Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have grantedautopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. INeverCry18:11, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I just noticed this question now that you've asked it again on my talk. I do rights changes pretty often, so I don't put talk pages on my watchlist after leaving the above message. I wouldn't want you to think I'd ignored the question. I've answered on my talk. INeverCry09:20, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I think the 'inscriptions' parameter is cursed. Last week I spent hours trying to fathom why the parameter didn't work on my file, only to discover I'd used 2 'inscriptions' parameters, the second of which was empty… Jastrow (Λέγετε) 20:21, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hallo Roland, machst du deine HotCat Änderungen von Feral Pigeons und Pigeon Breeds wie hier und da bitte wieder rückgängig? Da steckte ein kategorieübergreifendes System dahinter, dass diese Kategorien nur mit einem Leerzeichen in den Kopf der Kategorie versetzt wurden. Danke, --PigeonIP (talk) 08:09, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
[quotation end][reply]
Hallo, leider (aufrichtig gemeint) verstehe ich das dahinterliegende System hier wirklich nicht, da ich ja lediglich die "Sortierung" (dh kein 'Leerzeichen') imho 'logischer' und den Commons-üblichen Usus entsprechend für gerade nur diese zwei länderspezifischen Kategorien vorgenommen habe, btw zwei von etwa 500 edits an diesem Abend ;-) Bitte nimm ungeniert dies dem von Dir erwähnten Schema entsprechend vor, wie Du es für richtig hälst; dazu braucht es keine 'Aufforderung' an mich ;-) lg, Roland 18:42, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
Ich danke Ihnen für die richtige Kategorie. Ich warf noch ein paar Bilder von Vögeln. Seien Sie höflich sie beobachten. Zwiadowca2117:33, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Gern geschehen. Wissen Sie welche Farben die Puten hatten, die Sie fotografiert haben, oder ob sie alle gleich groß waren? Waren es Schwarze Deutsche Puten und Bourbonputen,[1] oder waren sie gelb, rot, kupfer? [2] --PigeonIP (talk) 18:11, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Did you read article 79 of the Portuguese "Civil Code"? (i bolded some parts):
"Article 79.º
(Right to image)
1. The portrait of a person is not allowed to be exhibited, reproduced or put in commerce without the person's consent; after death of the portrayed person, said consent rests in the persons designated on the Article 71(2), according to the order in said article.
2. It is not required the consent of the portrayed person when so justifies said person notoriety, the office that perfoms,police of justice demands, scientific, educational or cultural purposes, or when said reproduction is framed in public places, or framed in facts of public interest or have occurred publicly.
3. The portrait cannot, however, be reproduced, exhibited or put in commerce, if from said fact results prejudice to the honer, reputation or simple decorum of the portrayed person."
das ist doch nie und nimmer "self" sondern aus irgendeinem anderen Werk. möglicherweise PD. Für ein "falsch lizensiert" oder "copy-fraud" habe ich das richtige tag nicht gefunden. --PigeonIP (talk) 20:20, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Text logos Y has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!
Das sollte die Gruppen der Rasseneinteilungen widerspiegeln vgl. http://www.thebrc.org/standards.htm Ich bin aber schon bei der Zuordnung/Übersetzung/Übertragung der Rassen ins Deutsche gescheitert. Wenn man bei einigen Rassen die deutschen Beschreibung mit den vermutlich englischen Rassen vergleicht, kann man schon die ein oder andere Überraschung erleben. Ein erweiterter Schwierigkeitsgrad: UK und US scheinen sich da auch nicht wirklich grün (Kaninchen X in UK ist nicht Kaninchen X-US, das ist Z-US. X-US ist wieder eine ganz andere Rasse. Ich habe das dann lieber wieder sein gelassen. Habe mit den Tauben und Geflügel noch genug auf dem Tableau. Eine Übersetzung wurde mir aber schon angeboten, also wenn du Interesse hättest könnte ich dir vielleicht etwas vermitteln. Andererseits wäre ich dir aber auch nicht böse, wenn du einen LA stellst. Für mich ist das im Moment so gut wie nicht handhabbar. --PigeonIP (talk) 14:21, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
beim ZDRK sähe das übrigens so aus (6 Guppen, davon 3 Normalhaar). Ein Inhaltsverzeichnis vom EE-Standard sollte auch noch irgendwo auf meiner Platte liegen. --PigeonIP (talk) 14:25, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Irgendwieso hatte ich mir das gedacht. Nur "Category:Normal Fur Breeds" sagt eigentlich garnichts über Karnickel aus?! Ich suchte eigentlich eine Kategorie für Pelztierzüchter und bin deshalb darauf gestoßen. Ich will aber im Moment nicht wirklich eine anlegen, weil, was ist ein Pelztierzüchter? Einer der Pelztiere züchtet, oder jemand der Pelztiere für die Pelzgewinnung züchtet? Also lasse ich es lieber. Die Kategorie war nahe daran, allerdings nicht als Kaninchenunterkategorie. --Kürschner (talk) 16:08, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Wenn das so unklar ist/sein kann, sollte man vielleicht noch über einen Qualifikator nachdenken rabbits oder noch besser BRC oder British Rabbit Council, dann wäre auch klar nach wessen Gusto diese Einteilung vorgenommen wird (mein eigentliches Ziel war ja EE, wie bei den Tauben, aber so weit scheinen die Kaninchen noch nicht zu sein.) --PigeonIP (talk) 16:17, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Genau, das Wort rabbit sollte vorkommen, meiner Meinung nach in ausgeschriebener, auch für den Nichtfachmann verständlichen Form. Aber das streift mein Gebiet nur noch von fern. Schönen Abend! --Kürschner (talk) 17:50, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. I was wondering if you know if i could upload a painting such as this one under the art license? I'm not sure if its old enough so i could use a {{PD-old}} license. I won't take if from Facebook, its found on many other websites, as well as: this, & this, & this, & this. Could you please answer in my talk page? Thank you--باسم (talk) 17:48, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there - I noticed you created both the above categories some time ago & I can't see what the difference is in them? I think that one was probably meant for pictures of people feeding pigeons - in which case I would suggest a rename to Category:People feeding pigeons, much like Category:People feeding swans if you don't mind?
Actually I'm a bit confused with the whole "feeding animals" category - perhaps a look is needed to rename them to clearer things like the "people feeding...". Do you have any opinion on it? Let me know, if we can't be BOLD :), I'll list it at categories for discussion and see what happens.
Hallo @Deadstar: , sorry that I took some time to answer you. When I created these categories I was a little bit confused by all these "feeding animals" categories as well. I intended to create one category for all pictures, where "pigeon feeding" is shown. One easy general category, where uploaders would instinctively put their pictures into. Most pictures do show people actively feeding pigeons. So I did not intend to create a sub-category that I would have to fill manually by regularly cleaning the mother. So the pictures you shall find in Category:Pigeonfeeding (that may be should be Category:Pigeon feeding) may fit the line "People feeding pigeons". Two special subcategories where done to filter special situations, that are not so often uploaded:
show individual pigeons while feeding/eating bread or corn or something else.
places, where people do provide food for pigeons on a regular basis
Maybe I messed up with the names and it is all mixed now. Maybe there should have been three sub categories all along with a better description how they should be used...
a mother, that fits all
a subcategory with individial pigeons, that are eating
a subcategory for places/objects, where food for pigeons is provided (regularly; on streets, squares, parks)
a subcategory for people actively feeding pigeons (out of hand)
Example for individual pigeons, while eating
Example for places, where food for pigeons is provided
No worries about the delay - thanks for pinging me.
I had a closer look and actually found Category:Columbidae eating (didn't look that far last time obviously!). This could have pictures of all pigeons eating(1 above), categorised by type of pigeon if necessary (I wouldn't able to do that).
@Deadstar: Most pictures in Category:Columbidae eating do picture feral pigeons. People uploading pictures, are locking for "pigeons". So it shall stay a subcategory of Category:Pigeons, that is for domesticated and feral pigeons (no-one is looking for a special species, if they did a picture of an ordinary pigeon in parks or streets).
It is easier to maintain the categories. It is easier to look for other species in the "pigeons-category", than to look for feral pigeons in the columba-category. People, that took a picture of a special species, are more careful with the categorisation.
Agreed. I've undone some of the moves to Columbidae I did, and leave it up to experts to take them from "Pigeons eating". Category:Pigeon feeding sites is good, though would it be better to say "Bird feeding sites" to include other types of birds? -- Deadstar (msg) 15:44, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Birdfeeding is to be moved to Category:Bird feedingAgree I've nominated it for move as there are a lot of items in it & to see if any English native speakers have objection.
Yes, it is. I am trying to work on that right know. Maybe it is possible to abondon "Bird feeder" and go with "Bird feeding" as highest category, but fits the pheasant feeder, the poultry feeder and the pigeon feeder still in it? or the one with the emus? --PigeonIP (talk) 13:44, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
To me "Birdhouses" is not really an English way of saying it. However the concept to me would be for somewhere that birds lives created by man (that would be related to an "Aviary" (what does that cat structure look like (yes I know I should check it - will do so next if nothing else crops up!). An Aviary is - sort of - an open air but secure - place where birds are kept. Within in there might well be bird boxes that the birds actually live in.
"Whelping box" seems to be specific to dogs. "Cubbing pen" or "den" seems to be the term for other animals like ice bears and pandas [7][8]. Created the categories - hope that's it sorted now :) -- Deadstar (msg) 09:53, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Da kuckt man sich ein Bild mal nicht so genau an... Du hast natürlich recht. Ich habe sie für Perlhühner gehalten. Danke für's aufpassen. --PigeonIP (talk) 11:32, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Ich würde aufpassen nicht zu kleinteilig zu werden. Ich habe selber eine Tendenz dazu, ins Detail zu gehen, wenn ich kategorisiere, ärger mich dann aber wieder, wenn ich nix mehr finde, weil ich mich nur noch durch die Kategorien klicke und nicht dort ankomme, wo ich hin will... Meinst du es hat einer ein Interesse nach diesen Geiern bei einer Fütterung zu suchen? --PigeonIP (talk) 11:45, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Bienen sind halt auch domestiziert. Nutztiere, von denen man sich einen Nutzen erwartet und entsprechend pflegt... Die beobachtete Geierfütterung würde ich eher wie die Pinguin- oder Löwenfütterung einordnen. Sie ist eine Zoo- oder Touristenattraktion. Aber ich will dich auch nicht davon abhalten dieselbe einzurichten, falsch ist sie sicher nicht ;) --PigeonIP (talk) 13:36, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Polish Eagle has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!
A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.
Possible acceptable uses of this ability:
To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.
The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. This message is to inform you that a daily gallery in your userspace, User:PigeonIP/Geflügel, has failed. Due to software limitations, the bot has a hard upper-limit of about 6000 files per day (including overflow galleries), while your gallery had 22335 files.
This usually happens because a gallery is too broad, encompassing too many subcategories. Please review the logs here and request that a subcategory be excluded, or narrow your category choice(s).
Please make your request for removal within 4 days, or your gallery will be subject to removal.
Hello. This message is to inform you that a daily gallery in your userspace, User:PigeonIP/Geflügel, has failed. Due to software limitations, the bot has a hard upper-limit of about 6000 files per day (including overflow galleries), while your gallery had 43197 files.
This usually happens because a gallery is too broad, encompassing too many subcategories. Please review the logs here and request that a subcategory be excluded, or narrow your category choice(s).
Please make your request for removal within 4 days, or your gallery will be subject to removal.
Hello. This message is to inform you that a daily gallery in your userspace, User:PigeonIP/Geflügel, has failed. Due to software limitations, the bot has a hard upper-limit of about 6000 files per day (including overflow galleries), while your gallery had 38734 files.
This usually happens because a gallery is too broad, encompassing too many subcategories. Please review the logs here and request that a subcategory be excluded, or narrow your category choice(s).
Please make your request for removal within 4 days, or your gallery will be subject to removal.
Hello. This message is to inform you that a daily gallery in your userspace, User:PigeonIP/Geflügel, has failed. Due to software limitations, the bot has a hard upper-limit of about 6000 files per day (including overflow galleries), while your gallery had 28185 files.
This usually happens because a gallery is too broad, encompassing too many subcategories. Please review the logs here and request that a subcategory be excluded, or narrow your category choice(s).
Please make your request for removal within 4 days, or your gallery will be subject to removal.
Hello. This message is to inform you that a daily gallery in your userspace, User:PigeonIP/Geflügel, has failed. Due to software limitations, the bot has a hard upper-limit of about 6000 files per day (including overflow galleries), while your gallery had 29376 files.
This usually happens because a gallery is too broad, encompassing too many subcategories. Please review the logs here and request that a subcategory be excluded, or narrow your category choice(s).
Please make your request for removal within 4 days, or your gallery will be subject to removal.
Hello. This message is to inform you that a daily gallery in your userspace, User:PigeonIP/Geflügel, has failed. Your gallery has a hard upper-limit of about 8000 files per day, while your gallery would have had 57732 files (including files already on the page).
This usually happens because a gallery is too broad, encompassing too many subcategories. Please review the logs here and request that a subcategory be excluded, or narrow your category choice(s).
Please make your request for removal at User talk:OgreBot/gallerywithin 4 days, or your gallery will be subject to removal.
Hello. This message is to inform you that a daily gallery in your userspace, User:PigeonIP/Geflügel, has failed. Your gallery has a hard upper-limit of about 8000 files per day, while your gallery would have had 53568 files (including files already on the page).
This usually happens because a gallery is too broad, encompassing too many subcategories. Please review the logs here and request that a subcategory be excluded, or narrow your category choice(s).
Please make your request for removal at User talk:OgreBot/gallerywithin 4 days, or your gallery will be subject to removal.
Hello. This message is to inform you that a daily gallery in your userspace, User:PigeonIP/Geflügel, has failed. Your gallery has a hard upper-limit of about 8000 files per day, while your gallery would have had 41394 files (including files already on the page).
This usually happens because a gallery is too broad, encompassing too many subcategories. Please review the logs here and request that a subcategory be excluded, or narrow your category choice(s).
Please make your request for removal at User talk:OgreBot/gallerywithin 4 days, or your gallery will be subject to removal.
Hello. This message is to inform you that a daily gallery in your userspace, User:PigeonIP/Geflügel, has failed. Your gallery has a hard upper-limit of about 8000 files per day, while your gallery would have had 55511 files (including files already on the page).
This usually happens because a gallery is too broad, encompassing too many subcategories. Please review the logs here and request that a subcategory be excluded, or narrow your category choice(s).
Please make your request for removal at User talk:OgreBot/gallerywithin 4 days, or your gallery will be subject to removal.
Hello. This message is to inform you that a daily gallery in your userspace, User:PigeonIP/Geflügel, has failed. Your gallery has a hard upper-limit of about 8000 files per day, while your gallery would have had 61329 files (including files already on the page).
This usually happens because a gallery is too broad, encompassing too many subcategories. Please review the logs here and request that a subcategory be excluded, or narrow your category choice(s).
Please make your request for removal at User talk:OgreBot/gallerywithin 4 days, or your gallery will be subject to removal.
Hello. This message is to inform you that a daily gallery in your userspace, User:PigeonIP/Geflügel, has failed. Your gallery has a hard upper-limit of about 8000 files per day, while your gallery would have had 44901 files (including files already on the page).
This usually happens because a gallery is too broad, encompassing too many subcategories. Please review the logs here and request that a subcategory be excluded, or narrow your category choice(s).
Please make your request for removal at User talk:OgreBot/gallerywithin 4 days, or your gallery will be subject to removal.
.jpg)
, das andere, wie hier: 
. Zwiadowca 21 19:26, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
, I can't answer the question! but I will ask for that. Regards. --— D Y O L F 77
[Talk] 16:45, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
Example for individual pigeons, while eating
Example for places, where food for pigeons is provided
Example for "people feeding pigeons"
OK Category:Columbidae eating
Comment
Agree I've nominated it for move as there are a lot of items in it & to see if any English native speakers have objection.
Info I found a waterfowl feeder, so I did create Category:Game bird feeders --PigeonIP (talk) 21:33, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
on the left, there are many nestboxes in a loft (I do miss good pictures here)
inside a traditional tower in Iran
should qualify for "inside"
outside
outside
Bird table in summer - geograph.org.uk - 1296968.jpg Bird table at geograph.org.uk
.jpg){kind=link}
--PigeonIP (talk) 21:13, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
