User talk:Bijay Chaurasia

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Bijay Chaurasia!

First steps tutorial

Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content).

You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.

Getting help

More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks

Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities.
You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads.
Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~.
To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg.
You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account.
There are several tools to upload files.
Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful.

Made a mistake?

Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it.
Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 16:52, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Vidyapati ji.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Vidyapati ji.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Vidyapati ji.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:34, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bijay Chaurasia (Childhood Photo).jpg

File:Bijay Chaurasia (Childhood Photo).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Photo challenge/2015 - July - Food production and processing

I had to remove File:Tomato_&_the_Bamboo.JPG from this challenge, as it was uploaded to Commons before the start of the challenge. Entries have to be uploaded during the challenge period. -- Colin (talk) 10:47, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Little beautiful butterfly suck the marigold juice.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok --Poco a poco 10:26, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Water Mark

I have uploaded without water mark photo as you objected. pls check it. thanks. Sumita Roy Dutta (talk) 14:17, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Sumita Roy Dutta: You Welcome & thanks for your upload..

-- Bijay Chaurasia (Talk) 15:22, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Really helpful!

Heya Bijay! It would be great if you could include any kind of location information with your images, ex: "English: Buddha Chowk is main juction of Kathauna Bazar and is city of Shambhunath Municipality ward no 6, is in saptari District..."... isn't super helpful because there's no state or nation! Also did you know about

http://mondeca.com/index.php/en/any-place-en -- which gets latitude longitude from address or poking google maps and
http://tools.freeside.sk/geolocator/geolocator.html which applies lat/long in Wikicommons markup format!

Those two websites make it possible to add location tags to Commons !! For example, you would find the spot on earth, then "apply" on "tools.freeside" and you get output looks like this {{Location|48.87146|2.355}} which you add to the template of your photograph. Location pinpointing is a big help - especially as we get more photos, then people can search by your location, not just "white flowers on a fence" Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:40, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Ellin Beltz: Thanks alot for the info and i'll concern for it -- Bijay Chaurasia (Talk) 15:01, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wood carved roof decoration on the Chandeshwari Temple..jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Below minimum size requirement! --Cccefalon 05:44, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
** Review again changes done --Bijay chaurasia 06:51, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support OK for me, but it could be sharper given the size. --C messier 21:26, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Three Gumba.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments You pushed luminance red and blue down too much. As a result, there is a fine white line between sky and gumpa. --Cccefalon 07:55, 15 September 2015 (UTC) Comment luminance blue and red fixed.. --Bijay chaurasia 13:05, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Well done, the colours are now vivid and realistic. Good quality. --Cccefalon 13:31, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bageshwori Temple (3).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Reddish CA, sky blown out and perspective not done. Can be salvaged perhaps, you should give it a try and reprocess from scratch. --Cccefalon 15:36, 13 September 2015 (UTC) Comment Reprocessed, i do my best. --Bijay chaurasia 05:13, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment You managed to tackle most issues, that's good. However, for perspective correction, you need to fiddle around with the "manual undistort" sliders in LightRoom. Use the left- and rightmost pilars as reference. --Cccefalon 19:52, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed Thanks for your suggestion. fixed now.--~~~~
Support Given that the foundation is rectilinear and the left pilars are not rectilinear in reality, I think that you solved the task. --Cccefalon 20:19, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gajur of Kankalini Temple.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok --Poco a poco 18:09, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shiva Temple in the ground of 6344.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment Shadows too dark, and I would clone out the wire. --C messier 07:50, 6 October 2015 (UTC) Done But unable to load new version file... @C messier: --Bijay chaurasia 15:21, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support OK. --C messier 15:00, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kankalini Temple Bhardha Saptari 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good for QI.--Jebulon 19:10, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Neta Chwok-6684.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --XRay 16:15, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Neta Chwok 6683.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --XRay 16:15, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krishna Temple (1).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment Dust spots on the left need to be removed.--Ermell 20:02, 24 September 2015 (UTC) Done Dust spot removed --Bijay chaurasia 22:24, 25 September 2015 (UTC) Support Good quality. --Ermell 18:51, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krishna Temple (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment Dust spots on the left need to be removed.--Ermell 20:02, 24 September 2015 (UTC) Done Dust spot removed --Bijay chaurasia 22:24, 25 September 2015 (UTC) Support Good quality. --Ermell 18:51, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! God Ganesh statue. 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kankalini Temple Bhardha Saptari 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments CommentSlightly tilted, please correct, and I'll support.--Jebulon 19:06, 12 October 2015 (UTC) Done Thanks -- Bijay chaurasia 06:31, 13 October 2015 (UTC) Support As promised.--Jebulon 14:15, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Bhaktapur Nepal.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ हिन्दी ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Bhaktapur Nepal.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Ju Ta 06:03, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Bhaktapur square 1991.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ हिन्दी ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Bhaktapur square 1991.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Ju Ta 06:05, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Stupa of Boudhanath - Kathmandu 1991.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ हिन्दी ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Stupa of Boudhanath - Kathmandu 1991.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Ju Ta 06:10, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope files tagged as copyright violations

Please stop using {{Copyvio}} to tag files that are out of scope. {{Copyvio}} should only be used for copyright violations. Please raise a regular deletion request for files that are out of scope. Storkk (talk) 09:53, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

candiates list on COM:QIC

Hi there, I have removed two nominations by yours (arbitrarily chosen). Please note that only 5 nominations per day are allowed. --A.Savin 01:09, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Phewa Lake (फेवा ताल) Sunset View 2158.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support --Christian Ferrer 10:58, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Phewa Lake (फेवा ताल).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Needs to be straightened. Also, something wrong with the ID --A.Savin 01:52, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
DoneThanks for ur complement.. --Bijay chaurasia 07:11, 17 May 2016 (UTC) Yes, OK this way --A.Savin 01:01, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 06:42, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Phewa lake 2604.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --XRay 04:19, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Phewa Lake 2603.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --XRay 04:19, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Phewa Lake 2606.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 21:47, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Phewa Lake 2602.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 01:02, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Phewa Lake2605.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI in my opinion --J. Lunau 12:17, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Phewa lake 029.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality., QI for me --J. Lunau 12:17, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lotus Temple-Panoroma-Visit During WCI 2016- IMG 6471.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Please correct tilt --Soloneying 00:40, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
True, it is tilted Poco a poco 09:07, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Done -- Bijay chaurasia 03:14, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
SupportThanks. Good quality. I like the people in it. --Soloneying 12:33, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Panorama of Jallianwala Bagh-IMG 6348.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Code issues in User:Bijay chaurasia/vector.js

Hi Bijay chaurasia, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

You edited User:Bijay chaurasia/vector.js. Glad to see you coding in javascript! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
Though, that change appears to introduce 30 new jshint issues — the page's status is now having warnings. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in javascript writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page or cmb-opt-out anywhere on your your global user page on Meta. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!

ISSUE: line 12 character 12: Bad or unnecessary escaping. - Evidence: '{\{Own work}\} \<br \/\> ', //tagOpen
ISSUE: line 12 character 23: Bad or unnecessary escaping. - Evidence: '{\{Own work}\} \<br \/\> ', //tagOpen
ISSUE: line 12 character 26: Bad or unnecessary escaping. - Evidence: '{\{Own work}\} \<br \/\> ', //tagOpen
ISSUE: line 12 character 33: Bad or unnecessary escaping. - Evidence: '{\{Own work}\} \<br \/\> ', //tagOpen
ISSUE: line 21 character 12: Bad or unnecessary escaping. - Evidence: '{\{Welcome}\}\~\~\~\~', //tagOpen
ISSUE: line 21 character 22: Bad or unnecessary escaping. - Evidence: '{\{Welcome}\}\~\~\~\~', //tagOpen
ISSUE: line 21 character 24: Bad or unnecessary escaping. - Evidence: '{\{Welcome}\}\~\~\~\~', //tagOpen
ISSUE: line 21 character 26: Bad or unnecessary escaping. - Evidence: '{\{Welcome}\}\~\~\~\~', //tagOpen
ISSUE: line 21 character 28: Bad or unnecessary escaping. - Evidence: '{\{Welcome}\}\~\~\~\~', //tagOpen
ISSUE: line 21 character 30: Bad or unnecessary escaping. - Evidence: '{\{Welcome}\}\~\~\~\~', //tagOpen
ISSUE: line 30 character 12: Bad or unnecessary escaping. - Evidence: '{\{Welcome}\}\n\n{\{subst:test|', //tagOpen
ISSUE: line 30 character 22: Bad or unnecessary escaping. - Evidence: '{\{Welcome}\}\n\n{\{subst:test|', //tagOpen
ISSUE: line 30 character 29: Bad or unnecessary escaping. - Evidence: '{\{Welcome}\}\n\n{\{subst:test|', //tagOpen
ISSUE: line 31 character 12: Bad or unnecessary escaping. - Evidence: '}\}\~\~\~\~', //tagClose
ISSUE: line 31 character 14: Bad or unnecessary escaping. - Evidence: '}\}\~\~\~\~', //tagClose
ISSUE: line 31 character 16: Bad or unnecessary escaping. - Evidence: '}\}\~\~\~\~', //tagClose
ISSUE: line 31 character 18: Bad or unnecessary escaping. - Evidence: '}\}\~\~\~\~', //tagClose
ISSUE: line 31 character 20: Bad or unnecessary escaping. - Evidence: '}\}\~\~\~\~', //tagClose
ISSUE: line 39 character 12: Bad or unnecessary escaping. - Evidence: '{\{subst:test2|', //tagOpen
ISSUE: line 40 character 12: Bad or unnecessary escaping. - Evidence: '}\}\~\~\~\~', //tagClose
ISSUE: line 40 character 14: Bad or unnecessary escaping. - Evidence: '}\}\~\~\~\~', //tagClose
ISSUE: line 40 character 16: Bad or unnecessary escaping. - Evidence: '}\}\~\~\~\~', //tagClose
ISSUE: line 40 character 18: Bad or unnecessary escaping. - Evidence: '}\}\~\~\~\~', //tagClose
ISSUE: line 40 character 20: Bad or unnecessary escaping. - Evidence: '}\}\~\~\~\~', //tagClose
ISSUE: line 48 character 12: Bad or unnecessary escaping. - Evidence: '{\{subst:test3|', //tagOpen
ISSUE: line 49 character 12: Bad or unnecessary escaping. - Evidence: '}\}\~\~\~\~', //tagClose
ISSUE: line 49 character 14: Bad or unnecessary escaping. - Evidence: '}\}\~\~\~\~', //tagClose
ISSUE: line 49 character 16: Bad or unnecessary escaping. - Evidence: '}\}\~\~\~\~', //tagClose
ISSUE: line 49 character 18: Bad or unnecessary escaping. - Evidence: '}\}\~\~\~\~', //tagClose
ISSUE: line 49 character 20: Bad or unnecessary escaping. - Evidence: '}\}\~\~\~\~', //tagClose

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 15:25, 23 August 2016 (UTC).[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lotus Temple ladder - During WCI 2016- IMG 6498.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 01:54, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lotus Temple Front view with garden - During WCI 2016 - IMG 6499.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments A bit dark overall but still ok --Poco a poco 10:02, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The Lotus Temple-IMG 6497-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support --Christian Ferrer 09:27, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Golden Temple night view - IMG 6323-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 21:10, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lotus Temple.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pasupatinath Temple, Front gate Gajur-IMG 3500.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The image is tilted and needs some perspective adjustment. A little bit better description would also be good, such as what part of the temple is shown in the picture. Please fix this. W.carter 17:34, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
W.carter DoneThanks and sorry for late reply -Bijay chaurasia 16:25, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Well done! Excellent description (keep doing that) and good quality. --W.carter 10:16, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Statue of Lion in Entrance of Patan Museum -Bijay-IMG 3564.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good detail. Daniel Case 02:10, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wooden Window inside Patan Museum-IMG 3651.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice detail and symmetry. Daniel Case 02:10, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Entrance of Patan Museump -Patan Durbar Square - IMG 3562.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice street view ... love that bird in the center. Daniel Case 02:10, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Western entrance of Pasupatinath Temple, Front Gate-IMG 3466.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:42, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pasupatinath Temple from the bank of Bagmati river-Eastern side-Bijay- IMG 3358.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality and good description. --W.carter 23:23, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pashupatinath Temple Area- IMG 3360.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality and good description. --W.carter 23:23, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pasupatinath Temple area from the bank of Bagmati river-Eastern side-IMG 3359.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality and good description. --W.carter 23:23, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Code issues in User:Bijay chaurasia/common.js

Hi Bijay chaurasia, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

You edited User:Bijay chaurasia/common.js. Glad to see you coding in javascript! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
Though, that change appears to introduce 1 new esprima issue — the page's status is now having ERRORS. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in javascript writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page or cmb-opt-out anywhere on your your global user page on Meta. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!

ERROR: Cannot parse line 7 column 1: Unexpected token )

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 04:33, 20 September 2016 (UTC).[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Statue of Guardian lions, Mani Keshar Chowk, Patan.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Nepal Notice

Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Nepal

Hi Bijay Chaurasia, Thank you for participating to Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Nepal competition and for sharing your great and valuable images with the whole world. We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Please use this google form to submit your details. we will contact you for the further information. Thanks to the participation of people like you.

Kind regards,
The Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Nepal Team

Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Nepal Notice

Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Nepal

Hi Bijay Chaurasia, Thank you for participating to Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Nepal competition and for sharing your great and valuable images with the whole world. We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Please use this google form to submit your details. we will contact you for the further information. Thanks to the participation of people like you.

Kind regards,
The Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Nepal Team

A barnstar for you!

	The Photographer's Barnstar
	With best wishes-- Biplab Anand (Talk) 03:34, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks you @बिप्लब आनन्द: --Bijay chaurasia (talk) 03:41, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chana-Chick pea-Cicer arietinum-September 27, 2016-IMG 8013-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:12, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Naked wheat(Triticum aestivum) in Nepal-September 27, 2016-IMG 8014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:12, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Naked wheat(Triticum aestivum) in Nepal-September 27, 2016-IMG 8015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:12, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Sadhu in Janaki Temple, Janakpur-September 22, 2016-IMG 7437.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sadhu in Janaki Temple, Janakpur-September 22, 2016-IMG 7437.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sliced coconut in Vivah Mandap, Janakpur-September 22, 2016-IMG 7411.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The description on the file's page has nothing to do with what's in the picture. New description should include latin name for the coconut. Narrower category also needed. W.carter 10:33, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@W.carter: Done Thanks . -- Bijay chaurasia 14:12, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Now, that's much better! :) Good quality. --W.carter 19:09, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! A vendor of Sadar Janak Chwok,Janakpur-September 22, 2016-7600.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice, unusual and valuable picture, but please add the fire wood and tinder he's selling to the description and categories. W.carter 10:14, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@W.carter: Done Thanks for your review. --Bijay chaurasia 04:50, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! Good quality. --W.carter 11:44, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vivah Mandap, Janakpur-September 22, 2016-IMG 7317.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. --A.Savin 15:57, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Light Lamp in Vivah Mandap, Janakpur-September 22, 2016-IMG 7395.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK for me despite some noise --A.Savin 15:55, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Entrance of Vivah Mandap, Janakpur-September 22, 2016-IMG 7416.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Code 04:30, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Janaki Temple, Janakpur-September 22, 2016-IMG 7502.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 18:40, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ram Mandir, Janakpur-September 22, 2016-IMG 7617.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Kroton 06:42, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ram Mandir, Janakpur-September 22, 2016-IMG 7619.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:55, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nepal Railways-20160923-IMG 7905.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 00:01, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nepal Railways-20160923-IMG 7908.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I needed an additional category (added). Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:24, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nepal Railways-20160923-IMG 7909.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 12:24, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ram Mandir, Janakpur-September 22, 2016-IMG 7611.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Code 06:26, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nepal Railways-20160923-IMG 7906.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:47, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Janaki Temple, Janakpur-September 22, 2016-IMG 7493.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I see no substantial different, but I guess we can let it pass --Poco a poco 11:51, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Janakpur Station, Nepal Railways-20160923-IMG 7911.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:13, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Janakpur Station, Nepal Railways-20160923-IMG 7910.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:13, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Janakpur Station, Nepal Railways-20160923-IMG 7912.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 12:44, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Janakpur Station, Nepal Railways-20160923-IMG 7914.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:14, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Under construction bridge at Janakpur for new railway track-20160923-IMG 7916.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good quality --Christian Ferrer 07:22, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Janakpur station, Nepal Railways--IMG 7932.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:57, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Janakpur station, Nepal Railways--IMG 7931.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:57, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Abandoned Train at Janakpur station, Nepal Railways--IMG 7930.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments - Good enough for me, and interesting motif. -- Ikan Kekek 07:02, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Abandoned Train at Janakpur station, Nepal Railways--IMG 7927.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support ok with one category added fro the vehicule (the main subject) --Christian Ferrer 08:03, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Abandoned Train at Janakpur station, Nepal Railways--IMG 7923.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 09:16, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Abandoned Train at Janakpur station, Nepal Railways--IMG 7922.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 09:19, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Abandoned Train at Janakpur station, Nepal Railways--IMG 7926.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments - Good quality for me. -- Ikan Kekek 08:11, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Abandoned Train at Janakpur station, Nepal Railways--IMG 7925.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support --Christian Ferrer 06:33, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Abandoned Train at Janakpur station, Nepal Railways--IMG 7924.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments - The picture may be too bright, overall, but where I'm really seeing problems is on the left and in the background, where it's not only too bright but lacks enough contrast and might be so blown it lacks sufficient definition and detail to rescue. So I'm not sure it's fixable, but give it a try and see. -- Ikan Kekek 09:48, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Ikan Kekek: Thanks for your review.. I think i can fix that out. But i need sometime becoz am bit busy for 2 days.ASAP iĺl -- Bijay chaurasia 11:12, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Ikan Kekek: Done Thanks -Bijay chaurasia 06:41, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Good job. Good quality now, overall, in my opinion. -- Ikan Kekek 08:00, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Janaki Temple--IMG 7555-Pano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --XRay 06:59, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Abandoned train stations in Janakpur-IMG 7917.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok now. --Hubertl 10:13, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Photo challenge/2016 - September - Local culture/Winners

	Photo Challenge – Third Place
	Congratulations! Your picture Sadhu in Janaki Temple, Janakpur-September 22, 2016-IMG 7437.jpg won the 3rd place in the Photo Challenge Local culture, in September 2016. You can find the results of the challenge here.

-- Jarekt (talk) 03:06, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Clay Pots-IMG 7301-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 15:39, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ganga Sagar, Janakpur-September 22, 2016-IMG 7688.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 17:07, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ganga Sagar, Janakpur-September 22, 2016-IMG 7687.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:27, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Clay Pots-BW-IMG 7303.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Clay Pots-BW-IMG 7302.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Clay Pots-BW-IMG 7303.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Clay Pots-BW-IMG 7303.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Generosity Crowdfunding Campaign for User:The Photographer

Please excuse me spamming you. As a regular on Feature Picture Candidatess you will recognise User:The Photographer, who has 86 Featured Pictures. His contributions cover the architecture and culture of Brazil and Venezuela. He has basic photographic equipment: an old D300 camera and 35mm lens, and lives in a poor country where photographic equipment is expensive. The Photographer has recently taken several images using the technique where multiple frames are stitched together to create a high-resolution panorama. However, many times frustrated with the stitching errors that result from trying to take such photos without a proper panoramic head for his tripod. This special equipment permits the camera to be rotated around the entrance pupil of the lens, and eliminates such errors. Having a panoramic head would greatly increase the potential for The Photographer to create sharp high-resolution images for Commons. In addition, the purchase of a fisheye lens would enable 180 × 360° panoramas to be taken, which are a great way to explore a scene as though one is really there.

Please see the discussion about the Crowd-funding campaign on User talk:The Photographer#Generosity Crowdfunding Campaign and visit the Generosity Crowd-funding Campaign page to consider donating. Even a modest donation will make a difference if many people contribute. Thanks. -- Colin (talk) 21:12, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sunset at Ganga Sagar, Janakpurdham 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Not bad for lighting conditions like this, enough for QI --A.Savin 12:40, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Abandoned Train at Janakpur station, Nepal Railways--IMG 7925.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Abandoned Train at Janakpur station, Nepal Railways--IMG 7925.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation for felicitation program of Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 - Nepal

Dear Bijay Chaurasia, It’s our pleasure to invite you to Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 - Nepal winners awarding ceremony on 17th December, 2016 at Masala Cottage, 2:00 pm onwards. We would like to ask few minutes of your time to provide your details here. Your contribution as a contributor made Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 - Nepal possible. We’d like to have a privilege of having you there.

Kind regards,

The Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Nepal Team

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nagarkot hill-2539.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Perhaps it was better to focus on the top of the nearest hill to get to the top sharper. But still good enough for me.--Famberhorst 18:14, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nagarkot -3009 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 14:28, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Don't read too much into my vote. I voted for nearly all the pictures in the first stage. The only pictures I do not vote for are boring symmetrical ones such as this one. Abductive (talk) 16:16, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maithili Wikimedians User Group Logo.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:58, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wikipedia-logo-v2-mai.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:58, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shahil Khan in Group Photo - IMG 2328.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 07:44, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wikipedia-logo-v2-dty.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 14:54, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WLE Invitation

Wiki Loves Earth 2017 in Nepal

Hi Bijay Chaurasia, We would like to invite you to participate in Wiki Loves Earth 2017 in Nepal competition during 1 May to 31 May, 2017 and share your great and valuable images with the whole world. We would like to ask a few minutes of your time before you start upload your valuable images from 1 May, 2017. Please use this new survey to submit your mailing address.

Kind regards,
The Wiki Loves Earth Team

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kanyam-0265.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Imo acceptable for QI --DXR 08:10, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Oren_Kessler

Category:Oren_Kessler has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Another Believer (talk) 21:48, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation for felicitation program of Wiki Loves Earth 2017 - Nepal

Dear Bijay Chaurasia
It’s our pleasure to invite you to Wiki Loves Earth 2017 - Nepal winners awarding ceremony on 29th July, 2017 at Masala Cottage, 2:00 pm onwards. We would like to ask few minutes of your time to provide your details here. Your contribution as a contributor made Wiki Loves Earth 2017 - Nepal possible. We’d like to have a privilege of having you there.

Kind regards,

The Wiki Loves Earth 2017 in Nepal Team

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kathputli (Puppet)-IMG 0335.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --XRay 05:54, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! General Post Office - Basantapur-0336.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 12:43, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kathputali (puppets) at Basantpur Durbar Square -0334.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 17:40, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation for felicitation program of Wiki Events Nepal during 2015

Invitation for felicitation program of Wiki Events 2015 in Nepal

Dear Bijay Chaurasia, we heartily apologize for the delay due to some situational circumstances. It’s our pleasure to invite you to Wiki Events 2015 in Nepal winners awarding ceremony on 2nd September, 2017 at Masala Cottage, 2:00 pm onwards. We would like to ask few minutes of your time to provide your details here. Your contribution as a contributor made the Wiki Events 2015 in Nepal possible. We’d like to have a privilege of having you there.

Kind regards,

The Wiki Events Nepal Team

Invitation for felicitation program of Wiki Events Nepal during 2015

Invitation for felicitation program of Wiki Events 2015 in Nepal

Dear Bijay Chaurasia, we heartily apologize for the delay due to some situational circumstances. It’s our pleasure to invite you to Wiki Events 2015 in Nepal winners awarding ceremony on 2nd September, 2017 at Masala Cottage, 2:00 pm onwards. We would like to ask few minutes of your time to provide your details here. Your contribution as a contributor made the Wiki Events 2015 in Nepal possible. We’d like to have a privilege of having you there.

Kind regards,

The Wiki Events Nepal Team

Invitation for felicitation program of Wiki Events Nepal during 2015

Invitation for felicitation program of Wiki Events 2015 in Nepal

Dear Bijay Chaurasia, we heartily apologize for the delay due to some situational circumstances. It’s our pleasure to invite you to Wiki Events 2015 in Nepal winners awarding ceremony on 2nd September, 2017 at Masala Cottage, 2:00 pm onwards. We would like to ask few minutes of your time to provide your details here. Your contribution as a contributor made the Wiki Events 2015 in Nepal possible. We’d like to have a privilege of having you there.

Kind regards,

The Wiki Events Nepal Team

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Swayambhunath Stupa -Kathmandu Nepal-0336.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good enough for QI. --Peulle 10:34, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation for felicitation program of Wiki Loves Monuments 2017 in Nepal

Dear Bijay Chaurasia, It’s our pleasure to invite you to Wiki Loves Monuments 2017 in Nepal winners awarding ceremony on 11 November, 2017 at Masala Cottage, 2:30 pm onwards. We would like to ask few minutes of your time to provide your details here. Your contribution as a contributor made the Wiki Loves Monuments 2017 in Nepal in Nepal possible. We’d like to have a privilege of having you there.

Kind regards,
WLM 2017 in Nepal Team

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ख Devnagari letter in Unicode.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 21:42, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wiki Love Villages.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments ~~Good quality. --Basotxerri 12:54, 2 December 2017 (UTC)~~[reply]
@Bijay chaurasia: Shouldn't it be Wiki Loves Villages? (in singular) --Basotxerri 20:26, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Basotxerri: Actually Project name is Wiki Love Villages -Bijay chaurasia 06:50, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
OK, then! --Basotxerri 17:26, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nepali word in devanagri script.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Trougnouf 17:23, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

As i am being the amateur for the WIKI. I would like to thank you for giving me opportunity to attain the Wiki loves villages outreach program. --Nikesh Ghimire (talk) 01:47, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Poonam Pandey Indian model and film actress.jpg

File:Poonam Pandey Indian model and film actress.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Majora (talk) 04:56, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pashupatinath Temple cremations on the Bagmati River.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Billy69150 16:34, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Celina Jaitly.jpg

File:Celina Jaitly.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Majora (talk) 04:27, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Komatsu PC200-8 Hydraulic Excavator -Rakhu Bhagawati,Myagdi-0462.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:02, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wel come board at Baisari-Rakhu Bhagawati,Myagdi-0514.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Some noise reduction and/or sharpening artefacts at full resolution, but good enough for me. --Prosthetic Head 14:03, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Taapsee Pannu.jpg

File:Taapsee Pannu.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Invalid use of the Bollywood Hungama license. Is not a party or event. Photo shoots are not covered by the OTRS release.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Majora (talk) 05:25, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Maithili Wikipedia Logo

Hey, I noticed that the logo for the Maithili Wikipedia uses Eastern Nagari/Bengali script and I was thinking that it would better if it was in Devanagari since modern Maithili is written in Devanagari and the Maithili Wikipedia itself uses that script. It currently looks a little out of place on the homepage. What do you think? Thanks. Filpro (talk) 18:21, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ghanta in Changu Narayan-Changunarayan photowalk-WLV-3852.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good composition, but unfortunately over exposed --Michielverbeek 06:32, 28 March 2018 (UTC) Comment Done @Michielverbeek: Please review again. This version is better one. Thank You-- Bijay chaurasia 17:15, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed, this version is looking better --Michielverbeek 17:51, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Earth 2018 in Nepal — Invitation

Wiki Loves Earth 2018 in Nepal

Hi Bijay Chaurasia, We would like to invite you to participate in Wiki Loves Earth 2018 in Nepal competition during 1 May to 31 May, 2018 and share your great and valuable images with the whole world. We would like to ask a few minutes of your time before you start upload your valuable images from 1 May, 2018. Please use this new survey to submit your mailing address.

Kind regards,
The Wiki Loves Earth Team

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ghanta Ghar and Nepali Jame Masjid -IMG4170.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good view of a street --Daniel Case 03:59, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kagbeni Mustang-WLV-0741.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:02, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kagbeni Mustang-WLV-0746.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 19:44, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kagbeni Mustang-WLV-0745.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 19:43, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kagbeni Mustang-WLV-0775.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support OK for me. --Basotxerri 18:50, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kagbeni Mustang-WLV-0756.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
CA, mainly on top of the mountains (the sharpening technique (?) looks weird but that's not noticeable when viewed at 200% of screen) --Trougnouf 18:42, 6 June 2018 (UTC) Comment Fixed Done Thank You --Bijay chaurasia 03:00, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice! --Trougnouf 11:56, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kagbeni Mustang-WLV-0781.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support OK, I'll give you this one --Daniel Case 19:24, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Kagbeni Mustang-WLV-0741.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kagbeni Mustang-WLV-0741.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:The Heavenly Rara Lake - edited 2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:The Heavenly Rara Lake.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2017 is open!

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2017 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in R2.

Dear Bijay Chaurasia,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2017 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the twelfth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2017) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top 2 from each sub-category.

In the final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2017.

Round 2 will end on 22 July 2018, 23:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 11:32, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Biplab Anand, Rupika and Sam at New readers sessions- Wikimaina 2018 -3497.jpg

File:Biplab Anand, Rupika and Sam at New readers sessions- Wikimaina 2018 -3497.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Wikilover90 (talk) 21:41, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Koshi Barrage -00003921.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
There are CAs at the wires. Please fix it. And please try to improve the sharpness. --XRay 05:57, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Done Thank you--~~~~
Support OK, thank you. IMO it'S good enough for QI now. --XRay 11:03, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation for felicitation program of Wiki Loves Earth 2018 - Nepal

Dear Bijay Chaurasia
It’s our pleasure to invite you to Wiki Loves Earth 2018 - Nepal winners awarding ceremony on 8th September, 2018 at The Classic Bamboo, 11:45 pm onwards. We would like to ask few minutes of your time to provide your details here. Your contribution as a contributor made Wiki Loves Earth 2018 - Nepal possible. We’d like to have a privilege of having you there.

Kind regards,

The Wiki Loves Earth 2018 in Nepal Team

Invitation for felicitation program of Wiki Loves Earth 2018 - Nepal (Revised Location Link)

Invitation for felicitation program of Wiki Loves Earth 2018 - Nepal

Dear Bijay Chaurasia
It’s our pleasure to invite you to Wiki Loves Earth 2018 - Nepal winners awarding ceremony on 8th September, 2018 at The Classic Bamboo, 11:45 pm onwards. We would like to ask few minutes of your time to provide your details here. Your contribution as a contributor made Wiki Loves Earth 2018 - Nepal possible. We’d like to have a privilege of having you there.

Kind regards,

The Wiki Loves Earth 2018 in Nepal Team

Invitation for felicitation program of Wiki Loves Earth 2018 - Nepal

Dear Bijay Chaurasia
It’s our pleasure to invite you to Wiki Loves Earth 2018 - Nepal winners awarding ceremony on 8th September, 2018 at The Classic Bamboo, 11:45 am onwards. We would like to ask few minutes of your time to provide your details here. Your contribution as a contributor made Wiki Loves Earth 2018 - Nepal possible. We’d like to have a privilege of having you there.

Kind regards,

The Wiki Loves Earth 2018 in Nepal Team

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holi at Basantapur-0272.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:19, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holi at Basantapur-0271.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Rbrechko 10:09, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holi at Basantapur-0304.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Yann 14:14, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holi at Basantapur-0233.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Yann 14:14, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holi at Basantapur-0241.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Yann 14:14, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation for felicitation program of Wiki Loves Monuments 2018 in Nepal

Dear Bijay Chaurasia, It’s our pleasure to invite you to Wiki Loves Monuments 2018 in Nepal winners awarding ceremony on 15 December, 2018 at Siddhartha Cottage, Tinkune, 11:30 am onwards. We would like to ask few minutes of your time to provide your details here. Your contribution as a contributor made the Wiki Loves Monuments 2018 in Nepal possible. We’d like to have a privilege of having you there.

Kind regards,

WLM 2018 in Nepal Team

Your best shot 2018

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

I'm wishing you all the best for the New Year and I hope you're going to have many memorable photo opportunities in 2019. With 2018 coming to an end, it's time to look back at the past 12 months. I'm curious – what would you consider your best shot of 2018 and why? I invite you to share your image and your thoughts in order to provide others with the opportunity to celebrate, learn, and enjoy:

Your best shot 2018

Thanks for all your effort in sharing your vision of the world with others under a free license!

Warmly, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 19:43, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Meeting point of Sunkoshi and Tama Koshi River from Beni Ghat-IMG0620-Pano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support What a panorama! Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:15, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pujari at Chinnamasta Temple-0774.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:33, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Terrace Farming in Nepal in Rakathum VDC-0369.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support OK for me. --Aristeas 09:27, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Terrace Farming in Nepal in Rakathum VDC-0384-Pano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ercé 07:26, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pujari in Janaki Temple-6495.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Breathtaking colors, great composition. Stunning photograph. -- Johann Jaritz 03:12, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I changed the categorization from the messy catchall Category:Priests to the much more specific Category:Hindu priests. I recommend in the future for you to look for the most specific appropriate category. -- Ikan Kekek 03:40, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, Ikan! -- Johann Jaritz 03:44, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thank You Ikan and Johann -Bijay chaurasia 07:04, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Terrace Farming in Nepal in Rakathum VDC-0375.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 08:20, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Terrace Farming in Nepal in Rakathum VDC-0373.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --Johannes Robalotoff 14:23, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Terrace Farming in Nepal in Rakathum VDC-0377.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 08:20, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Meeting point of Sunkoshi and Tama Koshi River from Beni Ghat-IMG0620-Pano.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Meeting point of Sunkoshi and Tama Koshi River from Beni Ghat-IMG0620-Pano.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Statue of Buddha inside Pullahari Monastery(Gumba)-IMG 9188.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Paris Orlando 14:53, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pond of Kuruwapari Chaudharitol- Inaruwa, Kosi Municipality-WLV-2252.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 17:29, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pond of Kuruwapari Chaudharitol- Inaruwa, Kosi Municipality-WLV-2251.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 17:29, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bamboo Hut Near Pond of Kuruwapari Chaudharitol- Inaruwa, Kosi Municipality-WLV-2263.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Looks ok apart from the vignetting on top left --Poco a poco 18:01, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Done Please review once again. Thank you @Poco a poco: --Bijay chaurasia 16:08, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:45, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Pond of Kuruwapari Chaudharitol- Inaruwa, Kosi Municipality-WLV-2252.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pond of Kuruwapari Chaudharitol- Inaruwa, Kosi Municipality-WLV-2252.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tukuche Village-0660.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Piotr Bart 14:29, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tukche, Nepal-WLV-1451.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 18:48, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tukche, Nepal-WLV-1450.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 18:49, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jharkot Village-Upper Mustang Trek-1281.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Piotr Bart 14:29, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Panaroma from poonhill-2019-BJ.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Maybe a bit noisy, but considering the high resolution it reaches QI level. Also atmospheric and instruktive. --Milseburg 17:53, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Need your presence at Featured sound candidates

		We request the honor of your presence at Featured sound candidates
		Dear Bijay chaurasia, Featured sound candidates needs your help and you can help by reviewing , nominating your sounds for the FS Tag. You can start reviewing/nominating sounds now. -- Eatcha (talk) 19:08, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Panaroma from poonhill-2019-BJ.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Panaroma from poonhill-2019-BJ.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nepalese Children in Tadapani, Ghandruk-Nepal-4428.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Gooid quality --Michielverbeek 07:12, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Demonstration Before Raft-Rafting in Trishuli River, Nepal-3060.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Nepalese Children in Tadapani, Ghandruk-Nepal-4428.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Nepalese Children in Tadapani, Ghandruk-Nepal-4428.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Jharkot Village-Upper Mustang Trek-1281.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Jharkot Village-Upper Mustang Trek-1281.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Photo walk in Stockholm

It's only a few weeks until Wikimania 2019 in Sweden. I'd like to invite you to the Commons Photographer's photo walk. If you're planning on going to Stockholm in August, please consider joining this event. This is an opportunity to connect with other photographers, have fun together, and explore the beauty of an iconic Scandinavian city… All the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:48, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ranipauwa-Muktinath, Nepal-WLV-0916.jpg

File:Ranipauwa-Muktinath, Nepal-WLV-0916.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Judithcomm (talk) 13:26, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ranipauwa-Muktinath, Nepal-WLV-0907.jpg

File:Ranipauwa-Muktinath, Nepal-WLV-0907.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Judithcomm (talk) 14:47, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Image Flagged: George Levy

In regards the recently flagged image: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:George_Levy_at_the_Gilmore_Car_Museum.jpg

Author George Levy has given me explicit permission to use his photo and has transferred copyright privileges to myself. For further inquiries, please contact Mr. Levy at his email: george@georeplease.com. I would ask that you contact George and/or remove the challenge promptly. Thank you.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Waste containers and Cigarette Butts-8016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Chenspec 06:00, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Koteshwor, Kathmandu-8647.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Chenspec 06:00, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Girl-Siddha Pokhari-8694.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Chenspec 06:00, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berlin Cathedral Church-2017-5326.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Ok imo --ArildV 08:09, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Swayambhunath Stupa -Kathmandu Nepal-0336.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Swayambhunath Stupa -Kathmandu Nepal-0336.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Annapurna South, Himchuli, Machapuchare Himal-3794.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Dirtsc 06:55, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Machapuchare Himal-3797.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Dirtsc 06:55, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Machapuchare Himal-3797.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Machapuchare Himal-3797.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shadhu in Pasupatinath Temple-1973.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 05:00, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shadhu in Pasupatinath Temple-1957.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:18, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shadhu in Pasupatinath Temple-1968.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Bijay Chaurasia,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikimedia Commons and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 01:15, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Annapurna South, Himchuli, Machapuchare Himal-3794.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Annapurna South, Himchuli, Machapuchare Himal-3794.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Old Nepali Newar Peoples wearing traditional hat- Dhaka Topi-Patan Durbar Square-2061.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --C messier 12:23, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Entrance Wall of Patan museum-Patan Durbar Square-2053.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --C messier 12:23, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Shadhu in Pasupatinath Temple-1973.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Shadhu in Pasupatinath Temple-1973.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:04, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Bijay Chaurasia,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 15:24, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation for felicitation program of Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 in Nepal

Dear Bijay Chaurasia, It’s our pleasure to invite you to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 in Nepal winners awarding ceremony on 28 September, 2019 at Siddhartha Cottage, Tinkune, 11:30 am onwards. We would like to ask few minutes of your time to provide your details here. Your contribution as a contributor made the Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 in Nepal possible. We’d like to have a privilege of having you there.

Kind regards,

WLM 2019 in Nepal Team

Invitation for felicitation program of Wiki Loves Earth 2019 in Nepal

Dear Bijay Chaurasia, Please disregard our previous message about Felicitation of WLM.
It’s our pleasure to invite you to Wiki Loves Earth 2019 in Nepal winners awarding ceremony on 28 September, 2019 at Siddhartha Cottage, Tinkune, 11:30 am onwards. We would like to ask few minutes of your time to provide your details here. Your contribution as a contributor made the Wiki Loves Earth 2019 in Nepal possible. We’d like to have a privilege of having you there.

Kind regards,

WLE 2019 in Nepal Team

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pashupatinath Temple-1871.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Steindy 21:01, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pandra Shivalaya -Pashupatinath Temple-1910.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PANKAJ DEO 18:18, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shiva linga inside Pandra Shivalaya -Pashupatinath Temple-1887.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PANKAJ DEO 18:16, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shiva linga inside Pandra Shivalaya -Pashupatinath Temple-1878.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PANKAJ DEO 18:16, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, dear license reviewer

If you use the helper scripts, you will find the links next to the search box (vector) or as single tabs (monobook). They are named `license+` and `license-`.

Hi Bijay chaurasia, thanks for your request for license reviewer status. The request has been closed as successful, and you've been added to the list of reviewers. You can now start reviewing files – please see Commons:License review and Commons:Flickr files if you haven't done so already. We also have a guide how to detect copyright violations. Potential backlogs include Flickr review and files from other sources. You can use one of the following scripts by adding one of the lines to your common.js:

importScript('User:ZooFari/licensereviewer.js'); // stable script for reviewing images from any kind of source OR

importScript('User:Majora/LicenseReview.js'); // contains also user notification when review fails, auto blacklist-check and auto-thank you message for Flickr-reviews.

Important: thou shalt not review thy own uploads, nor those of anyone closely related to you!

Please feel free to join us on IRC: #wikimedia-commons ^webchat on irc.freenode.net. You can also add {{User license reviewer}} to your user page if you wish. Thank you for your contributions on Commons! --Biplab Anand (Talk) 15:43, 27 September 2019 (UTC) −[reply]

Mind nominating that BH file from your test for deletion? --GRuban (talk) 12:00, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome, Dear Filemover!

العربيَّة ∙ Deutsch ∙ español ∙ English ∙ français ∙ português ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ кыргызча ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（中国大陆）‎ ∙ 中文（台灣）‎ ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hi Bijay chaurasia, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:

Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{Rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one. Or, if there was no rename-request, please use the Move & Replace-tab.
Please leave a redirect behind unless you have a valid reason not to do so. Other projects, including those using InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references. Please see this section of the file rename guideline for more information.
Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.

— Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 16:10, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shiva Lingam in Bagh Bhairab Temple-3812.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 18:40, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wooden window in Bagh Bhairab Temple-3811.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 20:39, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sculpture of Ganesh in Bagh Bhairab Temple-3804.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 20:39, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stone Sculpture of lion in Bagh Bhairab Temple-3829.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Andrew J.Kurbiko 08:49, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Bijay Chaurasia,

There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 20:04, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stone Sculpture in Bagh Bhairab Temple-3876.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Chenspec 15:09, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bhawani Shankar Temple in Bagh Bhairab Temple-3883.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:02, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stone Sculpture in Bagh Bhairab Temple-3882.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:02, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kiran Kumar Sah.jpg

File:Kiran Kumar Sah.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Ju Ta 03:21, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Important message for file movers

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
To perform file name swaps.
When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pashupatinath Temple-1872.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 09:56, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Modi Khola (River) -IMG 4592.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 13:02, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Old man reading news paper early in the morning at Basantapur-IMG 6800.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 06:32, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019! Please help with this survey.

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Bijay Chaurasia,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team MediaWiki message delivery 12:09, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to participate in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 Participant Survey (Reminder)

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Bijay Chaurasia,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team MediaWiki message delivery 03:20, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your best shot 2019

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

It's early 2020, which means it's time again to look back at photographs taken over the course of the past 12 months. As always, I'm curious – what would you consider your best shot of 2019 and why? I invite you to share your image and your thoughts in order to provide others with the opportunity to celebrate, learn, and enjoy:

Your best shot 2019

Thanks for all your effort in sharing your vision of the world with others under a free license!

All the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 20:10, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gurung (Tamu) Kid at Dana,Nepal-Wiki Loves Villages-0604.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 11:59, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Annapurna South-5120.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. Good --Wilfredor 19:08, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Annapurna Massif-5133.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 11:05, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Suspension bridge in nepal-3033.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 14:14, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gangchempo 6387 m-2734.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 18:00, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Women with her child at the medical shop during Lockdown in Nepal-IMG 3257.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Smial 23:58, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mt. Dhaulagiri as seen from Annapurna Base Camp-5324.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 18:00, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nepali Kid face Painting-holi-2020-2977.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Can you add at least some description? --Podzemnik 00:51, 3 April 2020 (UTC
Done Does the new description suffice? --Rahul Bott 14:07, 8 April 2020 (UTC))[reply]
Support Thanks --Podzemnik 00:03, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Commons Photographers User Group: Meeting on May 30, 2020

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

I’d like to invite you to our group’s first Virtual Meeting on Saturday, May 30, 2020. The meeting will serve as an opportunity to get to know each other better, share learnings, and connect in times of the global COVID-19 pandemic.

Please take a look at the meeting page and add your name to the list of participants if you’re planning to attend.

Hope to see you in a week! All the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 16:48, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Annapurna South-4588.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Peulle 07:56, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mount Machhapuchhre-4589.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chorten in middle of trekking trial, Chomrong-Kaski District-2987.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:49, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pokhara Airport after rain-2945.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --MB-one 12:35, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gurung child at Upper Sinuwa during Annapurna Base camp trek in a Tea house-2972.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Contrast could be increased --MB-one 12:32, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good for me. --Palauenc05 06:24, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! NTNC-ACAP Tourist Check Post Information Center Chomrong-3004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Zcebeci 07:03, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Closed jewelry shop in rajbiraj COVID-19 pandemic in Nepal.-3292.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 21:32, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! A man sitting on the back of Road during lockdown-Shambhunath Municipality , Nepal-4556.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments GQ --Palauenc05 09:04, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tea House during Annapurna Base Camp trek, Chhomrong Hill-2991.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Composition wise there's still room for improvement but apart from that good quality. --MB-one 10:29, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Waterfall- Annapurna Base Camp Trek-3106.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 06:24, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! NTNC-ACAP Tourist Check Post Information Center Chomrong-3003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 06:24, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting permission

Hey Bijay chaurasia, Thank you for uploading wonderful pictures. With your permission, I'd like to use your picture(s) on the social media accounts of Wikimedia Commons from time to time. Do you consent to the use of your photo(s) on social media including Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, Telegram, Vkontakte etc.? If you agree then how would you like to be attributed (username/real name)? You can also add your information yourself on this list if you wish to do so. Thank you. ~ Nahid ^Talk, Thursday 17:48, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes Please,@NahidSultan: I consent to the use of my photos on social media And also added my name on this list. Thank you and feel free to use my photos --Bijay chaurasia (talk) 08:24, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Bijay :) ~ Nahid ^Talk 10:50, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Himalayan tole Rajbiraj-5352.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Zcebeci 20:45, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jhinu Danda Bridge (Kadoorie Bridge)-3024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --XRay 04:38, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Annapurna Massif-IMG 5221-Pano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 20:17, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Modi river along trekking way to Annapurna Base Camp- Kaski District-3302.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Mdaniels5757 03:32, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Enough is Enough-Rajbiraj Protest-5615.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Good picture but could you please provide more information about the file? At least some categorires that would identify what kind of protest this it --Podzemnik 21:20, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Do you have the permission of the people pictured to publish these photos? --TheRunnerUp 14:26, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, i already asked them about the permission and This Enough Is Enough Protest and Social Media campaign in Nepal against of Covid- 19 poor policy. Thank you :) -Bijay chaurasia 16:54, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Some categories have been added, the photo is OK (as Podzemnik already said), so IMHO we can promote it. --Aristeas 07:14, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Enough is Enough-Rajbiraj Protest-5617.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Same others --Podzemnik 21:20, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Same as above--Bijay chaurasia 16:54, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Some categories have been added, the photo is OK (as Podzemnik already said), so IMHO we can promote it. --Aristeas 07:14, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Enough is Enough-Rajbiraj Protest-5627.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Same as others --Podzemnik 21:20, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Same as above--Bijay chaurasia 16:54, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Some categories have been added, the photo is OK (as Podzemnik already said), so IMHO we can promote it. --Aristeas 07:14, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nepali Porter Taking Rest at Deurali VDC of Kaski District-3189.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Please add a description on the image page. --Aristeas 08:47, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Done Thank you :)-Bijay chaurasia 05:26, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support A bit grainy for ISO 125, but IMHO OK if we consider it as an environmental portrait. --Aristeas 14:13, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 14:51, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Modi river along trekking way to Annapurna Base Camp- Kaski District-3303.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:36, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Modi river along trekking way to Annapurna Base Camp- Kaski District-3450.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:36, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Canon 50mm 1.8 mm - IMG 5029.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --King of Hearts 03:32, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Canon 50mm 1.8 mm - IMG 5030.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --King of Hearts 03:32, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Photo of a newspaper reader

Hi Bijay,

Just wanted to leave a note to say I stumbled across your photo "Old man reading news paper early in the morning at Basantapur-IMG 6800.jpg" tonight by complete chance, without really even purposefully looking for anything like it, and I was struck by what an amazing photo it is. For such a humble subject matter it is such a well-composed and powerfully evocative image. In my opinion it captures something timeless and universal about the idea of "a newspaper reader". I was honestly moved—it reminded me of my own grandfather (deceased since a little over a year now) in intangible ways. I went ahead and added it as the main image at the top of English Wikipedia's "Newspaper" article where I hope it stays. It seems like it may rank as a relatively modest piece within your impressive overall body of contributions to Commons, compared to other more ambitious photos you've taken, but that feels like all the more reason to try to convey what a beautiful and valuable image it is in its own right. Thank you sincerely, you did good. All the best, Brandt Luke Zorn (talk) 07:51, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Annapurna Massif-IMG 5221-Pano.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Annapurna Massif-IMG 5221-Pano.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thrangu Tashi Yangtse Monastery-IMG 3008-Pano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:02, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Commons Photographers User Group: Meeting on September 26 and other stuff

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

I've got a quick update for you, containing three items:

I’d like to invite you to our group’s second Virtual Meeting on Saturday, September 26, 2020. As last time, this meeting will serve as an opportunity to get to know each other better, share learnings, and connect in times of the global COVID-19 pandemic. If you'd like to present, please add your name and the proposed topic to the list on the talk page.
Also, I'd like to start a conversation about how we should be sharing responsibility for the user group going forward. I'd love to get some help when it comes to organizing things and I'm convinced that we can achieve more if a couple of people helped with coordinating stuff.
Finally, the Wikimedia Foundation has asked me to spread the word about their latest survey: Universal Code of Conduct Survey. The goal is to create a safer environment on Wikimedia projects and the Foundation gathers feedback prior to coming up with a first draft.

Hope to see you at the Zoom meeting in September!

All the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 18:54, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prayer flags-Thrangu Tashi Yangtse Monastery-IMG 2985.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Charlesjsharp 11:45, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Patan Durbar Square-2644.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:40, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sweta Bhaira, Kathmandu Durbar Square-8512.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:40, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pashupatinath Temple-2020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 20:20, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WLM Invitation

Wiki Loves Monuments 2020 in Nepal

Hi Bijay Chaurasia, We would like to invite you to participate in Wiki Loves Monuments 2020 in Nepal competition during 1 September to 30 September, 2020 and share your great and valuable images with the whole world.

Kind regards,
The Wiki Loves Monuments Team, Nepal

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dhunge Dhara in Matatirtha Temple-9023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:36, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Man washing his leg at Dhunge Dhara, Matatirtha -9018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support QI although a cat about the person would be though good --Poco a poco 10:57, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Matatirtha Temple-9020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:57, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Entrance Gate of Matatirtha Temple-9011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:57, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Statue of Buddha ino Matatirtha Temple-9015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:54, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: User Group Meeting this Saturday

Dear Commons Photographers User Group member,

This is a quick reminder that our second virtual meeting will take place this Saturday, September 26. The agenda entails presentations about drone photography, about the story behind a featured picture, and about the future of LRMediaWiki. We'll also discuss photographers’ contacts with the Wikimedia Foundation and the election of representatives for our user group. You'll find information about all of this on the event page:

Virtual Meeting on September 26, 2020

I'm also inviting you to share some information about yourself and your photography work with other members of the user group on our new membership list:

Comprehensive membership list

I hope you're well during these difficult times. All the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 15:58, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2020! Please help with this survey

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Bijay chaurasia,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2020, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again for a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 200K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey.

Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2020.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team, 08:24, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Commons Photographers User Group meeting on Saturday

Dear Commons Photographers User Group member,

I'd like to invite you to our next virtual meeting on Saturday, December 12. We'll have two presentations: Habib Mhenni aka Dyolf77 will answer the question Do "we" need DSLRs anymore? and Martin Falbisoner will walk us through the making of his featured picture File:Caribbean_Sea_-_Long_Exposure.jpg.

If you can make it, please add your name to the list of attendees to this page:

Virtual Meeting on December 12, 2020

I hope to see you in three days. Also, I wish you, your family, and your friends all the best for 2021. Your contributions to Commons make a big difference.

Warmly, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 14:12, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the photo “Old man reading news paper early in the morning at Basantapur”

Bonjour Bijay,

I found your photo via DuckDuckGo, and I am using it as profile photo on one of my Fediverse social network accounts (https://misskey.de/@norznews). 😊 (The photo is cropped and very small, but I like it. 😉 🥰)

Thank you for the photo, and have a good day! 🙏

Norz (talk) 10:26, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Old man reading news paper early in the morning at Basantapur-IMG 6800.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Old man reading news paper early in the morning at Basantapur-IMG 6800.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

POTD Notification

⭐ The file you uploaded, is on the main page! ⭐

The file File:Shadhu in Pasupatinath Temple-1973.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your most memorable shot 2020

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

Over the course of the past two years, we've been sharing pictures that have a special meaning with each other at the start of the new year. Today, I'm inviting you add your most memorable shot of 2020 to this page:

Your most memorable shot 2020

I hope you, your familiy, and your friends are well during these difficult times. I wish you all the best for 2021 and I can't wait to see what your most memorable shot of 2020 looks like.

Warmly, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 20:41, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Next Commons Photographers meeting featuring large format photographer Ben Horne

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

I'm happy to invite you to our next virtual meeting on Saturday, March 20, at the usual time. As I mentioned during our last get-together, I'd like to invite external guests every now and then, given that it seems good to expand our view and learn something from someone outside our community.

Our first external guest, Ben Horne, will talk about large format wilderness photography, followed by a question-and-answer session. Ben is maybe one of best known contemporary large format photographers in the United States. On his excursions to national parks, he shoots 8×10 film and talks about his adventures on his YouTube channel which has attracted more than 48,000 followers so far. He is YouTube's first, and longest active landscape photography vlogger and I'm thrilled that he has agreed to join our next meeting and talk about his experiences.

If you're interested in joining this meeting, please sign up on the page below:

Virtual Meeting on March 20, 2020

Also, don't forget to post your question(s) prior to the meeting on the following page in order to ensure a good and fruitful question-and-answer session:

Questions for Ben

I'm very much looking forward to this event and I hope you'll be able to join.

All the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 21:42, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Commons Photographers meeting tomorrow

Just a quick reminder: the meeting with large format-photographer Ben Horne will happen tomorrow, Saturday, March 20. If you haven't done yet, please consider signing up for the event and add your questions to this page. This will be our first virtual meeting in 2021 and I'd be super happy if you could join. All the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 16:43, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chanakya College of Management.jpg

File:Chanakya College of Management.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Wrong license and logo still under copyrights.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Glorious 93 (talk) 09:05, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Boudhanath Stupa view from Kapan Height-IMG 9815.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Is it possible to add some information about the location (geo tag, name of the city)? --Imehling 18:07, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Done :) Thank You -Bijay chaurasia 04:26, 14 May 2021 (UTC) Thank you. And the name of the city is Tokha in Nepal? Please add this information. There are rather few people out of Nepal who know where the Kapan Heights are. --Imehling[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Everest Mini Market-IMG 0553.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Sandro Halank 19:24, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sisau Tree, Indian rosewood, (Dalbergia sissoo)-IMG 7825.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Looks good to me. I like the contrast between the soft background and the hard trees. --Steindy 09:26, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Water drops on the bike Pulsar 150CC fuel tank-IMG 1045.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. Categorie for the bike would be fine. --Ermell 20:19, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 1 inch PVC Valve and pipe-IMG 1061.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Commonists 18:50, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Abandoned electric water pump-IMG 1056.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:16, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Commons Photographers meeting on October 30th

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

I'm happy to invite you to our next virtual meeting next Saturday, October 30. This time, our colleagues User:Dey.sandip from India and User:Ermell from Germany will talk about their work.

If you're interested in joining this meeting, please sign up on the page below:

5th virtual meeting of the Commons Photographers User Group

I'm very much looking forward to this event and I hope you'll be able to join.

All the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 18:46, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Commons Photographers User Group: first board election

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

In preparation of the first board election of our group, I invite you to take a look at the following page:

Commons:Commons Photographers User Group/Board Elections 2021

and provide feedback. I've listed a number of positions for our first board and I've also outlined a possible timeline for the elections. The current plan is to open the self-nomination process up on November 15 and then have the election start on December 1.

I'm super excited to get this going and I'm very much looking forward to hearing from you. Please use this talk page for your thoughts.

I hope you're safe and well, and I wish you all the best! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 23:56, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Commons Photographers elections: self-nomination phase is open

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

The self-nomination phase for the first board election of our group is open as of today. If you'd like to take on a more active role and take our user group to the next level, please consider running for one of the open positions. Please check out the Board Election 2021 page for more details.

I hope you, your family, and your friends are doing well. All the best! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 16:40, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Board election: voting is open!

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

The voting phase for our group's board election starts today. Please consider casting your vote. Voting ends on December 17.

I wish you all the best for the rest of the year 2021. Stay safe and healthy! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 17:03, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your most memorable shot of 2021

Happy New Year! As always at the beginning of the new year, I'm inviting you to share your most memorable shot of the past year. Which of your photos stood out in 2021? Which image created special memories that you'd like to share with others? On behalf of the Commons Photographers User Group I wish you, your family, and your friends all the best for 2022. Warmly, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:25, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

POTD Notification

⭐ The file you uploaded, is on the main page! ⭐

The file File:Abandoned Train at Janakpur station, Nepal Railways--IMG 7925.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

😔У — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2A00:1370:817C:5F0E:9D9B:9F3A:7B94:B8AB (talk) 23:17, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can you upload picture of Shubhaavi Choksey?

Shubhaavi Choksey is an Indian Television Actress currently working on show Bade ache lagte hai season-2. Please can you upload picture on her Wikipedia page? Qpms (talk) 18:13, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Save the date: Commons Photographers meeting next week

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

Please save the date: on Saturday, June 19th, our next virtual Zoom meeting is going to take place. As you know, one goal of these meetings is to share knowledge about different types of photography. This time, we've lined up the following presentations:

Photography in Nigeria
Photographing vehicles
I started printing my images – here’s what I've learned so far…

If you'd like to participate in this event, please consider signing up on this page. Also, if you'd like to present at one of the next meetings, please send me a quick note. Sharing your experiences and learnings with others can make a huge difference!

I wish you, your family, and your friends all the best! Hope to see you on the 19th.

Warmly, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:13, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stone carved sculpture of Trishul, considered as the weapon of Lord Shiva in the Hindu mythology-9754.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good -- Spurzem 17:36, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Buddha Sculpture In Kritipur-9750.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Beautiful, good quality -- Spurzem 17:38, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Laboratory School (Nepal)-EIPE-9788.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 17:42, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This Sunday!

Hi, this is just a quick reminder: the next virtual meeting of our user group is scheduled for Sunday, June 19, 16:00 UTC. Topics are: “Photography in Nigeria”, “Photographing Vehicles”, “Wildlife photography and citizen science”, and “I started printing my images – here’s what I've learned so far…”. I'm thrilled about this great agenda and I'm looking forward to connecting with you again. Stay safe and all the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:08, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quick update on behalf of the Commons Photographers User Group

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

I hope you're well and enjoy taking photos for Wikimedia Commons. Here are a couple of quick updates on behalf of our group:

Our next virtual meeting will take place on Saturday, August 27. At this point we have two presentations lined up:

Suitable! Unsuitable! How to choose photos for a Wikipedia for children, “Klexikon” (Ziko)
The aperture and its (less known) effects (XRay)

You can sign up for the event on this page: Virtual Meeting on August 27, 2022. – Given that we can accommodate more speakers, I'll invite you to get in touch with me in case you'd like to present on the 27th. You can reach me any time on my talk page or by sending a quick email.

Also, we now have a page for local events organized by members of our user group: Local events 2022. Please check it out and consider organizing an event yourself!
And finally, we're planning on offering a Post-processing Workshop on October 8. Please save the date; an events page with more information will go up later.

Thanks for being a member of our group and for sharing your works under a free license. Have fun taking pictures!

All the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 15:23, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You're invited to provide input…

Dear fellow member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

At our last meeting end of August, we talked about getting in touch with the Wikimedia Foundation and offering our help for improving Wikimedia Commons. Today, I invite you to provide your input on a draft open letter to the Foundation. Over the course of the next ten days, we'll further improve the text together, before inviting people to sign it. If you're interested in providing input, please engage in the discussion on the talk page of the draft.

In the meanwhile, I hope you're well and have a great time taking photos! All the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 08:42, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Online workshop this weekend

Dear Commons Photographers User Group member,

This coming Saturday, October 8, we'll host an online post processing workshop. On behalf of our events coordinator Shreya I invite you to sign up for the event using this Google form.

I hope you're well. All the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 19:50, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Question from the CPUG Board

Dear user group member,

I'm writing you to today on behalf of the board of the Commons Photographers User Group. The past year has been a busy one for us. In 2022, we've had more activities than ever before in the history of our group and you'll find an overview on our group's page.

With that being said, 2022 was also a year of learning for the current board members. Most of us hadn't been involved in running the Photographers User Group and we spent quite some time on getting used to our new roles. We all feel it was a steep learning curve.

That's why, at our last board meeting, we decided to ask our members whether they'd be ok with us serving for another year. Extending our board duties to the end of 2023 would allow us to continue the work we've started this year, and to benefit from the knowledge we've built over the past twelve months.

However, in the end, it's up to you and the other members of our group to decide whether such an extension of our board term should be granted. I invite you to voice your opinion on this page:

Commons:Commons Photographers User Group/Board Elections 2022

We'll gather feedback until December 27, and we'll keep you in the loop about the outcomes of this process.

Thanks so much for your ongoing support of our group. I wish you, your family, and your friends all the best.

--Ailura (talk) 12:32, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Most memorable shot 2022 / Wikimania 2023

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

I wish you a Happy New Year! As it has been our tradition at the beginning of the new year for a while, we're sharing our most memorable shots of the past year with each other. I invite you to share a picture that is particular meaningful to you and to describe why that's the case. Also, as Wikimania 2023 will be here before we know it (August 16 to 19), please consider adding your thoughts on our planning page, where we gather ideas for how we can make Commons photography more visible than in the years before.

All the best to you, your family, and friends! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 21:01, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in Round 1 of the 2022 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2022.

Round 2 will end at 18 May 2023, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:44, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Close Up View of Mount Everest from Kala Patthar (5644 m) in 2023-IMG-3485.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Very nice image. I suggest giving the sky a moderate noise reduction. --Augustgeyler 19:15, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Updated please check it once again -Bijay Chaurasia 12:19, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good quality now. --Augustgeyler 21:34, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kathmandu City-9812.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --MB-one 09:45, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mt. Gangchempo 6387 m- Kyanjin Gompa Lantang Valley-IMG 2731.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Radomianin 08:39, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Boudhanath-9826.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 20:36, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mahankaal Temple, Kathmandu-6337.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Fine, but I'm sure that you don't need that file size. If you export it in 10 MB file size the detail would be the same. --Poco a poco 09:47, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vendor at Mahankaal Temple, Kathmandu-6316.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:39, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sainik Manch Tudikhel, Kathmandu-6386.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 17:26, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sainik Manch Tudikhel, Kathmandu-6388.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 17:26, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tundikhel, Kathmandu-6356.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 17:27, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tri Chandra Military Hospital (1925)-6341.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 06:54, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Old Man While Doing Kora (pilgrimage) at Mahankaal Temple, Kathmandu-6321.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Personality rights warning needed.--Peulle 08:28, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Peulle: Done-Bijay Chaurasia 08:37, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 19:09, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tri Chandra military Hospital-6392.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 17:34, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Annapurna-I, Annapurna South and Himchuli from Ghorepani Poonhill.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Too noisy in the foreground. Possibly fixable. --MB-one 17:37, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you @MB-one: Updated to a new version, and there's also fog (note added) in this image that looks like noise-Bijay Chaurasia 07:54, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good enough for me now --Kritzolina 06:32, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Commons photographers: next virtual meeting on August 5

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

I'm inviting you to our next virtual meeting on Saturday, August 5th. We'll have two speakers: Poco a poco will provide us with an update on his underwater photography and George Oates from the Flickr Foundation will talk about the Flickr-to-Commons bridge (“Flickypedia”) that is currently in the works. If you're interested in attending, please sign up on this page: Virtual Meeting on August 5, 2023.

I hope you're having a great time taking photos and I'm looking forward to seeing you on August 5th.

All the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 15:41, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Frank Schulenburg: Namaste! Thank you for invite. Excited to Join --Bijay Chaurasia (talk) 15:53, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Looking forward to talking to you, Bijay! Hope everything is going well for you! Warmly, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 16:08, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, also: would you be interested at giving a presentation at the next meeting? (the one after August 5; we don't have a date for that one yet) – I'd love to learn from your experiences as a travel photographer! Best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 16:21, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure about the next meeting (one after August 5) due to the upcoming travel season (OCT, NOV, & DEC) in Nepal. But sure in future days. Best Regards Bijay Chaurasia (talk) 16:56, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the quick reply! Yes, let's do it early next calendar year. Best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 16:59, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quick reminder: Commons Photographers meeting this Saturday

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

This is a quick reminder that our next meeting will happen on Saturday, August 5th. If you haven't registered yet and you're interested in learning more about underwater photography and “Flickypedia”, please sign up on this page. Also, I invite you to fill out this survey created by the people who are working on the Flickr-to-Wikimedia Commons software. Your input will make a difference.

We haven't had a virtual meeting in a while and I'm so looking forward to this weekend!

All the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:15, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dried fish at Fareniya Bazar, Indo Nepal Border Trail, Sonauli-IMG 7198.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:45, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimania

[1]. Wow, I look great ! Thank you for your skills and help ! Anthere (talk) 14:43, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Commons Photographers User Group: Board Elections 2023

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

in preparation of the 2023 board election of our group, we invite you to take a look at the following page:

Commons:Commons Photographers User Group/Board Elections 2023

and provide feedback.

The timeline for the 2023 election will be

September 15 – September 30: Applications for the election committee
October 1 – October 9: Vote for election committee (ideally comprised of three members)
October 10: Election committee starts work
October 20 – November 9: Nomination phase for candidacies
November 10 – December 10: Elections
December 15: Results announced

In the first step we ask you to be part of the election committe. Please add your name on the Election Page.

We are very much looking forward to hearing from you. Please use this talk page for your thoughts.

All the best

--Ailura (talk) for the CPUG board

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 87 Victoria St, Singapore-3270.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 11:33, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Civilian War Memorial, Singapore-3276.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Nino Verde 14:31, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Commons Photographers User Group: Board Elections 2023 - Nomination Phase

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

the 2023 board election of our group is run at

Commons:Commons Photographers User Group/Board Elections 2023.

The next steps in the timeline for the 2023 election are

October 20 – November 16: Nomination phase for candidacies
November 17 – December 10: Elections
December 16: Results announced

If you are interested in being a member of the board, please nominate yourself on the Election Page.

We are very much looking forward to hearing from you. Please use this talk page for your thoughts.

All the best

--Ailura (talk) for the CPUG board

Flickypedia soft launch and a huge thank you

Dear fellow Commons photographer,

I hope this message finds you well. As you might already know, the Flickr Foundation has been busy creating a new Flickr-to-Commons bridge (“Flickypedia”) this year. After a successful demo at the GLAM Wiki Conference in Montevideo, the Flickr Foundation team is now inviting all members of the Commons Photographers User Group to be the first to review their alpha, reporting any technical issues or other feedback via the Flickypedia project talk page.

At the same time, this message is an opportunity for me to thank you for your trust and support over the past couple of years. Since 2017, we've grown into being one of the largest user groups in the Wikimedia universe. I've tremendously enjoyed interacting with all of our members when it came to joint photowalks at Wikimanias, virtual Zoom meetings where we covered a wide variety of photography topics, as well as our annual “Most memorable shot of the year”, among many other events. As I'm not running for an official position in our current board election, this will be my last message on behalf of the user group to you. Thanks for all the happy moments we shared together over the years! I hope you'll continue creating free images for the millions of people we serve through Wikipedia and Commons.

All the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 19:36, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marina Bay Singapore-3499.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:50, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marina Bay Sands, Singapore-3491.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Aristeas 11:34, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marina Bay Sands, Singapore-3494.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 07:51, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --Kurmanbek 18:46, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marina Bay Singapore-070A3500-HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

cropped image

@Bijay Chaurasia: , File:Humayun Azad with fellow graduate-mates (cropped).jpg - the title of this image will have to be changed, please change this as 'File:Humayun Azad on his convocation day - 1970 (cropped).jpg' like this image. Alurgaritton (talk) 06:52, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello brother

@Bijay Chaurasia: , File:Asia Pornography Laws.jpg - is this photo correct? is pornography really illegal in India and in Nepal? 119.30.46.183 11:39, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Felt Dolls in Thamel, Kathmandu Nepal-8312.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:06, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Buddha Air 9N-AIM (aircraft)-ATR 42-320 at TIA-070A7456.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:06, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Marina Bay Singapore-3499.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Marina Bay Singapore-3499.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pashmina Shop in Thamel, Kathmandu-8255.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:38, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Dried fish at Fareniya Bazar, Indo Nepal Border Trail, Sonauli-IMG 7198.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dried fish at Fareniya Bazar, Indo Nepal Border Trail, Sonauli-IMG 7198.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deadline Approaching for Most Memorable Shot Submission!

Hello Bijay chaurasia !,

Commons-Photographers User Group-logo-en

Just a quick reminder that the deadline for submitting your most memorable shot of 2023 is swiftly approaching! As tradition holds, since 2018, we've been sharing our favorite captures from the past year with each other. This year marks the sixth iteration of our beloved "Most Memorable Shot" tradition, and we're excited to see what everyone has to share.

Whether you're a member of the Commons Photographers User Group or not, you're warmly invited to participate. Your unique perspective adds to the richness of our community, and we'd love to see the world through your lens.

So, if you haven't already, take a moment to pick out your most cherished picture of 2023 and share it with us on the designated page. The deadline is February 29th, so don't let time slip away!

Let's keep this wonderful tradition alive and celebrate the beauty and diversity of our collective experiences through photography.

Looking forward to seeing your memorable shots!

Best regards,

Suyash Dwivedi (talk) 17:45, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Machhapuchhre or Fishtail Mountain 6,993 m (22,943 ft)- IMG 5246.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Трифонов Андрей 16:25, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Entrance Fee Counter of Hanuman Dhoka Kathmandu Durbar Square-070A8646.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Bgag 14:19, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Machhapuchhre or Fishtail Mountain 6,993 m (22,943 ft)- IMG 5246.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Machhapuchhre or Fishtail Mountain 6,993 m (22,943 ft)- IMG 5246.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for organizing Wiki Loves Folklore 2024

Dear Bijay Chaurasia,

I hope this message finds you well.

First and foremost, I extend my heartfelt gratitude to you for taking the initiative and organizing Wiki Loves Folklore 2024 in your country. Your dedication and hard work have significantly contributed to the success of this international photography contest.

Together, as a global community, we have achieved remarkable results, with over 41,000 images submitted by approximately 1,900 users from around the world. This incredible accomplishment stands as a testament to the collaborative spirit and passion for folklore preservation that drives our efforts.

In light of the conclusion of the contest, I kindly request your valuable insights and feedback on your experience as an organizer. Your perspective is invaluable in helping us understand the challenges you may have encountered and the opportunities for improvement. Your input will enable us to refine our approach and make future iterations of Wiki Loves Folklore even more impactful.

I understand that your time is precious, but I sincerely urge you to spare just 10 minutes from your busy schedule to fill out the feedback form linked below:

Click here to redirect to feedback form

Your feedback will not only benefit our immediate understanding but also contribute to the long-term success and relevance of this project. Your input matters greatly to us, and we are eager to learn from your experiences.

Once again, thank you for your unwavering commitment to Wiki Loves Folklore 2024. Your efforts have not gone unnoticed, and we are immensely grateful for your contribution.

Wishing you continued success in all your endeavors.

Warm regards,

Wiki Loves Folklore International Team #WeTogether

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:33, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Commons photographers: next virtual meeting on April 13, 2024

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

I'm inviting you to our next virtual meeting on Saturday, April 13, 2024 at 9.00 UTC ( start time in your timezone (via zoneStamp!) (expected duration for 2 hrs). The primary agenda of this gathering will revolve around discussions regarding the Movement Charter. Your valuable input and participation in these discussions would be highly appreciated. If you're interested in attending, please sign up on this page: Virtual Meeting on April 13, 2024.

I hope you're having a great time taking photos and I'm looking forward to seeing you.

All the best, -- Suyash Dwivedi (talk) 10:35, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2023 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighteenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and top 5% of most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on 14 October 2024, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2022 Picture of the Year contest.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:02, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Narayanhiti Palace-070A1259.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --ReneeWrites 10:00, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you previously voted in the Picture of the Year contest. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2023.

Round 2 will end at 28 October 2024, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

If you have already voted for Round 2, please ignore this message.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:11, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Portrait of a Artist Sitting under a Tree Painting-070A1097.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Argenberg 14:25, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Folklore 2024 Organizers Feedback

Dear Organizer,

We extend our heartfelt gratitude for your invaluable contributions to Wiki Loves Folklore 2024. Your dedication to promoting folk culture on Wikimedia platforms has been instrumental in the campaign's success.

To better understand your initiatives and impact, we invite you to participate in a short survey (5-7 minutes).

Your feedback will help us document your achievements in our report and showcase your story in our upcoming blog, highlighting the diversity of Wiki loves Folklore initiatives.

Click to participate in the survey.

By participating in the survey, you help us share your efforts in reports and upcoming blogs. This will help showcase and amplify your work, inspiring others to join the movement.

The survey covers:

Community engagement and participation
Challenges and successes
Partnership

Thank you again for your tireless efforts in promoting Wiki loves Folklore.

Best regards,
Joris Darlington Quarshie
WLF Event Coordinator

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:00, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[Reminder] Apply for Cycle 3 Grants by December 1st!

Dear Wiki Loves Folklore Organizers, We hope this message finds you well. We are excited to inform you that the application window for Wikimedia Foundation's Cycle 3 of our grants is now open. Please ensure to submit your applications by December 1st.

For a comprehensive guide on how to apply, please refer to the Wiki Loves Folklore Grant Toolkit: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wiki_Loves_Folklore_Grant_Toolkit

Additionally, you can find detailed information on the Rapid Grant timeline here: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:Project/Rapid#Timeline

We appreciate your continuous efforts and contributions to our campaigns. Should you have any questions or need further assistance, please do not hesitate to reach out: support@wikilovesfolkore.org

Kind regards,
On behalf of the Wiki Loves Folklore International Team.
Joris Darlington Quarshie (talk) 08:35, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[Workshop] Identifying Win-Win Relationships with Partners for Wikimedia

Dear Recipient,
We are excited to invite you to the third workshop in our Advocacy series, part of the Feminism and Folklore International Campaign. This highly anticipated workshop, titled "Identifying Win-Win Relationships with Partners for Wikimedia," will be led by the esteemed Alex Stinson, Lead Program Strategist at the Wikimedia Foundation. Don't miss this opportunity to gain valuable insights into forging effective partnerships.

Workshop Objectives

Introduction to Partnerships: Understand the importance of building win-win relationships within the Wikimedia movement.
Strategies for Collaboration: Learn practical strategies for identifying and fostering effective partnerships.
Case Studies: Explore real-world examples of successful partnerships in the Wikimedia community.
Interactive Discussions: Engage in discussions to share experiences and insights on collaboration and advocacy.

Workshop Details

📅 Date: 7th December 2024
⏰ Time: 4:30 PM UTC (Check your local time zone)
📍 Venue: Zoom Meeting

How to Join:

Registration Link: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Event:Identifying_Win-Win_Relationships_with_Partners_for_Wikimedia
Meeting ID: 860 4444 3016
Passcode: 834088

We welcome participants to bring their diverse perspectives and stories as we drive into the collaborative opportunities within the Wikimedia movement. Together, we’ll explore how these partnerships can enhance our advocacy and community efforts.

Thank you,

Wiki Loves Folklore International Team

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:32, 03 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]