Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/May 2024
File:006 Giraffe portrait in the Lake Manyara National Park Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 May 2024 at 16:21:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family : Giraffidae (Giraffes)
- Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 16:21, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 16:21, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- This image captures the giraffe's demeanor very well, but based on the principle of highlighting the subject of the photo, I think this image can be made better through post-processing of color. WANGYIFAN2024 (talk) 04:26, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for your comment. I think that principle doesn't apply in the same way for wild animals. This giraffe was photographed in a dark forest where shutter speed was at 1/250s while still having ISO 2500. In a dark forest with no sun illuminating the subject, the subject shouldn’t be very bright. Moreover, animals usually have patterns, shapes and/or colors on their coats that camouflage them in their natural environment as it is an advantage for them. Also, I think that the giraffe is highlighted enough in other ways like the crop, the bokeh separating the subject from the background, the fact that it's still very visible, etc. Giles Laurent (talk) 10:03, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- This image captures the giraffe's demeanor very well, but based on the principle of highlighting the subject of the photo, I think this image can be made better through post-processing of color. WANGYIFAN2024 (talk) 04:26, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support The photography differs from the common representation of giraffes in the savanna, and it's interesting also for this reason. --Harlock81 (talk) 14:45, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:55, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Harlock81. – Aristeas (talk) 16:12, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 21:22, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 21:35, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 03:26, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support —Bruce1eetalk 06:54, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 19:44, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Harlock81 -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:49, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 06:28, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:58, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Extremely beautiful. Wolverine XI 19:57, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 09:04, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:08, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 May 2024 at 19:27:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Brazil
- Info created and uploaded by Ctseelig - nominated by ★ -- ★ 19:27, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ★ 19:27, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 12:35, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:55, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 03:13, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 03:26, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Jakubhal 04:29, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 11:56, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 20:05, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:59, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ivar (talk) 08:11, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 17:55, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Well-taken indeed. Wolverine XI 19:56, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:10, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 17:50, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:03, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:28, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 May 2024 at 18:38:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Reflections
- Info Sunset reflected over the Doce River in Colatina, Espírito Santo, Brazil. Taken from the Florentino Avidos Bridge. Created, uploaded and nominated by ★ -- ★ 18:38, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Painterly… 🎨 -- ★ 18:38, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Not outstanding Daftation (talk) 19:13, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination ★ 20:25, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 May 2024 at 22:23:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#India
- Info One of the landmarks of Kolkata and West Bengal, two colonial era buildings on Lal Dighi Lake. 19th century meets 20th century. Kolkata, India. All by -- Argenberg (talk) 22:23, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support The view may be simple, but I like the simplicity and serenity of it, the architecture, the tropical foliage, and the symmetry of the reflections on the lake. The afternoon light after the rain is not vibrant but soothing, solemn, and seems to work as a contrast/counterbalance in flamboyant tropical wet climate. --Argenberg (talk) 22:23, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 13:48, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Interesting reflection but awkward light, sorry. We have the shadowy sides in front, the trees all in the shadow... Moreover, the sky is a bit gray -- Basile Morin (talk) 15:00, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- I like how they stay in the shadows, giving a sense of calm. The ones on the right seem to be slightly lit. The feeling of ‘awkwardness’ may come from a mix of humidity, the break between afternoon showers, and chronic air pollution in Kolkata. There is a hint of tension in the sky, but for me the net effect is positive, i.e. not uneasy, but kind of contemplative. --Argenberg (talk) 17:40, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Nothing of considerable quality. Wolverine XI 17:11, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I agree with your introduction, Argenberg, pleasent, good compo,...but not extraordinary. I will only support for FP if at least one of these fields is extraordinary (and the others at least very good): the subject/compo, the lighting, the detail. And in this case unfortunately I cannot see any of those areas in the extraordinary area Poco a poco (talk) 11:32, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- I take your point. Your explanation sounds reasonable. For me, these two buildings, one from the late 19th century, the other from the middle 20th century, the way they stand and face each other on the lake in a tropical setting, is a little sensational or slightly extraordinary. Now I understand it might not be everyone’s cup of tea. No problem. --Argenberg (talk) 18:18, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Nice reflection, average lighting. --Thi (talk) 12:15, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination --Argenberg (talk) 18:18, 30 April 2024 (UTC).
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 May 2024 at 21:33:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Black and White#Structures
- Info created and uploaded by Agnes Monkelbaan, nominated by Yann
- Support This is a perfect illustration of modern black and white style. The absence of color brings out shapes and textures. -- Yann (talk) 21:33, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 21:51, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 03:13, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 03:27, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:17, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support The black and white combined with the composition creates a fascinating abstraction. -- Radomianin (talk) 20:44, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 20:47, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Not bad. Wolverine XI 20:59, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ivar (talk) 08:09, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 15:39, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 17:58, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Thank you for nominating my photo.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:28, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 00:13, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 May 2024 at 21:36:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#North Macedonia
- Info All by me. -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 21:36, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 21:36, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Something special is missing here, in my opinion. Sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:48, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose No wow, quite ordinary. --Milseburg (talk) 13:48, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Just a green field; nothing new here. Wolverine XI 23:18, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Nice motif; ruined by that giant pole in the centre. --SHB2000 (talk) 04:36, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 09:58, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Red Lechwe.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 May 2024 at 19:28:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family : Bovidae (Bovids)
- Info A Red Lechwe at Port Lympne Wild Animal Park created by User:Daftation - uploaded by User:Daftation - nominated by User:Daftation -- Daftation (talk) 16:43, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Daftation (talk) 16:43, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Bad crop on three sides. Yann (talk) 20:13, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
File:American robin (71307).jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 May 2024 at 11:31:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Turdidae_(Thrushes)
- Info Male American robin (Turdus migratorius). all by — Rhododendrites talk | 11:31, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 11:31, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 19:36, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 19:47, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Light, bokeh and colors! -- Radomianin (talk) 19:50, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 20:06, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:11, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 23:26, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 02:09, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 08:02, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ivar (talk) 08:09, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good shot, nice colors. But that horizontal "shadow line" which cross birds eye and continue to left ? --Mile (talk) 08:39, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 08:49, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 15:33, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 17:59, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Now this I can support. Wolverine XI 19:53, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 18:22, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:02, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:02, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 May 2024 at 08:53:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events
- Info 'KATHAKALI' is one of the classical dance forms of Indian State Kerala. All by Shagil Kannur -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 08:53, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 08:53, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:53, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 18:56, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:01, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Poor crop. --SHB2000 (talk) 04:09, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Too tight crop. --Thi (talk) 09:29, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Works for me. – Aristeas (talk) 09:57, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 12:53, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 03:24, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 17:37, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:34, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ivar (talk) 08:13, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The crop is awfully tight, and the black background doesn't give the picture a nice look. Wolverine XI 20:03, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:50, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 18:12, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 May 2024 at 11:10:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Statues outdoors
- Info Christ the Redeemer, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Constructed between 1922 and 1931, the 30-meter-tall Art Deco statue was created by French-Polish sculptor Paul Landowski and built by Brazilian engineer Heitor da Silva Costa, in collaboration with French engineer Albert Caquot. Romanian sculptor Gheorghe Leonida sculpted the face. Created and uploaded by Arne Müseler - nominated by
★The Cosmonaut -- ★ 11:10, 23 April 2024 (UTC) - Support -- ★ 11:10, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Again... --Cart (talk) 12:45, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- No, no… the Wilfredor's nomination is just a silent protest again his departure. Consider the below one as his nomination. ★ 13:42, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, but you can't make nominations in someone else's name. It doesn't work that way. And Wilfredor is not departing. He is just getting his life back on track so that he can continue here stronger than ever. People need to do that sometimes. Also, that nom is in a terrible shape; I will fix it up for you so you have a chance for many supports. --Cart (talk) 14:11, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- So, ok. I got it. #staystrong. @W.carter and Arne Müseler: Could you take over this one instead? I wouldn't want to see the Christ's photo being discarded. ★ 14:46, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry no, you have to ask someone else. I only do maintenance. Also small tip: If you want to 'ping' someone, you must mention them during the same edit as you write your signature, otherwise the 'ping' doesn't work. Here the 'ping' didn't get to the users since you added the {{ping|W.carter|Arne Müseler}} in the edit after you signed your post. --Cart (talk) 15:00, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for the useful tip! I'll try my best to keep calm, relax and drink a glass of water next time. ★ 15:09, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry no, you have to ask someone else. I only do maintenance. Also small tip: If you want to 'ping' someone, you must mention them during the same edit as you write your signature, otherwise the 'ping' doesn't work. Here the 'ping' didn't get to the users since you added the {{ping|W.carter|Arne Müseler}} in the edit after you signed your post. --Cart (talk) 15:00, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- So, ok. I got it. #staystrong. @W.carter and Arne Müseler: Could you take over this one instead? I wouldn't want to see the Christ's photo being discarded. ★ 14:46, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, but you can't make nominations in someone else's name. It doesn't work that way. And Wilfredor is not departing. He is just getting his life back on track so that he can continue here stronger than ever. People need to do that sometimes. Also, that nom is in a terrible shape; I will fix it up for you so you have a chance for many supports. --Cart (talk) 14:11, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support: this is a worthy image to feature, and I'm taking over the nomination. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:42, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you! That was kind of you. I have fixed the code accordingly. --Cart (talk) 18:29, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Much appreciated! --The Cosmonaut (talk) 18:49, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Grateful! ★ 01:47, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Much appreciated! --The Cosmonaut (talk) 18:49, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you! That was kind of you. I have fixed the code accordingly. --Cart (talk) 18:29, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Scaffolds are annoying. Yes I know, not photographer's fault, it's just sometimes you have all the luck and sometimes not (applies for myself too, of course). I don't see any other feature that might outweigh that such as exceptional lighting. I'm sorry --A.Savin 10:14, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Lovely! Wolverine XI 17:37, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support The scaffolds are annoying, yes, but I really like the contrast between the melodramatic gesture and style of the statue and the mundane bustle at its pedestal. The shadows in the background are really helpful to emphasize the foreground.– Aristeas (talk) 10:02, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support It took me a while to warm up to the circumstances of the shot. Aristeas' arguments for it aptly put my feelings about the image into words. -- Radomianin (talk) 22:22, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 03:24, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support for valuable image of a highly notable subject, despite the bright light and scaffolds. — Rhododendrites talk | 11:51, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:53, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Agree, the scaffolding is an issue and a dealbreaker to me, but still interesting Poco a poco (talk) 20:11, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 18:12, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Trier alte Wache Cläre Prem (2).jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 May 2024 at 16:36:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Reliefs
- Info created, uploaded and nominated by -- Palauenc05 (talk) 16:36, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Palauenc05 (talk) 16:36, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful planquette and well illustrated.--Famberhorst (talk) 04:40, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 12:24, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:57, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 03:24, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Berthold Werner (talk) 16:20, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support-- Giles Laurent (talk) 20:04, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:55, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 15:54, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral Good quality, but I don't see much in this picture. Wolverine XI 20:01, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose It is going to be promoted in an hour or so, so this makes no difference, but while this is a solid QI, it is not FP to me. I can see a bit of colour noise at full size and the resolution is not huge. For an easily reproducible photo like this I'd want something special in terms of detail captured in the frame for me to vote in favour. Cmao20 (talk) 15:17, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 May 2024 at 20:02:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family : Balaenopteridae (Rorquals)
- Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 20:02, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 20:02, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:12, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support The frozen water splashes are the cherry on top! -- Radomianin (talk) 20:37, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 21:13, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 21:26, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 22:20, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 06:25, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ivar (talk) 08:08, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Mile (talk) 08:46, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Bijay Chaurasia (talk) 15:22, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 15:30, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Majestic!! Where was this? I'd like to go whale watching some time. Wolverine XI 19:31, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you! It was at Ísafjarðardjúp in Iceland. That day I went on a hiking expedition to see the arctic foxes at Hornstrandir and you are driven to the starting point by a boat that picks you up at Ísafjörður. On the way whales can be seen but it's not guaranteed. Luckily, I saw around 10 humpback whales in the morning, including this one that made a big spectacular jump close to the boat (I only managed to photograph the end of the jump as I was photographing other whales when this one suddenly breached on the opposite side of the boat [the movement was so quick that many persons on the boat didn't even see it and only heard the big splash since everyone was looking a group of 5 humpback whales on the other side]). During the hike no arctic foxes were seen (that's nature) but we were lucky on the way back when we met this very excited humpback whale that kept lobtailing (the whale was moving it's tail up and down many times in a row to splash the water). Giles Laurent (talk) 11:44, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for this information. It's been a long time since I've seen truly wild regions, the last being a journey to the African savanna in late January and early February of this year. I'm thinking about going to Cape Town to see great white sharks and possibly whales. I don't want the trip to end in disappointment, like the last one, when I didn't spot any leopards or cheetahs! I must admit that I'm a little embarrassed to say that I've never gone whale watching, mostly because of my thalassophobia. I'll make an effort to overcome that phobia, but nothing is guaranteed. Do wish me luck. Wolverine XI 17:46, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- To never be disappointed the best is to try to not expect much since nature is unpredictable and there is a luck factor. But it's easier said than done and I must admit I was a bit disappointed when I did 10 half day safaris in India to see the Bengal tiger and only saw it once from behind without seeing its face. Good luck with your phobia. I had fear of heights when I was younger but almost completely overcame it so an evolution is possible! Giles Laurent (talk) 00:20, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for this information. It's been a long time since I've seen truly wild regions, the last being a journey to the African savanna in late January and early February of this year. I'm thinking about going to Cape Town to see great white sharks and possibly whales. I don't want the trip to end in disappointment, like the last one, when I didn't spot any leopards or cheetahs! I must admit that I'm a little embarrassed to say that I've never gone whale watching, mostly because of my thalassophobia. I'll make an effort to overcome that phobia, but nothing is guaranteed. Do wish me luck. Wolverine XI 17:46, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you! It was at Ísafjarðardjúp in Iceland. That day I went on a hiking expedition to see the arctic foxes at Hornstrandir and you are driven to the starting point by a boat that picks you up at Ísafjörður. On the way whales can be seen but it's not guaranteed. Luckily, I saw around 10 humpback whales in the morning, including this one that made a big spectacular jump close to the boat (I only managed to photograph the end of the jump as I was photographing other whales when this one suddenly breached on the opposite side of the boat [the movement was so quick that many persons on the boat didn't even see it and only heard the big splash since everyone was looking a group of 5 humpback whales on the other side]). During the hike no arctic foxes were seen (that's nature) but we were lucky on the way back when we met this very excited humpback whale that kept lobtailing (the whale was moving it's tail up and down many times in a row to splash the water). Giles Laurent (talk) 11:44, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 19:34, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support There's just some charm to whale watching. --SHB2000 (talk) 23:55, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- This picture caught the moment well Hkm5420 (talk) 04:37, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good quality, Nice light, striking composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:43, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:32, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 18:24, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:02, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:04, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 18:12, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:24, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:01, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Paul Lapeira celebrates his win with their teammates on Itzulia Basque Country stage 2.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 May 2024 at 20:13:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Sports#Individual sports
- Info created by Shougissime - uploaded by Shougissime - nominated by Shougissime (talk) 20:13, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Shougissime (talk) 20:13, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Poor crop. Wolverine XI 17:26, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- I've choosen to keep the original crop to have the ambience post race. You have riders passing behind the victorious team, soigneur from the team comes to share the hapiness of riders, cameraman is filming. It's just a bicycle race ambience that i want to show accross this picture. And in the center, you have the winner of the race with a big smile. it's a whole that I find hard to dissociate. Shougissime (talk) 17:21, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Not exceptional. --Tagooty (talk) 13:28, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- I'm not sure that there is a lot of pictures representing a recent cyclist rider victory on commons with this angle of view. The idea of this picture is to share with this young rider the hapiness of winning a famous race, and see the team spirit behind this individual sport. Because, behind one professionnal rider, there's a whole team out to win. Shougissime (talk) 17:55, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the context. An FP should speak for itself. This one requires an explanation. Tagooty (talk) 06:13, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- I'm not sure that there is a lot of pictures representing a recent cyclist rider victory on commons with this angle of view. The idea of this picture is to share with this young rider the hapiness of winning a famous race, and see the team spirit behind this individual sport. Because, behind one professionnal rider, there's a whole team out to win. Shougissime (talk) 17:55, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Works for me. The muddle of people is a bit distracting but typical at the finish of a cycling stage. Lapeira’s smile is heart-warming and authentic. – Aristeas (talk) 10:04, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 12:25, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support: per Aristeas. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:06, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 03:25, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I don't understand all the supports here. There is nothing special, and the composition is a bit busy. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 16:15, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Sebring12Hrs. Sorry -- Riad Salih (talk) 21:37, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Yes, the crop is not the best but I understand that getting a good one is very tricky here Poco a poco (talk) 20:04, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 18:12, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good evocation of the emotions of victory. Cmao20 (talk) 15:17, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Dutch army Pzh-2000 firing on Taliban in Chura. June 16, 2007. Photo by David Axe.jpg (delist), not delisted
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 May 2024 at 03:37:40
- Info It is hard to see what others saw in this when this was promoted in 2011. It is a technically boring photo. Where is the eye drawn? Nowhere. (Original nomination)
- Delist -- Schierbecker (talk) 03:37, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delist This isn't even a QI in my eyes. --SHB2000 (talk) 07:44, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Against this kind of behaviour. Its still FP for me and i know it since i made edits which took some time. --Mile (talk) 07:58, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Against what kind of behaviour? --SHB2000 (talk) 10:47, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Excuse me, User:PetarM? What sort of behavior are you insinuating? This is my first Featured Picture removal candidate ever. Schierbecker (talk) 17:08, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Against what kind of behaviour? --SHB2000 (talk) 10:47, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Interesting and of historic importance. I also had a stress-free June 2007, so that's a plus. I can't quite put my finger on why it is that this photo makes me feel nostalgic. Maybe because of how prevalent the theme of war games and films was to my early years. With that said, I now understand what those in 2011 saw in this picture. Wolverine XI 16:37, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Keep: I see no reason to delist.--The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:26, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Keep ★ 23:49, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delist Not an exceptional image, the original nomination does not have strong reasons for support. --Tagooty (talk) 13:32, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delist per others.--Ermell (talk) 17:23, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delist per others. --Milseburg (talk) 16:25, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delist per others. --Palauenc05 (talk) 07:28, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delist -- Ivar (talk) 08:11, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Keep The only problem I see is the small size. Apart from that, the composition is exceptional enough for FP, IMO. Cmao20 (talk) 15:18, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Confirmed results: Result: 7 delist, 5 keep, 0 neutral => not delisted. /--Mile (talk) 07:21, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 May 2024 at 20:01:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Sports#Other team sports
- Info My fellow Colatina-born famous basketball player Anderson Varejão as a member of the Cleveland Cavaliers team competing for a hoop with Washington Wizards' Marcin Gortat in 2014. Created by Keith Allison - uploaded by Baloncesto Puerto Rico - nominated by ★ -- ★ 20:01, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support A little unsharp/unfocused, but still a very good sport action composition. -- ★ 20:01, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- The image is of high quality, clearly showing the physical movements of two athletes, allowing one to feel the charm of sports. 등혜진 (talk) 04:25, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 18:11, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Question Blindness? ★ 13:56, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose No idea why you would nominate a picture you admit is unsharp. Quality is not there for FP. The expressions are great and it could be a cool action shot but the blurry sign distracts me. Cmao20 (talk) 15:26, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination ★ 16:02, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 May 2024 at 07:01:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Women
- Info created by Hernan Irastorza, uploaded by Jeff G., nominated by Yann
- Support Artsy portrait. -- Yann (talk) 07:01, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Nice portrait, i though old photo from Asia. But i saw new, modern camera. Focus point should be on (her) right eye, while i see its on her (highligted) hairs in the back so left eye is a bit more focused. For older i would support, not for new where camera should do automatic eye-focus. Colors are nice. --Mile (talk) 08:29, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I gotta agree with Miles here, the eyes should have more focus. And for a picture from 2013, it is not exceptional. Wolverine XI 14:50, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Thanks for your comments. Yann (talk) 20:16, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 May 2024 at 20:26:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Satellite images#South America
- Info Confluence of the Rio Negro (dark) and the Solimões River to the Amazon River at Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil, known as Meeting of Waters (Encontro das Águas, in Portuguese). Image captured on 7 February 2018 by ESA's Copernicus Sentinel-2. Created by ESA - uploaded by A11w1ss3nd - nominated by ★ -- ★ 20:26, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ★ 20:26, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:44, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Pretty average and nothing worthwhile to say the least. Wolverine XI 15:01, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose ESA pictures like this are a dime a dozen. They are very useful but this one doesn't have anything particularly outstanding. Cmao20 (talk) 15:31, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination ★ 16:02, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Woman playing cello during a concert in Moscow - Performance-2 (50774567563).jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 May 2024 at 19:07:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo_techniques/Styles_and_Techniques#Photo_art
- Info created by Tatiana El-Bakri - uploaded by Sintegrity - nominated by --Thi (talk) 19:07, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 19:07, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great portrait. Yann (talk) 21:51, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 23:48, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Overprocessed --PierreSelim (talk) 10:36, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Any information on who this is? — Rhododendrites talk | 19:31, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- To clarify, I am leaning support, but for an interesting portrait of a specific person, not for a stock photo of a cellist. — Rhododendrites talk | 11:52, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- I'm just as curious as you are, and I've tried to identify her by searching for concerts in Moscow on 13 December 2020 (or 12 or 14 since the camera might have been set to another time zone). No luck so far, but Russian pages are tricky for me. --Cart (talk) 09:00, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Nelli Tsinman [1][2][3][4]. --Thi (talk) 10:03, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Great. Thanks. Support — Rhododendrites talk | 11:35, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Nelli Tsinman [1][2][3][4]. --Thi (talk) 10:03, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- I'm just as curious as you are, and I've tried to identify her by searching for concerts in Moscow on 13 December 2020 (or 12 or 14 since the camera might have been set to another time zone). No luck so far, but Russian pages are tricky for me. --Cart (talk) 09:00, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Obvious tilt -- Basile Morin (talk) 15:03, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- ...which is why it is nominated as 'Photo art'. It's not the first time, 1 & 2, we've had an FPC with a tilt for artistic reasons. The technique is called the Dutch angle. --Cart (talk) 19:35, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- In this case, not enough to create an effect, too much to get unnoticed -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:49, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- There is no defined, absolute or minimum angle, it is up to the photographer who creates the image. --Cart (talk) 01:44, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose There is no absolut truth, it is up to each reviewer who interprets the image. Here the lady seems to fall forwards because the distance is shorter at the top, in the direction she's looking at. Awkward lead room and opposite effect to the intended one, if there was. Sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:42, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- There is no defined, absolute or minimum angle, it is up to the photographer who creates the image. --Cart (talk) 01:44, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- In this case, not enough to create an effect, too much to get unnoticed -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:49, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- ...which is why it is nominated as 'Photo art'. It's not the first time, 1 & 2, we've had an FPC with a tilt for artistic reasons. The technique is called the Dutch angle. --Cart (talk) 19:35, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support A good example of photo art, aesthetically pleasing. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:47, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ǃ --Terragio67 (talk) 15:50, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:13, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Seems like the processing went a bit too far. Wolverine XI 19:51, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support as per Frank. Thanks to Thi for finding out the musicans' name. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:08, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:00, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Agree, too much going on here, sorry. Quality could also be better for a 2020 shot Poco a poco (talk) 20:09, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Interesting idea and good image quality but sorry, I'm just not sensitive to the mood here. It makes playing a cello look weirdly eerie. Cmao20 (talk) 15:19, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose overcomplicated/overprocessed even as for Photo art category Chepry (talk) 09:08, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Campamento de ganado de la tribu Mundari, Terekeka, Sudán del Sur, 2024-01-29, DD 64.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 May 2024 at 06:43:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Children
- Info Mundari child in a cattle camp near Terekeka, South Sudan. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 06:43, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 06:43, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 09:15, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 17:35, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 17:48, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:10, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice light, touching portrait -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:37, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:03, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:06, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Mile (talk) 17:37, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Love the look. Wolverine XI 23:17, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 00:13, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 12:24, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 18:11, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Wow. Cmao20 (talk) 15:26, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support I know that I am retired indefinitely from FPC, but this photo is too incredible --Wilfredor (talk) 21:26, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Ras El Afia, Jijel.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 May 2024 at 18:36:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers#Algeria
- Info created by Mokhtarjet7 - uploaded by Mokhtarjet7 - nominated by Riad Salih -- Riad Salih (talk) 18:36, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Riad Salih (talk) 18:36, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Overblown lights. --SHB2000 (talk) 02:26, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ivar (talk) 05:32, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 12:25, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Looks like a photoshopped image. Wolverine XI 15:17, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment This is an interesting idea, but the rocks in the foreground are too dark. Some light there would make this a great image. Yann (talk) 09:17, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Yann there is also this version, what do you think? Riad Salih (talk) 09:39, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- It is even darker... Yann (talk) 09:49, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- I can attempt to adjust the brightness, although it might be challenging since we don't have the access to the raw files. Riad Salih (talk) 11:09, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, without the RAW, it will be very noisy. Yann (talk) 09:19, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- I can attempt to adjust the brightness, although it might be challenging since we don't have the access to the raw files. Riad Salih (talk) 11:09, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- It is even darker... Yann (talk) 09:49, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Yann there is also this version, what do you think? Riad Salih (talk) 09:39, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Great mood but IMO way too overprocessed for FP, sorry. The contrast has been pumped up too high and the detail at full size is not great. Cmao20 (talk) 15:21, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 May 2024 at 13:22:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#Italy
- Info Created by Tagooty - uploaded by Tagooty - nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 13:22, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Corniglia perched on a 300 ft (91 m) cliff. View from Trail 587 about 260 m (850 ft) above the village. San Pietro Church in middle right. Zigzag staircase down to the railway station lower right. One of five coastal villages in Cinque Terre National Park (a UNESCO Heritage Site), Liguria, Italy -- Tagooty (talk) 13:22, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 12:43, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 03:26, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support —Bruce1eetalk 06:53, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:57, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 15:43, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:06, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:20, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 May 2024 at 23:21:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Exteriors#Landscapes
- Info created by Jorge Juan Comendador de Aliaga and Antonio de Ulloa- scanned/uploaded by Jojagal - restored/nominated by Ezarate -- Ezarateesteban 23:21, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ezarateesteban 23:21, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- Question What is special in this artwork? Yann (talk) 08:12, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Is a landscape of Colombia painted in 1748 Ezarateesteban 11:18, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose IMO, there's nothing worthwhile. Wolverine XI 23:15, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Quality is god, but resolution is just average. This could be a FP if it would have some special historical significance, otherwise it is only one among many. Yann (talk) 22:30, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 May 2024 at 04:24:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Rosaceae
- Info New leaf from one Sorbus opens up. Focus stack of 14 photos.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:24, 30 April 2024 (UTC) - Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:24, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 13:02, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 20:05, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice off-center subject. Wolverine XI 23:14, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 00:12, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 06:42, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 18:05, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:28, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 17:48, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:54, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 09:24, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 May 2024 at 08:00:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#People at work
- Info Berberic painter drawing a bookmark per my idea and drawing (scheme), Ouarzazate, Morocco. -- Mile (talk) 08:00, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mile (talk) 08:00, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Bad crop. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:23, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Question I have two questions: Isn't it 'Berber painter' and not 'Berberic painter', and what is the copyright status for the painting in the background and his other works shown in the photo? --Cart (talk) 16:55, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Cart Might be for 1st question, for 2nd, probably de minimis and not in the focus with minor crop too. Otherwise let me know what % of pic and other stuff for de minimis. As far as i know, goes "subjective". --Mile (talk) 08:23, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Busy image with no main subject, not to mention the bad crop. I don't think this image has what it takes to become featured. Wolverine XI 14:56, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Maybe will be outvoted but I really like this. Slightly low image quality offset by interesting subject, wonderful colours, and a brave and challenging choice for the crop. Cmao20 (talk) 15:37, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Nope, not this one, the lack of perspective correction, the crop, the soso quality, this isn't a FP to me, sorry Mile Poco a poco (talk) 19:43, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Perspective and crop. --Thi (talk) 19:46, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination --Mile (talk) 12:01, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 May 2024 at 17:15:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Brazil
- Info Reclections of Mineirinho (left) and Mineirão (right) over Lake Pampulha, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais state, Brazil. Created by MTur Destinos (Pedro Vilela) - initially uploaded by Rkieferbaum - cropped and nominated by ★ -- ★ 17:15, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ★ 17:15, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Question Could the lighting be perhaps a tad less dull? --SHB2000 (talk) 11:05, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Normal lighting. The subject(s) is(are) wowing. ★ 22:01, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Good composition and colours but dull light and low detail + oversharpened at full size. Would need something more outstanding to support a picture with this quality. Cmao20 (talk) 23:29, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination ★ 10:22, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Campamento de ganado de la tribu Mundari, Terekeka, Sudán del Sur, 2024-01-28, DD 174.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 May 2024 at 08:51:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family_:_Bovidae_(Bovids)
- Info Girl of the Mundari tribe posing with a Ankole-Watusi cow in a cattle camp in Terekeka, South Sudan. c/u/n Poco a poco (talk) 08:51, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 08:51, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Question I fixed the link, but shouldn't be rather Sanga cattle? Or may be it should be Ankole? Yann (talk) 16:57, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- As far as I understood it, it would be right to assume that the breed is a mix o both, Ankole and Watusi, so I updated it. Sanga is a wider term that includes both and would be more generic. Poco a poco (talk) 21:12, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 18:11, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 21:06, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 22:59, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Question I find the left and right crops very tight. It fills a bit caged. Do you have more space available? Yann (talk) 07:05, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Yann: I uploaded a new version with a bit more of crop on both sides. Regarding the breed of cow, please, give me more time to investigate it, I was told they were all Watusi cows. That could be a general statement and I cannot say if it applies for sure to this examplar. Poco a poco (talk) 09:14, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Yes, better. Yann (talk) 11:17, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:17, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:33, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 17:49, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 19:18, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Giles Laurent (talk) 23:31, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 May 2024 at 09:10:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#Germany
- Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 09:10, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Llez (talk) 09:10, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:45, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 06:40, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 17:42, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:56, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:33, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 19:19, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Giles Laurent (talk) 23:31, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:57, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 09:25, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Interesting, eye-catching composition. -- Radomianin (talk) 20:34, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:01, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 10:17, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Bamboo Hookah at khagrachori 03.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 May 2024 at 06:21:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait
- Info created by Wasiul Bahar - nominated by Wasiul Bahar -- Wasiul Bahar (talk) 06:21, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment She isn't eating, is it? Please fix the description. Yann (talk) 08:10, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Yann thanks, done :-) Wasiul Bahar (talk) 10:04, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose poor crop. --SHB2000 (talk) 13:02, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 May 2024 at 18:22:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Musicians and singers performing
- Info created by Brackenheim - uploaded by Brackenheim - nominated by Tintenklecks -- Tintenklecks (talk) 18:22, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tintenklecks (talk) 18:22, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Hi and welcome to the FPC. Unfortunately, you have missed part of the rules about 'Alternatives': "Note: Do not add an 'Alternative' image when you create a nomination. Selecting the best image is part of the nomination process. Alternatives are for a different crop or post-processing of the original image, or a closely related image from the same photo session (limited to 1 per nomination), if they are suggested by voters.
- Please choose one of the images and run with that one. Best, --Cart (talk) 19:29, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Done and thank you! --Tintenklecks (talk) 19:55, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 13:09, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: I suggest cropping the top to make the composition more balanced. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:19, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- +1 Riad Salih (talk) 16:23, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for that suggestion! Is it okay like that? Brackenheim (talk) 19:32, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Better! --The Cosmonaut (talk) 23:30, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Impressive performance, well captured; congrats. – Aristeas (talk) 17:57, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Technically not there. I can provide a list as to why, but I'll leave that out for now. Wolverine XI 19:45, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support as per Aristeas. Thanks for the crop, Brackenheim. It is an improvement for the composition. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:01, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 23:30, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support I would also crop a few pixels at the bottom, but FP anyway. --Yann (talk) 09:17, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:02, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 18:12, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:22, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 May 2024 at 15:52:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Lighting_devices
- Info Oriental hanging lanterns. Souk Haddadine, Marrakech Medina. My shot. --Mile (talk) 15:52, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mile (talk) 15:52, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:56, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very nice shapes and colors. Yann (talk) 16:54, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 17:13, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Yann makes a good point, but not with that crop on the right. --SHB2000 (talk) 03:12, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 03:26, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 11:58, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 20:06, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The composition could be better. Wolverine XI 19:47, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
* Support The composition is very delicate and beautiful Bai0926 (talk) 04:42, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- Struck vote as invalid (user only has 29 edits). As per COM:FPC#Voting: only "[e]ditors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote." --SHB2000 (talk) 04:37, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:14, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Yann. Great motif and good composition Cmao20 (talk) 15:21, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Yann and Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 09:05, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Wolverine XI. -- Karelj (talk) 14:03, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
File:A Zimbabwean Artisan Weaving His Story.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 May 2024 at 20:23:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#People at work
- Info created by NormanMapfuno - uploaded by NormanMapfuno - nominated by NormanMapfuno -- NormanMapfuno (talk) 20:23, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- NormanMapfuno (talk) 20:23, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Color noisy and unsharp. ★ 20:31, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per ★. --SHB2000 (talk) 21:43, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Poor crop. Wolverine XI 23:10, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
File:026 Long-crested eagle at Kibale forest National Park Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 May 2024 at 00:09:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Accipitriformes#Genus_:_Lophaetus
- Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 00:09, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 00:09, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:44, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 06:35, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Punky bird. ;o) Yann (talk) 09:03, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 12:25, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Yann :) -- Radomianin (talk) 18:02, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 21:16, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Mile (talk) 08:31, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:58, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 11:09, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 12:35, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:35, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 17:51, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 19:17, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Chepry (talk) 09:00, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Spectacular! Wolverine XI 09:11, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cool guy. – Aristeas (talk) 09:30, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 15:02, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 May 2024 at 12:33:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Russia#North Caucasian Federal District
- Info Ancient glacial erosion cirque with high-altitude mountain lake and rock formation on one side, Abishira-Akhuba Ridge, Western Caucasus. All by -- Argenberg (talk) 12:33, 1 May 2024 (UTC).
- Support -- Argenberg (talk) 12:33, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support High educational value, nicely captured. I could imagine adding the image to more articles would be good – is there an article that describes "Rare, small-scale ancient glacial erosion cirques"? --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 14:13, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- There is an article about cirques in general, but I’ll see if it can be added somewhere. --Argenberg (talk) 00:55, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:21, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:14, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Frank. -- Radomianin (talk) 17:50, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 18:11, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 21:12, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:04, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thi (talk • contribs) 09:53, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:38, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 17:53, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 19:13, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral Great view, the shadow is not helping but what I had hoped a bit more of sharpness Poco a poco (talk) 19:41, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Giles Laurent (talk) 23:33, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:56, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 09:32, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 11:06, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 10:16, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 15:02, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 May 2024 at 12:21:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#United States
- Info created by Frank Schulenburg – uploaded by Frank Schulenburg – nominated by Frank Schulenburg --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 12:21, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 12:21, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:21, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:46, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very realistic, sculptural look; good light and quality. -- Radomianin (talk) 18:00, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 18:11, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 21:14, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 22:57, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:02, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 11:10, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:38, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 16:39, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 17:52, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 19:11, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Giles Laurent (talk) 23:32, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:57, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --BigDom (talk) 08:28, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Radomianin. – Aristeas (talk) 09:31, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 11:13, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Perfect photo! S. Perquin (talk) 16:01, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 10:17, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 15:02, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 May 2024 at 07:36:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#1930-1939
- Info created by Arthur Rothstein, restored by PawełMM and Yann, uploaded and nominated by Yann
- Support At first, I thought that the half-cut car and the pole in the middle make an odd composition. But the two poles give a sense of depth, and with the car and the running woman, they emphasis the on-going disaster. -- Yann (talk) 07:36, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 11:23, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Interesting shot. My comment is mainly about the restoration, which seems only part done. Blending the large semicircle pattern seems to make it into the source of light -- is it, though? There's still a strip of that pattern along the top-left, some splotches throughout, and maybe light smudging from the cleanup. I do not envy you the task, though -- restoring an image with so much noise (or "noise" given it's a dust storm) would be challenging. — Rhododendrites talk | 11:46, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- I think I fixed that. Yann (talk) 17:22, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 16:22, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Info Pinging @Yann I tried my hand at the photograph: I reduced the noise moderately so as not to take away the natural grain of the image. I think it's much better now. I also removed all the remaining scratches and spots. However, PawełMM and you have already done a very good job :) You can find the edited version under the SwissTransfer link, which you are welcome to use for an update if you like the result. Best, -- Radomianin (talk) 17:00, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --RodRabelo7 (talk) 15:10, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ǃ --Terragio67 (talk) 15:36, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The cropped car ruins it for me. Wolverine XI 19:42, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Made corection of "brush tool", more contionous colors. And beside first lamp on right side. I think is OK. --Mile (talk) 08:30, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 09:04, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 18:12, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:22, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Interesting and atmospheric photo. IMHO Radomianin’s version (linked above) would have been even better, but seems it got lost in discussion, so let’s feature this one. – Aristeas (talk) 09:09, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 May 2024 at 19:42:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Women
- Info created by Frank Schulenburg – uploaded by Frank Schulenburg – nominated by Frank Schulenburg --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 19:42, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 19:42, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:13, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Appealing, compelling portrait shot! -- Radomianin (talk) 20:40, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 21:12, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 22:20, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral Good photo, but the right hand disturbs me --Llez (talk) 08:04, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ivar (talk) 08:08, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose As Llez said, hands bother me, both. Also i would crop botom, above elbow. Aperture could be closed a bit. --Mile (talk) 08:44, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- By cropping it, you would lose that long elegant line that makes this portrait so special. There is a hint of John Singer Sargent to this. --Cart (talk) 09:10, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Could be, but is she modeling for wardrobe or this will be "her portrait" for Infobox or similar. Since is "Mitzi Akaha" is more about her face. --Mile (talk) 09:52, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- She is an actress appearing for the film Chaperon, in which she plays one of the leading roles, at a film festival. Actors and actresses use their whole body and their body-language as tools, they are not just "pretty faces". I don't see why a photo like this could not be in an infobox. On the other hand, it is not necessary for an FP to be the lead photo in an article. Most wikis use rather unflattering passport-style photos for that. Artistic photos of actors and singers can be used in articles, like this Valued image of Cohen (at least until he died and the en-wiki article went passport again).
- I've taken the liberty to update the info on the file page; most people (and search Bots!) don't read or follow the categories the photo is in, so it is good to have as much info as possible in the description slot. --Cart (talk) 12:26, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- For me, this image is much beter. On en.Wiki, yes, they will cut her to mugshot, because... I told them sometime that is not good. But they keep scissors sharp. Frankie, isnt that photo beter ?! Just clean some dust on her, for me thats FP. --Mile (talk) 14:28, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- She is probably doing her best for the cameraman in that photo, but for me, I had hoped that wiki portraits of women had evolved beyond that 50's pin-up-gesture with a woman holding her hands over/on her head, while giving the man behind the lens a sultry look. That gesture might be ok for actresses like Marilyn Monroe or Dita Von Teese who have made 'sexy' their trademark, but not otherwise. Try the same gesture with a man and see what you think of it. --Cart (talk) 14:57, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Impressive and interesting portrait. Please don’t crop it, Commons is not a mugshot repository. IMHO also more interesting than the mentioned alternative. – Aristeas (talk) 17:59, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The placement of her hand bothers me. Wolverine XI 19:35, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per above, strange pose Poco a poco (talk) 20:00, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support This is the kind of portrait I would like to see more of on FP. Thanks for nominating it, Frank! And yes, I definitely prefer it to the mentioned alternative, which is just cliché and not a living image. --Kritzolina (talk) 08:57, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 18:12, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice portrait, and from her pose and look you can immediately tell she is a professional model/actress. The internet is full of diverse pictures of her from many domains: lifestyle, fashion, cinema, commercials, etc. This portrait is candid and stands on its own. Besides the perceived candor I feel a touch of flirting/teasing/playing, also some deliberately played shyness, in her eyes and smile, all in an elegant way. Overall, she is is elegantly playful here. --Argenberg (talk) 01:07, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support per Llez but the expression and colours are too good not to feature. Argenberg explains it well. Cmao20 (talk) 15:23, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Giles Laurent (talk) 17:13, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 May 2024 at 08:06:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals#Class_:_Gastropoda
- Info created & uploaded by Roberto Strafella – nominated by Ivar (talk) 08:06, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ivar (talk) 08:06, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment f/25, on 60 mm and ISO 100 !? Result is visible. --Mile (talk) 08:48, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 18:12, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Depth of field could be better, but composition makes up for it Cmao20 (talk) 15:24, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Agree with Mile’s hint; but it’s so beautiful thanks to colours and composition. – Aristeas (talk) 09:13, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Giles Laurent (talk) 17:12, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 15:39, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --WildMouse76 (talk) 21:45, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support that's amazing! it looks like a glass sculpture or 3d render but it's a living thing.. Henrysz (talk) 03:14, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 May 2024 at 01:39:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Canada#British Columbia
- Info: Blanshard Peak viewed from Alouette Mountain; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:39, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:39, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 08:24, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 17:41, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:00, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Unappealing gray sky and average light, sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:02, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose light. --Thi (talk) 09:51, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The atmosphere is dull. Wolverine XI 14:58, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support It may be a bit grey, but the composition is IMO really good, and grey/overcast is a worthwile mood in itself. Cmao20 (talk) 15:36, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Agree with Basile, sorry Poco a poco (talk) 15:38, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Basile, sorry. --BigDom (talk) 08:29, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Basile. Yann (talk) 10:57, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:20, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Schnepfau Steinbruch Schrägluftbild.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 May 2024 at 15:14:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Industry#Austria
- Info An aerial photo of a quarry might not seem like the most obvious subject for FP but I really like this picture. I think it is very well composed and I enjoy the interplay of light and shadows and the autumnal colours. created by Heimfoto - uploaded by Heimfoto - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 15:14, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 15:14, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 17:43, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- SupportI really like the composition of this photo. It has a grand sense of atmosphereAYAO32269 (talk) 05:03, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support It’s a real achievement to create such a beautiful photo of a “boring” subject like a quarry. The season, the time of the day, the light and the composition are all optimal here. – Aristeas (talk) 09:40, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 10:51, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 15:37, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Unusual but impressive image. Thanks for the nomination, Cmao20. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:34, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 06:37, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support —Bruce1eetalk 07:35, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:32, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 10:15, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 15:02, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 19:11, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Shagil Kannur (talk) 06:50, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Giles Laurent (talk) 08:53, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:36, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Iglesia de Santa María de Gracia, Setúbal, Portugal, 2021-09-08, DD 26-28 HDR.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 May 2024 at 15:14:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Portugal
- Info I know that there are some people in this photo but for some well attended churches it is probably impossible to avoid, anyway the photo is high resolution and very beautiful with the lovely light and detail at the altar. created by Poco a poco - uploaded by Poco a poco - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 15:14, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 15:14, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support I didn't recognize the image right away but thought, wow, that's a nice church! :) I uploaded a new version with some improvements (crop, sharpening, overexposure,...). Thank you! Poco a poco (talk) 16:26, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 18:44, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:51, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Impressive church, good light and perspective. – Aristeas (talk) 09:38, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Aristeas. -- Radomianin (talk) 22:15, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:28, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 10:16, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 15:02, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Giles Laurent (talk) 08:53, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 May 2024 at 20:25:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Women
- Info created and uploaded by Poco a poco nominated by Yann
- Support Beautiful portrait. And Mona Lisa's smile. -- Yann (talk) 20:25, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Agree :) thank you, Yann Poco a poco (talk) 20:56, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 00:09, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:50, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 11:11, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 19:37, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Yann, very true. I really appreciate all the work you have done to document these tribes and their fascinating cultures. So many sensitive portraits to remind us that as different as their world is, we have a lot in common too. Cmao20 (talk) 23:41, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 15:38, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:34, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 10:14, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 19:09, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Shagil Kannur (talk) 06:28, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Portrait and colorful jewels -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:16, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
File:059 Baby baboon holding to its mother at Queen Elizabeth National Park Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 May 2024 at 23:30:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family : Hominidae (Great Apes)
- Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:30, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:30, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 23:40, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:11, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 01:55, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:49, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Touching capture. -- Radomianin (talk) 05:04, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice moment. BigDom (talk) 08:23, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support I remember viewing baby baboons on my last trip; they are just so cute! Wolverine XI 09:03, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very good, and cute! --Yann (talk) 10:45, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support aww, so wholesome. --SHB2000 (talk) 11:04, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 11:10, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 23:42, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 13:18, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 13:43, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Terragio67 (talk) 19:21, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 06:36, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:38, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 10:14, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 15:02, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 19:07, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Shagil Kannur (talk) 06:52, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Noisy but nice composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:14, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 May 2024 at 04:55:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/United States#California
- Info View from southwest across Lake Siskiyou to Mount Shasta, with the Wagon Creek footbridge on the left. Taken in mid-March 2024 during a photo excursion. Created, uploaded and nominated by -- Radomianin (talk) 04:55, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 04:55, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Breath-taking. Wolverine XI 09:00, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful and majestic scene. – Aristeas (talk) 09:44, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support majestique --SHB2000 (talk) 11:04, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 11:09, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 13:06, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Excellent. —-Frank Schulenburg (talk) 13:33, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ! --Terragio67 (talk) 14:47, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Per others.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:34, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ivar (talk) 17:34, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 18:22, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 23:44, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support It could be more sharp, but good compo, especially snow reflex on lake. --Mile (talk) 08:24, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- Improvement done Thanks for your helpful tip, Mile. I have applied a very reduced, gentle sharpening to the original file. Best, -- Radomianin (talk) 09:28, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 13:18, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 15:40, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Wow, amazing photo! Nice job, Radomianin! S. Perquin (talk) 15:46, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:39, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 10:14, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 15:02, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 19:06, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 20:14, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Shagil Kannur (talk) 06:42, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Giles Laurent (talk) 08:55, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Light and composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:12, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Milseburg (talk) 15:23, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 May 2024 at 02:34:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1890-1899
- Info Unknown photographer - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 02:34, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 02:34, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good portrait of Mergenthaler; his Linotype machine was one of the most important and beneficent inventions of the 19th century. Question @Adam Cuerden There is something like posterization over his left (from the viewer: right) shoulder – small areas which are rather greenish, while the rest of the background is rather reddish. These areas are already in the original, but appear a bit more prominent in the restauration because the other defects have been removed. Can you do something about them or do you think they belong to the original print and hence should be kept? Just asking, – Aristeas (talk) 09:53, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Aristeas: Fixed. The original is good, but definitely had some oddities. Adam Cuerden (talk) 11:34, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you very much, Adam! Now it’s even better. – Aristeas (talk) 13:41, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Aristeas: Fixed. The original is good, but definitely had some oddities. Adam Cuerden (talk) 11:34, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice pose, high resolution, and very good restoration. --Yann (talk) 10:43, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 11:09, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 18:22, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 23:41, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 15:39, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 19:19, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:40, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 20:15, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Giles Laurent (talk) 08:55, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Hericium americanum.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 May 2024 at 15:53:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Fungi#Order_:_Russulales
- Info: bear's head tooth fungus; no existing FPs. All by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:53, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:53, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Question Underexposed? Or bad light? Compare with this one. ★ 16:37, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: redeveloped and added an alternative. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:11, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Perhaps because of the scattered light, the photo has some cold tones, but it looks clear and the angle design is great. Jzhdylb (talk) 05:04, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
Alternative
[edit]- Info: slightly different angle and nicer bokeh --The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:11, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:11, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I barely see any difference between the two versions. ★ 23:28, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry man, but the quality and lighting. Wolverine XI 19:55, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:12, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Platon- Samir Terkih.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 May 2024 at 11:25:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Statues_indoors
- Info created by Terki hassaine samir - uploaded by Terki hassaine samir - nominated by Riad Salih -- Riad Salih (talk) 11:25, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Riad Salih (talk) 11:25, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Question could the background be darkened a bit? --SHB2000 (talk) 12:44, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 May 2024 at 18:39:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Malta
- Info Triq San Patrizju in Valletta, Malta, facing the Basilica Our Lady of Mount Carmel. In the "snapshot of a normal residential street facing a major landmark" category of photo. :) all by — Rhododendrites talk | 18:39, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 18:39, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 19:07, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 13:02, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I would decrease hightlights exposure. --Mile (talk) 17:37, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- I took a pass at the highlights in the current version. Played with bringing them down lower, but it looked unnatural. I don't think there's that much detail lost, though -- just a bit bright in spots. — Rhododendrites talk | 01:06, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Pic is good, just to make some more edits. You can send me original, CA is still strong and "blownout" can be corected. I would even crop it a bit above, church become biger. --Mile (talk) 09:17, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the offer! Where is the CA? Can you add a note? I'm not sure about a crop. I like the portrait orientation for narrow streets like this and wouldn't want to trim more off the sides to match a top crop. — Rhododendrites talk | 18:17, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Annoted. p.S. Crop would make, to strat from shadow to sun, now is sun-shadow-sun and church would be biger (would crop above too). Try as alternative. --Mile (talk) 06:45, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks. Regarding CA, I don't see any serious CA in those areas? The strange thing is there was CA around there in the previous version of the page. Is it possible you have a cached version? I like your idea of cropping from dark-to-light, but when I tried to do so it required cutting off too much of the left to make it work for me. — Rhododendrites talk | 21:58, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support A warm and well composed streetscape Cmao20 (talk) 15:27, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 17:47, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I see what you where trying but the street and lit background overall aren't expectional to me. I believe that there are many other more interesting streets in Valetta with colourful balconies. Those shown here in the foreground are not. Sorry, Poco a poco (talk) 19:58, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful perspective on the dome of the Basilica, giving an atmospheric impression of the steep streets. – Aristeas (talk) 09:16, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 15:40, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Sebastião Salgado 03.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 May 2024 at 10:26:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Men
- Info created by Fernando Frazão/Agência Brasil - uploaded by NMaia - nominated by ★ -- ★ 10:26, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ★ 10:26, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Victoria Alada de la Columna de la Independencia 01.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 May 2024 at 07:23:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Monuments and memorials
- Info Close up shot with a drone of the sculpture of the iconic Mexican Independence Monument. Created by ProtoplasmaKid - uploaded by ProtoplasmaKid - nominated by ProtoplasmaKid -- ProtoplasmaKid (talk) 07:23, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Hola Iván, I see potential for FP but you need to fix at least 2 issues: the strong chroma noise (probably as the result of having lifted up the shadows) and the red halo around the sculpture. Poco a poco (talk) 11:36, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you very much for your help, Diego! I have fixed as much as possible now the chroma and removed the halo you mention. Hopefully this will improve. Regards, ProtoplasmaKid (talk) 21:38, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- To be honest, I had expected improvements in the original picture, not a different one, but as they are pretty similar I have no problem with that. The noise level is good in the current version and I also prefer the POV/angle in this version. The halo is overcorrected so that you can see a grey halo around the statue but in the inner side with no saturation. I also agree with the lighting comments. I prefered the lighting of the original version and the WB too. I'd weak support if you fix the halo and brigthen it a bit Poco a poco (talk) 19:52, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks Diego! Yeah I think I added too much WB change of color trying to avoid the red halo. Maybe the next time! :) ProtoplasmaKid (talk) 16:12, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- To be honest, I had expected improvements in the original picture, not a different one, but as they are pretty similar I have no problem with that. The noise level is good in the current version and I also prefer the POV/angle in this version. The halo is overcorrected so that you can see a grey halo around the statue but in the inner side with no saturation. I also agree with the lighting comments. I prefered the lighting of the original version and the WB too. I'd weak support if you fix the halo and brigthen it a bit Poco a poco (talk) 19:52, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Hola Iván, I see potential for FP but you need to fix at least 2 issues: the strong chroma noise (probably as the result of having lifted up the shadows) and the red halo around the sculpture. Poco a poco (talk) 11:36, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Noisy and distracting background. --SHB2000 (talk) 21:45, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support: background is impossible to avoid, but light could be better. Still, impressive enough. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:50, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support, per Cosmonaut. RodRabelo7 (talk) 07:10, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Average at best. Composition and technicality could be better. Wolverine XI 15:12, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose I think this was a really good try but I'm not sure the light was particularly kind to you. Keep trying though, good effort for (I think) your first nomination Cmao20 (talk) 15:32, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks! It's really challenging! I think I can try again having a different lightday. ProtoplasmaKid (talk) 16:17, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose I think the buildings behind them are quite disturbing to the sculptures.Jiyoon Leee (talk) 04:32, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Just an average picture with unacceptably distracting background Chepry (talk) 09:04, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Just an average comment also with no little intention of being collegial. Thanks anyway. ProtoplasmaKid (talk) 16:14, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep it cool, please; don't make frivolous accusations as that will only further escalate things. --SHB2000 (talk) 13:09, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- Just an average comment also with no little intention of being collegial. Thanks anyway. ProtoplasmaKid (talk) 16:14, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose You could avoid the distracting background by positionning the drone differently -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:24, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 May 2024 at 12:24:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Walls
- Info, I took this shot with my phone, so the technical quality may not be perfect. However, despite it being my first FPC, I enjoyed capturing this mosaic.; created and uploaded by Riad Salih,
-- Riad Salih (talk) 12:24, 4 May 2024 (UTC)nominated by SHB2000 --SHB2000 (talk) 10:38, 6 May 2024 (UTC) - Support -- Riad Salih (talk) 12:24, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support For your effort. ★ 13:01, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Yes Poco a poco (talk) 13:21, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Category was "University of Abou Bekr Belkaïd". I would write what country on descriptions. --Mile (talk) 17:24, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Terragio67 (talk) 19:18, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support It is a pity that there is no higher resolution available, but the striking design is worth promoting, in my opinion. -- Radomianin (talk) 20:40, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support excellent phone photo. --SHB2000 (talk) 00:57, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:42, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak Support The resolution should be better. --XRay 💬 10:13, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 15:02, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 18:03, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Alaa :)..! 18:56, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 19:02, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice patterns (but isn't this a third active nomination?) --Giles Laurent (talk) 08:56, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Well spotted Giles Laurent, Riad Salih you must {{Withdraw}} one of your nomination since only two active are allowed. Otherwise the latest (this one) will be {{FPD}}-ed. Best, --Cart (talk) 10:29, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- I've taken over this nomination, so it can stay. --SHB2000 (talk) 10:38, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you! That was nice of you. --Cart (talk) 12:00, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Yeah, I didn't have any active nominations and don't feel motivated to search for new images at the moment, so I may as well take it over. It saves Riad from having to withdraw this image, too (which would suck if they did). --SHB2000 (talk) 12:03, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Totally agree, that is why I cautioned rather than just slam the template on it. There are often better solutions, and you provided one. --Cart (talk) 12:11, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Yeah, I didn't have any active nominations and don't feel motivated to search for new images at the moment, so I may as well take it over. It saves Riad from having to withdraw this image, too (which would suck if they did). --SHB2000 (talk) 12:03, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you! That was nice of you. --Cart (talk) 12:00, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- I've taken over this nomination, so it can stay. --SHB2000 (talk) 10:38, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Well spotted Giles Laurent, Riad Salih you must {{Withdraw}} one of your nomination since only two active are allowed. Otherwise the latest (this one) will be {{FPD}}-ed. Best, --Cart (talk) 10:29, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great motif and good framing outweighs low resolution. Cmao20 (talk) 11:06, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 16:02, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Gallery link changed to Architectural elements#Walls because the photo seems to show painted azulejos at a wall and similar FPs are located in that gallery section (thanks to Cart for the hint!). – Aristeas (talk) 16:34, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:24, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 May 2024 at 12:00:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Men
- Info Lopit man with dancing attires during a cultural dance, Imehejek, South Sudan. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 12:00, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 12:00, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 13:39, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support What a headgear! Yann (talk) 14:34, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice that photos from non-Western places are also nominated! The culture of Africa is very interesting! S. Perquin (talk) 14:59, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment
See annotations. I think if you do sharpening, do just face (a bit) and leave other as it is. I dislike noise on feathers, and skin (again), seem like carpet with zebra patern.--Mile (talk) 17:20, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- Mile: Ok, fair, I uploaded a new version. It should look better now. Poco a poco (talk) 19:37, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Anyway, could accept some CA. At least biger part isn’t spoiled by sharpening. --Mile (talk) 20:49, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 07:01, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:43, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 10:11, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 15:02, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 20:14, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support valuable image! --SHB2000 (talk) 04:00, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
Weak oppose Poor crop--Shagil Kannur (talk) 06:24, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Shagil Kannur: it's always helpful to elaborate how you would have done it. I see no room for improvement here --Poco a poco (talk) 18:03, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Shagil Kannur (talk) 09:50, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Giles Laurent (talk) 08:58, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 11:37, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Striking image --Tagooty (talk) 03:29, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:31, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Portrait and craft artwork -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:10, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:47, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Campamento de ganado de la tribu Mundari, Terekeka, Sudán del Sur, 2024-01-28, DD 187.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 May 2024 at 17:39:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family_:_Bovidae_(Bovids)
- Info Mother and baby goat sleeping at dusk in a Mundari cattle camp near Terekeka, South Sudan. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 17:39, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 17:39, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose--Shagil Kannur (talk) 06:41, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Shagil Kannur: You must provide a reason for your oppose vote. Yann (talk) 09:09, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Not an outstanding one-- Shagil Kannur (talk) 09:11, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- I would support if the two white goats are not there in the frame.-- Shagil Kannur (talk) 10:30, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Shagil Kannur: what do you mean with that? a tigther crop (they will still be partially there) or getting rid of them through editing the image Poco a poco (talk) 15:35, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- I wish they were not there.-- Shagil Kannur (talk) 17:09, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- I see --Poco a poco (talk) 17:26, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Shagil Kannur: what do you mean with that? a tigther crop (they will still be partially there) or getting rid of them through editing the image Poco a poco (talk) 15:35, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Shagil Kannur: You must provide a reason for your oppose vote. Yann (talk) 09:09, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Bad crop. --SHB2000 (talk) 10:36, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very lovely picture and excellent quality Cmao20 (talk) 11:44, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Touching and high documentary value. – Aristeas (talk) 16:27, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I know it's not easy to capture, but the crop is not optimal. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 16:53, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support I don't like the lighting but it's a very compelling subject! Henrysz (talk) 03:03, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, but this is too cluttered for my taste. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:51, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Busy composition, sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:00, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination Ok, I take it back, thank you Poco a poco (talk) 17:18, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Rare things happening here. D: ★ 20:16, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Rose-ringed parakeets.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 May 2024 at 16:32:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family_:_Psittacidae_(True_Parrots)
- Info Rose-ringed parakeets on a branch in Harrow, London created by User:Daftation - uploaded by User:Daftation - nominated by User:Daftation -- Daftation (talk) 16:32, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Daftation (talk) 16:32, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment For featured picture candidate to succeed, the categories must be better provided. We need a category for the bird species, the location, and removing the too broad ones. Yann (talk) 16:51, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- I've just fixed it. Thanks for the advice. Daftation (talk) 19:11, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great. Some of the birds are not as sharp as others but at this resolution I can forgive it. Cmao20 (talk) 15:34, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Really painterly and atmospheric. – Aristeas (talk) 09:29, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 14:35, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 15:41, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Low quality, and overprocessed in my view. Oversaturated and the blacks are too strong. Possibly artificial vignetting -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:20, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Feels good--Shagil Kannur (talk) 07:21, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Basile Morin. -- Karelj (talk) 16:00, 8 May 2024 (UTC) .
File:Sacred Lotus in a Pond 2.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 May 2024 at 16:25:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Nelumbonaceae
- Info Sacred Lotus in a pond in Shanghai, China created by User:Daftation - uploaded by User:Daftation - nominated by User:Daftation -- Daftation (talk) 16:25, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Daftation (talk) 16:25, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Idem above. For featured picture candidate to succeed, the categories must be better provided. We need a category for the flower species, the location, and removing the too broad ones. Yann (talk) 16:54, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Fixed this one also. Thanks again! Daftation (talk) 19:11, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The flower on the left ruins the composition for me, sorry. Wolverine XI 23:12, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 06:39, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 17:42, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 22:24, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:17, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, but I agree with Wolverine Poco a poco (talk) 11:08, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support I think this works as an artistic rather than encylcopedic flower photo. Cmao20 (talk) 15:35, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 09:26, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- ( Neutral), the blue halos around some of the petals are very disturbing to me.--Famberhorst (talk) 04:47, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:17, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 May 2024 at 04:26:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Magnoliaceae
- Info Flower bud of a Magnolia, Focus stack of 17 photos.
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:26, 5 May 2024 (UTC) - Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:26, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:56, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 06:33, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 06:59, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 09:54, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 15:02, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:52, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 18:28, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 20:13, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Giles Laurent (talk) 08:59, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 11:39, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 04:02, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:48, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 10:48, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --GRDN711 (talk) 00:07, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ivar (talk) 14:11, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 15:20, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 May 2024 at 09:10:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Horology
- Info Casio W-96H-4A2V wristwatch. 1st Casio W-96 on Commons as i see. Orange color is rare (imposible) to find, saw one and only in Rabat. -- Mile (talk) 09:10, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mile (talk) 09:10, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 14:45, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 15:02, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Good quality, but for FP, you should try with a less distracting background. Yann (talk) 15:49, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- I think the background palette matches with the color of the watch. ★ 16:29, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Yann thats is why i choose it. Its sporty watch, you cant place it on back of some expencive clock. Back was especially choosen for this. --Mile (talk) 08:08, 6 May 2024 (UTC) p.S. You even nominate botom portrait where black enter black face, that didnt bother you ?
- Since it is a sports watch, why didn't you place it on some background that is associated with sports or even outdoors and not 'expensive-looking', like a rock, in front of water ("water 50m resist"), on sand, or perhaps AstroTurf/grass that would have set off the orange so well rather than trying to match it. I think even the fabric of a sports bag would have been better. Keeping the watch in context would make a great photo. --Cart (talk) 11:51, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Green on orange, are you sure Cart ? I dont think its good idea. For "water" (all Casio are water resistant) but using water as back i would use other model for diving (Frogman). Rock, could be, but i would apply it at G-Shock series - strong structure and stonger material. However sand might be, but i am looking for similar on other clock. --Mile (talk) 15:50, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- I think green and orange are two vibrant colors that go great together. I always think of those colors as colors for stadiums where sports events take place. And there are a lot of other options for sports backgrounds, just use your imagination (or a Google search for ideas). Perhaps look at all the tricks people who do product photos do. --Cart (talk) 16:07, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose QI, definitely, but for FP, I agree with Yann. --SHB2000 (talk) 03:59, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support High quality product photography. And per ArionStar and author I like the background and how the colours match. Cmao20 (talk) 11:40, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao20. Not all product photography can uses a neutral (white, black, grey) background; it is not uncommon to use a “matching” background, and this is one. (When my father did product photographs for catalogues etc., we used neutral backgounds for the small photos in the lists of items, but complex arrangements, often also with complex backgrounds, for the title page and the opening photos.) – Aristeas (talk) 16:20, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Not exceptional. --Tagooty (talk) 03:24, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The watch has its style, and the tablecloth another style. Thus the background is distracting when we pay attention to the subject. Moreover, the vivid colors are eye-catching, thus still the show. Sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:07, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The choice for background is not successful. --Thi (talk) 13:45, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 05:26, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I don't like the background. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 00:18, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination --Mile (talk) 05:33, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 May 2024 at 15:18:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers#San Marino
- Info A paraglider next to the Cesta Tower takes advantage of the upward currents that form near Monte Titano (San Marino) which push it upwards. Noteː Six images stitched using Hugin - ISO-400 F/7.1 1/800 sec. - All by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 15:18, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 15:18, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very nice. But are the verticals quite straight? Cmao20 (talk) 11:43, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- According to your request, I'm going to check... Terragio67 (talk) 12:21, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Verticals reassessed, thanks. Terragio67 (talk) 13:21, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Image reworked from RAW files and verticals reassessed and image denoised, THX.
Infoː New version uploaded, refresh your computer cache, please. Terragio67 (talk) 14:31, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 15:04, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support We had a similar FP (demoted due to significant user problems), but your take is clearly better; the little part of the landscape shows much better in which high the tower and the paraglider are located. – Aristeas (talk) 16:25, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Composition brings out the heights. --Tagooty (talk) 03:22, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:26, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Aristeas. -- Radomianin (talk) 10:46, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 13:49, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:09, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Although the right part looks like leaning out. It may need a tilt correction in ccw direction Poco a poco (talk) 15:23, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for your review, I slightly corrected the geometry of the fortress on the right side... I actually had to consider that my position was slightly lower and that the right part of the structure was certainly further away than the left part. Anyway, let me know what do you think about the new version... Terragio67 (talk) 19:11, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 May 2024 at 15:09:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural_phenomena#Clouds
- Info created and uploaded by ADARSHluck - nominated by WildMouse76 -- WildMouse76 (talk) 15:09, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 15:09, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Hi and welcome to the FPC. I've fixed up the file page a bit for you to match what it should contain for the FPC. Nice clouds, but the file name is a bit ambiguous and not describing the photo very well. This is a requirement here. It should be more specific, but changing a file name during a nomination should only be done by one of the regular FPC coders since it affects the whole procedure. Would you mind if I changed it to 'Cirrus uncinus clouds in the morning sky - D35 2227 01' and fixed things for you? Or do you have a better suggestion for a name. Best, --Cart (talk) 16:41, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Your proposed name is good, but can you leave out the words after sky? The average person would have no clue what that is. WildMouse76 (talk) 22:03, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Ok, no problem. We just sometimes keep such numbers since they may be some sort of filing system the photographer uses and we respect such things, but for now I can skip them. I'll fix this right away. --Cart (talk) 22:16, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Your proposed name is good, but can you leave out the words after sky? The average person would have no clue what that is. WildMouse76 (talk) 22:03, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Info @ADARSHluck and WildMouse76: Great shot, worth promoting! The cloud structure is fascinating and reminds me of the structure of ice flowers on glass. Unfortunately, the image contains a lot of noise and some chromatic aberrations. I took the liberty of removing the imperfections and providing it to you under the SwissTransfer link. If you like, you can use the file for an update. The improvements increase the chances of promotion, in my opinion. Best regards :) -- Radomianin (talk) 17:48, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Perfect! I'll upload your modifications as soon as the download finishes. Thank you for your help! :) WildMouse76 (talk) 22:23, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- I just realized I can't override it. I did some research and it seems that only autopatrolled users can override images. Can someone else do that for me? Thanks! WildMouse76 (talk) 22:32, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Perfect! I'll upload your modifications as soon as the download finishes. Thank you for your help! :) WildMouse76 (talk) 22:23, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Ok, I've fixed that for you. When you ask nicely there is usually someone around to help you. Good luck with your nom now. :-) --Cart (talk) 23:09, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Special thanks to Cart for renaming and updating of the file, I just noticed it a moment ago. Otherwise I would have uploaded it tomorrow. Sincerest appreciation :) -- Radomianin (talk) 23:28, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Ok, I've fixed that for you. When you ask nicely there is usually someone around to help you. Good luck with your nom now. :-) --Cart (talk) 23:09, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support A striking scene - the formations of the clouds remind me of ice flowers on a window pane. Great capture! -- Radomianin (talk) 23:28, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice clouds. --Yann (talk) 07:03, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:06, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 09:52, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very interesting cloudscape, welcome to FPC, WildMouse76! I hope you bring more images like this one here. --Kritzolina (talk) 12:09, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support It looks like the clouds are trying to imitate the shapes of the trees (or vice versa). ★ 12:26, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:17, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Technically fine, but I don't see anything special. Wolverine XI 14:54, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Unusual and interesting idea. Well done. Cmao20 (talk) 15:38, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 17:54, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:55, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --BigDom (talk) 08:28, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Cart, Radomianin, Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 09:34, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:00, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 06:38, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Nice clouds, but I do not find the composition with cluttered bottomside extraordinary. —kallerna (talk) 10:57, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Red Lechwe.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 May 2024 at 19:28:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family : Bovidae (Bovids)
- Info A Red Lechwe at Port Lympne Wild Animal Park created by User:Daftation - uploaded by User:Daftation - nominated by User:Daftation -- Daftation (talk) 16:43, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Daftation (talk) 16:43, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Bad crop on three sides. Yann (talk) 20:13, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 May 2024 at 10:39:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events
- Info Kathakali is a classical dance form of Kerala. It is a "story play" genre of art. Usually the feminine characters in Kathakali, which is called minukka, are being performed by men. This is a good example for men dress up in the female attire. All by -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 10:39, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 10:39, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment This should be cropped at the top, so that the eyes are a third of the picture (see my suggestion). Yann (talk) 12:32, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Slightly cropped. Keeping the proportion is important to me-- Shagil Kannur (talk) 13:06, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Cropped--Shagil Kannur (talk) 13:42, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
Oppose The composition and upper crop isn't doing it for me.Wolverine XI 14:48, 2 May 2024 (UTC)- Cropped. Now please reconsider. Shagil Kannur (talk) 17:36, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Your opinion is valuable and I have made some changes accordingly. Now please comment on it -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 16:36, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Cropped. Now please reconsider. Shagil Kannur (talk) 17:36, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Wolverine, I have made some changes after your opinion. Would you please reconsider your vote?--Shagil Kannur (talk) 13:40, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Didn't see the changes. Nice work you did there, you have my Support Wolverine XI 14:30, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you--Shagil Kannur (talk) 15:00, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Didn't see the changes. Nice work you did there, you have my Support Wolverine XI 14:30, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Wolverine, I have made some changes after your opinion. Would you please reconsider your vote?--Shagil Kannur (talk) 13:40, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: a simple square crop of the original image looks best to me, and I would support it. If you want to preserve the proportions of the original, you can always upload a cropped version separately and propose it as an alternative here. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:23, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Agreed. Now please see the changes. Shagil Kannur (talk) 17:35, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support: much better! --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:47, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 17:54, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 18:40, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 20:20, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Wolverine 11. Crop is still bad. --SHB2000 (talk) 03:49, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 09:36, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment
I think White Balance isnt correct. White goes to yellow, maybe to put temperature down a bit. --Mile (talk) 08:12, 4 May 2024 (UTC)- Adjusted Shagil Kannur (talk) 10:14, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Mile (talk) 11:39, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Wolverine XI. -- Karelj (talk) 13:51, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Made some changes after Wolverine's comment. Please watch the older versions-- Shagil Kannur (talk) 16:42, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Karelj, SHB2000 Wolverine XI has modified his vote. I hope you reconsider your opinion--Shagil Kannur (talk) 06:26, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Nope, still a bad crop. --SHB2000 (talk) 06:29, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Ok. But there is no room for improvement.--Shagil Kannur (talk) 06:40, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Then it's not an FP. --SHB2000 (talk) 12:59, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Ok. But there is no room for improvement.--Shagil Kannur (talk) 06:40, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Nope, still a bad crop. --SHB2000 (talk) 06:29, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Karelj, SHB2000 Wolverine XI has modified his vote. I hope you reconsider your opinion--Shagil Kannur (talk) 06:26, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Thanks for the changes, they are a definite improvement. -- Radomianin (talk) 18:55, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 05:38, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Martha Annie Whiteley.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 May 2024 at 12:12:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/People#Other portraits
- Info created by Claire_Gaudriot - uploaded by Claire_Gaudriot - nominated by Alacoolwiki -- Alacoolwiki (talk) 12:12, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Alacoolwiki (talk) 12:12, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Quite good, even if I would scan it in higher resolution. High educational value, as no free picture of this person is available. Yann (talk) 13:01, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Not quality enough. Wolverine XI 14:46, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 05:38, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
File:05.05.2024 - Sobrevoo das áreas afetadas pelas chuvas na Região metropolitana de Porto Alegre (2).jpg
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 May 2024 at 11:43:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#2020-now
- Info Aerial view of Porto Alegre during the ongoing 2024 Rio Grande do Sul floods, Brazil. Created by Ricardo Stuckert - uploaded by High source - nominated by ★ -- ★ 11:43, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ★ 11:43, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Great document but the light is really tricky. There is some ccw tilt and it lacks a bit of vertical perspective correction Poco a poco (talk) 13:23, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- The light is tricky due to catastrophic weather conditions. For me, the wow factor overshadows that issues. ★ 13:41, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Obviously tilted. The light is IMO fine. Cmao20 (talk) 20:04, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Fixable? ★ 21:01, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, you can do it with the Commons:CropTool. Yann (talk) 11:55, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Fixable? ★ 21:01, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Content is interesting but the photo is not special in my opinion Daftation (talk) 19:45, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination ★ 20:29, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Henri-Julien-Félix Rousseau, French - Carnival Evening - Google Art Project.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 May 2024 at 20:04:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Exteriors#Landscapes
- Info Henri Rousseau, Carnival Evening, 1886 - uploaded by The Most Comfortable Chair - nominated by --Thi (talk) 20:04, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Thi (talk) 20:04, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Low-quality image. Wolverine XI 09:05, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Question It looks like low quality, but normally the Google Art Project reproductions are accurate, so maybe this is just how the original painting is. Can somebody who personally knows the original or at least other paintings by Rousseau comment on the quality? – Aristeas (talk) 09:56, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Yes, that's Rousseau's style. Yann (talk) 10:48, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 19:36, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Quality is fine IMO. It's just what the canvas looks like. Cmao20 (talk) 23:31, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Yann, Cmao20, thank you for your comments! – Aristeas (talk) 13:33, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 15:38, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:36, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support I think a slight rotation is needed --Shagil Kannur (talk) 06:49, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Giles Laurent (talk) 08:54, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment It would be fine if you correct the bottom left.--Shagil Kannur (talk) 10:01, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:42, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Brazil 16thc map.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 May 2024 at 17:16:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Maps#Maps of South America
- Info Map of Brazil in the Miller Atlas of 1519. Created by Lopo Homem - uploaded by Pedro Aguiar - nominated by ★ -- ★ 17:16, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support The map that was inserted in my school history/geography books. -- ★ 17:16, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful and representative old map in excellent reproduction. – Aristeas (talk) 09:42, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Historical map, very high resolution, good quality scan. --Yann (talk) 10:49, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 11:11, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 15:37, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:29, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Giles Laurent (talk) 08:54, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:20, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:43, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Shoshana Damari1961.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 May 2024 at 20:15:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Women
- Info created by Israeli GPO photographer - uploaded by Oyoyoy - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 20:15, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support beautiful portrait of Israeli singer and national icon Shoshana Damari. -- Tomer T (talk) 20:15, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Much too noisy, even for that time. Overexposed. Yann (talk) 09:18, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment She is beautiful and the expression + composition is great but the highlights do seem to be blown Cmao20 (talk) 15:04, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Yann. --SHB2000 (talk) 23:19, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Yann, not exceptional. A good portrait, could be VI. --Tagooty (talk) 03:00, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Yann. --El Golli Mohamed (talk) 18:42, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
File:MV Spirit of Vancouver Island.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 May 2024 at 14:16:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water transport#Ships
- Info: MV Spirit of Vancouver Island navigating Active Pass, British Columbia, Canada; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:16, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:16, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 14:17, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Good quality but I'm unsure if this is FP light. Cmao20 (talk) 15:39, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 16:38, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 17:55, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I'm sorry but I consider this image a QI. Neither the lighting nor the level of detail nor the subject/compo are outstanding. In fact, I would say the subject is rather unspectacular Poco a poco (talk) 19:36, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Agree with the above, this is a good capture but lacks 'wow' for FP. Needs a more spectacular backdrop, light and/or sky. BigDom (talk) 08:26, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Not sharp enough and the lighting is a problem. Wolverine XI 09:07, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral per above. --SHB2000 (talk) 11:06, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Poco -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:18, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Milseburg (talk) 15:25, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Poco a poco. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 18:53, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 08:50, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Edible mushrooms in baskets 2022 G1.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 May 2024 at 20:19:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Food and drink#Vegetables (raw)
- Info created & uploaded by George Chernilevsky - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 20:19, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Tomer T (talk) 20:19, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 20:42, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:04, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice simple composition.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:46, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:29, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support as Author. Thank you Tomer for this nomination. -- George Chernilevsky talk 14:02, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Llez (talk) 15:33, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Simple photo, but what a composition. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 12:52, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 18:55, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Wow! Wolverine XI 21:24, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 May 2024 at 20:40:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Reflections
- Info created and uploaded by Andre zumak - nominated by ★ -- ★ 20:40, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Amazon phenomena are always impressive. -- ★ 20:40, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Overprocessed, low quality, slightly tilted -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:34, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination ★ 11:35, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 May 2024 at 11:17:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Tunisia
- Info created by Atef Ouni - uploaded by Atef Ouni - nominated by Atef Ouni -- Atef Ouni (talk) 11:17, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Atef Ouni (talk) 11:17, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Atef Ouni: You are only allowed a maximum of 2 nominations at a time. This is your fourth. --SHB2000 (talk) 12:36, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry, so I have to wait till when to nominate other images? Atef Ouni (talk) 12:38, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, you will have to wait until one of your other two nominations have closed. --SHB2000 (talk) 12:45, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks a lot 🙏🏻 Atef Ouni (talk) 13:03, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Hello dear @SHB2000, now I have only one nominated image, how to do to nominate again this one? thank you for your time and your help Atef Ouni (talk) 13:38, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Hi, Atef Ouni, you would make a new nomination following the same process, but adding /2 at the end – in this case, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Coup de foudre et bateaux amarrées aux cotes de la Galite.jpg/2. --SHB2000 (talk) 13:40, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you very much!!! Atef Ouni (talk) 13:59, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Hi, Atef Ouni, you would make a new nomination following the same process, but adding /2 at the end – in this case, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Coup de foudre et bateaux amarrées aux cotes de la Galite.jpg/2. --SHB2000 (talk) 13:40, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, you will have to wait until one of your other two nominations have closed. --SHB2000 (talk) 12:45, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry, so I have to wait till when to nominate other images? Atef Ouni (talk) 12:38, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Atef Ouni: You are only allowed a maximum of 2 nominations at a time. This is your fourth. --SHB2000 (talk) 12:36, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Nomination denied. Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines because only two active nominations per user are allowed. |
I withdraw my nomination
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 May 2024 at 11:19:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Tunisia
- Info created by Atef Ouni - uploaded by Atef Ouni - nominated by Atef Ouni -- Atef Ouni (talk) 11:19, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Atef Ouni (talk) 11:19, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 May 2024 at 00:29:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Ramphastidae (Toucans)
- Info created by Bernard DUPONT - uploaded by Helmy oved - nominated by WildMouse76 -- WildMouse76 (talk) 00:29, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 00:29, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Noisy and chromatic aberrations -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:36, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Basile Morin. -- Karelj (talk) 09:49, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination --WildMouse76 (talk) 15:20, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 May 2024 at 00:07:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Ramphastidae (Toucans)
- Info created by Bernard DUPONT - uploaded by Helmy oved - nominated by WildMouse76 -- WildMouse76 (talk) 00:07, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support I know this image has been nominated before in a short time, but the problems suggested in the first nomination (chromatic aberrations and noise) have been fixed by Wilfredor, and the image is now ready for nomination. Also note that the old, unedited version might load or show instead of the new one (I don't know why that happens), so be patient until the file renders the correct version -- WildMouse76 (talk) 00:07, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination I'll just nominate it a different time. WildMouse76 (talk) 15:04, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 May 2024 at 05:17:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#France
- Info created by ComputerHotline - uploaded by ComputerHotline - nominated by ComputerHotline -- ComputerHotline (talk) 05:17, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ComputerHotline (talk) 05:17, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Extremely similar to your other nomination. Wolverine XI 08:38, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Nomination denied. Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines because only two active nominations per user are allowed. |
File:Fringilla coelebs canariensis 01.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 May 2024 at 08:04:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Fringillidae (Finches and Allies)
- Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 08:04, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Llez (talk) 08:04, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 09:19, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 09:21, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support A common bird, but here, light and compo is superb. --Terragio67 (talk) 09:33, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Shagil Kannur (talk) 09:43, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 10:43, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Chepry (talk) 12:47, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 13:37, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:07, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:04, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Milseburg (talk) 15:21, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 15:30, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 17:10, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Terragio67. – Aristeas (talk) 17:45, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 23:18, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Terragio67 --Tagooty (talk) 03:01, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:42, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --El Golli Mohamed (talk) 09:51, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ivar (talk) 14:09, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 19:21, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --WildMouse76 (talk) 03:34, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Detail is good, but the bird is common, the POV (from the top) not the best and I don't usually enjoy when there are man-made elements in wildlife pictures Poco a poco (talk) 15:36, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 18:55, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Incredible capture of an incredible bird! 👏 Wolverine XI 21:26, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Mosquée de Sidi Bou Médine03- SamirTerkih.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 May 2024 at 11:19:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings
- Info created by Terki hassaine samir - uploaded by Terki hassaine samir - nominated by Riad Salih -- Riad Salih (talk) 11:19, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Riad Salih (talk) 11:19, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 23:47, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose because of the lack of symmetry in both axles Poco a poco (talk) 13:19, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sharpness should be better, symmetry missing. --XRay 💬 10:13, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Shadow at the right and distracting objects -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:11, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 May 2024 at 16:22:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Rail_vehicles
- Info created & uploaded by David Gubler – nominated by Ivar (talk) 16:25, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ivar (talk) 16:26, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 17:07, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 18:59, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 23:18, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Famberhorst (talk) 05:40, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support-- Shagil Kannur (talk) 06:28, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support —Bruce1eetalk 07:42, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 08:38, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:23, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Llez (talk) 15:35, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 19:19, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 13:54, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 22:41, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 04:37, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 10:10, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Light and composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:10, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --BigDom (talk) 09:06, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 18:55, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Oh my goodness, that is so beautiful !!! Wolverine XI 21:28, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 May 2024 at 15:29:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Women
- Info created by Christophe Péan - uploaded by Alacoolwiki - nominated by Alacoolwiki -- Alacoolwiki (talk) 15:29, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Alacoolwiki (talk) 15:29, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 11:39, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The background is too bright and the quality just ok Poco a poco (talk) 13:21, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose bad background. --SHB2000 (talk) 00:58, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support IMHO this photo deserves a little bit more love. The bright background has a clear purpose – it helps to isolate the subject; using a high-key backgrund for subject isolation is unusual, but why not. The sharpness of the eyes is OK. There are some small CAs and I would wish for a little bit more contrast in the face (hence the weak support), but all in all the photo gives a natural, friendly and polite portrait of Pamela Ghislain. – Aristeas (talk) 16:08, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:21, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support agree with Aristeas. Cmao20 (talk) 20:53, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 23:58, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Poco --Tagooty (talk) 03:27, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Simpatical portrait. --Mile (talk) 08:25, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Poco. —kallerna (talk) 10:55, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Poco. Ermell (talk) 07:33, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Tornado outbreak sequence of April 25–28, 2024.png, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 May 2024 at 20:07:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Maps#Maps of North America
- Info created and uploaded by Wxtrackercody - nominated by WeatherWriter -- WeatherWriter (talk) 20:07, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Describes the large tornado outbreak sequence of April 25–28, 2024 in a single map. Decent quality map as well, meeting all requirements for a FP. WeatherWriter (talk) 20:07, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support solid quality to me. --SHB2000 (talk) 23:25, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
* Support Looks good to me Oppose Nothing worthy of a FP here. --WildMouse76 (talk) 00:41, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose QI not FP. Wolverine XI 08:13, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Wolverine XI: , if I may ask, what is your reasoning for it not being FP material? Fox Weather “Nearly 100 Tornado Warnings were issued Friday, making it the most active tornado day of 2024”, so it has a decent “wow” factor, especially for a map of a single tornado outbreak sequence. WeatherWriter (talk) 18:18, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:21, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I don't know why a screenshot of a (dangerous or/and rare) weather event on a radar/weather monitor would be a standout image. We could also add Windows screenshots, video games, Manor Lords, American Conquest. I don't know what too.... --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 19:02, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Sebring12Hrs. —kallerna (talk) 10:54, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 May 2024 at 17:18:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Fountains
- Info Water fountain at Mausoleum of Mohammed V, Rabat, Morocco. -- Mile (talk) 17:18, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mile (talk) 17:18, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 18:53, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cool motif and nice colours. Resolution a little bit low but FP for me. Cmao20 (talk) 19:04, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Info @Cmao20 "Foveon" colors, aka true color. --Mile (talk) 19:19, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Question Acc. to the Exif data the photo was taken with a Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III. Does that camera use a Foveon sensor? I always thought Olympus uses the usual Bayer sensors … No offence, just asking! – Aristeas (talk) 10:14, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao20. -- Radomianin (talk) 19:24, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 19:35, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Please centre the image. --SHB2000 (talk) 23:17, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Yes. Should be fixed --Shagil Kannur (talk) 06:38, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Probaly you mean one side to crop ? Above my crop start white stone/granit or whatever, which is new modern fence. So you can see crop of others. I will check the distane of both side and crop. My position was a bit to left of center. --Mile (talk) 09:01, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Done --Mile (talk) 09:26, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Cool: Support. --SHB2000 (talk) 01:43, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Done --Mile (talk) 09:26, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:30, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- SupportDespite the top crop, nice work--Shagil Kannur (talk) 06:37, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Llez (talk) 15:36, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice work. Wolverine XI 04:48, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Great subject, but still there is room for improvement: you focused on getting the horizontal next to the top parallel to the border, but the image needs indeed a tilt in cw direction (look at the horizontal at the bottom) and an horizontal perspective correction. Could you offer also a bit more of crop at the top? Poco a poco (talk) 14:21, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Sure Poco, show me. I can send you original, or if you find any similar around internet. p.S. Read comment above for crop. --Mile (talk) 16:52, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- What do you mean? is the fountain tilted for real? if not, which I don't believe, then it needs a tilt/perspective correction. I can upload a version with that fixed, it is an easy work Poco a poco (talk) 20:22, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 22:38, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 10:10, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Composition, light and subject -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:11, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 18:56, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 May 2024 at 03:03:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events
- Info created by RuinDig - uploaded by RuinDig - nominated by RuinDig -- RuinDig (talk) 03:03, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- RuinDig (talk) 03:03, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose {{FPX}} Low quality, chromatic aberrations, tilt, crop and composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:37, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Basile Morin: Tagged. --SHB2000 (talk) 22:15, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment In my viewpoint, this level of noise is unavoidable with 1/2.3 image sensor camera. Would it have been better if the ISO sensitivity had been a little lower?
- I didn't cropped, this is original size.
- As you can see here, the camera is held up in the crowd with parade bus scene, so the tilt is unavoidable. RuinDig (talk) 14:41, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Basile. Красный wanna talk? 13:18, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Description: 2016 Rio de Janeiro Olympic and Paralympic Games Parade of Japan National Team on 7th October, 2016. Located in Nihonbashi, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan. From left to right: Hirooki Arai, Yoshihide Kiryu and Shota Iizuka RuinDig (talk) 15:13, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: see Basile's comment --SHB2000 (talk) 22:15, 11 May 2024 (UTC) | Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed. |
File:Hinterstoder Schiederweiher-3187.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 May 2024 at 01:29:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural/Austria#Upper Austria
- Info A colourful and painterly Austrian landscape with a superb composition. created by Isiwal - uploaded by Isiwal - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 01:29, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 01:29, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 13:54, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Llez (talk) 15:37, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very picturesque, idyllic and soothing atmosphere. Perhaps the blue-colored aberrations on the branches at the top left of the tree could be toned down a little. -- Radomianin (talk) 18:15, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:12, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 06:37, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Strong contrast and some blue CAs on the branches, but overall good. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 12:47, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great mood and compo Poco a poco (talk) 13:43, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Radomianin. – Aristeas (talk) 10:20, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:14, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --BigDom (talk) 09:01, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:29, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 18:56, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nature is so heartwarming. Wolverine XI 21:33, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 May 2024 at 01:29:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#France
- Info Surprisingly there are no FPs of this iconic Parisian landmark, built in the reign of Emperor Napoleon III. (there is an FP on English Wikipedia but it cannot match this for image quality.) The composition and quality of this image are superb and I like the soft, golden light. created by Poco a poco - uploaded by Poco a poco - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 01:29, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 01:29, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice catch, thanks for the nom, Cmao20! Poco a poco (talk) 07:13, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I just uploaded a new version with better sharpness Poco a poco (talk) 12:30, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 13:54, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:29, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support I would mention Jeanne d’Arc in the file description --Llez (talk) 15:40, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Good point, Done Poco a poco (talk) 12:30, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 18:05, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 19:17, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 12:46, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 04:29, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 10:21, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:29, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 18:56, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 May 2024 at 04:22:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family_:_Dryopteridaceae
- Info Beautiful unfurling leaf of a Polystichum setiferum ('Herrenhausen'). Focus stack of 21 photos.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:22, 8 May 2024 (UTC) - Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:22, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Caught my eyes 😃 Bijay Chaurasia (talk) 05:12, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 11:25, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 13:53, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 15:41, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 19:15, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --WildMouse76 (talk) 22:21, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 05:09, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Carsten Steger (talk) 06:51, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 12:45, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 13:42, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 04:26, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 07:32, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 10:21, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Absolutely beautiful. Well done. Daftation (talk) 19:50, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 18:56, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very weird, but great quality. Wolverine XI 21:34, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 May 2024 at 23:08:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Air transport#Military jet aircraft
- Info U.S. Air Force photo by Bryce Bennett - uploaded by Mztourist - nominated by Schierbecker -- Schierbecker (talk) 23:08, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Great composition. Practically no shadows. First production T-7 means good EV. Schierbecker (talk) 23:08, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Striking Cmao20 (talk) 01:32, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support-- Shagil Kannur (talk) 06:31, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 08:37, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 13:54, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Llez (talk) 15:37, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ivar (talk) 16:56, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 19:18, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:14, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Carsten Steger (talk) 06:52, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 12:49, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Good quality and nice subject but I'm not convinced by the new crop, I prefer the original one and if any, I'd have just cropped a bit on the right and keep the lead room to enhance the high speed feeling Poco a poco (talk) 13:45, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 07:32, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 18:56, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support I've been hearing a lot aircrafts lately, so it wouldn't hurt if supported an image of one. Wolverine XI 21:31, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Paysage Oued Zen.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 May 2024 at 21:11:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Tunisia
- Info all by Atef Ouni -- Atef Ouni (talk) 21:11, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Atef Ouni (talk) 21:11, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Atef Ouni: J'ai corrigé les liens pour vous. --SHB2000 (talk) 23:16, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support I forgot to officially support. --SHB2000 (talk) 06:46, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Merci beaucoup@SHB2000 Atef Ouni (talk) 09:00, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Atef Ouni: J'ai corrigé les liens pour vous. --SHB2000 (talk) 23:16, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support L'une des meilleures photos de paysage que j'ai vues ici depuis un certain temps. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 00:07, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Nice viewpoint but only 3000x2000 pixels, the resolution is rather small for a landscape -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:13, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- I updated the image by uploaded the highest resolution available, its 3500 now and it's because image is cropped Atef Ouni (talk) 05:29, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Better -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:12, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support I wish something could be done about what appears to be aliasing in the water, but the mood is incredible. Cmao20 (talk) 01:31, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- I Updated the file after solving the blobs problem in the water, thank you for your help! Atef Ouni (talk) 09:48, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:40, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:39, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice lighting -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 06:32, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Impressive light, but the flaws in the water area still keep me from supporting it. --Ermell (talk) 08:25, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- I agree. It looks like the weird things you sometimes get when you do HDR in Lightroom and the program doesn't really merge the exposures correctly. You get "blobs" with hard contours. If the "blobs" in the photo are the result of an HDR merge, you can't get rid of them by doing a new one. The only way is to use some clone correction tool or doing a manual partial merge/patch from one of the original photos. In any case, I don't think such flaws belong in an FP. Atef Ouni, can you please see what you can do about this. --Cart (talk) 22:28, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- The 'Deghost' option may do the trick if the water was moving slowly. Click on 'Show deghost overlay' and check if the 'Low' deghosting amount masks the offending areas. If not, try 'Medium' or 'High'. After the HDR is generated, check if the masked areas look good and don't have excessive noise (a common side-effect of this technique). Julesvernex2 (talk) 08:34, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Ermell @Cart@Julesvernex2 Thank you a lot for your helpful comment, you are absolutely right, I hadn't paid attention to this point, I will try to see if I can correct that, thank you again for your advice! Atef Ouni (talk) 08:15, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Ermell @W.carter@Julesvernex2 I Updated the file after solving the blobs problem in the water, thank you all once again! Atef Ouni (talk) 09:47, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Awesome! Julesvernex2 (talk) 14:43, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Ermell @W.carter@Julesvernex2 I Updated the file after solving the blobs problem in the water, thank you all once again! Atef Ouni (talk) 09:47, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Ermell @Cart@Julesvernex2 Thank you a lot for your helpful comment, you are absolutely right, I hadn't paid attention to this point, I will try to see if I can correct that, thank you again for your advice! Atef Ouni (talk) 08:15, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- The 'Deghost' option may do the trick if the water was moving slowly. Click on 'Show deghost overlay' and check if the 'Low' deghosting amount masks the offending areas. If not, try 'Medium' or 'High'. After the HDR is generated, check if the masked areas look good and don't have excessive noise (a common side-effect of this technique). Julesvernex2 (talk) 08:34, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- I agree. It looks like the weird things you sometimes get when you do HDR in Lightroom and the program doesn't really merge the exposures correctly. You get "blobs" with hard contours. If the "blobs" in the photo are the result of an HDR merge, you can't get rid of them by doing a new one. The only way is to use some clone correction tool or doing a manual partial merge/patch from one of the original photos. In any case, I don't think such flaws belong in an FP. Atef Ouni, can you please see what you can do about this. --Cart (talk) 22:28, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 13:55, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:25, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Llez (talk) 15:36, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful composition. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 12:53, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:17, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --BigDom (talk) 09:00, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support That's it.--Ermell (talk) 13:59, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 18:56, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful! Thank you very much for fixing the HDR issue and to Cart and Julesvernex2 for their hints. – Aristeas (talk) 08:14, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --WildMouse76 (talk) 19:42, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 May 2024 at 08:27:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds #Family : Meropidae (Bee-eaters)
- Info created and uploaded by El Golli Mohamed, nominated by TOUMOU -- TOUMOU (talk) 08:27, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- TOUMOU (talk) 08:27, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Please fix the gallery above. Yann (talk) 08:38, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --El Golli Mohamed (talk) 09:51, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 13:51, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 06:35, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Carsten Steger (talk) 06:45, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 13:28, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 19:59, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 04:16, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:29, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 07:32, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 08:06, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 14:13, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 18:57, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Perfect shot. Wolverine XI 21:35, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:52, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --WildMouse76 (talk) 19:42, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Government office in The Hague housing the Dutch Ministry of Justice and Security (2019).jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 May 2024 at 13:21:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Netherlands
- Info Government office in The Hague housing the Dutch Ministry of Justice and Security (middle building) and Ministry of the Interior and Kingdom Relations (left building). Photo by S. Perquin -- S. Perquin (talk) 13:21, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support I think this is the most beautiful photo I have ever taken in my life. S. Perquin (talk) 13:21, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
SupportGreat picture 😍 143.177.126.40 (talk) 14:11, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- Please log in to vote. Anonymous votes are not allowed. Yann (talk) 14:33, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- That was an acquaintance of mine! Are they allowed to vote as well? Kind regards, S. Perquin (talk) 15:01, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- Users who are logged in and have at least 50 edits and 10 days on their account on Commons can vote. Just make sure you haven't told them to come and vote for your photo, since that can be seen as canvassing, and that's not allowed. --Cart (talk) 17:27, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- Ah, okay! Good to know! This is my first time nominating an image or being here at all. So that's why I didn't know! Kind regards, S. Perquin (talk) 17:00, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Users who are logged in and have at least 50 edits and 10 days on their account on Commons can vote. Just make sure you haven't told them to come and vote for your photo, since that can be seen as canvassing, and that's not allowed. --Cart (talk) 17:27, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- Please log in to vote. Anonymous votes are not allowed. Yann (talk) 14:33, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
SupportGeweldig mooie foto! 2001:1C03:B02:3D00:2D42:C1F3:6627:6F74 15:28, 4 May 2024 (UTC)- Dankjewel! Anoniem stemmen is helaas niet toegestaan, dus je zou moeten inloggen om te stemmen! S. Perquin (talk) 15:30, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
SupportGreat picture 2001:1C03:B02:3D00:2CFA:DA6B:546C:7894 15:32, 4 May 2024 (UTC)- Bedankt! Anoniem stemmen is helaas niet toegestaan, dus je zou moeten inloggen om te stemmen! S. Perquin (talk) 15:33, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Thanks Yann for fixing the name of the file, just please remember that you need to change to the new file name in all places of the code on the nom page, otherwise the FPC Bot will not be able to do what it's supposed to do. I have fixed that for you now. All the best, --Cart (talk) 18:16, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment By the way, the photo has been taken with a Samsung Galaxy S9 and has not been cropped, nor has it been edited or adjusted. No filters have been used either. Just to let you know! Kind regards, S. Perquin (talk) 02:40, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
Supporthet is goed, de formaat is goed, alles is juist goed, ik zal het goed rekenen Zozo7077 (talk) 16:46, 5 May 2024 (UTC)- Bedankt voor je reactie! Ik denk dat jij helaas ook niet mag stemmen... Je moet namelijk 50 bewerkingen hebben gedaan om te mogen stemmen, zie ik nu! 😕 Groetjes, S. Perquin (talk) 17:03, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Info Welcome and thank you for your review, Zozo7077. Unfortunately, you only have 4 edits, which is not enough. According to the rules, you need at least 50 edits to vote: "Editors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote. Everyone can vote for their own nominations". But the photo community appreciates your interest and would be happy to have you back as a reviewer after the 50th edit. Best regards :) -- Radomianin (talk) 18:00, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- why? is there a reason??? Zozo7077 (talk) 09:23, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Hey Zozo7077, you need at least 50 edits to vote. Je moet 50 bewerkingen hebben gedaan om te mogen stemmen. Met vriendelijke groet, S. Perquin (talk) 09:25, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- 50 bewerkingen EN 10 dagen op Commons, je account hier is op 5 mei aangemaakt. --Cart (talk) 10:00, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- why? is there a reason??? Zozo7077 (talk) 09:23, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Yeah, it's a good one. The image quality is a little bit low but I really like it anyway. Cmao20 (talk) 11:38, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support At first I was undecided because of the bright sky, but despite this fact and the lower image quality of the cell phone, after some consideration, I tend to support it. The composition of the objects makes up for any shortcomings - in that respect, a definite wow! -- Radomianin (talk) 13:05, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Yes! Definitely there's a FPC-related phoneography boom… ★ 01:24, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 15:06, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Typically one wants to avoid such a partially bright sky, but here the brightness of the centre effectively underlines the vanishing-point composition. Details show the typical smartphone rendering, but with this kind of architecture it works very well. – Aristeas (talk) 16:13, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support The architecture, colors and textures almost make it look like it's unreal and like it's a screenshot of a video game, which makes the photo quite interesting. The vanishing points are also quite interesting, and you could almost lose your sense of orientation when zooming in on the right-hand side of the image. --Giles Laurent (talk) 17:34, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:48, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 19:26, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Too bright.--Shagil Kannur (talk) 15:16, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, I don't see anything featurable here, neither the lighting, nor the subject nor the level of detail. All those prompt supporting votes of unknown people or IPs are not helping either Poco a poco (talk) 15:19, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Poco. —kallerna (talk) 10:52, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Poco a Poco. -- Karelj (talk) 12:01, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Poco. --Ermell (talk) 19:51, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Average composition and light, sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:53, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 May 2024 at 15:05:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Soldiers
- Info created by U.S. Army - uploaded by Schierbecker - nominated by Schierbecker -- Schierbecker (talk) 15:05, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Good composition. Schierbecker (talk) 15:05, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 17:51, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support I'd have liked to see more crop on the right, but overall interesting, original and of decent quality Poco a poco (talk) 13:38, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Wow Cmao20 (talk) 20:00, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 07:32, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Well executed Daftation (talk) 19:46, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Looks like a movie scene -- Giles Laurent (talk) 18:58, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Well, I guess it's the Call of Duty. Wolverine XI 21:12, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:19, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 18:31, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 May 2024 at 13:10:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes/United States
- Info created by Precisionviews - uploaded by Precisionviews - nominated by Wolverine XI -- Wolverine XI 13:10, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Guess who's back? Back again? That's right, Wolverine XI is back. Alright, so to put things in perspective, this is Wolverine XI's first FP nomination since September 11, 2023—that is, almost eight months ago. Additionally, it has been precisely 11 months since Wolverine XI's initial edit on this site. Being Wolverine XI's uncle's hometown, Charlotte, North Carolina, holds special meaning for Wolverine XI and is consistently a pleasant destination. Wolverine XI hopes this FPC goes smoothly. Wolverine XI 13:10, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 13:38, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment The verticals should be fixed. --XRay 💬 10:11, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment It makes Charlotte look positively utopian. But I can't support unless a perspective correction is done. Cmao20 (talk) 11:37, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment If somebody tries a perspective correction (which would be much appreciated), they should also check if adjusting the white balance improves the image. IMHO the colours are a bit too bluish, so moving the balance a bit more towards warmer tones could be rewarding. – Aristeas (talk) 16:11, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
Alternative
[edit]- Support It is very difficult to get all the verticals perfectly straight but this is IMO an improvement and I have also changed the white balance, please have a look Wolverine XI, ArionStar, XRay, Aristeas. Cmao20 (talk) 16:31, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Thank you very much, Cmao20! In my eyes this version looks much better and also more realistic. – Aristeas (talk) 16:42, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Thanks a lot Cmao20. Due to my busy schedule, I was unable to find the time for this. Wolverine XI 17:19, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 19:46, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 04:32, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- White balance in older version is looking better to me--Shagil Kannur (talk) 09:58, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --WildMouse76 (talk) 02:39, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:15, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Composition and appealing weather -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:51, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --BigDom (talk) 09:09, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 09:12, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:41, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 18:54, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Parque Nacional Marinho de Fernando de Noronha - João Paulo Marques DAndretta 17.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 May 2024 at 16:53:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family_:_Holocentridae
- Info created & uploaded by João D'Andretta – nominated by Ivar (talk) 16:53, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ivar (talk) 16:53, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Jpdandretta really have good photos. ★ 17:49, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 20:02, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 07:31, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 14:14, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 09:08, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral Level of detail is ok, compo nothing wild, squirrel fishes are not small fishes and are pretty common Poco a poco (talk) 10:41, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:12, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 18:58, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 07:24, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:54, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 May 2024 at 18:27:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Children
- Info Portrait of a girl from the Laarim Tribe, Kimotong, Kapoeta State, South Sudan. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 18:27, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 18:27, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice portrait --Shagil Kannur (talk) 04:06, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Interesting reflections in the pupils.--Ermell (talk) 06:32, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 09:22, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 11:45, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:57, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 20:02, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 09:08, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:55, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 18:31, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 May 2024 at 15:55:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events
- Info A folk dance performer dressed up like pre 1980 Indian woman's attire. All by -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 15:55, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 15:55, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I don't see anything here. The crop and background are bad; this image is not FP quality. Wolverine XI 08:42, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Wolverine XI. --SHB2000 (talk) 13:48, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination --Shagil Kannur (talk) 06:37, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Campamento de ganado de la tribu Mundari, Terekeka, Sudán del Sur, 2024-01-28, DD 157.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 May 2024 at 12:59:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Women
- Info Young woman of the Mundari tribe in a cattle camp in Terekeka, South Sudan. Poco a poco (talk) 12:59, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 12:59, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice pose. ★ 13:47, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Stunning sharpness. Nice comp. --Shagil Kannur (talk) 14:54, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 18:06, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 20:03, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ! --Terragio67 (talk) 04:13, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 13:31, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Light, composition, and high level of detail -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:20, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 09:06, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:18, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 18:59, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Famberhorst (talk) 04:13, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 07:20, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:56, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 May 2024 at 06:54:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers#San Marino
- The witches' pass (or Passo delle Streghe) is one of the attractions of San Marino, it is a shortcut that leads from the first tower (Guaita) to the second tower (Cesta) depicted in the background. It puts everyone in great fear due to the steep slope and the overhang on the sides. In the background the fortifications near the tower are literally devoured by nature every spring, each time giving a charm of mystery to the castle located on Mount Titan. Info All by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 06:54, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 06:54, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 11:39, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 12:39, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment A very nice view and I would be happy to support it. But (sorry to say this) at the branches at the left there are some odd transitions – see image note; maybe a stacking error? It would be great if you could fix this. Sorry again, – Aristeas (talk) 16:17, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for your comment. Yes, it was clearly a stacking error. It happens sometimes when the weather is windy or in this case, maybe I didn't rotate the camera precisely..., luckily I had spare shots, so I decided to re-process the new combo's images, cropping out minor disturbing blur benches parts declaring the new composition as retouched. Terragio67 (talk) 23:48, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support now. Thank you very much! – Aristeas (talk) 08:31, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for your comment. Yes, it was clearly a stacking error. It happens sometimes when the weather is windy or in this case, maybe I didn't rotate the camera precisely..., luckily I had spare shots, so I decided to re-process the new combo's images, cropping out minor disturbing blur benches parts declaring the new composition as retouched. Terragio67 (talk) 23:48, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 16:21, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:50, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 13:46, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Shagil Kannur (talk) 13:47, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:12, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support-- Giles Laurent (talk) 16:50, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support It would be great if you could document the amount of frames you require for a shot like this one Poco a poco (talk) 15:32, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- There are 18 stitched portrait images (6x3). I used Hugin (a free software) to merge all the images. Each image has a resolution of 24 megapixels (4000x6000), but I mainly only used the central parts of the images (2200x3300), because they offer greater guarantees of success being sharper than the edge. Terragio67 (talk) 19:50, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose IMO a bit busy composition, dull light. —kallerna (talk) 10:51, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:34, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 May 2024 at 19:42:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#United Arab Emirates
- Info created by User:Daftation - uploaded by User:Daftation - nominated by User:Daftation -- Daftation (talk) 19:42, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Daftation (talk) 19:42, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose overblown lights at the left. Would be much better with lights correction, but not sure if this is correctable at all. Красный wanna talk? 13:13, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I don't think portrait works for this image. Wolverine XI 08:45, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I quite like the portrait composition but I think it needs a perspective correction and the tilt to be fixed, and I fear that this would make the bench a little too close to the edge of the frame. Cmao20 (talk) 03:39, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination Daftation (talk) 18:53, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Lamp post in Schwerin (2).jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 May 2024 at 14:58:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements
- Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 14:58, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 14:58, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great composition. Cmao20 (talk) 11:42, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 15:04, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Indeed a very good composition: It emphasizes the reliefs on the lamp post, but adds the castle in the background, appropriately out of focus, to intimate the context. – Aristeas (talk) 16:23, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:25, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:27, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support A composition to be taken into account. --Terragio67 (talk) 10:00, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:11, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 16:51, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support I like the compo very much, the light is ok but the level of detail is low. It feels like the focus is below the sculptures, so that these are not really sharp. Could you also add some information about this piece? Poco a poco (talk) 15:25, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment This is probably the work of the architect Georg Adolph Demmler, probably made in 1845 during the reconstruction of the castle and bridge. However, it is difficult to find information about the lamp post. Maybe someone knows something more?. --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:15, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 17:52, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Underexposed, halo effect around main subject. I also find the light rather dull. —kallerna (talk) 10:50, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose QI but not FP, IHMO. -- Karelj (talk) 12:19, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Good details, not a bad composition with the castle at right, and of course QI, but dull light and no "Wow" effect for me. Sorry. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 16:34, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per others, sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:54, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
File:St Julian church in St-Julien-de-Toursac (6).jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 May 2024 at 14:56:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#France
- Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 14:56, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 14:56, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Dull light, strong distortion. Yann (talk) 15:49, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Well composed. Light is a bit grey but in this instance I think it doesn't detract. Cmao20 (talk) 11:41, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 15:05, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 16:21, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:22, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I like how you've worked the scene that day, but I agree with Yann about the dull lighting conditions. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 04:00, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 05:25, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose QI, but not FP, IHMO. -- Karelj (talk) 15:50, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Dull light. No wow. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 00:17, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per above, the subject/combo is not that extraordinary that compensates the lighting Poco a poco (talk) 15:34, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per above. —kallerna (talk) 10:50, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 May 2024 at 04:17:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Walls
- Info When we are taking photographs, we pay attention to objects that are often overlooked, such as this rusty link chain with a ring anchored in an ancient quay wall near the Römerbrücke over the Moselle in Trier.
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:17, 13 May 2024 (UTC) - Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:17, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I am sorry, but not a Featured picture TOUMOU (talk) 08:11, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I don't feel anything too, sorry. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 19:51, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The subject isn't exceptional in my opinion -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:14, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Nothing interesting here -- WildMouse76 (talk) 01:24, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination Thanks for your comments.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:30, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Plains zebras (Equus quagga) Maputo.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 May 2024 at 21:51:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family : Equidae (Equids)
- Info Quite a few zebra FPs. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:51, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:51, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 22:46, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice reflections. Cmao20 (talk) 23:12, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 01:36, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful.--Shagil Kannur (talk) 03:03, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very good composition.--Terragio67 (talk) 04:04, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 14:42, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very nice mirror image, good light -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:27, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 09:04, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 12:03, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:19, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 18:59, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 07:19, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:57, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 09:33, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 19:05, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --WildMouse76 (talk) 19:43, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:58, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 May 2024 at 21:42:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family : Cercopithecidae (Old World Monkeys)
- Info No FP. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:42, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:42, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 22:47, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 23:10, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Shagil Kannur (talk) 03:05, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 07:31, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Oppose you said "No FP", therefore not an FP– jk, Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:48, 10 May 2024 (UTC)- Support Impressive. – Aristeas (talk) 14:43, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Composition and plain background with an appealing weather -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:28, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great! BigDom (talk) 08:58, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 09:03, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 12:02, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:20, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 19:15, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Love the background! Wolverine XI 21:07, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:58, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 19:04, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --WildMouse76 (talk) 19:43, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 May 2024 at 11:35:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Food and drink#Fruits (raw)
- Info Avocado fruits in a grocery store, Colatina, Espírito Santo, Brazil. Created, uploaded and nominated by ★ -- ★ 11:35, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ★ 11:35, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support looks cool for me, nice composition. Красный wanna talk? 13:14, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Several aspects of this image make me feel this is not one of the best of the website. First, the background at the right and at the left, then the lack of sharpness in the corners, and finally the narrow depth of field, probably automatically set in the smartphone.
- The guidelines say "A bad picture of a very difficult subject is better than a good picture of an ordinary subject." and here neither the subject is very difficult nor the quality exceptional, compared for example to focus stacked fruits or vegetables in the same gallery -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:00, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Not very sharp and the irregularity of size means that this is a somewhat messy composition Cmao20 (talk) 03:44, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 06:04, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support disagree with Basile, but I'd be interested to see how a crop works out. --SHB2000 (talk) 07:59, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose lack of sharpness, light and compo are imo not outstanding. -- Ivar (talk) 11:38, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Don't like the composition. --Micha (talk) 09:23, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination ★ 11:21, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 May 2024 at 11:35:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Styles and Techniques#Minimalism
- Info Eletric roller shutter door. Created, uploaded and nominated by ★ -- ★ 11:35, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ★ 11:35, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose This kind of photography is always interesting, but I can't find any wow here. Sorry.--Ermell (talk) 19:12, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very minimalist! --SHB2000 (talk) 22:14, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- It's the door of my office.
- (by the way, I just changed the category to Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Styles and Techniques#Minimalism) ★ 23:57, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- I'm in doubt between Abstract, Minimalism or Texture Photography… ★ 01:23, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- It's a bit of a grey area – though after all, they're not photography concepts that exist in isolated bubbles; an overlap is expected (and this is one of them). Cart's suggestion also makes sense. --SHB2000 (talk) 07:58, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- I'm in doubt between Abstract, Minimalism or Texture Photography… ★ 01:23, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Minimalism is fine when the light is special, or when something extra makes you feel "wow". Unfortunately here it is just a boring texture with uneven light, in my opinion -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:32, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- I too would go with 'Texture Photography' on this. It makes most sense. --Cart (talk) 09:41, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Question Is the shutter white or grey in real life? BigDom (talk) 00:23, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- White, but the morning light made the top a little darker, grayish. ★ 00:43, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Basile Morin, nothing wrong with it but just not speaking to me. Cmao20 (talk) 03:46, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 06:05, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose --Micha (talk) 09:27, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination ★ 11:21, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
File:2024-05-09 10-15-36 FortDeRoppe.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 May 2024 at 07:26:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#France
- Info created by ComputerHotline - uploaded by ComputerHotline - nominated by ComputerHotline -- ComputerHotline (talk) 07:26, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ComputerHotline (talk) 07:26, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Support ★ 11:43, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Per above. ★ 23:22, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Perspective problem, at the left. Wall is not vertical -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:31, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I agree that the floor is falling down. I prefer the other image, it is depped and the lights make it more interesting, this one is not wowing to me --Poco a poco (talk) 12:01, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Should be centered, and the left side is especially subpar. Wolverine XI 08:47, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry but per Poco. This one lacks something in terms of the composition, too much of the frame is just a bare wall. Quality is good but IMO QI not FP. Cmao20 (talk) 03:37, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Gray espresso cup with amaretto.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 May 2024 at 09:17:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Ceramics
- Info created and uploaded by Friedrich Haag, nominated by
YannF. Riedelio - Support Harmonious composition of a simple cup. -- Yann (talk) 09:17, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Hi F. Riedelio, nice photo, but the name is a bit too ambiguous for an FPC. Could you suggest a name that better describes the image? --Cart (talk) 10:17, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Done
- Renaming to "Gray espresso cup with amaretto" commissioned. F. Riedelio • 💬 11:48, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks! I'll fix this for you. :-) --Cart (talk) 11:55, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support per nomination Cmao20 (talk) 11:45, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment The crop is a bit too tight in my opinion to make it to FP. --PierreSelim (talk) 12:21, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Done
- Thanks for the review. New version with different cropping. F. Riedelio • 💬 14:28, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 13:10, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 15:04, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very good quality, clear and effective composition. – Aristeas (talk) 16:30, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:24, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:59, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, for me that is an empty cup. Nothing inside visible. -- -donald- (talk) 10:12, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Done
- Thanks for the review. Description improved.
- The photo should represent a cup and not its contents.
- As the espresso is served in a half-full cup (about 40 ml), the contents would not be visible from this angle. F. Riedelio • 💬 10:34, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose When you try shots like this, you will have to clean all dust around. For instance, i spent 2-3 h with clock. Also, as above, cup is empty, its just a cup, so cookie and coffee would be nice, now just cookie without coffee and pic is named per coffee. Third objection, spoon could be new or without wearing scratches. I dont see EXIF, but this should be sharp photo (stacked image), here seems like one shot on to much closed Aperture. --Mile (talk) 10:31, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Just a language note: This model of small cups are called "espresso cups" even if they are empty. It's a name for the cup size. (example) --Cart (talk) 10:59, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- If you put cookie, than i would expect coffee too. Now its a bit spoiled, both or none. It could see size by spoon. --Mile (talk) 11:48, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you. Many thanks for the review and the tips.
- Unfortunately, the EXIF data has been lost due to the export from Lightroom. F. Riedelio • 💬 11:54, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- If you have some info about how the photo was made, even if the EXIF is lost, you can use the Template:Photo Information to add info to the file page. Just add it after the "Summary" section and fill in the parameters you want to display. --Cart (talk) 12:04, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Done
- Thank you. for the the tip. F. Riedelio • 💬 11:18, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- If you have some info about how the photo was made, even if the EXIF is lost, you can use the Template:Photo Information to add info to the file page. Just add it after the "Summary" section and fill in the parameters you want to display. --Cart (talk) 12:04, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:28, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose I believe that some of Mile's comments are too strict (like straches in the spoon) but he has got a point regarding the cookie with an empty cup. I also find the level of detail not the best for an studio photo. I'd have probably used focus stacking here Poco a poco (talk) 19:16, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Mile. —kallerna (talk) 10:48, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Poco a poco. -- Karelj 09:45, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Thanks for your comments. Yann (talk) 12:33, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Dust and scratch improved, generative filling. F. Riedelio • 💬 14:19, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- F. Riedelio, do you want to take over the nomination from Yann? You don't have any current nominations yourself so you can do that and let the nom continue until the end of the voting period if you like. If you say yes, I'll fix the code for the takeover for you. Also, you should not have uploaded the cup with coffee over the original photo, but instead uploaded it as a separate new file especially since the empty cup file has been assessed as a QI. This is a too big change. The empty cup image is valuable for the wiki project too, we need both. The filled in cup should have been offered as an 'Alternative' on this nom, or perhaps as a completely new nom. This needs to be sorted out, I can help you if you like. --Cart (talk) 15:20, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- I would like to continue the nomination. After this extensive discussion, I am looking forward to the outcome. Thank you in advance for your support.
- I have restored the older version of "Gray espresso cup with amaretto.jpg" and uploaded the modified photo as a new file "Gray espresso cup with amaretto 1.jpg". F. Riedelio • 💬 17:45, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for that, you are now in charge of this nomination.
- You might also want to take a look at the coffee in File:Gray espresso cup with amaretto 1.jpg, the right side of the coffee looks like it's not totally ok. Good luck with your nom! --Cart (talk) 18:16, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- F. Riedelio, do you want to take over the nomination from Yann? You don't have any current nominations yourself so you can do that and let the nom continue until the end of the voting period if you like. If you say yes, I'll fix the code for the takeover for you. Also, you should not have uploaded the cup with coffee over the original photo, but instead uploaded it as a separate new file especially since the empty cup file has been assessed as a QI. This is a too big change. The empty cup image is valuable for the wiki project too, we need both. The filled in cup should have been offered as an 'Alternative' on this nom, or perhaps as a completely new nom. This needs to be sorted out, I can help you if you like. --Cart (talk) 15:20, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
File:022 Brown-throated wattle-eye at Kibale forest National Park Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 May 2024 at 08:48:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Platysteiridae (Wattle-eyes, batises and shrike-flycatchers)
- Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:48, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:48, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Very good composition and pretty bird but the bird is quite small in the frame and also the resolution is not huge which means the actual pixel level detail on the bird itself is not that high. Cmao20 (talk) 11:46, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for your comment. With wildlife photography it is unfortunately very hard to get close to every subject and some birds are more shy than others. This small bird unfortunately didn't stay very long (only a few seconds) while I was approaching very very slowly. Apparently there is only 5 pictures of it on commons and the highest quality one that got it in focus is this one, the second one only beeing of 853x1280 pixels. Out of these 5, only 3 males were photographed and the second highest resolution picture in focus of the male after this one beeing only of 600x400 pixels. There is also no FP of the species nor of the family. The bird was shot with a 600mm lens with a 50 million pixels sensor and as I recall the bird wasn't that far, but it's just a small and shy bird. We have pictures of the same resolution of still subjects that are less sharp. I think that in this picture the light was good and that the picture nicely shows the bird's environment. The feather detail is also quite good considering the bird size in my opinion. Giles Laurent (talk) 13:30, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Yeah you're right, I should be consistent Cmao20 (talk) 16:15, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support The larger crop nicely shows the context and hints at the habitat. – Aristeas (talk) 16:28, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:24, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:25, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Only 2,797 × 1,865 pixels and the bird in this image is very small. The background is too dominant in my opinion. Useful document, but not all the useful images on Commons should be featured. For a FP of a bird, you need at least to be able to see some fine details of the animals at full resolution, not only the branches where it lives. Sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:59, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for your review. In my opinion it can not be expected the same level of detail for a small and shy bird where there is only a few seconds window to take a picture of it without possibility to go closer to it compared to pictures of still objects. Also, we have FP pictures of birds that have the same if not less definition than this one : 1, 2. I actually think this picture has enough level of detail compared to the bird size in real life and to the possibility to get close to it. -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:57, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- When comparing the size in pixels of the two images you give, the first one is 3 times larger, and the second one 2 times. So both may actually have more definition. Moreover, almost all the birds in the FP galleries are much larger than this one. The possibility to get closer is also very subjective. The more time you spend to capture a specific animal, the more opportunities you get. But this same day you also captured photos of Chimpanzees. Useful photo for Wikipedia, but when zooming in, it's not a FP in my opinion -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:35, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Small passerines like this one are among the most difficult subjects for bird photographers. They're skittish and notoriously hard to photograph. A big thank you to Giles for taking this excellent image and sharing it under a free license! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 05:18, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Then it's amazing JJ Harrison managed to photograph so many of them in high resolution. Perhaps a matter of equipment -- Basile Morin (talk) 15:00, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- It's a matter of resources. Harrison's lens costs about ten times more than Giles's. I think it's a bit unfair to other bird photographers that such expensive equipment should set the "standard" for FPs. We can only be grateful that people with very high-end cameras and lenses donate some photos to Commons, but I don't think they should set the bar for all the FPs in their special fields. Sometimes FPC can be a tad too elitist. --Cart (talk) 13:48, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- JJ Harrison sets the bar for birds like Kabelleger sets it for trains, or Iifar for focus stacked plants / fruits / insects. Equipment matters but also experience, explored places / subjects, patience, skill, chosen composition, etc. -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:07, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- FP rules state that "A bad picture of a very difficult subject is better than a good picture of an ordinary subject. A good picture of a difficult subject is an extraordinary photograph". Some birds are very hard to approach and small birds are especially always moving. I think that this picture is a good picture of a difficult subject as it has enough definition compared to the possibility to go close to the bird. Also, I don't think that JJ Harrison 30'000+ USD main camera gear (EOS R3 + EOS-1D X Mark III + 600 f4 + 400 f2.8) is the bar for small bird FP (difficult subject) when phone camera is the bar for still subject photography (easy subject)... Giles Laurent (talk) 14:16, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- JJ Harrison sets the bar for birds like Kabelleger sets it for trains, or Iifar for focus stacked plants / fruits / insects. Equipment matters but also experience, explored places / subjects, patience, skill, chosen composition, etc. -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:07, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- When comparing the size in pixels of the two images you give, the first one is 3 times larger, and the second one 2 times. So both may actually have more definition. Moreover, almost all the birds in the FP galleries are much larger than this one. The possibility to get closer is also very subjective. The more time you spend to capture a specific animal, the more opportunities you get. But this same day you also captured photos of Chimpanzees. Useful photo for Wikipedia, but when zooming in, it's not a FP in my opinion -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:35, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:58, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:08, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 13:56, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --El Golli Mohamed (talk) 00:15, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 05:12, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support I also wish more detail but I'm not an expert in bird photography and will support relying on Frank's opinion. What is definitely a minus in my eyes, is the crop, it's too generous. I'd definitely crop more everywhere, but above all the leaves at the bottom Poco a poco (talk) 15:30, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --WildMouse76 (talk) 19:42, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 18:45, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Generally, it's lacking of details and resolution but as someone who tried to photograph small birds I can only appreciate this image. Difficulty over quality. Красный wanna talk? 16:23, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 May 2024 at 11:52:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Musicians and singers performing
- Info created by Robin Müller, uploaded and nominated by Yann
- Support -- Yann (talk) 11:52, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good quality, impressive posture and facial expression. – Aristeas (talk) 14:47, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:38, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Felino Volador (talk) 01:15, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 19:00, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 19:13, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Argenberg (talk) 19:17, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 21:25, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --BigDom (talk) 00:14, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 05:48, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:59, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:22, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 10:31, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 03:37, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Maybe she is little a bit too much to left. But fine motion. --Mile (talk) 14:29, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 19:22, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 May 2024 at 06:57:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Tunisia
- Info created by Atef Ouni - uploaded by Atef Ouni - nominated by Atef Ouni -- Atef Ouni (talk) 06:57, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Atef Ouni (talk) 06:57, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great quality. Daftation (talk) 10:38, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Question Oversaturated? ★ 12:34, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, saturation updated :) Atef Ouni (talk) 10:48, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 13:09, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, saturation updated :) Atef Ouni (talk) 10:48, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poetic. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 14:14, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 18:33, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Really a better image after deciding to desaturate it. --Terragio67 (talk) 19:55, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Stunning subject and composition. Image quality not perfect but doesnt matter because it's so lovely. Cmao20 (talk) 03:39, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:16, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Mile (talk) 14:25, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:23, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:57, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 14:15, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Outstanding composition. --iMahesh (talk) 15:28, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 May 2024 at 12:45:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#India
- Info Hampi's ancient granite boulder landscape at sunset. The Archean plateau is stable and one of the oldest in the world. Hampi, Karnataka, South India. All by -- Argenberg (talk) 12:45, 7 May 2024 (UTC).
- Support -- Argenberg (talk) 12:45, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great light, unusual but effective composition. Compositionally much improved by having the woman in it Cmao20 (talk) 15:06, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 17:07, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I like 1st version more than yellowed, unless you could put yellow somewhere in the middle of both, or to revert back, 1st was just fine. --Mile (talk) 17:21, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- I might have overdone it with saturation. Following your suggestion, here is a new version with less saturation in red channel and tweaked temperature/tint. I don’t want to go any further as it will make it look bleak. I specifically reprocessed this file in newer version of Lightroom to get more true to life appearance. To me it looks golden/orange to match the last moments of the golden hour before sunset. I think it is closer to the original light as the sunset colors can be intense. Also newer versions have more detail and dynamic range. The original is 10+ years old and was batch-processed with older software and original temperature settings that may be wrong. --Argenberg (talk) 22:12, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support неплохо. --Mile (talk) 10:10, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:42, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Impressive like a painting, in my opinion. Thanks for the image improvement, Argenberg. -- Radomianin (talk) 05:48, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:20, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Llez (talk) 15:34, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 19:20, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral The light is great and the scene spectacular, but I personally haven't understood the composition. It isn't working for me, sorry. Poco a poco (talk) 19:27, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support A bit noisy, but great light and composition. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 22:46, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 10:08, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Poco, too busy composition IMO. —kallerna (talk) 10:46, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 18:55, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:00, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support TOUMOU (talk) 07:24, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
File:048 Lioness during golden hour of the morning at Queen Elizabeth National Park Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 May 2024 at 18:52:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family : Felidae (Felids)
- Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 18:52, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 18:52, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 19:06, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 21:21, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Light and composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:34, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 06:04, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Inspirational. Wolverine XI 08:40, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:24, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 10:30, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:37, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ivar (talk) 18:25, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --WildMouse76 (talk) 19:43, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 03:47, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 12:58, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Impressive! -- Radomianin (talk) 19:20, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 14:16, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 11:15, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Himmeldunkberg Gipfelkreuz II.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 May 2024 at 15:19:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#Germany
- Info Summit cross on the Himmeldunkberg. In the background on the right the Kreuzberg. All by me. -- Milseburg (talk) 15:19, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Milseburg (talk) 15:19, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Makes me feel cold just to look at it Cmao20 (talk) 18:57, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
NeutralSupport Great light, composition and perspective: The panorama has many interesting details, such as the serpentine road, the ski lift, the icy benches, the dynamic condensation trails, or the impressive view above the clouds. Well done! -- Radomianin (talk) 18:57, 7 May 2024 (UTC)Comment Temporarily changing my supporting vote to Neutral until the issue mentioned below is resolved.-- Radomianin (talk) 19:32, 8 May 2024 (UTC)- Support ★ 19:00, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Question Hallo Milseburg, ich finde das Bild klasse. Allerdings fällt mir bei Deinen Bergszenen immer auf, dass der Schnee ziemlich grau ist (was normalerweise ein Indiz dafür ist, dass bei der Aufnahme keine oder eine zu geringe manuelle Belichtungskorrektur eingestellt war). Egal, was auch immer der Grund für die graue Farbe des Schnees ist… könntest Du bitte überlegen, ob Du den Schnee durch nachträgliche Korrektur etwas weißer machen kannst? Beste Grüße, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 21:49, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
OpposeSnow is simply not gray. I rarely intervene based on technical concerns, but I've now seen enough winter photos here where exposure compensation wasn't applied correctly. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 17:27, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Info And just to explain this properly: Modern cameras are programmed to average the brightness of the scene to a middle gray, resulting in snow appearing dull and gray rather than bright and white. To correct this, the photographer has to dial in (some cameras have an extra wheel for this) a stop or so of exposure compensation to instruct the camera to increase the exposure, making the snow appear natural. Applying exposure compensation results in a well-exposed image where the snow retains its bright, white appearance without being washed out or appearing gray. Best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:44, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 15:01, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Thanks to Frank for the thoughtful review. I just opened the image in PS and noticed that the sRGB profile is not assigned. This can make a big difference in how the image looks in different browsers. @Milseburg: If you are going to develop the Raw file again with exposure adjustments, exporting it in the sRGB profile would be a good choice. Just my 2 cents to solve the problem. Best regards :) -- Radomianin (talk) 18:44, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Good catch, Radomianin. I have taken the liberty to embed the sRGB profile with ExifTool. @Milseburg: This is just a little help, especially if you do not want to edit the image anymore; embedding a colour profile with ExifTool is a lossless operation and has no impact on the image data itself, so your image was not changed by this at all. – Aristeas (talk) 14:39, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Not a usual sight from Germany. --SHB2000 (talk) 23:18, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Famberhorst (talk) 05:41, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:21, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Llez (talk) 15:35, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose I miss wow here. I like snowed landscapes, but preferably with virgin and white (I concur with Frank) snow, not the case here. I also find the crop at the top too tight. I believe that there was FP potential here but I just see a cross that cannot breath at the top, trampled grey snow and a bit of mountains. Poco a poco (talk) 20:07, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support It works fine for me. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 22:42, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Poco a poco. —kallerna (talk) 10:46, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment A wonderful view (I can only agree with Radomianin’s first comment); however I have to admit that the whites could be whiter – I have tried it, adjusting the white point makes the whole image even better. – Aristeas (talk) 14:39, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Weak oppose Impressive landscape but as others have said, the white balance is off and the placement of the cross feels a little awkward. BigDom (talk) 09:05, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral Whites are much better. I still find the placement of the cross a little too distracting for FP, but not enough to oppose. BigDom (talk) 14:00, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I agree with Frank Schulenburg.Ermell (talk) 18:55, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 18:27, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Info @Cmao20, Radomianin, ArionStar, Frank Schulenburg, Aristeas, SHB2000, Famberhorst, Agnes Monkelbaan, Llez, Poco a poco, Sebring12Hrs, Kallerna, BigDom, Ermell, and MZaplotnik: Sorry for my absence and thank you for the reviews and criticism. I tried to take this to heart, washed the snow and uploaded a new version. Better and sufficient? --Milseburg (talk) 14:58, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Thank you very much for the revision, Milseburg. Your editing has significantly improved the picture. I have restored my original supporting vote. -- Radomianin (talk) 19:08, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Thank you very much, Milseburg! – Aristeas (talk) 14:13, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:58, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Amazing Stories, November 1928.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 May 2024 at 18:22:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Printed#Magazine and newspaper illustrations in color
- Info created by Amazing Stories, uploaded and nominated by Yann
- Support -- Yann (talk) 18:22, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Really cool artwork. Cmao20 (talk) 03:46, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support —Bruce1eetalk 06:28, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 11:30, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 04:47, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Micha (talk) 09:22, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 10:05, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 14:16, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 11:14, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:10, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Garo people at khagrachori 04.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 May 2024 at 06:00:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Men
- Info Uploaded by Wasiul Bahar - nominated by Wasiul Bahar -- Wasiul Bahar (talk) 06:00, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose No wow and technically not one of the best. --Micha (talk) 09:20, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Scarlet Veil (51013483841).jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 May 2024 at 08:42:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Women
- Info created by Charlie Marshall, uploaded by Jeff G., nominated by
YannSHB2000 - Support Perfect composition. -- Yann (talk) 08:42, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Yann as uploader. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 10:47, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment We already have a similar FP of the same woman. ★ 13:49, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- @ArionStar: This one shows more of her left eye. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 14:07, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, but more important to me, this gives a kind of suspense or mystery, when she is not looking at the camera. Yann (talk) 14:11, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- @ArionStar: This one shows more of her left eye. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 14:07, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support I agree. --SHB2000 (talk) 01:42, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose I was going to stay neutral because the portrait is good, but definitely too soft. The already existing FP is too similar, of a better composition, and with much better sharpness than this one, that's why I feel that I have to oppose here, sorry, Yann. Poco a poco (talk) 13:36, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support I think the other one is better, but this one is sufficiently different also to make FP Cmao20 (talk) 20:00, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Poco a poco. —kallerna (talk) 10:40, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Thanks for your comments. Yann (talk) 11:49, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- I know I live in a hurry, but you should wait a little longer. ★ 21:17, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Agreed; at least I can take over the nomination if you [Yann] want. --SHB2000 (talk) 13:06, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- I don't think it has a chance now, but I am OK with you talking over. Thanks for offering. Yann (talk) 13:17, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Code fixed for SHB2000 taking over the nom. Good luck! --Cart (talk) 15:14, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support No problems with two coexisting FPs of her. ★ 18:38, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you Cart! SHB2000 (talk) 22:08, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support No problems with two coexisting FPs of her. ★ 18:38, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Code fixed for SHB2000 taking over the nom. Good luck! --Cart (talk) 15:14, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- I don't think it has a chance now, but I am OK with you talking over. Thanks for offering. Yann (talk) 13:17, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Agreed; at least I can take over the nomination if you [Yann] want. --SHB2000 (talk) 13:06, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 18:58, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The quality of the existing FP is much better. Compare the eyes, the nose and the mouth. Also too similar to the previous one -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:25, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 18:29, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Nah, this image is not what we need in an FP. The composition is underwhelming, the quality is subpar and the crop is OK, I guess. Sorry for not supporting, but hey, that's life. Wolverine XI 17:19, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Prefer the existing FP - this is nice, but not outstanding like the other. BigDom (talk) 13:58, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 May 2024 at 06:09:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Sitting people
- Info created and uploaded by Suresh Kumar Vakalapudi - nominated by iMahesh -- iMahesh (talk) 06:09, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- iMahesh (talk) 06:09, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice --Shagil Kannur (talk) 06:49, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 13:15, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Bijay Chaurasia (talk) 17:02, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ǃǃ Terragio67 (talk) 19:35, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Chepry (talk) 23:09, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 08:11, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --BigDom (talk) 08:42, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Year of Africa probably. --Mile (talk) 14:24, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- @PetarM: Thanks for the review, but that's from India and yes they are part of the first wave of migration from Africa about 60,000 years ago. --iMahesh (talk) 12:15, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- You should atleast respect the author by giving space and time to respond, please dont take everything into your hands unless I ask to. Search engines provide enough data but respect the owner of the picture to thank or share the gratitude too. Very weird and immature behaviour @IM3847 Suresh Kumar Vakalapudi (talk) 12:41, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- @IM3847 Is it still my picture or you owned it?, Im very much confused with these kind of comments. Suresh Kumar Vakalapudi (talk) 12:44, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Relax, it's not that deep. Wolverine XI 16:55, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- If you say so… Suresh Kumar Vakalapudi (talk) 01:19, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Relax, it's not that deep. Wolverine XI 16:55, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Suresh Kumar Vakalapudi: No, that's not how things work. You released it under the CC-BY SA 4.0 license; now you have to live with the consequences. IM3847's behaviour is certainly not "weird and immature", but it does reflect your behaviour. --SHB2000 (talk) 07:42, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- @SHB2000 Lets not get personal. He is new to Wikimedia commons and needs time to understand how process works. I should have created another filepage under his authorship and uploaded sharpened images over there. But since it will confuse the author seeing two different filepages, I choose to upload the new version. Anyway I should be placing a message on talk pages of Professional photographers from next time, before upgrading their photos. I have anyway created and added a this template to his userpage, so other users cannot rewrite the original version Mr. Suresh uploaded for the Wiki Loves Folklore photo contest. --iMahesh (talk) 08:26, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- @SHB2000 And since there is a Conflict of Interest between us, can someone please nominate his other two images 01 and 02 for Featured Picture Candidates as well. They look amazing and has a great potential to be the best we get here in India. --iMahesh (talk) 08:34, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- @IM3847: Please do not edit other people's messages because you disagree with the tone. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:58, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- @SHB2000: Understood, won't edit others' messages. Thanks for the reminder. -- iMahesh (talk) 10:11, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- @SHB2000 Lets not get personal. He is new to Wikimedia commons and needs time to understand how process works. I should have created another filepage under his authorship and uploaded sharpened images over there. But since it will confuse the author seeing two different filepages, I choose to upload the new version. Anyway I should be placing a message on talk pages of Professional photographers from next time, before upgrading their photos. I have anyway created and added a this template to his userpage, so other users cannot rewrite the original version Mr. Suresh uploaded for the Wiki Loves Folklore photo contest. --iMahesh (talk) 08:26, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- @IM3847 Is it still my picture or you owned it?, Im very much confused with these kind of comments. Suresh Kumar Vakalapudi (talk) 12:44, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- You should atleast respect the author by giving space and time to respond, please dont take everything into your hands unless I ask to. Search engines provide enough data but respect the owner of the picture to thank or share the gratitude too. Very weird and immature behaviour @IM3847 Suresh Kumar Vakalapudi (talk) 12:41, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- @PetarM: Thanks for the review, but that's from India and yes they are part of the first wave of migration from Africa about 60,000 years ago. --iMahesh (talk) 12:15, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 16:21, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:22, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment According to the guidelines, nominated images should not have signatures in the picture: "No advertisements, signatures, or other watermarks in image. Copyright/authorship information of all images should be located on the image's description page and should not interfere with content of the image." It was added during the nomination process. -- Radomianin (talk) 08:40, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks to SHB2000 for restoring the latest version. @Suresh Kumar Vakalapudi: You should also restore your other two photos that were already marked as quality images. Not only did you add a signature, but you also reduced the resolution so much that both images are only a few kilobytes in size due to very low resolution and high compression: Photos 01 and 02. Pictures that have already been tagged (QI, FP or VI) cannot be modified in this way. Best, -- Radomianin (talk) 10:28, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Too bad they released their content under a CC license if they didn't want their photos to be edited this way. --SHB2000 (talk) 10:29, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks to SHB2000 for restoring the latest version. @Suresh Kumar Vakalapudi: You should also restore your other two photos that were already marked as quality images. Not only did you add a signature, but you also reduced the resolution so much that both images are only a few kilobytes in size due to very low resolution and high compression: Photos 01 and 02. Pictures that have already been tagged (QI, FP or VI) cannot be modified in this way. Best, -- Radomianin (talk) 10:28, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Suresh Kumar Vakalapudi, per above, watermarks are not allowed on QI or FPC or FP images. Please revert to the original version. If you don't want anyone to edit your photos in overwrites, please use messages on the file page instead. Take a look at this photo and this one to see what such texts and templates can look like. --Cart (talk) 09:06, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:42, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 11:16, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:11, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:23, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 05:57, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 May 2024 at 06:44:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Industry#Germany
- Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay 💬 06:44, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- XRay 💬 06:44, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Quite an unusual perspective. --SHB2000 (talk) 06:45, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 13:52, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, but I don't get it. The wheel may be interesting, but it is only a small part and too dark, and the rest is a blurry background. Yann (talk) 09:26, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Yann. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 11:37, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose I agree, but a nice light, though Poco a poco (talk) 13:26, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Yann. --.Karelj (talk) 13:40, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral I have been going back and forth on this but I am not sure the composition really works. It feels like the wheel is a bit of an afterthought, placed at the edge of the frame. I think it would have worked better with more wheel and less OOF background Cmao20 (talk) 19:58, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The blurry background covers too much of the picture, while the wheel only covers a portion too small for my liking. --WildMouse76 (talk) 14:38, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Moral support A very interesting and unusual composition, probably too unusual for us. It reminds me of some paintings which show a person looking at a distant landscape or town; in these paintings the nominal subject is that distant object, but they emphasize the person in order to allow the viewers to identify themselves with that person; so in some regard the real subject is the contemplation of the person who looks at that distant object (example). I vaguely remember some photographs which use the same approach, but combine it with a key feature of photography (the interplay of sharp and unsharp) by putting the focus on the person and throwing the landscape/town out of focus, still keeping it recognizable. Now in this photograph the wheel plays the role of the front person; the standing wheel seems to contemplate the great past and presence of that big industrial area. I guess my explanation is lengthy and unclear, but on these lines the composition actually works for me. – Aristeas (talk) 19:47, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Many thanks for the detailed, yet rather unusual review. I think it's very positive that my intention for the photo is clear. --XRay 💬 19:51, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Won't work for me. I cannot tell what the content is, Daftation (talk) 19:49, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Composition and black subject don't work for me. Sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:16, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Nothing spectacular. Wolverine XI 17:26, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 May 2024 at 06:40:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Industry#Germany
- Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay 💬 06:40, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- XRay 💬 06:40, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Nice frame, but the reflective portion is not--Shagil Kannur (talk) 07:26, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Almost as beautiful as an Egyptian temple.--Ermell (talk) 08:23, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Fascinating, artistic composition Cmao20 (talk) 11:26, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 13:53, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:31, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 15:41, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very special, imo. An elegance of simplicity. -- Radomianin (talk) 18:07, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 05:10, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:57, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice Poco a poco (talk) 13:27, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ! --Terragio67 (talk) 04:23, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 07:32, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great. – Aristeas (talk) 10:22, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, I do not understand the composition. Nice light though. —kallerna (talk) 10:43, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Kallerna. -- Karelj (talk) 12:08, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support I do understand the composition. It is special and the execution is excellent. --Kritzolina (talk) 19:32, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 18:37, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 May 2024 at 05:46:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#United States
- Info created by Frank Schulenburg – uploaded by Frank Schulenburg – nominated by Frank Schulenburg --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 05:46, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 05:46, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 07:16, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice atmosphere. Wolverine XI 08:37, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:28, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 09:31, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support The pink light is a special element in the composition. ★ 13:14, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 19:03, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Strong support The lights are beautiful and the pink and blue colors together are also beautiful here and the accuracy in the crop of the image is even more decisive. I wish I had taken this photo. --Terragio67 (talk) 19:46, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 03:48, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --BigDom (talk) 08:42, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 12:57, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Mile (talk) 14:30, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support An outstanding photograph that makes the viewer believe that the great era of American Art déco has returned. The light, angle, composition, and timing are perfect. -- Radomianin (talk) 19:18, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:54, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 10:07, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support I usually find this style kitschy, but it is great here. Yann (talk) 12:00, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Radomianin and Yann. – Aristeas (talk) 14:17, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 11:15, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:11, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:43, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 May 2024 at 03:34:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural/Germany#North Rhine-Westphalia
- Info IMO a really beautiful composition. created by GZagatta - uploaded by GZagatta - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 03:34, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 03:34, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Great lights and composition, but there is vignating isn't it ? --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 08:24, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 01:38, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support The solitary tree creates a wonderful mood of hope in the scenery. The slight vignetting emphasizes this, in my opinion. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:02, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful light Daftation (talk) 10:59, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 12:07, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Radomianin. – Aristeas (talk) 14:17, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:35, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 04:34, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 11:17, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 12:12, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:16, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 18:35, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:42, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:16, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:24, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Residential by Carrer Sant Josep in Finestrat, Alicante, Spain, 2024 January.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 May 2024 at 03:34:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Settlements#Spain
- Info A really unusual composition but I like it a great deal. created by Ximonic - uploaded by Ximonic - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 03:34, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 03:34, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support interesting compo. --SHB2000 (talk) 07:55, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Mile (talk) 14:24, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support for the composition, although there are some strange contours around the leafs. --Micha (talk) 09:19, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 12:07, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support A nice place. It’s often very difficult to find a satisfying composition in such narrow corners; here this was achieved with real success. – Aristeas (talk) 14:20, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:35, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 11:17, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:16, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:42, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:26, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 May 2024 at 21:19:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Women
- Info created and uploaded by Mysteryang, nominated by Yann
- Support We don't have many FPs of mother and child, let alone one from China. Background is nice, and matches the kid's dress. -- Yann (talk) 21:19, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I like the photo itself very much, but unfortunately it is extremely Overprocessed and highly compressed (look at the skin around mouth and nose or hairs). Chepry (talk) 07:25, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Chepry --LexKurochkin (talk) 11:27, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Thanks for your comments. Yann (talk) 11:29, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 May 2024 at 06:42:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Italy
- Info Aerial image of the Monte Rosa east wall, with a height of 2400 m the highest mountain wall in the Alps; created by Carsten Steger - uploaded by Carsten Steger - nominated by Carsten Steger -- Carsten Steger (talk) 06:42, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Carsten Steger (talk) 06:42, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 09:18, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 11:45, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:57, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Supporting because of the subject, nice light and sky and good quality. Still it's just a close-up of a mountain without any interesting composition Poco a poco (talk) 13:40, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support per Poco Cmao20 (talk) 20:03, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice compo. Wolverine XI 03:59, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Poco a poco. —kallerna (talk) 10:39, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Impressive view of the highest mountain wall in the Alps (see nomination). – Aristeas (talk) 14:25, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:16, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:55, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose No wow. --Micha (talk) 09:11, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 May 2024 at 10:07:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events
- Info Theyyam, the dancing God, is a ritual art form of Kerala. All by -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 10:07, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 10:07, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 11:45, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Again, not an FP with this crop. --SHB2000 (talk) 12:56, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Nothing to say.--Shagil Kannur (talk) 13:57, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 20:05, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 14:26, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose some of the drummers are difficult to see against the background. Could be fixed with editing. Schierbecker (talk) 21:59, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Tried my level best. Since it is a lowlight photography hard to remove shadows. Now please watch. If somebody helps to improve more i will send the original file on email.--Shagil Kannur (talk) 04:42, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Heavy noise reduction and tight framing but the masquerade is fascinating. Ermell (talk) 07:28, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 18:32, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:31, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 09:12, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Macrocallista nimbosa shell, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 May 2024 at 14:38:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page
-
Right valve (Fossil, Lower Pleistocene, about 1 - 1.5 mio years old)
-
Left Valve (Fossil, Lower Pleistocene, about 1 - 1.5 mio years old)
-
Right valve (Extant)
-
Left valve (Extant)
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Shells#Family : Veneridae
- Info The set shows the shells (2 valves each) of two specimens of the same species. One shell, originating from the Lower Pleistocene, is about 1 - 1.5 million years old, the other is an extant specimen collected alive in 2003. Both specimens come from Florida; created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 14:38, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Llez (talk) 14:38, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:20, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Micha (talk) 08:41, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 12:07, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 20:37, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 07:02, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:18, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:41, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:15, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:30, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Pierre André (talk) 16:53, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Mountain View Cemetery1.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 May 2024 at 16:17:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Cemeteries#Canada
- Info: Boulder Mountain above the Mountain View Cemetery, Revelstoke, British Columbia; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:17, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:17, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 10:02, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 12:05, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:01, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 20:36, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 07:19, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 11:24, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:38, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:33, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 17:43, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Photographers in Rabat.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 May 2024 at 17:32:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Others
- Info Instead of forced portraits, you can have qucik and spontaneous shots. I like this one, planed and executed in few seconds till they realize. Sigthseeing group in Rabat, column stay. --Mile (talk) 17:32, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mile (talk) 17:32, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support I think it would be better without the two standing figures behind the photographers, but still good. Cmao20 (talk) 20:05, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 22:50, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support that standing fellows. --Shagil Kannur (talk) 03:07, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment So this was taken without the subjects knowing they were photographed? —kallerna (talk) 10:37, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Probably yes. Sometimes you do the same, right? --A.Savin 09:48, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment —kallerna I would still say spontaneous shot, not planed. For candid, i would think bushmans with extra zoom, hiding and waiting some superstar by pool next house, so they know what are they waiting and probably know what kind of photo will they get. --Mile (talk) 07:52, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Probably yes. Sometimes you do the same, right? --A.Savin 09:48, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice typical tourists scene. – Aristeas (talk) 14:42, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Funny but too busy compostion. It would work without the guy passing by in the background, with his finger on his nose. He seems embarrassed to be in the frame. The two ladies behind are also distracting. And the wall at the right has nothing special. Sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:24, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose I like the idea and it's a good candid shot of the photographers, very natural. I don't mind the wall on the right which adds to the candid nature, making you feel like you're watching these photographers from round a corner. But the people in the background, especially the man, are just too distracting for me, sorry. BigDom (talk) 08:56, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Average composition when taking background into account. --Thi (talk) 09:05, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Basile and others. Yann (talk) 12:35, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Basile and BigDom. --SHB2000 (talk) 13:04, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The guy bombs the photo, unfortunately. Wolverine XI 21:10, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 May 2024 at 23:52:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#United States
- Info created by King of Hearts - uploaded by King of Hearts - nominated by King of Hearts -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:52, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:52, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 01:36, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 11:51, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 12:05, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Strong support Stunning. Cmao20 (talk) 15:07, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 15:35, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Perfect, looks like an architectural render. --iMahesh (talk) 15:45, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:40, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Looks like monopoly to me. Wolverine XI 16:47, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:32, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Colors of the trees are nice to look at -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:14, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 07:17, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 11:26, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:20, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:14, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:38, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Pierre André (talk) 16:46, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Река Коксу осенью 2.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 May 2024 at 22:27:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Uzbekistan
- Info created by Marat Nadjibaev - uploaded by Marat Nadjibaev - nominated by Красный -- Красный wanna talk? 22:27, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Красный wanna talk? 22:27, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:53, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great scenery, enhanced by the long exposure. -- Radomianin (talk) 05:08, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 10:00, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 12:05, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:03, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:40, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:34, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Wonderful scenery. – Aristeas (talk) 07:18, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 11:24, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:19, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --BigDom (talk) 13:53, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 15:55, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:37, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:15, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:35, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 May 2024 at 23:36:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#United States
- Info created by Frank Schulenburg – uploaded by Frank Schulenburg – nominated by Frank Schulenburg --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 23:36, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 23:36, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Interesting and unusual subject, great find. There is a small amount of barrel and perspective distortion it seems? -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:50, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- The Leica Super-Elmar 21mm has an extremely low amount of distortion (virtually close to none). Please keep in mind that it's an old building. Oh, also: a good friend showed me this view. If someone deserves credit for finding this gem, it's him. Best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 00:47, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Micha (talk) 09:13, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 10:00, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 12:05, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great. – Aristeas (talk) 14:21, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:05, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Considering how small the room is, it's amazing what a sublime effect it creates in the image. Well captured! -- Radomianin (talk) 15:40, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Fascinating shot! I noticed a slight tilt to the right on the wall face, probably due to the building's age. Nevertheless, the composition is solid overall.. --iMahesh (talk) 16:07, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:40, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:33, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 11:25, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 12:13, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:19, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:35, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:14, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:36, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --BigDom (talk) 07:51, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Pierre André (talk) 16:53, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
File:2024-05-09 10-44-09 FortDeRoppe.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 May 2024 at 07:27:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#France
- Info created by ComputerHotline - uploaded by ComputerHotline - nominated by ComputerHotline -- ComputerHotline (talk) 07:27, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ComputerHotline (talk) 07:27, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 11:42, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:47, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 16:18, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 18:58, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 11:59, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Please fix the chromatic aberrations visible around the stones and the wall at the bottom right -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:32, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- I don't know how to make it. --ComputerHotline (talk) 14:59, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Sur Lightroom, "Pinceau" (sélection) -> "Supprimer la frange" -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:06, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Je n'ai pas lightroom. --ComputerHotline (talk) 05:13, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Pas de problème. Voir lien ci-dessus -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:35, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- For the record, the CAs have been fixed in the version offered above (link archived here). It's a choice of the photographer / nominator to ignore this improvement and keep the version with technical flaws -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:34, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good enough for me. Wolverine XI 21:06, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Famberhorst (talk) 04:12, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:25, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ivar (talk) 18:27, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 03:36, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 05:11, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 14:14, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
File:L'entrée de la vallée des gorges de Thelja.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 May 2024 at 10:17:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Tunisia
- Info created by Skander zarrad L'entrée de la vallée des gorges de Thelja
uploaded by Skander zarrad - nominated by TOUMOU -- TOUMOU (talk) 10:17, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- TOUMOU (talk) 10:17, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose IMHO, it would look much better if the plant in the bottom is not cropped and too much noise in the sky. --iMahesh (talk) 15:58, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Detail is lacking throughout the image. Wolverine XI 16:44, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose i am not sure what Wolverine thinks is wrong with the detail, this picture seems quite sharp to me. However, I miss an outstanding composition. The plant is awkwardly placed half cut-off at the bottom of the frame and I can't see an outstanding compositional idea in the landscape in general. Cmao20 (talk) 02:11, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 May 2024 at 13:41:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: [[Commons:Featured pictures/<add the gallery here>]]
- Info created by 48JCL - uploaded by 48JCL - nominated by 48JCL -- 48JCL (talk) 13:41, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- 48JCL (talk) 13:41, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose What's featurable here? Correct: nothing. To start with, I'd suggest at least to add appropriate categories, location, and to give the file a more meaningful name, because surely we have thousands of photos here that might be named "Swan in lake". --A.Savin 16:23, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination 48JCL (talk) 16:33, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 May 2024 at 23:26:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family : Lamnidae (White Sharks)
- Info created by Bernard DUPONT - uploaded by Helmy oved - nominated by WildMouse76 -- WildMouse76 (talk) 23:26, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support It is very hard to find a good image for this species, especially when there are no featured pictures. The majority either didn't meet the guidelines or had very tight/bad crops. IMO, this is the best one I could find. -- WildMouse76 (talk) 23:26, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Question Is that bait on the left? --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 23:30, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- I assume that it is the fish bait, just covered by the water splashing in front. The other pictures that did have the fish bait had bad crops. -- WildMouse76 (talk) 23:34, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose It's clearly not the best of the series, for the composition, quality, and angle of view. For example this one is better in my view. There are more -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:14, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination -- WildMouse76 (talk) 01:40, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 May 2024 at 15:00:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family : Lamnidae (White Sharks)
- Info created by Bernard DUPONT - uploaded by Helmy oved - nominated by WildMouse76 -- WildMouse76 (talk) 15:00, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 15:00, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Bad crop at the tail, sorry. --iMahesh (talk) 15:04, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Bad crop. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 15:51, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination -- WildMouse76 (talk) 22:30, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 May 2024 at 18:39:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1920-1929
- Info created by Alfredo Merello - uploaded by Mauricio V. Genta - restored/nominated by Ezarate -- Ezarateesteban 18:39, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ezarateesteban 18:39, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Poor contrast and color, bad quality, even for a 1925 picture. Nothing exceptional. Yann (talk) 19:28, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Nothing special and low quality -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:07, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Yann/Basile - Chepry (talk) 07:26, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Alternative version
[edit]- Comment sharpenned and more contrast Ezarateesteban 18:43, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Very grainy, even for a 1925 picture. Restoration not complete. Nothing exceptional. Yann (talk) 19:27, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Overprocessed + invalid alternative per the FPC guidelines "Do not add an 'Alternative' image when you create a nomination. Selecting the best image is part of the nomination process." -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:07, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Yann/Basile - Chepry (talk) 07:26, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Yann. --SHB2000 (talk) 12:48, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: This is not going to pass. Yann (talk) 08:24, 18 May 2024 (UTC) | Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed. |
File:Héron garde boeufs à Oued Mejerda.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 May 2024 at 17:02:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Pelecaniformes#Genus : Bubulcus
- Info created by El Golli Mohamed - uploaded by El Golli Mohamed - nominated by El Golli Mohamed -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 17:02, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 17:02, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 17:21, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:26, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 02:12, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 07:06, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 11:28, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:31, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Shagil Kannur (talk) 14:45, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 15:08, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 23:39, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:29, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:12, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:43, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Campamento de ganado de la tribu Mundari, Terekeka, Sudán del Sur, 2024-01-29, DD 36.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 May 2024 at 17:02:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Mixed_&_Groups
- Info Group of Mundari kids with cow dong ashes (as antiseptic agains mosquitos) in a cattle camp in Terekeka, South Sudan. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 17:02, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 17:02, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cool. Yann (talk) 19:52, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:25, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 02:13, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 15:07, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:26, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:27, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:46, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Pierre André (talk) 16:49, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support TOUMOU (talk) 21:47, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 May 2024 at 04:17:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Hydrangeaceae
- Info Budding leaf bud of a Hydrangea anomala 'Petiolaris' Climbing hydrangea. Focus stack of 15 photos.
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:17, 15 May 2024 (UTC) - Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:17, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 11:30, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:25, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:28, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:12, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:58, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 13:00, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 00:57, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 05:07, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Chepry (talk) 07:33, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Pierre André (talk) 22:14, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 22:41, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 May 2024 at 13:22:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family : Felidae (Felids)
- Info A number of FPs of varying quality. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:22, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:22, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 15:05, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --iMahesh (talk) 15:08, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:24, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:28, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 22:01, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 23:59, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:11, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support TOUMOU (talk) 07:13, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Composition is not so good and only the front part of subject is in focus. --Shagil Kannur (talk) 10:46, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Stunning light and angle of view -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:17, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:49, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:57, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 05:25, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Chepry (talk) 07:32, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Pierre André (talk) 16:48, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --GRDN711 (talk) 21:21, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 10:08, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 May 2024 at 13:04:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Russia#Northwestern Federal District
- Info created by Красный - uploaded by Красный - nominated by Красный -- Красный wanna talk? 13:04, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Красный wanna talk? 13:04, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 00:55, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support It could be sharper, but, stunning composition. Cmao20 (talk) 03:45, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao. --SHB2000 (talk) 07:56, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:22, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Good composition, but the sides and the edges aren't sharp enough to me, sorry. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 19:56, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 04:46, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:10, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support -- I'm not absolutely happy with the colors, but the view is really breathtaking. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 18:39, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 22:36, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 May 2024 at 16:49:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Aurora
- Info created and uploaded by W.carter, nominated by Yann
- Info Looking straight up into the magenta Aurora Borealis over Tuntorp, Brastad, Lysekil Municipality, Sweden. The aurora was the result of a G5 geomagnetic storm.
- Support -- Yann (talk) 16:50, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Love this color. ~Moheen (keep talking) 17:52, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Wow! ★ 19:33, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 19:44, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support It must be impressive to experience northern lights live. Fascinating picture! -- Radomianin (talk) 20:40, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 22:23, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment What has caused posterization? Can it be sorted? --Julesvernex2 (talk) 09:40, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Auroras are not like most light sources we are used to. They are not constant, like when you photograph sunlight, lamps or the moon. Instead they move constantly and quickly (the link is a good real time video of a lively aurora), kind of like smoke in the wind. They pulsate and throb, one moment you can have a bright formation to your left and 1/4 sec later it can flicker out and a new pulse/ray/squiggle of light appear above or to the right, and this aurora was extremely lively. This random pattern makes it impossible to set the camera perfectly and there will be some posterization if you want to catch the best of these light shows. If you shoot an aurora, you have to take the good with the bad. Also, in this photo, not all variances in luminescence are are due to the aurora. Some of them are small thin clouds. The night started out cloudy, but they began to disappear so I could catch some of the aurora. The small clouds are easier to see in some other photos, like this taken on the same spot, but down towards the horizon. The whole series is in this category. --Cart (talk) 10:56, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- I'm not questioning the camera settings, those seem perfectly reasonable. Is posterization also present in the raw file? If so, the issue is indeed due to camera limitations and there is not much that can be done without misrepresenting the aurora. However, in my own pictures I can only recall a couple that showed posterization on the original image. In all other instances posterization was caused by something I did during editing (e.g., clipping channels) or exporting (e.g., choosing the wrong colour space, using too much JPEG compression). --Julesvernex2 (talk) 11:35, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- My dear Julesvernex2, your prominent collection of cameras is so way, way, way much better than the two I have, so of course you don't have these problems. My aurora photos are actually among the least processed of all my photos. All edits on aurora photos from such an inferior camera will only make things worse, so I use a very light touch. But the camera is what it is, totally inadequate for professional night photos, but I like to photograph what I see anyway for my own amusement and for use on Wiki articles where the images look good enough at thumb and on the file page. I would never nominate any of my aurora photos here, but I've learned to play along if someone else does. Thank you for reminding me of my humble equipment and confirming that I made the right decision to not nominate my photos here any more, now that technology has moved forward and I haven't been able to follow. --Cart (talk) 12:13, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- I offered my own experience as advice, which is a regular (and, in my opinion, useful) occurrence on these pages. I apologise if I have in some way offended you, take care. --Julesvernex2 (talk) 12:51, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- I'm not offended and I always appreciate advice, but there is simply not much I can do about my camera. It's like owning an old Saab and someone with a Ferrari is trying to give you tips on how to drive your old rust heap. ;-) You just feel stupid for parking next to such fab piece of machinery. I know my place, and it's outside this race track now. :-) --Cart (talk) 13:01, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- I offered my own experience as advice, which is a regular (and, in my opinion, useful) occurrence on these pages. I apologise if I have in some way offended you, take care. --Julesvernex2 (talk) 12:51, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- The camera helps, but it doesn't make it all. The greatest pictures were taken with equipment way behind current technology. What's IMO most important is being at the right time at the right place, and having a bit of artistic genius or a human touch. And here you got it all, Cart! Yann (talk) 13:07, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks Yann, that philosophy works excellently out IRL, but it does not apply to FPC. Remember that this community has snubbed some of the greatest photos and photographers through pixel-peeping and hard-liner tech talk. --Cart (talk) 13:13, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, that's one of the great failures of FPC. I guess that a number of Pulitzer prizes or National Geographic pictures may fail here. This doesn't reduce the greatness of the pictures. It only shows the limitations of our community. Yann (talk) 13:59, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks Yann, that philosophy works excellently out IRL, but it does not apply to FPC. Remember that this community has snubbed some of the greatest photos and photographers through pixel-peeping and hard-liner tech talk. --Cart (talk) 13:13, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Cart's EOS 600D from Canon was one of the best in the entry-level class in terms of image quality, similar to my entry-level D3300 from Nikon. But I'm largely happy with it, and it's interesting to see the tried-and-true sensor used unchanged for the 2018 D3500. As Yann mentioned, it's always the photographer behind the camera that counts. The camera is just the tool, whether it's an old Saab or a Ferrari. I would also prefer a higher quality camera, but family commitments and a moderate income make investing in expensive camera systems almost unaffordable. If I may repeat my earlier statement at this point, many of Cart's images would, in my opinion, be worthy of inclusion in the FP Media Archive via the FPC nomination process. Thanks also to Julesvernex2 for the helpful hints and explanations. Just my two cents to this conversation. Best, -- Radomianin (talk) 20:28, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Don't get me wrong Radomianin, I love my old cameras. They are quite sufficient for my needs, but my needs don't include gathering FPs anymore. I've had my fair share of gold stars, and my little hoard is enough for me. I'm much happier just doing maintenance now and helping newbies here, so they don't stumble on some technicality. --Cart (talk) 05:10, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for your appreciated efforts to assist talented newbies. By welcoming them with open arms, we show them the open-mindedness and tolerance propagated by the WMF, so that FPC does not appear to be an elitist club that they will leave in fright. -- Radomianin (talk) 05:54, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Don't get me wrong Radomianin, I love my old cameras. They are quite sufficient for my needs, but my needs don't include gathering FPs anymore. I've had my fair share of gold stars, and my little hoard is enough for me. I'm much happier just doing maintenance now and helping newbies here, so they don't stumble on some technicality. --Cart (talk) 05:10, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- My dear Julesvernex2, your prominent collection of cameras is so way, way, way much better than the two I have, so of course you don't have these problems. My aurora photos are actually among the least processed of all my photos. All edits on aurora photos from such an inferior camera will only make things worse, so I use a very light touch. But the camera is what it is, totally inadequate for professional night photos, but I like to photograph what I see anyway for my own amusement and for use on Wiki articles where the images look good enough at thumb and on the file page. I would never nominate any of my aurora photos here, but I've learned to play along if someone else does. Thank you for reminding me of my humble equipment and confirming that I made the right decision to not nominate my photos here any more, now that technology has moved forward and I haven't been able to follow. --Cart (talk) 12:13, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Auroras are not like most light sources we are used to. They are not constant, like when you photograph sunlight, lamps or the moon. Instead they move constantly and quickly (the link is a good real time video of a lively aurora), kind of like smoke in the wind. They pulsate and throb, one moment you can have a bright formation to your left and 1/4 sec later it can flicker out and a new pulse/ray/squiggle of light appear above or to the right, and this aurora was extremely lively. This random pattern makes it impossible to set the camera perfectly and there will be some posterization if you want to catch the best of these light shows. If you shoot an aurora, you have to take the good with the bad. Also, in this photo, not all variances in luminescence are are due to the aurora. Some of them are small thin clouds. The night started out cloudy, but they began to disappear so I could catch some of the aurora. The small clouds are easier to see in some other photos, like this taken on the same spot, but down towards the horizon. The whole series is in this category. --Cart (talk) 10:56, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:51, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support An image of almost other-worldly beauty. – Aristeas (talk) 12:56, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:57, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support I wish I could see them in my country. --iMahesh (talk) 17:05, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 00:59, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 05:26, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:37, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Pierre André (talk) 22:23, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support [5] — Rhododendrites talk | 22:45, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Late to the party, but I have to support too: I've set it as background for my phone. --A.Savin 16:27, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Wow! Thank you for that compliment. That makes me blush with humble pride. :-) --Cart (talk) 16:32, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support per others. --Terragio67 (talk) 14:35, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- Question Could it be a good idea to create (unless it already exists) a category for those images that could clearly be used as PC or smartphone wallpapers? --Terragio67 (talk) 14:37, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- There is an old template, Template:Wallpaper plus the corresponding categories 1 and 2, that was used in the days of phone modems when it was still not that common for sufficiently large photos to be uploaded on Commons. In those days, people normally didn't have photo editing programs either, so it was a "cool" thing for Commons to be able to provide wallpapers for digital devices. These days it is deemed obsolete (deprecated for 12 years!) since almost any new image uploaded is more than big enough to be used for computers/phones/whatever and people are totally capable of fixing their own wallpapers. ;-) --Cart (talk) 16:53, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 May 2024 at 13:08:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family : Canidae (Canids)
- Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:08, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:08, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 15:53, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:25, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:28, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 21:20, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 22:03, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 03:12, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:26, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Tight crop at the right and at the bottom. But overall well captured -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:20, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:48, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:58, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 13:00, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 05:23, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Scimitar Light Tank MOD 45149231.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 May 2024 at 23:14:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles#Military vehicles
- Info created by British MOD - uploaded by Fæ - nominated by Schierbecker -- Schierbecker (talk) 23:14, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Super sharp image and the photographer captured the action quite well. Schierbecker (talk) 23:14, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Both antennas are cut off. Yann (talk) 09:06, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Very good quality, but cropped on the top. --iMahesh (talk) 11:00, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support TOUMOU (talk) 08:12, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support. The chopped-off antenna aren't a problem for me, the subject of the picture is the body of the tank. —Bruce1eetalk 07:18, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Crop isn't good enough for FP. --Milseburg (talk) 16:46, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 May 2024 at 11:38:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Black and White#Objects
- Info created and uploaded by Wilfredor, nominated by Yann
- Support I like the comparison between technology and modern city skyline. Very good quality. -- Yann (talk) 11:38, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Support Per Yann.--Sebring12Hrs (talk) 12:02, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Giles Laurent. Thanks to him. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 12:48, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:38, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 13:41, 17 May 2024 (UTC)- Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 13:52, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Support Spectacular composition! ★ 14:17, 17 May 2024 (UTC)- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:44, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:54, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Wilfredor, I believe this is missing a {{Retouched picture}} and a Digitally manipulated photographs category? --Julesvernex2 (talk) 19:04, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 19:53, 17 May 2024 (UTC)Support An interesting installation.-- Radomianin (talk) 20:54, 17 May 2024 (UTC)- Comment The result is beautiful on thumbnail but looking closer I'm disturbed by the fact that the reflexion of every object is not starting right at the bottom of each object individually as it should be the case for a real reflexion. We can also still see a visible line along the bottom of the screws (probably resulting from the copy pasted picture of the objects) that seems to have been forgotten to be deleted. Can that be improved ? -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:52, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- There is also many weird artifacts across the whole image that should be fixed -- Giles Laurent (talk) 00:17, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks to Giles Laurent for his helpful detective work. Any manipulation needs to be flagged on the file description page. I withdraw my support until this issue is clarified. -- Radomianin (talk) 04:41, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- There is also many weird artifacts across the whole image that should be fixed -- Giles Laurent (talk) 00:17, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Undeclared photo manipulation (like this one and so many before) with visible technical flaws. Unwatch now -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:05, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I'm not impressed. Why are there so many nails? it reminds me of how in China they build a ton of identical high rises in a cluster. It's too realistic of a city Henrysz (talk) 06:47, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support That reminds me strongly of two of my own pictures (both FP): File:Sechskantschrauben -- 2020 -- 3985-8.jpg and File:Schrauben, Muttern und Unterlegscheiben -- 2020 -- 4150.jpg --XRay 💬 07:20, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Undeclared photo manipulation. Yann (talk) 09:38, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- After someone's comment, I added the manipulations made, corrected the problems, and uploaded the new versions, all detailed on the description page. However, I think there is a lack of trust in my nominations why did some people withdraw their vote in favor without checking if what this person said, both the explanations about the modifications and the graphical errors, existed in the photograph?. Therefore, I thank Yann for his nomination and I understand the concern of some people here about me, but I am not well psychologically speaking and I feel it is necessary to withdraw indefinitely from this section because it causes me a lot of stress. --Wilfredor (talk) 11:10, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- I would have supported if all of the image problems would have been fixed but the reflexion is still wrong and you can see on this image how something closer to a real reflexion would look like, i. e. the reflexion needs to start at the bottom of each screw individually. Also, there are still plenty of artifacts and graphical errors across the image on the new version of the file (these are just examples I have quickly selected but there's probably more). The best would be to start again the edit from the original file because there are many places were dust is not the same above and on the reflexion because it was only removed on one of them. Feel free to fix all of these issues and to renominate the picture once you feel better. Best wishes of recovery 🍀 -- Giles Laurent (talk) 16:20, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- Or easier way : just place the screws on a real, big and clean mirror and take the picture again and there will be no complicated post-processing needed. -- Giles Laurent (talk) 17:45, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- I would have supported if all of the image problems would have been fixed but the reflexion is still wrong and you can see on this image how something closer to a real reflexion would look like, i. e. the reflexion needs to start at the bottom of each screw individually. Also, there are still plenty of artifacts and graphical errors across the image on the new version of the file (these are just examples I have quickly selected but there's probably more). The best would be to start again the edit from the original file because there are many places were dust is not the same above and on the reflexion because it was only removed on one of them. Feel free to fix all of these issues and to renominate the picture once you feel better. Best wishes of recovery 🍀 -- Giles Laurent (talk) 16:20, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- After someone's comment, I added the manipulations made, corrected the problems, and uploaded the new versions, all detailed on the description page. However, I think there is a lack of trust in my nominations why did some people withdraw their vote in favor without checking if what this person said, both the explanations about the modifications and the graphical errors, existed in the photograph?. Therefore, I thank Yann for his nomination and I understand the concern of some people here about me, but I am not well psychologically speaking and I feel it is necessary to withdraw indefinitely from this section because it causes me a lot of stress. --Wilfredor (talk) 11:10, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 May 2024 at 15:26:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges#Thailand
- Info created, uploaded and nominated by BigDom (talk)
- Support -- BigDom (talk) 15:26, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Nice photo. I can't quite pinpoint it, but something seems to be missing for me. --iMahesh (talk) 17:07, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good application of the rule of thirds. ★ 18:15, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ezarateesteban 18:47, 16 May 2024 (UTC) good
- Support --Llez (talk) 05:29, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:36, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 13:46, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice atmosphere.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:36, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:49, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Special light -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:21, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Laitche (talk) 18:14, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 23:03, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Milseburg (talk) 16:59, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 10:09, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 14:30, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 15:15, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Toadspike (talk) 16:49, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 May 2024 at 21:37:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Reliefs
- Info Louvre-Lens Museum Louvre RF 1337.- Fragment of decoration of a chapel of the Holy Sepulchre: Eternal Father blessing surrounded by angels.- All by me except the artwork!.-- Pierre André (talk) 21:37, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Pierre André (talk) 21:37, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Not sharp, crop too tight, light isn't optimal... --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 22:16, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination, Thanks for your advice! I posted this file by mistake, best regards.--Pierre André (talk) 22:25, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Mujeres trabajadoras de la tierra haciendo producción agroecológica - Berna Gaitán Otarán - 03.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 May 2024 at 21:02:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Agriculture
- Info created by Niamfrifruli - uploaded by Niamfrifruli - nominated by Niamfrifruli -- Berna (talk) 21:02, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Berna (talk) 21:02, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Some photos get promoted at FPC because of their aesthetic value, and sometimes the documentary value is more important. In the latter cases, context is important -- can you say more about this image? — Rhododendrites talk | 22:47, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 May 2024 at 04:11:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Fagaceae
- Info Emerging young shoots of a swamp oak (Quercus palustris). Focus stack of 12 photos.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:11, 17 May 2024 (UTC) - Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:11, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Chepry (talk) 07:27, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:51, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 17:32, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Pierre André (talk) 08:57, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 10:08, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:37, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 10:10, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 14:27, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 15:16, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --El Golli Mohamed (talk) 17:19, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 May 2024 at 00:54:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family : Bovidae (Bovids)
- Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 00:54, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 00:54, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Maybe crop the top a bit? -- WildMouse76 (talk) 01:36, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support I don't like crop/orientation, IMHO it should be horizontal Chepry (talk) 07:29, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for your review. I agree, the horizontal crop is better. New version uploaded with horizontal crop (press cmd+R on Mac or Ctrl+F5 on Windows with file open to see new version). -- Giles Laurent (talk) 11:03, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- New version with horizontal crop is better IMO. LexKurochkin (talk) 11:25, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for your review. I agree, the horizontal crop is better. New version uploaded with horizontal crop (press cmd+R on Mac or Ctrl+F5 on Windows with file open to see new version). -- Giles Laurent (talk) 11:03, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 11:12, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 11:25, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:48, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 13:45, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:41, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:50, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 19:55, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:15, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:04, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support —Bruce1eetalk 09:58, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support High level of detail -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:21, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 10:10, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --PierreSelim (talk) 12:19, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 14:28, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 15:15, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --El Golli Mohamed (talk) 12:25, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 May 2024 at 10:21:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Malaysia
- Info created, uploaded and nominated by BigDom -- BigDom (talk) 10:21, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- BigDom (talk) 10:21, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cool shot! Красный wanna talk? 22:10, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 12:07, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support IMO a bit oversaturated but I really like the composition Cmao20 (talk) 13:30, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Cmao20 Thanks for the support and feedback - only +2 saturation in PS but happy to dial it back if others feel the same. BigDom (talk) 13:53, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:35, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Agree with Cmao20 it's oversaturated. Green leaves, blue water -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:09, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Basile Morin, The Cosmonaut, Cmao20, ArionStar, and Красный: Thanks for the feedback. I've tweaked the saturation of the blue, green and aqua channels, looks a bit more natural now IMO. Let me know if it needs any more work, always happy to get constructive criticism. BigDom (talk) 02:55, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Water is improved in my opinion. Thanks for the notification -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:37, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 14:12, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 09:10, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 May 2024 at 11:04:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Rail_vehicles
- Info created by David Gubler - uploaded by David Gubler - nominated by Bruce1ee -- —Bruce1eetalk 11:04, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- —Bruce1eetalk 11:04, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 11:13, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Ermell (talk) 13:42, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:43, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:53, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:51, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 00:02, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support i like train dllu (t,c) 04:34, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 07:19, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Striking angle, impressive structure, taken at the right moment -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:19, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Milseburg (talk) 16:59, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 10:12, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 15:17, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support I appreciate the multilingual description. Toadspike (talk) 16:45, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 May 2024 at 09:41:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Russia
- Info created and uploaded by Vitaliy VK, nominated by Yann
- Support -- Yann (talk) 09:41, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Quality is not quite there for me (see overall posterization and blurred corner bottom-left), although the mood is well captured. Some formal flaws as well: there is a typo in filename, coordinates would be welcome, and FP gallery is not properly fixed (question to nominator). --A.Savin 14:40, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- The gallery link is ok. There are no 'Natural' FPs from Moscow Oblast yet, so that section doesn't exist yet. In such cases it's a toss-up between omitting the section in the nom, or to add it with a note that this would be the first FP for that section; styles of doing this vary and none particular is preferred. --Cart (talk) 17:05, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- First, by all means there is "Central Federal District" section, and second, it's at least controversial whether Places/Natural is here the best choice at all. --A.Savin 00:56, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Ok, thanks for clarifying the location, you obviously know more about Russian geography than me or the nominator do. It is more helpful when someone who knows an area steps in say what the right section should be, instead of just saying that things are wrong. --Cart (talk) 14:42, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- First, by all means there is "Central Federal District" section, and second, it's at least controversial whether Places/Natural is here the best choice at all. --A.Savin 00:56, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- The gallery link is ok. There are no 'Natural' FPs from Moscow Oblast yet, so that section doesn't exist yet. In such cases it's a toss-up between omitting the section in the nom, or to add it with a note that this would be the first FP for that section; styles of doing this vary and none particular is preferred. --Cart (talk) 17:05, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Interesting light condition and composition, but not sharp enough. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 22:18, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Thanks for your comments. Yann (talk) 11:16, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 May 2024 at 16:21:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods#Family_:_Tettigoniidae_(Katydids_or_Bush_Crickets)
- Info created by Stephan Sprinz - uploaded by Stephan Sprinz - nominated by Stephan Sprinz -- Stephan Sprinz (talk) 16:21, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Stephan Sprinz (talk) 16:21, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ivar (talk) 18:03, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Impressive. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 21:47, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support High educational value. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 23:38, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 00:34, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Frank. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:08, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 12:06, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment In my opinion you've gone too far with the colors. The greens appear like radioactive on my screen, and when I check the settings on Lightroom, I see you modified the "tint" (+18%), added whites +54%, and shadows +100%. The insect is sharp but the colors unnatural -- Basile Morin (talk) 13:17, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:51, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:37, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I agree with Basile Morin; the green color is way too much. Wolverine XI 16:50, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:23, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I uploaded a new version of the image with (hopefully) more natural colours. But you have to keep in mind that the picture was taken in bright morning sun light (with the subject in the shadow), which leads to bright colours. --Stephan Sprinz (talk) 06:16, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 11:22, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:18, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 15:36, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great composition, sharpness etc. The green still looks very strong at the bottom, but after all this animal has got a very bright green colour – Linné has called it Tettigonia viridissima for a reason (viridissimus/a/um means “greenest”) ;–). – Aristeas (talk) 09:30, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:31, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 15:52, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support I agree with Schulenburg and Aristeas, and let me say that the level of details and colors of the top is wonderful. --Terragio67 (talk) 18:45, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Casio W-96H.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 May 2024 at 13:47:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Horology
- Info Casio W-96H, second and beter try, light, colors etc. --Mile (talk) 13:47, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mile (talk) 13:47, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support The background is not distracting this time. ;o) Yann (talk) 16:19, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support This setup for the watch works much better and supports the intended effect. -- Radomianin (talk) 19:02, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Busy background (so distracting), with blurred and sharp areas, and dark and clear areas. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 19:53, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 22:10, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Sebring. --SHB2000 (talk) 22:21, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Nothing special. Daftation (talk) 10:58, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Honestly I preferred your last one, I found the colours and the background more interesting, but this is again good product photography and deserves a star. I understand that people might find it a little low on wow but that's a matter of the genre, still, I think it would be cool if we could feature good product photos like this. Cmao20 (talk) 13:33, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The subject is very easy to capture, so nothing worth featuring here. Wolverine XI 16:51, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Info I would like to see, those who oppose to make similar. Wolverine "easy". I think you never made something like this, so oppose is irrelvant, who made them would never say easy. Stacked Macro shots are heavy work. Some 5-6 h of work,cleaning, editing stack mistakes, which are normal. Show me "easy" shot. please. --Mile (talk) 18:59, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- It's not my responsibility to prove myself to anyone, so think what you must. And please, don't take things personally. Wolverine XI 07:38, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support I could only duplicate Cmao20’s words. And no, high-quality product photos like this one are absolutely not easy: this is very much work. – Aristeas (talk) 07:01, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 11:20, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao20 and Aristeas. BigDom (talk) 13:53, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:29, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Wolverine XI. -- Karelj (talk) 16:12, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 04:13, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 17:42, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Easy subject, dark background with a dark object on it — not a FP for me. Красный wanna talk? 18:58, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 May 2024 at 19:49:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Industry#Spain
- Info created by Mike Peel - uploaded by Mike Peel - nominated by Mike Peel -- Mike Peel (talk) 19:49, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mike Peel (talk) 19:49, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 01:29, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 08:31, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 10:16, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 15:37, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Pierre André (talk) 21:47, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:07, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 15:47, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Toadspike (talk) 16:38, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Composition and weather -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:45, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Punta de las Gaviotas.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 May 2024 at 16:17:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Spain#Canary Islands
- Info: golden hour at Punta de las Gaviotas; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:17, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:17, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 12:06, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 14:51, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 11:23, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:39, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:32, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I don't like the textures here Henrysz (talk) 06:59, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 17:43, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 15:51, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Fringe-fingered Lizard.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 May 2024 at 07:08:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Reptiles#Family : Lacertidae (True Lizards)
- Info created by Bill.pix - uploaded by Bill.pix - nominated by TOUMOU -- TOUMOU (talk) 07:08, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- TOUMOU (talk) 07:08, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice compo. and camouflage. -Shagil Kannur (talk) 10:39, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 18:18, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 01:00, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 13:47, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:37, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:48, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:35, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 15:39, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 19:54, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Panoramic view of Taj Palace Hotel and Taj Tower with the iconic Gateway of India in the background.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 May 2024 at 15:18:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#India
- Info All by iMahesh (talk) 15:18, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Abstain Since I'm the creator of the file, please inform me if any adjustments to the color palette are needed. I can make changes from the raw file if necessary. -- iMahesh (talk) 15:18, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 17:30, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Maybe if you crop the empty sky and water a bit, let's say to 16:10 or 16:9, it'll be better? Красный wanna talk? 22:13, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, it looks much better. I have cropped the dead spaces, please check. --iMahesh (talk) 12:06, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support now, thank you. Красный wanna talk? 21:48, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support I think you were not very lucky with the light but I enjoy the careful composition of this photo and the image quality is strong. Cmao20 (talk) 13:48, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: I think this would benefit from increased vibrance, especially for the reds that are particularly washed out. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:20, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- @The Cosmonaut Done, I tried replicating actual colors from images over internet.--iMahesh (talk) 03:00, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support: better. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 05:09, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good now. Thank you for the improvement. – Aristeas (talk) 09:28, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 10:20, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 17:42, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Sunset view of Everest.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 May 2024 at 00:32:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Nepal
- Info created and uploaded by Nir gurung - nominated by WildMouse76 -- WildMouse76 (talk) 00:32, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 00:32, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Really impressive. Consider cropping away a bit of the sky though; not so much that we lose the beautiful deep blue hue of the upper atmosphere, but enough to make the mountains clearly appear in the upper half of the image. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:23, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful colours Daftation (talk) 10:57, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 11:50, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Spectacular light. ★ 12:04, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Really beautiful. --Shagil Kannur (talk) 12:17, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support I'd honestly leave it as it is, wouldn't crop the sky. Cmao20 (talk) 15:07, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 16:28, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:39, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Perfectly executed. Wolverine XI 16:46, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:29, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice! --SHB2000 (talk) 05:03, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 07:16, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 07:18, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 11:26, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:20, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 15:53, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ~Moheen (keep talking) 17:55, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:34, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:13, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:39, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Question Nice scene, but isn't it too dark? --Milseburg (talk) 13:06, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Milseburg Not in my opinion. The scene was captured during sunset. Also, you can still see the details of the mountain, despite the darkness. -- WildMouse76 (talk) 14:57, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, there are details, but as I know from the high mountains, shortly before sunset there is still significantly more light, even in the shade, especially on snowy areas. Milseburg (talk) 15:43, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Milseburg Not in my opinion. The scene was captured during sunset. Also, you can still see the details of the mountain, despite the darkness. -- WildMouse76 (talk) 14:57, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Outstanding scene. But the sharpness doesn't convince me and the elaboration seems too dark to me. IMHO there is also to much empty sky. Overall not perfect enough for a FP. --Milseburg (talk) 16:58, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Milseburg I wouldn't say the scene is too dark. Again, noticable details. However, assuming by the colors on the very top, it is somewhere between nautical and astronomical twilight due to the redness. I've browsed through some categories of mountains during sunset, and the ones that had significant light had a more yellow shade, while this one is more red. The sky could probably be cropped a bit, but the sky is an important feature of this image. WildMouse76 (talk) 22:29, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- yeah it is dark my camera isn't good quality too, but what i shoot that good enough for me just experience high altitude landscaping photography during the winter. thanks for nice comments Nir gurung (talk) 14:51, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Milseburg I wouldn't say the scene is too dark. Again, noticable details. However, assuming by the colors on the very top, it is somewhere between nautical and astronomical twilight due to the redness. I've browsed through some categories of mountains during sunset, and the ones that had significant light had a more yellow shade, while this one is more red. The sky could probably be cropped a bit, but the sky is an important feature of this image. WildMouse76 (talk) 22:29, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Outstanding scene. But the sharpness doesn't convince me and the elaboration seems too dark to me. IMHO there is also to much empty sky. Overall not perfect enough for a FP. --Milseburg (talk) 16:58, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Question Does anyone have an explanation for this phenomenon? (in particular for the red color of the summit on the left, with its sharp edge to darker areas) To me, this looks weird, but I'm obviously not from Nepal, so I don't know what might have caused this. I'd love to learn more. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 01:27, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- See Alpenglow -- WildMouse76 (talk) 03:05, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Frank Schulenburg forgot to ping. WildMouse76 (talk) 03:42, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Frank Schulenburg, technically, it's the same effect that you have at the Horsetail Fall (Yosemite) (nearer where you live). With the sun at the right angle and normal conditions at sunset, the red light will prevail and strike the surfaces that can be reached by the light. The red light is not that uncommon, but it gets so striking when isolated to a few patches by the shadows of surrounding mountains. --Cart (talk) 11:33, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- In summary, the red color and sharp edge you're observing on the summit in the photograph likely stem from a combination of geological factors such as mineral composition, weathering patterns, and the play of light. These natural processes contribute to the unique and often striking appearance of mountain landscapes in Nepal and other mountainous regions around the world. Just learning high-altitude mountain landscape photography based in Nepal thank you. Nir gurung (talk) 14:58, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Question Is there consensus, that Everest and Nuptse have still late direct sunlight? --Milseburg (talk) 09:58, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Milseburg It's only me and you, so we don't have enough people to establish a consensus. -- WildMouse76 (talk) 22:26, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 15:50, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Flamant rose Thyna009.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 May 2024 at 21:18:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Phoenicopteridae (Flamingos)
- Info created by El Golli Mohamed - uploaded by El Golli Mohamed - nominated by El Golli Mohamed -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 21:18, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 21:18, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Image noise and weird blurring --WildMouse76 (talk) 22:31, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- ISO 250 : image noise? El Golli Mohamed (talk) 23:45, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment The blurred flamingo at left is a bit disturbing, but noise is fine. Please consider cropping. Yann (talk) 11:53, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- I cropped it, thanks El Golli Mohamed (talk) 16:08, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I agree a tighter crop would improve this image Cmao20 (talk) 15:02, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- I cannot crop it further to the left side of the photo otherwise the composition of the photo will be affected and unbalanced El Golli Mohamed (talk) 16:52, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The left crop is something else. Wolverine XI 16:48, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- He cropped the image to exclude the out-of-focus flamingo (old version), but now it feels imbalanced. Had he shifted slightly to the right when capturing the photo, the composition would've been a solid 10 --iMahesh (talk) 15:25, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- I was lying on the mud in camouflage among the flamingos for about an hour and a half so they could gain confidence and come closer. Once among the flamingos I didn't have much choice; I always had flamingos outside the depth of field and surrounding me. That's why I couldn't do better. El Golli Mohamed (talk) 16:43, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Good commitment, bird watching is a very hard task. New version looks perfect. iMahesh (talk) 01:40, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you El Golli Mohamed (talk) 08:00, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Good commitment, bird watching is a very hard task. New version looks perfect. iMahesh (talk) 01:40, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- I was lying on the mud in camouflage among the flamingos for about an hour and a half so they could gain confidence and come closer. Once among the flamingos I didn't have much choice; I always had flamingos outside the depth of field and surrounding me. That's why I couldn't do better. El Golli Mohamed (talk) 16:43, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- He cropped the image to exclude the out-of-focus flamingo (old version), but now it feels imbalanced. Had he shifted slightly to the right when capturing the photo, the composition would've been a solid 10 --iMahesh (talk) 15:25, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Due to the crop. --iMahesh (talk) 15:27, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Here is the new version with the only possible crop with a good composition El Golli Mohamed (talk) 16:48, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak Support. This is the best composition, but the image is now quite small. Yann (talk) 10:23, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
Alternative
[edit]- Info Cropped by me. ★ 20:39, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 20:39, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --El Golli Mohamed (talk) 21:22, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Support. --iMahesh (talk) 01:41, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support That's an improvement -- WildMouse76 (talk) 03:15, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you El Golli Mohamed (talk) 08:01, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 13:00, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Henrysz (talk) 06:56, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 17:43, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:18, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 May 2024 at 11:20:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods#Family : Acrididae (Short-horned grasshoppers and locusts)
- Info created by IssamBarhoumi - uploaded by IssamBarhoumi - nominated by IssamBarhoumi -- IssamBarhoumi (talk) 11:20, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- IssamBarhoumi (talk) 11:20, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- I've added an approximate gallery, but some better identification of this grasshopper would be appreciated. --Cart (talk) 11:53, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- Dear W.Carter I requested a rename in the basis of this link the actual name is "Sphingonotus rubescens"
- https://acrinwafrica.mnhn.fr/bases/fiches/Sphingonotus_rubescens.html IssamBarhoumi (talk) 13:47, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- Ok, name, code, gallery and links fixed. Please try to have all these things in order before your next nomination. It makes everything so much easier. You are a regular here now, so such things are sort of expected of you now. ;-) Good luck with your nom! --Cart (talk) 14:18, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you IssamBarhoumi (talk) 14:27, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- Ok, name, code, gallery and links fixed. Please try to have all these things in order before your next nomination. It makes everything so much easier. You are a regular here now, so such things are sort of expected of you now. ;-) Good luck with your nom! --Cart (talk) 14:18, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- I've added an approximate gallery, but some better identification of this grasshopper would be appreciated. --Cart (talk) 11:53, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Bad compo; a closeup would really be nice. Wolverine XI 13:40, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Hello with my 35mm and macro activated I can't be closer more than 0.2m so I recorp it that way to show up the main subject. IssamBarhoumi (talk) 15:52, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- but I did another recorp to show up the subject in its environment and keeping the details clear, I think it is like a shuttle on Mars now (just for fun ;) )
- If the compo is better let me know please. IssamBarhoumi (talk) 16:09, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Too small and unsharp, sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:21, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- ok I revert my previous photo have a look please IssamBarhoumi (talk) 07:20, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- Animal too small IMO, and lack of detail. Please compare with the FPs in the same gallery -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:05, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- ok thank you i ll withdraw it an do better next time IssamBarhoumi (talk) 09:50, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- Animal too small IMO, and lack of detail. Please compare with the FPs in the same gallery -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:05, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Thanks for your comments. --IssamBarhoumi (talk) 09:54, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Rufous-throated Partridge 0A2A9937.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 May 2024 at 12:20:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family_:_Phasianidae_(Grouse,_Partridges,_Peafowl,_Pheasants,_Quail,_Turkeys)
- Info created & uploaded by JJ Harrison – nominated by Ivar (talk) 12:20, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ivar (talk) 12:20, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --El Golli Mohamed (talk) 16:56, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:37, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Lovely, but the legs are underfocused. Wolverine XI 16:39, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- in such light conditions (low light) you can only open the diaphragm to full aperture to have a decent image and obviously everything will not be in focus. You must always take the shooting conditions into account. El Golli Mohamed (talk) 17:09, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Very true! Unfortunately, this is an old problem on FPC. Too many voters who have never tried photographing under difficult conditions, or have no proper understanding of what can be done technically, will think that all photos should have the same quality as a well-lit, stacked church façade or a studio photo. --Cart (talk) 20:01, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Cart's statement comes across as passive-aggressive. If I understand correctly, you are directly placing me in the category of "voters who have never tried photographing under difficult conditions, or have no proper understanding of what can be done technically". That's fine, do you; there's a legitimate reason why I don't post my pictures here, but that doesn't make me any less inadequate. I have no problem with the other responses here, except Cart's. Keep in mind that this is not the first time it has occurred; see here. Wolverine XI 07:29, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- There can be no argument on the settings used. But the criticism in the context of FPC is valid. It is difficult to take an FP-standard image in low light. I would be more than happy to support this level of technical quality if the bird was rare. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:42, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- Yeah, this. Support --SHB2000 (talk) 05:01, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Cart's statement comes across as passive-aggressive. If I understand correctly, you are directly placing me in the category of "voters who have never tried photographing under difficult conditions, or have no proper understanding of what can be done technically". That's fine, do you; there's a legitimate reason why I don't post my pictures here, but that doesn't make me any less inadequate. I have no problem with the other responses here, except Cart's. Keep in mind that this is not the first time it has occurred; see here. Wolverine XI 07:29, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Very true! Unfortunately, this is an old problem on FPC. Too many voters who have never tried photographing under difficult conditions, or have no proper understanding of what can be done technically, will think that all photos should have the same quality as a well-lit, stacked church façade or a studio photo. --Cart (talk) 20:01, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:28, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support In perfect light, the focus is sharp on the eye, which matters at this depth of field. More is not possible at f/4. An excellent capture in my view. -- Radomianin (talk) 20:34, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Light and composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:19, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Superb shot as usual from JJ. Cmao20 (talk) 02:12, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Radomianin. BigDom (talk) 03:16, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Radomianin. – Aristeas (talk) 07:08, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 11:28, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support There is no rule to have the whole subject in focus, and in many cases it is just impossible technically. The Image Guidelines state: "Depth of field is chosen according to the specific needs of every picture", and there is the example photo of a cat with focus on eyes and shallow DOF. I consider this image in compliance with the Image Guidelines. Nice photo of interesting subject with "wow-effect" IMO. LexKurochkin (talk) 11:49, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- I strongly agree with you. This issue should be addressed. --Shagil Kannur (talk) 14:49, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support At f4 with 1/100s while still beeing at ISO 6400 it must have been a very dark place. The photograph could not have been taken in a better way as smaller aperture (=more DoF) would have resulted in increased ISO. Also to me the most important thing to get in focus in animal photography is the eye and the bird eye is perfectly in focus. Focus stacking is usually impossible on birds as they tend to keep moving and I always find it quite impressive how JJ Harrisson manages shutter speeds of 1/100s with them -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:25, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, I agree. And I have the same thoughts about JJ Harrisson photoes. LexKurochkin (talk) 15:29, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Tripod? Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:42, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- My remark was not about the technique but about the fact that birds are always moving. And the answer is simple : burst photography until you have a split second where the bird/animal didn't move and then you just need to pick the good photo out of the hundreds you've taken (that's also what I did for photographing this chimpanzee at 1/80s in a very dark forest. Also, since almost all of JJ's pictures of birds on the ground are perfectly taken on bird eye level I suspect that he doesn't use tripod (it would be too high) but just puts his camera on the ground or on a camera bean bag. -- Giles Laurent (talk) 16:39, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- 'burst photography until you have a split second where the bird/animal didn't move' is not my technique. Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:13, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- As Giles said, tripod solves only a half of the problem, the other half is bird's behavior. LexKurochkin (talk) 06:48, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- My remark was not about the technique but about the fact that birds are always moving. And the answer is simple : burst photography until you have a split second where the bird/animal didn't move and then you just need to pick the good photo out of the hundreds you've taken (that's also what I did for photographing this chimpanzee at 1/80s in a very dark forest. Also, since almost all of JJ's pictures of birds on the ground are perfectly taken on bird eye level I suspect that he doesn't use tripod (it would be too high) but just puts his camera on the ground or on a camera bean bag. -- Giles Laurent (talk) 16:39, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- Tripod? Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:42, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, I agree. And I have the same thoughts about JJ Harrisson photoes. LexKurochkin (talk) 15:29, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful. --Shagil Kannur (talk) 14:47, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 03:12, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:13, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cart is right. --Yann (talk) 10:24, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:42, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --GRDN711 (talk) 21:32, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support A support filled with a recurring envy of JJ's talent and equipment. — Rhododendrites talk | 22:40, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 15:45, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Close wing Basking of Spindasis vulcanus (Fabricius, 1775) - Common Silverline WLB.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 May 2024 at 11:53:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Lycaenidae (Blues, coppers and hairstreaks)
- Info created by Anitava Roy - uploaded by Anitava Roy - nominated by Atudu -- Atudu (talk) 11:53, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Atudu (talk) 11:53, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose too blurry for a FPC Ezarateesteban 15:15, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose at 100% scale there are visible artifacts of too strong digital processing. Sorry. --LexKurochkin (talk) 18:00, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, but I have to agree with the comments above. --SHB2000 (talk) 05:44, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per above -- WildMouse76 (talk) 14:12, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 May 2024 at 11:20:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Italy
- Info created and uploaded by MHoser - nominated by ★ -- ★ 11:20, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support 2024 and we don't have any FPs of the Leaning Tower. Nice and different perspective, by the way. -- ★ 11:20, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Looks amazing. --iMahesh (talk) 15:42, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:38, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
OpposeToo many dust spots in the sky -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:17, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Fixed -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:41, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 02:12, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Lovely, but I have to agree that at least the most prominent dust spots need to be fixed. – Aristeas (talk) 07:10, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Basile Morin and Aristeas: the author seems to be inactive, so I took the liberty of fixing the dust spots. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:15, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Thank you very much, The Cosmonaut! – Aristeas (talk) 07:44, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:32, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:39, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:41, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support wow, that's surprising that we have no FPs of the Leaning Tower of Pisa. --SHB2000 (talk) 13:00, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Well, you know how picky voters are about tilted photos. ;-) --Cart (talk) 19:01, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- That was a good one, Cart :–). You made my day … – Aristeas (talk) 07:36, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- {{oppose}} I don't like the tilt. --~~~~ /s --SHB2000 (talk) 10:40, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- Well, you know how picky voters are about tilted photos. ;-) --Cart (talk) 19:01, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The author can't help it, but I can't get used to the scaffolding in a prominent place.--Milseburg (talk) 13:55, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Are you sure it ruins the photo? ★ 15:56, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- I wouldn't say ruin. But the scaffolding is too disturbing for an FP. The conditions for an outstanding image of this building were not present at that time. The rising sun is nice to have, but for a FP of this ensemble of buildings, I would forgo it and prefer if important parts of the building are not covered by elements that wouldn't normally belong. BTW, the crop is a bit tight, isn't it? --Milseburg (talk) 16:44, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Just a comment (no critic of your vote!). I completely understand the dislike for the scaffolding. Personally I have learned to resign myself with it especially in photographs of very prominent buildings. I have visited Florence, Siena, and Pisa (to mention just the most famous Cathedral towns of Tuscany) each several times, but AFAICR never seen any of the famous cathedrals without scaffolding – when the restoration work was finished at one part, the next part was scaffolded to carry on with the work. The same applies to all major French cathedrals I know. Therefore I am rather happy with photos like this one because it offers at least an almost clean foreground (almost no cars, people, stands/kiosks – all these nasty things which often ruin photos of such buildings). – Aristeas (talk) 07:36, 18 May 2024 (UTC) Comment Cologne Cathedral always has scaffolding somewhere. But if a prominent part, like one of the towers, was scaffolded, no FP would be possible at that time. Taking an FP is difficult, it is not possible under every condition. --Milseburg (talk) 16:58, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- I wouldn't say ruin. But the scaffolding is too disturbing for an FP. The conditions for an outstanding image of this building were not present at that time. The rising sun is nice to have, but for a FP of this ensemble of buildings, I would forgo it and prefer if important parts of the building are not covered by elements that wouldn't normally belong. BTW, the crop is a bit tight, isn't it? --Milseburg (talk) 16:44, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Are you sure it ruins the photo? ★ 15:56, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 15:48, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
Atlas nautique du Monde, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 May 2024 at 11:20:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Maps#Maps of the world
- Info created by Lopo Homem - uploaded by Gzen92Bot - nominated by ★ -- ★ 11:20, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ★ 11:20, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good quality, very high-resolution, interesting document. Yann (talk) 11:48, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Excellent reproduction of beautiful world map. I love the detailed invention of the Antarctic Mundus novus ;–). – Aristeas (talk) 07:15, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Indeed! A fascinating mash-up of an accurate representation of the Brazilian coastline (taken from contemporary Portuguese nautical charts) with the made-up Terra Australis from the Ancient Greeks. Julesvernex2 (talk) 21:59, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 11:27, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support High quality and very interesting -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:21, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:40, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 17:44, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 09:32, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 May 2024 at 08:15:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Brazil
- Info created by Mike Peel - uploaded by Mike Peel - nominated by Mike Peel -- Mike Peel (talk) 08:15, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mike Peel (talk) 08:15, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 10:28, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:23, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 00:56, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 08:31, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 10:17, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 14:22, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 15:19, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 15:36, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:09, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 15:48, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Toadspike (talk) 16:38, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 16:41, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Mirror effect and light -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:14, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 16:12, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 17:34, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 06:11, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Dar El Hadith - 20240512 153022.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 May 2024 at 17:13:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Walls
- Info created by Riad Salih - uploaded by Riad Salih - nominated by Riad Salih -- Riad Salih (talk) 17:13, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Riad Salih (talk) 17:13, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Not special enough, sorry. Composition, light and motif, too average -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:15, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Two black cabs with Big Ben in the background.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 May 2024 at 14:01:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles#Automobiles
- Info created by Pedro Lastra - uploaded by JustEMV - nominated by JustEMV -- JustEMV (talk) 14:01, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- JustEMV (talk) 14:01, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Nice idea, but the car is on shadows, too harsh shadow, and motion blur Ezarateesteban 15:13, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the feedback! I'll take it into account in future submissions. JustEMV (talk) 22:24, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Yes, nice idea, but neither of the cars is sharp. Yann (talk) 09:10, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The bus lane ruins it. --SHB2000 (talk) 03:33, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 May 2024 at 16:59:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Women
- Info Young Laarim woman with extensive scarification, Kimotong, South Sudan. c/u/m by Poco a poco (talk) 16:59, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 16:59, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Impressive! Yann (talk) 19:45, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:24, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 02:13, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 11:29, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Nice photo indeed. But ethically i can't agree to this photo. Exploiting innocence of indigenous people. Sorry --Shagil Kannur (talk) 14:41, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Who? The photographer? The "scarifierperson"? ★ 16:29, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Scarification may be a part of their culture and tradition. I just expressed my misgivings on exposing these kind of people in public. It's just my opinion. --Shagil Kannur (talk) 16:47, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Who? The photographer? The "scarifierperson"? ★ 16:29, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- With "in public" you mean on Commons, I guess, because they are proud of it and show it in public in their country all the time. Poco a poco (talk) 17:47, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Yea, of course. They are proud of it, they must. They are innocent. --Shagil Kannur (talk) 18:52, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- That's your take, I don't share it at all. I see an interesting tradition here, not a person who is innocent Poco a poco (talk) 19:10, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- I checked the case using Google and Wikipedia. The place is some 180 km from Juba, the capital town, it is definitely not a city like London or Tokyo, but it is a town of 490 000+ population, it has airport, banks, schools and university, telecommunication company, TV and shops of electronics, churches of several confessions, etc. There is a school and a clinic in Kimotong. So, I do not think that they are so innocent to not understand the consequences of photography. And I agree that the photo has documentary value and encyclopedic value. LexKurochkin (talk) 07:00, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Excuse me, but do you believe to know better than me where I was? it was not in the city of Kimotong, but a remote village in the province. And that's precisely why we went there. It was not a photo tour behind a mall in Juba. There is no shops, no current, no telecom, no transport or something like that in the area. The closest water well could be 1 hour away by foot. Telling this wiöl surely make no difference and people will believe whatever they want, but whatsoever. Poco a poco (talk) 07:24, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- I did not pretend to know the place better than you, as I said clearly, I just used Google and Wkipedia. I tryed to understand. And, actually, you told us your vision of the place only in this particular post. LexKurochkin (talk) 08:54, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Excuse me, but do you believe to know better than me where I was? it was not in the city of Kimotong, but a remote village in the province. And that's precisely why we went there. It was not a photo tour behind a mall in Juba. There is no shops, no current, no telecom, no transport or something like that in the area. The closest water well could be 1 hour away by foot. Telling this wiöl surely make no difference and people will believe whatever they want, but whatsoever. Poco a poco (talk) 07:24, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- With "in public" you mean on Commons, I guess, because they are proud of it and show it in public in their country all the time. Poco a poco (talk) 17:47, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Have you ever heard about documentary photography? ★ 20:26, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Can you ask the same to those people?--Shagil Kannur (talk) 06:22, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- I think, yes, considering my other comment. Actually, there are not too many places of that grade of innocence nowadays. May be somewhere deep in jungle, but not only 180 km from their capital. LexKurochkin (talk) 07:03, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- 180 km without any transport means (or public transport options) and with no asphalt roads (a 4x4 is required) is not what you may think of (definitely not a 1 and a half hours smooth drive). In fact, wit a 4x4 we couldn't drive often faster than 30 km/h Poco a poco (talk) 07:26, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- There are of course different degrees of innocense, but i seriously doubt that she is aware of how people with a scarification fetish will use this photo. --Cart (talk) 14:03, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- To oppose on the grounds that the person depicted is 'innocent' is patronising. Seems a high quality, respectful, documentary image to me. Part of a very valuable and impressive set of images from Poco. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:20, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- I believe that you need to know Africa to judge images like this one. Best regards from Amboseli :) Poco a poco (talk) 15:21, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- I'm African and this is very wrong. Wolverine XI 16:02, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- Can you please elaborate that? black Africa really?? Poco a poco (talk) 16:23, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- It's complicated. I'm part American, part European but mostly Sub-Saharan African. Wolverine XI 03:41, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- And Real Madrid fan? you're good ;) At least we have that in common Poco a poco (talk) 03:58, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- I'm still new to the game, having only started to support Real Madrid in October or November of 2021. Coming back to what matters, Poco a poco, having lived in Africa for more than 17 years, I am the best person to understand the mindset of black Africans. My biggest problem is that you're photographing a naked black woman, probably the most discriminated group in the world. White people will never understand black people, and that's okay. Looking at this picture makes me feel ashamed to be black. I should just stop talking now. Wolverine XI 11:18, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- And I believe in the motto of Wikipedia, where every single person on the planet is given free access to the sum of all human knowledge. That's what Wikipedia is about. I don't understand why an affected party of an issue should be the best person to talk about it. Most people in those remoted villages of South Sudan walked around naked, that's how things are there, and they love scarification too and show it proudly. We were all the time with a lot of local guides who know the area, the people and the customs. --Poco a poco (talk) 15:17, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- I'm still new to the game, having only started to support Real Madrid in October or November of 2021. Coming back to what matters, Poco a poco, having lived in Africa for more than 17 years, I am the best person to understand the mindset of black Africans. My biggest problem is that you're photographing a naked black woman, probably the most discriminated group in the world. White people will never understand black people, and that's okay. Looking at this picture makes me feel ashamed to be black. I should just stop talking now. Wolverine XI 11:18, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- And Real Madrid fan? you're good ;) At least we have that in common Poco a poco (talk) 03:58, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- It's complicated. I'm part American, part European but mostly Sub-Saharan African. Wolverine XI 03:41, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Can you please elaborate that? black Africa really?? Poco a poco (talk) 16:23, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- I'm African and this is very wrong. Wolverine XI 16:02, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- I believe that you need to know Africa to judge images like this one. Best regards from Amboseli :) Poco a poco (talk) 15:21, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- To oppose on the grounds that the person depicted is 'innocent' is patronising. Seems a high quality, respectful, documentary image to me. Part of a very valuable and impressive set of images from Poco. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:20, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- I think, yes, considering my other comment. Actually, there are not too many places of that grade of innocence nowadays. May be somewhere deep in jungle, but not only 180 km from their capital. LexKurochkin (talk) 07:03, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Can you ask the same to those people?--Shagil Kannur (talk) 06:22, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Who is "innocent" or "guilty" on Earth? No idea. But she has a striking look and wonderful colorful jewelry -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:34, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- By striking look, you mean...what? Is it what I think it is? Wolverine XI 11:19, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- She has a striking sight, powerful eyes. Great portrait. The previous nomination was also excellent -- Basile Morin (talk) 13:58, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 06:44, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 15:44, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose No, no, no. How do they even allow you to capture them like this. These people don't know where their photos are going, they think you just came to visit them or something. Per above, this is exploitation. I'm highly disappointed. Wolverine XI 15:54, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Sweets-Jamin-Store-2024.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 May 2024 at 19:30:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Food and drink#Sweet food
- Info all by Tuxyso -- Tuxyso (talk) 19:30, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Tuxyso (talk) 19:30, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support This makes me hungry. --SHB2000 (talk) 23:01, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 23:06, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:06, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Might go to Apeldoorn just to eat the sweets. -- WildMouse76 (talk) 01:42, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --iMahesh (talk) 05:47, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 08:31, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Composition, subject -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:15, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 11:29, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 05:31, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Arrangement of colours. – Aristeas (talk) 10:18, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 14:21, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 15:21, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:44, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:10, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 11:25, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Wow. I like how the bottom row of signs is entirely visible. Toadspike (talk) 16:35, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Good colors, but this image could be better, hence the weak support. Wolverine XI 15:48, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- You should elaborate your comments when you see a weakness in an image. Poco a poco (talk) 17:36, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 17:36, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 19:54, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Close wing moisture sucking and peeing activity of Papilio krishna (Moore, 1858) - Krishna Peacock (2) WLB.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 May 2024 at 03:56:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Papilionidae (Swallowtails)
- Info created by Anitava Roy - uploaded by Anitava Roy - nominated by Atudu -- Atudu (talk) 03:56, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Atudu (talk) 03:56, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The little brown thing on the right. Wolverine XI 13:44, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Bond Lake winter.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 May 2024 at 23:58:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Canada#Ontario
- Info: three men walking across frozen Bond Lake; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 23:58, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 23:58, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, but Nothing special in the photo,TOUMOU (talk) 08:30, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose It's a nice photo, but the people aren't centered and I'm unsure about the educational/informative value. Toadspike (talk) 16:33, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Moineaux - Sud tunisien.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 May 2024 at 21:34:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Passeridae (Old world sparrows)
- Info A sparrow in southern Tunisia singing created by Skander zarrad - uploaded by Skander zarrad - nominated by TOUMOU -- TOUMOU (talk) 21:34, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- TOUMOU (talk) 21:34, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment FYI that looks like a male Spanish sparrow (Passer hispaniolensis). — Rhododendrites talk | 22:31, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Yes it is , do you want to change the category TOUMOU (talk) 23:35, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Hi TOUMOU, I see that Rhododendrites has helped you with the categories and fixing the description, thanks for that. Documentation of the photo is just as important for FPC as a good image, so take a look at the changes that have been made on the file page. Good information on the file page will always improve your chances of getting a photo promoted to FP, since info makes it more valuable to the Wiki project. Therefore, would you please add the location to the photo too. If you don't know it, please ask the photographer Skander zarrad. I have fixed the gallery link for you. You need to specify both the right page and the section. When you nominate an image here, you become sort of a "temporary caretaker" of that photo, and it's up to you to make sure everything is fixed and correct. Best, --Cart (talk) 10:57, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Done I added the location of the photo, it was taken as part of a photo walk organised during the WLE this year Thank you for your help and suggestion TOUMOU (talk) 11:55, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- thank you
- i will do this for all my photos Skander zarrad (talk) 15:18, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- That is good to hear. :-) You could start with your photo of the flamingos since it is now nominated here. And welcome to FPC! --Cart (talk) 16:28, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Hi TOUMOU, I see that Rhododendrites has helped you with the categories and fixing the description, thanks for that. Documentation of the photo is just as important for FPC as a good image, so take a look at the changes that have been made on the file page. Good information on the file page will always improve your chances of getting a photo promoted to FP, since info makes it more valuable to the Wiki project. Therefore, would you please add the location to the photo too. If you don't know it, please ask the photographer Skander zarrad. I have fixed the gallery link for you. You need to specify both the right page and the section. When you nominate an image here, you become sort of a "temporary caretaker" of that photo, and it's up to you to make sure everything is fixed and correct. Best, --Cart (talk) 10:57, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment It does look like a Spanish sparrow but could easily be a hybrid. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:20, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- This one is a Spanish Sparrow. The breast of hybrids we have in Tunisia looks more like House Sparrow's breast. El Golli Mohamed (talk) 10:57, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment El Golli Mohamed what do you think about this bird, Charlesjsharp Mohamed Golli has great experience with birds in Tunisia TOUMOU (talk) 10:32, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- I am sure he will be right. I was in that part of Tunisia in March with Mohamed-Ali Dhakhli, one of Tunisia's top bird guides and we observed quite a few hybrids; they didn't all look the same; but El Golli Mohamed will know his own birds. Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:01, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 May 2024 at 10:42:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Reliefs
- Info Louvre-Lens Museum Fragment of the Palace of Darius, SB 23177
all by me except the artwork!.--Pierre André (talk) 15:41, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Pierre André (talk) 10:42, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Es-tu certain que la balance des blancs est correcte ici ? L'image semble un peu jaune.
- Are you certain that the white balance is right here? It seems a bit yellow. Yann (talk) 10:27, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Done white balance correction +5 with Gimp software, best regards--Pierre André (talk) 22:29, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Indeed better. So Support --Yann (talk) 09:07, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 21:32, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 06:47, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I don't see anything extraordinary here. In addition, it's not very sharp regarding the featured pictures standards. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 11:51, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- This fragment of the decoration of the palace of the Persian king Darius the Great, is an element taken from the frieze of archers found in the Achaemenid palace of Susa. The work of wall art is made up of glazed bricks with reliefs, of which unfortunately the shine of the enamels used has now decomposed under the effect of time and humidity, which explains why it cannot be very specific regarding the standards of the images presented, best regards.--Pierre André (talk) 16:22, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 May 2024 at 03:38:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Windows
- Info created by Красный - uploaded by Красный - nominated by Красный -- Красный wanna talk? 03:38, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Красный wanna talk? 03:38, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Crop is too tight. Wolverine XI 13:38, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The composition is odd – the top of the tower is cut off, and parts of other things are visible in the background. Toadspike (talk) 16:17, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination Красный wanna talk? 17:26, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 May 2024 at 13:30:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family : Bovidae (Bovids)
- Info No FPs of this species. All by Charlesjsharp-- Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:30, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:30, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support That white mark on his face reminds me something. --iMahesh (talk) 15:10, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- a votive candle? Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:08, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- An anime character from Dragon Ball. --iMahesh (talk) 17:10, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- a votive candle? Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:08, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 19:34, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support I wish I could see more of his left eye, but who cares? -- WildMouse76 (talk) 23:59, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 05:25, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 14:40, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I don't think the crop works, and I wish the left eye was visible. Wolverine XI 15:51, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
File:The copper chaser.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 May 2024 at 14:18:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#People at work
- Info created by IssamBarhoumi - uploaded by IssamBarhoumi - nominated by IssamBarhoumi -- IssamBarhoumi (talk) 14:18, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- IssamBarhoumi (talk) 14:18, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment @IssamBarhoumi: , what is the subject here? The person or his work?. --iMahesh (talk) 15:06, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- dear iMahesh Both of them --IssamBarhoumi (talk) 15:55, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support after the changes in description and file name. Now, its much clear. --iMahesh (talk) 16:50, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- dear iMahesh Both of them --IssamBarhoumi (talk) 15:55, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment dear iMahesh thank you -- IssamBarhoumi 19:45, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
Comments about profession depicted
|
---|
|
- Comment Possible to bring the shadows up just a little? — Rhododendrites talk | 22:41, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support I think it's worth a feature. Good focus on the activity, with artisanal concentration and relatively dimly lit setting for context. Shame about that light in the top-center, though. — Rhododendrites talk | 22:51, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you IssamBarhoumi (talk) 10:21, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 06:33, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The shadows unfortunately. Schierbecker (talk) 02:31, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Dear Shierbecker there is a story behind the shadow: the copper chaser works in front of his shop he let his hands and the copper in the sun light and his head in the shadow when the sun reach his head he enter to his shop. That is why this contrast light shadow is there. IssamBarhoumi (talk) 08:21, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
File:JoseFigueroaAlcorta(AR-MCR.FOWM CM0007).jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 May 2024 at 22:13:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/People#Caricatures
- Info created by Juan Carlos Alonso - uploaded by Mauricio V. Genta - restored/nominated by Ezarate -- Ezarateesteban 22:13, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ezarateesteban 22:13, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Size is not huge, and current version is too far from the original. There are also obvious flaws in this derivative version, like the space in the letter J for example (different color) -- Basile Morin (talk) 07:23, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Too small, and too different from the original. Wolverine XI 13:42, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Small size and too different from the original -- WildMouse76 (talk) 14:17, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- You confuse megapixels with MB. This photo is 1,936 × 2,662 = 5.15 million pixels (pixels, not bytes), so well with in the size guideline. It is 1.82 MB, but that has nothing to do with the guidelines. --Cart (talk) 16:09, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 May 2024 at 10:32:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#People at work
- Info created by IssamBarhoumi - uploaded by IssamBarhoumi - nominated by IssamBarhoumi -- IssamBarhoumi (talk) 10:32, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- IssamBarhoumi (talk) 10:32, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
OpposeScale down version. Yann (talk) 11:01, 22 May 2024 (UTC)- Dear Yann have a look now I improved the scale IssamBarhoumi (talk) 13:54, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- OK. Yann (talk) 14:40, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- Dear Yann have a look now I improved the scale IssamBarhoumi (talk) 13:54, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Busy composition and average light in my view -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:14, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Dear Basile
- I changed the composition with a recorp and the white balance to improve colors and light have a look please. IssamBarhoumi (talk) 15:01, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- This new version has been upscaled from the previous. Pixels and artifacts are now visible. Very poor quality, now. The sky is burnt and there are strong chromatic aberrations in the background -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:25, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination thanks for your comments --IssamBarhoumi (talk) 08:32, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Balbuzard pecheur Lac de Tunis.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 May 2024 at 10:48:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Accipitriformes#Genus : Pandion
- Info created by El Golli Mohamed - uploaded by El Golli Mohamed - nominated by El Golli Mohamed -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 10:48, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 10:48, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 11:27, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great photo! Toadspike (talk) 16:23, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you El Golli Mohamed (talk) 23:24, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:38, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Toadspike. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:08, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 16:30, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 16:31, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 19:54, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:33, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 06:10, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:06, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Llez (talk) 13:20, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 May 2024 at 16:26:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Reptiles#Family : Scincidae (Skinks)
- Info Eighty species in this genus. Just one FP - of a different species. Focus-stacked image. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:26, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:26, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Please keep uploading more of these! -- WildMouse76 (talk) 22:31, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --BigDom (talk) 07:53, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great photo! Toadspike (talk) 16:19, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:37, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 22:09, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support One, two -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:24, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 12:24, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 16:26, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 19:54, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:32, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Llez (talk) 13:21, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:19, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 07:21, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Antïlope acuático (Kobus ellipsiprymnus), parque nacional del Lago Mburo, Uganda, 2024-02-01, DD 25.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 May 2024 at 13:58:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family : Bovidae (Bovids)
- Info Waterbuck (Kobus ellipsiprymnus defassa), Lake Mburo National Park, Uganda. c/u/n Poco a poco (talk) 13:58, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 13:58, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 15:27, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Just uploaded a new crop following Charles's advice.Poco a poco (talk)
- Comment ssp. defassa; quite different from nominate. Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:06, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- Why wrong? species was right, I added now the subspecies Poco a poco (talk) 04:50, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- I didn't say anything was wrong; I just made the comment as this subspecies does not have the white diagnostic ring of white fur on its backside, so doesn't look like a typical waterbuck. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:25, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 11:27, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:38, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --El Golli Mohamed (talk) 17:21, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support High level of detail -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:23, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:34, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 10:30, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 17:46, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 19:54, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:10, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Llez (talk) 13:21, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 22:32, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Jun 2024 at 11:12:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Traditions
- Info all by IssamBarhoumi -- IssamBarhoumi (talk) 11:12, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- IssamBarhoumi (talk) 11:12, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose This might be an interesting picture, but the completely blurred hand is a no-no. A better framing and focusing is needed for FP. Yann (talk) 20:03, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Blurred hand. --SHB2000 (talk) 22:37, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination thanks for your comments --IssamBarhoumi (talk) 23:30, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Pécheur sur son bateau à Kerkennah.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 May 2024 at 07:43:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water transport#Boats
- Info created by Atef Ouni - uploaded by Atef Ouni - nominated by Atef Ouni -- Atef Ouni (talk) 07:43, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Atef Ouni (talk) 07:43, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice effect of infinity with the horizon line disappearing between the water and the sky -- Basile Morin (talk) 07:58, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- iMahesh (talk) 10:59, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 11:12, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Per Basile. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 12:01, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:48, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Out of the ordinary. -- Radomianin (talk) 13:00, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 13:43, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:39, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:52, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Question Could you add geolocation please? Yann (talk) 17:41, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Yann done :) Atef Ouni (talk) 18:55, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Thanks. Yann (talk) 19:39, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Seems not accurate, please check Google Maps. --A.Savin 01:04, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose for now, please address the above. --A.Savin 01:38, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- Hello @A.Savin, I took this picture in a boat aroud Kerkennah, it was around the Island but I don't know the exact gps position. Atef Ouni (talk) 09:36, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- And if you don't know the camera position, you add false coordinates? --A.Savin 09:37, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- I think that having approximate information is better than not having any, I am not trying to mislead anyone and I never intended to put incorrect information. Knowing where Kerkennah is located to locate the boat used, the fisherman and the equipment used is information that could always be useful to any enlightened mind. It was certainly very easy to put the GPS coordinates in the water around Kerkennah but I thought that with a minimum of wit we would understand that the position given is that of the island around which we use these boats. Atef Ouni (talk) 09:59, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- A way of avoiding misinterpretations about the location is to not enter the location using "N-W-degrees-minutes" system {{Location|34°42'0"N|11°10'48"E}} but instead use the decimal numbers rounded down to two decimals {{Location|34.70|11.18}} when you write it in the information box. Yes, the wiki-system will show the coordinates with the N and E, but for anyone who examines what you have written, it will be clear that the coordinates are estimated. This is a practice used by some photographers of endangered species so that they will be left in peace. While somewhat exact coordinates are appreciated for photos like this, I think any effort is better than none. You can also add the reason for the inexact location to the 'description' on the file page. --Cart (talk) 11:10, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- I think that having approximate information is better than not having any, I am not trying to mislead anyone and I never intended to put incorrect information. Knowing where Kerkennah is located to locate the boat used, the fisherman and the equipment used is information that could always be useful to any enlightened mind. It was certainly very easy to put the GPS coordinates in the water around Kerkennah but I thought that with a minimum of wit we would understand that the position given is that of the island around which we use these boats. Atef Ouni (talk) 09:59, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- And if you don't know the camera position, you add false coordinates? --A.Savin 09:37, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- Hello @A.Savin, I took this picture in a boat aroud Kerkennah, it was around the Island but I don't know the exact gps position. Atef Ouni (talk) 09:36, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose for now, please address the above. --A.Savin 01:38, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Yann done :) Atef Ouni (talk) 18:55, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 19:52, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 00:02, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 10:11, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 15:17, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Spectacular Toadspike (talk) 16:47, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Really like the rippled reflection of the quant pole. BigDom (talk) 12:19, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 19:54, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:43, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
File:027 Atlantic puffin in flight with mouth full of fishes Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 May 2024 at 11:22:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Genus : Fratercula
- Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 11:22, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 11:22, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- -donald- (talk) 12:49, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support I was initially going to nominate this picture. Thanks! -- WildMouse76 (talk) 14:04, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:00, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very nice photo! Educational value is clear. Toadspike (talk) 16:08, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ivar (talk) 17:01, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great capture, Giles! -- Radomianin (talk) 21:05, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --TOUMOU (talk) 22:07, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 22:22, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great capture of the head and great catch of fishes by the bird :-) Excellent angle. Difficult shot -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:41, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 01:38, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --BigDom (talk) 09:24, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 10:29, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 12:19, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support —Bruce1eetalk 14:58, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good job Poco a poco (talk) 15:15, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 17:43, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 19:53, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 02:47, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:26, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Llez (talk) 13:23, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:18, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Meiræ 12:58, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 21:24, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 07:21, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Tanner at work, Medina of Marrakesh.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 May 2024 at 17:15:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#People at work
- Info Tanner at work, Medina of Marrakesh. My shot. --Mile (talk) 17:15, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mile (talk) 17:15, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Nice photo! Are you sure he is a tanner or has there been a simple mix-up in the translation? A tanner is someone who process the raw hides into leather, a very hazardous and revolting job. After that the leather goes to a currier who dyes and prepare the leather before it can be made into different things by a leather worker. Traditionally, such craftsmen are called "saddlers" even if they make other things from leather than saddles. Perhaps he performs all three professions and we only see one of them (leather working) here in the photo. Love the cat! :-) --Cart (talk) 17:46, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Only until file name is changed as pointed out by Cart. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:49, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Nice photo! Are you sure he is a tanner or has there been a simple mix-up in the translation? A tanner is someone who process the raw hides into leather, a very hazardous and revolting job. After that the leather goes to a currier who dyes and prepare the leather before it can be made into different things by a leather worker. Traditionally, such craftsmen are called "saddlers" even if they make other things from leather than saddles. Perhaps he performs all three professions and we only see one of them (leather working) here in the photo. Love the cat! :-) --Cart (talk) 17:46, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 17:42, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 01:31, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 08:07, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support good Ezarateesteban 15:16, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:23, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Amazing. Riad Salih (talk) 17:17, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support TOUMOU (talk) 21:43, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 08:04, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Composition, angle of view, cat and chair -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:18, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Basile. – Aristeas (talk) 10:12, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 15:18, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:50, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Pierre André (talk) 21:52, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:05, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 19:54, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --GRDN711 (talk) 13:15, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Arc Diana Veteranorum.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 May 2024 at 21:09:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Algeria (no such section exists yet)
- Info created by Blackmysterieux - uploaded by Blackmysterieux - nominated by Riad Salih -- Riad Salih (talk) 21:09, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Riad Salih (talk) 21:09, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose because of the sheeps -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:16, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 May 2024 at 11:11:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family : Carcharhinidae (Requiem Sharks)
- Info created by Bernard Dupont, uploaded by Helmy oved, nominated by Yann
- Info Great White Shark (Carcharodon carcharias), The Shallows, Gansbaai, Western Cape, South Africa
- Support -- Yann (talk) 11:11, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I don't think it's quite there yet. The shot is fine but you can feel that something is missing. Having said that, I won't comment on the crop. Wolverine XI 13:50, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Wolverine XI I don't mean to badger, but I don't think this image was cropped – at least, I don't see anything on its file page. Am I missing something? Toadspike (talk) 16:12, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- The word "crop" can also mean "framing" in photography terms. No actual cutting of the image needs to have been made. It simply refers to the way the photographer has selected the scene. Since you are new here (like you wrote on another nom), there might be photo terms that are unfamiliar to you. You find most of them at COM:PT. --Cart (talk) 19:16, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Poor crop. --SHB2000 (talk) 10:29, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Yann (talk) 08:25, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Acacia in Ein Khadra Desert Oasis 00 (137).jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 May 2024 at 09:56:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Egypt
- Info created by ولاء - uploaded by ولاء - nominated by Wolverine XI -- Wolverine XI 09:56, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Lovely Acacia tree in the middle of nowhere. Wolverine XI 09:56, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Not exceptional for an FP. --SHB2000 (talk) 10:28, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- Do whatever feels right to you. I don't mind. Wolverine XI 14:52, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- Question Nice picture. Could you please add geolocation? Thanks, Yann (talk) 20:08, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Un ramasseur de sel dans les marais salants d'El Abassia à kerkennah - tunisie.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 May 2024 at 19:21:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#People at work
- Info created by Skander zarrad| - uploaded by Skander zarrad| - nominated by Skander zarrad -- Skander zarrad (talk) 19:21, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Skander zarrad (talk) 19:21, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Expressive photo, but I don't like the colors. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 02:45, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- thank you, and yet these are indeed the colors of the salt marsh Skander zarrad (talk) 06:08, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- I know right. Wolverine XI 11:24, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- thank you, and yet these are indeed the colors of the salt marsh Skander zarrad (talk) 06:08, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Does "unconfirmed" mean I can still vote on this? it's a great photo Henrysz (talk) 23:17, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 May 2024 at 17:59:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Italy
- Info created by dllu - uploaded by dllu - nominated by Dllu -- dllu (t,c) 17:59, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Late blue hour photo. Compare with Category:Remote views of Santa Maria del Fiore (Florence) at night. dllu (t,c) 17:59, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- Info The original upload had some vignetting and slight CA. I've replaced it with a version with better vignetting correction and CA correction. dllu (t,c) 16:51, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 19:53, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 22:43, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very high resolution, special light -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:06, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Basile. Unique mood and excellent quality. -- Radomianin (talk) 05:41, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Question Is it possible to remove the red and green CAs, especially in the area of the dome ? --Llez (talk) 13:28, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Fixed I uploaded a new version with CA correction. Thanks! dllu (t,c) 16:49, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 05:24, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 22:23, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 09:02, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:32, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 16:19, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:20, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Famberhorst (talk) 16:54, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:33, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Chepry (talk) 17:32, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
File:003 Olive-bellied Sunbird in flight at Kibale forest National Park Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Jun 2024 at 02:02:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/In_their_habitats#Birds in wooded areas
- Info Cinnyris chloropygius (Olive-bellied sunbird) flying from a flower to another. We can see the bird looking at the flower on the right to choose it before landing on it. Created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 02:02, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 02:02, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Super.--Ermell (talk) 22:19, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 23:27, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Meiræ 12:57, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 14:44, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
Support It's difficult to do nothing because you never know when you're done. Wolverine XI 16:00, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- May I ask what all these one-liners/fortune-cookie-quotes you are delivering are about? They don't seem very relevant as assessments of the photo to me, or am I missing something? --Cart (talk) 17:42, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- It was just another episode. I don't know what happened, all I remember was that I wasn't feeling well, so I grabbed my phone and typed a lot of nonsense while sitting in the corner. I wasn't drunk, I just zoned out for a little while, and typed my thoughts here. I think I must have been insane or something. Wolverine XI 04:17, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Ok, but if you had an episode while you did all these votes, wouldn't it be better if you went back to the votes and re-examined them all? Perhaps replace the nonsense with more relevant evaluations of the photos. --Cart (talk) 10:24, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- I'm not in the proper frame of mind to carry that out. Wolverine XI 14:00, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry to hear that you are unwell. In the meantime, I think it would be best if you just striked out your votes for now, and then you can come back later when you feel better. --Cart (talk) 15:31, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comments striken. Only two months after coming back, I suppose I'll have to take another five months off. Upon receiving approval from my roommate, I will proceed with editing in less complex areas. This has been an issue for me for a few months, but things are improving. Wolverine XI 06:59, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you. I wish you all the best for your recovery. --Cart (talk) 08:25, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Best wishes of recovery to you Wolverine 🍀 -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:38, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you. I wish you all the best for your recovery. --Cart (talk) 08:25, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comments striken. Only two months after coming back, I suppose I'll have to take another five months off. Upon receiving approval from my roommate, I will proceed with editing in less complex areas. This has been an issue for me for a few months, but things are improving. Wolverine XI 06:59, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry to hear that you are unwell. In the meantime, I think it would be best if you just striked out your votes for now, and then you can come back later when you feel better. --Cart (talk) 15:31, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- I'm not in the proper frame of mind to carry that out. Wolverine XI 14:00, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Ok, but if you had an episode while you did all these votes, wouldn't it be better if you went back to the votes and re-examined them all? Perhaps replace the nonsense with more relevant evaluations of the photos. --Cart (talk) 10:24, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- May I ask what all these one-liners/fortune-cookie-quotes you are delivering are about? They don't seem very relevant as assessments of the photo to me, or am I missing something? --Cart (talk) 17:42, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Composition with the plants, and animal well frozen in flight -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:59, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:35, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:58, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 06:57, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Famberhorst (talk) 16:52, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Unusual BIF shot. --Tagooty (talk) 03:06, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 04:19, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:32, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 12:47, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Chepry (talk) 17:31, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Wonderful. FP of the year, sure.--Shagil Kannur (talk) 04:37, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Purple martin in flight (30977).jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 May 2024 at 23:36:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Hirundinidae_(Swallows)
- Info Purple martin in flight, slowing down as it approaches its nest. Spent a long time try to get a sharp photo of these very fast birds -- I was happy with this one.
Note: I tried something with the sky that I haven't attempted before, pulling a cloud from another shot taken at the same place at the same time from roughly the same direction. I don't know if that's too much retouching for FPC, but erring on the side of disclosure (it didn't affect the bird itself -- just improved the background a little). all by — Rhododendrites talk | 23:36, 18 May 2024 (UTC) - Support — Rhododendrites talk | 23:36, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good job TOUMOU (talk) 08:27, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I feel quite strongly that replacing sky is not acceptable for FP. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:07, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support After spending a couple of hours (unsuccessfully) trying to get a decent shot of flying swallows, I understand your plights, great work! I have no issue with the replaced sky, since it is clearly mentioned. --Julesvernex2 (talk)
- Support as per Julesvernex2. -- Radomianin (talk) 20:39, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment It is mentioned but that doesn't make it acceptable. We can't go around replacing backgrounds. Where would that stop? Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:09, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- Why can't we? Restricting FP to the rules of photojournalism and photo contests would leave out a bunch of interesting candidates. Julesvernex2 (talk) 21:40, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- You have never manipulated a background (or a foreground)? All of the out-of-focus twigs, distracting leaves, bird/bug-specks in the background, etc. that you've photographed -- you've never removed them? Pay no mind to extraordinary feats of AI-enabled sharpening, AI-based denoising, selective tone adjustments, and all other manner of post-processing, but add a cloud (a cloud in the sky at that place and at that time, even) and all of a sudden I've crossed a bright line? I'm not saying it shouldn't matter -- I know it'll go against some people's sensibilities, which is why I highlighted it in the nomination statement, and anyone is free to oppose if they wish -- but this Arbiter of What's Acceptable stuff is too much. — Rhododendrites talk | 21:51, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- Technically, any panorama which includes sky and clouds will have several spots in the sky where parts are from other neighboring photos, so in fact replaced and often tweaked/reshaped by the processing program to look nice. I can guarantee that the sky never looked exactly like in this image, because it is a product of the program that stitched the panorama. We accept that without question because they are declared as panoramas and we know they are "manipulated". As long as the alteration is openly declared in a very clear manner (which has been made here), I see no problem with entering such photos here at FPC. It's just a matter of classification, and in each case votes can decide how much they are willing to tolerate in an FPC. Ideally it would be great if the original was found in the file's upload history so that we can see each step, I think that would help people decide how they are going to vote. In this case, I suspect there is no great difference. --Cart (talk) 22:17, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- For good measure, I've uploaded the version before the sky adjustment and reverted. Note that the uploaded file is also before another pass at tone adjustments/white balancing so it looks slightly different in other [more mundane] ways. — Rhododendrites talk | 22:40, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- It is indeed a small but surprisingly effective change! A small nitpick: those beautiful steel blue feathers above the eyes got quite a bit duller after the tonal adjustments. Julesvernex2 (talk) 12:18, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- For good measure, I've uploaded the version before the sky adjustment and reverted. Note that the uploaded file is also before another pass at tone adjustments/white balancing so it looks slightly different in other [more mundane] ways. — Rhododendrites talk | 22:40, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 22:33, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I agree with Charles that heavy-handed manipulations (like sky replacements) applied to images which will be used in a context where the audience can expect a realistic depiction of the subject shouldn't be featured here. As image manipulations seem to come up more often these days, there might be a need for a more in-depth discussion about what's ok and what's not. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 04:51, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- A discussion has been opened on the FPC talk page. --Cart (talk) 12:07, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- The "heavy-handed manipulation" didn't change the subject at all, so if the point is to ensure a photo of a martin looks like a martin that's irrelevant here. If it's to ensure a martin could be seen in front of a realistic background, the fact that it's the same sky from the same place/time would seem pretty realistic. So what's left is an arbitrary line whereby using AI to manipulate an image's noise/sharpness, stitching images, using content-aware fill, outright removing pieces like disturbing plants and smears, etc. is acceptable and this is not. I would feel less strongly about this if people just said "it offends my photographer's sensibilities in ways that a wide range of other manipulations and 'unrealities' do not" rather than act as though this is unrealistic but the rest of what we see at FPC is completely realistic. — Rhododendrites talk | 13:51, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support I'm fairly new to this but I think the concerns about the background are overblown. It's a great photo and probably took a lot of patience and effort to make. Toadspike (talk) 16:32, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I have no particular objection to the addition of the cloud in the background, so long as the effect is realistic and the modification is clearly stated. @Rhododendrites: Anyhow, what was your aim? What effect were you looking for? From an estetic point of view, both pictures are valuable, but, according to me, the original one is sharper and has better colors. --Harlock81 (talk) 17:11, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per above Poco a poco (talk) 17:26, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support I have no problem with the cloud. it does not harm the subject (the bird) in my opinion.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:41, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Not really sharp but bird posture in flight is difficult to achieve El Golli Mohamed (talk) 19:46, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:28, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
File:White ibis (10268).jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 May 2024 at 23:04:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Pelecaniformes#Family : Threskiornithidae (Ibises and Spoonbills)
- Info White ibis. For some reason, a flock of white ibis has started nesting in this weird spot in New Jersey, hundreds of miles north of their usual range. I took many photos, but like this one for the way the sunlit leaves kind of vignette the bird -- kind of like a zoo shot (but it's wild). all by — Rhododendrites talk | 23:04, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 23:04, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Hmm. No action on this yet. I'm a little surprised because I'm quite happy with the natural "vignetting". It looks perhaps a little busy as a thumbnail -- would recommend viewing at full size. We'll see. :) — Rhododendrites talk | 22:01, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: I think a portrait crop would work better. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:08, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks. I played with crops a bit -- perhaps a square crop, even -- but with a portrait you lose the "vignetting" that I like so much. It's possible it's just me that likes that, though. :) Would be curious to hear additional opinions before offering an alternative. — Rhododendrites talk | 17:30, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 11:25, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support A square crop would be definitely better Poco a poco (talk) 17:31, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
Alternative
[edit]- Info Offering a crop per above. — Rhododendrites talk | 12:38, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support (second choice) — Rhododendrites talk | 12:38, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Pinging participants: @The Cosmonaut, Giles Laurent, and Poco a poco: — Rhododendrites talk | 12:38, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:10, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 15:21, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 16:24, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Thanks to Poco for the suggestion and Rhododendrites for providing the improved version. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:53, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 23:30, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 01:04, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 21:50, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:27, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 May 2024 at 19:49:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Statues outdoors
- Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 19:49, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 19:49, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 10:05, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 23:27, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Support Everyone is a moon and has a dark side, which they try to hide from others. Wolverine XI 16:07, 24 May 2024 (UTC)- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:33, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 06:56, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --RodRabelo7 (talk) 10:14, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:20, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Famberhorst (talk) 16:53, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 21:57, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 04:26, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 04:23, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Jun 2024 at 21:09:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family : Felidae (Felids)
- Info All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:09, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:09, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Noisy background. --SHB2000 (talk) 01:18, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- I assume noisy = cluttered. Do you think this one is better for FPC? Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:18, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Will nominate the other image instead. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:59, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Jun 2024 at 12:56:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#China
- Info Interior of Beijing Daxing International Airport, China. Created and uploaded by Arne Müseler - nominated by ★ -- ★ 12:56, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ★ 12:56, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 21:46, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Good composition, but please have a look to (minor) CAs. --XRay 💬 07:19, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Fixable? ★ 13:00, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination ★ 12:30, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Jun 2024 at 12:56:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#China
- Info created by George N - uploaded by Wxmarshall - nominated by ★ -- ★ 12:56, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ★ 12:56, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Would like to see a better image description including location information (prefer GPS coordinates) and what the house on the hill is. --GRDN711 (talk) 13:13, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- W.carter already did it. Thanks! ★ 15:56, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- Question Is there a boycott against me? ★ 14:05, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Maybe against China? ★ 20:22, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment The building is straight but the horizon looks tilted, no? BigDom (talk) 01:01, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination ★ 12:29, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Duisburg, Landschaftspark Duisburg-Nord, Hochofen 5, Halle -- 2024 -- 4164 (kreativ 4).jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 May 2024 at 07:15:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo_techniques/Styles_and_Techniques#Intentional camera movement (ICM)
- Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay 💬 07:15, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Info It's probably (once again) a somewhat daring nomination, but I really like the picture. That was ultimately the deciding factor for the nomination. The motif is a simple gate in the Duisburg-Nord Landscape Park. The basis for this photo was taken using the ICM technique. This photo was enhanced in color and an additional layer was added with the mirrored photo. The two resulting layers were blended together. I lack the courage to nominate an even more intense version. ;-) --XRay 💬 07:15, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- XRay 💬 07:15, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose If it was an original photograph, it would have been interesting, but it seems to be 100% symmetrical at a pixel level through the vertical axis, which means it is more digitally composed (like two parts copy-pasted on a software) than natural. Something abstract, but too far from a real photograph or a real subject. Moreover, the appearance looks weird around the yellow lines, there are kind of artifacts, and this rupture is very visible, as if there were different layers. Overall the result is not very aesthetic, in my opinion. Sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:09, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support nah, I think it's quite cool that you [Xray] were able to create this effect. --SHB2000 (talk) 05:43, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 18:51, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Could you please change the name and the description of this image? It's just not a photo of the “rolling gate at blast furnace 5 in the Duisburg-Nord Landscape Park”, it's photo art based on a picture of that rolling gate. Best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 04:55, 21 May 2024 (UTC) P.S. I like your photo art projects!
- Thank you and good hint. I'll fix the description of this and all my other photo art pictures within the next days. --XRay 💬 06:04, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Danke! Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 16:33, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support but I like the other photo (which takes courage) better.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:36, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Impressive collage that reminds me a bit of the effect of a kaleidoscope telescope from my childhood. Thanks for the formal changes to properly identify the image. -- Radomianin (talk) 05:37, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:03, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Llez (talk) 13:18, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 05:22, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Meiræ 17:02, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 12:46, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Lactarius resimus Груздь настоящий.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 May 2024 at 14:31:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Fungi#Family : Russulaceae
- Info created by Avustfel - uploaded by Avustfel - nominated by Красный -- Красный wanna talk? 14:31, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Красный wanna talk? 14:31, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:41, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Amazing shot. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 02:48, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Llez (talk) 13:19, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Meiræ 13:01, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:17, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 08:07, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:54, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Decollage d'un groupe de flamants roses.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 May 2024 at 14:58:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Phoenicopteridae (Flamingos)
- Info created by Skander zarrad - uploaded by Skander zarrad - nominated by Skander zarrad -- Skander zarrad (talk) 14:58, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Skander zarrad (talk) 14:58, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Too bad for the crop. Wolverine XI 13:47, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- for the crop? Skander zarrad (talk) 13:59, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:38, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose No problem with the crop but I'd expect that at least a bunch of them are sharp Poco a poco (talk) 16:30, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Cercopiteco tántalo (Chlorocebus tantalus), parque nacional del Lago Mburo, Uganda, 2024-02-01, DD 88.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Jun 2024 at 04:34:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family : Cercopithecidae (Old World Monkeys)
- Info Tantalus monkey (Chlorocebus tantalus), Lake Mburo National Park, Uganda Poco a poco (talk) 04:34, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 04:34, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --GRDN711 (talk) 13:04, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 13:04, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
Oppose We need the full picture. Remind me to elaborate more on this; I gotta deal with somebody. Wolverine XI 16:24, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- What kind of feedback is that? what do you miss? The image has been cropped Poco a poco (talk) 16:59, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- Question. What do you mean Wolverine? The crop made is perfectly acceptable. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:02, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- I don't know what happened. Please give me a break. Wolverine XI 04:24, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- If you don't know what happened, perhaps you could remove your oppose vote? Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:53, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- You mean that the image was not loaded properly and you made your assessment based on that? Well, then I'm with Charles, I ask for a reassessment Poco a poco (talk) 14:40, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Striking out the votes in that case? See also here. It doesn't make sense -- Basile Morin (talk) 15:01, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Please respond Wolverine. Your vote doesn't look good unless you clarify. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:35, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Chsrles, the issue does not only apply to this nom, I haven't seen something like this before. We need a measure and maybe even a policy saying that if you don't have a clear mind you shouldn't edit otherwise edits will be revertrd and a ban placed Poco a poco (talk) 04:31, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Or, we could use common sense and just ask nicely first. And whaddayou know, it worked. --Cart (talk) 08:49, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Agreed. Why go punitive needlessly? SHB2000 (talk) 10:42, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Or, we could use common sense and just ask nicely first. And whaddayou know, it worked. --Cart (talk) 08:49, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- (sigh) Comment is down and I am out. Wolverine XI 07:03, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- FPC users urgently need therapy… ★ 12:46, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- (sigh) Comment is down and I am out. Wolverine XI 07:03, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Question. What do you mean Wolverine? The crop made is perfectly acceptable. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:02, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 21:41, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support I don't know what Wolverine sees in that image. It looks fine to me. -- WildMouse76 (talk) 22:00, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:41, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 19:45, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:43, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support but I would recommend to use a faster shutter speed because 1/200s was too slow to correctly freeze the subject that was moving : there is visible motion blur on one of the arms and also a bit on one of the legs -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:21, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 04:01, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Chepry (talk) 17:29, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Jun 2024 at 22:54:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Muscicapidae (Old World Flycatchers)
- Info created by El Golli Mohamed - uploaded by El Golli Mohamed - nominated by El Golli Mohamed -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 22:54, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 22:54, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 10:23, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
Support My name is Wolverine XI, but you can call me any time. Wolverine XI 15:53, 24 May 2024 (UTC)- Thank you El Golli Mohamed (talk) 18:48, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 21:43, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support May be a touch too dark. --XRay 💬 07:19, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:36, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:37, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 06:59, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:21, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Famberhorst (talk) 16:48, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak Support Acceptable light and a little bit grainy, anyway the final result at my eyes is delicious. --Terragio67 (talk) 04:11, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:29, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support seems like it could be brightened a bit without much issue — Rhododendrites talk | 12:50, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Chepry (talk) 17:29, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 17:17, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Цветная ящерица.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Jun 2024 at 07:18:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Reptiles#Family : Agamidae (Dragon Lizards)
- Info created and uploaded by Ezra Sheyner - nominated by Красный -- Красный wanna talk? 07:18, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Красный wanna talk? 07:18, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support if it possible can you add the location of the photo--Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 09:29, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- Sadly, author is mostly uncontactable (we tried when he was a winner of WLE 2022 in Kazakhstan) and the most precise location possible is in categories. Красный wanna talk? 09:55, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
Support If only... Wolverine XI 15:47, 24 May 2024 (UTC)- Support --Ermell (talk) 21:38, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 01:29, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Sharp and colourful --Tagooty (talk) 04:08, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great capture - not everything has to be created with focus stacking. -- Radomianin (talk) 20:41, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 00:41, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:00, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:22, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 03:46, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:34, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Chepry (talk) 17:28, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:32, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 23:49, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Jun 2024 at 20:33:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Ploceidae (Weavers)
- Info No FPs of this species. I think the garden tree may be an exotic. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:33, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:33, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 23:27, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Question Isn't this your third nomination? Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Leopard (Panthera pardus pardus) young female Kruger 2.jpg and Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lilac-breasted roller (Coracias caudatus) Kruger.jpg are both active at the moment. --SHB2000 (talk) 07:08, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- I've placed a tentative {{FPD}}, though anyone is free to take this nomination over. --SHB2000 (talk) 07:09, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- I created the page last night but did not add it here. Charlesjsharp (talk) 07:33, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Well, you shouldn't create a new nomination until one of your two active is done, not just because someone might find it and add it (like what happened here) but mostly because having a nom waiting in the pipeline will shorten the time for your nom and that is rigging the game if it's done on purpose. The voting time starts when you create a nom, not when you add it to the FPC list, and by creating it in advance you are in effect shaving off time on this voting platform until it closes. --Cart (talk) 08:57, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Nomination denied. Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines because only two active nominations per user are allowed. |
I withdraw my nomination Even though I didn't put it here, I guess I can withdraw it and restart the nomination. And of course I wasn't rigging the game as Cart implies above. Since the FPC rules state "The voting period is 9 complete days counted from the nomination", I suggest you change this wording. 'Nomination' to me means when I add it to the FPC nomination page, not when I prepare the page. And please place a warning on the FPC nomination page to stop others getting their next FP nomination ready in advance like I did. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:08, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- There is already a warning on every nomination page, it's that timestamp that is clearly visible right below the heading saying "Voting period ends on 6 Jun 2024 at 20:33:26 (UTC)". That time is set the second you click on 'Publish' on the nomination page, not when you add it to the FPC list. What is so hard about creating a nomination page that you have to do it so long in advance? --Cart (talk) 21:26, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Jun 2024 at 12:30:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Bones and fossils#Family : Callitrichidae
- Info Black-tufted marmoset (Callithrix penicillata). Taxidermy specimen of a marmoset on display at the Museum of Veterinary Anatomy FMVZ USP. Created by Museum of Veterinary Anatomy FMVZ USP / Wagner Souza e Silva - uploaded by Joalpe - nominated by ★ -- ★ 12:30, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Another one from The Tortured Brazilian Users Department. -- ★ 12:30, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination FPC users don't like the tortured Joalpe's photos. ★ 19:09, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Jun 2024 at 12:30:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Black and White#Natural scenes
- Info created and uploaded by Luiz.A.G.Rolim - nominated by ★ -- ★ 12:30, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ★ 12:30, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cool textures Henrysz (talk) 23:22, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Underexposed -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:40, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Fixed. ★ 14:13, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination Increasing exposure made the noise in the sky more visible. ★ 19:17, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Jun 2024 at 17:24:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Greece
- Info created and uploaded by Spirosparas - nominated by WildMouse76 -- WildMouse76 (talk) 17:24, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 17:24, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Question Unedited moon? ★ 00:00, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- @ArionStar Check metadata WildMouse76 (talk) 04:30, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Question How would the metadata reveal if the moon has been edited in Photoshop? 07:22, 28 May 2024 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Charlesjsharp (talk • contribs)
- Charlesjsharp, the moon is one of those things that is very constant at various locations, but with the same camera settings. The size here is ok for 70 mm lens and the moon phase is right, but the exposure time of 10/1 sec will give you a brighter moon. This moon looks like it's been taken with a shorter exposure time, so that's probably a partial HDR. Not a "terrible" photoshopping in my view, but people can be sensitive to such things. Compare with a photo of a full moon with similar settings that I know is just one shot. --Cart (talk) 13:23, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks, very helpful. Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:09, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination Going to assume the Moon was photoshopped. -- WildMouse76 (talk) 07:25, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Avefría senegalesa (Vanellus senegallus), parque nacional del Lago Mburo, Uganda, 2024-02-01, DD 61.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Jun 2024 at 04:06:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Genus : Vanellus
- Info African wattled lapwing (Vanellus senegallus), Lake Mburo National Park, Uganda. This species of unmistakable bird is a common breeder in wet lowland habitats, especially damp grassland. It often feeds in drier habitats picking insects and other invertebrates from the ground. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 04:06, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 04:06, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Chepry (talk) 17:24, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 00:07, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose A lot of noise on feathers and nothing memorable in lights or colours. Looking at the category there're few better photos of the same species, like this one by Charlesjsharp. Красный wanna talk? 07:46, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- I've applied some denoising Poco a poco (talk) 18:09, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The bird does not stand out from the background. —kallerna (talk) 07:13, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination Ok, not convinced either, I take it back. Thanks. Poco a poco (talk) 14:16, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Jun 2024 at 03:25:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Spheniscidae (Penguins)
- Info created and uploaded by Godot13 - nominated by WildMouse76 -- WildMouse76 (talk) 03:25, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 03:25, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Good snapshot, but unfortunately the main subject is quite blurred at full screen. -- Radomianin (talk) 12:21, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I would be happy to take this photo, but I don't think it's quite up to snuff for FP. I think this photo from Godot13 has a better shot of being promoted (with some minor edits). — Rhododendrites talk | 12:58, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination -- WildMouse76 (talk) 14:34, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Jun 2024 at 20:38:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Arachnida (there are no FPs of scorpions at all)
- InfoScorpion(Buthus paris) in El Feija National Park in Tunisia, I want to add this the first photo of this species in commons created by Slim Alileche - uploaded by Slim Alileche - nominated by TOUMOU -- Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 20:38, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 20:38, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Question {{Retouched}} picture? There is not metadata. Also artifacts or weird aspect around the claws. I don't think the quality is sufficient for FP -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:11, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- I hope Slim Alileche has another version of the photo with the metadata, and can fix it --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 09:49, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Strong overprocessed. -- -donald- (talk) 09:51, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 07:58, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Jun 2024 at 20:08:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Coraciidae (Rollers)
- Info Four high quality FPs; three with with foliage background. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:08, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:08, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Ermell (talk) 21:35, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Colors and angle of view -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:57, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support I'm a bit disturbed by that blurry thing behind the plant, but it's not enough for me to oppose. -- WildMouse76 (talk) 03:03, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Striking colours and sharpness. The blurry area is mildly disturbing. --Tagooty (talk) 04:07, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 07:17, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 11:29, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:44, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 21:58, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:02, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Tagooty --Terragio67 (talk) 03:53, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 10:36, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:36, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Chepry (talk) 17:26, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Carsten Steger (talk) 13:54, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Water reflection of canal houses at blue hour in Damrak Amsterdam the Netherlands.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Jun 2024 at 02:50:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Netherlands
- Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:50, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:50, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Lovely reflections --Tagooty (talk) 04:05, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 07:17, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:39, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 12:43, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 16:02, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great long exposure composition and colors. -- Radomianin (talk) 18:48, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 00:54, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:02, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 08:45, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:29, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 17:18, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 21:35, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 03:52, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 10:35, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:41, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Chepry (talk) 17:26, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ivar (talk) 18:24, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Carsten Steger (talk) 09:55, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very beautiful, technically excellent. – Aristeas (talk) 14:53, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Colorful canal houses at golden hour in Damrak avenue Amsterdam the Netherlands.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Jun 2024 at 02:52:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Netherlands
- Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:52, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:52, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 05:40, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 07:17, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Finally in Europe ! The right side is a bit unsharp, but colors and compo are very good, and the left side is very sharp. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 10:56, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:37, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support The dramatic cloudy sky provides a great contrast to the evening light effects on the houses and water surface. -- Radomianin (talk) 18:51, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 21:57, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 00:54, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:03, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 11:11, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:30, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Famberhorst (talk) 16:13, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 21:33, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 03:50, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:41, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support I think maybe a highlights reduction washed the colors out a little bit? Looks good, regardless. I'm a sucker for bright light on dark sky. — Rhododendrites talk | 12:52, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Chepry (talk) 17:26, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ivar (talk) 18:24, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 14:53, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Villnoess St Magdalena 1.JPG, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 May 2024 at 11:19:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Italy#Trentino-Alto Adige
- Info created and uploaded by Böhringer, nominated by Yann
- Support -- Yann (talk) 11:19, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great photo! Very nice composition, file page seems properly filled out. Toadspike (talk) 16:09, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:36, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ivar (talk) 17:01, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Very nice shot and compo. But there are a lot of CAs at the top of trees at left and right, and in the top on the mountain at the middle and at right. There are CAs on the left building too. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 20:55, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Agree -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:37, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- I have asked Böhringer to look at it. Yann (talk) 07:39, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- And please, a fix of the perspective correction, too Poco a poco (talk) 15:16, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:59, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Pécheurs démêlant les filets à Bahiret el Bibane.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 May 2024 at 09:05:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#People at work
- Info created by Atef Ouni - uploaded by Atef Ouni - nominated by Atef Ouni -- Atef Ouni (talk) 09:05, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Atef Ouni (talk) 09:05, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The crop is too tight. Wolverine XI 13:35, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support I like this photo. However, I would like to see it used on a project other than Commons. Toadspike (talk) 16:17, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Commons is just an archive for photos; very few photos are "used" here. The photos kept here are used in Wikipedias all over the world, as well as all the Wiki sister projects, schools, museums, organisations, and thousands of others that get their photos from Commons. Commons is like a "stock photo site" where images can be used for free if you credit the photographer. --Cart (talk) 19:25, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:37, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Clear distorsions of the face in the corner, due to the wide angle (24 mm) lens. Crop is too tight at the top. The guy seems to lower his head to fit it into the frame :-) The arm and hand in the foreground suffer from motion blur. Probably the shutter speed was not fast enough. The background is not very sharp, and the light is dull around the man with red jumper. To finish, there are big dust spots in the center, one between the worker and the street lamp, another one at the top, and at the right too -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:41, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:58, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Windows - Playa Santiago 01.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 May 2024 at 09:16:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Windows
- Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 09:16, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Llez (talk) 09:16, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support I love these kinds of photos that most photographers forget to take. As far as I'm concerned: simple but in the right proportions.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:30, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 23:29, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --El Grafo (talk) 15:05, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:30, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:58, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Красный wanna talk? 06:44, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:37, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 14:51, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Corvus corax in puddle at Bonny Doon Beach.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Jun 2024 at 17:33:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Corvidae_(Crows,_Jays_and_Magpies)
- Info A raven, Corvus corax, standing in a puddle at Bonny Doon Beach in Davenport, California. created by Grendelkhan - uploaded by Grendelkhan - nominated by Grendelkhan -- grendel|khan 17:33, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- grendel|khan 17:33, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Jun 2024 at 04:49:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Windows
- Info Window of the Mexican restaurant Amigos de Acapulco, located on Oroville Avenue in Chico, California. Created, uploaded and nominated by -- Radomianin (talk) 04:49, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 04:49, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 06:41, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support nice one, but the half-cut weeds at the bottom right kinda ruin the wow for me. It would me much better with whole weeds or no weeds at all IMO. Красный wanna talk? 09:25, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the constructive review, Красный. I agree that without the small plant, it would be a classical composition with conformity. Keeping it as an intrusive object was intentional because it matches the green paint residue from the previous coat as well as the other tiny plants on the left. It is cropped because the wall actually ends at the right edge of the image. Also, because of the plant, the asphalted section fits as a contrast. But you can find an edited version without the plant for comparison under the SwissTransfer link. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 17:55, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Famberhorst (talk) 16:05, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 21:26, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support A classic XRay's style. ★ 12:36, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--SDudley (talk) 21:37, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:47, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 08:50, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:30, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:33, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:23, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful exemplary composition. – Aristeas (talk) 14:58, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Jun 2024 at 19:09:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Styles and Techniques#Others
- Info AMAZÔNIA Exhibition, Madrid, 2023. Created by Sebastião Salgado - uploaded by Nerve net - nominated by ★ -- ★ 19:09, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ★ 19:09, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment So Nerve net has taken photos of photographs by Sebastião Salgado, a living photographer, at an exhibition. How does that work in terms of copyright? Was it ok because the exhibition was in an institution similar to a museum, or what? --Cart (talk) 20:59, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- COM:FOP Spain only mentions outdoor spaces ("in parks or on streets, squares or other public tracks and passes") and in any case the work would have to be permanently located there. Works like this that were only shown in a temporary exhibition in a museum don't seem to be covered. I think if this were sent to Deletion Requests it would go. BigDom (talk) 00:28, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Hello! The exhibition team told us that it was allowed to take photographs of the exhibition and publish them over Internet. I do not have a written consent from them if you are asking for it.
- The exhibition took place at the publicly owned Fernán Goméz Theater (Madrid City Council): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teatro_Fern%C3%A1n_G%C3%B3mez
- Exhibition information: https://www.teatrofernangomez.es/actividades/amazonia
- Press release: https://www.teatrofernangomez.es/prensa/amazonia-sebastiao-salgado Nerve net (talk) 07:42, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Underexposed, Overprocessed -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:02, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I do not want to have this image promoted -- Javier Perez Montes (talk) 07:53, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for your interest, but I do not want to have this image promoted. Nerve net (talk) 07:55, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- COM:FPC: Nominators and authors can withdraw their nominated pictures at any time. This is done by adding the following template: {{Withdraw}} ~~~~ -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:09, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thank You! Nerve net (talk) 09:55, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- COM:FPC: Nominators and authors can withdraw their nominated pictures at any time. This is done by adding the following template: {{Withdraw}} ~~~~ -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:09, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you all! But I do not want to have this picture promoted in any way. Nerve net (talk) 09:57, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Rambutão.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Jun 2024 at 12:48:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Food and drink#Fruits (raw)
- Info created and uploaded by ArionStar, nominated by me -- RodRabelo7 (talk) 12:48, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support (fun fact, tastes like persimmon but sort of resembles a lychee) -- RodRabelo7 (talk) 12:48, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Thank you! Another one eye-catching textures and shades captured by me. ★ 12:50, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 13:05, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Famberhorst (talk) 16:05, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Pleasantly striking. -- Radomianin (talk) 18:40, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Chepry (talk) 17:23, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 22:10, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:46, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 08:50, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:30, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:35, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:22, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 14:59, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Being honest, on the first glance I thought that it has nothing special, but somehow this catched my attention few times scrolling through the FP nominations list. So take my vote. Красный wanna talk? 12:36, 31 May 2024 (UTC)