2006

Image Tagging Image:Affine-vs-cartesian.png

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Affine-vs-cartesian.png. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{Cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. EugeneZelenko 19:43, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I am definite that on the moment of uploading the file (actually i had to upload it several times, because of minor corrections), I stated that it is "own work", provided under "GFDL content created by the uploader" and I chose this same license from the drop-down menu. The file was created by me for the needs of the article on Coordinates in the Bulgarian wikipedia here, as were several other images: Spherical-coordinates.png, Spherical-coordinates-1.png. I believe that with the correction just made and the present explanations, the image will not be removed from the commons database. --Spiritia 20:25, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just click edit on image description and replace no license tag with license of your choice. --EugeneZelenko 20:35, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Done, thank you :) Regards, Spiritia 11:11, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Spherical-coordinates.png

Please note that SVG is better format for such images.

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Spiritia!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

EugeneZelenko 19:52, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As far as the change of the file format, okay, I will have it in mind. But, can you please explain me what makes this beneficial difference? Thank you. --Spiritia 20:25, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

SVG could be easily scaled (it's vector format). It's more to translate vector images then bitmaps on other languages too. --EugeneZelenko 20:37, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

2007

Image:Cebocap.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Cebocap.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

--Jesse Viviano 16:48, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Начална страница

Посмотри, пожалуйста, начальную страницу на болгарском. Я её обновил, но там надо перевести текст про избранные статьи, ссылки на категории и просто посмотреть, не наделал ли я ошибок. =) Спасибо. ~ putnik 13:37, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Увижу позже :) --Spiritia 14:33, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Спасибо. =) Ещё скажи, пожалуйста, как перевести эти фразы:

Play media file	Пусни файла
Download	Сваляне (если существ.) или Свали (если глагол)
File info	Информация за файла
Problems playing the file?	Проблеми с файла?
~ putnik 18:55, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]	--Spiritia 19:29, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ещё раз спасибо. Всё заменил. ~ putnik 19:51, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Я очень рада чтоб могла помочь :) --Spiritia 20:05, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re User:Laino

It seems this user is either confused or or deliberately giving wrong information on his uploads. Several images has been identified (and deleted) as images from commons reuploaded with Bulgarian names and tagged as the users own work. I'm not sure if this user understands English, so your help in communicating to him/her with translating the messages left by Herby on user talk:Laino would be appreciated. There's also Image:Паметници в Древен Египет.jpg which seems an obvious copyvio, if you could do a google search with the relevant Bulgarian keywords it would probably be possible to identify the source. Finn Rindahl 11:23, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Finn, sorry for not having answered earlier, I was outside of Bulgaria for a week.

I saw a new suspicious "contribution" of User:Laino : Image:Египетски ръкопис.jpg (filename reading "Egyptian script"). My closest finding so far is this - not exactly the same image but very similar. I think that the uploaded picture can hardly be an "own work", maybe PD-old at its best, but the source is still missing.

I also tried to discover the origin of Image:Паметници в Древен Египет.jpg (meaning "Monuments of the Ancient Egypt"). I made searches in Bulgarian, when i realized that... although the user is apparently Bulgarian, and the filename is in Bulgarian, the inscriptions on the picture themselves are in Russian! True, "Egypt" is written in the same way "Египет" in both languages, but in Bulgarian the depicted Red Sea is written "Червено море", while in Russian it is exactly "Красное море" and the Eastern Desert only in Russian is named "Аравийская пустыня" (in Bulgarian: "Арабска пустиня"). And it is generally illogical to create your own picture for local use and filenamed in your native language while using inscriptions in another language... If I were you, I wouldn't need more proofs that the image is blatant copyvio :-)

I've been a copyright watchdog on BG WP for about an year, and even written down my personal experience to help other users deal with copyvio issues. Feel free to contact me whenever there are problems with BG users or their uploads, in some of the cases it is only a matter of novice inexperience. Since our community is not so big and I often know the users from their local behaviour, I often manage to fix the innocent problems before they come to a Commons administrator. :-) Another highly reliable user (copyright watchdog and administrator) from Bulgaria, whom you can contact in case of copyvio issues, is User:Daggerstab. He was who discovered that Laino's new upload Image:Белград.jpg is copyvio and found the source. --Spiritia 16:20, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Coa_buryatia.gif

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Coa_buryatia.gif. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Siebrand 09:28, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Coa_buryatia-1.gif

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Coa_buryatia-1.gif. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Siebrand 09:28, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:LocationSouth Korea.png

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which information may be missing. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Fil nik 14:12, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, done. --Spiritia 16:51, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

2008

Image:Human-sperm.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Human-sperm.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Phrood 22:44, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Египетски_ръкопис.jpg

Hi Spriritia, long time....

I've been more or less inactive on this and other wikimediaprojects since october last year, and I didn't notice your response and comment about user:Laino until I just now saw it in your talk archive. I've tagged the image you mentioned there {{No source}}. Regards, Finn Rindahl 12:06, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image Image:Skogskyrkogarden-night-2007-11-03.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Skogskyrkogarden-night-2007-11-03.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Congratulations, Dear Administrator!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ العربية ∙ +/−

Spiritia, congratulations! You now have the rights of administrator on Commons. Please take a moment to read the Commons:Administrators page and watchlist related pages (in particular Commons:Administrators' noticeboard and Commons:Deletion requests), before launching yourself into page deletions, page protections, account blockings or modifications of protected pages. The majority of the actions of administrators can be reversed by the other admins, except for history merges which must thus be treated with particular care.

Please feel free to join us on IRC: #wikimedia-commons @ irc.freenode.net. You may find Commons:Guide to adminship to be useful reading.

Please also check or add your entry to the List of administrators and the related lists by language and date it references....
EugeneZelenko 14:46, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Eugene, for the yummy cake, to you and all the people who supported me in the voting. :-) --Spiritia 16:49, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats&Welcome as sysop! Finn Rindahl 17:26, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations! and well done. ;-) FloNight ♥♥♥ 23:38, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Spiritia,

I never got around to congratulate you for passing your RfA. Thank you for accepting the challenge of permanent adminship on Commons, I see that you are putting it to good use. Keep up the good work, cheers, Patrícia ^msg 10:19, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, dear! :-) I really try to do my best to help the project. Only in the recent several days, after I read most of the guidelines, I got the courage to close some deletion requests. I still have some technical concerns related to archiving these, so any advise from a more experienced admin is more than welcome. :-) Spiritia 10:30, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the only thing I can think of right now is... please add yourself to Category:Commons administrators, either manually or by adding {{User admin}} somewhere :). I don't know if anyone uses that category, but hey, it's there to be used ;). If you do any mistake, you'll be punished... Just kidding, don't worry, we usually go around being mellow and give friendly advices and fix stuff that is broken, without much whining, hehe. Cheers, Patrícia ^msg 18:10, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CC-BY-SA-2.0 vs CC-BY-SA-2.5

Hi,
What's the difference between CC-BY-SA-2.0 and CC-BY-SA-2.5? Aren't those cumulative? Thanks! --Chech Explorer 12:22, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I just changed with respect to what the source (original author) say. I dont really know all the differences between the version, but Sharing alike means sharing under the very same license as the original. I think that such an upgrade might be permissible for CC-BY (only BY, no SA) but even then I'd prefer to play safe and license with respect to the author's will. Have in mind that Прон does not understand licenses so transfering his uploads requires extra care. :-) →Spiritia 12:36, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted photo

Hi, Spiritia! You deleted the photo of Erich Arendt (Erich_Arendt.jpg) from the Bulgarian article http://bg.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%95%D1%80%D0%B8%D1%85_%D0%90%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B4. Erich Arendt died in 1984 but the photo was made ca. 1938 - i.e. 70 years ago. Copyright owner is not the photographed object but the photographer, who is unknown. What was the reason for you to delete the photo? Please answer here. Thanks!--Darldarl 19:31, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thanks for your question, here is my argumentation. The deleted image is copy of this one: http://www.rimbaud.de/ericharendt.jpg (linked from here). Arendt was born in 1903. Do you imply that he looked in this way on the age of 35? Excuse me, but I doubt, he looks a way older. Second, in the description you only provided date 15 May 2007, which obviously is not the date of creation. The source itself does not provide information of neither this date, nor the photographer, so if we don't know who the photographer was, how can we imply he's already dead for at least 70 years? Because, you know, 70 years start to count down since the date of author's death, and not the date of creation of an image.

In a word, uploading images of alive or recently deceased people from sources that do not provide information about copyright status and authorship, is a risky business and I would not advise you to do this on Commons. However, on Bulgarian Wikipedia fair use is not tolerated any more. Cheers! →Spiritia 20:34, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! You're right!--Darldarl 08:40, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Advice needed

Hi, what do you think about these? Most should have their borders cropped off and I've already processed quite a lot, but I am not sure whether they are appropriate for Commons at all, especially with that "For Reference Use Only" water mark right in the center. What do you think? Should I go on cropping or some special measures should be undertaken? Checked for usage - these images are being used only on a subpage of the uploader. --Chech Explorer 07:36, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think that such images - although discouraged - are not due to deletion because of the watermark running over them. Yeah, their usage is hindered in one way or another but they are freely licensed, hence improveable. If you wish you may continue cropping them or leave it to the next editor who may take care of the watermarks, as well. :-) →Spiritia 12:01, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bulgarian politics

Hi! Why did you delete photos of Bulgarian politics? They were uploaded in accordance with bulgarian law. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Davi (talk • contribs) 12:24, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but they weren't. Please, take your time to first have a look at my copyvio investigation of this case: User:Spiritia/Investigations#Pictures from www.parliament.bg. →Spiritia 12:27, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

New BG interface

Very nice, but what about images with description generated by the Move-to-commons assistant? I paste the info in the additional info box and then I have a problem - I must have filled the boxes about the author, source and description. It is not very nice when you move images from Wikipedia to Commons. Is there any work-around?

PS You can delete Image:Exoplanets.jpg, Image:STS2.jpg and Image:STS полети.jpg. They are outdated and not needed anymore. Thanks. --Chech Explorer 10:17, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

PS2 And check this bot upload issue. --Chech Explorer 10:25, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Lom-central-square.jpg can be edited with correct cyrillic texts. As far as I know the Bot's programmer is aware of the bug. We have to reconcile with the situation, until it get fixed.

The way out is in your local Commons settings. Click Special:Preferences >> Gadgets >> Improved navigation >> Use the old-style upload form layout. This will help you use Move-to-commons assistant for cyrillic texts, without the need to pass through the File Uploader Bot that bugs them.

I will delete these images mentioned. For future candidates for speedy deletion, you may choose to use template:Speedydelete. →Spiritia 10:45, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

PS. Yeah, I will have to find several spare hours to translate the system messages... in the last week SUL consultations consumed a big part of my wikimedian time. :) →Spiritia 10:50, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Some help

Congratulations! You were chosen to get some help from Chech Explorer (talk · contribs). Your help is here. Check out the following thread as well. Feel free to edit, delete, corrupt or do whatever you want with it. Best regards --Chech Explorer 18:31, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

freedomdefined.org

Hi Spiritia, could you please confirm here (just for the sake of formality) that you are the same as [1]. I obviously can't check the Bulgarian translation myself, but if I know you've done it and that you trust the user who has proofread it I'll move it to reviewed versions there. Regards Finn Rindahl (talk) 23:20, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Finn, yes, I am freedomdefined:User:Spiritia :-) Thank you for considering my request there. Warm regards, →Spiritia 09:54, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I've added the Bulgarian version as "reviewed" there. All the best, Finn Rindahl (talk) 10:25, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Problem with one transclusion

Hi Spiritia, it's ok to add subst: everywhere. I don't know a better solution than this, for the moment. cheers, pfctdayelise (说什么?) 13:17, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Screenshot-of-Mozilla-Firefox-3.png

Здравей Spiritia,

Качих този скрийн и се чудя дали всички лицензи съм сложил правилно. Можеш ли да посъветваш?

Поздрави,

Alex.angelov (talk) 15:11, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Здравей, Алекс, мисля че беше добре, но намерих и някакъв комбиниран шаблон и реших да сложа него. Между другото, аз бих посъветвала друго: да повториш кадъра, но като излезеш от сметката си. Мисля, че не персонализиран ще е по-добър. Поздрави, →Spiritia 20:23, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Смених скрийншот-а. Вече се вижда и Awesome Bar. Alex Angelov (talk) 18:47, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Добре, ще направя нов при първа възможност. Имам още един въпрос: качих тази снимка, но не мога да се оправя с геотага, линкът се получава към друга страница. Alex.angelov (talk) 19:42, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Боя се, че на разбирам от geocoding шаблони... но ти препоръчвам да се посъветваш с Lupo. Аз само махнах разни излишни категории от картинката... →Spiritia 20:51, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Burgas-art-gallery-2.jpg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Sz-iwbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Sz-iwbot (talk)) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Sz-iwbot (talk) 07:14, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done →Spiritia 07:31, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Paris images

Thank you for uploading these images! I think they're great. I'm not living in Paris though, so I'll only be able to identify photos from better known locations. But even so it's a great set. Perhaps once a certain number has been pinpointed, the remaining ones can be found too. With the geolocations, it would be possible to kind of retrace your parents' steps! Imagine that! I think it's fascinating. You wouldn't have the dates the images were taken, so that they could be arranged in a chronological sequence? Lupo 07:31, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am afraid I only know the period April-June. My grandfather who took the pictures is late for more than 20 years. Cheers, →Spiritia 09:17, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the photos. I have transmitted your request to wp:fr : w:fr:Wikipédia:Le Bistro/25 juin 2008#Photos de Paris en 1981. --CHristoPHE 08:29, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Superb! Thank you very much, CHristoPHE! →Spiritia 09:17, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Church of Saint Paul and Saint Louis. Almost the same point of view. Funny. --CHristoPHE 09:44, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

*Nods*, not all the same buildings look the same, but these are 26 years after all... Thanks for sharing this :-) →Spiritia 10:00, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Great stuff Spiritia ! I have tagged a few, I'll try to go on. Would you know where your grandparents stayed in Paris ? Octave.H (talk) 12:50, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much, Octave, for the nice words and your work. Sadly, only several of the almost 200 photos have descriptions on the back. I only know that these pictures Image:Paris-in-1981-096.jpg, Image:Paris-in-1981-024.jpg and the alikes, were taken from the balcony/window of the room they lived in, but I have absolutely no clues if they have ever taken picture of the building itself and, if yes, which one is it. Are you able to figure it out? →Spiritia 13:06, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Octave.H has identified the building shown, and thus with two images we can pinpoint the location where these photos were taken: about here. It's quite possible that the building already existed in 1981 (after all, the underground parking entrance or whatever it is also existed back then), but I have no idea what that building is or was. Lupo 13:30, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent clues ! It's the Cité Internationale des Arts, in the 4th arrondissement, facing the Seine (I live not far away). You'll know everything about it there : [2] (in fact, not much !). I have tagged pictures taken in the area with 4ème arrondissement. I'll try to figure more about it. Octave.H (talk) 13:33, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed they once lived there. Check their list of former residents in Excel format! Stupefying! Lupo 13:50, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am not less amazed :-) True, he was a graphic artist and based on his impressions of Paris he drew a series of aquarelles. My grandma told me that he was so keen on taking these photos of buildings and places, not only to have the memories with him once they return to Bulgaria, but also to show some fine architecture to Bulgarian architects (who in the times of communism didnt really bother of the aesthetic appeal of the buildings... actually they didnt bother about the functional side of it all, but this is another story :-) ). What interesting discoveries really... →Spiritia 14:03, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This was the last, Image:Paris-in-1981-160.jpg. :-) →Spiritia 15:48, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your parents have been to Créteil, too. Thierry Caro (talk) 16:46, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ouch, sorry for the inconvenience, I've never been to Paris and I really didn't know... Shall I upload these images from Creteil under new names or the current ones can be tolerated? →Spiritia 17:23, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, as you know, I uploaded images of places which I didnt recognize by myself. I am not going to play drama queen on any of these. Feel free to delete anything illegal but please do not forget to avoid the copyright paranoia whenever you can (most of those "possibly affected" images are just normal buildings, nothing really artistic about them). :-) My personal opinion is that imposing restrictions on the basis of so-called "freedom" of panorama is a huge legislative misunderstanding, but this is an off-wiki problem, nothing I can about it. →Spiritia 10:35, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Whatever. I've opened Commons:Deletion requests/No FOP in France for most of these. We'll see what people think. Lupo 11:51, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thank you. →Spiritia 11:59, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Category redirects

Hey Spiri, it's me again, this time on Commons! :P Is it ok that I did this and created Category:Economy of the Republic of Macedonia? Or is it better to delete the first one?

Another thing, I uploaded Image:Macedonian yufki.JPG (my first self made) and I intend to start contributing to Commons with original photography (I'm buying a camera tomorrow). BTW, why the heck is the .JPG in uppercase? Arghh.. You must know, you know everything. :P --INkubusse (talk) 00:46, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hehe, I wish you were right and I really knew everything... :-) Well, yeah, the category redirect is just fine, the rule on Commons is to keep the (sensible) category duplicates as redirects, the practice on other wikis (like BG WP) is to delete them; just a matter of adopted convention and capacity to handle these properly.

Good news that you've come to contribute in the Commons. Btw, we also have yufka in BG and it doesnt look much different than yours, I hope you wouldnt object if I add the Category:Food of Bulgaria, it's relevant.

About the upper/lower case: uppercase extensions may come in result of using some Microsoft product like MS Paint or MS Office Picture Manager, in case that you save an image typing only its filename, i.e. leaving the application to automatically add the extension. But if you bother to manually type the extension in small case, it will keep it as you wish. Furthermore, when uploading a file on Commons or any other wiki, you are able to discern between Source filename (as appears on your computer) and Destination filename (as will appear on the wiki) and change the latest if necessary. The general advise is to use lowercase for filename extentions (and the software is case sensitive) but it's allowable to upload your files using uppercase as well. Good news is that if you attempt uploading the file Abc.def in the presence of an already existing file Abc.DEF (or vice versa...), you'll get a warning.

Congrats for the camera, wish you to make a good choice of cam and make brilliant shots for Wikipedia :-)))) →Spiritia 05:59, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ye, I know about Destination filename, the original filename was DSC000xxx (I'm not that dumb haha.. I am, but not that :D). I always edit the extension, but there were times (on mk.wiki) when it just said the filename was changed to xxx.JPG even though there was no image with a similar filename, whatsoever. Bleh, I guess I'm just missing something... Anyway, thanks for the wishes. :-) --INkubusse (talk) 14:08, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image talk:Paris-in-1981-093.jpg

Please take a look. I believe this image needs to be mirrored. I've also asked Octave.H about it; if he or she agrees, may I upload the mirrored version over the original? Lupo 09:38, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for bringing my attention to this talk page. And yes, if you guys are definite that the image has been incorrectly mirrored, feel free to upload over the original, storing misleading photos is a nonsense. :-) →Spiritia 10:28, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No. No mirroring. This is not Saint-Germain-l'Auxerrois church but Saint-Germain-l'Auxerrois church tower and the Mairie du 1er arrondissement. The church and the mairie look very much like each other. The church is on the right hand side and can hardly be seen. Have a look there Église Saint-Germain-l'Auxerrois de Paris. Octave.H (talk) 08:53, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, me and Lupo reached same conclusion after we took a look over several other pictures from different angles. Thank you! →Spiritia 08:57, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Images from en.wikipedia to Commons

I have replied at Image talk:Class 303 at Wemyss Bay (April 1984).jpg and also sorted out merge accounts. --Stewart^(talk) 20:56, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Upload problem

Hello,
I made this map on my computer and it worked well : Image:Latrun area 1948.svg.
But when I visualize this here in commons, all the names are in black boxes (???)
Could you please delete this ? Thank you ! Ceedjee (talk) 19:09, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Ceedjee, I also had the same problem with the file. It is deleted now. Cheers, →Spiritia 19:17, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your help !

I have uploaded 6 new images and again, once is not good...

Image:Opération Ben Nun.svg

Could you take care of this one (again).

Not to disturb you at each time, could you tell me where can I ask such request on commons ?

Thank you !

Ceedjee (talk) 15:20, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, don't worry, you're welcome. Fastest way in such cases is to tag the image with template {{speedydelete|Reason}} (press edit button of the image description page and then place the template, adding the reason). Other deletion procedures and templates are listed on Commons:Deletion guidelines. For questions and further assistance with image editing problems you may use Commons:Village pump or Commons:Help desk. Hope this helps. :-) →Spiritia 15:49, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Изтрита картинка

Здравейте, забелязах че сте ми изтрили картинката към статията за Castlevania, във всеки случай става въпрос за скрийншот от игра и не съм сигурен че е проблем за някого, във всеки случай искам да ви попитам има ли някаква възможност да прикача изображение към статията-на други езици към нея присъстват скрийншотове но когато се опитвам да ги прикача не ми позволява - да не би да иска само картинки качени на българския Common? Ами ако направя сам скрийншот, може ли да го кача и какъв лиценз трябва да посоча при евентуалното му качване? Благодаря за вниманието-нов съм тук :)--Valdes07 (talk) 19:08, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Здравей, междувременно пък съм ти писала в беседата в Уикипедия. Ще ти отговоря и тук. Имай предвид, че положението с картинките е доста строго, свикни отрано с мисълта, че могат да се качват сравнително малко неща, под сравнително неочевидни на пръв поглед условия. :-) Важно е да се обясни, че всяка езикова версия на Уикипедия решава сама за себе си какво да прави с така нареченото fair-use съдържание, което е несвободно и законно може да се ползва само за образователни и некомерсиални цели. Поради това такова съдържание се качва само локално, не и в Общомедия и то при изпълнение на цял ред ограничителни условия. По решение на общността на Българската Уикипедия обаче такова несвободно съдържание не се толерира след април 2008 г. и когато се качва бива изтривано. Впрочем, очакваме скоро разработчиците на сайта да спрат напълно възможността за локално качване, даже бих казала, че отдавна трябваше да го направят, но се размотават... :-( Поради това, ако в други уикипедии виждаш несвободни картинки, свикни с мисълта, че ще го виждаш само там. Все пак Уикипедия не е картинната енциклопедия, а свободната енциклопедия. :-)

Екранните кадри общо взето винаги са със запазени права, както и кориците на книги, обложките на музикални носители, филмовите плакати, пощенските марки и емблемите. Всички тези картинки ще продължаваш да ги виждаш в английската уикипедия, например, но постепенно подлежат на изчистване от нашата. И други измежду най-големите уикипедии са забранили несвободното съдържание - немската, испанската, португалската, норвежката, в голяма степен френската. Така че това не е прецедент, нито повод за разочарования. Съветвам те - качвай само изображения, които си правил лично ти или за които можеш да представиш доказателство, че оригиналните им автори са пожелали творбите им да се разпространяват под свободен лиценз. В този смисъл, за лични се броят лично направени оттеб снимки или чертежи, но само натискането на PrintScreen докато тече някоя игра, която е дело на хора, които не желаят труда им да се разпространява свободно, не те прави автор на изображението.

Сега две думи и за тази "свобода", за която става дума. Какво се разбира под свободно съдържание? За да бъде един лиценз свободен, той трябва да гарантира следните четири свободи, традиционно ограничавани от законите за авторското право:

свободата да се ползва произведението за всякакви цели, включително и комерсиални,
свободата да се изучава произведението и да се прилагат знанията, придобити от него,
свободата да се правят и разпространяват копия на произведението, изцяло или в някаква негова част,
свободата да се правят промени над произведението и така получените производни работи да се разпространяват.

Проблемите са свързани с това, че много хора не желаят други да внасят промени в творбите им, както и да ги ползват за комерсиални цели, т.е. теоретично да печелят от труда им, без самите те да имат право на заплащане (като процент или фиксиран хонорар). Казвайки това, съм убедена, че много от хората и източниците на картинки в интернет, които слагат надписи "All rights reserved" самите те крадат поголовно чужди материали, без да си признават, или признавайки с половин уста, както и че много материали спокойно могат да съществуват под свободен лиценз, без това да накърни нечии интереси. Но ако някъде съществува някаква несправедливост и тя е под закрилата на закона (а законите за авторското право закрилят много несправедливости!), ние все пак трябва да се съобразим с тези закони и да не ги нарушаваме съзнателно. Горе-долу това е положението с картинките. Ще ти оставя и тук препратка към freedomdefined:Definition/Bg - струва си да се прочете. Поздрави, →Spiritia 19:43, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Own subpage outside user space

A retort to your last quolibets has been given on my talk. But a different topic has emerged while I was observing your edits on Commons: why have you created on the one hand Потребител:Spiritia/Бързи връзки, and on the other User:Spiritia/monobook.js? On the second page there is link on the left superior corner with link to User:Spiritia and on the first there is none and I am afraid that the mainspace has been tresspassed. Regardless of the language /applies empirically for bg, en, de, fr, ja/ in my preferences, a link to your user page emerges only in the second case, thereby is every reader of Потребител:Spiritia/Бързи връзки with no knowledge of the Bulgarian language deprived of the possibility to conclude that it pertains to User:Spiritia. Would you thence consider moving Потребител:Spiritia/Бързи връзки to User:Spiritia/Бързи връзки? Bogorm (talk) 12:33, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for notifying me, I really forgot about the namespace differences... but no, I am not going to make any moves right now. Some javascripts need to be rewritten first. But hey, keep watching my edits, I like it :-) →Spiritia 13:11, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done Okay, bug is fixed, old page is moved and deleted. Thanks again. →Spiritia 13:29, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Изтрити емблеми

Здравей, искам да попитам защо си изтрила всички емблеми на българските футболни отбори в страниците им на английски/с изключение на Левски и ЦСКА/. Тоест, по-скоро не си изтрила файловете, а само си ги премахнала от визитките в дясно. По горе на друг потребител казваш, че ще продължи да вижда емблеми в английската версия. Надявам се да ми обясниш. И още нещо – ти ли си ми изтрила профила? Аз бях потребител Jordanson!

Здравей. Да почна отзад напред.

Профили (аз го разбирам в смисъл на регистрирани сметки) не могат да се трият, а най-многото да се местят. От това, което виждам в дневника на регистрациите, сметка на името User:Jordanson изобщо не е била разкривана тук. От търсачката на глобалните регистрации във всеки сродни уикита, при търсене за Jordanson излиза, че има само две регистрации - в българската и в английската уикипедия. Ако двете сметки са твои, съветвам те да извършиш обединение, най-сетне това е вече възможно от около два месеца, и тогава ще можеш да влизаш навсякъде под едно име. Повече информация за единната потребителска сметка има тук: bg:Уикипедия:Единна потребителска сметка, а самото обединение може да се извърши от уикито с повечето приноси, в случая английското, като последваш възката en:Special:MergeAccount. Ако имаш нужда от още инфомация, можеш спокойно да ме попиташ, на доста хора вече съм помогнала да се справят с проблемите съпътстващи обединението на сметките. :-)
Сега по въпроса за логата. Днес изтрих около 20 футболни лога, качени под неверен лиценз (GFDL-self) и под името Gospodin. Какво означава това преведено на достъпен език за всеки, който не разбира (и не е длъжен да разбира) от авторски права? С избора на този лиценз, един човек, потребител Frogcho, изказва твърдението, че той е автор на логата на всички тези 20 отбора, че той е носител на авторските права над тях и че желае да ги отдаде под свободния лиценз GFDL. Това разбира се е дълбоко невярно. :-) Дори и някой да прерисува сам дадено лого, дори и да е много близко до оригинала или даже да е неразличимо същата, това не го прави автор и носител на никакви права. Автор и носител на правата е само онзи художник, който е измислил логото и го е отдал (продал, подарил, ... ) за ползване от съответната организация. Без нейно изрично съгласие изображението на логото й не може да се появи под свободен лиценз, а тук в този сайт, Общомедия (Wikimedia Commons) се качват само неща, които са еднакво свободни навсякъде, във всяка регионална версия на Уикипедия. Лога, както и други категории изображения: корици на книги, обложки на музикални носители, валута и прочее, обаче като цяло са несвободно съдържание, използвано "по милост" в някои уикипедии под някои много строги условия. И тук следва обяснението, защо в английската уикипедия може, а в българската не може да има такива изображения. В английската уикипедия имат разписана подробна политика за употребата на несвободното съдържание, докато в българската уикипедия нямахме ресурс от компетентни желаещи да разпишат такава политика, а и немалка част от хората, изразили мнението си в обсъждания и гласуването, са поддържници на напълно свободното съдържание. Други уикипедии също са решавали по различен начин въпроса с несвободното съдържание. Това има отношение към качванията, понеже качванията на несвободно съдържание остават технически възможни и трябва да стават само локално в енциклопедиите, докато тук в Общомедия остава място само за свободно съдържание. Не пречи обаче да се свържеш с пресслужбата на някой сайт и да потърсиш възможност за отдаване под свободен лиценз, както е описано в bg:Уикипедия:Разрешения за ползване на материали. Ако обаче нямаш опит с въпросите за авторски права, по-скоро те съветвам да не предприемаш това, понеже е наистина нещо специфично. Можеш да се свържеш с bg:User:Scroch, с молба за съдействие, той има вече опит и познания. И той е взимал разрешение за ползване на материали от официалния сайт на ЦСКА, затова логото на ЦСКА може да остане, оставих си за утре да погледна дали твоя фаъл е може да се замени от вече качения. За повече информация погледни лиценза и препратките които сочат от него: Template:CSKA. А за Левски не си прав, изтрила съм логото им; доколкото ми е известно няма разрешение от тях.

Надявам се, че с това внесох необхододимите разяснения. Не се колебай да ми пишеш пак, ако има нужда. И не забравяй да си обединиш сметките, много е удобно и приятно. Поздрави, →Spiritia 23:34, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Chee Soo image deletion

Dear Spiritia You have deleted an image of which I am the copyright holder. Yes this image appears on my website [3] because I also hold the copyright to my website. It is taken from a book by my T'ai Chi teacher, I am the exclusive worldwide copyright holder for all of his works including written text and photographs. I have now published this photograph on Wikimedia commons so it is now copyright free and available for anyone to use in any circumstances. In future please ask first before arbitrarily deleting people's images without properly researching the reason.

If you do not believe me then feel free to email me at chuangzu@seahorsearts.co.uk which you will notice is the name of my domain, I will happily reply to you to confirm that I am this domain, in the meanwhile I will remove the copyright symbol which by the way does not specifically apply to this image only to the rest of the page content.

Might I humbly remind you: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Assume_good_faith_lolcat.jpg Chuangzu (talk) 23:50, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NGruev

Hello Spiritia, you participated in the discussion on Template talk:NGruev. The discussion ended in Bulgarian. Does Gruev agree to commercial use of his images or does he not? Perhaps you could say something about this on Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Cafe Lipstick.jpg. --Slomox (talk) 18:25, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

About PD-old

Hey there Spiritia, haven't talked to you in a while. I was quite inactive for the last few weeks, due to vacations and usual procrastinations, but I'm working on my comeback. You sent me a rather unpleasant message on my mk talk page and I was really upset to understand the way you interpreted my actions; I replied instantly, but on my mk talk page as well. In case you haven't read it, please do so whenever you have spare time. I humbly apologize for sounding like a harasser, but I explained my reasons. Now, if you're not mad at me (are you?), I'm asking for a short advice about this image: mk:Слика:KameniMost1.jpg. I've scarcely ever uploaded pd-old images to Commons (I usually upload my own works), so I'm asking if pd-old applies for this one and if it is uploadable to Commons. I hope for a warm and friendly response. :/ Peace! :) --iNkubusse^? 03:54, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The image in question lacks a verifiable source (URL from where the image was originally taken, or paper source from where it was scanned), that should contain information about the author and date of creation, in support of the PD-old claim. If author is known, his/her images fall in the public domain 70 yeas after his/her death. If author is unknown, these 70 years start counting from the date of first publication. That's it - warm and friendly. →Spiritia 14:11, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not exactly, but thanks anyway. I see it's no good for Commons unless I have a proof of its first publication. --iNkubusse^? 15:08, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

image:Bogdanci-IWW.jpg

There was a {{:bg:PD-анонимно}} on a picture I upload from bg on commons. I put a {{:anonymous-EU}}. Is it ok ? - Zil (d) 19:09, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Yes, it is okay, I'll ask the original uploader to specify the source of the image. By the way, fix your signature, the link underlining your username is now fr:Useur:Zil going nowhere (should be either User or Utilisateur). Regards, →Spiritia 05:42, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Protected edit requests

Spiri, what's going on with the admins on Commons? I requested an edit on a protected page and no one attends to it for three days now. Do you watch Category:Commons protected edit requests? Either way, could you please add the Macedonian translation on the GFDL template? Thanks in advance. --iNkubusse^? 12:27, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Inkubusse, sadly, watching categories means watching the editable part only, impossible to get direct notification of addition/removal of items to the category. It's explained on en:Wikipedia:Watchlist#What_you_cannot_watch and en:Help:Category#Detection_of_additions_to_a_category. However, there are some indirect ways with the related changes functionality, but imho this approach is impractical for this very case, because once completed an editprotected-request, the template usually get deleted, commented, &ly;nowiki>-ed or otherwise masked so that it no longer appears in the category itself (i.e. the page containing the template is by itself not enrolled in the category, hence the related changes are helpless). But now I remember, there was a bot doing to some extent this dirty job, User:BryanBot/CategoryWatch, I will study it and maybe make use of it. →Spiritia 14:16, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I already know this stuff, but I don't mind the explanation; it's your duty. :P I meant watch as in sometimes open it and see if there are new pages added. I know I do it in my administrative domain. ;) I just bookmark the links to those categories that I intend to "watch" and click on them occasionally. It is quite peculiar that so many admins on Commons fail to notice, or worse, neglect such requests. Anyway, there may be new ones, as I'm starting with Category:Language link templates right away. --iNkubusse^? 16:16, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I am not able to speak on the behalf of other admins or comment their actions or inaction. I myself didn't really know of the existence of this very template/category before the moment you drew my attention to it. :-) I didn't even know about this Category:Language link templates before I saw your request and worked out that for a person willing to translate Commons templates this might be the a better starting point than queries to Google or the wiki search engine. I'd suggest that you just make a longer list of the templates which you plan to translate and I'll add the respective mk-links at once, or vice versa: first make the translations and then give me the list, as you prefer. And of course, thanks for helping! →Spiritia 03:19, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, that's a great plan. I'm having some serious problems with my hard disk now and I will have to use my laptop, which I don't love very much, but I think I'll translate about 10 today, maybe 20, and then I'll give you a list of the protected templates. And don't thank me; I'm as much a member of the community as you are, right? :P I'm helping what I consider worth helping! :) --iNkubusse^? 14:44, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Another nice rendering of what work is pending on the translation battlefield: Category talk:Problem tags. →Spiritia 16:27, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My favourites. :) Oo, I don't know what to do first. --iNkubusse^? 16:30, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Кучешки

Ще погледнеш ли това? Има доста портрети с фалшиф GFDL, но ме мързи да ровя и да слагам шаблони. --Спас Колев (talk) 11:21, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done Едноседмичните шаблони насложени, една от картинките направо изтрита (запазени всички права), известих потребителя и доколкото можах накратко обясних в какво се състои проблема. →Spiritia 15:25, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

About the translations

I'm terribly confused and puzzled over a certain matter with the translated tags. Well, to be perfectly honest, I think I actually do know the answer to my question, but I feel I have to ask you first. Namely, how the heck do we make use of translated tags whose original tags employ parameters?! For example, I spent some reasonable time translating the whole Template:PermissionOTRS, and in the end, I realized that when a user sees the tag in English and clicks on Македонски, all he sees is poorly intelligible text with raw code showing unused parameters and wikilinking. In case you don't get the picture, pretend you're German and don't understand what the tag says on this image. Especially the part with "it is available as ticket 2008060510016958". Actually, I think this particular translation has to be revised, as well as many others that include parameters. Forgive me for expressing such strong feelings about such a foolish thing, but I was rather devastated to realize that there is no use in translated tags that employ parameters. :( Especially after finishing the OTRS translation with all the code. Or maybe I'm just missing something... Am I? Please say I do. I usually do. --iNkubusse^? 04:57, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I got your concerns but I think you're bothering a way too much :-) The purpose of these subpages is auxiliary - to provide handy translation to English non-speakers, not to fully replace the tag. You're right that parameters used in particular pages are not inheritable among the generic template and its subpages, but I think that readers are smart enough to make the necessary mapping and compile the information pieces from both pages into a single consistent message. However, if you keep seeing a problem or need to further discuss, best I can advise you is to use the template talk or Commons:Help desk. Regards, →Spiritia 12:35, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think I can get over it. :) And don't rely on readers' intellect that much. :P So, since they are unusable, do I have permission to remove parameters from translated tags on sight? --iNkubusse^? 15:59, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, no. I didnt mean this. I said that if page A calls template B with parameter C, then it's impossible that C gets inherited if you click from A to B/D.

But, it doesnt prevent that page A directly calls B/D with parameter C. In such a case, B/D should have parameters inside. You just translate what's translatable, don't change the logic. :-) →Spiritia 17:47, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm... You'll have to explain the last part better. Are you saying that a certain page (A) can call a translated template (B/D) which uses parameter C? I thought readers only click on the translations, which in fact open as new pages; they can NOT inherit the parameters from the previous page (the image description page). Right? Hence, parameters in translated template are useless! Isn't that so? Oh, please just tell me if I got that right. :( --iNkubusse^? 01:41, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

> a certain page (A) can call a translated template (B/D) which uses parameter C

In theory - yes. How is it implemented in practice, is another story. I have to admit that only now did I check the code of Template:PermissionOTRS/de. Well, it's normal that it gives error, the template definition is absolutely retrenched. :-) Compare source codes of generic and /de. Now see how it must be done and compare the outputs. :-) I will try to fix the rest of Template:PermissionOTRS/lang until this evening. Tell me if you come across other templates with parameters, whose translations are done half-only. :-) →Spiritia 10:17, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think you didn't get my point well. What I was trying to say was that there is no way to implement a parameter in a translated tag, like this: {{PermissionOTRS/bg|id=2006101710008538}}. The translations serve only as guides which explain the user what kind of licence applies for that image, right? I mean, parameters are not inheritable for translated tags. Agh, I'm having a hard time explaining my concern. :( Ok, I'll try harder. :) Here:

When I open an image (e.g. Image:Waterval Ova Fedoz.jpg), I see an OTRS tag in English, which implements one parameter (ticket). If I'm a native speaker of Bulgarian, I'll probably click on 'Български' just to make sure I understand properly.

When I click on 'Български', it takes me to a wholly different page, named Template:PermissionOTRS/bg. Now that page... Well, it doesn't use any parameters, does it? It doesn't have any connection to that particular image I was seeing, and thus cannot inherit any parameters, whatsoever.

The point: {{{parameters}}} in source codes of translated tags are utterly unnecessary and redundant. Hence, they need to be removed! (mwahaha) Right? :S --iNkubusse^? 03:56, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with the reasoning but I disagree with the conclusion. I do think that parameter calls are necessary to stay in their respective places, at least to mark presence, because they are important semantic milestones in the template rendering and facilitate the correct mapping between the message in the unknown language and the translation in the known one.

I further insist that if parameter definitions are skipped in the translated subpage then it can only function as a translation and nothing beyond this (language layer). However, if they are left intact, then the translation itself may as well function as a template (functional layer + language layer >= language layer). I think that translating in both cases costs same efforts, but in the second case, there is an added value, which as small and rare as it may be, is decisive to me.

As I said, if you have other concerns which I am unable to face, please use the respective talk and community pages. Thank you, →Spiritia 07:37, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TUSC token fd1d8bf475d9cb811c13bd3fbb9d7e69

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Image:Botevgrad_Botev_Memorial.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Botevgrad_Botev_Memorial.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

-Nard the Bard 22:25, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:When to use the PD-signature tag

Could you look at this proposal and comment please? --MichaelMaggs (talk) 20:20, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Michael. Thank you for having started this text, I'd be really interested to read it and if able: comment and contribute. I am only sorry that this will not happen in the next 2 weeks, as I'm travelling abroad tomorrow. I promise to get familiar with the proposal once I'm back. Wish you all the best! →Spiritia 23:07, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Elias Canetti's Signature

Elias Canetti was born in Bulgaria. He settled and stayed in England until the 1970s, receiving British citizenship in 1952. For his last 20 years, he mostly lived in Zurich when he died in 1994. Please undelete Elias Canetti's signature because he never had been a Swiss citizen. --Darldarl (talk) 11:36, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Darldarl, don't spam. Spiritia, FYI: See Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests#Image:Elias Canetti's Signature.jpg. Lupo 12:20, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I think there is really no sense to treat Elias Canetti differently than other Nobelprice authors. Please, unchain his signature too. Best of luck! --Darldarl (talk) 20:05, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ASF-Logo.svg

I just noticed you deleted the image Image:ASF-logo.svg some time ago... but, I think not for a valid reason. You cite a clause which was previously discussed at Commons_talk:Licensing/Archive_8#Apache_Logo.2FApache_License. If you think the entire license is invalid, then the template should probably be brought up for deletion rather than deleting the images (apologies if there was a separate reason why you deleted the image; I'm going by the deletion comment). Note that the FSF has explicitly declared the Apache 2.0 license as compatible with the GPLv3 (section 6 is not a fair use clause; see this PDF document, page 9), so it should be free by definition. If you agree, could you undelete the image? I'd be happy to open an undeletion request if you think that is a better route. Thanks :-) Carl Lindberg (talk) 04:00, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your kind note and pointing this previous discussion of which I didn't really know. I left a note on the talk page for further reference, yet it is still unpleasant that the Apache website is so explicit in their wording ("for reasonable and customary use" =/= "any use" :-) ) Regards, →Spiritia 05:47, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it is a bit confusing -- that section is referring specifically to trademark rights (and therefore is talking about en:trademark fair use), which is unrelated to copyright restrictions (and thus fine per Commons:Non-copyright restrictions), but recognizing the distinction can be hard unless reading closely. Pretty easy mistake to make. The only thing would have been to notice that the {{Apache}} license is listed as a free license on the Commons:Copyright tags#Other_free_tags page, so any images licensed that way should be presumed free unless the license itself turns out to have a problem (i.e. nominate the license for deletion first, then the images would follow). Anyways, no harm done, and thanks for getting to it :-) Carl Lindberg (talk) 17:45, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vidin

I have a question about the Jewish Monument in Vidin. Do you know for the honor of which event it was constructed? Thanks in advance --Klearchoskapoutsis (talk) 18:48, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Klearchoskapoutsis. I discovered another picture of this monument where the plaque inscription is legible: Image:Vidin-jews-monument-plaque.jpg. So, it reads:

We will never forget.

Since 2 century A.D. in Vidin there have lived a Jewish community, exiled from their motherland, which in 1949 returned in the newly established state of Israel.

The attitude of Vidin citizenship to the Jews has been markedly hospitable, tolerant and humane. With the Liberation of Bulgaria Jews were given the same citizen rights.

In 1943 49 000 Bulgarian Jews were threatened with physical annihilation, against which Bulgarian nation opposed in the most categorical way, and their protest led to our rescue.

With eternal gratitude and fondness to our fellow citizens from Vidin and to the whole Bulgarian nation for their humane feat.

From the Vidin's Jews community living in Israel

April 1998, 5758 Year of Nisan

Hope this helps :-) →Spiritia 22:52, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am grateful!! --Klearchoskapoutsis (talk) 00:29, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I used your translation here: [4] if you don't mind... --Klearchoskapoutsis (talk) 10:22, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OF course not. Thanks for notifying me :-) →Spiritia 14:55, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Катедралната църква “Св. Богородица” във Велико Търново през 1909 г.

If I haven't become a big problem can I ask you to see the photo here [5] and say to me which church it is. If we take for granted the date (1909), the Cathedral at that time at Veliko Tarnovo was the "Свето Рождество Богородично"

. If it is the same church then the present church has nothing to do with Koliu Ficheto design... Thanks in advance... --Klearchoskapoutsis (talk) 16:52, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I didnt know much about these churches, but I spent a bit time reading. This source lists 7 churches built by Kolyo Ficheto in Veliko Tarnovo and explains that the old cathedral church (presumably the one, you linked to) was devastated during an earthquake on 1 April 1913. On its place the present cathedral was built by the self-taught master Grozyu (Grandpa Grozyu) in 1933-34, and was decorated in 1954 by some of the leading Bulgarian painters and art professors of the time, Nikola Kozhuharov, Dimitar Gyudjenov and Panteley Seferov. Hope this helps. :-) →Spiritia 17:16, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, very much!!! Много благодаря!!--Klearchoskapoutsis (talk) 00:48, 4 December 2008 (UTC) One question more (I am all questions): the two churches were built in the same place or the new one is built in a different place; The old church was built in Bolyarska mahala...[reply]

On the same place, they say. In another paragraph it is written that the old church's façade was kept in Leon Filipov's sketches and a miniature model of the building, made before the quake. Nowadays this model is preserved in a special exposition [inside the house-museum of architect Filipov]. →Spiritia 12:05, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Once again thanks!

Burgas Ethnography

Very nice photographs. I remember many excellent ethnography museums from my visits to Bulgaria in 1975. Thankyou.Robert 86.147.59.118 22:28, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Robert, thank you very much! Ethnography museums are a real source of inspiration... and free content :-) Hope you come again in Bulgaria! And have a Merry Christmas and happy New Year! Vassia, 22:40, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

Nikopolis ad Istrum

Merry Christmas!!

I have another question... Do you, by any chance, know if there is any map describing the area of the Roman city Nikopolis ad Istrum?

Thanks in advance! --Klearchoskapoutsis (talk) 23:44, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Klearchoskapoutsis. Sadly, I cannot find online any map of Nikopolis ad Istrum. If I happen to find anything on paper I can scan it for you and send you by email, if I judge that it's not adequate for upload here under free license. Wish you all the best during the New Year! →Spiritia 07:18, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Zlatitsa-war-monument-1944-1945.jpg

File deletion warning

File:Zlatitsa-war-monument-1944-1945.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Eusebius (talk) 23:02, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FOP-based deletion requests

Please believe that I have nothing against Bulgaria, it's only coincidence here (and I'm not systematic at all in my "FOP interventions"). I'm French and before I read stuff on Commons about FOP, I didn't know that my national laws did not allow me to shoot recent buildings and sculptures (and I deeply regret it, but I agreed to respect Commons regulations and guidelines...). The first FOP cases I nominated for deletion were my own pictures, and this absence of FOP prevents me from uploading a lot of pictures. For the moment I don't do mass deletion requests though, because FOP-based DRs are quite aggressive on people who don't know/care about these absurd subtleties. I spotted one or two while looking at the new files and didn't want to avoid them, that's it... (I also request deletion when the pictures are nominated for Quality or Valued Images). --Eusebius (talk) 11:27, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Eusebius. I fully understand the rationale of your actions, in all of their subtleties... as well as I understand the wording of our law, in all of its crudity. I still have my very good reasons to oppose "freedom" of panorama, but I'll save you the effort of reading them. This is a battle that has to be fought with the half-wit lawmakers in my country, not with you. :-) Instead, I'll tell you a nice little story that happened to me several months ago...

...Several months ago I discovered a family archive with 160 photos by my grandfather of Paris in 1981, when he was there for an artist specialization. In feverish excitement, I scanned all of them and uploaded them for less than two days. As I have never been in Paris, I didn't recognize almost any of the buildings. And it was fantastic to see how almost 3/4 of these pictures got recognized by the Commons community, mainly but not limited to French people, and obtained their descriptions, categories, geolocations, etc in less than a week. Some of the people were so sweet to leave on my talk notes and share with me their joy of being able to take this romantic look in the past. It was a real thrill, I hope anyone on Commons be able to feel it, at least once in a wikitime. I was so happy to see the network effect, that even the FOP-based deletion request for some of these images did not cast a gloomy shade over my true delight of what has happened. True, I didn't know what's there on the pics, so I admitted my fault and it was me to delete these of the images, which were unanimously pointed out as violations. Natives say that FOP policy was strictly followed in France, and I didn't have any god reason to disbelieve them. So, about half of the nominated images really got deleted, yet another half was saved, maybe based on the healthy common sense of people who did not mistake the letter of the law with its spirit. Which was not less important and not less thrilling, is it? :-)

Back to reality. Today I wrote an email to the sculptor of John Atanasoff's monument with a request of explicit permission for having the photos of his works under free license with allowance of eventual commercial usage. I do hope that sooner or later (you know, holidays...) I will get a positive reply. Hope that there are Bulgarian-speaking members of the OTRS team, in case we have an occasion to bother them :-D →Spiritia 21:44, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I guess I understand what your feelings may be about all this. As an additional anecdote, I just want to tell you that architects (and sometimes sculptors as well, but above all architects) in France can be really, really annoying with the rights they have, and they do not hesitate to sue you. In the building where I work, we're not allowed to use curtains at the windows, because it affects the building's image, and the architect threatened to sue us. It's not exactly what the FOP issue is, but our courts are crowded with stupid cases like that, almost always won by rights holders (the Eiffel tower illuminations story is pretty absurd as well, if you don't know it yet it should be somewhere around COM:L).

Apart from that, I'd be glad if we get an authorization to keep Atanasoff's monument. I was watching Atanasoff's article on fr:WP when it was included to illustrate it. --Eusebius (talk) 11:01, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Balkan-mahala-chapel.jpg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Nikbot (talk)) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Nikbot (talk) 17:06, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Problem is fixed. →Spiritia 17:11, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

2009

Help with Bulgarian text

Hi. Would you please have a quick look at this picture? I don't think it can be PD-old, but source and author are in Bulgarian. Thanks in advance. --Eusebius (talk) 10:53, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I failed to see where the PD-old license is. I saw PD-self. The source reads: "Ivan Iliev, assoc. prof. in the Forestry Technical University" and as far as I see such a person truly exists. Same story with File:BStefanov.jpg. The third upload File:Vasila 1.JPG, is again tagged with PD-self but now the source is Rositsa Stefanova, newspaper "Reporter", Silistra. So, there is a problem, yes... I will tag the images with "no license" and will try to contact the user via email. Thanks for notifying me. →Spiritia 11:16, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the PD-old thing, thanks for your help. --Eusebius (talk) 11:20, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

CommonsDelinker

Hi. You by accident erased all the requests. Lycaon (talk) 13:21, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, weren't they done? →Spiritia 13:23, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nope, they are moved automatically (the replace of files that is) by the delinker (which is not working at the moment). Only the cat moves have to be removed manually when processed. Lycaon (talk) 13:34, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I see. I checked the page history and the time passed after the last request, grossly calculated that the universal replacements with rate of 15 per minute should have been completed so far, saw red links in moved categories and decided that all's okay :) I didnt realize that the bot is not functioning... Anyway, from now I will know about the manual removal. Thanks for notifying me. :-) →Spiritia 13:43, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Paris

And now photographs of my favourite city in my favourite medium black and white monochrome.Very many thanks for this fascinating archive and a very happy new year.Robert aka Notafly (talk) 22:02, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

My pleasure :-) I'm really glad that I discovered these photos and so many people enjoy them now. Happy new year to you too! Vassia, 10:29, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

File:Moses-by-Michelangelo.jpg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Fil nik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Fil nik 22:33, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OTRS

Здрасти, министър Васил Войнов ми изпрати File:The Rhodopes on The Paths Of Orpheus And Eurydice Project Map.svg и File:The Rhodopes on The Paths Of Orpheus And Eurydice Project Brochure.svg, като ми разреши да ги кача на О-я под CC-BY-SA-3.5, обаче искам всичко да е точно и да мине през OTRS. Въпросът ми е, той какво трябва да изпрати на permissions-commons@wikimedia.org и после какво трябва да се направи? Ако ти се занимава, мога направо да те свържа с него, в противен случай ще се опитам да оправя нещата сам. Някакъв примерен текст за писмото до О-я има ли? Между другото имаш ли представа, защо не се визуализират миниатюрни картинки? Ако не го оправя сам, след като мине процедурата с OTRS, ще питам за помощ в графичната лаборатория. Поздрави --Chech Explorer (talk) 16:39, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Здравей. Аз преди няколко месеца успешно проиграх OTRS процедурата, нищо сложно не е, просто препрати на permissions-commons@wikimedia.org неговият отговор с разрешението, копирайки (или препращайки в отделен имейл) своя имейл до него с молба за разрешение и сложи линкове към картинките, за които става дума. После в описателните им страници сложи шаблон {OTRS pending} - по-късно някой от OTRS екипа ще замени шаблона с номерчето, под което са завели разрешението в базата си данни. В моя случай, реакцията дойде след около 20 дни, ама сигурно щото беше точно по новогодишните празници. За всеки случай, добави и преводи на английски на кореспонденцията. Виж как точно аз си оформих нещата в User:Spiritia/Permissions/Vulko Tzenov, нямах никакъв проблем.

Иначе, за миникартинките. Без да съм 100% сигурна, предполагам че причината е в размера на файловете - 29 и 26 мегабайта. На мен (предполагам и на всеки друг потребител) докато ми се отворят оригиналните картинки минаха по десетина минути за всяка... и понеже са в SVG формат и се състоят от стотици детайли (всеки детайл кодиран като математическа крива), много се задъхва да ги преизчисли в по-малък мащаб (може би самият уики-софтуер има някакъв таймаут за тази операция, и като се надвиши, не показва минито). Може би ако им направиш по една PNG версия, ще се визуализират по-бързо. →Spiritia 13:42, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gr_Petrich_nosht_1.jpg

File:Gr_Petrich_nosht_1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Vasilmitov (talk) 18:00, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Transfer

Благодаря --Vammpi (talk) 07:59, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ъм? За кое бе, слънце? :) →Spiritia 20:15, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Martin-Petrov.jpg

File:Martin-Petrov.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

--Ytoyoda (talk) 05:53, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tram

Hi. I have one question to you. Do you remember, which tram type is in this photo File:Tram-inside.JPG? I think, that this is Tatra T6A2, but I'm not completely confident. And I suppose that photos File:Tram-front-control-board.JPG, File:Tram-rear-control-board.JPG and File:Tram-perforator.JPG are from the same tram (according to exif). --Harold (talk) 09:31, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, all photos are from one and the same tram, and i also think that it is of the precise model you point out. It might be harder for recognition because of these green advertising labels... →Spiritia 16:08, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. --Harold (talk) 13:43, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Undelete

Здравей. Не влизам често тук и чак сега виждам, че са изтрили File:Anton_Valentinov_Petrov.jpg, защото нямала лиценз. Източникът е тук: http://www.md.government.bg/bg/temav04.html - "Информацията в този сайт е публична и може да бъде копирана и разпространявана." Ако можеш да възстановиш снимката, ако не - кажи да я прекачвам. --Петър Петров (talk) 14:20, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Готово. →Spiritia 08:37, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Не влизам често тук и сега чак виждам труда, който си положила за да остане снимката. Благодаря ти, въпреки че все пак е изтрита. Ще чакаме по-добри времена. --Петър Петров (talk) 15:48, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Съжалявам наистина, вероятно покрай изборите са имали по-важна работа. :-/ Ако ти се пробва, прати им и ти едно писъмче с текст подобен на този, пък дано имаш повече успех. →Spiritia 16:01, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Картинка на деня

Здравей Спири! Хрумна ми една идея (едва ли е хрумнала на мен за първи път). Не може ли да предложим снимка с тематика от България в Снимка на деня. Има ли начин да предложим наши си снимки? От днешните ми снимки имам две, които много си харесвам, макар и първата от тях да е малко кичозна. Снимките са озаглавени Kaliakra 1.jpg и Balchik Palace 30.jpg. Може да ги видиш от моите приноси понеже незнам как да ти ги напрява като препратки. Ако има някаква възможност да действаме.--Izvora (talk) 17:37, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mile Markovski

Привет Спири, били наглеждала тази снимка, която я прехвърлих от бг/уики. Не съм и мнг. сигурен в лиценза. Поздрав --Vammpi (talk) 23:45, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Наложи се малка промяна, сега е добре. →Spiritia 15:58, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Burgas 1981

Поздравявам те за снимките Бургас, сезон 1981. Браво --Vammpi (talk) 17:36, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

see this http://dariknews.bg/view_article.php?article_id=391004 --Vammpi (talk) 15:42, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Благодаря ти :) Жалко, че само толкова снимки съм успяла да открия досега. А на Казиното нямам, за съжаление... →Spiritia 09:01, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Spiritia!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 02:17, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Commons-upload-screenshot.gif was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.

Template:CSKA

Template:CSKA has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

--ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 01:26, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Jetvarska_uruglitsa.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Jetvarska_uruglitsa.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Jetvarska_uruglitsa.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Карта

Здравей Спири. Днес направих опит да подобря една от създадените от мен карти свързана със случаите на бяс в България. Старата беше малко размазана, а и си усъвършенствах възможностите напоследък да правя карти :)). Да обаче пък изпитах затруднение при качването и. Напрактика в момента съм я качил два пъти в категория Category:Rabies maps с имена File:Rabies cases Bulgaria - 1988 - 2005.JPG и File:Rabies cases1 Bulgaria - 1988 - 2005.JPG. Целта ми беше да я кача като Upload a new version of this file. Въпреки това обаче, когато File:Rabies cases Bulgaria - 1988 - 2005.JPG е минимализирана, картата се вижда със старата си версия, а като се максимализира се появява новата. Моля за помощ! --Izvora (talk) 06:27, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Да, този проблем с качването на нова версия съществува, и на мен ми се е случвало, но не съм сигурна дали се е случил на сървъра или на клиента (т.е. при теб). Мисля, че в момента обаче всичко е вече наред, аз поне виждам като актуална версия на File:Rabies cases Bulgaria - 1988 - 2005.JPG новокачената. При теб как е? Ако всичко е наред, мога да изтрия дублиращата? Междувременно, един съвет за в бъдеще: по-добре запазвай и качвай такива графики в PNG формат. JPG-компресията е по-подходяща за фотографии, докато PNG ще запази чистотата на линиите в графиките (имам предвид границите на регионите и цифрите в легендата, които JPG прави "на облаци"). →Spiritia 09:53, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Да вече и при мен няма проблем с новата версия на File:Rabies cases Bulgaria - 1988 - 2005.JPG. Промени се и в статията Бяс. Благодаря за съвета. Точно затова реших да направя нова карта защото при старата границите бяха по-размазани.--Izvora (talk) 10:46, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

zdravey

zdravey kak si vijdam 4e si mnogo sposoben v vikipedia.dano i az 6te se naucha,ot den na den nauchavam da polzvam tozi sayt. lek den.--Kamuran otukenli (talk) 12:16, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

За Category:Students Town

Здравей,

Виждам, че ти си създала категорията Students Town, за своята снимка Picture:Bulgaria-Sofia-Students-town.jpg.

Току що добавих втора снимка към същата категория, за да не създавам излишни категории, но не мислиш ли, че по-правилно е да се транслитерира вместо преведе, особено след като статията в en:wiki е с транслитерирано име.

Все пак "Студентски град" се е наложило като име, макар първоначалната идея за Студентски град "Христо Ботев". Т.е. няма световна практика такъв тип комплекси да се наричат Student town. (Освен в страни от бившия социалистически лагер като Сърбия, където има Студентски град в Белград.).

Ако прецениш, я премести, не твърдя, че е крайно наложително, но може би освен правилно е и по-логично. :) Поздрави --Mishobg12 (talk) 00:19, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Добре, имаш основание, ще прекатегоризирам снимките. Благодаря за забележката. :) →Spiritia 18:31, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pleven-Panorama-8.jpg

File:Pleven-Panorama-8.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

dave pape (talk) 19:57, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Uploads

Hello Spiritia. Thanks for your comment on my Wikimedia Commons talk page. Are you familiar with any means and/or guidance, within the licences provided here, that the pictures that were previously uploaded may remain on Wikipedia?--Relativefrequency (talk) 14:19, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Снимка

Здрасти, не ми е много ясно кое как е тук, обаче ми е силно неприятно присъствието на тази моя снимка - просто не обичам да циркулират мои снимки в интернет. Има ли как да се изтрие?--Алиса Селезньова (talk) 15:36, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

А тази, от която тази е кропната? →Spiritia 20:24, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Никога не съм имала нищо против общите (освен може би тази :-))) ), но портрет ми идва в повечко.--Алиса Селезньова (talk) 20:33, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

2010

File tagging File:Iskra-Angelova.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Iskra-Angelova.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Martin H. (talk) 09:27, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The problem was fixed. →Spiritia 14:44, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Въпрос

Тъй като сегашният лиценз за шаржа на Пиндарев не е наред и не знам колко време ще отнеме едно разрешение, а и художникът би бил напълно в правото си да не се съгласи, питам се дали междувременно не би могло едно изображение с по-ниска резолюция да се използва 'феър юз' за илюстрация на една конкретна статия, en:Aleko Point; в крайна сметка рисунката е направена точно с цел да илюстрира връзката между Алеко и 'неговия' морски нос? Apcbg (talk) 11:31, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Да, като fairuse е възможно да се качи картинката локално в английската уикипедия, но тук не може. При качването само трябва да се попълнят и шаблоните en:Template:Non-free fair use in и en:Template:Non-free use rationale. А някакви контакти с Пиндарев имате ли, въобще такава молба за разрешение можем ли да му изпратим някак? →Spiritia 12:51, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Орден Кирил и Методий и др.

Здравей Спири. Първо, понеже днес е такъв ден, те моля да ми простиш за грешките, които съм направил към теб.

Второ, понеже си администратор тук и много по-често от мен, ако имаш възможност и желание, погледни Category:Order «Kiril i Metody» за авторски права. Причината е, че преди години тук изтриха файл, качен от мен, копиран от сайта на НВИМ. Самият орден не е обект на авторско право, но снимката е, така че не беше правилно. И после специално ходих лично да снимам ордена в НВИМ. По-специално, много файлове са качени от User:Gogcheto от такива места и може би трябва да се проверят.

Благодаря и поздрави. --5ko (talk) 20:05, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Здравей, Петко. Опитах се да разчистя колкото можах - очевидните нарушения изтрих, неочевидните отбелязах с шаблони. Изпуснала съм потребителя, за което съжалявам, хем съм си го записала и в списъка за наглеждане. Надявам се да си вземе бележка. Просто напоследък офуики животът надделява.

А за прошката... добре че има и такива дни в годината, да се сещаме, че сме грешили, и да си прощаваме... →Spiritia 21:19, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Като имаш време погледни и тези - повечето са НАП, а ме мързи да ги отбелязвам една по една. --Спас Колев (talk) 18:58, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Strong--weak--no-correlation.png

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Strong--weak--no-correlation.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Martin H. (talk) 19:27, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank for notifying me, I fixed the problem. →Spiritia 21:41, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wait a sec: WP Commons is not part of the Bulgarian WP; are you supposed to be administering me even here? (Just a question, no offense)

Градивният подход (вместо да се дебнем и да разваляме направени неща - тази енергия и време могат да се употребят по-добре) би бил да оставим илюстрациите -те веднаж щом са тръгнали из интернета иди ги спри- и чак когато (и АКО) се получи възражение от СОБСТВЕНИКА на копирайта, тогава съм готов да се извиня, да прехвърля_вината към моя източник; и ЧАК тогава нека отстраним илюстрацията. Ама да размаха негатива, все пак, ако обича. Логично, естествено, и най-лесно, не ли? rgds, Ecce Nemo =NoBody|TALK 22:31, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

Авторство

Здравей, Спири! Писах ти някъде, но не можах да го намеря, затова пак си пускам въпросчетата относно авторските права при ълоудването:

1. Ако съм собственик на картина, например, от Илия Петров, снимам я и реша да я публикувам?

2. Ако сканирам снимка от семейния архив, на която не знам автора (някой си фотограф от улицата), и реша да я публикувам?

Предварително благодаря!

User:Edal

Привет, беше на беседата ми в Уикипедия, bg:User talk:Spiritia. Друг въпрос е, че чак сега сколасвам да отговоря.

Значи, по въпрос 1. Собствеността на произведение на изкуството не значи автоматично и собственост на авторските права. Според ЗАПСП "Чл. 12. Авторското право върху произведения на изобразителното изкуство и архитектурата принадлежи на лицето, което е създало произведението, и в случаите, когато собствеността върху произведението принадлежи на друго лице." Вариантите за качване на репродукция от такава творба има общо взето два: (1) ако авторът е починал преди 70 и повече години (тогава творбите му придобиват статут на обществено достояние, Чл. 27) или (2) ако авторът е жив и лично предостави разрешение файл с репродукция на негова творба да се ползва под свободен лиценз. (Аз съм получавала няколко пъти такива разрешения, не е невъзможно, макар че на хората обикновено им е странно, че някой прави на въпрос такова нещо...).

По въпрос 2, понеже не съм юрист, не се наемам да правя пространни тълкувания :) Но със семейните архиви е някак по-лесно. Ако може да се направи разумното предположение, че този неизвестен уличен фотограф няма изведнъж да се присети за правата си, ако тя е правена достатъчно отдавна... качвай, пък ще видим :)

Поздрави →Spiritia 11:19, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Loparite-crystal-structure-3.png

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 13:23, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

Fixed, thank you. →Spiritia 21:27, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I am somewhat worried about photos from this source. As you stated in the template text, and as it is written at lostbulgaria.com term of use all photos are available only for non commercial usage. Such restrictions are in clear violation of main licensing policy where all content must be usable for any purpose including commercial one. Also I couldn't find any references to Creative Commons Attribution 2.0. Is there any other permissions (OTRS?) to justify the template and remove "non commercial" restrictions from it? --Justass (talk) 18:03, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think that the template itself does not impend non-commercial restrictions, but explains that on the original location the content is licensed as non-commercial while there is explicit permission for usage in Wikimedia with sole condition for attribution. (As far as I know, it is legally possible for the copyright holder to license one content in different ways.) In the email discussion which I had with the copyright holder and owner of the website, he asked me about the ways to send this explicit permission and I provided him with the properly completed template from Commons:OTRS per our talk. He agreed with the rules of Wikimedia and I am somehow surprised that the permission has not been sent yet (I am not OTRS member). I will write him again now to understand if there is any problem. In the meanwhile, shall I forward our correspondence? →Spiritia 17:55, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the clarification. I am not OTRS member too so cant assist in this and just come across this template following recently uploaded images. Maybe Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard could help or at least say do they got any email --Justass (talk) 18:25, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, after additional correspondence with the copyright holder, he claimed that he had only wanted to give exclusive rights to Wikipedia, without further downstream usage... which of course is no more "our case". I'll delete the template and the photos. →Spiritia 21:11, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:SVUBIT-official-hall.jpg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 10:54, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

Fixed, thanks. →Spiritia 10:57, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Request

Hello Spiri, long time no "see". I don't know if you remember me, but you're the only admin on commons I "know". I kind of need a quick administrator action, namely, the renaming of a file I uploaded today. Just take a look at the request at File:Female1.svg and you'll get what I mean. I was in quite a hurry so I didn't double check everything before uploading it and so I ended up with the wrong file name. So if you could please just move the file to the intended name and delete the current one I'd be very happy. There's nothing controversial as I created and uploaded the image. Thanks in advance. --iNkubusse^? 00:33, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OK You're welcome. →Spiritia 07:32, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Request: Creating some localized system messages

Hi, Spiritia! I require your assistance in localization of some of the links in the sidebar. Can you please create these pages with the following content:

MediaWiki:Welcome/mk → Добредојде
MediaWiki:Welcome-url/mk → Commons:Добре дојдовте
MediaWiki:Village pump/mk → Селска чешма
MediaWiki:Village pump-url/mk → Commons:Селска чешма
MediaWiki:Latestfiles/mk → Нови податотеки
MediaWiki:Randomimage/mk → Случајна податотека

And make a change on this page:

MediaWiki:Upload-url/mk → Commons:Upload/mk

Thank you in advance, Brainmachine (talk) 13:00, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Brainmachine. Sorry for not being able to react more quickly, but it's done now. Should you need more items for localization, don't hesitate to write me again (I'll allow email notification for the edits of my talk, in order to respond in a more timely manner) →Spiritia 19:30, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Here are some system messages, which you may also want to translate, mainly coming from Special:Preferences

In the Уредување tab
- Use new upload form logic (MediaWiki:Common.js)
- Use new upload form layout (MediaWiki:Common.js)
- Resize gallery and category widths to fit screen (MediaWiki:Monobook.js, MediaWiki:Vector.js)
In the Нагодувања на пребарувањето tab
- Custom AJAX suggestion box width (MediaWiki:Common.js)
In the Други нагодувања tab
- Show a Subpages link in the toolbox (MediaWiki:Common.js)
- Subpages (MediaWiki:Common.js)
Everything from Додатоци tab -- translate just the sentences, I will find where exactly the translations need to be placed
In the sidebar: the dropdown menu name Participate (MediaWiki:Participate/mk)

→Spiritia 19:56, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for pointing these out, I really appreciate it. The translated messages are here, but without the gadget-tab sentences. I'll be sure to let you know when I finish those. Once again, thanks. --Brainmachine (talk) 11:29, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done. In the meanwhile I discovered three other messages that are visible only via pages from the File: namespace: MediaWiki:Quick-delete2.js/mk

nfd_text = "Nominate for deletion";
nfd_tooltip = "Nominate this file for deletion";
nfd_prompt = "Why do you want to nominate this file for deletion?";

Regards, →Spiritia 10:13, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

nfd_text = "Предложи за бришење";
nfd_tooltip = "Предложи ја оваа податотека за бришење";
nfd_prompt = "Зошто сакате да ја предложите оваа податотека за бришење?";

Thanks, Brainmachine (talk) 19:12, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Spiritia!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 11:01, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Template-menu-standard-bg.gif was uncategorized on 1 July 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:01, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Redirect-example-bg.png was uncategorized on 1 July 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:01, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Toolbox-email-screenshot-bg.png was uncategorized on 1 July 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:01, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Searchbox-screenshot-bg.png was uncategorized on 1 July 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:01, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Permanent-links-screenshot-bg.png was uncategorized on 1 July 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:01, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Page-history-screenshot-bg.png was uncategorized on 1 July 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:01, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Edit-conflicts-notification-bg.gif was uncategorized on 1 July 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:01, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Edit-page-screenshot-bg.png was uncategorized on 1 July 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:01, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Edit-summary-screenshot-bg.png was uncategorized on 1 July 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:01, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thinker_6

Ще погледнеш ли тук (снимки от някаква енциклопедия)? До един момент ги маркирах по общия ред, но човекът е настойчив и ме домързя. :) --Спас Колев (talk) 17:26, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Нямам много време / желание за У напоследък. По-добре продължавай да маркираш или... всъщност още по-добра идея би билада се кандидатираш за админ тук? :) така и така помагаш. →Spiritia 19:12, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Kurshovski-Hitov-Zerdeliiski-1867-Belgrade.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Kurshovski-Hitov-Zerdeliiski-1867-Belgrade.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Masur (talk) 09:18, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Aint my fault, sorry. →Spiritia 08:34, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Thank you, Spiri --Иван (talk) 11:20, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome ;)

→Spiritia 11:46, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Преименуване на Файл

Спири, как мога да преименувам последния си файл от "File:Musee-dOrsay-interior.jpg" на нещо като "File:Petit-Palais-Interior.jpeg"?? Благодаря ти предварително! Edal (talk) 15:03, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Здравей, не бях в България за седмица и нямах междувременно интернет, затова се забавих с отговора. Преименуванията на файлове са достъпни само за администратори. В случая, тъй като ти си прекачил наново файла под новото име, аз само изтрих стария файл като повтарящ се. →Spiritia 11:23, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Снимка на деня

Здравей, във връзка с избирането на File:AlexanderNevskyCathedral-Sofia-6.jpg за „Избрано изображение“ сметнах, че е добре да се включи в списъка със снимки на деня. Съгласно препоръките на Общомедия мисля, че ще е добре да излезе на дата 3 март, когато на официална церемония е поставен „основополагащият камък“. Обаче датата беше вече заета, а най-близката свободна дата беше 24 март и го пуснах там. Ще съм благодарен ако съдействаш да разменим двете снимки, правилата го допускат при такива случаи. Мисля, че номиниралият другата снимка (показваща птици) няма да бъде засегнат. Можех и аз да го направя но се притеснявам да не настане врява та реших да се посъветвам. Поздрави! --MrPanyGoff 14:03, 20 December 2010 (UTC) Разбира се, ако сметнеш за необходимо, може да “пипнеш” и текста на описанието.--MrPanyGoff 14:08, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Честно казано, не зная каква е процедурата в такива случаи, но писах и на фотографа, и на админа, насрочил снимката за 3 март, с молба да приемат предложената смяна. Предполагам, че ще проявят разбиране. :) →Spiritia 16:41, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Благодаря :)--MrPanyGoff 07:54, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

:) →Spiritia 10:14, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

2011

Pencho Slaveykov

Здравей, какво смяташ за този файл Pencho Slaveykov photo.gif, който е в en.wikipedia, дали може да се прехвърли в Общомедия?--MrPanyGoff 11:13, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Със сигурност, даже смятам да потърся по-качествено копие. :) →Spiritia 10:46, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Сканирах едно от Енциклопедия България, но не твърдя, че се оказа по-качествено File:Pencho-Slaveykov-photo.png... →Spiritia 16:44, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Помощ за новодошъл

Здравей, Спири! Реших да се присъедина към Общомедия и да се опитам да помогна с преводи на шаблони и евентуално на помощни страници. Уви, нещо не се ориентирах с редактирането на шаблоните и по-точно създаването на тяхна българоезична версия. Може ли да ми посочиш страници, където да прочета информация по този въпрос. Първоначалните ми опити да се справя сам, приключиха с неприятен провал. Поздрави, Lelmerion (talk) 14:29, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Оправих се. Все пак, ще се радвам да получа евентуално съвети и насоки или да бъдат наблюдавани приносите ми тук. -- Lelmerion (talk) 15:37, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Приветствам те за решението :) Тук в действителност има нужда от доста помощ за превод на помощните страници и шаблоните. Аз съм правила някои преводи, но сам е - както би казал Пушкин - "И грустно, и скучно, и некому морду набить." :D :D :D С дружинка ще върви по-лесно и приятно. С удоволствие бих координирала с теб подобна работа. И да, справил си се отлично и с навигацията и с превода. При преводите на тези шаблони (което е много характерно и тук, и за всякакви преводи на Мета като многоезичен проект), обичайно версиите за отделните езици се отделят на подстраници, като /en е версията, която се зарежда по подразбиране, когато в личните настройки потребителят е сложил английски за език на интерфейса. Ако промениш в личните си настройки, езикът на интерфейса да бъде български, то и генералният Template:Geograph по подразбиране ще ти се показва в българския си превод. Също, както си открил и сам, на подстраницата /lang се добавя списък от наличните преводи. Обикновено ползваните в много страници шаблони биват защитавани, за да се предпазят от излишни вандализми, които задръстват работната опашка, като наред с това се защитава и основната страница и подстраницата /lang. Отделните езикови версии - обикновено не. Когато е защитена /lang подстраницата - на беседата заявка, както и ти си направил. Общо взето това е. Ако възникне някакъв конкретен въпрос, питай, дано да мога да помогна :) →Spiritia 17:52, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Todor Kolev

Поздравления за изключително ценната снимка на Тодор Колев, която номинирах за Valued Images. Номинацията беше одобрена и вече има печат и е поставена в представителната галерия до Sir Arthur Conan Doyle ;) (респективно в категорията Valued images of Bulgaria). Снимката на Пенчо Славейков, за която повдигнах въпроса по-горе, я обмислям за същата номинация.--MrPanyGoff 09:45, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Много благодаря за номинацията и съм поласкана. Това е първата ми оценена снимка (от... сигурно вече има три хиляди качени...) :)

За ПС - дразнещо е, че си личи растерът, но по-качествен източник, откъдето да сканирам, не съм намерила досега. Сигурно ще се появи отнякъде... →Spiritia 15:42, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Само една бележка. Концертът, който снимах, беше на импровизирана сцена пред сградата на БНТ на "Сан Стефано". Поправих. Не знам как се изчисляват geolocation данните, затова само закоментирам твоите, които предполагам, че се отнасят до НДК. Ако можеш, преизчисли ги. →Spiritia 18:11, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OK, коригирах координатите.--MrPanyGoff 18:54, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Отново поздравления... Прокарах и Itzhak Fintzi във Valued Hall of Fame.--MrPanyGoff 08:55, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Отново благодарности за което! Спомням си тази снимка с много топло чувство, защото дори си поговорихме няколко минути с Ицко Финци, а неговият, след гласовете на родителите ми, беше гласът, който може би най-често съм чувала в детството си (покрай драматизираните приказки на касетки...) :) →Spiritia 18:00, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Need help

Hi Spiritia. I have a problem with one admin and his behaviour. There is one file uploaded by a Greek nationalist and as you can see from the discussions here all involved users were against keeping this image, but the admin left it. It would be acceptable if he let me correct it, but I could not since he blocked it and I cannot upload correct image. Because you are familiar with these Balkan things, can you take some actions, please? The author of the map is blocked for personal attacks and the admin does not want to talk. The maps is imaginative, POV, represents false data and it is offensice (name). I hope you understand, best, --MacedonianBoy (talk) 15:28, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. No, I am not really familiar with "these Balkan things", neither with the historical, nor the political, nor the linguistic issues. I would advise you to contact the administrator and explain the problem again, calmly and patiently, considering in advance any aforementioned reasons of his behaviour: they probably are purely legitimate. Sorry for answering so late, I was on a short vacation away from computer. Regards, →Spiritia 06:41, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Погребение на Г. Димитров

Защо реши, че тази историческа снимка от семейния ни архив е неподходяща и е за триене? Mpb eu, 16:12, 25 май 2011

Искрено се надявам, че и последния ти принос (главнярника) е от семейния ви архив, но доста ме съмнява. Всичко го прекарваш през фотошоп, слагаш някаква дата за заблуда и го пускаш, белким мине. А сега ми обясни - през 1990 г. какъв е моделът на фотоапарата, който ползваше (или член от твоето семейство), че излизат цветни снимки (макар и с доста лошо качество)? Сигурен ли си, че са те допуснали до мавзолея с фотоапарат? Защото и аз съм ходил и си спомням, че снимането вътре май беше забранено. --Izvora (talk) 17:28, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mpb eu, интересува ме как твърдението Ви за семейния Ви архив се съвместява с посоченото от bg:потребител:Vasilcho (и след проверка потвърдено) обстоятелство, че предложените от мен за изтриване качени от Вас изображения са всъщност екранни кадри, взети от видеото „Schauplatz der Geschichte“? При това, поради ниската резолюция и размери на видеото, при преоразмеряването, което сте извършил, явно с цел заблуда и "замазване" на произхода на изображенията, качеството е паднало драстично. Изобщо, опитите Ви за качване на манипулирано съдържание, представено като собствено, и нахалството Ви да ми търсите сметка, когато взимам нужните мерки да Ви спра, ми идват малко в повечко. Не се учудвайте, ако един ден се окажете блокиран безсрочно. →Spiritia 09:48, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Датога

Здравей Спири :) Явно и тук имам нужда от помощта ти. Имам молба и въпрос. Писах доста писма из Flickr и убеждавах, но съм доволна от резултата. Качих десетина снимки на резервата "Аскания Нова" и още около толкова на етническата група датога. За племето нямаше никакви снимки тук. Молбата ми е да направиш една подкатегория към категорията Ethnic groups in Tanzania със заглавие Datoga People. За да мога да преместя всички подходящи снимки на едно място, което да е ясно. А към категория Askania-Nova да добавиш снимката на Friedrich-Eduardowitsch-Falz-Fein (http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Friedrich-Eduardowitsch-Falz-Fein.jpg). Програмата не ми приема категорията, като искам да я впиша, нямам представа защо.

А въпросът ми е за една от снимките на датога (http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Datoga_Women.jpg). Взета е от Flickr. Получих писмо от автора, че е съгласен да бъде публикувана с лиценз Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike 3.0 и ви го изпратих. После изпратих до администраторите още едно, с цитиран линк към снимката тук, за да я открият по-лесно. Получих отговор, че авторът трябва да смени лиценза във Flickr, независимо от разрешението, което е дал. Той обаче не го направи. Не ми е ясно каква трябва да е съдбата на тази снимка. Ако не може да остане с даденото разрешение, моля те, просто я изтрий. --Молли (talk) 10:18, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Спри, оправих се. :)--Молли (talk) 12:04, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

bg user

Hello Spiritia, can you please talk to this user about copyright and commons? Could be a language issue. /User_talk:LadyPopular Groetjes --Neozoon (talk) 23:01, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done, thank you for bringing it to my attention. →Spiritia 05:38, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Another language problem with this IP - maybe you could help him? Seems to be a permanent IP. --Schwäbin (talk) 12:57, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, it's a problem but not a problem of linguistic nature, I'm afraid. This user can't be really helped. (Anyway, let's wait for a checkuser's opinion...) →Spiritia 13:26, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks for sharing your information. I have simply reverted the edits on my talk page now. --Schwäbin (talk) 14:40, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Iulia Soaemias

For a over categorization. Both pictures are now in the category:Iulia Soaemias. This category is already into the Category:Severan dynasty. --Carlomorino (talk) 17:41, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dimitar-Nikolov-2.jpg

Реших да направя едно детайлно-копие от твоята снимка. Ако има проблем ми пиши. Поздрави --Vammpi (talk) 15:35, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Разбира се, че никакъв проблем не е. :) →Spiritia 17:50, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Здравей Спири. Днес качих този файл, но не съм много сигурен за лиценза.. а като се замисля дали съобще е разрешено да се качва тук.....--Vammpi (talk) 10:24, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Да, няма проблем - достатъчно стар е, за да са изтекли авторските му права. Освен това с зараждащото се сътрудничество с Държавна агенция "Архиви" (което ще видим как на практика да се разпростре и до всичките териториални дирекции), ще създам скоро един специализиран шаблон и категория точно за документи, идващи от архивите (в частност от сайта им). →Spiritia 10:29, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Благодаря ти Спири. Един въпрос ме мъчи от доста време: как мога да премествам картинка? т.е. когато съм сгрешил дадено име и искам да го променя? Пример File:Urgas Zar Asen1.jpg да стане File:Burgas Zar Asen1.jpg? --Vammpi (talk) 10:49, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Преместването на файлове е достъпно за администратори и потребители с права "file mover" (Commons:File renaming). Другият, заобиколен, вариант е да качваш файла повторно с вярното име и да пускаш за изтриване файла с грешното име, но мисля, че това е повече играчка. Пиши ми на беседата и ще ги местя (а с това мисля, че и връзките към от старото към новото заглавие се обновяват автоматично), няма проблем. →Spiritia 10:57, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Тествах с двата файла горе, явно не е съвсем автоматично. Но нищо, пак не ми пречи аз да оправям линковете. →Spiritia 11:00, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ок мерси. Приятен ден.--Vammpi (talk) 11:08, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Спири може ли да погледнеж дали съм прехвърлил с правилните лицензи ето тези две снимки: [:File:George_Dyulgerov.jpg] и [:File:Indjov.jpg ]. Благодаря --Vammpi (talk) 17:54, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Имаше проблеми. Не може файл, лицензиран в БГ У като GFDL да се пренася тук например като CC-zero. Спас също е трябвало преди да ги изтрие локално от БГ-У, да провери за съответствия. Както и да е, оправих проблемите [6], [7]. →Spiritia 12:05, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Привет можеш ли да преместиш File:Burgas Region 1903.jpg на File:Burgas Region 1880.jpg. Благодаря. Въпреки, че незнам.. Картата уж е от 1880, пък вече се вижда ново пристанище на Бургас, открито 1903 .... Какво ще кажеш? --Vammpi (talk) 14:09, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

В оригиналната карта File:Map_45-42_erkesia.jpg, от която си кропнал тази, в долния десен ъгъл пише 1903. Откъде идва съмнението ти, че е от 1880 година? →Spiritia 07:48, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Линка от където е взета карта е този, т.е. атласа 3rd Military Mapping Survey of Austria-Hungary (има и Commonscat със същото име), а от Уики (de:Franzisco-Josephinische Landesaufnahme) разбрах, че последните карти са правени през 1880те.--Vammpi (talk) 11:01, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Молба и за преместване на File:Raum Bugras mit Erklaerungen.jpg към File:Raum Burgas mit Erklaerungen.jpg--Vammpi (talk) 14:28, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Готово. →Spiritia 07:48, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Някак трябваше да се обозначават картинки когато се местя от бг уики.. какво ставаше? File:MIR 2007 DPS.png --Vammpi (talk) 14:00, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Uwlsubst

Hello Spiritia!

Since the Template:Uwlsubst is widely used on Commons, it would be helpful to have the text in other languages, too. Can you please write the text in Bulgarian as well? Thank you in advance! Greetings, High Contrast (talk) 20:01, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Снимки от Театър 199

Предлагам да ги изтриеш, тъй като са с неправилен лиценз и автор. Освен ако Нинов (подписът под рисунките) не е друг твой псевдоним. :) --V111P (talk) 02:57, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Прав си, опцията да се търсят евентуални разрешения никога не е толкова примамлива, за да бъде дори поставяна на обсъждане. :) →Spiritia 07:57, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Междувременно, погледни си и ти прекачената от теб снимка File:Limestone Hole.JPG. Дали наистина ти си й авторът, както твърдиш с избрания лиценз "PD-Self"...? →Spiritia 10:02, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Не, просто бях копирал лиценза и приложил името на потребителя, който твърди че е негов автор. Сега поправих и името на потребителя, защото беше повредено от вандализъм. --V111P (talk) 10:46, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Молба за изтриване на снимки

Моля да бъдат изтрити качените от мен файлове File:Символ АМВР 02.jpg и File:Символ на АМВР.jpg поради причините изложени в беседата на User:gogcheto. Извинявайте че ви отварям работа. G. Mihaylov (talk) 23:11, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Няма проблем. Весели празници! →Spiritia 12:49, 25 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Още изображения за триене

Спири, тъй и тъй си тръгнала, може би е добре да изтриеш и това лого, което абсолютно няма как да е "own work" на тоз, дето го е качил (щото е копнато от сайта на МВР). Логото на МО виждам, че е качено от Пакко -- надявам се, че той знае какво прави. :) Вероятно е добре също да следим това, щото вече месец се чака OTRS. А това на България Еър ми се струва, че също е за триене -- не съм убеден, че е чак толкоз просто, но ти имаш повече опит. — Luchesar • T/C 02:32, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Позачистих тези, както и някои от другите приноси на качилите ги потребители. Благодаря и весели празници! →Spiritia 12:50, 25 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Привет. може ли погледнеш и тази - File:Бургас от космоса.PNG на снимката пише google, а като източник е дадено друго. Поздрави --Vammpi (talk) 00:18, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Доста и от другите ъплоуди на потребителя са проблематични... →Spiritia 08:24, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kenana.jpg Source facebook, както и File:Камбанария Хасково.jpg (www.haskovo.com) мисля че са за триене --Vammpi (talk) 08:24, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Готово, благодаря. →Spiritia 19:18, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

MediaWiki:Gadget-ThumbnailPurger/bg

Hallo Spiritia, could you please update MediaWiki:Gadget-ThumbnailPurger/bg from MediaWiki:Gadget-ThumbnailPurger. Thanks. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 03:06, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Saibo. Can you please tip me how can I translate the "Generate thumb" string that appears in the toolbox menu, too. I guess that something in MediaWiki:Extra-tabs.js has to be done, though I don't have a clue what. This text in Bulgarian sounds like "Генериране на мини". →Spiritia 09:28, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I just found from where to do that: MediaWiki:Extra-tabs.js/bg. Thanks again and Happy New Year! →Spiritia 09:42, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Great - thank you! And wish you a happy new year, too! :-) --Saibo (Δ) 20:52, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

2012

Манджа с грозде

Здрасти Спири, виж кви ги натворих. Замених Nucleotide nucleoside general BG.jpg с Nucleotide nucleoside general bg.svg, ама между другото накачулих сума ти и версии на файла, че все нещо му се бъгваше. Номинирах и Nucleotide nucleoside general BG.jpg за изтриване. Молбата ми е да удариш едно око дали не съм направил някоя поразия. Мерси! --Gabby8228 (talk) 14:34, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Готово. Изненадвам се, че не съм изпълнила по-рано тази заявка. Със сигурност бях разгледала тези файлове и преди месец, но явно нещо съм се била отнесла в онзи момент и съм забравила да трийна PNG-то. →Spiritia 16:31, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

old files

i cannot see the reason, why you deleted this {pd-old} free file : "File:Hötzendorf Bozduganov 1.jpg--Gonzosft (talk) 17:48, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, source "lostbulgaria" is not freely licensed and they explicitly disallowed their images to be hosted in Wikimedia Commons. Moreover, the site often hosts images without correctly settled or known copyrights. So, it's better be safe than sorry. :) →Spiritia 07:58, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Cat for delete

Hi Spiti can you delete this Cat. Category:Naftex Stadium - thanx --Vammpi (talk) 09:40, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done. →Spiritia 16:26, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Pistol and knife on a green flag

Здравей, какво е това - File:Ostrhodopen PD 2011 3184.JPG, File:Ostrhodopen PD 2011 3187.JPG? В коя категория да го включа? (Където и да качвам снимки от Българиая, ти всякъде си качил вече твойте ;). --Bin im Garten (talk) 19:55, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Paris-in-1981-092.jpg

File:Paris-in-1981-092.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Lophotrochozoa (talk) 19:55, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Преместване

Привет искам да те помоля за едно преместване Category:Aqua Calidae към Category:Aquae Calidae thanx --Vammpi (talk) 18:59, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Готово. →Spiritia 06:02, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Молба за преместване

Моля за преместване на [[8]] беседата на профила ми, както и за изтриване на всичко което съм качил в общомедия.

Единственото което искам е да не се забърква паметта на дядо ми в дребни противоречия.

Благодаря --Mikhail Petkov (talk) 10:38, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Изпълнени и двете молби. На беседата Ви в Уикипедия Ви оставих малко съобщение. →Spiritia 19:27, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Благодаря много, имам още една надявам се последна молба. Искам да приключа с Уикипедия, но гугъл продължава да индексира беседата при търсене с името на дядо ми и молбата ми е да бъде премахната. Вие я имате архивирана, така че при проблем или необходимост бихте могли да я възстановите. Смятам, че беседата е колкото за мен, толкова и за вас и повечето администратори вредна и не показва истинското лице на Уикипедия. А то си струва.

Предварително благодаря Mikhail Petkov (talk) 14:06, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Това, което най-много мога да направя е [да сложа индикатор] търсачките да не индексират повече страницата. Ще отнеме обаче известно време (нямам точна представа колко) преди Google и други търсачки да разиндексират страницата... →Spiritia 15:26, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Това е добро решение, да се надяваме и успешно. Ще я следя и ще ви пиша на лични за резултата. Благодаря изключително много за съдействието. --Mikhail Petkov (talk) 15:39, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Здравей, страницата продължава да се индексира от търсачките. Съкратил съм имената в нея, и моля да бъде преименувана - тоест да остане само моето име. По този начин смятам, че ще се реши проблема. --Mikhail Petkov (talk) 03:23, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Проблемът с търсачките ще се реши от само себе си, когато се разиндексира страницата от тях. Въпрос на малко време. →Spiritia 17:16, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bulgarian description

Hi Spiritia, Could you please add a Bulgarian description to Iran gallery? Thanks in advance. Americophile 18:59, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Bulgarian_educational_slideshow_"I_love_you,_dear_homeland"

Здравей! Би ли погледнала снимките в категорията? Ако са публикувани през 1988 г., почти е сигурно, че не са минали 70 години от смъртта на фотографите. --5ko 11:11, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Message from 188.254.230.210

HelloSpiritia Здрвавеи Спири искам да те питам ако кача някоя снимка на какьв лиценз да я кача да не я трият — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.254.230.210 (talk • contribs)

@Spirita, see [9] for more information. Mathonius (talk) 22:38, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Though I don't have checkuser rights, and can't prove it, I happen to know this pattern very well... It has to do with Category:Sockpuppets of Fark. →Spiritia 22:48, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Невъзможност за качване на снимка

Здравей Спири, Писах писма до няколко фотографа с молба да си сменят лиценза на снимките си във Flickr. Един от тях го направи и тази вечер качих 5 от неговите снимки на езерото Бабати в Танзания. Обаче шестата не можа да се качи. Опитах втори път и пак неуспешно. Дали можеш да помогнеш?

Във Flickr - http://www.flickr.com/photos/danieltiii/3442282526/
В Комънс - http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Western_shores,_lake_Babati.jpg

--Молли (talk) 21:52, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Действително явно е станал някакъв моментен сбой, защото даваше съобщение "The database did not find the text of a page that it should have found, named "File:Western shores, lake Babati.jpg" (revision#: 0). This is usually caused by following an outdated diff or history link to a page that has been deleted. If this is not the case, you may have found a bug in the software. Please report this to an administrator, making note of the URL." Прекачих снимката под ново име, File:Lake Babati, Western shores.jpg, всичко изглежда наред. →Spiritia 04:51, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Благодаря ти Спири, аз не успях. :) --Молли (talk) 09:57, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Burgas lapidarium

Привет Спири, снимките в тази категория са по-скоро за Археогогическия музей. Вярно там се намира и от време на време лапидариума, ама като гледам надгробните плочи и съркофага нямат много общо с лапидаиум или?--Vammpi (talk) 16:41, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Какво значи "от време на време" да се намира, като си е там постоянно?! Лапидариумът представлява обособената външна експозиция на каменни артефакти с археологическо значение - а надгробните плочи и саркофазите са такива артефакти. В този смисъл, да, свързани са с Археологическия музей, но има смисъл да се обособят, заради Category:Lapidariums in Bulgaria. Надявам се това да ти реши проблема. →Spiritia 06:18, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Няма проблем --Vammpi (talk) 11:40, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Молба

Здрасти. Би ли да защитила потребителските страници на Darsie (talk · contribs), че само тук не е направено. Поздрави!--The TV Boy 17:42, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Защитих ги, благодаря. Не разбрах откъде ти е хрумнало тук] да пишеш "Лазарова", като само веднъж съм забелязвала да се представя с фамилия, и то е било Симеонова. Ако е било само от невнимание, ще помоля в бъдеще при подобни (особено чувствителни) редакции да бъдеш по-внимателен. →Spiritia 19:37, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

На Разговори пише Лазарова след корекцията на твоята реплика от Потребител:Seddass и аз така го написах, но не знам как е правилно. Все пак благодаря!--The TV Boy 11:42, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ако не те затруднява

Здравей, Спири. Този файл тук го изтрий, когато ти е удобно. Не се ползва, а съм затрил оригиналните снимки, тоест няма да мога да ги дам, ако някой поиска. --5ko 12:06, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Извинявай, трийнах я още преди няколко дни, но понеже много бързах, не можах да отговоря веднага. →Spiritia 05:55, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Снимка за триене

Здравей Спири. мисля че File:Чирпан.jpg този файл е за триене.([10]) Поздрави --Vammpi (talk) 09:20, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

За съжаление и други(те) файлове, качени от потребителя са за триене. →Spiritia 05:54, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Погледни File:Ill?yellow kid001.gif и прецени какво ще я правиш - аз я извадих от няколко статии при нас... --Спас Колев (talk) 11:59, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

+ едно върнато отдавна copyvio: [11]. Според мен претенцията за авторство е към колажа, а снимката изглежда доста отдавнашна, така че преценявай. :) --Спас Колев (talk) 10:47, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

И на мен ми изглежда стара снимка, от 1950-те може би. Колажът като цяло се явява обложка на възпоменателен компакт диск от 1999 година, личи си от първоначално качената версия на файла. Уви, за триене. Ще потърся в ДАА за някоя алтернатива. →Spiritia 12:56, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:2d_political_spectrum.svg

Created a "blank" SVG version of the file 2d_political_spectrum.png which can be annotated with overlay text in any language and is also more accessible. Do you happen to know where I could go to get help translating the code?--Abel (talk) 00:35, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I can help with the Bulgarian translation. You may ask the users who originally uploaded the rest translated versions, namely, User:Shizhao for zh:, User:Gengiskanhg for es: and User:Nagy for de:. I also made an edit in your English source; it should be "personal", not "political" freedom, shouldn't it? →Spiritia 05:56, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you on both counts. Yes, very much so, it should be personal rather than political freedom. Added "Civil liberties|" in front of "Personal freedom" to avoid the redirect. I have contacted several others, but not Shizhao, Gengiskanhg, and Nagy. Thank you so much for pointing me in their direction, I will contact them as well. --Abel (talk) 12:30, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Arcul-de-Triumf-Mincov.jpg

File:Arcul-de-Triumf-Mincov.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

128.250.5.245 07:48, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion

Здравей Спири можеш ли да погледнеш това Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sofia National Bibliothek.jpg. Благодаря ти --Vammpi (talk) 07:51, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OTRS

Re Commons:Deletion requests/File:Pametnik na osvoboditelite,gr.Kardzali.jpg - that's good news, but it needs verification via OTRS (and if we've had that already, {{PermissionOTRS}} applied to the file). Rd232 (talk) 17:03, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

NB the user has uploaded other files which can be covered by the same OTRS ticket: Special:Contributions/Rusels. Rd232 (talk) 17:05, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your interest in resolving the case. Forwarded correspondence between me and Mr. Zankov will do, right? Unfortunately, I am rather busy offwiki and have absolutely time to translate the whole of it in English, you can use Google Translate, can't you? I'll immediately forward it, can you please inform me when you receive and process it? Thanks a lot for your help! →Spiritia 17:07, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Correspondence forwarded. →Spiritia 17:30, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not an OTRS member, so I left a message at Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard#Alexander_Zankov_images. If Evgeni or you can write a message in English to OTRS, that would be better. Since it takes a while for OTRS tickets to get processed, it doesn't matter if it takes a while - but I expect a Bulgarian message might cause problems, we don't have too many Bulgarian speakers AFAIK... Rd232 (talk) 22:52, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've now had a look at the OTRS ticket and added permission tags as described in the discussion linked above. I hope this solves the problem. Mikael Häggström (talk) 15:58, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Mikael, thank you very much, your support is truly appreciated. :) →Spiritia 17:22, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome

Mikael Häggström (talk) 06:34, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Молба и въпрос

Здравей, имам обяснимата (за новак) молба да бъде премахната първата версия на един образ. Опитах се да поправя нещата (със скромните си умения), качвайки нова версия на файла File:Благославящият Христос.jpg. Но се притеснявам от съществуването на първата версия - на нея, на заден план има заснета случайна жена, пресичаща улицата. Предвид слабото качество на образа, моментът с разпознаваемостта едва ли стои, но все пак ми е съвестно. Предполагам, че мога да се обърна към теб, за да бъде заличена напълно тази версия. Дано не греша в нещо (пак). Второ, имам въпрос относно качването на образи, създадени с програмата, наречена "Terragen". Този софтуер е с условие за некомерсиална употреба. Според мъглявите им обяснения, това значи, че не мога да правя пари от изображенията, които създавам. А мога ли да ги качвам в Уикипедия под лиценза (CC), който позволява такава на всички ползватели на сайта? Никъде не успях да открия ясен и еднозначен отговор на въпроса си. Благодаря. Utar Sigmal (talk) 03:13, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Благодаря. По другия си въпрос получих положителен отговор от Oshyan Greene. Utar Sigmal (talk) 08:31, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:NGruev

Hello Spiritia. You have participated in a discussion about a template which is now proposed for deletion. As you (1) are a trusted admin here and (2) understand Bulgarian language, could you, when you have time, confirm on the deletion page what Mr Gruev wrote in Bulgarian? Thanks. --5ko 20:46, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for tipping me, I'd probably miss that discussion otherwise... →Spiritia 17:23, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Привет!! И ребелот, ако имаш време за губене. --5ko 16:13, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bulgarian pigeon association

Hallo Spiritia,

do you know if User Pigeons really is identical with the Bulgarian breeding assiciation? Pigeons contributed two times on commons and three times in Bulgarian WP.

I suspect the files of copyright violation. They are tagged as "Own work". But if Pigeons really is identical with the bulgarian pigeons association...

I cross posted this request on [12], in case you are not very active any more. --84.181.63.204 15:14, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

They don't seem to have been active ever after these five sporadic edits. Thanks for drawing my attention to that problem. →Spiritia 17:14, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have to thank you. --PigeonIP (talk) 06:54, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sofia

Hi Spiritia,

I wanted to create a category Banishora (a district of Sofia; квартал = Neighbourhood). But Sofia has strange (at least for germans) administrative units: Municipalities, Neighbourhoods and Districts. In Category:Sofia there are three different subcategories. Only insiders may realise, that they are related with each other. I would prefer to put these three categories together, for instance in Category:Administrative units of Sofia or Category:Districts, Municipalities and Neighbourhoods of Sofia or even better Category:Districts of Sofia . An outsider will hardly know whether Ovtcha Kupel, Banishora or Krasno selo are Municipalities or Neighbourhoods of Sofia. Therefore I would prefer only one common category for all this administrative units, where I (and all others) can easily find them all in alphabetic order. And I would like to give the subcategories names with appended exact administrativ name: for instance Mladost‎(Municipality), Category:Lozenets (Neighbourhood). What do you think? You can answer me in bulgarian (I have no bulgarian keyboard). --Bin im Garten (talk) 16:27, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is more difficult than what you think :) Given that English in not official in BG, the administrative divisions on all levels are a complete terminological mess. District here in BG context I have only used in the sense of 28 administrative divisions of the whole country (област, having a district centre, a big town, and usually several smaller towns and numerous villages). I haven't met "district" as a subdivision in the frames of a single town. On the contrary, some области have chosen to name themselves districts, and others -- regions. In the meanwhile, English Wikipedia names all these as "provinces". See the diversity:

Blagoevgrad -- Region / District -- http://www.bl.government.bg/en/2009-08-11-19-58-22
Dobrich -- Region -- http://dobrich.government.bg/
Haskovo -- ?? -- http://hs.government.bg/en/
Gabrovo -- ?? -- http://www.gb.government.bg/
Kardzhali -- Region -- http://kardzhali.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=15&Itemid=29
Kyustendil -- ?? -- http://vmnassociates.com/kustendil25/
Lovech -- District -- http://www.lovech.government.bg/section-14-contacts.html
Pazardzhik -- ?? -- http://www.pz.government.bg/news.php
Pernik -- Region -- http://www.pk.government.bg/
Plovdiv -- District -- http://www.pd.government.bg/index.php?page=oblasten-upravitel&hl=en_US
Razgrad -- District -- http://www.rz.government.bg/en_index1.html
Shumen -- District -- http://oblastshumen.government.bg/en/index.html
Silistra -- District -- http://www.ss.government.bg/
Sliven -- District -- http://www.sliven.government.bg/en/
Sofia -- Region -- http://www.sofoblast.government.bg/
Stara Zagora -- Region -- http://www.sz.government.bg/index.php
Targovishte -- Region -- http://www.tg.government.bg/index1.html
Varna -- Region -- http://www.vn.government.bg/en/index.htm
Veliko Tarnovo -- Region -- http://www.vt.government.bg/index.php?setpsitelang=2
Vidin -- Region -- http://en.vidin.government.bg/094/60-16-16/index.html
Yambol -- ?? -- http://yambol.government.bg/stk/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=179&Itemid=88

On the level of towns only,I believe that only the several biggest cities like Sofia and Plovdiv have sophisticated administrative subdivisions. I see for Sofia Municipality 24 districts -- http://sofia.bg/en/display.asp?ime=council and these actually comprise 38 "settlements" (населени места), 4 of which are separate towns: Sofia, Bankya, Bujovo and Novi Iskar, and 34 villages. On the contrary, of these 24 districts those which cover Sofia are subdivided in what you say neighbourhoods (or quarter, or living estate?)... квартали in Bulgarian. For instance, Izgrev District where I live comprises 3 квартала: Izgrev, Iztok and Dianabad... Lozenets District comprises квартали Lozenets, Vitosha (not to be mistaken with Vitosha District) and Hladilnika. So, it's a real mess. And has to be sorted out sooner or later, but better have it sorted simultanously here and in English WP. And we have to consider both official websites/documents. For what you suggest, it's probably best to have the explanatory noun together with the name. Unfortunately, I don't have as much time as I'd like to make a thorough research right now. So if you would like to discuss it, probaby the BG WP Village Pump is a good starting point: bg:У:Р. →Spiritia 10:00, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I raised the question for Sofia there: bg:У:Р#София. With the names for the provinces I dont see the problem (at least for de:WP): in german Wikipedia we call them all Oblast (very easy); община is "Gemeinde". --Bin im Garten (talk) 16:49, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Archeology in the Center of Sofia

Since 2 years there are archological findings in the very center of Sofia on exposition. We should have a special Category for this - File:Sofia Center walk with free sofia tour 2012 PD 028.jpg. Or do we have allready? How could we name this Category?

Category: Archeological findings at Independence square ? (but in front of ZUM is not Independence square)
Category: Archeological findings in the center of Sofia ?
Category: Archeological findings in roman Serdica ?

--Bin im Garten (talk) 17:35, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your options 2 and 3 are rather general, and not enough informative. Option 1 somehow misses to mention that the place is it's Sofia / Sedica. There might be "Independence" squares elsewhere. The project's official name (see here) is "Ancient Cultural and Communication Complex Serdica". If this seems to you too long, how about Category:Archaeological Complex Serdica or Category:Serdica Archaeological Complex? →Spiritia 17:50, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I liked Category:Archaeological Complex Serdica most. --Bin im Garten (talk) 10:09, 25 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Old Sofia

I would like to copy all pictures from www.stara-sofia.com/ and upload them on Commons (only the pictures that are older than 70 years). Would this be a copyright violation? The guys from stara-sofia.com didn't take the pictures themselves, they just scanned them. For me it is the same like with the pictures in Category:Samokov History Museum. These pictures are taken from the museum-staff. Nobody asked them, wether they agree "there photographies" of the old paintings to be used in Commons. They are even not very happy with this (I spoke personaly with them). Maybe the guys from stara-sofia.com are ready to sell there pictures (in higher resolution) for Commons. Though I doubt that they will sell most of there pictures for a reasonable price, would you try to contact them and to ask for there price? I personally would participate with two thousand Lewa. --Bin im Garten (talk) 10:25, 25 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Freedom of panorama in Bulgaria

Hi again Spiritia, how about freedom of panorama in Bulgaria? Not at all!? Commons:Freedom of panorama/table. Can you give me a link to the bulgarian law? Untill now I found only regular deletion activities in Category:SS. Cyril and Methodius National Library. What is your advice? To take no pictures of "modern" buildings? To include the neighbouring buildings also in the picture? To ask the architect for the CC3-copyright? The longer I think, the more I realize that this has terrible consequences for my photos on Commons. I have seen this with pictures from Moscow: some "activists" start slowly and after their first "victories" they start with mass deletion requests. I would appreciate when you inform me (preferrably on my german discussion page) when you see deletion discussion about bulgarian pictures (because of No-FOP). Then I could copy them to the german Wikipedia. There they don't care about bulgarian No-FOP (en:Lex loci protectionis). --Bin im Garten (talk) 12:35, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Accept my apologies but I have several really urgent things to do, both here and off-wiki, before I can devote the due time to answer to your questions. In the meanwhile, enjoy the holidays! :) →Spiritia 18:28, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

2013

File:Marshal-Baghramyan-Yerevan.jpg

File:Marshal-Baghramyan-Yerevan.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Takabeg (talk) 14:54, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Plovdiv-Konstantin-Stoilov-house-plaque1.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Plovdiv-Konstantin-Stoilov-house-plaque1.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

–⁠moogsi (blah) 08:50, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Plovdiv-Konstantin-Stoilov-house-plaque2.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

–⁠moogsi (blah) 08:52, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Plovdiv-Konstantin-Stoilov-house.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

–⁠moogsi (blah) 08:52, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the notifications, obviously they were due to an incidental omission of mine, repeated three times in a row. That's because I'm still quite used to the oldest file upload form that allows use of the Back browser button, keeping the input data in the text box from the previous upload. →Spiritia 11:07, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Nikolcho Tsvetkov Bakardzhiata, Hristo Tsonev Latinetsa (1878).jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Nikolcho Tsvetkov Bakardzhiata, Hristo Tsonev Latinetsa (1878).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Ju Ta 20:20, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Paris-in-1981-050.jpg

File:Paris-in-1981-050.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Jean-Fred (talk) 15:22, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ярослав Любомиров Калицин

Hello. I have written an Hebrew article about kalitsin who was the deputy of Alexander Belev. I understood there is an on going project with the Bulgarian National Archives. he was tried by the special court after WW2 and sentenced to 15 years. Maybe you can trace a photo of kalitsin?, perhaps photos from the court sessions? thanks [13] Assayas (talk) 17:13, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Plovdiv-Regional-history-museum.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Plovdiv-Regional-history-museum.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Ju Ta 21:21, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Plovdiv-Major-Raycho-Nikolov-plaque.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Plovdiv-Major-Raycho-Nikolov-plaque.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Ju Ta 21:22, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

De-adminship warning

This talk page in other languages:

Dear Spiritia/Archive. I am writing to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of inactivity.

If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section/Aug-Sep 2013 within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.

You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.

Thank you – Kwj2772 (msg) 07:51, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Interpred-WTC-Sofia-Bulgaria.jpg

File:Interpred-WTC-Sofia-Bulgaria.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Eleassar ^(t/p) 11:30, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:National-Statistical-Institute-Bulgaria.jpg

File:National-Statistical-Institute-Bulgaria.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Eleassar ^(t/p) 11:31, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

2 files for deletion

Здравей. Забелязах два файла качени от, изглежда, Fadams под псевдоним User:Обекти; (блокиран в бг уики [14]), от които няма особена полза:

File:Tharvesinata.pdf - possible copyright violation
File:Бяла риба плакия със заливка.jpg - виж [15]

--V111P (talk) 01:25, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Много ти благодаря, изтрих ги. →Spiritia 06:59, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Editor @ ar.wiki

Hello. I would like to inform you that I have granted you editor flag at the Arabic Wikipedia, all your edits there will be automatically marked as patrolled. Best regards.--Avocato (talk) 14:05, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

2014

Изтрит файл

Изтрит файл "Петко Теофилов.jpg". Това е моя репродукция (копие на копие) на фотография за лични документи (паспорт), чийто автор е неизвестен (около, но не по-късно от 1970 година),тоест преди повече от 40 години. Как бих могъл отново да я кача в сайта ? Изглежда съм предявил претенции за авторско право. Това не ми е необходимо. Правя статия за човека от снимката в бгу. Оригиналът най-вероятно е унищожен поради изтекла давност и смърта на обекта. Какъв лиценз следва да се приложи при повторно качване . Благодатя предварително.--Luxferuer (talk) 10:40, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation: If you are the copyright holder/author and/or have authorization to upload the file, emai. Това е мотивацията за изтриването.--Luxferuer (talk) 11:06, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!

⧼Wikibase-terms/Archive⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, ‎français, magyar, ‎italiano, македонски, ‎‎日本語, ‎‎‎русский, ‎‎‎svenska

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:23, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:NGruev

This is a note to let you know that I've reopened a deletion discussion that you previously participated: Commons:Deletion requests/Template:NGruev. Cheers, -- TLSuda (talk) 21:11, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement

Picture of the Year 2013 Results

In other languages: Deutsch, ‎español, ‎français, ‎日本語, Nederlands, русский, ‎svenska, ‎Türkçe, ‎українська

Dear Spiritia,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wikipedia Education Program map.svg

Hello! It's not Bulgaria that is blue now but Burundi. NNW 12:44, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

De-adminship warning

This talk page in other languages:

Dear Spiritia/Archive, I am writing to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of inactivity.

If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section/Aug-Sep 2014 within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.

You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.

Thank you, odder (talk) 19:59, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

2015

User:Giada Marini

Hello. Could you please have a conversation with this user about verifying permission through OTRS? This user has a lot of uploads that might actually be his/hers, if s/he is associated with a publicity firm. However, they might just be images scraped from the internet.

Could you ping me when you have a response?

Thanks. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:52, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Magog the Ogre:

Thank you very much for this notification. I deleted several images, which were obvious violations and I wrote this evening a long email explaining the situation and asking for honesty and cooperation. From the contributions and short presentation of the user in her/his (I think "her", but not 100% sure) talkpage in BGWP, it is a good faith editor, with encyclopedic scope of contributions, but completely confused and ignorant about copyrights and image sourcing. It is possible however that part of the images are truly self produced, despite the large share of violations. I believe that the offwiki communication in this case will really prove to be more successful and beneficial for all. Bests, →Spiritia 21:45, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This morning (I'm UTC+2), I just got a reply from Giada Marini, who was very eager to fix all the problems with her deleted uploads. She is the PR manager of some of the photoed subjects, personal friend of others. So far she has sent to me 4 photos in high resolution, which she has taken, and which in low resolution have been or are to be deleted. In a second email later today I will explain to her in details the free licenses and will ask her to provide permission in the OTRS email template.

Since the last time I have collaborated with the OTRS team was some years ago, and things may have changed, Would you like to have all the email correspondence forwarded, or just the official permission (when that comes). →Spiritia 06:37, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Magog the Ogre:

You might have seen the page User:Spiritia/Giada_Marini with a thorough research of all available and deleted uploads of Giada Marini. After the communications with Giada during this week, I uploaded today the original files, which she sent me, under the CC-BY-SA-4.0, as we discussed that will be more appropriate than CC-Zero (inapplicable in Bulgaria). I prepared for Giada the permission, following the email template, and she is expected to send it to the permission-commons email by herself. Just in case, I have sent a blind copy to the OTRS team, too. I hope that she'll manage sending the permission, as I felt that she's not quite technically minded. In addition, shall I translate to English all our correspondence from the week? →Spiritia 18:43, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Paris-in-1981-001.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Tangopaso (talk) 09:57, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Carcassonne board game.jpg

File:Carcassonne board game.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

BaseSat (talk) 19:39, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Относно забележка за мой собствен чертеж на Онгъла

Дискусията е започната и се води изцяло тук | The discussion has been started and led here: User talk:Mpb eu#Предупреждение за блокиране // Block warning. →Spiritia 15:28, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

За снимките

Здравей Спири. Качих днес снимки от язовир Доспат, но не открих код на мястото и ползвах код 1040 на неизвестно за мен място само за да не загубя сесията за качване. Може ли да се направи нещо по въпроса или да премахна категорията за проекта? --Izvora (talk) 17:55, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

В същия ден снимах и язовирите Широка поляна и Голям Беглик, които наистина са уникално красиви места.... но и тях не откривам из списъците. --Izvora (talk) 18:14, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Защото решихме като за първи път да го направим само за 104 места -- 3 национални парка, 11 природни парка, 55 резервата и 35 поддържани резервата. Следващата категория, защитена местност, вече са 500+, защитените зони и те поне едно 300 парчета, и нямахме време да ги направим на списъци и шаблони (организацията беше в последните три и половина дни). Обаче! Когато видя че има интерес към дадена защитена местност ще я добавям: bg:Уикипедия:Уики_обича_Земята/Обекти. Беглика и Широка поляна са вече добавени, за ШП направих снощи и статийка – преди да ми спре тока! ;) Уви следващите няколко дни почти няма да съм онлайн, обаче Водно конче, Лорда и Влади Неделев ще са на разположение и ще реагират. Можеш да пишеш и на беседите или wle2015@wikimedia.bg. така че смело качвай :) →Spiritia 16:12, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Привет. Част от снимките са от защитените места, но друга не (поне според wikimapia). Ще ги кача, защото местата са страхотни, невероятни, прекрасни, чудесни, уникални ..... Важното е, че ще ги има. Поздрави! ---Izvora (talk) 17:34, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Spiritia-Open-glam-2013.jpg

Hi. How have you done the shot? It looks like neither of your hands holds a cam. --Base (talk) 05:52, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Self-timer. →Spiritia 22:39, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Hello Spiritia,

File:Windows 10 - Armenian keyboard installation - 1.PNG

Windows 10 - Armenian keyboard installation - 1

File:Windows 10 - Armenian keyboard installation - 2.PNG

Windows 10 - Armenian keyboard installation - 2

File:Windows 10 - Armenian keyboard installation - 3.PNG

Windows 10 - Armenian keyboard installation - 3

File:Windows 10 - Armenian keyboard installation - 4.PNG

Windows 10 - Armenian keyboard installation - 4

File:Windows 10 - Armenian keyboard installation - 5.PNG

Windows 10 - Armenian keyboard installation - 5

File:Windows 10 - Armenian keyboard installation - 6.PNG

Windows 10 - Armenian keyboard installation - 6

these pictures I uploaded on Wikimedia Commons, because I not can upload in Armenian Wikibooks, because there when I click "Upload file" then redirected here. Now these pictures need a delete?, and how I can to keep these pictures --Vadgt (talk) 11:51, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Screenshots of proprietary software? I am afraid there is no way to keep them here.

But I checked the situation with the upload in the Armenian Wikiquote. It reads "Permission error: You do not have permission to upload this file, for the following reason: The action you have requested is limited to users in the group: Administrators." Ask a local administrator to upload these images instead of you. That should work, and then the images will be deleted from here.

Please, keep me informed. →Spiritia 21:37, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry in Armenian Wikibooks. Please say something for keep these pictures. --Vadgt (talk) 17:40, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oh yes, I must have been sleeping. Please check if the nature of the mistake is the same. For some strange reason, I am not able to login to armenian wikibooks. If this is again the case, contact a local administrator to make the upload instead of you. As I said, images of proprietry software cannot be freely licensed, i.e. used here. →Spiritia 22:57, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Изображение за изтриване

Здравей, бих искал да бъде изтрито изображението Bio rali gurkovo.jpg, което качих, заради неуреден лиценз. Animsaj (talk) 00:38, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Здравей. Изтрих я. Може би ще ти е по-лесно в бъдеще да номинираш за изтриване с щракване на връзката „Nominate for deletion“ в менюто Tools вляво. Още по въпроса: Help:Nominate for deletion, Commons:Deletion policy, Commons:Deletion requests. Разбира се, никакъв проблем не е да пишеш и тук. →Spiritia 07:14, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bulgarian speaking contributor seeking assistance

Hello. I noticed you speak Bulgarian and have been active recently. Contributor Lachezar.Lefterov has expressed interest in participating in the "Wiki Loves Monuments 2015 in Bulgaria" initiative, but seems to be having some difficulties uploading files and sought assistance here at Help Desk; I was wondering if you could possibly review this to find out what the troubles may be, as the rest of us do not speak Bulgarian and can only offer very limited assistance to them. --dsprc (talk) 13:11, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for notifying me, @Dsprc: . I wrote an explanation to the user on his talk page. It was so nice that you found me being one of the organizers of the Wiki Loves Monuments. I have to admint that being first-timers in "Wiki Loves X" this year, we have probably made some mistakes and some users may have has certain difficulties contributing. On the other hand, we have already obtained more than 1000 images so far, which makes me think that the problem is in the generally more sophisticated way of uploading content to Commons, in comparison to other platforms. :) →Spiritia 17:05, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fish in aquarium

Hi Spiritia
I have compared pictures on the Internet and I believe the fish in your video is a
Narrow-lined pufferfish (Arothron manilensis)
and not a Long-spine porcupinefish (Diodon holocanthus)

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Long-spine_porcupinefish_%28Diodon_holocanthus%29_breathing_-_Gijon_Aquarium_-_2015-07-02.webm

Please confirm this change is OK. Best regards The Nature Box (talk) 21:54, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Просьба

Здраствуйте уважаемый Spiritia, прошу переименовать эти фотографии:

File:Garegin-nzhdeh-portrait.jpg, так как здесь имя Нжде написано с маленькой буквой и это унизительно для армян [16].

А здесь надо менять j на zh

File:G.Njdeh.jpg [17]
File:Garegin Njdeh house Sofia.jpg‎ [18]
File:Garegin Njdeh founding of Tseghakron Boston 1933.jpg‎ [19]
File:Garegin Njdeh Balkan Wars 1913.png [20]

Все другие фотографии были изменены, остались только эти. Заранее спасибо--6AND5 (talk) 10:49, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@6AND5: : Файлы уже переименованы. Спасибо! :) →Spiritia 12:15, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Большое

Thank you.--6AND5 (talk) 12:30, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Извините, еще одна маленькая просьба. Чтобы Вы могли этот файл [21] переименовать на Garegin Nzhdeh, то надо этот файл [22] переименовать Garegin Nzhdeh 5, без оставления перенаправления, проблем не будет, так как этот файл не используется в других проектах.--6AND5 (talk) 12:52, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Вопрос

Здраствуйте уважаемый Spiritia, я правильно понял, что одна из задач (Archives Challenge), добавить например армянскoe описание [23] —?--6AND5 (talk) 22:28, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

2016

File:Commonswiki-gray.png

Здравей, Ще имам ли проблеми с тази картинка? --Termininja (talk) 16:05, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Здравей. Не би трябвало да има проблеми. Единствено бих предложила да уеднаквиш лиценза с този на оригинала ({{PD-ineligible}}, {{trademark}}). :) →Spiritia 14:09, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

English versions of Wikipedia mindmaps

Dear Vassia,

My compliments on your Wikipedia mindmaps in Bulgarian. They're wonderful. :)

Are there English versions of them? And, if not, could we please commission a translation?

These illustrations are a great resource for the global education community on Outreach wiki.

I'd love to do this exercise with my own students, as you did here. And it would help a lot to have a better idea of what your students collectively created as a model/example/guide.

Благодаря, Msannakoval (talk) 11:40, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not impossible. I'l think how it will be easiest to proceed with the translation and the respective new visualization. Oh and many thanks for the uploaded notes from September... :))))) →Spiritia 20:21, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Видео

Здравей, ще можеш ли да изтриеш файловете от тази категория, защото конвертора много ми ги смачка и са прекалено малки. Благодаря! --Спасимир (talk) 18:07, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Готово, благодаря! :) →Spiritia 21:44, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:20160406 BAS PhD forum Wikipedia in Science - Whether, When and How no-fairuse.pdf

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:20160406 BAS PhD forum Wikipedia in Science - Whether, When and How no-fairuse.pdf. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 11:57, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Просьба

Здраствуйте уважаемый Spiritia, я написал другому участнику [24], но он в отпуске, может поздно увидет, если возможно помогите меня в этом вопросе, я там с обоих учеток написал и подтвердил--Bari srtik (talk) 12:21, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Вопрос уже решен )))--Bari srtik (talk) 19:03, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

SVG (Scalable Vector Graphics)

In other languages ^{(translate this)}
Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ sicilianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ 日本語 ∙ +/−

Please use SVG

Thank you for uploading some images! Did you know that Wikimedia Commons recommends the SVG (Scalable Vector Graphics) format for certain types of images? Scalable Vector Graphics are designed to look appropriate at any scale, and SVG images are easier to modify and translate, helping Wikimedia to distribute knowledge to all of the world. A lot of modern programs support SVG export. If you encountered problems or have questions, don't hesitate to ask me, a member of the Graphic Lab, or the Graphics village pump. Uploading images in SVG format isn't mandatory, but it would help. (To avoid any misunderstandings, please don't just put raster images into an SVG container as embedded raster.) Thanks, and happy editing!

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Gorna Bela Rechka

Dear Spiritia!
I am native-speaking German, so sorry for my poor English. It seems to my that you are interested in this little village in Bulgaria as you put two photos to commons. Thank you for that. If you have more: please load them up as I am sitting on an article about Bela Rechka. When ready I will translate for the enWP. The reason I write you is a question I have. Could it be possible that you know somebody who could be interested in translating an article to the Bulgarian language? I wrote an article about en:Diana Ivanova, an interesting person I think. And she does a lot for Gorna Bela Rechka. You will find more about in the article. I translated the article and put it here to the enWP. I think it would be wonderful if this article could also exist in the bgWP. But I do neither speak Bulgarian nor can read it. I asked some Bulgarian friends to translate but they all are too busy with other things and are not so much interested in working for WP.
All the best --Andrea014 (talk) 06:53, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Andrea! I happen to know Diana personally, and the reason you see these images from Gorna Bela Rechka uploaded is one of the early editions of her GoatMilk Festival. While I am currently not very free myself to write an article she deserves (I am concurrently in the organization of a aarticle writing contest m:Wikimedia_CEE_Spring_2016 and the photocontest Commons:Wiki_Loves_Earth_2016_in_Bulgaria), I'd love to help for writing the article later this year. :) Thanks for writing it in English! →Spiritia 06:59, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the quick answer. It is wonderful. I also know Diana personally. If you see her, give some hugs from me! She will be in Bela Rechka, Goatmilk starts. I think there is no hurry. I just wanted to let you know that an article (in German & English) already exists and that everybody can translate by copy & paste. The links: perfect. So I contacted the best person. :-) If you want to contact me, please use my German account as I am not so often here. Have a nice time. --Andrea014 (talk) 09:05, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Spiritia! The english version of the article Gorna Bela Rechka is done! The translation was made by a new colleague. She arrived 3 weeks ago in WP and helps me so wonderful with translation (I know her: IrmaCan). So if you ever have time and energy to bring the article to the bgWP: feel free! Best wishes --Andrea014 (talk) 15:59, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for Spiritia

Благодаря ти @ Спири, и на Уози, и за хубавите думи които сигурно не заслужавам, имайки в предвид негативните коментари които съм правил по твой адрес, и не само. Моля те да забравиш миналото (ако е възможно) и да ме погледнеш с приятелски очи (моля те). Аз ще направя същото - обещавам! С пожелание за здраве и успехи. Поздрав --Oficialniat (talk) 18:39, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ъплоуди за проверка

Би ли хвърлила един поглед на Special:Contributions/Tananik. Благодаря! --Lord Bumbury (talk) 13:46, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Добре е също да се има предвид това и това. — Luchesar • T/C/U 13:48, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Лорд Бъмбъри and Iliev: Благодаря и на двамата. Nuke-нах картините и логото, за художниците си написах, че е по-добре да се качат в пълните им резолюции. →Spiritia 18:17, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. --Lord Bumbury (talk) 20:36, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

Please, FYI --The Photographer (talk) 04:17, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pengaroo, Pengarino and Wozzy.jpg

File:Pengaroo, Pengarino and Wozzy.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Fæ (talk) 04:06, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Asaf and Wozzy.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely Fæ (talk) 09:43, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Spiritia/Archive

2006

Image Tagging Image:Affine-vs-cartesian.png

Tip: Categorizing images

2007

Re User:Laino

Image Tagging Image:Coa_buryatia.gif

Image Tagging Image:Coa_buryatia-1.gif

2008

FP Promotion

Congratulations, Dear Administrator!

CC-BY-SA-2.0 vs CC-BY-SA-2.5

Deleted photo

Advice needed

Bulgarian politics

New BG interface

Some help

freedomdefined.org

Re: Problem with one transclusion

Image:Screenshot-of-Mozilla-Firefox-3.png

Paris images

Category redirects

Images from en.wikipedia to Commons

Upload problem

Изтрита картинка

Own subpage outside user space

Изтрити емблеми

Chee Soo image deletion

NGruev

About PD-old

Protected edit requests

Кучешки

About the translations

TUSC token fd1d8bf475d9cb811c13bd3fbb9d7e69

Elias Canetti's Signature

ASF-Logo.svg

Vidin

Катедралната църква “Св. Богородица” във Велико Търново през 1909 г.

Burgas Ethnography

Nikopolis ad Istrum

FOP-based deletion requests

2009

Help with Bulgarian text

CommonsDelinker

Paris

OTRS

Transfer

Tram

Undelete

Картинка на деня

Mile Markovski

Burgas 1981

Tip: Categorizing images

File source is not properly indicated: File:Jetvarska_uruglitsa.jpg

Карта

zdravey

За Category:Students Town

Uploads

Снимка

2010

File tagging File:Iskra-Angelova.jpg

Въпрос

Орден Кирил и Методий и др.

Copyright status: File:Strong--weak--no-correlation.png

Авторство

Request

Request: Creating some localized system messages

Tip: Categorizing images

Thinker_6

File source is not properly indicated: File:Kurshovski-Hitov-Zerdeliiski-1867-Belgrade.jpg

Category

Thank you

Преименуване на Файл

Снимка на деня

2011

Pencho Slaveykov

Помощ за новодошъл

Todor Kolev

Need help

Погребение на Г. Димитров