, Kenya. It's the largest living land animal with bulls reaching an average shoulder height of 3.04–3.36 metres (10.0–11.0 ft) and a body mass of 5.2–6.9 tonnes (11,500–15,200 lb). Since 2021, it has been listed as Endangered on the IUCN Red List. It is threatened foremost by habitat destruction, and in parts of its range also by poaching for meat and ivory. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 20:55, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 20:55, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:19, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 06:56, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain Isn't the image slightly tilted to the right? I'm estimating it based on the cloud bottoms. I tried to rotate it to the left by about 1.75 degrees, and I believe it looks more correct this way. I also modified the white balance to make it look somewhat colder. I know that elephants can be quite yellowish-brownish, but in this image the plants seem to have too warm hue/white balance. I don't know what the rules and etiquette are about uploading "new versions" or variants, so I haven't uploaded it.--Tupungato (talk) 15:27, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, fair, thank you for your feedback. I made some changes, please, have a look. To your question, please, don't upload versions on your own, that makes no sense. I have the RAW file as source and if somebody requests a change later one I wouldn't have the right version, so it makes sense that I do those changes. Furthermore I consider myself skilled enough to make a tilt or change the WB. I believe that uploading an own version is appropiate if the author requests for help of if the uploader is not active on Commons. Poco a poco (talk) 16:12, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't necessarily mean uploading the version to replace your version, but to upload a reference version to better illustrate what I mean. Tupungato (talk) 17:55, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, ok, I got you, well, you can do that if it's necessary. I'm rather interested in your feedback about the new version Poco a poco (talk) 19:26, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Majestic. – Aristeas (talk) 19:19, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support It could be sharper, but it's a big impressive photo Cmao20 (talk) 19:39, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your feedback. I can apply more sharpness but personally I feel that sharpness is good Poco a poco (talk) 22:07, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Ermell (talk) 20:49, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Harsh light at 10 am but the orientation of the sun is appropriate and the view point excellent -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:46, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
~~Oppose~~ Neutral The harsh sunlight spoils it for me. Otherwise nice. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:40, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Frank, ok, I've adjusted the curves. Poco a poco (talk) 08:23, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 09:49, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per Frank. Why replaced in Wikidata that photo (better compo, almost same quality level) by this one? --A.Savin 08:07, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You alreday said not same quality level, this one has better lighting and IMHO better lighting and a more encyclopedic pose. Is this really the right frame to discuss wikidata edits? --Poco a poco (talk) 11:28, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Nice, but I think this was not fast enough to freeze all movements. There is motion blur on the ear. Yann (talk) 12:39, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I agree, the right ear has motion blur and 1/125s is too slow for a moving subject and it is much preferable to have a frozen subject than reaching ISO 100 in a situation like this in my opinion, otherwise nice composition -- Giles Laurent (talk) 17:23, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Parkaden June 2017 08.jpg

Voting period ends on 30 Nov 2024 at 18:17:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Sweden
Info The upper part of Parkaden, a multi-storey car park built 1965 built by the luxury department store Nordiska kompaniet in Stockholm. The design is a combination of one express ramp and inclined parking ramps. Architect was Hans Asplund. Hans Asplund, son of the legendary architect Gunnar Asplund, and a architect and tarchitectural theorist most know today for Parkaden and Eslöv civic centre but also said to is have coined the term neo-brutalism. Over time, Hans Asplund became increasingly critical of modernism and, in 1980, published the book Farväl till functionalism, which systematically reviewed what the author considered to be the shortcomings of modernist architecture and his father's famous manifesto acceptera.
This is one of my own favorite pictures (I have a large enlargement in my apartment). I like the lines, the shadows and the contrasts and the, perhaps for many unexpected, beauty of this rather dilapidated sixties dream. The photo was taken before the upper floor was rebuilt. Created, uploaded and nominated by -- ArildV (talk) 18:17, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ArildV (talk) 18:17, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 21:57, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support A great, interesting, abstract way to illustrate an ugly building Cmao20 (talk) 00:14, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:19, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:03, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 12:54, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:57, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:01, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Revealing beauty in ugly things is one of the great gifts of art (here: photography). – Aristeas (talk) 19:17, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:52, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. --Ratekreel (talk) 10:12, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dominiiklaste klooster.jpg

Voting period ends on 30 Nov 2024 at 14:37:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#Estonia
Info created & uploaded by Kalev Kuljus - nominated by Kruusamägi (talk) 14:37, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kruusamägi (talk) 14:37, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lots of wow Cmao20 (talk) 17:05, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great with lights and contrast.--Paracel63 (talk) 17:26, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I'm puzzled, on one side the lights are wow, but the details quality are unsharp (and sometimes blurry). --PierreSelim (talk) 17:33, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The light is undoubtedly great, but unfortunately the overall quality is too low. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 23:38, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:19, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose per PierreSelim. Clear wow factor, but low quality. I think a tripod was necessary here, in this dark room, to allow more parts in focus with a larger depth of field and also less ISO for a better quality. Incidentally the highlights could have been more carefully handled -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:12, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per above, I am not fond of the top crop either Poco a poco (talk) 12:06, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:North Island saddleback (Philesturnus rufusater) head Tiritiri Matangi.jpg

Voting period ends on 30 Nov 2024 at 14:09:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Callaeidae (New Zealand wattlebirds)
Info Translocations, which started in the 1980s, have helped secure the future of this near-threatened New Zealand endemic. No FPs of this family. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:09, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:09, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cute Cmao20 (talk) 17:05, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow. --PierreSelim (talk) 17:35, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:19, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:01, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Expressive. – Aristeas (talk) 19:16, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:39, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Green Fungi Log Singanally Coorg Nov24 A7CR 04866-90 zsp.jpg

Voting period ends on 30 Nov 2024 at 10:35:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Fungi#Family_:_Polyporaceae
Info Yellow green fungi (tentative: Trametes sp.) on log, growing around silver oak leaves. The large fungi are about 7.5 cm (3 in) across. Green colour may be due to algal growth. Focus stack of 25 images. Singnally, Somwarpet, Coorg, Karnataka, India. Created by Tagooty - uploaded by Tagooty - nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 10:35, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tagooty (talk) 10:35, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 16:20, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 23:47, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:19, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very high level of detail -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:00, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:02, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:56, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:00, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 19:15, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:11, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 05:54, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Field of Iceland poppies in the flower garden near Cheomseongdae Observatory in Gyeongju South Korea.jpg

Voting period ends on 30 Nov 2024 at 00:44:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#South Korea
Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:44, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:44, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 02:10, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I just love the pet insect you placed on the flower! Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:25, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

:-) A divine hand placed many in that field. You have to wait less than one minute to get one (or two, three...) on any flower :-) Basile Morin (talk) 10:37, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --XRay 💬 10:33, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support amazing detail for such a large expanse. --Tagooty (talk) 10:38, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The white balance seems a bit too warm for the lighting conditions, especially the greens and reds in the foreground appear to have a strong yellow cast. I'm on an unfamiliar, uncalibrated monitor, though, so that may be just my perception being off. --El Grafo (talk) 11:11, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your comment. It's the original temperature, so I would expect accurate colors in this situation, at 8:22 am, almost golden hour. Colors also look normal on my calibrated screen. I agree it's quite warm, but I tend to believe that a colder temperature would correspond to a later time of day -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:26, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's great as it is, but I reduced yellow a bit and that worked nicely. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:14, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support--Ermell (talk) 11:13, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very beautiful, and it’s impressive how you achieved constant sharpness without sacrificing too much detail to diffraction. – Aristeas (talk) 15:52, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:03, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jakubhal 20:10, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 23:46, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:19, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:01, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:54, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 15:19, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Анастасия Львова^ru/en 15:38, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:11, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Golden poppies -- Terragio67 (talk) 05:50, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:31, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Puente Helix, Marina Bay, Singapur, 2023-08-16, DD 144-146 HDR.jpg

Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2024 at 20:45:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Singapore
Info Night view of the Helix Bridge and the Marina Bay Sands Hotel, Marina Bay, Singapore. Note: I've already a featured image of this area, this one taken a different day, with different light, from a different location and with the ArtScience Museum in the compo. I opted for this nom after the discussion that took place here. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 20:45, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 20:45, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Outstanding. Very different to the other FP in composition and light. Cmao20 (talk) 00:24, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Nice but perspective should be improved. You can see pillars leaning and the reflections in the water are not vertical -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:48, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'll look into it this evening CET Poco a poco (talk) 08:22, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done, FYI Basile Morin Poco a poco (talk) 18:28, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Well done. Special architecture -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:19, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 06:57, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per Cmao20. -- Radomianin (talk) 07:35, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice and very nice place. May there are some stars, may they light spots are hot pixel. Please have a look. --XRay 💬 10:33, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Stunning scenery and photograph. (I assume you will tweak the perspective acc. to Basile’s hint.) – Aristeas (talk) 15:50, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:03, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Paracel63 (talk) 17:24, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jakubhal 20:09, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:19, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 06:55, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:01, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:52, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 05:48, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Жирафик.jpg

Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2024 at 21:04:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family : Giraffidae (Giraffes)
Info created by SanNikGar - uploaded by SanNikGar - nominated by JukoFF -- JukoFF (talk) 21:04, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- JukoFF (talk) 21:04, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Useful picture, but bad crop and weird colours Cmao20 (talk) 00:28, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Cmao20. And weird vignetting -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:45, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Artificial background... Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:33, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose colours and backlight are not well handled here. --PierreSelim (talk) 09:41, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Milky way in Elbrus.jpg

Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2024 at 21:00:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Astronomy#Sky – Milky Way over the Elbrus, Russiа
Info created by Oliwok - uploaded by Oliwok - nominated by JukoFF -- JukoFF (talk) 21:00, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- JukoFF (talk) 21:00, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Анастасия Львова^ru/en 22:34, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Quite a lot of chroma noise. I don't feel strongly either way, but I'm not sure this is the quality we'd expect. Cmao20 (talk) 00:29, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
~~{{cmt}}~~ Support I did just add some notes to identify the portion of the Milky Way visible in the star field. It is the Serpens–Aquila Rift. The two main stats are Altair in the center of the image and Alpha Ophiuchi on the right. The third one, lower on the left, is Jupiter, that in August 2021 was in the constellation Capricorn. Several star clusters are also visible. I agree with Cmao20 on the fact that there is a lot of chroma noise, but the picture has some value. --Harlock81 (talk) 11:36, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 13:37, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:25, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:00, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:50, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:00, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:10, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wiewiórka w Parku Bednarskiego w Krakowie, 20241117 0903 2741.jpg

Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2024 at 19:14:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family : Sciuridae (Squirrels)
Info Red squirrel (Sciurus vulgaris) in Bednarski Park in Kraków, Poland. Created and uploaded by Jakub Hałun, nominated by – Aristeas (talk) 19:14, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I know I know I know: Just like “all sunsets are beautiful”, all squirrels are cute ;–), we already got quite some nice squirrel FPs and we are very demanding when it comes to photos of common animals. But I can’t resist to nominate this one. The light is so beautiful, the colours are so good, the pose is so nice. Since my last move I am watching these little rascals on my walks and this is a very typical posture and behaviour. Bon appétit, dear squirrel, and congratulations to the photographer! -- Aristeas (talk) 19:14, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good choice to nominate this irresistible rascal. Sometimes they can be very tame, the picture reminds me of the Łazienki Park in Warsaw, there they get incredibly close to people for a nut. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:52, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Анастасия Львова^ru/en 22:33, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 23:56, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Aristeas. This is also a special squirrel, looking at viewer with giant eyes, ears stretched, paws on belly, its booty well buried in his mouth :-) Yum -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:34, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 11:56, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:03, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 23:46, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:25, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:05, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:59, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 12:07, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:48, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --EUPBR (talk) 17:58, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 05:45, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lichtenfels Lokschuppen Orthophoto -20231001-RM-160347.jpg

Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2024 at 16:11:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Transport#Rail tracks
Info IMO superb composition, quality, and subject. created by Ermell - uploaded by Ermell - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 16:11, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 16:11, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent idea and realization. One of my favourites from WLM 2024/Germany. – Aristeas (talk) 16:38, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I love geometric structures, clear lines and shapes in photography. Saubere Arbeit, Ermell! -- Radomianin (talk) 21:41, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 22:24, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Анастасия Львова^ru/en 22:34, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thanks for the nom.--Ermell (talk) 23:15, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Geometrical shapes and patterns of the composition, and also rusty / decaying materials at full resolution -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:25, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 06:14, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 06:58, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:22, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:03, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Striking perspective, geometry and colours.--Paracel63 (talk) 17:39, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 23:47, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:25, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:06, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:58, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 12:08, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:43, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:10, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 05:43, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Basilique du Sacré-Cœur de Montmartre - Paris - GT-01 - 2024.jpg

Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2024 at 13:43:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#France
Info Architect Paul Abadie was commissioned to design the basilica, initially (1875), in a Romanesque-Byzantine style. He died in 1884, and then other architects continued his work with the result that a structure was obtained without a predominant characteristic, and for this reason unique in the world. Since 1900 this place full of meaning has been a symbol of Montmatre in Paris. c/u/n by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 13:43, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 13:43, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 23:55, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Nice weather but the picture is not horizontal. See the two horses, not leveled. And not vertical either (see the walls leaning to the center on both sides) -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:25, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I willingly corrected the verticals because a very slight convergence was actually visible with three-point perspective. Instead, the majestic staircase with gardens that leads to the basilica, and consequently the balcony where people are looking out, is not aligned with the basilica, because they have different angles. For this reason there remains a slight perspective shape whereby the horse on the right is slightly higher than the other. By the way, thanks for your comment. Terragio67 (talk) 11:28, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the correction of the verticals. About the horizontal lines, I'm sorry to disagree, after having taken the time to listen the arguments (Aristeas's in particular) and looking at maps, I believe that such a distance of the camera associated to such a minor angle (to the right) cannot realistically justify a strong horizontal inclination. This could be calculable geometrically :-)

I think this aspect is correct. Top AND bottom -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:00, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Basile, thank you very much for your additional effort and for your edited version! My statement (below) was mostly about the obvious misalignment between the axes of the church and the balcony. You are right that this does not necessarily imply the strength of the horizontal inclination and hence of the differences of the height e.g. of the two horses or of the two minor domes. There must be some difference, and it should indeed be possible to calculate it, but this exceeds my possibilites. So it is quite possible that these differences could/should be smaller and more like in your edited version – which indeed looks very appealing. I would like to ask you to upload your edited version as a derivative file to Commons; I guess that many people would appreciate your version. Best, – Aristeas (talk) 16:14, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support I was confused by the perspective, but Terragio67’s answer has opened my eyes: the basilica and the stairs/balcony are indeed not on the same axis ([1]), so in any photo of the south façade either the basilica or the monumental stairs and balcony will look misaligned. In photos taken from further away this is less appearant, but still visible (see the category). I can’t blame the photographer for this. A brownie point for this photo: the perspective avoids the usual vast crowd of people in the foreground – there are still enough people in the photo, of course, but they appear rather few when compared to the commons shots from the stairs. – Aristeas (talk) 15:46, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thanks to Aristeas for his detective work, and to Terragio67 for this fine image. -- Radomianin (talk) 17:35, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:25, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:06, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 12:08, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:41, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --EUPBR (talk) 17:59, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:00, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:09, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:33, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Schwaigern - Massenbach - Baumgruppe am Wilhelmstaler Bach bei Sonnenuntergang (1).jpg

Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2024 at 11:15:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Germany#Baden-Württemberg
Info A small grove of trees at sunset on an evening in early December. Massenbach district, Schwaigern, Germany. All by -- Aristeas (talk) 11:15, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support As I walked past this little grove of trees again and again, I noticed that, together with the reduced forms of the surrounding landscape, it had a simple but well-formed appearance. Of course something was missing. On a December evening, the setting sun coloured the clouds and gave the grove a slightly dramatic background. I like it when simple things show their beauty. -- Aristeas (talk) 11:15, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Composition, pastels colors of the clouds, and the foreground that is like a painter's brushstroke -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:50, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per Basile. -- Radomianin (talk) 13:35, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 13:49, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:29, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:37, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:36, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 22:24, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 23:17, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Basile Morin. Cmao20 (talk) 23:52, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lovely colours --Tagooty (talk) 10:42, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 19:54, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:25, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:07, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:57, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice sky. --Rbrechko (talk) 13:17, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:09, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:33, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Braunlage - Wurmberg 01.jpg

Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2024 at 10:42:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Pinaceae
Info It's depressing: Almost all of the spruce forests in the Harz National Park have died in recent years, and over long distances only dead trees can be seen (see also [2], [3], [4], [5]); created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 10:42, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 10:42, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 22:18, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Indeed very sad Cmao20 (talk) 23:51, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Special texture -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:19, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 06:59, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 07:23, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Could wish for a bit more detail resolution on the frontmost trunks, but this does not diminish the impressive texture effect. – Aristeas (talk) 15:28, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:02, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 19:55, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 23:16, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 23:45, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:25, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:08, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:33, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 13:16, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:08, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support excellent texture considering the lacking of light. -- Terragio67 (talk) 05:41, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:34, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Camp - Notes on Fashion at the Met - Moschino (73834).jpg

Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2024 at 02:34:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects#Clothing_and_textiles
Info Moschino ensemble from the fall 2014 ready-to-wear collection, on display at the Metropolitan Museum of Art in the Camp - Notes on Fashion exhibit. all by — Rhododendrites ^talk | 02:34, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 02:34, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:14, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Eye-catching, appealing composition and subject. -- Radomianin (talk) 13:39, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:37, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:23, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 15:26, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:56, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:38, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Juvenile yellow-crowned night heron (12938).jpg

Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2024 at 02:33:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Pelecaniformes#Genus_:_Nyctanassa
Info Juvenile yellow-crowned night heron (Nyctanassa violacea). I prefer the version that shows more of the habitat, but it didn't go over well. Giving the alternative a shot. all by — Rhododendrites ^talk | 02:33, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 02:33, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:15, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:56, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Sharp, attractive environmental portrait. – Aristeas (talk) 11:22, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per Aristeas. -- Radomianin (talk) 13:42, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 13:50, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:27, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:37, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:37, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 23:19, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 23:50, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Big eye. Good quality -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:16, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 13:15, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:08, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Seßlach Rodachbrücke-20180506-RM-191000.jpg

Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2024 at 22:25:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges#Germany
Info Rodach bridge in Seßlach. All by me -- Ermell (talk) 22:25, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ermell (talk) 22:25, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 01:54, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:16, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charming bridge with history and character; good light and atmosphere. I like how the statue of Saint (John of) Nepomuk seems to contemplate the facing wayside shrine … – Aristeas (talk) 09:54, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:56, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 13:44, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 13:51, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 15:08, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:26, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:37, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Nice subject (although it's a shame that we have no details about it) but I find the right crop too abrupt spoiling the compo, sorry Poco a poco (talk) 19:41, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:08, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Western wattled-honeyeater (Foulehaio procerior) on octopus tree (Heptapleurum actinophyllum) Colo-I-Suva.jpg

Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2024 at 21:34:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Meliphagidae (Honeyeaters)
Info A bird endemic to Fiji. One other image on Commons. Found it sharing fruit with a parrot. All by Charlesjsharp-- Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:34, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:34, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support This is what Featured Pictures should be all about. Not only is the photo visually pleasing, bird is somewhat rare (not a pigeon, mallard or tit). Bonus points for interesting setting (awesome fruit) and insect in focus. This is all around awesome. I can see this picture in ~top 20 of next Picture of the Year.--Tupungato (talk) 22:10, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 01:02, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Excellent capture / story / action. I will happily support once the blue CA is removed from the branch and from the leg -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:41, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

will sort when I can. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:02, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done, thanks. Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:36, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Yes, better. Thanks -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:03, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Superb Cmao20 (talk) 01:53, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:17, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 07:26, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 09:50, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:55, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 13:52, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 15:10, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:25, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:37, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:42, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 21:55, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 13:14, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Phyllis Diller by Allan Warren.jpg

Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2024 at 16:25:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1970-1979
Info created by Allan Warren, uploaded and nominated by Yann
Support I think this matches very well with the introduction of her article: "American stand-up comedian, actress, author, musician, and visual artist, best known for her eccentric stage persona, self-deprecating humor, wild hair and clothes, and exaggerated, cackling laugh." -- Yann (talk) 16:25, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Анастасия Львова^ru/en 16:53, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:44, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support :-) Basile Morin (talk) 23:00, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Expressive portrait with wow-factor. -- Radomianin (talk) 23:08, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:17, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 09:48, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:55, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:37, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:07, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 05:31, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:020912 - Janel Manns - 3b - 2012 Summer Paralympics (01).JPG

Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2024 at 14:30:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Sports#Individual sports
Info Wheelchair tennis at the 2012 Summer Paralympics - Janel Manns. Created by Sport the Library - uploaded by Laurenrobertson1 - nominated by Zquid -- Zquid (talk) 14:30, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Zquid (talk) 14:30, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Paracel63 (talk) 14:47, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:41, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:14, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Very interesting. Unfortunately the crop is too tight at the top -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:53, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Agree with Basile and in fact the issue is making me oppose --Poco a poco (talk) 19:36, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Felipe Gomes Rio2016b.jpg

Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2024 at 13:53:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Sports#Individual sports
Info 2016 Summer Paralympics - Felipe Gomes and sighted guide at 400m T11. Created by Fernando Frazão/Agência Brasil - uploaded by Materialscientist - nominated by Zquid -- Zquid (talk) 13:53, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Zquid (talk) 13:53, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Paracel63 (talk) 14:47, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:17, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tupungato (talk) 22:21, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sport -- Striking capture, taken at the right moment -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:51, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 23:10, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 01:53, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:18, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Peulle (talk) 08:29, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 09:41, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:54, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 13:53, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:23, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:37, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:49, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 22:24, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 19:58, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:07, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:45, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Camels at Aït Benhaddou, Saharan caravan route, Marocco (آيت بن حدّو, ⴰⵢⵜ ⵃⴰⴷⴷⵓ).jpg

Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2024 at 10:09:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family_:_Camelidae_(Camelids)
Info Camels at Aït Benhaddou, Saharan caravan route, Marocco (آيت بن حدّو, ⴰⵢⵜ ⵃⴰⴷⴷⵓ). My shot. -- Mile (talk) 10:09, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mile (talk) 10:09, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 01:52, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:19, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:53, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:37, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:35, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 10:15, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Zaaddozen van een beuk (Fagus sylvatica) 13-09-2024 (d.j.b.).jpg

Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2024 at 05:39:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Fagaceae
Info Half-opened seed pods of a beech (Fagus sylvatica) Focus stack of 57 photos.}}
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:39, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:39, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:02, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:58, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--PaestumPaestum (talk) 16:18, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:41, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:16, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 23:14, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 01:51, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:20, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good, IIRC much better than some earlier attempt at focus-stacking of a beech seed pod. – Aristeas (talk) 09:38, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:53, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 13:54, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:48, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:07, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dourdou river in Trou de Bozouls (14).jpg

Voting period ends on 27 Nov 2024 at 20:36:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/France (the subsection “#Aveyron” for the department does not exist yet, will be created after promotion)
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 20:36, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 20:36, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Looks a bit chaotic at thumbnail but when viewed at full size it's really good. Cmao20 (talk) 20:44, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Full screen works convincingly. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:30, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support By others.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:44, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good perspective and light. --Mile (talk) 10:13, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 10:32, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:59, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:57, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--PaestumPaestum (talk) 16:17, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:40, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 19:06, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:21, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:52, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:48, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:16, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 13:38, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:06, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 05:35, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Zona arqueológica de Cantona, Puebla, México, 2013-10-11, DD 43.JPG

Voting period ends on 27 Nov 2024 at 15:16:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Mexico
Info IMO a dramatic composition that really gets across how spectacular this site must be. created by Poco a poco - uploaded by Poco a poco - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 15:16, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 15:16, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 15:36, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ohh, that's a while ago, nice view :) I made some improvements (alone the export with a current processing algorithm helps) Poco a poco (talk) 18:36, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:39, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 21:12, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:10, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:45, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great composition. --Yann (talk) 10:31, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:58, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 11:35, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--PaestumPaestum (talk) 16:18, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:40, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great panorama, nice juxtaposition of the building (left) and the mountain (right). – Aristeas (talk) 19:01, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:21, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:52, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 22:25, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 05:36, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Ratekreel (talk) 10:17, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ridotto Teatro Grande Brescia volta di Francesco Zugno e Francesco Battaglioli.jpg

Voting period ends on 27 Nov 2024 at 13:35:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Painted ceilings
Info all by Moroder -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 13:35, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 13:35, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 21:14, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Part of the painting is hidden at the right. We just see a bit of an arm and of a head, because the camera was not in the axis. Also black distracting shape at the right in the foreground. Problem of composition in my view, sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:54, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I'm glad you say that, this is trompe-l'œil and the painter Francesco Battaglioli did a perfect job because the ceiling is flat. The black spots on the right are floodlights I could not hide.--Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 06:09, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment ~~Good point :-)~~ Sorry, I don't read Italian (for the title) though I think the word Trompe-l'œil is missing there. Still, there is "flat" and "flat", and the camera doesn't seem in the axis. The bottom and the sides are not symmetrical. To be honest, at first sight my eyes were attracted by the distracting black shape. That part could be cropped out. The two columns at the bottom are showing the same perspective, as if the picture was taken from the right -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:33, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm terribly sorry, I was tromped, the right part is missing. Trompe-l'oeil is in the English description, the other is just the filename. By the way I was going to delete my comment. You can see it in the other fotos of the painting.--Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 06:35, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Re-updated comment Yes, after looking at this view I realized my first impression was rather right. And it seems also possible to take the picture from the center, like here. Thanks for your comment. -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:56, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And at least I was fooled a short time at thinking it was a real trompe-l'oeil :-) Is maybe worth visiting again :-) Basile Morin (talk) 23:09, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support I like it the way it is. Not every single Featured Picture has to be in the axis. This is a photo depicting a three dimensional object with details in variety of levels. I appreciate the fact that I can see the sculpted balustrade, which would be invisible or almost invisible in symmetrical axis composition encouraged by many Commons users. This perspective allows me to appreciate the painted ceiling, but also to better understand the surrounding architecture, which is a great thing taking into account Wikimedia Commons image should be encyclopedically useful. Don't get discouraged in submitting unusual perspectives for Featured Pictures. Other voters, don't be intimidated by seasoned users who discourage unusual perspectives. --Tupungato (talk) 22:30, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment @Tupungato: "don't be intimidated by seasoned users" who spread unusual perspectives through optical illusions! -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:24, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Wow, “seasoned users” – I must remember that cultivated phrase. Very useful, as nobody can say for sure whether this is a respectful description or a refined insult. Well, every FPC regular knows that Basile and me often disagree, but when Basile is called a “seasoned user” I hope I am allowed to share this designation with him. Or am I already a rotten user, having been on Commons for six years longer? Who knows … ;–) But I agree that nobody should be intimidated by any other user, of course. Please take our arguments, check them, compare them, form your own opinion based on reasons, vote. Thank you. – Aristeas (talk) 10:12, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I'm afraid I'm a "seasoned user" too: born in the first half of last century A.D. 1947, with commons for 17 years, 150 FP and 7000 QI hahaha --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 11:19, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Welcome to the club of seasoned users, Wolfgang! ;–) We should request a privileged users group with many “members only” features … – Aristeas (talk) 12:38, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can I get a membership card please? ;o) Yann (talk) 20:02, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
only if you support my FP candidate ;-) Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 07:56, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:001 Greater flamingo in flight in the Camargue Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg

Voting period ends on 27 Nov 2024 at 13:10:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family_:_Phoenicopteridae_(Flamingos)
Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:10, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:10, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:21, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support An insect photographer (talk) 17:45, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:12, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:39, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 21:15, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:13, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Fantastic angle of view, good focus and high level of detail. Striking composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:58, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:47, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:59, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Peulle (talk) 08:51, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 10:28, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Basile. Also beautiful light. – Aristeas (talk) 10:46, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:57, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:40, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:21, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:51, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 13:55, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jakubhal 19:21, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:45, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:61-224-0001 Zbarazh Castle RB 24.jpg

Voting period ends on 27 Nov 2024 at 11:51:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#Ukraine
Info created, uploaded and nominated by Rbrechko -- Rbrechko (talk) 11:51, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Rbrechko (talk) 11:51, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Certainly not the most romantic one of the many castles and manors of the Ukraine, but the longer I look at it the more I like the clear geometric construction and how the fortress hides an imposing palazzo in fortezza. One hint: On the roofs of the palace there is some blue/orange/red moiree. In Lightroom or Photoshop/ACR, paint a brush mask over it and set “Moiree removal” e.g. to +60; it may be useful to increase (with the same mask) the saturation a bit, e.g. +20, because moiree removal often decreases saturation. If this is unclear, just drop me a note. – Aristeas (talk) 19:31, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Thank you for review. I didn't notice moiree on the roofs. I fixed this and deployed new version. --Rbrechko (talk) 12:58, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  - Comment Thank you very much! Now the roofs are perfect. – Aristeas (talk) 15:44, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 10:11, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Self portrait (8618889472).jpg, featured

Voting period ends on 27 Nov 2024 at 10:25:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Styles and Techniques#Photo art
Info created by Stacey Svendsen, uploaded by Victorgrigas, nominated by Yann
Info Self portrait illustrating the mordançage technique of altering gelatin silver prints for artistic effect.
Support No FP for this technique yet. -- Yann (talk) 10:25, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very impressive result with a poetic touch. – Aristeas (talk) 11:11, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:08, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:19, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support An insect photographer (talk) 17:42, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per Aristeas. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:27, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Special for me.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:50, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:55, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:34, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:50, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 13:55, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /– Aristeas (talk) 15:30, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Photo techniques/Styles and Techniques#Photo art

File:Katsuo ji temple waterfall Osaka Japan by Don Ramey Logan.jpg, not featured

Voting period ends on 27 Nov 2024 at 06:48:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Fountains
Info created by WPPilot - uploaded by WPPilot - nominated by WPPilot -- Don (talk) 06:48, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Don (talk) 06:48, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Good composition but most of the picture is not in focus Cmao20 (talk) 15:18, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose lacks wow and oof. --SHB2000 (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The composition itself would be good, but the image is a little shaken (unstable camera), and the level of blown highlights (white areas on water) is unacceptable for a Featured Picture. But don't get discouraged, I've been a photojournalist for ~18 years, and still have problems with waterfalls :D --Tupungato (talk) 22:35, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:11, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Paesens. Dobbe, 17-09-2024. (actm.) 01.jpg, featured

Voting period ends on 27 Nov 2024 at 05:32:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Netherlands
Info Paesens. For me soothing horizontal play of lines behind the sea wall at Paesens with a view of the Wadden, a unique tidal area (UNESCO World Heritage)
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:32, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:32, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very simple but IMO satisfying Cmao20 (talk) 15:17, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I agree with Cmao20, it looks like a beautiful painting to me. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:25, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support the minimalism is what makes this photo really nice. --SHB2000 (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Radomianin and SHB2000. – Aristeas (talk) 10:42, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I have changed the gallery link from Other objects in landscapes to Natural#Netherlands because most similar photos are on the “Natural” gallery pages. Your description (“horizontal play of lines behind the sea wall at Paesens with a view of the Wadden, a unique tidal area”) confirms that this is a photo of the landscape/nature. The dobbe and the fence are objects, but they are integral parts of the landscape, so we can still put this into the “Natural” gallery. (Thanks to Cart for the confirmation!) Hope it helps, – Aristeas (talk) 11:15, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cart and Aristeas, Thank you very much for all the effort. I am happy with that.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:23, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 16:27, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:40, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:36, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:49, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 13:57, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:11, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#Netherlands

File:Inimese peatäi.jpg

Voting period ends on 25 Nov 2024 at 18:09:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods#Family : Pediculidae (Lice)
Info created by Janeklass - uploaded by Janeklass - nominated by Janeklass -- Janeklass (talk) 18:09, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Janeklass (talk) 18:09, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I modified this file a little. I didn't do anything with the lighting, but I cropped it a little and changed the aspect ratio from 2:3 to 4:5 Janeklass (talk) 17:56, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Perhaps a bit dark? Cmao20 (talk) 01:54, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Underexposed Yes, though the picture looks interesting -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:21, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's impossible to agree with the claim that this image is underexposed. This is clearly proven by the excellent visibility of every detail on the head louse's body - its tiny hairs, complex body texture, and even various color shades. The dark, almost black background is not an exposure error, but rather serves to highlight the main subject more clearly. The image's tonality is well balanced - we can clearly see details in both lighter and darker areas, confirming that the exposure is not incorrect. This lighting choice is intentional here, designed to give the image a slightly dramatic effect. If the picture were truly underexposed, we wouldn't be able to see such fine details and color tones that are now clearly visible. Janeklass (talk) 04:19, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disagree. You will see more details if the photo is better exposed. Currently the contrasts are very hard to distinguish, especially at thumbnail size.

Note that you can also see a lot of details here, although the photo is underexposed too. And that one was properly fixed.

Hard to hear that "it's impossible to agree with the claim that this image is underexposed" while the two first reviewers here both find the image too dark :-) Then above you write "This lighting choice is intentional here, designed to give the image a slightly dramatic effect" (by the way, I don't understand this dramatic intention. It's just a close-up of an animal, no special background / context). Sorry, clear light problem for me, in state -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:45, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have responded to the criticism and want the evaluators to know that the lighting choice here is clearly intentional. How you choose to evaluate it is up to you. Janeklass (talk) 04:56, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:47, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per above. Please fix the light as you did here -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:00, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The subjects are different and unfortunately the same approach cannot be applied here. Increasing the light would also amplify surface reflections and this would ruin the image completely Janeklass (talk) 05:17, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think so, but the same was said here. At least one stop could be easily gained in that case IMO -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:26, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think this would cause more issues for the image. Unfortunately, I can't make those changes to this photo. This image stays as is. If there's no support... no worries, I'll try with another photo in the future (maybe) :D Janeklass (talk) 05:45, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:47, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment It is too dark for my eyes. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:58, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support It is a very fascinating image. The darkness is not a problem, as the object is clearly seen, and that seems more like a creative choice on this dark creature. I am thinking that maybe a square format would be better for this image... but I'm not sure. Kruusamägi (talk) 13:24, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 13:40, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry. I agree that there are dark photographs which do not tolerate an increasure of the exposure – reproductions of dark paintings, some gloomy atmospheric landcape photographs, low-key photos etc. However I fail to see why this would apply to this photo, despite of the explanations. I have played a bit with this JPEG file and can confirm that a careful increase of the brightness works very well when at the same time the light parts are dialed down a bit. If you have a raw image or a 16 bit TIFF file, this should work even better. Of course you have all right to keep your photo as you think it should be (so keep it!), but I cannot support it here. Sorry again, – Aristeas (talk) 10:25, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
As I mentioned before, this solution was intentional. I did try making changes but wasn't satisfied with the result. I can see that opinions are divided on this one - and I suppose not everyone has to like the picture. It's clear that I won't get much support for this image, but that's okay. I'm already looking forward to when this period ends and I can submit my next works 🙂 Janeklass (talk) 13:28, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support but I agree it should be brightened. if it fails, anyone could just upload a new [separate] version and nominate it. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 22:17, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 03:10, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Aristeas Poco a poco (talk) 12:10, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Петергоф, Нижний парк, Львиный каскад. Фонтанная статуя «Нимфа, льющая воду из кувшина» 2.jpg

Voting period ends on 25 Nov 2024 at 17:34:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Fountains
Info Lion Cascade, Peterhof, Saint Petersburg created by Игорь Гордеев - uploaded and nominated by -- FBilula (talk) 17:34, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- FBilula (talk) 17:34, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Анастасия Львова^ru/en 18:23, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Interesting place, good composition + light Cmao20 (talk) 01:52, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:55, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 20:15, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support —-Llez (talk) 13:32, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support —- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 23:45, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 01:31, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:39, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I like it but I think that taking the picture from the back of the scultpure is not the best idea Poco a poco (talk) 19:52, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Link-Lee House (HDR).jpg

Voting period ends on 25 Nov 2024 at 15:23:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#United_States
Info created by Euthman - uploaded by Euthman - nominated by DragonflySixtyseven. We have other images of the Link-Lee House, but this is the only one that combines high resolution, interesting angle (it would not look anywhere near as interesting seen head-on), and interesting light (File:Link-Lee House at an Angle.jpg was taken on an overcast day). -- DS (talk) 15:23, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- DS (talk) 15:23, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I agree that the angle and composition is great. I do think the shadows have been lifted too much, though, or else the HDR has gone a bit far. The tree branches particularly on the right don't IMO look natural. Cmao20 (talk) 01:51, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Ghost leaves at the right. No metadata but I would doubt this is a long exposure shot. Thus, more a problem of processing or Photoshopping in my opinion. We can see sorts of diffuse clear halos behind the trees. (Probably same impression as Cmao20, evoking "lifted shadows" / "branches don't look natural") -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:05, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not sharp enough and a bit distorted. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 23:44, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Constancy - Julius Klinger.jpg

Voting period ends on 25 Nov 2024 at 14:05:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Non-photographic_media/Printed#Posters_and_advertisements
Info created by Julius Klinger - uploaded by Balkanique - nominated by EUPBR -- EUPBR (talk) 14:05, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- EUPBR (talk) 14:05, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Анастасия Львова^ru/en 14:44, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent reproduction of an excellent example for a progressive poster of the 1920s. (This reduced style was ultra-modern then, and unlike many advertisings from the 1950s [not even to mention the terrible Nazi kitsch] it still works well.) – Aristeas (talk) 11:21, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:07, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 01:31, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:39, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 23:13, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Small stained glass window from Sainte-Chapelle (King). Paris.jpg

Voting period ends on 25 Nov 2024 at 07:55:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Single stained glass windows
Info created by Ввласенко - uploaded by Ввласенко - nominated by Ввласенко -- Ввласенко (talk) 07:55, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 11:04, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good reproduction of a beautiful exemplary stained-glass window. Now we just need to figure out which biblical or historic scene is depicted here; this should be added to the description and reflected by the categories. Can somebody help? – Aristeas (talk) 16:14, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

According to Vitraux de la Sainte-Chapelle du Palais, the stained glass windows were built on the order of Louis IX of France. Anyway, this is one of the kings of France, as shown by his sceptre. Yann (talk) 19:25, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose I am not a fan of stained glass photographed like this. The contrast and saturation has been pumped up too high so that the colours of the glass are exaggerated, and the details around the window are completely black. It doesn't look natural. I agree that many of the stained glass photos in the gallery have similar processing, but I don't think they should be FP either. This to me is an example of it being done right. Cmao20 (talk) 01:46, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Unfortunately an old image (2012) taken from an old camera (2008) with low resolution, no tripod, high ISO, and narrow DoF -- Basile Morin (talk) 08:03, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Dear Basile Morin, you have rated when, by what and under what conditions the photo was taken, but not any word about the image itself. Having read "Featured picture", I assumed that the pictures are rated here. Am I wrong? -- Ввласенко (talk) 09:41, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You're not wrong, but comments are allowed too, as part of this "rating process" -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:33, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose And I'd like to add that "low resolution", "high ISO" and "narrow depth of field" directly concern the technical aspects of "the image itself", as you request. This photo was perhaps a fair candidate in 2012, but much less in 2024. And even at that time, a tripod would have helped to increase the quality. The edges are slightly blurry, especially at the top and at the left. The crop is very tight all around. Overall, it is a standard photo of stained glass, not an exceptional one, in my opinion -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:21, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 17:02, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:03, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 13:56, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Question What is shown in this scene, who are the persons? --Uoaei1 (talk) 13:56, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As I said above, the person with the crown on the left is most probably Louis IX of France. Yann (talk) 15:53, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose The execution is fine but I cannot see why this stained glass, among thousands, should be featured. In fact it looks too simple to me. Poco a poco (talk) 18:22, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment The value of this stained glass window is determined not by its artistic intricacy, but by the time of its creation – the 13th century.-- Ввласенко (talk) 22:06, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There are more in the Category:13th-century stained-glass windows. And also from the 12th century and the 11th century -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:30, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Among all these images there is not a single one FP from Sainte-Chapelle (Paris). -- Ввласенко (talk)

File:Many colorful flowerpots in front of Bulguksa temple in Gyeongju South Korea.jpg

Voting period ends on 25 Nov 2024 at 05:15:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#South Korea
Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:15, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:15, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I love the juxtaposition of the old roof truss with its beautiful paintings in muted colours and the vivid colours of the flowers and their pots. – Aristeas (talk) 16:11, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Aristeas. Lovely photo. The different colours of the pots is the cherry on top of the cake. Cmao20 (talk) 01:44, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:54, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support —-Llez (talk) 13:27, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 17:01, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Sorry to discent. Composition, lighting or detail are not outstanding here IMHO. A well executed photo with a pretty subject but not outstanding to me. Poco a poco (talk) 18:28, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:40, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Val Montanaia.jpg

Voting period ends on 24 Nov 2024 at 08:07:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Italy (section 'Friuli-Venezia Giulia' doesn't exist yet)
Info created by Scosse - uploaded by Scosse - nominated by Civvì -- Civvì (talk) 08:07, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Civvì (talk) 08:07, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 08:09, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment There are lens flares in the sky and in the rocks (in the middle). Also a dust spot in the sky. There's no source for this resolution, that seems slightly higher than the camera sensor -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:23, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Just a nerdy note regarding the resolution: Some camera sensors deliver some more pixels than officially supported by the manufacturer. These extra pixels at the margins of the sensor are cut off by the cameras when creating a JPEG image, but they are saved into the raw image files; normally we still do not seem them because most raw converters just cut them off, too, probably because some of these extra pixels are often faulty. If one opens a raw image file from the camera used here (α7R IV) with RawTherapee, some of the extra pixels are retained and we get an image of 9,560 × 6,368 pixels. This means that all pixels in this photo (9,557 × 6,336 pixels) could indeed come straight from a simple single shot. Of course the Exif data state that the photo was developed with “Adobe Photoshop 25.9 (Windows)”, i.e. probably with Adobe Camera RAW (ACR), and ACR cuts the raw images from the α7R IV always to the nominal 9504 × 6336 pixels. But it is possible that the raw image was first developed with another raw converter (like RawTherapee) and only then edited with Photoshop … That’s the theory. Of course it seems more likely that the photographer made some kind of projection/perspective correction and streched the image slightly during that process; this would also explain the extra pixels and the image would still be authentic. – Aristeas (talk) 16:56, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Very interesting. Thank you for this information regarding this camera body -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:37, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The same applies also to other camera bodies, with a varying amount of extra pixels. Checking e.g. a CR2 file from the Canon EOS 5D IV, RawTherapee shows me 6732 × 4492 pixels – a little bit more than the official 6720 × 4480 pixels. So if one ever finds oneself in the situation that “just a few pixels” are missing at a border to complete the composition, it’s worth to give it a try and to open the raw image with RawTherapee … ;–) End of digression, sorry. – Aristeas (talk) 11:57, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support--UltimoGrimm (talk) 12:32, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Question The nomination indicates the name Scosse as uploader, but according to the file page, the uploader is Civvì. And because this last version is significantly different from the original one, with heavy processing, lifted shadows and oversaturated colors, I wonder if these modifications have been approved by the photographer. This message suggests that Scosse is not at the initiative of the FP nomination -- Basile Morin (talk) 14:13, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Basile Morin, and also wonder where the high resolution version of the image came from. If it was not uploaded by or with the consent of the original photographer then this is a copyright violation - if the photographer has chosen only to release the 6megapixel version then we don't have the right to upload a larger version that wasn't explicitly released under a Creative Commons license over the top Cmao20 (talk) 15:24, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi all, during the first candidature as QI the original version of the picture was considered too small so I asked the author if they were willing to upload a larger version of the picture, instead of uploading it they sent it me via email and I uploaded it. Maybe I should forward this email exchange to VRTS? --Civvì (talk) 15:38, 15 November 2024 (UTC) Update, I just forwarded the emails to VRTS. --Civvì (talk) 15:49, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Vote and comment struck on that basis. I will have a think about whether the lens flare bothers me too much to support. The dust spot should be fixed though. Cmao20 (talk) 16:05, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support very well --Msb (talk) 21:27, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Thanks for the clarification about the image source. The lens flares and dust spot are still a problem in my view, but more importantly, which person did manage the post-treatment here, Scosse or Civvì? Scosse could have sent the same image in larger size as requested, and Civvì handled the processing before uploading it? In any case the correct name of the uploader should be updated on this nomination -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:37, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'll ask the author to re-upload the image. --Civvì (talk) 23:12, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The author uploaded a new version with reduced flares. --Civvì (talk) 17:34, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Thanks for the notification and attempt to improve, but sorry to say the correction is not well handled in my opinion. First, the dust spot and lens flares are still there (I will add image notes to specify the exact locations), then the dark spot added to reduce the white spot in the center creates artificial shadows on the rocks. Moreover, in this last version, the contrasts have been reduced, or the clarity increased, compared to the original, it's really blueish in the background and at the top of the foreground -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:35, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 17:00, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support on reflection Cmao20 (talk) 16:13, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support +1 -- Radomianin (talk) 22:08, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support on reflection. – Aristeas (talk) 10:57, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Open wing position of Vindula erota (Fabricius, 1793) - Cruiser butterfly sucking sweat from human socks ANK6537.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Nov 2024 at 14:23:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Nymphalidae (Brush-footed Butterflies)
Info created by Ankit0908 - uploaded by Ankit0908 - nominated by Atudu -- Atudu (talk) 14:23, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Atudu (talk) 14:23, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Анастасия Львова^ru/en 14:37, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support A different take, I like it --Kritzolina (talk) 19:51, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It's a beautiful capture but the background doesn't appeal to me. I know you can see it as a fresh take on this kind of photo, but it just isn't for me. Cmao20 (talk) 19:58, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I agree with Cmao20. In this case, the cropped shoes ruin the composition in my view. Please do bring more space around if you can. Although the full resolution of the camera has been reached here, perhaps a different shot as alternative? I will be happy to review again and perhaps change my vote -- Basile Morin (talk) 23:03, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Basile Morin. -- Karelj (talk) 15:48, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Extremely sorry, actually this species gave me only 10 sec for clicking photographs. Suddenly it came and sit on my shoes and this moment I clicked only one photograph after clicking it move to land then I clicked another one and after clicking it was gone. I am using Tamron 90mm prime that why I am failed to click more wide image, I was standing for search another species suddenly it came and at that moment I was clicked photograph from where I was stand before. This species not give to me more time for clicking more images. Ankit0908 (talk) 02:57, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Understood. Thanks for the notification. Try the same smell next time, if they like it, they may visit again? :-) -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:19, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Lupe (talk) 08:05, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 16:25, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like this unusual take. Full quality on butterfly. I understand the compromise in partially cropping shoes. We still get the full context (the other shoe with visible sock inside), but the crop is tight enough that the butterfly is quite big. --Tupungato (talk) 22:44, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Agree with Basile Poco a poco (talk) 23:01, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:47, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Agree that unusual takes are very welcome; and the butterfly itself is very sharp; just the crop partially spoils the effect. – Aristeas (talk) 10:16, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:80-391-9014 Kyiv Sofia 2 RB 24.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Nov 2024 at 09:28:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Ukraine
Info created, uploaded and nominated by Rbrechko -- Rbrechko (talk) 09:28, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Rbrechko (talk) 09:28, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive church in beautiful winter scenery, good composition. The side light nicely emphasizes the shapes of the building. Large parts of the foreground are in the shadow, but IMHO this works well here because it gives a nice contrast to the bright walls and the golden domes (if everything on the photo was in the sun, it would probably look flat and boring). – Aristeas (talk) 19:48, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Aristeas. Cmao20 (talk) 19:53, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:19, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice composition and pleasant light. Possibly slightly tilted at the right, and presence of minor chromatic aberrations in the tree branches, though -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:40, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Aristeas —Bruce1ee^talk 06:55, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Nikride (talk) 08:43, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The buildings is nice and the weather a plus but those trees spoil the composition IMHO Poco a poco (talk) 11:55, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:42, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:38, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:41, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 12:40, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:02, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 18:38, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:57, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:49, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /– Aristeas (talk) 15:32, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Ukraine

Кандидати за брисање

Featured picture candidates

File:כיכר עין השמש (היובל) באשדוד, דצמבר 2023 06.jpg

Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2024 at 19:35:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Sculptures outdoors
Info created by מקף־עברי - uploaded by מקף־עברי - nominated by מקף־עברי -- מקף־עברי (talk) 19:35, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- מקף־עברי (talk) 19:35, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Family of lions during the mating season.jpg

Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2024 at 16:01:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family : Felidae (Felids)
Info Good quality, a different composition to any of the lion pictures currently in the category, and taken on safari. created by Byrdyak - uploaded by Byrdyak - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 16:01, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 16:01, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support Ain't no way was I going to pass the chance of supporting this absolutely magnificent, perfectly captured piece of art. Woah!! You have no idea how good this image is man. I don't think FP is enough! Wolverine X-eye 18:10, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Wolverine Je-str (talk) 19:57, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:British Columbia Regiment 1940.jpg

Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2024 at 16:01:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#1940-1949
Info created by Claude Dettloff, restored, uploaded, and nominated by Yann
Support Notable historical image with its own article. This was a delicate restoration. It was heavily damaged. Apparently the print was scratched with a sharp tool. All copies on the Net have the same defect. -- Yann (talk) 16:01, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Historical or not, this is an atrocious image. Wolverine X-eye 18:13, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:П'ятницька церква вночі.jpg

Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2024 at 12:18:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Ukraine
Info created by Andrew4you - uploaded by Andrew4you - nominated by George Chernilevsky -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:18, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:18, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Big tilt. Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:59, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Checked, image not tilted -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:08, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Cmao20 (talk) 16:27, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support You got the lighting spot on! Well done! Wolverine X-eye 18:15, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vesilest (Hydrachnidia).jpg

Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2024 at 07:38:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Arachnida#Others
Info created by Janeklass - uploaded by Janeklass - nominated by Janeklass -- Janeklass (talk) 07:38, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Janeklass (talk) 07:38, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:06, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 12:31, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:37, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 14:02, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive shot considering the subject you had to work with. Wolverine X-eye 18:19, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Close wing moisture sucking of Appias lalage (Doubleday, 1842) - Spot Puffin (Male) WLB.jpg

Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2024 at 04:59:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Pieridae (Whites and Sulphurs)
Info created by Anitava Roy - uploaded by Anitava Roy - nominated by Atudu -- Atudu (talk) 04:59, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Atudu (talk) 04:59, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:06, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:36, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 14:02, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment What is the blurry object in the background beneath the wing? Cmao20 (talk) 16:26, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Image:The Milky Way over Germany.png

Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2024 at 03:06:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Astronomy#Sky
Info created by Zwiebackgesicht - uploaded by Zwiebackgesicht - nominated by Zwiebackgesicht -- Zwiebackgesicht (talk) 03:06, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Zwiebackgesicht (talk) 03:06, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:06, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Why PNG? I would support a JPEG version. Yann (talk) 12:31, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:35, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I've never seen the Milky Way look anything like this. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:00, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Per Charles, the colours certainly do look very strange. I'd like to know more about how this picture was taken. Was it during an aurora, or is a special filter being used? Cmao20 (talk) 16:09, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The image was strongly edited : the milky way was brightened a lot and everything else extremely darkened with a painting brush. Also the stars are sadly out of focus (these shots always require manual focus and usually to achieve a good focus on the stars the cursor must be set just slightly before infinity because at infinity the focus is always missed, at least on Sony cameras but I don't know what camera was used for this one since the exif data are missing). As for the colors they are either a side effect of the strong edits or were painted in the image with a brush -- Giles Laurent (talk) 17:09, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Je-str (talk) 19:59, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:010 Greater flamingos male and female in the Camargue during mating season Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg

Voting period ends on 1 Dec 2024 at 22:57:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Phoenicopteridae (Flamingos)
Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:57, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:57, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent focus on the pair, appealing light and composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:40, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 06:04, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:06, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:25, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:35, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:44, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 14:02, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Basile. – Aristeas (talk) 16:06, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 16:07, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Zero complaints from me. Wolverine X-eye 18:17, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Schloss Tambach Luftbild-20240901-RM-154500.jpg

Voting period ends on 1 Dec 2024 at 22:32:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications/Germany#Bavaria
Info All by me -- Ermell (talk) 22:32, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ermell (talk) 22:32, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Subject, composition and weather -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:42, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:06, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:43, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 14:01, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Superb Cmao20 (talk) 16:03, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Basile, and excellent quality for a drone photo. – Aristeas (talk) 16:06, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jaszczurówka at Winter.jpg

Voting period ends on 1 Dec 2024 at 17:46:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Poland
Info created by Jakub T. Jankiewicz - uploaded by Jakub T. Jankiewicz - nominated by EUPBR -- EUPBR (talk) 17:46, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- EUPBR (talk) 17:46, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow. Great atmosphere Cmao20 (talk) 19:47, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 20:46, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Nice but too dark IMHO Poco a poco (talk) 22:09, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Underexposed Agree with Poco. Even an atmospheric image needs to offer a little more distinguishable content. The roof and the trees are currently too dark in my opinion -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:36, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Heavily manipulated image. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:38, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question Frank, this is a very important hint, can you elaborate a bit on the manipulation? Thank you! – Aristeas (talk) 08:25, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The overprocessing (in particular with regard to the colors) makes this look super artificial to me. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 09:45, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your assessment, Frank! It seems the photographer was after a very painterly look … – Aristeas (talk) 16:05, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I hear you. I guess it's more a matter of taste and what the image is being used for. In my opinion, for a piece of art to be hung on the wall, it would be wonderful. But in an encyclopedic context, the heavy-handed processing is just to much. At least for me. Given the artistic merit, I'd be perfectly ok with it being promoted.--Frank Schulenburg (talk) 16:37, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral I’m torn on this one: on the one hand I am conviced by Frank’s assessment, on the other hand I can’t deny the atmosphere and effect of the result. After looking at other photos of the church it seems not totally unrealistic to me, so I am inclined to regard the editing as within the creative freedom of the photographer. – Aristeas (talk) 16:05, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support The image looks natural to me (eventhough it's a bit underexposed in my opinion, hence the weak support) and I honestly think the image was not edited much from what was captured with the camera. In night photography long exposure shots like this one (6sec exposure) often lead to such colors and such light effects -- Giles Laurent (talk) 18:24, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Svörtuloft Lighthouse.jpg

Voting period ends on 1 Dec 2024 at 09:54:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Iceland#Western Region (Vesturland)
Info created by C-M - uploaded by C-M - nominated by Tupungato -- Tupungato (talk) 09:54, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tupungato (talk) 09:54, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great selfie! ;o) Yann (talk) 10:43, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Is the author near the table near the lighthouse? -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:22, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Rbrechko (talk) 15:22, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Анастасия Львова^ru/en 15:37, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --EUPBR (talk) 17:58, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:01, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 19:43, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 20:47, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:12, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Composition and viewpoint -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:22, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 05:59, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:06, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Apparently a stitched pano, should be marked and categorized as such. --A.Savin 08:17, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:28, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:41, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive landscape, impressive photo. The lighthouse is slightly leaning to the right, so maybe a tiny rotation or perspective correction would be useful. And obviously A.Savin is right that {{Panorama}}, Category:Panoramics in West-Iceland etc. should be added. – Aristeas (talk) 15:39, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:RDAF General Dynamics F-16AM Fighting Falcon E-006 Royal International Air Tattoo 2024 01.jpg

Voting period ends on 1 Dec 2024 at 10:00:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Air_transport#Military_jet_aircraft
Info created by Julian Herzog - uploaded by Julian Herzog - nominated by Tupungato -- Tupungato (talk) 10:00, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tupungato (talk) 10:00, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 11:02, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 19:42, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:47, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:12, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive view of the cockpit -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:17, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thank you for the nomination! — Julian H.^✈ 07:41, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:06, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:26, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:40, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 14:01, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Well frozen, beautiful colour contrast. – Aristeas (talk) 15:33, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Elefante africano de sabana (Loxodonta africana), parque nacional de Amboseli, Kenia, 2024-05-22, DD 07.jpg

Voting period ends on 30 Nov 2024 at 20:55:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family_:_Elephantidae_(Elephants)
Info African bush elephant (Loxodonta africana), Amboseli National Park, Kenya. It's the largest living land animal with bulls reaching an average shoulder height of 3.04–3.36 metres (10.0–11.0 ft) and a body mass of 5.2–6.9 tonnes (11,500–15,200 lb). Since 2021, it has been listed as Endangered on the IUCN Red List. It is threatened foremost by habitat destruction, and in parts of its range also by poaching for meat and ivory. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 20:55, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 20:55, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:19, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 06:56, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain Isn't the image slightly tilted to the right? I'm estimating it based on the cloud bottoms. I tried to rotate it to the left by about 1.75 degrees, and I believe it looks more correct this way. I also modified the white balance to make it look somewhat colder. I know that elephants can be quite yellowish-brownish, but in this image the plants seem to have too warm hue/white balance. I don't know what the rules and etiquette are about uploading "new versions" or variants, so I haven't uploaded it.--Tupungato (talk) 15:27, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, fair, thank you for your feedback. I made some changes, please, have a look. To your question, please, don't upload versions on your own, that makes no sense. I have the RAW file as source and if somebody requests a change later one I wouldn't have the right version, so it makes sense that I do those changes. Furthermore I consider myself skilled enough to make a tilt or change the WB. I believe that uploading an own version is appropiate if the author requests for help of if the uploader is not active on Commons. Poco a poco (talk) 16:12, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't necessarily mean uploading the version to replace your version, but to upload a reference version to better illustrate what I mean. Tupungato (talk) 17:55, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, ok, I got you, well, you can do that if it's necessary. I'm rather interested in your feedback about the new version Poco a poco (talk) 19:26, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Majestic. – Aristeas (talk) 19:19, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support It could be sharper, but it's a big impressive photo Cmao20 (talk) 19:39, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your feedback. I can apply more sharpness but personally I feel that sharpness is good Poco a poco (talk) 22:07, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Ermell (talk) 20:49, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Harsh light at 10 am but the orientation of the sun is appropriate and the view point excellent -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:46, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
~~Oppose~~ Neutral The harsh sunlight spoils it for me. Otherwise nice. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:40, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Frank, ok, I've adjusted the curves. Poco a poco (talk) 08:23, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 09:49, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per Frank. Why replaced in Wikidata that photo (better compo, almost same quality level) by this one? --A.Savin 08:07, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You alreday said not same quality level, this one has better lighting and IMHO better lighting and a more encyclopedic pose. Is this really the right frame to discuss wikidata edits? --Poco a poco (talk) 11:28, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Nice, but I think this was not fast enough to freeze all movements. There is motion blur on the ear. Yann (talk) 12:39, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I agree, the right ear has motion blur and 1/125s is too slow for a moving subject and it is much preferable to have a frozen subject than reaching ISO 100 in a situation like this in my opinion, otherwise nice composition -- Giles Laurent (talk) 17:23, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Parkaden June 2017 08.jpg

Voting period ends on 30 Nov 2024 at 18:17:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Sweden
Info The upper part of Parkaden, a multi-storey car park built 1965 built by the luxury department store Nordiska kompaniet in Stockholm. The design is a combination of one express ramp and inclined parking ramps. Architect was Hans Asplund. Hans Asplund, son of the legendary architect Gunnar Asplund, and a architect and tarchitectural theorist most know today for Parkaden and Eslöv civic centre but also said to is have coined the term neo-brutalism. Over time, Hans Asplund became increasingly critical of modernism and, in 1980, published the book Farväl till functionalism, which systematically reviewed what the author considered to be the shortcomings of modernist architecture and his father's famous manifesto acceptera.
This is one of my own favorite pictures (I have a large enlargement in my apartment). I like the lines, the shadows and the contrasts and the, perhaps for many unexpected, beauty of this rather dilapidated sixties dream. The photo was taken before the upper floor was rebuilt. Created, uploaded and nominated by -- ArildV (talk) 18:17, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ArildV (talk) 18:17, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 21:57, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support A great, interesting, abstract way to illustrate an ugly building Cmao20 (talk) 00:14, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:19, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:03, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 12:54, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:57, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:01, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Revealing beauty in ugly things is one of the great gifts of art (here: photography). – Aristeas (talk) 19:17, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:52, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. --Ratekreel (talk) 10:12, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dominiiklaste klooster.jpg

Voting period ends on 30 Nov 2024 at 14:37:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#Estonia
Info created & uploaded by Kalev Kuljus - nominated by Kruusamägi (talk) 14:37, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kruusamägi (talk) 14:37, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lots of wow Cmao20 (talk) 17:05, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great with lights and contrast.--Paracel63 (talk) 17:26, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I'm puzzled, on one side the lights are wow, but the details quality are unsharp (and sometimes blurry). --PierreSelim (talk) 17:33, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The light is undoubtedly great, but unfortunately the overall quality is too low. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 23:38, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:19, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose per PierreSelim. Clear wow factor, but low quality. I think a tripod was necessary here, in this dark room, to allow more parts in focus with a larger depth of field and also less ISO for a better quality. Incidentally the highlights could have been more carefully handled -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:12, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per above, I am not fond of the top crop either Poco a poco (talk) 12:06, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:North Island saddleback (Philesturnus rufusater) head Tiritiri Matangi.jpg

Voting period ends on 30 Nov 2024 at 14:09:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Callaeidae (New Zealand wattlebirds)
Info Translocations, which started in the 1980s, have helped secure the future of this near-threatened New Zealand endemic. No FPs of this family. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:09, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:09, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cute Cmao20 (talk) 17:05, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow. --PierreSelim (talk) 17:35, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:19, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:01, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Expressive. – Aristeas (talk) 19:16, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:39, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Green Fungi Log Singanally Coorg Nov24 A7CR 04866-90 zsp.jpg

Voting period ends on 30 Nov 2024 at 10:35:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Fungi#Family_:_Polyporaceae
Info Yellow green fungi (tentative: Trametes sp.) on log, growing around silver oak leaves. The large fungi are about 7.5 cm (3 in) across. Green colour may be due to algal growth. Focus stack of 25 images. Singnally, Somwarpet, Coorg, Karnataka, India. Created by Tagooty - uploaded by Tagooty - nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 10:35, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tagooty (talk) 10:35, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 16:20, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 23:47, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:19, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very high level of detail -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:00, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:02, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:56, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:00, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 19:15, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:11, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 05:54, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Field of Iceland poppies in the flower garden near Cheomseongdae Observatory in Gyeongju South Korea.jpg

Voting period ends on 30 Nov 2024 at 00:44:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#South Korea
Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:44, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:44, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 02:10, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I just love the pet insect you placed on the flower! Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:25, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

:-) A divine hand placed many in that field. You have to wait less than one minute to get one (or two, three...) on any flower :-) Basile Morin (talk) 10:37, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --XRay 💬 10:33, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support amazing detail for such a large expanse. --Tagooty (talk) 10:38, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The white balance seems a bit too warm for the lighting conditions, especially the greens and reds in the foreground appear to have a strong yellow cast. I'm on an unfamiliar, uncalibrated monitor, though, so that may be just my perception being off. --El Grafo (talk) 11:11, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your comment. It's the original temperature, so I would expect accurate colors in this situation, at 8:22 am, almost golden hour. Colors also look normal on my calibrated screen. I agree it's quite warm, but I tend to believe that a colder temperature would correspond to a later time of day -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:26, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's great as it is, but I reduced yellow a bit and that worked nicely. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:14, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support--Ermell (talk) 11:13, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very beautiful, and it’s impressive how you achieved constant sharpness without sacrificing too much detail to diffraction. – Aristeas (talk) 15:52, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:03, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jakubhal 20:10, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 23:46, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:19, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:01, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:54, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 15:19, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Анастасия Львова^ru/en 15:38, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:11, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Golden poppies -- Terragio67 (talk) 05:50, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:31, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Puente Helix, Marina Bay, Singapur, 2023-08-16, DD 144-146 HDR.jpg

Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2024 at 20:45:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Singapore
Info Night view of the Helix Bridge and the Marina Bay Sands Hotel, Marina Bay, Singapore. Note: I've already a featured image of this area, this one taken a different day, with different light, from a different location and with the ArtScience Museum in the compo. I opted for this nom after the discussion that took place here. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 20:45, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 20:45, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Outstanding. Very different to the other FP in composition and light. Cmao20 (talk) 00:24, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Nice but perspective should be improved. You can see pillars leaning and the reflections in the water are not vertical -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:48, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'll look into it this evening CET Poco a poco (talk) 08:22, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done, FYI Basile Morin Poco a poco (talk) 18:28, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Well done. Special architecture -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:19, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 06:57, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per Cmao20. -- Radomianin (talk) 07:35, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice and very nice place. May there are some stars, may they light spots are hot pixel. Please have a look. --XRay 💬 10:33, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Stunning scenery and photograph. (I assume you will tweak the perspective acc. to Basile’s hint.) – Aristeas (talk) 15:50, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:03, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Paracel63 (talk) 17:24, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jakubhal 20:09, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:19, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 06:55, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:01, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:52, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 05:48, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Жирафик.jpg

Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2024 at 21:04:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family : Giraffidae (Giraffes)
Info created by SanNikGar - uploaded by SanNikGar - nominated by JukoFF -- JukoFF (talk) 21:04, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- JukoFF (talk) 21:04, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Useful picture, but bad crop and weird colours Cmao20 (talk) 00:28, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Cmao20. And weird vignetting -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:45, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Artificial background... Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:33, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose colours and backlight are not well handled here. --PierreSelim (talk) 09:41, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Milky way in Elbrus.jpg

Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2024 at 21:00:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Astronomy#Sky – Milky Way over the Elbrus, Russiа
Info created by Oliwok - uploaded by Oliwok - nominated by JukoFF -- JukoFF (talk) 21:00, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- JukoFF (talk) 21:00, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Анастасия Львова^ru/en 22:34, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Quite a lot of chroma noise. I don't feel strongly either way, but I'm not sure this is the quality we'd expect. Cmao20 (talk) 00:29, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
~~{{cmt}}~~ Support I did just add some notes to identify the portion of the Milky Way visible in the star field. It is the Serpens–Aquila Rift. The two main stats are Altair in the center of the image and Alpha Ophiuchi on the right. The third one, lower on the left, is Jupiter, that in August 2021 was in the constellation Capricorn. Several star clusters are also visible. I agree with Cmao20 on the fact that there is a lot of chroma noise, but the picture has some value. --Harlock81 (talk) 11:36, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 13:37, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:25, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:00, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:50, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:00, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:10, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wiewiórka w Parku Bednarskiego w Krakowie, 20241117 0903 2741.jpg

Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2024 at 19:14:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family : Sciuridae (Squirrels)
Info Red squirrel (Sciurus vulgaris) in Bednarski Park in Kraków, Poland. Created and uploaded by Jakub Hałun, nominated by – Aristeas (talk) 19:14, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I know I know I know: Just like “all sunsets are beautiful”, all squirrels are cute ;–), we already got quite some nice squirrel FPs and we are very demanding when it comes to photos of common animals. But I can’t resist to nominate this one. The light is so beautiful, the colours are so good, the pose is so nice. Since my last move I am watching these little rascals on my walks and this is a very typical posture and behaviour. Bon appétit, dear squirrel, and congratulations to the photographer! -- Aristeas (talk) 19:14, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good choice to nominate this irresistible rascal. Sometimes they can be very tame, the picture reminds me of the Łazienki Park in Warsaw, there they get incredibly close to people for a nut. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:52, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Анастасия Львова^ru/en 22:33, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 23:56, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Aristeas. This is also a special squirrel, looking at viewer with giant eyes, ears stretched, paws on belly, its booty well buried in his mouth :-) Yum -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:34, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 11:56, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:03, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 23:46, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:25, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:05, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:59, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 12:07, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:48, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --EUPBR (talk) 17:58, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 05:45, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lichtenfels Lokschuppen Orthophoto -20231001-RM-160347.jpg

Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2024 at 16:11:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Transport#Rail tracks
Info IMO superb composition, quality, and subject. created by Ermell - uploaded by Ermell - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 16:11, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 16:11, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent idea and realization. One of my favourites from WLM 2024/Germany. – Aristeas (talk) 16:38, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I love geometric structures, clear lines and shapes in photography. Saubere Arbeit, Ermell! -- Radomianin (talk) 21:41, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 22:24, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Анастасия Львова^ru/en 22:34, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thanks for the nom.--Ermell (talk) 23:15, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Geometrical shapes and patterns of the composition, and also rusty / decaying materials at full resolution -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:25, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 06:14, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 06:58, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:22, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:03, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Striking perspective, geometry and colours.--Paracel63 (talk) 17:39, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 23:47, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:25, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:06, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:58, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 12:08, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:43, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:10, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 05:43, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Basilique du Sacré-Cœur de Montmartre - Paris - GT-01 - 2024.jpg

Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2024 at 13:43:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#France
Info Architect Paul Abadie was commissioned to design the basilica, initially (1875), in a Romanesque-Byzantine style. He died in 1884, and then other architects continued his work with the result that a structure was obtained without a predominant characteristic, and for this reason unique in the world. Since 1900 this place full of meaning has been a symbol of Montmatre in Paris. c/u/n by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 13:43, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 13:43, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 23:55, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Nice weather but the picture is not horizontal. See the two horses, not leveled. And not vertical either (see the walls leaning to the center on both sides) -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:25, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I willingly corrected the verticals because a very slight convergence was actually visible with three-point perspective. Instead, the majestic staircase with gardens that leads to the basilica, and consequently the balcony where people are looking out, is not aligned with the basilica, because they have different angles. For this reason there remains a slight perspective shape whereby the horse on the right is slightly higher than the other. By the way, thanks for your comment. Terragio67 (talk) 11:28, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the correction of the verticals. About the horizontal lines, I'm sorry to disagree, after having taken the time to listen the arguments (Aristeas's in particular) and looking at maps, I believe that such a distance of the camera associated to such a minor angle (to the right) cannot realistically justify a strong horizontal inclination. This could be calculable geometrically :-)

I think this aspect is correct. Top AND bottom -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:00, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Basile, thank you very much for your additional effort and for your edited version! My statement (below) was mostly about the obvious misalignment between the axes of the church and the balcony. You are right that this does not necessarily imply the strength of the horizontal inclination and hence of the differences of the height e.g. of the two horses or of the two minor domes. There must be some difference, and it should indeed be possible to calculate it, but this exceeds my possibilites. So it is quite possible that these differences could/should be smaller and more like in your edited version – which indeed looks very appealing. I would like to ask you to upload your edited version as a derivative file to Commons; I guess that many people would appreciate your version. Best, – Aristeas (talk) 16:14, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support I was confused by the perspective, but Terragio67’s answer has opened my eyes: the basilica and the stairs/balcony are indeed not on the same axis ([6]), so in any photo of the south façade either the basilica or the monumental stairs and balcony will look misaligned. In photos taken from further away this is less appearant, but still visible (see the category). I can’t blame the photographer for this. A brownie point for this photo: the perspective avoids the usual vast crowd of people in the foreground – there are still enough people in the photo, of course, but they appear rather few when compared to the commons shots from the stairs. – Aristeas (talk) 15:46, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thanks to Aristeas for his detective work, and to Terragio67 for this fine image. -- Radomianin (talk) 17:35, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:25, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:06, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 12:08, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:41, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --EUPBR (talk) 17:59, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:00, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:09, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:33, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Schwaigern - Massenbach - Baumgruppe am Wilhelmstaler Bach bei Sonnenuntergang (1).jpg

Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2024 at 11:15:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Germany#Baden-Württemberg
Info A small grove of trees at sunset on an evening in early December. Massenbach district, Schwaigern, Germany. All by -- Aristeas (talk) 11:15, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support As I walked past this little grove of trees again and again, I noticed that, together with the reduced forms of the surrounding landscape, it had a simple but well-formed appearance. Of course something was missing. On a December evening, the setting sun coloured the clouds and gave the grove a slightly dramatic background. I like it when simple things show their beauty. -- Aristeas (talk) 11:15, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Composition, pastels colors of the clouds, and the foreground that is like a painter's brushstroke -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:50, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per Basile. -- Radomianin (talk) 13:35, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 13:49, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:29, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:37, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:36, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 22:24, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 23:17, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Basile Morin. Cmao20 (talk) 23:52, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lovely colours --Tagooty (talk) 10:42, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 19:54, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:25, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:07, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:57, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice sky. --Rbrechko (talk) 13:17, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:09, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:33, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Braunlage - Wurmberg 01.jpg

Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2024 at 10:42:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Pinaceae
Info It's depressing: Almost all of the spruce forests in the Harz National Park have died in recent years, and over long distances only dead trees can be seen (see also [7], [8], [9], [10]); created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 10:42, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 10:42, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 22:18, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Indeed very sad Cmao20 (talk) 23:51, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Special texture -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:19, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 06:59, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 07:23, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Could wish for a bit more detail resolution on the frontmost trunks, but this does not diminish the impressive texture effect. – Aristeas (talk) 15:28, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:02, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 19:55, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 23:16, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 23:45, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:25, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:08, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:33, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 13:16, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:08, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support excellent texture considering the lacking of light. -- Terragio67 (talk) 05:41, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:34, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Camp - Notes on Fashion at the Met - Moschino (73834).jpg

Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2024 at 02:34:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects#Clothing_and_textiles
Info Moschino ensemble from the fall 2014 ready-to-wear collection, on display at the Metropolitan Museum of Art in the Camp - Notes on Fashion exhibit. all by — Rhododendrites ^talk | 02:34, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 02:34, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:14, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Eye-catching, appealing composition and subject. -- Radomianin (talk) 13:39, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:37, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:23, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 15:26, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:56, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:38, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Juvenile yellow-crowned night heron (12938).jpg

Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2024 at 02:33:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Pelecaniformes#Genus_:_Nyctanassa
Info Juvenile yellow-crowned night heron (Nyctanassa violacea). I prefer the version that shows more of the habitat, but it didn't go over well. Giving the alternative a shot. all by — Rhododendrites ^talk | 02:33, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 02:33, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:15, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:56, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Sharp, attractive environmental portrait. – Aristeas (talk) 11:22, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per Aristeas. -- Radomianin (talk) 13:42, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 13:50, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:27, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:37, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:37, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 23:19, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 23:50, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Big eye. Good quality -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:16, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 13:15, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:08, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Seßlach Rodachbrücke-20180506-RM-191000.jpg

Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2024 at 22:25:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges#Germany
Info Rodach bridge in Seßlach. All by me -- Ermell (talk) 22:25, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ermell (talk) 22:25, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 01:54, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:16, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charming bridge with history and character; good light and atmosphere. I like how the statue of Saint (John of) Nepomuk seems to contemplate the facing wayside shrine … – Aristeas (talk) 09:54, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:56, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 13:44, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 13:51, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 15:08, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:26, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:37, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Nice subject (although it's a shame that we have no details about it) but I find the right crop too abrupt spoiling the compo, sorry Poco a poco (talk) 19:41, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:08, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Western wattled-honeyeater (Foulehaio procerior) on octopus tree (Heptapleurum actinophyllum) Colo-I-Suva.jpg

Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2024 at 21:34:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Meliphagidae (Honeyeaters)
Info A bird endemic to Fiji. One other image on Commons. Found it sharing fruit with a parrot. All by Charlesjsharp-- Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:34, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:34, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support This is what Featured Pictures should be all about. Not only is the photo visually pleasing, bird is somewhat rare (not a pigeon, mallard or tit). Bonus points for interesting setting (awesome fruit) and insect in focus. This is all around awesome. I can see this picture in ~top 20 of next Picture of the Year.--Tupungato (talk) 22:10, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 01:02, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Excellent capture / story / action. I will happily support once the blue CA is removed from the branch and from the leg -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:41, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

will sort when I can. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:02, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done, thanks. Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:36, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Yes, better. Thanks -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:03, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Superb Cmao20 (talk) 01:53, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:17, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 07:26, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 09:50, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:55, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 13:52, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 15:10, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:25, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:37, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:42, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 21:55, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 13:14, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Phyllis Diller by Allan Warren.jpg

Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2024 at 16:25:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1970-1979
Info created by Allan Warren, uploaded and nominated by Yann
Support I think this matches very well with the introduction of her article: "American stand-up comedian, actress, author, musician, and visual artist, best known for her eccentric stage persona, self-deprecating humor, wild hair and clothes, and exaggerated, cackling laugh." -- Yann (talk) 16:25, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Анастасия Львова^ru/en 16:53, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:44, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support :-) Basile Morin (talk) 23:00, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Expressive portrait with wow-factor. -- Radomianin (talk) 23:08, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:17, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 09:48, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:55, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:37, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:07, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 05:31, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:020912 - Janel Manns - 3b - 2012 Summer Paralympics (01).JPG

Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2024 at 14:30:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Sports#Individual sports
Info Wheelchair tennis at the 2012 Summer Paralympics - Janel Manns. Created by Sport the Library - uploaded by Laurenrobertson1 - nominated by Zquid -- Zquid (talk) 14:30, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Zquid (talk) 14:30, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Paracel63 (talk) 14:47, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:41, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:14, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Very interesting. Unfortunately the crop is too tight at the top -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:53, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Agree with Basile and in fact the issue is making me oppose --Poco a poco (talk) 19:36, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Felipe Gomes Rio2016b.jpg

Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2024 at 13:53:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Sports#Individual sports
Info 2016 Summer Paralympics - Felipe Gomes and sighted guide at 400m T11. Created by Fernando Frazão/Agência Brasil - uploaded by Materialscientist - nominated by Zquid -- Zquid (talk) 13:53, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Zquid (talk) 13:53, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Paracel63 (talk) 14:47, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:17, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tupungato (talk) 22:21, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sport -- Striking capture, taken at the right moment -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:51, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 23:10, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 01:53, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:18, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Peulle (talk) 08:29, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 09:41, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:54, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 13:53, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:23, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:37, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:49, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 22:24, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 19:58, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:07, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:45, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Camels at Aït Benhaddou, Saharan caravan route, Marocco (آيت بن حدّو, ⴰⵢⵜ ⵃⴰⴷⴷⵓ).jpg

Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2024 at 10:09:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family_:_Camelidae_(Camelids)
Info Camels at Aït Benhaddou, Saharan caravan route, Marocco (آيت بن حدّو, ⴰⵢⵜ ⵃⴰⴷⴷⵓ). My shot. -- Mile (talk) 10:09, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mile (talk) 10:09, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 01:52, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:19, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:53, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:37, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:35, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 10:15, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Zaaddozen van een beuk (Fagus sylvatica) 13-09-2024 (d.j.b.).jpg

Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2024 at 05:39:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Fagaceae
Info Half-opened seed pods of a beech (Fagus sylvatica) Focus stack of 57 photos.}}
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:39, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:39, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:02, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:58, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--PaestumPaestum (talk) 16:18, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:41, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:16, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 23:14, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 01:51, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:20, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good, IIRC much better than some earlier attempt at focus-stacking of a beech seed pod. – Aristeas (talk) 09:38, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:53, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 13:54, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:48, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:07, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dourdou river in Trou de Bozouls (14).jpg

Voting period ends on 27 Nov 2024 at 20:36:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/France (the subsection “#Aveyron” for the department does not exist yet, will be created after promotion)
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 20:36, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 20:36, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Looks a bit chaotic at thumbnail but when viewed at full size it's really good. Cmao20 (talk) 20:44, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Full screen works convincingly. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:30, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support By others.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:44, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good perspective and light. --Mile (talk) 10:13, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 10:32, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:59, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:57, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--PaestumPaestum (talk) 16:17, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:40, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 19:06, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:21, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:52, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:48, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:16, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 13:38, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:06, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 05:35, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Zona arqueológica de Cantona, Puebla, México, 2013-10-11, DD 43.JPG

Voting period ends on 27 Nov 2024 at 15:16:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Mexico
Info IMO a dramatic composition that really gets across how spectacular this site must be. created by Poco a poco - uploaded by Poco a poco - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 15:16, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 15:16, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 15:36, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ohh, that's a while ago, nice view :) I made some improvements (alone the export with a current processing algorithm helps) Poco a poco (talk) 18:36, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:39, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 21:12, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:10, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:45, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great composition. --Yann (talk) 10:31, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:58, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 11:35, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--PaestumPaestum (talk) 16:18, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:40, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great panorama, nice juxtaposition of the building (left) and the mountain (right). – Aristeas (talk) 19:01, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:21, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:52, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 22:25, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 05:36, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Ratekreel (talk) 10:17, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ridotto Teatro Grande Brescia volta di Francesco Zugno e Francesco Battaglioli.jpg

Voting period ends on 27 Nov 2024 at 13:35:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Painted ceilings
Info all by Moroder -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 13:35, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 13:35, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 21:14, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Part of the painting is hidden at the right. We just see a bit of an arm and of a head, because the camera was not in the axis. Also black distracting shape at the right in the foreground. Problem of composition in my view, sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:54, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I'm glad you say that, this is trompe-l'œil and the painter Francesco Battaglioli did a perfect job because the ceiling is flat. The black spots on the right are floodlights I could not hide.--Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 06:09, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment ~~Good point :-)~~ Sorry, I don't read Italian (for the title) though I think the word Trompe-l'œil is missing there. Still, there is "flat" and "flat", and the camera doesn't seem in the axis. The bottom and the sides are not symmetrical. To be honest, at first sight my eyes were attracted by the distracting black shape. That part could be cropped out. The two columns at the bottom are showing the same perspective, as if the picture was taken from the right -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:33, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm terribly sorry, I was tromped, the right part is missing. Trompe-l'oeil is in the English description, the other is just the filename. By the way I was going to delete my comment. You can see it in the other fotos of the painting.--Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 06:35, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Re-updated comment Yes, after looking at this view I realized my first impression was rather right. And it seems also possible to take the picture from the center, like here. Thanks for your comment. -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:56, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And at least I was fooled a short time at thinking it was a real trompe-l'oeil :-) Is maybe worth visiting again :-) Basile Morin (talk) 23:09, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support I like it the way it is. Not every single Featured Picture has to be in the axis. This is a photo depicting a three dimensional object with details in variety of levels. I appreciate the fact that I can see the sculpted balustrade, which would be invisible or almost invisible in symmetrical axis composition encouraged by many Commons users. This perspective allows me to appreciate the painted ceiling, but also to better understand the surrounding architecture, which is a great thing taking into account Wikimedia Commons image should be encyclopedically useful. Don't get discouraged in submitting unusual perspectives for Featured Pictures. Other voters, don't be intimidated by seasoned users who discourage unusual perspectives. --Tupungato (talk) 22:30, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment @Tupungato: "don't be intimidated by seasoned users" who spread unusual perspectives through optical illusions! -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:24, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Wow, “seasoned users” – I must remember that cultivated phrase. Very useful, as nobody can say for sure whether this is a respectful description or a refined insult. Well, every FPC regular knows that Basile and me often disagree, but when Basile is called a “seasoned user” I hope I am allowed to share this designation with him. Or am I already a rotten user, having been on Commons for six years longer? Who knows … ;–) But I agree that nobody should be intimidated by any other user, of course. Please take our arguments, check them, compare them, form your own opinion based on reasons, vote. Thank you. – Aristeas (talk) 10:12, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I'm afraid I'm a "seasoned user" too: born in the first half of last century A.D. 1947, with commons for 17 years, 150 FP and 7000 QI hahaha --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 11:19, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Welcome to the club of seasoned users, Wolfgang! ;–) We should request a privileged users group with many “members only” features … – Aristeas (talk) 12:38, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can I get a membership card please? ;o) Yann (talk) 20:02, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
only if you support my FP candidate ;-) Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 07:56, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:001 Greater flamingo in flight in the Camargue Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg

Voting period ends on 27 Nov 2024 at 13:10:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family_:_Phoenicopteridae_(Flamingos)
Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:10, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:10, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:21, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support An insect photographer (talk) 17:45, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:12, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:39, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 21:15, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:13, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Fantastic angle of view, good focus and high level of detail. Striking composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:58, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:47, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:59, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Peulle (talk) 08:51, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 10:28, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Basile. Also beautiful light. – Aristeas (talk) 10:46, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:57, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:40, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:21, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:51, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 13:55, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jakubhal 19:21, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:45, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:61-224-0001 Zbarazh Castle RB 24.jpg

Voting period ends on 27 Nov 2024 at 11:51:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#Ukraine
Info created, uploaded and nominated by Rbrechko -- Rbrechko (talk) 11:51, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Rbrechko (talk) 11:51, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Certainly not the most romantic one of the many castles and manors of the Ukraine, but the longer I look at it the more I like the clear geometric construction and how the fortress hides an imposing palazzo in fortezza. One hint: On the roofs of the palace there is some blue/orange/red moiree. In Lightroom or Photoshop/ACR, paint a brush mask over it and set “Moiree removal” e.g. to +60; it may be useful to increase (with the same mask) the saturation a bit, e.g. +20, because moiree removal often decreases saturation. If this is unclear, just drop me a note. – Aristeas (talk) 19:31, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Thank you for review. I didn't notice moiree on the roofs. I fixed this and deployed new version. --Rbrechko (talk) 12:58, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  - Comment Thank you very much! Now the roofs are perfect. – Aristeas (talk) 15:44, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 10:11, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Self portrait (8618889472).jpg, featured

Voting period ends on 27 Nov 2024 at 10:25:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Styles and Techniques#Photo art
Info created by Stacey Svendsen, uploaded by Victorgrigas, nominated by Yann
Info Self portrait illustrating the mordançage technique of altering gelatin silver prints for artistic effect.
Support No FP for this technique yet. -- Yann (talk) 10:25, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very impressive result with a poetic touch. – Aristeas (talk) 11:11, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:08, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:19, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support An insect photographer (talk) 17:42, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per Aristeas. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:27, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Special for me.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:50, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:55, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:34, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:50, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 13:55, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /– Aristeas (talk) 15:30, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Photo techniques/Styles and Techniques#Photo art

File:Katsuo ji temple waterfall Osaka Japan by Don Ramey Logan.jpg, not featured

Voting period ends on 27 Nov 2024 at 06:48:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Fountains
Info created by WPPilot - uploaded by WPPilot - nominated by WPPilot -- Don (talk) 06:48, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Don (talk) 06:48, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Good composition but most of the picture is not in focus Cmao20 (talk) 15:18, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose lacks wow and oof. --SHB2000 (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The composition itself would be good, but the image is a little shaken (unstable camera), and the level of blown highlights (white areas on water) is unacceptable for a Featured Picture. But don't get discouraged, I've been a photojournalist for ~18 years, and still have problems with waterfalls :D --Tupungato (talk) 22:35, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:11, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Paesens. Dobbe, 17-09-2024. (actm.) 01.jpg, featured

Voting period ends on 27 Nov 2024 at 05:32:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Netherlands
Info Paesens. For me soothing horizontal play of lines behind the sea wall at Paesens with a view of the Wadden, a unique tidal area (UNESCO World Heritage)
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:32, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:32, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very simple but IMO satisfying Cmao20 (talk) 15:17, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I agree with Cmao20, it looks like a beautiful painting to me. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:25, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support the minimalism is what makes this photo really nice. --SHB2000 (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Radomianin and SHB2000. – Aristeas (talk) 10:42, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I have changed the gallery link from Other objects in landscapes to Natural#Netherlands because most similar photos are on the “Natural” gallery pages. Your description (“horizontal play of lines behind the sea wall at Paesens with a view of the Wadden, a unique tidal area”) confirms that this is a photo of the landscape/nature. The dobbe and the fence are objects, but they are integral parts of the landscape, so we can still put this into the “Natural” gallery. (Thanks to Cart for the confirmation!) Hope it helps, – Aristeas (talk) 11:15, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cart and Aristeas, Thank you very much for all the effort. I am happy with that.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:23, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 16:27, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:40, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:36, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:49, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 13:57, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:11, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#Netherlands

File:Inimese peatäi.jpg

Voting period ends on 25 Nov 2024 at 18:09:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods#Family : Pediculidae (Lice)
Info created by Janeklass - uploaded by Janeklass - nominated by Janeklass -- Janeklass (talk) 18:09, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Janeklass (talk) 18:09, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I modified this file a little. I didn't do anything with the lighting, but I cropped it a little and changed the aspect ratio from 2:3 to 4:5 Janeklass (talk) 17:56, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Perhaps a bit dark? Cmao20 (talk) 01:54, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Underexposed Yes, though the picture looks interesting -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:21, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's impossible to agree with the claim that this image is underexposed. This is clearly proven by the excellent visibility of every detail on the head louse's body - its tiny hairs, complex body texture, and even various color shades. The dark, almost black background is not an exposure error, but rather serves to highlight the main subject more clearly. The image's tonality is well balanced - we can clearly see details in both lighter and darker areas, confirming that the exposure is not incorrect. This lighting choice is intentional here, designed to give the image a slightly dramatic effect. If the picture were truly underexposed, we wouldn't be able to see such fine details and color tones that are now clearly visible. Janeklass (talk) 04:19, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disagree. You will see more details if the photo is better exposed. Currently the contrasts are very hard to distinguish, especially at thumbnail size.

Note that you can also see a lot of details here, although the photo is underexposed too. And that one was properly fixed.

Hard to hear that "it's impossible to agree with the claim that this image is underexposed" while the two first reviewers here both find the image too dark :-) Then above you write "This lighting choice is intentional here, designed to give the image a slightly dramatic effect" (by the way, I don't understand this dramatic intention. It's just a close-up of an animal, no special background / context). Sorry, clear light problem for me, in state -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:45, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have responded to the criticism and want the evaluators to know that the lighting choice here is clearly intentional. How you choose to evaluate it is up to you. Janeklass (talk) 04:56, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:47, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per above. Please fix the light as you did here -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:00, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The subjects are different and unfortunately the same approach cannot be applied here. Increasing the light would also amplify surface reflections and this would ruin the image completely Janeklass (talk) 05:17, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think so, but the same was said here. At least one stop could be easily gained in that case IMO -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:26, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think this would cause more issues for the image. Unfortunately, I can't make those changes to this photo. This image stays as is. If there's no support... no worries, I'll try with another photo in the future (maybe) :D Janeklass (talk) 05:45, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:47, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment It is too dark for my eyes. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:58, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support It is a very fascinating image. The darkness is not a problem, as the object is clearly seen, and that seems more like a creative choice on this dark creature. I am thinking that maybe a square format would be better for this image... but I'm not sure. Kruusamägi (talk) 13:24, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 13:40, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry. I agree that there are dark photographs which do not tolerate an increasure of the exposure – reproductions of dark paintings, some gloomy atmospheric landcape photographs, low-key photos etc. However I fail to see why this would apply to this photo, despite of the explanations. I have played a bit with this JPEG file and can confirm that a careful increase of the brightness works very well when at the same time the light parts are dialed down a bit. If you have a raw image or a 16 bit TIFF file, this should work even better. Of course you have all right to keep your photo as you think it should be (so keep it!), but I cannot support it here. Sorry again, – Aristeas (talk) 10:25, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
As I mentioned before, this solution was intentional. I did try making changes but wasn't satisfied with the result. I can see that opinions are divided on this one - and I suppose not everyone has to like the picture. It's clear that I won't get much support for this image, but that's okay. I'm already looking forward to when this period ends and I can submit my next works 🙂 Janeklass (talk) 13:28, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support but I agree it should be brightened. if it fails, anyone could just upload a new [separate] version and nominate it. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 22:17, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 03:10, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Aristeas Poco a poco (talk) 12:10, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Петергоф, Нижний парк, Львиный каскад. Фонтанная статуя «Нимфа, льющая воду из кувшина» 2.jpg

Voting period ends on 25 Nov 2024 at 17:34:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Fountains
Info Lion Cascade, Peterhof, Saint Petersburg created by Игорь Гордеев - uploaded and nominated by -- FBilula (talk) 17:34, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- FBilula (talk) 17:34, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Анастасия Львова^ru/en 18:23, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Interesting place, good composition + light Cmao20 (talk) 01:52, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:55, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 20:15, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support —-Llez (talk) 13:32, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support —- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 23:45, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 01:31, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:39, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I like it but I think that taking the picture from the back of the scultpure is not the best idea Poco a poco (talk) 19:52, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Link-Lee House (HDR).jpg

Voting period ends on 25 Nov 2024 at 15:23:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#United_States
Info created by Euthman - uploaded by Euthman - nominated by DragonflySixtyseven. We have other images of the Link-Lee House, but this is the only one that combines high resolution, interesting angle (it would not look anywhere near as interesting seen head-on), and interesting light (File:Link-Lee House at an Angle.jpg was taken on an overcast day). -- DS (talk) 15:23, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- DS (talk) 15:23, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I agree that the angle and composition is great. I do think the shadows have been lifted too much, though, or else the HDR has gone a bit far. The tree branches particularly on the right don't IMO look natural. Cmao20 (talk) 01:51, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Ghost leaves at the right. No metadata but I would doubt this is a long exposure shot. Thus, more a problem of processing or Photoshopping in my opinion. We can see sorts of diffuse clear halos behind the trees. (Probably same impression as Cmao20, evoking "lifted shadows" / "branches don't look natural") -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:05, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not sharp enough and a bit distorted. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 23:44, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Constancy - Julius Klinger.jpg

Voting period ends on 25 Nov 2024 at 14:05:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Non-photographic_media/Printed#Posters_and_advertisements
Info created by Julius Klinger - uploaded by Balkanique - nominated by EUPBR -- EUPBR (talk) 14:05, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- EUPBR (talk) 14:05, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Анастасия Львова^ru/en 14:44, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent reproduction of an excellent example for a progressive poster of the 1920s. (This reduced style was ultra-modern then, and unlike many advertisings from the 1950s [not even to mention the terrible Nazi kitsch] it still works well.) – Aristeas (talk) 11:21, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:07, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 01:31, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:39, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 23:13, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Small stained glass window from Sainte-Chapelle (King). Paris.jpg

Voting period ends on 25 Nov 2024 at 07:55:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Single stained glass windows
Info created by Ввласенко - uploaded by Ввласенко - nominated by Ввласенко -- Ввласенко (talk) 07:55, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 11:04, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good reproduction of a beautiful exemplary stained-glass window. Now we just need to figure out which biblical or historic scene is depicted here; this should be added to the description and reflected by the categories. Can somebody help? – Aristeas (talk) 16:14, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

According to Vitraux de la Sainte-Chapelle du Palais, the stained glass windows were built on the order of Louis IX of France. Anyway, this is one of the kings of France, as shown by his sceptre. Yann (talk) 19:25, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose I am not a fan of stained glass photographed like this. The contrast and saturation has been pumped up too high so that the colours of the glass are exaggerated, and the details around the window are completely black. It doesn't look natural. I agree that many of the stained glass photos in the gallery have similar processing, but I don't think they should be FP either. This to me is an example of it being done right. Cmao20 (talk) 01:46, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Unfortunately an old image (2012) taken from an old camera (2008) with low resolution, no tripod, high ISO, and narrow DoF -- Basile Morin (talk) 08:03, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Dear Basile Morin, you have rated when, by what and under what conditions the photo was taken, but not any word about the image itself. Having read "Featured picture", I assumed that the pictures are rated here. Am I wrong? -- Ввласенко (talk) 09:41, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You're not wrong, but comments are allowed too, as part of this "rating process" -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:33, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose And I'd like to add that "low resolution", "high ISO" and "narrow depth of field" directly concern the technical aspects of "the image itself", as you request. This photo was perhaps a fair candidate in 2012, but much less in 2024. And even at that time, a tripod would have helped to increase the quality. The edges are slightly blurry, especially at the top and at the left. The crop is very tight all around. Overall, it is a standard photo of stained glass, not an exceptional one, in my opinion -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:21, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 17:02, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:03, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 13:56, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Question What is shown in this scene, who are the persons? --Uoaei1 (talk) 13:56, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As I said above, the person with the crown on the left is most probably Louis IX of France. Yann (talk) 15:53, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose The execution is fine but I cannot see why this stained glass, among thousands, should be featured. In fact it looks too simple to me. Poco a poco (talk) 18:22, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment The value of this stained glass window is determined not by its artistic intricacy, but by the time of its creation – the 13th century.-- Ввласенко (talk) 22:06, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There are more in the Category:13th-century stained-glass windows. And also from the 12th century and the 11th century -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:30, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Among all these images there is not a single one FP from Sainte-Chapelle (Paris). -- Ввласенко (talk)

File:Many colorful flowerpots in front of Bulguksa temple in Gyeongju South Korea.jpg

Voting period ends on 25 Nov 2024 at 05:15:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#South Korea
Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:15, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:15, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I love the juxtaposition of the old roof truss with its beautiful paintings in muted colours and the vivid colours of the flowers and their pots. – Aristeas (talk) 16:11, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Aristeas. Lovely photo. The different colours of the pots is the cherry on top of the cake. Cmao20 (talk) 01:44, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:54, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support —-Llez (talk) 13:27, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 17:01, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Sorry to discent. Composition, lighting or detail are not outstanding here IMHO. A well executed photo with a pretty subject but not outstanding to me. Poco a poco (talk) 18:28, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:40, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Val Montanaia.jpg

Voting period ends on 24 Nov 2024 at 08:07:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Italy (section 'Friuli-Venezia Giulia' doesn't exist yet)
Info created by Scosse - uploaded by Scosse - nominated by Civvì -- Civvì (talk) 08:07, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Civvì (talk) 08:07, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 08:09, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment There are lens flares in the sky and in the rocks (in the middle). Also a dust spot in the sky. There's no source for this resolution, that seems slightly higher than the camera sensor -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:23, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Just a nerdy note regarding the resolution: Some camera sensors deliver some more pixels than officially supported by the manufacturer. These extra pixels at the margins of the sensor are cut off by the cameras when creating a JPEG image, but they are saved into the raw image files; normally we still do not seem them because most raw converters just cut them off, too, probably because some of these extra pixels are often faulty. If one opens a raw image file from the camera used here (α7R IV) with RawTherapee, some of the extra pixels are retained and we get an image of 9,560 × 6,368 pixels. This means that all pixels in this photo (9,557 × 6,336 pixels) could indeed come straight from a simple single shot. Of course the Exif data state that the photo was developed with “Adobe Photoshop 25.9 (Windows)”, i.e. probably with Adobe Camera RAW (ACR), and ACR cuts the raw images from the α7R IV always to the nominal 9504 × 6336 pixels. But it is possible that the raw image was first developed with another raw converter (like RawTherapee) and only then edited with Photoshop … That’s the theory. Of course it seems more likely that the photographer made some kind of projection/perspective correction and streched the image slightly during that process; this would also explain the extra pixels and the image would still be authentic. – Aristeas (talk) 16:56, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Very interesting. Thank you for this information regarding this camera body -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:37, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The same applies also to other camera bodies, with a varying amount of extra pixels. Checking e.g. a CR2 file from the Canon EOS 5D IV, RawTherapee shows me 6732 × 4492 pixels – a little bit more than the official 6720 × 4480 pixels. So if one ever finds oneself in the situation that “just a few pixels” are missing at a border to complete the composition, it’s worth to give it a try and to open the raw image with RawTherapee … ;–) End of digression, sorry. – Aristeas (talk) 11:57, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support--UltimoGrimm (talk) 12:32, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Question The nomination indicates the name Scosse as uploader, but according to the file page, the uploader is Civvì. And because this last version is significantly different from the original one, with heavy processing, lifted shadows and oversaturated colors, I wonder if these modifications have been approved by the photographer. This message suggests that Scosse is not at the initiative of the FP nomination -- Basile Morin (talk) 14:13, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Basile Morin, and also wonder where the high resolution version of the image came from. If it was not uploaded by or with the consent of the original photographer then this is a copyright violation - if the photographer has chosen only to release the 6megapixel version then we don't have the right to upload a larger version that wasn't explicitly released under a Creative Commons license over the top Cmao20 (talk) 15:24, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi all, during the first candidature as QI the original version of the picture was considered too small so I asked the author if they were willing to upload a larger version of the picture, instead of uploading it they sent it me via email and I uploaded it. Maybe I should forward this email exchange to VRTS? --Civvì (talk) 15:38, 15 November 2024 (UTC) Update, I just forwarded the emails to VRTS. --Civvì (talk) 15:49, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Vote and comment struck on that basis. I will have a think about whether the lens flare bothers me too much to support. The dust spot should be fixed though. Cmao20 (talk) 16:05, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support very well --Msb (talk) 21:27, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Thanks for the clarification about the image source. The lens flares and dust spot are still a problem in my view, but more importantly, which person did manage the post-treatment here, Scosse or Civvì? Scosse could have sent the same image in larger size as requested, and Civvì handled the processing before uploading it? In any case the correct name of the uploader should be updated on this nomination -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:37, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'll ask the author to re-upload the image. --Civvì (talk) 23:12, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The author uploaded a new version with reduced flares. --Civvì (talk) 17:34, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Thanks for the notification and attempt to improve, but sorry to say the correction is not well handled in my opinion. First, the dust spot and lens flares are still there (I will add image notes to specify the exact locations), then the dark spot added to reduce the white spot in the center creates artificial shadows on the rocks. Moreover, in this last version, the contrasts have been reduced, or the clarity increased, compared to the original, it's really blueish in the background and at the top of the foreground -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:35, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 17:00, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support on reflection Cmao20 (talk) 16:13, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support +1 -- Radomianin (talk) 22:08, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support on reflection. – Aristeas (talk) 10:57, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Open wing position of Vindula erota (Fabricius, 1793) - Cruiser butterfly sucking sweat from human socks ANK6537.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Nov 2024 at 14:23:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Nymphalidae (Brush-footed Butterflies)
Info created by Ankit0908 - uploaded by Ankit0908 - nominated by Atudu -- Atudu (talk) 14:23, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Atudu (talk) 14:23, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Анастасия Львова^ru/en 14:37, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support A different take, I like it --Kritzolina (talk) 19:51, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It's a beautiful capture but the background doesn't appeal to me. I know you can see it as a fresh take on this kind of photo, but it just isn't for me. Cmao20 (talk) 19:58, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I agree with Cmao20. In this case, the cropped shoes ruin the composition in my view. Please do bring more space around if you can. Although the full resolution of the camera has been reached here, perhaps a different shot as alternative? I will be happy to review again and perhaps change my vote -- Basile Morin (talk) 23:03, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Basile Morin. -- Karelj (talk) 15:48, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Extremely sorry, actually this species gave me only 10 sec for clicking photographs. Suddenly it came and sit on my shoes and this moment I clicked only one photograph after clicking it move to land then I clicked another one and after clicking it was gone. I am using Tamron 90mm prime that why I am failed to click more wide image, I was standing for search another species suddenly it came and at that moment I was clicked photograph from where I was stand before. This species not give to me more time for clicking more images. Ankit0908 (talk) 02:57, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Understood. Thanks for the notification. Try the same smell next time, if they like it, they may visit again? :-) -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:19, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Lupe (talk) 08:05, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 16:25, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like this unusual take. Full quality on butterfly. I understand the compromise in partially cropping shoes. We still get the full context (the other shoe with visible sock inside), but the crop is tight enough that the butterfly is quite big. --Tupungato (talk) 22:44, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Agree with Basile Poco a poco (talk) 23:01, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:47, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Agree that unusual takes are very welcome; and the butterfly itself is very sharp; just the crop partially spoils the effect. – Aristeas (talk) 10:16, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:80-391-9014 Kyiv Sofia 2 RB 24.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Nov 2024 at 09:28:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Ukraine
Info created, uploaded and nominated by Rbrechko -- Rbrechko (talk) 09:28, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Rbrechko (talk) 09:28, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive church in beautiful winter scenery, good composition. The side light nicely emphasizes the shapes of the building. Large parts of the foreground are in the shadow, but IMHO this works well here because it gives a nice contrast to the bright walls and the golden domes (if everything on the photo was in the sun, it would probably look flat and boring). – Aristeas (talk) 19:48, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Aristeas. Cmao20 (talk) 19:53, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:19, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice composition and pleasant light. Possibly slightly tilted at the right, and presence of minor chromatic aberrations in the tree branches, though -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:40, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Aristeas —Bruce1ee^talk 06:55, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Nikride (talk) 08:43, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The buildings is nice and the weather a plus but those trees spoil the composition IMHO Poco a poco (talk) 11:55, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:42, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:38, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:41, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 12:40, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:02, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 18:38, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:57, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:49, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /– Aristeas (talk) 15:32, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Ukraine

Commons:Кандидати за изабране слике

Формалности

Номинација

Политика за кандидате за изабране слике

Кандидати за уклањање статуса изабране слике

Кандидати за изабране слике

Featured picture candidates

File:Self portrait (8618889472).jpg, featured

File:Katsuo ji temple waterfall Osaka Japan by Don Ramey Logan.jpg, not featured

File:Paesens. Dobbe, 17-09-2024. (actm.) 01.jpg, featured

File:80-391-9014 Kyiv Sofia 2 RB 24.jpg, featured

Кандидати за брисање

Featured picture candidates

File:Self portrait (8618889472).jpg, featured

File:Katsuo ji temple waterfall Osaka Japan by Don Ramey Logan.jpg, not featured

File:Paesens. Dobbe, 17-09-2024. (actm.) 01.jpg, featured

File:80-391-9014 Kyiv Sofia 2 RB 24.jpg, featured

Navigation menu

Search