User talk:Filnik

STOP! If you have a question concerning Copyvio, License, or Something-like-that, please read this information on choosing a license. Please also note that I used a Bot to place a message in your talk page, so please pardon me if it made an error. If you are the author of the picture, it is usually enough simply to add {{PD-Self}} to the description page. Otherwise, search for a suitable license here, and all will be well. If your question concerns Bot issues (for example, if it's too fast or something like that) or anything else, please don't hesitate to write me immediately.

Archive 1, Archive 2, Archive 3, Archive 4, Archive 5, Archive 6. Don't forget to include your signature! ...I may choose not to answer unsigned messages...

File:Wikipedia-logo-v2-it.png

[1] Ho cancellato la tua contribuzione. If you wanted to have another logo You should upload it in another file. Also you could upload via this tool: [2] Kind regards, Otourly (talk) 20:55, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No problem and congratulation for the 700k ;) Otourly (talk) 11:08, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me. Do you speak spanish or only english? I`m from Argentina and if you speak spanish perhaps we can have a talk. Thank you.- --Villegassuccar (talk) 22:48, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please help!

I don't want to publish this file, but I don't know how can i delete it,because I don't speak english well. Please delete this file:http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Alexa_szlavics.jpg Thank you so much!Gyongyhal (talk) 10:03, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Pyotr Slovtsov

Hello! Help me to understand a question of copyrights please.I am the author of several broadcasts about creativity of opera singer Peter Slovtsova.My co-authors-regular employees of radio station "National radio" and "RtV-Podmoskove" had for these transfers, unlike me monetary compensation.I have been interested in rehabilitation of my grandfather-subjected to repression in 1937 was my most important task.For this reason my work was absolutely free. contacted supervising directors radio stations-they publication of these broadcasts do not object.Moreover, they are interested in popularisation of the of radio station.At present the unique justification of the publication of these broadcasts in entsiklopedii-is my desire, desire of the basic author.With respect - Сергей Соковнин (talk) 14:09, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No mistake... at least by you.

I just got a message from your bot claiming that I didn't add a license to three images I've uploaded. Actually, I did, but I believe that they were deleted when I was required to rename them before uploading them. I've since re-added the licenses that have disappeared. ----DanTD (talk) 21:13, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't say it was caused by your bot, and I agree it was the uploading tool. Of course that mistake by the uploading tool triggered your bot. ----DanTD (talk) 03:12, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No instructions.

I've received a message saying that one of my pictures lacks a copyright notice. I will gladly correct this to match the other pictures I uploaded today, but HOW? I have read everything I can link to, but can't find instructions on how to do this simple thing, just warnings that if I don't, the picture will be deleted. There isn't even an answer in the FAQ. Grrrrr.

Likewise you warn that you won't answer unsigned questions - but how does one sign anything? Really, Wikipedia does take an awful lot for granted - or is it a deliberate ploy to discourage contributors? I'm not even sure if this is the way to contact you via this talk page. What's wrong with a standard edit box and Send button? Kendall K. Down

Thanks for your help. I trust this is now signed? I've also tried to add a suitable copyright to Glenmoriston2010a.jpg KendallKDown (talk) 07:35, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have to agree that Wikipedia is incredibly difficult to follow and makes contributing (by people who are recognised experts on a particular subject) extremely difficult to the point that they won't bother. Wikipedia is failing to make contributing user-friendly and by having instructions and help pages that are very confusing and complicated it essentially restricts its content. I know many people who are experts in one subject and who all want to improve a page but none of us can comprehend how do do so. Make it simpler Wikipedia!!!!! [user talk:dcrobertson68]

No mistake made ... entry deleted

I recognized that many companies, also SME´s, have entries about their companies on wikipedia.

Because of that, I thought it might be a good idea to do so as well. I followed the instructions and set up a wikipedia-site for the company I work for. About an hour later I got the message that my entry was deleted because I was the only user who edited the entry and that it would be only an entry for advertising reasons. So I wondered whether I am allowed to create a wikipedia-site for my company? And I wondered why all other companies are allowed to? Is there any criteria for it?!

I would be very thankful if you would tell me which steps I did wrong, or better: how I can make an entry about the company I work for without erasure following.

Thanks for your help. PeCo-PerformanceConsulitng (talk) 08:32, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

KurtEisner1919.jpg and license

Hello Filnik, though I don't quite get what was missing from the https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/wiki/File:KurtEisner1919.jpg file I uploaded, I indeed made a mistake: it seems the author died in June 8th 1940 but his works will not be in the public domain till the end of the year (I assumed it was 70 years from the date of his death). Thus, I'd be grateful if you could delete it for the time being. I will try to remember and add it back into Commons next year. Thanks you in advance for your help.--Rowanwindwhistler (talk) 18:16, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A database error...

Dear Filnik , hello !

I took advantage of your kind invitation to contact you when we have a problem, so please excuse me for the inconvenience. I want to ask you what does mean this message on my gallery page about the occurrence of an error in the database and how can I solve this problem. Thanks in advance!

The message is:„ A database error has occurred Query: SELECT cl_to as cat FROM categorylinks LEFT JOIN u_daniel_cache.commonswiki_nontopics ON namespace = 14 AND title = cl_to where cl_from = 8451192 AND id IS NULL Function: getCategories Error: 1146 Table 'u_daniel_cache.commonswiki_nontopics' doesn't exist (sql-s4 “

Argenna (talk) 21:06, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. I think that all Commons users` image galleries are in the same situation . I found many galleries with the same error and message. Argenna (talk) 21:47, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A database error...

Dear Filnik , thank you for your message and reply . I can not give now a link because the issue was resolved, but I do not know by who. On July 25 the error still exists. I left a message with this error to Túrelio , on July 25 (I saw it in his gallery too), but he never found it. The message is in history (it was deleted in the meantime). The error was that it only display the last downloaded image, other images could not be accessed . Have a nice evening . Argenna (talk) 21:22, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for your interest and prompt response . A nice evening I wish to you .Argenna (talk) 20:29, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

License

hello, I received your message about a missing license for my image [[3]], but I didn't know how to add the license or even what to add, though I went to the pages explaining what to do :/ It has been a time since I last came to Commons and I forgot a lot of things ^^' so a little help will be the most welcomed :) Arwen.lb

Fixing the license and changing a file name to binomials

I'm having the same problem as some other folks - I can't see where to change or add the license to Multi-license with CC-BY-SA-3.0 and GDFL (recommended). I think I've been to every link there is and I still can't find it - can it really be that difficult to do? I would be more than happy to change it, but how? I can just wait a week and start over when the file has been automatically deleted, but I'd really like to know how to correct this.

Also, I would like to rename all my images that use English common names to the standard binomials. Should I change the name of the images from English to the binomial before uploading? The instructions for renaming a file say: "If you're not an admin, you can place the text {{rename|newname.ext|reason}} on the image description page. An administrator will perform the move, if it conforms to the guidelines described below."

Where exactly do I put "{{rename|newname.ext|reason}}"? There are at least two edit places to add it - I tried the top one and got an offsite third-party webpage! I also tried to upload the same image with the binomial name and I could not do that, so at my http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Yellow-rumped_myrtle_warbler_02.jpg image, there are now 4 unwanted images while I was working out that this approach doesn't work.

I could really use a little help. Thanks, Amaling

request to delete files

Please could you delete the Flag of Berkshire.jpg and Wap_vv_hoofkerk.jpg‎ (if not already deleted). Struggling with license-tags, I do not wish to use them. No harm intended in uploading them. Thank you --Williwaw (talk) 11:45, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Strokkur geyser erupting 2.ogv

Your bot said there's an issue with the licensing of this video, but it didn't give much of a clue what that problem might be. It says I've "only used a template, not a license", but when I look at Commons:Choosing a license, I'm told that "If you don't want to read this and just want to know which license the Commons community recommends, choose one of the following: {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}}: "Copyleft (Multi-license GFDL, all CC-BY-SA)"; {{PD-self}}: "All rights released (Public domain or waiver if the PD release is invalidated)". I've already marked it with {{Own}} and with CC and GFDL licenses ({{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}}{{GFDL-self}}), which seems to be pretty much what that page advises: what more is needed?! I think the Commons help pages on the issue of licensing seriously need revising, as I'm hardly a simpleton and I have trouble working out what hoops to jump through and boxes to tick. Fences and windows (talk) 17:42, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Request to delete file File:Wilhelm von Brandenburg-.jpg

Hello! I uploaded a picture of Riga's last Archbishop, but hitted wrong key first time and so picture went up half-named and without license. Later I uploaded picture properly, but since I can't delete older picture, it's still up with half name and without license. So, maybe You can delete it? Athanasius Soter (talk) 20:03, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bot tagging of files already marked for speedy deletion

Per Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests#File:Benton Burlesque, 1922.jpg, I though I'd suggest to you that it might be a good idea if your bot(s) skipped any files already tagged for speedy deletion (at least for tags like {{Bad name}} where the deletion is indeed likely to be speedy, maybe not for "delayed speedy" like {{Nsd}}/{{Nld}}/{{Npd}}). It just seems a bit pointless to warn people about problems with files that are likely to be gone by the time they see the warning. What do you think? —Ilmari Karonen (talk) 16:37, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Photo of Roman barbotine cup

I am new to uploading pictures, so I don't know what the trouble is here. This photo was taken yesterday (23 August 2010), by me, in the British Museum galleries, as were the other files I have uploaded so far. It is absolutely my own copyright. I edited it (cropping, lightening etc.) in Photoshop, but I have also edited the others. I have chosen the 'recommended' licence option on all uploads so far. Please help me understand what I have done wrong. AgTigress (talk) 13:06, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your bot error?

Your bot "Nikbot" tagged File:Kansai Wikimedia Unconference 20100626 02.JPG as "No license", but the file has been for speedy deletion ({{Bad name}}). I think your bot must check the file's status of deletion before it tag and warn.--aokomoriuta (talk) 14:26, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

SitCen

Thanks for the counsel, I'll try to introduce a valid licence, but I'm not completely shure to achieve it, I'm not very proficient in Wikimedia. --Miguel Bravo-Ferrer (talk) 15:43, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright missing

Hello, I am new here on Wikimedia Commons. You have sent me messages that copyrights are missing from two of my photographs: Garden Solhaug.jpg and Pinsemenigheten, Betania.jpg. I do not know what do do? Can you please explain that? I have uploaded these photographs twice, because their file names were uncorrect in the beginning. You wrote that I could add the licence in the the image linked above. What image? Please give me a reply. Best wishes! Mbakkel2 27. aug 2010 21:49 (UTC)

I have no added GFDL in the description page! Best wishes Mbakkel2 28. aug 2010 16:24 (ITC)

File

So far I uploaded one file and the name was wrong. Could you delete the file completely so that I can upload the proper version with the correct name? WiggerBarry (talk) 11:22, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Shibley Rahman

New to Wikipedia

I have taken a picture of the ventromedial prefrontal cortex from the vmpfc page as I assumed it was covered by 'Creative Commons'. I need to notify where I got it from. Likewise, I am experimenting with the syntax. Therefore I have put a picture of Tony Benn on my page but will remove it asap. Please help urgently. Articleman11 (talk) 14:11, 28 August 2010 (UTC)Articleman11[reply]

Licence problems

I seem to be having licence problems I have permissions from al the Libraries/ Museums and I use my own photos I am unable to follow how to modify the permissions The Help is so detailed I can not find a simple answer Please advise Ray_Oaks

Deleting File Problem

1- 09 -2010 Please, is possible to delete the previous version of the file Nonem.JPG?? Present in Wikimedia Commons at link: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Nonem.JPG?uselang=it Thanks For Help! = ] --Dadonene89 (talk) 15:53, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Aula(1931).jpg

Hi, would you please delete my file Aula(1931).jpg, I tried to upload it as a "Wikilovesmonuments" Rijksmonument (the project) but I failed, I like to try again, please. Ilonamay (talk) 11:54, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Forget this, please, I think I fixed it:-) Ilonamay (talk) 14:56, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re: File:Peackock Butterfly 1.jpg

Hi, and thanks for your help. I made a spelling error with the name of the file - so I removed the license and categories. I'd be happy for you to delete the file. I have, since then, uploaded the same file with the correct details.

Best wishes Francis Hannaway (talk) 10:31, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Next time you can add a {{Rename|File:Peacock Butterfly 1.jpg}} to get the file renamed. --MGA73 (talk) 13:42, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Job for your bot

Hi! Your bot hunts down files without a license. I noticed that this file does not have a license File:Kvogur.jpg but it has not been tagged. Is {{Insignia}} on the skip list? I think that it should not be. Perhaps you could get your bot tho check the Category:Insignia and tag the files without a real license?

First version of file uploaded by mistake

It was deleted (history). Thanks.--Kusurija (talk) 10:47, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wooden-Coaster Mammut.JPG & File:Euro-Fighter Saw - The Ride Thorpe Park.ogv

1) I just got a message from your bot. It recognized that I didn't add a license to the file: Wooden-Coaster Mammut.JPG It should be published under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0. Could you please add the licensing, i forgot it.

2) I’ve uploaded the file: Euro-Fighter Saw - The Ride Thorpe Park.ogv But something has gone wrong during converting the file. It’s inoperable. Could you please delete the file.

Thanks in advance. Dr Player (talk) 17:56, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Problem with screenshots

Hello. I wanted to upload a screenshot of a serie in which wikipage I am working. What licensen shall I use? How can I upload it without beeing deleted. My image is the same case as this one: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Supernatural_TheColt.png a screenshot of a serie Thank you, fitg. 9 September 2010

File:Coat of Arms of Niels Bohr 2.png

How do I put the license File:Coat of Arms of Niels Bohr 2.png? Sorry for my English. --Franci juve (talk) 16:06, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cruz Cubicularios Zamora.jpg

Sorry, I'm not very skilled with Wikimedia. The file corresponds to the 'Cross of the Cubicularian Knights of Zamora', that is the simbol of the Confraternity itself. It was scanned yesterday by me, thanks to the permission granted by the president pf the Confraternity, Dr. García-Faria. What other data am I supposed to add? Thanks in advance, Sergerod

File:The First Presidential Mansion.jpg

I think I fixed the problem. Thanks for pointing it out. BoringHistoryGuy (talk) 00:40, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Supplément d'explication

Je voudrais SVP avoir quelques explications sur le défaut avec la licence de ces fichiers

File:Chenille01.JPG
File:Moto Belge Cseol se trouvant dans la salle d'exposition du Bois du Cazier à Marcinelle.JPG

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Mario52 merci

File:Kodo-Sawaki.jpg

File:Kodo-Sawaki.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Pieter Kuiper (talk) 18:51, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re:File:Luís Onmura.JPG

Prior to erase this image, please, was just an attempt to upload a material with the intention that he should be fair use, please leave a message on my talk page. Bruno Ishiai 01:59, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

Filnik AIUTO...

Ciao Filnik, spero che tu sia la persona giusta a cui mi possa rivolgere per risolvere un grande problema. Mi sono collegato a common oggi dopo molti giorni che mancavo e ho notato che qualcuno ha cancellato molte delle immagini che per anni ho caricato in common. Sono tutte immagini con regolare licenza a cui avevo lavorato per molto tempo per arricchire wikipedia e che erano presenti in wikipedia italia fino a poco tempo fa. Non so cosa sia successo ne chi sia stato e non so che fare anche perchè non ne ho di copie conservate per poterle ricaricare. Spero che tu possa aiutarmi. Fammis apere presto.--Chicco2 (talk) 20:52, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gerstlauer Launch-Coaster Plopsaland.ogv

Please delete File:Gerstlauer Launch-Coaster Plopsaland.ogv Thank you. Dr Player (talk) 14:00, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Immagini da cancellare

Ciao, avrei una domanda da farti: sei capace a cancellare queste immagini che ho creato io?

Grazie del favore che mi farai e buon lavoro. Ciao --Gattoarturo (talk) 14:55, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Frana Valegion.jpg

Anzi no, scusami o trovato il modo per fare richieste. CIAO --Gattoarturo (talk) 17:24, 7 October 2010 (UTC) ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________[reply]

Thank you!

pd-italy

good day. we try restore using of PD-Italy template, can you please shutdown bot "http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Nikbot"? This bot morning delete file "dead mussolini in 1945.jpg" from commons. --77.48.153.172 15:11, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Same problem here. My uploaded images may be nominated for deletion, but not just because of adding Template:PD-Italy anymore :-) Thanks! Clausule (talk) 01:04, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Possible bot error

I received these four messages here, I checked by I do not see any problem with the licenses. Can you help?-Mariordo (talk) 00:38, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please review license

Thanks for reminding the license at File:Transitos vs CPSuab 1914-2009.jpg. Plase review it.--Kiam-shim (talk) 21:48, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Adding copyright tag

I'm so sorry but I have been reading all the wikipedia copyright/license pages but I can't figure out how to apply a copyright tag that this is just my own picture of my grandfather! (its about this picture http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:P.J._Schmidt.jpg) I hope you can help me with this... Kind regards Lauer (talk) 10:57, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Indian Hatchet-pipe - Audubon.jpg

Has a copyright tag

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published (or registered with the U.S. Copyright Office) before January 1, 1929.

Public domain works must be out of copyright in both the United States and in the source country of the work in order to be hosted on the Commons. If the work is not a U.S. work, the file must have an additional copyright tag indicating the copyright status in the source country.
Note: This tag should not be used for sound recordings.

. The work was published in 1899 in the U.S. Mattisse (talk) 23:34, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

fyi

I believe this was a false positive. Geo Swan (talk) 00:32, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Uploaded images duplicated

Dear Administrator,

I uploaded third version, which is exactly identical with the second uploading. Would you be able to delete the third version? Thanks Donaldytong. 25/10/10.

Scientology?

Ciao, ho trovato nella pagina Category:Meta categories qualcosa di starno relativo a "Anonymous" anti-Scientology protests by date "Anonymous" anti-Scientology protests by place". Non penso si tratti di meta-categorie. Puoi fare qualcosa?Ciaurlec (talk) 09:08, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re: File:50x_RGC_axotomy_1_day.png

Added a proper license. Photo was taken of a live specimen by me in my lab. User:MemoryLapse

Your robot Nikbot set too fast (about new upload)

Before launching any warning message to user, please allow some time (at leat 15 mn) for correction by user after your bot detected something wrong. Thanks. --Warp3 (talk) 01:29, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ane Hedvig Brøndum (1880 painting).jpg

Hi Filnik, I have received an automatic message from your Nikbot on my talkpage regarding the above mentioned file but I fail to see what the problem is - all info regarding author, license, date and origins seem to be in order. Sprry if I am mistaken.Ramblersen (talk) 01:50, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It occured after your doings on August 2010 (no more tags/licences). Since the image has been changed, this is no more relevant. Cheers, --Warp3 (talk) 02:52, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Need help with licencing

Hello Filnik i see that I've had some trouble with my logo uploading.... I still don"t get everything on this website, but I'm getting better everyday :) Anyway, about the incorrect licence: I used the choice list given when uploading the file and I messed up the licence type.... I should have used "logo" instead of "my own work"... I did the logo so it is my work in a way, but I suppose I "logo" is better...

On the other hand , I have another question, how do i erase an image I uploaded? In order to complete the article I'm writing I used the old logo (I hadn't finished the new one :) ) and now I would like to erase it, but it doesn't seem I can... If you can help me with the licence problem and this one, you'd save my day :D

Thank you in advance, and I look forward to your replay.

JoliesceramiqueJoliesceramiques (talk) 15:26, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Seems that Filnik hasn't been replying here or there since end of July 2010... --Warp3 (talk) 01:30, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Need help

Hallo Filnik können Sie diese File:Biological cell-2.pngund File:Biological cell az.png löschen. Vielen Dank.--MrArifnajafov (talk) 20:38, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Didouner : picture delated

Bonjour Filnik sorry for my english! My photos has been delated because You're think I'm not the author. So I've tried to send a e mail by my internet site www.fauteuil-club.info to permission@wikimedia.org but it doesn't work. so What can I do? Can you give me a e-mail where somebody can hear me, please.

Thank you very much

didouner

So, I found an e mail that i made in 2008. I gave authorisation to put these photos on wiki. thank you. didier

File:DE LIJN.svg

Hallo,

ich sah heute, dass das SVG-Logo vom belgischen Busbetrieb De Lijn von Ihrem Bot gelöscht wurde, auf Grund von falscher Lizenz. Nun habe ich mich etwas schlauer gemacht und etwas genauer andere Logos auf dem deutschsprachigen Wiki angeschaut und den fehler behoben. Nun habe ich das Logo erneut hochgeladen, jedoch auf dem dt. Wiki.

Ich würde mich freuen, wenn Sie erneut prüfen könnten, ob nun das Logo nicht erneut gelöscht werden muss.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen Claas-Fan

paintingm.jpg

I received a message from nikbot saying that an image that i have added, paintingm.jpg, doesn't have a proper license. I thought I went through the proper channels and added the license correctly? It is a photo from the archives at the library on my campus, but I was given permission to use the image as long as I attributed it to the archives, which I believe I also have done correctly? Any help is appreciated, Thanks!

Ngast (talk) 04:37, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Adding licenses

Hi Filnik,

I'm Turkish user and my English isn't good enough, so I could not adding licences to my uploaded pictures.
1 and 2 I took the pictures from here. I'm having problems with uploading pictures. Can you help me with that two pictures? Thanks. -Ravages (talk) 16:27, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Spirit of '43

About my two files of The Spirit of '43 I thoguht there is no appropriate template. May be the nearest one is {{PD-USGov}}, which I Added to those files.--Maher27777 (talk) 19:45, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Schroedinger equation.jpg

About the message in my personal page, I think the problem with the licence have been solved. Could you check, please!

Thanks!

Lauro Chieza de Carvalho (talk) 09:23, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Licenze per cartografia

Ciao, vorrei contribuire su commons con la creazione di alcune carte tematiche. Si tratterebbe di lavori personali fatti con software GIS open source (gvSIG e GRASS). Il grosso problema è con la fonte dei dati che potrei scaricare da siti governativi (APAT, geoportale, etc...). Mi sai dare qualche dritta sulle licenze che coprono questo tipo di dati, o su qualche wikipediano che possa conoscere la materia? Grazie --Ciaurlec (talk) 16:45, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Painting1.jpg (Hein Boeken)

Hello Filnik. Could you please check if the licensing of the file Painting1.jpg is correct now (I justed capital letters, by mistake). Thank you. Pimbrils (talk) 15:23, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mail To Me

Hallo Filnik,

i hope, you can help me in germen.

Ich habe diese Problem auch schon hier angesprochen und Hilfe erbeten!

--Woelle ffm (talk) 17:20, 25 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Filnik ist nur ein Botbetrieber - siehe hier ganz oben auf der Seite. Wir helfen dir schon bei Urheberfragen. Filnik markiert nur automatisch Bilder, bei denen etwas nicht stimmt. Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 20:54, 25 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

@Filnik: all explained. :D Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 20:54, 25 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Help

Hi, I am not able to choose a Licence for this. Since this is the first time I have uploaded a photo, Could you please help me ? I also asked another administrator to help me before your bot left me a message. Thank you in anticipation. *** in FACT *** (contact) 07:33, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please to not cross-post. Talk at help desk and stay patient. I gave you a first answer there. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 13:40, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Schroedinger_equation.jpg removal

Ok! No problems. I've made my own version of the file.

Sorry for the problems.

Lauro Chieza de Carvalho (talk) 17:31, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

checkimages.py

Hello! I am trying to update the script so that it could work in ru.wikipedia. I've added new translations, categories of license plates, etc. It works OK and tags images without license but I have one problem: when I use -duplicates paramater bot breaks when finds such a file. For example:

100 2994.jpg has a duplicate! Reporting it...
Execution time: 29
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "checkimages.py", line 1915, in <module>
    checkbot()
  File "checkimages.py", line 1896, in checkbot
    response2 = mainClass.checkImageDuplicated(duplicates_rollback)
  File "checkimages.py", line 1099, in checkImageDuplicated
    if self.duplicatesReport or only_report:
UnboundLocalError: local variable 'only_report' referenced before assignment

I haven't changed the code of the script, only translations, so, I think, the problem is in script itself. Can you advice me how to solve this problem? Or is it better to open a bug on tracker ? rubin16 (talk) 08:47, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Ernest_Koliqi.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Ernest_Koliqi.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Ernest_Koliqi.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Fut.Perf. ☼ 10:18, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Laskowski Battery Hel 1939.tif

I added File:Laskowski Battery Hel 1939.tif Nikbot answered - it's not a valid license. I want to use the some licence as in http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:ORP_Wicher.jpg - but I tried several times, with no result... Please, help me!

Vallenty (talk) 14:52, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Great Thanks - but how to learn repeating this licence? Trust me. I tried to read help several times - but with no result. Where I can find just THIS LICENCE method of writting?

Vallenty (talk) 13:52, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Vallenty, please continue at Commons:Help_desk#.2F.2A_Licensing_.2A.2F if you have more questions. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 15:23, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Too fast? Yes.

"Hi, sorry if I'm answering only now, but the bot already waits almost 10 minutes. Aren't enough? :/ --Filnik^{\b[Rr]ock\b!?} 11:31, 28 December 2010 (UTC)"[reply]

Please, give more time (half an hour seems fair) to anyone engaged in correcting a bad (fresh) uploaded file. Thank you in advance. --Warp3 (talk) 02:39, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

PD-Italy

Ciao. Mi è stato fatto notare che Nikbot indica ai caricatori che {{PD-Italy}} non va usato, ma recentemente il tag è stato ripristinato. Puoi correggerlo? Grazie (se fossi in te terrei le linee di codice e i testi degli avvisi, però, non si sa mai ;)--Trixt (talk) 09:36, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Category: Paintings of Saint Rosalie

Ciao Filnik, dopo aver creato la suddetta categoria, ci ho improvvidamente caricato le immagini di due dipinti del Prado trovate sul web: 1) File:Museo del Prado S.Rosalia vanDyck.jpg e 2) File:Santa Rosalia Luca Giordano Prado.jpg .

Riguardandole ad alta risoluzione ho notato la presenza in sovrimpressione del logo del Museo. Non è presente la "C" del copyright, ma forse sarebbe più prudente eliminarle. Potresti dargli un'occhiata ed eventualmente ( sigh! mi dispiacerà moltissimo per il van Dyck, ma...) procedere alla loro "cancellazione immediata"? Grazie! --Memorato (talk) 09:54, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ciao Filnik, molte grazie. E ho incassato anche la ramanzina. A riguardo, nella categoria museo del Prado c'è più di un'immagine con lo stesso logo in sovrimpressione (e questa volta non caricata dal sottoscritto); sarà il caso che qualcuno vi compia una piccola ricognizione --Memorato (talk) 22:30, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour - good Afternoon

Fiknik, thank you for all your work in Wikimedia Commons. I have a problem with a photo: File:Quebecphenix.jpg File:Quebecphenix.jpg

(this is a logo of one former women's ice hockey Team for the page en:Quebec Phenix
Permission = I read the document pdf 2007-08 CWHL Review`: the original photo is on page 18 and the text said photo: Christine Dufour. And I clik on the photo: title Womens_2009:Layout 1.qxd , auteur: rscott, creation: 2008-05-18 18:12:38, in another page of the clik you can read in french language: Impression: autorisé(e), Assemblage du document:non-autorisé(e), copie du document: autorisé(e), copie du document pour accessibilité: autorisé(e), extraction de pages: autorisé(e), commentaires: non-autorisé(e), remplissage de champs de formulaire: autorisé(e), apposition de signature: non-autorisé(e), création de modèle de pages: non-autorisé(e).

This is ok or not ok for Wikipedia ? I am a new member and the rules are not always evident for me. Thank you for your help. merci de votre aide --Geneviève 21:14, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

Vicond

Hi .First that all.I have an special situation with this file.I need A few time to woark on that and see what I can do with it.Is all.Thank you.

Vicond (talk) 00:44, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Open Beelden

Hello, could you read what I wrote at Commons talk:Licensing#Template:Open Beelden and say if Nikbot could be helpful detect files with that template, yet without a proper licence ? Teofilo (talk) 17:55, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

change your bot's msg

Hi Filnik, since it seems that you cannot answer all questions here you should delete the message "if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik)". Rather please only point to the help desk. People get frustrated if they ask here and get no response. Of course I and other people could answer here - like in the HD - but it does not make sense to have two help desks. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 23:37, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Answered at User_talk:Saibo#Message. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 13:24, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

And again. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 20:24, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Imbrugllia

Como faço para carregar um ficheiro de uso restrito? pois tentei fazer certo no File:Boogie Nights.jpg, mas não consegui. me ajude!!

Me ajude preciso fazer isso Imbrugllia (talk) 03:00, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please see → User_talk:Imbrugllia#Ficheiros_de_uso_restrito. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 13:34, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Triumphal Arch in Lisbon

May you kindly tell me if it everything OK now regarding copyrights with this photo on Wikimedia? Joao.pimentel.ferreira (talk) 20:31, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Carabinieri

Salve, vorrei chiederti un favore. Oggi ho caricato una serie di immagini relative ai gradi dei Carabinieri:

Ma nel caricare la penultima (OF9b), ho sbagliato a scrivere il titolo.

L'ho caricata di nuovo con il titolo corretto e ho applicato il Template:Duplicate sotto l'immagine con il titolo sbagliato. Ora non resta che eliminare l'immagine con il titolo non corretto. Mi spiace per l'inconveniente. Buon lavoro e grazie. --Just Angelus (talk) 23:14, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Italian deletion request

Ciao Filnik. This DR is almost all in Italian. It'll probably require an Italian sysop to close it. Would you mind?--Chaser (talk) 00:28, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kay mills.jpg

Hi Filnik.

The above image lacks a license. Wouldn't Nikbot normally tag that? -- Docu at 05:15, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

add_text_mod.py

Hi Filnik!
You once modified the "add_text.py" for me and named it "add_text_mod.py". Do you still have a copy of that modified script? That'd be really great! Kind regards, abf «Cabale!» 10:06, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

nikbot's signature

Hello Filnik! Is it intentionally that you did not add the date/time? Just use ~~~~~ to add the date/time. Otherwise people cannot see when the bot wrote the message. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 14:46, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Could you get Nikbot to add a date stamp to its signature? It would be helpful when looking at a user talk page to see the sequence of things. Thanks, Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 17:39, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I was bold and removed your section title. ;) See the section from me above. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 21:09, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

*knock* *knock* :-) Nobody at home? --Saibo (Δ) 19:21, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

moved from my talk --Saibo (Δ) 15:36, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I read your message only right now. I've added the signature, it will be ok as soon as Zscout370 explains to me why my bot has been blocked. Cheers, --Filnik^{\b[Rr]ock\b!?} 08:26, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Filnik, okay - fine that you have added a time stamp now, thanks! Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 15:36, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Screenshot TouchMail.png

File:Screenshot TouchMail.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Santosga (talk) 21:19, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nikbot

Please make sure that Nikbot accepts images included in Category:Copyrighted usable and its subcategories. Some people have been complaining that Nikbot is marking these images as missing licensing information. Thanks! Kaldari (talk) 21:32, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted image at Italian Wikipedia

Resolved– Kerαunoςcopia^◁gala xies 21:16, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Filnik, I was referred to you from my discussion at Commons:Help_desk#Can_admins_see_deleted_histories_across_language_wikis.3F. I was hoping you would be able to go to this image and look for the uploader's original "source" proving the image was licensed for use on Wikipedia. The image was eventually moved to File:Avril_Lavigne_Geneva_June_09_2005.jpg and I believe it to be a copyvio image, but I can't prove it. In addition, I have tried to contact the original photographer with no luck, but I emailed him a second time a few moments ago. I'm sort of hoping there may be a clue in the deleted image information at the Italian Wiki. Thanks so much! – Kerαunoςcopia^◁gala xies 21:04, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This has been answerd. See my comment here. cheers, Amada44 ^{talk to me} 21:09, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I misunderstood Vituzzu's reply. Thanks! – Kerαunoςcopia^◁gala xies 21:16, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Stemma comunale errato

Buongiorno Filnik, rappresento il comune di Collina d'Oro e scrivo a nome dell'esecutivo comunale (il Municipio) per chiedere un aiuto. Lo stemma presente sulla pagina del nostro comune è errato, è stato caricato nel 2008 ma non sappiamo esattamente da chi. Ora, trattandosi di uno stemma comunale la licenza di utilizzo è praticamente illimitata o regolata comunqe da leggi che ci consentono di pubblicarlo in 'libero utilizzo' essendone i legittimi proprietari. Purtroppo accade che molti utenti utilizzino questo stemma (errato) al posto di quello 'ufficiale' presente sul nostro sito istituzionale www.collinadoro.com e questo al Sindaco non piace per nulla. Avrei bisogno di sapere come posso correggere questo errore inviando (come, a chi, in che modo) lo stemma corretto da pubblicare su wikipedia. Mi rendo conto che malgrado io e i miei colleghi siamo degli utilizzatori pressochè giornalieri del sistema informativo più conosciuto del mondo, non sappiamo in realtà praticamente nulla sulla sua costruzione e modifica. La ringrazio già sin d'ora per ogni aiuto che potrà fornirci.

Comune di Collina d'Oro Ticino - Svizzera Paolo Cavadini

--Paolocavadini (talk) 09:01, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Filnik!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 11:14, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Holiday in Südtirol 2004 (66).jpg was uncategorized on 6 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:14, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Holiday in Südtirol 2004 (6).jpg was uncategorized on 6 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:14, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Holiday in Südtirol 2004 (111).jpg was uncategorized on 6 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:14, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Holiday in Südtirol 2004 (94).jpg was uncategorized on 6 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:14, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Holiday in Südtirol 2004 (104).jpg was uncategorized on 6 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:14, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

RetraitesPopulaires Lausanne.JPG

Please delete.I made an error uploading a revised version of this file. Sorry about that Robert aka Notafly (talk) 13:44, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your bot is misfunctioning!!!!! - pleas check it!!

Your bot puts a wrong licence warning on pitures wich are correctly licensed: exmple File:Guetsch (Niederdorf BL) 200.JPG Please stob it urgently!!! DidiWeidmann (talk) 00:48, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry - I remarked, that there was eventually a tecnical problem with the upload and the information was not completely copied. The probleme seems now to be resolved.DidiWeidmann (talk) 00:55, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

license warning after renaming

Hi Filnik, after renaming a file, I sometimes change the resulting redirect to a {{Bad name}} to get it deleted by an admin. Especially after having typos in files just uploaded. And 5 minutes later your bot bashes me for not having a license. Although I can as well live with that, there is no need to warn in that case and maybe you can improve the behavior, cheers, --Herzi Pinki (talk) 07:02, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:ReunionFlag.png and File:Lican.gif

Hi,Fidnik. The Licenses of File:ReunionFlag.png and File:Lican.gif are posted.says goodbye,--Jrodriguezvillalobos (talk) 20:33, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Filnik

Hello, Filnik! Your bot has advised me on my image so I thank you. If you need anything, let me know on my talk page. I'm spanish, so the next time write me in spanish, please. Well, this is everything. Regards, --BSac102E (talk) 13:02, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Help

Hi, Filnik! Can you tell me how to do it to put a new license? Is that today is the first day I'm on commons and I'm pretty clueless. Regards, --BSac102E (talk) 15:08, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Piccola aggiunta per Nikbot

Ciao. In seguito a questa richiesta, dovresti per favore "dire" a Nikbot di mandare lo stesso messaggio che manda quando "vede" {{PD}} anche quando vede {{Public domain}} (che non è altro che un redirect al primo). Ti ringrazio--Trixt (talk) 21:57, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non saprei dire. Comunque, ho caricato File:Bot test - Please don't delete.png vediamo che succede ;)--Trixt (talk) 12:14, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This talk page in other languages:

De-adminship warning

Dear Filnik. I am writing to you to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of inactivity.

If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section/Aug-Sep 2011 within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.

You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.

Thank you a×p_de ^Hello! 17:03, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tillman REVIVAL 2 title page.jpg

Do you still have a concern about the title page of Tillman's Revival No. 2? It was published in 1896 (i.e., before 1923) and thus is in the PD in the US. Richard David Ramsey (talk) 22:01, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[update] Nikbot e {{Public domain}}

Ciao. Attualmente il mio file di prova File:Bot test - Please don't delete.png risulta ancora non essere stato segnalato dal bot. Strano. Non so, se riesci a trovare un po' di tempo per rivedere il codice e capire come mai non lo rileva... Non che sia urgente, ma inseriscilo nella tua to do list ;) Grazie--Trixt (talk) 20:12, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Container 01 KMJ.jpg

Nikbot placed a notice on my talk page after I reverted File:Container 01 KMJ.jpg to an earlier version, however I did not upload the file. —danhash (talk) 18:22, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Problemi con la CURVA DI BURNSIDE

Ciao Filnik

Pare che vi siano dei problemi col mio file CURVA DI BURNSIDE, che penso siano dovuti al fatto che volevo risistemare le informazioni su di esso, ma penso invece di aver fatto qualche errore, perchè prima andava tutto bene... Le informazioni che ho messo sono: '''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''

  == Dettagli ==
  Grafico della curva quintica detta di Burnside
  Scfn : scfn@interfree.it
  Opera propria
  == Licenza ==

I, the copyright holder of this work, release this work into the public domain. This applies worldwide.
In some countries this may not be legally possible; if so:
I grant anyone the right to use this work for any purpose, without any conditions, unless such conditions are required by law.

'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''

e pensavo che fossero giuste...che c'è che non va?

Fammi sapere...

--79.19.30.114 17:30, 2 November 2011 (UTC) Scfn : scfn@interfree.it[reply]

Problemi con la CURVA DI BURNSIDE

Ciao Filnik

Pare che vi siano dei problemi col mio file CURVA DI BURNSIDE, che penso siano dovuti al fatto che volevo risistemare le informazioni su di esso, ma penso invece di aver fatto qualche errore, perchè prima andava tutto bene... Le informazioni che ho messo sono: '''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''

  == Dettagli ==
  Grafico della curva quintica detta di Burnside
  Scfn : scfn@interfree.it
  Opera propria
  == Licenza ==

I, the copyright holder of this work, release this work into the public domain. This applies worldwide.
In some countries this may not be legally possible; if so:
I grant anyone the right to use this work for any purpose, without any conditions, unless such conditions are required by law.

'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''

e pensavo che fossero giuste...che c'è che non va?

Fammi sapere...

--79.19.30.114 17:31, 2 November 2011 (UTC) Scfn : scfn@interfree.it[reply]

Answ:Unknown extension!

It's GIMP version of png file. It is in order to be able to work with layers of file. It may not show it in the preview.

Template

Ciao, vorrei un tuo parere. Ho creato questo template utilizzando "autotranslate", ma non riesco a capire perché, quando clicco su "italiano" invece di tradursi automaticamente, mi reindirizza alla pagina Template:User talk/it. Puoi dare un'occhiata? Ho sbagliato qualcosa? Un saluto e grazie in anticipo. Angelus ^(talk) 14:38, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Rettifico, alla fine ho risolto da solo! Grazie lo stesso. Un saluto. ;-) Angelus ^(talk) 15:09, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

forse vedo male, ma...

...mi pare che questa immagine sia in violazione di copyright (vedi qui) e anche diverse altre dello stesso autore (esempio). In tutti i casi le immagini riportano come fonte riviste online con accesso libero, ma con tutti i diritti riservati. Vedendo l'enorme mole di contributi, nel dubbio di aver capito male e non essendo pratica di Commons, mi rivolgo a te per un consiglio. Grazie e ciao, --Doc.mari (talk) 19:08, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done, risposto io.--Trixt (talk) 00:45, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Flickr upload bot

Hi,

It would helpful if you could programme Nikbot not to leave messages on User talk:Flickr upload bot, but instead to trace the user who used that tool. Andy Mabbett (talk) 11:47, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

foto Marramao FondazioneBasso.jpg

Ciao, ho un problema con la licenza della foto Marramao_FondazioneBasso.jpg nel senso che ho provato a specificare che, pur non essendo io l'autrice, avevo il permesso di usare l'immagine, tuttavia è stata ugualmente segnalata la violazione di copyright e il file è stato rimosso dalla pagina Wikipedia inglese in cui l'avevo inserito (Giacomo Marramao). Si tratta di una foto scattata per conto della Fondazione Basso, diretta dal prof. Marramao e l'ho ricevuta dal prof. stesso con la richiesta di usarla per la sua pagina sul Wikipedia inglese. Mi ha detto che il copyright è della Fondazione e mi ha autorizzata a pubblicarla online, tra l'altro informandomi che la stessa era già stata utilizzata per un paio di suoi libri come foto profilo. Quando ho caricato il file su Wiki Commons ho provato a specificare tutto ciò ma o non l'ho fatto secondo gli standard previsti oppure la mia spiegazione è stata ignorata. Non so come fare per ripristinare il tutto correttamente: puoi aiutarmi? Grazie! Dreammy

Please remove the inappropriate restriction your bot placed on my image

Hi,

I work as a consultant for Wikimedia Foundation and your bot just placed an inappropriate restriction for this image I just uploaded as part of my work:

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:AFT-v5-Feedback-Form1-Mockup-11-28.png

I have no idea why that restriction was added, as I filled in all the fields correctly, as I do for all other images I create for Wikimedia.

Please remove this restriction at your earliest convenience. I need this image to stay up for this project.

Thanks!

Fabrice Florin (talk) 01:29, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Fabrice, first of all: It does not count a bit if you are a hobby photographer or Jimbo Wales.

Apparently you understood now that the bot was totally right and you were wrong. ;-)

By the way: "Wikimedia Foundation" is no source. Please state how you got this image. If you are the author of the mockup the correct source would be {{Own}}. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 02:31, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Flag File

I recently added the required license file File:Bandera Provincia de Colon.jpg is correct check if all or the license is correct to treat so that the file is not removed. Thanks!

Evanex (talk) 03:25, 06 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Evanex! Please ask such questions at Commons:Help desk (there also was a direct link on the file page in the license section).

You have added a license tag now - yes - but only the author / creator / designer of the image can issue such a license.

I had a look in COM:L and COM:CT but couldn't find anything about Panama. In this case here see also COM:COA. Unless we know that the image is freely licensed or public domain we cannot use it. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 20:24, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Incomplete License

About all of my recent uploads of images,

I understand that to upload images that are for information purposes without permission is not accepted, but, It's just to add more a little more understanding or to make the article recognizable for the readers, in no way I want to harm the companies, I just know alot about retail and well adding an image of a company logo to be recognized by viewers can be considered a good thing, correct?

Thank you for your time and for your attention.

Resende13 (talk) 01:58, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rock & pop argentina.PNG

Hola, esa imagen solo es un recorte de esta File:Roca78.jpg y lo agregue en la descripción de la primera, saludos. --Antoniairiarte (talk) 07:25, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bot's (understandable) mistake

File:Autorickshaw view of windshield from inside.jpg was uploaded in 2006, it was just moved to Commons with en:WP:FTCG. ▫ JohnnyMrNinja (talk / en) 21:47, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

file not caught

Hallo Filnik, http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:KIT-Reception.png&action=history - do you know why? I cannot look in the log (too long ago).

Otherwise it seems to run fine! :-) Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 03:08, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

immagini da controllare

Ciao Filnik

Mi è arrivata una e-mail che mi dice che alcune mie immagini non vanno bene, e precisamente le:

1 CURVA DI BURNSIDE.JPG

2 CURVADIBURNSIDE.JPG

3 EPTACONNESSA

Per l'immagine 1 già nel 21/11/2011 ti avevo contattato per dirti che mi pareva che il file aveva tutte le informazioni essenziali, tranne la data. Comunque l'ho inserita e ho aggiunto ...reale... nella descrizione... Per le immagini 2 e 3 le ho sostituite con altre più adatte e quindi vanno cancellate...

Non capisco bene l'ultima voce

4 CLASSIFICAZIONE DELLE IMMAGINI...

Sono andato sulla immagine 1 ma non ho so cosa mettere e dove mettere questa classificazione... Sono andato alle spiegazioni ma ci ho capito poco e niente...

Mi puoi aiutare?

--scfn@interfree.it 16:31, 10 January 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Scfn (talk • contribs) 2012-01-10T16:31:23‎ (UTC)

De-admin message

Hi Filnik. I regret to inform you that soon you'll loose the admin bit as you failed to make 5 log actions since last run, see here. Trijnstel (talk) 21:52, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems about a file I uploaded, although consent was sent in due form

Dear Filnik,

You have requested copyright information about a file I uploaded, <File:Guido Haazen Selfportrait.jpg>. In addition, all kinds of warning signs and messages have been attached to that file, lots of it in jargon I do not understand, but also including a passage I do understand: “This media file does not have sufficient information on its copyright status. Unless the copyright status is provided, the file will be deleted seven days after this template was added: (1 February 2012).”

But I have done absolutely everything I thought I could do to provide WikimediaCommons with that information, and I am at my wits’ end to explain what went wrong. I will tell you the whole story of what I did.

I first corresponded with the copyright holder of the picture, and at my request he gave it to me, for the express purpose of using it in an article I am writing for the Dutch-language Wikipedia. I told him about the advantage of putting it on WikimediaCommons, I told him about the strictness of all Wikipedia projects regarding copyright, and he assured me he would cooperate. One more thing about this correspondence: we are both speakers of Dutch, so our correspondence was in Dutch.

Obviously I had his permission. But this being the first time I planned to upload a picture I did not take myself, I wrote to <permissions-commons AT wikimedia DOT org> in advance. I received a reply (from an OTRS volunteer who signed her e-mail, but whose name I must not divulge on this open-access page) which contained the following passage: “If we are provided with a clear statement that the copyright holder is releasing this content for redistribution under an allowable license, then the content may be used on Wikimedia projects. The email template at <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:CONSENT> can be used if needed.”

So, since I had already obtained the copyright holder’s permission, I followed the procedure outlined in the section “When permission is confirmed” on <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requesting_copyright_permission>:

(1) I uploaded the image.

(2) I had the copyright holder send his consent to <permissions-commons AT wikimedia DOT org>, using the form suggested by my OTRS correspondent. I also made sure he added the picture itself as well as the URL of the file I had uploaded. As to the additional requirements in this second point of “When permission is confirmed”, I had him summarize our correspondence mentioned above. (It would have made no sense to include it, since it is all in Dutch.). — He sent me a copy of his e-mail, so I know his consent was sent in due form.

(3) I added the OTRS pending template (between double braces, naturally) to the description page.

I do hope you can solve the problem. I am sure you understand that to have done my best to make sure there would be no copyright problems, and then to find that there are is very discouraging. Polla ta deina (talk) 11:13, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In case you read this reply: you did fine - until the permission is received and processed the image will be undeleted. Please write further comments regarding that image to the permissions-commons email address. You can also find information here: Commons:OTRS/nl. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 20:19, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. Saibo (Δ) 20:19, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

copyright clearing

Hey Filnik, thanks for your message. As I wrote this picture was taking from a friend of mine. I announced his name under the picture as copyright owner. And I also payed for this picture shoting, because these is one of my promotion pictures of 2012. Please let me know how to handle it ind the best way. I will write the photographer a short message by Email in the mainwhile. Thanks in advance. --Ingo Boss (talk) 19:26, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Answered at User talk:Ingo Boss#File:Ingo Boss at CocoonClub 2010.jpeg. --Saibo (Δ) 20:07, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. Saibo (Δ) 20:07, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Autopatrol given

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. Morning Sunshine (talk) 15:42, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:PSP White.png

File:PSP White.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

—danhash (talk) 18:55, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Michał Szczerba.jpg

I send to polish parlialmetarist Michał Szczerba qestion to free license. He will send information of Michał Szczerba.jpg to mail permissions-commons-pl@wikimedia.org in his free time.Lukasz2 (talk) 11:09, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Files of Lushnikov

Good day! Tell me please what should I do with this file and its author? The letter to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org from alexey.lushnikov@xxx.xx was sent on 15 March but no answer is visible. Best regards, Doctor Zevago (talk) 13:56, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Help to delete

Hi Filnik,

Thank you for your notification on my talk page. I just used the commonist tools for the first time and unaccidently uploading this picture. Can you help me to delete the picture, please? Thank you. --22Kartika (talk) 13:29, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bug

See [4]. Clearly licensed. Not sure what should be done about it. Magog the Ogre (talk) 02:53, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Still has issues: File:2-18th on Ferry.jpg. Are you even around anymore to ask? If not, who can maintain and fix your bot's bugs? Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:21, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Can't find the right license

Hi!

My friend John Quinlan sent me a photo via e-mail to which he owns the copyright, and he encouraged me to share it as widely as possible, releasing it to the public domain. I uploaded it here http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Model_John_Quinlan_in_Calvin_Klein_65.jpg but it does not have a license attached as I paged through hundreds without finding any that said "For a recent work released into the public domain."

John can be reached at therealjohnquinlan@yahoo.com to clear up the issue.

Walters Image License

I changed the copyright status on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Walters_Art_Museum_Charles.jpg. Can you please verify to see if you still need more information? Contact me at cocosua88@gmail.com. Thank you!

12:29 7 May 2012

First time submitting problem maybe?

Sorry to disturb, I know you're probably busy. I uploaded image " http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Beto_O'Rourke.JPG " which I recieved from his campaign website at " http://www.betoforcongress.com ", which he clearly put up for public use. This is the first I've uploaded to Wikimedia, because I don't want to have to wait to make wikipedia a better site. Thanks.

Grammarxxx (talk) 3:09, May 31, 2012 (UTC) --Schubbay (talk) 10:22, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nikbot issue

Hi. User:Russavia uploaded File:Air India Boeing 747-437 d'Silva.jpg. A few minutes after that upload, I edited the file and uploaded a new version. Nikbot toddled along a few minutes later, slapped it with {{no license}} and left me a message. Would be a whole lot more useful to leave a message for the original uploader instead. This has happened twice recently, and had I not manually copied Nikbot's message to the original uploader's talk page, they would have gotten no notice that you'd been through. Sort of like getting a traffic ticket and not finding out about it until they arrest you for non-payment. – JBarta (talk) 06:41, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

See my comment at #Obvious copyright violations. --Saibo (Δ ∇) 21:09, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:BernadettePeters Headshot.jpg

Your marked this, and another Peters image for deletion, but they did not get deleted after the 7 days. Did you change your mind? -- Ssilvers (talk) 19:24, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Images are not automatically deleted after precisely 7 days. However, at some point after 7 days an admin will stumble by and if nothing has been corrected, he will most likely delete it. This can happen after 7 days, 8 days, 9 days or even longer. – JBarta (talk) 19:44, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:我的小姑姑21.jpg

File:我的小姑姑21.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

— KC9TV (talk) 04:24, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Obvious copyright violations

Hello,

I think that obvious copyright violations (images with Google/Internet/Facebook/etc. as source, CD/DVD/book covers, posters, images from agencies (Getty/etc.), promo images, logos, etc.) should not be tagged with a missing license template, as your bot does. They should be tagged as {{Copyvio}}. That would greatly help the work of admins and others trying to separate the good from the bad. Thanks, Yann (talk) 14:35, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

We can be glad that the bot is still running at all (see Filnik's contribs) - at least most of the time. No license is not wrong - and at the end hopefully the files will get deleted due to that tag. --Saibo (Δ ∇) 21:08, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Attribution Share-Alike 3.0 license

Hello Filnik, please have a glance at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:WalbranGrave.png . "Template:Attribution Share-Alike 3.0" is a red link when it should be blue. Please tell me what is wrong, Thanks, PeterEasthope (talk) 02:18, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind; I found the syntax "Cc-by-sa-3.0|1="<attribution>. Remaining questions: why is it rendered as "Unported" and what does that mean? Thanks, PeterEasthope (talk) 13:42, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Zeichnung-3b.svg

To let you know, your bot is complaining about a file that does not exist. This is confusing but (from my point of view) easy to fix. You should skip such description pages if they do not contain a file. --TMg 13:13, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

James Monroe cabinet - picture license

Hello, I uploaded new picture with name "James Monroe Cabinet" yesterday and you marked it as insufficient licencing picture. Please remove your warning about possible deletion of my picture because this picture I found on internet as free and I also gave link of website where this picture can be found on internet (http://kids.britannica.com/comptons/art-123209/US-President-James-Monroe-standing-presides-over-a-cabinet-meeting). I am not very experienced in licencing matters but I know that pictures with similar origin are dozens in wikipedia. Thank you for your help in advance.Lucullus19 (talk) 18:47, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Jarvis Brook

Hi

I have used a photograph of a window in a Jarvis Brook church and it is earmarked for deletion. Below is some detail on the photograph. http://www.geograph.org.uk/reuse.php?id=2486821 I guess when I uploaded the image it was not clear that I was basing the upload on this approval although I did attach a link to the geograph image.

I would like to save the image from deletion. What do I do?????

Weglinde (talk) 18:48, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Piñas collage2.png

Hi. The file is located on the website of the Gobierno Autónomo Descentralizado de Piñas. If you look in the lower left corner of the web, says his content is licensed under Creative Commons 3.0 (CC BY 3.0). Regards. Juanpa780874 (talk) 21:29, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

wikimedia file

Hi there, I have just borrowed the file from enwiki. that's all. why so much fuss when it is being shown in the enwiki elephant page?--Somesh virgo (talk) 20:39, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Manuela in 2012.jpeg

Because this edit? Érico Wouters ^msg 02:03, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

About this file

File:Nanchang-metro-logo_01.png,how do it ?--Qa003qa003 (talk) 05:37, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Schloss Weissenstein Pommersfelden.jpg, File:Passau Dom Sankt Stephan.png

Ich habe bei beiden Bildern lediglich eine modifizierte Version (minor improvements) hochgeladen, für die die ursprüngliche Lizenz nach wie vor gilt. Eine Genehmigung des Urhebers ist deshalb nicht erforderlich. Ich bitte deshalb das gelöschte Bild wieder hochzuladen und das andere nicht zu löschen. --Schubbay (talk) 10:22, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please restore both pictures because I made only minor improvements. The original licence is still valid. --Schubbay (talk) 19:40, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nikbot accusing the innocent

Hi there! I just got fingered by the bot. Please take a look at the situation. No hard feelings. Palosirkka (talk) 21:25, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

FILES WILL BE DELETE BECAUSE I FORGOT TO WRITE THE TYPE OF LICENSE

Good morning Filnik,

I uploaded two files: Dolomía sinterizada.JPG and Dolomía calcinada.JPG, but I forgot the license that is: "This file is ineligible for copyright and therefore in the public domain, because it consists entirely of information that is common property and contains no original authorship"

How Could I provide the copyright status in order to these files will not delete?

Kind regards,

--Calerita (talk) 10:56, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

.xcf is allowed

https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Studienverlauf_KoSI-B.Sc..xcf&diff=prev&oldid=79393437 --93.132.125.152 08:50, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Suitable licence

Please add a suitable licence to Čtrnáct pražských mučedníků 4.jpg. I wrote information about this image to description. I don't know which licence is suitable, here is no help in Czech language. This image was made by unknown author probably in 1698 because the year 1698 is written in this image. I think an author of this image is more then 70 years dead. Šárka Praha (talk) 08:11, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done. It's {{PD-old}}. --McZusatz (talk) 08:18, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much. Šárka Praha (talk) 08:23, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

license enquiry

Kindly review this file that I uploaded yesterday because it has been marked for deletion. I believe I have chosen the most suitable license for this file, it is publicly displayed in a museum and it falls exactly in the category license of “freedom of panorama” in Egypt.

Karimalaa (talk) 17:39, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wadim Gippenreiter 3 May 2012.jpeg

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ --Frze (talk) 10:55, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

il tuo bot pensa che un'immagine violi la licenza

Ciao Filnik, il tuo bot pensa che questa immagine File:" 11 ITALY FERRARI 458 in competition (focus on flap and headlamp).jpg violi qualche licenza o non abbia informazioni dettagliate. Essendo un'opera derivata ed essendo abbastanza sicuro di aver fatto le cose fatte bene rilasciando informazioni adeguate riguardo le licenze penso che sia un errore del tuo bot. Se puoi controllare mi fai un favore, altrimenti se ho sbagliato qualcosa ti prego di dirmelo (PS: scrivimi sulla mia pagina discussione che altrimenti mi dimentico. Ciao) --Pava (talk) 08:24, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

License

Hello Filnik, could you please verify if my file (regarding license info) is now correct? Thank you in advance for your help. --Poetrybrazil (talk) 17:18, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the files

¡Hello! please delete all the files of Damian Romero because all comply with copyvio. Thanks. --Andesmen (talk) 00:00, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hola mi imagen esta siendo usada por otro usuario

Hola Como estas? mil disculpas por la molestia, hace algunos dias edite la informacion de la contribucion que realizamos a Wikimedia, el texto ya quedo, pero la imagen por error la subimos de nuevo y no sabes como conservar solo la original que subimos en el 2009, ahora un usuario externo esta usando la imagen y no corresponde al nombre de la persona, la imagen puede verse el la seccion de global use quien la usa y pues como comentamos aqui, no corresponde a la persona que es. Necesitamos de tu ayuda para que el otro usuario no haga uso de la imagen y asi poder darte mas detalles de los derechos de autor de la imagen ya que tenemos el permiso del titular (Alejandro Flores) si nos puedes hacer favor de checar nuestra contribucion y ayudarnos te lo agradeceremos, saludos, perdon una cosa mas puede usted borrar las imagenes o archivos anteriores, dejar solo la imagen del 2009 y el texto corregido del 2013? una vez mas gracias Usuario: Cine

Nikbot question

Hi Filnik, do you know whether Nikbot warns the uploader of a file whenever it marks a file? We've found a situation in which a Nikbot marked a file as not having a valid license but the uploader was not warned and couldn't fix the issue before the file was deleted? Was it a fault in Nikbot's usual behaviour or is a design choice? Best regards --Ecemaml ^{talk to me/habla conmigo} 15:22, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

hey, could you please help out (your bot notice)

Seems to be a speaker of English as a second language at File:Bonus-Sweden.png struggling through licensing issues. Sorry for the intrusion, but you please give him/her a hand? I'm kinda busy. Thanks ServiceableVillain (talk) 11:44, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Nikbot

Every day I find a new message from you on my email account, where there are indicated pages in wiki/commons. But I do not know what to do with these pages. Of course I read them. But all the messages are only confusing for me, becausae I do not know, what actually is to do for me. Can you please help me - or who else? --Jakarandatree (talk) 14:30, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ayuda

Hola mucho gusto, disculpa pero no sé inglés u.u, y soy semi-nuevo en commons (ya que una vez subí imagenes sin saber de los derechos de autor y eso, y obviamente fueron eliminadas). El caso es que subí una foto que está libre de derechos de autor. Pero tu bots notifica algo que no tengo ni la menor idea de que hacer: "There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you." Qué debo hacer? de ante-mano gracias.

Bot de-flagging notification

Hi Filnik, I'm writing to you because your bot Filbot (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information) (assign permissions) is about to be de-flagged as a result of inactivity for a period longer than two years. If you'd like to keep that account flagged as a bot, please speak up at Commons:Bots/Requests/de-flag 2#Discussion; otherwise, I'll remove the bot flag from that account in a month from now (10 May 2014). Thanks for your understanding, odder (talk) 13:26, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

re: ImageT5P.JPG (Pavel Branko, film critic)

Dear Filnik, the robot concluded that the source is missing for the file I uploaded. I found the file on the internet (a photo of Pavel Branko, by his son, created in 1977). I gave the URL of the webpage where I found the file, and the URL of the file. Plus the license. If I put that info in the wrong place on the upload page, could you perhaps help me? Thank you so much for your advice or for whatever help you may give me.JoanX.Chen (talk) 22:43, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User_talk:Dirgela#Image_Tagging_Image:Satyras.jpg

Hey, what's wrong with User_talk:Dirgela#Image_Tagging_Image:Satyras.jpg this? It is clearly written in the description that I am author of this image.--Dirgela (talk) 07:39, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please explain...

You deleted File:Kurdistan caravan كوردستان.jpg, about five years ago. I see no obvious clue as to why it would be considered a copyvio.

Back when I uploaded it from flickr I left a note on the flickr contributors's description page for that image, thanking them for using a CC license, and telling people the URL where they could find the image on the commons.

It showed up on my flickr "recent activity" list, because someone else left a note on that description page.

Your deletion log entry says the image was a copyvio -- but it doesn't point to a discussion where that copyvio concern was discussed.

No discussions link to the image.
If some third party tagged it as a copyvio they did not follow the guideline of leaving me a heads-up on my talk page -- a serious problem, IMO.
Tineye.com doesn't find any versions not on flickr

I know it has been been five years, but do you remember how you came to be convinced it was a copyvio?

If there is a good explanation I will update my comment on that flickr page, explaining why it was deleted from the commons. Geo Swan (talk) 00:08, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Inactive Image-reviewers

Hello Filnik, there is a discussion about a request regarding your image-reviewer userright, which have never been used or not used recently. You can participate discussion in Commons:Administrators' noticeboard#Inactive_Image-reviewers. This is just a notification of discussion you may be involved. Best regards, --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:54, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed you from several groups per this discussion. When you return to editing, you can apply again at the relevant pages. Thank you for your contributions to Commons. Green Giant (talk) 01:50, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Filnik.png

—LX (talk, contribs) 18:40, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Commons bot inactivity

Hello! Your bot has been listed at Commons:Bots/Requests/de-flag 4 as being inactive for over two years. As a housekeeping measure we'd like to remove the bot flag from inactive bot accounts, unless you expect the bot will be operated again in the near future. If you consent to the removal of the bot flag (or do not reply on the deflag page) you can rerequest the bot flag at Commons:Bots/Requests should you need it again. Regards --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:49, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Need help regarding images on Stacked Like Pancakes wiki

Hello Filnik,

I would like guidance on what to do to resolve the issues regarding the images on Stacked Like Pancakes. I am the copyright owner of both images. Naturally, I don't want to keep messing up.

Thank you! --RisingDown360 (talk) 16:37, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Need help

User talk:Cyphoidbomb is stalkingbullying please help.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Cyphoidbomb. my friend is upset over his rude comments can you help in this issue,if to contact to whom i must report--Robertvarsha (talk) 12:35, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Contact request

Hi Filnik, you may contact me under w.sauber@gmx.at. Regards ---Xenophon (talk) 21:52, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Adminpedia-en-2.png

And also:

Yours sincerely, — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 10:13, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Szmrt fazismo sloboda narotv.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Szmrt fazismo sloboda narotv.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Szmrt fazismo sloboda narotv.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Yours sincerely, Ruthven (msg) 13:42, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]